Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneousHARVEY HILLSIDES ADDTI'ION November 1,1999 To: City of College. Station Planning Division Re: R~rzoning request for 4004 Harvey Road «'e, tbie undersigned, live in Harvey Hillsides Addition; some of us reside within the City o:f College Station, and others reside in the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of College Station. V4Fe request that the City of College Station deny the above referenced rezoning request from A-0 to C-B, inasmuch as the property adjoins directly on to single family residences. ~, Thank you very much for your considerations of this important matter. '~, .., .. I. ~ /' ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :. .. 3 .. >: -~ 2.. 3 .. ~~ . ~ ~~-- ~~ ....:.... ~G~- rte- ~~~. ~~ , ~- ~. ~~Q~ ~~ ~~ '~~ I~.~ ` ~~ ~ ~ '~ it _ ~~-~-1-~ ago' ~~ ~~ ~/ ~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ 3z 33 / ~ 1 °~ p~ V ~ ~ ~~ ~s ~ ~ C'. S , - ~. ~~1~, ~. a ~ ~„mil ~~w , oc~/ !/ ~ ~~. HARVEY HILLSIDES ADDITION November 1,1999 To: City of College Station Planning Division Re: Rezoning requesf for 4004 Harvey Road We, the undersigned, live in Harvey Hillsides Addition; some of us reside within the City of College Station, and others reside in the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City off' College Station. VVe request that the City of College Station deny the above referelpced rezoning request from A-O to C-B, inasmuch as the property adjoins direct~~y on to single family residences. Thank you very much for:,.yourconsiderations of this important matter. ~- -~8 ~~ ~_~ ~~_ ~ ~~~~ ~. . ~~ if ~s ~ ~. , ~- s ~, ~- ~~ 5 ~~ ~ ~2~~~ a ~ v~ . ~ ~ S ~s ~ `~ ,~~-yam--~ ~~ ~~m~~ ~ HARVEY IIII,LSIDES ADDITION November 1, 1999 To: City of College Station Planning Division Re: Rezoning request.for 4004 Harvey Road We, the undersigned, live in IIarvey IIillsides Addition; some of us reside within the City o~f College Station, and. others reside in the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of College Station. We request that the City of College Station deny the above referenced rezoning. request from. A-O to C-B, inasmuch as the property adjoins directly on to single family residences. Thank you very.mucli for your considerations of this important matter. ,. _, ~` UI S~~ l ~, . ~~ .. _. ~.~/" (//J// S /.y[..~i. VV ~ ~~ V / ~ ~~ ~ ~~~` r ,~ ~1~, ~ ...r z - , `~ , ~? T ~-~- G~~- l ~~ / C~/ ~ ~~~~~~~ ~,~ . frCl~` ~ ~~i'~ ~ ~ HARVEY HILLSIDES ADDITION November 1,1999 To: City of College Station Planning Division Re: Rezoning request for 4004 Harvey Road. We, the undersigned, live in Harvey Hillsides Addition; some of us reside within the City of College Station, and others reside in the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of College Station. We request that the City of College Station deny the above referenced rezoning request from A-O to C-B, inasmuch as the property adjoins directly on to•single family .residences. Thank you very much for your considerations of this important matter. ~~ _ . . _M. ~` ~ ; ~~ ~,. - .~ /-~ ~~ .. .~ ~~~ HARVEY HILLSIDES ADDITION November 1, 1999 T0: CITY OF COLLEGE STATION PLANNING DIVISION RE: REZONING REQUEST FOR 4004 HARVEY ROAD We, the undersigned, live in Harvey Hillsides Addition; some of us reside within the. City of College Station and others reside in the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of College Station. We request that the City of College Station deny the above referenced rezoning request from A-O to C-B, inasmuch as the property adjoins directly on to single family residences. Thank you very much fo~~ your considerations of this. important matter. ~~ ~~--~, ~~~~ ~ ~~~~~ V ~~s~, ~~ ~~,a~ . .: ~ /~~/E / a- rn ~. ! ~ /~e$~ ~ei/1'S HARVEY HILLSIDES ADDITION November 1, 1999 To:_City of College Station. Planning Division Re: Rezoning request for 4004 Harvey Road We, the undersigned, live in Harvey Hillsides Addition; some of us reside within the City of College Station, and others reside in the extraterritorial. jurisdiction of the City of College Station. We request that ttie City of College. Station deny the above referenced rezoning request from A-d to ~-8, inasmuch as the property adjoins directly on to single family residences. Thank you very much for your considerations of this important matter. _/'% ~ 1,~ - ~ ~ i~~ ~~ ~! ~~~ ~~ti ~ ~,~ -. ~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~-- ~ ~- ~~ ~ i ~~ ~? . ~~ ~~ ,~,/ .~ ~~~-- n ~'}~ ~'~~ ~~ i~ ~~ ;~ ~/ KONRAD AND KATHE EUGSTER 12 VISTA LANE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77845 November 22, 1999 College Station City Council 1101 Texas Avenue South College Station, Texas, 77840 Dear Council Members: My wife and I .agree with the City Planning Staff and the Planning Zoning Commission in denying the zoning request by Mr. Delph Ross for a C - B zoning on 4004. Harvey Road. . , .. .Highway 30 represents a major gateway ~rito the city. We have lived in Harvey Hillsides Addition for 3b`years, and while we realize that there. will be some commercial activity along Hwy 30, we hype it will be a well planned one. We always envisioned professional buildings along the Hwy and, therefore, would like. to request an A - P zoning. The trend in citiesr today, is to have residential areas closer to the city center; for.example, the most thought-after residential areas in Houston .... <. are no"longer~the suburbs, but"`t11e areas•~insid`e Loap 610. We, therefore, dike to propose the land bordered by Hwy.` 30, Hwy 60, FM 158 and Texas A&M (formally Texas Instrument)µbe zoned residential. The area is ideal for a variety of .residents from those that have to commute to the city, shopping center, TAMU, and especially also those who need to be close to medical facilities. It would appear to us that residents would prefer to live as close. to their work place as possible, and that manufacturing industries be more suitably located in areas further removed from the city center. We appreciate the city staff s invitation to participate in the planning for this area along Hwy. 30, and look forward to it. Thank you in advance for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely yours, Tony M. Dyson & Kimberly J. Dyson 1 Lori Lane College Station, TX 77845 November 4, 1999 Planning and Zoning Commission P.O. Box 9960,. College Station, TX 77842 Subject: Rezoning Proposal - 4004 Harvey Road. Gentlemen: As a resident of the.Harvey Hillsides Subdivision I wish to register my objection to the proposed rezoning of the above referenced property from A-O to C-B. My wife and`I bought our property in 1993 and built our home in the subdivision in 1996. The decision to purchase out- property was. made after reviewing the deed restrictions and feeling secure that the land use within the subdivision, including the properties at the entrances to ..the subdivision, was well defined as single family residential. I understand that as members of.the Planning. and Zoning Commission you render your recommendation based on criteria other than the Subdivision Restrictions and that enforcement of the Restrictions is a civil matter between property owners.. I would however ask you to bear in mind that the owner(s) prior to acquiring the property knew the Deed Restrictions limited use of the property to residential.. The Deed Restrictions, which were updated and renewed this last year, are an affirmation by the people. of this beautiful subdivision that. they want the subdivision to retain its character and not be encroached upon by commercial activities. In closing, let me thank you for your time in considering this matter, please turn down the requested rezoning, we do not need this type of development at this location. Sincerely, J `.. \J Tony Dyson 47 Pamela Lane College Station, Texas 77845 November 4, 1999 City of College Station Planning and Zoning Commission Department of Planning C/O Deborah Charzone 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 77842 Re: Rezoning request for 4004 Harvey Road This letter is to request that the city of College Station'deny the above referenced rezoning request from A-O to C-B. Our objection is based upon the following factors: • This property adjoins directly to single-family residences, and this rezoning would affect the"quality of life for. these residents. • Allowing a bar to establish`on a very busy highway could become a very serious safety hazard. ' • The city is establishing a park facility/softball complex across the highway from this proposed site. • This facility will be located almost`adjacent to a church facility, Covenant Family Church. • Highway 30 has been established as a gateway into College Station. In our opinion, a bar should not be one o~the first businesses-someone sees when coming to our area. We are residents of the Harvey Hillsides Community, and we currently enjoy a very quiet, country life-style. We are' asking for your support in maintaining our quality of life by denying this rezoning request. Sincerely, Robert T. Gilmore ~~ ~~ Nancy H. Gilmore November 22; 1999 College Station City Council College Station; Texas To Whom It May Concern; My name is Nancy Jo Kuder; and my husband Charles and I live at 9 Lori Lane, t.o.llb.ge,(S.tatioii;.:~.in?_the Habv~.y .Hi3,l~ides ,sulidf~3.~fon~ I am writing this letter in response to the request to rezone property on Harvey Road and P.amela~Lane in College Station.. .,... ~_ This is a matter o.f great,,concern for my hus}sand~and myself. When we bought our home in the Harvey Hillsides approximately 6"i/2 years ago,. we did so with the thought~•that.we could have the peacefulness"and tranquility that country living brings. My husband and :I both have jobs that require us to be "on call" in case of an emergency.. It is for this reason we chose-`to live where we do, close enough so our response time is limited, yet in an area where we~can enjoy life surrounded by large beautiful trees, flowers,.:and..an__abundance-of:wildlife. 1 realize that a restaurant preciously occupied the area which is being considered for rezoning. ~I am also .aware that Jose's Restaurant's quiet ambiance will be quite different than the hamburger and beer establishment that is being proposed for the lots on Harvey.. With the projected construction of Veteran's Park on Harvey Road, I can only imagine the increase of traffic and noise that a hamburger restaurant would bring to the entrance of our subdivision. Please give careful. thought to this. rezoning request. The fact that the majority of the. homeowners in the subdivision. are .against this rezoning in comparison to ONE landowner who will benefit financially by the rezoning, should greatly affect your decision. I would ask that the Council accept the Planning and Zoning's decision and also deny this request for rezoning until a General Plan is developed for the Highway 30 gateway into College Station so that we can. provide citizen's input with suggestions. Thank you for .your attention and consideration to this matter. Sincerely, Nancy Jo Kude ~_ Alien N. Chisholm 44 Pamela Lane College Station, TX 77845 November 20, 1999 City of College Station Planning and Zoning Commission Reference: Land tzse for Pamela Lane/Highway 30 area. Thank you for hearing our spokesmen during the last public hearing regarding the request to rezone two tracts of land. As I understood it, the request was disapproved until a comprehensive plan is developed. We appreciated your favorable considera#ion. As aBryan native who has lived in a number of locations in the US and foreign countries, we chase to. live at our. present loeation,on Pamela Lane. This location was selected because it has large lots, open areas, wooded areas, is quiet, peaceful, and ideal as a retirement location where grandchildren can safely play. In the 14 years we have owned our present home aril lived here; the conditions have remained essentially the same, with new homes being built from time to time. There was a popular Mexican Restaurant-Jose's in the.eazly yeazs. During the time it '~ was in operata<on there was minimal noise, but at times the parking was inadequate, causing customers o park alongside Highway 30.' As you are well aware, the tragedy with the 6 students alpng~SH60 was caused by the need to park along, a busy highway. Highway 30 is quite busywith a=60mph speed limit. Any business will certainly experience a serious potential accident-exposure to customers exiting. the premises or turning info the business. As the residents. of this area know well, great caze must be taken at the two intersections we use, especially at night. What will happen at night when restaurant patrons leave after a heavy meal and a few after dinner drinks? Another reason to disapprove the rezoning request is the simple fact that Jose's used the fue torelocate to what must evidently be a much better location on Texas Avenue since he essentially abandoned the site:' Suzanne and I do recognize that a certain amount of development will take place. It should be limited to activities that operate during the day, do not attract clot ofcome-and,go traffic, have adequate parking, have good visibility both ways on Highway 30 when entering and leaving and do not pollute with noise or in any other way. Please consider the above when analyzing any request for rezoning from the present AO permitted activities. and your long range planning