Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMisc Date: May 30, 2000 To: Amanda Hudec, Accountin From: Bob Mosley, City Engineer Subject: Completed Infrastructure from Private Development By the attached letter of completion for the Rudy's Bar-B-Que development, we have accepted the following improvements to the City of College Station infrastructure. Water: 6-inch PVC waterline 67 linear feet $3,175.00 The above figure represents the total value of the water infrastructure. cc: Natalie Ruiz, Development Coordinator Vern Wright, Engineering Technician Missy Green, Staff Assistant u5~ia~uu ua:ia Sens ey: TEXCON; (ydua 7114 J~la6 DE~BLOP~IEIvT SVCS 409 890 9787; May-19.00 9;12; COST ESTIMATE FIRE SYSTEM WATEf~LINE RUDY'S IIBQ - COLLl:G!` STATION, ~'EXAS item Estimated N~ Descri t n Quanti ~ 6" Wat~rlfne • PVC-CI 200 (C900) 67 2 6" - 90;deg. M.J. Bends 1 3 Riser Pipe 1 a Tie-in to existing pike 1 Prepared by_ Texcan G¢noral Gvntractors Unli Estirrtated Prig Ca&t LF $25,DD $1,fi75.dQ EA $2QD.00 $240.00 EA $3o0_t70 $300.DD LS $1,000,00 7 0.00 Total $3,176.00 (~jo02 Pege 2!P LETTER OF COMPLETION CITY ENGINEER CITY OF COLLEGE STATION COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS DATE: 4-- ~2 -~ RE: COMPLETION OF ~ ~~ 1~! <e 1 c ~ e ~T' f?u b 'j's' B8 Dear Sir: The purpose of our letter is to request that the following listed improvements be approved and accepted as being constructed under city inspection and completed according to plans and specifications as approved and required by the City of College Station, Texas. This approval and acceptance by the City is requested in order that we may finalize any sub-contracts and to affirm their warranty on the work. This approval and acceptance by the City of the improvements listed below does hereby void the letter of guarantee for the listed improvements on the above referenced project. The one year warranty is hereby affirmed and agreed to by Sr~.loa~a Aut~,,n~T~~ ice GJr /.~~, and by their sub-contractors as indicated by signatures belo WORK COMPLETED ~" ~i r~ LI HQ ©~ ~ DATE ~-- iz- ~o .~r~c~~ Utility Representative (s) A E C & APPROVAL City Engineer Owner: ~{ k~~ s /~~.~ ~/~, ~(~ Address: l ,~' / y /S/Z <.1-~J S<:. ~~ ,~ a ~, ~ r~- -,y~ 3 y Signature: ~ Contractor: Sr~a,~,~ ~,,~-R,,,,~,_T~ F~aE Ed'T~2PRas~S, rl~. Address: p, e, Sox (~ ~FoB Signature. .x..10/ 12/92 ac Bridge#te George...PRC Wednesday, Ma .19, 1999... _. .....___,.,,.., .... . .. .......... ... „„, ...Page_1. From: Jim Smith To: PRC Date: 5/12/99 1:17PM Subject: PRC -Wednesday, May 19, 1999 Ray Cowart Division (99216): No problem. Edelweiss Business Center (99-221): No problem. Rudy's Barbecue (99-419): I do not see a container location noted on the site plan. I need a 12 x 12 pad with screening fence for service. Sigma Alpha Epsilon (99-701): No problem. All Pets Medical Center (99-705): No problem. Thanks! I COLLEGE STATION P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tel: 409 764 3500 MEMORANDUM DATE: June 27, 2000 TO: Design Review Board FROM: Shauna Laauwe, Staff Planner ~t~ RE: Rudy's Bar-B-Q attached sign modification This item is to consider proposed modifications to the existing attached sign located on the front of the building. The existing sign is a 40" x 65" aluminum letter cut out ("Rudy's")that is mounted directly to the face of the building. To increase visibility, the applicant wishes to place the current sign onto a 78" (6'5") white circle. The applicant also wishes to add black vinyl lettering to the white circle that reads: "Real Texas Bar-B-Q." The applicant is also proposing lighting the "Rudy's" part of the sign. Staff has not received any details regarding lighting. The applicant is prepared to discuss this point at the meeting. Staff has found record that a round sign was approved by the DRB on May 25, 1999, however the file and minutes did not indicate the size of the sign or its location. The decision points for the project are: • Sign (size, location, lighting, and color) Home of Texas A&M University COLLEGE STATION P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tel; 409 764 3500 MEMOR~INDUM June 29, 1999 TO: Blake Brown, via fax (512) 263-1942 FROM: Bridgette George, Asst. Development Coordinat SUBJECT: Rudy's Bar-B-Q -Site Plan Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. This project is scheduled for review by the Design Review Board on Wednesday, July 30, 8:30 a.m., those comments/conditions will be forwarded to you as soon as they are prepared, and will be required in addition to the attached comments. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further staff review: Ten (10) copies of the revised site and landscape plans; and The attached redlined site plan with staff comments. Please submit the items requested by Monday, July 12, 10:00 a.m. to be considered for scheduling at the next Planning and Zoning Commission meeting scheduled for August 5, at 7:30 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Texas Avenue. Due to the recent increase in development activity and the number of cases scheduled for the Planning and Zoning Commission, staff will review the caseload and determine what items will be scheduled for the Commission on August 5, 1999. If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 764-3570. Attachments: Staff review comments TxDOT Permit Application cc: MoonDance Investments Ltd., via fax (512) 263-1942 W. Michael Sfeffey, via fax (713) 686-8180 Mark Ferguson, via fax (409) 846395 Home of Texas A&M University Bridgc~tte:George Rudy's BBQ _: _ Page.1' From: Natalie Ruiz To: Internet: msteffey~ksa-adi.com Date: 5/13/99 6:51 PM Subject: Rudy's BBQ I just wanted to let you know that staff has performed a cursory review of your submittal on the new Rudy's BBQ in College Station. We will have a list of review comments available at the DRB meeting; however, there were several items that I thought you should know about before the meeting. The following is a list of items that you should be prepared to address at the DRB meeting: (1) Lighting details. Provide details/standards for all freestanding and any attached lighting. (2) Pavement treatment. What type of pavement treatment is proposed in the cross-hatched areas? Provide actual color/material samples to be reviewed by the Board. (3) Are there existing trees on the site? The DRB will want to know what trees are existing and may require some to be saved. (I wasn't able to tell if there weCe existing trees on this site or if they were on the Office Max and creek properties.) (4) Dumpster location. Where will your dumpster be located, how will it be screened from the public rights-of-way? This area may be incorporated as an access to the park and for maintenance vehiGes. (5) Pedestrian access to the park (creek area in the rear). How will pedestrians move between the restaurant and the creek? (6) Utility connections to the buildings including the A/C units. Where are these connections located and how will they be screened from all public rights-of-way? (7) Signage. Is a freestanding sign proposed? All freestanding and attached signage must be reviewed and approved by the DRB. I just wanted to give you a "head's up" before Wednesday's meeting with the Board. The meeting is at 9:30, here at City Hall. I'll be out of the office on Friday; however, if you need additional information, please contact Bridgette George at (409) 764-3570. I'll be back in the office on Monday, Thanks & I'll see you Wednesday, 5/19. CC: Bridgette George ~'~1 ~~~1 July 23,1999 Mrs. Natalie Ruiz City of College Station 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77840 RE: Rudy's BBQ -College Station, TX Via Priority Federal Express 98710.0001 Dear Mrs. Ruiz: The following is our response to the Staff Review Comments #2 dated July 20,1999. 1. Please relocate the Transformer back to it's original spot or call to work out another location that is acceptable to the electrical department staff and the guidance and values expressed by the Design Review Board. Response: The transformer has been relocated as per your request and approval of the electrical department. See note #4 on attached DD1 sheet. '~2. Please see if you can relocate items to put this island back to it's original configuration that was reviewed by the DRB. Response: Per your request, the island has been changed to it's original configuration. See attached DD1 sheet. /3. To avoid returning to the DRB for additional review, remove the compact car space by the dumpster and put it back in its original location at the rear of the building. Response: The compact car space has been moved per your request. See car row #90-93 on attached DD1 sheet. !4. Catch Basins -note #23 points to the opening in the curb as a "catch basin". Please remove this note as that area is not a catch basin. Response: Note has been removed please see park access area on attached DD1 sheet. 5. In the earlier review we asked for a note stating the property owner is responsible for opening the dumpster gates at the appropriate time. Please add that note to the site pan. Response: Done see note #37 on attached DD1 sheet. 6. You'll need to apply for a TxDot permit for the driveway and sidewalk. Response: Application in progress pending Owner's signature. City of College Station Development Service Rud~s BBQ Submittal Page 2 of 3 Provide water and sewer demands. Response: To be determined at a later date by engineer. 8. We will need full calculations on the sizing of the pipe and plan and profile views of the pipe. Response: To be determined at a later date by engineer. ,- 9. The pathway needs to be 10 feet wide by ordinance. Please show where it can be located in the future and attempt to remove all site elements from that future path if you can. Response: The pathway has been widen to 10 feet according to ordinance. See attached DD1 sheet f10. Please crosshatch grasscrete area again as on the previous submittal. Response: Done, see attached DD1 sheet. 