Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous COLLEGE STATION P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tel: 409 764 3500 Paul Clarke Clarke & Wyndham 3608 East 29th Street, Suite 100 Bryan, TX 77802 Re, Proposed restaurant developments in the Wolf Pen Creek District. Dear Paul, Staff is currently reviewing the three restaurant proposals recently submitted for Sonic, Kona's Steak House and Johnny Carino's to be located along Harvey Road in the Wolf Pen Creek zoning district. As requested, I am coordinating all correspondence, plans review, future meetings, etc. with you as our single point of contact. From the City's perspective, I will be coordinating the review and scheduling of all three projects and will be your single point of contact with the City. I look. forward to working with you on these projects and .seeing this area of Wolf Pen Creek develop in accordance with the vision of the Wolf Pen Creek Master Plan. As requested, the following is a summary of the status of each project: Kona's Steak House & Johnny Carino's Italian Restaurant: We received the site plans with color and material samples on Wednesday, August 26, 1998. However, landscape plans are missing for both sites including the Wolf Pen Creek tributary area located on lot 4. As part of the approval of the Preliminary Plat of West Wolf Pen Creek, this tributary area was "to be dedicated or developed in accord with the Master Plan at the time of development of lots 3 and 4" as. noted on the Plat. We did not receive information concerning the development or dedication of this area with the submittal on Wednesday. The site plan subrrutted refers to a "Landscape Plan" that we have not received to date. Staff has been directed to refrain from forwarding incomplete submittals to the Wolf Pen Creek Design Review Board (DRB). Before a DRB meeting, staff needs ample time to review the landscape plans for lots 3 and 4. Therefore, these proposals will not be scheduled for the September 17, 1998 Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) meeting. I've tentatively scheduled a DRB meeting on Wednesday, September 9, 1998 at 9:00 a.m. and will place both restaurants on that agenda with the condition that we receive a complete submission by noon on Wednesday, September 2, 1998. Once we receive a complete subnuss>on, staff will perform a technical review of the site, landscape and grading plans and forward comments to the DRB. Depending upon the outcome of the DRB meeting, it is possible that both restaurants could then be placed on the Thursday, October 1, 1998 P&Z meeting for final approval. The September 2, 1998 deadline is critical to meet the October 1, 1998 P&Z meeting for several reasons. Due to -the current personnel constraints in the Development Services department, increased development pressures throughout the City and prior staff commitments in September, the three weeks between the DRB meeting and the P&Z meeting will allow the DRB and staff time to work with the applicant to make any corrections or changes before staff reports -. are due to the P&Z on September 23, 1998. ,_ Home of Texas A&M University August 28, 1998 From: Jane Kee To: SVOLK~CITY OF COLLEGE STATION.CITY HALL Date: 10/8/98 9:30AM Subject: Re: Paul Clarke yes. there is no final plat yet. And they still need to revise the PP. It doesn't need to go back to anyone, just have the changes made that came outta the mtgs. »> Shirley Volk 10/08/98 08:05AM »> started looking for the final plat file for West Wolf Pen Creek and, of course, can't find one because we don't have one ! At least, if we do, I can't find a file. If, indeed, we don't have one, should we be reminding Paul Clarke so they don't think they can get building permits for these restaurants and then find out when they are ready to build that they can't? I'm gathering some information for Jim to give to Paul today, so it might be a good time to remind him. That means. infrastructure plans, etc. ~ /j ~~ ~~~ `^ ~ ` ;~ ~, __~ ~, ~~ ;~ -- ;, ~~J ~~'- ~~_ STAFF REVIEW NOTES Johnny Carino's Restaurant Case #98-439 The site plan submitted on Wednesday, August 26, 1998 was not reviewed. Instead, the site plan, with the landscaping information, submitted on Tuesday, September 1, 1998 was reviewed. The two plans did not match in several areas; so, staff reviewed the most recent submittal. Review of the ,site plan was performed with the assumption that the developer requests to develop the creek area between lots 3 and 4 instead of dedicating it to the City. Discretionary Items: Creek Orientation: The DRB needs to discuss creek orientation and possible building shift. Tributary Area: Clarify the boundaries of construction. (The improvements noted as "future" in the tributary area must be installed with the. construction of the restaurant.) Why is the 1.5' wide "Access to Corridor" different than the crushed granite pathway? What are the circle shapes with the "R" inside them near the observation deck. The City would like to see focal points created along the Harvey Road frontage of the tributary area as an entranceway to Wolf Pen Creek. Submit construction plans for the proposed observation deck and walkways. The 5' wide crushed granite pathways must be 10' wide concrete pathways. A hydraulic analysis will be required of the observation deck and stream. A sidewalk is required along the Harvey Road frontage. Other Do we have maintenance access to the creek? Ordinance Requirements: Site Plan Related _ Provide a vicinity map. Provide a parking legend -that includes the number of parking spaces required and provided. _ Location and distance to adjacent and opposite driveway locations? (This access drive was not shown. on the preliminary plat.) Johnny Canino 's Case # 98-439 Page 2 of 3 Ordinance Requirements: _ Label the dumpster location. (There appears to be a dumpster location adjacent to the southern side of the building. If this is the correct location, remove the gates and show the required 12' x 12' dumpster pad.) _ The dumpster pad must be elevated at or above the 100 year floodplain elevation. If this elevates pad much above 1', the. pad needs to be enlarged and encompassed steps up into the dumpster area for employees. Screen fence may need additional- softening as it could potentially be 10' - 12' high. (The dumpster shall not be within 20' of the minimum reservation line.) _ Show water/sewer legend to include demands. Show meter locations and label. _ Show all existing and proposed utilities. _ Show the proposed fire hydrant and fire land. on the site plan. Show and label the floodplain and floodway lines. A lot of the trees they are taking points for are going to be destroyed by the path that goes through the tree protection area or with filUcut of the site. _ Label the dotted line that runs perpendicular to Harvey Road and continues through lot four into the Wolf Pen Creek dedication area in the rear. Show or note the location of adjacent proposed and existing opposite drives. Provide a note stating that an irrigation system will be installed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Note and label the current floodway and floodplain locations. With respect to the row of handicap parking along the front of the Harvey Road side of the building: There will need to be a curb to tie the parking area to the landscaped island area. It appears. the walkway was deleted from this area. This is a difficult backing maneuver into the entrance drive. Grading Plan Revated.