HomeMy WebLinkAboutMisc.::Natalie: Ruiz.-:Double A'Honk-Honk' MCO Pa9e: 1:
From: Edwin Hard
To: Sabine McCully
Date: Fri, Apr 30, 1999 4:58 PM
Subject: Double A'Honk-Honk' MCO
spoke with fellow Conroeite James Canada about the driveway for the site.
He faxed me a copy of a conceptual site plan showing the driveway near the western property line. It
included an option that had the future lube site to the west sharing this proposed curb cut. James said
that he would provide a x-access easement.
I told him that the driveway in this location would be ok if it would also serve the future lube site. I told
him I wanted to make sure that he was coordinating with them so that they would know what impact the
driveway decision on the AAMCO site would have on their site. James said that he's been doing
that ...that Rabon M. from MDG had faxed him a couple of site layouts for the lube site. One of these
layouts had the lube site using the QAB site via a x access, so he's knows they are at least thinking
about x access. I have a call in to Rabon to talk about this.
I also forwarded James these additonal comments on his site:
- still need to meet the 25 feet throat length
- add end islands
- told him what his setbacks were
- told him that with xaccess in place he'sd probably have to go to ZBA for a parking variance, but that if
xaccess were not necessary than he may not need a variance.
- tod him that his parking requirement would be 26 spaces (assuming 14 also provided interior to the
building)
- told him next available ZBA was June 1
- told him the x access would probably need to be about 30 feet wide.
Yall have a good weekendl
CC: Natalie Ruiz
f
D • _
Ale w
crl ~F1 " P d1 TiA~k ~1
q.A,ec
144 eel d
-40r ell ~~3rnrsSrJ
l14 .1 f
e~
~Pr, v~ l l C" ? >lO C nT@ /t.►~ ~v d d -ore
t+ - V.3 V-- / Q
C,p { e~ a ~Yiv~ r7fisTyt e "+Oiv~ri.-.+
/ f ~ r ~ ~C ~ ~ ~1 S'1`'.n.~! ~ ~ T ip....1 D r yr- f o
del
d o 'i v ~ ~ P ~ P•~r 1--P ~ o~ ~ / ~ / ~'J~Q,
y
-5ee .5
-e 117
OR r 1/', 4 .5.~ a of's 41e
~-o vs,r f Aq dy'~ (~a !f ~t alt' ..I PJ o~~ci a~
! Pv-%
of-s-, e^se- e. t GS e W 7 Pa 77'
C 1
-46, .
i /
~ e
U ~
` Y J ~ Y
-two
I ~,1 4 ~O Pa
Q }
'A
S7org9~ ~ ~
4-t
f~
0
;Edwin Hard - Double A'Honk-Honk' MCO Pa el
From: Edwin Hard
To: Sabine McCully
Date: 4/30/99 4:58PM
Subject: Double A'Honk-Honk' MCO
spoke with fellow Conroeite James Canada about the driveway for the site.
He faxed me a copy of a conceptual site plan showing the driveway near the westem property line. It
included an option that had the future lube site to the west sharing this proposed curb cut. James said
that he would provide a x-access easement.
1 told him that the driveway in this location would be ok if it would also serve the future lube site. I told
him I wanted to make sure that he was coordinating with them so that they would know what impact the
driveway decision on the AAMCO site would have on their site. James said that he's been doing
that ...that Rabon M. from MDG had faxed him a couple of site layouts for the lube site. One of these
layouts had the tube site using the QAB site via a x access, so he's knows they are at least thinking
about x access. I have a call in to Rabon to talk about this.
I also forwarded James these additonal comments on his site:
- still need to meet the 25 feet throat length
- add end islands
- told him what his setbacks were
- told him that with xaccess in place he'sd probably have to go to ZBA for a parking variance, but that if
xaccess were not necessary than he may not need a variance.
- tod him that his parking requirement would be 26 spaces (assuming 14 also provided interior to the
building)
- told him next available ZBA was June 1
- told him the x access would probably need to be about 30 feet wide.
Yall have a good weekend!
