Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous. TO ~.,,>~ ~.a ~ ,5 ® ~ P hn • City of College Station - POST OFFICE BOX 9960 1101 TEXAS AVENUE ~~~~~~1 ,-~~~.e'1 / 'COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840 Planning Division ,; ~hlrley i/olk ,r~~~ ~~SJ~CT: Ganstrsaotl~r~ ~cada~ment.s fear FROM ,~ T` 7 The Flee°ltae at €~~rtmo~th Ltd. 's DATE E~/?~~ ....MESSAGE Preliminary review ~sf the ;~reliminary plans submitted far this prQ~gect has been made, a~sd ire are ~~turn@n~ the redl ineel plans tc~ y®~ fc~r y~~.~r ~~~ ire p:'uparlnc~ .the le~la~~dc~an~ent~ for submittal and rvie~t, Phase nests that this 9s only a pa~°tiai revl es~a since' 1 t was d i soav~r~d that the pl ins had not been ses~1 eel 9 but i t: wi 1 1 und~subted 1 y he€~P you s n i ddr~ t i fy 1:n~ sesr~e p resb 1 ems when yci~ .~ r~: comp 1 At i f7~1 the P 1 art s for sub~ti ttal ® 9~e c~sB~plete subs~i tt~`l wl 1 1 co~rsti tuts tyre f i rs.~ re~i~w c>f the p~~c~a9ect® 12-Mar-99 qa~~'~ ct1~=z~, ~ , COLLEGE STATI~.r P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue TeF. 409 764 3500 Mr. Emanuel H. Glockzn, Jr. 4500 Carter Creek Parkway, Ste. 101 Bryan, Texas 77802: RE: HERITAGE AT DARTMOUTH PROJECT College Station, TX 77842 Dear Emanuel: As requested, the City hereby confirms that there is capacity for the:post-development iunofffrom the Heritage at Dartmouth Project within the Ashford Square detention pond. Your Project, as defined in the Ashford Square report, is Lot Two (2) and Three (3), Block One {1) of the DARTMOUTH ADDITION SUBDTVISON. You are. now authorized to utilize the Ashford Square detention pond and no permits, approvals or certificates of occupancy from the City will be withheld for your Project on the basis of insufficient detention pond capacity for your Project. Further-requirements related to the detention pond or downstream drainage improvements (Swoboda Property) .are the responsibility of the developer of the Ashford Square Project. The City will not request payment or performance from you. The City has accepted the detention po~~d and drainage improvements as a public dedication and will maintain the same at no cost to you. Very truly yours, CITY OF COLLEGE STATION ~'r by: Name: ROBERT MOSEL , P.E. Title: City Engineer by: l U-~/~.C~ Nam . NICA J.B. MORGAN, P.E. Title: Asst. City Engineer cc: David Scarrnardo, Ashford Square Natalie Ruiz, :Development Coordinator file Home of Texas. A&M University ::::.:. ........--~ .......:...:.........~ ~-~-~--~~---.....:.::::..::.:.:.:.,..:...:...::--..::........:1..: .... :Shirley Volk-:hentage.at.dartmouth..:____.__ Page.,_. From: Veronica Morgan To: Lisa Hughes /~ Date: 11/24/98 4:59PM - Subject: heritage at dartmouth lisa, as we discussed, please assure that prior to release of the blanket easement for this project, we receive a dedicated public. utility easement to cover the waterline being constructed internally within the complex. thanks v CC: Bob Mosley, Jeff Tondre, Natalie Ruiz, Shirley ... I COLLEGE STAT ®N P. d. Box 9964 11 d1 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 TeL 4d9 764 3500 MEMORANDUM TO: Emmanuel Glockzin Via fax (409) 846-0783 ~( ' FROM: Natalie Ruiz, Development Coordi for DATE: June 11, 1999 RE: The Heritage at Dartmouth apartment project. I just wanted to keep you informed about your project over on Southwest Parkway and Dartmouth. I spoke with the Engineering Inspector, Jerry Jones, and he has several problems at the job site. I've attached a punchlst of items that need to be addressed. as soon as possible, I know that Raymond Olson with the Fire Marshal's Office has been working with the contractor on a few other items as well. Please let me know your Certificate of Occupancy schedule so that we can start working in that direction. I just didn't want any of these items to catch you. off guard. If you have any questions, please contact me at (409) 764-3570 or a-mail me at "nruiz@ci.college-station.tx.us". Attachment: Engineering Punchlist Home of Texas A&M University. Heritage @ Dartmouth June 6,1999 1. Locate and uncover all valves---new and existing. 2. Adjust all fire hydrants to correct grade. 3. Uncover new 8" waterline at Station # 8+00 and # 9+00. 4. Provide as built of private sanitary sewer line change at tie in to existing manhole. , 5. Rebuild south entrance at correct location; should line up with Teal Drive centerline. 6. Repair damaged asphalt street at south entrance. 7. Repair all damaged sidewalk along Southwest Parkway and Dartmouth. 4...~ 8. Participate in cleaning silt from Ashford Square Detention Pond (lack of erosion control). NOTE: This is not a final punchlist. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION *~~ CUSTOMEk kECEIPT **~ OPEk: MRODGERS CT DATE: 6/17/98 00 DkA~ER: kECEIPT: 1 0015967 DESCRIPTION QTY AMOUNT TP TM FILING FEE/DS/Ai #108.88 B7 GK SITE PLAN FILING fEE/DS/KI 5100.00 A7 CK DEVELOPMENT PEkMIT GAkkETT ENGINEEkING-CK164~6 SITE PLAN DEVELOPMENT PEkMIT NEkITAGE @ DAkTMOUTH Mk TIME: 14:09:5D TOTAL PEk5ONAL GNECK 569.96 AMOUNT TENDEkEU THANK YQU ~~0'., ~O'X 3 ~. ~~ $~lr~l~f y TX ~~~r ~~~e ~~3 ~3 7 1998 ~~ December , Mr. Bob Mosely City Engineer City of College Station 2613 Texas Ave. S. College Station, TX 77840 RE: Ashford Square/Dartmouth Subdivision's drainage facilities and detention facilities Dear Mr. Mosely: It is my understanding from David W. Scarmardo that the City Engineer has approved and accepted the required drainage. facilities and detention pond which has been placed upon the Ashford Square property as well as on THE HERITAGE AT DARTMOUTH, LTD. property and certain part of Swoboda property, all in accordance with the specifications and instructions which you gave them in orderto get final approval on both properties as to detention pond and drainage facilities. Attached hereto is a copy of the letter of completion. As you know, a portion of the detention pond is on our property, being a 7.89 acre tract, known as Lot 2, Block 1 of the Subdivision. Subject to certain conditions, I am to participate in the payment of the cost of these improvements which Mr. Scarmardo was to construct. However, I need some type of written approval that these facilities will be sufficient for the City's requirements forme to build my project on the 7.89 acres without having to construct or fulfill any additional requirements for additional drainage and detention pond on my property. I have submitted to the City for approval plans for a detention pond on my property, but that was solely and alternative plan in the event Mr. Scarmardo did not obtain a final approval of the existing drainage .facility improvements and detention pond as was our agreement. I have drafted a letter agreement which I am attaching hereto for you and/or the appropriate City official to execute which in essence, tells me that all drainage and detention pond requirements of the City of College Station as to my tract of land have been satisfied with the completion of Mr. Scarmardo's work per the attached letter and approved and completed to the satisfaction of the City and that I may proceed.: with my project and obtain whatever permits. that I need to complete my project and that no certificate of occupancies shall be denied me because of drainage facilities. and/or a detention pond has not been completed. December 7, 1998. Page 2 If you have any questions concerning this, then please don't hesitate to cal me. Very truly yours, THE HERITAGE AT DARTMOUTH, LTD. a Texas Limited Partnership by its General Partner: HERITAGE INTERESTS, INC. a Texas Corporation B Name: EMANUEL H. GLOCKZ Title: