The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMiscellaneousGTE .301 INDUSTRIAL BLVD.. BRYAN, TEXAS 77803 LA VERVE AKIN `DESIGNER ACCESS DESIGN 409/821-4723 DATE: MARCH 27, 1998 CASE: UNIVERSAL COMPUTERS REVIEWED BY; LA VERVE AKIN AFTER REVIEW OF THE ITEM LISTED ABOVE, THE FOLLOWING CONCERNS WERE NOTED: GTE WILL FOLLOW THE SAME ROUTE ASBLECTRICAL FOR TELEPHONE SERVICE. THE DEVELOPERJOWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND PLACING TWO FOUR INCH CONDUITS WITH PULL STRING FROM THE OUTSIDE BUILDING LOCATION TO THE BASEMENT ALONG LAKEWAY DRIVE. ';THE CONDUIT SHALL BE'CAPPED ON BOTH ENDS. THE CONDUIT SHALL ELL UP 4 FEET AT THE OUTSIDE BUILDING LOCATION AND 6 INCHES IN THE EASEMENT ALONG LAKEWAY DRIVE.. THE OUTSIDE BUILDING TERMINATION SHALL BE WITHIN 20 FEET OF POWER, IF NOT, THE DEVELOPER/OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PRbVIDING AND PLACING A S'XSlB" COPPER GROUND RQD AT THE BASE OF THE BUILDING TERMINATION.. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS; CONTACT CAVERN AKIN WITH GTE AT 409/821- 4723 FOR TELEPHONE REQUII2EMENTS,.CONDUIT PLACEMENT, AND OCCUPANCY DATE: 03/30/98 14:24 ^L~409 846 8252 KLING ENGR ~-~-~ COCS VOLK/MORGAN 1~j003 a , - -- ---- - - - - -- --- - --- -- .._., ~ • • - ~ ..•.._.__. • _•_~N~lt ~NI~33N(JN3 JNIIN ... , .\ •~~ ~~ yyyy .. '„ . ... v ~~ t p i• t :`%~'.'i ~~.., X44 ~11~~~'~r.8~ ~~,t g ~.,: ..: ...•1eiAC 83-••. Fg ~ ..~.~' -~` ,• ` ~~ ~ ,•E. r .,.. _ G~3ldr.~~`6-=:•. ., ~ .. cop... ,~~~ ., _ tic .. _..._..:._.`: ~ ~.~ •. rPrt ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ a~ ~~ ~, I -~- ~ .J +I +I I. -- - ~ ' ~~ - - - - -- -- r ~' ~ ~ ; ,. f ~ i i 1 1 ~ i i ~ ~ ~ - p I• b r.. i ,j.< ~ j,• It..•~1 r t ~ ~ t` ,;~•~•;- +I j ~, +`':, 1 ~' !' 1~;~• /tit /;~ ,. U:s,/,~SU/ yM 14: L3 p 4Uy 040 OYJL: 1tL11Vli t;lVlii( -y~y vu~.~ ~ ua.a~i iuua~uru~ --- ~+. uuc. e~..~° ~~,Ii1vG ~NCAIN~EffZING ~ ~~VExIN~ Consulting ~+ingineere • and $urveyore 4103 Tads AvenuC, Suice 212 Past OtXiCa Box 4234 Bryan, Tcxas 77802 Hry~; Teas 77805 Tdephant 409/8465212 Fax 4o9~s4(.g252 B]. Kling, P.E., R.P.L.$. S1-f. Kling, R.P.LS. March 30, 1998 To: Veronica Morgan, P.E. From: Stacy King . Re: Results from Friday's Meeting for Universal Computer Services Following is a list of the construction activities, tentative start dates and the approval status of the activity. Approval meaning that. as far as the City of College Station Engineering Department is concerned the construction activites can start on the following dates. Storm Sewer 3/24/98. ..Approved. Piers 4!1/98 Approved Casting.Beds 4/8/98 Need,Limits of Construction for Casting Beds Casting ofPanels 4l15l~~S~V Lime Stabilization at Paving 4/1 /S 98 UNeed Drainage Report Paving Concrete 5/1/98. ~° Based an the above dates, Lime Stabilization at Paving will be the only construction activity that cannot start on the stated date dueat~o the Drainage Report. ~--~c ~ ~rrinaar *~nn°+ i,t. ~f~~~ The limits of construction for the casting beds are attached to this memo. Please sign this memo if you agree with the approval status of the above construction activities. Also, fax us a copy of the signed memo and limits of construction far the Basting beds for our records. If there are any discrepencies bet en what has been presented and your recollection pf our meeting please Iet me know. Veronica. Morgan, P.E. ' ~ 3~` i~ Thank You,. " ~,'.¢".`~`~ ~I- ~ U ~~'~~P~,~ ~ ~ ~ (l Stac Kin Y $ ~kledoc;~d~~.,~l~:ak wc. uJCUk&-vYaQez._ y...;via0 1°l.L:'! ~y40a O"2U OGJG 1\L11V.1~ L'1Vla1C 'iyy VUIiJ VVL11/lYlUlCl~t11V - l,~/~UUS -~NRl33NI9N3 ~NIIN ~- -, '_ -- _, ,+ ~~ _ _ ~ __ • ~J~e. ~` ~ ~ 1" __ __ _ °~-~~ ~u O.al•X•'lnif/2s'W'.Tl.1~e=~~ \~a ' ` ~~~as`~44,- s- ~ ~' . , _ . ~i:; .mow:" Via, `~"~~!`, ~.. . .. _ y'{ r { ~et_ t• i. J r V I ~ '~ .. J ~ '~ J q '.. i \ ,. i ~ j i ~: 1~:~7 _~ Zo ~, ~ ~, ~~ f~/ f t '• f i ~ ! : ~ ` ~ ! `^ - J C' i + ~ ~ i~ ~ j ! I ! t 1 ~ } ~ ~ ~ ff.. / I ~ I ~ ' 1 %! s/ z / ~ ! // ~ p / I ~ {~ 3~ V fi ~ o i ~ ~ ~~~ ~E I%~tl9q r 1 l ~ t . a ;:, l G ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ,~ ~ f ~ I ;; ~ ' 44 ~ ~ ° ` • ~ I i ! 1 ~\ ~ / ~~ ! ~~ I ~ t ' , j - 1 I1` ~ r ~ f I ~ t '~• I i ( : ~ ~ i r I ! ~ ~ i I Ir ! ; ~ / 1 ~ ~ ~ i I i > 7 • ~ l / f~~.. - ( 1 + 1 ~ ~ ! ' j • ' _ !~_ • ~ . ~ ~ -~-~_ + , f ~ ~ f / r i ~~l I I' I i I I I f' ~ I I! I ~ ;'~ ,' ~ f; <. 1; ~ 1 t ~` ~ IIL,'li III- ~~ ; ! ; - T ' t ~ - ~ j--- - ~ ' a__~ ~ .I i ~ !~ '~ 03/23/98 AEON 14:00 FAX 409 696 0601 C. F. JORDAN- T ~ 001 __ _ - • • • ~ - ~ ~ Ta Stewart 14ir~g-Kling Engineering; via FAX 846-8252 Fr+ome Theo Rouse C~G Rabert Payne-RL Payne 8~ Assoc., Ron Vernon, CFJ t 03123/98 Re.- Construction Activities Ne7ct 30 days-UCS SITE Per os~r conversation, tentative activities to oar on the UCS site are as follows: Storm Sewer ~~~ Piers 4/1198 Casting Beds 418198 Casting of Panels 4!15!98 Lime Stabilization at Paving 4!15!98 Paving Concxete 5N/98 • Page 1 US/ Z3/ ytS YlUiV 14:00 FAX 409 696 0601 C: F. JORDAN ~ 001 ~ r i • ~ 1 . ~. Memo Ta Stewart 14ing-14ing Engineering; via FAX 846-8252 from; Theo Rouse°~~ C~ Robert Payne-RL Payne 8~ Assoc., Ron Vemon,CFJ Datae 03/23/98 Ra: Construction Activities: Next 30 days-UCS SITE Per our conversation, tentative activities to occur on the UCS site are as follows: Storm Sewer 3/24/98 Piers 4/1198 Casting Beds 4/8/98 Casting of Panels 4/15/98 Lime Stabilizakion at Paving 4115198 Paving Concrete 511198 • Page 1 From: Shirley Volk To: Lance Simms, Paul Kaspar, Date: 3/19/98 9:05am Subject: Universal Computer Systems PLANNING, Tony Michal... Just had a call from Stewart Kling about the possibility of setting up a monthly meeting with him and Robert Payne to "discuss what they want to do during the next month, and what the City will require for them to do it". Right now they are interested in what they need in order to pour piers and build . some parking lot - after the storm sewer system is in place. V, I guess this is what you call "fast tracking", because we've already told them if they will submit plans, we will review them as fast as is possible and get them back to them and once they have approved. plans, they can begin. Then Paul told them at .the meeting last week that `storm, sewer construction activities can begin on-site without submission of the design, but no hook-up will be allowed until the plans are approved. I'm not sure what else they want, but I DO know they'd like a meeting on .Friday or Monday. I'm inclined to set it up for a predevelopment meeting on Monday and include Sabine, Paul, Tony, Lance and me. Does this sound like a plan to all concerned?.. Also, I'll include Jim just to get the ball rolling and perhaps help set the parameters in this first build-as-you-go project. Elrey, do you want to come,. too? CC: Elrey Ash MEETFNG AGENDA C.F. JORDAN COMMERCIAL,L.P. 1509 Emerald Parkway, Suite 105 College Station, Texas 77845 Meeting Description UCS Weekly Meeti~ #10 Results DesiredClarification Date 3/12/98 Time 9:.30 Location C.F. Jordan's Office Start Stop Total Start Stop Total 9:30 11:00 1-1/2 1 Kling Engineering 2 KW Brown 3 SAFE 4 R. L. Payne & Associates 5 C.F. Jordan Commercial 6 Universal Compufer Services 7 Britt Rice. 8 College Station Engineering Dept. 9 Swoboda 10 .erns To<Be Discussed 1 Permitting matters -City of College .Station 2 Request that City Staff present at all meetings 3 Distribute meeting minutes from 3/4/98 review for disrepancies. 