activities. Re~sp~ectfull~y~fSubmitted Allen N Chisholm M. Suzanne Chisholm. c~ November 4, 1999 To: City of College .Station Planning Division Subject: Rezoning request for 4004 Harvey Road We are currently the lonaest living residents of the Harvey Hillsides Addition! My wife and I purchased lot 25 of block 1, in the year 1965 and had our current house was built. on tfiis lot_in 1968.. We worked our land; planted trees, kept our house and yard neat. VVe raised our two daughters here and built a life time of always trying to do best thing for our place and our community. Now our grandchildren love to come ` here and enjoy. the results of our hard work that we put into our home and faeiiities. When we first started~livmg here., it was a wonderful place. to live, raise a family, and ~~ . , enjoy our country home with a Hi~gnw~y. 30 `being a small, and seldom traveled road as compared to today's busy highway. Life charges and we certainly accept that, but f ....why must we accep# the rezoning of residential property into ,commercial j property when .property :located in"""~~ijlock 4 haspalways been .reserved for ..commercial. uses! .Please keep residential and commercial properties separated! Residents of the Harvey Hillsides Addition desire and deserve to continue living' in '' harmony and enjoying our'wonderful community. We join our many neighbors in asking that the City of College. Station Planning Division deny the request to rezone the land currently A-4 to C-B especially since I~, this land adjoins single family residences. ~, ''~ Your consideration is greatly appreciated) Sincerely,, ~, Dennis Hejtmancik Estelle Hejtman November 21, 1999 College Station City Council/Mayor/Manager Dear Sirs: My family moved to Harvey Hillsides because it is a rural suUdivsion along Harvey Road, the wooded gateway to our community. We never dreamed those planning the firture of College Station would consider rezoning Harvey Road. As College Station continues to grow, I would think conununity leaders would want to preserve this greenbelt coi7idor to the city. We are bird watchers and are blessed by the great variety of song birds, birds of prey•and scavenger birds which rely on this wooded: greenbelt area for their habitat. Our children ride their bikes and walk through this neighborhood which would not be possible if there is going to be an open bar and grill at the end of our street on Harvey Road. None of us would feel safe. There are any number of places in the College Station area that are zoned for commercial and industrial development where a yew business such as an open bar would fit in. We would like for College Station to reject the current proposal'for rezoning the two lots on Harvey Road and; work together with our property'ow~iers in •planning the future of the Ilarvey Road Green Belt ' Coi-~~idor. The city may be able to obtain..governrnent~grants for such a project.which would preserve our rural way. of life and stand as a visual testimony to the concerns of our city leaders. for the quality of life of all its citizens. Sincerely yours, ~~ i/' //"~~ -- j ... ~`" Dr. Nathaii~:-$~uer;-Lot 41; Class of 75 -' 53 Pamela Lane, College Station, Texas 77845 (409) 260-9433 Dr. Rhonda D. Bauer, Class X76 ~~~` ~ Walter E. Bauer, Class of 2009 /. /. Y ~ ~ i ~7 - _~_, ~CL;~._~~' ~Z -. C~-Lz eat C'~-~~ ~ - ~"~ ~c. ~. ~~~_ Susan E. Bauer, Class of 200 ~~~~ fit' ': i `~ ~: ~~ ; .r November 20, 1999 City Council of College Station City of College Station Gol.lege Station, Texas To Whom it may concern: In reference to the present zoning change request for the former Jose's restaurant site together with the adjoining lots fronting Harvey Road (Hwy 30), I beg you to base your decision on .what is good for Harvey Hillsides. The integrity and .quality of life of a great number of people. are at stake here. My family has been here for twentytwo years. My husband and I have raised our three children here. The quiet of the country and the relative safety is what attracted us to this neighborhood and we want to preserve this if at all possible. It would be detrimental to Pamela Lane to have a high impact business on the corner of Hwy 30 and Pamela Lane. The street is narrow and would not allow the increase in traffic without causing major accidents. I cringe if I imagine the lot devoid of its trees. Aesthetically it would be devastating, if not sacrilegious. There not being much of a curb allowance on Hwy 30, I shudder at the thought of having any kind of business entrance on Pamela Lane. For council's information there are quite a number of children on Pamela Lane. These children, ranging in age from one to 1~ years old, are used to ride their bikes freely throughout the whole street. We, their neighbors, watch out for them. If a high traffic .business would be allowed it would be dangerous to these children who do .have the right to continue to enjoy their freedom in this .lovely neighborhood. ~s for the restaurant, although it looks .like a fait accompli, I would like to remark that those awfully good. hamburgers of Koppe Bridge are going to taste awfully bad if the restaurant is going to be~a loud biergarten type of place. We ~may~have been'spoiled haying' Jose's restaurant there, however, it is a nice neighborhood, so please Ist's have equally nice proprietors. I invite all of you to come and visit our neighborhood. Listen to the birds, watch them play. Look at the children and watch them play. Harvey Hillsides is the best little secret in Brazos County. Although we as a community do realize that change is imminent, we beg you not to let this beautiful area to be impregnated by undesirable traits. r- Donald Austin. FASLA Landscape Architect November 4, 1°J°J°J Planning and Zoning Commission City of College Station College Station, Texas To Whom it may concern: Pursuant to the. present zoning" change request for the former Jose's restaurant site together with'~adjace:nt parcels fronting Harvey S~oad (Hwy 30), I wish to'offer the following remarks: ,. ~.~. ...<. ~1. The corridor of Hwy 30-from Hwy 6 to the intersection of Fm 158 is one of the few remaining entrances to the Gity of College Station with a landscape not characterized by urban hardscape and/or strip commercial. This corridor warrants-Special planning and design considerations which the present General Plan. has. left somewhat undefined . ~... .. and ambiguous. I recommend this corridor be set aside as a Special Treatment District, planned in concert with local citizen input, and assisted in its future change through a .more restrictive zoning ordinance designed to support this particular District alone. 2. The former restaurant was a very compatible use in relation to the neighborhood--at least by the character of its operation. The La Selva .nursery, rent house and future Farm Bureau office. are also quite compatible. Future activity allowed by present zoning districts may, however, allow uses detrimental to the neighborhood. While the residential area has some separation from commercial activity by virtue of a drainage way and tree cover, the R.M. Dudley parcel bounded by Hwy 30, Pamela Lane. and Vista Lane does not possess such separation opportunities. Access from Hwy ~0 to this parcel would present serious traffic concerns as the drive connections would be too close to Pamela Lane. Pamela Lane should never be considered for such .access. This would change the nice entrance to Harvey Hillsides to an uncharacteristic scale and intensity.. 4.09.776.8466.48 Pamela Lane .College Station.. Texas.. 77845 V Pamela Lane presently has only 15' of pavement in a 50' right-of-way of County ownership. 3. Any granting of zoning in this area would at the present constitute spot zoning. The Planned Development District could act as a tool to effect General .Plan intent, goals and objectives when such is clarified. For the moment, however, ..the District does not appear to have sufficient safeguards to serve this_corridor and the Harvey Hillsides neighborhood.. Commercial activity, well defined and- regulated (bad word), can be a very good neighbor. A realistic zone for such activity would occur between Pamela Lane and Laura Lane. The most important consideration should be its. character and intensity of activity. If the. right and sensitive. kind of homework is done, the end result would certainly be rewarding for all interested parties. Respectfully submitted, ~' Donald Austin . November 22, 1999 To: City Council Members c/o Sabine McCully, Senior Planner City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Re: Rezoning Request for 4004 Harvey Road Dear City Council Members: I live at 10 Vista Lane, which ~ behind the proposed. rezoning area. I am against this rezoning for the following reasons (the first six items pertain to the Dudley tract) 1. My main objection is that. it would change the Dudley 5.3-acre tract on the East End '" ' next~to Pamela Lane from a rural residential subdivision lot into a commercial tract. . .k ~ The original developers of this rural subdivision intended. for this ENTIRE tract to be residential. They made it a part of Block2, which is all residential. It is NOT a part of Block 4, which was the. developers set aside for commercial or business uses. This is indicated on the Master_P,lat of Harvey Hillsides, recorded in Volume 263, Page 485, 487 and 489 of the Heed Records,-July 25, 1967 (copy attached). '" 2. The Deed Restrictions also~confirm this fact. According to the Deed Restrictions this - tract was to be a residential tract and subject to the restrictions placed upon the residential areas as part of Block 2. 1vlr. Dudley acknowledged to Sabine McCully it it in ublic . The tract was a residential tract this very fact (but he will not adm p ) when he purchased it, per the original developers' intent in 1967. 3. The portion of this tract which fronts on Harvey Road'should not be rezonedto 1 because it fronts on Harvey Road. Many'residences also ercial or A-P sim Comm ) p y ( front on Harve Road. y act was ront ortion of this tr ealized that the f 4. The original developers undoubtedly r P from the north via a storm drain very low and was a drainage basin. It collects water under the highway and from the east via a 5' deep drainage creek that crosses under Pamela Lane. The original developers thus platted it as one 5.3 acre rectangular tract in order to allow room fora residence on the upper south end and designated the entire tract as residential In my opinion the entire tract should be rezoned Rural Residential, which I believe is AOR. This would keep the tract in accordance with ', the original Master Plat and theDeed Restrictions. 5. When I purchased my residential tract in 1970, it was n1y understanding that this entire 5.3 acre tract was residential I am sure that all of the other residents of Harvey Illsides had this same understanding and purchased on this basis. 6. Pamela Lane is one of two main entrances to this subdivision. Pamela Lane is a very narrow tree-covered LANE. I seriously doubt that the City would allow a curb cut and entry drive off of Harvey Road to serve this tract since it borders Pamela Lane. A .curb cut and entry would be too close to the Pamela Lane and Harvey Road intersection. Therefore, the entry to this tract would have to come from Pamela Lane. This. lane is much too narrow to accommodate commercial traffic in and out of a business or office building. Besides destroying the peaceful beauty of entering a tree- canopied lane into the subdivision, it would be very dangerous due to the-traffic entering and leaving a business parking lot.. Pamela Lane has a curve to it, which would become dangerous if an entry to a business were constructed on it. I hope that you will have the opportunity to drive out Harvey Road and turn onto Pamela Lane. Then try to envision a.commercial business or office building with a parking lot and - entry drive on thistract. L: think you wilLsee the potential problem. ` 7. Regarding the Delph Ross tract, which Mr. Ross intends to use for another Koppe Bridge Bar and .Grill, I personally do not have a problem with a restaurant on'this tract. Again,. when I purchased my residentaact on Vista Lane in .1970,: there was ;an existing restaurant on this tract (the Crown and Anchor, later to become Jose's _ ~ Restaurant). These restaurants., were quiet, and had only interior dining. My concern is that Mr. Ross will install an outdoor patio with loud speakers and I will~be subjected to late night loud music and noise from. patrons that may have had~a little ,..:, _ N. ... too much to drink. I~would riot object;to a re.~taurant that provided only interior. dining with no outside eating. or drinking or outdoor music system/speakers. 8. Mr. Delph Ross will probably tell you how he.bought this tract in good faith.' I doubt that he has fully purchased the tract with no .provision for getting his money back or - getting out of the deal if the tract is not rezoned to allow a restaurant.. He should be intelligent enough not to purchase a tract of land without first being certain that he `""° - ~ can use the land for its intended`purpose. Hopefully he bought the tract with good sense and. not strictly on good faith. He should also not be trying to place a guilt trip on the Council by talking about he money he has invested and could lose if the property is not rezoned as he wishes.:. He should have purchased the property contingent upon approved rezoning for the. restaurant. This same logic certainly applies to Mr. Dudley's tract also and his purchase of the 5.3 acre tract. 