Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Miscellaneous
.:~~ Cornerstone Commercial Section Two - A preliminaryplat of approximately 7.6 acres divided into 6 C-1 Commercial lots generally located on the northeast corner of Woodcreek Drive and the Highway 6 Frontage Road. {98-323) Texas Utilities/Lone Star Gas Company Contact for this project: David L. borough Manager,. New Customer Development 4200 S H 6 S Bryan, TX 77802. {409)774-2527 Office (409)774-2528 Fax (409) 220-5455 Mobile ddorougl@ tuelectric.com Comments: In order to provide gas service to Lots 2 and 3 of this development, we will need a 10' PUE between Lots 1 and 4 running north to the corner of Lots 2 and 3. ************************************** Johnny Carino's Italian Restaurant - A site plan for a new restaurant totaling 6300 square feet to be constructed along the south side of Harvey Road, just west of the Woodstock condominiums in the Wolf Pen: Creek zoning district. The total site is 2.65. acres, lot 4 of the West Wolf Pen Creek Subdivision. (98- 439) Texas Utilities/Lone Star Gas Company Contact for this project: David L. borough Manager, New Customer Development 4200 S H 6 S Bryan, TX 77802. (409) 774-2527 Office (409)774-2528 Fax (409) 220-5455 Mobile ddorougl@ tuelectric.com Comments: We need a gas equipment list broken down. by appliance and a rating for each piece of gas equipment before a service line can be run or a meter is set to serve this restaurant. There is no charge for the service line if we are allowed to install the service before any Lime. stabilization or paving is in place. We also reserve the reserve the right to determine the meter location. ona's Steak House - A site plan for a new restaurant totaling 7800 square feet to be constructed on along the south side of Harvey Road, just west of the Woodstock condominiums in the Wolf Pen Creek zoning district. The total site is 1.8 acres, lot 3 of the West Wolf Pen Creek Subdivision. (98-438) Texas Utilities/L,one Star Gas Company Contact for this project: David L. borough Manager, New Customer Development 4200 S H 6 S Bryan, TX 77802 (409) 774-2527 Office r w c (409)774-2528 Fax (409) 220-5455 Mobile ddorougl@ tuelectric.com Comments: We need a gas equipment list broken down by appliance and a rating for each piece of gas equipment before a service line can be run ora meter is set to serve this restaurant. There is no charge for the service line if we are allowed to install the service before any lime stabilization or pacing is in place. We also reserve the reserve the right to determine the meter location. HoteUConference Center - A preliminary site plan for a hotel, conference center and office building development to be located on the southwest corner of Holleman Drive and Dartmouth Street in the Wolf Pen. Creek zoning district. (This is a site plan only, the applicant will submit grading, drainage and other construction details at a later date. 98.437) Texas Utilities/Lone Star Gas Company Contact for this project: David L. borough Manager, .New Customer Development 4200:5 H 6 S Bryan, TX 77802 {409) 774-2527 Office. (409) 774-2528 Fax (409) 220-5455 Mobile ddorougl@ tuelectric.com Comments for this project: We need a breakdown of the gas equipment by building and by appliance with a raring for each appliance. We need to know how many meters the City of College Station will require for this project. Sonic Drive-In Restaurant - A site plan fora new restaurant to be constructed on along the south side of Harvey Road, just west of the Woodstock condominiums in the Wolf Pen Creek zoning district, lot 2 of the West Wolf Pen Creek Subdivision. (98=430) -Texas Utilities/Lone'Star Gas Company Contact for this project: David L. borough Manager, New Customer Development __ 4200` S H 6 S Bryan, TX 77802 (409) 774-2527 Office (409)- 774-2528 Fax (409) 220-5455 Mobile ddorougl@ tuelectrc.com Comments: .:...::. :Natalie Ruiz Re New Development .......:.::::. .: ........ ..... ............._ .....:..... ....... .. ._. Page....: From: Tony Michalsky To: NRUIZ~CITY OF COLLEGE STATION.CITY HALL Date: Fri, Aug 28, 1998 2:31 PM Subject: Re: New Development Development. Comments Cornerstone Commercial Section Two (98-323) We need a 10 ft easement. along the east property line of Lot 1 and Lot 2. We need a 10 ft easement along the north property line of Lot 2, Lot 3 and Lot 6. We need a 20 ft easement, 10 ft on each side of the property line between Lots 3 & 6 and Lots 4 8~ 6 to be able to provide service to Lot 5. Johnny Carino's Jtalian Restaura t (98-439) Kona's Steak House (98-438} Sonic Drive-ln Restaurant {98-430) The ElectricaC Division will want to install an electrical duct system across the front of this property within the proposed 20 ft easement for future burying of the overhead lines along. Harvey Rd. The work will need to be coordinated with construction of the development. Developer is responsible for 20°!0 of the cost for providing electrical service to the property. Developer installs conduit and pours transformer pad. per city specs and. requirements. Developer will need to provide easements for any on site electrical infrastructure. Need electrical load :data and service voltage requremen#s Need to show existing electrical ' ine along front of .property and any power poles. Coordinate with electrical division location of padmount transformer on site plan. Carter Lake Section Five (98-231} Carter Lake Section Six (98-332) No Comments Living Hope Baptist Church (98-705} Show Overhead electrical line across front of property: and .power poles.. Electrical service can be provided from front overhead line. Service will need to be underground, the developer installs conduit per city spec and requirements.. Developer pays 20% of the cost for electric service. Hotel /Conference Center (98-437) Developer is responsible for 20% of the -cost for. providing electrical service to the property. Developer installs conduit and pours transformer pad .per city specs and requirements. Developer will need to provide easements for any on site electrical infrastructure. Need electrical load data and service voltage requirements Need to show existing electrical lines along property line backing up to the Crest lots, along Dartmouth and along Richards St. Coordinate with electrical division location. of padmount transformer on site plan. »> Natalie Ruiz 08/26/98 03:47PM »> Attached is a list of items submitted this week for review. Thanks! 5 Natalie. Ruiz -PRC -Wednesday September 2, 1998 ............ .. .....:......... ... ......:....::.:::::.,.:::.::::::...::.:.... Page 1 From: Jim Smith To: PRC Date: Fri, Aug 28, 1998 8:51 AM Subject: PRC -Wednesday, September 2, 1998 Cornerstone Commercial Section Two (98-323): No problem. Johnny Carino's Malian Resaurant (98-439): I do not see a container location on this site. However, i do see something on the southease comer of the building that may be container location, but I'm not sure. If it is, it has gates which are not required. Pleaselet me know on this one. ~a's Steak House (98-438): This container pad is not 12 x 12 and should be moved to the southeast so I can have astraight-in approach, Also, it shows to have gates which are not required. Get with me if you have any questions. Please let me know on this one also, HoteUConference Center (98-437): No problem. Great looking site. Has atoll-off compactor. Sonic Drive-ln Restaurant (98-430): No problem.. Carter Lake Section Five (98-231): No problem. Carter Lake Section Six (98-232): No .problem. Living Hope Baptist Church (98-705): No problem, We can service this location with a small, automated container on wheels. Thanksll ~. ,t~. ~ SUBMIT APPLICATION AND THIS ~. ~ `r /~ LIST CHECKED-0FF WITH 16 I ~~uG~ FOLDED COPIES OF SITE PLAN FOR ItEViEW ~ a.1 ti~ ~ ~~ ~~ MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN PROP®SALS ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET INCLU~ING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLL WIIeiG: 1. Sheet size - 24" x 36°' ~[~ 11~ 2. Title block to include: /a.) Name, address, locatioq and legal description " b.) Name, address, and telephone number ofapplicant lvame, address, and telephone number of developer/owner .ed.) Name, address,. and telephone number of architect/engineer ~}-Date of submittal ,~) Total site area (~ 3. Ownership and current zoning of parcel and all abutting parcels. %~ ~ 4. A key map (not necessarily to scale). /~C~ 5. Scale should be largest standard engineering scale possible on sheet. /`~~ Its 6. Provide a north arrow. ® 7. °Topography, final grading plaq and other pertinent drainage information: (If plan has too. much informatioq show drainage on separate sheet.) ~~ ® 8a All existing streets, drives, buildings, and water :courses on or adjacent. to the proposed project site. ~ ~ 9. Locate 100 yr tloodplain on or adjacent to the proposed project site, note if there is none on the site. ® 10. Location and size of existing utilities within ®r adjacent to the proposed project site.: 11. Proposed locatioq type,. and size of the following: Via.) Buildings and structures /b.) Off-Street parking areas with parking spaces drawn, tabulated, and dimensioned tee.) Sidewalks ~/'d:~) Common, open space. sites ? e.)'Sites for solid waste containers ~~ ~ 12. Proposed .streets, drives, and .curb cuts. For each proposed curb cut (including driveways, streets, alleys, etc.) locate existing curb cuts on the same and opposite side of the street to determine.. separation distances between existing and proposed curb cuts. Indicate driveway throat length as measured in the Driveway Ordinance. (See Ordinance 1961 for driveway location and design. requuements.) ~~~ 13: The total numberi of residential buildings and units to be constructed on the proposed project site. 014. Landscape plan. as required in Section 1 L of the Zoning Ordinance (See Ordinance # 1638:.) The landscaping plan can be shown on a separate sheet if too: much information is on the original cite plan, Attempt to reduce or eliminate'plantings in easements. Include. information on the plan such as: a) existing landscapingto.remain b) required. point calculations c) proposed new plantings. with points earned /U ~'-- ~, 15. Indicate unit type (number of bedrooms). ~,~" ~_16. The density of dwelling units per acre of the proposed project. /- ~ 17. The gross square footage of buildings and the proposed use of each building. rr ~,.. fd 18. Designate number of parking spaces required by ordinance and provided by proposal.. 19. Show dimensions to size and locate all structures, parking spaces, drives, curb cuts, parking islands, and setbacks. /~ ~ ^ 20. Are there impact fees associated with this development? ~ ~- ``C~ 21. Provide a water and sanitary sewer legend to include water demands (minimum,. maximum and average demands in gallons per minute) and sewer loadings (maximum demands in gallons per day). . ~! ,_. ~~,~, ~0~ 22. Show all meter locations. Meters mustbe located in easements or RO.W. (City will size meters.) The following are typical standards for Plan Development established by Ordinance or Policy: '~! '/__-C~ 1. Building separation is a minimum of 15 feet. vim` ~/ 2. Building setbacks are outlined in Ordinance 1638, Zoning Ordinance, Table A (Sec. 7, P. 30). 3. Minimum pazking space is 9' X 20', or on a perimeter row, 9' x 18' with a 2' overhang. ~/~ ~ 4. Minimum' drive width is 23' with head-in pazking or 20° without pazking. j, -~ ~ 5. Raised landscaped islands, (6" raised curb) of a minimum of 180 sq. ft. are located at both ends of every ^ p ovid dow Additionally, 180 sq. ft. of landscaping for every 15 interior parking spaces must be ~,' ~~® 6. Streetscape compliance is required which involves special plantings along streets specified in the City's Streetscape Plan. '~' "'" O 7. A 6" raised curb is required around all edges of all parts of all. paved azeas without exception. (To i ~ include islands,. planting areas, access ways, dumpster locations,. utility pads, etc.) Curb detail to be ~, approved' by City En ig_neer. No exceptions will be made for areas designated as "reserved for future parking" ~' ~ 8. Wheelsto s ma be re uired on interior rows longer than 10 spaces or in special situations.. ® P Y q ~ii ~~ 9. Sidewalks are required at-time of development if property has frontage on a street. shown on the sidewalk,Master Plan or if the Project Review Comnuttee determines the necessity. (Refer to Section 10.2 of the Zoning Ordinance). ?7, ~ 10. Locations of dumpsters shall be such that dumpsters are not visible from streets. Gates are discouraged ~! and visual screening from R.O.W. is required. i ~~' '~'® 11. Healthy, ,native trees over 6" in caliper should be retained whenever possible. 12. Fire lanes of a minimum of 20 feet in width with a minimum height cleazance of 14 feet must be established if any structure of any type is more than 150 feet from a public street or highway. ~ ~ 13. Any structure in any zoning district other than R 1, R lA, or R 2 must be within 300 feet of a fire hydrant as measured along a public street or along an approved fire lane as the hose' is laid off the truck. ~~ 14. Fire hydrants must be located on the same side of a major street as a project, and shall be in a location approved by the City Engineer. ' ® 15. Fire hydrants must be operable and accepted by the City and drives must have an all weather surface before combustibles can be brought. on any site. ;~ 16. A twenty four foot setback from R.U.W. to curb of parking lot is required. Parking may be allowed in ., this area up to a maximum of 7 contiguous spaces. V (~ 17. All plans must include irrigation systems for landscaping. Irrigation meters are separate from the regular water systems for buildings and must be sized accordingly and include backflow prevention protection. ~w COLLEGE STATION P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tel: 409 764 3500 August 28, 1998 Paul Clarke Clarke & Wyndham 3608 East 29th