Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous'° ~ SUBMIT APPLICATION AND THIS LIST CHECI~D-OFF WTIH 16 ti FOLDED COPIES OF SITE FLAN FOR REVIEW MZrfIlVIUM REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN PROPOSALS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIlVIITED TO THE FOLLOWING: ,,~~ V~l. Sheet size ®24" x 36" J . Ca" 2. Title block to include: ~-'" a ).. Name,. address, location, and legal description ,/'b,) .Name, address, and telephone number of applicant ~° c.) Name, address, and telephone number of developer/owner ..~-= d;); Name, address, and telephone number of arciutect/engineer tee.) 'Date of submittal £) Total site area ® 3. Ownership and current zoning of parcel and all abutting pazcels. `s p 4. r~ key map (not. necessarily to scale). ~~ 5. Scale should be largest standard engineering scale possible on sheet. G7 6. Provide a north arrow. D 7. Topography, final. grading plan,. and other pertinent inane information. (If plan has too much informatioq show ~ in ve on separate. sheet.) .° _ / i V O 8. All existing streets, drives, buildings, and water courses on or adjacent to the proposed project site. ~~ 9. Locate 100 yr. floodplain on or adjacent to the proposed project site, note if there is none on the site. ~;' © 10. Location and size of existing. utilities within or adjacent to the proposed project site. f~ 11. Pro locatioq type, and size of the following: -- a. Buildings and structures ~Q~ t9S'e /b.) Off=Street parking areas v~nth parking spaces drawn, tabulated, and dimensioned ~b/~-) Common open space sites ~-~ Sites for solid waste containers 12. Proposed .streets, .drives, and curb cuts. For each proposed curb cut (including driveways, streets, alleys, etc.) locate existing curb cuts on the same and opposite side of the street to deternune separation distances between ro osed curb cuts. Indicate driveway throax length as measured in the Driveway Ordinance. (See existing and p p Ordinance 1961 for driveway location and design requirements.) ~~Pd~~ ~ 13. The total number of residential buildings and units to be constructed on the proposed project site. . Landscape plan as required in Section 11 of the Zoning Ordinance (See Ordinance # 1638.) The landscaping plan be shown on a separate sheet if too much information is on the original site plan. Attempt to reduce or i ~~~g eliminate plantings in easements. Include infocination on the plan such as: a) existing landscaping to remain b) required point calculations c) proposed ne« plantings with points earned {i ~,' (~~/ ;'~ Cr 15. Indicaxe unit type (number of bedrooms). /(~ ~, 16. The density of dwelling units per acre of the proposed project. 17. The gross square foci: ~° cf b~~i'.di~-~.gs and the proposed use of each building. ,~ _ - ..(~ 8 Designate number of packing spaces .required by ordinance and provided by proposal. ~ islands, and ~C9 19. Show dimensions to size and locate all structures, parkng .spaces, dnves, curb cu 9 Pig setbacks. 20, Are there impact fees associated with this development? L1 21. Provide a water and sanitary sewer legend to .include water demands (minimum, max:mum and. average demands in gallons: per minute) and sewer loadings (maximum demands in gallons per day}. will size meters. i ) .W. C nts or RO eters must be located in easeme ( tY locations. M meter w all C~22. Sho The following are typical standards for. Plan Development established by Ordinance or Policy: I, I II'i ~ (~ ~, .1. Building separation is a minimum of 15 feet. I ') .,--~'"C~ 2: Building setbacks are outlined in Ordinance 1638, Zoning Ordinance, Table A (Sec..7, P. 30). /r~3. ~nimum parlQng space is 9' X 20', or on a perimeter row, 9' x 18' with a 2' overhang. Wheelstops maY be required on interior rows longer than 10 spaces or in special situations. ''~ +~ 4. M.inunum drive width is 23' with. head-in parking'or 20' without parking. III 5. Raised landsca ed islands, (6".raised curb). of a minimum of 180 sq. ft. are located at both