Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneousAgenda ItemCover Sheet 0 Regular Item Consent Item ~ .,7 Workshop Item % F-] Item Submitted By: Ed Hard, Transportation Planner Council Meeting Date: Director Approval: City Manager Approval: 10, 1998 Item Summary: This preliminary plat divides the property into 3 lots and 3 reserve areas. Phase I consists of approximately 24.7 acres zoned C-B Business Commercial. Phase 2 consists of 14.9 acres zoned C-B. Phase 3 contains 5.2 acres zoned C-B, and the 2 reserve tracts contain 26.2 acres zoned R-5 Medium Density Apartments. The entire property is bound by University Drive on the south, the SH 6 East-Bypass on the east, Bryan/C.S. city limits line on the north and duplexes in University Park on the west. The Land Use Plan shows the area as mixed use and the Thoroughfare Plan show the northward extension of Glenhaven Drive through this tract. There is a 1.15 acre tract at the very corner of University and the SH 6 East Bypass which should be included with the preliminary plat as it was subdivided out since adoption of the City's Subdivision Regulations. This is particularly important as the University Drive Study adopted in 1991, and the City's Driveway Access Ordinance would not allow access to this corner piece. This corner will have to have shared access or cross access with the adjacent Lot 1, Block Two and Lot 2, Block Two and this should be reflected on a preliminary plat Item Background: The extension of Glenhaven north into Bryan is included on the Thoroughfare Plan in order to provide additional north-south movement between the two cities and also to provide an alternative flow to the one-way frontage road. Although this is a good idea from a traffic mobility standpoint, it does not appear to be critical to either College Station or Bryan. At the P&Z meeting on November 5, 1998, the developer did not ask to vary from the Thoroughfare Plan and presented a preliminary plat which included the Glenhaven extension in order to comply with the plan. At the P&Z meeting on November 19, the developer indicated that they did not need the extension for their development. Staff agreed that the extension was Item: Consideration of a Preliminary Plat of The Gateway, approximately 75 acres, divided into 6 C-B and R-5 zoned lots located on the NW corner of University Dr. and SH 6. (98-327). The applicant is Municipal Development Group, Engineers for owner Delmar Baronhead I, Ltd. not needed for the development and indicated to P&Z that they did not have a great concern about removing the extension from the Thoroughfare Plan. As for the traffic that will be generated from the development itself, the Council realizes that these issues are dealt with at the time of zoning requests. This property was rezoned in the early 90's to commercial and multi-family residential. This is very appropriate for large tracts at the intersection of two major arterial roadways. With the zoning in place, the property owner has rights to the uses that are permitted in these districts and to reasonable ingress and egress. These cannot be denied. That does not mean that the City cannot affect the design through the platting process and how the ingress and egress occurs. Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends approval with the conditions as underlined in the coversheet and attached Engineering Information as well as with the following conditions: That a commercial (private) drive be provided in lieu of extending Glenhaven through the tract. Approval of this condition would amend the Thoroughfare Plan to not extend Glenhaven Drive north of University Drive; 2. That the Final Plat for Phase I include two access points on University Drive and one on the SH 6 Frontage Road in order to distribute traffic so that one access point does not bear the burden of all traffic from the site. The two access points on University Drive would be located at median openings in accordance with TXDOT plans for the widening of University Drive; and, That internal circulation for the site be addressed at the time of site plan review to ensure adequate distribution of traffic to all access points. Related Advisory Board Recommendations: The Planning and Zoning Commission tabled the plat on November 5, 1998 pending additional information regarding traffic generation and due to resident concerns for the possible increase in traffic on Glenhaven. P&Z approved the preliminary plat without the Glenhaven extension on November 19, 1998. Council Options: 1. Approve the preliminary plat. 2. Approve with conditions. 3. Deny. Supporting Materials: 1. Location Map. 2. Application. 3. Engineering Information and Notification Information. 4. Copy of Preliminary Plat. 5. P&Z Minutes (11/5 and 11/19/98). 