HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutesr r .
', 4 An easement will be needed to .extend the proposed Glenhaven Drive. across Phase III to the
-- Lamar Property.-__. :__--- -----
__ _
• There is an existing sewer line. that :has no recorded easement. This. should be shown as a 20'
public utility easement on the plat.
• The ".plat should. show the location of the offramp where traffic exits the. bypass to access
University Drive, '
• Designate the access easement shown on Reserve: Tract B as "proposed".
• Sidewalks will be required on both sides of Glenhaven Drive and should abut the University
Drive r.o.w.
• There should be a note on the plat stating that drainage easements will be located at the time. of
site design for the off-site drainage coming from Scott and White and that- running through the
reserve tract west. of Lot 1, Block 1.
• Designate the floodplain line on the plat.
Staff has spoken with the applicant regarding these conditions and they:: are in agreements with all
~~ comments.
r,
Chairman Massey invited the public to address ttus item.
.The following people approached the Comnussion expressed their concerns and comments:
Mr. Tun Smith, 1:703 Serval L ane Sharon Colson, 1116 Neal Pickett
Mr. J O.' Alexander, 1-506 Lynx Cove" Milce McMichen,'1405 Bayou,Woods
Mr. run Mallett, 1705 Serval Lane Kayla Glover, 1210. Marsteliar
Bill Johnson, 1508 Dominik
The above people were all concerned with increased traffic and the quality of life issues in the
~, Glenhaven`area. They wanted. a traffic analysis completed for the property before approving the request
to assure there would not be an increase in the traffic which would cause problems. They were opposed
to any additional traffic through the neighborhood.
__ _ _
Mr. Greg Taggart, Municipal Development Group' offered to answer any questions. He explained that
the applicant offered to remove the street butthe cities ofBryan and College Station want the street.
Transportation Planner Hard explained that Glenhaven needs to be the primary entrance to the site
because of the signal, whether or not the street is extended.
Commissioner Kaiser moved to table the_ item pending clarification of traffic issues and pursuing
options. C~~mmissioner Garner: seconded the motion which passed-unopposed (5-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6: Consideration of a Preliminary Plat of L.O. Ball Memorial Phase H,
revised plat of approximately 28 acres, 9 C-2 lots (orated on the southwest corner of Rock Prairie
and Highway 6, including the future Longmire extension. (9'328).
Assistant City Engineer.. Morgan presented the staff report; She explained that this preliminary plat
® includes-the extension of l.ongmire as !a major collector -south to .Birmingham. There are two access
easements that have not been placed on the plat. Access should be shared among the 10 lots. The first.
P&Z Minutes November S, 1998 Page 3 oJ8
~-
y ~~
/access easement should provide access from the existing Bank property out. to Longmire and .line up
', _ _ with__the access _ea ement running between_lots_4 ad 5_across Longmire. The second .should provide
access to lots 1 - 4 and: run parallel. to Rock Prairie Road. The preliminary plat gives no indication that
this development .will be phased. Without. this note, Staff would expect all lots to come in for final
ilt at the same time. -If the ro'ect will.: be phased, the plat should
plattcng and all infrastructure to be bu P J
reflect phase lines such that staff can deternune whether the phasing is adequate to insure infrastructure
development. Staff recommended approval as shown with addition of access easements as mentioned
and with phasingindicated if applicable.
Commissioner Garner moved to reconunend approval of the preliminary plat with staff comments. and
clarification of access. Commissioner Parker seconded the motion which. passed unopposed (5-0):
AGENDA ITEM NO. 7: Consideration of a conceptual plan for Tlie Estates at Spring Creek.
I consisting of approximately 220 acres between Barron Road and the future State Highway 40
and including a future high school site, the extension of Victoria Avenue to Highway 40, and the
extension of Southern Plantation to Yictaria Avenue.: (98-324):'.
Transportation Plarurer Hard presented the staff report. He explained that this ..conceptual plan would
establish a 65 acre parcel for the future high school site and also determine the location and alignment of
' the southward extension of Victoria Avenue.
Staff recon-rmendations:
Victoria Ali~nmentlExtension
Staff recommends approval of the. general location of Victoria as shown adjacent to the proposed future
high school site with the condition that Victoria be located on the Seaback property such that it will not
require any right-of--way for. the section of Victoria north of Barron Road from any of the. existing
residential lots in the Bald Prairie Subdivision.
Location of Victoria Connection/Cross-over on SH 40
Staffrrecorrunended against the cross-over on State Highway 40 at Victoria due to the negative impact
for traffic flow on Highway 40 and because of the potential for higher traffic volumes on Victoria.
Thoroughfare Plan
Staff recommended that the City's Thoroughfare Plan be amended to reflect the location and alignment
of Victoria .and Southern Plantation Drive as ultimately-approved as part of the Estates. of Spring Creek
Master Plan.
Interior Lot Lines
Staff recommended approval with the condition. that interior lot lines be removed.. Since land use and
utility information is not being provided at this.. time, staff cannot support these proposed divisions of
land.
-Commissioner Maloney said that he thought Victoria would be aligned to allow for-an overpass or an
underpass in-the future.
• Mr. Tim Crowley, applicant, approached the .Commission to support Staffis recommendation to not
have across-over.. at Victoria. He said that if it is decided to be necessary, the .Parks Department
P&ZMinutes November S, 1998 Page 4 of 8