9. Regarding the third tract next to the .existing nursery, it is presently serving as an apartment building with who knows ho«~ many residents. I would prefer a daytime business on this site rather than its current use because the residents usually party until late at night on the weekends and I am subjected to listening to their loud music. I live behind this site and yes, I can hear their stereos very clearly and loudly late at night. I wouldbe in favor of a commercial rezoning of this tract which also precluded multi-family residential uses. I believe that a compromise solution to this rezoning request would be the following: rezone the Dudley 5.3 acre tract which fronts .along Pamela Lane to AOR (rural residential); rezone the Delph Ross tract to allow an inside restaurant (perhaps PDD zone or conditional use); rezone the small apartment house tract to PDD or conditional use also. Or, another alternative would be to leave the Dudley tract as it is and rezone the other two tracts. By rezoning two tracts, I believe that this would circumvent the "spot zoning" issue. Thank you for your time in considering the concerns of the Harvey Hillsides subdivision and the best interests of the residents living .there. Please call me if you have any questions or if I may be of help in any way. Sincerel , ~' Weldon Jordan P.O. Box 10210 College Station, Texas 77842 Ph: 693-0900 or 774-4908 (home) ~.: ~"L.RVEY {-{~llS~pfS M... ta.~. ~ M..~_ K..._-. la -..... e..._, c..,.... x~. ~d r. 15 Ranchero Road College Station Texas 77845-9405 18 November 1999 College Station City Council 1101 Texas Avenue South C©llege Station, Texas 77840 Dear Council Members, The purpose of this letter is to comment upon the proposed rezoning of 4004 Harvey Road from A-O to C-B end the subsequent construction of an establishment serving food and alcoholic beverages. We are stroriglp.,opposed to this proposed action for many .reasons among which are: i - the establishment of an alcohol-serving facility adjacent and/or in close proximity,. to~an established,.,strictly residential neighborhood, ~" - the direct conflict which would exist between the ,late-night operating hours of a bar and grill .and the "quiet hour's".expected and now enjoyed by home owners, - the decrease in~proper~Ey~values which can be expected by .. the infusion of businesses not compatible with the surrounding residences, - a degredation of the potential _f or an attractive "east. entrance corridor" to College Station, - the increase in traffic when the new sports complex and park, and the construction east of the Furrow lumber yard become a reality, - the latitude permitted in the variety of establishments encompassing zoning C-B, - the seeming indifference of College Station officials by (1) failing to notify all property owners within 200 feet of the affected tracts, except those within the College Station city limits, and (2) by apparently ignoring the newly approved deed restrictions of the Harvey Hillsides addition, and - the Planning and Zoning Commission, City of College Station, on 4 November 1999, voted disapproval (recommended denial) of the proposed rezoning. page 2 of 2 t is recommended that: - the proposed change in zoning for 4004 Harvey Road be disapproved, - plans for the "east entrance corridor" to College Station be studied and publicized, - a determination be made of zoning categories which would be compatible with the Harvey Hillsides addition and the "east entrance corridor," and .that efforts be undertaken to appropriately rezone all properties along Harvey Road which are within and/or contiguous to Harvey. Hillsides, and - College Station officials hereaf°ter promptly notify all property owners within 200 feet of any property considered for rezoning or othe~.actiyities affecting those property owners. The City of College Station ha's, at this point in time, a unique ..opportunity to plan for anyelegant ar~,~u~nctional "east entrance .corridor" to College. Station: ~~ We .zdaul'~`be pleased to workwith ~, ~~you~to the benefit of the City and the residents of Harvey Hillsides. ~.. Sincerely, :•, , ~~, G G~~~ John ~:.~ ~^las _. .~. ,, ,:> F. Jean W. Vilas Proposed Zone Change 4.71 Acre Harvey Hillsides Blocks 1 and 4 College Station, Texas All that certain. tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in the Maria Kegans League, Abstract No. 28, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas,. being a part of Block 4 of Harvey Hillsides addition according to plat of Record in Volume 264, Page 484 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, and being. all. of that tract conveyed to Oscar Parulian and wife Swanzy Parulian by deed recorded in Volume 23.76,: Page 316 of the Official Records of Brazos. County, Texas, all of That tract conveyed to Delph S. Ross and wife Glenda T. Ross by deed recorded in Volume 3435, Page 3:12 of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas, which is Tract A -DelRaye subdivision as described by plat recorded in Volume 3565., Page 335 of the Official Records of Brazos County,:Texas, and a part of Lot 42 in Block 1 of Harvey Hillsides according to plat of record in Volume 263, Page 485 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, and being,more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the .intersection of the southwest line of Pamela Lane and the southeast line of Harvey Road (State_Highway No. 30) which is the northeast corner of the said Lot 42 of Harvey Hillsides. Thence S 47° 43' 40" E - 312.71 feet along the southwest line of Pamela Lane to the southeast corner of this tract; Thence S 42° 16' 20" W - 270.39 feet across the said Lot 42 to the southeast corner of Block 4 of Harvey Hillsides subdivision according to plat of record in Volume 264, Page 484 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas; Thence N 52° 38' 37" W - 66.47 feet along the line between Block and Block 4 of the said Harvey Hillsides subdivision to the southeast corner of Tract A of the said DelRaye Subdivision; Thence S 42° 16' 07" W - 312.66 feet along the southeast line of the said Tract A of the DelRaye Subdivision to .the northeast line the said Parulian tract; Thence S 47° 48' 35" E - 126.04 feet along the northeast line of the said Parulian tract to the southeast corner of same; Thence S 31 ° 37' 20" W - 111.90 feet along the southeast line of the said Parulian tract to the southwest corner of same which is the southeast corner of the tract conveyed to D.S. Chadbourne acid wife by deed recorded in Volume 1166, Page 736 of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas; Thence N 47° 48' 35" W - 393.12 feet along the southwest line of the said Chadbourne tract to the northwest corner of same in the southeast line of Harvey Road; Thence N 42° 15' S 1" E - 699.10 feet along. the. southeast line of Harvey Road to the Point of Beginning and containing 4.71 acres of land more or less. Proposed Zone Change 3.32 Acres Harvey Hillsides Block 1 College Station, Texas All that certain tract or parcel of land. lying and being situated in the Maria Kegans League, Abstract No. 28, in College Station, Brazos County, Texas, being a part of Lot 42 in Block 1 of Harvey Hillsides according to plat of record in Volume 263, Page 485 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas, and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the southwest line of Pamela Lane and the northwest line of Vista Lane which is the southeast corner of the said Lot 42 of Harvey Hillsides. Thence S 42° 16' O1" W - 362.78 feet along the northwest line of Vista Lane which is the southeast line of the said Lot 42 in Block l ofHarvey Hillsides to the southwest corner of the said Lot 42; Thence N 52° 38' 37" W - 474.99 feet along the southwest line of the said Lot. 42 to the southeast. corner of Block 4 of Harvey Hillsides subdivision according to plat of record in Volume 264, Page 484 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas; Thence N 42° 16' 20" E - 270.39 feet across the said Lot 42 to the southwest line of Pamela Lane; Thence S 47° 43' 40" E - 75.43 feet along the.: southwest line of Pamela Lane to an angle point in said line; - Thence S b6° 13" 40" E - 419..44 feet continuing along the southwest line of Pamela Lane to the Point. of Beginning and containing .3.32 acres of land more or less. 99-123 Carrara Partnership David Hard & Wm S. Hart P.O. Box 17424 San Antonio, Texas 78217 99-123 Mary D. Allen 1507 E. 31S` street Bryan, Texas 77802 99-123 Oscar & Swany W. Parulian 2606 Pedernales Drive College Station, Texas 77845 99-123 Walter Ford Hoke 37 Pamela Lane College Station, Texas 77845 99-123 Delph & Glenda T. Ross 1002 Oakhaven Circle College Station, Texas 77840 99-123 Weldon E. Jordan F.O. Box 10210 College Station, Texas 77842-0210 99-123 Mark Dudley 8 Lori Lane College Station, Texas 77845 99-123 Dan S. & Eddie Ruth Chadbourne 2102 Wayside Drive Bryan, Texas 77802 HARVEY HII.LSIDES ADDITION November 1,1999 Too City of College Station ~, Planning Division Re: Rezoning request for 4004 Harvey Road i~ . .. a i~ the undersi ned liv in e, __ _ b e HarveyHlszdes Addition, some. of us,_reside within_the - ' City of College Station, and others reside in the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of College Station. We .request that the City of College,Station deny the above '' ' `referenced rezoning request from A-0 to C-B, inasmuch as the property. ad1oins directly on to single family residences. Thank you very much for your considerations of this important matter. ~- ~~ ~- ~~ ~ ~ ~~ j ~~ i ~~ ~~~~~ ~G~ ~~3Z~3 ~~. ~'~' ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ dam, ~~: ~~~- ~ ~ ~ - C'.s.-~.~1~ 1~ jam/ a ~ ~,,~\~~; ~ 01/11fOD 17:18 $'4b9 26.8 307 Y-C-$ & S l~J(-~4 ~lr+i,PH R~I~S IBC-~!' Q1F~xt;~ ~i?~ 61J(}~ BRYAN, ~i'F".4S l~S~` 3sttt~a-ry 1 ], 2Q0{} pity ot'Colkege Statit~n Flannixag I3ivisioa~ Attentia~n: Sabiue i~cCully 1103 'd'emos Avenue 4~c~llege ~iatian; Texas 7'~$4~ RE: ~onitt~ Application honing Item Nd. 9~-d ~3 5.03 acz'es - 44]04 Harvey Road (~Tighwxy 34~ Dear Ms. McCully: Chz S~pterrsber ~, 1999j I filed an Ap4alicatian £or'~tszanitag. TThis applioation was made on my behalf and fd:~ adjoining property owners, Msx°k I3udley and Mr. end Mrs. 4~scar d~arulian. I wss sctfng on their behalf ~nde~ a Sgecal l?pwea~ af,A.tkomey. 'This is to'advise that d have resigned/termir~ated sny authority which d has lc~ art an their behsl#' I lrlan:to c~ntnri~~ ryn nay behalf foa- that properly which T aawaa. They have beezx advised cif rn`y action and i~sade aRrsa`e t arty mature action in dais resdaect shouXd l}e made by them ora their o'er beha]~ if you ~a~=e any quest~ans or wish to disc ss this further, please feel freeto call: cc: Mr. NJark Dudley h~lr. and Mrs. Oscar lyarulian __ LI~'fhe Landscape Alliance September 8, 1999 .Sabine McCully, AICP Senior Planner City of College Station P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 77842 Re: A&M Consolidated High School Dear Ms. McCully, I visited your office on August 26th during a site visit to several A&M Consolidated I. S. D. schools which are under construction.. The purpose of my visit was to inquire about modifications to the approved .landscape plan for A&M Consolidated, High. School The modification was requested by the school district related to concerns by the Band Director that the trees in some of the islands would disrupt visibility of the band practices on the parking lot from the. viewing _ towers. lYly visit was to det~rmneif we could relocate these trees immediately across the drive, providing similar perimeter planting but satisfying the District's needs. You were preparing for. a meeting, but Ms. Kelly of your office made the inquiry on my behalf. She indicated that you would approve.. the modification. subject to submittal of a site plan sketch which recorded the requested changes. I am including a site plan sketch which graphically represents the tree relocations. Thank you for your assistance in this manner. Sincerely, Gary. _ tilek, RLA The Landscape Alliance cc: Steve Aloway, VLK Architects Attachment _ November 3, 1999 Sabine McCully Senior Planner City of College Station Plannir.