6. Memo From Parks Dept. ENGINEERING Water: Will be extended from University Drive from two locations. Design calculations iustifying the proposed 8" lines should be submitted at the time of final plat. A water line will also need to be extended across Lot-1 Btock:T-wa- nierre-the -corner--piece. Staff would support a variance to require the deve}opiii t on-the corner piece to construct this waterline rather than the developer of Lot ` , The easement is provided on this preliminary plat. .An--easement will *I"- be needed extending across Phase III to the Lamar Property__ Sewer: Will be provided through existing lines and a proposed 8" line. There is an existing line that has no recorded easement. This should be shown as a 20' PUE on the preliminary plat. Streets: Property is bound by University Drive and the SH6 East Bypass west frontage road. _ The preliminary plat should show the location of the off-ramp -where troi€fic 4exits-the, -bypass..to access University Drive. CAenhaven-is-shown-on--the-tharnughfare plan as-,a extended"dnmgh-tM - mperty. There is a proposed access easement shown on Reserve Tract B which should be shown as proposed rather than existing. Off-site Easements: N/A Sidewalks: At this time, because of the impending widening of University Drive by TXDOT, the developer will not be required to install sidewalks on University Drive. The TXDOT project will include sidewalks along both sides of University Drive. Drainage: Detention will be determined at the time of site plan review. There should be a note on the plat stating that easements will be located at the time of site design for the off-site drainage coming from Scott and White and that running through the reserve tract iust west of Lot 1, Block L. Flood Plain: Some 42.5 acres is in the floodplain, although none of the site has floodway on it according the applicant's engineer. The floodplain line should be designated as such on the preliminary plat. Oversize request: None requested Parkland Dedication:. None required for C-B. See memo from Park's Department NOTIFICATION: NONE REQUIRED oAgroup\deve_ser\cvsht\dec.109\98-327.doc DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TRANSMITTAL LETTER Y., Name/Firm: ( K-r /v-o Date: ~g J Gf A) 9 9 Address: ~i.Srf Xist/~ , Phone: C S 7 7 c ! Fax: Cv ~l3 2 ~3 We are transmitting the following for Development Services to review and comment: (Check all that apply.): Master Development Plan Preliminary Plat Final Plat ❑ FENLA. CLOMA/CL0MR/L0NfA/L0MR ❑ Site Plan ❑ Grading Plan ❑ Landscape Plan ❑ Irrigation Plan ❑ Building Construction Documents w/ ❑ Redlines ❑ Development Permit App. w/ ❑ Redlines ❑ Conditional Use Permit w/ ❑ Redlines ❑ Rezoning Application w/ ❑ Redlines ❑ Variance Request w/ ❑ Redlines ❑ Other - Please specify w/ ❑ Redlines w/ ❑ Redlines w/ ❑ Redlines w/ ❑ Redlines INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS All infrastructure documents must be submitted as a complete set. The following are included in the complete set: ❑ Waterline Construction Documents w/ ❑ Redlines ❑ Sewerline Construction Documents w/❑ Redlines ❑ Drainage Construction Documents w/ ❑ Redlines ❑ Street Construction Documents w/ ❑ Redlines ❑ Easement application with metes & bo unds decsription ❑ Drainage Letter or Report w/ ❑ Redlines ❑ Fire Flow Analysis w/ ❑ Redlines ❑ TxDOT Driveway Permit ❑ TxDOT Utility Permit ❑ Other -Please specify Special Instructions: L / 1Q I./ I'S I"WI o F "-!tee ~q7 2~J ~rc ~imrna~ Pla~ vVr _4- o _IAA4 '41 _CG ZP /1 'P,4n J llI r~' f r ✓ n e e 7 iI4 m ) / vc74~ ?"-T- (-W loo ~WVI-Q- t q 79 I< TRA.tiS~;.: AL LITTER TRAtiS`.:°'.DOC 03/23/99 I of l MUNICIPAL DE VEL OPMENT GR O UP 2551 Texas Ave. South, Ste. A • College Station, Texas 77840 •409 693-5359 • FAX.- 409 693-4243 • E-mail: mdgcs@gte.com Consulting Engineers, Surveyors, Planners and Environmental Consultants n~- June 18, 1999 Sabine McCully City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, TX 77840 Re: Staff Comments No. 1 and discussion comments from 16 June Meeting Gateway Preliminary Plat MDG Drawing 3127-000300, Revision D dated 5/20/99 Dear Sabine: We are in receipt of the above staff comments addressing revision D of this preliminary plat, have already discussed them, and prepared a revised document to reflect the changes. This is the revision we discussed on Wednesday 16 June. Addressing the staff review comments using the same numbering as the letter, we have made the following changes reflected in the new revision, revision E. We have provided the VOLUME and PAGE number citations for Reserve A and Reserve B. 2. Our client has agreed to dedicate 17.5 feet of Lot 4 at the common line with Lot 3, as an access easement. The current revision depicts this. The driveways were depicted for informational purposes only. The original preliminary plat has been superceded by this submission, and the proposed driveways on that document do not meet the new development scheme. We have depicted the driveways based on the median strip which is to be constructed. 