Street, Suite 100 Bryan, TX 77802 Re: Proposed restaurant developments in the Wolf Pen Creek District. Dear Paul, Staff is currently reviewing the three restaurant proposals recently submitted for Sonic, Kona's Steak House and Johnny Carino's to be located along Harvey Road in the Wolf Pen Creek zoning district.. As requested, I am coordinating all correspondence, plans review, future meetings, etc. with you as :our. single point of contact.. From the City's .perspective, I will be coordinating the review and scheduling of all three projects and will be your single point of contact with the City. I look. forward to working with you on these projects and seeing this area of Wolf Pen Creek develop in accordance with fihe vision of the Wolf Pen Creek Master Plan. As requested, the following is a summary of the status of each project: Kona's Steak House & Johnny Carino's Italian Restaurant: We received the site. plans with color and material samples on Wednesday, August 26, 1998. However,. andscape plans are mussing for both sites including. the Wolf Pen Creek tributary area located on lot 4. As part of the approval of the Preliminary Plat of West Wolf Pen Creek, this tributary area was "to be dedicated or developed in accord with the Master Plan at the time of development of lots 3 and 4" as noted on the Plat. We did not receive information concerning the development or dedication of this area with the submittal on Wednesday. The site plan subtrutted refers to a "Landscape Plan" that we have not received to date. Staff has been directed to refrain from forwarding.: incomplete submittals to the Wolf Pen Creek Design Review Board (DRB). Before a DRB meeting, staff needs ..ample time to review the landscape plans for lots 3 and 4. Therefore, these proposals will-not be scheduled for the September 17, 1998 Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) :meeting. I've tentatively scheduled a DRB meeting on Wednesday, September 9, 1998 at 9:00 a.m. and will place both restaurants on that agenda with the condition that we receive a complete submission by noon on Wednesday, September 2, 1998. Once we receive a complete submission, staff will perform a technical review of the site, landscape and grading plans and forward comments to the DRB. Depending upon the outcome of the DRB meeting, it is possible that both restaurants could then be placed on '.the Thursday, October 1, 1998 P&Z meeting for final approval. The September 2, ..1998. deadline is critical to meet the October 1, 1998 P&Z meeting for several reasons. Due to -the current personnel constraints in the Development Services department, increased development pressures .throughout the City and prior staff commitments in September, the three weeks between the DRB meeting and the P&Z meeting will allow the DRB and staff time to work with the applicant to make any corrections or changes before staff reports -. are due to the P&Z on September 23, 1.998. ,_ 4 Home of Texas A&M University Letter to Paul Clarke.. WPC Restaurants August 28, 1998 Page 2 of 2 Sonic Drive-In Restaurant:. A DRB meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, September 2, 1998 at 9:00 a.m. to review the Sonic proposal. I've enclosed a copy of the original redlined plans that were discussed at the August 19, 1998 DRB meeting in addition to a file note that includes a brief summary of the meeting and the major concerns discussed. At that meeting, the DRB did not make. a final decision ,on the project; however, they did express several concerns. Staff began the review of the revised site plan submitted on Thursday, August 27, 1998; however, they stopped the review because too many items were either missing or not addressed on he revised plan. A revised site plan was submitted; however, a revised landscape plan and grading and drainage. plan was not.. (The original redlines for these two sheets were .not resubmitted as well:) There are also many details .missing including parking lot/landscape screening, the pedestrian _access to the :creek, retaining wall details, etc. The revised color scheme submitted looks great; however, staff feels that the intent of the WPC ordinance is still not met with respect to pedestrian/vehicular. traffic conflicts. As requested, we will proceed to DRB on September 2, 1:998. At that` time, staff will inform: the DRB of the items lacking or not addressed and will recommend denial until such time that. a complete submittal is received with all previous redlines and DRB concerns addressed. If there are items .that the .applicant does not want to address, he has the option of submitting these items' in writing explaining why they are not addressed fore the DRB and P&Z to consider. Staff also ,suggested that it might be helpful to the DRB to see an elevation or perspective drawing of all three restaurants from Harvey Road showing how designs relate to .each other. This is not a .requirement; however, it may be beneficial to the DRB and the P&Z during .their review of the proposals. I look forward to working with you on all three developments in the Wolf Pen Creek district and we are excited. to see so much activity in the area. If you. have any questions or need .additional information, please contact me at (409) 764-3570. Sincerely; ~ ;, /,, ~, Natalie Thomas Ruiz Assistant Development. Coordinator cc: Case File #98-430 use File #98-438 Case File #98-439 Greg Taggart, Municipal Development Group, via fax (409) 693-4243 Ray Corkran, Sonic Restaurants, via fax (409) 294-0442 Charles Mercer, Fired Up, .Inc., via fax (512) 263-8055 (w/o Attachments) Attachments ~~ ~J ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~! .~~ Federal Emergency Manage Washington, D.C. 20472 JAt~ 0 51999 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED The Honorable Larry Ringer Mayor, City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842-0960 Dear Mayor. Ringer: o~~~'~~p ~;:~~ D CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE IN REPLY REFER. TO: Case No.: 99-06-065R Community: City of College Community No.: 480083 104 This responds to a request that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) comment on the effects that a proposed project would have on the effective Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) and Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report for Brazos County, Texas and Incorporated Areas (the effective FIRM and FIS report for your community), in accordance with Part 65 of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) regulations:... In a letter dated October 9, 1998, Ms. Veronica J. B. Morgan, P.E., Assistant City Engineer,: City of College Station, requested that FEMA evaluate the effects that placement of fill along Wolf Pen Creek from approximately 780 feet upstream to approximately .4,020- feet upstream of the intersection of Dartmouth Road and Holleman Drive and along Wolf Pen Creek Tributary A (Tributary A) from its confluence with Wolf Pen-Creek to just upstream of Harvey