• _ Remove the curb leave-outs in the parking. lot near the Wolf Pen Creek dedication area. Pipe the drainage to the creek so it does not drain across the walkway. _ At outlet # 1 per drainage report will need to improve "drainage path" to creek. Label the contours on far west of parking lot (hilUpond). Continue the top of curb labels along the west side of the parking lot. Johnny Carino's Case # 98-439 Page 3 0, f 3 Comments/Concerns: _ A final plat is required prior to issuance of a building permit. (We still need a mylar of the revised preliminary plat that meets all of the Planning and Zomng Commission conditions.) _ FEMA submittal is currently pending awaiting information from a FEMA library request. No development permits will be issued until FEMA adoption of the new floodway and floodplain lines. _ TxDOT permits will be required for the drive and utilities. _ The proposed fire lane and fire hydrant must be installed and accepted prior to combustibles being stored on site. _ The electrical division will want to install an electrical duct system across the front of this property within the proposed 20' easement for future burying of the overhead lines along Harvey Road. The work will need to be coordinated with construction of the proposed development. The developer is responsible for 20% of the cost for providing electrical service tot he property. The developer installs conduit and pours transformer pad per city .specifications and requirements. The developer will also need to provide easements for any on site electrical infrastructure. Provide the electrical load data and service voltage requirements. Show the existing electrical line along the front of the property and any power poles. Coordinate electrical service details and the location of the padmount transformer with Electrical Operations Coordinator Tony Michalsky at (409) 764-3660: _ For gas service, provide a gas. equipment list broken down by appliance and a rating for each piece of gas equipment before a service line can be run or a meter is set to serve this restaurant. There is not change for the service line if we are allowed to install the service before any lime stabilization or paving is in place. We also reserve the right to determine the meter location. For more information, contact David L. borough with Texas Utilities/Lone Star Gas Company at (409) 774-2527, office; (409) 220-5455 mobile; or e- mail at "ddorougl@tuelectric.com". _ Provide a 20' public utility easement along Harvey Road. The developer is responsible for providing and placing one 4" conduit with pull string from the outside building termination to the 20' utility easement along Harvey Road. The conduit shall ell up 4' at the outside building termination and ell up 6" in the easement. The outside building termination must be within 20' of power; if not, the developer is responsible for providing and placing a 8' x 5/8" copper ground rod at the base of the termination. For more information contact Laverne Akin at (409) 82.1-4723 for conduit placement, telephone requirements and a future occupancy date. SUBMIT 10 COPIES OF THE REVISED SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS BY NOON ON TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 15, 1998 TO BE INCLUDED IN THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PACKETS FOR THE MEETING ON THURSDAY, OCTOBER 1, 1998. THE MEETING WILL BE AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT 1101 TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH. COORDINATE FUTURE SUBMITTALS WITH ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR NATALIE RUIZ AT (409) 764-3570. Ruiz -PRC - Wednesday,_September.2,._1:998 ........................ From: Jim Smith To: PRC Date: Fri, Aug 28, 1998 8:51 AM Subject: PRC -Wednesday, September 2, 1998 Cornerstone Commercial Section Two (98-323): No problem. ohnny Carino°s Italian Resaurant {98-439): I do not see a container location on this site. However, I do see something on the southease corner of the building that may be container location, but I'm not sure. If it is, it has gates which are not required. Please !et me know on this one. Kona's Steak House (98-438): This container pad is not 12 x 12 and should be moved to the southeast so I can have astraight-in approach. Also, it shows to have gates which are not required. Get with me if you have any questions. Please let me know on this one also. Hotel/Conference Center (98-43~: No problem. Great looking si#e. Has aroll-off compactor. Sonic Drive-In Restaurant (98-430): No problem. Carter Lake Section Five (98-231): No problem. Carter Lake Section Six (98-232): No problem. Living Hope Baptist Church (98-705): No problem. We can service this location with a small, automated container on wheels. Thanks!! `~ ~~-- ~ f _. ~... Cornerstone Commercial Section Two - A preliminary plat of approximately 7.6 acres divided into 6 C-1 Commercial lots generally located on the northeast corner of Woodcreek Drive and the Highway 6 Frontage Road. (98-323) Texas UGlities/L.one Star Gas Company Contact for this project: David L. Dorough Manager, New Customer Development 4200SH6S Bryan, TX 77802 (409) 774-2527 Office (409)774-2528 Fax (409) 220-5455 Mobile ddorougl@ tuelectric.com Comments: In order to provide gas service to Lots 2 and 3 of this development, we will need a 10' PUE between Lots 1 and 4 running north to the corner of Lots 2 and 3. ************************************** Johnny Carino's Italian Restaurant - A site plan for a new restaurant totaling 6300 square feet to be constructed along the south side of Harvey Road, just west of the Woodstock condominiums in the Wolf Pen Cree oning district. The total site is 2.65 acres, lot 4 of the West Wolf Pen Creek Subdivision. (98- 439) Texas Utilities/Lone Star Gas Company Contact for this project: David L. Dorough Manager, New Customer Development 4200 S H 6 S Bryan, TX 77802 (409) 774-2527 Office (409) 774-2528 Fax (409) 220-5455 Mobile ddorougl@ tuelectric.com Comments: We need a gas equipment list broken down by appliance and a rating for each piece of gas equipment before a service line can be run or a meter is set to serve this restaurant. There is no charge for the service line if we are allowed to install the service before any lime stabilization or paving is in place. We also reserve the reserve the right to determine the meter location. Kona's Steak House - A site plan for a new restaurant totaling 7800 square feet to be constructed on along the south side of Harvey Road, just west of the Woodstock condominiums in the Wolf Pen Creek zoning district. The total site is 1.8 acres, lot 3 of the West Wolf Pen Creek Subdivision. (98-438) Texas Utilities/Lone Star Gas Company Contact for this project: David L. Dorough Manager, New Customer Development 4200 S H 6 S Bryan, TX 77802 (409) 774-2527 Office DATE: AUCrUST 28, 1998 CASE: JOHNNY CARTON'S ITALIAN RESTATJEZANT (98-439) REVIEWED B~': LAVERNE AKIN AFTER REVIEW OF THE ITEI!'I I,IS'TED ABOVE, THE FOLLOWING CONCERNS '6~ERE NOTED: PROVIDE 20 FOOT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT ALONG HARVEY ROAD. THE DEVELOPER/OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND PLACING 1-4 INCH CONDUIT WITH PULL STRING FROM THE OUTSIDE. BUILDING TERMHNATION TO THE 20 UTILITY EASEMENT ALONG HARVEY ROAD. THE CONDUIT SHAI.,L ELL UP 4 FEET AT THE OUTSIDE BUILDING TERMINATION AND ELL UP 6 INCHES IN THE EASEMENT. THE OUTSIDE BUILDING TERMINATION MUST BE WITHIN 20 FEET OF POWER - IF NOT, THE DEVELOPER.OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FORPROVIDING AND PLACING A 8'X5/8" COPPER GROUND ROD AT THE BASE OF THE TERMINATION. alie Ruiz-~Re: New.:::..evel.o:. ment~~,.:`. ..._............_. .............. - -..._._.__... _... ..._.................... ......._.._....... --..._.... _ _ _............ - Nat D P ::::::::::::::::.::::.. _--..... - ~ ~~ ........_ __ -~ -::::::::::..... ..::._:::::::........._.........Pa e 1 . ........... 9 . From: Tony Michalsky To: NRUIZ cLDCITY OF COLLEGE STATION.CITY HALL Date: Fri, Aug 28, 1998 2:31 PM Subject: Re: New Development Development Comments Cornerstone Commercial Section Two (98-323) We need a 10 ft easement along the east property line of Lot 1 and Lot 2. We need a 10 ft easement along the north property line of Lot 2, Lot 3 and Lot 6. We need a 20 ft easement, 10 ft on each side of the property line between Lots 3 & 6 and Lots 4 & 6 to be able to provide service to Lot 5. Johnny Carino's Italian Restaurant (98-439) Kona's Steak House (98-438) Sonic Drive-In Restaurant (98-430) The Electrical Division will want to install an electrical duct system across the front of this property within the proposed 20 ft easement for future burying of the overhead lines along Harvey Rd. The work will need to be coordinated with construction of the development. Developer is responsible for 20% of the cost for providing electrical service to the property. Developer installs conduit and pours transformer pad per city specs and requirements. Developer will need to provide easements for any on site electrical infrastructure. Need electrical load da#a and service voltage requirements Need to show existing electrical line along front of property and any power poles. Coordinate with electrical division location of padmount transformer on site plan. Carter Lake Section Five (98-231) Carter Lake Section Six (98-332) No Comments Living Hope Baptist Church (98-705) Show Overhead electrical line across front of property and power poles. Electrical service can be provided from front ovefiead line. Service wiH need to be underground, the developer installs conduit per city spec and requirements. Developer pays 20% of the cost for electric service. Hotel /Conference Center (98-437) Developer is responsible for 20% of the cost for providing electrical service to the property. Developer installs conduit and pours transfor~~er pad per city specs and requirements. Developer will need to provide easements for any on site electrical infrastructure. Need electrical load data and service voltage requirements Need to show existing electrical lines along property line backing up to the Crest lots, along Dartmouth and along Richards St. Coordinate with electrical division location of padmount transformer on site plan. »> Natalie Ruiz 08/26/98 03:47PM »> Attached is a list of items submitted this week for review. Thanks! 