President CC: Veronica J.B. Morgan, P.E. -Assistant City Engineer Shirely Volk -Development Coordinator _ ~ oDa Y-C-B & S 2~/D4/98 28:98 '~`4D9 288 ~D~~ r (PLEASE PUT ON CITY OF COLLEGE STATION LETTER) peccmber 1, 1'98 Tflfi HERITAGE AT rjggTMGUTH, T TD. c!o Emanuel Gloclmn Ste. 101 45~ Carttr (.'reek Parkway, Bryan, Texas 77802 ~D~outh Addition S~xbdivision exception of detention gotsd g~: Ashford S4 ~bdivision Lots 2-7, Block "C". and drainage improvemeuts for Ashford Sq~c on, Lots 2-3, Block 1. and Lots 1-6, R1ock "D", and the Dartmouth Addition's Subdivisi Dear Mr. Glocl~n: rovemt~s and d~ption pond ~ roved the above described drainage ~F~~ ~ne~ ~~¢~~ vn The City of College Station ha, al?P ~ as well as the downstream imp located on bout of the above ~~~' and fina11Y completed. the Swoboda properh' ~ being fully 7,g9 acres, resents fnr your tract dcscrib~ abova, being Therefore. all drainage ead dctcution pond ~"~'~ ou shy be ~~ ~ permits ect which You "~ COnstruccing thereon have been s~sfied~ heretofore denied you ~~ of Mr" and the prof lete our project thereon which. dditionally final Cemficates of necessu'Y to continue .and romp Y d roblems. A of da~$e yr detenuon S~ardo's failure to Correct ~s and lnvin units w'~ snot be dents by the Ciry b ~ f~fi~ ~ ~ ~W ~ QocuP2un~3' on all of your building 8 e vnprovements and detention rovxl. The dramas a aII,d. detention pond pond non-COmpletian bey ~~ mv~ by vs ~e ~ficient to serve the drainag -' gloms - of the feted xud app fatted into Lots place and. have fin~Y for the enrize 7.89 acres which leas now been g rcquiren~nt of the City Subdivision. Very truly yours, CITY OF COLLEGE. S'T'A'T'ION city ~g'tncer 12/04/98 17:44 TX/RX N0.0786 P.002 ,. _ __ 12/08/98 16:57 $40.98468878 f~00. ~~~ _ _ _. .. .~ December 8, 1998 Jon Mies ~ City of College Station Fire Den Post 1'P Fayc Note 7671 Data ~~~ to ~ From ~ ~~ l.~ i Phone li Phoj ~Q # ~ r F~ # ~ -,. ~~ Fax / y # -ZJ~ itage at Da~lmouth, L . Apa~nents Deaz Mr_ Mies: 'We are requesting the City's approval to construct a temporary road so DeQarttnezat would be able. to access the Fleritage at Dartrnoutb, Ltd. A~ arise. The road. is to be constructed of "ball rock" five to six inches thi twenty feet wide. This should meet and/or exceed the City's requireme also be constructed at thrr end of the roadway according to the City's sp Your prompt attention to thin matter will be appreciated. If yoti. have additional. information please do not hesitate to gimme me a call at 409- Sincerely, Emanuel H_ Glockzin, Jr, President ITeritage Interests, Inc., Gen. Ptr. I~eW~~ai ....~;~: 'h ~t the City's Fire tments should the need. and a miniml~ q~' ~_ A turnaround will questions or need any 8878_ ~~ ~, .~ -~ SUBMIT APPLICATION AND THIS LIST CHECKED-OFF WITH 16 ` ~ FOLDED COPIES OF SITE PLAN FOR REVIEW J ~'1~~~ REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN PROPOSALS C~" 1. Sheet size - 24" x 36" ~2. Title block to include: C~" 3. ~ 4. l9" 5. a.) Name, address, location, and legal description `~ b.), Name, address, and telephone number of applicants c.) Name, address, and to phone number of developer/owner d.) Name, address, and lephone number of architect/engineer/~ e.) .Date of submittal Ownership and current zoning of parcel and all abutting parcels. A key map (not necessarily to scale). Scale should be largest standard engineering scale :possible on sheet. C+d" 6. Provide a north arrow. [~ 7. Topography, final grading plan, and other pertinent. drainage information: (If plan has too much ~ inform bio~hc~w drainage on separate sheet.) ~' 8. All existing streets, ;drives, buildings, and water courses on or adjacent to the proposed project site. 9. Locate -100 yr floodplain on or adjacent to the proposed project site, note if there is none on the site. Q 10. Location and size of existing utilities within or adjacent to the proposed project site. 19~11.•Proposed location, type, .and size of the following:. ir) Buildings and structures ~.) Off-Street parking areas with parking spaces drawn, tabulated, and dimensioned /c.) .Sidewalks a/,O~ d) Common open space sites /e.) Sites for solid waste containers ,~12. Proposed streets, drives, and curb cuts. For each proposed curb cut (including driveways, streets, .alleys, etc) locate .existing curb cuts on the same and opposite side of the: street to determine separation distances between existing and proposed curb cuts. Indicate driveway throat length as measured m the Driveway Ordinance. (See Ordinance 1961 for driveway location and design requuements.) 13. The total number of residential buildings and units to be constructed on the proposed project site. ^ 14. Landscape plan as required in Section 11 of the Zoning Ordinance (See Ordinance # 1638.) The landscaping plan can be shown on a separate sheet if too much information is on the original site plan. Attempt to reduce or eliminate plantings m easements. include information on the plan such as: a) existing landscaping to remain b) required point calculations c) proposed .new plantings with points earned ^ 15. Indicate-unit type (number ofbedrooms). ^ 16. The density of dwelling units per acre of the proposed project.. LETTER OIy COMPLETION CITY ENGINEER CITY OF COLLEGE .STATION COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS DATE: 1-12-99 V RE: COMPLETION OF The Heritaae At Dartmouth Dear Sir• The purpose of our letter is to request that the following. listed improvements be approved and accepted as being constructed under city inspection and .completed according to plans and specifications as approved and required by the City of College Station, Texan. This approval and acceptance by the City is requested in order that we may finalize any sub-contracts and to affirm their warranty on the work... This approval and acceptance by the City of the improvements listed below does hereby void the letter of guarantee for the listed improvements on the above rzferer-ced project. The one. year warranty is hereby affirmed and agreed to by Elliott Construction, Inc. and. by their sub-contractors as indicated by signatures below. WORK COMPLETED 8" C-900 Water d~~ Tap Sleeve Fire Hyci.rant Meter Vault DATE 12-28-98 OWrier: The Heritage at Dartmouth, Ltd. Address: P.o. Box 3144 Bryan, TX 77805 _ . ,~..- Signature• ~-~' ~~ ~, President of Heritage Inter t Inc., Gen. Ptx Contractor: Elliott construction, Inc. 1 Utility Representative (s) A EP CE & APPROVAL, ~~ City Enginee Address: p , o . Box 510 Wellborn, T 77881 Signature: ~' ' KuSo~ COLLEGE STATION P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tel: 409 764 3500 September 3, 1999 Mr. Emanuel H. Glockzin, Jr. 4500 Carter. Creek Parkway, Ste. 101 Bryan, Texas 77802 Re: Heritage at Dartmouth Project Dear Mr. Glockzin: Attached is a preliminary punchlist that was previously provided to the project superintendent for the Heritage at Dartmouth project. Special attention is directed to item #8 related to the cleaning of accumulated silt from the Ashford Square Detention Pond. Efforts by the City inspector to call attention to deficiencies with the silt fence during the construction were. largely ignored.. This detention facility is a public facility and was adversely impacted by the large amount of silt during the construction of the Heritage development. Because of .the wet conditions encountered when completing the Ashford Square development the contractor was unable to remove the accumulated silt resulting from. that project and is now committed. to removal. of that silt west (Ashford Square side) of the center flume of the detention facility. Our expectation related to item #8 of the preliminary punchlist is that you will remove the accumulated silt east (Heritage side) of the center flume of the detention facility. I am attaching a copy of the bottom contours of the detention facility to provide information. for the appropriate removal level. The reestablishment of Bermuda vegetation is necessary following .removal of the silt. As we are in a relatively dry period at the current time, you are encouraged to .initiate this as soon as possible and avoid the problems that were incurred previously. Should you have any questions, please caH me at 764-3581, incerely, W~ Robert W. Mosley, P.E. City Engineer c: Jerry Jones, Public Works Natalie Ruiz, Development Services Home of Texas A&M University Heritage @ Dartmouth , June 6,1999 1. Locate and uncover all valves---new and existing. 