4 Status of Drainage Plans-Kling 5 Status of Grading Plans-Kling 6 Storm Water Prevention Plan Status-Kling 7 Site Lighting, Security and Sleeves- Swoboda 8 Update on the Structural Plans-RLPfor Haynes. Whaley 9 Update on Electrical Design- Swoboda 10 Britt Rice needs disk with floor plan for layout 11 Update on Plumbing Underground Design-RLP and Swoboda 12 Riser Locations-SAFE 13 Cut Sheets on Food Service Equipment-Prince 14 Selection of Mechanical Equipment-GRACO 15 AHU Layout-GRACO 16 Roof'Penetration Layout-GRACO 17 Fixture LayouUCount-Britt Rice 18 Plan Revisions-.RLP 19 Status of Fire Alarm Layout=6ritt Rice 20 Comments /Questions 03/17/98 TUE 09:52 FAX 409 696 0601 C.F.JORDAN ~ 002 C®~~..~ordan Commercial, LP MEETING MINUTES 1509 Emerald Parkway No. 00011 Suite 105 Phone: 409-695-0500 College Station; Texas 77845 Fan: 409.696-Ob01 PROJECT TITLE: Universal Computer Systems MEETIl~IG DATE: 3/12/98 L~1CAT~ON; .Robert Payne's Off SUBJECT: Project Meeting #10 1'f'~11~:'> :::':':'~ ~. `~~8C1t~PT>i~1+1 .. .: :. ...; . ,: ~ <: '."ST`AB:`~5.'1~A8'~`~1~ ~3~ ::< ~:~~BA~;~ ~:~~1~':; . ";: 00001 City of College 5tatian would Iike to see a site plan package. Robert Payne is to take the most updated site plan package Yo the city on Mondav ?!16/98.: Siorm sei~ er construction acti~zties can begin on-site ~;ithout subnvssian of deign but no hook-up «~ill be allowed until the plans are apprQVed 00002 Shirley Valk will attempt to be present at the weekly pro}ect meetings to enhance communications with the City of College Station on progress being made. 00003 Meeting minutes from 314198 were distributed to all pasties present. Any discrepancies found should be sent to CF Jordan office in writing by clsce of business on Friday, 3113/98/ 00004 Drainage plans need another week for completion. Should be ready by our next meeting on~3/ls/~~ 00005 ~ Grath ng plans leave been partially completed. Texcvn is in receipt of partially completed drawings. Front as+Ea and sides of building need to be designed, this should be complete by Friday 3II3/98.-''Mow strips need to be incorlsorated into layout. 0~ . Storin Water Prevention Plan -Robert has sepia & CFJ has a copy. Texcon has aplilied to the EPA under the "Notice of latent" farm, Theo to research any owner requirements by teh EPA. 7 Swoboda incorporating sleeves with existing trees. Should have sleeve layout b5' next Thursday 3/i9/98. NEW 3116/98 RLP RLP (~~ ~~ ,,~ .-- NEW ~~ 3fi~3'198~ . ~. CFA ~ ~rYt f _ ~. OLD ` `~~/ 3 19/98 KLiNG SI~; ~~~~~ ~, OLD 311 ~~~. ~-- It 30 TR ...- OL C~~~ • 3/19/98 SVllOBODA PS Prepared By: C.~'. Jordan Commercial, LP Signed: (.Q~,(,t}~~ Dated: 3/17/98 From: PETE SCHMID <pschmid@arkitex.com> To: "CS Development Services (Natalie Ruiz)" <nruiz@ci... Date: 1/13/98 10:22am Subjects.. Building setback .. Natalie, I found the following references to the "developable" area in the Covenants. & Restrictions: 11.30 - Parking lots and associated 20' buffer zone as defined in 12.20 are prohibited within the. building setback ... 12.20 - Developed area - is defined as an area bounded by a line 20 feet. beyond the outside boundary of the following .... Developed area may. not encroach upon the LAUE/BS or Protected Areas. 13.10 - ... the number of parking spaces required by the business br trade must be located behind the building setback line. (No mention of the additional 20' buffer zone) Please coordinate with Veronica and Elrey concerning this item, specifically the following: Where can parking be placed? - Do these restrictions only apply to the street exposures? - What are the implications for drainage detention (drainage facilities are considered part of "developed area" by 12.20)? We have a meeting Thursday morning with CableTime to discuss site concepts,. therefore we need to know our limitations ASAP. Thank you for your help. Pete Schmid The Arkitex Studio:,. 511 University Dr. East., Suite 20.1 College Station, Texas 77840 pschmid@arkitex.eom http://www.arkitex.com/ Voice 409 260 2635 Fax 409 846 8224 COLLEGE STATION P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tel: 409 764 3500 March 6, 1998 Mr. Teddy Peinado C.F. Jordan, Inc. 1509 Emerald Parkway Suite 105 College .Station, Texas 77845 Re: Unauthorized work on Universal Computer Systems site Dear Mr. Peinado: This letter i to inform you that site work on the Universal Computer Systems site has exceeded the scope of the temporary development permit issued on this project on December 22, 1997. Upon a site inspection on March 6, 1998 it was noted that a considerable amount of grading ~rork and filling of the site had already been done. The development permit under which you are operating clearly states it is for site clearing and grubbing only. Construction must cease until we have approved grading and erosion control plans as well as an approved drainage reporto Please contact me or Veronica Morgan at 409-764-3570 upon receipt of this letter. Sincerely, W. Paul ICaspar Graduate Engineer xc: Veronica Morgan, Assistant City Engineer Elrey Ash, Director of Economic Development Shirley Volk, Development Coordinator Jon Mies, Code Enforcement Home of Texas A&M University ~ ,.a G ~ ~~~ ~ ~'~ ~ Ce ~l cGi~ s s CARL.AN COOPER A ~ yIGE PRESIDENT - HARDWARE SUPPORT - UNIVERSAim COMPUTER SERVICES. INC. i IN-HOUSE DEALERSHIP SYSTEMS (718) 718-9800 6700 HOLLISTER (713) 798-1441 (Fwz) HOUSTON, TExws 77040 -. .. ? ~- t ~~ 4~ti sally H. G' o l,anc~sdape Architect City of College station Planning Department 2945 Country Club Drive, Bryan, 'I'X. 77802 Re: Universal Computer Servioe, College ,station Business Parlx, College ,Station, TX 731-1800 ~nclosed axe the landscape plans for the UCS project in College station, Texas. After discussing the seYeexaing intent with Nanette last weele, I went to the site to verify that my landscape plan would adequately screen the parizing lot from Quality Cixele. The. existing trees and undexstory that is left leas been trimmed to eye level, so I added additional Photinia along the perimeter parleing. I leave also put together a plan showing the tree survey information provided to me by Fling engineering. During my site visit I verified the remaining trees from the original proposed plan (that was shown to the city earlier this year according to Ben Boggs, R.I~. Payne Architects). C.F. Jordan has maintained most of the existing trees that were shown on Kung's tree survey.. They have maintained them through barricading. My irrigation designer is completing the irrigation preliminary plans this weelz. He proposes to use rotor heads in the large turf areas but will not place heads in the middle of existing tree groupings. He will spray into these areas but not fully cover them with irrigation water. The owner is having C.F. Jordan explore the possibility of drillirig a water well on-site fox irrigation water only. If there is not enough water or a good quality water, then we will rase the existing 2" water meter that was set for irrigation. If you have any questions, please call me @ 731-1800. sincerely, sally .Godfrey 02!2311999 16:32 1-409-690-1402 ~+ CF JORDAN UCS PAGE 02 RL. P,'-;'r't'•.IE P A~90G . ~ ~: ~' .