4. We have removed the setback lines. The water lines are depicted for schematic purposes only. The actual design drawings show the bends as appropriate. 6. We have added an easement segment across Lot 1 to tie to Reserve B. The northeast property is part of Lot 1. 8. As we discussed on Wednesday, we have extended the 64' access easement across Reserve B. Reserve B does not belong to Delmar, so this depiction is merely of a "future" easement. 000300-c.05-53 (3127) 9. We now show the 8" waterline crossing University Drive to serve Lot 3. 10. The waterline we depict along University Drive will tie to the waterline which crosses University Drive to serve Lot 3, and which was recently approved for construction. That will accomplish a service loop along the front. The drawing which has been submitted shows a waterline running back from University Drive across Lot 4 through the eastern part of Lot 1 adjacent to Lot 2, crossing Reserve B. IL . We have revised the title block . 12. Phase I is comprised of Lots 1 - 8. Phase II is made up of land not owned by Delmar, namely Reserves A & B, which will be developed at some later time. We have added notes on Reserve A and Reserve B to explain this. We have made additional revisions based on staff comments at our meeting of the 16 th. 1. We show a water line and public utility easements for service to the Lamar tract. 2. We show a complete water line loop around Reserve A. 3. We have added a note that lots must provide cross-access, with locations to be determined at site plan approval. 4. We have depicted a 40' wide joint access easement across Lot 2 and Reserve B from the frontage road to Lot 1. We have added a note clarifying the responsibility of Lots 2-8 to detain water on an individual basis, as they develop. I believe Revision E addresses every comment that we have received to date. Please feel free to call if there are other questions. Sincerely, K- / Grego K. T gar Vice President/Project Manager 000300-c.05-53 (3127) I COLLEGE STATION P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tel: 409 764 3500 MEMORANDUM June 10, 1999 TO: Gregory K Taggart, MDG, Via Fax 693-4243 FROM: Bridgette George, Assistant Development Coordinator SUBJECT: Gateway - Preliminary Plat Staff reviewed the above-mentioned preliminary plat as requested. The following page is a list of staff review comments that need to be addressed. Please address the comments and submit the following information by Monday, June 14, 10:00 a.m. to be placed on the next available Planning & Zoning Commission meeting scheduled for July 1, at 7:30 p.m., in the City Hall Council Chambers, 1101 Texas Avenue. Ten (10) copies of the revised preliminary plat. The Mylar original of the revised preliminary plat. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 764-3570. Attachments: Staff Review Comments No. 1 cc: Delmar Baronhead I, via fax (972) 233-1501 Case file no. 99-309 Home of Texas A&M University STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS No. 1 Project: PRILIMINARY PLAT OF GATEWAY 99-309 1. Fill in the volume and page for Reserve Tracts A and B. 2. Show dedication of 17.5 feet on Lot 4 for access easement. 3. No driveway to University Drive will be allowed by plat for Lots 5, 6, 7, or 8. Refer to the original preliminary plat for approved driveway locations for each individual lot based on internal circulation layout. Access to University Drive for Lots 5, 6, 7, and 8 would not be able to meet the driveway ordinance as platted. (Once a median is installed on University Drive, proposed access locations would meet the driveway ordinance.) 4. Remove setback lines. 5. Use 45 degree bends not 90 degree on the water lines. 6. Show how the Lamar tract gets water. 7. What is the northeast property? Is it a reserve tract? Why is it separated out from Reserve A and B? Is it part of Lot 1? 8. Continue the 64' Public Access Easement to rear lots/reserves, excluding Reserve A. 9. Show waterline crossing under University Drive. 10. Loop the waterline and show how Reserve B and Lot 2 will get water. 11. Individual acreage amounts do not add up to this number. 12. Clarify what is Phase 1. Is there a Phase 2? Reviewed by: Edwin Hard .06/11/99 09:53 $409 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS I& 001 *~a ACTIVITY REPORT TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. 7907 CONNECTION TEL 919722331501PP161 CONNECTION ID START TIME 06/11 09:52 USAGE TIME 00'57 PAGES 2 RESULT OK y- MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT GR 2SS1 Teras Ave. South Ste. A • College Station, Terar 77840.409 693-53S9 • FAX.