The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutStaff Review CommentsSTAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 3 Project: UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUMS (SP) -SITE PLAN (99 -190) PLANNING 1. The addresses that you show for the condominiums are not the approved addresses that were assigned by Melissa Rodgers in the Building Department. 2. Developer needs to show proper street name for Welsh Avenue. 3. Developer needs to show placement of, Dwarf Yaupon Nandina /juniper. Reviewed by: Jennifer Reeves Date: 02/02/01 ENGINEERING 1. Please show existing tie -in manhole on site plan. 2. In response to water meter size; water meters are sized according to the engineer's water demand estimates. The estimates shown on the plans call for a 3/4" irrigation meter. Each unit will be separately metered for domestic water. Each individual unit should not need anything more than a 3/4" meter. If you feel otherwise, please submit calculations substantiating that a change is necessary. Reviewed by: Spencer Thompson Date: 02/01 /01 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. Staff Review Comments J: \PZTEXT\PZ04267. DOC Page 1 of 1 qq-50� STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 2 Project: Site plan review — University Heights Condos THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WERE FOUND THAT WILL NEED TO BE REVISED ON A SITE PLAN SUBSEQUENT TO CONSIDERATION BY THE PRC: 1. OK 2. OK 3. OK What will the utility connections to the buildings look like? They may need to be screened. kA- How are you extending electrical to the buildings? Where will the, me ers b They will need to be screened from the rights- of- way. ot t1; i tbl� -• �e 6. Provide a total of 470 square feet of ' ten island somew ere in these s a parking rows (marked with red #6). Th n may a one continuous one several smaller ones. 7. OK to, 3z� 'L Change the #3 rebar to be #4. t 9. OK 10.OK .11 ubmit an irrigation plan or provide _a_.note regarding how you intend to meet the irrigation requirementbe ore . Ok must be located a minimum of 30' behind the street curb. Either P move these two trees back 30' or select a different canopy tree species. ,`,Will any part of your AC units be visible above the ground? If so, they will _ need to be screened. 15. OK Reviewed by: Sabine McCully Date: 2 -8 -00 Z `9"O Staff Review Comments STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 1 Project: Site plan review — University Heights Condos THIS SUBMITTAL SHOWS 3 STORY BUILDINGS THAT ARE GOING TO BE LOCATED VERY CLOSE TO THE ROADWAY. WHILE THE ZONING ORDINANCE GIVES STAFF THE DISCRETION TO DETERMINE SETBACKS AND HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS THROUGH SITE PLAN REVIEW, WE ARE NOT COMFORTABLE APPROVING BUILDINGS OF THIS MAGINTUDE THIS CLOSE TO THE ROADS. WE RECALL DISCUSSIONS RELATED TO 2 STORY BUILDINGS, NOT 3 STORIES. DUE TO CONCERNS THAT THE SCALE OF THE INTENDED BUILDINGS SEEM TO BE OUT OF CHARACTER WITH THE AREA, STAFF IS DENYING THE SITE PLAN. AT THIS TIME, YOU HAVE THE OPTION TO APPEAL THE DECISION TO THE PROJECT REVIEW COMMITTEE OR TO REDRAW THE SITE PLAN TO SCALE DOWN THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING AND INCREASE THE FRONT SETBACK. IF YOU CHOOSE TO APPEAL TO THE PRC, PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (SKETCHES, ETC) THAT WILL BETTER DEMONSTRATE THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS TO THE STREET AND SURROUNDING AREA. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WERE FOUND THAT WILL NEED TO BE REVISED ON A SITE PLAN FOR THE PRC OR THESE ITEMS NEED TO BE CONSIDERED WITH ANY REDESIGN. 1. Provide a floodplain note if there is none on the property. 2. Make sure these areas (marked on the plan with a red #2) have a 13.5' total clearance from the ground to the second floor for trash trucks to enter the site. 3. Provide screening in this area (marked on the plan with a red #3). 4. What will the utility connections to the buildings look like? They may need to be screened. 