Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Miscellaneous
FROM (Company) Preprint Format No. gin Ai,bill Number 7468 762525 CitX 0 f-College Station____ ;Street Add ss Method of Payme Assumed sender unless Service c otherwise noted Bill ❑ Type One bax mPst be 1101 Texas --Avenue----.--- - Sender ► ith an°X' h k d i City State ZIP CODE (Required) Airborne Sender account no. . e w c ec Assumed Express J CIJ11ege StatlOri--- z Bill IM Receiver *6163408 Service unless otherwise noted. be Sent by (Name9Dept) Phone Numr L Airborne Receiver account no. Bri dgette George (409) 764-3570 ❑Bill3rd Next Aftemoon Shpmentsover , Party No will be charged 6s 5 r r TO (Company) Airborne Customer account no. . at the Express ate. Osborn & Vane Architects, ITic o Check Amount Paid in No. ❑ Advance $ Next Afternoon delivery to Bold Red i Street Address Billing Reference will appear on invoice destinations only. 2000 Bering Dr. Ste. 410 a City State ZIP CODE (Required) I of Pkga Pr Weight(LBS) ; One box must be checked Ex ress Other L tte - e . _ < Houston Tx_- 177057 1 a9erc owearcltx e r Ex ress Patk Patke Ing 1 11 1:1 Attention: (Name/Dept) Phone Number (Important) a A Special Instructions ABSENT A HIGHER SHIPMENT VALUATION, L Raymond Suarez Delivery❑ Hold at l Saturday Ai b _ C 00 PER PAC ACTUAL ARRIERS LAKE, O IS LIMITED L SPECIAL OgUE, SS KAG g r orne Extra Charge Express Only WHICHEVER IS LE , CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES ARE NOT ? Description T Not available to all locations ❑ Lab Pack ❑ RECOVERABLE. SEE TERMS AND CONDITIONS ON REVERSE SIDE OF THIS E T Bluelines I.D NO. 91,0837469 ED SCA C A RB ? THANK YOU FOR SHIPPING WITH AIRBORNE EXPRESS Declared Full Shipment Valuation Value Insurance AIRBORNE Sender's Date ► ❑ Or ❑ $ ,00 EX ESS m Signature Ig 19199 - . PR Airborne Signature oyte~o~ Time Received At Airborne El 1 43 Q Terminal l Drop Box # E L C www.airborne.com / OSBORN & VANE ARCHITECTS, INC. Vendor ID: COLLEGE City of College Station Check Amount : 500.00 Invoice # Date Invoice Amount Gross Payment 4/5/1999 04/05/1999 $500.00 $500.00 / SENDER'S COPY Discount Net Payment Notes $500.00 + E~m PO BOX 662, SEATTLE, WA 98111-0862 1-sca-24,-2676 J Check 2857 Date : 04/05/1999 2857 - CITY OF COLLEGE. STATION CUSTOMER RECEIPT e ° - OPER: MRODGERS CT ARAYER: 1 DATE 4/88/99 • : 08 RLCEIPT: 88187 83 370 DESCRIPTION QTY AMOUNT TP TM FILING FEE/DS/6I 1 $100.08 *R7 CK Z A r to SITE PLAN APP FEE A L ING 1 $100.00 *B7 CK DEV PERMIT = r FILING FEE/DS/AI 1 $388.88 *A7 CK INSPECTION FEE OSBORN & VANE ARCHITECT-CK2857 SITE PLAN ARP a DEV PERMIT FEE A d s ' w S _ ? INSPECTION FEE rC„ < v 3 o w o a o el) - ROCK PRAIRIE SHOPPING CTR MR f1 TENDER DETAIL CK 2857 $588.08 a 2ce ° p> vt i DATE: 4/88/99 TIME: 15:45:46 m a N TOTAL PERSONAL CHECK $500.88 ° ~ r AMOUNT TENDERED $588.08 0 3 3 N w - KROGER SITE PLAN REVIEW Case #99-404 Reviewed by S.A.M. 4-9-99 (1). AS 1 These islands need to be either landscaped or set with decorative pavers (stamped dyed concrete is also ok as long as it's not left gray). (2). AS 1 This island needs to be at lease 180 square feet and meet same standards as #(1) above. (3) AS 1 Which spaces are the "57 future" parking spaces? Does this mean that the phase lines are different from (or in addition to) the future pad sites C, D, and E? If so, then the phase lines must be shown such that each phase can stand alone, meeting all ordinance requirements. (4) AS 1 What does the hatched symbol mean? Clarify on plan. (5) L1.2 The landscape plan meets all of the City's landscaping and streetscaping requirements, however, the required point calculations are missing all of the City's streetscape requirements. Provide the calculations as follows: frontage HWY 6 = 683'-36' (driveways)-40' (sight clearance)=607' frontage Birm.=749'-72'-80=597' frontage Long.=934'-170'-160'=604' total frontage = 1808' streetscape points req'd = 1808/50 X 300 = 10,830 streetscape points 10,830 + 14,666 = 25,496 total points req'd (6) L1.2 Calculate the minimum tree count required along frontages and tally total frontage tree count (non-canopy trees accrue toward the requirement at a ratio of two non-canopy trees for every one canopy tree): frontage HWY6 = 607' / 25=25 canopy trees req'd repeat for Birmingham and Longmire but divide by 32 rather than 25 for these two roads 7. Will the detention areas have any concrete walls or other surfaces that will be visible? If so, they must be screened or meet streetscape standards. 8. Need a sidewalk detail for the proposed walk on Longmire unless it will be installed as part of the platting. (9) AS 1 Dumpster enclosure must be a minimum of 8' in height. What will the materials be? It must either be screened or match building materials. Where will the dumpsters be for the pad sites? Either show a location now if they are on the main site or make a note that dumpsters will be provided on the pad sites themselves. O:rvup\&ve_seebiw*roW.doc Kroger Site Plan Review 4-9-99 Page 2 of 2 10. How high are the retaining walls at the truck well? They must be adequately screened by the proposed vegetation. (11) C-2 Add fire lanes as suggested or propose alternative lanes that will adequately cover all buildings. 12. The 3 detention areas on the grading plan do not seem to match the landscape plan (for instance, there is a berm shown on one plan where another plan shows a detention area). Landscaping in these areas should not be planted in depressions because it needs to be high enough to adequately screen the rear of the buildings, the loading dock and other loading areas, and any outside storage areas. 13. How many of these buildings will be sprinkled? We will need to see their Fire Dep't connections - they need to be between 150' to 300' from the nearest hydrant with a clear path in front of them. (14) AS 1 Please provide an alternative design for this area showing no direct north-south connection with a note that the alternate will be built if a median is not installed in Rock Prairie Road. (15) AS 1 Provide a 180 square foot end island here. (16) AS 1 We have concerns regarding sight clearance and traffic maneuverability around this corner. Our sanitation trucks will barely make this corner and will be forced into the lane of opposing traffic - when this happens, it should be visible to oncoming traffic. Any delivery vehicles that are larger than the City's service vehicles might not make this turn at all. Modify this area to give more open visibility and circulation. (We have similar concerns at pad sites C, D, and E at these comers - at this point, perhaps a note will suffice until we receive final site plans for these pad sites.) (17) AS1 How do delivery vehicles get around the front of Building A? Vehicles that are larger than passenger cars might not make this turn. (18) AS 1 Show a striping plan and turning arrows to delineate left and right exit lanes. (19) AS 1 Show a striping plan and exit signs to ensure this will be an "exit only" drive. Reduce the drive width to 24'. (20) MEP It seems as though there is both a tree and a transformer in the same location - resolve this discrepancy but make sure the transformer is screened from Birmingham. (21) MEP Where is this transformer in relation to the proposed landscaping? It should be screened from Longmire. (22) C-2 This fire hydrant should be in a protected area (like an island). 23. C-2 This hydrant needs to be on a fire lane (perhaps a good location for it is in the entrance island?) 24. C-2 Provide a backflow preventer for the fire line located along Birmingham Road near the Longmire intersection. O:group\deve_ser\bine\kroger.doc 07%16/99 10:35 $409 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS CLR Cobourn Linseisen & RatcliffI Inc. July 10, 1999 Bridgette George City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station. TX 77842 RE: Kroger SWC SH6 & Rock Prairie City Review Cl-R Job No: 98-057-00 Dear Ms. George: Pursuant to my conversation with Mr. Raymond Suarez, with Osborne & Vane Architects, Inc., we are submitting the following items to be included with the site plan review package for the referenced project. 1. 2 sets of Waterline Plan & Profile drawings 2. 2 copies of the Drainage Report 3. 2 copies of the water line easement description 4. 2 copies of the fire flow calculations. In addition, we have addressed each of the comments on the Civil Drawings as follows: Sheet C-1 1. Runoff out the driveway? Pursuant to my conversation with Mr. Jeff Tondre, the driveway area that is currently graded to sheet flow to Birmingham Street is insignificant and will not adversely affect the off site drainage system. 2 Drainage Report siring storm sewer. The Drainage Report is included with this submittal. 3. Approval of concept by TxDOT TxDOT is currently reviewing the design concept. 4. Analysis of down stream drainage system (Hwy 6 crossing) Pursuant to my conversation with Mr. Jeff Tondre, the site was included in the original drainage design for the State Highway 6. The enclosed Drainage Report provides sufficient documentation that the down stream drainage system was designed for a discharge rate of at least 83 cfs from this site. 5_ TOOT Controlled Access Utility Permit Application. Z002 Th~p~~tlflie~caiAor~tY~tlt~n ~ul§NtKtrlttltb folk. ~~19idl~s 13100 Northwest Fwy, Suite 500, Noerton, Texas 77040 Phone: (713) 462-0993 ■ Far: (713) 462-2732 • Page 2 6. TxDOT Driveway Application The permit application has been submitted to Mr. Tondre. Sheet C-2 .July 10, 1999 7. Can we consolidate some of these water line bores? We think 6 bores under Blaningham is a little excessive. Sheet C-2 has been revised to reduce the number of water line bores under Birmingham. 8. Provide profile for all public water lines, show all conflicts, deflections, station all valves and fittings. Two copies of the profile drawings are included with this submittal. 9. Fite flow analysis (velocities and pressures) Two copies of the fire flow analysis prepared by Standard Automatic Fire E-nterprises. Inc. are included with this submittal. 10. Dedicate easements for public water lines Two copies of the water line easement description are included with this submittal 11. show water meter locations (in easement/ROM provide water use for each meter and for the overall project, sewer demand for the overall project. Pursuant to my conversation with the MEP consultant, Mr. Brad Kalmans with R.H. George & Associates, the following flows were estimated based on the proposed building area for each of the proposed uses. BUILDING MAX WATER AVE. WATER SEWER Kroger 13 gpm 6.5 gpm 9360 gpd Bldg A 13 gpm 6.5 gpm 9360 gpd Bldg B 6.5 gpm 3.2 gpm 4608 gpd Total 32.5 gpm 16.2gpm 23328 gpd The water meter locations are shown on the civil drawings. 