~c~ Division 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 77840 Dear Ms. McCully: In response to your letter of October 22, 1999 .concerning the rezoning request for 4004 Harvey Road and lot #42, I would like to state that we oppose this request. Attached are pictures of my home at 37 Pamela Lane, College Station which is a 6,900 sa,. ft. structure on which the: yard begins approximately 200 ft. off Harvey Road, and my house next door located on lot #38 which is a 1,900 sq. ft. structure. Both of these homes are across the street from lot #42 which is requesting rezoning. Our deed restrictions state this to be a single family residential subdivision. These were rewritten and approved by a majority of the residents of the Harvey Hillside sub- divison. Sd far, al.l"resid'ents have observed these deed restrictions. The rezoning of lot #42 would greatly effect the quality of home life for me and my family. We want to keep this a residential subdivision and retain our picturesque country look and feel which we relate to the "Rosemary Drive" area in Bryan. We have children playing in our streets, wild animals ream freely in our yards and many species of wild- flowers which all of us enjoy and protect! Please help us keep this a residential ubdivision and. keep lot #42 zoned A-0. As you can imagine, being across the street from a business, would greatly effect the value of my houses. Just because property is in the city .limits shouldn't mean it has to be zoned commercial. Thanking you. in advance for your consideration, I am Sincerely, ~~. , Walter & Beverly Hoke Lots #32, #33, #37 & #38 37 Pamela Lane College Station, TX 77845 HARVEY >~ILLSIDES ADDITIUN November 1,1999 To: City of College Station Planning. Division Re: Rezoning request for 4004 Harvey. Road We, the undersigned, live in Harvey Hillsides Addition; some of us residewithin the City of College Station, and others reside in the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of College Station. We request that the City of College Station deny the above referenced rezoning request from A-0 to C-B, inasmuch as the property adjoins directly on to single family residences. Thank you very much for yonr considerations of this important matter. / (~ ~i ~~ ~ . `~z ~~ ~~ ~~~-" .;~ 132 33 ~~.~ ~"~.~~~ ~. ~ ~! ~.~~- ~~ ~. ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ /~'~'~ Z ~ -~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ r a- ~ ~~~M ~-~ `_' ~S - ' r ~ ~- ~ ~. 3 ~~s~q Li- C' , f HARVEY HII.LSIDES ADDTTiON November 1,1999 Tot City of College Station Planning Division Re: Rezoning request for 4004 Harvey Road We, the. undersigned, live in Harvey Hillsides Addition; some of us reside within the City of College Station, and others reside in the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the ~I City of College Station. We request that the City of College Station deny the above referenced rezoning request from A-O to C•B, inasmuch as the property ad~oms directly on to single family residences. Thank'you very much for your considerations of this. important matter. ~~~- 3 3 ~-~~d 1 ~- f ~~~, ems.-`•.-d,~ 3 3 S w r~ ~---G-~-fl-- " J- ~ ` ~g ~~~ L ~~ .~-~ . ~~ f ,~- ~~ ~~ ,~~ ~~~ ~~~e; ~. s ~~ ~~sf C~~~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~C ~.. . ~~ ~~~~ d ~~-Q~cv`. ~. 3 ~~~,0'~' off- l/k . ~ ' S _ _ \\\~~ G HARVEY IffILLSIDES ADDITION November 1,1999 To: City of College Station Planning Division Re: Rezoning request far 4004 :Harvey Road We, the undersigned, live in Harvey HUlsides Addition; some of us reside within the City of College Station, and others reside in the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of College Station. We request that the City of College Station deny the above referenced rezoning request from A-0 to C-B, inasmuch as the property adjoins directly on to single family residences. Than>l. you very much for your considerations of this important matter. <, ~ l ~ w~~~~~ , ~~ /~~ ~/S TA E J~`~"- HARVEY HII~LSIDES ADDITION November 1,1999 Tot. City of College Station Planning Division. Rec Rezoning request for 4004 Harvey Road We, tl~e undersigned, live in Harvey Hillsides Addition; some of us reside within the City off' College Station, and others reside in the extraterritorial .jurisdiction of the City off College'Station. We request that the City of College Station deny the above refere~pced rezoning request from A-O to C-B, inasmuch as the property adjoins directly on to single family residences. Thank you very much for your considerations of this important matter.. ~~ ~- ~~ rYtio tic: ~ 8d~-wow ~ ~ G' ~ .~A~~'v, ~x- ~ ~~, ~( 0 f - t ~'lul HARVEY HILLSIDES ADDITION November 1, 1999 T0: CITY'OF COLLEGE STATION PLANNING DIVISION RE: REZONING REQUEST FOR 4004 HARVEY ROAD We, the undersigned, live in Harvey Hillsides_Addition; some of us reside within the City of College Station and others reside in the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of Col~~ege Station. We request that the City of College Station deny the above referenced rezoning request from A-O to 0-B, inasmuch as the property adjoins directly on to single family residences. Thank you very much for your considerations of this important matter. ~,, _ _r -~~ ~~r~~~ ~ /ees~a~eN~s ~J"~~~Ca ~, /~ I HARVEY HILLSIDES .ADDITION November 1,1999 Tp: City of College Station Planning Division Re: Rezoning request for 4004 Garvey Road We, the undersigned, live in Harvey Hillsides Addition; some of us reside within the City of College Station, and others reside in the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of College Station. We request that the City of College Station deny the above referenced rezoning request from A-O to C-B, inasmuch as the property adjoins directly o~p to single family residences. Thank you very much for your considerations of this important matter. r ~~--'~---..' ~ v f ~~ ~~ ~ 3 ~ .. a ~T ~a 1 I'~ ~.-tine/ t `~ -~ . ~t~ C~~~- C~ November 4, ~ 999 To: City of College Station Planning .Division Subject: Rezoning.. request for 4004 Harvey Road We are curre ntly the lona est living residents of the Harvey Hillsides Addition! My wife and I purchased lot 25 of block 1, in the year 1965 and had our current house was built on this lot.in 1968.. We worked. our land; .planted trees, kept our house and yard neat. We raised our two daughters here and built a lifetime of always trying to do best. thing for our place and our community. Now our grandchildren love to come here and enjoy the results of our hard work that we put into our home and facilities, When we #irst started living here, it was a wonderful place to live, raise a family, and enjoy our country .home with a Highway 30 being a small and seldom traveled road as compared to today's busy highway. Life changes and we certainly accept that, but why must we accept the rezoning of residential property into commercial property when property .located in block 4 has always been reserved .for commercial uses! _Please keep residential and commercial properties separated) Residents of the Harvey Hillsides Addition desire and deserve to continue .living in harmony and enjoying our wonderful .community. We join our many neighbors in asking that the City of College Station Planning Division deny the request to rezone the land currently A-O to C-B especially since this land .adjoins single family residences. Your consideration is greatly. appreciated! Si cerely, Dennis Hejtmancik .~z2~~=~- ~7 Estelle Hejtman KONRAD AND KATHE EtJGSTER 12 VISTA LANE CaLI,EGE STATION, TEXAS 77845 November`4,1999 '~, To: City of College Station ~~ Re: Rezoning request for 4004 Harvey Rd. My wife and I have lived in Harvey Hillsides Addition for the past 30 • ein years Our homestead is within 200 feet of the property. which is b g considered for rezoning from A-U to C-B. We very much oppose this .rezoning request, inasmuch as a C-B zone adjoining directly onto single family. residences will devaluate residential properties. An A-P zoning of the above referenced properties would be more desirable. We request • rridor that. the city develops a comprehensive plan for the Hwy. 30 co , and that the affected neighbors be invited to participate in this process. ..Thank you in advance for your considerations of this matter. ~. 47 Pamela Lane ~ College Station, Texas 77845 November 4, 1999 City of College Station Planning and Zoning Commission Department of Planning C/O Deborah Charzone 1.101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 77842. Re: Rezoning request for 4004 Harvey Road ' ~ This letter is to request that the city of College Station deny the above referenced rezoning request from A-0 to C-B. Our objection is based upon the following factors: • This property adjoins directly to single-family residences, and this rezoning would affect the quality of life for these. residents. • Allowing a bar to establish on a very busy highway could become a very serious safety hazard.. • The city is establishing a park facility/softball complex across the highway from this proposed site. • This facility will be located almost adjacent to a church facility, Covenant Family Church.. ~I • Hi wa 30 has been established as a gateway into College Station. In our opinion, a ~ Y bar should not be one of the first businesses someone sees when coming to our area. We are residents of the Harvey Hillsides Community, and we currently enjoy a very quiet, country life-style. We are asking for your support in maintaining our quality of life by denying this rezoning request. Sincerely, .`' ~ ~~ ~~ U /~ Robert T. Gilmore Nancy H. Gilmore i 10/31/99 Mr. Walter Hoke 37 Pamela Ln. College Station, Texas 77845 Dear Mr. Hoke, In regards to the request :being considered by the City of College Station to rezone 4004 Harvey Road from A-O Agricultural Open to C-B Business. Commercial, this letter is to express my strongest objection to allowing such rezoning. Rezoning this property as outlined in the October 22,.1999 "Notice of Public Hearing" issued by the City of College Station; will in my opinion, undoubtedly decrease the value of your home. .Even more important it will surely decrease the quality of life. you currently enjoy living in the Harvey Hillsides subdivision. Frankly,.. it is unclear to me why such a request would even be considered. by the City of College Station in light of the fact that just this past .year, the. home and property owners living in the Harvey Hillsides subdivision. worked very hard to develop Deed Restrictions. These Deed Restrictions were voted on by the residents of .Harvey Hillsides,. approved/passed, and subsequently filed in the, Deed Records of Brazos County, .:Texas. " As you know; during the discussions leading to the final Deed Restrictions, the utilization of lot 42, Block 1, was discussed at length by the Neighborhood ..Deed Restriction''Committee as Mr: Mark Dudley had requested approval to use his property for commercial development.. It was decided at'that time that the property would remain zoned A-0 Agriculture Open, and again approval 'of the Deed Restrictions which include this_ information were subsequently voted on and approved by residents of Harvey Hillsides.. It is indeed very concerning to me .that our residents here at Harvey Hillsides .can spend so much time .and effort developing. deed restrictions that were overwhelmingly ;approved by the residents (58.3% approved, 7.4% disapproved, 34% not voting), and now it appears our efforts and desires are being ignored. I do not understand the legal aspects of this request, however_ if this rezoning .request is .approved, and it is legal, then what is to keep the City of College Station from rezoning a number of other properties in our community regardless ofthe wishes of the residents? This seems to me a blatant disregard for our deed restrictions, which makes me wonder what the value is of having deed restrictions if the City can ignore them and do as they please without approval of the residents. In closing,. I :want to again communicate to you, and anyone else you would..like to share this letter with, that I am completely. opposed to rezoning 4004. Harvey Road- from A-O Agricultural Open to C-B Business Commercial. As outlined above, the majority of Harvey Hillsides residents do not want this change and neither do I. Please do not hesitate to contact me if there is anything further I can do to .support your efforts against rezoning. Sincerely Yours, -- ~. Mark Wes usin 16 Ranch ro Rd. College Station, TX 77845 HARVEY HILLSIDES ADDITIQN November 1,1999 To: City of College Station Planning. Division° Re: Rezoning request for 4004 Harvey Road We, the: undersigned, live in Harvey Hillsides Addition; some of us reside within the City of College Station, and others reside in the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of College Station. We request that the City of College Station deny the`above referenced .rezoning request from A-U to C-B, inasmuch as the property adjoins directly on to single family residences. Thank you very much for your considerations of this important matter. ,~~, .