Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneousPage 1 -Sabine-:McCuILY..-:Prodigene .:..:::---~-~- --------A ..... , .... --::. From: Shirley Volk To: Paul Kaspar, PLANNING, Tony Michalsky, Veronica... Date:: 9/8/98 9:12AM Subject: Prodigene I have put revised site plans for this project in the plans check room with the case file (98-428). I have also sent a copy to Tony at PUD. ~aR%~ !~ ~ l~'1""`G'AL,. ~~~~~, ./~, ~ ~,~ ~, ~L /l ~,,~'-~ r ~~ ~ ~~ - .. . ..... .. .... <:... Pale 1 ' Shirley.Volk Re Gateway Boulevard .:...._... ., .. .......: .:. From: Roxanne Nemck To: Ccryan@CITY OF COLLEGE STATION.CITY HALL Date: 11/20/98 3:56PM ~ Subject: Re: Gateway Boulevard Charles, ' not. a cit ro'ect. If it were it would They received a grant for to build this roadway from the city. It is y p ) have had to go aut to bid. l don't think that this is a city project. Frankly, l think that it is just an attempt to get more money from us. They gave us engineers estimates on the cost of construction. They were never fold it would be tax exempt. We can talk about it some .more on Monday when harvey gets back. »> Charles Cryan 11/20/98 03:10PM »> I believe that it would. be tax exempf since the project is for the city. I suppose that they will need a letter designating the project as a CoCS project and indicating that it istherefore tax exempt for sales tax purposes. As I understand iY those #ypically come from Fiscaf Services. I'll see if we have a form letter that can be used if not work with`Legal to draft an appropriate document. »> Shirley Volk 11/20/98 0959AM »> ~ Pamela Carlisle of C.F.Jordan (696-0500) called yesterday to explain that they will be building Gateway ~ Boulevard for the City, and wondered if, because it is a City project, it will be tax exempt. Also, if it is, how would she get a tax exemption certificate from: the City. This is something I've. NEVER handled before, so I'm sending out this sort of scatter-shot message, with the hope that somebody outthere will be able to help Pamela. Can you? Thanks, whoever it may be! June 27, 1998 Mr. Teddy Peinado, Vice President C.F. Jordan Construction 1509 Emerald Parkway, .Suite 105 College Station, Texas 77845 RE: Prodigene and Gateway 2A Development. Dear Teddy: The City. is .very. excited about the Prodigene .and Gateway Boulevard 2A projects. At this time, you can proceed with application for Development Permits on both Gateway Boulevard 2A and the .Prodigene site. These. permits will allow you to begin clearing the sites for development. Ln addition, please allow me to update you on several issues that we are faced with as we proceed with the development of these projects. As for Gateway Boulevard 2A, the City has directed McClure Engineering to redesign the .driveway within the Gateway 2A design. McClure should have the redesign ;completed by the end of this week. Once completed, McClure will forward the plans to Mark Smith, the City's Public Works Director, for immediate review and approval. As soon as the plans are approved, we will give you authority to proceed. with the ordering of materials. As we discussed this morning, your team will be responsible for paying any City fees associated with the construction' of this project. As for the Gateway 2A grant award, the City plans to have the grant award for the payment of costs associated with the construction of Gateway 2A on the Council's August 13, 1998 Regular Agenda for consideration. The grant award will be based upon your team's construction estimate of July 9, 1998 or McClure's final estimate which will be supplied to us with the redesign (whichever is greater), The grant resolution will also give the City Manager .authority to change the grant amount up to an additional $25,000 only for design changes requested by the City. As for the development of the Prodigene site, I understand that your architect has met with staff on several occasions but that no formal approval has been P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tel: 409 764-3510 Letter to Mr. Teddy Peinado July 27, 1998 Page 2 given. Yourteamwill need to provide a Site Plan_,_a Grading/Drainage Plan, and _. Construction Plans to .the City for development review.. Mrs. Shirley Volk, Development Coordinator for the City, has been assigned as your point of contact and will ably assist your team through the appropriate processes. Mrs. Volk can be reached at 764-3570. Please also feel free to call me at 764-3753 if you have any questions during the process. Furthermore, as we discussed this morning, you are required to pay. all development and permit fees associated with the development of the Prodigene site. Teddy, I view our relationship as a partnership. I know that we can work together to make both the Prodigene development and Gateway 2A successful projects. I understand your time constraints. The City will work with you to help you meet those constraints.. Again, please give me a call if you have any questions as we proceed with the development of these projects. Sincerely, w O~ '~~ Todd E. McDaniel Senior ED Analyst cc: Skip Noe, City Manager Tom Brymer, Assistant City Manager Harvey Cargill, City Attorney Roxanne Nemcik, Senior Assistant City Attorney Mark Smith, Director of Public Works Ji ~~Callaway, Director of Development Services ~irley Volk, Development Coordinator /.:' COLLEGE STATION P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tel: 409 764 3500 October 28, 1998 Pat Williams, P.E. Texas Department of Transportation 1300 N. Texas Avenue Bryan, Texas 77803-2760 RE: TXDOT DRIVEWAY PERMIT FOR PRODIGENE Pat:. Enclosed please. find 2 drawings for the Prodigene driveway permit which you have already received. It is my understanding that you are expecting this information. Sincerely, ~.o..