+ .. F11101 ~~~ ~~~~ ~.1':.: ~...r;. ~' ~~ e' 8 N ~ lD~ I Fr &a ! dE+ . 7' r` B .~ ~. F?~,C;~~S: ~ ~NCLL3L'9II~~ ~~A1~i~1V1ITTt~,~ `.i~.~I~IN~FiN~~.~': ~! G ~ ~_~ ,~~ ~ r~A y V [~ ~..r ,~ E~° ~.s C :~ TiP'Mm~ . -ATM---~-^-- ~ -~---•.. 11. .....JC_~_-_. ~ 'w~ ~ - ..,...~.iA ~~ 8 d V'If ~• ~ b'E ~ ~$ a~ ~' ~ /SnY 6~. ~f • I • ~' d•! ~.; ~.: . ~:>(}~3 ~Ina~i~:al~~ Pa~:k~ray 9ui~~ 104 C~il'a~e Stacfo~, ~'~~,aa 77~~•5 ~4{~9'~~59Es-'~:~"7~ F~c (~09j~iyF~-8114 J 0 m ~~ ~~ ~--- W o c~ i ~ W ~ ~--- W (~ W ~~ "'~VVL ~ f~, ~ U z ~, I t ,A~/`' I.~.w ~4, O W ~j' r1 ~' ~ ~ V t l 4 S ~, ~~ 5 ~. W ~~ ~~ ~2 ZZ~~Lg l \", !~1 r~ ~ REVIEWED FUR CC)I~~'LIA.NGE ~~~ 198 H COLLEGE STATION W DEVELQPMENT .o-,oe s-,oe 0 32lIj • 0 1 a N J 12/22/98 TUE 11:52 FAX 409 696 0601 C. F. JORDAN IQ]001 1509 Emerald Parkway, Suite 105, CaNege Station, TX 77845 Pho. 4091696-0500 FAX 4091696-0601 Fax TM ~~ From: Theo Rouse Fax: ~ ~ '~ ~J~/. /~ Pagese !/ Phone: Qate: Re: CC: ^ Urgent O For Review C]Please Comment O Please Reply ^ Please Recycle ~Z.~,ri ~ ~,~~ l ~ E- ~~y~~~ ~~- ~~~"5'~~ ~~ Vim. Ca*~.pNle^- ~~.o,~ 3/z~q g • SUBMIT APPLICATION AND THIS LIST CHECKED-OFF WITH 16 FOLDED COPIES OF SITE PLAN FOR REVIEW COLLEGE STATION BUSINESS. CENTER REQUIREMENTS FOR-SITE PLAN PROPOSALS (ALL CITY ORDINANCES MIDST BE MET). INCLUDING BUT NOT LIlVIITED TO THE FOLLOWING: ~l. Sheet size - 24" x 36" C~ 2. Title block to include: /a.) Name, .address, location, and legal description /6) Name, address, and telephone. number of applicant ~) Name, address, and telephone number of developer/owner ~/d.) Name,. address, and telephone number of arehitect/engineer / e.j Date of submittal ~) Total site area Y r 3. Ownership and current zoning of parcel. and all abutting parcels. 4. A key map (not necessarily to scale). 5. Scale should be largest standard engineering scale possible on sheet. Q" 6. Provide a north arrow. 9 ~ '/ ,~ /'~l 7. Topography, grading pl d other pertinent drainage information. (If plan has too r much informa ion, s ow drainage on separate sheet.) ~8. All existing streets, drives,. buildings, and water courses on or adjacent to the proposed project site. C~' 9. Locate 100 yr. floodplain on or adjacent to the proposed project site, note if there is none on the site. ~ 10. Location and size of existing utilities within or adjacent to the proposed project site. ^ 11. Pro sed location, type, and size. of the following: ~) Buildings and structures C ~~) Off-Street. parking areas with parking spaces -drawn, tabulated, and dimensioned -' c.) Sidewalks /d) Common open space sites i/e.) Sites for solid waste containers ^ 12. Proposed streets, drives, and curb cuts. For. each proposed curb cut (including driveways, streets, alleys, etc.) locate existing curb cuts on the same and opposite side of the street to .determine separation:. distances between existing and proposed curb cuts. Indicate driveway throat length: as measured in the Driveway' Ordinance. (See Ordinance 1961 for driveway location and :design requirements.) 13. Landscape. plan as required in Section 11 of the Zoning Ordinance (See Ordinance # 1638.) The landscaping plan can be shown on a separate sheet if oo much information is on the original site plan.. Attempt to reduce or eliminate plantings. in easements. Include information on the plan such as: a) existing landscaping to remain . . b) required point calculations c) proposed new plantings with points earned C'~" 14. The gross square footage of buildings and the proposed use of each building. L~' I5. Designate number of parking spaces required by ordinance and provided by proposal. 6''~ ,x 1 . Show. dimensions to size and .locate all structures, parking spaces, drives, curb cuts, .parking islands, and setbacks. ~~7. Are there impact fees associated with this development? 18. Provide a water and sanitary sewer legend to include water demands (minimum, maximum and average demands in gallons per minute) and sewer loadings (maximum demands in gallons per day). 19. Show all meter locations and note their sizes. ~.., ^ 20. A11 plans approved prior to issuance of building permit to included but not limited to: - Landscape Plan for developed area including irrigation. plan and all point calculations; -Plan showing protected area and tree survey showing size and species; - Streetscape plan for landscaping. Landscape. design shall be in general conformance with landscape concept as shown on the Master Plan and the Master Landscape Plan (see Sections 12.40-12.50 of Covenant and Restrictions). ~. 0 ___ The following are the standards 'for Plan Development established by Business Center Covenants and Restrictions, Ordinance, `or Policy. L~1. Building separation is a minimum of 15 feet. Minimum Lot Area shall be one acre. except as provided on Page 8 of the Covenants and Restrictions. Minimum Front Lot width at property line shall be one hundred feet except as provided on Page 8 of the Covenants and Restrictions. ^ 2. Building setbacks aze as follows: - Minimum Front'Building Setback'from street R.O.W. as shown on final plat; - Minimum Side and Rear Building Setback shall be as required in the Zoning Ordinance for the proposed'use of the site/lot. - Pazking lots and the associated 20' buffer zone as defined in Section 12.20 of the Covenant and Restrictions are prohibited within the Building Setback with the exceptions of lots.-which have building setbacks in excess of 40 feet. Granting or perrrussion to encroach into these setbacks that aze greater than 40 feet shall be at the / discretion of the Board. Q 3. Minimum parking space is 9' X 20', or on a perimeter row, 9' x 18' with a 2' overhang. 4. Minimum drive width is 23' with head-in parking or 20' without parking. ^ 5. Raised landscaped islands, (6" raised curb) of a minimum of 180 sq. ft. are located at both ends of every parking mw. Additionally, 180 sq. ft. of landscaping for every 15 interior parking spaces must be provided. d ^ 6. Streetscape compliance is required which involves special. plantings along streets specified m the City's Streetscape Plan. 7. A 6" raised curb is required around all edges of all parts of all paved areas without exception. (To include islands, planting areas, access ways, dumpster locations,. utility pads, etc.) Curb detail to be approved b~City En ineer. No exceptions will be made for .