Road would have on the flood hazard information shown.on the effective FIRM and FIS report: In addition, this. request.included an`updated hydraulic- analysis that incorporated more detailed topographic 'information to reflect existing watershed conditions along Wolf Pen Creek from approximately 1,770 feet downstream to approximately 5,530 feet upstream. of the intersection of Dartmouth Road and Holleman Drive and along.. Tributary A from its confluence to approximately 950 feet upstream. of Harvey Road. All data required to complete our review of this request .for a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) were submitted with letters from Mr. Mark W. Roberts, P.E., Nathan D. Maier Consulting Engineers, Inc., and Ms. Morgan. We have completed our review of the submitted data-and the flood data used to prepare the effective riicPvt for your community. The submitted existing conditions HEC-2 hydraulic computer.,model, dated October 22, 1998, based on updated. topographic information, was used as the base conditions model in our review of the proposed conditions model. for this CLOMR request. We believe that, if the proposed project is constructed as shown on the work map entitled "NBB Project 2492-000009," dated October 23, 1998, and as described in the report entitled "Request for a Conditional Letter of Map Revision -Wolf Pen Creek," dated September 1998, both prepared by Nathan D. Maier Consulting Engineers, Inc.,. and the data listed below are received, a revision to the FIRM .would be warranted. The existing conditions- analysis incorporated snore detailed topographic information to reflect existing watershed conditions along Wolf Pen Creek.. The elevations of the flood having a 1-percent chance of being'equaled or exceeded iri any given year (base.flood) increased and decreased' compared to the effective base flood elevations (BFEs). The maximum.,increase in BFE, approximately',' 0.6 foot, occurred approximately 4,020-feet upstream"of the intersection of Dartmouth Road and Holleman- Drive. The 2 maximum decrease in BFE, approximately 2.5 feet, occurred just upstream of the intersection of Dartmouth Road and Holleman Drive. As a result of the proposed project, the BFEs along Wolf Pen Creek will increase compared to the existing conditions BFEs. The maximum increase in BFE, approximately 0.3 foot, will occur approximately 1,470 feet upstream of the intersection of Dartmouth Road and Holleman Drive. These increases in BFE will be a result of placement of fill in the floodway fringe. As a result of the proposed project and updated topographic information, the .BFEs along Wolf Pen Creek will increase and decrease compared to the effective BFEs. The maximum increase in BFE, approximately 0.6 foot, will occur approximately 4,020 feet upstream of the intersection of Dartmouth Road .and lolleman Drive. The maximum decrease in BFE, approximately 2.5 feet, will occur just upstream of the intersection of Dartmouth Road and ~-Iollernan Drive: The existing conditions analysis. for Tributary A incorporated more detailed topographic information to reflect existing watershed conditions. As a result of the more detailed topographic information, the BFEs increased and decreased compared to the effective BFEs. The maximum increase in BFE, approximately 2.9 feet, occurred just upstream of Harvey Road. The maximum decrease inBFE, approximately 1.3 feet, occurred. approximately 100 feet upstream of Harvey Road. As a result of the proposed project; the BFEs along. Tributary A will increase and. decrease compared to the existing conditions BFEs. The maximum increase in BFE, approximately 0.05 foot; will occur approximately 950 feet upstream of Harvey Road. The maximum decrease in BFE, approximately 0.1 foot, will occur just upstream of Harvey Road. These increases in BFE will be a result of placement of fill in the floodway fringe. As a result of the proposed project and updated topographic information, the BFEs along Tributary A will increase and decrease compared to the effective BFEs. The maximum increase in BFE, approximately 2.8 feet, will occur just upstream of Harvey Road. The maximum decrease in BFE; approximately 0.9 foot;. will occur approximately 100 feet upstream of Harvey Road. The widths of the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA), the area that would be inundated by the base flood, and regulatory floodway will increase in some areas and decrease in other areas compared to the effectivt: SFHA and floodway widths along Wolf Pen Creek and Tributary A: All affected property. owners were notified of the proposed project in a letter dated September 16, .1998. Upon completion of the project, your community may submit the data listed below and request that we make a final determination on revising the effective FIS report and FIRM. • Effective October 1, 1996, FEMA revised the fee schedule for reviewing and processing requests for conditional and final modifications to published flood information and maps. FEMA established flat review and processing fees. for most types of requests. Effective March 10, 1997, FEMA modified the fee schedule that became effective on October 1. In accordance with this schedule, the fee for your map revision request will be $2,300 and - must be received before we can begin processing your request. Payment of this fee shall be made in the form of a check or money order, made payable in U.S. funds to the 3 National Flood Insurance Program, or by credit card. The payment must be forwarded to the following address: Federal Emergency Management Agency Fee-Collection System Administrator P.O. Box 3173 Merrifield, VA 22116-3173 • As-built plans, certified by a registered professional engineer, of all proposed project elements • Community acknowledgment of the map revision request • Certification that. all fill placed in the currently effective base floodplain. and below the proposed BFE is compacted to 95 percent ofthe maximum density obtainable with the Standard. Proctor Test method issued by the American. Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM Standard D-698) or an acceptable equivalent method for all areas to be removed from the base floodplain • A copy of the public notice distributed by your community stating your community's intent to revise the floodway, or a statement by` your community that it has notified all affected property owners and affected. adjacent. jurisdictions • A letter stating that your community will adopt and enforce the modified floodway • Hydraulic analyses, foss-built conditions, of the base flood; the floods having a 10-, 2-, and 0.2-percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year; and regulatory floodway if they differ from the. proposed conditions models After receiving appropriate documentation to show that the project has been completed, FEMA will initiate a revision to the FIRM and FIS report. Because the BFEs would change as a result of the project, a 90-day appeal period would be initiated, during which community officials and interested persons may appeal the revised BFEs based on scientific or technical data. This CLOMR is based on minimum floodplain management criteria established under the NFIP. Your community is responsible for approving all floodplain development, and for ensuring all necessary permits required by Federal or State law have been received. State, county, and community officials, based on knowledge of local conditions and in the interest of safety, may set higher standards for construction in the SFHA. If the State, county, or community has adopted more restrictive or comprehensive floodplain management criteria, these criteria take precedence over the minimum NFIP criteria. Y + ~, a 4 If you have any questions regarding floodplain management regulations for your community or the NFIP in general, please contact the Consultation Coordination Officer (CCO) for your community. Information on the CCO for your community may be obtained by contacting the Director, Mitigation Division of FEMA in Denton, Texas, at (940) 898-5127. If you have any technical questions regarding this CLOMR, please contact Mr. Alan Johnson of our staff in Washington, DC, either by telephone at (202) 646-3403 or by facsimile at (202) 646-4596. Sincerely, Alan A. Johns n P.E., Project Engineer Hazards Study anch Mitigation Directorate cc: Ms. Veronica J. B. Morgan, P.E. Assistant City Engineer. City of College Station Mr. Mark Roberts,. P.E. Nathan D. Maier Consulting Engineers, Inc. For:. Matthew B. Miller, P.E., Chief Hazards Study Branch Mitigation Directorate ~ ~ ..~. ~~ ~~ ''~ q_Z. ~.ca.~,.~..~`~-~e-( ~K 'Sty ~___._- ~ .~M,~`G.`cu,v~- -~ w~~..G.a. Gotit~-s~ia~s ~u-~O-c~- ` a ~ P~~ _ f ~- b ~~i/ ~~°°'" _" ~~ t^ x/13 ,~,,~~ ~fi r ~.~-~ Q-~ Gt1L.Q. 3 _ te~~-~C~-ts s~( ~/I ~+~/v-.1r ~ '^ ~ U Shirley Volk - Re: Paul Clarke ~ ~~~ ~~~~ Page. i ,:~ From: Jane Kee To: SVOLK~CITY OF COLLEGE STATION.CITY HALL Date: 10/8/98 9:30AM Subject: Re: Paul Clarke yes. there is no final platyet. And they still need to revise the PP. It doesn't need to go back to anyone, just have the changes made that came outta the mtgs. »> Shirley Volk 10/08/98 08:05AM »> I started looking for the final plat file for West Wolf Pen Creek and, of course, can't find one because we don't have one ! At least,: if we do, I can't find a file. If, indeed, we don't have. one, should we be reminding Paul Clarke so they don't think they can get building permits for these restaurants and then find out when they are ready to build that they can't? I'm gathering some information for Jim to give to Pau! today, so it might be a good time to remind him. That means infrastructure plans, etc. ~/ ~~/ ~~~f~ U ~~- ~~r ~~- ~. ~~'-~-~. ®f~~ --°~ ~ ~~ TIO LLEGE STA. N co P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Sta ' n, TX 77842 Tel: 409 764 3500 ' Charlie Mercer Fired-Up, Inc. Via fax #(512) 263-8055 Dear Ivlr. Mercer, Yesterday. {2-3-99) we noticed that there are no tree barricades on the Kona's site. The approved landscape plan indicates that 13 trees were to be protected. The ordinance allows 300 points for .protected trees. and' only 35 .points for unprotected ones. We have noted construction materials,. the job shack and heavy equipment tracks under or adjacent to 10 of the trees that were supposed to be pra~tected. The other 3 {at the northeast corner) are at risk because the full bamcade is not present. You have therefore, at this time lost all protected tree. points and. are required to bring in a revised landscape plan to be reviewed by the. Wolf Fen. Creek Design Review Board (DRB). You have no approved plan that allows the removal of these trees at thin. time. The next .available DRB meeting will be scheduled for February 17, 1999 at 10:.00 a.m. at College Station -City Hall. Until that time .you must have all construction material` and the job shack. relocated and the trees barricaded. This dogs not assure that you will. receive any protection points since the damage has most likely been done. If you do not install tree barricades by 5:00 Friday, February 5; 1999, there will be a stop work order issued. You must also bring a revised landscape plan to our office by Wednesday February 10, 1999 or a stop work order. will be issued. This is a serious matter and we urge you to comply in order to not delay the construction of Kona's. Please contact me at (409) 764-3570 if you have any questions Sincerely, e Kee, AICP City Planner cc: Case file #98-438 -Tom Slate, Aubry Hansen Construction, Via fax # (817) 335-5609 .Home of Texas A&M University February 4, 1999 ~ . ~ ~L "" ~ ~~ ~e {t is-{~ ~! ~,.9;~Y+#j "`'d(....+' i, E ~~ " 9 ~~ ~ .` ~ ~° yySy 9f !~ :,. . GTE 301 INDUSTRIAL BLVD. SRYAN, TEXAS 77803..: '~, LAVERNE AKIN DESIGNER ACCESS DESIGN 409/821-4723 DATE: AUGUST 28, 1998 j CASE: KQNA' S STEAK HOUSE (98-438) REVIEWED BY: LAVERNE AKIN ' AFTER REVIEW OF THE ITEM LISTED ABOVE, THE FOLLOWING CONCERNS ~ WERE NOTED: PROVIDE 2QFOOT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT ALONG HARVEY ROAD. THE DEVELOPER/OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FbR PROVIDING AND PLACING 1-4 INCH CONDUIT WITH PULL STRING FROM THE OUTSIDE BUII,DING TERMINATION TO THE ZO UTILITY EASEMENT. ALONG HARVEY ROAD. THE CONDUIT SHALL ELL UP 4 FEET AT THE OUTSIDE BUILDING TERMNATION AND ELL UP 61NCHES IN THE EASEMENT. THE OUTSIDE BUILDING TERMNATION MUST BE WITHIN 20 FEET QF POWER - IF NOT, THE DEVELOPER.OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND PLACING A 8'X5/8" COPPER GROUND ROD AT THE BASE OF THE TERMINATION. ATDDITIONAL COMMENTS: CONTACT LAVERNE AKIN WITH GTE AT 409/821- 4723 FOR C®NDUIT PLACEMENT AND TELEPHONE REQUIREMENTS, AND OCCUPANCY DATE. I ~ ~; ~ ~g, ~o z tin nc ~~ :,~ ih~~ ~ n _ ~~ 14625 E. Clark Ave. Industry, CA 91745 (626)336-4511 Phone (800)544-8769 Fax i i i \I ~ ~ 11 1 -. • t or Stem Mountin For Arm, Pos 9 C7 Nominal MODEL NUMBERS Size 1/2 IPS Fitter 3/4 IPS Fitter 1i" 2RS12 3RS12 14" 2RS14 3RS14 1s" 2RS16 3RS16 ~~ ANGLE REFLECTOR Nominal MODEL NUMBERS Size 1/2 .IPS Fitter 3/4 IPS fitter 10° 2RA10 3RA10 12° 2RA12 3RA12 RADIAL WAVE • Nominal Size MODEL NUMBERS 1/2 IPS Fitter 3/4 IPS Fitter 1s° ' 2RW16 3RW16 1s° 2RW18 3RW1$ All Aluminum Construction (Can Not Rust ) * Powder Coated Finishes * Wet Location Listed * 200W Incan. Standard (See Fixture Options) HEAVY DUTY Nominal MODEL NUMBERS Size 1/2 IPS Fitter 3/4 IPS Fitter 14° 2RH14 3RH14 1s° 2RH16 3RH'16 1s° 2RH18 3RH18 DEEP REFLECT',OR .Nominal MODEL NUMBERS Size 12 IPS Fitter 3/4 IPS Fitter ~o~~ 2RD10 3RD10 12~~ 2RD12 3RD12 UPLIGHT SHADE Nominal MODEL NUMBERS Size 1i2 IPS :Fitter 3/4 IPS Fitter 1s° 2RU18 3RU18 Open top, Damp Location Listed. Wet Location listing requires glass enclosure. STANDARD Arms • Large Loop Model Available in 1/2 IPS or 3/4 IPS All Aluminum Construction Threads: 1/2 - 14 for 1/2 IPS 3/4 - 14 for 314 IPS Number 2LL23 ,~2IPS 12.5" 3LL23 ~~ IPS 2,3•, 30 " Model Number 2LL30 ,!ZIPS 12.5" 3LL30 3/4 IPS Small Loop l Model