~ ~~Veronica J.B. Morgaq P.E. Assistant City Engineer enclosure cc: TXDOT Driveway Permit File Shirley Volk, Development Coordinator Home of Texas A&M University ~~ ~ RESTER ENGINEERING COMPANY CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES -- -- 7607 EASTMARK DRIVE,-SUITE 253-B COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840 (409)693-1100 fx:(409)693-1075 email: hec2000@aol.com October 20, 1998 Veronica Morgan, P.E., Assistant City Engineer City of College Station Development Services Division P.O. Box 9960 College Station, TX 77.842 Re: PRODIGENE BUILDING BUSINESS CENTER AT COLLEGE STATION COLLEGE STATTON, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS , TXDOT PERMIT APPLICATION Dear Veronica, TXDOT has requested that curb cuts be installed in the front driveway curbs for drainage purposes. Find attached. graphics showing the modifications to the plans. Please forward to TXDOT for review. If you have any questions please call. Thank yob; J ~. ~~.~ ~A Mi h el G . Fester, P . E . attachments': -North driveway graphic -South driveway graphic xc: Robert Payne, AIA, R.L. Payne & Associates E E STATION CO L L G P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Tx 77842 Tel: 409 764 3500 September 22, 1998 Texas Department of Transportation ATTN: Mr. Patrick Williams, P.E.. 1300 N. Texas Avenue Bryan, Texas 77803 RE: Driveway Perini for Prodigene. Dear Mr. Williams: Please find enclosed three copies of the driveway permit for the above referenced project. The applicant is proposing a temporary construction entrance. A traffic control plan is not included. Included with this letter is a copy of the applicant's construction plans. Please return two signed copies for our distribution, Please review at your earliest convenience and if you have any questions feel free to contact me at 409-764-3570. Your expedience is appreciated, Veronica JB M~~an,1~:E1 Assistant .City ngineer~v xc: Shirley Volk;I)c~cIopment Coordinata~ TxDOT Driveway Permit File encl: Form 1058. Construction plans Home of Texas A&M University O'r12E/199E 0E: 4E 409696E114 RL PAYNE & ASSOC. fIT!'L8l~i3 X773: i0 ~,y'~ua •rs4 aa~a UI..Tl.LUi'IILL~lid a=~~ PAGE 02 a,_.._ < i"` ~= y 9', ~ t "' S'13r3MiT !-PP`LICATION AND THi~ ,/~ ;0~~'i.• LIST CiIECK$D-UFN` W1TH 16 ~/ 1~ F4}L.'I~EU COP3E5 Ulu S~'CEPLAN ~ORnSV4E~ eOLLEGI~ STA'~,`I~iV BI~SIl~iLSS CENT~~ 1~rf~UM REf~UXREMLhITS FOR STI'E PLAN PROPQSALS f~ ~~ ORDIl~C~ A'I[FST ~E h~l!.T'~ IlV(:LLJDiNG BUT NOT Li[l'viITED TO THE FOLLOG: / ~1. Sheet sire - 24" x 3f" l• a block tQ iaclw,ia: '~a~} NAmct addFe~T location, aad legal dcs~pnv~ ~b.~fi1'ame, ad~tress, dad r~elel~hone number of a3ppplicant ~~' Name, addres9~ ~ telopvone aumibcr of devclope~ownet' ~,.d,~' ~+Farac, a~idxcss, and ~~phSsne number of ~rchitcctJcngineer ,,o,e°~~D3te Qf su~mit#a1 vf:~ Ta#.91 site area Q , t),~nershig and current zaaing of pa~~cel and all abutting parccts. :~'` • ' • not necessarily m scale. ------~ 4, ,~ kc3' ~P ~ /~~, Scale should ba largest st~adard engir~ecribg scale possible on sheet 6. l'[O~li~ ~ north asow• ~~~q~~,u%~'-' LAY 7. TvpvgruPhy• fi~l wing plan, tin~1 otF~ar p~crtv~ut clraiitage iafc~rmstivn. (if plan lza.~ too . - t ` +~ much infornnati8a, show drainage ou ~parate sheet } - ~~ ~~~ 1~ N~ g~ All e~isfim stmts. drives, i~uildings, and war .courses on dr adjs~nt to t1><c pmposod ~" g prflject sites. r®' 9_ Locs3~e l04 yr, floodplaia on or adjacent to the prap~sed Ploj~t ~i#c, Hate if th~* is aona tlae sits. ~' 14. I.BCazion and size of existing tzcilstics w~itl~in qr adjacent to t~ grc~~sed Project site. l.. Progosed loari~on, type, and size of slie fo4lowing: ~uilditags and structures ~,0$ gtteet parkiu~ areas with parfdtts spaces dr$wa, ial~uiated, sad d'u~~ansioned -5ide~walks ~omnu»n open space altos, t/' Sites fc~r solid waste conteuae~s~' 0712E/1998 0E: 4S 4096966114 RL PAYNE ~ ASSOC. t17f~,'tf1~18 U8:'LFf ZT4I~f1 ?~4 3486 vr;ve~LUr~r'1 av[:~ PAGE 03 yyjVVd 12. Pro ased tercets, drives, aced ourb cut ~ncludiug driveways, l? and. curb cuts. For e2icch prop ,(- strnets, aJ.ley~, etc ~ locate existin8. ctufi outs an the s~ and oppns~tcurb vat ~ Tnd'scats dst~rm%nc separation distatfces bctvveeu axiat~ pzopased th'[vcv~ay tha~oat lau~th as itleasvred ttt the Driveway Qrdinanvc~ (sec prdiaanc~a 196j far driv~y locative and dcs~ge requirements.) 3. Landscape plea c.s requiz~ri in Section 1 ] of the 2ornng ~IrdizutnCe See prciinance # 1638.3 The 1ats,dscepifl$ plea can lie shwa Em a separate shut if tvo much iatormatioa is on the original Site plar+• ~tt,~,Pt w reduce car clinuncde pl a in easeatcnts. include in£armatlan as the plan such as. .