___~__ a. ~~-~~ :~~~,~ d- ~~ . ~~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~ i~~~ ~~ ~ 33 r„ ~ ,...., ! , . _,~ i ,., r ~~~~ ~i~ Jay C. Drgac 3 Vista Lane College Station, Texas 77845 {409) 567-3690 HM (409) 567-4621 WK November O1, 1999 ..Ron Kaiser The City of College Station Dept., of Planning c!o Deborah Charzone 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Tx' 77842 __ _ _ __ __ Dear Mr Kaiser, My wife Leanne'and I along with our three children, Colbert (10), Erin (8); and Leisa (2), are about to move into our new home of 3 Vista Lane in the Harvey Hillside Subdivision. We have been working on this new home for .two years and have made a considerable investment into it. You and the other members: of the Planning and Zoning Committee will be considering an issue which will strongly impact our future. Your committee will be holding a public hearing on Thursday, November 4, o consider a request to rezone a parcel of land located at 4004 Harvey Road from A-0 to GB. There are several reasons why we chose to sell our house in the Copperfield subdivision and move to the Iarvey Hillside addition. We liked the quiet, secluded country atmosphere of the area. Being the parents of three small children, we liked the idea of there being less traffic in our neighborhood. We wantedto raise our children in a safe area where they can go outside and enjoy their surroundings. This will all change if a parking lot is built-across the street from us. I always suspected that there would be commercial development along Harvey Road, but I do not agree with the rezoning of the. property outlined in the proposal comming before your committee. There is absolutely no justification for rezoning the entire lot from the corner of Hwy 30 along Pamela Lane to the corner of Pamela Ln and Vista Lane. The. commercial property should be contained along the Hwy 30 corridor and stay away from .the. streets contained in the Harvey Hillside Addition. While I am not totally against the commercial development along Hwy 30, I do question theproposed business which this entire rezoning request`is about. I am under the understanding that the business which will be built is a new Koppe Bridge Bar & Grill. Everyone I have mentioned this to has commented that I will have a BEER JOINT in my front yard. The Harvey Hillside Subdivision has a lot of children residing in it and this has to be a safety concern. The other main reason I have to oppose this rezoning request is the fact that I believe it will greatly decrease my property value. I am 38 years old and have invested almost everything I have into my new home, I cannot afford to start: over again. somewhere else, I'm here for the long haul. You should be getting. letters from many of my new friends iu Harvey Hillside, please consider what we all have to say as this will impact our everyday lives greatly. Sincerely, :Jay C. Drgac ~i ~ G ~~~j Jay C. Drgac 3 vista Lane College Station, Texas 77845. (409)-567-3690 HM (409) 567-4621 WK November O1, 1999 on~~fsef" ~~~- ~~11-.11'.~ The City of College Station Dept. of Planning c% Deborah Charzone 1101 Texas Avenue :College Station, Tx 77842 Dear.IVlr Kaiser, My wife Leanne-and I along with our-three children, Colbert (10), Erin (8);-and Leisa (2), are aboufto move into our new home at 3 Vista Lane in the Harvey Hillside Subdivision. We have been working on this new home for two years and have made a considerable investment into it.: You and: the other members of the Planning and Zoning Committee will be considering an issue which will strongly impact our future.. Your committee will`be holding a public hearing on Thursday, November 4, to consider a request to rezone. a parcel of land located at 4004 'Harvey Road from A-O to C-B. There are several reasons why we chose to sell our house in the Copperfield subdivision and move to the Harvey Hillside addition. We liked the quiet, secluded country atmosphere of the area.. ,Being the parents of three small children, we liked the idea of there being less traffic in our neighborhood. We 'wanted'to raise our children in a safe area where they can go outside and enjoy their surroundings. This will all ;change if a parking lot is built across the street. from us. I always suspected that there would be commercial development along Harvey Road, but I do not agree with the :rezoning of the property-outlined in the proposal comming -before your committee. There is absolutely no justification for rezoning the entire lot from the corner of Hwy 30 along Pamela Lane to the corner of Pamela Ln 'and Vista Lane. The commercial property should be contained along the Hwy 30 corridor and stay away from the streets contained in the Harvey..Hillside Addition. While I am not totally against the commercial development ',along Hwy 30, I do question the proposed business which this entire rezoning request is about. I am under the understanding that the business which will be built is a new Koppe Bridge Bar & Grill. Everyone I have .mentioned this to has commented that I wilt have a BEER JOINT in. my front yard. The Harvey Hillside ,Subdivision has a lotofchiidren residing. in it and this has to be a safety concern. The other main reason I have to oppose this rezoning request is the fact that d believe it will greatly decrease my property value. I am 38 years old and have invested almost everything I have. into my new home, I cannot afford to start over again somewhere else, I'm here for the long haul. You should be getting letters from many of my new friends in Harvey Hillside, please consider what we all have to say as this will impact our. everyday lives greatly.. ~~t ~-~` '~ 15 Ranchero Road College Station Texas 77845-9405 3 November 1999 Mr: Walter Hoke 37 Pamela Lane College Station, Texas 77845 Dear Walter, Thank you for your memo, received 1 November 1999, advising us of the proposed rezoning of 40D4 Harvey Road from A-0 to C-B and the subsequent construction of a business serving food .and. alcoholic beverages: We arse strongl~i opposed to this proposed action for. many reasons among which are• - tie establishment of an alcohol-serving facility adjacent and/or in close proximity to an established, strictly residential neighborhood, - the direct conflict which would exist between the late-night operating hours of a bar and grill and the "quiet hours".expected and now enjoyed by home. owners, - the decrease in-property values which can be expected by .the infusion of businesses not compatiable with the surrounding residences, - a degredation of the potential for a beautiful "east entrance .corridor'." to College Station, - the: increase in traffic when the new sports complex and the construction east of the Furrow lumber yard become a reality, - the latitude in the variety of establishments permitted by zoning C-B, and - the seeming indifference of College Station officials by (1) failing to notify all property owners within 200 feet of the affected tracts, except those within the College Station city limits, and (2) by apparently ignoring the newly approved deed restrictions of .the Harvey Hillsides addition. It is .recommended than - the proposed change in zoning for 4004 Harvey Road be disapproved, - plans for the "east entrance corridor" to College Station be studied. and publicized, - a determination be made of zoning categories .which would be compatible with the Harvey Hillsides addition and the "east entrance corridor," and-that efforts be undertaken to appropriately rezone all properties along Harvey Road which are contiguous with Harvey Hillsides, and - College Station officials hereafter promptly notify all property owners within 200 .feet. of any property considered for rezoning or other activities affecting those property owners. .~ We look forward to `working with you and other members of our community to maintain it with. the same quality of life which existed when we decided to invest in and build on our ,properties. Sincerely, John R. Vilas Gt/. (~ .GCCG4 can W. Vilas -Lots 15 and 17 Ranchero Road r 's a ~~ i p ,. 'I', ~~ III ~~ ICI I, ~I r d Donald. Austi~.FASLA Landscape Architect November 4, 1999 Planning and Zoning Commission City of College .Station College station, Texas To Whom it may concern: Pursuant to the present zoning .change request for the former Jose's restaurant site together with ad,Jacent parcels fronting Harvey Road (Hwy 30), I wish to offer the :following remarks: 1. The corridor of Hwy 30 from Hwy rn to the infiersection of Fm 158 is one of the few remaining entrances to the Glty of College Station .with a landscape not characterized by urban hardscape and/or strip commercial.. This corridor. warrants special planning.. and design. considerations which the present General Plan has (efi somewhat undefined and.: ambiguous. I recommend. this corridor be set aside as a Special Treatment District, planned in concert with local citizen input, and assisted in Its future change through a more restrictive zoning ordinance. designed to support this particular District alone. 2. The former restaurant was a very .compatible use, fn relation to the neighborhood--at least by the character of its operation. The La Selva nursery, rent house and future Farm Bureau office. are .also quite compatible. Future activity allowed by present zoning districts may, however, allow uses detrimental to the neighborhood.'While the residential area has some separation from coirmmerclal activity by virtue of a drainage. way and tree cover, the R.M. Dudley parcel bounded by Hwy 30, Pamela Lane and Vista Lane does not possess such separation opportunities. Access from Hwy 30 to this parcel would present serious traffic concerns as the drive connections would be too close to Pamela Lane. Pamela Lane should never be considered for such access. This would change the nice entrance to Harvey Hillsides to an uncharacteristic Scale and intensity. 409.776.8466.. 48 Pamela Lane .College Station .Texas .77845 / ~r~ Pamela Lane. presently has only 15' of pavement in a 50' right-af-way of Gour~ty ownership.. 3. Any granting of zoning in #his area would at the present contitute spot zoning. The Planned Development District could act as a tool to effect General Plan Intent, goals and ob,Jectives when. such is clarified. For the moment, however, the District does not appear to have sufilcient safeguards to serve this carrfdor and the Harvey Hillsides neighborhood. Commercial activity, well defined and regulated (bad word), can be a very good neighbor. A realistic zone for such activity would occur between Pamela Lane and Laura Lane. The most Important consideration ~ 1 should be its character and Intensity of activity. ~ If the. right and sensitive kind of homework is done, the end result would ~' certainly be rewarding for all Interested parties. ~, ', Respectfully submitted, • '~ - ~! ~~ Donald Austin ~! II; i 'I INFRASTRUCTURE AND FACILITIES Water: An 8" waterline exists in Highway 30 across the frontage of much of the property fronting .that road. Development of .the five acre tract on the corner may require water nine extensions in the future. Sewer: A 15" sewerline exists through all tracts. If the corner tract is subdivided, sewer extensions may be required. Streets:.. The subject property has frontage along Highway 30, Pamela Lane, and Vista Lane. Highway 30 is classified as a major collector; Pamela and Vista are local residential streets. Off-site Easements: None at this time. May be required as part of site plan approval. Drainage: Compliance with drainage ordinance requirements will be .applied at the time of site plan (existing impervious cover is exempt from requirements). Flood Plain: None in this area. Oversize request: Impact Fees: None in this area Parkland: Not required for commercial developments Sidewalks: Typically required with site development; requirement waived if street frontage has open ditch sections NOTIFICATION: Legal Notice Publication(s):. The Eagle; 10-20-99 and 11-24-99 Advertised Commission Hearing Dates(s): 11-4-99 Advertised Council Hearing Dates: 12-9-99 Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners Within 200': 8 Response Received: Three inquiries as of 10-28-99 J`\PZTEXT\PZ02134.DOC ---- ~.;_ Harvey Hillsides. Addition December 7, 1999 To: City of College Station Planning Division Re: Rezoning Request for Property. at the Corner of Harvey Road and Pamela Lane We, the undersigned, live in Harvey Hillsides Addition; some of us reside within the City of College Station, and others. reside in the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City of College Station. We request that the City of College remove our names from the previous petition, dated November 1, 1999, requesting denial of the above referenced rezo ~g rest fro~m~A`~O to C-B. ~~/ ~~ C~~~<~ C ~ Q.eto(1~ J~-LOV'~ ry~, f/ ~' Harvey Hillsides Addition ~~ December 7, 1999 To: City of College Station Planning Division ;. Re; Rezoning Request for Property at the ..Corner of Harvey-. Road and Pamela Lane . We, the. undersigned,. life in Harvey I~illsides Addition; .some of us reside within. the City of College Station, and others reside in the _ extt~aterritoral jurisdficton of the City of .College. Station. We request that the City of College remove our .names from. the previous petition,. dated November,,1, I'999, requesting denial af, the above referenced rezoning request from A-0 to C-B~ .~ ~a~ ~~~~ q9 ~~ - f __- ~. - - - -. ~_._ .. ~'` _ ~ __ - -~ __ ~~fs _ __ __ . _ _. i { __ _- _ _. _. -- - _ ~ A ~ 2 -~:-___ _.__ _._.__ ORDINANCE NO. FILE COPY 99ia3 AN ORDINANCE REZONING ONE TRACT -0F LAND TOTALING 1.711 ACRES, BEING SITUATED 1N THE MARIA KEGANS LEAGUE, ABSTRACT NO. 28, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That the City of College Station Zoning Ordinance #1638, more specifically the Official Zoning Map, be amended as set out in Exhibits "A", "B", "C", "D", and `B" attached hereto and made apart of this ordinance for all purposes. PART 2: That if any provisions of any section ofthis ordinance shall be held to be void or unconstitutional, such holding shall in no way effect .the validity of the remaining provisions or sections of his ordinance, which shall- remain in full force and effect. PART 3: That any person, .firm or corporation violating any of the provisions of this chapter shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon. conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not less. than Twenty-five dollars. ($25..00) nor more than Two Thousand Dollars. ($2000.00). Each day such violation shall. continue or be permitted to continue, shall be deemed a separate offense. Said Ordinance, being a penal ordinance, becomes effective ten (10) days after. its date of passage by the City Council, as provided. by Section 35 of the Charter of the City of College Station. PASSED,. ADOPTED and APPROVED this 14t" Day of December 2000. ATTEST: Connie Hooks, City Secretary APPROVED: Lynn McIlhaney, Mayor Harvey C ~ 7r., C' ey ORDINANCE NO. EXHIBIT "A" PAGE 2 OF 7 That the Official Zoning. Map of the City of College Station, and part of Zoning Ordinance #1638, is hereby amended as follows: The following property is rezoned .from A-0 Agricultural-Open to PDD-B Planned Development for Business. 