HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous~•, CITY OF COLLEGE STATIOI`I
`~ PARKS & RECREATION
\ ~ POST OFFICE BOX 9960
COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842-9960
(409)764-3773 _
MEMORANDUM
December 1, 1998
TO: Edwin Hard, Transportation Planner
FROM: Steve Beachy, Director of Parks & Recreation
SUBJECT: .Gateway Preliminary Master Plan
The preliminary master plan for the Gateway subdivision includes one tract identified as
RS (reserve "B"). The plan does not indicate any site for potential park land dedication.
The RS tract encompasses a total of 20.59 acres. This would provide up to 494 dwelling
units at the maximum density allowed by the zoning regulations. Under the current park
land dedication requirements, this would equate to approximately 3.7 acres of park land or
$111, 150 cash dedication.
Should the developer. propose the land dedication, this will require review and approval of
the parks and .recreation .board, .The closest existing park site to this development is
located in the adjacent University Park subdivision and includes approximately 10.2 acres.
There appears to be no pedestrian linkage available between the two subdivisions without
traveling along. University Drive. However, I believe that the future residents will most
likely be college students and they will have different needs than those of a typical single
family residential development.
I recommend that the parkland dedication be met with cash rather than additional land in
this area. The location and small amount of land required will not lend itself to a quality
park development.
copies: Parks & Recreation Board
We provide good things in life!
Natalie Ruiz New Development Comments age 1.
From: Tony Michalsky
To: Natalie Ruiz
Date: Fri, Oct 16, 1998 9:37 AM
Subject: New Development Comments
New Development Comments
The Estates at Spring Creek (98-324)
No Comments
Nantucket Cove (98-326)
No Comments
The Gateway (98-327)
Developer,is responsible for the installation of conduit for electric service to all. lots per City specs and
.requirements.
Developer is responsible for the installation of street lights on any public street extensions per City specs
and requirements. .
Developer is responsible for 20% of the cost of providing electrical service to lots.
Developer'is responsible for providing necessary easement to cover any electrical infrastructure as
installed.
L.O. Ball Memorial Subdivision Phase II (98-328)
Developer is responsible for the installation of conduit for electric service to all lots per City specs and
requirements.
Currentlyfhere is no on site electrical for Block 3, :Lots 1 - 8. We would like to visit ~Nith the developer as
soon as #hey are ready to lay out a proposed plan for electrical service.
Developer is responsible for the instaWation of street lights on any public street extensions per City specs
and requirements.
Developer is responsible for 20% of the cost of providing electrical service to lots.
Developer is responsible for providing necessary easement to cover any electrical infrastructure as
ins±alled.
Crowley Subdivision (98-329)
No Comments
Hotel Conference Center in Wolf Pen Creek (98-437)
No Comments, already working with MDG on this project.
.....
...
1:
::Shirley Volk -: gatewax:clearing.:. .:.::::.:....:..... ..:::.:.:.,.::::......:.~:.:::.:::N:....:..:: ::::::-----:.~:..---..::::::....:::::::::...v::.,:...:.vn.:...:.::.,,.:.:..::::::::Page.:
From: Jane' Kee
To: PLANNING
Date: 12/1/98 9:15AM
Subject:. gateway clearing
Spoke to Robert Todd.. Told him that before any building permits are issued theyneed to bring in a plan
~, that shows how they wiH address the screening along Univ. Dr. and where they will replant. Also told him
' that TxDot wants their ROW cleaned up immediately. Told him o fence the 50' area initially just along
the project side. If this doesn't keep people and equipment out of the area they may have to fence the
entire area.
Shirley, please put this in the file. Thanks
i
~ij
91P•3ar
1~1ZINICIPAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP
2551 Texas Ave. South, Ste. A • College Station, Texas 77840 •409-693-5359 • FAX.• 409-693-4243 • E-mail: mdgcs@gte.com
Consulting Engineers, Surveyors, Planners and Environmental Consultants
''~i,
October 26, 1998
Natalie Ruiz
City of College Station
.1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas .77842
Re: Gateway Comments.
Dear Natalie:
We have a response to the following numbered comments with o+ur Revision B.