~~~ ~ m~ existi»~ ids Go reij~ia b required point. cal+aulatiaoS c~ proposed ne~v plantin fda with paints earned 1~. Tie grass s9~ footage of bnildia~a a~ the proposed use of e~h building. U (~~15. ~cs~i~-at~ nw'nber of parkir~ spaces r©gvired b~- ardinani:8 ~d piv~ided by P~Po$~.. 6, hr~w„dixnensiona to site .and i©cate all stnwtiureS, patl~ing spaexsa rlri~s, curb cum perk}n~ asla~3s, and sotbacks. O 17. ire there impact &~s associated with this developmeal? l8. Frovlde a water and sanitary sewer .legend ~ include water demands (tnii3imvsrk, inaxnmum and ~vcrage demands in gsilons per zr+inute} and sc:wet• loadin~3 (~szmum deraand~ in gallons per day). ~n 19. Shaw all meter ]~e91i17t3S and note their siz~s_ U. All plans ap}uoved prier tv issuance of building.p®rn~it to included hµt soot limited to: - Land~~rp~ PIeri for. de~vclaped a~a it~clu~ditq; arn$a:lc~n plan at~rl tell point al91c1]l.aiivIIS; - plan shovru~ Amtected area and tra@ survey 51~oweag size and species; . gtreetscape plan far landscaping. coa E as shown o~ 'Landscape design shall be in genorat confimnanae with landscape ccF tlu A+tastcr Flea as~d the Master Landscape Plea {see Sections 12.4Q-12.50 of ~uver~aut srrd R.estrictions). ~~~ C~ ~~ 07/20~r2~89~0E.4~:2a 40'$`4091784 2498 REVEL P~EN1 ~t~~SSOC. PAGE~vv4 The falTa~ug are tkte standards fos Pisa Developm¢nt ~tabllshed by' 1~nsisess Geutcr ~oY and Il~stritttons* prclinance, or Policy. 1. Baildirig $8p°~` i ,~ P~ ~ ~ Cov Weans and Kestriotions.~Mls~ inum Front Let except as provided oa ~ feet exo t as ravi~3. ~n Page S of the width at prstpertY line shall be ane hundred ~' P (;ovenants and Restnctaons. 2, Bulldin~ setbacks are as foitrn+us: • ~inim~ Front eta; B ~ ~ ~ ~~ mall bca a~q,~~ T~ h~°p~ ~tdirtannc - ~.~nirnum Side ~ ~ Pm~~ u~ of the sitel[trt. _ Parking Iota and ~~ uons1 a ~ 2~hib t~~.d~ ~ the Building Speck with lhehe Cave~nant sad Ras ildiu seibacl:s inn excess of~0 fact. Granting or e~pto~ of lots which Iuive g ter Phan. ~!~ feet shall be at the ~+ermissian to ea~ccnaeh into these setbFU;ks t4at are tom. d~.scretiast of the Board. v/ ~~~ parking space is 5' X 2L1; vs' air a perimeter row, 9' x l.8' v.~ith a ~' nverhartg. t/ . Niinim~un drive width is Z3' with hca~3-~~ paw or ~©' without pa-rid~- 6" raised curb} of a minimum of 184 sq.f't. etc lcaeated st lsoth ~. Raised landscaped ' ~tc~c-da, ~ P g 13 intsriflr earls of every P~~'g row. Ac3ditionall_v1SQ sq. ft. of laudsca in for evory pnr~Ci.ng spaces must be provided. Street~pe compplisa~e is ractuis~d wbich involves special plant~g~s ~a~ guts s~secified in the. Cit7~s bhcetscape Flan, ~o~~ t~`tL- of all arts of ati ed iueas witlaovt ~, 6~' raised curb is rcc}uued ~iuad all ~ mss ways, dtti]1p~r locAtioas, utility ~~I,,tio~,, ~To include islat-ds planting areas, . t Ci E i ear. Na exceptions wdlt be made for }~gd,Sy ett areas desigsated as "resexverl for futut~e parking''. ~Vh~lstnps raiay be required oa infector rows longer than 14 apneas cr is spacial sitvatians. ~~'ideu+-alks s~ required st time of de~elapmeni ifprc}pertY lzas ~'e ca. a street shown son the side~ralk Ivias~ plan?or if t s project inartce ~ Secstion 12.7t}~~v~nant nea~ssity. (R+cfGr t8 $eCtiOn 14.., of rite Coning Restrictions}. ultlic slmczts, private ll?. ~r,rice iva3ing, ~ deti~ry areas. sFiali net ba visibie form P ~ ce, Visr~al d~tves, ~u131ic and/or visitor Fang Ibts, walks, gad the c4tnzaon c~ P$ s~enin8 is 3e~~w'ed- ace pa a 1~, Sections 12.33 anc4 12.84 of the C~ez~l Restrictions. ~I, tc..t- 't ~ ~~ ~' £~ ~ C~.~•~~-~ ~ ~#itije trees over 6" in .caliper should be retained ~~ever possible. All nc~v p' 11. He~.th~, eg ~ be a minimum of 2,75" caliper.. AlI r~+ aan-canopy trees shall be s canopy tre . ce #163 $ far Teoomtneaded m;,:~nurn df Y.5" der.. See S~eatian 11.3 of species. 0i02Eo7f[a~raaOE:~~~~,r 4©~yoalaea eons U~Rr~,LUrnirNivEr ~YA~SOC. P~GE~ 00 1 ~. Fire ranee of a ~ninimnm of ~ pct in. wsdth ~ i~ mbrme~tban 1 ~d t frcxnp ubl a street must be esytablished if ~Y stru~c of azty typ or highr~va~r. 13. Any strums in ~ zanutg district other tbau R-1,1~-i. A, or R 2 mint be wrtttirt 300 feet of a file hydtaut as,neasured slung a public slxeet yr ~ghway. 14. Fire hydratyt~ must be located au the se~rnc aide of a major strut as a project, end s1:all be in a. l+~e~tiort apgrovcd by the City Eng'• is must bed ahl~ sod aoc by the Ctry grid driv~3 rsti,ast have ati all ~. Fire l~ydrav, a permit. cart be issued. ~xeatber sur~ee before utldu~ lens. ~navst istclude irri~tion systeuas for lsndscaping. k~~~~an meYecs are separate !6. ~,LI p far buildings cad must bQ sized acc~din,~lp acid incluctc iirom t~t~e negulat water ~ backflow ~venft~a prvtectit~n. ~~- ~.~T'~-- 17, Ala packing facilities, service snd deliver}r areas, and refl3se facilities si~atl be screened from viewr as iadic~d (see ~ectians 1?.$0, 12.81, 12.62, 72~78~, ands 12.84 for gcrcaning ethadalOgy)• lfy 1 C~l,~ ~j~ e~ t~ Ii~r''~ 6C,~1~•~~` 18. See Section 13,24. atul j x.30 £oa Parking spaces inquired. PROTECTED AREA ANALYSIS 1 TOTAL SITE AREA:______ 2.S1TE AREA * 15%:____-._ 3.