Model Number Number r. ~ ~ ~ ` 8„ 2SL23 ,lz.PS 2SL30 ,!ZIPS s 3SL23 3l4.PS 3SL30 3/41PS 23,. I 30., • Sign Arm Model Model Number Number 2SA18 ,!z IPS 2SA23 1!2 IP5 10" 10" 3SA18 3l4IPS.. 3SA23 ~4IPS 18" 23" Mounting Method i l ~~ , 2 3 ~/ / (1) Die Cast Universal BacKplate (2) .Set Screws, 1 /4-20, Stainless Steel (3) Round Canopy Cover (4) Locking Slip Ring - ~~ ~~ i For Arm, Post or Stem Mounting Nominal MODEL NUMBERS Size 1/2 IPS Fitter 3/4 IPS Fitter 1z° 2RS12 3RS12 14° 2RS14 3RS14 1s° 2RS16 3RS16 V ANGLE- REFLECTOR Nominal MODEL NUMBERS Size 42 IPS Fitter 3/41PS Fitter 10° 2RA. 10 3RA10 12° 2RA12 3RA12 Nominal MODEL NUMBERS Size 1/2 IPS Fitter 3/4 IPS Fitter 1s° 2RW16 3RW16 1s° 2RW18 3RW18 * Ail Aluminum Construction (Can Not Rust ) Powder Coated Finishes * Wet Location Listed 200W Incan. Standard (See Fixture Options) K e ~^' ~6 ~4 {[Ht{~ HEAVY DUTY Nominal MODEL N U M B E R S Size 1/2 IPS Fitter 3/4 IPS: Fitter 14" 2RH14 3RH14 ~s° 2RH16 3RH16 1s~~ 2RH18 3RH18 DEEP REFLECTOR Nominal MODEL NUMBERS Size 1/21PS Fitter 3/41PS Fitter 10~ 2RD10 3RD10 12'~ 2RD12 3RD12 UPLIGHT SHADE Nominal MODEL NUMBERS Size 1 i2 IPS Fitter 3141PS Fitter 1s° 2RU18 3RU18 Open top, Damp Location. Listed. Wet Location listing requires glass enclosure. STANDARD RADIAL WAVE .: ~. _ .•; , ~3~ FR1 UZ~4~ rM TKUY LTG _ rxn nu. ~l~~~u~c~o ® ~ R 'i ~,.. r, ur ~r...~. KB 100 . Rbi 3 -- ! USG-- Z,~ ~ 8 ~~-t,~ ~~ 9cliT~: Nora T.I~OY ARCHITECTURAL LIGHTIIITC 148T~6 E11~1T CiaRK AVE 4TPX OB IIiD[T3'1TtY. CA., 81745 TEIt 628 998-4511 FJ17G #8~; 330-4266 MOTES HY SYMBOL: "O" 1 ~„ DOMESTIC WATER sERvicE REFER r0 c~vit~ pWCxS. FOR GONTINUATlON. 2 6" F1RE SERVICE REFER TO GIYIL DWGS. FOR CONTINUATION. 3 FREE STANDING. FIRE DEPT. SIAMESE CONNECTION PER LOCAL FIRE DEPT: REQUIREMENTS. 4 GAg METER t SERVICE BY CsAS COMPANY. 5 2600 CsALLON GREASE INTERCEPTOR REFER TO SHEET P-3 FOR DETAIL INFORMATION. 6 ll) 2" SAN. VENT TO INLET SIDE OF GREASE INTERG~PTOR t (1) 4" SAN. PENT TO OUTLET SIDE OF GRi`ASE INTERCEPTOR 1 4" 3AN. 3EWER'FROM TOILETS. 8 4" GREASE` WASTE FROM KITCHEN. 9 POIIlER COMPANY TRANSFOR'1ER t CONCRETE PAD. CONCRETE PAD BY ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO POWER COMPANY SPECS. TRANSFORMER t FINAL GONNECTION3 B7 POt1~R COMPANY. LOCATIONS AS PER CIVIL ENGINEER. ' VERIFY WITH POWER COMPANY PR10R TO FINAL BIDS. 10 UNDERCsROUNO SECONDARY CONDUCTORS, CONDUIT, TRENCHINCs t BACIGFILL B7 ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR VERIFY LOCATION. SEE RISER DIAGRAM. Ii MAIN SERYiGE'PANEL 'TIP". 6EE RISER DIAGRAM t PAN>=L SCHEDULES. Yl 2" E.C. WITH Pt1LLW{RE UNDER~'zROUND FOR TELEPHONE :3ERYICE. STUB- UP AT PROPERTY LINE, GAP,. t MARK. VERIFY LOG,4TION, WITH TELEPHONE COMPANY PRIDR TO FINAL B1D3. 13 2" Ems. WIT1-! PULLWIRE t~1DERCzROUND FOR G,4BLE SERVICE. STUB-UP AT PROPERTY LINE, GAP, AND MARK VERIFY LOCATION W{TH TELEPHONE - COMPANY PR10R TO FINAL BIDS. 14 WP J-BOX FOR RESTAURANT 3lGNACsE. VERIFY LOCATION. MAKE ALL FINAL GONNEGTIONS. COORDINATE WITH OWNER ~~ > -._: 15. WP TELEPHONE ENCLOSURE. SEE POWER PLAN. ~~ 16 2 " 8, 1 " 10G-, 3/4"C. HOMi=RIW THid.t TIME CLOCK. (FURNISH AND INSTALL CONTACTORS AS REQUIRED. ASGO OR EQUAL.) Il 2 " lm, 1 " 12Cs., 3/4"G. 19 POLE LIC~cHT FX'iURE a POLE. FIXTURE SHALL BE LIGHTOLIER "EXCELINE" "5AR403MAL 40mU1.MH'TYPE III WITH "EXGELINE" "801-H00~-30 30' S.SrS. POLE. DOLOR < FINISH TO BE VERIFIED W/JOB ARCHITI=GT t OWNER PRIOR TO ORDERING. . ___r_,~_._. z0 coNCR;==~. PcLE SHSE. SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET.. 21 3" PYC SLEEVES UNDEI~ROUND BY ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR FOR IRRIGATION SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS. STUB-UP ;!IEEE IN8lDE CURBS, FIELD VERIFY. 22 APPRO:cIMATE LOCATION. OF LIGH T ~D al~sN. YER(F1' LGGATIDN WITH JOB ARGNTEGT ~`J~1D CsL. October 15, 1998 WOLF PEN CREEK DESIGN REVIEW BOARD REPORT TO: Charles Mercer; fired Up, Inc. 3555 R.R. 620 South, Austin, TX 78734 Greg Taggart, Municipal Development Group 2551 Texas Avenue South,: Ste A, College Station, TX 77840 Paul Clarke, Clarke 8 Wyndham .3608 East 29th Street, Bryan, TX 77802 FROM: Design. Review Board. Kay Henryson, DRB Chairman Philip Kelby, DRB Member Chara Ragland, DRB Member George McLean, DRB Member James Massey, P8Z Chairman Jane Kee., City Planner Veronica Morgan, Assistant City Engineer Others attending: ' Shirley Volk, Development Coordinator SUBJECT: Kona Ranch Steak & Seafood Restauran - to be located on Lot 3 West Wolf Pena Creek along the south side of Harvey -Road in the WPC zoning district {98-438) The Design Review Board met on Tuesday, October 6, 1998#o review the proposed signage for. the subject restaurant. Chara Ragland .moved to accept the signage as presented in the locations shown on the site plan highlighted by the applicant (one freestanding sign. and 4 signs either painted on or• attached to the building on each fide), and with colors and fighting shown in the specifications presented. James.Massey seconded the motion which carried unanimously. The applicant can: move forward with submittal of building .plans for review, but permits will not be issued until the requirements of the final :plat are completed and the plat is filed for record with Brazos County. ~•~ CITY OF COLLEGI/ ~TATIOI~I `~ MEMORANDUM TO: Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Jane R. Kee, .City Planner RE: Three Restaurant Developments in the Wolf Pen Creek Corridor ~; PLANNING DIVISION POST OFFICE BOX 9960 1101 TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842-9960 (409)764-3570 DATE: September 16, 1998 The Design Review Board has been working with. three .separate restaurant developments that are adjacent to each other in the Wolf Pen Creek Comdor. They are located on lots 2,3 and 4 in the West Wolf Pen Creek Subdivision. These lots are located along Harvey :Road just east and adjacent to an existing building, formerly Sneakers and The Christmas Store. Two of the restaurants are owned by the same company, Kona's Steakhouse and Johnny Carino's Italian Restaurant. The: third is a Sonic. The three will be presented and discussed`together at the P&Z level because of their relationship to each other. Color and material samples, photographs and similar design information will be presented at the:. P~r.Z meeting. The P&Z must determine whether these uses meet the intent of the WPC master plan as designed. Restaurants are permitted uses `in the district but their design. and orientation are all things that the DRB and ultimately .members of the P&Z must decide. The site plans in your: packets have been. revised as per the Design Review Board's direction DRB notes are included in your packet for reference. Individual members of the DRB stopped by to review each plan and considering DRB review and the individual members comments, staff offers the following: Sonic: Discretiona . Iry terns • The Use: There was discussion as to whether this use "fits" in with the vision of the WPC corridor. The. major concerns involved