'x REAL ESTATE INVES NT SERVICES August 20, 1998 Ms. Shirley Volk, Development Coordinator Ms. Natalie Ruiz, Associate Coordinator City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842-9960 RE: DRB and PRC Wolf Pen Creek Developments Via: Faz and Mail Dear Shirley and Natalie: We are in the process of assisting the development of five restaurants in Wolf Pen Creek (W.P.C.). Four of the restaurants will need forthcoming meetings with the DRB, PRC or both, prior to site-plan hearings at the Planning & Zoning Commission. These are KONA Steakhouse, Johnny Carino's, Sonic and Rudy's Barbecue. We intend to have all the documentation for KONA, Carino's and Sonic submitted by noon on August 26, 1998 to be able to proceed to P&Z on September 17, 1998. Additionally, we are requesting a DRB meeting for Sonic, KONA, and Carino's on Wednesday, September, 2, 1998. It is extremely important that I be contacted on any future hearings so that my representative, or I can attend. These restaurants have been specifically site-planned to the foot, to fit the newly approved Plat. Additionally, these restaurants have a cross access easement and are all contingent upon the master plan. I was unaware that Sonic had a DRB meeting last week, until after the meeting. Mr. Ray Corkran of Sonic explained that it was his understanding that Mr. Greg Taggert of MDG was notified of the DRB meeting, and Greg either failed to notify anyone or assumed the City had notified us. Our office will bear the responsibility to inform the applicable people needing to attend these meetings from the private sector end. Mr. Taggert, of MDG, will be requested to attend these meetings and procure documentation for these meetings; but is not the designated contact or presenter. Since each restaurant hinges on the successful approvals of the others, as well as the Plat, there is too much at stake for our firm not to handle communications and attend the hearings. 3608 East 29th Street, Suite 100 • Bryan/College Station, TX 77802 • (409) 846-4384 • Fax: (409) 846-1461 College Station • Bryan • Houston (713) 681-5876 Page 2 of 2 This letter is not intended to insinuate that you or the City has handled anything incorrectly whatsoever, is a request that if only one Party can be notified, it needs to be Clarke & Wyndham,. Inc., and not MDG. Thanking you in advance for your assistance and we look forward to working with you. Best regards, Paul J. Clarke, CCIM President PJC/tb cc: Jane Key/City Greg Taggert/MDG via fax Charlie MercerlKONA via fax' Ray Corkran/Sonic via fax ref:10450 ~a 's cif } 'v}'a t kt^. +~s ~~~ NOTE: FOR FIXTURE SPECIFICATIONS, SEE CHART ON PAGE 23. ~~'~~~ ~ ~ ,~`' ~~ $t ~ [ . With cast aluminum pole, PM4946 Additional post fixture not shown, P6839 (see chart). `~ m fixtures not shown, F6893 and I ^~° ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~"'~ F6895 (see chart). NUMBER LIGHTS MAX. WATT LAMP TYPE FLUORESCENT PHOTOCELL HEIGHT WIDTH PROJECTION TOP TO LOCKUP 86790 3 40 CAND. 26" 13" 4'h" 10'h" BF6790 2 13 PL-13 26" 13" 4'/2" 10'h" 86830 1 100 MED. 18" 7'/2" 9" 12" 86831 * 2 60 LAND. 25" 11 " 13" 18" P6832* 2 60 CAND. 27" 11" - - F6833* 2 60 CAND. 26" 11" - - B6834* 3 60 CAND. 35" 16" 17" 25" P6835* 3 60 CAND. 34" 16" - - B6836* 4 60 CAND. 43'/2" 19" 21" 31'h" P6837* 4 60 CAND. 42'/2" 19" - - F6838*NOrsrioww4 60. CAND. 42" 19" - - P6839*NOrsHOwN1 100 MED. 19" 7'/2" - - 66890 1 100 MED. 133/4" 7'/2" 9'/4" 6'/4" 86891 * 2 60 CAND. 22" 11'/2" 14" 7" 66892* 3 60 LAND. 2T/8" 16" 17'i2" 13" F6893NOrsHOwN1 100 MED. 133/4" 7'/2" - - F6894* 2 60 CAND. 22" 11'h" - - F6895*NOrsHOwN3 60 CAND. 27'/8" 16" - - METALWORK DIE CAST ALUMINUM. GLASSWARE MW, HN, CD, IW, IH, CL 'NOTE.• WHEN ORDERED WITH COLORED GLASS PANELS, THIS ITEM SUPPLIED WITH ONE-LIGHT, MEDIUM BASE CAMPING (100W MAX.J METALLIC PATINA PAINTED TEXTURED PAINT ~-~ ~/ .- , e~/ ~~ZUlf2~~ '~ ~o ~~ ~~ NUMBER LIGHTS MAX. WATT LAMP TYPE ~$ FLUORESCENT PHOTOCELL HEIGHT WIDTH PROJECTION TOP TO C~ ~~£~ LOCKUP P4917* 2 60 CAND. • • 18'/2" 7" - - 84918" 2 60 CAND. • 18" 7" 9'h" 103/8" 64919* 2 60 CAND. 27" 7" 9'/2" 103/8" F4993*NOTSHOWN2 60 LAND. 20" 7" - - B5715 1 100 MED. • • 13'/2" 6" 8" 63/4" 85716 1 100 MED. 19'/4" 6" 8" E~'/4" v -----* P5717 3 60 • -- CAND. -- • 24" 11'/4" - - B5718* 3 60 LAND. • • 26'h" 11'/4" 14" 12" B5719* 3 60 CAND. • 39'/2" 11'/4" 14" 12" F5720'`NOTSHOwN3 60 CAND. 24" 11'/4" - - 85721 1 100 MED. 12" 10" 5'/4" 6'/4" 65722* 2 60 CAND. • 16 153/4" 75/8" 9'/2" _ ---- 86820 - 1 60 MED. 18" 6" ' 2 _ - '~~ 66821 - 1 60 MED. - -~, 86822" ---- 2 60 ----- --- CAND. 21'/2" -- 7" 11 " 14" 66823" 2 60 - CAND. • • 19" 7" 11'h" ~ 5'/2" j 86824' 3 60 LAND. 29" 1 '4 2 2 l' B6825* 3 60 CAND. 26" 11'/4" 14" 8" METALWORK SOLID BRASS GLASSWARE CL, CD, MW, HN, IW, IH. LEADED: LS, HA, WG. NOTE: WHEN ORDERED WITH COLORED GLASS PANELS, THESE ITEMS SUPPLIED WITH ONE-LIGHT MEDIUM BASE CAMPING (100W MAX.) Companion hanging fixtures available, F4993 and 1-b/~v (see cnarr~. z,4j ,+ ~~, "~ • __ 01/11/99 15:51 4409 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS ~:~ x:x:x`x;x:x:x::kx:x::kY::Y*xsx:xSx;x:x;x:x:x:x:x::k* :k x: x: ACTIVITY REPORT x:>kx: x;xcx::kxc:k%k:kx::kx:~x:x:ak:kxcx:xc%kx:sk%k:kxexc:k TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX N0. 6102 CONNECTION TEL 15122638055pp152 CONNECTION ID START TIME Ol/11 15:51 USAGE TIME 00'40 PAGES 2 RESULT OK I~ 0 O 1 Y FACSIMILE COVER SHEET CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 South Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (409) 764-3570 Fax (409) 764-3496 DATE: ~- ~ `, ~ ~ ~ # PAGES INCLUDING COVER Ifyou did not receive a complete fax, please call our office immediately for a new transmittal. ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ coNrnANY: ~- ~„ ~~a~~~ DEPARTMENT: PHONE: F ~2 Zl.¢ - 55 FROM: ~ ~.u.~~ ~..,, vc~ C FAX: REMARKS: ^ Urgent ^ For your review ^ Reply ASAP ^ Please Comment O.~-c ~~ Gi~~e .~- CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 South Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (409) 764-3570 Fax (409) 764-3496 DATE: '~~ ~~~ `aqq # PAGES INCLUDING COVER Z If you did not receive a complete fax, please call our o.,~ice immediately for a new transmittal. COMPANY: DEPARTMENT: PHONE: FAX: $~l-lo - ! Ole ~ FROM:. ~~~~ n 4 ~ _ - ~Io~-- PHONE: ~l ~ ~, - 3'S ~ y FA.X: REMARKS: ^ Urgent ^ For your review ^ Reply ASAP ^ Please Continent 03/1199 THU 14:27 FAY X4.001 BASMARKHAM ENGINEERING, INC, Consulting Engineers 6500 Greenville Avenue, Suite 525 " ~ ~ ~~ Datlas, TX 7520b (214) 692-5186 (214) 692-5189 -Fax TAX TRANSMITTAL DATE.° ~ ' J l ~ r°1 ~ TIME: T®: N~:1` ~~ ~ ~,t,t (-~ PROJECT NO.: PROJECT.• PHONE.° ~~2¢ ~$ ' 2 52 ~~ f(/ ~ ( .'y~ p; i. ~ ~F11j~l~, ~i ,~ lJi~~~ ~2vnQ„n(X . ~- -~1Q Number ojpages including this cover sheet REMfIRb'S: ®URGENT FOR INFORMATION ONLY ~ FOR YOUR REVIEW ^ PLEASE CONHvFENT ^ REPLY ASAP _ ~~' ~tpc~t ~~QU,~Q N~~17 f~~`•( ~tlt2TNc~L l~t`e~rZ.Mys-7~inr`1 {~(~~5~ ~ t yG f'+~l ~ ~ ~ ~ L s PLEASE NOTIFY SENDER IIvIIvIEDLATEt-Y ff TRANSMISSION IS NOT COMPLETE. 03111/90 THIJ 14:27 FAX CARINO'S COLLEGE STATION 98252 DOMESTIC WATER FIXTURE COUNT SCHEDULE ITEM DESIGNATION DW. FIXTURE UNITS QUANTITY TOTAL F.U. WATER CLOSET FV WC 10 5 50 WATER CLOSET TT WC 5 0 0 LAV LAV 3 4 12 URINAL UR 5 1 5 MOP SINK MS 4 1 4 SHOWER SHR 4 0 0 WATER COOLER EWC 2 0 0 MISC. EC2UIP. 1.5 48 72 - - 0 0 0 - - 0 0 0 - - o a 0 - - 0 0 0 - - 0 0 0 - - 0 0 0 - - 0 0 0 - - 0 0 0 - - 0 0 0 - - 0 0 0 - - o a a - - 0 0 0 TOTAL 143 GPM 80 lQ] 002 2:28 PM Page i January 11, 1999 SUBJECT: West Wolf Pen Creek Subdivision Johnny Carino's Restaurant Kona's Steak House TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: The final plat for the West Wolf Pen Creek subdivision has been submitted and reviewed by City staff, and subsequently returned to the engineering firm for revision. These revisions were minor, and if made the City of College Station staff does not anticipate a problem in receiving approval of the plat from the Planning and Zoning Commission on January 21, 1999. Section 212.005 of the Local Government Code states "The municipal authority responsible for approving plats must approve a plat or replat that is required to be prepared under this subchapter and that satisfies all applicable regulations". Therefore, if all changes required by ordinance have been made, and barring identification of additional applicable regulation by the Planning and Zoning