~L.A. U . E. AREA:----------- PROTECTED AREA REQ'D ~2 _ ___- -----9.3 ~ ACRES ______ 1.40 ACRES -_ ---_____-~ 1.14' ACRES MINUS 3) : _______O.2 f ACRES PROTECTE® AREA PRO~IIDED:_-----------------0-`~ ACRES ::Shirley Volk -gateway blvd.. project .Page 1 ', From: Veronica Morgan To: Bob Mosley Date: 8/26198 11:45AM Subject: gateway blvd. project fyi.... in looking at the prodigene site plan there are two curb entries into the site from gateway blvd. one is a full curb cut, the other is a section of laydown curb like used on university drive in front of scoff and white for their fire lane.. prodigene wilt be using grasscrete and a laydown curb section in a similar manner. in an effort to not break out a brand new curb on gateway can you please make sure that the curb cuts and special laydown curb section is a part of your construction project. i think we can provide you a site plan that has dimensions if you need it: robert Payne is the architect on the project. CC: Jon Mies, Mark Smith,. Natalie Ruiz, Shirley Vol... '. i - .~ i Page 1, Shirle Volk Re New Development in College Station . _.:.. . . ~~,,F~-- From: "David Dorou ~ " -~R'3DOROUG1 @tuelectric.com> ~, To: Shir , ~ aSVOLK~ci.college-station.tx.us> Date: 30/98 4:13PM Sjiecf:""~ Re: New Development in College Station Where did R.L. Payne get their information on gas meteriocation? This was not approved by anyone. in my office and may have to be changed. I will need the following information on every gas fired piece of equipment in the building to determine the correct meter size: Type of Equipment: Number of Units: BTU Rating: Example: Furnace 2 85,000 LSG. Contact for this project: David L. Dorough Manager, New Customer Development 4200 S H-6 S Bryan, TX 77802 (409)774-2527 Office (409)220-5455 Mobile .(409)774-2528 Fax ddoroug1 cLDtuelectric:com ~~ ~~ Shirley Volk <SVOLKcLlici.college-stationax.us> on 07/27/98 04:30:52 PM To: Balb t cLDci.college-station.tx.us, BRILEY@ci.college-station.tx.us, Ccryan 'college-station.tx.us, CROOKS@ci.college-station.tx:us, CMIXON 11ege-station.tx.us, CRANEY@ci.college-station.tx.us, DGIORDANO i.college-station.tx.us, DGRACE@cicollege-statiorr.tx.us, EASH~ci.colleg ation.tx.us, Ebroussa~ci.college-station.tx.us, EFELDMAN~ci.co e-stationax.us, EHARD~ci.college-station,tx.us, Hcargill~ci.college-sta n.tx.us, JCALLAWAYLm' ci.college-~tion.tx.us, Jholder~ci.college-station.txus, JKEE@ci.college-station.tx: JKERSTEN@ci.college-station.tx,us, JMIES cL' cicoNege-stationax.u~4.1SMITH cLDci.college-station.tx,us, JWOODY~ci.college-station.tx. u~;.~KANTHONY~ci.col lege-station.tx. us, KPAVLI N SKI ~ci.college-stati on ax. ass LBATTLE@ci.college-station.tx.us, LGARTER~ci.college-station.tx.us, LHANKINS@ci.college-station.tx.us, Lpiwo~kaLcDci.college-station.tx.us, Lsimms cLDci:college-stationax.us Mrodgers~ci.coflege-station.tx.us, MSMITH~ci.college-staton.tx.us, NMANHARl"~ci:college-stationax.us, NRUIZ~ci.college-station.tx.us, Oburnside@ci.coite~e-station.tx.us, PkasparcLDc:.college-station.tx.us, Pvanecek@ci.collec~e-station.tx.us, Sbeachy~ci:college-station.tx.us, SHESTER tLDci.colleye~station.tx.us, Smccully~ci..college-station.tx.us, SNOE~ci.college-stationax:us, TBRYMER~ci.college-station.tx.us, TMCDANIEL~ci.college-station.tx.us, TMLCHALS@ci.college-station.tx,us, VMORGAN~c..college-sta{ion,tx.us, David Dorough/LSG/ENSERCH/US, Don Fazzino/LSG/ENSERCH/US ;: , cc: BVCA~myriad.net, jnefson@theeagle.com, Kean RegisterllSG/ENSERCH/US, Kimberly Winn/Texas Utilities ,:; .. . . .::.:::-::.:-:-::..:::::-.::::::......:..a9e..::.: ..Shirley Volk New Develo merit in College Station Reply. _. _ _. .. ......_... .:..: .........._.___.:::._::_.::.:.....:::..:...::;::....::::.::..::. From: Jim Smith To: City HaILSVOLK Date: 7/30/98 3:08PM Subject: New Development in College Station -Reply Seen it -Looks great. Lots of room, large container area. Thanks+. »> Shirley Volk 07/27/98 04:30pm »> July 27, 1997 We have just received a site plan for the Prodigene office building to be located on Lots 3R & 4R Block 3, The Business Center at College Station, Phase One replat. ATTENTION DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STAFF: Please review this project as quickly as you can work it into your schedule. Thank you. CC: Collection Supvr's :~-: lI ~' ~ ~~0 _ ~ f L~~~~ ~~ . ~;~ MEMORANDUM To; Development Services Department From: Business Center Advisory Board Date: April 12,1999 Re: CF Jordan Building -Site Development Plan The Business Center Advisory Boazd convened a meeting on March 31, 1999. Attendance: Jim Callaway -Present Kim Foutz -Present Skip Noe -Present The Board reviewed a site development plan submitted by CF Jordan. The Board unanimously recommended approval of the plan with the following comments and changes: 1. .Parking areas highlighted on the attached site plan should be adjusted/relocated to minimize impact on trees. /r~/~ ~- ~- ~~~` SOP for PAC Meeting ,,,e~Platted Property ~~/Zoning/Land Use -Existing and Proposed. .~`~ (~ ~ ` ^ Drainage Report !