5. How are you extending electrical to the buildings? Where will the meters be? They will need to be screened from the rights -of -way. 6. Provide a total of 470 square feet of interior island somewhere in these parking rows (marked with red #6). The island may be one continuous one or several smaller ones. 7. Place end islands around the dumpster sites. Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 2 8. Provide pavement details. 9. Show the fire department connections on the buildings. 10. Where is this section A -A used? 11. Submit an irrigation plan or provide a note regarding how you intend to meet the irrigation requirement before C.O. 12. Either pull the trees back onto the property or submit an application for a PIP. 13. Live Oaks must be located a minimum of 30' behind the street curb. Either move the trees back 30' or select a different canopy tree species. 14. Where are your AC units? Show how the will be screened. 15. Calculate the required parking as 3 spaces required per unit for the 3- bedoom units plus 1.25 spaces per bedroom for the 2- bedroom units. Reviewed by: Sabine McCully Date: 12 -10 -99 Staff Review Comments Page 2 of 2 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 4 Project: UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUMS (SP) -SITE PLAN (99 -190) PLANNING 1. No Comment. Reviewed by: Jennifer Reeves Date: 02/13/01 ENGINEERING 1. No comment. Reviewed by: Spencer Thompson Date: 02/13/01 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 1 40 r. FREDEVELOFMENT MEETING The purpose of a predevelopment meeting io to meet the City Staff that will be involved with your development and identify general issues that need further analysis. Along with the discussion of these major issues, Staff will talk about the development process, distribute necessary information and discuss what permits will be required for your particular development. This meeting is in no way a complete review of your project. Staff will perform a formal thorough review once the minimum requirements are submitted for your particular development. Date of Meeting: I U Ia"1 I Ci Applicant(S): City Staff present: ( 2 _�af ! .,ein i Proposal: JI Miscellaneous:d -�o J Utility Issues: Water Availability /Capacity: Sanitary 5ewer Availability /Capacity: Impact Fees: N M Electrical r�� P ic � L, /�t, C . t OVA Fire Hydrant G m 1 Y'tL* Miscellaneous: Landscaping /5treetocape: Ac r 61kvu Dumpoter Location: 5igns: Screening /Buffering: Variance Requests: - � � �' 0.4� 't- d�lv AV- , . , c -�=' r�s d' k'wul ��;ycc�,. rKoFc Permits required for this development: Development Permit Building Permit Conditional Use Permit TOOT Driveway Permit for work in State ROW TxDOT Utility Permit for work in State ROW Special Review required by: Wolf Pen Creek Design Review Board Northgate Revitalization Committee Parks and Recreation Board Planning and Zoning Commission City Council Information provided: Zoning Ordinance Subdivision Regulations Specifications for Street Construction Drainage Policy & Design 5tandardo C5 Building Regulations (Local Amendments to the Building Code) Fire Department Construction & Development Guide Driveway Access Location & Design Policy Water & Sewer Specification Manual C5 Business Center Covenants & Restrictions Guide to Building & Development Development Resource Guide 4 Land Use: Zoning: fC 4 Special zoning district information: 5ubdivioion /Flatting Issues: U I T -Fare Flan /Street Issues: Driveway Access: A &V..cql Parkland /Greenways Dedication: Farko & Recreation Board Consideration: Drainage Issues: 6:ta a , SeYr (m2 STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 1 Project: UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUMS (SP) -SITE PLAN (99 -190) PLANNING 1. No Comment. Reviewed by: Jennifer Reeves Date: April 10, 2001 ENGINEERING No comment. Reviewed by: Spencer Thompson Date: April 10, 2001 NOTE: Any changes made to the plans, that have not been requested by the City of College Station, must be explained in your next transmittal letter and "bubbled" on your plans. Any additional changes on these plans that have not been pointed out to the City, will constitute a completely new review. Staff Review Comments J: \PZTEXT\PZ04658. DOC Page 1 of 1