Commission, we anticipate approval by that body on January 21, 1999. The development permit for site grading and fill can be issued if designated trees are protected and the floodplain/floodway is staked to preclude intrusion. If any required revisions following review of construction documents are made and the documents are approved, a building permit can be issued for both of the restaurants. The architectural plans and most of the civil/site plans have been reviewed and approved at this time. Yours very truly, James M. Callaway Director of Development Services cc: file rIL COLLEGE STATION P. O. 13ox 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tel: 409 764 3500 August 2, 1999 Johnny Carino's Restaurant Attn: Mr. Brett Oldham, Manager 620 Harvey College Station, TX 77840 Re: Required screening fence Dear Mr. Oldham It has come to our attention that a required screening fence between Johnny Carino's Country Italian. Restaurant and Woodstock Condos has not been installed. It seems this requirement was overlooked during the site plan process, however we must require a fence to be installed at this time. The Zoning Ordinance in Section 8, paragraph 10 states: Where there is a common side or rear lot tine or lot lines between commercial or industrial land and developed residential areas, the owner of said commercial or industrial land shall erect a fence that properly screens adjacent residential lots from adverse influences such as noise, vehicular lights, trespass, and other adverse .influences. . In order to come in compliance with the above section, please erect a fence between Johnny Carinos and Woodstock Condos of at least six (6) feet in height within 60 days of the date of this notification. Again, we are sorry that this matter was overlooked during the site plan process. Your cooperation in this situation is much appreciated; if you have any questions, please feel free to either contact Natalie Ruiz or me at 764-3570 Monday through Friday. Sincerely, Shauna Anderson Staff Planner Cc: Charles Mercer, Fired Up, Inc. , Natalie Ruiz, Development Coordinator Planning File Home of Texas A&M University __ 25/02 ' 99 13:02 FAX X09 693 -1243 N1 D G l~j 001 1~ IU1 VICIPA~ D~ ~~L OPM~~~' GROUP 3551TezesAve,Soru3~St~.43Col1egeStation.7'esas775403909-693-53593FAX--X09-693~(243~E-mail-md~ts gte.neY F.ngineeting, 5urvcyingaPlsnning andfinviros-mcntal Consultants DATE: February 25, 1999 TO; Development Services FROIvi: W.F. Koehler RE. Johnnie Cornino's (NIDG # 009-2997) I The ma.~»lm flow rate for the irrigation system is 75 gallons per minute, limited by 2" control .ralves_ A 2-inch meter should serve this demand. t~~~-,' +"~n~ i I 11®f.' Post-it® Fax Note To CoJDept C Phone # ' Pax B 7671 Dare Frem ~ ~ Co. Phone ~ t ~~ Fax 1! D®(' -1 _ _ --- -- _ - __ __ _ __ niiivi44 1325 ^n 409 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT 5VC5 I~001 %k%k%k:k:k%k%k%k%k%k%k%k~%k%k~%k %k %I: %k :k %k %k*%k~* :k:kx: ACTIVITY REPORT :kxc:t: %k~~%k%k%k%k%k%k:k%k%k%k%k%k~%k:k%k~%k%K%k%k%k%k%k TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX N0. 6143 CONNECTION TEL 17349941376pp161 CONNECTION ID START TIME 01/14 13:24 USAGE TIME 00'45 PAGES 2 RESULT OK SHEET CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 South Texas Avenue, P.O, Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (409) 764-3570 Fax (409) 764-3496 1\d~1Vit1C\L1J. V U1 b'Clll u r~r your review u nepiy r-~~r~.c- u riease ~;omment CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 South Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (409) 764-3570 Fax (409) 764-3496 DATE: ~ / # PAGES INCLUD]NG COVER ~- If yo did no receive a complete fax, please call our office immediately for a new transmittal. TO: ~ COMPANY: DEPARTMENT: PHONE: FAX: r,,, ,~. / ~/, ~ O~ _ i //.~ Off; FAX: ^ Urgent ^ For your review ^ Reply ASAP ^ Please Comment ,G-- 'C'am ~ r~~- Q~ ~` ~`7f~~"`~ f ~' COLLEGE STATION January 14, 9999 TeL 409 7&4 3500 SUBJECT: TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: P. O. Box 9960 ~ 1101 Texas Avenue m College Station, TX 77842 Building Permits m Johnny Carino's Restaurant Kona's Steakhouse In response to requests from Fired Up, Inc. to identify exactly what permits can be issued for the subject restaurants, and under what conditions those permits can be issued, the City has deterrnined the following: Based on the plats and plans for the subject restaurants that have been submitted to the City of College Station, and the reviews and requests for revisions made by the City to the submitting engineering firm to date, the City has made the determination that a limited drainage development permit, a site clearing and grubbing permit and a "foundation only° permit for each restaurant could be issued at this time with certain conditions. Because the subdivision plat for this development has not been filed for record, the issuance of the "foundation oniy° permit would allow foundation work to proceed. The recipient of the permit would be proceeding construction at his .own risk until the plat is approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and is filed for record: Fina( inspection of the foundation and authorization to pour concrete will be withheld until the subdivision plat is filed for record. In addition to that condition, the remaining required construction documents for the projects must be submitted, reviewed and approved prior to issuance of a `full building permit°, which would cover all the remaining aspec,~ts of the buildings. As with all construction projects in College Station, no combustibles can be brought to the site until the water lines and fire hydrants are installed, tested and accepted by the City, and fire lanes which will support emergency vehicles are installed. We hope that this information will be beneficial to you in completing the purchase of your property. ours ery I , ,,,1 a~,..._ J mes M Callaway Director of Development cc: files Home of Texas A&M University LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL MUNICIPAL DEVELOPI~NT GROUP 2551 TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH, S[71TE A ® COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840 Ph: (409)693-5359 Fs: (409)693-4243 Engineering • Plan ring • Snrveying TO• Veronica Morgan / Natalie Ruiz ~ FROM: DATE: Greg Taggart 22 Jan 99 MDG JOB NUMBER: 009-2997 ATTACHED PLEASE FIND: NO. OF COPIES: DESCRIPTION: 2 Construction Plan Sets, Johhnie Corino's 1 Markup Set THESE ITEMS ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BELOW: ~E7 FOR APPROVAL ® FOR ~fOUR USE ® AS REQUESTED ® OTHER: COMMENTS: RECIPIENT: SIGNED: ~ DATE: COLLEGE STATION January 14, 1999 Te(: 409 764 3500 SUBJECT: TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: P. O. Box 9960 ~ 1101 Texas Avenue ~ College Station, TX 77842 Building Permits a Johnny Carino's Restaurant Kona's Steakhouse In response to requests from Fired Up, Inc. to identify exactly what permits can be issued for the subject restaurants, and under what conditions those permits can be issued, the City has determined the following: Based on the plats and plans for the subject restaurants that have been submitted to the City of College Station, and the reviews and requests for revisions made by the City to the submitting engineering firm to date, the City has made the determination that a limited drainage development permit, a site clearing and grubbing permit and a "foundation only" permit for each restaurant could be issued at this time with certain conditions. Because the subdivision plat for this development has not been filed for record, the issuance of the "foundation only" permit would allow foundation work to proceed. The recipient of the permit would be proceeding construction at his own risk until the plat is approved by the Planning and .Zoning Commission and is filed for record: -Final inspection of the foundation and authorization to pour concrete will be withheld until the subdivision plat is filed for record. In addition to that condition, the remaining required construction documents for the projects must be submitted, reviewed and approved prior to issuance of a "full building permit", which would cover all the remaining aspects of the buildings. As with all construction projects in College Station, no combustibles can be brought to the site until the water lines and fire hydrants are installed, tested and accepted by the City, and fire lanes which will support emergency vehicles are installed. We hope that this information will be beneficial to you in completing the purchase of your property. ours ery I , t`~ ~\ James M Callaway Director of Development Serti cc: files Home of Texas A&M University January 14, 1999 SUBJECT: Building Permits TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Johnny