~1~,,,~ ~~"'`~ `~`"~`'~" Fire Flow Report ^ Label Fire Lane ^ Hydrant Location ^ Bldg Type, Square Feet, Sprinkled ^ Water/Sewer Demands ^ Storm Sewer -Junction Boxes ^ Water Service -Size, Material ^ Sewer Service -Size, Material, Slope ^ Meters (Domestic and Irrigation) -Size, Location, w/ in Easement ^ Label Existing Easement ^ Label Existing Mains Thoroughfares ^ Easement Abandonment ~ TxDOT Permits -Access, Utility Utility Master Plan ^ Impact Fee ~~,~,,, (~ ~t;~ 2y~ . ~ ~ / ~~~~ P~<DS ~onfarence room -PAC - Prodi ene ex ansion in the CS Business Park ~ ~ Page 1 g p ~ - From: Bridgette George To: Bridgette George; Preapplication Conference Group Date: Wed, May 17, 2006 Time: 1:00 PM - 2:00 PM Subject: PAC - Prodigene expansion in the CS Business Park Place: P&DS Conference Robert Payne (696.7272) would like to meet to discuss a possible addition to this existing building. MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Re: Development Services Department Business Center Advisory Board July 1, 1999 Results of Business Center Advisory Board Meeting held on June 22, 1999 The Business Center Advisory Board convened a meeting on June 22, 1999. Attendance: Guests: Tim Callaway- Present Brett McCully Kim Foutz -Present Bob Ruth, architect Charles Wood -Present I. Sidewalk Development Policy The Board approved the following policy for sidewalk development: Quality Circle: The developer must install 6' wide meandering sidewalks with accents at the .crosswalks (outside portion of the loop only). No City upgrades or cost participation on Quality Circle. Lakeway Drive: Developer cost participates with b' wide meandering sidewalks with accents at the crosswalks;. City cost participates with upgrades to include brick paver designs Gateway Driver Developer cost participates with 6' wide meandering sidewalks with accents at the crosswalks; City cost participates with upgrades. to include brick paver .designs. Technology Way~if developedl: The developer must insta116' wide meandering. sidewalks with accents at the crosswalks (outside portion of the loop only). No City upgrades or cost participation on Technology Way II. Phase IIa and IIb Landscaping. The Public Works should continue with bidding the full design for Phase IIa and IIb. If the bid comes in over budget, additional funding should be requested. ~Jatal:e l~uiz entrsign doc Page.:2 III. Development Sign Variance (Business center entrance sign) The Board determined that all proposed signs are on city public r-o-w, therefore a variance is not required at this time. In the event that the signs are proposed to be moved into easement areas, the Board authorizes the variance. IV. Development Sign Public Improvement Permit Brett McCully will submit an application to Development Services for a Public Improvement Permit in order for staffto review the project. Actual permit issuance is not required. V. Development Sign Concept Drawings The Board authorized staff and Bob Ruth to proceed with final concept design. VI. Deed Restriction Amendment The question was raised whether deed restrictions had actually been filed. The Board approved staff to proceed with deed restriction amendments. J 1 CF JORDAN C_.~ + MERCIAL, INC. 15.09 EMERALD PKWY. SUITE 105 COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845 (409) 69G-0500 Fax (409) 696-0601 For your review the attached includes a rendition of the C.F. Jordan office building, afloor-plan, elevation and site plan. This building is to be located at the North side of the Gateway Technology Center, Prodigene building. PREAPPLICATION CONFERENCE The purpose of a preapplication conference is to meet the City staff that will be involved with your development and identify general issues that need further analysis.. Along with the discussion of these .major issues, staff will talk about the .development process, distribute necessary information and discuss what permits will be required for your particular development. This meeting is in no way a complete review of your project. Staff will perform a formal .thorough review once the minimum requirements are submitted for your particular j development. ~~--~ Date of Meeting: _ Time: L rd~1 Deadline for submittal (Monaay, io ~): Applicant: ~ ~ ~~ Phone Number: ~G ~ ~ ~~ Property Owner:. Phone. Number: Location/Legal description (including # of ac fes) .al (type of development. -retail, apts, single family, restaurant, etc.): `r~-~'ir)~t ~~ is ~~ f c~-~°- ~,~ In ~~ ~ Ira ~ ~~, .City Staff Present: E~Bridgette George D Joey Dunn ^ Steve Smith ^ Molly Hitchcock ^ Lance Simms ^ Jerry Duffey ~ennifer Prochazka L~-Carol Cotter ^ Eric Dotson ^ Jennifer Reeves F1P ^ Josh Norton ~ ~b ^ Sam Weido ~ ;,-,A~ 8 ~ 1~ l~ tG~}Pr ~ Thy ^ Lindsay Boyer Almon-ri £, ^ Ken Fogle ~ .~i~ i ^ Brent Read ^ Crissy Hard ~ ^ ^ Weldon Davis Issues to contact applicant back on: Development Issues:. Existing' Land Use/Zoning: ~ ~ Proposed: Special zoning district .information: Subdivision /Platting: T-Fare Plan/.Street: Driveway Access: Fire Flows: Site Plan Issues: NRA Standards: ~G{-- Parkin 0 Q.C,~~ ~ :~ ~ (. ~ ~ Did ~ f • • ./rlt9.~ ~~~ Ligh aC~c.S Landscaping: Streetscaping: Dumpster: Electrical: Fire Lanes. Fire Hydrant: '~ Signs: Screening/Buffering: Easements: Other: Parkland/Greenways .Dedication: Parks Board Consideration: Misc.: Drainage Issues: ~ ~_ Issues: Water Availability/Capacity: Sanitary Sewer. Availability/Capacity: Impact Fees: Miscellaneous: Variance Requests: Permits required for this development: Building Permit Development Permit Conditional Use Permit TxDOT Utility Permit for work in State ROW TxDOT Driveway Permit for work in .State ROW Special Review required by: ZBA besign Review Board City Council Parks and Recreation Board Planning and Zoning. Commission Information Provided: Unified Development Ordinance Subdivision Regulations Northgate Design Guidelines eve opmen esource ui e Guide to Building & Development Drainage Policy. & Design Standards Specifications for. Street Construction Water & Sewer Specifications Manual Driveway Access Location & Design Policy CS Business. Center Covenants & Restrictions Fire Department Construction & Development Guide CS Building Regulations (Local Amendments to the Building Code) ..... >. vv r.. dz y:vo ,! U=f J~tm~/ Us.rLLVrdlrl~l JY~.J $[aIL t)Cpai'IIItCaL OI lt~nr:tys and PuhGc T[aaspoctatiaa Form 1058-Rw. I3-86 lQ.