12. Show detail for fire hydrant. The fire hydrant detail is included with plan & profile drawings included with this submittal. Sheet C-3 9 Page 3 .July 10, 1999 13. City of College Station Standards for parking, fire lanes - 6" concrete w/ H4 @ 18 O. C., parking - 5" concrete w1tt4 @ 18" O. C. The Civil Drawings have been revised to comply with the City of College Station requirements. Sheet C-4 14. What is proposed in this ama? Additional erosion control facilities were added to Sheet C-4 15. Submit a copy of the filled in NOI form An executed copy of the NOI form was previously submitted to the City of College Station. Please call me If you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, COBOURN LINSEISEN 8, RATCLIFF, INC. Curtis R. Burnett Project Manager cc. Mr. Raymond Suarez - Osborne & Vane Architects (w/enclosures) enclosures 07/16/99 10:40 $409 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS Z002 CLR Cobourn Linseisen h Rateliff, Inc. July 10, 1999 Bridgette George City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 RE: Kroger- SWC SH6 & Rook Praide City Review CLR Job No: 98-057-00 Dear Ms. George: Pursuant to my conversation with Mr. Raymond Suarez, with Osborne & Vane Architects, Inc., we are submitting the following items to be included with the site plan review package for the referenced project. 1. 2 sets of Waterline Plan & Profile drawings 2. 2 copies of the Drainage Report 3. 2 copies of the water line easement description 4. 2 copies of the fire flow calculations. In addition, we have addressed each of the comments on the Civic Drawings as follows: Sheet C-1 1. Runoff out the driveway? Pursuant to my conversation with Mr. Jeff Tondre, the driveway area that is currently graded to sheet flow to Birmingham Street is insignificant and will not adversely affect the off site drainage system. 2. Drainage Report sizing storm sewer. The Drainage Report is included with this submittal- 3_ Approval of concept by TxDOT TxDOT is currently reviewing the design concept. 4. Analysis of down steam drainage system (Hwy 6 crossing) Pursuant to my conversation with Mr. Jeff Tondre. the site was included in the original drainage design for the State Highway e. The enclosed Drainage Report provides sufficient documentation that the down stream drainage system was designed for a discharge rate of at least 83 ifs from this site. 5. TxDOT Controlled Access Utility Permit Application. Th(jyi&RRltBppkallo1Pf0t@1&n %u&t'Rttll % ?hRW 13,00 Northwest Fwy, Suite 500, Noustos, Teees 77040 Phone: (713) 462.0993 ■ Pee: 1713) 462-2732 07/16/99 10:40 $409 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS Z003 • Page 2 6. TxDOT Driveway Application The permit application has been submitted to Mr. Tondre. Sheet C-2 July 10, 1999 7. Can was consolidate some of these water line bores? We think 6 bores under Birmingham is a little excessive. Sheet C-2 has been revised to reduce the number of water line bores under Birmingham. 8. Provide profile for all public water lines, show all conflicts, deflections, station all valves and fittings. Two copies of the profile drawings are included with this submittal. 9. Fire flow analysis (velocities and pressures) Two copies of the fire flow analysis prepared by Standard Automatic Fire Enterprises, Inc. are included with this submittal. 10. Dedicate easements for public water fines Two copies of the water line easement description are included with this submittal 11. Show water meter locations (In easement&OM provide water use for each meter and for the overall project, sewer demand for the overall project. Pursuant to my conversation with the MEP consultant. Mr. Bias! Kalman; with R.H. George & Associates, the following flows were estimated based on the proposed building area for each of the proposed uses. BUILDING MAX WATER AVE. WATER SEWER Kroger 13 gpm 6.5 gpm 9360 gpd Bldg A 13 gpm 6.5 gpm 9360 gpd Bldg B 6.5 gpm 3.2 gpm 4608 gpd Total 32.5 gpm 16.2gpm 23328 gpd The water meter locations are shown on the civil drawings. 12. Show detail for fire hydrant. The fire hydrant detail is included with plan & profile drawings included with this submittal- Sheet C-3 07/16/99 10:41 $409 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS Z004 • Pnge 3 July 10, 1999 13. City of College Station Standards for parking, fire lanes 6" concrete w/ #4 @ 18" O.C., parking - 5" concrete w1#4 @ 18" O.C. The Civil Drawings have been revised to comply with the City of College Station requirements. Sheet C-4 14. What is proposed in this area? Additional erosion control facilities were added to Sheet C-4 15. Submit a copy of the tilled in NOl fonn An executed copy of the NOI form was previously submitted to the City of College Station. Please call me if you have any questions or need additional information, Sincerely, COBOURN LINSEISEN & RATCLIFF, INC. Curtis R. Burnett Project Manager cc: Mr. Raymond Suarez - Osborne & Vane Architects (w/enclosures) enclosures Rug 05 99 10:59a RBEI k 409-775-2874 p.1 ASH & BROWNS ENGINEERING, INC. Engineers and Consultants P.O. Bog 10838, College Station, Texas 77842 409-694-2123 Fax: 409-694-3694 July 23, 1999 Veronica Morgan, P.E. Asst. City Engineer City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 Post-ir Fax Note 7671 Date _ - pa°ges ~ To,J y_ / From G/t' Co./Dept. Co. Phone # iJ 2 ~ `C Phone # ~ 27 / Z Fax # 74 Fax # 69 2 / Re: Plans Check for Rock Prairie Crossing Shopping Center Dear Veronica: I have reviewed the construction plans and drainage report that were provided to me on the above referenced subdivision. Please review the following comments regarding may review: ■ The information that was provided for review did not contain any engineer's estimate for the portions of the job that will be public infrastructure. There are no plan and profile drawings for the sewer lines ( public portions). The water line plans that are contained in the Architect's plans are not signed or sealed and neither is the drainage report. (I believe this to be a violation of the state regulations and should be pointed out to them.) ■ The drainage report lacks the following information: • Hydrologic Criteria • Hydraulic Criteria • Drainage Facility Design • There is no statement by the engineer of compliance of the DPDS. • Hydrologic and/or Hydraulic computations. ■ The plans reference City of Houston Specs which is inappropriate. ■ The cross slopes on sidewalks does not meet T.A.S. and A.D.A. requirements for handicap access routes ■ It was requested that they provide a fire flow analysis. In response to the analysis, we received is a listing of the needs of the different retail areas on the site. The engineer should understand that this means a calculation of his designed system to see if it meets the needs stated in the information from SAFE, Inc. Aug 05 99 10:59a RBEI l Veronica Morgan, P.E. July 23, 1999 Page 2 409-775-2874 p.2 It would be my recommendation that the plans and drainage report be returned to them with a copy of the checklist and instructions to return them when the checklist is satisfied. Sincerely, Elrey B. Ash, P.E. Ash & Browne Engineering, Inc COLLEGE STATION P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Teh. 409 764 3500 August 27, 1999 Mr. Curtis Burnett Via Facsimile: (713) 462-2732 Re: Rock Prairie Crossing Shopping Center - Drainage Report Mr. Burnett, The drainage calculations that we received for the above-mentioned project were not sealed Per the Texas Engineering Practice Act, a public official of this state or a political subdivision of the state who is charged with the enforcement of laws, ordinances, codes or regulations that affect the practice of engineering may only accept plans, specifications, and other related documents prepared by a licensed engineer as evidenced by the seal of an engineer. Preliminary documents released shall identify the purpose of the document, the engineer of record and the engineer license number, and the release date by placing the following text or similar wording instead of a seal. Said document is released for the purpose of interim review, under the authority of the engineer with license number and date of release shown. An initial evaluation of the submittal did reveal that most of the standard information that is typically included in drainage reports (and required by the City of College Station) was not included The City's Drainage Policies and Design Standards Manual (DPDS), pages 91-94, lists items that should be included in drainage reports. Attached is a copy of those pages from the DPDS. Of these items, the most pressing is the certification sheet, which states that the drainage design is in accordance with the provisions of the City of College Station Drainage Policy and Design Standards. If you have any questions, or need further information, please feel free to call Jeff Tondre, or myself at (409) 764-3570. Sin ly I 1 atah Development Coordinator Attachment: DPDS, Pages 91-94 Cc: Dan Muniza, Center America Property Trust Via fax: (713) 349-0901 Raymond Suarez, Osborn & Vane Architects Via fax: (713) 781-5347 vase file # 99-404 Development permit file Home of Texas A&M University 4 qq u6`{ COLLEGE STAnON P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tet 409 764 3500 September 27, 1999 Mr. Curtis Burnett Coboum, Linseisen, & Ratcliff 13100 Northwest Frwy Suite 500 Houston, TX 77040 Re: Drainage Report Rock Prairie Crossing Shopping Center Mr. Burnett, This is in response to the drainage report received by Fed-Ex on September 24, 1999, for the above-mentioned project. I reviewed the calculations submitted, and have found that the information submitted is not complete. With the exception of outlet works design and sizing calculations, the report would be complete for a site with a single detention pond. This is based upon the triangular hydrograph method described in the Drainage Policy and Design Standards (DPDS). However, the design appears to incorporate eight ponding areas, which may be hydraulically inter-connected. The outlet works design, which limits discharge flows to no more than pre-developed flows must be included in the report. Supporting documentation, which should include the effect of inter-basin flow if necessary, should be included in the report. Final design plans incorporating the detention design and addressing water line comments, will be required prior to issuance of a development permit. As you were previously informed, all work proceeding on the site is at the developer's risk. Work within the rights-of-way and the placement of impervious cover on the site is not currently authorized. If you have any questions, or need further information, please call me at (409) 764-3570. Sincerely, Plondre, P.E. Acting Asst. City Engineer Cc: Dan Muniza, Center America Property Trust Via fax: (713) 349-0901 Raymond Suarez, Osborn & Vane Architects Via fax: (713) 781-5347 Home of Texas A&M University COLLEGE STATION P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tel: 409 764 3500 MEMORANDUM TO: Project Review Committee FROM: Ed Hard, Transportation Planne~ DATE: January 21, 1999 RE: Driveway Variances for the Rock Prairie Kroger Center This item is for PRC'S consideration of driveway variances for the Kroger Shopping Center, a proposed 12.55 acre development to be located generally on the southwest comer of the intersection of the SH 6 West Frontage Road and Rock Prairie Road immediately south and west of First American Bank. The applicant is Municipal Development Group for Centre America Developers. See attached letter of request and site plan. Frontage Road Driveways. Per the City's Driveway Ordinance, access points to the SH 6 Frontage Roads are required to be 275 feet apart and at least 