Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMisc ~,, ..mss ;~ ~oi3:u arm - _ _ ,J- - _ ,~_~-.~m~i ", -_~ ___ t O r- I ~~ ~• -e G~"~ Hl I F r~ `1` o ~ ~~ :; .~ ~'. ~ ~- ~. o. ` N i P =. '~ ._~ ~, •~ z I ~f .'-.1 r r '. ,_ I a ~ ....,...._...~.,... ~ v { '~' _ L F • T {j ~a /i ` i , Y t ~ ~ ~ Jr. ' ~ µ 7 F-_ ~ ~ R1 p ~ M ~ y K s b pW M+ a j 7f QK ~ ~y7 _ ~ _ ~ ~ n F9 t ~ H FFF ~~I i ~ b ~ y ! " pp~~ ~ O ar ~ ~ ~ _ ~ P, ~ ~, ~~~ ~ 1~ CL ~ ~ (6~' p ay `~ ti ~ ~ ~ ro ~ °i - ~ ~ ~ M v y p p ~ F00~ [L ~ i ~ C _ - ~ t c ~ , ~ ~ ~ x e :~ ~, i ~ l ;, f" ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ _ r ({ ~ ~ `r , w pA Q ~ O }j ~~ P~ -} ~ a ~. a .__ ,~ } ~ µ ~; a'+i a ~~: ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ = t t ~ ,V(r,il '.' I" l ' ARTICiE I D~ZQLJ 1.1 AGU1Vl~i714 PdrtV. "Approving ~.a.' •'I 6t1d11 D12diI f~19 Pdlty designated from time to time to make certain decisions arx~/or give certain approvals pursuatzt to the terms o! the OFA. Rl~ere shall be one Approving Party representing the Developer Tract, ~ APP~~J PAY ~ the Target Tract, and cure Approvi~ Party representing the Pad Tract. ~e holder of the App~wirg Party position. shall have the riot to assign suds positicai to any other Party owning a Tract within the real. estate repx+esented by suds position, but if an assignment is not made, then such Appzvvi~ Party poeit.irn shall automatically be deemed assigned to the Party aa;uiring the last Tract owned by the transferring Approving Party. ;f..;... Developer shall be the initial Approving Party for the Developer Tract; Target shall be the initial Apprwirg Party far the Target Tract) Pad Owner ~y -..'. shall be the initial Approving Party Par the Pad Tract. ~. 1.2 soil id rw. and Buildira Area. "Building Area" shall mean the limited areas of the Shopping Center within which, subject to the other 'terms and provisions of this OFA, t„iidirgs may be oa~structed, Placed ar `~ located, as shown an the site-Plan. Thera is one Buildis~q Area on~he ~``'T~J~ Tract (the "target Building Area") t one Buiidirrg Area on the Pad ,Yip=.n3et -(the "Pad Building Area")J and two Building Aram on the Developer '# Trct. the "Developer Pad eui]tling Area" and the "Developer Bu1ldiTq a I -,Page Y-1 ~. ~ ' I: . ~ ' I' ': I :.'l ~,I ~~'~ 1' a.:' ~I, ..al.i ,~i~" r ~: ~ ~~~ ri. ~;~ ,i:' ja> li ,, i~~ ~~. .t .. i~RFA9, the Target Siact and tha Pad Tract are oartiguars and r. adjacent as ehowm m the Site Plans and i I ' YII1F~2FAR, the sic~atories hereto irrtexd to develop an3 operate i~ ~I. their respective 1Secta (oollectivelY the "~~P1~~9 ~~") in onnjunctian with eadr other as integral parts o! a retail shopping oa~Qlex and in order ,loll ~ to e!lectuate the eo;~on use and operation thereof they desire to enter ' ~ ~ into certain oovenatrta aryl agzeemesrts as a part o! a general plan, and to lire ~ . ~~ i 3 grant to eadl ot2fer oeZ'talri reciprocal easemesrta, in, to, over, and across Its s ~~ % their Zespec'tlve Tracts. %~~, 1 ~L; ~ij`, NC1FT, 'III, in oonsiderat3on of the premises, the ooveriants ~f ~~~ ~~~''~ '. and agreements hereinafter set forth aryl in Rrrtheranoa of the parties ~~ I 'i I, taidessterdirxJ, it is agreed as follows: r ~ I~j ,, ~ ', ~;i; ~I I~~I~: ,~ ` u n, 0 .~~ Ca O H ly ~ d S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~'` ~ ~ ~_ ~~~ p ~ ~ R ~ ~ ~. M ~ ~ M ~rt a A' p K ~{ ~ ~ a ~ _ M ~ a ~ ~~o~~ ~ ro ~ ~ ,~ ~_ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~~ a ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ M ~ p~~ ~" ~ ~~v ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~~ C ~' ~ y~ r ~ ro ~, ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~~ ~ r ~~~~ °~~~ .. ~~ ,~~ o " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ro ~ ro w ,~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ -`.. ~ '* b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ q ° ~~ ~ ~~ p~ o ,\ c ~ ~ ~ ffI .-, S ~ o ~~+. r{ 5 ~ o Lob 1. I ~~ oo ~ Ol F+. 0' ggg ~ ~1 '~ ~ ~ H ry ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m _,- _ ~ ~ ~d ~ 5' -- .. --_ - ' ~~~H --' ~~= `~ ~. _ ~ g W M W [J ~ [] [+] a h7 1.7 ~ 11 ~ H O ~ x o x x x m m m m a, a ~tn M ~v, x x~p ~, x x ° A q ~ ~~ ~A A ~ °A A ~ W p 1A0 ~ HK ~ ~ ~m ~ ~ FF'+ oo G oo ~ m i ~:+ - p ~ i i 1 1 ~~ 1 ~A ~~g ,~ 1 ~ ~. ; N 1 _ ~_1 -fl j 1 N ld N W O W 01 U N N .. W ~. W `. N ~{, /~ !{ 1 .~ o~ p ~a ° dt sr a n ~a a ~ a o a a a __ ~01 d a ~~~,~ ~~ -n ~ ~ p ~ ~ ~~ g~~ a C O ~ O r°s M H O ~ ro ro ~' M H rOS r°- $~ C M (j`D~ ~ ~, F~~' p~{ M M W ~ M N m •. F'O ~ro A w W O ~ ~N ~~ ~ "~ -~OPF+ _ WW W o ~y ~ o ~u p N ~ ro w~+ w W (] Q -- 0 ~ Fn'. ~ .O 1Y ~ 00 ~ N N v ~ ~ ft ~ p UI N O N A ~ - ~ ~ t'r .7 O ~ ~ O LBI (~pQ ~(pQ ~ O (ryQ ~~pq 1@M~ O ~+;qJ W M 1* M Kropp p Kropp ~Mpp 1Mpp `• H tT K M M O M (T K ~ ~ q ~ • M ~ ~ T] [~ O ~ c- O K (T ~f ~ A 5~ 8 "~ '~~ ,~ I ~+ x i r I ~ a.a rmmo.m ~ Y" ~ / Z ~ Cig,~ Q• z r' `a Vj v ` jj ~ ~~ ~} I '~ ~3 TEXAS AVENUE 6~ a i---- --- -- x ~- - ~---- r~l ~l o a TT V/ '- S D •~^ m ti~W 0 - 1 ~W~ _ ~ a~aayr ,~. - .. ..w aeoa r---- -' - .r+ 1 ~`~ ~ ~1 I III ------i -'•JJ .. ! 4~ /j. a ~ ;, ~ TARGET ~~ ~.a4 ~..~•- i r!/' 1. II . "m ia~. 1 ~ ~ rwas ~p- ~ ~! 1~ w~ _ / _I '• i 6 o _ .~,~.... ~ 1 - i 0 1 8 ~ ,.nw rap..; / ! `g 1 ~ ! _""_ ~ I I I ~-------, __ ~ ..o .,,. _ _ ~ ~ ~ 1 _ - --' - ~... s .~.a•ar c - rac.ao ..a. ua - .aw. F' Q~ .~,, "~, ~ T E X A S A V E N U E ~ _ n ~ nn ~~ ~<<ts -- -.- { ~,n~ ~: 1 ~ r ~"~ ~~~. ~ .! ~ '1 i ~ c ~ / ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~, f (w t Vv I ~ ~ C~ ~ U __ ~ V ~ i i ~ " - - 8 " ~ . ~ - I -1 ~ / ~-. Z 1 1 s - • " n (r `~ c ~ ' ~ ~ t~ C fi ~ l T E X \ A V E N U ~ -- A S _~ ...-. ~ n ~ nn r ~~ • -n ~n n r- . ~ .~- _ "~ °~ ' ~ N i ,. ~ _. _ . _ . __. ._._._- - - _ -- __ _ _ - - - - - _~_ ~,t~ ,~ 02 -21 -00 1 0 38 HEB REAL ~.~TATE 02'18%O6 16:50 F3~ 40A 7.64 389A COCS PL'ItCHASING ID=713 329 3016 City of College Station ~T D1 texas Axe '~ College Station, Tat 77842 ~' (d09) 764.3823 Bed # s0-2,3 SALE UE ggC~IANCyE QF LAND 'l'1~A,S A~ENYJE ARID PAS PLACE ADDEND[T'.VI # Y Date_ February lo, 20[f0 Toe All Interested Eidders mom: chcryl K Turney, C.P.M.. PurchASing Meager ~; Bid # 00-23 ~JUU1 Pursuant ~ the 1-re-bid conference conducted on this daft, the following Changes and clarifications era hereby made a part of the terms, conditions, special provisions and spectficattons of laid #00.23 as follows- . removal of the existing watc~' cower will be m9de to ground level. Each lowcs leg has a cylindrical colurtm pier 5 feet ~n diameter and 18_S feet deep that is flared at the boriom to a diamctcr of 10 fret. ~ eoaeh P~ iTh~ utg grade there is a eondntwus linear reinforetmtnt ring eoasa~d thtough and connecting cornponants are 1 foot wide at~d 1 footthieL• Additionally thtro ate 4 puss outs[ undoarc on dine in thud at the bast of the standpipe (genter). Drawings Can be lttade available upon re4 Purchasing office_ The demolition of the eus6ng water tower will be done within the fenced gcs. rt'a''fl be ~'~ dDR't"n a'cut and drop' method, dropping disassembled p:cces bctaecn the legs. accut to the lower Droperiy that Waia ~pacicy: as indicaucd on Exhibit A, [here is an 18 inch diameter line ~dj should provide adequate water supply to most any 8pplica#ian. • Sewer capacity: the sewer flows from south m north. 'Itta present line Crossing lots 4 and 2 frotu south to north continues approximaccly 500 fez[ north of Park l''lace whc~ it enters a 15 inch diameter sewer line. • The City will not eotyv~y Lot 3 (existing water tower site) tulti7 dcmolitiosz is eotnnleoe. A lettrx of credit guaranteeing payment at time of final convcy~ ofLot 3 clay be accepted in lien of p~yrrtent for tltc entire txacc • A request for access tb the property trey be addressed co Kim Fouu, Diru-tor ~ lconoYrtic ewe opmen l~aut7.~'ci_colie e-st3'on.tx.us or Cheryl'Iluney ffi ~ ~GLG lle e-st.ati n. .us. p~.se acknp~vledge rccrspt of this add~nndum w~kh si~atut•e 9ud dzrfe and return with completed bid- Fuilure to do so may Cause yolr bid to be considered onto-tcsponsive. eceipt of this Addendum iS hereby aClQ+owtedged Sig~nturt e ~ ~uthor~d ~ P.02 ~ I II 3~/- 2~~~ s n ~^ .. G /v / u~ ~. t 3.Suc ..~-ic l late COf7ipm7J ~aTfl ADAMS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. CIVIL ~ ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS * * * FAX TRANSMITTAL. COVER SHEET * * * DATE: October 4, 2002 PAGES: 3 (Including Cover Sheet) TO: Bridget George COMPANY: City of College Station FAX NO: (979) 764-3570 FROM: Jimmy Lopez The documents accompanying this Fax transmission contains information from Adams Consulting Engineers, lnc. which is confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents is prohibited. Please notify us immediately if you received this Fax in error so that we may arrange for retrieval. If you do not receive all the pages, please contact ACEI as soon as possible. COMMENTS: Re: H.E.B. Fuel Station, please call me to discuss. ~~ ~ ~e ~ ~~~!• ws Hard Copy to be mailed: ACEI J.N.: Please Acknowledge Receipt: 2445 E Southlake Boulevard, Suite 100, Southlake, Texas 76092 Phone: (817) 329-6990 Fax: (617) 329-7671 Corporate Office: Tyler, Texas Branch Offices: Garland, Texas • San Diego, California I'd TL9L 6zE LIB ~1~Q I30d dZD~EO ZO b0 ~~0 ~~ -~ cc77 -ate ~ ~ ,Jra~ ortatior~ ~ irteeri ~na ~~ P `~ '~ ~ Joseph D. Blaschke, D. Eng., P.E., President 1008 Woodcreek Drive, College Station, Texas 77845 979/693-5800 Fax: 979/693-5870 a-mail: tea 1®tca.net December 18, 2000 City of College Station ATTN: Mr. Lee Robinson Traffic Systems Superintendent 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 77842 RE: Traffic Impact Analysis Report Proposed H. E. Butt Grocery Company Development College Station, Texas Dear Mr. Robinson: I have reviewed the referenced Traffic Impact Analysis Report prepared by WHNi Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc., dated December 4, 2000. As you know, the proposed development is located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Texas Avenue and Holleman Drive in College Station. This report was prepared by John M. ("Mike") McInturff. I have known Mike for many years and have often recommended him to various clients as a competent and qualified traffic engineer. Mike is very talented and very professional. His report was well-written and the data was well- documented. I thought he did a terrific job. If I had conducted the study, I would have done it in a similar manner and made similar assumptions. Consequently, I endorse his study and his findings. I believe that this development has the potential to be very successful. With this success, however, comes a significant amount of additional traffic to this specific College Station location. As Mike indicated in his report, there likely will be some reduction in traffic generated by the development on the southwest corner of the same intersection (the Target/Hastings development) when the existing HEB Pantry Store closes. Also, there will be a certain percentage of traffic that will simply be attracted to the new development that is already traveling along Texas Avenue or Holleman Drive. Nevertheless, one cannot ignore the fact that additional vehicles will be generated by the new development and that the intersection of Texas Avenue and Holleman Drive will have to accommodate much of this additional traffic. The proposed access locations to the new development from Texas Avenue to the east and from Park Place to the north will not be points of congestion, as indicated in Mike's report. This is especially true when a median barrier is placed along Texas Avenue north of Holleman Drive in the near future. The access locations along Holleman Drive, however, will become points of congestion, especially at Driveway "A," which is located closest to Texas Avenue and directly opposite of an existing access location to the Target/Hastings development. Specialiiing in: Traffic Engineering Roadway Design Accident Analysis Mr. Lee Robinson December 18, 2000 Page 2 As indicated in Mike's report, this "intersection" of Holleman Drive and Driveway "A" currently operates at Level-of-Service "F." After completion ofthe new HEB development, the same "intersection" will continue tooperate at aLevel-of-Service "F." In other words, it is a problem now and will continue to be a problem in the future. There is no simple solution to this problem. I believe that improvements at the intersection of Texas Avenue and Holleman Drive could help alleviate some of the congestion problems at the intersection and in the vicinity of the intersection. Additional intersectional capacity can be obtained by widening Holleman Drive to provide additional through and turn lanes. Widening Texas Avenue in the vicinity of the intersection to permit dual-left-turns for northbound left-turning vehicles certainly would help to increase intersectional capacity. Also, reconstruction of the intersection to remove the Holleman Drive "jog" will allow the intersection to operate with more efficiency. Because these intersectional improvements will be long-term future projects, they likely will not be in place when the new HEB development is completed. Hence, some other traffic flow modifications maybe more appropriate. I believe that some relatively minor changes to the access plan may provide some alleviation of the congestion and still provide adequate accessibility. I suggest considering the following modifications at and near the proposed intersection of Holleman Drive and Driveway "A." Continue to provide access to both developments on the north and south sides of Holleman Drive, as it exists on the south side and as it is proposed on the north side. 2. Construct a median barrier along Holleman Drive between Texas Avenue and the proposed westernmost access location to the new HEB development; however, design the barrier to permit left turns into the Target/Hastings development from westbound Holleman Drive and left turns from the development onto westbound Holleman Drive. This particular access location is the primary access location for the Target/Hastings development along Holleman Drive and denial of left turns into or out of the development would be detrimental to customers. 3. Construction of the median barrier along Holleman Drive as indicated in Item (2) would make the Driveway "A" access location to the HEB development operate as a right-turn-in, right-turn-out access location. The new development's proposed additional access location along Holleman Drive, to be located to the west of Driveway "A," will accommodate left-turns from the new development onto eastbound Holleman Drive. 4. Construct a new traffic signal installation at the intersection of Texas Avenue with Manual Drive/Outback Steakhouse Driveway. This signal will help to disperse traffic from the Target/Hastings development and alleviate the vehicular demands at the Texas Avenue-Holleman Drive intersection. J• Mr. Lee Robinson December 18, 2000 Page 3 I am sure that customers to the two developments located on the west side of Texas Avenue and adjacent to Holleman Drive will adapt to the access accommodations and find the least restrictive routes to and from these developments. However, these recommended improvements may provide some assistance in reducing delay and congestion adjacent to the two developments and at the intersection of Texas Avenue and Holleman Drive. I would suggest discussing these suggestions with Mike McInturffand the developers of the HEB project. They are much more familiar with the effects that these changes will have on their development and Mike would be able to address any concerns that these changes would have on the overall operation of traffic flow in the vicinity of the development. Please contact me if you have any questions. Respectfully submitted, ~~~~ Joseph D. Blaschke, D.Eng., P.E. President JDB/sb ..~ ~;~~ y ~ ~~ f~ Z 1[ ~ • ~ • •~~~~~~~~{~~~~~t Al J45EPH D BIASCti#~E o`~ 8~ \~ ~ti ~- ~c~ H. E. BUTT GROCERY COMPANY TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SYNOPSIS The H. E. Butt Grocery Company proposes to construct a retail grocery store to be located in College Station, west of Texas Avenue between Park Place and Holloman Drive as shown in Figure 1. For purposes of this analysis, the buildout year is assumed to be 2002. Existing land use consists of a restaurant and small retail building. Proposed land use for the site consists of a retail grocery store (88,000 square feet) with drive-in pharmacy, fuel station with eight vehicle fueling positions, and a print shop (6,000 square feet). The restaurant will continue to operate and the proposed print shop will replace the existing retail building. The project is bounded on the north by Park Place, on the south by Holloman Drive, on the east by Texas Avenue, and on the west by apartments. Current access to the site is provided via two driveways on Holloman Drive as shown in Figure 2. With the addition of the grocery store with drive-in pharmacy, fuel station, and replacement of the retail building, access points will be redesigned. Access for the project is proposed through six driveways, three on Holloman Drive, two on Park Place, and one on Texas Avenue, as shown in Figure 3. The purpose of the Traffic Impact Analysis is to examine the interaction of existing and programmed land use activities, their intensity and traffic characteristics, and identify actions that would create a successful, effective, and safe development program under both existing and future traffic conditions. By utilizing accepted traffic engineering methods and techniques, a TIA for the project was conducted. Existing traffic conditions were examined on area roadways and at selected intersections and compared with traffic conditions that could be expected in 2002 considering both site generated and external (background) traffic. Based on the analysis, findings and recommended actions were identified, and are summarized as follows: 1. Existing operation at the signalized intersection of Texas Avenue and Holloman Drive is Level of Service E. Eastbound vehicle queues on Holloman Drive observed during the study were as long as 24 vehicles, resulting in frequent blockage of the existing driveways west of Texas Avenue. TxDOT plans to reconstruct Texas Avenue with a six lane divided section will improve intersection operations at this intersection. r 2. Although overall existing operation at the unsignalized intersection of Texas Avenue and Park Place is Level of Service A, eastbound turning movements are at Level of Service F with significant delay. Discussions with City and TxDOT representatives concerning plans to reconstruct Texas Avenue provided the following information with respect to the Park Place intersection: a. Alternative schematics provided by City personnel included the following options: (1) Provision of a median opening on Texas Avenue to allow northbound left tum movements to Park Place with right tum only movements to/from Park Place. (2) Provision of a median opening on Texas Avenue immediately north of Park Place to allow southbound left turn movements to a proposed driveway for Wolf Pen Plaza with right turn only movements to/from the driveway. (3) Provision of a median opening on Texas Avenue to allow all movements to/from Park Place. This alternative had been annotated to indicate a continuous median with no left turning movements to/from Park Place. b. Discussion with TxDOT personnel indicated that no decision has been made concerning median design at Park Place, but they were evaluating the options described above. 3. Proposed driveways should be constructed in accordance with the City of College Station's "Driveway Access Location and Design Policy' whenever feasible. Existing driveways adjacent to the site on Holloman Drive and Park Place preclude conformance with all of the spacing standards. Throat lengths for proposed driveways exceed the minimum standards. 4. Proposed 60 degree angle parking spaces 9 feet in width and 19 feet in length are appropriate for the grocery store parking area. 5. Holloman Drive is classified as a four-lane minor arterial and traverses College Station completely from east to west. It will serve as the primary travel route for vehicular traffic from the east and west. Traffic control on Holloman Drive between Texas Avenue and Wellborn Road includes two traffic signals and three multiway stop controlled intersections. Traffic volume in the vicinity of the site is anticipated WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. 2 to increase by 113 vehicles in the PM peak hour as a result of the proposed development. This is approximately 8 percent of the existing PM peak hour traffic volume. This vehicular increase will have a negligible impact on traffic operations adjacent to and within the area residential developments. 6. Park Place is classified as a collector street and provides access to local streets between Wellborn Road and Texas Avenue. It is a discontinuous street with three off-set intersection locations. In the immediate vicinity of the site, there are two right angle turns with warning signs and 15 mph advisory speed plates. As a result of the existing conditions along Park Place, it is not anticipated to be an attractive travel route for vehicular traffic, except for residents in the immediate vicinity of the site. Traffic volume in the vicinity of the site is anticipated to increase by 8 vehicles in the PM peak hour as a result of the proposed development. This is approximately 14 percent of the existing PM peak hour traffic volume. This vehicular increase will have a negligible impact on traffic operations adjacent to and within the area residential developments. WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. 3 E~dgette George - Re: HEB Retail Site Page 1 From: Edwin Hard To: Mike Mclnturff Date: 10/19/00 1:26PM Subject: Re: HEB Retail Site Mike, The proposed scope didn't appear to address some of the items that were listed in my a-mail to Natalie Ruiz. Just to make sure they are covered, I'd like to call them out specifically in the scope. The proposed site is located at one of our most congested intersections and any additional traffic on Holleman will be a source of concern/sensitivity. Below are a few items that I'd like you to include in the scope. If you already intended to do this - I apologize, but I just wanted to make sure they were covered because they will be questions asked by P&Z Commissioners, Councilpersons, and residents. - Since the TIA will be considered as part of the PDD rezoning process, one of the first things that will need to be done is to determine the access locations. The driveways shown on the preliminary site plan did not appear to meet ordinance requirements. The TIA will need to address the means and locations of providing safe access to the site as well as access that minimizes conflicts to traffic flow on adjacent roadways. This was item 4 on my a-mail to Ruiz. - Address LOS and capacity not only for intersections, but also for the Holleman and Park Place street sections. See item 2 in Ruiz a-mail. -Address impacts of traffic added on the sections of Holleman adacent to the the City's Southside residential area and Lincon Center. This area is a half mile to a mile west of the subject site. I realize that the impact could be small, but some area residents will be very vocal about any increase in traffic. I see this being a percentage of the existing traffic on Holleman in this area. You may need to get a traffic a 24-hour traffic count on this section of Holleman. See item 3 in my a-mail to N. Ruiz. - Finally, the traffic impacts on Park Place street will need to be addressed. This street has single family homes on it and is built to residential street standards. The TIA will need to address cut through traffic on the western section of Park Place as a result of the development. 24 hour counts may also be needed on Park Place. Feel free to call or set up a meeting if you'd like to discuss this further. Edwin Hard Transportation Planner City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 (979)764-3570, FAX (979)764-3496 ehard@ci.college-station.tx.us »> "Mike MclnturfF' <mcinturff.mike@whmeng.com> 10/17/00 04:02PM »> Ed, We have been requested by HEB to prepare a traffic impact analysis for the proposed retail development to be located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Texas Avenue and Holleman Drive. I have enclosed a letter with a description of the proposed scope as well as a document summarizing the scope and study area for your review and approval. Please contact me if you have any questions. Bridgette George - Re: HEB Retail Site Page 2 Thanks, Mike ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- Mike Mclnturff, P.E. President WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. 2717 Rio Grande Street Austin, Texas 78705 Phone: 512-473-8343 Fax: 512-473-8237 Email: mcinturff.mike~whmeng.com CC: Bridgette George; Natalie Ruiz Agenda Project Review of Proposed HEB -College Station November S, 2000 1. Update Project Team of current status of site planning process 2. Review of WHM Traffic Engineers Executive Summary and site plan modifications made. 3. Architectural Review and status A. Buffer yards, and truck delivery area B. Landscape Plan C. Building Elevations 4. Review of Engineering Constraints A. Water Tower Location B. Storm Drain/ Grading Analyses C. Water and Sewer Re-routing 5. What is Missing? Next Steps? ~~~ lam- s~-~-~- ~ ,~, ~ ~,ti L'F ~ P 1 ~D~ a ~~~' 3~"~ r From: Kim Foutz To: Bridgette George; Edwin Hard; Jessica Jimmerson; Jim Callaway; Natalie Ruiz; Ted Mayo Date: 11 /22/00 2:43PM Subject: Notes from HEB neighborhood meeting #2 HEB met with the Park Place neighborhood last night to continue their discussions to resolve several issues. Five people were present, four of which were at the first meeting. The following items were agreed upon: `1. Plat reflects moving pharmacy and truck delivery to Holleman Lighting will be adjusted and screened - 3. Entrance on Park Place should look like a neighborhood i.e. more landscaping with native plants 4. Water tower site should be cleared on brush, cleaned out, and landscaped along Park Place _~ No truck access on Park Place (weight limit sign) --6. No left turn onto Park Place; right-in-right-out only; probably use a median to accomplish; narrower lane with shorter car storage .7. Explore possibility of using Hughes lot for parking instead of on-street parking on Park Place ,.,_ 8. No speed bumps 9. Explore signal and street improvements on Holleman 10. Right turn only onto Texas Requests made of City: 1. On-street parking should be removed on one side 2. Higher enforcement by police 3. Eliminate parking at the curves College Station. Embracing the Past, Exploring the Future. CC: Mark Smith From: Kim Foutz To: Jon Mies; Mike Patterson Date: 11 /22/00 2:49PM Subject: Park Place neighbofiood requests Yesterday evening, residents of the Park Place neighbofiood met with HEB regarding their rezoning request. Several issues came up that were more city-related. They indicated that cars were parking on both sides of the street and it was becoming a hazard (cars having to wait on each other to pass). They believed it was a hazard for emergency vehicles to pass. They made two requests at the meeting: 1) remove on-street parking on at least one side of the street; 2) remove parking at the curves for visibility. Could you please look into this and let me know what you think? Also, they indicated that speeding in the area was a problem and asked whether enforcement could be enhanced. College Station. Embracing the Past, Exploring the Future. CC: Bridgette George; Edwin Hard; Jessica Jimmerson • G~~~%~-'~~-mss v~~, ~-u ~z~~' .. _. __ ~-{ ~ • • ~~ ~~ ~ ~ . , - ~r • ~_....bo._... ~~~ 2.Qc JG.~uv ,.~- ~ J cam, ~ w ~ ~ s~ a~ .~. P~~' • • 1988. 1989, DAV~TIMERS, Inc. ALLENTOWN, PA • STYLE MS?8 PRODUCT NO. 91495 • ~ ~` ~~ o '~ :?~ ~ ~ ~~ ~•. v ~s • • • • C • • ~.~ ~~ ~~ • ~~ . °1988, 1989, DAV~TIMERS. Inc. ALLENTOWN, PA STYLE M878 • PRODUCT N0. 91495 ~ _ ''. T • V ~y. ~, ~rt' oJ'~ L~ i'~ ~ ~ ~~~ • ~ - ~~`~ ~ ~, c9~`' /~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ , k"~~ ~,`~~~~ ~. • ;~- ~~ ,~ • ~~ PRINTED IN USA Jan-04-O1 04:24pm From-Ellison Law 9796938619 T-392 P.07/08 F-489 •~• •w• •YYl eE,IJ j~:t14" t~ 6] ~ 4TH 6¢sr 9fifl( TR~N9POR'f.~'t04 @lbu~/a00 • _. ~.•'"~ it ....•/ ~~ ~~- ~~•,~~ ~' .~'~ `• ~ _r' ~ .- J'r, a a _~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ G t a .._ ._ ~ - I = ~ ~ ~m .... - ~~ ~~ y ~ i i t i lr ~ v .. ~t w ' =i ~ ~"1 .. .. ~6E 1 ~~~ ~'i 71gYlMYUoai~/(~~Ci+n+lwe. in.-ta.11, ley ~~ 1~ ~ ~ v N I Q R r Jan-Od-OI 04:24pm From-Ellison Law 9796938619 T-392 P.04/08 F-489 .. N r ~ddt ~ :. ~~ . . _ , ~~~~ . ~ ~` o a ~ b ~ ~ _ .~ ,_ ... -- .. ,, ~ s , ~ ~ '~ ~ ;. ' ' ~ , ' 1 ~ , .f . ~, , ~ . ~ i r ~- . - 1 ~ . O _ . ~ ~ ~- _ •~ . ~ - ' ' ~~ ~ ,' . ~ ..~ . .O ~ , ~, ~~ ~~. ~ ~ ~r~ ~ ~ ~~ i ~ - . Jan-04-O1 04:24pm From-Ellison Law 9796938819 7-392 P.05/08 F-489 ... . ~. . -- -~ ~.. ~. .... r.~~ ••~•.. a..•\~114i 4•Gi11 GIC 7 ~'.~ !Y "J ~j fd ~. On N^` ~I ~ + ' r ortat~r~ ~ cn~ rc ~ e ..~~ ~ ~ ~ Jasrph D. BlasrJlksy Q Eng„ P.E., President tDt78 Woodaeek D~hre, eallege S a~or~ Tesar7784s 97 693,S8D0 9/ f.~x19J9f693-5B~t1 email: foal®cca.net January 4, 2001 WHM Transpottation Engin aeriag Consultants, inc. ATTN; Mr, Mike McInturft P.E. 2717 Rio C~andt Street Austin, Texas 7870S RF:: HE$ Development Holleman Drive at Tt seas Avenue '' College Station. Texz,s Dear Mike: Thank you foryour lei ter ofJanuary 3, Zoo i, relev8nt to the referenced development 3 agree with you that some clarifies ;ion is needed in respect to the recanunettdatians contained in my December 18, 20041etter to I .ee Robinson. Tho following is my response to your letter and to your suggestions cantair~ed therein. I. You and I both agr ~ that there should be additional capacity improvemer-ta at the intersection of'I'e~as Avoaue aed Holleman Drive and both of us arc aware of she current Texas Department of'!'ransportation pian$ for improvements at the intersection. Ultimately, additionat improvemer its will have to ba made at that intersection. However, l did not intend to imply that HEB Ss re ~ponsible for these future improvements, Them is no reasouwhy H.EB should be responsible ~ br these additional irnpravemettts or why HEB should be required to pay for these additioru 1 improvcmonts~ 2. The proposed si~mal installation at the intersection of TexBS Avenuo and Manual Drive/Outback 8toakl souse Driveway is a logical eper8tionai improvement far the "Hastingsrfarget" dev~ :lopmeat. Again, 2 did eot ia~ond to imply that HE8 is responsible in any manner what8aeve r for the cost of this signal installation. This new signal installation should be the respa>zsil ~ility of the city of College Station. 3. I have reviawod your 61;etch of propased median channelization along Holleman Dove west of Texas Avenue and adjacent to the propaBed HEB development. i con~,vr with your suggestions in regard tc locatlvn and type ofchanneli7atio~. These suggestions at+a consistent with my suggestions c tmtained in my Decetnbes 1 B, 2000 lcttar to Gee Robinson. For alariScation, t have c nelased your two 6ketahas to t1~is letter. 1 believe that these improvements will impr eve traEic flaw along Holleman Drive by providing conveniont access witiil~ restricting minor Tovemenrs, SperJallringln: lia(~1cFngMaarfeg IPoad,.ayDesign Aa/dentAnalys~s Jan-04-O1 04:24pm From-Ellison Law ... - - . ~~ .... ~..~ ..~rrr. ..+r vGll 1 GF Mike Mclatarff January 4, 200[ Page Z 9796938819 T-392 P.06/08 F-489 ~ r7 wt 3870 P, 03 4. The cost of tho ma Ilan itnprovemertts $long Holleman Dove should include some Ieve1 of participstlon by l`iE B. Yost suggested in your letter that, in otla®r cities, "an estimate of improvement costs '~y devo(opers (was} based on their pro rata share of site traflyc ~ e percent of total ttafl5 :_'+ You are correct. Many ojtios have used this methodoIegy:o allocate fimding patticipetioe for rnadwsy itngrovementa, Y believe that this would be an sppropclate method to use to atl+ -o8te costs for HEB participation with the city of College Station. [hope these eommer, is have addressed your qucstians and roncert;ls. Please contact me if3rou have anyr questions, ,:, ~. Sir-cerely, ~~~~ Joseph .Blaschke, D.Eng,, P,E, President JDS/sb Enclosures xc: Lee Robinson Jan-04-01 04:23pm From-Ellison Law ~~ 9796938819 T-392 P.O1/OB F-489 l~ ~ ~ ~ TYai ~sporta dart Engineering Consultants, Inc. C. Michael Walton, PhD., F.E. Mike McInturff, M.Eng„ P.E. Ra,idy 8_ Machemehl, PhD,, P.E. januguy s, 2oai Joseph D. Blaschke, D.Eng., P E. President Ttansportatinn Engineering ~ nalysts 1008 Woodcreelc Drive College Station, 3'exas 7784a Deaz Joe: Past-it• Fax Not® 7671 Dare _ ~ / pages- To Fro ~ Co.lDept. Co. ' Phone # Phones ! ~~ (~ Fax It ~ ~ Fex ~f i have ravlewed your Deceml per I8 letter to Lee Robinson, City of College Station, concerning our Traffic Impact Analysis Report for I he proposed HE$ de~elapmant at Holleman Drive and Texas Avenue in CoIIeg¢ Station. First, Iet me express my app -eciation to you for your positive conunerats concerning the quality of the report and your endorsem~ at of the study and findings. As a professional engiineer, it is always gratifying to rcceiv+e conGrma ion of your work from a fellow engineer. As we discussed by telepho~ ~e last weep, there may be some clarification needed with respect to the rccommer-dal'ions contained i, your letter_ Irt addition, we have since received comments from the City concemirag the level of partic~ potion by the developer ire the Holleman Drive median construction. As a result of this information, I ~ espectfally request your review and coataaents concerning the Following issues: 1_ Y concur with your comrnt rats in the second paragraph of page 2 of your letter concerning InterszcEion improvements at Texas A venue and Holleman Drive intersection iTnfortuna[Ely, TxDQT"s planned improvements at this inh zSECtion do not include actual capacity lraereases {such as a southbound tight turn lane, due! Wort Zbouad left turn Iaaes, etc.). Plans include improvement of the northeast comer to provide an it creased zadius and better alig~uient for westbound Holleman Drive. Although not listed in the City review convYtenfs, it would be helpful to clarify that it was not your intention that HEB be resF onsible for any intersection improvements at this localism. 2. figure 3 from the TIA is ctirlosed for driveway rcfcrcncC information. It Is net clear hom Recommendation 2 on F~ ge 2 of your letter whether you propose to restrict left turn movements #o/from Hastings Drivew; .y 2. There ;s a limited amwnt of space between Hastings 2 and 2 to allow a northbound left terra frr m Hastings 1 (to travel westbound on Holleman Drive} and a westbound left rum from Holleman I give to Hastings 2. !t would be helpful iE your recommendation could be clarified to include chanrulization on Holleman Drive west of Driveway A to preclude northbound Ief t turn movements from castings 2. This would allow all movements a t Driveway B as well as righE and left turn exit only m aneuvers from the apartment exit driveway. Because Hastings 2 is the primary access paint for Service vehicles, it would be desirable to allow westbound left turn maneuvers at Hastings 2. I have enclosed a schematic illvstratirg the proposed. modificatiaas alcaag Holleman Drive. With the exception of the 1Tiangular island at Driveway A which is propo.Red to be a 2717 Rio Grande Srtraet AL stir, Tmcos 78705 Phone 512/47's8.