Carino's Restaurant Kona's Steakhouse In response to requests from Fired Up, Inc. to identify exactly what permits can be issued for the subject restaurants, and under what conditions those permits can be issued, the City has determined the following: Based on the plats and plans for the subject restaurants that have been submitted to the City of College Station, and the reviews and requests for revisions made by the City to the submitting engineering firm to date, the City has made the determination that a limited drainage development permit, a site clearing and grubbing permit and a "foundation only" permit for each restaurant could be issued at this time with certain conditions. Because the subdivision plat for this development has not been filed for record, the issuance of the "foundation only" permit would allow foundation work to proceed. The recipient of the permit would be proceeding construction at his own risk until the plat is approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and is filed for record. Final inspection of the foundation and authorization to pour concrete will be withheld until the subdivision plat is filed for record. In addition to that condition, the remaining required construction documents for the projects must be submitted, reviewed and approved prior to issuance of a "full building permit", which would cover all the remaining aspects of the buildings. As with all construction projects in College Station, no combustibles can be brought to the site until the water lines and fire hydrants are installed, tested and accepted by the City, and fire lanes which will support emergency vehicles are installed. We hope that this information will be beneficial to you in completing the purchase of your property. Yours very truly, James M Callaway Director of Development Services cc: files / t ~~.._~ '. ~...~ ,~ '~°" 1. __ SUBMIT APPLICATION AND 'T'HI"S~ LIST CHECKED-0FF WIT'H,t~6 (® FOLDED COPIES OF SITE PLAN FOR REVIEW MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN PROPOSALS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING: Sheet size - 24" x 36" Title block to include: a.) Name, address, location, and legal description b.) Name, address, and telephone number of applicant c.) Name, address, ar~d~ tel~hone number~of developer/owner ~d:~) Name, address, and telep~ione number of architect/engineer e.) bate of submittal-~° ~f Total site area ,;Ownership and current zoning of parcel and all abutting parcels. A key map (not necessarily to scale). ®''~5. Scale should be largest standard engineering scale possible on sheet. (6. Provide a north arrow. l~ 7. Topography, final grading plan, and other pertinent drainage information. (If plan has too much information, show drainage_on_separate sheet.) ~~'~8. All existing streets, drives, buildings, and water courses on or ad~acent~to the proposed project site. ®`~ 9. Locate 100 yr. floodplain on or adjacent to the proposed project site, note if there is none on the site. ®0. Location and size of existing utilities within or adjacent to the proposed project site. ~~ ,--~ Q~ 11. Proposed location, type, and size of the following: a:): Buildings and structures ~,b'`)~ Off-Street parking areas with parking spaces drawn, tabulated, and dimensioned sec'.) ..Sidewalks °d:~ Common, open space sites ~~) "Sites for solid waste containers ~ _. ~, „Proposed streets, ~dnves, and cure' cuts. For each proposed curb cut (including drivewa}~s, streets, ,,~~ ~ alleys, etc.) locate existing curb cuts on the same and opposite side. of the street to determine separation distances between existing and proposed curb cuts. Indicate driveway throat length as measured in the Driveway Ordinance. (See Ordinance 1961 for driveway location and design requirements.) t,,,a"~""® 13. The total number of residential buildings and units to be constructed on the proposed project site. ,: ~ 3 ® 14..;Landscape plan as required in Section 11 of the Zoning Ordinance (See Ordinance # 1638.) The ~'~ landscaping plan can be shown on a separate sheet if too much information is on the original site plan. Attempt to reduce or eliminate plantings in easements. Include information on the plan such as: a) existing landscaping to remain b) required point calculations c) proposed new plantings with points earned ~ ~ ® 15. Indicate unit type (number of bedrooms). ~ ~ ® 16. The density of dwelling units per acre of the proposed project. ®° 17. The gross square footage of buildings and the proposed use of each building. ~~ . ~' q{ l8~ Designate number of parking spaces required by ordinance and provided by proposal. .~ .~ ~'' 19. Show dimensions to size and locate all structures, parking spaces, drives, curb cuts, parking islands, and ~~tbacks,~, (~20. Are there impact fees associated with this development? ~~~21. Provide a water and sanitary sewer legend to include water demands (minimum, maximum and average demands in gallons per minute) and sewer loadings (maximum demands in gallons per day). C,1~22. Show all meter locations. Meters must be located in easements or R.O.W. (City will size meters.) The following are typical standards for Plan Development established by Ordinance or Policya 0'~1. Building separation is a minimum of 15 feet. t~ s2. Building setbacks are outlined in Ordinance 1638,.Zoning Ordinance, Table A (Sec. 7, P. 30). 3. Minimum parking space is 9' X 20', or on a perimeter row, 9' x 18' with a 2' overhang. ~``~4. Micumum drive width is 23' with head-in parking or 20' without parking. 5. Raised landscaped islands, (6'° raised curb) of a minimum of 180 sq. ft. are located at both ends of every parking row. Additionally, 180 sq. ft. of landscaping for every 15 interior parking spaces must be provided. ^ ~ 6. ~ Streetscape compliance is required which involves special plantings along streets specified in the City's ~~ Streetsca e Plan. P 4~ 7. A 6°' raised curb is required around all edges of all parts of all paved areas without exception. (To include islands, planting areas, access ways, dumpster locations, utility pads, etc.) Curb detail to be approved by City En ig Weer. No exceptions will be made for areas designated as "reserved for future .parking" C3` 8.7 Wheelstops may be required on interior rows longer than 10 spaces or in special situations. ® 9. Sidewalks are required at time of development if property has frontage on a street shown on the sidewalk Master Plan or if the Project Review Comrruttee determines the necessity. (Refer to Section 10.2 of the Zoning Ordinance). g4 l0e Locations of dumpsters shall be such that dumpsters are not visible from streets. Gates are discouraged and visual screening from R.O.W. is required. ~'~11.1-lealthy, native trees over 6" in caliper should be retained whenever possible. °~ ` ® 12.~~Fire lanes of~a34iruruirium~"of,20 feet in wiidth ~vsnth~~a minimum heighf clearance of 14 feet must be '`established if any structure of any type is more than 150 feet from a public street or highway. (73. Any structure in any zoning district other than R-1, R lA, or R-2 must be within 300 feet of a fire hydrant as measured along a public street or along an approved fire lane as the hose is laid off the truck. X14. Fire hydrants must be located on the. same side of a major street as a project, and shall be in a location approved by the City Engineer. 15. Fire hydrants must be operable and accepted by the City and drives must have an all weather surface before combustibles can be brought on any site. 0~ 16. A twenty four foot setback from R.O.W. to curb of parking lot is required. Parking may be allowed in this area up to a maximum of 7 contiguous spaces. ® l7. All plans must include irrigation systems for landscaping. Irrigation meters are separate from the regular water systems for buildings and must be sized accordingly and include backflow prevention protection. _ ~ t L L SUBMIT APPLICATIOI~T AIaID THIS LIST CHECKED-0FF ~vI°TEI 16 FOLDED COPIES OF SITE PLAid FOIL ItEVIE~/ MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN PROPOSALS ALL TY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET INCLU~ING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLL WING 1. Sheet size - 24" x 36" 2. Title block to include: a.) Name, address, location, and legal description b.) Name, address, and telephone number of applicant c.) Name, address, and telephone number of developer/owner d.) Name, address, and telephone number of architectlengineer e.) bate of submittal f.) Total site area I~ 3. Ownership and current zoning of parcel and all abutting parcels. ~' 4. A key map (not necessarily to scale). ~~ 5. Scale should be largest standard engineering scale possible on sheet. y~ 6. Provide a north arrow. ® 7. Topography, final grading plan, and other pertinent drainage information. (If plan has too much information, show drainage on separate sheet.) //~ 8. All existing streets, drives, buildings, and water courses on or adjacent to the proposed project site. l~ 9. Locate 100 yr. floodplain on or adjacent to the proposed project site, note if there is none on the site. ® 10. Location and size of exist~g utilities within or adjacent to the proposed project site. 11. Pro osed location, e, and size of the following: ~a .Buildings and structures b.) Off-Street parking areas with parking spaces drawn, tabulated, and dimensioned ~~: f Sidewalks /~.) Common, open space sites " ? e.) "Sites for-solid waste containers „ ~~ l~ 12. Proposed streets, drives, and curb cuts. For each proposed curb cut. (including ..driveways, streets, alleys, etc.) locate existing curb cuts on the same and opposite side of the street to determine separation distances between existing and proposed curb cuts. Indicate driveway throat length as measured in the Driveway Ordinance. (See Ordinance 1961 for driveway location and design requirements:) ~,~. 