~ U UL Permit to Gonstract Access Driveway Facilities on ~Iighway Right of Way Toe ow} ~ttt) f~~ ~~~ Hwy. Permit Ho. 1 _ T Control Section The State I3egarunent of Highways and Public Transportation, hereinafter called the State, hereby authorizes hereinafrer Called .the grantee, to (re} construct an access ~~veway gn the hig~w,,,. right of way abutti hi~Shw~ty no. S _ .in ~~/~ Z GS County, located %2 /h ~ /P /<J~1~ /~ Subject to the following: 1. The grantee is rrtsponsible for all costs associated wlih the construction of this access driveway. 2. Design of facilities shall. be as follows andlor as shown on ske#ch: - 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. AA construction and materials sh~l be s~ject to inspection and agproval by the State. l+rfaintenance of facilities tonstructcd hereundershalt be the resgonsibility of the grantee, and the State reserves the right to require any changes, maintenance or repairs as may be necessary to provide protection of life or property on or adja- cxnt to the hghway_ Changes in desi~r will be made only with agproVal of the State. The Grantee shall hold harrnlcss the Stale and its duly appointed agents and employees ag•.inst any action for personal injury ar property damage sustained by reason of the exercise of this permit. .The Grantee shall not erect any sign an or extending Duct nay poition 'of the highway right of way, and vehicle service ft~-tures Such as service pumps, .vender stands, or tanks shall be located at least twelve (12} (feet from the right-of-way line ttf ensure that any vehicle services from these fhciures will be off the highway.. This permit will become null and void if the above~referenced driveway facilities arc not constructed within six (5) months from the issuance date oP this permit. The Grantee will contact the State's representative telephone ( } at least twenty-four (24} hours prior to begirming the work authorized by this permit. State Department of Highways and Public Transportation Date of Issuance DLtttiec Engineer The undersigned hereby agrees to comply with the terms and conditions set forth in :this permit for construction of art access driveway on the highway right of way. Signed: Date: ~ S~~"~ s-~. [~~~..~ Access Driveway Regulations The State Highway and. Public Transportation Commission, in recognition of its responsbility for the safety and utlilify of public highways under its jurisdiction, has directed the adoption of rules and regulations to accomplish a coordinated. develop- ment between highways and abutting property.. For this purpose, the booklet entitled "Regulations for Access Driveways to State Highways" was published and adopted, setting out departmental policies to regulate construction and maintenance of access driveway facilities. Sketch of Installation ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ / _ ~~ ~~~~~~" ~' ---- ----- ~f 1/ `~ - f I ~~ ~ ice. ~~°~`~~ ~ ~~,~i --- - -- __ -------- -- -- -- _. -- _ , ,yam U ~~ ,. ~~ ~.. ~, ~- `.~ ; . . ~~ 1©/28!1998 13:13 4©96968114 R~ PAYNE & ASSOC. PAGE D2 ti 1508 Emerald Parkway, Suite 104, College Station, Texas 77845 (408) 695-7272 Fax (408) 688.8114 `~ B LDING PERMIT CHECKLIST ~ j Project Name: Address: ~~ , ~69o a3a3 Electrical: (Tony #3438) ~/~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ p~ ~~ Development Engineering: (Veronica #3763, Paul #3756) /l/7~ 0,~ 0 U Fire: (Jon #3781, Raymond #3709) ~J Planning: i e #3782, ee #3748, Jane #3757) ///-~ O [~' Final Plat filed for record. ~~ Parkland dedication: JV Impact Fees: Notify Sanitatio Jim Smith ,Engineering (Mark Smith) and Legal (Jan Schwartz). ~~~v d/C Conditions of Permit: ~/ , fi ,fie-ah ~ ~ ~. ~B ~i~ Transportation Planner Hard presented the staff report and stated that the preliminary plat is for the development of the last remaining sections of the undeveloped portion of the Woodcreek Subdivision. It includes the extension of Woodcreek Drive as a minor collector street to connect with Faulkner Drive in the Foxfire Subdivision. This connection is shown on the City's Thoroughfare Plan. No access points from lots will be permitted on Woodcreek Drive. Staff will work with the neighborhood associations in both subdivisions to either rename Woodcreek or Faulkner Drive in order that the street has a single common name. The section of Faulkner between Fontaine and its western terminus is in poor condition. When the connection is made between Woodcreek Drive and Faulkner, improvements will be needed to this section of Faulkner in order to make a smooth transition. In lieu of the City making these improvements, staff has requested that the developer include