2. Adjust all fire hydrants to correct grade. 3. Uncover new 8" waterline at Station # 8+00 and # 9+00. 4. Provide as built of private sanitary sewer line change at tie in to existing manhole. 5. Rebuild south entrance at correctlocation; shouldline up with Teal Drive centerline. 6. Repair damaged asphalt street at south entrance. 7. Repair all damaged sidewalk along Southwest Parkway and Dartmouth. 8. Participate in cleaning silt from Ashford Square Detention Pond (lack of erosion control). NOTE: This is not a final punchlist, ~4~ '. I 1 I // ELEV. 271- #4 BARS- 4 ROWS 4' OCBW- EXISTING ELEV. 264 ELEV. 263 ~ 2 ~ ~o 'J 1 J i ~ ~~v 12- "~~~^ ~~~~ 2 ~ v tZ. SCALE: 1" =30' ,-~ ~ T. SCALE: 1" =3' ,~' ,, , -------. 3' 5 .45'21 'S ~ EN t ESMT lNAGE 1 PUBLIC U~ 1 , ~ _. ,, ____ ____ ---- , .--- --__ 2 4 27 , - ~---- 7 3 ' ~ ~~72 ,- 1 - ~ _270.8 - 2~ ~ -- ~ _ - 27 ~ , -~ 269 ~ 268: 267 _ ~ 66 2g5 ~, .~i3 I _ N ~ ~,t,,- -~ ~ / ~ ~ / -~~ =~- BEGIN 2~0 ` ~ ~ / ~= ` ~ ~_ ------~ PROJECT ~r~' -~`~ ~'~` ~ REVISIONS ~~ S ~ . ~~ ~ AS~S4 - ~ ~' `~ \ 48„x\ \~~ ~,~ ~ F-..? ~ ~ '! ,~ -- aF ~l ~6, A ~. ,~ - ~ r-- - ~ ~' ~ - , ~`:~~~ ~r~ ~ ~O i _J,I ---- REVISED OUTLET CHANNEL / ALLEN R. swoeoo ~~ _ ~ OAlC FOREST TRAILER VOL. 274, PG. 33 .-~~,~ ~` ~~0 Q' I ~ Q f ~t ~ `,t? Z ` \ . ~ ~~ ~~ _,. ~ 0' - - ~r `~ ~ ~~~ •• 1 ~ ; ~~ - -~ , HERITAGE AT DARTMOUTH Certificate of Occupancy Checklist 2518 Dartmouth (Bldgs. 1 - 8 & Office) Gary Welch, Superintendent Case #98-503 Brazos Valley Construction Project. Mgrs: Jane & Sabine Phone (409) 846-8878 C. O. Checklist: In addition to the C.O. Inspection Checklist, the following items must be completed before C.O.: X Letter of credit/bond in the amount of $31,494.94 for the drainage flume improvements. near the detention pond:. (Kling submitted an engineer's estimate in this amount to cover the work that will not be completed at the time of C.O.) X There was. damage to Dartmouth that was done when the main driveway entrance was constructed.. The contractor will provide a contractor's estimate for the work that should be around $1500. A letter ofcredit/bond must be provided for this work as well.) ~~ Final plat filed for record. Go through planning case files to determine other items that may be required as part of the C.O. Check with the following staff members prior to issuance of a C.O. X Tony Michalsky, Electrical (Legal has the temporary blanket easement.) Jerry Jones,. Engineering :(777-4594. mobile) (The street. repair and drainage items that Jerry has problems with will be handled with the letter of credit/bond. However, he still has some problems with the sidewalks and handicap ramps along Dartmouth.): X Lisa Hughes/Jan-Schwartz, Legal (Ok per Lisa re: temp. blanket easement ~~ v Jim. Smith,. Sanitation Raymond Olson, Fire Department HERITAGE AT DARTMOUTH Project Notes 2518 Dartmouth (Bldgs. L - 8 & Office) Gary Welch, Superintendent Case #98-503 Brazos Valley Construction Project Mgrs: Jane & Sabine Phone (409) 846-8878 If you're not able to get rn touch with Gary Welch, contact .the owner, Emmanuel Glockzin, at the same number. August 16..1999: C.O.'s have. been issued for the office as well as Buildings 1 - 6. Buildings 7 & 8 are the only two remaining for the entire. project. Landscaping has been installed as they go; however, it has not been checked against the approved landscape plan. The main. driveway entrance was not built according to plans and .did not :line up with Teal Drive across the street. Ed .and Scott determined that'it did not create a traffic problem. It was left up to Jerry-Jones & Bob Mosley to determine if the driveway needed to be removed and installed as per the plans. FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY MULTI-FAMILY AND COMMERCIAL PROJECTS PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING ITEMS (EXTERIOR) All pavement must be in -especially around perimeter: Ali curbing must be installed, including edges of future phases. All parking spaces must be striped, including handicap spaces. • Spot check dimensions of spaces and circulation aisles. (9' x 18' with 2' ovefiang or 9' x 20' without overhang; 2-way circulation aisles must be 23' wide; 1-way carr be 20' wide.) • All islands must be curbed, raised, and either planted or bricked (decorative pavers, stamped colored concrete o.k.) and: located as shown on approved plans. • The dumpster screening must be installed as shown on approved plans. • The landscaping must be :installed and appear to be similar to approved plan. • The site must be clean and free of construction debris, equipment, job shacks, sand, dirt, eta • The development, construction and finance .signs must be removed. • The adjacent lots disturbed during construction must be returned to original condition (graded, seeded or sodded, debris removed). • Handicap ramps must be installed. • .Handicap signs must be installed. • Fire lanes must be painted in locations shown on approved plan. • Detention with groundcover must be installed and located as shown on approved plan. Look to see if water can get into and out of the pond per the approved plans. • If grass is the .ground cover to be used for general landscape and detention requirements, the sod must'be installed or there must be evidence that the area has been seeded or hydromulched. IF ANY OF THE ITEMS HAVE NOT BEEN COMPLETED, PLEASE CONTACT THE DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR IN CHARGE OF THAT PROJECT 08/12/99 13:41 $`409 846 8252 KLING ENGR ~-~-~ COCS VOLK/MORGAN I£l.J 001 KLING ENGINEERING c~ ,SURVEYING Consulting Engineers • Land Surveyors 4143 Texas Avenue, Suite 212 ..Bryan, Texas T780~ Telephone 409!846-6~1~ Far 409/84b-8252 FAX TRANSMISSIQN COVER SHEET Date: August' 12, 1999 To: Veronica Morgan, P.E., Assistant City Engineer ~1rm: City of College Station s QevelQpment Services -Engineering Fax: 764-3496 Re: Heri#age ~Ipartmen#s @ L7artmouth -Engineer's Estimate Sender: Fred Paine YQU Shl~?ULL) RECEIVE 3 PAGE(S1, INCLUDING THIS CaVER SHEET. lF YCU DD NQT RECEIVE ALL THE PAGES, PLEASE CALL (4091 84~-E~ 1~ 08/12/99 13:41 r~409 846 8252 KLING ENGR -~~~ COCS YOLK/I4fORGAN 1Qj002 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE THE HER{TAGE AT DARTMOUTH DRAINAGE FLUME IMPROVEMENTS ITEM ESTIMATED UNIT ITEM AND UNIT PRICE UNIT COST TC~TAL_EBTIMATED 1. 1510 SF Construct 8" thick Reinforced Concrete Flume Section F-F +~pleta and in place for the sum cf Dollars and Cents per square foot. (3 SF) 2. 1 LS 1_adsting Swales adjacent to Flume Section F-F to be flllad -area graded b drain complete far the wm of Dol~rs and Cants par lump sum. (S LS) 3. 