ends of every parking P re on be rovided somewhe in for eve 1~ interior azking spaces must p ~--/ ditionall 180. . ft: of landscap g r3' P .row. Ad y, sq ~ the site. ~~ b. Stre~etscape .compliance is required which involves special plantings along streets specified in the City's Streetscape Plan.. ~7. A 6°' raised curb is required around all edges of all parts of all paved areas without exception. (To include utility pads, etc.) Curb detail to be a~yroved by City ster locations dum wa s ° i ' , p y , ss ng. azeas, acc. islands, plant Engineer. No exceptions will be made for areas designated as "reserved for future parking". ~' ~ 8. Sidewalks aze required at time of development if property has frontage on a street shown on the sidewalk Master 2 of the Zoning (Refer to Section 10 it s h . y. e nece s Plan. or if the .:Project Review Committee detenrunes t Ordinance). C~ 9. Locations of dumpsters on pad. at least 12ftx12ft shall be such that. dumpsters are not visible from sixeets. Gates of dumpster with sibilit di t C y e acces na oor discouraged and visual screening -from R.O.W. is required... . are . Planning, using same fuming raidus requirements as those of a Fire Department Pumper Truck. N f ~ ~ 10. Healthy, native trees over 6" in caliper should be retained whenever possible. NJA ~ 11. Fire lanes of a minimum of 20 feet in width with a minimum height clearance of 14 feet must be established if any structure of any type is more than 150 feet from a public street or highway. O 12. Any structure in any zoning district other than R-1, R-1A, or R-2 must be within 300 feet of afire hydrant as measured along a public street or along an approved fire lane as the hose is laid off the truck. Nlg ~ 13. Fire hydrants must be located on the same side of a major street as a project, and shall be in a location approved by the City Engineer. 1v~~} ~], 14. Fire hydrants must be .operable and accepted by the City and drives must have an all weather surface before combustibles can be brought on any site. ~/ -'Q 15 . A twenty four foot setback from R.O.W. to curb of parking lot is required. Parking may be allowed in this area up to a maximum of 7 contiguous spaces. 1~ l~! 16 .:~II lans must include irrigation systems for landscaping.. Irrigation meters are separate from the regular water s~~stems for buildings and must be sized accordingly and include backflow prevention protection. TION C L I~ STA P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tel: 409 764 3500 MEIVI012ANI?IIM TO: PROM DATE: RE: Greg Taggart, Municipal Development Group r Natalie Ruiz, .Assistant Develo merit Co~ at ~ ' p August 24, 1998 Quality Assurance Brakes on Brentwood~Drive. Staff reviewed the above. mentioned site plan for the proposed Q.A.B. facility to be located on Brentwood Drive in College Station. Attached is a redlined copy of the site plan with staff comments/concerns that must be addressed prior to further review. Once you have addressed all of the redlined comments, submit the following information to continue with site plan approval: - 10 copies of the revised site plan; - 2 copies of~the revised landscape plan; and, - the attached redlined site & landscape plan with staff comments. If there are. comments Ghat yozt are not able to address, submit a Zetfer trddressing those items to be reviewed by staff with .the revised site plan. If you have any questions or need .additional information, .please call me at 764-3570. Thank you. Attachment cc: John Kiltz, CCG Venture Partners, 14450 T.C. Jester Blvd. Suite 170, Houston, TX 77014 (~Se file #98-435 Home of Texas A&M University COLLEGE STATION P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Te/: 409 764 3500 MEMORANDUM TO: Rabon Metcalf, Municipal Develop ' nt Gro FROM: Natalie Ruiz, Assistant Development Coo in r DATE: September 22, 1998 RE: Quality Assurance Brakes orr Brentwood Drive. Staff' reviewed the above mentioned site plan for the proposed Q.A.B. facility to be located on Brentwood Drive