100 feet away from SH 6 entrance ramps. Under these requirements, the Kroger site would only be allowed one driveway to the Frontage Road. The applicant is requesting variances to allow for two access points on to the Frontage Road. The site's south driveway on the Frontage Road is located approximately 170 feet away from Birmingham Road and 225 feet from the site's north driveway on the Frontage Road. Both of these distances are required to be 275 feet, thus variances of 105 and 50 feet would be needed, respectively. The north driveway is located approximately 70 feet south of the SH 6 entrance ramp. Under both City and State regulations, this distance is required to be 100 feet. A variance of 30 feet would be needed to meet the City's requirement relative to the entrance ramp. It is not known at this time if the State (TY.DOT) would approve of the driveway at this loot-bin. A variance would also be needed for the throat lengths of the driveway(s) on the Frontage Road. The City's ordinance requires driveways on the Frontage Road to have a throat length of 55 feet. The preliminary site plan submitted as part of this request shows throat lengths of only 30 feet for these driveways. At the time of the writing of this staff report, the applicant had not requested a variance to the throat length requirement. Home of Texas A&M University Kroger Variance, Page 2 The developer has indicated that the two access points on to the Frontage Road are very important because they have already been included as part of a lease agreement with Krogers. Unfortunately, this agreement was developed prior to any city review of the site plan. The West Frontage Road is the primary means of access to the city for the new residential areas in the south being developed in the Shenandoah and Barron Road areas. It will continue to serve this important function until Longmire is extended to Barron Road in the future. The additional driveway being requested would add more conflict and delay to a section of the Frontage Road that will experience significant increases in traffic in the next 5 to 10 years. Staff recommends denial of the variances to allow for two access points onto the Frontage Road. There does not appear to be any undue hardship or overly compelling reason from an accessibility or circulation standpoint to justify these variances. Without undue hardship, staff has a concern for the precedence that could be set by granting the variances. Staff would also recommend denial of a variance to the throat length requirements Longmire Extension Driveways. While the location of the driveways on Longmire meet minimum ordinance requirements, staff still has a concern for how they will function and the impact they will have to Longmire Drive. The City's Driveway Ordinance allows engineering judgement to override the spacing requirements if warranted by specific traffic conditions. Under the current layout of the site's internal circulation system, the driveway nearest Rock Prairie Road will serve as the primary driveway to the site and experience the highest traffic volumes. As a result, vehicles on Longmire attempting to turn left into this proposed driveway could be blocked by vehicles on Longmire waiting to turn left at the future signal. Changes to the site parking layout and internal circulation system should be made to decrease the incidence of conflict on Longmire caused by the site's driveways. Staff recommends approval of the locations of the driveways on Longmire with the conditions as discussed below: Driveway on Longmire Nearest Rock Prairie: 1. Incorporate the access easement between the Bank and Longmire into the site design such that no backing maneuvers will occur into the easement. 2. Change circulation of parking lot layout such that this driveway is a less accessible means of entry into the shopping center's main parking lot. The function of this driveway should be to primarily serve traffic associated with the bank and the comer retail immediately west of the bank. 3. Change or remove the access easement located immediately opposite of this driveway on Longmire to either only serve Lot 4 or to serve Lots 4 and 5. This will help in reducing congestion in the area near the Longmire/Rock Prairie traffic signal. Kroger Variance, Page 3 Middle Driveway on Longmire: 1. Increase the width of the travelway between the two buildings to match that of the driveway's width at Longmire. 2. Change internal parking layout such that a parking circulation aisle is located directly opposite of the travelway between the two buildings. This will facilitate traffic flow to the primary parking area thus increasing the use of the middle driveway. 3. Design the travelway from Longmire to the front of the buildings to include no backing maneuvers Staff does not have any concerns for the driveway on Longmire nearest Birmingham. Birmingham Road Driveways. The site shows two proposed driveways on Birmingham Road. The west driveway is located 160 feet from the future Longmire extension. Per the driveway ordinance, this distance is required to be 185 feet. Since this will be a low volume driveway and it is located so as to facilitate service vehicles, staff recommends approval of a variance of 25 feet for this driveway. cko. C-w al~/q ~vF~e~ 15'il~ M~ UL,2-,,q 4A~ C4- o Lit ov<6--t- 64-N~ZL V C-lt-a ~oj -fO- Js: a76 aAr e~ T~( u MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP 2551 Texas Ave. South, Ste. A • College Station, Texas 77840 •409-693-5359 • FAX.- 409-693-4243 oE-mail:mdgcs@gte.com Consulting Engineers, Surveyors, Planners and Environmental Consultants January 20, 1999 Veronica J. B. Morgan City of College Station 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 77842 Re: Centre America Rock Prairie Development, MDG Project No. 3138-000631 Driveway Variance Request Dear Ms. Morgan: As an elaboration of my previous letter, we would like to request the following specific variances to the driveway ordinance. 1) For the South Driveway, exiting on to the Frontage Road. The centerline, as currently depicted on the conceptual site plan, is 177 feet from the north curb line of Birmingham. Since the Highway 6 Frontage Road is classed as a Major Arterial, minimum spacing is required to be 275 feet for adjacent drives. We request a variance of 100 feet. 2) For the North Driveway, the distance from the south driveway, centerline of centerline, is 250 feet. We request a variance of 25 feet. This variance is reasonable in this circumstance. Most of the traffic at the Rock Prairie/Highway 6 Intersection proceeds to the on ramp and leaves the frontage road at that point. The Frontage Road carries only that traffic southbound to Birmingham, and Barron Road, and Shenandoah Subdivision, none of which produce a high traffic volume, and it certainly seems reasonable to treat that portion of the Texas 6 Frontage Road south of the freeway on-ramp as a lesser street classification than Major Arterial. Given such a circumstance, granting of a variance is within the spirit of the ordinance. We will provide additional data as it becomes available. Included is the most recent conceptual site plan for this development, dated 1/20/99. 000631-c.20-36 (3138) Please call if you have questions. Sincerely, Gre ry K. Taggart Vice President ~'7 - 71" 000631-c.20-36 (3138) JAN-27-99 WED 07;56 AM CA EXEC/REDEV FAX NO. F. 02 7135076388 KROGER REAL ESTATE 647 P01 JAN 2G '99 17:55 7NE R9o, er ~16770 IMPERIAL VALLEY OM, • HOUSTON, TEXAS 77(560.3400 REAL IESTATr1; DIEPARTNMRNT MAILING ADDR[BS: HOUSTON MARKCTINQ AgCA P. 0. fox 1309 1+OYa70m. 71{ 778a I.170Y "LL-l PAONC! {51.31 30?.4e1a January 25, ~.n 79~ FAXI (711 007-4004 Mr. Dan Muniza Center America Property Trust 3901 Bellaire Blvd. Houston, Texas 77025 Ref; SWC Nwy 6 8 Rack Prairie Road, College Station, Texas Dear Dan: Regarding access to Hwy 6 feeder road at the above site, we at Kroger feel that two drives are necessary and must be located as shown on the current site plan to allow adequate traffic flow in and out of the shopping center. This Is the standard configuration for Kroger developments and has been found to 'work very well at high volume locations such as thls should become. Feel free to call if you have questions regarding this information. Yours truly, THE KROG CO. rn Obermeier Asst. Real Estate Manager • 0- • C7 Aa~,t 4 E --CD ) ~ f • • UL I" LINI.D r VIN8 1 96. DAY-T]W HS. In, ALI INIOWN. IMP, „I • f"IJITi [I If. COLLEGE STATION P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tel: 409 764 3500 March 8, 1999 Dan Muniza Vice President CenterAmerica 3901 Bellaire Blvd. Houston, Texas 77025 re: Rock Prairie Crossing Shopping Center site plan dated 02-25-99 (copy attached). Dear Mr. Muniza: We have reviewed the above referenced site plan submitted by you in response to our comments of February 23, 1999. The driveways reflected on this site plan are consistent with those comments with respect to number and location with no changes necessary. Adjustments to width, radius, etc., particularly of the "exit only" service drives may be necessary and will be addressed through the formal site plan approval process. A median in Rock Prairie Rd. will be necessary for the proposed Rock Prairie Rd. entrance. The attached site plan is conceptual and lacks detailed information necessary for formal approval. The revisions do address our comments regarding the previous concept. We look forward to your submission of a final site plan based on the attached drawing. Sincerel , Jim Callaway Development Services Director Jc cc: case file 99-404 Home of Texas A&M University C ~c r ~ 0 ~ l 7cLn.~ C J o (p ! Y ~ . ~ C~ ou vt 77 wl G t Fvo v~+1 cue.--- -~-N 0 r bo un a ri-k bo ~Ad Fr n }'a-'_e 12oa vvt a y(f S +v O v~ le q w Soufiln 60 'All Cl 31 - l I.~i I I l~ t Flli l ►ti i I I1~.~1 00, KKK 0 Dgfe t I Z/ l 1 G Q ~J, b /,~1( Yfl ihr 71A cou n-tcv- lavia c e (C J o (o No . -77(m c- lvl ©_-_.Fro_v~fa_q_e-~ - Fvov~~c~c~G_~.~i -0-60 Y- .boun II v% i ,t FY f"a) e . _koc, C So u'~ Lt ~ O to vi o~ 5~eo75515 NORK 'N~,~~1H~__1111~_XK- ire tt~.-~m~t,t~►- co) 5 - - _ I*NK"KNK- I ~r~nunu~u~+u Coup ~f o~ ct.~u~2 0 -rmC. l O - Fr o_~ f_a-q_~-__ ~k • - - _ Fvo vl'~ctQ_e - J J - - S_ot~,_b_o ud--- for bond - - - - - ` j `='te 4-f S (do K -A-40-~L AL 1N1~lL- T~l~ TF1~. R11 hFll~l - (I rim TK 3 l~(o r_f-~ bo un d -Q- Fr o n_}'a_9 12oa C f9 cv~ - qm .So u'}' Lt b O t.