HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff ReportsPREDEVELOPMENT MEETING
The purpose of a predevelopment meeting is to meet the City staff that will be involved with your
development and identify general issues that need further analysis. Along with the discussion o
these major issues, staff will talk about the development process, distribute necessary
information and discuss what permits will be required for' your particular development. This
meeting is in noway a complete review of your project. Staff will perform a formal thorough
review once the minimum requirements are submitted for your particular development.
General Information:
Date of Meeting: q I 1'q Cl
Applicant(s): 1C0"1 a9,C1
City Staff Present: ✓~L~~-1/v~ i ,~Cc.6 UI~L(~
Proposal: S 3- q i /YT) mvn Ct d a ulq l J Ij ( v
Development Issues
Land Use:
Zoning:
Special zoning district information -
Subdivision/Platting Issues:
I "-C cA cy 2X OAe
i
,t STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
No. 1
Project: - Aamco site plan review
THE FOLLOWING REVIEW WAS CONDUCTED WITHOUT BENEFIT OF A
DRAINAGE REPORT. THEREFORE, IF THE DRAINAGE PLAN RESULTS IN A
CHANGE TO THE SITE PLAN, A FULL FIRST REVIEW WILL BE REQUIRED.
1. Dimension all parking spaces with "typical" notation.
2. Dimension the handicap spaces and the h-cap space loading zones.
3. Dimension the areas shown with a "Y.
4. Dimension the setback lines.
5.)What is this "concrete drive"? Is it a concrete pad? What is it to be used for?
It cannot be used for anything that will block the drive aisle
6. Dimension this circulation aisle. The starred area may not meet the 23' 2-
way circulation aisle requirement.
7.) The dumpster cannot open onto Brentwood and it should not be gated. Turn
the dumpster pad so that it is facing the eastern property line.
8.\ Dimension the distance from the back of the building to the curb on
Brentwood.
9. Show how these bay areas will be laid out (are there going to be 12 bays?)
10. Dimension the circulation aisles.
11. Sign will be permitted separately.
12. How will detention be handled? Will there be a detention pond? Any
retaining walls?
13. Irrigation system must be permitted and submitted by a licensed irrigator.
14. Provide "standard curbing" and paving details.
~ '15. Dimension the closest distance between the back of curb of the parking lot
and the property line.
16.Are you requesting a review of the foundation plan at this time?
17. Dimension driveway width at the ROW.
L' 18. Dwarf hollies will meet screening requirements for parking lot. However, we
may need additional screening if any of the parking lot is going to store
vehicles for a longer period of time. Show where such storage may occur,
and increase the screening of those areas.
G 19. Is the sidewalk existing? If so, provide a note to that effect. If it's proposed,
provide details and dimensions.
Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 2
20. Provide a floodplain note.
- 21. Show service lines - water, sewer, electrical, and how they will extend to
building.
ti 22. Where are the public electrical lines? Are there any existing or proposed
transformers? Show them on the plan.
23. Show proposed meter locations.
24. Provide a turn-out area for backing maneuvers.
25. What is the proposed grading? Provide a grading plan.
26. Provide a water and sewer legend.
Reviewed by: Sabine McCully Date: 10-4-99
Staff Review Comments Page 2 of 2
11/18/90 15:01 V409 784 3498 DEVELOPKENT SVCS aOO2
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
No. 2
Project- - A811100 site plan review
1. ok
2. ok
3. ok
4. ok
Vv 5. Will there be any equipment on this "concrete drive"? Testing tires in this
area will only be permitted If the individual tests are on a temporary basis and
during other times this driveway is not blocked.
8. ok
0/ V-7 . The dumpster pad needs to be 12'X 12'. e~ls~
8. Is the 136' dimension the total distance from the back of the building to the
curb on Brentwood?
9. ok
10. ok
11.ok
12. ok
13. ok
14. ok
15. ok
18. Planning will forward the foundation plan to Building for review.
D/f 17. Dimension driveway width at the ROW, not In the middle of the dri eway.
18. ok
D ✓19.The sidewalk on Brentwood needs to be 6' if it is going into the propas9d
location at the back-of-Curb. ~evrsia~ 6' r~~~~~*r~ar ~✓r~9~.e,t
20. ok
21.ok
22. ok
23. ok
24. ok
O i~- 25. Revise the proposed grading to match the final site plan layout.
J:+~zr~xrwzosa r t . ooc
Page 1 of 2
26. ok
Reviewed by: Sabine McCully Date: 11-17-99
J:\PZTEXT\PZ02271.DOC Page 2 of 2
GALINDO ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS, INC.