~ ~ eas es~gnated as''reserved for future pazking". ^ 8. Wheelstops may be required on .interior rows longer than 10 spaces or in special situations. ^ 9. Sidewalks are required at time of development if property has frontage on a street shown on the sidewalk Master Plan .or if the Project Review Committee determines the -necessity. (Refer to Section 10.2 of the Zoning Ordinance and Section 12:70 of Covenant and Restrictions).. ~ _ d L ~ 7 Wes- ~v~' ~@QUD'-~t.~y, ~ t'"' , ^ 10. ervice, load' ,and elive azeas :shall not be visible orm public eets, private s, pu is and/or vis parking lots, walks, and the common open pace.: Visual screening is required. See Page 12, Sections 12.83.. and 12.84 of the Covenants and Restrictions. EJ'~c~,ucr ~ ~„~ ^ 11. Healthy, native trees ver 6" in call r should be reta ned whenever possible. All new o canopy trees shall be a minimum of 2.75 caliper. All new non-canopy trees shall be a minimum of 1.5" caliper. .See Section 1.1.3 of .Ordinance #1638 for recommended species. a - C~' 12. Fire lanes of a minimum of 20 feet in width with a minimum height clearance of 14 feet must be established if any structure of any type is more than 150 feet from a public street or highway. C~' 13a Any structure in any zoning district other than R-l, R-1A, or R-2 must be within 300 feet ~ of a fire hydrant as measured along a public street or highway. L4Y 14. Fire hydrants must be located on the came side of a major street as a project, and shall be in a location approved by the City Engineer. LEI" 1So Fire hydrants must be operable and accepted. by .the City and drives .must have an all ~,? weather surface before. a building permit can be issued. ~ ^ 16. All plans mustinclude irrigation systems for landscaping. Irrigation meters are separate ? from the regular water. systems for buildings and must be sized .accordingly and include backflow prevention protection. ` ^ 17. All parking.. facilities, service and delivery areas, and refuse facilities shall be screened from view;as indicated (see Sections 12.80, 12.81, 12.82, 12.83, and 12.84 for screening methodology). ^ 18. See Section 13.20 and 13.30 for Parking Spaces Required. 03/17/98 TUE 09:54 FAX 409 696 0601 C. F. JORDAN I~003 C.F. Jordan Commercial, LP MEETING MINUTES 1509 Emerald Parkway N0. 00011 Suite 105 Colle Station, 'Texas 77845 Phoae: 409-696-0500 ~ Fax: 409-696-0601 PROJECT TITI.Ee Universal Computer Systems IVIEETING DATE: 3/I2/~8 LOCATION; Robert Payne's 01~ SUBJECT: Project Meeting #l4 ~~1~ ..:.. ~:.>A~~OI[tfPT~i?ht ::.: : ~ . . ~,;~~`A~.'S S'l'AR`f~Pb:~~E:;~:: ;:':.B~~~: Cli~.i.'h:;:::.: 0000$ Swoboda needs specs an control gate from Bob Poole OLD 3/i9/g8 UCS BP 00009 Structural Drawings. Piers have been received. Final OLD 3113/98 HAYNES JJ foundation drawing should be done tomorrow. Panel drawings are to be completed by the end of next week. CFJ to send someone to Houston to pickup foundation drawings. Would like to work fratn the plans aver the weekend {lvlost recent revisions cnaade to the project have not been calculated in the anticipated plans, design for these to come through change order) 00026 Fhishduct being detailed by Swoboda OLD SWOBODA PS 00027 Carlan approver! layouts submitted by David Poole on NEW RLP BB 3{11/98. RLP can proceed with incorporation 00010 Structural Steer status to be checked by 1tI., Payne. Waiting OLD 3/ltit98 HAYNES JJ on roof memebers, this should be complete. 00011 Electrical design - BRE and Swoboda working on light levels OLD 3!26/98 SWOBODA PS inside the building. Underground electrical to be completed first then coming out of the ground sa foundation wank will not be held up_ Drawings for underslab to be ready in 2 weeks so foundation can be started. 00012 BRE and SAFE need updated layout on disk from 1tLP far OLD 3/19/98 RLP RLP alarm and sprinkler layout. RLP W have completed by Tuesday, disks will be ready at next weeks meeting, 3/19/98. 00013 Plumbing underground design -ninety percent complete {not NEW SWOBODA PS incorporating latest revisions). People count may have increased, therefore fixture requirements need to be verifies. 00014 SAFE brought elevation of riser to be located in Z areas in OLD SAFE SR the building. Valves not going through the wall instead there will be 2 post valve indicators located outside the building. 00015 Kitchen equipmentcut sheets have been received with the OLD exception of floor sink, booster. heater on dishwasher, and under canopy pieces. 00016 F1oar drains need to be located for Swobo~a and his OLD 3!19/98 GRACO JG plumbing design. Should be forwarded from Graco by next Thursday. 00017 Roof penetrations have not been completed due to the most OLD 3/i9/98 GRACO JG recast revisions Prepared By: C.F_ Jordan Commgrciat, LP Signed: .~-+ Dated; 3117/98 GxpediRon Page 2 of 3 03/17/98 TUE 09:54 FAX 409 696 0601 C. F. JORDAN ~ 004 A C.F. Jordan Commercial, LF MEETING MiNIUTEs 1509 Emerald Parkway N0. 000 i 1 suite 10s College Station, Texas 77845 Phone: 409-696-0500 Faa• 409-696-064i PROJECT TITLE: Universal. Computer Systems MEETING DATE: 3/12/98 LOCATION: Robert Payne's Uff SUBJECT: Protect Meeting # 14 ~I''~:.~;:`::::: ~If1E~Sl~l~t?l~`°...:....... ::.:. :.. 'I, ..:. :?`:::.:.~:>S"1A'i>S'f~;~'~`~A°t?BE:.::`BA1~:G~:~~PT~~O~`.>>::.: 00018 Plan revisions made by Carlan should be completed as far as NEW 3/17!98 RLP RLP layout of wall changes by Tuesday. Drawings will be available Thursday to consultants. All changes wilt not have been made such as door schedules, reflective ceiling plans etc. The coordination changes will take 2-1/2 to 3 weeks for architectural. Unsure about MEP. Carlan to approve these drawings once completed. 00019 Carlan verified that he wants to review all plans so he has a NEW complete understanding of the buidling and all its components. 00020 SAFE wants to review duct design as early as possible due to NEw GRACb JG the type of system going into the banding. Prelinunary layout will be done for Carlan's review. 00021 Robert has requested a list a material from Ron Vernon to NEW Jp~~ RV incorporate in the proejct specifications. Ofl022 Carton needs to draft a letter to the city of College Station NEW UCS CC stating the average number of employees aqd visitors that will occupy the building. 00023 Robert Payne has contacted a private licensed indivual that NEW can have an ADA review done in a 2 day turnaround. 00024 Completed interior security design needed from UCS so BRE NEW UCS BP can design for all necessary rough in 00025 BRE to forward cut sheets on cable trays to UCS. BRE needs NEW BRTTRICE JB to coordi~aate efforts with Swoboda Engineeting. Prepared By; C.F. 3ordan Commercial, l;_.P Signed: ~~ .T Dated: 3/17!98 Facpar}ition n.. a _s~ I6G=~a~7~- ~~G PERMIT CHECKLIST ~%~~ d~ Project Name: Address: Electrical: To # 438 .3 3 / ,0~ De elopment Engineering: Veronica #376 ,Paul #3756) ~~(? d~- Fire: Jon #3781 Raymond #3709) ~,3J O~ ~- .