~&3 PAX 512/4?3-8237 Jan-04-O1 04:23pm From-Ellison Law 9796938619 T-392 P.02/OB F-489 ' ~ .J ...~ Joseph D. Blaschke, D.Eng., P.E. January 3, 2001 Page 2 concrete curbed island, ill channelizativn is proposed to be accomplished with jiggle bar tiles, pavement nzarkinggand/ ~r raised reflective pavement markers. 3. Although not listed in th{ 4~ty review comments, it would be helpful to clarify that it was not your intenfion that HE$ be Tea ~onsible for any parfion of the proposed tra![ic signal irutallation at '('eras Avenue and Manual Driv, :/outback Steakhouse Driveway. 4- Planning Departa-ent con ~ttsents include the following: "'The level of participation in the proposed Holleman median constn coon, which will be required of the d~eloper, will be determined by the Comir~ion and Council.'' In other cities, we have developed an estimate of improvement costs by developers balled on theiz pro rata share of site traffic as a percent of total traffic. In your opinion, , would this be an appropriate bsgis for such a determination for the fIolleman live modifications? HEB wishes to develop a .:ooperative project for implementation of channelizat3an recoalnlendation.G with a combination of I] EB-funded improvements a~td City pavement marking inodificatYOms, or some similar arrangement In order to insure that there is no ~octisunderstanding concerning recommerulation6 to be considered by the City and to clarify which of i hese should be Ehe resparsaibility Qf HEB, I respecifuAy request that you supp]ement your December ] S letter with an additional letter addressing the points contained herein. Please feel free to call me For discussion/clarification prior to preparation of additional written in Formation. In order to a~aini sin HES's rezoning case nn the scheduled January 1$ PBra agenda„ the City mus# receive our respansa and all review coaurents by I0:OO am on January 8_ Please review this informatio1 ~ and advise me if it would be possible for you to prepare a response to these comrnent® and request b~ ~ January 4. Your assistance is appreciated. Sincerely, Mike McInturff, P.E. President Enclosures cc: Mary Rohrer - F3ES David Kayle - HEI3 Chuck Ellison t 'ec-05-00 05:35pm From-Ellison Law CHARLES A. ELLISON, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW ?b+st ASHFORD DR~vE SUITE 100 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840.4698 CHARLES A. ELU50N AMY L CLOUGH' ldao tleenaed in Wisconsin T-303 P.O1/03 F-253 TELEPHONE: {979) 8989889 FACSIMILE: (979) 693-8818 FACSIMILE T~tANS~5SION~ COVER. PAGE DATE: TO: FACSIlVIILE N[JNIBER: FROM: 9796938819 MAIUN(3 ADDRESS P.O, BOX 10103 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842-0103 ~~•5~~~ ~tr~d~f2rf t C7QOr~,.e ~- 7 ~o ~ ' 3~l5~ c~k~ 1-~1,~~-,•~ NUMBER OF PAGES: ~. {including this page) RE: l~-~ coNnv~NTS: U ~~ CONFIDENTIAL IMPORTANT: This message is inten. led Por the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may coatain information that is privllegejl, calnfide~ >tia! and exempt from disclosure wader applicable law, and is intended for the lawful use of the iadivi)itlal er entity named b. low. l'f the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of thi} telecopy is strictly prohibited. it you have received this teleeopy in error, please Immediately notify us by teleph~ ae (collect iP necessary) and return the original message to us at the address above ~za United States Postal Service. Thank y ,u. ~\ ADAMS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC Civil • Environmental Engineers 2445 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 100 Southlake, Texas 76092 (817) 329-6990 FAX (817) 329-7671 To: Jessica Jimmerson P.O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Tx 77842 PH 979-764-3570 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DATE: 1 /26/01 JOB No: 2000.078 ATTN: Jessica Jimmerson RE: Citv of Collette Station COPY TO: WE ARE SENDING YOU ^ ATTACHED ^ UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA ^ Shop Drawings ^ Prints ^D Plans ^ Copy of Letter ^ Change Order ^ Samples ^ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 2 Revised site Ian 2 Revised site Ian with than es clouded THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ^ For approval ~ For your use ^ As requested ^ For review and comment ^ FOR BIDS DUE 19_ REMARKS: SIGNED: ~.l~'(.ll~~ CA .c .~,~n/~-~ Corporate Oftice: Tyler, Texas Branch Offices: Garland, Texas ~ San Diego, California fN~'~~ LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL ~~~Oa ADAMS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC Civil • Environmental Engineers 2445 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 100 Southlake, Texas 76092 (817) 329-6990 FAX (817) 329-7671 TO: City of College Station 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 77842 (979)764-3570 DATE: 12/4/00 JOB No: 2000-078 ATTN: Ms. Natalie Thomas Ruiz, AICP RE: H.E.B. -College Station COPY TO: WE ARE SENDING YOU X ATTACHED ^ UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA ^ Shop Drawings X Prints ^ Plans ^ Copy of Letter ^ Change Order ^ Samples ^ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 10 12/02/00 1 Zonin Site Plan 10 12/02/00 1 Landsca a Plan 10 12/02/00 1 Conce t Plan 10 12/02/00 1 Prelimina Drains a Plan THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ^ For approval X For review and comment REMARKS: X For your use SIGNED: ^ Rob Adams illiford ^ Ngozye Musenda X Jimmy Lopez ^ Nathan Olson ^ Jason Small ^ As requested Corporafe Office: Tyler, Texas Branch Offices: Garland, Texas • San Diego, California C~.~6 i I~ ~n~ LETTER OF TRANSMIT AL ADAMS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC Civil • Environmental Engineers 2445 E. Southtake Blvd., Suite 100 Southlake, Texas 76092 (817) 329-6990 FAX (817) 329-7671 TO: City of College Station 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 77842 (979)764-3570 WE ARE SENDING YOU X ATTACHED ^ Shop Drawings X Prints ^ Plans ^ Copy of Letter ^ Change Order ^ Samples COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 3 01 /06/01 6 Revised Le al Descri tions '~ 10 01/06/01 1 Landsca a Plan 10 01/06/01 1 Conce t Plan 1 01 /06/01 2 Memo Addressin staff comments DATE: 1 /6/01 JOB No: 2000-078 ATTN: Ms. Jessica Jlmmerson RE: H.E.B. - COllege Station COPY TO: ^ UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA ^ Specifications THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ^ For approval X For your use ^ As requested X For review and comment REMARKS: c ~/ SIGNED: ^ Rob Ada s ^ Pat illiford X Jimmy Lopez Nathan Olson ^ Ngozye Musenda ^ Jason Small Corporate Office: Tyler, Texas Branch Offices: Garland, Texas • San Diego, California Bridgette Geo f}E Q From: Kim Foutz ,1'~ , ~~ C / To: Jessica Jimmerson ~J ? Date: 11/9/00 4:55PM Subject: HEB PDD I just wanted to reiterate the conversation you and I had this afternoon regarding the truck turnaround on the HEB property to keep everyone up to speed. The turnaround that is depicted is shown on property that the City has under contract. We are currently having discussions about this turnaround, and until it is resolved, I don't think that the PDD can go to P&Z. Hopefully, these discussions will transpire quickly and won't hold anything up. College Station. Embracing the Past, Exploring the Future. CC: Bridgette George; Jim Callaway Tammy Macik - From: Chuck Ellison <chuck@ellisonlaw.com> To: "Natalie Ruiz (E-mail)" <NRUIZ@ci.college-station.tx.us> Date: 12/22/00 11:28AM Subject: HEB Application for Rezoning Natalie Please allow this a-mail to confirm our discussion this morning wherein we decided that it would be best to pull the captioned application from consideration for the January 4th P&Z meeting. Instead, please reschedule it for the January 18th meeting. Unfortunately, we received the staff comments yesterday and do not feel that we will be able, considering the holiday schedule, to have everything you have requested by the staff deadline at noon on Wednesday, December 27th. Also, would you call me at your earliest opportunity to discuss the timing of the filing of the plat application? Thank you and have a Happy Holiday! Chuck Ellison Charles A. Ellison, P.C. P.O. Box 10103 College Station, TX 77842 (979) 696-9889 (979) 693-8819 (fax) chuck@ellisonlaw.com This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you. ~o'~~~( CC: "David Kayle (E-mail)" <Kayle.David@heb.com>, "Mary Rohrer (E-mail)" <rohrer.mary@heb.com>, "Jim Hughes (E-mail)" <jhugheship@aol.com>, "Don Martell (E-mail)" <rodomo@aol.com>, Amy Clough <amy@ellisonlaw.com>, Barbara <Barbara@ellisonlaw.com> H. E. ,UTT GROCERY COR ?~-NY December 6, 2000 Mrs. Willie Watson 1707 Park Place College Station, TX 77840 Dear Mrs. Watson: Thank you for participating in the two meetings we conducted with the Park Place neighborhood regarding ow new HEB project. Your suggestions discussed at the meetings and incorporated into our store plans will help make the new project successful. We want to extend to you, ow commitment to do the following: 1. Lower the height of our parking !ot poles on the north side of our store and focus the parking lot lighting on site to minimize Light spillover into your neighborhood Z. Landscape the water tower street frontage after its construction by the City. 3. Restrict the Park Place entrances from truck traj)iG 4. Design the driveways onto Park Place to restrict any left turn traffic from Ong the property through your neighborhood S. Landscaping the entrance of the neighborhood on Park Place adjacent to the store site to provide a better neighborhood identity and entry appearances 6~ Face our loading dock toward Holleman Drive so all delivery truck traffic will enter and exit oJj of Holleman. 7. Move the drive through pharmacy to the south side of the building, away from the Park Place community. To move beyond words, please be asswed we will incorporate these items into ow development plans we submit to the city to stand behind ow commitment. These items will therefore be a required part of our construction and development should the city approve ow plans. While we had a lot of dialogue on eliminating parking on Park Place or using traffic slowing measures in the right-of--way, the existing conditions on Park Place can only legally be completed by the city. We will, however, certainly be glad to assist in your efforts. Please be asswed that ow meetings with you were not cone-time event. Since ow store will be serving your neighborhood, we would like to have continual communication to be certain we do in fact serve yow needs as customers. i'hanks again for yow input. Sincerely, ,- , David E. Ka le Director of Real Estate /bw cc: Charles A.Ellison, P.C. Kim Foutz, City of College Station COLLEGEE STATION CIT~NS H. E. BUTT GROCERY COMPANY• 4625 WINDFERN • HOUSTON TEXAS 77041• (713) 329-3000 ~~ Date: 26 January 2001 ~~ To: Jessica Jimmerson • ~ ~~ City of College Station ' ` •' I i n x c H t T E c ~ ~~ ~ Fax: 979-764-3496 ~ m ~~~ From: B. Mark Luddeke, ALA ~~ Pages: 2, including cover sheet. FAX File: ~~~ RE: HEIf SITE LIGHTING PLAN Attached pl. ase find the proposed site lighting plan for the HEB project at Texas Avenue. From the desk of... B. Marl, Luddeke, AIA Wilson I .ullman McCord, Inc. 909 S. T uicahua Corpus ('hristi, TX 78404 512.887 5696 Fax: 51~ ,887.bb97 T'd G699L88 T9E puoOoW uewjjn~ uosjt~ d0E~Z0 TO 9Z UeC Jan "t'6 O1 11:39a RCEI DFW 817 329 7671 p.l ADAMS CQNSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. CIVIL • ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS * * * FAX TRANSMITTAL COVER SHEET * * * OATE: January 26, 2001 PAGES: 2 (Including Cover Sheet) T0: Ms. Jessica Jimmerson ASSOC.: City of College Station FAX N0: 979-764-3496 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ FROM: Jim Lopez The documents accompanying this Fax transmission contains information from Adams Consulting Engineers, Inc. which is confidential or privileged. !f you are not the intended recipient, be aware that disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents is prohibited. Please notify us immediately if you received this Fax in error so that we may arrange for retrieval. !f you do not receive a1! the pages, please contact A CEl as soon as possible. COMMENTS: RE: Revised Concept Plan Ms. Jimmerson - Attached you will find an exhibit showing the areas revised on the proposed H.E.B. and EI Chico parking lot. If you need any additional information please feel free to give me a call. Hard Copy to be mailed: Please Acknowledge Receipt: ACEI J.N.: 2000-078 2445 E. Southlake Boulevard, Suife 100, Southlake, Texas 76092 Phone: (817) 329-6990 Fax: (817) 329-7671 ~.,_...,_.,~., ~s~..,.. r.d.,~ re,,.,~ Gron~h /lff~rwc• /?arlanrl Tavas ~ .San Diann CaGfOrnla Jan %6 O1 11:39a Y RCEI DFW 817 329 7671 t ' • r ,. O z '. I f ._. N Oi v r~ 30' DRIVE ~ ~ ~_ ~ Oi O V! _~ ~ ~ O G ~ - r~ rn r~* `~ 1 - ~ f 1 - f ~~' ~ ~ _~ _ ~ ~ ro o e I IJ CJD ~ NN~ V ~C •• D "'~ (, ~ m_ cn 23' DRI\ ~ I ~`~ r ' ~ i ~. ' ~~ d \ ~ d \ ~ i' i~~ r /, ~~~ ~~ .~~ a m .. ee~ e^ ^. .^ ~ I ie O ~ N _y N `C U ~ II ~ N 0/ \1 ~ A ~ • G O m ~ ~ -----a ^ ~~~~_+~ r---° n1 ~ x i ii x N f 1 _ ~ f----- c --t---- ~ _ - i, ~ r' i~----- 8 --- ~ ^ r ~ ----; m II ~ r--___ i e s r----- ,,y., \~ I i i ~~----- .mot' ~ • n ,~ _ r' /~ /~ m ~ t ~ p~m \ • ~' "t • ~' AoMns CaNet~nrn ENa+l~e, irc. """ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' $~~S If~~•B •~ o~ • e~o~,errK eror+~+e t ..~.........,~•.,...,~~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ !e! Kc wm aaur cow,ur+ n~~n~~a•r~~+ri~ ~ : ~ ~ ~~~~~i REVISED~~COSNrCEP~TsPLAN aa..~~r '~' ss E~~g ~~ss ~~r~ I~ . 2 r C~~ *~~~ ~_ ~. ._._ ~' -: . J t: . - ~, ,- - .J7 - .Y': \~. - .may S. 3'. Cr`~'1' O ~~ COIJ~JIJ\ j1J S~L A~ .lO I\T I~ 1 \j~>;,01'~~:1~1~~ ~' S~I,:~jI;C~S I I OI South Teas !-~~;~~rlue, 1'.0. T3o~ 9960 CoIle~e Station, 7=exas 7742 I'Ilone (979) 764-3 ~ 7 0 1~al (979) 764.-3496 DATL--: ~- / 2 - ~9 _ 6D PAGES INCLUDIl~TG COMER Ifyorr and ~~ot receive a co~~rplete f,~x, please call cur o~jrce imnrediatel}~ for a rein 1rn~snr,-ttal. ~ T0: COi~, ~PAI~T1': DEPARTi~~IEi~TT: PHO\TL: _ ~o -- 93 S - gZ 3 ~ FRO \~ ~A~.. ~' ~ -- Z! Del 3 ~ -' b'D ~ l Pxo~TE: ~ 79 - 7~ - 35 7p RL-;~S_~;J;};S: ^ Urent ^ 1-or ~~our rep-ie~:- r~ 1: ^ I:cl~ly~ :ASAP O Please Conu~ient .. ~ ~] ~ ~ Jrart,~ ortatiort ~ ineeri ~naC ~~ p '~ '~ ~ /oseph D. Blaschke, D. Eng., P.E., President 1008 Woodcreek Drive, College Station, Texas 77845 979/693-5800 Fax: 979/693-5870 a-mail: tea 1®tca.net December 18, 2000 City of College Station ATTN: Mr. Lee Robinson Traffic Systems Superintendent 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 77842 RE: Traffic Impact Analysis Report Proposed H. E. Butt Grocery Company Development College Station, Texas Dear Mr. Robinson: I have reviewed the referenced Traffic Impact Analysis Report prepared by WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc., dated December 4, 2000. As you know, the proposed development is located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Texas Avenue and Holleman Drive in College Station. This report was prepared by John M. ("Mike") McInturff. I have known Mike for many years and have often recommended him to various clients as a competent and qualified traffic engineer. Mike is very talented and very professional. His report was well-written and the data was well- documented. I thought he did a terrific job. If I had conducted the study, I would have done it in a similar manner and made similar assumptions. Consequently, I endorse his study and his findings. I believe that this development has the potential to be very successful. With this success, however, comes a significant amount of additional traffic to this specific College Station location. As Mike indicated in his report, there likely will be some reduction in traffic generated by the development on the southwest corner of the same intersection (the Target/Hastings development) when the existing HEB Pantry Store closes. Also, there will be a certain percentage of traffic that will simply be attracted to the new development that is already traveling along Texas Avenue or Holleman Drive. Nevertheless, one cannot ignore the fact that additional vehicles will be generated by the new development and that the intersection of Texas Avenue and Holleman Drive will have to accommodate much of this additional traffic. The proposed access locations to the new development from Texas Avenue to the east and from Park Place to the north will not be points of congestion, as indicated in Mike's report. This is especially true when a median barrier is placed along Texas Avenue north of Holleman Drive in the near future. The access locations along Holleman Drive, however, will become points of congestion, especially at Driveway "A," which is located closest to Texas Avenue and directly opposite of an existing access location to the Target/Hastings development. Specialising in: Traffic Engineering Roadway Design Accident Analysis Mr. Lee Robinson December 18, 2000 Page 2 As indicated in Mike's report, this "intersection" of Holleman Drive and Driveway "A" currently operates atLevel-of-Service "F." After completion ofthe new HEB development, the same "intersection" will continue tooperate at aLevel-of-Service "F." In other words, it is a problem now and will continue to be a problem in the future. There is no simple solution to this problem. I believe that improvements at the intersection of Texas Avenue and Holleman Drive could help alleviate some of the congestion problems at the intersection and in the vicinity of the intersection. Additional intersectional capacity can be obtained by widening Holleman Drive to provide additional through and turn lanes. Widening Texas Avenue in the vicinity of the intersection to permit dual-left-turns for northbound left-turning vehicles certainly would help to increase intersectional capacity. Also, reconstruction ofthe intersection to remove the Holleman Drive "jog" will allow the intersection to operate with more efficiency. Because these intersectional improvements will be long-term future projects, they likely will not be in place when the new HEB development is completed. Hence, some other traffic flow modifications maybe more appropriate. I believe that some relatively minor changes to the access plan may provide some alleviation of the congestion and still provide adequate accessibility. I suggest considering the following modifications at and near the proposed intersection of Holleman Drive and Driveway "A." Continue to provide access to both developments on the north and south sides of Holleman Drive, as it exists on the south side and as it is proposed on the north side. 2. Construct a median barrier along Holleman Drive between Texas Avenue and the proposed westernmost access location to the new HEB development; however, design the barrier to permit left turns into the Target/Hastingsdevelopmenr from westbound Holleman Drive and left turns from the development onto westbound Holleman Drive. This particular access location is the primary access location for the Target/Hastings development along Holleman Drive and denial of left turns into or out of the development would be detrimental to customers. 3. Construction of the median barrier along Holleman Drive as indicated in Item (2) would make the Driveway "A" access location to the HEB development operate as a right-turn-in, right-turn-out access location. The new development's proposed additional access location along Holleman Drive, to be located to the west of Driveway "A," will accommodate left-turns from the new development onto eastbound Holleman Drive. 4. Construct a new traffic signal installation at the intersection of Texas Avenue with Manual Drive/Outback Steakhouse Driveway. This signal will help to disperse traffic from the Target/Hastings development and alleviate the vehicular demands at the Texas Avenue-Holleman Drive intersection. ,. r , Mr. Lee Robinson December 18, 2000 Page 3 I am sure that customers to the two developments located on the west side of Texas Avenue and adjacent to Holleman Drive will adapt to the access accommodations and find the Least restrictive routes to and from these developments. However, these recommended improvements may provide some assistance in reducing delay and congestion adjacent to the two developments and at the intersection of Texas Avenue and Holleman Drive. I would suggest discussing these suggestions with Mike McInturffand the developers of the HEB project. They are much more familiar with the effects that these changes will have on their development and Mike would be able to address any concerns that these changes would have on the overall operation of traffic flow in the vicinity of the development. Please contact me if you have any questions. Respectfully subm;;~~itted, ~~C~ Joseph D. Blaschke, D.Eng., P.E. President JDB/sb • • • ~~~~~~~~I~~~~~~~Ret' ,~~ o eu~sc~~ 4 ~; o0 AL. ~_ \ 12/19/00 18:02 4979 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS ~ ool :k :k ~ :i::k ~::k sk ~::k * :k ~::k * %k ~ :3::k ~ :k :k ~ ~ :k :k :k :k :+: •x. ACTIVITY REPORT x:+:~: x~~:%x:~:x:~h:x~~::~:~~:~:~x~k~:~:+:sk~k~:x~k*~~k TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX N0. 5705 CONNECTION TEL 912109388091pp161 CONNECTION ID START TIBIE 12/19 17:59 USAGE TIME 03'06 PAGES 4 RESULT OK ~~~ ~ ~ HOLLEMAN DRIVE WIDENING /NEW HEB DEVELOPMENT REMOVE QUANTITY UNITPRICE COST CURB AND GUTTER 1 , 1 00 LF $ 5/LF $ 5,500 6' SIDEWALK 500 LF $ 1 O/LF $ 5,000 PAVEMENT & BASE 51 O SY $ 2/SY $ 1 ,020 (3' WIDTH) $ 1 1 ,520 INSTALL CURB AND GUTTER 1 , 1 00 LF $ 7/LF $ 7,700 6' SIDEWALK 1 ,000 LF $ 1 5/LF $ 1 5,000 PAVEMENT: SUBGRADE PREP (8' WIDTH) 1 ,360 SY $ 1 .00/SY $ 1 ,360 6" LIME STABILIZATION WITH 1 ,360 SY $ 2.50/SY $ 3,400 LIME FOR STABILIZATION (5%) BASE: 4" HMAC TYPE B 1,050 SY $ 9.00/SY $ 9,540 PAVEMENT: 2.5" HMAC TYPED 1 ,050 SY $ 6.50/SY $ 6,825 DRIVEWAYS 3 EA $2500/EA $ 7,500 HANDICAP RAMPS 8 EA $ 500/EA $ 4,000 $55,325 TOTAL REMOVE & INSTALL $66,845 30% CONTINGENCY $20,055 TOTAL $86,900 •---- 9 ~ ~ ~~~~ H. E. BUTT GROCERY COMPANY TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SYNOPSIS The H. E. Butt Grocery Company proposes to construct a retail grocery store to be located in College Station, west of Texas Avenue between Park Place and Holloman Drive as shown in Figure 1. For purposes of this analysis, the buildout year is assumed to be 2002. Existing land use consists of a restaurant and small retail building. Proposed land use for the site consists of a retail grocery store (88,000 square feet) with drive-in pharmacy, fuel station with eight vehicle fueling positions, and a print shop (6,000 square feet). The restaurant will continue to operate and the proposed print shop will replace the existing retail building. The project is bounded on the north by Park Place, on the south by Holloman Drive, on the east by Texas Avenue, and on the west by apartments. Current access to the site is provided via two driveways on Holloman Drive as shown in Figure 2. With the addition of the grocery store with drive-in pharmacy, fuel station, and replacement of the retail building, access points will be redesigned. Access for the project is proposed through six driveways, three on Holloman Drive, two on Park Place, and one on Texas Avenue, as shown in Figure 3. The purpose of the Traffic Impact Analysis is to examine the interaction of existing and programmed land use activities, their intensity and traffic characteristics, and identify actions that would create a successful, effective, and safe development program under both existing and future traffic conditions. By utilizing accepted traffic engineering methods and techniques, a TIA for the project was conducted. Existing traffic conditions were examined on area roadways and at selected intersections and compared with traffic conditions that could be expected in 2002 considering both site generated and external (background) traffic. Based on the analysis, findings and recommended actions were identified, and are summarized as follows: 1. Existing operation at the signalized intersection of Texas Avenue and Holloman Drive is Level of Service E. Eastbound vehicle queues on Holloman Drive observed during the study were as long as 24 vehicles, resulting in frequent blockage of the existing driveways west of Texas Avenue. TxDOT plans to reconstruct Texas Avenue with a six lane divided section will improve intersection operations at this intersection. 2. Although overall existing operation at the unsignalized intersection of Texas Avenue and Park Place is Level of Service A, eastbound turning movements are at Level of Service F with significant delay. Discussions with City and TxDOT representatives concerning plans to reconstruct Texas Avenue provided the following information with respect to the Park Place intersection: a. Alternative schematics provided by City personnel included the following options: (1) Provision of a median opening on Texas Avenue to allow northbound left turn movements to Park Place with right turn only movements to/from Park Place. (2) Provision of a median opening on Texas Avenue immediately north of Park Place to allow southbound left turn movements to a proposed driveway for Wolf Pen Plaza with right turn only movements to/from the driveway. (3) Provision of a median opening on Texas Avenue to allow all movements to/from Park Place. This alternative had been annotated to indicate a continuous median with no left turning movements to/from Park Place. b. Discussion with TxDOT personnel indicated that no decision has been made concerning median design at Park Place, but they were evaluating the options described above. 3. Proposed driveways should be constructed in accordance with the City of College Station's "Driveway Access Location and Design Policy" whenever feasible. Existing driveways adjacent to the site on Holloman Drive and Park Place preclude conformance with all of the spacing standards. Throat lengths for proposed driveways exceed the minimum standards. 4. Proposed 60 degree angle parking spaces 9 feet in width and 19 feet in length are appropriate for the grocery store parking area. 5. Holloman Drive is classified as a four-lane minor arterial and traverses College Station completely from east to west. It will serve as the primary travel route for vehicular traffic from the east and west. Traffic control on Holloman Drive between Texas Avenue and Wellborn Road includes two traffic signals and three multiway stop controlled intersections. Traffic volume in the vicinity of the site is anticipated WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. 2 Y to increase by 113 vehicles in the PM peak hour as a result of the proposed development. This is approximately 8 percent of the existing PM peak hour traffic volume. This vehicular increase will have a negligible impact on traffic operations adjacent to and within the area residential developments. 6. Park Place is classified as a collector street and provides access to local streets between Wellborn Road and Texas Avenue. It is a discontinuous street with three off-set intersection locations. In the immediate vicinity of the site, there are two right angle turns with warning signs and 15 mph advisory speed plates. As a result of the existing conditions along Park Place, it is not anticipated to be an attractive travel route for vehicular traffic, except for residents in the immediate vicinity of the site. Traffic volume in the vicinity of the site is anticipated to increase by 8 vehicles in the PM peak hour as a result of the proposed development. This is approximately 14 percent of the existing PM peak hour traffic volume. This vehicular increase will have a negligible impact on traffic operations adjacent to and within the area residential developments. WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. 3 Agenda Project Review of Proposed HEB -College Station November 8, 2000 1. Update Project Team of current status of site planning process 2. Review of WHM Traffic Engineers Executive Summary and site plan modifications made. 3. Architectural Review and status A. Buffer yards, and truck delivery area B. Landscape Plan C. Building Elevations n ri__~____ _rr.__~___~__ r.___.__~_~_ f'REDEVELOi'MENTMEETlNG The purpose of a predevelopment meeting i5 to meet the City Staff that will be involved with your development and identify general issues that need further analysis. Along with the discussion of these major issues, staff will talk about the development process, distribute necessary information and discuss what permits will be required for your particular development. This meeting is in no way a complete review of your project. Staff will perform a formal thorough review once the minimum requirements are submitted for your particular development. Date of Meeting: (T/~~IL~~ Applicant(s): ~' (T°~u''-'s~~ 1 ~ ~~~~ ~r~v r,P ~'~,~ flt r~ ~ ~ r \~ I it ~f~,t/',~„ ~Fn1 1~' `~ ~ ) z Gity Staff present: ~ `~ .~~~ c~ Proposal: ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~k ~ o`~~A-~~'in1 Gt~ri ~,~ ~~'1~~' ~~'~~~t- -E-f ~ ~~ ~,-, ~~~ ~a~ MiSCellaneous: ~~~~~~ ~F ,-" ~ /~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~r, ~ ~ ~~~Q ~ /,~ . ti Utility Issues: Water Availability/Capacity: 1 ~ i - ~~ C~- I,an~ ~,{, ~~r~~ Sanitary Sewer Availability/Capacity: ~, ~~ i ~~~~ ~j w~- ~ ~ ~~ ~a.~~ Impact ~FeeS: Electrical Fire Hydrant Miscellaneous: LandSCa in /Street5ca e: F /~2~ c°~r,~a~ J Sidewalks: ;'~ ~ ~ `~;~ ~ . ~~ N ~(C~t ~ ~(Q~~CI~rr1G~/) i ~/~9~~1./?~ Dumpster Location: Signs: ~~~~ _ ~~ ~~'.cc~,a~a,.~,~~~~t' C(°~ f~~/J. Screening/Buffering: Variance Requests: ~~~ ~~ /1 ~,~11,~ `~ ~ ;~ r~ T~~-~C ~ ~ ~'1,I~ Ct CCi1~:~L 1~ Il~~pO • ~u~o ~u,Pa? /n,~e~ tinC~cCe a,~ ~» /,~~ ~JLIC~" _ 1 0 q4e s~urr~ +~~~ access : ,~a `{~ ~ imaaf -~ ,~'"~ ` do ~n.e, ~,SQA ~y ,~B l~d~%~ m~-e ~r,~ /t~~ J IJc~ hkp ~-i~,l2d- ~n . hi cch ~ ~t o~ I / IAwLK L~ ~~~~ ~e~ ~ .~~,,~ S6J ~ ~~~) ,~vaf,~ G 7 ~ccNn ah ~. ~~~it~eu,.,Q ~.~n,~Cr~ - ~/~nc~ .mac %IC~CPim~a~n - ~~G~ /nu~Ca~ yo' u~, i~, ~(Y~tU-~rl~/bl ~ M p i0 ~/a~ 3 ~d ~~' ~ ~ ~~-~ irk r A ~~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ O~ ~ ~ ~~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ = ~ O ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ c~ c? ~ I ~ < ~ rn ~, • ~ O `~ ~ ~ ~^",~ ' l ~ III~~~~ o ~ ~. ~* o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o . ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ "~ 0 N CD n ~D m f ermit5 required for this development: Development Permit Building Permit Conditional Use Permit TxDOT Driveway Permit for work in State ROW TxDOT Utility Permit for work in State ROW Special Review required by: Wolf Pen Greek Design Review Board (DRB) Northgate Revitalization Committee (NRB) Parks and Recreation Board Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) City Council Project Review Committee (PRC) Information provided: Zoning Ordinance Subdivision Regulations Specifications for Street Construction Drainage Policy & Design Standards CS Building Regulations (Local Amendments to the Building Code) Fire Department Construction & Development Guide Driveway Access Location & Design Policy Water & Sewer Specification Manual CS Business Center Covenants & Restrictions Guide to Building & Development Development Resource Guide Land Use: Zoning: ~ p~0 Special zoning district information: ~ ~~ n~- ~.~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~Ll,l1 Subdivision/Platting Issues: e', ;~ !~ r T-dare Plan/Street Issues: ~2G~ ~ ~ .~~~ . Driveway Access: -~(.~ ~~ - ~~~~,~,~ ~)„~~~~"~ C~2c/1~G(,'~ t~~~~ ,~'1~~~~ ~ ~ c~ ~~ ~ ~ti1 f~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ar~and/Gt"eeM~~ayS ~ edic`~tion ~ ~~~"~"'~~~'~ ~-~ ~ ~~ ~~' 1 A Parks & Recreation Board Consideration: ~I~ Drainage Issues: ~~~1_ c~Y} ,~~1 ~~ h.~ ~ . ,~ ~' ~ ~~ w V a L d N 0 Q. L Q ~ /~O cn L.L ~1 J 1~1 ~--+ ~--~ U U (C5 a. L . .. -1-~ O C~ ~' ~ ,~ .O L 7O O 7 _~ ~~ ^ ^ L ^ , rl O ^~ ~~ ~ ~ 0 L... ~ . O ~ /f Q. ~ O -~--~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ^ ` rl ^• W .~ rl ~ L ~L ^ , W 0 ~ ^ ~,~ W A L. .. -1--+ O .~ ~ ~ ~ V -~ ~ ~ ~' ~ °~ ~ . ~ a~ a~ ~ o ~ ~ `~ ~ = ~ N ~ .- 0 .- 0 y- ~ ~ m U ~ ~ ~-+ to ~ N M d' W (n ~ ~• . . ~ ^ ^ ~ ~ ~ o - U ~ C~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ Q ~ ' . O .~' . ~ ~ U N ~ ~ > O ~ ~ p •- ~ - ~= ~ ~ U ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ > to ~ ~ • - .. C~ ~ _ ~ ~ o ~ ,~ cn 0 L Q. ~ ~ 0 ~- ~ ~ cn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , cn ~ N ~. ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ L Q 0 ~ C~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 + ~ O ~ '. ~ V (a 0 a o •- •`~ ~ ~ o U V r U ._ ~ .~ .~ U ~ C6 ~ ~- ~- _ ~ C~ ~ > ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~= ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ o ~ U .O ~ ~= ~ ~ •o N U .~ O • N ~ N ~ cn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •- '~ _ U cn . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .O ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ U ~ U 4- ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ M U c~ d- ~ NOi1N;S ~_, ,z.-oo ~. sue, o - ~,^ A ^~~°g° '~ !n i.y ~. l ~~ 1 J d {' ~.3 Nt.Y ~ 9~ ~ . e` i o'. N ~ " ~\ „ f I ~', „ ` ~ , n { ~ ~~ ~ .~ ~ ~ HAM' ~ e M', '~~ y ~`~~ a i ~ {~~ N~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ i:~ ~ ~~ , i ,.~ ~.~ Proposed Park Place EST ~,~; Nole: The pictures in this presentation are for informational purposes only and are intended to give the viewer an idea of what the proposed tower may look like. • (Left) Proposed EST as seen from Holleman Drive in front of Enclave Apartments (looking North; a South elevation) Proposed Park Place EST ~ (Left) Proposed EST as seen `~~'~~'` from vacant lot -°i~ on Park Place ~~ 'l~~ (looking South; a North elevation) ~1b10 COLLEGE STATION e~1Of1 (e) The maximum width of commercial and multi-family driveway approach for two-way operation, shown in Figure 4, shall not exceed thirty-six feet (36~ except that the City Engineer may issue permits for driveway approaches greater than thirty-six feet (36~ in width on major streets to handle special traffic conditions. The minimum width of commercial and multifamily driveway approach for two-way operation shall not be less than twenty-four feet (24~. Figure 4 COMMERCIAL AND MULTIFAMILY DRIVEWAY st~a~t iot.p.^cr P°~^~ -Curb Return RodiuS (R) gpproach Maximum of 30 .feet and Width F..linimum of 15 feel. -<a x . 