3833 South Texas Ave., Suite 213 Bryan, Texas 77802 (40R EMIE (E D FOR
AAMCO TRANSMISSIONS , COMPLIANCE
DRAINAGE REPORT NOV 17 1999 40-99
1. TRACT DESCRIPTION COLLEGE STATION
ENGINEERING
The AAMCO Transmissions project covers a 0.689-acre tract located on the northeast corner of
Brentwood Dr., 300' east of the intersection with Texas Ave.
A separate 24"x36" sheet, Drainage and Grading Plan, is part of this report.
The adopted Flood Insurance Study does not identify the existence of a 100-flood plain affecting
this tract (Map # 48041 C 0144 C, July 2, 1992).
2. STORMWATER RUNOFF
All of the runoff from the 0.689 acre flows in a general southwest direction, as sheet flow, onto
Brentwood Dr. The current site is currently vacant. Exhibit 1 shows the tract, its location and its
topography. Topographic data was obtained from city of College Station records. The tract was
divided into two drainage sections.
Exhibit 2 shows the runoff calculations for 5, 10, 25, 50 and 100-year rainfalls for each of the two
sections. Runoff detention computations have been made using the 100-year return period.
Because of the nature of the site plan, and in order to mitigate the effect of the increase runoff, two
storage locations were defined intended to meter the flow onto Brentwood Dr. These ponds are
labeled as Pond 1 and Pond 2.
3. INFLOW HYDROGRAPHS - POND 1
Haestad Methods Quick Tr-55 V. 5.47 was used for the analysis given in Exhibit 3 (in 5 pages).
This Exhibit graphically shows individual hydrographs for all storm frequencies. The estimated
required storage for the 100-yr storm is .058 ac-ft.
4. DETENTION FACILITY - POND 1
This pond will be built on project's the west parking lot. The weir will consist of a 0.9' long curb cut
on the existing curb which at this location is to be a maximum of 8". The flow elevation was set at
2917 and the curb elevation was set at 292.5'
Exhibit 4 shows the storage volume calculations based on the proposed grading of the parking lot.
This Exhibit shows that at a maximum peak flow of 1.7 cfs the storage required will be less than 0.1
ac-ft.
Haestad Methods Pondpack V. 5.21 was used in the ponding calculations. Exhibit 5 shows the
s ~
TKh.w~ r
I I r e"
I
~ s
s
NA.
s t rl Coy i~ 51,j. C v
l
1E I
3ael - -
2 `t2- j
TyP K4/ ~a»,p 4$ Ma.'
~A~c%c~+~ !~'f+ v~~ ~ r►ry ifs _ ,,r I
IvTS
i
i
i I
f
STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS
No. 3
Project: - Aamco site plan review
5. Make a note on site plan indicating that no equipment will be located in the
"concrete drive."
7. ok
8. ok
17. Driveway not dimensioned to scale. 1"=10' dimension is only 25', not 30' as
shown. Also, remark 25' driveway throat depth.
19. Sidewalk not dimensioned to scale
shown.
Reviewed by
Shauna Anderson
1"=10' dimension is still 4', not 6' as
Date: 12-29-99
Staff Review Comments Page 1 of 1
00
T-Fare Plan/Street Issues:
Driveway Access: t t~
VX n
Parkland/Greenways Dedication:
Parks Board Consideration
1 ~Ur
Drainage Issues.
Utility Issues
B l a e 'YI Ge_ - c15 64 ~ &r Jc)
&714' fy)
Water Availability/Capacity:
Sanitary Sewer Availability/Capacity:
Impact Fees
Electrical
acP~a c~,i
F~~ 2{y~c,~~t
PZ410U01 City of College Station
Project Review Steps Maintenance
Project number . . . 99 00000131
Project description ARMCO TRANSMISSIONS (SP)
Review description SITE PLAN REVIEW
Type options, press Enter.