in College Station. Attached is a redlined copy of the following items with staff comments: _ Site Plan, _~ Landscape & Irrigation Plan, _ Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plan; and, _ Drainage Report. Once you have addressed all of the redlined comments, submit the following .information to continue. with Phase II of the. building permit.. process: Revised drainage report; _ 3 sets of construction documents with the revised site, landscape and grading & drainage plans attached; and, The 4 redlined. items listed above. If there are comments that you are not able to address, submit a letter addressing those items to be reviewed by staff with the revised site plan. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me at 764-3570. Thank you. Attachment cc: John Kiltz, CCG Venture Partners, 14450 T.C. Jester Blvd. Suite 170, Houston, TX 77014 (w/o attachment) ~se file #98-435 Home of Texas A&M University 01/09 "98 15:27 FAX X09 693. ~2~3 Dl D G ~ 001 M~T.I'~IC.I~AL ~EY~.~DP1V~~~T GROUP 3557 TesasAye• Sor~rh, Ste.: A • College.St~ian, Texas T?84Q • 4a9=693-359 • FAX.• s09-693-443 • EMA~:rrrdga=a?gr~rtet $ngineering, Surveying, Planning and Environmental GonsvlYanfs O FELLOW l DATE ~ 1 ~~~ g NO. PAGES T TO FRU11 Ui If there is a problem with this trasmission, please call vs at 409 69j-5359 CONDIFENTL~LI?'YNOTICE: This facsimile message and accorn~ffnyin,, communications and/or documents are inr~nded far the excusive and confidential use of the individual or entity to which the tnessbe is addressed co~rrrs FF-t_~ /]~ U ~.. ~ _ _ . i /f /Jn r.r n // LANE 7.ca i~ SCOC~/~T"t ~~cS tl.~ ~ Y+/1~N7rcaNI~D ~ -'C~ - f rev W1 ~ C7i _ ~ ./.J ~ ~P.~~= '~ fJ1~-f ~L-1~ liU 1°~ST1F.a~ Leo r~ sriv s '~%ri~ 1.~~- ACG~.r~~ ~ r~bv ~C. ~ 20 ~d~ 1A N~~ -~ ov~C _.. n f~2oPFr,P.-rY. CA~~.-. r~ ~~ ~~/~ /~~~ %~ 1~:~: 01/09 '98 15:27 FAY 409 893 4243 b~ D G 01002 c w ~ ~ ~a ~ ~ ~ m N ~ b ~ w ~ $ _ `~ _ ~ I .00'0 3.0£,L1.8~b S I a ~ ~ l I~ - -~--- - a - ~ I ~ ~ _ 1 t ~ `~ ~ I - - - - T ~ m o m I ,~ M1 ~, II e~ j.. J ~ `.. ~~ V ~ ~ a 7 2 ` ~ ' 0 ~ I ~ b ` ° -- -- aN m o ~ ~ f A .Q .0 ~ 1 rn ( ! 1 t ~i 1 I ~ ~ ~ I I ssr Xili~'e~fd 9 yi 'jLWlWiilj 9GDWOJQ ,QZ - 1 1 ~ ~ 1 _ ~~,.~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ R ~ ,~ ~ _ ~ m ~ ~q/ - ~ ~ ~l ~ f lE ~ ~ _ ~.. l` m ~ N ~_ ~ I ~ ~~ 0~ ~~ ~ I m ~ ' I~ $$$ _ h .~ I ' ~ s~ ' ~ m lI 4 ~W t71 1 1~1 UNICIPAL IJE VEL OPMENT GROUP 2551 Texas Ave: South, Ste. A • Codlege Station, Texas 77840 •409-693-5359. • FAX.• 409-693-4243 • E-mail: mdgcs@gte.net Engineering, Surveying, Planning and Environmental Consultants ~s ~~,~ September 24, 1998 City of College Station Project Review Committee Re: Q.A.B. Development -Driveway Access Location MDG Job No. 000129-2987 To Whom It May Concern: The Q.A.B. proposed development is located along Brentwood Drive on a 0.603-acre tract adjacent to the Dairy Queen. Below is a time line illustrating the dates and comments received by Development Services and the discussions and design of the projects driveway entrance: August 19, 1998- Initial submission. - Au,~,ust 24. 1998 -Received comments from Development Services. The comment on the location of the driveway entrance was noted on this set of plans. In general, the requested change involved moving the driveway from in line with the front of the .office center to the east approximately 65'. This new location would make. the driveway closer in compliance with the driveway ordinance, but neither location fully complies. As discussed below in more detail this requested change compromises customer safety. Therefore, we began working with John Kiltz and Natalie Ruiz to come up with an alternative design that would allow the driveway to stay located as originally planned. - .September 1, 1998 -Sent fax (see attachment) to both parties with the new parking lot design. Included in the design was the original driveway location. with a 20' access lane on the east property line. The access lane would provide for