~ ✓1 I b _ 10 2b$ ~ 1(v ~ Pe a r KRaGt=- ►Z o. B-L~--- ~ aC ~ ~ V r~ ~°rtit E nl T _S l 7' E ~ ~Zot~T~4- ~ E RortD 1 Z Z' 3 COLLEGE STATION P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tet 409 764 3500 PROJECT REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT January 29, 1999 TO: Dan Muniza, Center America Property Trust 3901 Bellaire Blvd., Houston, TX 77025 Greg Taggart, Municipal Development Group 2551 Texas Avenue S, Ste. A, College Station, TX 77840 FROM: Project Review Committee James Massey, P&Z Commission Chairman Winnie Garner, P&Z Commission Member Karl Mooney, P&Z Commission Member Others Attending: Natalie Ruiz, Development Coordinator Bridgette George, Asst. Development Coordinat Edwin Hard, Transportation Planner Scott Hester, Transportation Analyst Sabine McCully, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Driveway Variance - Rock Prairie Kroger Center: proposed 12.55 acre development located on the southwest corner of the intersection of the SH 6 West Frontage Road and Rock Prairie Road immediately south and west of First National Bank. A Project Review Committee (PRC) meeting.was held on January 27, 1999 to discuss the aforementioned center. Dan Muniza informed the Committee that two access points on to the Frontage Road are very important because they have already been included as part of a lease.agreement with Krogers. Edwin Hard recommended attaining an access easement from First National Bank which would give Krogers a second entrance to the Frontage Road. Edwin also recommended no backing maneuvers into the main drive entrance from Longmire. He also expressed his concern on the first entrance on Longmire regarding the potential for high traffic and suggested putting up deterrents making it more difficult to access Krogers from that first entrance. This would hopefully encourage patrons to utilize the second Longmire entrance. Mr. Muniza stated that Kroger would be inclined to deny the site if that were required. Home of Texas A&M University AN The Committee's concerns included setting a precedence by approving a driveway variance along Highway 6. They were also concerned about the safety of having two drives on the Frontage Road, instead of one. They discussed the idea of having a boulevard-type driveway which would allow patrons more room when coming off the Frontage Road. Winnie moved to deny the variance and recommended that the applicant consider only one curb cut on the Frontage Road and to reconfigure the interior traffic flow to allow cars to enter the site quickly with adequate stacking room. The motion was seconded by Karl Mooney and passed 3-0. Karl Mooney moved to approve the appeal of the Longmire Extension Driveways with the following conditions: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Provide signage at the primary driveway location on Longmire advertising only the establishments in the lots closest to Rock Prairie Road. Provide signage at the second driveway location on Longmire advertising Krogers Change the parking lot configuration to preclude backing maneuvers into the driving aisle. (This pertains to the driving aisle that begins at the Longmire curb cut closest to Rock Prairie Road and extends to the access easement at First National Bank.) Winne Garner seconded the motion with the above conditions, which passed 3-0. COLLEGE STATION P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tel: 409 764 3500 MEMORANDUM TO: Project Review Committee FROM: Ed Hard, Transportation Plannge d- DATE: January 27, 1904 RE: Variance for driveway located at 3225 Caterina Lane This item is consideration of a driveway variance for a residential lot in Phase 11 of the Edelweiss Subdivision located on the comer of Caterina Lane and Edelweiss Avenue. Caterina Lane is classified as a residential street and Edelweiss Avenue is classified as a minor collector. The City's driveway ordinance calls for access to comer lots to be taken from the lesser street, in this case Caterina Lane. The applicant, Lary Marion of Mariott Homes, Inc., is requesting that access to the lot be allowed from Edelweiss Avenue. His attached letter of request cites two similar variances for access on to Edelweiss Avenue that have already been granted. The first of these variances involved a case at 3216 Sunflower Trail where the P&Z granted a variance to allow a driveway to Edelweiss Avenue which was already under construction. The second case was a variance at 3201 Innsbruck which was subsequently approved by a former staff member in light of the variance granted at 3216 Sunflower. The subject lot is located across from Westchester Paris approximately 1000 feet from the Welsh Avenue/Edelweiss Avenue intersection and 1100 feet from the intersection of Edelweiss Avenue and Rock Prairie Road. The present traffic volumes on Edelweiss Avenue are low, but once the area is fully developed, the volumes will increase along this sectiz:, of roadway. The speed limit on Edelweiss Avenue is 35 mph. The primary purpose of bringing this case to the PRC is to determine if the staff should continue to allow access to Edelweiss Avenue in light of the two previous variances, or if we should uphold the ordinance in future cases despite the two variance cases. Home of Texas A&M University ~ry j; r I 7r' 7T OTT.. I.0. Box 19 16 j (409) 696-1787 In, TX 77842 I i ! FAX (09) 693 3398 College ollege SCati `,i nuary 20, 999 I R.C. i C v of Colle e Station 1 C j y2 , T6xc~u j , i L I R i of i; of Cii 4, Edefvyci 5 Estes Phase i i Via, d 2'25 CalCr tlcj 1 i I i ouid lire t request a cur' cut on Edelweiss Ave, tie f;:r Biock w, Edelweiss Esiat P1~ase 11. al o knoWTr j as A5 Catarina T~ a i + 3202 Lobgmire kaaon.'1177846 •an- a.lo~:~ entrance to the aarag while I a. Ov in,; the tome c•.vner ko aintain a Ian -is aped ; a j Vill iGI V. T is request i ( in agr em of With Yarianseg alreat ^;MA-d for h roes, at I..nnebrook and i Edetweiss it nue an Syn;l iTver and Edelweiss iiv nue. f ank you for your wic! r ion. riott L i hr Sidciu j , i j i 1i i, OOQ~ SOAS JNHNdO•IHAHQ SHWOH L.LOIHVK 8V:TT 66/OZ/TO II r i CATEi INA LANE ~2i' OP;=RTY LINC= 7 _ *4 5 47.103'58 ' E O!id f 25 0' f3UiLDING 5L 1 G : LINE - - ,I OE J ) 1 I l ; + 4I 1 e ~ ~a}y ` jib R ~ I r~ 1 : 7 . { D'_ ~ O i r I n , ~o k: i~u_f r _ i F fA R -i I ~ 1~ { 7t O I . I I I_ i ( C Z t..~-ry p' ~h-Om # M M m rn `D Ct3 _ 't i i U1 N C i (P 7~ IM 1 D M N D I 13 i M Z I z Irn t i fy bti ~ y e:r > a rd 3; tI 1 3 D 1•' Us L~ o a o z M I Ti I - i y~ t s A :sa } i, iN S.. " S ' ~ ? I - - 2S ETBA BUILDING .0 - - - - I ± T-e0 J 10 .0'; PUBLI C UTILITY AND DRAIN AGE FA5EME T PROPE RTY LINE: 9336' - 5 ( 47'03'58' E 1 -no sq . FT ?9 a 5Q . Fr PLAN l . Q Z OO DI SOAS 114 MdO'IHAH Q F fF SHKOH .LLOI2IVK L6: TT 66/OZ/TO J 12/01 '99 10:20 FAX 409 693 4243 M D G 2002 MUNICIPAL DEVL01'ME1VT GRQUP=~«~) 2551 Texas Ave. South, Ste. A . College Sratio?, Texas 77840 . 409-693-5359 • FAX-- 409-693-4243 • E-mail. mdgca@,gte_com Consulting Engineers, Surveyors, Planners and Environmental Consultants EVMJ .C-f January 11, 1999 Veronica J.B. Morgan, Asst City Engineer City of College Station 1 10 1 Texas Ave College Station, TX 77842 Re: Variance for Curb Cut location and number. Kroger L.O. Ball Develop t Dear Ms. Morgan: On behalf of our client Centre America Property Trust, we request a variance hearing on the above referenced project Our client would like to be allowed to have 2 curb cuts on the Highway 6 Frontage Road, as discussed at our meeting with staff on last Tuesday. We would like to have this variance hearing at your earliest opportunity. We will provide additional information prior to the meeting. Please feel free to call me if you have questions. Thank you, CVice President 000631-c.18-36 (3128) V4 COLLEGE STATION P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tel: 409 764 3500 PROJECT REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT January 29, 1999 TO: Dan Muniza, Center America Property Trust 3901 Bellaire Blvd., Houston, TX 77025 Greg Taggart, Municipal Development Group 2551 Texas Avenue S, Ste. A, College Station, TX 77840 FROM: Project Review Committee James Massey, P&Z Commission Chairman Winnie Garner, P&Z Commission Member Karl Mooney, P&Z Commission Member Others Attending: Natalie Ruiz, Development Coordinator Bridgette George, Asst. Development Coordinat Edwin Hard, Transportation Planner Scott Hester, Transportation Analyst Sabine McCully, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Driveway Variance - Rock Prairie Kroger Center: proposed 12.55 acre development located on the southwest corner of the intersection of the SH 6 West Frontage Road and Rock Prairie Road immediately south and west of First National Bank. A Project Review Committee (PRC) meeting,was held on January 27, 1999 to discuss the aforementioned center. Dan Muniza informed the Committee that two access points on to the Frontage Road are very important because they have already been included as part of a lease.agreement with Krogers. Edwin Hard recommended attaining an access easement from First National Bank which would give Krogers a second entrance to the Frontage Road. Edwin also recommended no backing maneuvers into the main drive entrance from Longmire. He also expressed his concern on the first entrance on Longmire regarding the potential for high traffic and suggested putting up deterrents making it more difficult to access Krogers from that first entrance. This would hopefully encourage patrons to utilize the second Longmire entrance. Mr. Muniza stated that Kroger would be inclined to deny the site if that were required. Home of Texas A&M University The Committee's concerns included setting a precedence by approving a driveway variance along Highway 6. They were also concerned about the safety of having two drives on the Frontage Road, instead of one. They discussed the idea of having a boulevard-type driveway which would allow patrons more room when coming off the Frontage Road. Winnie moved to deny the variance and recommended that the applicant consider only one curb cut on the Frontage Road and to reconfigure the interior traffic flow to allow cars to enter the site quickly with adequate stacking room. The motion was seconded by Karl Mooney and passed 3-0. Karl Mooney moved to approve the appeal of the Longmire Extension Driveways with the following conditions: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Provide signage at the primary driveway location on Longmire advertising only the establishments in the lots closest to Rock Prairie Road. Provide signage at the second driveway location on Longmire advertising Krogers Change the parking lot configuration to preclude backing maneuvers into the driving aisle. (This pertains to the driving aisle that begins at the Longmire curb cut closest to Rock Prairie Road and extends to the access easement at First National Bank.) Winnie Garner seconded the motion with the above conditions, which passed 3-0. ~I t. 1 r Lk, t ~ 1 ' i,...- /t Jy,,:l~ L+..,~-,.. • ~ ,.~C.... y"'4r1,,.,,, ~ts' 1 '~Lr'V i.i L..' `.i l / ff~r~, ~.L„ . t . i r ti i t ~ ~A6 jcmt,z tt Lo 4,~ yf, ~"atj lu-~ alIg o" 7y Kl~bqt~ C"d opt 0- lmaldllv) o-x) od 7 AiTI f2i'l W-~ a~i ~Zc ~1y)d d&W bL~ V CJ u,I Chit c✓!~ c qd? c y,~ &.t 6 ~ ~ d 4-Yi,T) spau c,,v A) 6o ep P~(. iU To 7~ ~u~ ~v ~dl o ~ ~J~` X111 J_ PNM IV ^ ~C E 'M*O a 909 t _ _ t w REIAJL SPACE 19,909 SF a G f All AM r ' \ \ \E\ 64 w s o o O \ \ -n r W r F ' ,3 \ \ \ , -n _0 0 d 3 5 T JTi f 1Tl~2l \ \ \ Ui - c= 1/. C, L ~v t~ } 1 lil I i ¢ - E-- iN'071'05 - - - f z Rock Prairie Crossing Shopping Center Site Plan (General comments only based on pre-submission review of preliminary site plan - Not a full site review) 1. Even though this driveway does not meet the driveway ordinance, staff could support it if. 1) it serves service vehicles only; 2) it is designed as "exit only," and 3) it can be shown that it is needed for site circulation purposes. 2. This curb cut also does not meet the driveway ordinance. Staff could not support a driveway at this location due to its proximity to other key driveways. 