13: The total number of residential buildings and units to be constructed on the proposed project site. 14. Landscape plan as required in Section 11 of the Zoning Ordinance (See Ordinance # 1638.) The landscaping plan can be shown on a separate sheet if too much information is on the original site plan. Attempt to reduce or eliminate plantings in easements. Include information on the plan such as: ~) existing landscaping to remain /b~required point calculations ,rej-proposed new plantings with points earned ~~-- 15. Indicate unit type (number of bedrooms). /~ 16. The density of dwelling units per acre of the proposed project. >~ 17. The gross square footage of buildings and the proposed use of each building. (~ 18. Designate number of parking spaces required by ordinance and provided by proposal. C 19. Show dimensions to size and locate all structures, parking spaces, drives, curb cuts, parking islands, and setbacks. /U~- ® 20. Are there impact fees associated with this development? ~~~~® 21. Provide a water and sanitary sewer legend to include water demands (minimum, maximum and average demands in gallons per minute) and sewer loadings (maximum demands in gallons per day). `-'`` ®22. Show all meter locations. Meters must be located in easements or RO.W. (City will size meters.) The following are typical standards for Plan Development established by Ordinance or Policy: /" C'] 1. Building separation is a minimum of 15 feet. 2. Building setbacks are outlined in Ordinance 1638, Zoning Ordinance, Table A (Sec. 7, P. 30). t~® 3. Minimum parking space is 9' X 20', or on a perimeter row, 9' x 18' with a 2' overhang. /~ 4. Minimum drive width is 23' with head-in parking or 20' without parking. 5. Raised landscaped islands, (6" raised curb) of a minimum of 180 sq. ft. are located at both ends of every parking row. Additionally, 180 sq. ft. of landscaping for every 15 interior parking spaces must be provided. 6. Streetscape compliance is required which involves special plantings along streets specified in the City's Streetscape Plan. t~ ® 7. A 6°' raised curb is required around all edges of all parts of all paved areas without exception. (To include islands, planting areas, access ways, dumpster locations, utiltty pads, etc.) .Curb detail to be ac~nroved ~ Cit~En ig Weer. No exceptions will be made for areas designated as "reserved for future parking" ~/~ ® 8. Wheelstops maybe required on interior rows longer than 10 spaces or in special situations.. t~9. Sidewalks are required at time of development if property has frontage on a street shown on the sidewalk Master Plan or if the Project Review Commtttee determines the necessity. (Refer to Section 10 of the Zoning Ordinance). ~- ;~'~ ~ 10. Locations of dumpsters shall be such that dumpsters are not visible from streets. Gates are discouraged and visual screening from R.O.W. is required. ® 11 . Healthy, native trees over 6" in caliper should be retained whenever possible. 1J1~ 12. Pire lanes of'a minimum of 20 feet in width with a minimum height clearance of 14 feet must be established if any structure of any type is more than 150 feet from a public street or highway. ~.,~r ,~~® 13. Any structure in any zoning district other than R:1, R-lA, or R 2 must be within 300 feet of a fire hydrant as measured along a public street or along an approved. fire lane as the hose is laid off the truck. "~ ® 14. hire hydrants must be located on the same side of a major street. as a project, and shall be in a location approved by the City Engineer. ''r`' ® 15. Pire hydrants must be operable and accepted by the City and drives must have an all weather surface before combustibles can be brought on any site. /L~ 16. A twenty four foot setback from R.O.W. to curb of parking lot is required, Parking may be allowed in this area up to a maximum of 7 contiguous spaces. 17. All plans must include irrigation systems for landscaping. Irrigation meters are separate from the regular water systems for buildings and must be sized accordingly and include backflow prevention protection. -~~e' Federal Emergency 1Vlanagerrient Agency Washington, l~.C. 20472 JAM 0 51899 CERTIFIED MAIL IN REPLY REFER TO: RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Case No.: 99-06-065R The Honorable Larry Ringer Community: City of College Station, Texas Mayor, City of College Station Community No.: 4$0083 P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842-0960 104 Dear Mayor Ringer: This responds to a request that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) comment on the effects that a proposed project would have on the effective Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) and Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report for Brazos County, Texas and Incorporated Areas (the effective FIRM and FIS report for your community), in accordance with Part 65 of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) regulations. In a letter dated October 9, 1998, Ms. Veronica J. B. Morgan, P.E,, Assistant City Engineer, City of College Station, requested that FEMA evaluate the effects that placement of fill along Wolf Pen Creek from approximately 780 feet upstream to approximately 4,020 feet upstream of the intersection of Dartmouth Road and Holleman Drive and along Wolf Pen Creek Tributary A (Tributary A) from its confluence with Wolf Pen Creek to just upstream of Harvey Road would have on the flood hazard information shown on the effective FIRM and FIS report. In addition, this request included an updated hydraulic analysis that incorporated more detailed topographic information to reflect existing watershed conditions along Wolf Pen Creek from approximately 1,770 feet downstream to approximately 5,530 feet upstream of the intersection of Dartmouth Road and Holleman Drive and along Tributary A from its confluence to approximately 950 feet upstream of Harvey Road. All data required to complete our review of this request for a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) were submitted with letters from Mr. Mark W. Roberts, P.E., Nathan D. Maier Consulting Engineers, Inc., and Ms. Morgan. We have completed our review of the submitted data and the flood data used to prepare the effective FIRM for your community. The submitted existing conditions HEC-2 hydraulic computer model, dated October 22, 1998, based on updated topographic information, was used as the base conditions model in our review of the proposed conditions model for this CLOMR request. We believe that, if the proposed project is constructed as shown on the work map entitled "NBB Project 2492-000009," dated October 23, 1998, ;,: ,-; as described in the report entitled "Request for a Conditional Letter of Map Re-. ision -Wolf Pen Creek," dated September 1998, both prepared by Nathan D. Maier Consulting Engineers, Inc., and the data listed below are received, a revision to the FIRM would be warranted. The existing conditions analysis incorporated more detailed topographic information to reflect existing watershed conditions along Wolf Pen Creek. The elevations of the flood having a 1-percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year (base flood) increased and decreased compared to the effective base flood elevations (BFEs). The maximum increase in BFE, approximately 0.6 foot, occurred approximately 4,020 feet upstream of the intersection of Dartmouth Road and Holleman Drive. The 2 maximum decrease in BFE, approximately 2.5 feet, occurred just upstream of the intersection of Dartmouth Road and Holleman Drive. As a result of the proposed project, the BFEs along Wolf Pen Creek will increase compared to the existing conditions BFEs. The maximum increase in