~e?~~ O~ Plannin ~ Sabine #378 ,Lee #3748, ne #3757 3 ~ 0~ Final Plat filed for record. ~' Parkland dedication: Impact Fees: C7 .Notify Sanitatio (Jim Smit ,Engineering (Mark Smith) and Legal (Jan Schwartz). (Conditions of Permit: Date Project Manager Volk ~- Re; Universal Com uter~g. sums::: ...... ................ . ..............._...,.............. ......... P. .y_...... From: Paul Kaspar To: SVOLK cLDCITY OF COLLEGE STATION.CITY HALL Date: 3/19/98 9:24AM Subject: Re: Universal Computer Systems 1 think we need to have thismeeting -with everyone, including Jim and Elrey. 1 think that UCS is rapidly approaching a point where they will have to pick. up the pace on the design end - to get us some plans - other wise they may become adesign-wait project instead of adesign-build. 1 understand the concept of adesign-build project,. but you do reach a point where you have to have a pretty complete sef of plans otherwise you risk having serious conflicts.. HANG ON! »> Shirley Volk 03/19/98 09:04AM »> Just had a call from Stewart Kling about the possibility of setting up a monthly meeting with him and Robert Payne to "discuss what they want to do during the next month, and what the City will require for them to do it"..Right now they are interested in what they need in order to pour piers and build some parking lot -after the storm sewer system is in place. V, I guess this is what you call "fast tracking", because we've already told them if they will .submit plans, we will review them as fast as is possible and get them back to them and once they have approved plans, they can begin. Then Paul told them at the meeting last week that storm sewer construction activities can begin on-site without submission of the design, but no hook-up will be allowed until the .plans are approved. I'm not sure what else they want, but I DO know. they'd like a meeting on Friday. or Monday. I'm inclined to set it up for a predevelopment meeting on Monday and include Sabine, Paul, .Tony, Lance and me. Does this sound like a plan to all concerned? Also, I'll include Jim just to get the ball rolling and perhaps help set the parameters in this first build-as-you-go project. Elrey, do you want to come, too? CC: Veronica Morgan c A ..............:1i: .......:....:...........:. ::... :............:.......:.:.w:.; ............ .... .. .::...... ........... ::..:.: :...:.:::........... .................. ............... .:::::-:::....... ~.. Sh~rle Volk - Re: Universal Com uter S stems _ Page.1 P Y - -- - I From: Tony Michalsky To: DCHARANZA~City of College Station.City Hall, DGRA... Date: 3/19/98 9:25AM Subject: Re: Universal Computer. Systems Okay with me. We are going to .need to gef some conduit installed before some on the driveways start getting poured. So timing and coordination is crucial for us. »> Shirley Volk 03/19/98 09:04AM »> Just had a call from Stewart Kling about the possibility of setting up a monthly meeting with him and Robert Payne to "discuss what they want to do during the next month, and what the City will require for them to do it". Righf now they are interested in what they need in order to pour piers and build some parking lot - after the;storm sewer system is in place. V, I guess this is what you call "fast tracking", because we've already told them if they will submit plans, we will review them as fast as is possible and get them back to them: and once they have. approved plans, they can begin. Then Paul told them at the meeting last week that storm sewer construction activities can begin on-site without submission of the design, but no hook-up will. be allowed until the plans are approved. I'm not sure what else they want, but I DO know they'd like a meeting on Friday or Monday. I'm inclined. to set it up for a predevelopment meeting on Monday and include Sabine, Paul, Tony, Lance and me. Does this sound like a plan to all concerned? Also, I'll include Jim just to get the ball rolling and perhaps help set the parameters in this first build-as-you-go project. Elrey, do you want to come, too? CC: Elrey Ash t:' 1 Shirley Volk Re` Universal Computer Systems _. ...... ..,,,,,....___.,,Page,1. From: Veronica Morgan To: DCHARANZA~City of College Station.City Hall, DGRA... Date: 4/2/98 9:19PM Subject: Re: Universal Computer Systems I'm ok with a shell only permit because as far as engineering is concerned the- piers have already set the finished floor elevation so a shell only doesnt commit to anything else that affects the drainage on the site. stacy and i just agreed that kling wanted me to see a drainage report. before they lime the parking lot. v »> Shirley Volk 04/01/98 04:46PM »> I just talked to Robert Payne because I had faxed him a copy of the letter V & Sabine signed regarding what we agreed to on .this mess, .and he said that he and Lance had talked about perhaps being able to get a "shell only" permit instead of a "foundation permit" as was agreed to for today. Lance would prefer the shell only because of the. way our computer program works (every permit that is issued gets a new permit number). 1 sent up a flag to Robert because I'm not sure that Veronica will feel comfortable issuing the shelf permit without more drainage information. Robert wondered if a condition could be .placed on the permit which addressed timing of additional drainage information, with the conditions being that only piers can be poured and walls "cast" (and no'other work allowed) until the drainage information is received and approved. Can this happen this way? He's hoping he can get that shell permit by Friday and hopes he can submit the structural elements to Lance to review for that by tomorrow. V'~Ihile I had him on the phone,. I asked him. what happened that we did not get to see or schedule any review of the "concept design" as is spelled out in the. covenants and restrictions for the Business Park. He said that he had. to submit renderings, sample materials, site plans,. etc. for Council and that he is operating under the. understanding that when the agreement was reached and approved by Council, that covered the review and approval of the concept design. Further, when I asked him about the submittal for the Final Design Review, he said exterior elevactions, materials, colors, textures and shapes of buildings and structureswere inclwded in the concept design review and approval by Council, and he can re-submit them if we need for him to, but tte hadn't really. planned to do- it. Also, he said that in the end we will get everything on the checklist, but it won't be in a package like we're .used to. Jim, please check with Elrey on this and see if that's what he meant to happen. I don't want to be wishy-washy about what we require, but I don't know what the developer has required in this particular case. CableTime has turned to a package for the "concept design review" today, so 1 am really. confused; because (1) .we're doing. a :concept design. review, and (2)it appears to include some of the requirements pelted out in the covenants & restrictions! Jim, if you {as a Board member) could: get something in writing for the -file which. spells out what -staff needs to be looking for and being concerned with, it might help this project go a lot smoother. Thanks. 