cross access to adjacent landowners and future connection to Discount Tire and through street. Per my phone conversation with Natalie on August 28, 1998, she believed the site plan would be acceptable with the original driveway location so long as the access lane was added, but the ultimate decision would be made by staff review. This access lane is not required by any of the COCS development ordinances, but we integrated it into our desigr>`to meet Development Services. preferences and as a aid to our original driveway location. - September 14, 1998 -Second submission to Development Services with above changes. 000129-c.OS.doc MDG- 1 - September 22. 1998 -Received comments from Development Services. Comments on the construction plans still required the location of the driveway entrance to change regardless of the access lane. Our concern with the driveway at the location directed by Development Services is a matter of safety. As customers enter. the parking lot it would be best. if they can walk directly to the service center without crossing in front of the parking/service bays. Due to vehicles frequently entering and backing out of these bays,. pedestrian traffic's safety would be highly compromised if made to cross in front of this area From my discussions with Mr. Kiltz, we are both in agreement that changing the driveway location is not the right thing to do. From the owner's viewpoint, an insurer would certainly cover potential liability still customer safety would be compromised. Q.A.B. takes pride in its safety record and do not want to compromise it based on what really amounts to a "preference" of driveway location by the City. Q.A.B. can assure customer safety with the original design, but can not assure it if we accommodate the City's preference. I appreciate your attention to this matter. Rabon Metcalf, E.I. RM/tm CC: John Kiltz, CCG 000129-c.OS.doc MDG - 2 ~~aal~a ~~~-~- N~ J MUNICIPAL DE V~L ®PMENT GROUP 25.11 Texas Ave. South, Ste. A • College Station, Texas 77840 •409-693-5359 • FAX.• 409-693-4243 • E-mail: mdgcs(a~gte.net Engineering, Surveying, Planning and Environmental Consultants September 14, 1998 Natalie Ruiz City of College Station Development Services Ite: Q.A.B. _ Brentwvood, Section One - 0.603. acre tract MDG Job No. 000129-2987 Dear Natalie: Attached are the following items for the Q.A.B. development project: • 10 copies of revised Site Plan; • 2 copies of revised Landscaping & Irrigation Plan; • 2 copies of revised Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plan; • 1 copy of revised Drainage Report; • 1 set of complete construction .plans; • Redlines of previous construction plans. Also, within Development Services comments where a few items that required explanation. They are as follows: 1) The proposed office/service center location has been checked to ensure that is not encroaching upon. the'existing 20' drainage easement. Minimum size requirements for the .building. and the 20' cross. access lane make it impossible to shift further from the easement. 2) Per our phone conversation and yours with Jim Smith,. John Kiltz is currently drawing out a joint-use agreement with Dairy Queen on the existing dumpster. This will provide for adequate storage for disposal of waste, accessible location and new screening fence for .better asthetics for Dairy Queen and Q.A.B. 3) Per our phone conversations we have provided fora 20' cross-access way along the northeast property line: As we discussed, this construction would allow the developer to keep the driveway entrance as originally planned. 