BFE, approximately 0.3 foot, will occur approximately 1,470 feet upstream of the intersection of Dartmouth Road and Holleman Drive. These increases in BFE will be a result of placement of fill in the floodway fringe. As a result of the proposed project and updated topographic information, the BFEs along Wolf Pen Creek will increase and decrease compared to the effective BFEs. The maximum increase in BFE, approximately 0.6 foot, will occur approximately 4,020 feet upstream of the intersection of Dartmouth Road and Holleman Drive. The maximum decrease in BFE, approximately 2.5 feet, will occur just upstream of the intersection of Dartmouth Road and Holleman Drive. The existing conditions analysis for Tributary A incorporated more detailed topographic information to reflect existing watershed conditions. As a result of the more detailed topographic information, the BFEs increased and decreased compared to the effective BFEs. The maximum increase in BFE, approximately 2.9 feet, occurred just upstream of Harvey Road. The maximum decrease in BFE, approximately 1.3 feet, occurred approximately 100 feet upstream of Harvey Road. As a result of the proposed project, the BFEs along Tributary A will increase and decrease compared to the existing conditions BFEs. The maximum increase in BFE, approximately 0.05 foot, will occur approximately 950 feet upstream of Harvey Road. The maximum decrease in BFE, approximately 0.1 foot, will occur just upstream of Harvey Road. These increases in BFE will be a result of placement of fill in the floodway fringe. As a result of the proposed project and updated topographic information, the BFEs along Tributary A will increase and decrease compared to the effective BFEs. The maximum increase in BFE, approximately 2.8 feet, will occur just upstream of Harvey Road. The .maximum decrease in BFE, approximately 0.9 foot, will occur approximately 100 feet upstream of Harvey Road. The widths of the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA), the area that would be inundated by the base flood, and regulatory floodway will increase in some areas and decrease in other areas compared to the effective SFHA and floodway widths along Wolf Pen Creek and Tributary A. All affected property owners were notified of the proposed project in a letter dated September 16, 1998. Upon completion of the project, your community may submit the data listed below and request that we make a final determination on revising the effective FIS report and FIRM. • Effective October 1, 1996, FEMA revised the fee schedule for reviewing and processing requests for conditional and final modifications to published flood information and maps, FEMA established flat review and processing fees for most types of requests. Effective March 10, 1997, FEMA modified the fee schedule that became effective on October 1. In accordance with this schedule, the fee for your map revision request will be $2,300 and must be received before we can begin processing your request. Payment of this fee shall be made. in the form of a check or money order, made payable in U.S. funds to the 3 National Flood Insurance Program, or by credit card. The payment must be forwarded to the following address: Federal Emergency Management Agency Fee-Collection System Administrator P.O. Box 3173 Merrifield, VA 22116-3173 • As-built plans, certified by a registered professional engineer, of all proposed project elements • Community acknowledgment of the map revision request • Certification that all fill placed in the currently effective base floodplain and below the proposed BFE is compacted to 95 percent of the maximum density obtainable with the Standard Proctor Test method issued by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM Standard D~698) or an acceptable equivalent method for all areas to be removed from the base floodplain • A copy of the public notice distributed by your community stating your communityas intent to revise the floodway, or a statement by your community that it has notified all affected property owners and affected adjacent jurisdictions • A letter stating that your community will adopt and enforce the modified floodway • Hydraulic analyses, for as-built conditions, of the base flood; the floods having a 10-, 2-, and 0.2-percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year; end regulatory floodway if they differ from the proposed conditions models After receiving appropriate documentation to show that the project has been completed, FEMA will initiate a revision to the FIRM and FIS report. Because the BFEs would change as a result of the project, a 90-day appeal period would be initiated, during which community officials and interested persons may appeal the revised BFEs based on scientific or technical data. This CLOMR is based on minimum floodplain management criteria established under the Is1FIP, Your community is responsible for approving all floodplain development, and for ensuring all necessary permits required by Federal or State law have been received. State, county, and community officials, based on knowledge of local conditions and in the interest of safety, may set higher standards for construction in the SFHA. If the State, county, or community has adopted more restrictive or comprehensive floodplain management criteria, these criteria take precedence over the minimum NFIP criteria. 4 If you have any questions regarding floodplain management regulations for your community or the I~1FIP in general, please contact the Consultation Coordination Officer (CCO) for your community. Information on the CCO for your community may be obtained by contacting the Director, Mitigation Division of FEMA in Denton, Texas, at (940) 898-5127. If you have any technical questions regarding this CLOMR, please contact Mr. Alan Johnson of our staff in Washington, DC, either by telephone at (202) 646-3403 or by facsimile at (202) 646-4596. Sincerely, V V ``~- Alan A. Johns n~ P.E., Project Engineer Hazards Studyianch Mitigation Directorate cc: Ms. Veronica J. B. Morgan, P.E. Assistant City Engineer City of College Station For: Matthew B. Miller, P.E., Chief Hazards Study Branch Mitigation Directorate Mr. Mark Roberts, P.E. l~lathan D. Maier Consulting Engineers, Inc. ~, __ ~' t~.d ~._T_. _ _ 7 1 _ -__ October 13, 1998 WOLF PEN CREEK DESIGN REVIEW BOARD REPORT TO: Charles Mercer, Fired Up, Inc. 3555 R.R. 620 South, Austin, TX 78734 Greg Taggart, Municipal Development Group 2551 Texas Avenue South, Ste. A, College Station,TX 77840 Paul Clarke, Clarke & Wyndham 3608 East 29th Street, Bryan, TX 77802 FROM: Design Review Board Kay Henryson, DRB Chairman Philip Kelby, DRB Member Chara Ragland, DRB Member George McLean, DRB Member James Massey, P&Z Chairman Jane Kee, City Planner Veronica Morgan, Assistant City Engineer Others attending: Shirley Volk, Development Coordinator SUBJECT: Signs for Johnny Carino's Country Italian Restaurant -Lot 4 of the West Wolf Pen Creek Subdivision (98-439) A Design Review Board Meeting was held Tuesday, October 6, 1998 to review the signs proposed for the subject project. P&Z Chairman James Massey made a motion to approve the sign locations as shown on the site. plan, being 3 signs on the building (one each on front, right side and left side), and one freestanding sign located in front of the parking spaces facing Harvey Road, approximately 60 feet back from the curb, of a height and size to meet the sign regulations in the Zoning Ordinance; the colors of the signs being primarily green, red and a buff color matching the stucco finish, with the pole being green as shown on the photo submitted and the `lighting being as shown in the specifications submitted. George McLean seconded the motion which carried. unanimously. The applicant can move forward with submittal of building plans for review, but permits will not be issued until the requirements of the final plat are completed and the plat is filed for record with Brazos County. __ __ 11~1CT.1 Y~CIPAL l~~ ~.~L DP~~~VT CR O U~' 2531 Ti•Ync AVd Sor~rh, Sri A - College Sr~ion, Te=~ss ??$4D • 409-693-5359 • FAX.• 409-893-4243 • EMAIl:srdgcs~,grt:nel Engineering, Surveying, $lanning and Environmental Consultants FAX# 7(„ ~ -~ 4 q ~_ NO. PAGES TO FOLLOW ~ DATE ~B S ~,~~ TO t 1 ~,.~ ~ e ~ F120M [~ try If there cs a problem with ibis trasmission, please call us at 409 693-5359 C01~~'FEIV~TALrTYNOTTCE: This facsimile message and accompanying cofnmunications and/or documents are intended for the excusive a~zd confidential use of the individual or entity to wf:ich the messge is addressed CONIlV~NTS eL r/ T00~1 ~~ -~, ~; 1 ~_ ~ ~ d '>, /" n ~ L,, rU~. °J .t. P•e~o ~ d.s s;._P.~ F~ ms`s-~--~' °-G3 Cry' _,~. d. C'~~` r` `~ (y ,~, ©,~ :6} ~. _ ~ ~ 7 -~ v~~~ 9 Q ~ ~$Zi: C69 60~' K~d~ 00=i~T S6, 60/~Z / ,/ ,,! .