- 409 693-4243 • E UP mdgcs@gte.com Consulting Engineers, Surveyors, Planner and Environmental Consulmnts June 11, 1999 Sabine McCully City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, TX 77840 Re: S omments No. 1 teway Preliminary Plat and scheduling questions MDG Drawing 3127-000300, Revision D dated 5/20/99 Dear Sabine: We are in receipt of the above staff comments and accompanying memorandu memorandum, we understand this Preliminary Plat is not scheduled for the June 17, Zoning Commission meeting, but for July 1. Delmar is currently selling a portion of this restaurant chain, and in order to close, they must have a platted lot within a particular i n. Based on the 1999 Planning and property to a major ime period. If we cannot be at the June 17 P&Z meeting, is there anyway we can process thelFinal Plat and the Preliminary Plat simultaneously? This is a matter of great importance to us, and we ask your assistance in anyway possible either be allowed to proceed to P&Z at the time for which we submitted, or alternatively, run both plats t the same time. Addressing the staff review comments using the same numbering as the letter, we ave the fallowing response. 1. We will provide the VOLUME and PAGE number citations for Reserve A and Reserve B. 2. Our client has indicated that they do not want to dedicate 17.5 feet of Lot 4 asan access easement which is not needed for their site circulation, and only benefits the owner of Lot I _ We are willing to discuss alternatives. This is something which we wish to discuss with the commission. The driveways were depicted for informational purposes only. The original reliminary plat has been superceded by this submission, and the proposed driveways on that doe ent do not meet the new development scheme. We have depicted the driveways based on the medjan strip which is to be constructed- This is an item we want to discuss at length at our meeting of Tuesday June 1 _ 0003000-c.04-53 (3127) Z00 E 9 Q lii Mt C69 60t XvA CZ : ST 66, 90/TT L 4. We will remove the setback lines. They were depicted because special restri University Drive frontage and we wanted to assure that all parties were info. 5. The water lines depicted are for schematic purposes only. When the actual de use of 90° or 45° bends will be determined on a case by case basis, depending of good practice. 6. We will add an easement segment across Lot 1. 7. The northeast property is part of Lot 1. 8. We can easily extend the 64' access to the common boundary between Lot 1 an( B does not belong to Delmar and we do not have any authorization to burden B with an easement, particularly one of approximately 0.96 acres. If you db easement there. 9. We will show the waterline crossing University Drive. apply along the ign is executed, the )n the requirements Reserve B. Reserve r encumber Reserve ;ct we will show an 10. The waterline we depict along University Drive will tie to the waterline which ill cross University Drive to serve Lot 3, and which was recently approved for construction. Th will accomplish a service loop. The drawing which has been submitted shows a waterline running back froi University Drive across Lot 4 through the eastern part of Lot 1 adjacent to Lot 2, terminating ai Reserve B. 11. We used the term "called" in the title block because of discrepancies in recorded instruments- We will revise so there is no discrepancy. 12. Phase I is comprised of Lots 1 - 8. Phase 11 is made up of land not owned Reserves A & B, which will be developed at some later time. We will add a circumstance. I trust this answers any questions you may have. Please feel free to call. Sincerely, 1 90 6 ~ f87K7ag7 Vice President/Project Manager cc: Frank Mihalopoious Chuck Ellison 0003000c.04-53 (3127) summation of the Delmar, namely :e to explain this C00O 9 a K Mt C69 60t XVJ CZ=ST 66, 90/TT r ~W CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PARKS & RECREATION \ P OST OFFICE BOX 9960 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842-9960 (409) 764-3773 MEMORANDUM December 1, 1998 TO: Edwin Hard, Transportation Planner FROM: *,Steve Beachy, Director of Parks & Recreation SUBJECT: Gateway Preliminary Master Plan The preliminary master plan for the Gateway subdivision includes one tract identified as R5 (reserve "B"). The plan does not indicate any site for potential park land dedication. The R5 tract encompasses a total of 20.59 acres. This would provide up to 494 dwelling units at the maximum density allowed by the zoning regulations. Under the current park land dedication requirements, this would equate to approximately 3.7 acres of park land or $111, 150 cash dedication. Should the developer propose the land dedication, this will require review and approval of the parks and recreation board. The closest existing park site to this development is located in the adjacent University Park subdivision and includes approximately 10.2 acres. There appears to be no pedestrian linkage available between the two subdivisions without traveling along University Drive. However, I believe that the future residents will most likely be college students and they will have different needs