4 Per my phone conversations with Veronica Morgan, Paul Kaspar & Mark Smith in regards to the location of private detention in a public drainage easement, the described design changes were made. The City's concern with having a private detention pond located in a public drainage easement is that the City.. might get caught with the maintenance 000129.c-03.doc MDG- 1 res onsibili Thou hit is allowed for developers to build parking lots, (for use p ty g of detention), in these. easements, a natural, grass-lined detention. facility-would require mowing. I am assuming the City feels that commercial businesses have a tendency of allow areas located in front of their property or in locations highly visible to the public and their customers to become unruly, degraded and non- maintained. Therefore, the site was redesigned so that the parking area and useable land located west of the existing easement would do for storage of runoff. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions. 000129.c-03.doc MDG - 2 RM/tm 2/09 '98 07:32 FAX X09 693 X243 b'! D G ~ 002 1~~INICI~~L D~T~~LOP~ENT C~RO~LP 2551 Tesas.4v8. Soutb,'Sle. i! • College Sta[ian, ?vas 77840 •409-693-5359 ~ FfLY_• 409-693-4243 ~ E maii- mdgcs~aglenet Engineering, Suaveying, Planning and Environmental Consultants September 23, 1998 , Shirley Voll~ Development Coordinator City of College Station Development Services Ree Q.A.Be -Driveway Access Location MDG Job No. 400129-2987 bear Shirley; Per my phone conversation today with Jim Callaway, and as an authorizt;d agent for John Ki1t~ we are requesting an appeal for the driveway access location as stated in Ordinance #1971. The set of plans that was reviewed and commented on by the COCS (file number 9835 dated September 15, 1998} request a design change that will result in as unnecessary hardship. Time is of the essence with this project and we need you to schedule a meeting with the PRC as soon as possible. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions. Rabon Metcalf, RMltm CC: John Ki1tz, CCG Robert Mosely, COCS noolz9t.o4.a~ r~-1 (409) 764 3570 MEMORANDUM TO : Project Review Committee FROM : Ed Hard, Transportation Planne~~ DATE : October 6, 1998 RE : Driveway Variance for Quality Assurance Brakes This request. is for a variance. to the adjacent driveway spacing requirement of the city's driveway ordinance. The ordinance calls for .driveways on collector streets (ie Brentwood) to be spaced 185 feet apart. The applicant is requesting that the driveway be located 75 feet away from an existing adjacent driveway, In applying the ordinance, staff indicated that the location of the driveway should be shifted approximately 75 feet to line up with the parking aisle nearer the sites east side. The reasoning behind this is two-fold. First, in order to uphold the driveway ordinance. the driveway needs to be shifted as far east as practicable. Moving the driveway to line up with the sites east parking aisle increases the spacing distance to approximately 150 feet. The QAB site can not meet the full 185 feet spacing requirement due to its lack of frontage. Second, a driveway located at the east parking aisle would. better align with the cross. access driveway which will connect the QAB site to the private roadwau {contained within a private. access, drainage, and utility easement). which serves the Discount Tire and the Epicures Catering sites. The Texas Department of Transportation '(TXDOT) is currently developing the plans for the .Phase II Texas Avenue widening from about Dominik Drive south to FM 2818. The preliminary design for this phase does not include a median opening for the private roadway which serves the Discount: Tire and Epicures sites. In light of this, staff requested that`the QAB site. include..a cross access `°• CITY OF COLLEGE ~TATIOI`I `~ PLANNING DIVISION ® POST OFFICE BOX 9960 1101 TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842.9960 PRC/QAB, Page 2 easement. which would connect to the .private roadway in order for existing and .future. developments to the north to have access to Brentwood. It is important to note that the City did not require the cross access, but much to the developers credit, he voluntarily included it on the QAB site: However, with the driveway location as proposed. it will make. "cross" traffic zigzag through the. site. The applicant has. indicated that if the driveway