3. The width of this section of the Longmire main driveway appears to have a reduction in width instead of an increase. Driveway needs to be widened to allow for separate right and left turns at the intersection of the interior travel aisle. 4. In the 2/8/99 meeting this area of parking was to be removed (1-2 spaces) to insure site distance. 5. The curb cut indicates a 35-foot opening. The width of the throat is approximately 25 feet. To allow for one entry and separate left and right exit maneuvers, this throat width needs to be wider. 6. As per the 2/8/99 meeting, this was to have an access point into the bank parking area. 7. This area was to remain open allowing direct access into the Kroger parking lot only if Rock Prairie were to have a median installed between the Frontage Road and Longmire. Without a median, it needs to be redesigned showing it closed. 8. End island required. 9. Width of exit lane should be widened to allow for separate left and right turn exit maneuvers. Width of entrance lane should be narrowed since only a single lane is needed. 10. Calculations show about 6,000 S.F. of interior islands needs to be provided in the interior of the parking lot - this number could change because the new layout may show a different number of interior spaces. So far, only these two strips qualify as "interior islands." 11. Well need to see good evidence upon submittal that this area will be substantially screened; especially in the areas where loading docks, recycling storage, dumpsters, etc., will be located. 12. It still appears that some of your end islands are too small. 13. This area does not appear to be wide enough to serve as a travelway. COLLEGE STATION R O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tel: 409 764 3500 MEMORANDUM February 28, 2000 TO: Richard Vane, Via Fax (713) 781-5347 FROM: Natalie Ruiz, Development Coordi to SUBJECT: Rock Prairie Crossing Shopping Center - Site Plan Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. There are still a few comments that need to be addressed. Please address the attached comments and submit the following information for further staff review: Three (3) complete set of construction documents for the proposed development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached. (Additional sets may be needed once approved.) If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 764-3570. Attachments: Staff review comments cc: Robert Scott, Center America Property Trust, Via fax (713) 349-0901 Raymond Suarez, Via fax (713) 781-5347 Case file #99-404 Home of Texas A&M University STEEP FOREST LAKE r 47 l /ARVEY is q k O 1 2 1 I TINBERVILF Suck 4111t6 6, ZI Sa 2 ' 147 159 6 :T 8 Labe 1 46 1 j ' 257 3 60 256 250 32 3 1 t 2154 MONUMENT NAME MON. 131 NAD-27 LATITUDE LONGITUDE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HORIZONTAL CONTROL MONUMENT DATE ESTABLISHED STATE: COUNTY 1994 TEXAS BRAZOS GEODETIC POSITION NAD-83 GEODETIC POSITION N 030° 34' 28.13538" LATITUDE N 030° 34' 28.85965" W 096° 16' 39.09203" LONGITUDE W 096° 16' 39.94900" NAD-27 TEXAS STATE PLANE COORDINATES CENTRAL ZONE Y COORDINATE 353424.054 X COORDINATE 3276056.238 CONVERGENCE = 20 05' 20.33" SCALE FACTOR = 0.9999093 G.P.S ELEVATION : 279.43 ft. NAD-83 TEXAS STATE PLANE COORDINATES CENTRAL ZONE (US Survey Feet) Y COORDINATE 10196005.795 X COORDINATE 3572535.894 CONVERGENCE = 20 05' 19.89" SCALE FACTOR = 0.9999093 (NGVD 1929 MEAN SEA LEVEL DATUM) AZIMUTH MARK ASTRONOMIC AZIMUTH (FROM NORTH) GRID AZIMUTH (FROM NORTH) ANTENNA N 325° 48' 58" N 323° 43' 38" REFERENCE MARK DESCRIPTION m IR CENTER OF RED AND WHITE ANTENNA RM 1: P.K. NAIL AND SHINER IN CENTERLINE WHITE STRIP 5.20 NORTH OF EDGE OF ASPHALT RM 2: CHISELED ON CENTERLINE TOP OF CONCRETE CULVERT RM 3: P.K. NAIL AND SHINER IN POWER POLE DISTANCE (ft)IDIRECTION 1000000,001, 34.21' 077018'47" 223.19' 1163°32105" 33.30' 1167017'47" DETAILED DESCRIPTION : ALUMINUM CAP SET IN CONCRETE, STAMPED "COLLEGE STATION MON. 131, 1994". THE MONUMENT IS LOCATED SOUTH OF COLLEGE STATION, ON SOUTH SIDE OF THE SOUTH ACCESS ROAD OF HIGHWAY 6. THE MONUMENT IS 0.70 MILE FROM THE INTERSECTION OF ROCK PRAIRIE ROAD AND SOUTH ACCESS ROAD OF HIGHWAY 6 AND IS ALSO APPROXIMATELY U250 FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION OF EAGLE AVE AND SOUTH ACCESS ROAD OF HIGHWAY 6. THE MONUMENT IS 46.0 FEET FROM THE CENTERLINE OF SOUTH ACCESS ROAD OF HIGHWAY 6. a %FIELD SKETCH yk y 4; KM~ ~ Spey ACCE SS Ppq~ Q W CITY OF COLLEGE STATION HORIZONTAL CONTROL MONUMENT MONUMENT NAME DATE ESTABLISHED STATE: COUNTY MON. 130 1994 TEXAS BRAZOS NAD-27 GEODETIC POSITION NAD-83 GEODETIC POSITION LATITUDE N 0300 35' 14.47037 LATITUDE N 030° 35' 15.19334" LONGITUDE W 0960 17' 07.71842" LONGITUDE W 0960 17' 08.57588" NAD-27 TEXAS STATE PLANE COORDINATES CENTRAL ZONE Y COORDINATE 358010.624 X COORDINATE 3273385.234 31 CONVERGENCE = SCALE FACTOR = 14 G.P.S ELEVATION 2° 05' 05.58" 0.9999077 NAD-83 TEXAS STATE PLANE COORDINATES CENTRAL ZONE (US Survey Feet) Y COORDINATE 10200592.404 X COORDINATE 3569864.911 CONVERGENCE = 20 05' 05.14" SCALE FACTOR = 0.9999077 303.57 ft. (NGVD 1929 MEAN SEA LEVEL DATUM) ASTRONOMIC AZIMUTH (FROM NORTH) GRID AZIMUTH (FROM NORTH) N 3240 31' 00" N 3220 25' 55" AZIMUTH MARK ANTENNA REFERENCE MARK DESCRIPTION RED AND WHITE ANTENNA RM 1: CHISELED ON TOP OF BACK CURB CLOSE TO END OF CURB RM 2: CHISELED ON TOP OF 24" R.C.P. WITH CONCRETE CULVERT RM 3: P.K. NAIL WITH SHINER IN POWER POLE DISTANCE (ft)IDIRECTION 000°00'00" 17.88' 1163026'4711 26.79' 1263003'25" 27.83' 1323°20'18" DETAILED DESCRIPTION : ALUMINUM CAP SET IN CONCRETE, STAMPED "COLLEGE STATION MON. 130, 1994". THE MONUMENT IS LOCATED IN COLLEGE STATION, ON NORTH SIDE OF THE NORTH ACCESS ROAD OF HIGHWAY 6. THE MONUMENT IS 0.10 EASTERLY FROM THE INTERSECTION OF WOODCREEK DRIVE AND THE NORTH ACCESS ROAD OF HIGHWAY 6. THE MONUMENT IS 61.0 FEET EASTERLY FROM THE CENTERLINE OF THE NORTH ACCESS ROAD AND 41.4 FEET NORTHERLY FROM THE CENTERLINE OF WOODCREEK DRIVE. FIELD SKETCH \ rr OSBORN & VANE ARCHITECTS s Transmittal Dade ^r:vj 1 s,1949 To N a f -et 1 t 71t0 MX.), v z... dr= c_.o 1 Jtyt 5~&hon 1101 7" hs Alvu , X011 egc Sf a f10 Tx -17847- Projec~ JZcc-44- ! f d t r e- 62-05_51nq '57,C. Pgcd no 98110-7 By I/ Jcr 11 No of Copies Description / Date Rem~irks k plan Arpocabo4i pla,% G h tr-K- LI5"f fi5 GJI 4t, plan prin I S Ghe.-cj<.#2857 (GOO.V) rbx A-pplica-{roar f:ee5 ,ur use ❑ I or . K~rc , iI ❑ -x ir I ; ~er~l ❑ AS C:g)Ies to Wi!h enclosure kv (2t hwnA IGUAre7 Badge#te Georg a New Develo merit:for 4/5 Comments Page 1 From: "Kimberly Winn" <KWINN1@tuelectric.com> To: City of College Station.City Hall(BGEORGE,NRU12) Date: 4/12/99 10:12AM Subject: New Development for 4/5 Comments Natalie, we have already decided to change our process here, which should be easier for you too. Paul and I will alternate weeks with the COCS new development. So next week, expect comments from him. Thanks for bearing with us while we figure out the most efficient way to approach this. Lone Star Gas has the following comments for the week of 4/5/99: Wheeler Subdivision Phase II - No comment Barker's Heating and Cooling - No comment, we have received all necessary information Kroger Shopping Center at Rock Prairie Road - If this facility is to use gas, the owner or architect/engineer needs to contact me at 774-2506 to discuss placement of the meter and service line, which will need to be shown on the site plan. We would also like our existing gas main along the Hwy 6 frontage road to be shown on the site plan, and if necessary, they can contact me for help in locating this main. Thank You! Kimberly Winn Utility Designer - Bryan District TU Electric/Lone Star Gas COLLEGE STATION P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tel: 409 764 3500 MEMORANDUM TO: Richard Vane, Osborn & Vane Architects-Inc. FROM: Natalie Ruiz, Development Coordin or DATE: April 14, 1999 RE: Site plan for the Rock Prairie Crossing Shopping Center. Staff reviewed the above mentioned site plan for a shopping center to be located in the L.O. Ball Memorial Subdivision, Phase II. Attached is a copy of the site plan with staff review comments that need to be addressed. Please address all comments included and submit the following for further review and approval: ✓Three complete sets of construction documents with the revised site, landscape and drainage/grading plans attached. VIThe attached redlined site plan with staff comments. If there are comments that you are not able to address, submit a letter addressing those items to he reviewed by staff with the next suhmittal of construction documents. Attached is also an "Easement Information Sheet" and an "Electrical Service Request". Electrical Superintendent Tony Michalsky asked that I forward these documents to you for your use. Please coordinate all electrical service details with Tony at (409) 764-3438. The following is a comment that I received from Lone Star Gas that I agreed to forward to you for your information on the project. "If this facility is to use gas, the owner or architect/engineer needs to contact me at (409) 774-2506 to discuss placement of the meter and service line, which will need to be shown on the site plan. We would also like our existing gas main along the Highway 6 Frontage Road to be shown on the site plan, and if necessary, they can contact me for help in locating this main. Contact Kimberly Winn, Utility Designer for TU Electric/Lone Star Gds.,, If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 764-3570. Thank you. cc: Dan Muniza, Center America Property Trust, 3901 Bellaire, Houston, TX 77025 (w1o attachments) Case file #99-404 Home of Texas A&M University V W Kroger Site Plan Review 4-9-99 Page 2 of 2 10. How high are the retaining walls at the truck well? They must be adequately screened by the proposed vegetation. 1) C-2 Add fire lanes as suggested or propose alternative lanes that will ade~qquately cover all buildings. ACV13 EV G - z pev a<Ay cps nioln l11 12. The 3 detention areas on the grading plan do not seem to match the landscape plan (for instance, there is a berm shown on one plan where another plan shows a detention area). Landscaping in these areas should not be planted in depressions because it needs to be high enough to adequately screen the rear of the buildings, the loading dock and other loading areas, and any outside storage areas. 13. How many of these buildings will be sprinkled? We will need to see their Fire Dep't connections - they need to be between 150' to 300' from the nearest hydrant with a clear path in front of them. /rCr490M(/Vo7'/-I to✓rfs"•rc~'~ - -0 /a., 1,04,v9. 1A''.. s/C/ed (14) AS 1 Please provide an alternative design for this area showing no direct north-south connection wi a note that the alternate will be built if a median is not installed in Rock Prairie Road. N/,A )P« b.~~ r1'Iv ~iz,w CC~,n i eciGeJ *~f/,w Gt//w w.