1.711 acres being situated in .the Maria Kegans League, Abstract No. 28, College Station, Brazos County, Texas. Said tract being a portion of Block 4, Harvey Hillsides, according to the Master Plat of Harvey Hillsides, recorded in Volume 264; Page 484 of the Deed Records of Brazos County, Texas and being the same tract of land Called 1.707 acre as described by a deed to Syed Hyder, recorded in Volume 2105, Page 250, of the Official Public Records of Brazos County, Texas. Said tract being more particularly described by-metes and bounds in the attached Exhibit "B" and shown graphically in Exhibit "E". Purpose: This district is designed to allow a restaurant use. CB Business Commercial Zoning district requirements shall be applicable except as specifically modified in the attached standards and concept plan, Exhibits C and D. \\CHl NE1'WARE\VOLI\GROUP\DEVE_SER\Rezoning Ordinances\2000\Koppe Bridge Ordinance, 00-217.doc ORDINANCE NO. EXHIBIT "B" METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION OF A 1.711. ACRE TRACT PORTION BLOCK 4 HARVEY HILLSIDES MARIA KEGANS LEAGUE,. A-28 COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS PAGE 3 OF 7~ ~1- METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION OF ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT OR PARCEL OFLAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE MARIA KEGANS LEAGUE, ABSTRACT NO. 28, COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS. SAID TRACT BEING A PORTION OF BLOCK 4, HARVEY HILLSIDES, ACCORDING TO THE MASTER PLAT OF HARVEY HILLSIDES, RECORDED IN VOLUME 264, PAGE 484 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING THE SAME TRACT OF LAND CALLED 1.707 ACRE AS DESCRIBED BY A DEED. TO SYED HYDER RECORDED IN VOLUME 2105, PAGE 250 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS. SAID TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS: BEGIlVNING AT A S/8 INCH IRON ROD FOUND ON THE SOUTHEAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY N0.30 (120' R.O.W.) MARKING THE COMMON CORNER OF SAID 1.707 ACRE TRACT AND A CALLED TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED BY A DEED TO MARK DUDLEY RECORDED IN VOLUME 2508, PAGE 230 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS:OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID DUDLEY TRACT ALSO BEING KNOWN AS LOTS 42 AND 43, BLOCK 1, HARVEY`HILLSIDES, ACCORDING. TO THE PLAT OF BLOCK 1, HARVEY HILLSIDES, RECORDED IN VOLUME 263, PAGE 485 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS; THENCE: S 49°51' 00" E'ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID 1..707 ACRE TRACT AND SAID DUDLEY TRACT FOR A DISTANCE OF 247.40 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD FOUND MARI{Il~tG THE COMMON CORNER OF SAID 1.707 ACRE TRACT AND A CALLED 3.329 ACRE TRACT AS DESCRIBED BY A DEED TO MARY D. ALLEN RECORDED IN VOLUME 2338, PAGE 322 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID 3.329 ACRE TRACT BEING. A PORTION OF SAID BLOCK 4 AND ALL OF LOT 2, BLOCK 2, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF BLOCK 2, HARVEY HILLSIDES, RECORDED IN VOLUME 263, PAGE 487 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, FOR REFERENCE A 2 INCH IRON PIPE FOUND ON THE NORTHWEST LINE OF VISTA LANE (50' R.O.W.) MARKING THE COMMON CORNER OF SAID LOT 42, BLOCK 1 AND SAID 3.3?9 ACRE TRACT BEARS; S 49°51' QO" E FORA DISTANCE OF 541.47 FEET (THIS LINE WAS USED FOR BEARING ORIENTATION HONORING THE PLAT CALL BEARING OF HARVEY HILLSIDES, 263/485, 263/487 AND MASTER. PLAT 264/484); ~~ ~ 1: 99-355 ~'n~ j~ H I B I T ~- '~s_.. h.~ ~ ORDINANCE NO. EXHIBIT "B" PAGE 4 OF 7 ...THENCE: S 45 ° 03' 00" W THROUGH SAID. BLOCK 4 AND ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID 1.707 ACRE TRACT AND SAID 3.329 ACRE TRACT FOR A DISTANCE OF 312.70 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD FOUND ON THE NORTHEAST LINE OF A CALLED 0.97 ACRE TRACT AS DESCRIBED BY A DEED TO OSCAR PARULIAN AND WIFE, SWANY PARULIAN RECORDED IN VOLUME 2367, PAGE 253 OF .THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID IRON ROD FOUND MARKING A COMMON CORNER OF SAID. 1.707 ACRE TRACT AND SAID 3.329 ACRE TRACT; THENCE: N 45 ° 03' 00" W COrf7ClNUING THROUGH SAID BLOCK 4 AND ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID 1.707 ACRE TRACT AND SAID 0.97 ACRE TRACT FORA DISTANCE OF 246.50 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD FOUND ON THE SOUTHEAST LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY NO.30 MARKING THE COMMON CORNER OF SAID 1.707 ACRE j. TRACT AND. SAID 0.97 ACRE TRACT, FOR. REFERENCE A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND ~, ON THE SOUT~IEAST LINE. OF STATE HIGHWAY N0.30 D~,ARKING THE WEST CORNER OF SAID 0.97 ACRE TRACT BEARS: S 45 ° 03' 00" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 110.00 FEET; THENCE: N 45° 03' 00" E ALONG THE SOUTHEAST LINE`OF STATE HIGHWAY N0.30 .FOR A DISTANCE OF 292.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING CONTAINING-1.711 ACRES OF LAND MORE OR LESS AS SURVEYED ON THE GROUND MARCH, 1999. FOR MORE DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION SEE PLAT PREPARED MARCH, 1999. BRAD KERR REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR No. 4502 D:\work\99-355.mab of ..~ ~ s r7 f ~~•~, ~~ F^l ~o'; v ERAO KERB . ',~ .............................I , t_ 45f?2 c~ : ~. ~'~ ~soF o :' v ~~ M ~. ~.~.. ~ ~ a. ~ \ b ~ g~.~. ~~ ~ ~ x ~ ~~~ ~ .~ ~ t~D o ' ~ c ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~.$~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~XFNSIT I ~ ._ viz ORDINANCE NO. EXHIBIT "D" PAGE 6 OF 7 Attachment A - Koppe Bridge Summary of Proposed Zoning District. Requirements Zoning District C-B, Commercial. Business, restrictions and regulations will .apply for any regulations not expressly modified by the following Planned Development District guidelines. Permitted Uses: Restaurant. Building Height: The building height will be a maximum of 35 feet Setbacks:. The setbacks shall be no less than those set forth by City of College Station ordinances for property in zoning District CB. Buffer Area: A natural vegetation buffer of 40 .feet wide shall be maintained in its present condition on the. south side of the property, (see Concept Plan) between the building and the residential neighborhood to the south (subject only to the provisions for parking set forth below). Parking: The parking shall be as set forth on the Concept Plan. The Concept Plan also sets forth an area for possible future development of parking spaces. Owner would also be entitled. to construct parking in the buffer area, but only if and at such time as Highway. 30 is widened, which widening deletes parking on the north side of the property as set out on the Concept Plan. Any parking space constructed in the future will' meet City of College Station requirements. Access: Access shall be from State Highway 30 with two planned entrances. Building Elevations: See Concept Plan. Square Footage: See Concept Plan Noise: The sound level shall be maintained at such level as not to exceed the City of College Station ordinances pertaining to noise/sound. A separate volume control will be installed for control of exterior speakers. Light: Lighting in the parking lots and on the sides of the proposed building will be constructed and situated in a manner so that it is not directed toward the residential neighborhood to the south. Exterior lighting in the rear will be limited to residential type security lighting and landscape lighting. ORDINANCE NO. EXHIBIT "E" PAGE 7 OF 7 ~a nr»w o-~ --oz i' /~~ b~ 3 ~~~ v z °~ zo d n ~,, ~ e~ ~ .~-. w tiA_ po 2 ~ 'PO ~-3 I X ~ ~ ~ CO , O °° l~~,G` F Z q~. ~ .oti~ O ~ a q~c,,y~ y ~ -n N .~ n ° o h, ~ ~ ~ ,~,` a ~ o_ w j x0 ~, '<€x ~` Z <g~ f~ ;: ~ `" ~ .0 ~`.x°" ;d ~ '"' _ i d C~ . ~ a ~ ti b ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~V/~U ~ ~ v `~ O 47 0 ~• ~ ~ Jo u a w F ~ r ~ F ti r, ~~o ~ ~ m ST9~ H 90 e ~ /yu ti y~ ~ ~• ~ O C~~ ~~~ ti 4~~ nO~~ a S ,J ti ~ ~ m ~ ~i [~ tr~'~ w ~ti I U ' _ b Q '^ ~ ~ W a ~ • T ~ ~\ W o v ~ e 53Nd' N~ ~ ~ ° Dy I I I ~~ ~ ,1 i ~OC1 j i ~~ _~ ,r ~~t-123 ORDINANCE NO. ~~,~ ~° pV~~~ D.1 ~~ 211 ~~ ~yl.• ~ .~ DD AN ORDINANCE REZONING 'fW0 TRACTS OF LAND TOTALING 8.03 ACRES, TRACT ONE BEING 4.71 ACRES AND TRACT TWO BEING 3.32 ACRES, LOCATED IN BLOCKS ONE AND FOUR OF THE HARVEY HILLSIDES ADDITION, COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY,. TEXAS. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY CtJUNCIL OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS: PART 1: That the City of College Station Zoning Ordinance #1638, more specifically the Official Zoning Map, be amended as set out in Exhibits "A", `B", "C" and "D" attached hereto and made a part of this ordinance for all purposes. PART 2: That if any provisions of any section of this ordinance shall be held to be void or unconstitutional, such holding shall in no way effect the validity of the remaining provisions or sections of this ordinance, which shall remain in full force and effect. PART 3: That any person, firm or corporation violating any of the provisions of this chapter shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor, .and upon conviction thereof shall be punishable by a fine of not less than Twenty-five dollars ($25.00) nor more than Two ~ Thousand Dollars ($2000.00).. Each day such. violation shall continue or be permitted to continue, .shall be deemed a separate offense. Said Ordinance, being. a penal y ordinance, becomes effective not less than ten (10) from the .date of it's passage by the City Council, as provided by Section 35 of the' Charter of the City of College Station. PASSED, ADOPTED and APPROVED this 9th day of December, 1999. ATTEST: Connie Hooks, City Secretary Lynn McIlhaney, Mayor APPROVED: Harvey Cargill 7r., City Attorney i ORDINANCE NO. EXHIBIT "A" PAGE 2 OF 5 That the Official Zoning. Map of the City of College Station, and part of Zoning Ordinance #1638, is hereby amended as follows: The following tracts are rezoned -from A-O Agricultural Open to C-B Business Commercial and A-OX E~sting Rural Residential: A 4.71 acre tract rezoned to C B Business Commercial and a 3.32 acre tract rezoned to A-OX Existing Rural Residential, both tracts described by metes and bounds in the attached Exhibits `B"and "C"and shown graphically in Exhibit "D". J __ __ _ _ ~r .a. -7- O1fiDINANCE NO. EXHIBIT "B" PAGE 3 OF 5 ' METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION __ OF A ~ 1.711 ACRE TRACT ~ PORTION BLOCK 4 HARVEY HILLSIDES MARIA KEGANS LEAGUE, A-28 COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION OF ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING SITUATED IN THE MARIA KEGANS LEAGUE, ABSTRACT NO. 28, COLLEGE STATION,. BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS. SAID TRACT BEING A PORTION OF BLOCK 4, HARVEY HILLSIDES, ACCORDING'TO THE MASTER PLAT OF HARVEY HILLSIDES, RECORDED IN VOLUME 264, PAGE 484 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING THE SAME TRACT OF LAND CALLED 1.707 ACRE AS DESCRIBED`BY A DEED TO SPED HYDER RECORDED IN VOLUME 2105, PAGE 250 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS. SAID TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY METES AND BOUNDS AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD FOUND ON THE SOUTHEAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY N0. 30 (120' R.O.W.) MARICING THE COMMON CORNER OF SAID 1.707 ACRE TRACT AND A CALLED TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED BY A DEED TO MARK DUDLEYRECORDED IN VOLUME 2508, PAGE 230 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID DUDLEY TRACT ALSO BEING KNOWN AS LOTS 42 AND 43, BLOCK 1, HARVEY HILLSIDES, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF BLOCK 1, HARVEY HILLSIDES, RECORDED IN VOLUME 263, PAGE 485 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS; THENCE: S 49°51' 00" E ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID 1..707 ACRE TRACT AND SAID DUDLEY TRACT FOR A DISTANCE OF 247.40 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD FOUND MARKING THE COMMON CORNER OF SAID 1.707 ACRE TRACT AND. A CALLED 3.329 ACRE TRACT AS DESCRIBED BY A DEED TO MARY D. ALLEN RECORDED IN VOLUME 233.8, PAGE 322 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID 3.329 ACRE TRACT BEING A PORTION OF SAID BLOCK 4 AND ALL OF LOT 2, BLOCK 2, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF BLOCK 2, HARVEY HILLSIDES, RECORDED IN VOLUME 263, PAGE 487 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, FOR REFERENCE A 2 INCH IRON PIPE FOUND ON THE NORTHWEST LINE OF VISTA LANE (50' R.O.W.) MARKING THE COMMON CORNER OF SAID. LOT 42, BLOCK 1 AND SAID 3.329 ACRE TRACT BEARSs S 49°51' 00" E FOR A DISTANCE OF 541.47 FEET{THIS LINE WAS. USED FOR BEARING ORIENTATION HONORING THE PLAT CALL BEARING OF HARVEY HILLSIDES, 263/485; 263/487 AND MASTER. PLAT 264/484); 99-355 PG d =° • N ~,~ ~:~HIBIT `: ____~_. ,~ r ~~ ....... .. .... r ORDINANCE NO. EXIiIBIT "B" PAGE 4 OF 5 THENCE: S 45° 03' 00" W THROUGH SAID BLOCK 4 AND ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID 1,707 ACRE TRACT AND SAID 3.329 ACRE TRACT FOR A DISTANCE OF 312.70 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD FOUND ON THE NORTHEAST LINE OF A CALLED 0.97 ACRE TRACT AS DESCR[BED BY A DEED TO OSCAR PARULIAN AND WIFE, SWANY PARULIAN RECORDED IN VOLUME 2367, PAGE 253. OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS, SAID IRON. ROD FOUND MARKING A COMMON CORNER OF SAID 1.707 ACRE TRACT AND SAID 3.329 ACRE TRACT; THENCE: N 45 ° 03' 00" W CONTINUING THROUGH SAID BLOCK 4 AND ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SAID 1.707 ACRE TRACT AND SAID 0.97 ACRE TRACT FORA DISTANCE OF 246.50 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD FOUND ON THE SOUTHEAST LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 30 MARKING THE COMMON CORNER OF SAID 1.707 ACRE ~. TRACT AND SAID 0.97 ACRE TRACT, FOR REFERENCE A 1/2 INCH IRON ROD FOUND ~, ON THE SOUTHEAST LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY NO.30 MARI{ING THE WEST CORNER OF SAID 0.97 ACRE TRACT BEARS:.: S 45°03' 0~0" W FOR A DISTANCE OF 110.00 FEET; THENCE: N 45° 03'.00" E ALONG THE SOUTHEAST LINE OF STATE HIGHWAY N0.30 FOR A DISTANCE OF 292.