1) The access easement does not exist, we show it as proposed. <~ ~ i t ~5 GFo ~~-f ~`~'"°~
.~l) The phase lines follow the property lines of the depicted tracts. We are currently concerned with
Phase I, therefore the other phases are not set off by heavy lines. ~
C wt _ ~ ~ ~ct~'`'
3) Currently there is no oversize participating foreseen. We propose for the street to be a collector, as
indicated by the thoroughfare plan.. If the city desires to raise the street service classification we
would request OP, The same may be said for water line sizes. This may be appropriate for discussion
~~ or Development agreement.
~/4) Although no cross access should be necessary we have shown it as you requested.
~) We have removed the ink blot. The zone is C-B.
~) The. flood plain has been located by using x-sections.
7) We show the existing apparent easements. To date we have found nothing of record. //~~
8) The Bert Wheeler tract was split off from this tract in the early 70's and the ownership is remote. ~ { f~ +~
~~
~) Would prefer detention be handled on a lot by lot basis. Due to the size and Tc of the Burton Creek C,t`~9`~~a
Basin, there is a very real possibility of creating flooding due to "peak stacking". '~~-- ,~~~' ~~~~
t~ ` c~~ ,~,~ - ~~ y Vie, .
10) Scott & White is discharging to a natural drainage way. Our cltent cannot prevent the drainage from
c.01-38(3127)
..~ ~~~ 98.3
~~ b ~
using the channel, but we do not wish to grant an ement prior to site development on Lot 1, Block
Two, as it is best to wait until actual site design. ~~ , ~ ~ (~~ ~ (,p er~~- C~
\/I 1) This is unclear. ~~~, ~ ~..c~e~ ° ~~ ~~~'~ ` ~ f~
~~~~~~a~
~) The Bert Wheeler tract is not included in our preliminary Plat. Water is available across Highway 60,
and the tract is legally served.
13) Based on our preliminary it~vesti~atio~ns„~" ~ater~nes should be sufficient for service. ~ ~-p~
x---l°l~°°L--ots-ham-a~ces~-to-.str~eet~; w~h3L-ar-e-separ-ate~c~~s~easet~}uir-ed~--6,
For Development of Lot 1, Block One, and Lot 1, Block Two, there is no plan to acquire a
CLOMAR, but to use the tracts "as is".
We have extended proposed Glenhaven in Phase. One to the north line of Lot 1, Block One.
~1) Land and Development cost on the 5.20 acre tract will run around $2.25/SF - to $2.75/SF. When
ever reasonable benefits are likely given these expected costs, the tract will likely develop, barring
governmental interference. ~ ~ ~ ~
d'C~-r`~
~) No Floodway is on this tract according to the FEMA-FIRM. U
~/ 19) Glenhaven Phasing will be address by development agreement as appropriate.
20) (A) Glenhaven is intended to be a part of subdivision lot development.
(B) Client does not want to grant remote landowner access easements at this time. This is
negotiable.
21) Same as 20B. ~~(~ '~
.~
22) Parkland dedication will be dealt with at time of final platting for R-5 tracts.
23) We have moved proposed Glenhaven to match the center line of existing Glenhaven.
Please call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
l< . ,f
Gregory IC. aggart
Vice President/Project Manager
c.01-38(3127)
e..~,. ~.~._. pit C..e
,~.¢~.~~. cue. ~~~cQss ~.se~3 _~~~.:
3 ~ .~-
___
__
__ .. _. __:y_. -, . .....--.uw~ .. ~.+~+-mot __.- ~ -. wT_ - __ ~ ~
.•~
FROM BERT WHEELER°S IhJC.
JUN. 25. 1898 1:55PM P 1
PHONE NO. 713 781 5281
~.~-
M. D:1
GP,` tnc.
M. D. Wheeler, sta.
DATE: - 2 5 -9 ~ _
DELIVER TO: M R . ~Au t.. KASp ~4'R
COMPANY: C ~'t"t ac w ~~~~ s-ta-T iaN , -
RECEIVINGFAX NO. ~ _ qo9 " '~to4 " 4 9cp _,_
FROM: ?o C ®w E
F,q)(NUMBER 713 892-5281 OR 713 355-5355.