the drive-through and the "design" in general.. The DRB :worked with the applicant on alternative colors and designs. The applicant added an outdoor seating area in the rear to attract pedestrians moving .through the corridor. ® Outside Rear Patio: This outside seating area has not been designed using materials approved by the DRB as yet: Initially a concrete slab was proposed.. Screening of the slab would be required due to the elevation. Rather than apply some .kind of decorative facing or retaining wall feature, the applicant submitted wooden decking "O"stffrpt"WPC EAT.doc material. Individual DRB members (James Massey, Kay Henryson and Phil Kelby) had concerns about the decking and how it harmonizes with the rest of the design. There was also concern about providing a place for trash, :food and animals to collect underneath. • Patio Furniture: DRB approved the outside seating to match the green color provided by the applicant. This is not noted on the site plan and should be part of any motion for approval: • Transition Between Sonic and Sneakers: DRB requested some screening between this property'and the adjacent soon to be redeveloped property. The applicant shows a 6' high cedar fence. This was not discussed at the. DRB meeting. Plant material was mentioned to provide a soft but effective transition. • Dry Storage Bldg: DRB .has not reviewed elevations of this area. Location was approved but we do not know what. the roof structure will look like. • Front Brick WaIL• DRB has not reviewed what this will look like. Plans state that this wall. will match the bldg.. colors which will be a stucco: material in a sand or taupe color. There will be brick pavers in the entry drive which will be red in color. • Cone Shaped Lighting :Elements: These cones are red with fiber .optic tubing around them that can change .colors. It was not clear whether the intent was to use these. They are not part of the design of the store used as an example showing the green color scheme. The DRB objected to the use. of bright reds and yellows in the original Sonic color scheme. • Si a e: DRB felt that an exit sign at the front of Sonic would encourage patrons to use the Sonic driveway rather than heading east through the adjacent parking lots to exit onto SH 30. DRB .did not approve use of the yellow background for the main Sonic sign. The backgroundis to be white. • Transition between Kona's and Sonic:. It is not clear how Sonic and Kona's integrate their sites at the rear. This area contains Sonic's outside seating. area and dumpster and Kona's vehicular accessway. • On the Section A-A detail on the Landscape Plan show "limits" of the exposed face curb on the plan view.:. TechnicaZltems • Show the top-of--curb elevations between Sonic and Christmas Store to show curbs on each property to assure a smooth transition. "O»stffrpt"WPC-EAT.doc Kona's Steakhouse The :applicant intends to dedicate the. minimum reservation and floodway area. along the tributary.{that comes from Oaks Park and runsbetween these two restaurants) to the City. There is a meeting scheduled between the staff and the applicants to work out details of how the. City and applicant might work together to develop this area where it benefits the City, the Wolf Fen Creek area and the restaurants. Results of this .effort willbe reported at the P&Z meeting. The revised site plan submitted at the time of this writing is unclear relative to or lacks the following information: ~~ V°~, ,~$ Discretionar Iry terns ~, \ ~~ lo~`• ~' • Signa~e: The signage will be reviewed later by the Design Review Board. ~~;~ ~ • Metal Roof Some DRB members expressed concern about the galvanized metal ~ roof. The applicant states this is an important part of the image of the restaurant. The DRB agreed to have the decision made at P&Z and. not come back for further review. • Sidewalks: There is a sidewalk requirement along SH 30: This is noted on the plan. However, staff had mentioned building. this sidewalk further into the tributary area rather than. along SH 30. This: item was to be part. of the discussion concerning, this dedication as mentioned previously. Staff is confused as to why the sidewalk is shown on the revised plan along SH 30. ~,. ~• ...Switch Gear Location: This was to be located adjacent to the transformer and screened with it as a "unit". It is shown apart and away from the transformer and dumpster: area. ~(• Landscape Screening: The area behind the dumpster and transformer was to show a continuous;,landscape screen ~ Pedestrian Access: It is unclear how. pedestrians coming from the creek area will move onto and through Kona's property to access he restaurant itself. There are landscape beds and driving aisles that must be crossed. X • Transition between Kona's and Sonic: It is not clear how Sonic and Kona's integrate their. sites at the rear. This area contains Sonic's outside seating area and dumpster and Kona's vehicular accessway. Technical Items • Floodplain Line: More than one 100 yr. floodplain line is shown.. Label both the correct floodway and floodplain lines as .the 1998 NDM study. Floodplain and floodway lines on landscape plan should match lines on other plans. • Tree Protection: Details must be shown on approved. plans. "O" st~'rpt"WPC-EAT. doc • Vehicular Maintenance Access: The City will need an access easement all the way -' from SH 30 to the minimum reservation area. A minimum 10' wide paved surface must be provided up to the minimum reservation area. Travel through the parking area is acceptable Design must address how drainage water will not leave the parking lot through this accessway and will: get to the gates in the parking lot so that it will leave underground1 Johnny Casino's Discretiona IrY tens • Sidewalks: There is a sidewalk requirement along SH 30. This is noted on the plan. However, staff had mentioned building this sidewalk further into the tributary area rather than along. SH 30. This item was to be part of the discussion concerning this dedication as mentioned previously. Staff is confused as to-why the sidewalk is shown on the revised plan along SH 30. • Dumspter Location: Staff is working with sanitation and .owners on an acceptable location that can be accessed. Decorative .Swale: On the grading plan there is a decorative. swale but there is no detail shaving what it will look like. Technical Items • Pedestrian walkways: There are 6' walks that are mentioned on the plan but not located. All pedestrian walkways must be 10' wide. • Deck Area: There is a "deck area as per the WPC standard" which is mentioned but not located on the plan. • Floodwa, /F~plain Line: Should be labeled as the correct 1998 NDM study and should be the same on a113 plans (site, landscaping and grading). • Vehicular Access Easement: An access easement must be provided from SH 30 to the minimum reservation area. It must be a minimum 10' wide and paved. Travel,through the parking area is acceptable. Design must address how drainage water will not leave the parking lot through this accessway and viii get to the gates in the parking dot so that it will leave: underground. • Clarify top-of--curb of adjacent property parking lot (Woodstock) to east showing transition between 21ots. attachments: Original DRB notes, revised site plans. "®" st~rpt"WPGEAT. doc ~ x.,,,, ~ ~ ~ --°---'°' ~ ~j~~?.. I ~ ~/~ /--~t r c~ ~'~o ~ /~r~ty--~-- l~-e- ~ Z --~u~,,,1 ~ l S r1 ~- ~~ a-~'[ ~ ~ ii r 3 i vy~ ~ 1 C °~°"~'~/~1J~q r ~r,•~ '~, r i ~'~ G'/ S ~ ~7~ `~ c vv1 c ~l 1~/ ~-vl S 1 ~C ~l Gt~lfl ~ ~ ~~-~~~ ~,~fr, i'JI ~~~1/J S ~' ~-- ~ ~c~cti'1 rev ~ s ~' ~~ ~ - ~- - e 5--~c~-~l D2e v, ' s ~' ~~~'1 ~f~ ~... L ~' Cc~. ~ i \~1 ~" i''c~Y3~~ G ~~ ~ i\v `'~ c ~ ~ Li I\L ~t ~~ l I~, ~~~ v f ~~ ~ .