improvements to Faulkner as part of the construction of Woodcreek Drive when the connection is made to the Foxfire Subdivision. The developer has agreed to this and will possibly submit a formal request to City Council for city participation to cover his costs for improvements made to Faulkner. Mr. Hard explained that the subdivision regulations state that "A sidewalk may be required on cul-de- sac streets if needed to provide through pedestrian access." Since the common areas located at the end of the cul-de-sac streets will be entirely used as stormwater detention ponds, it is staffs suggestion that sidewalks not be required on the cul-de-sac streets shown on this preliminary plat. Mr. Hard presented traffic count information for the area and felt that there would not be an increase in traffic volumes. Staff recommended approval with the condition that a Public Drainage Easement be included adjacent to the existing creek running along the west side of the proposed Woodcreek sections 10-A and 10-B only if the 100 year water surface elevation can be contained within the drainage easement. In response to a question asked about frontage along Woodcreek Drive, Mr. Hard pointed out there would be no lots fronting on Woodcreek and no direct access to Woodcreek Drive. Michael McClure, Project Engineer, was present to answer any questions regarding the preliminary plat. Commissioner Maloney moved to approve the preliminary plat with Staff s comments. Commissioner Parker seconded the motion which passed unopposed (5-0). AGENDA ITEM NO. 6: Establishment of parking requirements for Prodigene located within the Business Center of College Station. (98-428) Assistant City Engineer Morgan presented the item and stated that according to the guidelines recently adopted by the Commission, manufacturing uses were set at one space per employee. Other uses typically associated with industrial users such as warehousing and office, have parking requirements based on square footage and do not need approval by the Commission. In this particular case, a Research and Development (R&D) user, Prodigene, plans to locate on the northeast corner of Highway 6 and future Gateway (in the College Station Business Center). An unknown tenant will occupy half of the 60,000 square foot facility in the future. Due to the unknown future use, the applicant is requesting that the parking requirements be set as a total, rather than have separate ratios for each individual use. • The applicant is requesting that the total parking requirement be set at one space for every 300 square feet of building area. This request is less than retail and office (1:250) but considerably more than warehousing (1:1000). Ms. Morgan explained that staff was comfortable with the proposed parking, especially in view of the fact that additional parking can be accommodated should the need arise. An P&Z Minutes August 6, 1998 Page 4 oj6 Natalie Ruiz- Prodigene_Buildin .::: .......:.....::.:.::::::::: :::::::::::....:...:........::::.:.......::::.:.........:: v ....:.:- ~::-... : .v.....-...:-::-:-::::. .: :Page.:.:: From: Lawrence Carter To: Natalie Ruiz Date: Wed, Jul 29, 1998 10:27 AM Subject: Prodigene Building The comments that I have ar the following Q~V 1. How are they getting water into the building? They show a meter and a line that just stops and does not tie to anything. ,~(,,/ 2. What is the distance from the fire hydrants to the fartherest comers of the buildings? Do they need a ~~) hydrant on the back side of the building? I don't know. 3. What is the size of the proposed sewert line?What products will they be making and what type of waste will they be discharging into the sewer? Is the proposed sewer line private or public? If it is public then it'neeas a' f least 5 manholes to accomodate the way they weavg it in and around trees. If it is private then it needs to be so marked and I would recommend putting in the manholes for a private line anyway. I believe that the plumbing code requires cleanouts every 75 feet for private lines. Is the proposed sewer line going to an existing sewer main? I can't tell from this site plan. ~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~Q d,~ U MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Zoning Commission ~~~ FROM: Sabine IVicCully, Senior Planner DATE: July 29, 1998 RE: Establishment of parking requirements for Prodigene As has been recently discussed by the Commission, the Zoning Ordinance does not specify off-street parking requirements for certain industrial uses. The Planning and Zoning Commission has set a guideline for manufacturing uses at 1 space per employee. Other uses typically associated with industrial users such as warehousing and office, have parking requirements based on square footage and do not need to come to the Commission. The proposed development is to be located within the City's Business Park, which has been an on-going economic development effort. The City provides certain incentives for industrial users to locate in the Park, including tax reductions and deed restrictions. In this particular case, an R&D user, Prodigene, plans to locate on the northeast corner of Highway 6 and future Gateway, with an unknown tenant to occupy half of the 60,000 square foot