5240 SF FlYdromulch application for revegetation of alt graded ar dlsturbad areas complete and In place for the sum of Dollars and Cents par square foot (3 SF) i 4, 750 SF Fumiah and Install Concrete Slurry (min. 12" thickness) 3000 psi (min) over existing Concrete Rubble channel lining complete and in place for the sum of DoNars snd Cants per squari3 foot (S SF) 5. 106 LF .Famish and Install 19.4" Dia. Steel Plpa Handrail painlsd to match wasting sitm amenities complete and in platy for the sum of Dollars and Crntc par square foot (3 LF) 6. 4 F~4 Famish ar+d install Concrete Filled Pipe Bollards painted yellow complete and In place fior the sum of Dollars and Cents par arch. (S ~°+) 7. 365 SF Construct ~' tl~ick Reinforced Concrete Flume Section A-A (incl. east of curb cut) complete and in place for the sum of Dollars and Cents per square foot. {3 SF) 8. 220 SF Construct 4• chick aeinforced Concrete Flume Section B-B complete and in place for the earn of Dollars #5.00 $1,000.00 50.0$ 53.00 560.00 3200.00 54.50 1 004. 664.40 ~ 2sa.oa tf . a 800.Oa s4s.aa I and Cents per square foot ~~ SF) 54.50 93 94.0 g, 715 SF t^or~'uc# 4~ tllick Reinforced Concrete Fttune Section C-G complete and in place ~ ~ sum ~ Dollars and Cents per square foot ($ 5f) 54.50 2 217.50 08/12199 13:42 ^C409 846 8252 KLING ENGR ~-~~ COCS VOLK/D~fORGAN 1003 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE THE HERITAGE AT DARTMOUTH DRAINAGE FLUME IMPROVEMENTS r]NTINUEQ: BEM ESTIMATED UNIT ITEM AND UNIT ARICE UNIT C05T TOT CCS MATED JO. QTY. 10. 300 5F Famish and Ine~H Rock Rubble satin Concrefie in de#entiQr- pond area ~mplete and in place i'or the sum of Qdlars ~ Cants per square foot ~~ gF) 55.00 1 500.0 S 1. 435 SF Famish and Instal{ Rock Rubble (2' wide drip both sides of Flume C-+C) eomp[ate and in place for the sum of Dollars and Cants par squats foot. {$ SF) 53.;x0 1 322.50 SUB-TOTAL: 1 S°!° CONTINGENCY: TOTAL AMOUNT 1 SUBMIT APPLICATION AND THIS ~, , ,, LIST CHECKED-0FF WTI'H 16 FOLDED COPIES OF SITE PLAN FOR REVIEW MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN PROPOSALS ALL C1 ~'Y ORDINANCES MUST BE MET)) INCLU~ING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLO~'VING: ~l . Sheet size - 24" x 36"' ~. Title block to include: a.) Name, address, location, and legal description b.) Name, address, and telephone number of applicant c.) Name, address, and telephone number of developer/owner d.) Name, address, and telephone number of architect/engineer e) Date of submittal f) Total site area 3. Ownership and current zoning. of parcel. and all abutting parcels. 6~ 4. A key rilap (not necessarily to scale). ~5. Scale should be largest standard engineering. scale possible on sheet. ~' 6. provide a north arrow. ~/7. Topography, final grading_plan, and other pertinent drainage information, (If plan has too much information, show drainage on separate sheet.) ~8. All existing streets, drives, .:buildings, and water courses on or adjacent to the proposed project site. ~~9. L,ocate I00 yr, floodplain on or adjacent to the proposed project sites note if there is none,on the site. 0. Location and size of existing utilities within or adjacent to the proposed project site: !~ 11. Proposed location, type, and size of th.e following; -~ Buildings and structures ,'Off-Street parking areas with parking spaces drawn, tabulated, and. dimensioned -""Sidewalks ,~ Common ngpen space sites "Sites for solid waste containers G~ 12. Proposed. streets, drives, and :curb cuts. For each proposed curb cut (including driveways, streets, alleys, etc.) locate existing curb cuts on the same and opposite side,of the street to determine separation distances between existing and proposed curb cuts. Indicate driveway throat length as measured in the Driveway Ordinance. (See Ordinance 1961 for driveway locatior_ and design requirements.) 3. The'total number of residential buildings and units to be constructed on the proposed project site. ~14. Landscape plan as required in Section 11 of the Zoning Ordinance (See Ordinance ~ 1638.) The landscaping plan can be shown on a separate: sheet if too much. information is on the original site plan. Attempt to reduce or eliminate plantings in easements. Include .information on the plan' such as: a) existing landscaping to remain a b) required pointcalculations ,~/ c) proposed new plantings with points earned t~ 15. Indicate unit type (number of bedrooms). >~16. The density of dwelling units per acre of the.proposed project. ~7. The gross square footage of buildings and the proposed use of each building. ^ 18. Designate number of parking spaces .required by ordinance and provided by proposal. O~ 19'. Show dimensions to size and locate all structures, parking spaces, drives, curb cuts, parking islands, and setbacks. C~3~10. Are there impact fees associated with this development? 21. Provide a v~~ater and sanitary sewer .legend to include water demands {minimum, maximum and average :demands in gallons per minute) and sewer loadings (maximum demands in gallons per day). 2. Show all meter locations. Meters must be located in easements or R.O.W. (City will size meters.) The following are typical standards for Plan Development established by Ordinance or Policy: (~' 1: Euilding separation is a minimum of 15 feet. l~ Building setbacks are outlined in Ordinance 1638, Zoning Ordinance, Table A (Sec. 7, P. 30). Minimum parking space is 9' X 20', or on a perimeter row, 9' x 18' with a 2' overhang. ~4.1 Minimum drive width is 23' with head-in parking or 20' without parking. (~/ .Raised landscaped islands, (6" raised curb) of a minimum of 180 sq. ft. are located at both ends of every parking row. Additionally, 180 sq. ft. of landscaping for every 15 interior parking spaces must be provided. ~'' 6. Streetscape compliance is required which involves special plantings along streets specified in the City's Streetscape Plan. A 6" raised curb is required around all edges of all parts of all paved areas without exception. (To include islands, planting areas, access ways, dumpster locations, utility pads, etc.) -Curb detail to be approved by City Engineer. No exceptions will be .made. for areas .designated as "reserved for future parking" ~. ~Theelstops maybe required on interior rows longer than 10 spaces or in special situations. C~' 9. Sidewalks are required at time of development if property. has. fi-ontage on a street shown on the sidewalk Master Plan or if the Project Review Committee determines the necessity. (Refer to Section 10.2 of the Zoning Ordinance). 10. Locations of dumpsters. shall be such that dumpsters are not visible from streets. Gates are discouraged and visual screening from R.U.W. is required. 1. Healthy, native trees over 6" in caliper should be retained whenever possible.. ® 12. Fire lanes of a minimum of 20 feet in width with a minimum height. clearance of 14 feet must be ~ established if any structure of any type is more than 150 feet from a public street or highway. [~' 13. Any structure in any zoning district other than R-1, R-lA, or R-2 must be within 300 feet of a fire hydrant as measured along a public street or along an approved fire lane as the hose is laid off the truck. t.