were moved east to meet the intent of the driveway ordinance, pedestrian safety would be compromised since customers would have to walk in front of the parking service bays; However, a similar point about pedestrian safety could also be made about a west driveway location since it would introduce cross traffic more internally through the site. In summary, the..applicants desired location for the QAB driveway andwhat is needed to meet the intent of the driveway. ordinance differs by 75 feet.. Given that the QAB site is located on a collector, staff does not consider this variance request. a-major public safety.. issue, particularly when compared to most other driveway variance .cases that have. been brought forth to PRC (and'formerly P&Z and Council).. Staff tries. as much. as .possible to work differences. such as these out without having to resort. to the PRG However, this was not a variance we felt comfortable granting at the staff level since shifting the driveway east appears to be a reasonable means by which to try and uphold the ordinance. o_~~~~-- v~'~r ~~l~.la8. ~'QI ~P~o' STATION ®LLEGE C P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tel: 409 764 3500 MEMORANDUM TO: John Kiltz, CCG Venture Partners, LLC Via fax (281) 893-2420. FROM: Natalie Ruiz,. Assistant Development Coordi t DATE: October 16, 1998 ~: Building permit issuance of the Quality Assurance Brakes facility on Brentwood. Staff has completed the :final round of plans review and is ready to issue a building permit once the following fees have been taken care of: Water and sewer tap fees in the amount of $1650 which include: 3/4" Domestic Water Meter - $400 1" Irrigation Water Meter - $500 4" Sanitary Sewer Tap fee - $350 Temporary electrical pole fee in the amount of $45. _ Completed application for a Contractor's License. Your contractor will be required to submit the completed application .along.: with the $54 application and processing fee, (See attached .application.) _ Completed application for a building permit. (See attached. applica.tion.) _ Building permit fees in the amount of $835.. (This fee is based on the building valuation of $225,000.) All of the fees listed above may be paid at one location with. one check for your convenience, The electrical department still needs your electrical.. requirements and a temporary blanket easement for the property.. Please coordinate these electrical service details with Tony Ivfichalsky at (409) 764-3660. Home of Texas A&MUniversity QAB BP Checklist Case # 98-435 Page 2 0, f' 2 It is my understanding that you are currently working with the owner of the Dairy Queen next door on a joint use agreement. for the dumpster. We will issue the building permit without this written agreement; however, we must have an agreement in writing from both property owners prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the building. If you have. any. questions about he issuance of the building permit or any of the fees listed above, please let me know.. I look. forward to working. with you and :your contractor during the construction phase of the project: I'll .also be your main contact through issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Please keep in touch and let me know how things are going. If you have any problems or questions, please contact me at (409) 764-3570. cc:'UCase file #98-435 Building Official Lance Simms Rabon Metcalf, Municipal Development Group, (Via fax,. w/o attachments) MUNICIPAL DE VEL OPMEN~' GROUP 3.i.i1 Texas Ave. South, Ste. A • College Station, Texas 77840 + 409-693-.i3.i9 • FAX: 409-693-4243 • E-mail: mdgcs@gte.net Engineering, Surveying, Planning and Environmental Consultants ii January 13, 1999 Shirley Volk, Development Coordinator Development Services College Station, TX Re: Q.A.B. -Revised Site Plan MDG Job No. 000129-2987 Dear Shirley As you know, over the last several months Mr. John Kiltz as been attempting to adjust his approved parking lotto accommodate an outdoor