2=Change 4=Delete 5=Display prev steps 6=Action log
Opt Review Step
Nbr
Date In
P&Z DEADLINE DATE
1000
9/23/99
_
STAFF REVIEW COMPLETE (1)
1500
9/23/99
_
REDLINES RETURNED TO APPLICANT
2000
10/04/99
_
REVISED PLAT/PLANS SUBMITTED
3000
10/04/99
_
STAFF REVIEW COMPLETE (2)
3500
11/08/99
_
REDLINES RETURNED TO APPLICANT
4000
11/08/99
_
REVISED PLAT/PLANS SUBMITTED
5000
11/18/99
_
STAFF REVIEW COMPLETE (3)
5500
12/13/99
_
_ REV. PLANS SUB./FEE REASSESSED
6000
1/12/00
APPROVED BY STAFF
6500
F3=Exit F6=Add F12=Cancel
r
\
~c
k~.
i
Date Out
9/23/99
10/04/99
10/04/99
11/08/99
11/18/99
11/18/99
12/13/99
1/12/00
3/08/00
09:43:49
8=Fast log
Est Cpl Last
Date Action
9/23/99 CO
9/30/99 CO
10/11/99 CO
1/06/00 CO
11/15/99 CO
11/15/99 CO
2/20/00 CO
12/20/99 CO
1/13/00
P
if
1
I
PREDEVELOPMENT MEETING
The purpose of a predevelopment meeting is to meet the City staff
development and identify general issues that need further analysis
these major issues, staff will talk about the development
information and discuss what permits will be required for your
meeting is in no way a complete review of your project. Staff w
review once the minimum requirements are submitted for your par
General Information:
Date of Meeting: `q
Applicant(s): aA4 6,---
u.
)e involved with your
vith the discussion of
distribute necessary
development. This
d~,J-L [qq
ff7
City St P esent:
41 1
c
Proposal: jj~
too
Development Issues
Land Use: PL
Zoning:
~fl
Special zoning district information -
L06-C---/
Subdivision/Platting Issues:
I
T-Fare Plan/Street Issues:
Driveway Access-
Cie
~~C, n , l ~Q ll
Parkland/Greenways Dedication:
Parks Board Consideration
2Y ~¢t~YT
Drainage Issues:
Utility Issues
Water Availability/Capacity:
Sanitary Sewer Availability/Capacity:
Impac Fees
l
Electrical
CJ La
Miscellaneous:
Landscapin treetscape
Dumpster Location
Signs 4
I~CA
Screenin uffering
e
Q
Variance Requests
_ ~..~•-gam
Permits required for this development:
Development Permit
J,~ Building Permit
Conditional Use Permit
TxDOT Driveway Permit for work in State ROW
TxDOT Utility Permit for work in State ROW
Special Review required by:
Wolf Pen Creek Design Review Board
Northgate Revitalization Committee
Parks and Recreation Board
Planning and Zoning Commission
City Council
Information Provided:
_L~Zoning Ordinance
Subdivision Regulations
Specifications for Street Construction
Drainage Policy & Design Standards
A~(S Building Regulations (Local Amendments to the Building Code)
~Fire Department Construction & Development Guide
_~Driveway Access Location & Design Policy
Water & Sewer Specifications Manual
Northgate Design Guidelines
CS Business Center Covenants & Restrictions
Guide to Building & Development
Development Resource Guide
Clef
20. Provide a floodplain note.
21. Show service lines - water, sewer, electrical, and how they will extend to
building.
22. Where are the public electrical lines? Are there any existing or proposed
transformers? Show them on the plan.
23. Show proposed meter locations.
24. Provide a turn-out area for backing maneuvers.
25. What is the proposed grading? Provide a grading plan.
26. Provide a water and sewer legend.
Reviewed by: Sabine McCully Date: 10-4-99
Staff Review Comments Page 2 of 2
W
Miscellaneous:
Landscaping/Streetscape
Dumpster Location -
Signs
Screening/Buffering
;f(o add
4c c`~c sQ5 X2, r-e
011~ ,
Variance Requests "v avc_
~ l' p ~-/,.e. ~ l ~ ~ r ti ,6 (h ~ `rte(
(Ja.~~ c~a-iC. v►il~.~j ~cl~c~YC_~-e l1zj'slu.Q.
Permits required for this development:
Development Permit
Building Permit
Conditional Use Permit
TxDOT Driveway Permit for work in State ROW
TxDOT Utility Permit for work in State ROW
Special Review required by:
Wolf Pen Creek Design Review Board
Northgate Revitalization Committee
Parks and Recreation Board
Planning and Zoning Commission
City Council
Information Provided:
Zoning Ordinance
Subdivision Regulations
Specifications for Street Construction q~
Drainage Policy & Design Standards
CS Building Regulations (Local Amendments to the Building ode)
Fire Department Construction & Development Guide
Driveway Access Location & Design Policy
Water & Sewer Specifications Manual
Northgate Design Guidelines
CS Business Center Covenants & Restrictions
Guide to Building & Development
Development Resource Guide