3 6' urn. 2<' _ d~i~e IUM (f) The combination of two driveways for residential circular drives shall not exceed twenty-eight feet (28~. (g) The angle of driveway approach shall be approximately ninety degrees (90°) for two (2) way drives and between forty-five degrees (45°) and ninety degrees (90°) degrees for one way drives. (h) A minimum driveway throat of twenty-five feet (25~ for collector streets, forty feet (40') for minor artenals, and fifty-five feet (55~ for major arterials, as shown in Figure 5, may be required to allow for traffic entering the site to be stored on site in order to avoid a queue of traffic from the development from being out on the roadway causing delays to the through traffic stream. The driveway throat length shall be defined as the distance from the street to the first point of conflid in the driveway. (i) For the benefit of traffic safety and flow on colledor and arterial streets, access points may be required to be designed to prohibit certain types of turning movements. Driveways not meeting the spacing guidelines in Tables 1 and 2 may be designed for limited access by the addition of a median to the driveway. Examples of the types of limited access driveways recommended are shown in the APPENDIX. 3-7 Rev. 10197 r b0(1 Figure 5 D R I~EWAY THROAT LENGTH parking Street OTL (feei~ Collector 25 Minor Arterial 40 ~ Major Arterial 55 drive parking Firzf point of j confl(ct Driveway Throat length (OTL) represents distonco from street fo first point of conflict. Ttrect :J M (j) For the benefit of traffic safety and flow on collector and arterial streets, tapered or channelized deceleration lanes for vehicles turning right into high volume or intersection type driveways may be required if warranted as per the criteria set forth in the graph for warrants for right turn lanes shown in the APPENDIX. Design of right-turn deceleration lanes shall be in accordance with the AASHTO Green Book on auxiliary lanes. (i) The spacing requirements for driveways not meeting the specifications in Tables 1 and 2 may be lessened or waived if tapered or channelized deceleration lanes are used. (k) Access points on arterial and collector streets may be required to be signalized in order to provide safe and efficient traffic flow. A development may be responsible for all or part of any right-of-way, design, hardware, and construction costs of a traffic signal if it is determined that the signal is necessitated by the traffic generated from the development. The procedures for signal installation and the percent of financial participation required of the development in the installation of the signal shall be in accordance with criteria set forth in the City's Traffic Signal Policy 3-8 Rev. 1LV97 LIMITED ACCESS 30 p~.IVE~rA~S RIGHT IN , RIGHT OUT, LEFT I I~1 18' ~~n. Rndtus = SO' ~t~- , 30 I ~ I ~ ~ RIGT3T IN, RIGHT OUT , 18` r-In. Radius = 50,18'nrh(n. Rad lus = 50 ` ~ ~ n --___r--40`-1 _--- 30 RIGIiT IN, RIGHT OUT, LEFT OUT 18' c~~n . Radius = 50' non 2` - - - - ; J-L 20~ ~~n._ - 3-12 Rev. 10/97 . ~\ ADAMS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Civil/Environmental Engineers MEMORANDUM TO: City Staff FROM: Jimmy Lopez SUBJECT: Response to Staff Review Comments on H.E.B. Rezoning (00-124) DATE: January 6, 2001 Dear Staff: Adams Consulting Engineers has addressed all your comments (comments dated 12/21/00). Adams Consulting Engineers has responded by addressing each department that reviewed our plans. Electrical 1. Noted 2. Noted 3. Electric Load information will be provided to the city once MEP has had a chance to review the amount of electrical service needed to service the H.E.B. and Aggieland Print Shop. 4. A digital site plan will be emailed to Mr. Tony Michalsky once the city planning department and H.E.B. have approved the Concept plan. 5. Noted Miscellaneous 1. Noted (see Landscape Plan) 2. Noted 2445 E. Southlake Boulevard, Suite 100, Southlake, Texas 76092 Phone: (817) 329-6990 Fax: (817) 329-7671 Corporate Office: Tyler, Texas Branch Offices: Garland, Texas • San Diego, California 2445 East Southlake Boulevard, Suite 100 ^Southlake, Texas 76092 ^ Metro [817) 329-6980 ^ FAX (817) 329-7671 Corporate Office ^ Tyler, Texas Planning 1. The future Texas Avenue R.O.W. has been labeled. One parking space in front of the Aggieland Print shop was eliminated due to encroachment on future right-of-way. 2. Yes, there will be shopping cart returns. Cart returns are now shown on Concept Plan. 3. Additional landscape islands have been added in the parking rows along the streets. 4. Sidewalks have been added to provide access from the front of the store to both Park Place and Holleman. 5. The trees that were encroaching on the water tower have been relocated per Dale Schepers with the water department. (See Landscape Plan) 6. A 6' x 6' trash corral has been added at the rear of the Aggieland Print Shop. 7. The parking ratios on the Concept Plan and Landscape Plan have been updated to match. 8. Noted 9. Noted Engineering 1. Mr. Mayo per our conversation on 12/22/00, you had informed ACEI that the drainage plan did not go into enough detail for you to review but nothing more was required for this submittal. Mr. Mayo had also informed us that the detention pond needed on this development would not affect the Concept Plan because the proposed detention pond is located underground. 2. Noted 3. A copy of the legal description was included with the package that went to planning. ACEI has provided and additional legal description to be forwarded to the engineering department. If any city department has any questions or comments please feel free to give me a call. Thank you for your time. J~ y Lopez Project Manager 2445 E. Southlake Boulevard, Suite 100, South/ake, Texas 76092 Phone: (817) 329-6990 Fax: (817) 329-7671 Corporate Office: Tyler, Texas Branch Offices: Garland, Texas • San Diego, California • ~ ~] ~ ~ ~Jran,~ ortatiort ~ ineeri ~naC ~~ P '~ '~ ~ o~ /oseph D. Blaschke, D. Eng., P.E., President ~'LI1~ 1008 Woodcreek Drive, College Station, Texas 77845 979/693-5800 Fax: 979/693-5870 a-mail: tea 1®tca.net City of College Station ATTN: Mr. Lee Robinson Traffic Systems Superintendent 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 77842 December 18, 2000 RE: Traffic Impact Analysis Report Proposed H. E. Butt Grocery Company Development College Station, Texas Dear Mr. Robinson: ~-iZ~ Fes- ~ ~- I have reviewed the referenced Traffic Impact Analysis Report prepared by WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc., dated December 4, 2000. As you know, the proposed development is located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Texas Avenue and Holleman Drive in College Station. This report was prepared by John M. ("Mike") McInturffi I have known Mike for many years and have often recommended him to various clients as a competent and qualified traffic engineer. Mike is very talented and very professional. His report was well-written and the data was well- documented. I thought he did a terrific job. If I had conducted the study, I would have done it in a similar manner and made similaz assumptions. Consequently, I endorse his study and his findings. I believe that this development has the~potential to be very successful. With this success, however, comes a significant amount of additional traffic to this specific College Station location. As Mike indicated in his report, there likely will be some reduction in traffic generated by the development on the southwest corner of the same intersection (the Tazget/Hastings development) when the existing HEB Pantry Store closes. Also, there will be a certain percentage of traffic that will simply be attracted to the new development that is already traveling along Texas Avenue or Holleman Drive. Nevertheless, one cannot ignore the fact that additional vehicles will be generated by the new development and that the intersection of Texas Avenue and Holleman Drive will have to accommodate much of this additional traffic. The proposed access locations to the new development from Texas Avenue to the east and from Pazk Place to the north will not be points of congestion, as indicated in Mike's report. This is especially tnie when a median barrier is placed along Texas Avenue north of Holleman Drive in the near future. The access locations along Holleman Drive, however, will become points of congestion, especially at Driveway "A," which is located closest to Texas Avenue and directly opposite of an existing access location to the Tazget/Iiastings development. Specializing in: Traffic Engineering Roadway Design Accident Analysis Mr. Lee Robinson December 18, 2000 Page 2 As indicated in Mike's report, this "intersection" of Holleman Drive and Driveway "A" currently operates at Level-of-Service "F." After completion ofthe new HEB development, the same "intersection" will continue to operate at aLevel-of-Service "F." In other words, it is a problem now and will continue to be a problem in the future. There is no simple solution to this problem. I believe that improvements at the intersection of Texas Avenue and Holleman Drive could help alleviate some of the congestion problems at the intersection and in the vicinity of the intersection. Additional intersectional capacity can be obtained by widening Holleman Drive to provide additional through and turn lanes. Widening Texas Avenue in the vicinity of the intersection to permit dual-left-turns for northbound left-turning vehicles certainly would help to increase intersectional capacity. Also, reconstruction of the intersection to remove the Holleman Drive "jog" will allow the intersection to operate with more efficiency. Because these intersectional improvements will be long-term future projects, they likely will not be in place when the new HEB development is completed. Hence, some other traffic flow modifications may be more appropriate. I believe that some relatively minor changes to the access plan may provide some alleviation of the congestion and still provide adequate accessibility. I suggest considering the following modifications at and near the proposed intersection of Holleman Drive and Driveway "A." Continue to provide access to both developments on the north and south sides of Holleman Drive, as it exists on the south side and as it is proposed on the north side. 2. Construct a median bamer along Holleman Drive between Texas Avenue and the proposed westernmost access location to the new HEB development; however, design the barrier to permit left turns into the Target/Hastings development from westbound Holleman Drive and left turns from the development onto westbound Holleman Drive. This particular access location is the primary access location for the Target/Hastings development along Holleman Drive and denial of left turns into or out of the development would be detrimental to customers. Construction of the median barrier along Holleman Drive as indicated in Item (2) would make the Driveway "A" access location to the HEB development operate as a right-turn-in, right-turn-out access location. The new development's proposed additional access location along Holleman Drive, to be located to the west of Driveway "A," will accommodate left-turns from the new development onto eastbound Holleman Drive. 4. Construct a new traffic signal installation at the intersection of Texas Avenue with Manual Drive/Outback Steakhouse Driveway. This signal will help to disperse traffic from the Target/Hastings development and alleviate the vehicular demands at the ~~ Texas Avenue-Holleman Drive intersection. 1 ~,,,r (~'4- ,~- a ~r ca+~ ' Mr. Lee Robinson December 18, 2000 Page 3 I am sure that customers to the two developments located on the west side of Texas Avenue and adjacent to Holleman Drive will adapt to the access accommodations and find the least restrictive routes to and from these developments. However, these recommended improvements may provide some assistance in reducing delay and congestion adjacent to the two developments and at the intersection of Texas Avenue and Holleman Drive. I would suggest discussing these suggestions with Mike McInturffand the developers of the HEB project. They are much more familiar with the effects that these changes will have on their development and Mike would be able to address any concerns that these changes would have on the overall operation of traffic flow in the vicinity of the development. Please contact me if you have any questions. Respectfully submitted, ~~~~ Joseph D. Blaschke, D.Eng., P.E. President JDB/sb .~ ~ ~~~ g, *~ .~_ 7+~ ~ : ~- I•~~~~~~~~~s~~1~~te2 KPH D BIASCH~GE hoc ~~~ ~ti 00-124 BRYAN RADIO & TV SERVICE INC 4105 TANGLEWOOD BRYAN, TX 00-124 GROCE, CLIFTON A 1632-A PARK PLACE COLLEGE STATION, TX 00-124 COLLEGE STATION, CITY OF ATTN: ACCOUNTING DEPARTMENT PO BOX 9973 COLLEGE STATION, TX 00-124 GROCE,LEE 1632-B PARK PLACE COLLEGE STATION, TX 00-124 FORD, FREDERICK G 1631 PARK PL COLLEGE STATION, TX 00-124 HARRIS, ANDERSON ESTELLA HARRIS 1633 PARK PLACE COLLEGE STATION, TX 00-124 00-124 00-124 H-E-B;H E BUTT STORE PROP CO # 1 LOJON PROPERTY LLC ETAL MARTIN, KENNETH P ATTN: PROPERTY TAX DEPT U S REALTY ADVISORS LLC 1500 BROOK HOLLOW DR PO BOX 839999 1370 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS BRYAN, TX SAN ANTONIO, TX 29TH FLOOR, ATTN:DAVID M LEADY NEW YORK, NY 00-124 MELCHER. LE ROY PO BOX 27455 HOUSTON, TX 00-I24 PARK PLAZA PARTNERSHIP C/0 TED WHITHER 2508 MERRIMAC CT COLLEGE STATION, TX 00-124 MONTANA MICROGROOVE ASSOCIATES 110 LINCOLN COLLEGE STATION, TX 00-124 PRITCHARD, PETER PO BOX 3033 EDGEWOOD, NM 00-124 00-124 STIMSON, JOHN WILLIAM & CINDY W9/JP-M REAL ESTATE LIlVIITED 1801 HOLLEMAN DR PARTNERSHIP COLLEGE STATION, TX PO BOX 530292 BIRMINGHAM, AL 00-124 00-124 WASHINGTON CHAPPEL BAPTIST WATSON, WILLIE V 906 HOLIK 1707 PARK PLACE COLLEGE STATION, TX. COLLEGE STATION, TX 00-124 MOORE, IDA B ETAL 1628 PARK PLACE COLLEGE STATION, TX 00-124 RODGERS, TOMMY 103-A STERLING ST COLLEGE STATION, TX 00-124 WALKER, ELVIN & MABLE 3905 OAK BLUFF CIR BRYAN, TX FILE COPY 4 ZL7 /' i v~l/i ~~i~.. l 00-124 BRYAN RADIO & TV SERVICE INC 4105 TANGLEWOOD BRYAN, TX 00-124 GROCE, CLIFTON A 1632-A PARK PLACE COLLEGE STATION, TX ~9 %~ Z/~e ~Cc~a 00-124 00-124 COLLEGE STATION, CTI'Y OF FORD, FREDERICK G ATTN: ACCOUNTING DEPARTMENT 1631 PARK PL PO BOX 9973 COLLEGE STATION, TX COLLEGE STATION, TX 00-124 00-124 GROCE, LEE HARRIS, ANDERSON 1632-B PARK PLACE % ESTELLA HARRIS COLLEGE STATION, TX 1633 PARK PLACE COLLEGE STATION, TX 00-124 00-124 00-124 H-E-B;H E BUTT STORE PROP CO # 1 LOJON PROPERTY LLC ETAL MARTIN, KENNETH P ATTN: PROPERTY TAX DEPT U S REALTY ADVISORS LLC 1500 BROOK HOLLOW DR PO BOX 839999 1370 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS BRYAN, TX SAN ANTONIO, TX 29TH FLOOR, ATTN:DAVID M LEADY NEW YORK, NY 00-124 MELCHER, LE ROY PO BOX 27455 HOUSTON, TX 00-124 PARK PLAZA PARTNERSHII' C/O TED WHITHER 2508 MERRIMAC CT COLLEGE STATION, TX 00-124 MONTANA MICROGROOVE ASSOCIATES 110 LINCOLN COLLEGE STATION, TX 00-124 PRITCHARD, PETER PO BOX 3033 EDGEWOOD, NM 00-124 00-124 STIMSON, JOHN WILLIAM & CINDY W9/JP-M REAL ESTATE LIMITED 1801 HOLLEMAN DR PARTNERSHIP' COLLEGE STATION, TX PO BOX 530292 BIRMINGHAM, AL 00-124 00-124 WASHINGTON CHAPPEL BAPTIST WATSON, WILLIE V 906 HOLIK 1707 PARK PLACE COLLEGE STATION, TX. COLLEGE STATION, TX 00-124 MOORE, IDA B ETAL 1628 PARK PLACE COLLEGE STATION, TX 00-124 RODGERS, TOMMY 103-A STERLING ST COLLEGE STATION, TX 00-124 WALKER, ELVIN & MABLE 3905 OAK BLUFF CIR BRYAN, TX fILE COPY U `~ ~` CITY OF COLLEGE STATION ~~ DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (979)764-3570 /Fax (979)764-3496 December 14, 2000 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Re: Consideration of a REZONING request for 1900 TEXAS AVE SOUTH. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING This is to notify you that the City of College Station is considering a REZONING request for the following property: Applicant: MONTANA MICROGROOVE ASSOC Sub ect Property: 1900 TEXAS AVE S (See attached location map.) Proposed Zoning: FROM A-P ADMINISTRATIVE-PROFESSIONAL AND C-3 PLANNED COMMERCIAL AND C-1 GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO PDD-B PLANNED DEVELOPMENT-BUSINESS The Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing on Thursday, JANUARY 4, 2001 at 7:00 P.M. to consider the request. The City Council will also hold a public hearing to consider the request and the Commission's recommendation on Thursday, JANUARY 25, 2001 at 7:00 P.M. The public hearings will be held in the City Hall Council Room located at 1101 Texas Avenue South, College Station, Texas. All owners of the subject property and property owners within 200 feet of the subject property have received notification of this request. Any request for sign interpretive services for the hearing impaired must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3547 or (TDD) 1-800-735- 2989. For additional information, contact the City Planning Office, (979) 764-3570. JESSICA JIlVIMERSON Staff Planner D1~16•~01 17:53 HEE PLf1PaPIIPIG f1FID DESIGPJ ©DS ' ~ H.~at. Grocery Cof»patty, b46 Snutfi 1klain, Sint tijttnnio, TX 78204 FAX Date: 1/1610] Nu«~bcr of pHgos inclucling cover: 3 from the F,ngir~~~ring Team To: .Iim (':allaway Phone: Fax: 979-76~-3'!96 CC: REMARKS: U Urgent X Por your review ^ For your use ~ Plcasc comment Jim, I-Iere is a site plan showing the propo3cd revisions tv the arcs adjacent to El CLicu. I've attached a portion of the Concept plan submitted last week so that you can review both plans. Please call me tv discuss, I'll be in the office most of Wednesday. Thanks for your help on this. r From; Mary L. Rohrer Manager of tiite _ En~ineerinQ Phone: (210) 938-8238 NaY: (210)93$-8091 Problems in trnns»nssiorr7 Please cvntac! [hc I~E13 En~inccrittg leant ut (210} 93S-6306. FILE COPY LEGAL NOTICE DATE TO BE PUBLISHED: WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 24, 2001 ONLY BILL TO: The City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 REFERENCE ACCOUNT # 11106712 CREDIT CARD #5405-8231-9379-5783 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: The College Station City Council will hold a public hearing to consider a REZONING for 1900 TEXAS AVE SOUTH from A-P Administrative-Profession C-3 Planned Commercial, and C-1 General Commerical to PDD-B Planned Development-Business. The hearing will be held in the Council Room of the College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue at the 7:00 P.M. meeting of the Council on Thursday, FEBRUARY 8, 2001. Any request for sign interpretive services for the hearing impaired must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3547 or (TDD) 1-800-735-2989. For additional information, please contact me at (979) 764-3570. JESSICA JIMNiERSON Staff Planner ~'~ Z ~ ~a~ CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (979)764-3570 /Fax (979)764-3496 December 27, 2000 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Re: Consideration of a REZONING request for 1900 TEXAS AVE SOUTH. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING This is to notify you that the City of College Station is considering a REZONING request for the following property: Applicant: MONTANA MICROGROOVE ASSOC Subject Pronertv: 1900 TEXAS AVE S (See attached location map.) Proposed Zoning_ FROM A-P ADMINISTRATIVE-PROFESSIONAL AND C-3 PLANNED COMMERCIAL AND C-1 GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO PDD-B PLANNED DEVELOPMENT-BUSINES S The Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing on Thursday, JANUARY 18, 2001 at 7:00 P.M. to consider the request. The City Council will also hold a public hearing to consider the request and the Commission's recommendation on Thursday, FEBRUARY 8, 2001 at 7:00 P.M. The public hearings will be held in the City Hall Council Room located at 1101 Texas Avenue South, College Station, Texas. All owners of the subject property and property owners within 200 feet of the subject property have received notification of this request. Any request for sign interpretive services for the hearing impaired must be made 48 hours before the meeting, To make arrangements call (979) 764-3547 or (TDD) 1-800-735- 2989. For additional information, contact the City Planning Office, (979) 764-3570. JESSICA JII~~IlVIERSON Staff Planner ctl_E COPY LEGAL NOTICE DATE TO BE PUBLISHED: WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 3, 2001 ONLY BILL TO: The City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 REFERENCE ACCOUNT # 11106712 CREDIT CARD #5405-8231-9379-5783 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: The College Station Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing to consider a REZONING for 1900 TEXAS AVE SOUTH from A-P Administrative- Professional, C-3 Planned Commercial, and C-1 Gneral Commercial to PDD-B Planned Development-Business. The hearing will be held in the Council Room of the College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue at the 7:00 P.M. meeting of the Commission on Thursday, JANUARY 18, 2001. Any request for sign interpretive services for the hearing impaired must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3547 or (TDD) 1-800-735- 2989. For additional information, please contact me at (979) 764-3570. JESSICA JINIlVIERSON Staff Planner E-Mat LED '~ ~ ~r ~6-i~~ C~~A~ LEGAL NOTICE DATE TO BE PUBLISHED: WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 10, 2001 ONLY BILL TO: The City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 REFERENCE ACCOUNT # 11106712 CREDIT CARD #5405-8231-9379-5783 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: The College Station City Council will hold a public hearing to consider a REZONING for 1900 TEXAS AVE SOUTH from A-P Administrative-Profession C-3 Planned Commercial, and C-1 General Commerical to PDD-B Planned Development-Business. The hearing will be held in the Council Room of the College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue at the 7:00 P.M. meeting of the Council on Thursday, JANUARY 25, 2001. Any request for sign interpretive services for the hearing impaired must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3547 or (TDD) 1-800-735-2989. For additional information, please contact me at (979) 764-3570. JESSICA JIIVIMERSON Staff Planner CAD-~,`Z~ Pfz ~~/ LEGAL NOTICE DATE TO BE PUBLISHED: WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 20, 2000 ONLY BILL TO: The City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 REFERENCE ACCOUNT # 11106712 CREDIT CARD #5405-8231-9379-5783 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: The College Station Planning and Zoning consider a REZONING for 1900 TEXAS Professional, C-3 Planned Commercial, and Development-Business. Commission will hold a public hearing to AVE SOUTH from A-P Administrative- C-1 Gneral Commercial to PDD-B Planned The hearing will be held in the Council Room of the College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue at the 7:00 P.M. meeting of the Commission on Thursday, JANUARY 4, 2001. Any request for sign interpretive services for the hearing impaired must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make arrangements call (979) 764-3547 or (TDD) 1-800-735- 2989. For additional information, please contact me at (979) 764-3570. JESSICA JIlVIMERSON Staff Planner FACSIMILE COVER SHEET CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 South Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (979) 764-3570 Fax (979) 764-3496 DATE: ~ I ~ , ~ v ~ # PAGES INCLUDING COVER If you did not receive a complete fax, please call our office immediately for a new transmittal. ITO: COMPANY: ARTMENT: FAX: FROM: PHONE: FAX: I' REMARKS: ^ Urgent ~.~ ~QV~~P(,cJ ^ For your review ^ Reply ASAP ^ Please Comment /~i1~5 01/26/01 15:23 C^)979 764 3496 DEVELOP114ENT SVCS ~ ool `~, The Ci of `~ Cole a Station Texas \/ g Embracing the Past, Exploring the Future. P.O. Box 9960 • 1101 Texas Avenue • College Station, TX 77842 (979) 764-3500 www. ci.college-station. tx.us March 20, 2001 Charles A. Ellison 2501 Ashford Drive College Station, Texas 77840 Re: Concept plan approval for the HEB development at Texas Avenue & Holleman. Dear Mr. Ellison, This letter is to certify that the College Station City Council approved a concept plan of the proposed HEB shopping center development on February 8, 2001. The.concept plan is part of an approved rezoning request to Planned Development District-Business ~(PDD-B). The approved PDD-B district includes an HEB grocery store, multi-tenant retail building, fuel station and a three million-gallon water tank. The subject property includes 10.255 acres being all that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, said tract being all of lot 4 and a portion of lots 1 and 2, block 4, Anderson Ridge Subdivision, Phase 4, according to the plat recorded in Volume 795, Page 257 of the official records of Brazos County, Texas. Prior to issuance of a site development permit, a more detailed site plan that matches the concept plan must be submitted and approved by staff. At that time, the necessary infrastructure plans and engineering reports must also be provided that address drainage, water and sewer impacts. All applicable development-related codes and ordinances must be met prior to issuance of any site development or building permits. I've attached a copy of the approved concept plan for your use. If you need additional information or further clarification, please contact me at (409) 764-3570. Sincerely;/ ( '-_ ee C Natal e Thomas Ruiz Development Review cc: Case file #00-124 Attachment: Approved Concept Plan dated February 8, 2001 Home of Texas A&M University Traffic Counts for HEB-TARGET Parking lot ,, X Q D C U ~; D JI a~ O ~ O D r O N O~ A O O~ A O~ O A OD V r N O V W A O J ~ J N N O ~ O O O D ~ 3 ~ 3 N A U U Cn '.3_=' 00 v N O O ~-~ O~ CWJ~ v ~O A A~ O U N -r OD N N O O ° ° ° ° ~ o y o 3 ~ ~ ~ D o 3 ~I~IWIA l~°'IAlwlwlol~ININl01~1~101~.1~1~101~101--101~1~1~ ;:1Alwl`~'ICI,oloolAlOl~I,oI,oII.~IwIo~II.~II.~IOIN10101-,I-~I~I~, v -• -~ O~ 0 0 0 ;:. I ..~ ..... ......::::. I I A --- - - I I ~ I ~ ~ ~ ' ~ G Z ~1 I ~ 7C1 ZI ~ ~ ~. < I I ~.< ~I 1 .... C- C I 1 3 ml . ; ~ : 1 ..........: .: : ; : 1 I 1 I~p I N I\ =y" ~ ~ v O t ~ ~ t I ml ~I ' Z ~ , ~' °"" ~ c ~ ~ i s: ~ ml I <Q O 7 7 n n ~Q 7 0 rt m Z /~ a z n m 0 ,G = ~ T W a a ~ ~ < m m ~ '~ a ~_ Z V I r O J N ~~ ~ J p N p N ~ O ~ O D O 3 3 3 3 ~ ':; .. _.. .... ~ ,, N ': ~ W 3:? O~ N N W N CT O (T ~ A A W C CT ,- N -r N W C7o T ~O ~` A : V iy; C7D . N ~ W CT A A A ~ W ~ A A W W ~ W ~ W ~ W W N O -~ A _~ W v W .~ ,~ N . A C1D W A C T D O Cb N CT CT CT A ~O O O C? - ~ - ~ ~-.W...~,.. ~ E ":`. ~ & f~ A ~ p , ~ k'&w :; `O ': ~ ~ ~ C7o N V W ~ W W W v W A W CT W v W A W CT N (T ~ ~O ~O A N N ~ -- W e,B C ~ ; ~.%Y °:. v ~O O W CA -~ A CT A ~ v ~ O O N CT ~ CT O O O ~ ~O O:>~ $L~_~, A ~'• ' ' f I ~a j °T N '.'' V ::: CT W -~ CT (T ~O ~ ~ W P.; ~O O ~ ~ N ~ N °o ~ °o y °o 3 ~ 3 ~ D N N ~O A A ~O N A N_ V N OD ,,pp ~°~ ry ~O CT 00 A v W ~ I E s: A CT A O~ 00 ~ 4~.=.~:...f, :;:: .A ~._.b _» N W A W W W W W W W W N~ ~ b'~::i;! S''I: V O ~ v V CT ~! CT CT A ~ N ~ 00 CT ~ -~ CT CT :!r E? CT W W O A N W W A ~O W O E C7D W CT N N (T A CT O A CT ;: - ::.. `'-s ~'/i! ;:i_>>:> ---~ N N W W A W W W W W -, _. (T A v A W ao W N CT W V CT ~ N CT ~O :::::.:.... 3:i W N V CT ~ CT A ~O C)D O O ~! V W~~ CT A N A Cb A W N s r>;;:; N CT ~! ~ CT ~ J 1 I I I I I O :-' ~ A C CI ` I m I I~ ~ W y D I ~ l m o I~ . ~ O W Z ml , I~ .:::::.::: ~: 0 ~ ~ -1 ml I I £ ~ ~ I m I I I i ~ I m I Z Z ~i i ~ I 1 ~. C? ~I OI I I <I OI o ~ 0 3i i~ ~ ~: g :: I I _._. :::::::' 1 n ~Q O CQ T Z Z T `G = m W a m ~ D m Z ~ n Z O ~ O O ~ C ~ D ~ O Z p ~ ~ W D o a A O O ~ pp D ° ~ ~ ° D ~ m ~ ~ O ~ a ~ O D ~ o N ~ a ~ z ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ D ~ ~ ~ ~ ° o °o D ° D ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ N N D N Ui N .~i N N A 2 0 n Z O v m --~ m X D N D m a z v Traffic Counts for HEB-TARGET Parking Lot Count for Monday April 3, 1995 Count for Tuesday April 4, 1995 Count for Wednesday April 5, 1995 /~'~~~ ^ *Data incomplete Agenda Item # r Item sent Item Item Submitted By: ~lessica Jimmerson, Staff Planner :Council Meeting Date: :February 8t", 2001 irector Approval: Manager Approval: Item: Public hearing, discussion and possible action on a Rezoning for H.E.B. consisting of approximately 10.25 acres located on the northwest corner of Texas Avenue and Holleman Dr. from R-1, Single Family, C-1, General Commercial, C-3, Planned Commercial, and A-P, Administrative- Professional, to PDD-B, Planned Development District -Business. (00-124) ~1~t1~w--- vuu: ~~ ~orat~e- + Cx1~t , Item Summary: The applicants~'are requesting the zoning change to enable the development of a shopping center and the relocation of the City's water tower. The uses proposed for the shopping center include a grocery store, gas pumps, and retail use including the relocation of the existing printshop. The developer has chosen to submit very detailed plans for the rezoning request to enable them to address the issues and concerns raised by staff and the neighbors. At least three neighborhood meetings were held regarding this project. The concerns voiced by area residents primarily ~~ ~~ involve use of Park Place, lighting, landscaping along Park Place and landscaping of the proposed water tower. The plans submitted reflect almost all of the solutions negotiated at the meetings. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Land Use Plan (LUP) shows the subject property as Retail Regional and Institutional surrounded by Retail Regional and High Density Residential. Most of the surrounding property is existing development, with the exception of the new shopping center being built across Texas Avenue. Taking this and the condition of the existing streets (See Infrastructure and Facilities for more information.) and intersections into consideration, staff has been concerned about the traffic impacts since the onset of discussions about this project. At the request of staff, the developer hired a traffic engineer to prepare a Traffic Impact Analysis {TIA} for this site. The City contracted with atraffic-engineering consultant to evaluate the TIA. These reports confirm what staff already believed about existing problems at the intersections of Holleman and Texas Avenue and of Holleman and the first driveway into the Hastings shopping center (we will call this drive intersection A). Even without the new development, drive intersection A is rated Level of Service "F", which is the lowest possible classification. It is the view of the consultants that the new development will cause the level of service at intersection A to become marginally worse. To improve the existing situation and lessen the impact of the new development the consultant recommends a threefold solution. Long-term intersectional improvements will need to be made over time to remove the "jog" in Holleman Drive and to allow the intersection to operate more efficiently. This is not something that should be the responsibility of the developer. More immediate improvement recommendations include a signal to be located at the intersection of Texas and the Manual Drive/Outback Steakhouse driveway, and installation of a median in Holleman, to better control the access to the existing and proposed driveways. The City already has a signal planned and designed for the Manual Drive/ Outback Steakhouse intersection, which is slated for installation after the TXDOT improvements to Texas Avenue are complete. City staff, the developer and the consultants have determined that prorating the costs of the installation of the median in Holleman between the City and the developer is the solution to mitigating the affects of the new development on the existing infrastructure. A development agreement may need to be executed between the City and the Developer to finalize this agreement. Staff is recommending that a condition of the rezoning is that the median must either be constructed or the developer must have paid the City their prorated share prior to the issuance of a C/O (Certificate of Occupancy) for any structure on the property. Item Background: This property was annexed in 1956. Portions of the property are currently platted, however the property will need to be replatted for this project. Related Board Recommendations/Actions: The Planning and Zoning Commission heard this request on January 18t", 2001. They voted 4-3 in favor of recommending approval of this item. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning with conditions. First, that a median in Holleman must either be constructed or the developer must have paid the City their prorated share prior to the issuance of a C/O (Certificate of Occupancy) for any structure on the property. Second, that at the time of platting an access easement must be provided across the HEB tract for the proposed water tower. Third, that standard C-1 zoning requirements apply for anything not expressly modified by the proposal. And last, that additional lighting detail is provided prior to going before Council. Council Action Options: 1. Approval of rezoning as submitted. 2. Approval with physical conditions that will mitigate negative impacts. 3. Approval of a less intense zoning classification (only if recommended by PNZ). 4. Denial. 5. Denial without prejudice (waives 180-day waiting period). 6. Table indefinitely. 7. Defer action to a specified date. Supporting Materials: 1. Infrastructure and Facilities 2. Draft of P&Z Meeting Minutes from January 18th, 2001 3. Schematic of water tower 4. Draft of Ordinance (Exhibits C-G and color/material samples are available for view in Development Services Office) a. Exhibit A b. Exhibit B -Metes and Bounds /t c. Exhibit C -Concept Plan - ~.tiJ f d. Exhibit D -Landscape Plan e. Exhibit E - HEB elevation f. Exhibit F - Printshop elevation g. Exhibit G -Gas pump elevation STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 2 Project: H.E.B.-REZONING (0-124) PLANNING 1. Reviewed by: JESSICA JIMMERSON Date: ENGINEERING 1. Metes and Bounds -Tract 1: First call-N 40* 35' 11 "W ;Drawing( Zoning Site Plan) shows N 40* 35' 22" W. Tract 1: Third call/distance; 209.26' not 469.69'. Reviewed by: Ted Mayo Date: 01 /10/01 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. ~~ ~~ . ~ ,`\~~ ~, ~ Q ~ ~ ~, ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~`~' Q~w x ~ . ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ / Staff Review Comments ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ '~ / ~ ~~ ~ ~(,r ACC x ~ ~q~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ,~ \~~ ~' ~ ~' J Page 1 of 1 X39 ,, Uracu. - /~Gt/ ~ ~~~~ Agenda Item Cover Sheet Agenda Item # ular Item nsent Item orkshop Item (Item Submitted By: Jessica Jimmerson, Staff Planner Council Meeting Date: February 8th, 2001 Director Approval: City Manager Approval: Item: Public hearing, discussion and possible action on a rezoning of approximately 10.25 acres located on the northwest corner of Texas Avenue and Holleman Dr. from R-1, Single Family, C-1, General Commercial, C-3, Planned Commercial, and A-P, Administrative-Professional, to PDD-B, Planned Development District -Business. (00-124) Item Summary: The applicants, Montana Microgrove and the City of College Station, are requesting the zoning change to enable the development of an H.E.B., a shopping center and the relocation of the City's water tower. The uses proposed for the shopping center include a grocery store, gas pumps, and retail use including the relocation of the existing printshop. The developer has chosen to submit very detailed plans for the rezoning request to enable them to address the issues and concerns raised by staff and the neighbors. At least three neighborhood meetings were held regarding this project. The concerns voiced by area residents primarily involve traffic on Park Place, lighting, landscaping along Park Place and landscaping of the proposed water tower. The developer has incorporated many of the suggestions from the neighborhood meetings into the submitted plans. Comprehensive Plan Considerations: The Land Use Plan (LUP) shows the subject property as Retail Regional and Institutional surrounded by Retail Regional and High Density Residential. Most of the surrounding property is existing development. Taking the traffic and the condition of the existing streets (See Infrastructure and Facilities for more information.) and intersections into consideration, the developer hired a traffic engineer to prepare a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for this site. The City then contracted with atraffic- engineering consultant to evaluate the TIA. To improve the existing situation the consultant recommends a threefold solution. Long-term intersectional improvements will need to be made over time to remove the "jog" in Holleman Drive and to allow the intersection to operate more efficiently. This is not something that should be the responsibility of the developer. More immediate improvement recommendations include a signal to be located at the intersection of Texas and the Manual Drive/Outback Steakhouse driveway, and the installation of a median in Holleman, to better control the access to the existing and proposed driveways. The City already has a signal planned and designed for the Manual Drive/ Outback Steakhouse intersection, which is slated for installation after the TXDOT improvements to Texas Avenue are complete. City staff, the developer and both traffic engineers have determined that prorating the costs of the installation of the median in Holleman between the City and the developer is the best course of action. A development agreement or oversize participation will be needed to finalize this. Staff is recommending that a condition of the rezoning is that the median must either be constructed or the developer must have paid the City their prorated share prior to the issuance of a C/O (Certificate of Occupancy) for any structure on the property. Item Background: This property was annexed in 1956. Portions of the property are currently platted, however the property will need to be replatted for this project. Economic Development: In late 1999, the City was contacted by HEB Corporation expressing interest in purchasing 3.8 acres owned by the City. The acreage was comprised of two lots fronting Holleman; one lot was being utilized for a water tower and the other was vacant. Staff considered the request and determined that sale of these lots would be in the best interest of the City, both as promotion of economic development and fulfillment of a need for an alternate site to accomplish a relocation and upgrade of the existing water tower. Subsequently, the Economic Development Department, in conjunction with the City's Utility Department, requested bids for these lots. As part of the bid criteria, all bidders were required to submit an exchange property for the location of a new, 3 mgd water tower. The exchange property was required to meet several criteria defined by the Utility Department. In addition, as part of the City's economic development efforts, bid criteria included creation of a minimum number of jobs and capital investment. Bids were received on March 1, 2000 and one bid was submitted. The economic development proposal submitted by Montana Microgroove includes development of a 76,887 square foot H.E.B. Store; an exchange property for the water tower valued at $452,624.00; a cash payment of $747,376.00; a $5,000,000 capital investment guarantee; and creation of fifty new jobs in addition to jobs retained from the current HEB Pantry Store. Montana Microgroove submitted its bid contingent upon a successful rezoning. City Council awarded bid and entered into a real estate contract with Montana Microgroove on April 27, 2000. Since that time, HEB has been working with staff and the neighborhood to develop an acceptable PDD rezoning application. Utility Department-Proposed 3 million aallon elevated storage tank• An engineering study of the water distribution system, completed in 1999, determined capacity, functional requirements (through computer modeling) and considered several locations for additional elevated storage. The study concluded that constructing a new facility as near as possible to the existing elevated storage tank along Texas Avenue at Holleman Avenue provided the best functional performance with the water system at the lowest cost. The property proposed for the elevated storage tank in the HEB plan meets the requirements for size, configuration and surface elevation to accommodate a 3 million gallon tank. Related Board Recommendations/Actions: The Planning and Zoning Commission heard this request on January 18th, 2001. They voted 4-3 in favor of recommending approval of this item. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the rezoning with conditions. First, that a median in Holleman must either be constructed or the developer must have paid the City their prorated share prior to the issuance of a C/O (Certificate of Occupancy) for any structure on the property. Second, that at the time of platting an access easement must be provided across the HEB tract for the proposed water tower. And last, that standard C-1 zoning requirements apply for anything not expressly modified by the proposal. Council Action Options: 1. Approval of rezoning as submitted. 2. Approval with physical conditions that will mitigate negative impacts. 3. Denial. 4. Denial without prejudice (waives 180-day waiting period). 5. Table indefinitely. 6. Defer action to a specified date. Supporting Materials: 1. Infrastructure and Facilities 2. Draft of P&Z Meeting Minutes from January 18th, 2001 3. Schematics of water tower 4. Draft of Ordinance (Exhibits C-G and color/material samples are available for view in Development Services Office) a. Exhibit A b. Exhibit B -Metes and Bounds c. Exhibit C -Location Map d. Exhibit D -Concept Plan e. Exhibit E -Landscape Plan f. Exhibit F -HEB elevation (2 pages) g. Exhibit G - Printshop elevation h. Exhibit H -Gas pump elevation i. Exhibit I -Lighting specifications (2 pages) 12/21/00 16:16 4979 764 3496 DEVELOPIIIENT SVCS tool ~k%ka~:k:~:Y~~k~~Y%k~k~+:%k~::k~E::~:f:sY.~k%k~~kW%~~ :r.*~ ACTIVITY REPORT ~::r~ TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX N0. 5748 CONNECTION TEL 3481 CONNECTION ID CITY OF CS ADMIN START TIME 12/21 16:14 USAGE TIDIE O1' 40 PAGES 3 RESULT OK 12/21/00 15:51 C^'1979 764 3496 DEVELOPhIENT SVCS X1001 ~ :k :k ~ ~ :~ :~: ~: k ~ :}::f: %f: sk :k %k :f: g::k :F: ~: * :F :k :~: k :f: xc:x:t: ACTIVITY REPORT :t:w:t: TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX N0. 5747 CONNECTION TEL 97642781 CONNECTION ID START TIME 12/21 15:49 USAGE TIhIE O1'24 PAGES 3 RESULT OK CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (979) 764-3570 /Fax (979) 764-3496 MEMORANDUM December 21, 2000 TO: Montana Microgroove, Assoc., Via fax 696-3095 ~(~ 'Z"~g~ FROM: Bridgette George, Asst. Development Review Manager SUBJECT: H. E. B. Rezoning - Corrditlonal Use Permit Site Plan Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information by Wednesday, December 27, 10:00 a.m. to be placed on the next available Planning and Zoning Commission meeting scheduled for January 4, 2001, 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Texas Avenue. Ten (10) copies of the revised site plan; and, The attached redlines with staff comments If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 764-3570. Attachments: Staff review comments cc: Kim Foutz, Via fax 764-3481 Case file #00-124 Home of Texas A&M University f' Susan Hazlett -PDD rezoning request for H.E.B. ~ Paae 1 ~1~ ,E From: Jessica Jimmerson 1 j~ To: Jessica Jimmerson Date: 2/2/01 4:19PM Subject: PDD rezoning request for H.E.B. It came to the attention of staff, after the presentation of the H.E.B. PDD-B rezoning request to the Commission, that a mapping error had been made in regard to the existing zoning. The property currently owned by the City, from the water tower north to Park Place, is actually zoned R-1 not C-1. This property has been zoned R-1 since it was annexed because that was the holding zone used at the time. The existing water tower was built under a conditional use permit. Commercial zoning of this piece is appropriate, since retail land uses are reflected on the Land Use Plan along Texas Ave in this vicinity. After evaluating this information staff determined that our recommendation for the rezoning would not have changed. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at uimmersCd)ci.college-station.tx.us or 764-3570. Jessica Jimmerson Development Review Planner REQUEST FOR BID EXCHANGE OF LAND TEXAS AVENUE AND PARK PLACE BID #00-23 DUE DATE: Wednesday, March 1, 2000 @2:00 P.M. C.S.T. DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 1101 Texas Ave. College Station, TX 77842 (409) 764-3555 www.ci.college-station.tx.us CITY OF COLLEGE STATION INTRODUCTION SPECIFIC TERMS AND CONDITIONS PROJECT/PROPERTY DESCRIPTION CRITERIA FOR PURCHASE SELECTION PROCESS/LIMITATION QUOTATION CERTIFICATION OF BID SITE LOCATION MAP EASEMENTS FORM REAL ESTATE SALES CONTRACT FORM GENERAL WARRANTY DEED AND SPECIAL W~-IZRAN'TY DEED APPRAISAL k Page 3 3 6 7 10 10 11 Exh. A Exh. A Exh. B Exh. C Exh. D Page 2 of 15 ~. ~ .~ .r 3,`-.. ~, , ~,..~ .:: ,: ~. _~ ~ . INTRODUCTION .. "_ e Bids will be received at the City of College Station Purchasing Department, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas 77842, until Wednesday, Mazch 1, 2000 at 2:00 pm, CST, and publicly opened and read aloud at City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas. Any questions concerning the bid should be directed to Cynthia Sciulli, Buyer, Purchasing Services Division, (409) 764-3437. Clearly mark return bid envelope with Bid # and Bid Opening Date. Bids are solicited for the exchange of land located at Texas Avenue and Park Place in College Station, Texas, and consisting of two tracts of raw land totaling 3.825 acres and is further described as Lots 2 and 3, Block 4, Anderson Ridge Subdivision, Phase Four in the City of College Station, Brazos County, Texas, with the terms and conditions specified hereinbelow. .~~ ~` .. ~ s ~` ~ '... ~ SPECIFIC TERMS AND CONDITIONS,: ...~~.._f. ~~. .~ ..e, ,.. ~.... , ..., The following instructions apply to all bids and become a part of the terms and conditions of any bid submitted to the City of College Station Purchasing Services Division, unless otherwise specified elsewhere in this bid request. All Bidders are required to be informed of these Terms and Conditions and will be held responsible for having done so: Definitions In order to simplify the language throughout this bid, the following definitions shall apply: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION -Same as City. CITY COUNCIL -The elected officials of the City of College Station, Texas given the authority to exercise such powers and jurisdiction of all City business as conferred by the State Constitution and Laws. CONTRACT - An agreement between the City and a Bidder for the exchange of real property. BUYER -The successful Bidder(s) of this bid request. CITY -The government of the City of College Station, Texas. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN - A document submitted by the bidder that presents the plan for development and use of the property which shall be part of the basis for award of the bid. LETTER OF INTENT - A written statement that must be executed by the Buyer detailing the preliminary understanding of the parties as to the development plan and use of the property that shall explain and detail items which may include but not be limited to: the amount of capital investment Buyer will make to improve the property; the number of new jobs that the development will create; the time within which the development will commence and be completed; the nature of the business, etc. PROPERTY -Lots 2 and 3, Block 4, Anderson Ridge Subdivision, Phase Four in the City of College Station, Brazos County, Texas. EXCHANGE PROPERTY -The tract offered by Bidder in exchange for PROPERTY. Pagc 3 of I S Receipt of Bids Bids must be received by the Purchasing Services Division prior to the time and date specified. The mere fact that the bid was dispatched will not be considered. The bidder must insure that the bid is actually delivered. Faxed bid responses are NOT acceptable. f Prtifiratinn Bids must be completed and submitted on the form included within the specifications of this bid. Certification of Bid must be fully completed. Award of Contract The bid awazd may be based on, but not necessarily limited to, the following factors: a. Price per square foot or acre (awazd by unit of measurement); b. The value of the ExchangeProperty. The latest assessed value as reflected in the Brazos County Appraisal District records will be used as the value unless bidder submits an appraisal of the Exchange Property. Any appraisal submitted for evaluation must not be older than 6 months from the date of submittal and have been performed by an M.A.I. appraiser. The full appraisal report must be submitted with Bidder's bid. c. Special needs and requirements of the City; d. Letter of Intent and Economic Development Plan; e. Bidder's past performance record with the City; f. Cash offer in addition to the Exchange Property; g. Suitability of the Exchange Property for a water tower site and related costs for relocation. In the event that there are any discrepancies between the price per squaze foot and the total acreage price, the price per square foot will prevail. Although the amount of the bid is an essential part of the Bid, the City is not obligated to awazd a contract on the sole basis of the monetary bid. ~ Acceptance Upon acceptance and approval by the City Council, this bid is accepted and effects a working contract between the City and the successful bidder for the period designated. Reservations The City reserves the right to accept or reject in part or in whole, any bids submitted, and to waive any technicalities for the best interest of the City. The City reserves the right to reject any bid that does not fully respond to each specified item. Page 4 of 15 Communication No verbal agreement or conversation with any officer, agent or employee of the CITY and any potential bidder, either before or after the closing of the bid, shall be binding on the City or affect or modify any of the terms or obligations hereunder. Only written specifications and price quotations will be considered. Cancellation The City reserves the right to cancel this contract or any portion thereof immediately should Buyer fail to comply with terms stated in contract. Management Should there be a change in ownership of the exchange property, ownership of the company or management of the company submitting the bid, Buyer shall notify the City. The City shall not be obligated to sell or exchange the property unless City expressly consents to the assignment after notice and Assignee agrees to assume all of the terms and conditions of the bid and contract with its present provisions, conditions and prices. Payment Terms Buyer shall deposit earnest money in the amount of one percent (1 %) of the total purchase price with a title company of City's choice. Payment shall be made at closing. DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES CITY MAKES NO WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS ABOUT THE CONDITION OR ENVIRONMENTAL STATE OF THE PROPERTY. THE PROPERTY IS PLACED OUT FOR BID AND SOLD AS IS AND WITH ALL FAULTS. WITHOUT LIMITING CITY'S OBLIGATION TO DELIVER A DEED WITH SPECIAL WARRANTY OF TITLE ON THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED IN THIS CONTRACT, CITY MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTY WHATSOEVER, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPERTY. THE PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THIS PARAGRAPH SHALL SURVIVE THE CLOSING HEREUNDER AND THE DELIVERY FROM SELLER TO BUYER OF THE WARRANTY DEED. Variations Any variation from these specifications must be indicated on the Bid or on a separate attachment to the Bid. This sheet shall be labeled as such. Page S of 15 Prebid Conference A Prebid conference will be held at 10:00 a.m. on Thursday, February 17, 2000 in the City Council Chambers, City of College Station, 1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas 77840. City of College Station representative(s) will be present to discuss the plan. Bidders are encouraged to attend and participate in the conference. An on-site inspection of the property will immediately follow the pre-bid conference. --;PROJECT/PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Proiect Description As part of a strategy to promote economic development, the City of College Station has decided to consider the sale of land that it owns, situated between and having frontage on Texas Avenue and Park Place, in exchange for land suitable for the location of a water tower. The sale of this land will be subject to certain economic development criteria to ensure that economic development occurs and that the land is not used for land speculation. The City is therefore soliciting sealed Bids from companies interested in exchanging land that the bidder owns within the City and that is suitable for the location of a water tower ("hereinafter referred to as "Exchange Property") in exchange for the City's property referenced hereinbelow for the purpose of locating their business to; expanding their business currently located in College Station; or relocating their company within College Station. The Exchange Property must be suitable for the location of a water tower by city (see "Criteria for Purchase" hereinbelow). If the value of the City's land exceeds the value of the Exchange Property, Bidder may supplement its offer with cash. Similarly, if the value of the Exchange Property exceeds the value of the City's land, Bidder may specify the amount of dollars required to be paid by City. The City's property is zoned R1. If Buyer's economic development proposal requires rezoning to a different classification, then Buyer, at its sole initiative and expense, is responsible for rezoning the property. The City does not guarantee, warrant, represent or promise that any rezoning request will be granted. The offer to exchange land may be contingent ~pon rezoning to another zoning classification. However, Buyer must exercise due diligence in filing any rezoning application with the City and any rezoning request must be submitted to the City of College Station Development Services Department within 60 calendar days of bid award. Property Description The property for sale consists of two tracts of raw land totaling 3.825 acres and is described as Lots 2 and 3, Block 4, Anderson Ridge Subdivision, Phase Four in the City of College Station, Brazos County, Texas (hereinafter referred to as the "Property"). The Property has access to all city utilities (see Exhibit A). Page 6 of 15 The successful bid will be subject to the following criteria: • The Property must be used for the construction of a new business or the expansion of an existing business. • The Property will not be exchanged for property of less than fair market value which has been determined by an independent appraisal to be $1,080,000. A copy of the appraisal is attached as Exhibit D. • Buyer's Economic Development Plan must generate a minimum of 50 new jobs and a minimum capital investment of $5 million • Construction shall start within two (2) yeazs of the date of closing or the Property shall revert to the City free and cleaz of any liens or encumbrances and City shall refund the purchase price less a penalty of five percent (5%) of the bid price charged to the Buyer. • Construction shall be completed 18 months after commencement.. • The terms and conditions of Buyer's bid proposal and Economic Development Plan shall be binding on Buyer's successors-in-interest, heirs, and assigns. • Buyer must convey the Exchange Property offered to the City by general warranty deed at closing. The Exchange Property shall consist of a pazcel of raw land and must be sufficient to meet the City's needs to construct an elevated water storage tank and related improvements. All bids must include an Exchange Property. • The Exchange Property shall: 1. have access to a paved road; 2. must be within the city limits of the City of College Station; 3. be within a 1,000 foot radius of the existing water tower site (see Exhibit A); (4) be a minimum size of 225 x 225 ft rectangulaz site (more or less). If the Exchange Property is minimum size, then a 25' temporary construction easement must be provided around the entire tract to be abandoned upon the completion of construction and the placement into service of the new elevated water storage tank; (5) have a minimum site elevation of 308 feet above sea level; and (6) if the Exchange Property is not adjacent to an existing City water easement then a utility easement must be provided that is a minimum of 20 feet wide and must extend from the Property to existing City water utility easement. • The City will retain temporary utility and access easements for ingress and egress to Lot 3, Block 4, Anderson Ridge Subdivision, until such time that the existing elevated water storage Page 7 of 15 tank is dismantled and removed from the site and a replacement water tower is placed into service. Such removal shall be completed on or before twenty-five (25) months from the date of closing. • The existing elevated water storage tank and improvements located on Lots 2 and 3, Block 4, Anderson Ridge Subdivision, Phase Four, are not conveyed with the sale of the Property. • The City will convey the Property subject to the retention of the following easements on the Property: 1. A 25 foot wide public utility easement located along the western ROW of Texas Avenue beginning at the south ROW of Park Place and extending along the west ROW of Texas Avenue to the north ROW of Holleman Drive, labeled "Easement 1" on Exhibit A; 2. A 20 foot wide public utility easement located along the southern ROW of Park Place beginning at the western property line of Lot 2 of Block 4 of the Anderson Ridge Subdivision, Phase Four, and extending along the southern ROW of Pazk Place to the western ROW of Texas Avenue, labeled "Easement 2" on Exhibit A; 3. A 20 foot wide public utility easement located along the western property line of Lot 2 of Block 4 of the Anderson Ridge Subdivision, Phase Four, and extending south along the western property line of Lot 2 of Block 4 of the Anderson Ridge Subdivision, Phase Four to the northern property line of Lot 4 of Block 4 of the Anderson Ridge Subdivision, Phase Four, labeled "Easement 3" on Exhibit A; 4. A 15 foot wide public utility easement located along the western property line of Lot 4 of Block 4 of the Anderson Ridge Subdivision, Phase Four, and extending south along the western property line of Lot 4 of Block 4 of the Anderson Ridge Subdivision, Phase Four, to the northern ROW of Holleman Drive, labeled "Easement 4" on Exhibit A. , • The City agrees to abandon the following easements on the Property after a new water tower is constructed and in operation at the Exchange Property: k 1. A 20 foot wide public utility easement located along the western ROW of Texas Avenue, beginning at the southern ROW of Pazk Place and extending southeast to a point approximately 75 feet west of the western ROW of Texas Avenue along the northern property line of Lot 3 of Block 4 of the Anderson Ridge Subdivision, Phase Four, labeled "Easement 5" on Exhibit A; 2. A 20 foot wide public utility easement located along the southern ROW of Park Place, beginning approximately 150 feet west of the western ROW of Texas Avenue, and extending southeast to a point approximately 150 feet west of the western ROW of Texas Avenue along the northern property line of Lot 3 of Block 4 of the Anderson Ridge Subdivision, Phase Four, labeled "Easement 6" on Exhibit A; 3. A 10 foot wide public utility easement located along the northern property line of Lots 4 and 5 of Block 4 of the Anderson Ridge Subdivision, Phase Four, beginning at the western property line of Lot 4 of Block 4 of the Anderson Ridge Subdivision, Page 8 of 15 Phase Four, and extending eastwazd along the northern property line of Lots 4 and 5 of Block 4 of the Anderson Ridge Subdivision, Phase Four, to the eastern property line of Lot 5 of Block 4 of the Anderson Ridge Subdivision, Phase Four, labeled "Easement 7" on Exhibit A; 4. A 15 foot wide public utility easement located along the northern property line of Lots 4 and 5 of Block 4 of the Anderson Ridge Subdivision, Phase Four, beginning at the western property line of Lot 4 of Block 4 of the Anderson Ridge Subdivision, Phase Four, and extending eastwazd along the northern property line of Lots 4 and 5 of Block 4 of the Anderson Ridge Subdivision, Phase Four, to the eastern property line of Lot 5 of Block 4 of the Anderson Ridge Subdivision, Phase Four, labeled "Easement 8" on Exhibit A; 5. A 10 foot wide public utility easement located along the eastern property line of Lot 5 of Block 4 of the Anderson Ridge Subdivision, Phase Four, beginning at the northern property line of Lot 5 of Block 4 of the Anderson Ridge Subdivision, Phase Four, and extending southwazd along the eastern property line of Lot 5 of Block 4 of the Anderson Ridge Subdivision, Phase Four, to northern ROW of Holleman Drive, labeled "Easement 9" on Exhibit A; 6. A 20 foot wide public utility easement located along the eastern property line of Lot 1 of Block 4 of the Anderson Ridge Subdivision, Phase Four, beginning at the southern ROW of Pazk Place, and extending southward along the eastern property line of Lot 1 of Block 4 of the Anderson Ridge Subdivision, Phase Four, to northern ROW of Holleman Drive, labeled "Easement 10" on Exhibit A. • Electric lines on Property shall be relocated at successful bidder's expense. • Easements aze approximate locations and specific sealed metes and bounds surveys will be provided at closing and referenced in the final real estate contract. • Buyer to pay all closing costs for the Property, except Title Insurance, which will be paid by the City of College Station. Buyer must provide Title Policy on the Exchange Property for its full value. • The above criteria will be incorporated into the real estate sales contract. • The sale of the Property is contingent upon Buyer providing the Exchange Property for relocation of the water tower with mazketable title and subject to the terms and conditions in the real estate sales contract and form deed attached hereto as Exhibit B and Exhibit C. Page 9 of 15 Selection Process Bids will be evaluated on the basis of compliance to the criteria listed above, information supplied in response to the items defined herein, and highest bid amount. All respondents will be notified of the selection once the City Council has made its decision. Limitation The City of College Station reserves the right to accept or reject any or all bids as a result of this request, or to cancel, in part or in its entirety, this Request for Bids if found to be in the best interest of the City. This Request for Bids does not commit the City to award a contract, pay costs incurred for the preparation of the response documents or any subsequent costs associated with provision of additional information or presentation, or to procure or contract for services or goods. All submittals become the property of the City of College Station, and will be open to public inspection. Questions concerning this Request for Bids may be addressed to Cynthia Sciulli, Buyer, 409/764- 3437 or may be submitted in writing and delivered to the City's Purchasing Department at: City of College Station Attn: Cynthia Sciulli, Buyer P.O. Box 9960 110 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 77842 Sealed bids must be received no later than 2:00 p.m. on Wednesday, March 1, 2000 by the purchasing department at which time they will be publicly opened. Bids received after that time will be returned unopened to the sender. - k .~..e ey~_`P "ms's yam" ~ 's.' §~`~k..,ka~ ~° +~.-+3'~" ~'` d`~ ~ ^~ ~ ® ~ ..~: : ,~ Q Quantity UOM Description PricelSq.Ft. or Total Price Acre 3.825 Acres Lots 2 and 3, Block 4, Anderson Ridge Subdivision, Phase Four, an addition to the City of College $ 7.20/Sc1.Ft. $ 1 ,200,000 Station, Brazos County, Texas Specify: Acres Exchange Property Location: 1.8071 Value of Exchange Property: $ 5.75/Sq.Ft. $ 452,624 Page 10 of 15 • Bidder shall include with its returned bid a "Letter of Intent" and Economic Development Plan. The undersigned represents that no member of the College Station City Council is under contract either directly or indirectly with Bidder, Bidder's agents, contractors or subcontractors. This representation and warranty shall be in effect for the full term of this Agreement. The undersigned affirms that they are duly authorized to execute this contract, that this bid has not been prepared in collusion with any other bidder, and that the contents of this bid have not been communicated to any other bidder prior to the official opening of this bid. Furthermore, the undersigned agrees to execute the required real estate contract and form deed as attached in Exhibit B and C. The undersigned also certifies the fum's commitment to adhere to the CRITERIA FOR PURCHASE as defined in this invitation to bid. Signed By: Title: General Partner Typed Name: James H. Hughes Company Name: ~~~ Microgroove Associates Phone No.: 409-696-3095 Fax No.: 409-764-2781 Mailing Address: 110 Lincoln Ave. E-mail: ~~_ eshi ~aa~l _ oom P.O. Box or Street College Station, TX 77840 Date: 3/1 /2000 City State Zip CORPORATE SEAL IF SUBMITTED BY A CORPORATION END OF BID #00-23 Page 11 of 15 EXIIIBIT "A" Page 12 of 15 .~ ~.N~ ~ ~'5„ ~ a Ca a ~~~ °: Q °~' o~`~ ~'~ ~ o~ ~ ~' a 3 U ~~ c~ ~' 3 i ~, e 0 N 7 C O (6 E `o `c 0 a~ m E ~X O Q a m m c ~~ m _ m E c m X~ m W" vi c 0 .`~ 0 N C O .N C N s~ E ~~p7~ O V ~ ` Z ^~r. Y6/ ~~ r EXHIBIT `B" FORM REAL ESTATE SALES CONTRACT Page 13 of 15 REAL ESTATE CONTRACT STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF BRAZOS § THIS CONTRACT OF SALE AND EXCHANGE is made by and between the CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS ("Seller"), and a ("Buyer"), upon the terms and conditions set forth herein. ARTICLE I PURCHASE AND SALE Seller agrees to sell and exchange in fee simple by Special Warranty Deed a 3.825 acre tract of land known as Lots 2 and 3, Block 4, of the Anderson Ridge Subdivision, College Station, Brazos County, Texas (hereinafter referred to as the "Property"), together with all and singular the rights and appurtenances pertaining to the Property, including all right, title and interest of Seller in and to adjacent roads, streets, alleys or rights-of--way; and Buyer agrees to purchase Property and exchange more particularly described in.Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes, (hereinafter referred to as the "Exchange Property") together with all and singular the rights and appurtenances pertaining to the Exchange Properpty, including all right, title and interest of Buyer in and to adjacent roads, streets, alleys or rights-of- way, for the consideration and subject to the terms, provisions, and conditions set forth herein. Seller does not convey its interest in any improvements and fixtures situated on and attached to the Property. Buyer conveys its interest in any improvements and fixtures situated on and attached to the Exchange Property for the consideration and subject to the terms, provisions, and conditions set forth herein. This Contract between Seller and Buyer to purchase the Property and exchange the Exchange Property is subject to approval by the City Council of the City of College Station, Texas; such approval indicated by signature of Seller's representatives to this CONTRACT OF SALE AND EXCHANGE. Seller, at its expense, has ordered a survey of its Property which will show, without limitation, all adjacent property lines, record ownership of adjoining properties, encroachments, easements, rights-of--way and other encumbrances of record. They survey shall also reflect any encroachments onto or by the Property onto adjoining properties. Buyer, at its expense, has ordered a survey of its Exchange Property, which is a Class lA Condition II Land Title Survey as defined by the Texas Surveyor's Association in the Manual for Practice of Land Surveying in Texas, showing, without limitation, all adjacent property lines, record ownership of adjoining properties, encroachments, easements, rights-of--way and other encumbrances of record. The survey shall reflect any encroachments onto or by the Exchange Page 1 Contract No. 00-078 lahV:~group~legal~projecAwa~er towerlre coneract.doc 717A~0 Property onto adjoining properties. The field notes description, as prepared by the surveyor, is attached to this Contract in Exhibit "A" and shall be used in the General Warranty Deed. The parties agree that general real estate taxes on the Property and the Exchange Property for the then current yeaz, shall be prorated as of the closing date and shall be adjusted in cash at the closing. Buyer alone shall be liable for any taxes and assessments assessed and levied for prior years resulting from any change in use subsequent to the conveyance to Buyer of the Property and Seller alone shall be liable for any taxes and assessments assessed and levied for prior years resulting from any change in use subsequent to the conveyance to Seller of the Exchange Property. If the closing shall occur before the tax rate is fixed for the current year, the apportionment of taxes shall be upon the basis of the tax rate for the next preceding year applied to the latest assessed valuation. The conveyance of the Property shall be made by Special Warranty Deed from Seller to Buyer. The conveyance of the Exchange Property shall be made by General Warranty Deed from Buyer to Seller. ARTICLE II PURCHASE PRICE The parties to this contract agree that the value of the Property is . The purchase price for said Property shall be the Exchange Property plus/minus the sum of $ and other good and valuable consideration to be paid by Buyer. ARTICLE IH WARRANTIES AND REPRESENTATIONS OF BUYER 3.1 Buyer represents and warrants to Seller that the following statements aze true. In the event that any of the following representations and warranties aze not true on the date of closing, Seller, at Seller's option, shall have the right to terminate this Contract. In the event of such termination all Earnest Money shall be returned to Seller and thereafter no one will have any further obligations or liabilities under this Contract. Buyer shall certify to Seller at closing either (i) that all of such representations and warranties aze true, or (ii) indicate which are not true as of the closing date. (a) Buyer has the full right, power, and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this Contract. (b) As of the effective date, Buyer has been hereby advised in writing that Buyer should have an abstract covering the Property examined by an attorney of Buyer's own selection or that Buyer should be furnished with or obtain a policy of title insurance. Page 2 Contract No. 00-078 (ahV:~roupVexufy~rojet'Awufer fower've ~•onvact.dnc 2/7/00 (c) Buyer has no actual knowledge of any parties in possession of any portion of the Exchange Property, either as lessees, tenants at sufferance, trespassers, or other persons in possession. Additionally, Buyer has no actual knowledge of any action by adjacent landowners, or any natural or artificial conditions upon the Exchange Property, or any significant adverse fact or condition relating to the Exchange Property, which has not been disclosed in writing to Seller by Buyer, which would prevent, limit, impede or render more costly Seller's contemplated use of the Exchange Property. (d) Buyer has no actual knowledge that Buyer has not complied with all applicable laws, ordinances, regulations, statutes, rules and restrictions relating to the Exchange Property or any part thereof. (e) If Buyer obtains actual knowledge of any such matter subsequent to the date of this Contract that would make any of the representations or warranties untrue if made as of closing, Buyer shall notify Seller, and Seller shall have the election of terminating the Contract and receiving back its earnest money, in which case neither party shall have any further obligation to the other. (f) Buyer has no knowledge that the Exchange Property contains any environmental hazard, (g) Buyer is not a "foreign person" within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, Sections 1445 and 7701 (i.e., Buyer is not anon-resident alien, foreign corporation, foreign partnership, foreign trust or foreign estate as those terms aze defined in the Code and regulations promulgated thereunder). (h) To the best of Buyer's knowledge there are no unpaid charges, debts, liabilities, claims or obligations azising from any construction, occupancy, ownership, use or operatic5n of the Exchange Property, or the business operated thereon, if any, which could give rise to any mechanic's or materialmen's or other statutory lien against the Exchange Property, or any part thereof, or for which Seller will be responsible. ~ (i) Buyer agrees to fulfill the terms and conditions of the Request for Bid #00-23 and its Economic Development Plan submitted thereto. Both the Request for Bid and Economic Development Plan and incorporated hereto by reference as if set out in full herein. ARTICLE IV REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF SELLER 4,1 Seller represents and warrants to Buyer as of the effective date and as of the closing date that: (a) Seller has the full right, power, and authority to exchange and convey the PROPERTY with Seller as provided in this Contract and to carry out Seller's obligations under Page 3 Contract No. 00-078 lult~i \lrrrtr/rVr•,tnl~/rrr jt'rAr~'uler fm~cr\re tvmlrnrr drr znioo this Contract, and all requisite action necessary to authorize Seller to enter into this Contract and to carry out Seller's obligations hereunder has been or on or before closing will have been taken. (b) As of the effective date, Seller has been hereby advised in writing that Seller should have an abstract covering the Exchange Property examined by an attorney of Seller's own selection or that Seller should be furnished with or obtain a policy of title insurance. (c) Seller is not subject to any legal or administrative proceeding, debt structure or other agreement which would prevent Seller's full and timely performance of its obligations hereunder. (d) In the event the transaction contemplated by this Contract is not consummated for any reason, Seller shall promptly deliver to Buyer all reports and studies relating to the Exchange Property in the possession of its agents, consultants or employees, including, without limitation, any and all environmental reports, market studies, site plans, plats and related engineering, prospect lists, soil reports, architectural renderings, drawings and/or elevations, and third party documents, including any copies thereof made by Seller or at Seller's direction. (e) DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES SELLER MAKES NO WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS ABOUT THE CONDITION OR ENVIRONMENTAL STATE OF THE PROPERTY. THE PROPERTY IS PLACED OUT FOR BID AND SOLD AS IS AND WITH ALL FAULTS. WITHOUT LIMITING SELLER'S OBLIGATION TO DELIVER A DEED WITH GENERAL WARRANTY OF TITLE ON THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED IN THIS CONTRACT, SELLER MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTY WHATSOEVER, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPERTY. THE PROVISIdNS CONTAINED IN THIS PARAGRAPH SHALL SURVIVE THE CLOSING HEREUNDER AND THE DELIVERY FROM SELLER TO BUYER OF THE SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED. ARTICLE IV CLOSING The closings for the sale of the Property and exchange of the Exchange Property shall be take place simultaneously and shall be held at University Title Company, 1021 University Drive East, College Station, Brazos County, Texas, 77840, within forty-five (45) calendar days from the execution and tender of this Contract by Seller and Buyer, at such time and date as Seller and Buyer may agree upon the closing date". At the closing, Seller shall: 1. Deliver to Buyer a duly executed and acknowledged Special Warranty Deed conveying good and indefeasible title in fee simple to all of the Property, free and clear of any and all liens, encumbrances. Page 4 Contract No. 00-078 IrrhV:~ru«pVr/;aA/uujecAwure~ frnrer~re cn«MurLdnc 2/7/W 2. Deliver possession of the Property to Buyer. 3. Pay any and all required property taxes on the Property. 4. Pay recording fees for conveyance of Property. 5. Pay for Buyer's the title policy on the Property. 6. Pay all other closing costs related to the conveyance of the Property. Upon such performance by Seller at closing, Buyer shall: 1. Deliver to Seller a duly executed and acknowledged General Warranty Deed conveying good and indefeasible title in fee simple to all of the Exchange Property, free and clear of any and all liens, encumbrances. 2. Deliver possession of the Exchange Property to Seller. 3. Pay any and all required property taxes on the Exchange Property. 4. Pay recording fees for conveyance of the Exchange Property. 5. Pay for Seller's title policy on the Exchange Property. 6. Pay all other closing costs related to the conveyance of the Exchange Property. 7. Pay the balance of the purchase price at closing. ARTICLE V SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. The parties herein agree that part of the consideration for this contract is the Buyer's performance of its obligations contained in its Economic Development Plan as submitted by the Buyer. 2. Buyer agrees that the Property shall revert to the City of College Station if Buyer fails to commence the construction phase of its Economic Development Plan within two (2) years from the date of closing. ARTICLE VI MISCELLANEOUS Survival of Covenants: Any of the representations, warranties, covenants, and agreements of the parties, as well as any rights and benefits of the parties, pertaining to the period of time following the closing date, shall survive the closing and shall not be merged by deed or otherwise be extinguished. Page 5 Contract No. 00-078 IahV:~groupVegal~projecAwater tower've contract.doc 2~7A~0 Notice: Any notice required or permitted to be delivered by this Contract shall be deemed received when sent by United States mail, postage prepaid, certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to Seller or Buyer, as the case may be, at the addresses set forth below: Seller: City of College Station 1101 Texas Avenue Buyer: College Station, Texas 77840 Texas Law to Apply: This Contract shall be construed under and in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas, and all obligations of the parties created by this Contract are to be performed in Brazos County, Texas. Parties Bound: This Contract shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, legal representatives, successors, and assigns. The persons executing this Contract do so in their capacities as set forth below and in no other capacity whatsoever, and such persons shall have no personal liability for executing this Contract in a representative capacity. All such liability is limited to the principal for which they execute this document as a representative. Legal Construction: In case any one or more of the provisions contained in this Contract shall for any reason be held invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, ille- gality, or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision of this Contract, and this Contract shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had never been contained in the Contract. Prior Agreements Superseded: This Contract constitutes the sole and only agreement of the parties and supersedes any prior understandings or written or oral agreements between the parties respecting subject matter within. Time of Essence: Time is of the essence to this Contract. Gender: Words of any gender used in this Contract shall be held and construed to include any other gender, and words in the singular number shall be held to include the plural, and vice versa, unless the context requires otherwise. Memorandum of Contract: Upon request of either party, both parties shall promptly execute a memorandum of this agreement suitable for filing of record. Page 6 Contract No. _ 00-078 lahV:~groupVegal~proj~cnwater toweilr~ contract.doc ?l1/Y10 EXECUTED on this the Buyer: By: THE STATE OF TEXAS * COUNTY OF BRAZOS day of , 2000. By: Seller: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION Lynn McIlhaney, Mayor ATTEST: CONNIE HOOKS, City Secretary APPROVED: Thomas E. Brymer, City Manager City Attorney Charles Cryan, Director of Fiscal Services ACKNOWLEDGMENT k This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of , 2000, by Lynn McIlhaney as Mayor of the City of College Station, a Texas Municipal Corporation, on behalf of said corporation. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the STATE OF TEXAS Page 7 Contract No. 00-078 lahV:~groupVegaly~rojecAwater towcr\re corttract.doc 2/7ro0 THE STATE OF TEXAS * ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF BRAZOS This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of , 2000, by as a on its behalf. NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the STATE OF of Page 8 Contract No. 00-078 lahV:~groupVegal~mj~cAwafer tower\re cnntract_Aoc 2/1/00 EXHIBIT "C" FORM GENERAL WARRANTY DEED AND SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED k Page 14 of 15 GENERAL WARRANTY DEED DATE: GRANTOR: GRANTOR'S MAILING ADDRESS: (including county) County GRANTEE: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS GRANTEE'S MAILING ADDRESS: 1101 Texas Avenue (including County) Brazos County College Station, Texas 77840 CONSIDERATION: Ten Dollazs ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration. PROPERTY: [Legal Description of Exchange Property] RESERVATIONS FROM AND EXCEPTIONS TO CONVEYANCE AND WARRANTY: This conveyance is made subject to all valid and subsisting easements, restric- tions, rights-of--way, conditions, exceptions, reservations, covenants, oil and gas leases, mineral severances, and other instruments of whatsoever nature of record, if any; zoning laws and other restrictions, regulations, ordinances and statutes of municipal or other governmental authorities applicable to and enforceable against the described premises; rights of adjoining owners in any driveways, walkways, walls and fences situated on a common boundary; any discrepancies, conflicts, or shortages in azea or boundary lines; any encroachments or overlapping improvements; taxes for 2000 from the date of closing which Grantee assumes. GRANTOR, for the consideration and subject to the reservations from and exceptions to conveyance and warranty, grants, sells, and conveys to GRANTEE the property, together with all and singular the rights and appurtenances thereto in any wise belonging, to have and hold it to GRANTEE, GRANTEE'S successors or assigns forever. GRANTOR binds GRANTOR and GRANTOR's heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns to warrant and forever defend all and singulaz the property to GRANTEE and GRANTEE'S successors and assigns against every person whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim the same or any part thereof, except as to the reservations from and exceptions to conveyance and warranty. lah~i ~~graup~legal~project~water towe~'~genwd from buyer.duc 2/7/t~0 [GRANTOR] By: Printed Name: Title: STATE OF TEXAS ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF BRAZOS Before me, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared of a known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed, on behalf of said corporation. Given under my hand and seal of office on this the of , 2000. Notary Public in and for the State of Texas k - 2- lah4':~;rou~Vcgaly~rojec(~water towcr~genwd jrom buyer.doc 2/7/l70 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED DATE: GRANTOR: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS, a Texas Home Rule Municipal Corporation GRANTOR'S MAILING ADDRESS: 1101 Texas Avenue (including county) Brazos County College Station, Texas 77840 GRANTEE: GRANTEE'S MAILING ADDRESS: (including county) County CONSIDERATION: Ten Dollazs ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration. PROPERTY: Being all that certain 3.825 acre tract or pazcel of land lying being situated in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, and being further described as Lots 2 and 3, Block 4, Anderson Ridge Subdivision, Phase TV, according to the plat recorded in Volume ,Page ,Official Records of Brazos County, Texas. RESERVATIONS FROM AND EXCEPTIONS TO CONVEYANCE AND WARRANTY: Easements, rights-of--way, and prescriptive rights, whether of record or not; all presently recorded restrictions, reservations, covenants, conditions, oil and gas leases, mineral severances, and other instruments, other than liens and conveyances, that affect the property; any discrepancies, conflicts, or shortages in azea or boundary lines; any encroachments or overlapping of improvements; taxes for the current year 2000, the payment of which GRANTEE assumes; and subsequent assessments for that and prior yeazs due to change in land usage, ownership, or both, the payment of which GRANTEE assumes. GRANTOR, for the consideration and subject to the reservations from and exceptions to conveyance and warranty, GRANTS, SELLS, and CONVEYS to GRANTEE together with all and singulaz the rights and appurtenances thereto in any wise belonging, to have and hold it to GRANTEE, GRANTEE's successors and assigns forever provided, however, in the event GRANTEE fails to commence the construction phase of GRANTEE'S Economic Development plan on the Property within two (2) yeazs from the date of this document, fee simple title to lah~n:\groupVega(y~rojecAwater towcr~genwd from ciry.doc 117/00 Property shall revert to the GRANTOR free and clear of any liens and/or encumbrances and such reversion shall be automatic. GRANTOR binds GRANTOR, and GRANTOR'S successors and assigns, to warrant and forever defend all and singular the property to GRANTEE and GRANTEE's successors and assigns against every person whomsoever lawfully claiming or to claim the same or any part thereof, except as to the reservations from and exceptions to conveyance and warranty and subject to the following disclaimer: GRANTOR MAKES NO WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIONS ABOUT THE CONDITION OR ENVIRONMENTAL STATE OF THE PROPERTY. THE PROPERTY IS SOLD AS IS AND WITH ALL FAULTS. EXCEPT FOR GRANTOR'S OBLIGATION TO DELIVER A DEED WITH GENERAL WARRANTY OF TITLE, GRANTOR MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTY WHATSOEVER, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPERTY. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS ATTEST: By: Lynn McIlhaney, Mayor CONNIE HOOKS, City Secretary STATE OF TEXAS § § ACKNOWLEDGMENT COUNTY OF BRAZOS § k Before me, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared LYNN McII.HANEY, Mayor of the City of College Station, a Texas Home Rule Municipal Corporation, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that she executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed, on behalf of said corporation. Given under my hand and seal of office on this the of , 2000. Notary Public in and for the State of Texas -2- Iah~n:~nroupVegaly~rajecnwarer urwer\genwd jrom ciry.doc 2/7/00 EXHIBIT "D" APPRAISAL OF PROPERTY Page I S of 15 _~ ~~ ~~ ,~ ~~ ~~ JOHN M. HAMILTON, MAI JOHN M. HAMILTON INCORPORATED MICHAEL J, PEENING, SRA REAL ESTATE APPR.4/SERS AND CONSULTANTS December 10, 1999 City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 ATTN: Ms. Kim Foutz, Economic Development Reference: 3.047 acres being Lot 2 and 0.778 acres being Lot 3, Block 4, Anderson Ridge Subdivision, Phase Four, City of College Station, Brazos County, Texas. Dear Ms. Foutz: As requested, we have inspected and appraised the above referenced property as of December 9, 1999. We have provided a current market value estimate of the subject property. As of December 9, 1999, it is our opinion that the market value of the subject property is as follows: ONE MILLION EIGHTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($1,080,000.00) "Market Value" is defined as the most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: a. Buyer and seller are typically motivated; b. Both parties are well-informed orwell-advised, and acting in what they consider their own best interests; c. A reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; d. Payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and e, The price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. 3131 ORIARCREST DRIVE, SU(7E 111 14091 2680200 ~ FAX (409) 731-8809 BRYAN, TX 77802 ~~ ~~ ~~ ,~~~ ~~ City of College Station December 10, 1999 SCOPE OF THE APPRAISAL Page 2 At the request of the client, this report has been prepared in a summary format. This report is prepared in accordance with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice under the Departure Provision and Standard 2 as revised and accepted on March 22, 1994. Based on the revised standards, this report falls under the category of a summarized complete appraisal report. As a summarized report, vital information for forming a valid and accurate opinion of value has not been presented herein, but has been retained in the files of John M. Hamilton, Inc.. As such, this report may not be fully understood by third parties without of review of the file material. PURPOSE OF THE APPRAISAL The purpose of this appraisal is to estimate the market value of the legally described property in fee simple interest as of December 9, 1999. INTENDED USE OF THE REPORT This appraisal report was requested by Ms. Kim Foutz to assist the City of College Station in determining the current market value of the legally described property. DATE OF THE VALUE ESTIMATE The effective date of this appraisal is December 9, 1999, and the date of the report is December 10, 1999. SALES HISTORY According to the information available to our office, the subject property has not sold within the past three years. DISCUSSION OF THE APPRAISAL PROCESS To arrive at an estimate of current market value for a property, the appraiser must determine the typical purchaser who would be interested in that particular type of property. Market value, as defined earlier, is the most probable price in terms of money which a property should bring in a competitive and open market for a reasonable time, and this price depends upon the typical purchaser's reaction to the various supply and demand factors which affect the property being appraised. Of significant importance are properties which are in competition with the subject. ~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~ City of College Station December 10, 1999 Page 3 All of this information must be derived from the market. The appraisal process is basically an economic analysis and consists of an orderly program by which the problem is defined. Data is acquired, classified, analyzed, and interpreted into an estimate of market value for the subject being appraised. This process is accomplished in three approaches of the Appraisal Process. These approaches include the Cost, Income, and Sales Comparison Approach. Regardless of the approach utilized, the data under consideration is taken from the market in one form or another. One or more of these approaches may not be applicable in all assignments or may have reduced significance because of the nature of the property, the decision, or the available data. In the event that more than one approach is utilized, the value estimates arrived at from the different approaches are correlated into a single value estimate considered most appropriate for the subject property. The following is a brief discussion of each approach and its application. The Sales Comparison Approach is a method of estimating market value in which a subject property is compared with comparable properties that have recently sold. This process relies heavily upon the principle of substitution. Preferably, all properties utilized as comparable are in the same geographic area. One premise of the Market Data Approach is that the market will determine a price for the subject property in the same manner that it determines the prices of comparable, competitive properties. The sales are compared to the subject and adjustments for differences in location, time, terms of sale, or physical characteristics can be made using the subject as the standard of comparison. Most types of properties which are bought and sold can be analyzed using "common denominators" such as sale price per unit of size. Estimating the degree of comparability between two properties involves judgment about their similarity. Elements of comparison utilized in this judgment are (1) financing terms, (2) conditions of sale, (3) market conditions or time, (4) location, (5) physical characteristics, and (6) income characteristics, if any. Adjustments are made to the price of each comparable, as appropriate. The major strengths of this approach include the reflection of actual market transactions and the fact~that the normal "common denominators" tend to be fairly easily determined. The potential weaknesses of this approach arise from the fact that the data is historical and "ideal" comparables are usually very difficult to find. The Cost Approach yields a value indication for a property by adding the land value to an estimate of the depreciated reproduction cost of the improvements. This approach recognizes that physical, functional, and external disadvantages will be recognized by the market and which may result in lower selling prices. The Cost Approach provides specific measures for these disadvantages, and anything that diminishes value is termed accrued depreciation. The land value is based upon a vacant site being utilized to its highest and best use. Generally speaking, the site value is estimated via the Sales Comparison Approach. _~~~a^ ~~ ~~ ^^ City of College Station December 10, 1999 Page 4 Replacement cost or reproduction cost new, is derived from reliable cost manuals and/or from interviews with reputable local contractors. Depreciation can be observed from rent loss or based upon an estimated cost-to-cure. In all cases, information concerning depreciation is developed from the market by observing comparable properties. The Income Approach to value is applicable to income producing property and is practical in the appraisal of properties for which a rental market or a rental value can be identified. The Income Approach is an appraisal technique in which an appraiser derives a value indication for income producing property by converting anticipated benefits into property value. This process is accomplished by either capitalizing a single year's income expectancy or an annual average of several years' income expectancies at amarket-derived capitalization rate or by discounting the annual cash flows for the holding period and the reversion at a specified yield rate. Capitalization is the conversion of earnings into an indication of value and involves multiplying the annual net income by a factor or dividing it by a rate which weighs such considerations as risk, time, return on investment, and return of investment. The appropriateness of this rate or factor is critical, and there are a number of techniques by which it may be developed. The net income attributable to the subject property is estimated by subtracting vacancy and collection loss, and expenses from the property's annual potential gross income. These figures are derived from the market comparison of properties similar to the subject. The reliability of the Income Approach is based upon a number of considerations which include the reliability of the estimate of income and expenses, the duration of the net annual income, the capitalization rate or factor used, and the method of capitalization used. The weakness of this approach lies in the estimation of income and expenses and the fact that not all properties are suitable for this approach. The strength of this approach is that it reflects typical investor considerations in purchasing and analyzing income producing properties. The subject property involves a 166,626 square foot vacant tract of land. The Sales Comparison Approach to value is considered to be the most reliable method of estimating values for tracts of the subject's type, therefore, it is the approach which was utilized in our analysis. As indicated, the Cost Approach would involve improvements, as the subject is vacant, then it is our opinion that the Cost Approach is not pertinent or appropriate, and therefore, was not utilized. Also, as mentioned previously, the Income Approach is predicated on the property generating income. As the subject is unimproved, it is our opinion this approach is not applicable when estimating the value of a property of the subject's type. Therefore, it was also not utilized in this analysis. ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ City of College Station December 10, 1999 Page 5 CONTINGENT AND LIMITING CONDITIONS This appraisal is subject to the following limiting conditions. The legal description furnished is assumed to be correct. We assume no responsibility for matters legal in character, nor do we render any opinion as to the title, which is assumed to be good. Any existing liens and encumbrances have been disregarded and the property appraised as though free and clear under responsible ownership and competent management. We have made no survey and assume no responsibility in connection with such matters. We believe to be reliable the information identified in this report as being furnished by others, but we assume no responsibility for its accuracy. The construction and condition of the improvements mentioned in the body of this report are based on observation, and no engineering study has been made which would discover any latent defects. No certification as to any of the physical aspects could be given unless a proper engineering study were made. Unless otherwise stated in this report, the existence of hazardous substances, including without limitation asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls, petroleum leakage, or agricultural chemicals, which may or may not be present on the property, or other environmental conditions, were not called to the attention of nor did the appraiser become aware of such during the appraiser's inspection. The appraiser has no knowledge of the existence of such materials on or in the property unless otherwise stated. The appraiser, however, is not qualified to test such substances or conditions. If the present of such substances, such as asbestos, urea formaldehyde foam insulation, or other hazardous substances or environmental conditions, may affect the value of the property, the value estimated is predicated on the assumption that there is no such condition on or in the property or in such proximity thereto that it would cause a loss in value. No responsibility is assumed for any such conditions, nor for any expertise or engineering knowledge required to discover them. The distribution of the total valuation between land and improvements in this report applies only under the existing program of utilization. The separate valuations for land and improvements must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal, and are invalid if so used. We are not required to give testimony or attendance in court by reason of this appraisal with reference to the property in question unless arrangements have been made previously therefore. Possession of this report or a copy thereof does not carry with it the right of publication. It may not be used for any purpose by anyone other than the addressee without the previous written consent of the appraiser. ~~~~~ ~~~~~~ City of College Station December 10, 1999 Page 6 Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report shall be conveyed to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other media without the written consent and approval of the author, particularly as to valuation conclusions, the identity of the appraiser or firm with which he is connected, or any reference to the Appraisal Institute or the MAI or SRA designations. NEIGHBORHOOD ANALYSIS BOUNDARIES North: University Drive South: The conjunction of Texas Avenue and the State Highway 6 East Bypass East: The State Highway 6 East Bypass West: Wellborn Road (F.M.2154) LOCATION: Southeast sector of the City of College Station MAJOR THOROUGHFARES: ACCESSIBILITY: DISTANCE FROM CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT: Texas Avenue, State Highway 6 East Bypass, Wellborn Road (F.M. 2154), Holleman Drive, Southwest Parkway, University Drive (F.M. 60), and Harvey Road (State Highway 30) The neighborhood is provided with good accessibility via the various roadways which either traverse or form the boundaries for the area. The City of College Station does not have a centralized business district. However, the majority of the commercial developments in the area are situated on the city's major roadways. The largest commercial development within the city is Post Oak Mall which is situated on the southwesterly corner of Harvey Road and State Highway 6 East Bypass. ~~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ City of College Station December 10, 1999 Page 7 PREDOMINANT TYPES OF DEVELOPMENT: The subject neighborhood is comprised primarily of single family residences. However, the area's supportive commercial uses are located along major thoroughfares. Additionally, portions of the area include multi-family projects. CONFORMITY: The subject neighborhood appears to conform with a typical, older established portion of the City of College Station. SCHOOLS: The neighborhood is situated within the College Station Independent School District which provides educational facilities for kindergarten through twelfth grade. Additionally, the fact that the A&M University's main campus is situated just northwest of the neighborhood across Texas Avenue is considered to enhance the marketability of the properties within this area. ZONING/RESTRICTIONS: The subject property is situated within the City of College Station which enforces zoning regulations upon properties within its boundaries. RELATIONSHIP TO GROWTH PATTERN OF CITY: The area is experiencing new development along Harvey Road between Texas Avenue and the bypass. NEW DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE AREA: A shopping center was recently completed on a site which wraps the northeasterly corner of Texas Avenue and Lincoln Avenue, and two new sit- down type restaurants and adrive-in restaurant were recently opened on the southerly line of Harvey Road at Stallings Drive. ~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~ City of College Station December 10, 1999 Page 8 NEW DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE AREA: (Cont'd) A Quality Inn Motel was recently completed on the southerly line of University Drive, west of Lincoln Avenue. A suite motel recently was completed on the southeasterly corner of University Drive and Lincoln Avenue, a computer company opened a new facility on the southerly line of University Drive, east of Lincoln Avenue. A parcel containing ±17 acres immediately across Texas Avenue from the subject property is in the process of being assembled. A proposed shopping center is planned for the site. It will have frontage on Texas Avenue and Holleman Drive. CONCLUSIONS: The subject neighborhood is an established area which has received favorable market acceptance in the past. The neighborhood has good accessibility to the educational, employment, shopping and medical facilities within the area. Additionally, its very close proximity to the A&M University's main campus is considered to enhance its overall marketability. Therefore, it is our opinion that the subject neighborhood can be anticipated to receive favorable market acceptance into the foreseeable future. SITE DATA LEGAL'-DESCRIPTION: The subject is legally described as 3.047 acres being Lot 2 and 0.778 acres being Lot 3, Block 4, Anderson Ridge Subdivision, Phase Four, City of College Station, Brazos County, Texas LOCATION: The subject is located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Texas Avenue and Park Place Drive. LAND AREA: 3.047 acres in Lot 2 (132,743 sq.ft.) 0.778 acres in Lot 3 (33,883 sq.ft.) 3.825 acres total (166,626 sq.ft.) SHAPE: Semi-Rectangular ~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ City of College Station December 10, 1999 Page 9 TOPOGRAPHY: Gently sloping from the southeast to the northwest DRAINAGE: Appears adequate STREETS TYPE: Texas Avenue -Four-lane, asphalt-paved road with center turn lane, street lights, and concrete curbs and gutters Park Place -Two-lane, asphalt-paved road with concrete curbs and gutters FRONTAGE: LOT 2 1350 feet on the south line of Park Place Drive 1205 feet on the west line of Texas Avenue LOT 3 1133 feet on the west line of Texas Avenue UTILITIES: All public utilities available on site EASEMENTS: Assumed to be typical utility easements, for the purpose of this report. ZONING: Currently R-1 single family residential. For the purpose of this report, it is assumed to be zoned C-1, General Commercial RESTRICTIONS: No adverse restrictions noted ,~ FLOOD PLAIN: None -According to the National Flood Insurance ~. , Program's Flood Insurance Rate Maps Community Panel 48041 C0144 C dated July 2, 1992 SOIL & SUBSOIL CONDITIONS: CURRENT USE: Appear to be typical of the area and provide an adequate foundation for construction as is evidenced by the neighborhoods existing improvements. However, we have not been furnished with any soil or subsoil maps/ studies, nor is the responsibility for such accepted. The site is utilized by the City of College Station Utilities Department for water storage. ~~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ City of College Station December 10, 1999 Page 10 IMPROVEMENTS: Lot 3 is improved with a water tower surrounded by a six-foot high chain link fence. Lot 2 is vacant. For the purpose of this report, the tracts are effectively vacant TAXES: For 1999, Lots 2 and 3 are valued by the Brazos County Appraisal District at $518,490.00. Based on the 1999 combined tax rate for the City of College Station, the College Station Independent School District, and Brazos County of $2.5967 per every $100.00 of valuation, the subject tracts' indicated 1999 taxes are $13,463.00. The subject tracts are currently tax-exempt due to being owned by the City of College Station. ADJACENT LOTS/IMPROVEMENTS North: Retail and restaurant developments South: Retail development East: Office building West: Vacant land INGRESS AND EGRESS: Lot 2 has a curb cut on the south line of Park Place Drive. Lot 3 is accessed by traversing Lot 2. The Planning and Zoning Department at the City of College Station stated that if the property were sold and was to be improved that two curb cuts would be allowed on Park Place Drive and one right turn only curb cut would be allowed on Texas Avenue. ANALYSIS/CONCLUSIONS: The site is located on the west line of Texas Avenue between Harvey Road and Holleman Road in a prime commercial area. The physical characteristics of the site are typical for the area and are not felt to inhibit the development potential of the site. The site's location and physical characteristics are considered conducive to development under current economic conditions. ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ City of College Station December 10, 1999 HIGHEST AND BEST USE Page 11 According to the Appraisal Institute in The Appraisal of Real Estate (11th Edition), highest and best use may be defined as, "The reasonably probable and legal use of vacant land or improved property, which is physically possible, appropriately supported, financially feasible, and that results in the highest value." The crucial elements of this definition suggest that the highest and best use must be, "(1) physically possible, (2) legally permissible, (3) financially feasible, and (4) maximally productive. The four criteria are applied in sequential order. Potential uses are narrowed through the consideration of each criteria, so that by the time the last criteria is applied, only a single use is indicated. A property often will have numerous uses which are physically possible; a lesser number which are both physically possible and legally permissible; fewer still which are physically possible, legally permissible and financially feasible; and only a single use which meets all four criteria. There are a number of tests for the highest and best use of a given tract of land. The use must be a legal development. The highest and best use which is proposed for the subject property cannot be a use which is prohibited by law, deed restriction, or zoning ordinance. Another test is that the proposed highest and best use must be one which is physically possible on the site. If a site's configuration, shape, or topography would not permit the feasible utilization of the property for the anticipated use, it cannot be a highest and best use for that site. The third test for the highest and best use is that the use must be reasonably probable in that the typical purchaser would visualize the site being utilized for that purpose. The fourth and last test for the highest and best use is that it must be economically feasible. This test, though focused primarily on the income producing properties, applies to all properties to the degree that the use must be a profitable one by income or amenities. The subject consists of a 3.047 acre lot and a 0.778 acre lot. These parcels adjoin and are located. at the southwest corner of the intersection of Texas Avenue and Park Place Drive. Texas Avenue is the primary north/south interior thoroughfare through the Cities of College Station and Bryan. Thus, the site has average to good accessibility to all points of the neighforhood, as well as to and from all parts of the City of College Station and connecting loops to the City of Bryan. Highest and Best Use Physically Possible: The subject is semi-rectangular in shape. The configuration of the tract is considered to be such that it would not limit its overall utility or substantially restrict the type of development which could be physically possible for the site. The subject tract has all public utilities available at the site. According to the F.I.A. flood maps which have been provided to this office, the subject tract is not situated within an identified flood hazard area. Under the scenario where both tracts are sold as a single parcel and the utility easements are abandoned, there are no known easements or restrictions which are considered to be detrimental to the marketability of the subject tract. The physical characteristics of the site do not impose substantial limits upon potential uses, but neighborhood trends suggest some type of ~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ City of College Station December 10, 1999 Page 12 commercial development to be the most likely potential use for the site. Improvements which might be constructed upon the site are physically limited only by the size of the site and the easements. Legally Possible: The subject tract is located in the City of College Station, within Brazos County. The City of College Station, enforces zoning regulations upon properties within its boundaries and, as such, has zoned the subject tract R-1 for single family residential district. This zoning is designed for detached single family residential development. The subject is owned by the City of College Station and was not rezoned to commercial as was done with the majority of the land along Texas Avenue over the past several years. City officials stated that if the city were to sell the subject it would be rezoned C-1 for general commercial district. This zoning classification is primarily intended to be used for general commercial uses that serve the entire community. This is the broadest based zoning district in the City of College Station. As this zoning classification would be in effect when the property sold, the subject is considered to effectively be zoned general commercial and has been evaluated as such. Financially Feasible: Financial feasibility of the reasonably probable physically possible and legally permissible uses is now considered. Since, market and economic conditions determine the success and feasibility of virtually all types of developments, consideration is given to supply and demand levels for all physically and legally possible developments. The retail/commercial market has been strong along the Texas Avenue Corridor. A parcel immediately across Texas Avenue from the subject is being assembled to combine tracts containing t17 acres to be called Wolf Pen Plaza. It is proposed to be developed with amulti-tenant shopping center. THe highest and best use of the subject property is speculative, with the likelihood of retail development in the near future. Maximally Productive: Consideration of the physically possible, legally permissible, and financially feasible uses indicates that the maximally productive use of the site, as though vacant; is to hold for future development once the market nears a point of equilibrium where demand can support new development and construction. Based on the current market and the surrounding properties, the most reasonably probable uses for the subject are felt to be high intensity commercial uses such as a restaurant or retail development After considering the various physical attributes of the subject tract, as well as the current economic conditions within the subject area, it is our opinion that the highest and best use is for speculative investment, with a most probable future use for commercial development. ~~ ~~ ~~ ,~~~ ~~ City of College Station December 10, 1999 Sales Comparison Approach to Value Page 13 In estimating the current market value of the subject property, the Sales Comparison Approach to value was utilized. In this approach, the deed records were searched for sales involving properties considered comparable to the subject site and indicative of market trends for such properties. These sales were compared directly to the subject property, so as to estimate from this comparison, its indicated current market value. It should be noted at this point that the market data included herein does not represent a complete inventory of real estate activity in the area, but are those properties which are considered to be most similar to the subject. In the valuing of properties with the Sales Comparison Approach there are several units of comparison that may be utilized. The most commonly used method in valuing commercial land is on a price per square foot basis. Therefore, this was the method utilized in our analysis. It was necessary to expand our market research to include sales of as similarly as possible tracts that have occurred. Nevertheless, the data utilized in this analysis is considered to be the best available and to be indicative of current market trends for properties of the subject's type. A detailed description of the sales utilized can be reviewed in the Addenda of this report. MARKET DATE OF SIZE/ PRICE/ DATA SALE LOCATION ACRES/SF SQ.FT., Subject N/A Southwest corner of intersection 3.825 acres N/A of Texas Avenue 8~ Park Place (166,626 sq.ft.) Drive, College Station, Texas One Jan. 1999 Southeasterly line of Harvey Rd. at 3.427 acres $5.69 Stallings, College Station, Texas (149,280 sq.ft.) Two Nov. 1997 Southeasterly corner of University 2.498 acres $5.28 Dr. and Lincoln Ave., College (108,813 sq.ft.) Station, Texas Three Nov. 1997 Southerly line of University Dr., 1.744 acres $5.27 just east of Lincoln Ave., College (75,969 sq.ft.) Station, Texas Four March 1997 South line of University Dr., west 2.83 acres $6.00 of Lincoln Ave., College Station, (123,275 sq.ft.) Texas Five May 1996 Southerly line of Harvey Rd., at 4.339 acres $5.03 George Bush Dr. E., College (189,007 sq.ft.) Station Texas ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ City of College Station December 10, 1999 Page 14 As is noted above, the sales ranged in size from 1.744 acres to 4.339 acres and the sales prices per square foot ranged from $5.03 per square foot to $6.00 per square foot. The data utilized in this analysis is considered to be the best available and to be indicative of current market trends for properties of the subject's type. Since no two properties are ever exactly alike, dissimilarities do exist, and the extent to which they affect sale price must be analyzed and allowances for these differences made. Components that affect the sale price of vacant land are numerous, but the most prominent are highest and best use, property rights conveyed, financing, date of sales, market conditions, size, location and physical characteristics. Each of the sales were adjusted upward for time, due to the appreciation of properties in the area, With the exception of Market Data Number Two, each of the sales were inferior tracts. This indicated another upward adjustment. Each of the comparables was carefully analyzed and adjusted appropriately as required. After analyzing the available data giving consideration to the subject property's physical and locational characteristics, as well as the current market trends in the area for properties of this type, it is our opinion that the indicated market value for the subject site, is $6.50 per square foot or $1,080,000.00 which is calculated as follows: 3.825 acres 166,626 square feet @ $6.50 per square foot = $1,083,069.00 SAY: $1,080,000.00 CERTIFICATION The undersigned does hereby certify that, except as otherwise noted in this appraisal report: We have no present or contemplated future interest in the real estate that is the subject of this appraisal report. We have no personal interest or bias with respect to the subject matter of this appraisal report or the parties involved. To the best of our knowledge and belief, the statements of fact contained in this appraisal report upon which the analysis, opinions, and conclusions expressed herein are based, are true and correct. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are our personal, unbiased professional ~Jo--2~f HEB COLLEGE STATION ~ ~ ~ ~- TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared For H. E. Butt Grocery Company December 2000 WHM HEB COLLEGE STATION TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared For H. E. Butt Grocery Company Prepared by WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. 2717 Rio Grande Street Austin, Texas 78705 Phone: 512-473-8343 Fax: 512-473-8237 December 4, 2000 ~. L 1 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures .............................................................................................................................. . iii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................ .. v Synopsis ........................................................................................................................................ ..1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. .. S Site and Access Characteristics .................................................................................................. .. 8 Existing Thoroughfare System .................................................................................................. .. 8 Future Roadway Improvements ............................................................................................... .. 9 Traffic Analysis ............................................................................................................................ 14 Signalized Intersection Level of Service ..................................................................... 14 Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service ................................................................15 2000 Existing Conditions ...........................................................................................................17 Signalized Intersection .................................................................................................17 Unsignalized Intersections ...........................................................................................18 2003 Forecasted Conditions with Site Generated Traffic ...................................................... 28 Site Generated Traffic ................................................................................................... 28 Directional Distribution ................................................................................................ 29 Analysis Assumptions .................................................................................................. 29 Intersection Analysis .................................................................................................... 31 Neighborhood Street Impacts .................................................................................................... 45 Summary and Recommendations ............................................................................................. 47 References ..................................................................................................................................... 50 ' WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. ii 1 LIST OF FIGURES FiQUres Paee 1 Area Site Location Map ........................................................................................................... 5 2 Existing Site Plan ...................................................................................................................... 6 3 Proposed Site Plan ................................................................................................................... 7 4 Texas Avenue Plans north of Holleman .........................:................................................... 12 5 Texas Avenue Plans south of Holleman :............................................................................13 6 Texas Avenue and Holleman Drive 2000 Existing Geometric and Traffic Volume Conditions ................................................ 20 7 Texas Avenue and Park Place 2000 Existing Geometric and Traffic Volume Conditions ................................................ 21 8 Driveway A and Holleman Drive 2000 Existing Geometric and Traffic Volume Conditions ................................................ 22 9 Driveway B Holleman Drive 2000 Existing Geometric and Traffic Volume Conditions ................................................ 23 10 Driveway D and Park Place Drive 2000 Existing Geometric and Traffic Volume Conditions ................................................ 24 11 Driveway E and Park Place 2000 Existing Geometric and Traffic Volume Conditions ................................................ 25 12 Driveway G and Park Place 2000 Existing Geometric and Traffic Volume Conditions .............:.................................. 26 13 Driveway H and Park Place 2000 Existing Geometric and Traffic Volume Conditions ................................................ 27 14 Texas Avenue and Holleman Drive 2003 Future Geometric and Traffic Volume Conditions ................................................... 35 15 Texas Avenue and Park Place 2003 Future Geometric and Traffic Volume Conditions ................................................... 36 16 Driveway A and Holleman Drive 2003 Future Geometric and Traffic Volume Conditions ................................................... 37 17 Driveway B and Holleman Drive 2003 Future Geometric and Traffic Volume Conditions ................................................... 38 18 Driveway C and Texas Avenue 2003 Future Geometric and Traffic Volume Conditions ................................................... 39 19 Driveway D and Park Place 2003 Future Geometric and Traffic Volume Conditions ................................................... 40 20 Driveway E and Park Place 2003 Future Geometric and Traffic Volume Conditions ................................................... 41 21 Driveway F and Park Place 2003 Future Geometric and Traffic Volume Conditions .................................................. 42 WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. iii ' 22 Driveway G and Park Place 2003 Future Geometric and Traffic Volume Conditions ................................................... 43 23 Driveway H and Park Place ' 2003 Future Geometric and Traffic Volume Conditions ................................................... 44 r WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. iv ' LIST OF TABLES Tables Paee 1 Holleman Drive -Hourly Traffic Volumes .......................................................................10 ' 2 Park Place :Hourly Traffic Volumes ............................................... ...................................11 3 Signalized Intersection: Level of Service ' 4 Measurement and Qualitative Descriptions .......................... Unsignalized Intersection :................................................................ ...................................15 ...................................17 Level of Service Measurement ................................................ ...................................17 ' 5 Summary of Unadjusted Daily and Peak Hour Trip Generation ...................................28 6 Summary of Adjusted Daily and Peak Hour Trip Generation .... ...................................29 t 7 Forecast Directional Distribution of Site-Oriented Traffic ........... ...................................30 0 ' WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. v ' H. E. BUTT GROCERY COMPANY TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ' SYNOPSIS ' The H. E. Butt Grocery Company proposes to construct a retail grocery store to be located in College Station, west of Texas Avenue between Park Place and Holleman Drive as shown in Figure 1. For purposes of this analysis, the buildout year is assumed to be 2003. Existing land use consists of a restaurant and small retail building. Proposed land use for the site consists of a retail grocery store (88,000 square feet) with drive-in ' pharmacy, fuel station with eight vehicle fueling positions, and a print shop (6,000 square feet). The restaurant will continue to operate and the proposed print shop will replace t the existing retail building. The project is bounded on the north by Park Place, on the south by Holleman Drive, ' on the east by Texas Avenue, and on the west by apartments. Current access to the site is provided via two driveways on Holleman Drive as shown in Figure 2. With the addition of the grocery store with drive-in pharmacy, fuel station, and replacement of the retail ' building, access points will be redesigned. Access for the project is proposed through six driveways, three on Holleman Drive, two on Park Place, and one on Texas Avenue, as ' shown in Figure 3. The purpose of the Traffic Impact Analysis is to examine the interaction of existing ' and programmed land use activities, their intensity and traffic characteristics, and identify actions that would create a successful, effective, and safe development program ' under both existing and future traffic conditions. By utilizing accepted traffic engineering methods and techniques, a TIA for the project was conducted. Existing traffic conditions were examined on area roadways and ' at selected intersections and compared with traffic conditions that could be expected in 2003 considering both site generated and external (background) traffic. Based on the ' analysis, findings and recommended actions were identified; and are summarized as follows: ' 1. Existing operation at the signalized intersection of Texas Avenue and Holleman ' Drive is Level of Service E. Eastbound vehicle queues on Holleman Drive observed during the study were as long as 24 vehicles, resulting in frequent blockage of the existing driveway immediately west of Texas Avenue. TxDOT plans to reconstruct Texas Avenue with a six lane divided section, however, this will do little in alleviating congestion at the intersection. Recommendations are made to allow for ' two eastbound exclusive left turn lanes and then combining the thru and right turn movements. This will help the delays and queues in the eastbound direction and can ' be completed within the existing pavement. 2. Although overall existing operation at the unsignalized intersection of Texas Avenue ' and Park Place is Level of Service A, eastbound turning movements are at Level of Service F with significant delay. Discussions with City and TxDOT representatives ' concerning plans to reconstruct Texas Avenue (TxDOT Texas Avenue Phase II Project) provided the construction information concerning the Park Place intersection ' as well as plans for the entire project. Texas Avenue Phase II Plans in the immediate vicinity of the site are as follows: a. A median opening will not be provided at the intersection of Texas Avenue ' and Park Place. Thus, there will be no eastbound left turn access from Park Place and no northbound left turn access to Park Place. b. While TxDOT will be acquiring additional right-of-way along both the east and west sides of Texas Avenue, no additional travel lanes will be ' constructed. In the vicinity of the site, Texas Avenue will still have asix-lane cross-section. ' c. To the south of the site, TxDOT is proposing to construct a continuous median between Manuel Drive and Holleman Drive. As a result of the planned median, the existing access point into the Hastings retail center, a driveway which aligns with Richards Drive, will operate with only right- in/right-out turning movements. There will not be a median opening at this location. d. Based on the proposed median design, the only access point to the Hastings retail center from northbound Texas Avenue will be at the driveway adjacent to the existing Cutback Steakhouse, across from Manuel Drive. 3. Proposed driveways will be constructed in accordance with the City of College Station's "Driveway Access Location and Design Policy" to the extent feasible. Existing driveways adjacent to the site on Holleman Drive and Park Place preclude conformance with all of the spacing standards. A thorough evaluation has been undertaken to insure that proposed driveways are necessary and that the critical operational issues with their design are considered as follows: a. Provision of a single primary driveway on Holleman Drive was considered, but the resulting level of service was unacceptable. Concern for encouraging WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. 2 1 ' unnecessary traffic on Park Place was also a consideration, resulting in the need to accommodate the majority of site traffic via access driveways on ' Holleman Drive and Texas Avenue. b. Spacing between adjacent driveways on the site exceeds the minimum standards except for the driveway on Texas Avenue. The existing separation ' between Park Place and Holleman Drive, combined with the presence of the water tower preclude compliance with adjacent driveway spacing ' requirements. As a result, the spacing exceeds the minimum for Holleman Drive and is approximately 45 feet short of the minimum for Park Place. ' c. Throat lengths for proposed driveways exceed the minimum standards. d. Driveway designs have been developed to restrict turning movements where ' feasible. These include recommended prohibition of eastbound left turn movements at the eastern driveway on Holleman Drive and prohibition of northbound left turn movements at both driveways on Park Place. 4. Holleman Drive is classified as a four-lane minor arterial and traverses College ' Station completely from east to west. It will serve as the primary travel route for vehicular traffic from the east and west. Traffic control on Holleman Drive between ' Texas Avenue and Wellborn Road includes two traffic signals and three multiway stop controlled intersections. Traffic volumes in the vicinity of the site are anticipated ' to increase by 2,733 vehicles per day and 246 vehicles in the PM peak hour as a result of the proposed development. These are approximately 15 percent and 17 percent, respectively, of the projected traffic volumes on Holleman Drive. This vehicular ' increase will have a minimal impact on traffic operations adjacent to and within the area residential developments. 5. Park Place is classified as a residential street and provides access to other residential streets between Wellborn Road and Texas Avenue. It is a discontinuous street with five offset intersection locations. In the immediate vicinity of the site, there are two right angle turns with warning signs and 15 mph advisory speed plates. As a result of the existing conditions along Park Place, it is not anticipated to be an attractive travel route for vehicular traffic, except for residents in the immediate vicinity of the site. Traffic volumes in the vicinity of the site are anticipated to increase by 75 vehicles per day and 7 vehicles in the PM peak hour as a result of the proposed development. These are approximately 8 and 15 percent, respectively, of the projected traffic volumes on Park Place. It should be noted that a portion of the WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. 3 ' projected site traffic will result from pass-by traffic (vehicles which are currently using Park Place). As a result of this fact, the projected volumes discussed previously ' are conservative estimates. In addition, the current design of Texas Avenue will include a continuous median between Holleman Drive and Harvey Road, further reducing potential traffic volumes on Park Place based on resulting right-in/right-out ' only movements. The projected vehicular traffic increase will have a negligible impact on traffic operations adjacent to and within the area residential developments. L WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. 4 ~. 4`' ~ 3 s c' a a, Q JG v~ I 1$ r y ' / `4 ~ 4 ~ F. SP ~a,,„ A _/ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ ~, V ~ ~9 ~ ~ -.l l~ ~~ 1 ~~ ~~ O9 \ ~/~ \ c, __ Paz1c ~ G~O~ O~ ® \ Oy ~~ N ~ - \ /' - 3 ® O 4 Oti ~, ~, r~ (~ ~ - J Earl Rudder ~ ® ~Y ~P ~~ t coy c~r~e 4 g~ °g ; _ , SITE ~ ' ~ o ~ R ® / T~ O \ n0 ~-'LfOND' ~' ~ I ~f- 'fz` y~~ ~ . - - ~ ' GE 6~G y ~p q . Centa~ 4,4 'SO O+P O GAO ~ ~e~' ~ ~ , O G~ ?~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' \ 1 OL ~ ~ ~~~ Park ~. BAR1T-IOLLOW _ t 'Y ,~ ~ ~ ~ RIpGE ~ ~ l ~ t '~~~~ B;soli ~~ l C vgG04' ~~ q 4 v q9~ 'lS~ ~~ ~ `~`L--~ \ l~ 4 °~ ~ ~ y~, _ . '~7 4' ~ , ~ . Pazk TI p '~ G ~C ~ ~., ~ 0.8 ~ ~; ~,y ~ ~~ y ~ P. ~ 1\ 1 Ou~ J5 4 1'K ~ k,~~ p1 ~ C~ \ O~ \ Son ~ / 8 D ® ,~ A ~ o v~ay1O~,~y~ ~F ` ~ o~/ Chem AR'rM ' ~~,t\ G4' ~ 'plc ~ ~ 9 `" 4~ ly 5 q, O ~y 8~1 ` CBreek _ ~ tyti 4 ~ ~ ~ O Pazk\ 49~~ ~ti ~, ~~arkf ® ~ ~; q $ ~ 'b 1 -~ \~' ~ ~ 'P~OO 4- ~ ~ s , ~ V R ~- \ ~~~~o G ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L\ ,~3~ 'y `t` S ~~S ~ GAO -- - - , 1 ~ •~, ~ .pLt~c~~, OQ. ~ 1+ 9 ~ ~ t ~ ` C9 O ~ ~ 4~ ~' G 4~' Q44s' P~~ ~~ 8 ~ 'fRF~ s \ ~ Gs 9 ~ P ~/"- ~ ~ " S~pxWY bra ~f~' 1 ` J ` - ~ - ' ~ ' ~4V' .A ~+~4 ~OO ~ h~. x ' 1.8 ~ ~ 44 w\~ ,~- ~ - - - -~ _ 1~ ~~, FIGURE 1 ~~ •'~ ~ ~~~~ ~ - ~ AREA LOCATION MAP ' WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. -Austin, Texas i~ .~~~. N a a W (~ F--i W '~'' A II O WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. -Austin, Texas i) 11 II I1 II '~,~'~ `\ I1 ' i \ 11 ~~ ,• .; , ,-a 1 ,1 ,.~-~ ~'~~ I I ~' '~ 1 I 1 ~ I 1 ~~ I 1 I / '~ _ ~ ; ~ 1 I ' ~ 1 1 ~ , I - 1 I 0 =^ ~` , \, I 'I ~ cl~~+ \ \ t II _ 1 I _-- /'~ ~ ~' ti~ 1 1 I k\ 11..11 I 1 ~ II \ \ 1 I i ~ ``- _ 1 -~ 1 1 ~ - ~ 1 I r ~ 1 I j I_ _-~__ ~ ._1 1 I 1 ~ in i~~w S ~~ tJL -r•ly I I ~ xy~'gna0 l_ ~ O I ZONO ~ 1~ I J~ I $ Oc1~00`" Y ~ m aa~on - ram I 1 ~- I 1 Q ~ i i i I 1 aam I I I I I~ I 1 r' I I I I 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 I I I II i I I I I I _ r Y r Y j1 I ~ ~ a ~ ~ € € 1 ; I i I I ~ ; ~ ~ 1 I , J i ~ ~, ~ 11 I ~~ g I '~ I N P P I(1 I i Ir __ 1 ~ snm ~ ~ I, - ' w ~ I sam n~ua ,a ntxo , I ~ 1 1 1~-- ~ i ~ m r I 1~ 1 i; r ' ~ ~ I I p 1 .. I I I f 1 11 1 1 1 ' Y I '"" ~ 1 ~ h ~ I - I I IL. 1 1 I I 1 Y e 11 I I 1i I I ~ ~ ~ ~ it I i I , ~ I, I I ~~~ I ; n ~~~ ~ I it 1 I I I 1~ I I t l 1 I ~ ;I 1 ~ I ',~ a ~~ \ ` t \ \ 1 ,~ \~ 1 r- ~' I ~ I _ \ I \ I ~ I \ II W 1 I \ a w'^ \\ 1 \ OpW \ I I \ Jt-F \ 1 \ K 6 O \ 1 1 -° W ~, 1 \ oam \ \ rcs- 1 \ a \ 1 1 \y I \ I \ 1 \ I ~ /~~ II \ ~~ ~ WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. -Austin, Texas M r~ V w W A 1-i O a a W 1--1 A v~ a A-1 L~ INTRODUCTION The H. E. Butt Grocery Company proposes to construct a retail grocery store to be located in College Station, west of Texas Avenue between Park Place and Holleman Drive as shown in Figure 1. For purposes of this analysis, the buildout year is assumed to be 2003. Existing land use consists of a restaurant and small retail building. Proposed land use for the site consists of a retail grocery store (88,000 square feet) with drive-in pharmacy, fuel station with eight vehicle fueling positions, and a print shop (6,000 square feet). The restaurant will continue to operate and the proposed print shop will replace the existing retail building. The project is bounded on the north by Park Place, on the south by Holleman Drive, on the east by Texas Avenue, and on the west by apartments. Current access to the site is provided via two driveways on Holleman Drive as shown in Figure 2. With the addition of the grocery store and drive-in pharmacy, fuel station, and replacement of the retail building, access points will be redesigned. Access for the project is proposed through six driveways, three on Holleman Drive, two on Park Place, and one on Texas Avenue, as shown in Figure 3. Site and Access Characteristics Figures 2 and 3 consist of existing and proposed site plans for the project. Current access to the site is provided via two driveways Holleman Drive. With the addition of the grocery store and drive-in pharmacy, fuel station, and replacement of the retail building, access points will be redesigned. Access for the project is proposed through six driveways, three on Holleman Drive, two on Park Place, and one on Texas Avenue, as shown in Figure 3. Examining the interaction of existing and programmed land use activities, their intensity and traffic characteristics is necessary to render an appreciation of appropriate actions required to create a successful, efficient, and safe program. This report on the analysis of the traffic conditions, present and future, responds to these objectives. EXISTING THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM As indicated on the site location map shown in Figure 1, the project is bounded by Park Place, Holleman Drive, and Texas Avenue. The interrelationship of these roadways and others in the area is shown on Figure 1. To adequately define the significance of these roadways, a further characterization is provided for each. WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. 8 ' (1) Texas Avenue -This roadway forms the eastern boundary of the site. It is classified as a four-lane divided major arterial in the project's vicinity. Texas Avenue is an ' important roadway for the proposed project. It serves as one of the main access routes for the project related traffic. 'The traffic volume on Texas Avenue in the vicinity of the site was approximately 33,700 vehicles per day (vpd) based on ' information provided by the City of College Station. (2) Holleman Drive -This roadway forms the southern boundary of the site. It is classified as a four-lane minor arterial. Holleman Drive is an important roadway for ' the proposed project. It serves as the main access route for a large percentage of the project related traffic. Traffic counts conducted on Holleman Drive during the study ' resulted in a total of 15,395 vpd, adjacent to the site, as summarized in Table 1. (3) Park Place -This roadway forms the northern boundary of the site. It is classified as ' a residential street. Traffic counts conducted on Park Place during the study resulted in a total of 834 vpd, adjacent to the site, as summarized in Table 2. ' FUTURE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS The Texas Department of Transportation is currently developing a project for improvement of Texas Avenue from Dominik Drive to FM 2818. This includes the area in ' the immediate vicinity of the site. TxDOT plans to re-build the existing roadway with a continuous center median that has various median openings, from Dominik Drive to FM 2818. Thus, providing limited access to those streets and retail areas that have direct ' access onto Texas Avenue. The new facility will include a raised, curbed median separating each direction of traffic. Public meetings were held to assist in determining a ' preferred alignment and planning the preliminary roadway layout, now under detailed design. Right-of-way acquisition is currently underway for this project. Construction is ' anticipated to begin in 2003. Figures 4 and 5 show the preliminary plans for Texas Avenue in the vicinity of the proposed HEB site. WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. 