~' 14. Fire. hydrants must be located on the same side ofa major street as a project; and shall be in a location approved by the City Engineer. ~Se Fire hydrants must be operable and accepted by the City and drives must have an all weather surface ..before combustibles can be brought on any site. t~ 16. A twenty four foot setback from R.O.W. to curb of parking lot is required. Parking may be allowed in ~ this area up to a maximum of 7 contiguous spaces. ®" 17. All plans must include irrigation systems for landscaping. Imgation meters are separate from the regular water systems for buildings and must be sized accordingly and include backflow prevention protection. ~•, CITY OF' COLLEGE ~TATIOIeI `~ PLANNING DIVISION POST OFFICE BOX 9960 1101 TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842-9960 (409) 764-3570 MEMORANDUM TO: Don Garrett, Garrett Engineering )~O1~I: Natalie Ruiz, Assistant Development Coordinator DATE: July 14, 1998 ItE: The Heritage at Dartmouth apartments site plan review. Staff reviewed the .above mentioned site plan for a the Heritage at Dartmouth to be located on lot 1, block 1 of the Dartmouth Addition. Attached. is a redlined copy of the site plan with staff comments/concenns that must be addressed prior. to further review. Once you have addressed all of the redlined comments, submit 3 sets of complete construction documents with the :revised situ plan attached t® continue with Phase II of the building permit process. If there are comments that you are not able to address, submit a letter addressing those items to be reviewed by staff with the construction dmerrts If you have any questions or need additional information,. please call me at .764-3 570, Thank you. Attachment cc: Case file #98-503 Emmanuel Glockzin ~~ DEVELUPI~~E1~iT IN COLLEGE STATION Week of 7/6/98 °I'he following is a list of development projects submitted this week for review: The Heritage at Dartmouth m A site plan for a new apartment complex to be located on lot 1, block 1 of the Dartmouth Addition generally located in the southwest quadrant of the Southwest Parkway and Dartmouth extension intersection. The proposed. complex totals approximately 8 acres. and contains 128 living units. (98=503) Contact for Gas Service for this. project is: David L. borough Manager, New (.~stomer Development (409)774-2527 Office (409) 777-0305 Mobile (409)774-2526 Fax ddoroug l @tuelectric: com 4200. S H 6 South. $ryan, Tx 77802 Questions about the high pressure distribution natural gas line crossing this property need to be referred to: Paul Leventis Utility Designer (409) 774-2507 Office (409) 774-2503. Fax (409) 2284224 Pager ^ HYPERLINK mailto:pleventl@tuelectric,cogn ®^pleventl@tuelectric.com^ 4200 S H 6 South Bryan, TX 77802 G~1~E ~®i I1~US'TRIAI, RLVOm BRYAI~1, TEXAS 7783 LAYERNE AKIlv DI•,SIGNER ACCESS DESIGI~i 409/S21a47Z3 DATE: JULY 1Q, 1998 CASE:1'HE HEIRTAGE AT nARTNiOUTFI (98-503} REVIEWED I3Y: LA VERVE AKIN AFTER REVIEW OF THE ITEM LISTED ABOVE, THE FOLLOw1NG CONCERNS WERI{1 NOTED: PLEASE CONTACT ME A'T YOUR EARLIES:I' CONVENIENCE SO `NE .CAN DISCUSS THE Lt~Y®I1T TO SERVE THESE APAR°i°~~NTS - iT WOUi.T3 BE A ti00D IDEA TO HAVE TI-~ ELECTRICAL LAYOUT, BECAUSE i~TE CAN SHARE THE SAME TRENCH AS ELECTRICALo IT WILL BE THE OV~INEi2~DEVELOPEIiS RESPONSIBILITY TO PROVIDE AND PLACE CONDUIT FOR GTE SERVICE TO EACH BTJII,DING. GTE WILL TERMIl~IATE OI~T.THE ®UTSIDE OF EACH BUII,DING. GTE HAS SERVICE ALONG SOUTHVVE~T PARKVtrAY. ADDITIONAL COb~NTS: CONTACT L,AVERNE AKIN VYITH GTE AT SZI-741.3 FOR ANY. CONCERNS. AS I INDICATED JUNE 26, 1998 THERE WILL BE ADQITIONAL REQUIR~MENTS;.HOWEVER, AT THIS TIME I DO NOT KNOW HOW THIS DEVELOPMENT WIL~L~BE SERVEO - AGAIN I URGE YOU TO CONTACT ME S0 W~ CAN' DISCUSS TEl_FP~IONE SERVICE. -.5~~ ~3~c~c,~~d ~ P COLLEGE STATION P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tel: 409 764 3500 September 8, 1998 Emmanuel Glockzin 4500 Carter.Creek.Parkway Bryan, Texas 77802 Dear. Mr. Glockzin, Per our phone conversation Friday, September 4, 1998, the City of College Station has issued a development permit for the Heritage @ Dartmouth project. There is one exception noted on the plans which does not allow the construction of the drive aisle at the far west side of the project along the creek. This is not being permitted for construction at this time pending the resolution to the Ashford Square detention pond acceptance. This area will be permitted once: 1. The downstream channel improvements are accomplished to allow the Ashford Square detention. pond to completely drain.. or 2. The grades on the rear driveway are revised and the detention pond design/drawings located on your site are approved for construction. The latter of the options would allow your site to stand alone independent of the Ashford Square detention pond. As your construction progresses remember that this rear drive is essential to allow your contractor to bring combustibles on site for many. of the rear buildings. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. cc: Site Plan File Development Permit File Jon Mies, Fire Marshal Shirley Vollc, Development Coordinator Home of Texas ABM University Assistant city ~ngmeer ~P.cT~ ~~X ~ 1 ~4~ ~~.Y, 'PX 77$a~5~ December 7, 1998 Mr. Bob Mosely City Engineer City of College Station 2613 Texas Ave. S. College Station, TX 77840 RE: Ashford Square/Dartmouth Subdivision's drainage facilities and detention facilities Dear Mr. Mosely: It is my understanding from David W. Scarmardo that the City Engineer has approved and accepted the required drainage facilities and detention pond which has been placed upon the Ashford. Square property as well as on THE HERITAGE AT DARTMOUTH, LTD. property and certain part of Swoboda property, all in accordance. with the specifications and instructions which you gave them in order to get final approval. on both properties as to detention pond and drainage facilities. Attached hereto is a copy of the .letter of completion. As you know, a portion of the detention pond is on our property, being a 7.89 acre tract, known as Lot 2, Block 1 of the Subdivision. Subject to certain conditions, I am to participate in the payment of the cost of these improvements which Mr. Scarmardo was to construct. However, I need some type of written approval that these facilities will be sufficient for the City's requirements for me to build my project on the 7.89 acres without having to construct or fulfill any additional requirements for additional drainage and detention pond on my property. I have submitted to the City for approval. plans for a detention pond on my property, but that was solely and alternative plan in the. event Mr. Scarmardo did not obtain a final approval of the existing drainage facility improvements and detention pond as was our agreement. I have drafted a letter agreement which I am attaching hereto for you and/or the appropriate City official to execute which in essence, tells me that all drainage and detention pond requirements of the City of College Station as to my tract of land have been satisfied with the completion of Mr. Scarmardo's work. per the attached letter and approved and completed to the satisfaction of the City and that I may proceed with my project and obtain whatever permits that I need to complete my project and that no certificate of occupancies shall be denied me because of drainage facilities and/or a detentionpond has not been completed. December 7, 1.998 Page 2 If you have any questions concerning this, then please don't hesitate to cal me. Very truly yours, THE HERITAGE AT DARTMOUTH, LTD. a Texas Limited Partnership by its General Partner: HERITAGE INTERESTS, INC. a Texas Corporation By: ~.