than those of a typical single family residential development. I recommend that the parkland dedication be met with cash rather than additional land in this area. The location and small amount of land required will not lend itself to a quality park development. copies: Parks & Recreation Board We provide good things in life! SUBMIT APPLICATION AND THIS LIST CHECKED OFF WITH 13 FOLDED COPIES OF PLAT FOR REVIEW PRELIMINARY PLAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LM11TED TO THE FOLLOWING: 1. Drawn on 24" x 36" sheet to scale of 100' per inch or larger. Include the words "PRELMNARY PLAT - NOT FOR RECORD" in letters 1/2" high. If more than 1 sheet, an index sheet showing entire subdivision at a scale of 500 feet per inch or larger. 2. Vicinity map which includes enough of surrounding area to show general location of subject property in relationship to College Station and its City Limits. No scale required but include north arrow. 3. Title Block with the following information: Name and address of subdivider, recorded owner, planner, engineer and surveyor. Proposed name of subdivision. (Subdivision name & street names will be approved through Brazos County 911.) (Replats need to retain original subdivision name.) ® Date of preparation. (INCLUDE DATE THE PLAT WAS SUBMITTED AND THE DATES OF ANY REVISIONS ON THE PLAT) Engineer's scale in feet. Total area intended to be developed. 4. North Arrow. !1~ 5. Location of current city limit lines and current zoning district boundary. M` 6. Subdivision boundary indicated by heavy lines. Boundary must include all of parent tract. 7. Descriptions by metes and bounds of the subdivision which shall close within accepted land survey standards. (Labeled on boundary lines, not separate metes and bounds description.) 8 Primary control points or descriptions and ties to such control point, to which, later, all dimensions, angles, bearings, block numbers, and similar data shall be referred. The plat shall ml of the survey or tract, or an original comer of the 9. Name of contiguous subdivisions and names of indication whether or not contiguous properties 10. Location of the 100 Year Floodplain and Flood` m✓ 11. Topographic information, including contours at of streams. / Oa""' 12. Proposed land uses (In compliance with Land U •,4r 13. Proposed zoning changes, if any, submit formal PRELI.%fI]1;ARY PLAT CHECKLIST 1 of 2 PPCK.Dr-)C 03/25/99 ❑ x/14. The location and description with accurate dimensions, bearings or deflection angles and radii, area, center angle, degree of curvature, tangent distance and length of all curves for all of the following: (Show existing items that are intersecting or contiguous with the boundary of or forming a boundary with the subdivision, as well as, those within the subdivision). N41r, ng Proposed 13 C, ❑ Nlh ollq ❑ lg' ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ L~ ❑ AlIA- ❑ ❑ • Streets. Continuous or end in a cul-de-sac, stubbed out streets must end into a temp. turn around unless they are shorter than 100 feet. Public and private R.O.W. locations and widths. (All existing and proposed RO.W.'s sufficient to meet Thoroughfare Plan.) Street offsets and/or intersection angles meet ordinance. Alleys. Reserve tracts. Well site locations. Pipelines. If carrying flammable gas or fuel, also show size of line, design pressure and product transported through the line. Utility Services. (Water & Sanitary Sewer) All existing and proposed utilities of sufficient size/depth to meet the utility master plan and any future growth areas. Easements. Drainage Structures and improvements including underground storm sewer and all overland systems (flow line of existing watercourses) and showing )Ehere these will discharge. Proposed channel cross sections, if any. If-f e% v-- /op A number or letter to identify each lot or site and each block Greenbelt area/park linkages/parkland dedication ( All proposed dedications must be reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Board prior to P & Z Commission consideration.) Public areas Other public improvements, including but not limited to parks, schools and other public facilities 15. Proposed phasing. Each phase must be able to stand alone to meet ordinance requirements and infi-astructure costs should be distributed evenly throughout the subdivision.. 16. Are there impact fees associated with this development? 0 Yes N No 17. If requesting oversize participation items, are the necessary impact studies included? 0 Yes 0 No.,XN/A PRELP D,;,kRY PLAT CHECKLIST PPCK.DOC 03 25/99 2 of 2 R CITY OF COLLEGE STATION CUSTOMERR RECEIPT* OPER: MRODGERS CT DRAWER: 1 DATE: 5/24/99 00 RECEIPT: 8851596 DESCRIPTION QTY AMOUNT TP TM FILING FEE/DS/BI 1 $288.00 *87 CK PRELIM PLAT MDG-CK190 PRELIM PLAT GATEWAY MR TENDER DETAIL CK 198 $208.00 DATE: 5/24/99 TIME: 11:23:82 TOTAL PERSONAL CHECK $288.80 AMOUNT TENDERED $280.00 THANK YOU