CC: Natalie Ruiz
A.AMCO TRANSMISSIONS
612 W. PHILLIPS
CONROE, TEXAS 77301
November 4, 1999
To: Bridgette George, Asst. Development Coordinator
From: James Canada
Subject: Aamco Transmissions-Site Plan
This letter will answer the staff review comments not changed on the attached revised site
plan. The number corresponds to the number of the comment.
5. This section of concrete will be used for testing 4 wheel drive vehicles to make
sure each wheel spins properly. Testing inside is dangerous & testing on asphalt is
damaging to the asphalt.
12. A separate drainage plan will be submitted.
13. A licensed irrigator will be hired to install this system.
16. I would like to get the foundation plans approved as soon as possible.
18. No outside extended storage is planned at this time. We have the capabilities to
store 24 cars inside by parking 12 on the lifts, raising them & parking 12 more
underneath. Therefore if we did have to keep one for an extended time we could
move it inside for better security each day at closing.
25. The grading plan will be shown with the separate drainage plan.
COLLEGE STATION
P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842
Tel: 409 764 3500
MEMORANDUM
November 18, 1999
TO: James Canada, Via fax (409) 756-7647
FROM: Bridgette George, Asst. Development Coordinato
SUBJECT: Aamco Transmissions - Site Plan
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The Grading Plan and
Drainage Report have been approved. The following page is a list of staff review
comments detailing items that need to be addressed with the Site Plan. The next
submittal will be the third and final review by staff for this round of reviews. If all items
have not been addressed on the next submittal, another $100 processing fee will need
to be submitted for the subsequent set of three (3) reviews. Please address the
comments and submit the following information for further staff review:
Three (3) complete sets of building construction documents for the
proposed development with the revised site and landscaping plans
attached.
If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please
attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional
information, please call me at 764-3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
cc: oobi 5 Bolero o 10 7840
Case file # -444
Home of Texas A&M University
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
PLANNING DIVISION
\ / POST OFFICE BOX 9960 1101 TEXAS AVENUE
COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842-9960
(409) 764-3570
MEMORANDUM
October 4, 1999
TO: James Canada, Via fax (409) 756-7647
FROM: Bridgette George, Asst. Development Coordinator- f
SUBJECT: Aamco Transmissions - Site Plan
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list
of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address
the comments and submit the following information for further staff review:
Three (3) complete sets of building construction documents for the
proposed development with the revised site and landscaping plans
attached;
Two (2) copies of the grading plan; and,
The attached redlined site plan with staff comments.
If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please
attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional
information, please call me at 764-3570.
Attachments:
cc:
Staff review comments
Redlined site plan
C me 2915
e #99-444
, i exas,
[~tt~
~3O 7~0
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
PLANNING DIVISION
POST OFFICE BOX 9960 1101 TEXAS AVENUE
COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842-9960
TELEPHONE: (409) 764-3570
MEMORANDUM
January 13, 2000
TO: James Canada, Via fax (409) 756-7647
FROM: Bridgette George, Asst. Development Coordinat
SUBJECT: Aamco Transmisstions - Site Plan
Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list
of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Please address
the attached comments and submit the following information for further staff review:
Three (3) complete sets of building construction documents for the
proposed development with the revised site and landscaping plans
attached (additional sets will be required once the plans have been
approved);
$100 processing fee for the next round of three (3) staff reviews; and,
Engineering is still reviewing the If there are comments that you are not addressing with
the revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any
questions or need additional information, please call me at 764-3570.
Attachments: Staff review comments
Case file #99-444
c,
b
s
C
125 O
~ V
rV
c
N
C
S
A-zl_
C
n
hhb-bb
C~p z ~Cr05z- 92~ 6 f.
1
3D'
SUBMIT APPLICATION AND THIS
LIST CHECKED OFF WITH 10
FOLDED COPIES OF SITE PLAN FOR REVIEW
SITE PLAN MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
(ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)
INCLUDING BUT NOT LEMTED TO THE FOLLOWING:
53( r 1. Sheet size - 24" x 36" (minimum).
Qty 2. A key map (not necessarily to scale).