-~ Name: EMANUEL H. GLOC Title: President CC: Veronica J.B. Morgan, P.E. -Assistant City Engineer Shirely Volk -Development Coordinator 12.;D4/98 28: ~8 '8`~lA9 288 3A37 Y-C-B 8a S (PLEASE PUT ON CITY OF COLLEGE STATION LETTER) peccmber 1, 1998 THfi gg12TTAGE AT bAlt'TMOi3TH, I TD. c/o Emanuel Glom Ste. 101 4504 Carter Creek Parlcv~-ay, Bryan, Texas 77802 ,r~D~v„th Addition Subdivision exception of detention popd R.g: Ashford Sq Subdivision Lots 2-7, Block "C". and ,~~ge improvements for Ashford Square and Lots 1-6, Block ^D", and the Dartmouth Addition's Subdivision, Lots 2-3, Block 1. ~DD2 Dear Mr. Glocl~: non d roved the above described drainage improvemcros and detect - P'~ The City of College Station has aPP ~ as well as the downstream imguoven~ canneeted therewith vn lvcateil an both of the above described prate ca Ieted the 5woboda property a~ being fuIIy and fcnally nzP for our tract described above, being 7.89 a~+ Therefore. all drxiuaSa ead detention pond requirements y au shy be $~~ ~ Permiu ereon have been satisfied in full and Y ou because ~ H=- and the project which You ~e construc~g ~~ ect thereon. which were heretofore denied Y n~szry to continue and cemPletc your p J d roblems, Additionally final Certificates of S~rtnardo's failure to correct the drainage and detention pon P the City because of da~$e ~ detentton aoalp~ey on all of your buildings and living „n;tg ~-u'not be denied by ~~ facilities ~ ~ now ~, lesion and non approv:tt. The dzamag° improvements and detention a gr,+d. d~enrivn poud pond non-comp 1~ ~ approved by us are sufficient to serve the drainag , Bloom - of the place and have finally been COMP 7.89 acres which has now b~ glued into Lots ~ulretnent af' the City for the eotire gubdivisien. very t~.~y yaur~, CITY OP C4I-LEGE STATIdN City EngFneer 12/04/98 17:.44 TX/RX N0.0786 P.002 '~ Shirley Volk Fwd' Re' # for Emanual Glockzin Pra.r I ~~ - ~ / _ ~ ~ ' may, I ~~ ~° ~+ From: Veronica Morgan To: BmosleyLCITY OF COLLEGE STATION.POLICE DEPARTMENT Date: 11/24/98 5:13PM 'i Subject: Fwd: Re: # for Emanual Glockzin i talked with ferry today about this and it appears that the. waterline that is on the construction plans for heritage at darmouth serves. a dual purpose. it is to serve the heritage. complexbut is also constructed along the northernmost lot line to serve Lot 1 of the Dartmouth Addition subdivision, which by subdivision ordinance had_ to'have public water extended to it (thus the letter of guarantee which we currently have posted). soooooo, we will need a letter'of acceptance on this heritage waterline since a portion of it was used to meet the subdivision regulations. once we get a letter of acceptance we will release the guarantee: thanks v »> Bob Mosley 11/24/98 01:28PM »> Veronica We had a letter of completion on Dartmouth Crossing which included a 12 inch waterline west of Dartmouth drive. This was recognized as a subdivision. We have not had a project called Dartmouth Addition. Emanual Glockzin is :involved with the Heritage at Dartmouth .apartments being constructed west of Dartmouth. As, part of this projectthere is a 6 inch water line loop connected to the 12 inch that was part of the Dartmouth Grossing project. The water line has been installed and tested; however, this project is 'not recognised as a subdivision and I could .not find any requirement that called for a letter of completion in our ordinances on such a project. If you have some additional information, please let me know. Bob »> Veronica Morgan 11/24/98 41:07AM »> bob, ~, can you.please check your records on this and forward a copy of the acceptance letter for the waterline extension completed. as a part of the darmouth addition (not dartmouth crossing) subdivision, we need that to release this guarantee. thanks. please send the acceptance letter to deborah grace. v CCs Deborah Grace, Natalie Ruiz, Shirley Volk ./' SUBMIT APPLICATION AND THIS LIST CHECKED-0FF WITIi I6 FOLDED COPIES OF SITE PLAN FOR REVIEW lO~IINIMU1Vi REQUIREMENTS BOR SITE PLAN PROPOSALS (ALL C TY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: ~1. Sheet size - 24" x 36" / / vt~ 2. itle block to include: ~~Name, address, location, and legal description ,~ Name, address, and telephone number of applicant Name, .address, and telephone number of developer/owner /~'Name, address, and .telephone number of arclutect/engmeer ~',/~,~Date of submittal L f,,Y`I'otal site area ~~1 3. Ownership and current zoning of parcel and all .abutting parcels. - ~~ 4. A key. map (not necessarily to scale). 1/ l~f~. Scale should be largest standard engineering scale possible on sheet. ~' ~ ~L,"/~~,,6. Provide a north arrow. " ~7. Topography, final grading plan, and other pertinent drainage information. (If plan has too much `' information, show drainage on separate sheet.) ~,+ ~l~~8. All existing streets, d, rives, buildings, and water courses on or adjacent to the proposed project site. ~~~/ 9. Locate 100 yr, tloodplain on or adjacent to the proposed project site, note if there is none on the site. ~' '~/ C~ 10. Location and size of existing utilities within or adjacent to the proposed project site. 1 1. Proposed location, type, and size of the following: a.) Build'uigs and structures b.) Off-Street parking areas with parking spaces drawn, tabulated, and dimensioned c.) Sidewalks d.) Common. open space sites e.) "Sites for solid waste containers ~2. Proposed streets, drives, and curb cuts. For each proposed curb cut (including driveways, streets, alleys, -etc.) locate existing curb cuts on the same and opposite side of the street to determine separation distances between existing. and proposed curb cuts. Indicate driveway throat length as measured in the Driveway Ordinance. (See Ordinance 1961 for driveway location and designrequuements.) 3. The total number of residential buildings and units to be constructed on the proposed project site. (~°'1`4. Landscape plan as required in Section 11 of the. Zoning Ordinance (See Ordinance # 1638.) The landscaping plan can be shown. on a separate sheet if too. much information is on the original site plan. Attempt to reduce or eliminate plantings in eas ~ments. Include information on the plan such as: a) existing landscaping to rernam b) required point calculations c) proposed new plantings with points earned 5. Indicate unit-type (number of bedrooms). C]6. The density of dwelling units per acre of the proposed project. ~7. The gross square footage of buildings and the proposed use of each building. i'~ ~~„ (~~. Designate number of parking spaces required by ordinance. and provided by proposal. l~' 19. Show dimensions to size and locate all structures, parking spaces, drives, curb cuts, parking islands, and setbacks. " (~0. Are there impact fees associated with this development? _ I. Provide a water and sanitary sewer legend to include water demands (minimum, maximum and average demands in gallons per minute) and sewer loadings{ maximum demands in gallons per day). ~2. Show all meter locations. Meters must be located in easements or RO.W. (City will size meters.) The following are typical standards for Plan. Development established by Ordinance or Policy: C~1. Building separation is a minimum.of 15 feet. Oft. Building setbacks are outlined in Ordinance 1638, Zoning Ordinance, Table A (Sec. 7, P. 30). G~'3. Minimum parking space is 9' X 20', or on a perimeter row, 9' x 18' with a 2' overhang. 