THIS COVER SHEET AND MORE PAGE(S)
t3'9 M t "; -t ~ K G L 6T? ~ tL { ~ . ~=. fiy t ~c~n:iv~ [L to t`~
MESSAGE: 5
_ R~ ~ Of ~..-t iv c~ P ~,0~-~ ~~ a-e L;~ ~~t ~a R ,, k a ~ « Q w ~ i l ? 7`
(,..slat t~ ~-y~J C 6101! t.0 c1 S ~ or~W '~'s e~+..,- 0.4~'~f DQ~sc [!1 ATie~s
4543 Post Oak Place, .Suite 230 Houston, Texas 77027 {713} 355-5355 .Fax: (7'13} 892-528
Pl~ ~'i ,u ~.f .~ ~,e.
FROM : BERT WHEELER'S INC.
08/1997 FRI 15:46 FAX 409 846 0652
JUN. 25. 1988 1:56PM P ~
PHONE NO. 713 781 5281
BRAZOSLAND MEAL f~9002
i ~~~~
~~~~~
F', O. i3ox 9360 1101 Texasa Avenue • • Cottage atatian, ?X 77G~12
Trl• 4[l9 764 350D
September 3, 1987 „>4~9 ~°
~ b~-
~~t} ~ ~. ~y~ ~
Mr. Hank McQuaide ,~ ~,~.-
A
gip3 $. Twos Avenue, Suite 100
Bryan, Texas 77802
g,E; p~r;vCway Lacatior~ for the Wheeler property otn the Northwest Corner of SH 6 and
Un;wersity Drive
Dear Mr. McQuaide:
I havoc rcvievved tl~es informatiosa you submitted with rcgarcl to your driveway location request at the
above roFerenced Ioca#ion. The two drivcw[i~+ locations you submitted on August 20, 1997 axe
aPPravcd as to tha loetition bnSy. I have attached your submittals to this letter for refcxenec.
Please kc~cp in mind that as part of the U:tiversity Drivev4rideningprojact that is scheduled to bcbin
in the Sprite of 2000, there will be a praised center xnc;dian that will preclude 1eR-in, lcft~out
vchioles front this sits. Prior to this catsstructian, you sbaauld try to negotiate an a,cccss casement
with the adjacent property owner in order to have aeee:;s to the prpposcd Glcnhaves~ e~ctension.
The intersection at University Drive and C3lenh2tven Drive. wi1M eventually bC sigszed and will be
one oE'tlYe few median openings allowed esn Llniveraity Drive. if you Dave any questions, r can be
contacted iLt 764~3~70.
S~ car ys
Steve H
Asst, to the City I.ngulecr
.~
xc: Verotti~ca Morgan, Asst. City Engin
Paul Ka,spae, Ciraduats En~teer~?C
Td Hard,'l'ra=-sportation Plaru~er
Shirley Volk, Development Coordinator
Fra-Development File
Home of Texas A&M University
November 17, 1998
To: Residents of Glenhaven, Cat Hoitow, Dominik, Francis, and
.Neighboring Streets
From: Sharon Colso 116 Neal Pickett`St., 696-6050
Subject: Extension of Glenhaven across University Dr.
Just when you thought you had heard everything, a new menace.. appears! A few of
your neighbors attended the College Station Planning and Zoning meeting on Nov.5
because a preliminary plat of The Gateway (across from Scott and V1lhite) was to be
presented including the extension of Glenhaven Dr. As we suspected (having seen
the C.S. master plan previously}, Glenhaven was. to be put. across to Burton
Creek where the City of Bryan .could: build a bridge and connect it ail the way to
Barak (the Bryan High School area)... After several residents voiced opposition to the
plan, the developer said to just remove the street from the plan because it was not
necessary to the development of The Gateway at'all---that the city staff had said it
HAD to be done. The P&Z tableci the item until the next meeting on Nov.
19.