~y . ~15) AS1 Provide a 180 square foot end island here. Z;0.7 C_, (16) AS 1 We have concerns regarding sight clearance and traffic maneuverability around this corner. Our sanitation trucks will barely make this corner and will be forced into the lane of opposing traffic - when this happens, it should be visible to oncoming traffic. Any delivery vehicles that are larger than the City's service vehicles might not make this turn at all. Modify this area to give more open visibility and circulation. (We have similar concerns at pad sites C, D, and E at these corners - at this point, perhaps a note will suffice until we receive final site plans for these pad sites.) AeQCI t w.1 e_wAw b11jJ0e 4( I-wh <o, User d eAromr RL.o y . ton~Jyv~afzo . (17) AS I How do delivery vehicles get around the front of Building A? Vehicles that are larger than passenger cars might not make this turn. Y7a h tl& tt y V Ch rC/cf 400s : ute; The- AevlseW al/v vG CA~i'G'/JC< • tlG,~i plc ,04,pC (18) AS I Show a striping plan and; turning arrows to delineate left and right exit lanes. tJo~c (19) AS I Show a striping plan and exit signs to ensure this will bean "exit only" drive. Reducethe drive width to 24' . 470,7e_ (20) MEP It seems as though there is both a tree and a transformer in the same location -resolve this discrepancy but make sure the transformer is screened from Birmingham. (21) MEP Where is this transformer in relation to the proposed landscaping? It should be screened from Longmire. (22) C-2 This fire hydrant should be in a protected area (like an island). /=./~j. yw f~„t'~z7~i(esal by ~'/iClrGf W /7tl Lon'woi~C ~+isfr~c/r. Co~Sfi'vc#>~~ p/was ~o~ ~~s+.~c I»it f 23. C-2 This hydrant needs to be on a fire lane (perhaps a good location for it is in the entrance island?) Pe {y corhnirtifJ. /V i-A.- ,/"-24. C-2 Provide a backflow preventer for the fire line located along Birmingham Road near the Longmire 400,W A intersection. t 4' /"~QQCV~S'G~ ~~GI/7 0:v-pldew_se -%meUvoger.doe 04!16/99 MON 19:13 FAX 713 781 5347 Osborn & Vane FAX TRANSMITTAL 10001 Date: 4/-z-! ! d f To: I 1 M G/I ) I Aw Gtr or, 4p llejc 5 a/1 cc: From: M o tid SIL&S✓LZ' Re: P-o c4c FrA i e 1 G CrLoS.Si A r, S-G. Project No. Iq 151(p -7 Pages a-. (including transmittal) Items Transmitted: 5 ~ 'A ~r Vlce Sri v e J5i.0 v/sfoo. Messages: /1v+/ . j M~ ~i ir. mvNIJA 1dS~YL)Gho^S . nZee'S 7-W la SL/plGe. Pr'i ✓e 17lh in4 6LO5 IA' 4 4O M M en f _ P*%.M nUerI /v -1 t~ i I n~.e ~-r 7 13 . ~ 8 ! • 5 Z~ 2 Osborn & Vane Architects, Inc. 2000 Bering Drive, Suite 410 Houston, Texas 77057 Phone: (713) 781-5262 FAX: (713) 781-5347 ,K1 ,I IJ. N ~ e I I 9 I I 0 I II - ~~'-011 I I N 11 I 16 1 1 1 1_ il DO5.J_ F'YLUN 1 N I II 745'~7~5-E ' 04/26/99 MON 19:13 FAY 713 781 5347 Iz \ n I = s a rlre @ 24' LANDSCAPE I- EASEMENT TYPICAL I ~ 7 I I I I - ' A I , I cn I I • I I t1 I z 7 I X I @ . z n i J I p cn 4 a o m- ~ N m ' J c~v V M I I 04 A 1 ~ V I 1 W Im 0 zl ct1 I ~ ~jl n ~ ~U - Osborn & Vane , ~ell 10002 ^s s, .a 11 e 03 8 15 6' 12'-6" I 1 `-0' ~0'-011 i I 23' 5 I I e N r 8 cq Lis 123 20' 20' 23' -col' 0" 61'-0' 0 0 r it r, 0y, 13 1/1 351 04/20/99 TUE 16:17 FAX 713 781 5347 FAX TRANSMITTAL Date: 4 L~zv 9 To: 1 M C.O~ , I G~ W Osborn & Vane 41ati cc: r" From: mor-0 SU iV2- Re: - Pra i r l c. C -c7SS l ngi G. Project No. 4181(0-1 Pages (including transmittal) Items Transmitted: 5cr'v11.~ F)r'1~ c ~w ' A' Messages: 4W • &N AW AAA 6yNcl osed L5 f!lJt~ ;*Y f+4 5u"y1cc dA r% yep 4/ ' A I Drive 15 G1o see ~o to Iveew"Se., M r M V Zvi zA THp vs n tm )rruoM- Lou14 ofrI v-f- I n 4 04<4- vice, Vy Rest aF !!ft- R, Aau a ut s hans ca, l 1 an AU0I" E 1(5. 1000.435S- Osborn & Vane Architects, Inc. 2000 Bering Drive, Suite 410 Houston, Texas 77057 Phone: (713) 781-5262 FAX: (713) 781-5347 2001 0 I n I 0 0 n = c -11' 16 1 1 I YI ' 01 LON N ~ BMWtN u I S 43 59 3S E - _ l 04:20/99 TUE 16:17 FAX 713 781 5347 Osborn & Vane Iz 1 I ~ ~01 - ~ II Dt~'1*6 lHCL0i1Jls 0 ' 24' LANDSCAPE IE; - EASEMENT TYP ICAL QN l I ~ 7 I I 43~ I 0 I I I VI I \ I Y J Q I I ~ G? ~ cn 7 z I ( N I I X W I - ` I LU I I ~ I J Q p p 4 w j rt1 - r tf~ n M I Q fV I W 1 m ' ado ~ - I n ' ~D I 1 , 9 12'-6" 5 ~ 6 I A 10' L ~3~ I 'v in 10002 7 a, IA B 15 0 r bp = 13 B cf) 23 2m' 20' 23' ~1' 0" 0 A 1 ~ n r MAR-09 99 15:14 FROM:CHRISTON CO L TO:409 764 3496 PAGE:01 March 5, 1999 fir Fax # (409) 764-3496 Ms. Natalie Thomas Ruiz Development Coordinator CITY OF COLLEGE STATION P.O. Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 RE: Shopping Center Development Rock Prairie & State Highway 6 Dear Natalie: I appreciate your assistance yesterday, Enclosed please find the latest site plan for the Kroger development. I would like to request that you revise your letter dated March 4, 1999 to provide conceptual approval of the attached site plan. I understand that the final site plan must be formally submitted prior to receiving final approval from the City. Should you have any questions regarding this request, please feel free to contact me. Best wishes and best regards, Frank Mihalopoulos FM:kc 15900 Dooley Road . Addison, Texas 75001 (972)233.3333 •(972)233-1301 FAX Number n MAR-05 99 15:15 FROM:CHRISTON CO MAR-05-99 FRI 08;46 AM CA EXEC/REDEV TO:409 764 3496 PAGE:02 FAX NO, P. 02 w a mow,: 10~ I Q M J O Q~ ,y w r i E 1 Pi - 1 I i a E- >a UT F a~ A f- a 0 EMST, BANK N.I.C. a Q h 90 q A 806.61 k 30rd811v138 irm E p i .j I i i t s1 i _ ~ it March 4, 1999 Frank Mihalopoulos Christon Company 15900 Dooley Road Dallas, Texas 75244 Re: Shopping Center development at Rock Prairie & State Highway 6. Dear Frank, This letter is to confirm that City staff has reviewed a conceptual site plan for the proposed shopping center development to be constructed in the L.O. Ball Memorial Subdivision, on the southwest corner of Rock Prairie Road and State Highway 6 South. Up to this point, we have primarily discussed driveway locations and internal traffic circulation issues. We feel confident that these issues can be resolved through the site planning and building permit process. Once the site plan is formally submitted, staff will perform a complete review and ensure that all of the technical requirements outlined in the City's Zoning Ordinance are met. I look forward to working with you and the Center America group on this and other projects throughout the city. If you have any questions, please call me at (409) 764-3570. Sincerely, Natalie Thomas Ruiz Development Coordinator I KROGER SITE PLAN REVIEW Case #99-404 ► [ ~cq Reviewed by S.A.M. 4-9-99 square feet and meet same standards as #(1) above. /s/a.~qr LaAdru~-G/_ a ~o~r. /so ?c (3) AS] Which spaces are the "57 future" parkin spaces? Does this ean that the phase lines are different from (or in addition to) the future pad sites C, D, and E? If so, then the phase lines must be shown such that each phase can stand alone, meeting all ordinance requirements. c PdrW r - o1114pMi°/y w my ~*-Ile2vl 40-10010 v i'e~orJ . (4) AS 1 What does the hatched symbol mean? Clarify on plan. . 10M, e-e 4919G/'C/G (5) L1.2 The landscape plan meets all of the City's landscaping and streetscaping requirements, however, the required point calculations are missing all of the City's streetscape requirements. Provide the calculations as follows: 1?e l reel .42. ✓ (1). AS 1 These islands need to be either landscaped or set with decorative pavers (stamped dyed concrete is also ok as long as it's not left gray). ,s/,VAdl AWAW:'taIbL-W vl( '2). AS 1 This island needs to be at lease 180 frontage HWY 6 = 683'-36' (driveways)-40' (sight clearance)=607' frontage Birm.=749'-72'-80=597' frontage Long.=934'-170'-160'=604' total frontage = 1808' streetscape points req'd = 1808/50 X 300 = 10,830 streetscape points 10,830 + 14,666 =25,496 total points req'd (6) L1.2 Calculate the minimum tree count required along frontages and tally total frontage tree count (non-canopy trees accrue toward the requirement at a ratio of two non-canopy trees for every one canopy tree): Ae Y/-red L 2 , frontage HWY6 = 607'/ 25=25 canopy trees req'd repeat for Birmingham and Longmire but divide by 32 rather than 25 for these two roads 7. Will the detention areas have any concrete walls or other surfaces that will be visible? If so, they must be screened or meet streetscape standa- NO Need a sidewalk detail for the proposed walk on Longmire unless it will be installed as part of the platting. S/TJ.E~✓~t-/CS by Or/f- -X X far consfr &cfzgP,-7. (9) AS 1 Dumpster enclosure must be a minimum of 8' in height. What will the materials be? It must either be screened or match building materials. Where will the dumpsters be for the pad sites? Either show a location now if they are on the main site or make a note that dumpsters will be provided on the pad sites themselves. X17E PaW re veyw., / 17A37- /vod bt~rrpsL~r W i con+PLy 6viJ O:group\dcvc scrlbincUwgc.doc 04- AS 4Q6 AS /O-u ez~ll 1,40 +4e VU,A C,~ c~e~~ ~e~~~ wl ~e ✓tec-ce sue, red (IleGQ t-t O-t 5~ ~ 7 / 6 u.¢. S -4 L a4- V 61 Wt4.~- #A.- Z co mac., NK! (iVV~ k CJ✓~'t~t~ 7~' w~J 7Y~1- /7-~- y ~ r , / a e, S ~y~ L. - Alr-!uJ a-- rt,~~ 1 ,rte 01 / nom/ t/7 sloe c9- •~-L ~llti.t- j4j q~R ! / J. -~-G T!~ ~'tf"f' )^n.r)., lit cv-f ~ . /4 m &-7 14 COLLEGE STATION P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tef 409 764 3cno MEMORANDUM June 17, 1999 TO: Richard Vane, Osborn & Vane Architects, vi,_ 4d t _ 1 ~n T2 'S FROM: Bridgette George, Asst. Development Coordinator. SUBJECT: Rock Prairie Crossing Shopping Center- Site Plan 6'''" Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. Staff could not complete their review due to the landscape redlines not being returned. The next submittal will be the third and final review by staff for this round of reviews. If all items have not been addressed on the next submittal, another $100 processing fee will need to be submitted for the subsequent set of three reviews. Please address the attached comments and submit the following information for further staff review: Two (2) complete sets of building construction documents for the proposed development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached (additional sets will be requested once the plans have been approved); The attached redlined construction documents with staff comments; and, The original landscape redlined plans from the first review. If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 764-3570. Attachments: Staff review comments cc: Dan Muniza, CenterAmerica Property Trust, via fax (713) 349-0901 Raymond Suarez, via fax (713) 781-5347 Case file #99-404 Home of Texas A&M University El 14. OK 15. OK 16. How will the blind corner with 2-way traffic be addressed? With signage? Will there be a "no build" corner? 17. OK 18. Make the straight arrow a right turn arrow (you cannot go straight out of here) and add a white line to delineate the left from the right turn lane. 19. Provide a "do not enter" sign that is oriented to Longmire. 20. Cannot confirm that this redline is addressed until we receive the original redlined landscape sheets. 21. Cannot confirm that this redline is addressed until we receive the original redlined landscape sheets. 22. Verify all fire hydrant locations per the Longmire extension plans. We cannot verify coverage until you provide the actual hydrant locations. 23. OK 24. OK 25. THIS LAST ITEM IS A NEW COMMENT AND IS THEREFORE NOT A REDLINE BUT A SUGGESTION. THIS AREA IS GOING TO BE DIFFICULT FOR TRAFFIC MANEUVERABILITY. PERHAPS YOU WOULD CONSIDER WIDENING THE DRIVE AISLE AND REDUCING THE SIZE OF THE ISLAND (AS SHOWN OR OTHERWISE) TO IMPROVE THE CIRCULATION. Reviewed by: Sabine McCully Staff Review Comments Page 2 of 2 06/16m 1 06/8/99 11:44 FAY 713 781 5347 OSBORN & VANE. 0001/004 .:J p FAX TRANSMITTAL, Date: To: B e f Ol oy c 14c 3 &j "C G~ - Go (lIca, %W40* * _ cc: From:A~rkv~ SMOU`L~2. Re• 0-9~ 1 tc. C#-0.