HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff ReviewSTAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
No. 1
Project:: JEFFERSON COMMONS (SP) (0-92)
*STOP REVIEW* The parking needs to be substantially reconfigured. A full
review was not conducted. The following are some precursory comments.
1. Section 9.2 Paragraph 7, Interior Islands: "For every fifteen (15) interior
parking spaces, 180 square feet of landscaping must be provided
somewhere in the interior rows of the parking lot. Interior island areas may
be grouped and configured as desired provided that circulation aisles remain
clear. Interior islands may have sidewalks through them."
:• The proposed site has 710 interior parking islands which calculates to
a minimum requirement of 8,520 square feet of interior islands. The
present configuration, however only shows 2,400 square feet of such
interior islands. Only end island areas that exceed the minimum
required may be counted toward the interior parking island
requirement.
2. Curb detail - #4 bars are required.
3. Give rear and side setbacks for all property boundaries.
4. The site plan shows an outer line following the curb. What is this line?
5. Show 24 foot Landscape Reserve line on the site plan.
6. Dimension Control Plan -Sheet 4 - of Construction documents will be
considered park of the site plan.
7. Give tandem parking detail. The fifteen tandem spaces will be counted as
single off-street parking; no credit will be given for double parking.
8. For the proposed curb cut on Krenek Tap, provide separation distances of
opposite and adjacent curb cuts.
9. Give throat lengths for proposed driveways.
10. Staff prefers the previous entry/exit design of Dartmouth Drive access, or that
the parking on entry aisle be removed.
11. Provide a detail of the Krenek Tap exit gate.
12. For fire protection, the Dartmouth exit gate needs to be an entry as well.
**Engineering review is not yet complete.
Reviewed by: Shauna Anderson Date: 15-May-00
Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 1
ENGINEERING REVIEW
COMMENTS No. 1
This is NOT a full review. These comments are provided for your
benefit to allow you to address issues before you resubmit.
These comments do not reflect all the concerns or conflicts with
this submittal, rather they are issues caught by a brief perusal
of the submitted plans.
1. Provide Q vs. elevation curve and storage/ routing table for Pond Bin
drainage report.
2. Include the 5, 10, 25 and 50 year storms for pond design, as per the City
Drainage Policy and Design Standards (DPDS).
3. Include offsite, upstream drainage areas in drainage calculations.
4. Line 4 stormsewer should drain to a junction box in 30" RCP, as per DSDP.
5. The proposed outlet for Pond B should discharge in the downstream direction
to allow a smoother transition of converging flows. The outlet may need to be
moved to the northeast to provide for this ell.
6. Minimum depth for public water lines is 4'.
7. Fire lines should be in public utility easements up to building or to backflow
preventer, whichever is first.
8. Provide profile sheet for sewer lines, including any conflicts with other utilities.
Previewed by: Spencer Thompson Date: 15-May-00