9 Table 1. Holleman Drive -Hourly Traffic Volumes Interval Westbound Eastbound Total Be~u~s Volume Percentage Volume Percentage Volume Percentage 12M 181 1.2 98 0.6 279 1.8 1:00 126 0.8 66 0.4 192 1.2 2:00 76 0.5 52 0.3 128 0.8 3:00 29 0.2 27 0.2 56 0.4 4:00 19 0.1 19 0.1 38 0.2 5:00 33 0.2 29 0.2 62 0.4 6:00 49 0.3 87 0.6 136 0.9 7:00 247 1.6 277 1.8 524 3.4 8:00 226 1.5 289 1.9 515 3.3 9:00 265 1.7 285 1.9 550 3.6 10.00 293 1.9 327 2.1 520 4.0 11:00 337 2.2 383 2.5 720 4.7 12N 419 2.7 428 2.8 847 5.5 1:00 451 2.9 395 2.6 846 5.5 2:00 448 2.9 437 2.8 885 5.7 3:00 517 3.4 498 3.2 1015 6.6 4:00 574 3.7 546 3.5 1120 7.3 5:00 697 4.5 719 4.7 1416 9.2 6:00 683 4.4 605 3.9 1288 8.4 7:00 622 4.0 447 2.9 1069 6.9 8:00 553 3.6 470 3.1 1023 6.6 9:00 528 3.4 400 2.6 928 6.0 10:00 405 2.6 281 1.8 683 4.4 11:00 265 1_7 190 1_2 455 3_0 TOTAL 8,040 52 7,355 48 15,395 100 WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. 10 Table 2. Park Place -Hourly Traffic Volumes Westbound Eastbound Total Interval Begins Volume Percentaee Volume Percentage Volume Percentage 12M 10 1.2 8 1.0 18 2.2 1:00 3 0.4 2 0.2 5 0.6 2:00 5 0.6 1 0.1 6 0.7 3:00 1 0.1 1 0.1 2 0.2 4:00 2 0.2 3 0.4 5 0.6 5:00 2 0.2 1 0.1 3 0.4 6:00 1 0.1 8 1.0 9 1.1 7:00 30 3.6 14 1.7 44 5.3 8:00 18 2.2 18 2.2 36 4.3 9:00 15 1.8 14 1.7 29 3.5 10.00 21 2.5 10 1.2 31 3.7 11:00 24 2.9 18 2.2 42 5.0 12N 19 2.3 21 2.5 40 4.8 1:00 33 4.0 24 2.9 57 6.8 2:00 27 3.2 25 3.0 52 6.2 3:00 23 2.8 32 3.8 55 6.6 4:00 28 3.4 26 3.1 54 6.5 5:00 40 4.8 21 2.5 61 7.3 6:00 38 4.6 35 1.2 73 8.8 7:00 31 3.7 26 3.1 57 6.8 8:00 33 4.0 21 2.5 54 6.5 9:00 27 3.2 23 2.8 50 6.0 10:00 18 2.2 9 1.1 27 3.2 11:00 10 1.2 14 1.7 24 2.9 TOTAL 459 55 375 45 834 100 WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. 11 i ~ , i _____d_ i ~..,. ~ ___ i i i i i I I~ Tp I N I I .~ .~ \~ ..~~, WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. -Austin, Texas - ~z W~ ~ ~'Wa i ~, ~c~o ~~ ~ ~ ~~w ~~~ w ~~~ ~ ~v f ~~a ~c ~ ~ ~~ U ~ ~O~//oy ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ •.rp uvwa//o/~ 0 0 i ~ --- ~~~ •ap larxrn`Y -~-----~ e sp/~12! ~ --- Id I I i 0 I° Tf IN I i I I I I 00 ~~ ,~~ ! 1 I I I ~ ~ I , ' I I , ~~ I I I N ' ' 1 I I i ; ..~ i I -- - -- ' ' I i '' ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 I. ,, .- I '' '' I i I ' ._____ _ , ~ I i I r a ' i , WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. - Austin, Texas U ~wa ~a ~n ~ C7 ~~O (~ ~Az w ~ o~~-. ~~a '-' O ~x ~v TRAFFIC ANALYSIS In order to assess the traffic implications of the proposed development, two time periods and travel conditions were evaluated: 1. 2000 -Existing Conditions 2. 2003 -Forecasted Conditions with Site Generated Traffic Intersections in the vicinity of the site are considered the locations of principal concern because they are the locations of highest traffic conflict and delay. The standard used to evaluate traffic conditions at intersections is level of service (LOS), which is a qualitative measure of the effect of a number of factors such as speed, volume of traffic, geometric features, traffic interruptions, freedom to maneuver, safety, driving comfort, convenience and operating cost. Two types of intersections to be evaluated are signalized and unsignalized, which use different criteria for assessment of operating levels. These are described in the following sections. Signalized Intersection Level of Service Signalized intersection LOS is defined in terms of delay, which is a direct and/or indirect measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and lost travel time. The levels of service have been established based on driver acceptability of various delays. A benefit of using delay as the basis for intersection LOS is the ease with which the public can relate to delay as opposed to the previous concept, which related LOS to the volume to capacity ratio. The delay for each approach lane group is calculated based on a number of factors including lane geometries, percent of trucks, peak hour factor, number of lanes, signal progression, volume, signal green time to total cycle time ratio, roadway grades, parking conditions, and pedestrian flows. Because delay is a complex measure, its relationship to capacity is also complex. Analysis was performed using the microcomputer program "Highway Capacity Software" by the Federal Highway Administration (Ref. 1), which is based on the ' procedures contained in the Highway Capacity Manual (Ref. 2). In general, levels of service for intersection movements of A to D are acceptable, while an overall LOS of E or F is unacceptable. Table 3 summarizes the levels of service that are appropriate for ' different levels of average control delay, and a qualitative description for each. In the versions of the HCM published before 1998, stopped delay and total delay had been the WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. 14 ' criteria used to relate delay to LOS. The 1998 HCM uses the criteria of average control delay. Control delay includes initial deceleration, delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay (Ref. 2). In urban areas, overall levels of service for signalized intersections of A to Dare acceptable, while overall LOSE or F is ' unacceptable. The intersection LOS is computed as a weighted average of the vehicle delay; therefore, an intersection may have an overall LOS C or D and have individual ' movements, which are LOS E or F. Table 3. Signalized Intersection: Level of Service Measurement and Qualitative Descriptions (Ref. 2) ' Level of Control Delay Qualitative Service Per Vehicle (sec) Description ' A 510 Good progression and short cycle lengths B > 10 and <_ 20 Good progression or short cycle ' lengths, more vehicle stops C > 20 and S 35 Fair progression and/or longer ' cycle lengths, some cycle failures D > 35 and 5 55 Congestion becomes noticeable, high volume to capacity ratio ' E > 55 and _< 80 Limit of acceptable delay, poor progression, long cycles, and/or high volume ' F > 80 Unacceptable to drivers, volume greater than capacity Unsi~nalized Intersection Level of Service Unsignalized intersection LOS is defined in terms of average control delay. Control ' delay is that portion of total delay attributed to traffic control measures, either traffic signals or stop signs. Control delay includes initial deceleration delay, queue move-up ' time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. The analysis method assumes that major street through traffic is not affected by minor street flows. Major street left-turning traffic and the traffic on the minor approaches will be affected by opposing movements. Stop or yield signs are used to WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. 15 1 assign the right-of-way to the major street. This designation forces drivers on the controlled street to judgmentally select gaps in the major street flow through which to execute crossing or fuming maneuvers. Thus, the capacity of the controlled legs is based upon two factors: 1. The distribution of gaps in the major street traffic stream. 2. Driver judgment in selecting gaps through which to execute their desired maneuvers. The LOS procedure computes a capacity for each movement based upon the critical time gap required to complete the maneuver and the volume of traffic which is opposing the movement. The average control delay for any particular movement is calculated as a function of the capacity of the approach and the degree of saturation. The degree of saturation is defined as the volume for a movement, expressed as an hourly flow rate, divided by the capacity of the movement, expressed as an hourly flow rate. Table 4 shows the relationship between the average control delay and the LOS. The LOS for unsignalized intersections is different than that for signalized intersections. This difference is due to the fact that drivers expect different levels of performance from different kinds of transportation facilities. Unsignalized intersections carry less traffic volume than signalized intersections and delays at unsignalized intersections are variable. For these reasons, control delay would be less for an unsignalized intersection than for a signalized intersection (Ref. 2). The overall approach LOS is computed as a weighted average of the vehicle delay for each movement; therefore, an approach may have an overall LOS C or D and have individual movements, which are LOS E or F. Analysis was performed using the microcomputer program "Highway Capacity Software", which is based on the procedures contained in the Highway Capacity Manual. In general, levels of service of A to D are acceptable. WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. 16 1 Table 4. Unsignalized Intersection: Level of Service Measurement (Ref. 2) Level of Service Control Delay Per Vehicle (sec) A S10 B >l0and_<15 C >15and<_25 D > 25 and _< 35 E >35andS50 F > 50 2000 Existing Conditions The analysis of existing traffic required the acquisition of secondary data from the City of College Station, as well as the collection of primary data on adjacent roadways and intersections. Afield survey was designed through discussions with City of College Station staff and implemented to obtain the necessary data and to verify the trends established by data available from previous years. Signalized Intersection Texas Avenue and Holleman Drive is the only signalized intersection within the study area. Existing roadway geometries are presented in Figure 6 along with current fuming movement counts and levels of service (LOS). This intersection is signalized with a traffic signal controller that is capable of providing multiple signal cycle lengths. A brief description of the intersection follows. Holleman Drive and Texas Avenue This intersection consists of four approaches. The northbound approach to the intersection provides a left turn lane, two through lanes and a shared through/right turn lane. The southbound approach provides a left turn lane, two through lanes, and a shared through/right turn lane. The eastbound approach provides a left tum lane, a shared through/left turn lane, and a right turn lane. The westbound approach provides a WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. 17 1 left turn lane and a shared through/right turn lane. All movements occur as shown in Figure 6. Current overall level of service is E for the PM peak period. Unsignalized Intersections The following intersections within the study area are unsignalized: • Park Place and Texas Avenue • Site driveways and Holleman Drive • Adjacent site driveways and Park Place Existing roadway conditions at the above intersections are presented in Figures 7 through 13 along with turning movement counts, LC1S, and intersection geometry. Brief descriptions of each of these intersections are presented in the following paragraphs. Park Place and Texas Avenue This intersection consists of three approaches. The eastbound approach to the intersection provides a shared left/right turn lane. The northbound approach provides a left turn lane and three through lanes. The southbound approach provides a left turn lane, two through lanes, and a shared through/right turn lane. All movements occur as shown in Figure 7. Current overall level of service is A for the PM peak period. Driveway A and Holleman Drive As shown in Figure 8, this intersection operates as a fully functional driveway, providing access to El Chico. The northbound approach provides a shared left turn/through lane and a right turn lane. The southbound approach provides a shared left/through/right turn lane. The eastbound approach provides a shared left/through/right turn lane. The westbound approach provides a left tum lane and a shared through/right tum lane. Current overall level of service is C for the PM peak period. Driveway B and Holleman Drive As shown in Figure 9, this intersection operates as a fully functional driveway providing access to the print shop. Both the northbound and southbound approaches provide a shared left/through/right turn lane. Both the eastbound and westbound approaches provide one left turn lane and one shared through/right turn lane. Current overall level of service is A for the PM peak period. WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. 18 i Driveway D and Park Place This intersection consists of three approaches. The southbound approach provides one lane that serves all movements (left/right turn). The eastbound approach provides a shared left turn/through lane. The westbound approach provides a shared right turn/through lane. All movements occur as shown in Figure 10. Current overall level of service is A for the PM peak period. Driveway E and Park Place This intersection consists of three approaches, however the southbound approach is an exit only from afast-food drive through restaurant. This approach provides one lane that serves both the left turn and right turn movement. The eastbound and westbound approaches provide only a through lane. All movements occur as shown in Figure 11. Current overall level of service is A for the PM peak period. Drivewav G and Park Place This intersection consists of three approaches. The southbound approach provides one lane that serves all movements (left/right turn). The eastbound approach provides a shared left turn/through lane. The westbound approach provides a shared right turn/through lane. All movements occur as shown in Figure 12. Current overall level of service is A for the PM peak period. Drivewa~H and Park Place ' This intersection consists of three approaches. The southbound approach provides one lane that serves both the left tum and right turn movement. The eastbound approach ' provides a shared left turn/through lane. The westbound approach provides a shared right turn/through lane. All movements occur as shown in Figure 13. Current overall ' level of service is A for the PM peak period. WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. 19 ai D ~~ x v H 11' __ ~', ' ~. 1 ' T ' ' ~o.TM ~llil LEGEND: 000 = PM Peak Hour Volume .00 X = PM Level of Service (V/C LOS) = Traffic Signal WHM Transportation Engine 15' ~' 1',f'1 I~ „ ,... Service Measures: Existing "' ~ L ~ ~-1.05 E 1.05E .43 D -- -- 81E 1 ~ . .92F -.79E-- .92E ~-.92F- -.33D ~ ~ ~.41D ~ ~-.55E~ •~D ~.88D-- ~ Holleman Dr. ~_ 13' Sign alized Intersection LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) Control Delay LOS Per Vehicle (sec) A <_ 10 B <l0and<_20 C < 20 and <_ 35 D <35and<_55 E < 55 and <_ 80 F > 80 >ring Consultants, Inc. -Austin, Te: FIGURE 6 EXISTING GEOMETRIC AND TRAFFIC VOLUME CONDITIONS cas f Traffic Volumes: Existing 11' 11' 14' v D i ~ i ~~it Service Measures: Existing t ' Park Place ' 27 1 1 1 ' 14' 11' 11' 13' 1 LEGEND• Unsignalized Intersection • LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) All Lanes = 12 feet Wide Unless Otherwise Noted ' FIGURE 7 000 = PM Peak Hour Volume LOS Control Delay Per Vehicle (sec) X = Level of Service (LOS) A <_ 10 EXISTING ' B < l0 and <_ 15 GEOMETRIC AND =Stop Sign C < 15 and 5 25 D < 25 and < 35 TRAFFIC VOLUME ' NORTH + = Undefined Service Measures _ E < 35 and <_ 50 F > 50 CONDITIONS WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. -Austin, Texas 1 l rattic Volumes: existing ~- 10 -I 1 ~ 8 -- 10 ~ i ~ 18 - - 560 ~ ~- 515 - -141 ~ ~ ~ 112 ~- 96 ~ 1 ~ 151-- ~ _ ~ ~ •~ A~ ... :~ uA w 9' 25' c~ ~ ~ tat) ~ .~ :~+ Q c~ x~ .., LEGEND: 000 = PM Peak Hour Volume X = Level of Service (LOS) =Stop Sign NORTH + = Undefined Service Measures -- WHM Transportation Engine 35' Service Measures: Existing ~~- B ~ E L E --~ _+~ ~ i Al ~- F F B -- -' ~ ~ Holleman Dr. ~~_ 13' /l- 12' All Lanes =12 feet Wide Unless Otherwise Noted 20' Unsignalized Intersection LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) Control Delay LOS per Vehicle (sec) A <_ 10 B <l0and515 C <15andS25 D < 25 and <_ 35 E < 35 and 5 50 ' F > 50 sing Consultants, Inc. -Austin, Tee FIGURE 8 EXISTING GEOMETRIC AND TRAFFIC VOLUME CONDITIONS :as Traffic Volumes: Existing e~ 18' 10 ~ ~ + 0 ~ 68 -- A >, ~- E ~ E ~ C -- c~ tl+ a~i ~ .~ ~ ~ .~.~ A .., ~, Holleman Dr. 13' 9' _~~ i 9' 19' ~~ c~ All Lanes =12 feet Wide ~ ~ Unless Otherwise Noted ~ 'i :~ A ~ d .~ x~ v ~ 31' LEGEND: 000 = PM Peak Hour Volume X = Level of Service (LOS) = Stop Sign NORTH + =Undefined Service Measures WHM Transportation Enginee Service Measures: Existing Unsign alized Intersection LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) FIGURE 9 Control Delay LOS Per Vehicle (sec) EXISTING B < l0 and < 15 GEOMETRIC AND C < 15 and <_ 25 TRAFFIC VOLUME D < 25 and S 35 E < 35 and S 50 CONDITIONS F > 50 gyring Consultants, Inc. -Austin, Texas Traffic Volumes: Existing 14' 27' Service Measures: Existing 27' All Lanes =12 feet Wide Unless Otherwise Noted NORTH LEGEND• ' Unsignalized Intersection LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) FIGURE 10 000 = PM Peak Hour Volume Control Delay LOS Per Vehicle (sec) X = Level of Service (LOS) A 510 EXISTING B < 10 and <_ 15 GEOMETRIC AND =Stop Sign C < 15 and <_ 25 TRAFFIC VOLUME D < 25 and 5 35 + = Undefined Service Measures E < 35 and <_ 50 CONDITIONS F > 50 i T i E i C l T ng ransportat on ng neer onsu tants, Inc. -Austin, exas WHM 14' 27' J~ 27' All Lanes =12 feet Wide Unless Otherwise Noted LEGEND: 000 = PM Peak Hour Volume X = Level of Service (LOS) =Stop Sign NORTH + = Undefined Service Measures WHM Transportation Engine Unsignalized Intersection LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) FIGURE 11 Control Delay LOS Per Vehicle (sec) EXISTING A <_ to B < to and <_ 15 GEOMETRIC AND C < 15 and _< 25 TRAFFIC VOLUME D < 25 and S 35 E < 35 and S 50 CONDITIONS F > 50 'ring Consultants, Inc. -Austin, Texas Traffic Volumes: Existing 25' 27' 27' All Lanes =12 feet Wide Unless Otherwise Note d LEGEND• ' Unsignalized Intersection LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) FIGURE 12 000 = PM Peak Hour Volume Control Delay LOS Per Vehicle (sec) X = Level of Service (LOS) A <_ 10 EXISTING B < 10 and <_ 15 GEOMETRIC AND =Stop Sign C < 15 and <_ 25 TRAFFIC VOLUME NORTH D < 25 and <_ 35 + = Undefined Service Measures E < 35 and <_ 50 CONDITIONS F > 50 Service Measures: Existing WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. -Austin, Texas Traffic Volumes: Existing 28' J~ 27' Service Measures: Existing 27' All Lanes =12 feet Wide Unless Otherwise Noted LEGEND: 000 = PM Peak Hour Volume X = Level of Service (LOS) = Stop Sign NORTH + = Undefined Service Measures WHM Transportation Engines Unsignalized Intersection LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) Control Delay LOS per Vehicle (sec) A 510 B <l0and515 C <15and525 D < 25 and <_ 35 E <35and<_50 F > 50 gyring Consultants, Inc. -Austin, Texas FIGURE 13 EXISTING GEOMETRIC AND TRAFFIC VOLUME CONDITIONS ' 2003 Forecasted Conditions With Site Generated Traffic The year 2003 was established as the year in which the project would become fully ' operational. This time frame was used to assess the major roadway effects and to facilitate the evaluation of alternative improvements. The forecasted traffic was projected using available information. This process was facilitated by using trends established by ' prior data for the major roadways in the immediate vicinity of the project site. Site Generated Traffic Deterinining the generated traffic or the traffic, which is considered to be contributed by development of the proposed project, was a major analysis process element. Unadjusted total trips per day as well as the peak hour traffic associated with the project were estimated using the microcomputer program "Trip Generation" by Microtrans Corporation (Ref. 3), which is based on recommendations and data contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers report Trip Generation (Ref. 4). Table 5 provides a detailed summary of the traffic production, which is directly related to the proposed retail development. As a point of reference, the unadjusted total trips per day were estimated at 11,405. Table 6 summarizes trip generation estimates, which have been adjusted in accordance with analysis assumptions discussed in the following section. The adjusted total daily trip generation. is 7,431. Table 5. Summary of Unadjusted Daily and Peak Hour Trip Generation Proposed Land Use Grocery Store Specialty Retail Fuel Station Total 24 Hour Two-Way PM Peak Hour Size SF Volume Enter Exit 88,000 SF 9,813 457 439 6,000 SF 244 7 9 8 pumps 1,348 59 57 11,405 523 505 WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. 28 ' Table 6. Summary of Adjusted Daily and Peak Hour Trip Generation ' 24 Hour Proposed Two-Way PM Peak Hour Land Use Size SF Volume Enter Exit ' Grocery Store 88,000 SF 6,378 297 285 Specialty Retail 6,000 SF 244 7 9 ' Fuel Station 8 pumps 809 35 34 Total 7,431 339 329 1 ' Directional Distribution Once site generated trips were known, the next step involved distribution of those trips to appropriate geographic directions and logical connecting roadways. The major thoroughfares, which have a direct bearing on the accessibility of the project, have been previously identified. The distribution of site traffic was based upon intersection approach traffic counts ' conducted during the study, observations of area traffic operations, 24-hour tube counts that were conducted along both Holleman Drive and Park Place, and HEB customer ' information. These data provided the basis for the directional distribution of traffic approaching and departing the project site. The directional distribution information ' derived from this process is summarized in Table 7. Based on roadway characteristics and observations, the site traffic utilizing Park Place will have a negligible impact on the overall roadway safety and operations. A ' distribution of two percent (seven vehicles entering) was included along Park Place to allow for those neighborhood residents that will access the site via Park Place. WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. 29 ' Table 7. Forecast Directional Distribution of Site-Oriented Traffic 1 of Traffic Direction Enterin¢ Exitine ' North on Texas Avenue 30 15 South on Texas Avenue 15 15 ' East on Holleman Drive 20 20 West on Holleman Drive 33 50 West on Park Place 2 0 ' Total 100 100 ' Given the total site generated traffic and the directional distribution by approach, the next step in the process was to assign the traffic destined to and from the project to the ' most likely travel paths. This was done by investigating a number of alternative travel patterns as well as ingress/egress points along the project boundaries. Primary consideration was given to the traffic flow and safety of the major roadways. ' Analysis Assumptions The traffic impact analysis process involves the use of primary data and engineering ' judgment on transferable parameters. Specifically, engineering judgment is required for estimation of background traffic growth, pass-by capture, internal capture, transit trips, and pedestrian trip reductions, and the retail replacement of the existing HEB Pantry site, ' all of which are further described below. Background Traffic Based on historical growth trends and discussions with the City of College Station transportation staff, an annual growth rate of one percent was assumed for existing traffic. Background traffic volumes for 2003 included estimated traffic volumes for the ' Wolf Pen Plaza retail project. Pass-By Capture ' Studies have shown that retail land uses will capture from 20 to 60 percent of their traffic as pass-by trips, depending upon their size (Ref. 5). It is well documented that many other land uses also experience significant pass-by trip capture, such as fast food restaurants. The amount of trip reduction, which each tract may attribute to the pass-by WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. 30 1 phenomenon, will depend directly on the type of land use, which is developed. A pass- by capture reduction of 35 percent was assumed for the grocery store and 40 percent for the fuel station. Internal Capture Once the total buildout of proposed land uses occurs, there will be interaction among the uses within this development. Internal capture is accounted for in two ways. First, to account for internal capture among similar retail land uses in adjacent areas, the sizes may be combined during the trip generation process. Because the equations used in trip generation estimations are logarithmic, the number of trips generated by a site does not increase in duect proportion to an increase in the square footage of a development. By combining retail projects in close proximity to each other, a lower number of trips will be estimated, thereby taking into account the internal capture factor. The second way to account for internal capture is to reduce the expected number of trips directly by some percentage, which reflects, expected multipurpose trip-making among different types of land uses which are in close proximity. However, as with pass-by trip reductions, internal capture depends on the type and quantity of land uses. Due to the nature of this project, no internal capture reductions were applied to any of the land uses within the site. It should be noted that a limited number of trips will occur among the grocery store, existing restaurant, and relocated retail building. Transit/Pedestrian/Bicycle Trips The provision of transit service and the availability to the site for pedestrians and bicyclists will reduce the expected number of trips by providing an alternative mode of travel to the private automobile. The reduction may be in two forms, either a reduction in site generated trips or a reduction in background trips. Currently, the only available transit service is Brazos Valley Transit. This runs on an hourly basis and has an undefined stop in front of the existing HEB center within College Station. Due to the frequency of this service, no reductions were taken to account for transit service. It should be noted that a limited number of pedestrian and bicycle trips will occur among the adjacent residential and retail developments and the site. Since there are two large apartment complexes directly adjacent to the site, pedestrian trips to/from the site can be assumed. It was determined that an overall pedestrian reduction of one percent was appropriate; however, this reduction was only applied to the Holleman Drive driveways since pedestrians from the apartment complexes would access the site via Holleman Drive. WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. 31 1 1 HEB Pantry Store Replacement During 2003, when the HEB store opens, the existing HEB Pantry store will be vacated. It is assumed that a retail use and not another grocery store, will replace this retail space. A retail space within an existing center generates less traffic than a grocery store. Based upon the interrelationship between the existing HEB Pantry store, the total retail area, and the total number of trips entering and exiting the site, a difference of 12 percent was estimated. As a result of this estimate, each of the driveway movements on Holleman Drive, entering and exiting, were reduced by 12 percent. Intersection Analysis The total 2003 traffic demand will be the sum of traffic generated by this proposed development, traffic generated by other development projects, and changes in existing traffic. Buildout year 2003 roadway geometries of the study area intersections are presented in Figures 14 through 23 along with forecast turning movement counts and levels of service (LOS). Assuming the recommended improvements shown in these figures and discussed in the recommendations section are implemented, all levels of service fall within an acceptable range for each intersection. Brief descriptions of forecasted intersection operations follow. Holleman Drive and Texas Avenue Under site plus forecasted traffic conditions, this intersection needs geometric improvements in order to retain the existing LOS E. In addition to the signal timing and phasing optimization, an exclusive southbound right turn lane should be constructed. However, according to TxDOT there will not be enough right-of-way to allow for any improvements to either side of Texas Avenue. Therefore, no geometric improvements can be made. The only improvement would be to re-stripe the eastbound movement to provide two exclusive left turn lanes and one shared through/right tum lane. This can be done within the exisitng pavement and will help in reducing the eastbound queues. As shown in Figure 14, the intersection will operate at LOS F. Park Place and Texas Avenue As shown in Figure 15, this intersection is assumed to be a limited access intersection, with right-in/right-out movements only. During these future conditions, the intersection will operate at an overall LOS A. WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. 32 ' Driveway A and Holleman Drive As shown in Figure 16, under site plus forecasted traffic conditions, this intersection ' will be fully functional and will operate at LOS E. This driveway will replace the existing El Chico driveway. Existing pavement markings on Holleman Drive should be modified to prohibit eastbound left turn movements. The proposed site driveway should be ' constructed as a 36-foot cross-section with two outbound lanes. Adequate driveway throat depth should be provided to allow for storage of exiting vehicles. 1 Driveway B and Holleman Drive As shown in Figure 17, under site plus forecasted traffic conditions, the proposed intersection will be function as two separate intersections: HEB site driveway and ' Hastings center service driveway. The spacing between the two driveways is adequate to provide storage for those vehicles exiting each of the driveways. Thus the intersections were analyzed as separate "T" intersections. The proposed site driveway should be ' constructed as a 36-foot cross-section with two outbound lanes. Adequate driveway throat depth should be provided to allow for storage of exiting vehicles. This intersection ' will operate at LOS A during site plus forecasted conditions. The Hastings center service driveway will continue to operate at LOS A during site plus forecasted conditions. ' Texas Avenue and Driveway C ' Driveway C will serve as a right-in/right-out driveway. Upon completion of the site (2003), it was assumed that the Texas Avenue improvements would have been completed. At that time, it was assumed that northbound left turn access into the site ' and eastbound left tum exit from the site will be prohibited through the completion of a raised median on Texas Avenue. In addition, the Wolf Pen Plaza retail center will have a right-in/right-out driveway (Wolf 2) slightly north of the proposed Driveway C. These intersection geometric assumptions are shown in Figure 18. The proposed driveway will ' operate at LOS A during site plus forecasted conditions. Driveway C should be constructed as a 24-foot cross-section with one outbound lane. Adequate driveway throat ' depth should be provided to allow for storage of exiting vehicles. Driveway D and Park Place ' As shown in Figure 19, proposed Driveway D will align with the existing Driveway D (existing retail center driveway). The overall intersection LOS will remain A during ' site plus forecasted traffic conditions. The proposed site driveway should be constructed as a 24-foot cross-section with one outbound right turn lane. The exiting traffic lane WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. 33 1 ' should be constructed such that vehicles are physically prohibited from turning left and continuing westbound on Park Place. Adequate driveway throat depth should be ' provided to allow for storage of exiting vehicles. Driveway E and Park Place ' As shown in Figure 20, this existing driveway intersection will not have any modifications. It will continue to operate under LOS A during site plus forecasted traffic ' conditions. Driveway F and Park Place This driveway will be a new three legged driveway onto Park Place as shown in Figure 21. Under site plus forecasted traffic conditions the intersection will operate under LOS A. The proposed site driveway should be constructed as a 24-foot cross- section with one outbound right turn lane. The exiting traffic lane should be constructed such that vehicles are physically prohibited from turning left and continuing westbound on Park Place. Adequate driveway throat depth should be provided to allow for storage of exiting vehicles. Driveway G and Park Place As shown in Figure 22, this existing driveway intersection will not have any modifications. It will continue to operate under LOS A during site plus forecasted traffic conditions. Driveway H and Park Place As shown in Figure 23, this existing driveway intersection will not have any modifications. It will continue to operate under LOS A during site plus forecasted traffic conditions. WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. 34 1 Traffic Volumes: Forecasted /Site 316 1613 132 ~ 0 ~ 30 _ 16 395 ~ 99 39 0 212 59 ~ 210 ~ 68 106 ~ 250 20 i 0 93 1331 83 51 0 ~-~ ai y e~ x a~ H /J 14' ~` ~- 316 ~ 1643 ~ 148 -- 435 ~ ~ ~ 99 271 ~ 278 15°' ~' 1 f ~1 ~ 126 ~ ~ ~ 250 ~ - 144 ~ 1331 ~ 83 -- 15' Service Measures: Forecasted ~~~1.03EJ 1.03E .50E-~ -.60D ~ I ~1.04F, .91 F -- .99E ~-1.04 F -~ .91F ~ ~ .85E ~ .89 F ~ .97E r .97E -- -_ Holleman Dr. ~_ 13' All Lanes =12 feet Wide Unless Otherwise Noted ~ 1.05E 1.05E L.57E-- ~.67DS 1 ~1.26F~ -1.14F-- 1.14F ~1.26F ~ -1.14F~ ~ ~ .85E ~~1.37F1 .97E r.97E -~ Traffic Volumes: Site + Forecasted Service Measures: Site + Forecastec LEGEND: Signalized Intersection LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) 000 = PM Peak Hour Volume FIGURE 14 Control Delay .00 X = PM Level of Service LOS per Vehicle (sec) (V/C LOS) 203 A < 10 B < l0 and < 20 GEOMETRIC AND NORTH =Traffic Signal C < 20 and <_ 35 D < 35 and <_ 55 TRAFFIC VOLUME E < 55 and 580 CONDITIONS F > 80 WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. -Austin, Texas r Traffic Volumes: Forecasted / Si 29 2151 128 19 i I II ~ I- 1 1 1' Park Place _~ m x a~ H d~lil L~ Service Measures: Forecasted I~ J __+ + i A B i~.r1 All Lanes =12 feet Wide Unless Otherwise Noted Traffic Volumes: Site +Forecasted Service Measures: Site + Forecast LEGEND: Unsignalized Intersection LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) 000 = PM Peak Hour Volume Control Delay FIGURE 15 LOS Per Vehicle (sec) X =Level of Service (LOS) 2~~3 B =Stop Sign < 10 and s 15 GEOMETRIC AND NORTH + = Undefined Service Measures C < 15 and _< 25 D < 25 and <_ 35 TRAFFIC VOLUME E < 35 and <_ 50 CONDITIONS ,: ~.