6Y4. Muumum drive width is 23' with head-in parking or 20' without parking. GYS. Raised landscaped islands, (6" .raised curb) of a minimum of 180 sq. ft. are located at both ends of every parking row. Additionally, 180 sq. ft. of landscaping for every 15 interior parking spaces must be provided. C~/ti. Streetscape compliance is required which involves special plantings along streets specified in the City's Streetscape PIan. ^,/7" A 6" raised curb is required around all edges of all parts of all paved areas without exception. (To include islands, planting areas, .access ways, dumpster locations, utility pads, etc.) .Curb detail to be ~nroved by City En ineer. No exceptions will be made for areas designated as "reserved for future parking" ^~,8°' Wheelstops may be required on interior rows longer than 10 spaces or in special situations.. Sidewalks are required at time of development if property has frontage on a street shown on the sidewalk Master Plan or if the Project Review Committee determines the necessity. (Refer to Section 10.2 of the Zoning Ordinance). ~0. Locations of dumpsters shall be such that dumpsters .are not visible from streets. Gates are discouraged and visual screening from RO.W. is required. ~1. Healthy, native trees over 6°' in caliper should be retained whenever possible. Q/f2. Fire lanes of a minimum of 20 feet in width with a minimum height clearance of 14 feet must be established if any structure of any type is more than 150 feet from a public street or highway. X13. Any structure in any zoning district otherthan. R-1, R 1A, or R-2 must be within 300 feet of a fire hydrant as measured along a public street or along an approved fire lane as the hose is laid ®ffthe truck. ^'' 14. Fire. hydrants must be located on the same side of a major street as a project, and shall be in a location approved by the City Engineer. ~®" 15. Fire hydrants must. be operable and :accepted by the City and drives must have an .all weather surface before combustibles can be brought on any site. N~16. A twenty four foot setback from RU.W. to curb of parking lot is required. Parking may be allowed in ~' this area up to a maximum of 7 contiguous spaces. ly' 17. All .plans must include irrigation systems for landscaping. Irrigation meters are separate from the regular water systems for buildings and must be sized accordinglyand include backflow prevention protection. y ~r ~. J ~ ~ _. ~~ ] J J r ~~ ~~~ CONSULTING ENGINEERING & LAND SURVEYING 4444 CARTER CREEK PKWY, SUITE 108 BRYAN, TEXAS 77802 14091 846-2688 [409) 846-3094 August 5, 1998 Shirley Volk Department of Development Sercrices P.O. Box 996(} College Station, Texas 77$42-9960 RE: HERITAGE AT DARTMOUTH APARTMENT COMPLEX, COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS Dear Shirley, Parking Spaces 1-12 .(see attached exhibit "A"~, lying within the joint access easement on the northwest side of the access drive have been targeted for removal by city staff.. The given reason for wanting to remove these spaces is because they allow cars to back into same afore said joint access easement. Mr. Glockzin "owns" both lots 2 and 3, Slock 1 of the Dartmouth Addition. Development projected to .occur on lot 3 will be consistent with development proposed to occur on lot 2 (Apartments). The entrance of question has been designed to facilitate both phases of construction. Throat length for the Access Drive exceeds that required by ordinance. The original reason for providing the joint Access Easement at the present .location was to allow the proposed access drive (Boulevard) to align with the center line of Teal Drive which lies opposite subject driveway on the northeast side of Proposed Dartmouth Drive. As afore stated, Mr. Glockzin Does own "Both" portions of the "J©int Access Easement" and has incorporated this same Joint Access Easement into his Future Development Design. As per Exhibit "A" please note that each drive within the Access Drive (Boulevard) is 24' Back to Back. This allows for Two (2) Lanes "in" and Two (2) Lanes 'but" of the subject project for traffic flow. The Two (2) lanes into the subject project would allow for backup movement from spaces 1-12 while still allowing adequate passage of incoming traffic movements. Please review this matter regarding the significance and the necessity of removing said parking spaces 1-12 and advise us of your and/or staffs final decision regarding said spaces. If you have any additional questions or problems regarding the above items please contact me at your earliest convenience (409) 846-2688. P ~o ~: ~~ ~;,+~a,,~ P.L.S. i~t~~~° ~.~~ ~~~a ~~~~~~ _,~~ c;-~;t;tr-r~r ~~irl\i~~;~,oic ._.----, ..~r'~" ~ q ~ ..~ ,,,~-~~ . Date: December 29, 1999 To: Amanda Hudec, Accounting From: Bob Mosley, City Engineer~1~ Subject: Completed Infrastructure from Private Development By the attached letter of completion for The Heritage at Dartmouth .development, we have accepted the following improvements to the City of College. Station infrastructure. Storm Sewer: Concrete Drainage Flume 285 linear feet Streets: 24 foot wide access drive 575 linear feet Based upon our previous meeting, Development Services has .begun providing us engineering estimates with the private development plans. This will allow us to identify the cost of the infrastructure in the future. We do not .have the engineering estimates for this project. This memo provides a record of the infrastructure acceptance, however, the engineering cost estimates for this infrastructure will be .required from Development Services. _ c: Natalie Ruiz, Development Coordinator Jerry Jones, Engineering Technician Missy Green, Staff Assistant LETTER OF COMPLETION CITY ENGINEER DATE: I Z-ZO 'q9 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION COLLEGE .STATION, TEXAS Dear Sir: RE: COMPLETION OF H~Yti~9~ ~7` ~~Z r-f 1~IDG~-']~~ The .purpose of our letter is to request that the following listed improvements be approved and accepted as being constructed under city inspection .and completed according to plans and specifications as approved and .required by the City of .College- Station, Texas. This approval and acceptance by the City is requested in order that we may finalize any sub-contracts and to affirm their warranty on the work. This approval and acceptance by the City of the improvements listed below does hereby void the letter of guarantee for the listed. improvements on the above referenced project. The one year warranty is ZvS Vu /1~~, C'Qt~~ indicated by si atures below. WORK COMPLETED ~ ~ru ~~~e 17rr v~5 .lira r r~ ~~e -~u due., Utility Representative (s) CE & APPROVAL Cit Engineer hereby affirmed and agreed to by and by their sub-contractors as DATE /2 -Zv - 19 tz~zo-y~ Owner: ~e~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~Q~f~ ~~~ Address: ~. ~7 ~ ~~r" Signature• _ .Contractor: ~Y'Q'iis (/~~~ey ~ ~ ~G' Address: iGS~~ ~~Y~ ~y ~ ~~ ~1~Y~7 ~ Q'..S 77 ~~`~ Signature• rev 10/12/62 d(. StIBMI"I° APPLICATION AND THIS LIST CHECKED-0FF WITH 16 FOLDED COPIES OF SITE PLAN FOR REVIEW MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS F4R SITE PLAN PROPOSALS ALL TY ORDINANCES MUST BE ME INCLU~ING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE POLL~WING: ~1. Sheet. size - 24" x 36" ~!~ 2. Title block to include: ;~/~a.) Name, address, location,.and legal description ;~ ) 1Vame, address, and telephone number of applicant .~~c.) Name, address, and telephone number of developer/owner c~,o ') Name, address, and telephone number of architect/engineer 1'" /~~.) Date of submittal 1, ~/f) Total site area /,f ~d Ownership and current zoning of parcel and all abutting parcels. 