facility in the future. Due to the unknown future uses, the applicant is requesting that the parking requirement be set as a total, rather than have separate ratios for each individual use. The applicant is requesting that the total parking requirement be set at 1 space for every 300 square feet of building area. This requirement is a bit less that retail and office (1/250) but considerably more than warehousing (1/1000). Staff feels comfortable with the proposed parking, especially in view of the fact that additional parking can be accommodated should the need arise. An initial review of the site plan shows compliance with the 1/300 and shows room for additional parking should the need arise. o:lgroup~deve_ser~lfrpt~98-411.doc 1©r'28I1998 13:13 4©96968114 RL PA1'NE ~. ASSOC. SANITARY SEWER SERVICE iGALIONS PER dAY) MAX. 4'75, 200 GPD MIN. fl GPD AVG. 370 aPD S~~ SERVICE WATER SERVICE (GALLONS PER MINUTEl MAX. 100 GPM MIN. 0 GFM AVG. 8 4FM 1.5" WATER METER ~~~ ~ •~~ r U JUG/ l 1 Y PAGE 83 r. ~i bt~1 ~cr~ ~ o¢~ vTt ~~i~ Tl~h1• ~ g?yn `~ ~~» ~ gpw~ tou ~~ ~~ ~% --- -- ' ~_~.~_. ``~~-- '' _ aY1d~C . ~.ra . 'i3aSC~ ~N ~.~ ~'tl.G ~ ~.°t3°r~ ~(~,~-t,~ ~ ~-~-~ . V ~~ [G~dO~.e.~.~-. ~ -~ ' ~- _ ~ ~ ~ ~~. ~~, c~Q . TOTAL P.01 Shirley Volk, ..Re Gateway Technology Park~~~~ Page 1 From: Veronica Morgan To: JCALLAWAY~City of College Station.City Hall, Shir... Date: 10/21 /98 8:08AM Subject: Re: Gateway Technology Park???? I'm not sure if this is the same thing.. but.... someone (i think it was john logan or jon mies) asked me within the Last few days about a discrepancy on the plans for prodigene vs. gateway blvd..... gateway blvd., the project that is building the apron section for prodigene shows a 30' curb return radius (i think) and the prodigene site plan (by hester) shows a curb return radius 5' larger than that. the city staff member asked me if it mattered what they built (so i think it was logan) and i checked our ordinances and said no.... we dont care..... but since the change would be to mcclures plans and he is the engineer of record it should be okd through him. mcclures response via the staff member back to me was he didnt want to change it.. he thought the radius he provided was large enough and i think had other concerns about making it larger... maybe drainage, I'm not sure..... so i told the staff member...it is mcclures plans and he said no... so the answer is no. do you suppose robert didnt like the answer and so is now looking for a different one? i dont know -does it sound like the same problem? »> Jim Callaway 10/20/98 05:05PM »> I have visited with Mark Smith and resolved this. I have a call into Robert. Short answer: Robert can use the 31' wide drive per the Prodegene plans. I will ask him to request that Mike contact Mark to verify. We do not need to revise the plans for Gateway, just build it from the plans approved for Prodegene. »> Shirley Volk 10/20/98 11:35AM »> I believe this is Prodigene! Anyway, apparently CFJordan send an "RFI # 11 -Intersection at Station 6 + 36.84" to Mike McClure and copied "Shirley Volk, City Engineering". Oh - Now I got a copy of the RFI, which says, "the drive to the north into Gateway Technology Park parking lot was set by SD-1 and SP-1 at 31'-0" back of curb. The Gateway Blvd Plans sheet 2 indicates 36'-0" back of curb. To avoid taking out any additional trees along this drive, can we use 31-0" BOC dimensions." I've put a copy of this FAX in the basket in the plans check room, and will check it in on your board. CC: Deborah Grace, Natalie Ruiz OCT-26-1998 18 37 FROM NESTER ENGINEERING CO. TO CS ENGR. Ht5 I tk tNC;IIVttKIIV(.i C;UIVIF'HNY CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES 7607 EASTMARK DRIVE, SUITE 253-6 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840 (409)693-1100 fX:{409)693-1075 email: hec2000@aol.com October 27, 1998 Veronica Morgan, P.E., Assistant City Engineer City of College Station Development Services Division P.O. Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 Re: PRODIGENE BUILDING BUSINESS CENTER AT COLLEGE STATION COLLEGE STATION, BRAZOS COUNTY, TEXAS REQUEST FOR INFORMATION - BASE FLOOD ELEVATION Dear Veronica, P.02 The proposed developments highest Base Flood Elevation (BFE) shown on the Federal Emergency Management Agency FIRM Map No. 480410205 C, effective date July 2, 1992 is 274 and the minimum proposed slab elevation is 279.55 which is over 5.5 feet above the BFE. If you have any question please call. T ank y , ~ ` } ~ ~ ~~ ael G. Hester, P. xc: Robert Payne, AIA, R.L. Payne & Associates 1©i28i1998 13:13 4©96968114 RL PA1'NE &. ASSOC. SANITARY SEWER SERVICE {GALLONS PER OAY) MAX. 475,200 GPD MIN. 0 GPD AVG. 3270 dPD 8° SERVICE WATER SERVICE {GALLONS PER MINUTE} rcA~c . i 0 a aPM MIN. 0 GPM AVC3. a (}pM 1.5" WATER METER ~~~ •~~ x+h- P~nz, I~~Pr PAGE D3 V J.JC71 1 `. r . el 1 btu ~f1 tr OQ- UTt c..~i4~w TI~N• _ 1 ~' qP-~ ~ ~p~ ~' gpw~ ~ ~~~ ~ :___ .. -- ~ !.`~-w~~ ~ ~~~u~r-'~ ~ ~ ~ ~cAr Syr}-rc w~ -~ ~~14-, ~ .~~n~r 1~z7~ gpp. . V ~~ . ",~'"~,' .,._.. ~ ~`' ~'`~'`" ~"'1 ~ ~^~ ~~ ve, cc,~.Q . TOTAL. P.01 r ~~ tO~ 5~ I ~~'` ~'~c2. ---Z---- ~~.~~,~z ___ i ~ _ ..: R.L. PAYNE & ASSOCIATES C.F. JORDAN -COLLEGE STATION ~~ An Office Park for The Business Center at College Station