~ 0 --- - - ! e .,. ~7~i ~e _ ~ ~.J vt Q Y rt1 m u ~ d' ~ ~ ~ !.G € ~o ~.~t ~tytS___-~ ~-~i, , ° P ~~ nn~ir, ~ rt nr ~~-~ cao ang vus nn°~:r oa an:ax October 13, 1998 WOt_F PEN CREEK DESIGN REVIEW BOARD REP®RT TO: Charles Mercer, Fired Up, .Inc. 3555 R.R. 620 South, Austin, TX 78734 -Greg Taggart, Municipal Development Group 2551 Texas Avenue South, Ste. A, College Station,TX 77840 Paul Clarke, Clarke 8~ Wyndham 3608 East 29th Street, Bryan, TX 77802 FROM: Design Review Board Kay Henryson, DRB Chairman Philip Kelby, DRB Member Chars Ragland, DRB Member George McLean, DRB Member James Massey, P8~Z Chairman Jane Kee, City Planner Veronica Morgan, Assistant City Engineer Others attending: Shirley Volk, Development Coordinator SUBJECT: Signs for Johnny Carino's Country Italian Restaurant -Lot 4 of the West Wolf Pen Creek Subdivision (98-439) A Design Review Board Meeting was held Tuesday, October 6, 1998 to review the signs - ~ proposed for the subject protect. PAZ Chairman James Massey made a motion to approve the sign locations as shown on the site plan, being 3 signs on the building (one each on front, right side and left side), and one freestanding sign located in front of the parking spaces facing Harvey Road, approximately 60 feet back from the curb, of a height and size to meet the sign regulations in the Zoning Ordinance; the colors of the signs being primarily green, red and a buff color matching the stucco finish, with the pole being green as shown on the photo submitted and the lighting being as shown in the specifications submitted. George McLean seconded-the motion which carried :,unanimously. The applicant can move forward with submittal of building plans for review, but permits will not be issued until the requirements of the final plat are completed and the plat is filed for record with Brazos County, Home of Texas A&M University COLLEGE STATION P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tel' 409 764 3500 August 28, 1998 Paul Clarke Clarke & Wyndham 3608 East 29th Street, Suite 100 Bryan, TX 77802 Re. Proposed restaurant developments in the Wolf Pen Creek District. Dear Paul, Staff is currently reviewing the three restaurant proposals recently submitted for Sonic, Kona's Steak House and Johnny Carino's to be located along Harvey Road in the Wolf Pen Creek zoning district. As requested, I am coordinating all correspondence, plans review, future meetings, etc.. with you as our single point of contact... From the City's perspective, I will be coordinating the review and scheduling of all three projects and will be your single point of contact with the City. I look. forward to working with you on these projects and seeing this area of Wolf Pen Creek develop in accordance with the vision of the Wolf Pen Creek Master Plan. As requested, the following is a summary of the status of each project: Kona's Steak House & Johnny Carino's Italian Restaurant: We received the site plans with color and material samples on Wednesday, August 26, 1998. However, landscape plans are missing for both sites including the Wolf Pen Creek tnbutary area located on lot 4. As part of the approval of the Preliminary Plat of West Wolf Pen Creek, this tributary area was "to be dedicated or developed in accord with the Master Plan at the time of development of lots 3 and 4" as noted on the Plat. We did not receive information concerning the development or dedication of this. area with the submittal on Wednesday. The site plan subrrutted refers to a "Landscape Plan" that we have not received to date. Staff has been directed to refrain from forwarding incomplete submittals to the Wolf Pen Creek .Design Review Board (DRB). Before a DRB meeting, staff needs ample time to review the landscape plans for lots 3 and 4. Therefore,'these proposals will not be scheduled for the September 17, 1998 Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) meeting. I've tentatively scheduled a DRB meeting on Wednesday, September 9, 1998 at 9:00 a.m. and will place both restaurants on that agenda with the condition that we receive a complete submission by noon on Wednesday, :September 2, 1998. Once we receive a complete submission, staff will perform a technical review of the site, landscape and grading plans and forward comments to the DRB. Depending upon the outcome of the DRB meeting, rt is possible that both restaurants could .then be placed on the Thursday,. October 1, 1998 P&Z meeting for final approval. The September 2, 1998 deadline is critical to meet the October 1, .1998 P&Z meeting for several reasons. Due to the. current personnel constraints in the Development Services department, increased development .pressures throughout the City and prior staff commitments in September, the three weeks between the DRB meeting and the P&Z meeting will allow the DRB and staff time to work with the applicant to make any corrections or changes before staff reports -. are due to the P&Z on September 23, 1998. Y Home. of Texas A&M University ~i ~~' N~~ G ~13~ ~~, ~~r~ ,,, i ~ _-- ~~ ~" , 5~ ~~~. ~~~ ~~ ,~ , ,~'~' ^ J i ~. • For Arm, Post or Stem Mounting * All Aluminum Construction (Can Not Rust * Powder Coated Finishes * Wet Location Listed * 200W Incan. Standard (See Fixture Options) Nominal MODEL NUMBERS Nominal MODEL NUMBERS Size 1/2 IPS Fitter 3/4 IPS Fitter Size 1/2 IPS Fitter 3/4 IPS Fitter 12" 2RS12 3RS12 14" 2RH14 3RH14 14" 2RS14 3RS14 1s" 2RH16 3RH16 1s° 2RS16 3RS16 1s° 2RH18 3RH18 (~~' ~~~~ • ~~~ ANGLE REFLECTOR DEEP REFLECTOR Nominal MODEL NUMBERS Size 1/2 IPS Fitter 3/4 IPS Fitter Nominal MODEL NUMBERS Size 1/2 IPS Fitter 3/4 IPS Fitter 10" 2RA10 3RA10 12" 2RA12 3RA12 10~ 2RD10 3RD10 12" 2RD12 3RD12 UPLIGHT SHADE Nominal MODEL NUMBERS Size 12 IPS Fitter 3/4 IPS Fitter Nominal MODEL NUMBERS Size 12 IPS Fitter 3/4 IPS Fitter 1s" 2RW16 3RW16 1s" 2RW18 3RW18 18p 2RU18 3RU18 Open top, Damp Location Listed. Wet Location listing requires glass enclosure. HEAVY DUTY STANDARD RADIAL WAVE I~ Arms i• i• Large Loop Available in 1/2 IPS or 3/4 IPS All Aluminum Construction Threads: 1/2 - 14 for 1/2 IPS 3/4 - 14 for 314 IPS Model Number 2LL23 „Z IPs 12.5" 3LL23 3/41PS 2~3" Small Loo ~~" P , ~ , ~--' ~ ~~; ,' Model '~ Number a-. 2SL23 ,/ZIPS 3SL23 3/41PS 23" Sign Arm 10" 18" Mounting Method 30" Model Number 2SA18 ,/21PS 3SA18 3/41PS 23" (~) Die Cast Universal Backplate (2) Set Screws, 1 /4-20, Stainless Steel (3) Round Canopy Cover (4) Locking Slip Ring ~ o~~ °~ 30 " Model Number 2LL30 ,/ZIPS 12.5" 3LL30 3/41P3 8., 10" Model Number 2SL30 „ZIPS 3SL30 3/41PS Model Number 2SA23 ,/Z IPS 3SA23 3/41PS NOTES BY SYMBOL: "~" 2" DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE REFER TO CIVIL DWCsS. FOR CONTINUATION. 2 6" FIRE SERVICE REFER TO G1VIL DWCsS. FOR CONTINUATION. 3 FREE STANDING Fib DEPT. SIAMESE CONNECTION PER LOCAL FIRE DEPT. REQUIREMENTS. 4 CsAS METER t SERVICE BY CsAg COMPANY. 5 2600 CsALLON GREASE INTERCEPTOR REFER TO 5HEET P-3 FOR DETAIL INFORMATION. ., 6 li) 2" SAN. VENT TO INLET SIDE OF GREASE INTERCEPTOR t (1) 4° SAN. VENt TO OUTLET SIDE OF CsREASE INTERCI=PTOR 1 4" SAN. SEWER FROM TOILETS. 8 4" GREASE WASTE FROM IGITGHEN. 9 POWER COMPANY TRANSFOA"tER t GONCI~ETE PAD. CONCRETE PAD BY ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO POWER COMPANY SPECS. TRANSFORMER t FINAL CONNECTIONS B7 POWER GGl`1PANY. LOCATIONS AS PER CIVIL ENGINEER. VERIFY WITH POWER COMPANY PRIOR TO FINAL B1DS. 10 UNDERCsROUND SECONDARY CONDUCTORS, CONDUIT, TRENCHING t SAGKFILL BY ELECTRICAL GGNTRACTOR VERIFY LOCATION. SEE RISER D I ACsRAi'1. it MAIN SERVICE PANEL 'T'IP". 5EE RISER DIAGRAM t PANEL SCHEDULES. 12 2" EL. WITH PULLWIRE UNDERCsROUND FOR TELEPHONE SERVICE. STUB- UP AT PROPERTY LINE, CAP, t MARK VERIFY LOCATION WITH TELEPHONE COMPANY PRIOR TO FINAL SIDS. - 13 2" E.C. WIT(-I PULLWIRE lA1DERTROUND FOR GAE;LE SERVICE. STUB-UP AT PROPERTY LINE, GAP, AND MaRK VERIFY LOCATION WITH TELEPHONE COMPANY PRIOR TO FINAL BIDS. 14 WP J-BOX FOR RESTAURANT SIGNACsE. VERIFY LOCATION. MAKE ALL FINAL CONNECTIONS. COORDINATE WITH OLLNER. - 15. WP TELEPHONE ENCLOSURE. SEE POWER PLAN. 16 2 • 8, I • 1OCs, 3/4"C. HOMERUN THF~1J TIME CLOCK (FURNISH AND INSTALL CONTACTORS AS REQUIRED. ~~ O OR EQUAL.) XCEL 19 POLE LICsHT FiXTURE~t POLE. FIXTURE SHALL BE LlGHTOLIER "E • SAR4O3MAL 4O0W. MH TYPE III WITH "EXCELINE" '801-500-30 30' S.S,S. POLE. COLOR t FM15H TO BE VERIFIED W/JOB ARCHITECT < OWNER ~'R~OR TO ORDERING. ~ :,gym , r . _ .............. -_._,..~,,.,.-.,., _~ww.r~~ w..- .,.,,., 20 CONCRETE POLE BASE. SEE DETAIL ~ TH15 5HEET. 21 3" PVG SLEEVES UNDERGROUND BY ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR FOR IRRIGATION BYSTEM REQUIREMENTS. STUB-UP WELL INSIDE CURBS, FIELD VERIFY. 22 APPRD:tIMATE LOCATION OF LIG~; i cD °~'KsN. VERIFY LOCATION WITH JOB ARCHTEG7 Al`1D GEC.