W 3. Title block to include:
L9" Name, address, location, and legal description
"'0" Name, address, and telephone number of applicant
' U' Name, address, and telephone number of developer/owner (if differs from applicant)
/V 4 ❑ Name, address, and telephone number of architect/engineer (if differs from applicant) ► N n e 6`' r
e Date of submittal
ti Ex Total site area
eL 4. North arrow.
v 5. Scale should be largest standard engineering scale possible on sheet.
Ownership and current zoning of parcel and all abutting parcels.
lfz 7. Existin locations of the following on or adjacent to the subject site:
✓E- Streets and sidewalks (RO.W.).
Driveways (opposite and adjacent per Driveway Ordinance 1961).
Buildings.
IwAo Water courses.
Show all easements clearly designating as existing and type (utility, access, etc.).
100 yr. floodplain and floodway (if applicable) on or adjacent to the proposed project site, note if there is
none on the site.
Utilities (noting size and designate as existing) within or adjacent to the proposed site, including building
;rte transformer locations, above ground and underground service connections to buildings, and drainage inlets.
r '4 -e
n s i
❑ j Meter locations. o r A
R" Topography (2' max or spot elevations) and other pertinent drainage information. (If
plan has too much information, show drainage on separate sheet.)
8. Proposed location, type and dimensions of the following.:
1 Iir Phasing. Each phase must be able to stand alone to meet ordinance requirements. d h
The gross square footage of all buildings and structures and the proposed use of each. If different uses are
to be located in a single building, show the location and size of the uses within the building. Building
separation is a minimum of 15 feet w/o additional fire protection.
Y Setbacks. Show building setbacks as outlined in Ordinance 1638 Zoning Ordinance, (Section 7, Table A).
Off-Street parking areas with parking spaces drawn, tabulated, and dimensioned. Minimum parking space
is 9' x 20', or on a perimeter row 9' x 18' with a 2' overhang. Designate number of parking spaces
required by ordinance and provided by proposal.
f [N ' Handicap parking spaces.
SITE PLAN CHECKLIST 1 of3
S[TECKDOC 03/25/99
2/°. Parking Islands. Raised landscape islands, (6" raised curb) a minimum of 180 sq. ft. are required at both
ends of every parking row (greenspace area contiguous to the end island maybe applied toward the
required 180 sq. ft.). Additionally, 180 sq. ft. of landscaping for every 15 interior parking spaces must be
provided. All required islands must be landscaped or set with decorative pavers, or stamped dyed concrete
or other decorative materials as approved.
Drives. Minimum drive aisle width is 23' with head-in parking or 20' without parking.
Curb cuts. For each proposed curb cut (including driveways, streets, alleys, etc.) locate existing curb cuts
on the same opposite side of the street to determine separation distances between existing and proposed
curb cuts. Indicate driveway throat length as measured in the Driveway Ordinance. (See Ordinance 1961
for driveway location and design requirements.)
Security gates (show swing path and design specs with colors). N 0
Sidewalks (both public and private). Sidewalks are required at time of development if property has frontage
on a street shown on the Sidewalk Master Plan or if the review staff deterrrunes the necessity. (Refer to
Section 10.2 of the Zoning Ordinance).
Q' y Medians. Show any and all traffic medians to be constructed on site. /V 0 v, e
f~y Landscape Reserve. A twenty four foot setback from R.O.W. to curb of parking lot is required. Pavement
may encroach into this 24' reserve by up to 1134 square feet if streetscape requirement can still be met. In
no case may the pavement be less than 6' from the property line.
Common open spaces sites
Loading docks
Detention ponds ~ e- e v id 4;.,4 ❑ ,1 Guardrails At 0;1 r
❑ 1 Retaining walls
Wrd' All required and other types of fences (a 6' privacy fence is required between industrial/commercial and
residential developments as well as between multi-family and single family developments).
Sites for solid waste containers with screening. Locations of dumpsters are accessible but not visible from
.41streets or residential areas. Gates are discouraged and visual screening is required. (Minimum 12 x 12 pad
required.)
'Show all easements clearly designating as proposed and type (utility, access, etc.). If dedicated by separate
instrument list by volume and page.