12/31/97 Note to the Filer FROM:. Nanette Muzzy Manhart RE: Checking barricades .for UCS building & Parking Lot in Bus. Ctr. Met with Emily and Gary of Texcon on site in a.m. Walked .site with both. Found excellent barricading of trees that they are trying to-save. Indicated that I was looking at barricades at to if the were enough to receive point, BUT that we did not yet know how many points they needed and how they were-going to achieve them. They understood that was indeed the .case. Site prep looked good.. I saw hand clearing under trees. Did note several large, flagged trees that were not barricaded. They indicated that they would indeed finish the barricading. Overall they have done an excellent job of site prep for tree preservation. My only reservation is the 3 5' front reserve, in that it is not barricaded. But site control looks tight enough that the manager should be able to control access over that reserve: area. Paul K. indicated that if the. barricades looked good to go ahead and let sign the expanded permit to allow grubbing of the building and parking lot area. I did that and get them a copy and brought back the original o Paul. DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PERMIT NO. 98-400 A UNIVERSAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS FOR AREAS OUTSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA RE: CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE SITE LEGAL DESCRIl'TION: SITE ADDRESS: College Station Business Center, Block 2, Lot 1 & 2 200 Quality Circle OWNER: Universal Computer Systems Carlan Cooper 6700 Hollister Houston, Texas 77040 (713) 718-1800 DRAINAGE BASIN: Alum Creek Segment I TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: This permit is valid for clearing and grubbing ONLY!!: Clearing shall be limited to the area of the proposed structure footprint and secured parking area. The Contractor shall take all necessary precautions to prevent silt and debris from leaving the immediate construction site in accordance with the approved erosion control plan as well as the City of College Station Drainage Policy and Design Criteria. The Owner and/or Contractor shall assure that all disturbed areas are sodden and establishment of .vegetation occurs prior to removal of any silt fencing or hay bales used for temporary erosion control. The Owner and/or Contractor shall also insure .that .any disturbed vegetation be .returned to its original condition, placement and state. The Owner and/or Contractor shall be responsible for any damage to adjacent properties, city streets or infrastructure due to heavy machinery and/or equipment as well as erosion, siltation or sedimentation resulting from the permitted work. Any trees required to be protected by ordinance or as part of the landscape plan must be completely fenced before any operations of this permit can begin. This permit, being temporary, is valid only .within sixty (60) days of the date shown below, and is not intended to allow the complete. development of the site as proposed. Any work performed after the expiration of this permit is not covered, and is considered unauthorized. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the. Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, .measures shall be taken to insure that debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities. I hereby grant this permit for development of an area. outside the special flood hazard area. All development shall be in accordance with the. plans and specifications submitted to and approved by the City Engineer in the development permit application for the above named project and all. of the codes and ordinances of the City of College Station that ~. ~ r Date Date ~ ~ ' -.'71 - ~ ~ Date Contractor t w- ~ ~`' a. Universal Computer Services Comments from Redlines SHEET C1 1) Revise Parking Analysis. Required. parking for warehouse space is I space .per 1000 SF not space per 3000 SF. The requirement is based on the zoning ordinance which is more restrictive than the deed restrictions.. Increase required parking for warehouse from 25 spaces to 74 spaces.. 2) Need G.P.D. on .sewer not G.P.M. Sanitary sewer demands converted FROM GPM TO GPD. 3) Show detail of security gates. Architect will show the detail for the security gates in his plans. The gate is to be a 4' high painted square tube gate. 4) How high are cooling. towers? The cooling towers have yet to be selected by the mechanical engineer. The architect .believes they will be about 7'. This height may vary depending on the brand. 5) Do you meet TNRCC clearance? Yes. We need a minimum of 6" between the wastewater line and potable waterline. Providing the potable waterline is above the wastewater line and one segment of the potable waterline is centered over the wastewater line and the wastewater line is pressure rated. The wastewater line is PVC, a key note was added to tell contractor to comply with TNRCC standards. 6) Specify service line from public line, meter should be copper per COCS specifications. Key Note 51 specifies 6" copper waterline. 7) Where is note 13? Why 2 water meters? Where is note 12? Notes 12 and 13 have been added. There are not two water meters. One meter is an irrigation meter incase the proposed irrigation well is not feasible. 8) Is there- aplan/profile for on-site water line? Plan/profile for on-site water line will be submitted. the week of June 15`". A general note was added that plan/profile plans would be submitted later and the waterline is to be .constructed by the plan/profile construction plans. 9) Will you get a permit from health dept. or TNRCC to drill well? Provide city with copy. It cannot connect to city Water System. My understanding based on a conversation with the architect on 05/18/98 is the firm who is hired to drill the well will fill out and submit the appropriate applications for a permit to drill the well. When this is done we will provide the- city with a copy of the permit. 10) Show other half of site plan. See sheet x? (like you did with grading plan) The only improvements to the other half of the site include the detention pond, channel, flume and outlet works.. I have renamed the grading sheet with the detention pond Site/Grading Plan and included "See Sheet C4" on sheet Cl. 11) Where are pipe bollards used. Ballard spelled correctly? The pipe bollards are used around the Stand Alone FDC on the south side of the building to protect the FDC from being hit. by traffic coming in and out of service drive. No, Ballard is spelled bollard. 