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING CONTAINING 1.711 ACRES OF LAND MORE OR LESS AS SURVEYED ON THE GROUND MARCH, 1999. FOR MORE DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION SEE PLAT PREPARED MARCH, 1999. BRAD KERR ~Q F~~ REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ~~'~ ~•ti s 7F'••:~+ LAND SURVEYOR No. 4502 `'~ ~ ...I.M••...N.iM ~~~G~F.AO KERft D:\work\99-355.mab `'~.y,;•v.FS~~~ ';w ~,~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ Z c ~ ~c ~ _ ~N ~ ~ . M"- W /~ ~+ ~ Z M f ..r.~ ~ • V ~ ~ ~ 4 •. ~+ t6 ~ ~ ` ~ ~•~ ~ Y Y g~ ~ VV S :y#~d~IT .~ z ~_~ ~- ' EXHIBIT "C" PAGE ~ OF 5 ~ ~ z°m xei ~ :x. U a F w _..•~ __„o5ft0 0 . ~ ^ ~ h / ~ ~ ~ ! ~ -^ ()f~nJl t ~. ~ n b a ` ~ h' ~ ~ .~ M -•D~ ~ ~ ' ~ ' ` b n N v v H ~ Q ~~ ~C1' aV ~S`~/ h U ¢~P ~ ~ ~ ~~~y o~ / J aV : b ~ q N b ~ O /] [~ ~~( JJ~ ~ ~, 3 ~s N °b N ~ 0~ a N '~o, ~~ ~ [~ x h ' ""i ~/ ` ao ~ ~ ii '~~'Gf` ~ $~ ~• o a ~ ~ n ~ h ` o, ~ ~ ' ^"?~ `~ M~ ~ ~ • - o Q ~~~fi ~:-.: a Z ~ "-~~ - x p • - ' M ~~ ` H ~ ~ ~ o W . ~ Se Q ~ ~.-~, 0 `~J~ Z ~b ~ S ~ ~ X Q' Oy F ~ O ~' a U] ~ q^ . .. ~ mA ~~ ~' ~ ~ ~ z ~~ w z ~ oz .., A~ ~ ~a i ~o....o .,~<~~, ~, G~~ ~ ~/ illillillllllilllllllll illi!l1111111111111111f~'11 Gra~a'~Gl`~~ :1~~~'JSJ ~rr:af~~~~J Motivation for Development Eight years ago I started a construction company. Initially, I worked out of my house and subsequently grew to a point that we needed and could afford to build an office warehouse complex. We purchased 3.3 Acres on Highway 30 at the entry to Rainbow Acres and built a 7,500 SF, facility, please see photographs behind tab 8. The lot was a reserve tract for commercial use. Initially, we encountered some resistance to our locating at the Entry to Rainbow Acres, however, over the past five years I have had several people that reside in the neighborhood tell me that we are an asset to the neighborhood. Subsequently, Robinson Plumbing and Accurate Machine Works located their businesses on the remaining reserve tracts without any resistance. I think that fear of the unknown was the main ingredient for the opposition encountered in Rainbow Acres as it is for the residence of Harvey Hillsides. I hope that in our presentation to the Council that we can put these fears to rest. My firm is a Commercial General Contracting firm. We work primarily within a 60 mile radius of Bryan/College Station. Some of our current or recently completed projects consist of the Remodel of the Brazos County Courthouse, construction of the Falls County Jail (4 million), a sewage treatment plant in New Caney, a water treatment plant in Marlin, a school in Caldwell, a 40,000 SF addition to O. I. Analytical, a 20,000 SF addition to Dynacon and additions to Parking Lot `50 at Texas A&M (1 million). We have had significant growth over our eight years, winning a Newman 10 award for three consecutive years, equaling the most by any organization. Last year our volume was in excess of eight million and we project that this year will exceed 10 million. We have an average of 40 employees on the payroll. Our current facility, that I thought would be an excessively large Office/Warehouse complex, has been filled to capacity. What used to be our Conference room is now occupied by our Accounting Staff, so it is time to project for our future growth. We are separating our warehouse operations from our office operations, having recently contracted to purchase 36 Acres nearby for the warehousing and staging of equipment. We feel that our current facility can easily be leased and thereby allowing us the opportunity to construct a more professional looking office complex. We are professional and we are high tech.' Every person in our office staff is a college graduate, some with multiple degrees. Every desk has a computer on it. It is our desire to become the Premier General Contractor of our region. Too often, I hear that there is not a Contractor in the Brazos Valley to handle the really large projects, such as the College Station Convention and Conference Center. Therefore, out of town contractors are hired to handle these projects, many times on a negotiated basis. By permitting us to build this facility you will allow us to take a large step forward to meeting that goal. I think it is a goal that will benefit not only our organization, but the City of College Station as well. lDevelopment Parameters Lot Size: 87,120 SF Building Size: 18,000 SF Site Improvements 50,000 SF Lj Landscaped: 19,120 SF Conceptual Design Strategies 1. Access off of Harvey Road 2. An "L" Shaped Building, Protecting Pamela Lane and Harvey Hillsides from Viewing the Service Entrance. 3. Parking along Harvey Road and the South Side of the Property, Protecting Pamela Lane and Harvey Hillsides from Viewing the Cars. 4. A Buffer Zone, with Dense Vegetation along Pamela Lane and the East Side of the Property. 5. Site Detention Facility Located to the East to Coincide with Small Creek that Exists in the Area. 6. Fagade to make Impact on Passers by. PAMELA LANE Conceptual Site Plan Conceptual Elevation Ties to the Neighborhood My family moved to the Brazos Valley in 1966, when I was six years old. Our house was located in Harvey Hillsides, on Harvey Road, see the attached Plat Plan. This property is now owned by Covenant Family Church. I lived there until I went to College After graduating from Texas A&M, with a degree in Construction Science, I lived and worked in Houston. The company I worked for contracted to build a prison in Huntsville and knowing that I was from the area and wanted to get back there, they gave me the prof ect to manage. My wife and I looked all over Bryan/College Station for the best place to build our house and raise our children. We couldn't find any place better than Harvey Hillsides. We built a 3,600 SF house on two acres, see attached pictures. Our residence abuts the property that's up for rezoning. It's been 13 years since we built our house. Today, we have three children, see attached picture, and we think our neighborhood is still the best in Bryan/College Station. My wife and I plan to build a new house some day on the upper portion of the lot in question. In my opinion, the neighborhood could not have a better person owning and developing the lot at the corner of Pamela and Harvey Road because I have so much at stake within the neighborhood. 'now ~n r !-1 Li r41 i r~l Li LIAM - - - - - - 1- - E,7-73 y i • ~ ~ 6#a III ~ ~ r ~~.:~s ¢ & tl ~ ' Fv ~ A ~ f n ~ ~ ~ ~ ac ~ ' . a a . ~ .,c ' ` ~by0. e w:,.~` g ~ ^ ` . `9.~y~," s~+ `t f V ,,.sue rx~ 9^, 4Yy.u- ~c~. ~ ' e... c, :,fit ~i ~ y~ w F ~ 8 4 °,aq s " f „ • y S i QA ~ ~ y JP"~ i6 `9- , E Y ~ ,ems .z t?8r.. t N'i1 ~ if.~Sm - .e ~~~^,i .y m~' - - L n . . o .JT~ta c . ' i c ~ i d cA ,1, v a s:, ~ s ~ . ~ 'a..,. 7 I ~ a.1: G. ~ ~ t~~ J K~ i i . cab ` ~ a c d.. £ , „ ~ ~ ~ ~y ~ _ ~ ~ . £ xfl ~ P r m ~ § , - 5} _ 3~ i1"` n t ~ ~ Y y n.L Y e a F µ a k+ N vy _ "041 6 5 L- _ .,j o ,Al. t, s s P Arl a, ~ ~ , ~~ ,, ,;~ ~ w.. r ~,~ , ~° ~~ ~ c rt~ F ~~ ~ ~+ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~~ u ~ .~~. ~ ~ ~' ~t ? ~~' ~'` ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ F x , gym. ~¢ ~ a ~ ~ ~' ~ ,; ~ ~,a ~~ . z. ~ ~~' 8 ~ ,~ ~p 4 m a <~~ ~~ , m. p~ ~ § i ~ ~~ 1 ~ d ~i & ,h{~.,. , ~' : `~ Fh Jam s; ~ 1 ti 5 ~ R s,. R ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~` T! w .~! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ry5 ` 4 ~ '^am ~„ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~: ,.g"~ ~w# > 3 ~ ~ `~ ~~. ~.wq a a ~' ,~, ~ ~~ „ ~,.~, r ~ ~ g ' a ~ ,g ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ Ft ^" ~ ~ v ~ 1 ~4.` ~ ~ a ~' ~ ~ ~ . .~ . ., -c. ~~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ "3 e, ,' H . a ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E °A & ~ ~~ y ' ~ ~ , F ~ (P ai ~ i ~ i ~~ ~},1 a ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ ° ,. ^a. 4R~~~~ .. .~ .. .awn ,~'~~i'f e ~,' v'~' , a4 ~o'~ a ~~t. =~s ~; ~~~ r , ~^~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~5, s. ~ ,. r~ ,I ~_J is ~u _. 6, ~~__~ I~~ i_ f ~U ~_~ ~~ r-? z O O z o~ ~~ U O ~ Q ~ J zw OU U I~ w W ~ ~~ ~ W ~~ ~~ •U .~~ '. ~.. ~~ ~h 8 ~- ~~ 1 ~~ 1 w~ ~'-' ,--.,` _ 1 .' ,1 _-~. v` J ~~ ' - _ ~ . .~ ~ }' ~ 1 _J ~ %yv~ ~ `~' x y 74 ~~ #~ ~~ '~ ~-, ^ l ~„~ S"yz , ~~' ' *+° ~ ~'t x{E ~~~~ -w ~~`~ t qTd `2;: ~~ c..~. 3 1< ~~ ~{ ;, - ?. x ~, . ~ ~; ~ , ~ e: ~ $ ~ tl ~ ~c , ,~ 4~* ~ a s ~ n ~ d. k ' ~ $ £x R a~~"g 7..~, £i ~ 9 'c _ ~ ~ s a Y~ ~ y v~ o xY ~ { ~ ~ ~ [ Nt ~e ~ ~ `. F R L e a t ~, ~ r s- ~ 4 e ., ~~~ ~'. i ~ ~~ ~ f to _j~~. ~;- ~~ ' ~ ~ . ~.< ~~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ; ' ~ ~ ~$~~ ~ ~ ~+ 15 x 4 n ~ ~ ~~ d< ~~ `z ~ N.• 6` b rg*n s®y~n„ . ~'.~ ~4 Q 3 ..~ `~~£ 9 ' £ IX.,i m '_ i ~; e 5 ~ ~3 g g1 e~ ti? C kt mA~y. y,' ice' ~~ _ r 1, d F g ~ Py, tl € ^ Transition Strategies. Officer Build anew office building on a major arterial in Bryan/College Station. Ofd ce should be separated from any warehouse or staging. of construction ..:equipment in order to project .the most professional ..image. possible. warehouse and Staging: Our field operations have had signi~ cant growth.. we continue to --, acquire significant amounts of equipment such - as dozers, graders, trackhoes, front-end .loaders etc. that require.. signi~ cant maintenance and ( storage. Therefore, we have contracted to purchase 36 Acres on a county road, for locating -- the division of our -plant needs. Exi ting Facility: Locate and .secure lease for .existing facilities prior to building new office building. Corporate Goals. Establish R. M. Dudley Construction. Co. Inc., as the premier regional general contractor in the Brazos Valley. Currently, I would say. that we are third in the rankings of locally owned.. -- General Contracting Firms. Recent restructuring of Bryan Construction and continued growth. on our part may lead more. quickly to move us to number two. Furthermore, we want to grow to the size that when significant projects are to be built in the area, our .local developers will: not be forced to use outside Contractors from Houston,:. Dallas, San Antonio or E1 Paso. Compliance With Existing Planning and Zoning Strategies The applicants have requested a C.B. zoning on their property because this district would - allow the redevelopment of a restaurant which had burned, the new development of an office _, building on the corner of Pamela and. SH 30, .and would place a zoning district in an apartment type development, which has been on the property for at least 20 years without having a designating district. The development planned would be a mix of uses which would spread traffic overthe entire day and evening, rather than to have it peak .for all uses at the same time. _ While Pamela is not a major street, it does create an intersection with a major street, which is a .gateway to the: City. The development of commercial businesses. is best located at intersections of streets. We have been told by staff that the amount of commercial zoning.being requested is "too much" for an intersection of this type. Our thoughts are that this requested commercial zoning is less'intense than the C-3 zoning which is already in place, and would eliminate the "spot zoning" of that'property. Also, the requested commercial zoning would provide the much desired "step down zoning" the City has tried to develop over the. years. _ While there is no plan for the. way the land should develop on the south side of SH 30 in this area, it has been indicated without a specific statement that single family development along SH 30 might be appropriate. We would point out that individual residential driveways along this major street, which has a high speed limit, would not only be unrealistic, but would also be inappropriate because of the safety problems it would create. Across SH 30 from this property, there is a zoning designation of M-l, which has been in _ place for a number of years. That properly could be, and could have been,. developed'into several large complexes such as Texas Instruments and Westinghouse were, with hundreds of employees entering SH 30 at a few key locations. Should this land develop in that way, the employees would need some;commercial services. The development of the subject property could provide some of those