~ h -~ ~ ~ r ~' r ~ . ` , ~+ r f/ y ,,~ `(. C~ ~ ~ ~vt e ~ -~ /~~-etc ~', '-~1 ' e ~~ ~~ ,~' l '~ y ~ ~ 1 ~ . C ~(.c~ ~ ~,N-e-mot ~ ~ cc:~~r ~// . C ~ Ir' r' cry S / ~~~~~ ~'-$ ~v7 ~ -fir ~ c.~ ~ l '~~ ~. iT ~ l ~- ~~ (./~ ~' ~~ i ~ ~ L6~ ~ ~ `~~z- V'l s i WI _ s G~"/~ ' n ~' s. C 4~~-h -~-- C ti-~-f~~ r- s ~-~.~~~- ~.-~.-J~ ,~: ~ ~~ ~e,-~~ ~ ~ s w ~ I C c~ s ~~-u ss is/~~s 1 l i ~ '( Gam- ~ ~ ~~ - .b (c ~~- ~- ~ cy } ~ f 'I ~ ~~ Ls L' :~ ~ ~-~" r J ~~~~ '~~ '~ L~~ Gt ~ rye-~- ~ ~/mss ~~ ~ ' ~ ~- ~ ~ ~--~t 1 n \~ ,~"~ ! ( i A R ~E TRANSMITTAL LETTE MUDIICIPA,L DEVELOPMENT GROUP . , 2551 TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH, SUITE A COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS. 77840 Ph: (409)6.93-5359 F~a: (409)693-4243 Enginaeri~tg - Pld~.ni~rg - Surueyting ~ (~ ~!, ~~ C-S FROM: ~ r r DATE: l F~ ~ 1 f MQG JO8 NUMBER: Z~?© ATTACHEQ PLEASE FIND: .~r, nc rr~o~cc. DESCRIPTION: . ~ ._..--- K_ v~~ ~l Vie. ~r~rtiti a.,., ,~(~'s ~, . Cr`v~'l .D.e. r .s -~`~ ~.~`` err, K~,,,~ 5 i ~ et' e. ~ Z ~G G s~{~ PloWt ` S THESE ITEMS ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED .BELOW: FOR APPROVAL ^ FOR YOUR USE AS REQUESTED ^ OTHER: SIGNED: ~~ ~~ ~~ `~ TRANSMITTAL LETTER ~ E ML'NICFP?,I. DEVELOPMENT GROL? ~c ~ z55i TgXy4 avENtrE souTx, SiJIT' a COLLEGE STaTION, TEXAS 77840 Ph: (409)893-5359 F~: (409)693-z2"_3 E~ngtine eying • PZ ~:,: ar~ting - Sun e ying ' 0 : ~a ~ FROM: ~ r2~ a.~Q ~ MGG JOB NUMBER: Z ~ ~~ A ~ ~ ACNEg PLEASE FIND: U f ~~. cwt ~--- rte ~ s ~- . ~r'~ ~'t .~~.-t~ ~ I s l ~ ~ ~ ~ er~~~ I ~ ~.- I K ~ ~ ~-y ~ ~ -~.- ~'~~ ~ cr`~.se ~' c .. . ~ 1 ~ THESE ITEMS ARE" TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED BE_OW: J~ FOR APPROVAL p `FOR YOUR USE ~~. AS REOUESTED p OTHER: * , "~ r fi 2 '~ ' ; C ~i~~P ' COMMENTS: ~ , ~ ~~1 ! ~ S j ~:~// ~ ! , ~ ~ ,/ - l - ~, i; ~GNED: ~ ~ ~ ~ f / : ~ f COLLEGE STATION January 14, 1999 SUBJECT: P. O. Box 9980 • 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tel: 409 784 3500 Building Permits - Johnny Carino's Restaurant I<ona's Steakhouse TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: In response to requests from: Fired Up, Inc. to identify exactly what permits. can be issued for the subject restaurants, and under what conditions those permits can be issued, the City has determined the following: Based on the plats and plans for the subject restaurants that have been submitted to the City of College Station, and the reviews and requests for revisions-made by the City to the submitting engineering firm to date, the City has made the determination that a limited drainage development permit, a site clearing and grubbing permi# and a "foundation only° permit for each restaurant could be issued at this time with certain conditions. Because the subdivision plat for this development has not been. filed for record, the issuance of the "foundation only` pegnit would allow foundation work fio proceed. The recipient of the permit would be proceeding construction a# his own risk until the plat is approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and is filed for: record: -Final inspection ofthe foundation and authorization to pour concrete will be withheld. until the subdivision plat is filed for record. In addition to that condition, the remaining required construction documents for the projects must be submitted, reviewed and,approved-prior to issuance of a `full building permit", which would coverall the remaining aspects of the. buildings. As with all construction projects in College Station., no combustibles can be brought to the: site until the water tines and fire hydrants are installed, tested and accepted by the City, and fire lanes which will support emergency vehicles are installed. We hope that this information will be beneficial to you in completing the purchase of your property. ours ery I , ~~ a~.,,r_ ' J mes M Callaway Director of Development cc: files Home of Texas A&M University :. ~~ .Veronica Morgan e KONAS and Johnny Corinas Drainage Report Page 9 ~~~5 S~~h~~ From: Paul Kaspar To: Ve organ Date: 8/31/ -11:3 f~""`~'"`~~=~•-~-~ SubJect: NAS and ohnny Connas Drainrtge Report I glanced throng rnage reports and they show no improvements to the creek area between them. The just reference copies of the site plans we received last week and the only detail is a curb leaveout detail. So, there is still no information available on what they are proposing to do .with the. dedication area. The drainage reports are very skinny as well, so 1 don't think much analysis was done. /~~ / a s~ ~~`s I t . • -CITY OF CC~LLE~E ~TATIOI`I PLANNING DIVISION `~ E BOX 9960 7101 TEXAS AVENUE ® POST OFFIC COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842-9950 (409) 764-3570 MEMORANDUM T0: Karl Dreier, Aubry-Hansen, Inc Ton Mies, Fire Marshal Lance Simms, Building .Official FROM: Natalie Thomas Ruiz, Development Coordin or ~ r DATE: March 5, 1999 RE: Approved landscape plan for the Kona's Restaurant on Harvey Road. Attached is the revised landscape plan for the Kona's Restaurant that was approved by the City's Wolf Pen Creek L2esgn Review Board on Wednesday, March 3, 1999. Please replace these sheets in your approved set of construction plans, .- -The landscape and irrigation plans previously approved on 7anuary 7, 1999 are n~ longer applicable. If you have any questions, please call me at (499) `164-3570. cc: Charlie 1Viercer, Fired-Up, Inc. (w/o attachments) Planning Case File #98-438. N~3I24/1959 14:21 15122638!955 _ !=1h'tll !J!-' 1~1t_: rr~u~ uL; _~c f ~ ~ __ ~. - ~a ~ ~" curb Gu r C CS S' {~ rvu~ c~ are ing ~v, z~~ ,- 'P _J t !~ 4J • ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ,. ~' ; ~ ' O Q Z ,~ i~ 7 ~. '~ ~~ ;~ a~~ r RtS~ '; ~_ arn~ r t1 ~ I' I ~ PL~NT~N~ ,.,~;~ i cn _ ~~ `f _~ r ~J ~ _ I{~f ~- ~, :.;~;; ~ ,Q.;; - ~:~ ~. M // ~" / r ! :~i Q~ ~~ ~;. M H ~ ~ w ~-~ ~ k'/~MP dP~ ~3°Jo ~~~ t _ }` ~ ~ 278.b$ ~ t~! ~ ~ - ,~... ~ f; .d. ti., w ~~ 11"" ~ I ~~ i ~,~_ ~1• ~ ~ O v 34.t~ ~ -' ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ' ~ - ~ I l i i % .~ - _ ~ ~., x.97 ..~,. =~ ~ `~~- ' 6.5~ ~ .^'" ~~ '~ ~ . DSO .~ ` - ~l y ' T~ , , i ~i Q 4~,! ~ 1 ~ tu~s~NRY ~ .. ~.:.- ~ ~ : ~ ~- ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~~~ /~~?``~ c~~ _ Wow -- ~~~ r G~ ~~~