4, A key map (not necessarily to scale). Scale should be largest standard engineering scale possible on sheet. l!d° 6. ~6: `' ® 7. ~~ Provide a north arrow. Topography, final gradingplan, .and other pertinent drainage information. (If plan has too touch information, show drainage on separate sheet.) Ly' 8. till existing streets,' d_ n_'v~,,es, buildings, and water courses on or adjacent to the proposed project site. 9. Locate 100 yr. floodplain on or adjacent to the proposed project site, note if there'is none on the site. 10. Location and size:of existing utilities within or adjacent to the,proposed project site. I~' 11 a Proposed location, ype, and size of fihe following:. a:) Build'ings,and structures b.) Off-Street parking areas with parking spaces drawn, tabulated, and dimensioned c.) Sidewalks d.) Common, opera space sites e.) "Sites for solid waste containers ® 12. Proposed streets, drives, and curb cuts. For each proposed curb cut (including driveways,; streets, alleys, etc.) locate existing curb cuts on the same and opposite side of-the street to determine separation distances between existing and proposed curb cuts.. Indicate driveway throat ength as measured in the Driveway Ordinance: (See Ordinance 1961 for driveway location and design requirements.) ^ 14. Landscape plan as required in Section 11 of the Zoning Ordinance (See Ordinance # 1b38.) The landscaping plan can be shown on a separate sheet if too. much information is on the original site'plan. Attempt to .reduce or eliminate plantings to easements. Include information on the plan such as: a) existing landscaping to remain b) required-point calculations c) proposed new .plantings with points earned ^ ' 13 The total nuinber of residential buildings and units to be constructed on the proposed pr®ject site. ^ 15. Indicate unit type (number of bedrooms). ^ 16. The density of dwelling units per acre of the proposed project. ^ 17. The gross square footage of buildings. and the proposed use of each building. ^ 18. Designate number of parking spaces required by ordinance and provided by proposal. ^ 19. Show dimensions to size and locate all `structures, parking spaces, drives, curb cuts, parldng:islands, .and setbacks. ^ 20. Are there impact fees associated with this development? ^ 1. Provide a water and sanitary sewer legend to .include .water demands (minimum, maximum and average demands in gallons per minute) and sewer loadings (maximum demands in gallons per day). 2. Show all meter locations. Meters must be located in easements or RO.W. (City will size meters.) The following are typical standards for Plan Development established by Ordinance or Policy: ^ 1. Building separation is a minimum of 15 feet. ^ 2. Building setbacks are outlined in Ordinance 1638, Zoning Ordinance, Table A{Sec. 7, P. 30). ^ 3. Minimum parking space is 9' X 20', or on a perimeter row, 9' x 18' with a 2' overhang. ^ 4. 1Vlinimum drive width is 23' with head-in parking or 20' without parking. ^ 5. -Raised landscaped islands, (6" raised curb) of a minimum of 180 sq. ft. are located at both ends of every parking row. Additionally, 180 sq. ft. of landscaping for every 15 interior parking spaces must be provided. ^ 6. Streetscape compliance is required which involves special plantings along streets specified in the City's Streetscape Plan. ^ 7. A 6°' raised curb is required around all edges of all. parts. of all paved areas without exception. (To include islands, planting areas, access ways, dumpster locations, utility. pads, etc:) Curb detail to be ~~roved b~ Cit~Engineer. No exceptions will. be made for areas designated as "reserved for: future parking'" ^ 8. Wheelstops maybe required on interior: rows longer than 10 spaces or in special situations.. ^ 9. Sidewalks are required at time of development if property has frontage on a street shown on the sidewalk Master Plan or if the Project Revtew Commtttee determines the necessity. (Refer to Section 10.2 of the Zoning Ordinance). ^ 10. Locations of dumpsters shall be such that dumpsters are not visible from streets. Gates are discouraged and visual screening from RO.W. is required. ^ 11. Healthy, native trees over 6" in caliper should be retained whenever possible. ^ 12. Fire lanes of a minimum of 20 feet in width with a minimum height clearance of 14 feet must be established if any structure of any type is more than 150 feet from a public street or highway. ^ 13. Any structure in any zoning district other than R 1, R 1A, or R-2 must be within 300 feet of a fire hydrant as measured along a public street or along an approved fire lane as the hose is laid off the truck. ^ 14. Fire hydrants must be located on the same side of a major street as a project, and shall be in a location approved by the City Engineer. ^ 15. Fire hydrants must be operable and. accepted by the City and drives must. have. anall weather>surface before combustibles can be brought on any site. ^ 16. A twenty four foot setback from R.O.W. to curb of parking lot is required. Parking may be allowed in this area up to a maximum of 7 contiguous spaces. ^ 17: All plans must include irrigation systems for landscaping. lmgation meters are separate from the regular water systems for buildings and must be sized accordingly and include backflow prevention protection. ^ 17: T'he gross square footage of buildings and the proposed use of each building. .~ ^ 18. The total site area and percent of building coverage of site. ^ 19. Designate number of parking spaces required by ordinance and provided by proposal. ^ 20. Show dimensions to size and locate all structures, parking spaces, drives, curb cuts, parking islands, and setbacks. The following are typical standards for Plan Development established by Ordinance or Policy: ^ 1. Building separation is a minimum of 15 feet. ^ 2. Building setbacks are outlined in Ordinance 1638, Zoning Ordinance, Table A (Sec. 7, P. 30) ^ 3. Minimum parking space is 9' X 20', or on a perimeter row, 9' x 18' with a 2' overhang. All multi-family parking lots must be screened from rights-of way. ^ 4. Minimum drive width is 23' with head-in parking or 20' without parking. ^ 5. Landscaped islands of 6" raised curb are located at both ends of each parking row. ^ 6. Landscaped islands are also located every 15 spaces or interior rows and every 20 spaces on perimeter rows. Streetscape compliance is required which involves special plantings along certain specified in the City's Streetscape Plan. 7. A 6" raised curb is required around all edges of all parts of all paved areas without exception. (To 1~ include islands, planting areas, access ways, dumpster locations, utility pads, etc.) Curb detail to be t~'~ approved by City Engineer. No exceptions will be made for areas designated as "reserved for future parking". ^ 8. Wheelstops may be required on interior rows longer than 10 spaces or in special situations. ^ 9. Sidewalks are required at time of development if property has frontage on a street shown on the sidewalk Master Plan or if the Project Review Committee determines the necessity. (Refer to Section 10.2 of the Zoning Ordinance). ^ 10. Director of Public Services determines number, and size of dumpsters. Locations shall be such that dumpsters are not visible from streets. Gates are discouraged and visual screening may be required. ^ 11. Parking islands are 9' X 20'; or 180 square feet. ^/12. Healthy, native trees over 6" in caliper should be retained whenever possible. t~ 13. Fire lanes of a minimum of 20 feet in width with a minimum height clearance of 14 feet must be established if any structure of any type is more than 150 feet from a public street or highway. ~~14. Any structure in any zoning district other than R-1, R-lA, or R-2 must be within 300 feet of a fire hydrant as measured along a public street or highway. l~" 15. Fire hydrants must be located on the same side of a major street as a project, and shall be in a location approved by the Fire Marshal's office and the Superintendent of Water and Sewer. C9" 16. Fire hydrants must be operable and accepted by the City and drives must have an all weather surface before a building permit can be issued. ^ 17. A raised island not less than 6" in height and not less than 8' in width shall separate parking areas from public rights-of--way. Eight foot setback from R.O,W. to curb of parking lot.