services, perhaps eliminating the need to travel greater distances into the city to find those services. " The owners of the subject property are ready to develop and redevelop their property. There is no plan included in the Comprehensive Plan for the development. of this land. It would seem unfair to make these small developers wait for possibly several years.. for the city to initiate, and then conduct studies, hold public hearings, and actually change the. Comprehensive Plan, especially when these small developers are ready to develop commercial business at an intersection on a major arterial, create "step down zoning", and provide services for future development of property that is already zoned for Planned Industrial uses. Surrounding Developments. (Existing, Under Construction, Planned) A. Overview Map B. County Building: C. Park Hudson: D. veterans Park: E. Central Baptist Church: F. Covenant Family Church: G. State Farm Insurance: H. Widening of FM 158 I. County Right of Way Expansions J. Extension of University Drive ' -. ~-.: ~- . ~. -.: ~~ ~- 1 ~_ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ' 11 ~ ~ ~ ~~ X11 The following are excerpts from a "Request for Qualifications for Design Services" issued by Brazos County for the proposed Exposition Center, Project number 99-016. SYSTEM OVER VIEW There is a need to construct an exposition center in Brazos County to handle various types of event in this area. At present, the County does not own an enclosed facility large enough to handle an event or exhibition of large size. The project will consist of three (3) phases. The first phase will consist of a feasibility study to determine the best size and type of facility, .traffic flow to the facility, and specific needs of the facility (complex) based upon the information provided below. The second phase will consist of the actual design of the facility, and the presentation of this design. The third phase will consist of making the firm available during construction for such occurrences as design changes, consultations, etc.. The third phase will also consist of attending the pre-bid conference, as well as to assist the selection committee with the actual bid evaluation. The contents of the RFQ and the proposal of the successful service provider may become contractual obligations, if a contract ensues. However, Brazos County reserves the right to stop the proceedings of this proposal after the first phase, if it so deemed by Brazos County. An Exposi activities: a. b. c. d, e. .f g. h. i. J• k. 1. m. n. tion Center is desired to be built which will accommodate the following County Fair Horse/livestock shows Arts/craft shows Auto/boat shows Pet shows Special,events -circus, carnival Tractor pulls Auctions Training events Festivals Trade Shows Banquets and meetings Antique shows Mineral and gem shows 1 o. Home shows p. Garden Shows q. R. V. hook-ups • The facility should be large enough to handle such events as Concerts, Hockey and Rodeos, however any special requirements for these types of events will be considered during the feasibility study of the services to be provided. 2 .~ y ~ '~ ~ ~ a .~ ~_~: ~~ rJ!~J:~:J~J -_ ~.,~~ HWY 158 r ~®, - . e .® v 0 0 /, e ,,~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ Location of Veterans Park & Athletic Complex .. ii Texas A&M University Research Center Veterans Park Athletic Complex (150 Acre Site) 0 M D uglas H // so issan _ heat arse Eax/R~dde~, fxee HighN,aY 6BYpassay r F ..--~ U J N OO H ~~ O N¢ Z Z,~ o ~ ~' J ((''~~ ~' . W 1__I. W U ~~ N O ~ '^'""~ O Z ~ ~ `~ Z Q ° °- ~~~ a o- a a U ~ o J W_ ~ W ~ Q N J m ~ Z W Q 4. ~ ~L ~ w U U O D J W li L O Q J .~ n.+ m W ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~' ~f a U ~ W a~ °~ U rn m ~ \ ~ ~ ~ d L ~ c o Z o a Y V w ~ O y ~~ ~ ~ ~ dO a ~ a ~ti N ~ O L d C~ ~ N O O~ O C U ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r' (B U N ~ ~ ~ j O ~ ~ > ~ N ~ ~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U to f2 ~ ~ N O ~ .C O N E ~~ t N U N ~!- (6 O N O N -p ~ ~ `~' ~ ~ ~ O N 'L c4 U~ Q.. ~ ~~ O N N X~~ ~~ O •"_ O~ U to ~~ y ~ O ~ (B Q J~ ~F- _O NU L N ~v-~ C C C ~ N N v- O -p O (II (6 (B _ .> C~ N C O~ ,~ U ~ ~ ~~ O O O N~~ o v~ c o n. N N j U C.) U Q. N .~ ~ O ~ Off-' ~ O .~ N .~ X ~ ~ ~ ~ ,0 ~ O ~ ~ ~ O O O p ~ ~~ Q Q. W N U ~ C~ O N ,.r 0 ,..., ~ p O ~ O N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C O N L Q-N O Nnj ~ O 3 > N a-' ~ ~ .~ ~ N C O' ~ N C ~ .•O ~ U ~ (6 O ~ ~ Q U ,Q U ~, _ ~ O ~ p Q. N__ o U~O> Q~,a~~o >.~~~ ~~,'3m I- N O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ >~ ~ (6 ~ X OL ~ T O (Q (4 :_~ _ _ L O O C C ~ ~ .® ~ ~ ~ y O .~ ~ ~ ~ ~"~ O ~ C, ._ ~~~YY O O ` ,~ ~:.~0 ~ - O (~ ~ _ ~ Y ~ O Y N"~ p ~ O U-C ~ ~~ ~ '~ ~ ~ O - , to N O ~ ~ _ N 'a p, O ~ N ~«- ~ ~ Y O ~ C p ~N ~ C 4- U ~ C ~ O ~ (6 Q c6 W ~ O 'O ` -U ~ : 1 ~ M t6 ~ ~ Y M ~ Q N O ~ ,~ M N 4- C C ~ ~ ~ O .~ E3.. ~ C N ~ ~~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ p _ C : v' O O - C 3 ~.. N (A ~ cB J - N N fn O ~ ~ ... U __ - L RS i O 'O •~ ~ a¢ j N N C 'L N ~ i O U O ~ O ~ ~~ ~ 0~ Y ~ Q N a ~ ~ ~ ~ '' Q.. p _ t6 O ~ Q. .Q ~ ~+ O - -Q L ~ 'C p ' ..C ~ ~ ~ ~ .,... O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; s C d ] ~ O -p U' N J - O ~.. ~ "'' C O ~ ~ C (B ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "~ ~ ~ V s ~ +~ 1 (6 N ~ Y C ~ ~ Q..- ~ i. f- ~ I Q _C, d, O~ ~f6 I O V ,flN to C1 ~ to Y O C X O O C ~ Y ~--~ O r (A Q L ~ LO Q N O S -p p_ ~ S O U O . ~ ~ O L O N O O U N.~C ~ O ~Y~ N Lf 41 LL 'D(~ ~ N i ~, ~ ~ 4-. _ - ( Q. C U .~ ~ W ~~ ~ cOn O -O m 1 I U F O A _ O~ C o C ~~ cB .N p O ~ ~ O U. m O ~ ~ ~ i N ~ ~ ~ ~i ca ~~ ~- ~ ' '~ _ ~ a ~ ~ ~ o •- > ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ca~- •- f N -wO - o ~, _~ ~ R a ~ (B O (6 ~ ~ ~ F- Q~ ~ma._ `~ ++ a ~ O ~ C ~z~Q . 1~ •. .,\ ~: _ ~ . .~.~ • ~ .~.+ ~ O~ ~ g ._ ~ ~ ~ v I ~ .r.+ O a t~ ' - o ~ d v a. ~i L 7 G. J =i IJ :: J ~ Y~tT:I_i:,_ G L~:_I 'i L r-~;~,t u E~ ~~ sJJs~~s ~ .~ Q .. I 4 (~ c~-. ~J b `]3Uv ~/d /~~~!'d W d 0 w ~3 ( A J WZ ~~,~, ;~; ~9 ~ .fie: ~ M, ~~ ~ yd / x r ._ u ~ - _`~ O I'll °~. ~a V ~ ' '' d~ nnlly ~-`__ T j ~ ,' _, ~ ~ ~ ~' _ . 4 Q ~ y '.~ ~ Z 1~1 ,;. i 111- ~ .iN i L( e XSQ 1ll~ 1. `. Ka ` ~ a ., - , •~, i I ~ - _ oJ' ` yr ~ i V a :, - - ~, >- I 1 r r,z _!<.; I W M T~ Q .. ' L' ~~ ill - ~ ,. ~ l L~ • . u -, 1 I ~, ~ z 1 d I yn ~ 'f U~ ! G~ ~cF#f,~t! tUl o. r ~ ~ / _ c W L ^ J 10 1 n f ~+ J ttii ~l Y. tll ;~ '°°r c L r LL ~ k ~ d ~ u '.U ~ ~ -•1 ~ ~ ' _ ~ d ~ a i .r I~ <u ~ V^ v . w~ t 2 ~\ I y ~~~ ^ ;~ ~u ~ '.., ? is ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~~ -!, , O ~~-a,~t r ', } 1 `~ ~ .,~ ~ y ~ - ~ r~ _~~ ~ ul ~~ iii ~ ' z _ _~ V W 1 ~ ~- ~ r ~ m ~, 7 - v p a. w r4- y ~, ~ ~ •o I j . ~ - _ H E ~ N N ~+ ~ r `~ ,.~. r 1 c~ ~+~ ` ~1 : i ~ ~ Z iJ ~ ~t 1 ,.~ nil T ~ ~_~ ~ O F~ ~ h ~ tz__-.r---!_ ... Y-'a- ~-t~/ i--+--dam-. 1 ~N+ _ I ' - j -p. ` v~ ~ /~ V r ~ 1 7 0, ,. _~ 6 a I J~~ ; yL4 (, '~ y ~ I I p i r n ~~ ,A N s , 3 ~ ! ~'~---~ ~~ ~a o ~ ~~.. ~-~. ter' ~ LL' +;d 1 i i. F ~ M ~ ~~ tl H x ~ O / ~/ W `* 3 ~~ ~~ t4fl1 I o ~'F i W; I i I ~ i /{/ q0~9 +O~DI i "emu- ~,~ O~;/ ~. OO-_.~.__ 0 ': 1 - __ _ ~.: I ~_ti it _ J, d . _ f` I - ~~ - ~ P8~~e0 81 ~ ~ ;to~~ 3. v~o-8J~#. t ~~ I. ~ ' I ' lY ~ T M. I L'OZ.L q 1 . I + ~ - C _ 5 ZfZ ~" ~, a rZ .~~, ^i yy 9 { W e~- ~J I ' i C ~i i m Ii I' ('^~ I ~ ~ ~ - 4 '9 d ' /; J f b ~ , i j I ~ tl" 3oJ.S ~. /~i ° a F I . i ~l p ~ jt ~ .~ '~ `t ~~ l l :~ r FF ~r Nu / ~~ _ tai v g ~ I~ v p,p~~ J a i ~ P' oQ ~ 4 J' D ~ ~ ! ~ !~ ;~ > ~~-' ai ' / ~~ dos r a"" 70~ s I ~ ~+u' oe ~ ~ i ~T' ? ,n y[ J ~ a ~ /~ ' . ~ ,~;: w s' ~ F~- "t ~" '~ ~ a `v ~ ' a"' +v ur K ~ ' o ~° ~ ` I " • ` t- y ~n u~ ~' ° z , `5 y ~~ y' ~ R,t o .,~'~'~ ~ ' ~ atN w'' ~E ~~i s, a .~ o ~ ! ~I~u;y ~ ry ~ ,~ ~ ? ~~ '!~ 6 w ^~ ~ / r ;-13~i ;t~~~ _ ' ~ 4 ~ It V_ J. ~ --~-~-:- ~ ~jV , s ~--~,, • ~ ~ a ,3 ~ ~ 0 ~ U O f- ,9 ~ ~ - ~\ ~` 11f .. { 1~ f ~ ", / h -~ , r .D~ ~~ ,~ ! fis ~ -3~-` r~ 1 .a ~ ` v { ° .n ~b i rf ,+a... ~' ' 1-1 ~ s ~ { ~~k-ti"''i Ct J I w ie{//fy/)o_ I i n I r ,1 Z N •y ,. 1 ~, Q ,~ v_ ~'' J«r:. ~_ <t ute ~ ~r' ~, ( ZI ~ ~'' ' i I ~ ,~ r o W N ~ < , N £ ~~~/ ' N~ ~ A r to ~~ F{ ~~~ 4 v1'7 0 ~ ti's '. i / M s- ~ d G \ I d ~. ~; +? , h r k is 4 0 ~ I I ~ Q L, - a ., a v . ~` !1 ~ ~ 1 / ~>>~ ~ ~ f ~~ r Nils"~' I I ,! I rr~ s J~ ~ 1~- ~~ i I I y 1 ~11b O 3, a! ,~ III m i ''~ V V n -p F. i I i y/ ; v~ / l a ~ ~ m~1 ~ ~ r~ ! ! F'w I I ~,~ jq(t I'F',J ! i I YF ~ `9 Z ,~ _ ~ sue- .v o ~ ~ ~i ~:. ~ ~ v+3 D dl Y ~p M ?J t" 10 '~ r Q h !-i 0 _l a ~ \~ ~ ~ f O.~ M U ~t V . a ~ ~ ~r n4 ~) F- a ~L l 4~ t i ~ ~ or r S WV O~ ~ . F.~ l ~~. ~~ - a ; Jr ~+ 4! ~ ~ D ~ • y !~ ~ ~. m I .~ ~ I ;; t>J / : ! Nv r d~ b~ do ~ ,' ~::~'~ ~ a~ o .~; ~ da W er Z Z c ~ 's Q c~. ~d7 p o 1 ,. a. ~ 4 V LL 4 c) ' ~~I~ ®N~ ro oNr ~ ~- ~~~ ~ ~ - b _\ r hid Z N ~ o ~ F '~ r ~ H t, e E d N V Q ~Q ! ~ s a ~~ r _n ti J o -'ee v - ~a Q D ~ ua- o J i M is •~ - J _ ~ a -~ - . a ~ ~ ~• ~ - • ~, "' _ , F (y ~20'85'y M~~4~9.i+4S 3~ s ut { ~ ( ~~ ~F ~.~ • =~,~' ~ N ~ V ~ 9N- I ~SIYHd ~a0~',dLb t ~ J DZ z 11 `. Y /V .s r a -~ ,~~~ md~o N~~ ~ I ! Paz h+PLp NF / St I~ ~, w ~ _ ~~d ~j ~~ n j ~ti _ ~ - U' y~ 3 i '~ ~ ~22 ` ~" ~ - Gd O Q r _ a _o lli I ~ ~P~ tay; 1 ._ - _ c% r~ D ~ oz~~LL j jza siI -_~ o ~ ~ Y d 5 i a~ o} ' 1~ ~, ,,, Q . .o Z ~~I f , . E. v' P o ,Z7 - - - -- - -- - -- - -- - ~. r ~ 'n _ ~ c'10>>~ d d ~ e ~---- ~ J ~_ r ~j=j~-_.- ~ _-- _1 _ .. _; -.a._''~. __- _ _ ____._- ~ ~Z~ d~ i~ ~FMpq~Yl E~ ~ LL J d~~ ~_~ 'o/~ol-,~i _ '~,grF1'4~ a/t!'rbl ~~~;t ----~~a_~ _~t--~i- I i i s c j~ d C o~ n > ~ 1 ~~ ~ ~- ~ -rte _ _ G -1 -rt~"---15-~ t ~ I n i LL ~ ~ I 4 O P -`-t~ --~-~--~- ~~- off.! ~~ - ~ -- ~ ~ ~.~ - q -t~"I~_ri~'-i` "fir _~`~ ~-------- 1 ' ~ ~~ i ~ z Ili t ~ }. ~ I C 1'r L ! O ! ~ ~ I -± f L. IVMI , Y, IC O ~ O ~ - ~. _ i I ~ , y,~. V) t~ p , L ~ tl,; LL1 i. :t: I I I u VU ~ f N N; '6~~i O d ~/, 4 O; ,~ ~~ C ~ ~ Y~y _ LL r' Ln ( D ~? 3 I ~ it L} p , LL l J' ~1, I I I oo. p ~A-Z. ,I ~. n9 ,ZI n5 A-,q n-'` ~~~r5 i41 a3 aGtq ..S '~ ~ i ~ ~F , I IM {LLL ~/. u I I r-. ^ 1 rr ~ ~~ J ~ ~ 1 ~ ~) ~0 4 I I ~ N t ! '`~J-~- a 1--- u 1 _~ -~ ° C' ~'' ~JC-._ ~_ I ~p =IJ ~ Q `-+ c J+ J - .o ~) ~ ~J~` O~ _~ ; ~~ ,n ~ ~ ~ 1 H dab 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 yY~ 1~ . ~ r ~ ti ~ . t_, ~ ~ - -~ --~. LL.-J ' 's ~ I - 4 ~ , ~ ~ v 0. -~ -,. ~ SI ~ 1 4 I~ _~ V ~ N 1 ~. I U J I ~ r 1. tr - ~` Y __ - ~ ~ - t ~ ~~ I I ~ ~ Q W~ 1 O I ~ T 8 _~ ' i~ m ~' ~~ O= w ~ i I O -- --- 'V' y c. ! _„1 U i I ~ Y i ~ _ M a a u '- I~. a• ~-+_ ~ - _ ! h~'IsITOIVi ;i~5 ,~,~ I 1 ~' ~" m j ~ =01 ~"~ i ^ '~ 1 I \ YS IP`r~~ Il;~ll r4 i~r; ~ \}~ ~ ~(IfJ 3 ~ ~ - - ~r L- - s-~-~ -- - '~ >U U` 1 :'t 1 ~ ~ - _ 7, 1 tt O' '1 ~ II ~~ 1~ dl ~_ I - o~ of ~- • i i o ec ~. i _rI ~I i ~_ ~--- > ! ~ o C ,! i' j to ~ j10-1g N p ~ IIQ-,F, ~,c';r ~ N " J r_~~ a 11 `~ _ ~ S *- i ~ ~ I \' ~ y1 o I~-- ,, ~, -~ --~ --- ~e ~ 1~_~i y =_ - -_I T ~ ~ I ~ ~-- a -' ~ ~ '~ --~---- 4- 1 _._ __~ 7 .- o, ~~~/ Nth ~, I ~I ;i ~ ~ri~ `~ >` N 1~ z ~ ~ J J -+ 4 , 4 ~ d~ ~ - L~ ` .t --t ~ _ Z 4 ~ ~ N ~ ~-- __._.r LL I 1 } ~~o- L Fes- _,~ e ~r "t Oi d ~> ~ , ~~ ~ Z~ N z z of E d ~ ~~ K: ~~ ~- J l11 i t11 d N ~; J ~ }' F-O ~~ VJ ~~ ~ Z~ ~ 1 i u u t ~ ~ 4 ~1~-- 1il t,1 ! iL Z ~ - ~ _ o~z i ~_ Z ~ q ono f ~~ ~~ i t ~ ~- ~ ~ D ~~ c U Y ~- ~_ .~ ~ ~~ ~- u ~~I ~I . ~ o _ ~ r~ a p W r State Highway 30, State Highway 60, FM 158, and Greens Prairie Road State Highway 30 -The last 24 hour traffic count performed in 1997 by TXDOT shows 4,700 vehicles traveled Hwy 30. Since that time, the traffic flow has certainly not. decreased and thus the Hwy 30 corridor is a major access into and out of the Bryan/College Station area. State Highway 60 -The City of Bryan has plans to extend Hwy 60 northward from FM 158 to .State Highway 21, and possibly even fiu-ther northward to State Highway b. This should provide greater and easier access to the FM 158, Harvey Road, and Hwy 30 roadways. FM 158 -Phase. one of the widening of FM 158 to 41anes is presently under construction. The remaining stretch of 2-lane roadway on FM 158 is scheduled to be contracted for expansion in May of 2002: When complete, FM 1 S8 will be a major east-west corridor connectingthe East.By-pass to Hwy 30. Greens PrairieRoad =The County's expansion of Greens Prairie Roadahrough o Hwy 30 is another major corridor providing easier access to the. southeastern part of the area. All of these expansions and improvements o the above mentioned roadways will greatly assist the traffic flow to the southeastern part of Brazos County. It should rapidly increase the commercial development of this .area and provide significant growth for the county and both cities. ~ t 4aaa t~ ' .. ~ rrv 2 i j ~ IaAt~j t~4 6~Q0 ~ i ~ ., 1 a :f ~90Q 14 9~< u ~ ~ ~o i004 zauao t. _. i ~ tg4oo - a ' ~s fl p t zaov a ~ 1 ~ , 3B4p 14 ` OOQQ ~ ~6~tC0 . t 1,2 ~~ 7e 4570 r ~ __ ' l6i7 'fit ~~ f t7Q4 1: - ~ [ i7 ~ 8~1fA11 ~~ taG4Q r t i _ t ~ 2'01 O6 ~20~ ~ ~' ' ! ~ >[ ESsoa s Y740a ~ ~t 22 ooq t }~ «~ 2[~p¢ 4200 700 ~. ~-' icao t93do X6880 ~ ~_' ~ I S ~~ ~f~ 3( 000 I r t to ~ tz o t ; ~ t ~ s , t. ~ ~ - c tai s~xrioa y ~ 74 ?~~ ~ 4204 4 ~~ t ~ ' i ~ 1 SSgC~ A '~OOQa ~ iatno ~ sus, ~ ,~ < ~ ~ t~1 i rM~a ~ ~ 2oooa - ~ t50oa- t2$ o ~aTaa i ~ ~ , ~ t ~ o ~ 1 oo za __ __,____~ ~___ ___ ___ . _ _ - _ . _~ ____ _r~_ ____ _~_~_ _ I; - BRYAN Ii i ~~ ~foy~ (~~FF'/C ~ o unl~ - I ~ ~ rj „~ /~ s ~~ Y~. m~anasesnnmR ore. m ~sso msr.+o cmoc eaYan BRYAN ~F~E/~ UFFtlrt ~'ttu~tV ~ ~t,~rttt~uL~ P"