quick alignment station. Due to this, the parking requirements have increased to a total of 36 parking spaces. This number takes into consideration the square-footage of the new working bays. Attached are two revised sets of plans that reflect the above changes. Please note the following two items. - The area of impervious cover has decreased from the original site plan. Therefore, detention requirements have also decreased. This will give the site's detention area more buffer and also decrease the rate of discharge from the pond due to a lower head on the grate inlet. - Per the PRC meeting in December the 20' access alley east of the building has been opted to be removed. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions. Sin~ce(ely;----~-~ i , `Ration 1CIet alf, E.LT/' RM/tm Cc: John Kiltz, CCG Ventures Enclosures: (2) Revised Construction Plans 000129-c.06.doc MDG - 1 w r~ AB, LLC 14450 TC Jester Blvd,, Suite 170 Houston, Texas 77014 (281} 893-8331 November 24, 1998 Natalie ituiz City of College Station 1101 South Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 RE: Agreement between Smith Dairy Queens, Inc. and QAB of College Station, LLC Dear Natalie: Until further notice, the undersigned parties (107 Brentwood and 2323 Texas Avenue South) agree that a shared dumpster will be located on a 12' by 12' fenced asphalt pad on the northwest corner of the 107 Brentwood land site. Smith Dairy Queens, Inc. will allow access to the dumpster via their driveway. Agreed: QAB of ollege Statt LLC ~~~~ Smith Dairy Queens, Inc. CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 South Texas Avenue,. P.O. Box 9960 College Station, .Texas 77842 Phone :(409) 764-3570 Fax (409) 764-3496. 03 ' 99 38 FAX X09 13 ~ 693 X243 hi D G , ~. ~ 002 ~ y 29/ ~ ~ _ - -' -~ ~ _ r r I _ ~ ~ ' !. ~- Rear Setback Line .Applies s 1 i ~ .A.B. OFFICE/SERVICE CENTER ft T? s 3, 2 q ?SED ' ~ I ~ ~ c~ r~ E ! ~ CONDU IT I ! S isle P ing o ~ ~ a ~. c 1 ~ ~ $'- l t . _ 3 2.00' .. ~ \ _ ~ C III f( • " .• ~••••, ~ ONCRETE 6R1 C \ o \ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ P m 0ETAIL AvERS, SEE N m N \ •- ~ ~ z , THIS SHEEP ~ , L , ~ ~ tyx~{o GQ+*~o~ '' , c I ` 'f ~ 5 ~~.R. i '~ ~, W ~ ~~ ~++ ~ l ~ ~ ~ ~ y a t o m ~~ I ~ t ~ v ~ ~ T1110 BAYS ~ ~ m ~ + ~ ~ i ~' $ C ! ~ ~ ~ ~ w a + o ' a v' 01 01 om m ,nm N a ~ N U ~ ,~ ~ O 01 1 i I i h t r ~ ~ D ~ m ~ ~~• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r om f ~' ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ a tV ~ ~ ~{ ~ la ~ -- _ / _ .~ an ~~ 25.00 ~p~ _ ~ J W Li t P - ° I _~ _ n - - l- roaer y. 7 00' " ' _ _ Q ~ . ' '~ 5. W ~ 30 zzgz-~ S 4148 ~ 1/2 I.R. .-- I 6' PROP. S EwaL4c - ~ II _~y'~ ~I _ ^ I ,r _. w ~ . .,.~-~~ I• ~ ~ .~ -~ ~ - ~,NDlcAP RAMP {TYPE A) i PICAL ~~ ' 1:43' ADJACENT RIGHT , 570 ADJAC N gRENTW00D DRIVE ~ (yo R.o.w;) ~ I 14T OPPOSITE RIGHT 5~ T LEFT ne i4n io0 9 d • f1R ~anq 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS lQ] 001 ~~~~~~~:~~x~~~:~~~~~:~~:~~~~~~~~ ~~~ ACTIVITY REPORT ~~x~ ~e~x~~;:~x~:~~:xx~~ex:x:~x~:x~~:~:x:~~x~~:~x~x~~: TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX N0. 7045 CONNECTION TEL 96934243 CONNECTLON ID MDG START TIME 03/30 14:05 USAGE TIME 00'49 PAGES 2 RESULT OK 'Natalie Ruiz Wednesday, August 26, 1998 Page 1 From: Jim Smith To: PRC Date: Fri, Aug 21, 1998 8:50 AM Subject: Wednesday, August 26, 1998 Quality Assurance Brakes (98-435): I have several problems with this site. First. I have limited access to the container location as noted. I can get in, but can not get. out. This could be eliminated with a second drive access. Secondly, the container enclosure is not 12 x 12: I measure it at 10 x 13. Plus it has gates. If the sputhern most container screening wall in increased to 20 feet,. gates will not be required. and, if a second. access drive is installed,l will have complete access. Call me on this one as I see lots of problems. Shadow Canyon (98-436): No problem. John Loggins Subdivision (98-322): No problem.. Thanks.