\ _ "tint 1s~.i:It red > 50 WHM T i E i i C l - ransportat on ng nee r ng onsu tants, Inc. -Austin, Tex as "~' ~ ~- + + i A C ~A I' 'raffic Volumes: Forecasted / Sil c~ v ~ '~, ed Q O ~ v .~ ., V A it .--. W 12' -- 12' ~~ -~ ~- 73 ~ i1 ~ 95 -- ~-~ ~~, 111 690 - ~-- 591- 1-128 ~ ~ -102 i ~- 87 1' 137 - - r?' e~ ~~ ~ 'i ~ A x~ .~ 10' 10' ' ~ ~ ~~' ~C C F-- i ~ - + ~~ -+-- E ~ + - _+i ~ i B ~- F B B -- - --- (raffic Volumes: Site + Forecasted Service Measures: Site + Foretaste LEGEND• • Unsignalized Intersection LEVEL OF SERVICE LOS ( ) FIGURE 16 Control Delay 000 = PM Peak Hour Volume LOS Per Vehicle (sec) 2~~3 X = Level of Service (LOS) A < 10 B < to and s 15 GEOMETRIC AND =Stop Sign C < 15 ands 25 TRAFFIC VOLUME NORTH D < 25 and <_ 35 + = Undefined Service Measures E < 35 ands 50 CONDITIONS F > 50 Service Measures: Forecasted Holleman Dr. ~_ 13' ~- 12' All Lanes =12 feet Wide Unless Otherwise Noted WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. -Austin, Texas Traffic Volumes: Forecasted !Site Service Measures: Forecasted Driveway B ~I~ Holleman Dr. ~~_ ~- 13' 9' ~ -/- 9' 19' -- ~~ t All Lanes =12 feet Wide Apartment Exist Hastings Center Unless Otherwise Noted , , Service Drwy. 44 9 22 62 ~ Traffic Volumes: Site + Forecasted Service Measures: Site + Forecasted Unsignalized Intersection LEGEND: LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) Control Delay 000 = PM Peak Hour Volume LOS Per Vehicle (sec) X = Level of Service (LOS) A <_ 10 B <l0and<_15 = Stop Sign C < 15 and <_ 25 NORTH D < 25 and <_ 35 + = Undefined Service Measures E < 35 and <_ 50 F > 50 WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. -Austin, Te; FIGURE 17 2003 GEOMETRIC AND TRAFFIC VOLUME CONDITIONS :as ~ -- - -- Service Measures: Forecasted 1 - + - + l ~~ ;~ k.. L ' Traffic Volumes: Site + Forecasted Service Measures• Site + Forecast LEGEND: Unsignalized Intersection LEVEL OF SERVICE LOS 1 000 = PM Peak Hour Volume ( ) FIGURE 18 X = Level of Service (LOS) Control Delay LOS Per Vehicle (sec) 2003 =Stop Sign A < 10 B < to and s 15 GEOMETRIC AND + = Undefined Service Measures C < 15 and <_ 25 TRAFFIC VOLUME NORTH • ;; ~`,, ;~~ j~~,; , g < 35 and <_ 50 CONDITIONS F > 50 WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. -Austin, Texas L All Lanes =12 feet Wide Unless Otherwise Noted .. .... 'raffic Volumes: Forecasted /Sit A 3 ~, .~ A 27' 1-~ Traffic Volumes: Site + Forecasted Service Measures: Site + Forecaster LEGEND: Unsignalized Intersection LEVEL OF SERVICE LOS ( ) FIGURE 19 Control Delay 000 = PM Peak Hour Volume LOS Per Vehicle (sec) 203 X = Level of Service (LOS) A <_ 10 B < 1o and <_ 15 GEOMETRIC AND =Stop Sign TRAFFIC VOLUME NORTH + = Undefined Service Measures D < 25 and <_ 35 E < 35 and <_ 50 CONDITIONS F > 50 Service Measures: Forecasted 27' All Lanes =12 feet Wide Unless Otherwise Noted WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. -Austin, Texas 14' 27' Service Measures: Forecasted 27' -- All Lanes =12 feet Wide Unless Otherwise Noted -J ~- A -I L A -- ~-- + ~- + `~ -I rvice Measures: Stie + Forecaste LEGEND: Unsignalized Intersection LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) FIGURE 20 000 = PM Peak Hour Volume Control Delay LOS per Vehicle (sec) X = Level of Service (LOS) A 510 2003 B < l0 and <_ 15 GEOMETRIC AND =stop sign C < 15 and 525 TRAFFIC VOLUME NORTH D < 25 and <_ 35 + = Undefined Service Measures E < 35 and <_ 50 CONDITIONS F > 50 WHM T E C ransportation nginee ring onsultants, Inc. -Austin, Tex as Traffic Volumes: Site + Forecasted 'raffic Volumes: Forecasted / Sid Park Place a~ .., ~, w D, e~ Q Service Measures: Forecasted All Lanes =12 feet Wide Unless Otherwise Noted rvice Measures: Stie + Forecasts NORTH LEGEND• Unsignalized Intersection LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) FIGURE 21 000 = PM Peak Hour Volume Control Delay LOS Per Vehicle (sec) X = Level of Service (LOS) A 510 2~~3 B < 10 and <_ 15 GEOMETRIC AND =Stop Sign C < 15 and <_ 25 TRAFFIC VOLUME D <25and<_35 + = Undefined Service Measures E < 35 and <_ 50 CONDITIONS F > 50 WHM Tra ortation En ineerin s lt C t I A ti T g n p g an onsu s, nc. - us n, exas Traffic Volumes: Site + Forecasted raffic Volumes: Forecasted / Si 25' 27' 27' All Lanes =12 feet Wide Unless Otherwise Noted Traffic Volumes: Site + Forecaste LEGEND• ' Unsignalized Intersection LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) FIGURE 22 000 = PM Peak Hour Volume Control Delay LOS Per Vehicle (sec) X = Level of Service (LOS) ,~ < 10 2~~3 B < to and <_ 15 GEOMETRIC AND =Stop Sign C < 15 and s 25 TRAFFIC VOLUME NORTH D < 25 and <_ 35 + = Undefined Service Measures E < 35 and <_ 50 CONDITIONS F > 50 Service Measures: Forecasted Service Measures: Forecasted WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. -Austin, Texas raffic Volumes: Forecasted / Si _~ ~_ 0 0 1 ~ 4 1 0 0 15 31 7 ~ 0 28' ~- 27' Service Measures: Forecasted l_ _-A~ LA- _C' A ~ ~ + - A - A ~ + - ~ ~ Park Place 27' Traffic Volumes: Site + Forecast All Lanes =12 feet Wide Unless Otherwise Noted Service Measures: Forecasted NORTH LEGEND• ' Unsignalized Intersection LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) FIGURE 23 000 = PM Peak Hour Volume Control Delay LOS Per Vehicle (sec) X = Level of Service (LOS) A <_ 10 203 B < 1o and <_ 15 GEOMETRIC AND =Stop sign C < 15 and s 25 TRAFFIC VOLUME D <25and<_35 + = Undefined Service Measures E < 35 and <_ 50 CONDITIONS F > 50 WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. -Austin, Texas 1 NEIGHBORHOOD STREET IMPACTS Since the site is adjacent to an existing residential area, care must be taken so as to reduce the potential for "cut through" traffic consisting or either passenger vehicles or delivery vehicles. Analysis of the site indicates that the delivery vehicles will be routed away from the residential areas. In addition to being routed away from these areas, large trucks would not normally travel through residential areas as they would desire to access the arterial and freeway system as quickly as possible. Only those patrons living in the surrounding neighborhoods will actually be using the surrounding residential streets. The City of College Station currently does not have a standard in determining neighborhood impacts. As stated in the Neighborhood Traffic Management section of the Development Guide (Ref. 6): 'Traffic Management and Calming Measures should be considered as a means to address problems with traffic volumes and speeds in residential neighborhoods where it is difficult or undesirable to provide the needed roadway capacity with a street improvement that might create unwanted traffic conditions and/or require additional street right-of-way which could be damaging to the residential character of the area. Such measures should be used with caution and only when they would not result in shifting the problem to another street or area. The application of these measures and techniques are particularly appropriate in already established neighborhoods where changes or additions in development in surrounding areas has resulted in vehicular volumes which are incompatible with the character of residential neighborhood traffic.' According to the City of College Station Development Guide, Section 5: Thoroughfare Plan (Ref. 6) the design criteria for a residential street (Park Place) should include a pavement width of 27 feet (existing conditions) and the vehicular volume should be in the range of 200 vehicles per day to 1,000 vehicles per day (vpd). The average daily volume that was recorded during October 2000 was 834 vpd as summarized in Table 2. This total daily traffic volume falls within the specified range. The Thoroughfare Plan indicates that there are no plans to upgrade this roadway from the present residential street status. Therefore, it can be anticipated that the volumes would not increase by a substantial percentage. Meetings conducted with the neighborhood residents determined that the residents fear that the HEB traffic will utilize Park Place as a "cut through" route. Therefore, the elimination of traffic utilizing westbound Park Place was the desired effect. This will be accomplished through the construction of right tum lanes to physically prohibit the left turn movement from the HEB driveways onto Park Place. WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. 45 ' Another feature of Park Place that will reduce "cut through" traffic is the fact that it is a discontinuous street with five offset intersections. Within the vicinity of the site, there ' are two right angle turns with warning signs and 15 mph advisory speed plates. As a result of the existing conditions along Park Place, an alternative route will be provided to those residents living within the area, but a convenient, cut through roadway will not be provided to those people living outside the immediate neighborhood. In addition, once the Texas Avenue Phase II construction is complete, the traffic ' utilizing Park Place will be further reduced. The Park Place access will be greatly reduced, so there will be a reduction of the number of vehicles using Park Place as a "cut through." Based on assumed distribution of site traffic along Park Place to the west, an increase of 149 vpd is estimated, resulting in a total of 1,008 (834 + 25+ 149) vpd with anticipated annual background traffic growth. This is less than one percent above the 1,000 vpd upper limit of the design guidelines. As discussed previously, a portion of the projected ' site traffic will result from pass-by traffic (vehicles which are currently using Park Place). In addition, it is probable that the design of Texas Avenue will include a continuous ' median, further reducing potential traffic volumes on Park Place. For these reasons, the proposed retail development is not expected to result in a significant impact on ' surrounding neighborhoods adjacent to Park Place. WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. 46 1 1 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS The preceding analyses have illustrated the effects of site generated and forecasted traffic demand upon the street and network adjacent to and in the vicinity of the project site. Generated traffic volumes were developed in a conservative scenario and assuming complete site development by 2003. Based on analysis of existing and projected conditions and in order to provide the safest and most effective movement into and out of the site, the following findings and recommendations were developed. 1. Existing operation at the signalized intersection of Texas Avenue and Holleman Drive is Level of Service E. Eastbound vehicle queues on Holleman Drive observed during the study were as long as 24 vehicles, resulting in frequent blockage of the existing driveway immediately west of Texas Avenue. TxDOT plans to reconstruct Texas Avenue with a six lane divided section, however, this will do little in alleviating congestion at the intersection. Recommendations are made to allow for two eastbound exclusive left turn lanes and then combining the thru and right turn movements. This will help the delays and queues in the eastbound direction and can be completed within the existing pavement. 2. Although overall existing operation at the unsignalized intersection of Texas Avenue and Park Place is Level of Service A, eastbound turning movements are at Level of Service F with significant delay. Discussions with City and TxDOT representatives concerning plans to reconstruct Texas Avenue (TxDOT Texas Avenue Phase II Project) provided the construction information concerning the Park Place intersection as well as plans for the entire project. Texas Avenue Phase II Plans in the immediate vicinity of the site are as follows: a. A median opening will not be provided at the intersection of Texas Avenue and Park Place. Thus, there will be no eastbound left tum access from Park Place and no northbound left turn access to Park Place. b. While TxDOT will be acquiring additional right-of-way along both the east and west sides of Texas Avenue, no additional travel lanes will be constructed. In the vicinity of the site, Texas Avenue will still have asix-lane cross-section. c To the south of the site, TxDOT is proposing to construct a continuous median between Manuel Drive and Holleman Drive. As a result of the planned median, the existing access point into the Hastings retail center, a driveway which aligns with Richards Drive, will operate with only right- WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. 47 1 in/right-out turning movements. There will not be a median opening at this location. d. Based on the proposed median design, the only access point to the Hastings retail center from northbound Texas Avenue will be at the driveway adjacent to the existing Outback Steakhouse, across from Manuel Drive. 3. Proposed driveways will be constructed in accordance with the City of College Station's "Driveway Access Location and Design Policy" to the extent feasible. Existing driveways adjacent to the site on Holleman Drive and Park Place preclude conformance with all of the spacing standards. A thorough evaluation has been undertaken to insure that proposed driveways are necessary and that the critical operational issues with their design are considered as follows: a. Provision of a single primary driveway on Holleman Drive was considered, but the resulting level of service was unacceptable. Concern for encouraging unnecessary traffic on Park Place was also a consideration, resulting in the need to accommodate the majority of site traffic via access driveways on Holleman Drive and Texas Avenue. b. Spacing between adjacent driveways on the site exceeds the minimum standards except for the driveway on Texas Avenue. The existing separation between Park Place and Holleman Drive, combined with the presence of the water tower preclude compliance with adjacent driveway spacing requirements. As a result, the spacing exceeds the minimum for Holleman Drive and is approximately 45 feet short of the minimum for Park Place. c. Throat lengths for proposed driveways exceed the minimum standards. d. Driveway designs have been developed to restrict turning movements where feasible. These include recommended prohibition of eastbound left tum movements at the eastern driveway on Holleman Drive and prohibition of northbound left turn movements at both driveways on Park Place. 4. Holleman Drive is classified as a four-lane minor arterial and traverses College ' Station completely from east to west. It will serve as the primary travel route for vehicular traffic from the east and west. Traffic control on Holleman Drive between ' Texas Avenue and Wellborn Road includes two traffic signals and three multiway stop controlled intersections. Traffic volumes in the vicinity of the site are anticipated ' to increase by 2,733 vehicles per day and 246 vehicles in the PM peak hour as a result of the proposed development. These are approximately 15 percent and 17 percent, WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. 48 i i i i respectively, of the projected traffic volumes on Holleman Drive. This vehicular increase will have a minimal impact on traffic operations adjacent to and within the area residential developments. 5. Park Place is classified as a residential street and provides access to other residential streets between Wellborn Road and Texas Avenue. It is a discontinuous street with five offset intersection locations. In the immediate vicinity of the site, there are two right angle turns with warning signs and 15 mph advisory speed plates. As a result of the existing conditions along Park Place, it is not anticipated to be an attractive travel route for vehicular traffic, except for residents in the immediate vicinity of the site. Traffic volumes in the vicinity of the site are anticipated to increase by 75 vehicles per day and 7 vehicles in the PM peak hour as a result of the proposed development. These are approximately 8 and 15 percent, respectively, of the projected traffic volumes on Park Place. It should be noted that a portion of the projected site traffic will result from pass-by traffic (vehicles which are currently using Park Place). As a result of this fact, the projected volumes discussed previously are conservative estimates. In addition, the current design of Texas Avenue will include a continuous median between Holleman Drive and Harvey Road, further reducing potential traffic volumes on Park Place based on resulting right-in/right-out only movements. The projected vehicular traffic increase will have a negligible impact on traffic operations adjacent to and within the area residential developments. WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. 49 ' REFERENCES ' 1. "Highway Capacity Software," United States Department of Transportation, Federal Hi hwa Administration Janua 1995 g , ry y . ' 2. Highway Capacity Manual, (SR 209), Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.,1994. ' " 3. Buttke Carl H., Tri Generation " Microtrans Cor oration Portland Ore on 1997. p p g , 4. Trip Generation, 6th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, ' D.C.,1997 5. Trip Generation Handbook, An TTE Proposed Recommended Practice, Institute of ' Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C., October 1998. ' 6. Development Guide, Section 5, City of College Station. 7. Driveway Access Location and Design Policy, City of College Station, Development ' Services Department, February 1997. 1 1 1 t WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. 50 1 rnflnr~'nrfllluurrl'nrf~nr"nrI'rtlln'innr~~nr 11 aaQ 11NaS 01 Nan11.~~a 96tr6-zhBLL Y.l NOIlb1S ~J3"1"l00 abt~b .~:oe od aao~ QN3S Ol NJ..a d'+,'=1 31^J T. ..I QabM2J0~ 'C01fT0l70 BO 66LT c OOEOhSLL TE9QaOd x.L `NOI.L~'.LS ~J~'I'IO~ "Id ?12Idd i £9I J }I~Ri~Q~3 `Q2I03 tiZi-00 a ~~ L ~...s~ ,~.~ o , x m °r 'r o~ x D ~y l,, c m I - 0 ~~ w ~~ o O X V N W O ~ O d U m (~ ~ ~ Frl ~ Q x h ~° ~o x O~ m V~ a Pl~~ ~~~r.~ ~ uwe.l~z .owvo ia`~NE3 ~E N n O ~ ~~ o U W G r ~ > V X r-~~ Wll° fal^ o O ~ 0 m 0 a ' '~. 00-124 ,FREDERICK G 1631 PARK PL COLLEGE STATION, TX ~rr¢f. ac+v«i.~...rn~rf s: v ~ i O ~ ova ~ gro o X 0 3 3 :. ;E~ u.s, resr 4 FORD631 778=F•~~Ot36 1799 08 iZl2il00 FORWARD T.Ih1E E? ~.P RTN TO SEND FORD PO BO:a 9r--98 COLLEGE STATION T:C 778L12-9~l98 II,~Ji.,,Il~rl,.1.rNl.,.,~I~I~i~~Il~I,ti~L~l~i~~l~i~~~~t~tl 1' ~ ~ L r I ~ ~~ ~ 9~~~Y ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~z ~ ~~~~ ~~ 1 x 5 ~ M m M r J U m O Q 7 c d c d 0 U T m 0 U c c m LL r m m O Cs £ ,5 - ~~/~~ v ~ ~~ ° DEC i sro 0 ° ~~ ~,_:-° PBME 7o+e 1 Ct~ ._....~.. t • _* X0.60= .* ~ Z ° Z ~, o J O ~ Q Q O Q (~ ~ ~ a W C3 ~ °' - w o W x Q Q ~ ~ z ~W ~ O ~ H OC z ~ a ~ t.~_ Q. } ~ ' . y W o Q ~ m~ d ~ ~ ~ v O ~ ~ F p a ~d ~ i a" ~ z N.Y ~ ~ E A W w o ~ ~ `"' W ~O ~ ~ w O O LLz E W ( y oN O a - ° ° a J ~ w Q `~~ ~ ; o , , O o J O~~C w O a 7 W W m~ ~ > m . d ~ ~ Y ~ QO ~ Q d C O ~ ~a ~L~V °oEOisroo° ~ ~ ~0.60~ ~~''- PB MEj~A f0~1131 U. S. rOST E z Z ~ a ~ ~ ~ a LL ~ O Q W H z ° X O C O a m ( j z ~ X LL ~ ~ F ~ O E..., o ~ ~ O~ ~ y O ~ U a ~ ° = ~ C7 E~ ~ d ~ E O~~ ~Z oa ~ ~C.7 B ~ ~~ ~z E ~ L7.1 w ° NQQa J 42 W ~ LL p 'i O M O ~ ~ ~° ~ boo;--~U O a W 0 m_ > m p vi Y o Q ~ o[ ~ c O O ~a ~ 6..~ t S \~JI W n7 O LL a m m M O LL N a :...~ i *. _* 0.60= w 1.8. COST E ~ ~ Z ~ a ~ ~ Q ~ W LL ~ J Q ~ W X _ a Q J m a U Z ~~ ~ p ? ~ a F a O ~ (~ a u~i U° 2 ~ ~ °' ~ a iz N ~ ~ ~ .-~ E w~H w U W O ¢ w m (Yi ~, ~ 41 o LL Z E ~~ 0 O ~ °o LL ^' ~ ~ ~" °x ~~ vi O ~ 3 ° o M W O a w w m~ > °' o } ~ a U ¢ d O ~ rn Ri M o LL d t *.. z Z ¢ I I I ~ ° ~ Q ~ ~ W O Q z W X ~ ~ ° ~ ~ v - ~ O U ~ a x LL ¢~ F ~ ,~ a: i, o H a~c Z~ oa ~ O m ~ N ~c.>O ~ V ¢v i U O (/~ ~ ~ m ~U~ v Q. d Fa O ~ ~ 4 W `~ d ~ H ~ O a O¢ m C7 '~' Q a ~ w O ~ f r7 ~ y -.] t"~ ~n ~ LL ? w~ ~° E ~ ~ ° -. pp a ° ~ ~ =a 0o0 N ° , O a w0 m- ? m n ~ ~ Q~ ~a U ~ N O ° 4 ~1 ~ s " DES i 9ro 0 ° ~ ' ~•' yr'.• PBME 'oi173t W MC C O LL a N T `~-~ .~ ,f t ,w v ~ , ;0.60= ~0.60~ ° DEC. i 8ro 0 .$. r6ST E * PBME~ U.8. ~~ST E 70i173i Z Z O Q Ca C ~ v! O a W ~ ~ a Q (~ ~ o - U ~ z ~ . O ~ ~ H I- ~ ?Q o ~ u. o- v H ~ Q z W V z~ ao Q } ~ ~ 3 ~ 7~ a ~ U ~Z O Q ~¢ N ~ ~ OWH ~ .-~ ~ ¢_ O 000 y z E ° N ~ x a J ~ 2 ~' ° ' ~ -~ .. O r~..l ~- 1- ~.~1 ~ o E-+ o°o O o a , W ~ m~ > ~ ~+ o rn n ~ QQ ,> ~ O O ~a `.~i~6 G 7~ ~~ m 00 fh O a v ~. A -' i °oECisroo° ~0.60~ ~, <.-~ 70 173 U. S. rOST E ~*, c~ Z z o I I I a y 0 ~ 7 ~ C~ Q W w Q W z W ~ ~ Q Q z J a O H Z ; O IZ ~ d U a vii = ~ w O a ~ N m "~" Q" 0\ of w p Z _ Nr^^ W ~ _ ~ > W U 0 ¢ ~° ~" ~xz uwi ~? E °~~~~'~ ~ ~ J Q OQ w0 LL ~ LL p 4 ^'= 3 a pr at O ~ w~ 7 > ~ a ~ a ~ m. ~> d ~ m c ~ QO ~a ~ O ,....ST ~ t V f. ~ i * O O °oEei9roo ~ ~0.60~ rt ~t * ~~~ 708173; U. S. rOST E ~ Z z Cad W ~ H a ~ ~ Q r ~ ~ X ~' O a f>a a Z ° a H Q ~ Q ~ LL ¢ ~ ~ (/~ ~ z O ~ o a ~ m m ° V "" H W z a O E-' R w ~ ~ Z ~ E Z "~ w W U O 0 yy ~ ¢ ~ m `.-r ~ .-a d ~o a N ~ oQ ~O o LL ~ 3 d N ~ d m O a W w ~ m. > d 'a ~ C ~ O I 7 k___~~~ __._ C7 °z Z ~, do Q° ~ Q LL ~ OQ W z aQ Z LL ww ~~ ~ zm ~ p~ U a~ ~ Va Ni ww ~U z (O U ~ Q Q ~ Q ¢N ~, ~ Z J ~ Q M ~ ~O E oWo o a m_ LL uj Q ~O a ~°~a 2 N CD E ,~, LL nn C16 '~ ~s m m O U ~ i i x H m ~ W O d ~ Q Q v~-'aF, `° 3 a' v1 E z~~ N 0 a w dc0 ~3~~ U d n O q Ch C n i M 0 LL n. m M E O LL d ~ ~ ~ `oFC t sro o ~ ~ 0.6 0 pppp ~~~~EI?3 U. S. POST E C7 z CJ Q O Q ~ ~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ J X Q a m X z Q ~ LL ~ ? a ~' 0 °- C:) ~ ~ o W °z ~ - 0 ~, U `.., ~ ~ Er v = ~ W Fa ~ ~ p,~ A I w OZ a ~ w ~ ~ O vl ~ N A " ra I v .-I ~~rii ^ti a . ~ ~ W O ~ LL " ' ...y .~/ V f O:. O w w ~ O > V °' a a m ~ ~ ¢ O ~ v_i -p `= ° o~ °ofctsroo ~ ~ X0.60.. "}~ ` ~~ ~Ej~i U. S. POST E Z !n !~ a ~ ~ ~ `~ ~ a ~ O ~ ~ ~ C3 ~ ~ - ~ U Q J X ~ W U Q ~Q ~ Q ~ ~^Q `" ~~ U ~ a ° ~ r W ? Q Z~ O ~ O V Qa ~ = ~ ~ ff" H ° v ~~a I ~ p mU . a w `-' ~Z ~~ E ~ az ~ tWfY~ooO ~ w fn ~ 7 O fn w ? E C v o 7' Q ~ ~, o ~ „ ~' W O ww D a > ~ i ~i Q V] 'n a N m }' ~ ~a ~ O a ~ o ~~_. ° ° ~~ ~_ ~ 0.6 0 ° o~c. t sro o i - U.S. POST E ,*~ J w O OO a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x Q ~ _ W ~ o - X o ~ o a, Q a ~ ~-- A o o~c o a a ~ a U a ~ 2 ~ ~' ~ ~ O ~ ~ O f ~ W x u~i a ~ N v x - o CD z b a x w ,~ ow wz E ago o0 O ' J W Q 0 N ~ ~ ryMe O~ •"'~ W H (/1 LL 7 ~ V a w m °_ Y ~ ~ 'd U fu c f/j QO i a ¢ O ~a rn m r M O LL . a m M `o LL a `m M E O a q~~ - ref ~.~..~-- ~. v ~. ° ofc t sro o ° ~ ~- ~ 0 '.6 0 . .~- "'~' ME~ U. S. POST E lV;x/38 ~ b z V v I I I J Q w ~ Q ~ 0 Q W ~ 0 Q w x J m ~ Q a ~ O JC ~ z v~i LZ ~- v ¢ (~ z O 0 m W V Q~ ~o a ~ I ~ ~ ~ N Oa ~ d m ~ F'+ a V~ _ ~v (.~ ~ .- E U W U oQ ~11 a(7 ¢= W c NW¢a ' w ~ cn p to W ? E w v ,,.,. V N i.-~ o ~ rare M O v~ O f F- to ~~ = d O O o_ w w m ~ > °' n cii > ~ QO m ¢ c O O ~a ~~ w i V ~ ~ ° ° oEC t sro o t pppp ~ "'` _ ~O~11Sb V.S. POST E rn ~-- M ° LL a V Z w Z o I I I a ~ a ~ Q ~ c°Q o Q w U ~ a s ~ o Z ~ m ' >C ~ ~~ ~ p o wz -~ U v Z~ ~ o O S ~ a ~ Nal G?~ E, W W ~ o U ~ a W w oZ c o a c ? 7 Q m ~J ~ o ~~ a w0 w dOV~r` V H j w -o ~ O a w~ m _ > ~, ~. ~ Y~ QO ~ ¢ d O O ~a y !' ~ ~. r ° o ~ ~ - . ., °ofc.tsroo ~ ~0.60~ p® ~ - PL7 ,E~t U. S. POST E ~ c~ ~ Z L ~ I I I J ~ ~ a O Q Q ~'+ ~ O L3 ~ Q ¢ ~ _ ~' co ~ ~~ a ~ ~ ?~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ o N w wW ~Z ~ ~ ~~ rxNz > ~ ~ O Q~ w O Z o ~ E ~ ~~ Q H N W o ~ W fi W .~ o O fu ~ a W w0 m_ > d U p N N O QO a ¢ O ~ W M O LL N a m W M O LL a -~..-. ~' p e S r .'"'ice ~ ~:~' ~. -.~:_.,,.• ° oEC tsroo° ~ r°'` ~0.60~ ~. U. S. POSt E V ° 4 ~ r t A1+ ~ R 7~ u.s. POST E C7 Z ~ Z ZO I I I J O Q a ~ ~ Q ~ ~. o ~ a w ~ a~ rn W ~ ~ ~ L1J ~ X ~ > U ~ ¢ C E-~ 'i ~IW- U ~ o zv, z OC o LL ~- y ~ W O V ~ ~o ~ ~ W ~Q¢ 2 ~ .~ D_ ~w cn ~~ ~ ~ ~ ¢a~ w ~z O (fl U E ~ W ~C7 ~' ~ U a w N Wz E ~ -f W M O ~ Q UO w ~ o ~O \ .r U ° ;~ f~/1 ~ w ~ U ~ O a W w m ~ ~ n O Y ~ V7 }' d ~ C ~ ~a o a ~ o c w~p E s r "~d~~~. o ~ , ° oEC. t sro o ' ,~a„`~~~ (U ME rn `m b O n L m M a X0.60= I* U.S. lOS~R z N o I I I J `~' O Q w ~ Z ~ ~ m Q Q Z ~ ~ ~~ O H LL ~ M ? Q U ~ a: ~ ~ m ~ z I.L W Q z ~ ~ N ; a. O U a o ~a = } 1- ~ U E- ~ ~ ~~ Z N U co W~~v~] E d p w o z¢ W ¢ w o~ c ~~~U W o a 0 u i a w? ~ ~ W E W 'V ..a N~ ~~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ d~ Q--U O a w0 m . > 'd O o fU C to ~ Q ~ ~a 2 ~ m c~ O N a N ~ 'r ~' v i ~ "1+~ f s~ otic s aro a ° ~~~~~~ w 0.6 0 u.s. PosT E t ~nai ~ o z r i i i J a ~ ~ ~C ~ ~ Q ~ LLI R (•, L C ~ O Q v O ~ a s ~ W I ~~ ~ U z o U Q U~ H ~ ~~ a m a zz z V ~ o a Cn F. ~ d d l w ~~ N (~ .O ~'° C/2 O ~ V] E WUc,W ~ oQ ~ C7dxC7 ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ° z .0 ~ 1~1 o~ W~~ W a wo E O w 1 ~~Ud~S F' N W W ~ 0 O O a w0 m _ ~ > ~, U a ~ C ~ O QO ~a Q O MC C O LL a. ~ G E S T9 ~~°'r. ,.. .°'......~....~..~.. ~~ a ~ t i ° o€c z a~o o - ~ 0.6 0 ~ R ~'~ , p~ ,- ~na~E/~i U. S.I~OS7 E Ur Z p Z In v ~ jv'vi j /fi J ~ ~ ' r 7 O~ V [ Q ~ ~ Q 7 ~~n ~ O J J ~ ~~ 4.. ~ ('Y a z ~ ~ Y~~m~.fi ~ x ° . H LL ~~ ~ s dUz ~ Za ~ ~ zdo O U a of ~ ~ o a" Va F ~ ~ N U _ „~ ~ ~ w ~Z ~ ~" U W >, a W U oQ W ~~c ,~Q w N O N W? E ~ .-1 N '"'~ . a"'O F y0 w m N O W d m ' O w O > o. fA Y p Q m 2 d c O O ¢ ~a :F ....-.. ~ .~._.. //' '4' r w ~E $ t4 ~~ 1 v ~ t ° v °`~'° :0.60- ; OEC 2 9`4 Q • ~, rUMEj~t U.S. }pST E « •~ fna173a W O 0 a J Q Z O a Z 'ww Z ~ . a o~ Z Q O U_a F- wW N w ~ Z CO U OQ ~ ~~ ~oz Q w ~ li N ~ LL ~ O w0 d f~ - U u~ Q O 2 ~ dal . cn ~~~' n C3 ~~~~1~.y7n nT ~ *\ -^ \` tr~ ~~.. )~ ~ p3 Q) .o """ W ~ ~ U ~ z d '~ ~ ~ EF V'1 o ~ ~ O ~ o O ~ d' (~ U d O I I O rn m M O LL N a m r 0 LL N a a ~ o c N v l ~ ~ • ° ~ofc~aroo ~' ~0.64~ ~~}}pp _ .,~+'~ ~Qa173a U.3. POST E J "' Q Q 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w T T VI z ~ U W Q o J J m ~ ~ a Z ° o ~ Za ~ Q- ~ H Q ~ W o~ z o y ~8 ~ ~ ~N ~ 3 0 F ~- ~ ~ CP (~ ~ ~ ~, W `° W H w U ~ ~ z 0 0~ _ 7 C ~ ~ y O N ~ a~ p v E"~ f-~ oQ w O o 0 1 ~ 0 ~ ryry~~ MM C ~ ~ ~ ~ W W U O a w~ m_ ~ d n (/j O > 0 ~d m ¢ c O ~,~w .sw,,• ss t _ v 4 r /~ ~o~caa~oo°~~ X0.60- ,~ k ~~~ ioati U. S. COST E ~ a ~ o c 1.~~OC ~S ~ ~~ v G w~ ~~~1~ ° -1 ° ore z a~o o ° t ,~ ~. ~~, fl• / ~ ~ ... i ~ 'g ei . TQ.60~ ~~6', .mss nnm Z ~, ~ J ~ .~,~~ - n ! ~ 1~ O ..J Q ~W., 4 X ~ Q a z o U ens F ? ~ Lt a ~ F W z~ = o z V ~o Cq~ d U ~ d0 ~w ~U a¢ gc~ ~ Q E W~H ~ _U > ¢ ~ ~ ~ W~ w rn 0 !/7 w? E ~T ~ v a V o •~ W pa W Q O W ~ ~ LL lL > O nN.i CV ~ 1 m 1 /~~/ f•.) -~ m ~ O 1 a w0 op _ .~ O V ~a rn j ~¢ y > ~ ~ O C m m M LL d Z Q ~, V •V ~~~/ J a W ~ ; ~ v n~OZ ~ ~ C)'z n , + ~ O ~ °° ~ a v Z p ~ ~15 ~~ U '~ a H ~ Z~ a ° ~ o = ~ H ~ ~ O W V z U 0 ~ ~ ~ .~~~y F ~ '` ~ U ~ d gZ E Q Q" vl w O ~ ~ > W ¢ ¢7 o ~ m (~ 5 QQ~~ ~ er W fn w? E p~AA''a 1 H 0 Od 0 w y 0 tOZ ~ O oOLz O a w ~ m y >_ m , °' o. ~ j } ~ ~a OUi ~ C O ~.'~ w acs t ~r°. _,. ,t X0.60_ `°\ i. m r C7 O LL a T m MC C ILL a ~`~ E}~:. ~ ~_ Boa ~ ~a 9 t f • '^ V Z H Z V ~ ~, o ~ ~r ~ Q ~ ` )~ O a n ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~~ a Q ~, B oa m N zz z ~ = Q Q ~° a ~ U v ~ d 8 d wU ~ m 'm V7 O (~ !% B > oa ~ ~' C7d~C7 m ~ w ~~ orn E ~ W o N Zma ~ wZ ~ a a a O w w o > n °' a. (n m Y > ~ d C ~a ~ O __~. •.~•-- aye lr`' - _ _ _ V % rl1f~-,r °oEc2a`OO° ~r. :0,60 Qr~ ~. -.. ~' . - f U N{ r Ina ~ 'i'~ct\ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ,~ J O r~ ~ ~+ ~A ~ Q ^ r ,i/, ~~ ~ ® 4 S G J ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~w" *~ U ~ m as ~ Q ~ ~ O cn W A ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ? D ~ _ ~ o y Er E"1 V ~ a~ Cn ® y va d ~ U O a a ~ N ~ v (yi 'S ~ W ~ O v i z ~" oa Cfl = E GO~~O W ~ ~ ~ ~~ x a~C ~ ~ ~ ? ~ yy o '.~V ~ F ~, O w W .~ W t" R~ 7 t"' ° _ ~ F+ a ~ ~, O ~ w w ~ > Uoxd zn °~ a m 0 ~ o. (n O } ~ QO ~a d ¢ C O W rn R M 0 LL a Cm G M O LL a rn N M O LL N a c y _..~. -~~ c q v ~ ~ ~ ^ ` DEE 28`0 0 a '~ .,;. r ~dS~~ ~ z a o z w ~ ~ ~ on z ~, ~, ~~ ~-,n Q ~ o Q ~ W F- o - O a Q Z ~ ~ ? a °' ~ H M I.L W Q ~ z~ = ~ ry d V ~o fn O U ~ F~WO v~ia wU N ~ ~ WVE ~ E ~ a w O z ^ ( ~ / ~ Q W V ~ o ¢ ¢ m UI A w N ~ ~ Z ~ ~r r~ ~ o V J F oy (n ~ ? LL ~~^ W 01N W F~1 d ml N O ~ ~j QO V ~ O I I I ~ ~a arc o c rn ao `w M `o LL a y "q'r•• NI µ ~~.~..~..~... ~ '9~, ~~++' ~ 0 ~ I i , ~flEC 2 8'~0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ j } ~ _ ' , ~S// ... r rD ME .~ ?nit 2E : " R 6 S~ ~ -- i 6* ~ ~~' v Z ~ 4~ I ~ , ~ ~ A 4 _ ~ O o ~ ~ ~,' ~ ~~d .~~'~ a ~ , ~ ~ w Z W W f' °- ~ J a ~ Q Q v LL ~~ F~ U ~ ~ o ~ ~ W ?a z~ _ Q ~ V a ~' C/? >'_ CS d m ~~O w W w ~Z ~~ ~~ E o z ~ ~ V~1 U ~ W OQ o ~ Q ~ ON m C ~ ' v] W W ~ ~ ~ W ~ ccm L rn LLz E o o ~ W ~ .-a ~ ¢ E NO ~ V O O O O ~ O a W Q m_ > ~ p lit V CC C ~ ~ Q O r, ~ a Q ~ Q C I I I O LL to a a~ O C :: v q ~ ~~ AGE sT ~~~~`'~` ~ ~ f f~ "GEC 2 8'0 0 ~ ~ .~ ~ ~. .+ t ~ ,.. <; /~~~ ~' MEN / ~ae~:/~~ Q~ v Z ~V ~/ 1 I R a ° ~ ~~f~ ' ~~~ ~ Q ~ G 15 ~ o ~ a °' +- _ W O m O ~ Q ~ a ¢~ O ~ ct X a ~ LL H F a ~ ~ 0 / / i~ ~ ca C ^' W 1~1 N Y~1 O ~ Y O ~ r , H~ ~~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ O H E CF7 ~ W , c O w N ¢~ °Z € ~ s ~~sa ~ p C 1 to ~ O a w~ m _ ~ ~, a uj Y Q m c ~ Q ~a ~ O .~1~-- ~:~ __ _. _ i~ -•° ~ ~ i n. # - _0.60= ~Q~jETf=~U.S. ~eST~iE ~' . f0 M O LL N a a ~ o c c m d . '~ n ~ o c F m - °' ~.sas„~sr rn rn c0 n M 0 LL a ~~° a~ '~ ,,,~, . _. t }/~ :-0,61,0.. _. ~ ~: Z o z ~ j~~n~ 9 e6 J Q w 0 O ~ '/~{ q, ~f 11~ ~G Y' ~,/~ l x y NJ ., t"\ ~ LL ~ .~,~._:: C Q O O ~ o m -~ a s a ~ LL Z ~ ~ Q. ~ o _ F' ? ~ ~ W Z f _ ~ '~' ~i U Q f/7 0 // //~~ V J O U V ~ N a 1 ~ aRWi ~~ E ~M A w U Oz O~ ` ~ M W ay ~ ~3 ~ LLz E o ~ ti ~ o ~ Q wo LL ~ ~ 1 r a°oo°~..~~W < a m_ ~ ~' } ~ ~ °' O ~ ~a i~i!!6 C S r ~`~G O ~ ,I ~, ~ n S ~, ~~pp ; SdS~i rD ME , a~~t° ---~ OOOZ rn tb r M 0 (n a. 1 ~~..~. - .60~ ,. .. i c,~St1.~ o ~ Z z ~ i`}I o ~ Y. ~~n LL ~ O Q ~ _O ~ Q Q z ~ r-a a~ ~ o ~ W Z~ = O ~ o23U v as cn U ~ 5~ Ua N m _ fA W ~ 'm ~ r-~ X 6 W p g W U ~ z 00 ~ / F i ~ r•y „ N Q ~ oZ C W Q; z o Nx~d ~ V O ~ ~ J ~ 0 ~ N° 1 ~ °3~~ C y 7 y o, O a w0 m. > d n y ~ yo Q ~ 2 c O ~ Q ~a N Tl ~ -~ .., ~oEe2s'oo X0.60= ~oEe28~oo _ ~ X0.60= _, [[.. ~--~ OOOZ nm z N ~~1 ~~ a ~ ~ o ~ ~~ ~n ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ O O Q a ~p (~ z .~ m x H ~ ?~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ z y Q ~ U d ~ ~ ~ r' r',, [~~ ~ ~ ^ O m .-.a Q E"" u~i~ N U ~.W ~..~Q w ~~ OZ ~ ~ 3a~ U 0~ m Z W K N ~~ ~ z E ~ O c7 o et VJ q., w Q Oa NU ~ LL a o .N~ ¢ ~ I..a 1 m ~ ~ O o n W ~ - m !' >_ m y O. C ( ~ O ~ ~a oc ~ ...~~ v .. r T0.6.0-. t ! ~ e~[.`\ z 1~~ ~ z O o Q ~/~~ ~ o `~ti-, n aka T b co C7 C O LL. N a J -Q ~~ J Q u_z 0 Sa z ~ ww F;, z w ~~ W z I- QN U_O a ~" I ~w wU ~Z w pa U pQ ~ KN Noz J 0 ~ w F ~ LL rn O wC a m- vi Q C 7 ~ 0 N CD 0 LL "O d U c O :-. RS W O O U ~_ a o 9 d N N v W m ~ a N m rti O~ xN ~aox oa~~ZOz H y ~ ~;T~ ~~3a~~a n O I I I rn rn n ('~ 0 LL a n b T C M O LL a m r MC C O LL N a `~ ,,.,... . [, • • .!F ~ M .~ ~- ~ `o. z Z ° ~ ~ ;c~, ~ O ~ ~ ~~~ Q o °~ ~ ' r~ ~`t V~S ~ ~ ~ O J ~ o O Q a "'.' U ,~ Z W W Cn o g x F z ~ ~ v E" fy a O ~ „ H N v ' ` v V ~ Z O o V Q F a ~ V ~ V E" w~ CO E ~~ZF U ~ O Q o¢ o~ ~ Q~. O ~ ry W v ~~ V~ m ~- z E o~ [[[F~~,,,,.'' z W ~ J O B ~° ~ ~ 1~ O ti H ° ~ Q~ O ~, a m o ~ ,~ n~~ Q ^-~ U ~ ~ QO ~a ~ O rn w `m M E 0 LL N a v 9 i ~ 1M ""'~'---~....'.._ " pEE 2 8r0 0 ~ ~,.~ y x .. , M°'6°~ ~' ~ wr s a m m` M O LL fA a r id's-+r+~„ .,~ P ~' X0.60:: ¢~, ~ gyre " cdSl1 `~; z ~ ~ d o C ~~ W ~ z o Q Q W z ~~ ~~ o Z t/1 W Q z~ ~ m V U 0 v R a ~' I W w ~ v 1O ~( N a ~ E U ~ Q e~ yy `~- ~"' N f-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q C J D Q ° ~ G ..r ~ W~ ~ ~ LL ~ ~ p O Q m ~ O a w u' m~ > ~ a -' ~++ x ' O N T' ~a m ~ O c rn M O LL N 2 o1Uw,. •. e d pEE 2 8 0 0 ._ ~, ~~ Q'~ r~E ~~11 ~ ~ e F~~S~. ~~~~ n •y ~= C7z N ~I (' ~~ a ° '~ ~~Q~"di. o ~ ~-_ ~ a J a £ a ~ W o O Q U Q a ~ F" a Q LLWw ~ a~ Q ~ o~ ~ H W 0 m ~ 5wH U"~ ~ Ca wdQ¢~ u+ v ~ V iii, ~w N E Qr"~g z ~G'rJr > ~, ~,L~ v~~? E ° ~QtYd ~ o o ti o 3 H N~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M N~~ ~ N ~ w ~ d ~ ~--i C O w0 ? a a m ~ ~~ c j ~O ~ O rn rn l0 n M O LL N d - ~' ROBERT ADAMS, PE DFW Branch Manager +.i ADAMS CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 2445 E. Southlake Blvd., Suite 100 Southlake, Texas 76092 CIVIL /ENVIRONMENTAL Metro (817) 329-6990 FAX (817J 329-7671 ENGINEERS E-Mail: robo@aceitl(w.com i PLASTIC • _--_ ~- NEON SIGNS • MAINTENANCE (G~Ei NEON ,~[jv CO. 'r, PETE SITTERLE r PHONE (210) 341-7244 8211 U.S. 2B1 NORTH FAX (2t0) 341-7279 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78216 PLASTIC • NEON SIGNS _: • MAINTENANCE COMET NEON .a-U~: CO. PETE SITTERLE PHONE (210) 341-7244 FAX (270) 341-7279 6211 U.S. 261 NORTH SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 76216 Paul E. Kullman, AIA Vice President/Principal pkulfmanG3L9!tkl(architects.com 3050 Post Oak Blvd. Suite 460 Houston, Texas 77056 voice: 713.499.2900 lax: 113.499.2929 mobile: 832.594.6563 www.WKMCarchitects.com l~ ~,- --' - -_ ---- ~~,i'YV~ i~~ uS~s c~ S~~ - ~ ~ ~~ ~d~ ~~ ~ ,L ~/ `~~ Ik, 0 '.. ;.. -- 4.xrl MnxY L. Roxu;Ex, P.E. MANAGER OF SITE ENGINEERING FACILITY ALLIANCE H.E. BUTT GROCERY COMPANY (210) 938-8238 646 S. MAIN AVE. (78204-1210) (210) 938-8091 /FAX P.O. BOX 839999 EMAIL: rohrer.mary@heb.com SAN ANTONIO TEXAS 78283-399^ 1 C~, Q i~ 0 i c NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING: The College Station Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a pubPic hearing to consider a REZONING for 1900 TEXAS , AVE SOUTH from A-P Administrative-Professional, C-3 Plan- -. ned Commercial, and^~.1 6~reral Commercial to PDD-B Planned Development-Business. The hearing will be held in the Council Room of the College Station City Hall, 1101 Texas Avenue at the 7:00 P.M. meeting of the Commission on Thursday, JANUARY 4, 2001. Any request for sign interpretive services for the hearing im- aired must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To make p arrangements call (979) 764-3547 or (TDD) 1-800-735-2989. For additional information, please contact me at (979) 764- CIF CU5TONER RECEIPT *$~ 3570. DER; GMESSARRA CT DRA4~R: 1 JESSICA JIMMERSON DATE: 6/2fi/00 00 RECEIPT: 0'249573 ~ ~ ~ Staff Planner 1z-zo-oo DESCRIPTI~V QTY Ap~IAJT TP TM -- - - 2000 124 1 (250. Qf0 ~rPL GK _-__-` PLANNING f ZONIN CK: 1402 ......... _ . -- - TENDER DETAIL CK 1402 (250.00 DATE: fi/26/00 TII~: 17:13:23 TI~TAL RERS~IL CHECK f250.00 NOTICE nF Pl1RLIC HEARING: AP10t~JT TENDERED (258. I ie College Station Planning and Zoning Commission will t public hearing to consider a REZONING for 1900 TEX. /E SOUTH from A-P Administrative-Professional, C-3 Plar ~d Commercial, arad C-1 General Commercial to PDD-I anned Development-Business. ie hearing will be leld in the Council Room of the Colleg ation City Hall, 11 V1 Texas Avenue at the 7:00 P.M. meetin the Commission on Thursday, JANUARY 18, 2001. ,y request for. sign interpretive services for the hearing irr sired must be made 48 hours before the meeting. To mak rangements call (979) 764-3547 or (TDD) 1-800-735-2989. >r additional information, please contact me at (979) 76~ i70. :SSICAJIMMERSON i ^ ^J OD I ~~ aff Planner ~ iHANH YOII