%j Nb- c..+.G, Project No. !~I(o Pages (including transmittal) Items Transmitted: Rev 1 I:PW CfDmr eo%% N It 2 Messages: !G a K re y) rur Ka 6--A l 4em; 4 5 Le G~Ct, ~ t f~t G`L'~'t o N S ~ 'Cl-}'CS ~ !'~~rthS N mr s . Osborn & Vane Architects, Inc. 2000 Bering Drive, Suite 410 Houston, Texas 77057 Phone: (713) 781-5262 FAX: (713) 781-3347 JUL-07-1999 WED 09:14 AM SAFE INC. STANDARD AUTOMATIC FIRL ENTERPRISES, INC. Fire SplInkler Systems Specictli,ts July 7, 1999 CLR 13 100 Northwest Freeway Suite 500 Houston, Texas 77040 Attn: Curtis Burnett Ref: Kroger College Station, Texas ]Kroger Store FAX NO. 409 690 6741 P. 02/03 SAFE, inc. Texas License No. SCR-6322 • Type IV Construction • Class M occupancy • Fully Sprinklered • 63,373.00 square feet, single story/mezzanine + Coefficient related to type of construction, (8) for non-combustible constnuction • Exposure protection value 55% of flow. • Fire flow to be 2,720 GPM total water rcgWred for a totally involved structure. Minimum of 20 PSI pressure. tail BuRdinsi "A-" • Type IV Construction • Class M occupancy • Fully Sprinklered • 23,457 square feet single story • Coefficient related to type of construction (8) for non-combustible construction. • Exposure protection value 600/a of flow • Fire flow to be 1,800 GPM total water required for a totally involved structure. Minimum of 20 PSI pressure. Combined Kroger and Retail Building "A" • Type IV Construction • Class M occupancy • Fully Sprinklered • 86,830 square feet combined. • Coefficient related to type of construction (8) for non-combustible construction. T n t N j N P.0. flax 1x08 • College.station, Texas 77342-040,9 • (409) 690-0,301 • Far (1109) 690-6; ~i1 P. Q. Box S40705 • Houston, 7xas 77244-0705 • (281) 555-2354 • Far (281) 5.55-2546 ' ' ' R0. Box 310931, • Xw, Braunfels, Texas • 78131-0934 • (830) 606-4323 • F-ar (830) 606-4325 r JUL-07-1999 WED 09:14 AM SAFE INC. FAX NO. 409 690 6741 P. 03/03 • Exposure protection value 45% of flow • Fire flow to be 3,082 GPM total water required for a totally involved structure. Minimum of 20 PSI pressure. Notes: • Per City Fire Marshal, the individual unit calculations can be used in lieu of the combined calculation, although the combined results are more prudent. The smaller pads for Retail Building "B" and future pads C, D, and E will have smaller water demands, therefore calculations are not necessary. Should you have any questions or require and further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, S ev R. Rians President SAFE, Inc. SRR:cih cc:file Jon Meis - Collcge Station Fire Marshal • w OSBORN & VANE ARCHITECTS I)(11,; Jviy 8 1999 D, k/' I61gCAt- g~ 0 4f ef C01(ca~c 54u 6,1 • Transmittal r=rfZock praIMc 64o54iP13 S.G. ~Fr~~j, ~:1 nG7$ I FYI 1 - r a2 Sc~S ConS,~'j),C6n Re ~ I I n e, Cep n s ~rtlAcp i t?om m re4 P145 5.26 •R9 Sjlpe~ f;~GVI Co WAMcKf' U,/ sVPO 4 PC4 ~ornc41C., 1G 51cr-.5e,4 7 aj I ca . Lac n d s 5beet L(. 4 L 2.2. F04M TlI co P, Rs7 A v (gvA). MEMORANDUM August 9, 1999 TO: Richard Vane, Via Fax (713) 781-5347 FROM: Bridgette George, Asst. Development Coordinato i SUBJECT: Rock Prairie Crossing Shopping Center- Site Plan Staff reviewed the above-mentioned site plan as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments detailing items that need to be addressed. The next submittal will be the third and final review by staff for this round of reviews. If all items have not been addressed on the next submittal, another $100 processing fee will need to be submitted for the subsequent set of three (3) reviews. Please address the comments and submit the following information for further staff review: One (1) complete set of construction documents for the proposed development with the revised site and landscaping plans attached. If there are comments that you are not addressing with the revised site plan, please attach a letter explaining the details. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 764-3570. Attachments: Staff review comments cc: Dan Muniza CenterAmerica Property Trust, Via fax (713) 349-0901 Raymond Suarez, Via fax (713) 781-5347 Case file #99-404 W FACSIMILE COVER SHEET CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (409)764-3570 / Fax (409)764-3496 Date: Au must 17, 1999 # of pages including cover: 5 Ifyou did not receives complete fax, please call our office immediately for a new transmittal. TO: Curtis Burnett FAX: 713-462-2732 COMPANY: CLR RE: Rock Prairie Crossing FROM: Bridgette Geonze PHONE: (409)764-3570 COMPANY: City of College Station REMARKS: ® Urgent ❑ For your review ❑ Replay ASAP ❑ FYI The following items are needed prior to the issuance of a "Clearing 8c Grubbing Permit" and follow this coversheet: a Development Permit application and an EPA Notice of Intent for Storm Water Discharge application, please fill them out and return by fax or mail to the above address. We will also need three (3) copies of an Erosion Control Plan prior to the issuance of the DP. Please call me if you have any questions. Thank you, Bridgette FACSIMILE COVER SHEET CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (409)764-3570 / Fax (409)764-3496 Date: Au ug_st 12, 1999 # of pages including cover: 5 Ifyou did notmceive a complete fax, please call our office immediately for anew transmittal. TO: Raymond Suarez FAX: (713) 781-5347 COMPANY: Osborn & Vane Architects RE: Rock Prairie Crossing Site Plan FROM: Bridgette George PHONE: (409)764-3570 COMPANY: City of College Station REMARKS: ❑ Urgent ❑ For your review ❑ Replay ASAP ® FYI Good MorningI Sorry it took me so long to stet back to you. The following are copies of the plans with the redline comments numbered for better clarification. Please call me if you have any questions. Thank you, Bridgette S; T n3'R. 3 If g S, ♦ . Z ~p0" ry h• ~ , •e 5 1 Ig 24'. LANDSCAPE . ESEMENT 1G TYPICAL Z® 64 S. / 27 ,,b Ib iZ + % 21 r % of 'til _ ••Z + - 5'R a % TIN ~ 12 9 2~ RUULIK 1 ,110' 1 1 o 1 - e 4 ~ I I I / ~o . aAI *yI~ D + x ~ ~5 R ~ 8 g4 R- 1 6 24' LANDSCAPE ' Ii R!I I03 1 EASEMENT 1m'R~ICAL e T, s. x 2 . U o ~ I l I D Q 1 D I I ~ Cj ~ • D Q~ _ 4 T ; Jn D n - cV i 12.' i R ~ CG D 0 IS'R ;0 I 12'-6" p b 2 D 'A I 0 I I ' . u 10 8 54'-m" n S. 45' I ~ - 8 I I ~ - 4~4 ~o 21 0 C4 12"*~ 5 'R 13 I ~ I m x'11" 11 U I ~ ~ 22853' - I ~ 4]'59 35~ E _ _ 35.-0x 5 of 12 , 6 23 R -4-R- 1161-5 5/P 14 FUTURE PP 25 3600 ` r MAX R.O.W. • VARIES - ---F -R--O- N--T- A--G - R-0 -A-D - - - a Liw shr SIDEWALK TO RAMP TO U ne o DRNEWAY PER SHT. C-3. N GMII? ~a44 pftp )8.70 n TC.300.01 TC.300.98 CU" 'FWD p~~~_A'1/T. 20 G.299 6.300.46 -",~5 6y 29&8 v 20 P.U.E. • . !mmkomw ' .0i-s0 6 ' . *d • RK SLV. SAM. C.0 f • • . .5I1I~. ' o b: ••35 LF.' 6 6294.E 1 4 • , . ' • . :$~FL:?93.65 • . SAN.' A . '1 + , C ,14,• G ABANDON E=. 8 SAN. SEWER. VERIFY THAT SAN. LINE CLEARS ; ,~c , GyF9 am. mu SHAFTS, FILL WITH A CEMENT AND PLUG EINDS. VERIFY SEWER IS ALREADY ABANDONED. ti • • 11,111, 'air N91► &N, *45 F.~ .0 . 6 + Q~Q- ~;Cr O O. O Is \0~ Ice SLV... . 'L' 0 O --,7 enzerAmerica Property Trust TE/LECOPIER TRANSMITTAL FORM TO: kG cry/ COMPANY: TELECOPIER NUMBER: 3 j& DATE: 8l~GI ! q QI FROM: V00 SENT BY: direct # (713) PAGES: REFERENCE: COMMENTS: INCLUDING THIS PAGE) te4-! ~1v~i . ,DDS . Ci 5- o~-il-✓. 3901 Bellaire Blvd. • Houston, Texas 77025 • Tel. 713,660.4300 A REIT Affiliate EXECUTIVE 1 ACQUISMONS / REDEVELOPMENT DEPT. FAX #(713) 349-0901 LEGAL DEPT. FAX # (713) 665-0450 PROPERTY MANAGEMENT FAX #(713) 665-0331 LEASING DEPT. FAX #(713) 668-3394 ACCOUNTING DEPT. FAX #(713) 665-4282 PLEASE CALL THE TELECOPIER OPERATOR IF THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENT(S) ARE NOT LEGIBLE. The information contained in this fax message is confidential and is intended only for the addressee named above. If you are not the named addressee or agent to deliver it to the addressee, note that any dissemination of the information or distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone at our expense at 713/660-4300. Thank you. IO 'd 'ON xv. A303N/032 dO WV 60:11 M 66-H-900 Af ►G-20-99 FR I 1110 AM CA EXEC/REDEV FAX NO, L ,0 '0 Z - Z ,L L S 1 f • t+~r . Z.: 00 Ir 2911 v r 3 in NI - - I Ln ltlz ti m t. 6 1 cx' ! L9 \ I I I 1 I n W N P. 02 I `Y V) w ck: Q 0 o~ N qutx:)ef\dwll\:3 C,\TEMP\jackinbox2.dwg Thu Aug 19 10:37:55 1999 ! - - - - - - - - - - - - l IN 1/ -H J 1-? I Nl~~ RETAIL BLDG. "A" 4 23,457 S.F. : r - r l s4t l '~r r r i D r rI I w 1r ~ ~l J r o~ • r 4 ~FT 7M + i 1 r I 1 o ~r o r i r r r j . r 1 I ~ r r I r f I M s7KY';' ~ -i7lOf^_~J ~P~~ r r ~M'0'2i ,04 ---------I-~-~d !t J~ so 'a 'ON XV~ A303N/03X3 VO WV 0 I :11 l E 66-0MAV SITE AND BUILDING DATA KROGER 63,373 S.F. RETAIL BLDG. "A" 23,457 S.F. RETAIL BLDG. "B" 11,400 S.F. FUTURE PAD "C" 15,255 S.F. FUTURE PAD "D" 4,000 S.F. FUTURE PAD "E" 3,600 S.F. BUILDING TOTAL AREA 121,085 S.F. SITE TOTAL AREA 5461,678 S.F. - BUILDING / SITE RATIO 22.15 % PARKING REQUIRED 605 CARS (5 CARS PER 1000 S.F.) PARKING PROVIDED 599 CARS (4.95 CARS PER 1000 S.F.) HANDICAPPED PARKING REQUIRED 12 CARS (2% OF TOTAL SPACES) KROGER 63,373 S.F. RETAIL BLDG. "A" 23,457 S.F. RETAIL BLDG. "B" 11,400 S.F. BUILDING AREA 98,230 S.F. PARKING REQUIRED 491 CARS (5 CARS PER 1000 S.F.) PARKING PROVIDED 571 CARS FUTURE PAD To 15,255 S.F. FUTURE PAD "D" 4,000 S.F. FUTURE PAD "E" 3,600 S.F. BUILDING AREA 229855 S.F. PARKING REQUIRED 114 CARS (5 CARS PER 1000 S.F.) PARKING REQUIRED 491 CARS FUTURE PARKING REQUIRED 114 CARS 12.55 ACRES TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED 605 CARS TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 599 CARS OSBORN & VANE. Z 002 I Z O d I z Q J Lu II C/7 11/17/99 09:27 FAX 713 781 5347 CENTERAMERICA PROPERTY TRUST December 9, 1999 VIA OVERNIGHT MAIL First National Bank of Bryan Mr. Tim Bryan 2807 Texas Ave. South Bryan, TX 77802 RE: Cross access between 1St National Bank and Rock Prairie Crossing Shopping Center Dear Tim: I was very disappointed to learn of the Board's decision about our proposed cross access between our two properties. I feel that this is contrary to the negotiations that you and I have had over the last 6 months or so. Based on the Board's decision I am withdrawing CenterAmerica Property Trust's offer to modify any driveway access between our two properties. By plat the bank has the right to access our property. I have enclosed a drawing showing you the approved access point. If you plan to make this connection it will be at your cost. If you do plan on construction involving our property, please contact this office to work out a temporary construction easement. Again, I am sorry your Board could not maintain the spirit of cooperation that you and I have enjoyed. We will continue to be good neighbors and will honor any rights the bank has been granted by the approved plat. Should you have any comments, please call. Sincerely, CE TERAMERICA PROPERTY TRUST, L.P., De aware limi d partnership Dan Muni Vice Pres' ent, Development & Construction cc: Chuck Ellison Laura Lund - Foodmakers Jim Callaway - City of College Station DM:bt enclosure 3901 BELLAIRE Bwn. . HOUSTON, TEXAS 77025 . TEL 713.660.4300 . F.L% 713.668.3394 %%i%w.ccntcramcrica.com RFIT AFFI:1ATF. f - Q b 80' R.O.W. • OSBORN & VANE ARCHITECTS Data F,6. 