( E~nns ~ ' and desi o osed within r_atlja~ to the..pro op ite, including building
ti ve ground and unde-mmuund service connections to bui~tG_s
must located in public R .O.W. or public utility easement..
sed grading (1' max for proposed or spot elevations) and other pertinent drainage information. (If
Propo
~ Ian has too much information, show drainage on separate sheet.)
Show proposed and existing fire hydrants. Fire hydrants must be located on the same side of a major street
as a project, and shall be in a location approved by the City Engineer. Any structure in any zoning district
other than R-1, R-IA, or R-2 must be within 300 feet of a fire hydrant as measured along a public street,
highway or designated fire lane.
show fire department connections. FDC's should be within 150' of the fire hydrant. In no case shall they
be any further than 300' apart, and they shall be accessible from the parking lot without being blocked by
parked cars or a structure. 4" r''
Show fire lanes. Fire lanes a minimum of 20 feet in width with a min:.num height clearance of 14 feet must
be established if any portion of the proposed structure is more than 150 feet from the curb line or pavement
edge of a public street or highway. ,1. 1.) h c
NOTE: Fire hydrants must be operable and accepted by the City, and drives must have an all weather surface as
defined in the Zoning Ordinance Section 9 before a building permit can be issued.
~9. Will building be sprinkled? Yes ❑ No Ell"
If the decision to sprinkle is made after the site plan has been approved, then the plan must be resubmitted.
U I " hl Wheelstops may be required when cars overhang onto property not owned by the applicant or where
there may be conflict with *dicap accessible routes or above ground utilities, signs or other conflicts.
Al,
SITE PLAN CHECKLIST 2 of 3
SFrECK.DOC 03/25/99
77...
11. Show curb and pavement detail. A 6" raised curb is required around all edges of all parts of all paved areas
without exception. (To include island, planting areas, access ways, dumpster locations, utility pads, etc.)
Curb details may be found in the Zoning Ordinance Section 9 and alternatives to those standards must be
approved by the City Engineer. No exception will be made for areas designated as "reserved for future
parking".
12. Landscape plans as required in Section 11 of the Zoning Ordinance (See Ordinance # 1638.) The
landscaping plan can be shown on a separate sheet if too much information is on the original site plan.
If requesting protected tree points, then those trees need to be shown appropriately barricaded on
the landscape plan. Attempt to reduce or eliminate plantings in easements. Include information on the plans
such as:
5~v'~ required point calculations
additional streetscape points required. Streetscape compliance is required on all streets larger than a
"residential street.
calculations for # of street trees required and proposed (proposed street tree points will accrue toward total
✓,landscaping points.)
/P-roposed new plantings with points earned
R(i proposed locations of new plantings
screening of is
l~ screening o d p , detention ponds, tr,~fo , A/C units, loading docks, propane tanks, utility
demarcation point on buildings, or other areas potentially visually offensive.
existing landscaping to remain v c e) C9r how existing trees to be barricaded and barricade plan. Protected points will only be awarded if
barricades are up before the first development permit is issued. M 0,1
13.
C
Show irrigation system plan. (or provide note on how irrigation system requirement will be met prior to
issuance of C.O.) All plans must include irrigation systems for landscaping. Irrigation meters are separate
from the regular water systems for buildings and will be sized by city according to irrigation demands
submitted by applicant and must include backflow prevention protection.
E~ - 14.
Is there any landscaping in TxDOT R.O.W. ? Yes ❑ No Ua""
If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted.
(k( 15.
Will there be any utilities in TxDOT R.O.W. ? Yes ❑ No L9'
If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted.
16.
Will there be access from a TxDOT R.O.W. ? Yes ❑ No Ui '
If yes, then TxDOT permit must be submitted.
❑17.
The total number of multi-family buildings and units to be constructed on the proposed project site.
❑ /V (`l'18.
The density of dwelling units per acre of the proposed project.
❑ 19.
Provide a water and sanitary sewer legend to include water demands (minimum, maximum and average
demands in gallons per minute) and sewer loadings (maximum demands in gallons per day).
G( //20.
Are there impact fees associated with this development? Yes ❑ No C~
NOTE: Signs are to be permitted separately.
SITE PLAN CHECKLIST 3 of 3
SITECICDOC 03/25/99