11. In accordance with the spec that you submitted on the grass paving material, the city will need engineering design calcs/drawings showing the paving section under the grass pave material. Per the specs, that will need to be designed to meet the max traffic loading expected on that area. Response: To be determined at a later date. ~~' 12. Sonic and Office Max are zoned WPC. Response: Done, see attached DD1 sheet. 13. Please assure that handicap ramps are located at the driveway on SH30. Response: Done, see attached DD1 sheet. 14. Label the sanitary sewer line entering the property from SH30 as a private line. Response: Done, see attached DD1 sheet. J 15. The waterline parallel to SH30 appears to be a private service line. If so, please label as such and place outside the public utility easement. Response: Done, see attached DD1 sheet 16. You show an existing water line tee. Are you sure it exists?. Response: To be determined at a later date by engineer. ,' 17. You can either move the FDC to the front of the building or add another fire hydrant. Response: The FDC and firelane have been relocated. See attached DD1 sheet. ~18. On detail DD1.02 change the note to read the paving must be 6" thick in all firelanes. Response: Done, see detail DD1.02. 19. Assure that the base site plan being used for the landscape plan is the same as the site plan being submitted. Response: Done, see corresponding Landscape plan. KSA ARCHITECTURE, Inc. G:1RudyslCollegeStationlDocsW72399nruiz.response2ltr.doc 2180 North Loop West, Suite 350, Houston, TX 77018 (713) 686-4900 FAX (713) 686-8180 City of College Station Development Service Rudys BBQ Submittal Page 3 of 3 x`20. Assure that whereever the FDC is located that it is not blocked by shrubs that may grow tall and cover the connection. Response: The shrubs have been changed to DwarfYaupon, which will not grow tall enough to cover the connection. 21. Show screening around the transformer. Response: Redistributed shrubs to adjusted transformer location. ~22. Assure that the two elms nearest Office Max are at least 20' apart. Response: Done, see noted dimension on Landscape plan. End of Response. i Boo er ministrative Director KSA ARCHITECTURE, Inc. G:\RudyslCollegeStation\Docs\072399nruiz.response2.ltr.doc 2180 North Loop West, Suite 350, Houston, TX 77018 (713) 686-4900 FAX (713) 686-8180 DATE: July 23,1999 T0: Natalie Ruiz City of College Station 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77840 (409) 764-3570 FROM: Gina Boozer for Mike Ste VIA: Priority Federal Express RE: Rudy's -College Station PROJECT # : 98710.0001 Enclosed you will find a response to the Staff Review Comments #2 and ten (10) blue-line copies of the revised sheet DD1 for the above referenced project. In addition I have also included an 8.5x11 copy of the site plan which identifies the island square footage. The landscape plan will follow under a separate cover. Please contact me immediately to confirm our scheduling for the August 5th Planning and Zoning meeting. GBImam enclosure(s) cc: Blake Brown ~ ~ G J Iii 'I ~. ;~, ,1UL ~~ ~L. 4 ~'` -~~ ~~ _.:.._._ KSA ARCHITECTURE, INC. G:IRudyslCollegeStationlDocs1072399nru¢.reu2.tmdoc 2180 North Loop West, Suite 350, Houston, Texas 77018 (713) 686-4900 FAX (713) 686-8180 -. ,...~..a. - --F . ... .. . Sabine McCully - rudy's review ~ ~ , A :Page 1 e. -r- .. ~~r .. ....... ,... From: Sabine McCully To: Bridgette George; Natalie Ruiz Date: 12/1/99 2:40PM Subject: rudy's review also note to file: here's apparently what happened with this review. gins boozer had revised the site plan that went to pnz not only to answer the first 3 items that were critical to keep the item on the agenda, but also to meet the rest of the review comments. from what i can tell we missed this, but her comments back to us along with the site plan dated July 26 met all of the requirements with the exception of the engineering items, which were not site plan requirements anyway. another point of confusion came in because gina submitted a different site plan with the building plans. i mentioned to her that we cannot have two separate site plans. so, the option was to either 1) tweek the July 26 plan to revise two new island configurations or 2) add the review comments no. 3 revisions to the building plans site plan. today she told me that she will go with the second option and will return the site plan separately because it's ready to send and revisions (if any) can be added and submitted with the final round of building plans. thanks. CC: Jeff Tondre ^ Name Date Work Description Time ~ ~ ~Z.~