8, Zooo To br 14 g e 4c 9 6o r-g c, 6k) Pfr- lot'1.cS~ 51-cx+ion • Transmittal I ock ~a~ ~a'tosst~ 5 S.c, F fro qg V err ❑ ao ❑ _ _ No of pies D iptior' Date Gj~'~wt ~7cc~ wv nc~c Color Se-l e- eJun ChArt A , 2q (2- u5sc-1 r-vr y0L., r aPpFrova Fen-uks ~/~5/00 ~a~cc_ us ~rid &Jul ~ ~ ❑rC~~ ~ ire ❑ ❑ By ~ . ~jUArEL~ • OSBORN & VANE ARCHITECTS 9 • Transmittal Date 5/41/670 To Na' &)IL (ZVIL. Cot l e9c S}X floe, a n h► 0) y Dcfi- Project or rrairlG G2oS31.'Ll S.G. Project no a S ( &'J VerewiIh ❑ Under separate cover By Mail ❑ Messenger ❑ Other (OVCPh ofc) No of Copies Description / Date Remarks I *,e- 3 FIel al 5,+c 191,g07 5U I Hal 3•oq o0 ple'vi IV° 9 ~ s~ GI ,G?-, e'I,'d^4 L- I tau L 4) 5 Sll rF Fe i tw Co vi , 0'S V <r your use V<or approval ❑ For review and comment ❑ As requested by Copies to: With enclosure By 2000 5ering Drive, Suite 410, Houston, Texas 77057, 713 781 5262, Fax 713 781 5347 Members American Institute of Architects g 7 9 3 2-7 S 7 '77 2 ~ Q 2 ti o sy o 2~ z 21 z r AcLe / y ,n ~ JLeL hhh, yr #Ac, nnr•(:I I IRF FN(,INFFRINC,% IN(: April 12, 2000 Mrs. Natalie Ruiz Development Coordinator CITY OF COLLEGE STATION P.O. Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 RE. Proposed Access Driveway Construction First National Bank Property Rock Prairie Road Branch Dear Natalie: Attached for your review and comments, please find two (2) copies of the construction details for the proposed access driveway to be added to the existing First National Bank parking facility to connect to the Rock Prairie Crossing Shopping Center. The current shopping center contractor will perform the construction. I anticipate additional stormwater runoff to the shopping center parking lot to be negligible. Please review and fax me your comments. Thank you for your attention to this submittal. Very truly yours, Q?,- 14~1 M' hael R. McClure, P.E., R.P.L.S. President MRM/mlm attachments 1008 Woodcreek Drive, Suite 103 • College Station, Texas 77845 (409) 693-3838 • FAX (409) 693-2554 • email: mcclure@tca.net CENTERAMERICA PROPERTY TRUST April 20, 2000 Ms. Natalie T. Ruiz Assistant Development Coordinator City of College Station 1101 Texas Ave. College Station, Texas 77842 Re: Rock Prairie Crossing Shopping Center Dear Natalie: Transmitted herewith please find three prints of the drawing for the proposed common driveway that will connect our shopping center and First American Bank. This driveway was designed and drawn by McClure Engineering, Inc. I am submitting these drawings for your review and approval as a revision to our approved site plan. If approved, I will contact our general contractor to assist me in acquiring the actual construction permit for the driveway. Your help with this matter will be greatly appreciated. If you need any further information or have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, CenterAmerica Prope Trust, L.P., ware 1 ited par ership Robert S. Scott Director Development Services RSS:md 3901 BELLAIRE BLVD. • HOUSTON, TEXAS 77025 • TEL 713.660.4300 • FAX 713.668.3394 www.centcramcrica.com A REIT AFFILIATE COLLEGE STATION P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tel: 409 764 3500 99'ya4 MEMORANDUM TO: Project Review Committee FROM: Ed Hard, Transportation Plannea- DATE: January 21, 1999 RE: Driveway Variances for the Rock Prairie Kroger Center This item is for PRC'S consideration of driveway variances for the Kroger Shopping Center, a proposed 12.55 acre development to be located generally on the southwest comer of the intersection of the SH 6 West Frontage Road and Rock Prairie Road immediately south and west of First American Bank. The applicant is Municipal Development Group for Centre America Developers. See attached letter of request and site plan. Frontage Road Driveways. Per the City's Driveway Ordinance, access points to the SH 6 Frontage Roads are required to be 275 feet apart and at least 100 feet away from SH 6 entrance ramps. Under these requirements, the Kroger site would only be allowed one driveway to the Frontage Road. The applicant is requesting variances to allow for two access points on to the Frontage Road. The site's south driveway on the Frontage Road is located approximately 170 feet away from Birmingham Road and 225 feet from the site's north driveway on the Frontage Road. Both of these distances are required to be 275 feet, thus variances of 105 and 50 feet would be needed, respectively. The north driveway is located approximately 70 feet south of the SH 6 entrance ramp. Under both City and State regulations, this distance is required to be 100 feet. A variance of 30 feet would be needed to meet the City's requirement relative to the entrance ramp. It is not known at this time if the State (TXDOT) would approve of the driveway at this locztion. A variance would also be needed for the throat lengths of the driveway(s) on the Frontage Road. The City's ordinance requires driveways on the Frontage Road to have a throat length of 55 feet. The preliminary site plan submitted as part of this request shows throat lengths of only 30 feet for these driveways. At the time of the writing of this staff report, the applicant had not requested a variance to the throat length requirement. Home of Texas A&M University Kroger Variance, Page 2 The developer has indicated that the two access points on to the Frontage Road are very important because they have already been included as part of a lease agreement with Krogers. Unfortunately, this agreement was developed prior to any city review of the site plan. The West Frontage Road is the primary means of access to the city for the new residential areas in the south being developed in the Shenandoah and Barron Road areas. It will continue to serve this important function until Longmire is extended to Barron Road in the future. The additional driveway being requested would add more conflict and delay to a section of the Frontage Road that will experience significant increases in traffic in the next 5 to 10 years. Staff recommends denial of the variances to allow for two access points onto the Frontage Road. There does not appear to be any undue hardship or overly compelling reason from an accessibility or circulation standpoint to justify these variances. Without undue hardship, staff has a concern for the precedence that could be set by granting the variances. Staff would also recommend denial of a variance to the throat length requirements Longmire Extension Driveways. While the location of the driveways on Longmire meet minimum ordinance requirements, staff still has a concern for how they will function and the impact they will have to Longmire Drive. The City's Driveway Ordinance allows engineering judgement to override the spacing requirements if warranted by specific traffic conditions. Under the current layout of the site's internal circulation system, the driveway nearest Rock Prairie Road will serve as the primary driveway to the site and experience the highest traffic volumes. As a result, vehicles on Longmire attempting to turn left into this proposed driveway could be blocked by vehicles on Longmire waiting to turn left at the future signal. Changes to the site parking layout and internal circulation system should be made to decrease the incidence of conflict on Longmire caused by the site's driveways. Staff recommends approval of the locations of the driveways on Longmire with the conditions as discussed below. Driveway on Longmire Nearest Rock Prairie: 1. Incorporate the access easement between the Bank and Longmire into the site design such that no backing maneuvers will occur into the easement. 2. Change circulation of parking lot layout such that this driveway is a less accessible means of entry into the shopping center's main parking lot. The function of this driveway should be to primarily serve traffic associated with the bank and the comer retail immediately west of the bank. 3. Change or remove the access easement located immediately opposite of this driveway on Longmire to either only serve Lot 4 or to serve Lots 4 and 5. This will help in reducing congestion in the area near the Longmire/Rock Prairie traffic signal. Kroger Variance, Page 3 Middle Driveway on Longmire: 1. Increase the width of the travelway between the two buildings to match that of the driveway's width at Longmire. 2. Change internal parking layout such that a parking circulation aisle is located directly opposite of the travelway between the two buildings. This will facilitate traffic flow to the primary parking area thus increasing the use of the middle driveway. 3. Design the travelway from Longmire to the front of the buildings to include no backing maneuvers Staff does not have any concerns for the driveway on Longmire nearest Birmingham. Birmingham Road Driveways. The site shows two proposed driveways on Birmingham Road. The west driveway is located 160 feet from the future Longmire extension. Per the driveway ordinance, this distance is required to be 185 feet. Since this will be a low volume driveway and it is located so as to facilitate service vehicles, staff recommends approval of a variance of 25 feet for this driveway. STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 2 Project: 99-104 KROGER CENTER SITE PLAN REVIEW REVIEW WAS STOPPED BECAUSE WE CANNOT REVIEW THE LANDSCAPE PLANS OR VERIFY THEY ARE BEING COORDINATED WITH OTHER PLANS UNTIL WE RECEIVE THE ORIGINAL REDLINED LANDSCAPE SHEETS. THE FOLLOWING REDLINES FOLLOW THE ORIGINAL LIST OF REQUIRED REVISIONS: 1. OK 2. OK 3. Future pad sites must have curbing around the edge of the sites where the pavement is to stop temporarily unless they are to be built with the first phase. The curbs in these areas may be "temporary knock-off curbs". Show them on the plan and specify the curbing type. 4. Where is this spec? Somewhere it needs to specify what colors these will be. 5. Cannot confirm that this redline is addressed until we receive the original redlined landscape sheets. 6. Cannot confirm that this redline is addressed until we receive the original redlined landscape sheets. 7. OK 8. Show the sidewalk that is to be constructed on Longmire with a note that it will be constructed with the street extension. 9. Add information to this detail re: height, material, & colors of the dumpster enclosures. The screening must be a minimum of 8' and must either match the buildings or be screened with vegetation. Add a note that future pad sites will be required to provide their own dumpster location per City of College Station standards. 10. Cannot confirm that this redline is addressed until we receive the original redlined landscape sheets. 11. OK 12. Cannot confirm that this redline is addressed until we receive the original redlined landscape sheets. 13. We need to review the FDC locations for Retail Building A and the Kroger building before we can approve the final site plan. Also, make a note that Pad Site C cannot build to the full 15,255 square feet unless the required FDC can be provided per City of College Station requirements. Staff Review Comments Pagel of 2 06/16/99