12) We need 20' clear lane for a fire lane! What about a knox box connection? This is the first time this was labeled. 20' clear lane has been accommodated. Knox box should be coordinated with owner. 13) Sidewalks are. required - do not have to be 8ft wide -only have to meet regular city standards. SHEET C2 1) Retaining wall on west side of dock - 8ft above what elevation, 272? Will this be architecturally compatible with building. If so, please. note. Yes, the 8ft elevation is above 272 according to the architectural plans. Architect says the retaining wall will be architecturally compatible with building. SHEET C3 - OK SHEET C4 1) Key Note 36 -Should berm height 284.50 be 264.50? Berm height should be 264.50'. SHEET CS - OK SHEET C6 1) Where do the different pavement thickness occur? The thickness difference occurs in the service drive and the front entrance drive lane. Refer to Sheet CS Control Joint Plan for pavement thicknesses. 2) Standard Drop Manhole -not standard - 45 degree WYE should be a TEE -revise to standard. Revised to meet city of college station standard drop connection. 3) Pavement Junction - do not toe under, provide flush connection. I talked with Paul Kasper and he said that we could leave detail as it is since the City does not have a standard detail. SHEET C7 - OK DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PERMIT NO. 98-400 UNIVERSAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS FOR AREAS OUTSIDE THE. SPECIAL. FLOOD HAZARD AREA RE: CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE .STATION CITY CODE SITE LEGAL. DESCRIPTION: College Station Business Center, Block 2, Lot 1 & 2 SITE ADDRESS: 200 Quality Circle OWNER: Universal Computer Systems Carlan Cooper 6700 Hollister Houston, Texas 77040 (713)718-1800 DRAINAGE BASIN• Alum Creek Segment I TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: This permit is valid for clearing and grubbing ONLY!!:! Clearing shall. be limited to the area of the proposed structure footprint. The. Contractor shall take all necessary precautions to prevent silt and debris from leaving the immediate construction site in accordance with the approved erosion .control plan as well as the. City of College .Station Drainage Policy and Design Criteria. The Owner and/or Contractor shall assure that all disturbed-areas are sodden and establishment of vegetation occurs prior to removal of any silt fencing or hay bales. used for temporary erosion control. The Owner and/or Contractor shall also insure that any disturbed vegetation be returned to its original condition, placement and state. The Owner and/or Contractor shall be responsible for. any damage to adjacent properties, city streets or infrastructure due to heavy machinery.and/or equipment. as well as erosion, siltation or sedimentation resulting from the permitted work, Any trees required to be protected by ordinance or as part of the landscape plan. must be completely fenced before any operations of this permit can begin. This permit, being temporary,_is valid only within sixty {60) days of the date shown below, and is not intended to allow the complete development of the site as proposed. Any work performed after the expiration of this permit is not covered, and is considered unauthorized. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities. I hereby grant this permit for development of an area outside the special flood hazard area. All development shall be in accordance with the .plans. and specifications submitted to and .approved by the. City Engineer in the development permit application for the above named project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of College Station that appl . lam' ~~- ~ dministrator/Represe 've Date rO/wn''er'/A ent ~N Contrac or Date ~Z. 22~ °i? Date COLLEGE STATION P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue Tel: 409 764 3500 Mr. Teddy Peinado C.F. Iordan, Inc. 1509 Emerald Parkway Suite 105 College Station, TX. 77845 December 22, 1997 Re: Site Clearing for U.C.S. Building Footprint Dear 1VIr. Peinado, College Station, TX 77842 This correspondence will serve as formal approval of the Business Center Advisory Board for the clearing of the building footprint for U.C.S. in accordance with the preliminary site plan submitted to the City on December 22nd. As soon as a tree survey is complete and it has been determined what existing trees will be salvaged in the parking area, please notify the board and a letter approving the clearing.. of the parking area can be issued at that time. If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact us. Sincere y, f` s lrey B. Ash, Director of Economic Development -.w,,,- T Callaway Director of Development Services cc: Skip Noe, City Manager Carlan Cooper, U.C.S. Robert Payne, .Architect Home of Texas A&M University ,,, _ ,.- ~~, CITY OF COLLEGE STATIOI`I Planning Division } s ~, t ~~ ~ ~~ ~~~ u~. ~ ~, ,~ Ay ` ~J U~ ~~` i/~' > ~~``"' ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ '- i re ~~, ,~on.,_am~- (~ sue( Dt- u.e e~ ~y "~' `~Q n`u"e~.~- +~.a >3o/4Y ~/~ ...... :: Shirle Volk Urnyersal Computer Systems _ 9.:..:.:::; From: Shirley Volk To; Jim Callaway, Nanette Manhart, Sabine McCully Subject: Universal Computer Systems Just .got back from my bi-weekly C.F.Jordan meeting. Carlan .Cooper attended this one. When they talked about landscaping I told them. that Nanette had already talked with Sally Godfrey and is now waiting for Sally to submit a conceptual landscaping plan. Robert said he was getting that conceptual plan today and would go over it with Carlan before getting with the City for review. Then they referred town item in the minutes that reflect "Robert to attempt to get a varience from COCS on landscaping requirements because they are much more stringent than in other areas of the city." I had asked Robert. to explain. what they want, and he had said earlier that he thinks it's really a matter of clarification, rather than .perhaps a variance. Well, he kinds/sorts said the same thing today, but I think what he's really saying without saying is they are asking for a variance to the deed. restrictions -not ordinance requirements. Carlan said after Robert's kindalsorta explanation that he just wants everyone in the business park to live by the same standards, and if, after he spendsthousands of dollars on landscaping, someone else doesn't have to do the same thing., there will be a lawsuit! They also pointed out that the exterior wall. is a little lighter in color than originally was shown (but they didn't say shown on what), but Carlan likes the-little lighter color. Jim, how closely should I be checking into a statement like this? Mostly I just listen and take notes on items which we're directly affected by and come back and talk to the specific people involved. Then if it appears as an item in the minutes, at the next meeting I have a reply... Well, that's where we are now, I believe. This is more of a "heads-up" note ratherthan one which needs action. CC: Natalie Ruiz ~` Universal Computer Services Comments from Redlines SHEET Cl '~l) Revise Parking Analysis. Required parking for warehouse space is 1 space per 1000 SF not 1 space per 3000 SF. The requirement is based on the zoning ordinance which is more restrictive than the deed restrictions. Indrease required parking for warehouse from 25 spaces to 74 spaces. f/ 2 Need G.P.D. on sewer not G.P.M. Sanitary sewer demands converted FROM GPM TO GPD. ~~ .; ~e~~ 3~Show detail of security gates. ~" ~s ~ ~ 7~Architect will show the detail for the security gates in his plans. The gate is to be a 4' high • `~~ ~ painted square tube gate. ~. . C - ~ ° Iow high are cooling towers? '`~'~ The cooling towers have yet to be selected by the mechanical engineer. The architect believes they will be about T. This height may vary depending on the brand. 5) Do you meet TNRCC clearance? Yes. We need a minimum of 6" between the wastewater line and potable waterline. Providing the potable waterline is above the wastewater line and one segment of the potable waterline is centered over the wastewater line and the wastewater line is pressure ~I rated. The wastewater line is PVC, a key note was added to tell contractor to comply with TNRCC standards.. _ _ . _ _ - _. -=~~ ',_. "~' `' ~. 6) Specify service line from public line, meter should be copper per COCS specifications. ~,:iis~ ~~ ~ • Key Note 51 specifies 6" copper waterline. a ~R " ~ ~/ 7) Where is note 13? Why 2 water meters? Where is note 12? Notes 12 and 13 have been added. There are not two water meters. One meter is an irrigation meter incase the proposed irrigation well is not feasible. •. •- k ff) Is there aplan/profile for on-site water line? f- ~ w< Plan/profile for on-site water line will be submitted the week of June 15`t`. A general note ~~ -~ =~ was added that plan/profile plans would be submitted later and the waterline is to be constructed by the plan/profile construction plans. 9) Will. you get a permit from .health dept. or TNRCC to drill well? Provide city with copy. It cannot connect to city Water System. My understanding based on a conversation with the architect on 05/18/98 is the firm who is hired to drill the well will fill out and submit the appropriate applications for a permit to drill the well. When this is done we will provide the city with a copy of the permit. ~10) Show other half of site plan. See sheet x? (like you did with grading plan) The only improvements to the other half of the site include the- detention pond, channel, flume and outlet works. I have renamed the grading sheet with the detention pond Site/Grading Plan and included."See Sheet C4" on sheet C1. 11) Where are pipe bollards used. Ballard spelled correctly? The pipe bollards are used around the Stand Alone FDC on the south side of the building. to protect the FDC from being hit by traffic coming in and out of service drive. No, ballard is spelled bollard. d 12) We need 20' clear lane for a fire lane! What about a knox box connection? This is the first time this was labeled. 20' clear lane has been accommodated. Knox box should. be coordinated with owner. ,/ 13) Sidewalks are required - do not have to be 8ft wide - onl have to meet re lar cit standards. Y ~ Y SHEET C2 ;,,;~. 1.. j,l ~.5 1 y7:~ r , z;~: ~~ ,a ~~:. , ~~ (~~) Retaining wall on west side of dock - 8ft above what elevation, 272? Will this be architecturally compatible with building. If so, please note. Yes, the 8ft elevation is above 27~ according to the architectural plans." Architect says the retaining wall will be architecturally compatible with building. SHEET C3 - OK SHEET C4 1) Key Note 36 -Should berm height 284.50 be 264.50? Berm height should be 264.50'. SHEET CS - OK SHEET C6 J 1) Where do the different pavement thickness occur? The thickness difference occurs in the service drive and the front entrance drive lane. Refer to Sheet C5 Control Joint Plan for pavement thicknesses. 2) Standard Drop Manhole -.not standard - 45 degree WYE should be a TEE - revise to standard. Revised to meet city of college station standard drop connection. 3) Pavement Junction - do not toe under, provide flush connection. I talked with Paul Kasper and he said that we could: leave detail as it is -since the City does not have a standard detail. ~7 177r-, k~~~ `~ / I ~h ~am-~-~A-~ ~. SHEET C7 - OK q n-~- Prw Jl cQ/~ ,q,•, u itc~,,t-- ~ , ,4 ~~~si~ ~~ w~ ~. i ~ ~~ 1~ ~as s1ww~ o~ ~~~~i-is ~-~ ~o ~~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~~ o J ~''~ ~I~ ~.~ -~.~~ ~~ ~ 8 ~~.r.~. , O `~ - ~ 01/26/98 MON 12:47 FAX 409 696 0601 C. F. JORDAN 1002 R.~.,, rayne I I I -- L__..' -- - - f i ----~ --- -. -- -_J- i ' - ~ --~--_... I ~ `~ ~ i - - i - 6c HSSOCIat@5, IBC, T-. ~ ~ - -. -. - ~ IL_ _ _ I ~ -.._ .tl _S' . v i i - ' E t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I i ~ ~ i .... 1 i _. .....' --.. i r ~ i r -- - --~ !! i __._...... i ....,.- _ -.,_ _7_- l- I.. •- ~ f ~ ' 4 ~ ~ _ _ - I ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 I I i i ! t 1 t • f ~' a~ ~- ~.... - ~Lt1 ~~i-{.~_...-~~ V _ .., .. - --- -~ i i - -- I ~ I I ~ ~-~_ - I -~ -- - - i... .. ~J i .. -: 1.1 ~ ~ I ~ _ ! i - I .~ _ T i ~ - I ~ //~~ { l ~ ~ I _ ~ ~ -~ ' i - -- - -j-~- -- - I --.-- ~ ~` .-r ~., .- i ~ --`+-~-- - -- - -- --- ~- - - -- ~y I ~- - - ~ - i f ! I. u r~, I _ I _ i _ I '' ~ t ---ter- F~._..... ~.(III.~~~2~- i _ - _ -. - ~_~ `'~~- ; ---i -''iK---~ ~-~ ' _ _ _ i -G~ _~~-- - • -I- !r QJ .._ ~ - ~ _ ,:~ - ,. ~ - ... ~ I _ _ _ T -~. ; __-_ ,~ _-_ ~ I ~ - -..,_._ _~ I -.._ i ( I ~ ~ _ _ I ~ i-. i... ~~~~ I - } -. I - I i F- - I -_ i . 1 '~ i j - I t ~~ I I r i ..-~.. ...---J-. ~ ~ -.i....-_. .t ....- _..-._ _.. - i - ~- .. - - -. _ '1 _ // , -- _ 1 I ..-. r"-- 'I- - - -.... l - - --- -- - - - - -- ~,y, - . -. _ _ ---,. ---~. I f _-_ ~ __ _ ~ - - - • + ~--- - - --~- _ - _ ---- -- - _ -_. ~~._ L. .._.~__-_~ _J__' i I i 1509 Emerald Parkway, Suite 104, College Station, Texas 77845 (409) 696-7272 Fax (409) 696-8114 Sent By: TEXCON; 979 690 9797; Aug-31-01 11:15AM; Page 213 ' ~.,~„ - ,. :.i - - --- ~~ '~ . ~ t ~ ~ ;~ l ~ ~~~ ~ ~ . r~ri ~ _ Jam. ,,._-,. ~.,,, `~~ ... . r . P ~ a ~ \ , .... . ~ .....~ ~ f •.... _. -. . 1 ,...~: ... ~~- ...~ 1 IYY ' ~~ I ~~ ~'' r .y ... , ..... ~.... y , ...... ,., .. .... .. ,. ~ , ,r; r' ~ ~ ~ ~ ;f ~ j j j l ~ f ~ j ~ ~ j ~ f j l ~ ! ~ j I ~ j ! 'j ~ I ~ f ~ ,' ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ \ ,\ ~ ~ i .~,.. tih ~ ~. .~ ;~ ~... .... 'ri' ~ ~~ ~~ ; j ,~_ ....~.. -~. -~-- r...t ,, --~ ` '~ >~ ~. ~ ,. ' 7l '.... .. -- ! xi 4 'u~ ~ ~., ~ .-~'~ `` ~ ~ ~ i --~-- ~ I ,.:.. __ .,: 1, a ,...... - ... .,.. ®...... \\ a ~ ~ _ ~ ~ (-1 I! I!! 1 f I f I I NEw PARKING 205 SPACES LOST SPACES 9 SPACES TOTAL W1N tg6 SPACES