THiS IS WHERE YOU COME INI There will be a Workshop .Meeting for.. P&Z at
6:30PM to discuss items submitted for the Regular Meeting and future. items to be
considered by the P&Z Commission. The Regular Meeting wild follow at
7:OOPM -- both meetings in Council. Chambers in the City Hall on NOV. 19
(THURSDAY). The reconsideration of the Preliminary .Ptah of The Gateway
including the Glenhaven extension is on he agenda. Even if Bryan never
builds the bridge or the street, Glenhaven could be connected to the. west to l°arrow
J29th St. The proposed- extension will. flow raffle directly into Glenhaven
and up Francis or up Dominik and theoretically .makes.: every cross-street a
potential thoroughfare depending on the driver's destination on Harvey Rd.!
Obviously., Merry_ Oaks, `Munson and Walton would carry the heaviest loads as a
result of this. You might want to look at the web page ISSUES.ORG for more related
information. I am writing to you because just a few of'us cannot stop this. It will take
many who are willing to be visible and vocal. Several of us_have already spoken to
P&Z on this +ssue and hey tabled their decision. We have no way of knowing what the
outcome will be this week. Won't you please consider ,tieing presen# at the
meeting 'and speaking to this issue?
Planning and Zoning Commissioners are:
James Massey, Chairman, 845-8661(w) Dennis Maloney, 696-6594. (h}
Steve Parker, 260-5200 (w) Winnie Garner, .260-4399 (w)
Ronald Kaiser, 845-5303 (w)
THANK YOU FOR READING THIS!
... .
~--
Page 1
'Sabine McCully Re Hansen\Gateway\Cit~ Meetm~: ___ . :_ _
From:. Shirley Volk
To: "cae~rmelaw.com"City of College Station.SMTP
Date: 12/22/98 309PM
Subject: Re: Hansen\Gateway\City Meeting
Let's do it! .Sabine will not be able to respond until next week, but Ed ~ Jane are o.k. with this time and
date.
'I »> Chuck Ellison ~cae~rmelaw.com> 12/22/98 02:52PM »>
Shirley
Wednesday January`13. 1:999 at 2:00 for the meeting is good with my group and Hansen's group. Will
that work for you?
Chuck
CC: Amber Kelly, Edwin Hard, Jane Kee, Sabine McCul...
;~i
Fromc Chuck Ellison. <cae@rmelaw.com>
To: "'Shirley Volk'" <svolk~ci.college-stationax.us>
Date: 12/21/98 6:14PM
Subject:. Gateway and Hansen Meeting
Shirley
Would you forvvard this to Sabine for me, please? 1 do not have. her a-mail address. Thank you.
Sabine
By how you should have gotten a copy of a letter l sent to Ray #ollowing our meeting Thursday night.
Today Buzz Hamilton called me and asked for a meeting between Ray and the Gateway folks. I also
told him that you mentioned to me the City's. desire to meet with both of us. He was receptive to that; as
is Frank. i told them that in view of the Christmas and New Year's holidays, I did not think that we would
get it done thisyear. Can you. give me some dates that you would like to meet, and I'll try to get it
organized.
That said, I drove by the Welsh project at night a couple of times .over the weekend and am still of the
opinion that the lighting could be an issue for Frank and I feel sure that it is not what the City'had in mind
when it adopted the overlay corridor. I will look forward to hearing, from you at-your earliest opportunity.
Merry Christmas!
Chuck
9f`'Sa~7
MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP
2551 Texas Ave. South, Ste. A • College Station, Texas 77840 •409-693-5359 • FAX.• 409-693-4243 • E-mail: mdgcs@gte. com
Consulting Engineers, Surveyors, Planners and Environmental Consultants
'";
October 26, 1998
Natalie Ruiz
City of College Station
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas 77842
Re: Gateway Comments.
Dear Natalie:
We have a response to the following numbered comments with our Revision B.
1) The access easement does not exist, we show it as proposed.
2) The phase lines follow the property lines of the depicted tracts. We are currently concerned with
Phase I, therefore the other phases are not set off by heavy lines.
3) Currently there is no oversize participating foreseen. We propose for the street to be a collector, as
indicated by the thoroughfare plan. If the city desires to raise the street service classification we
would request OP. The same may be said for water line sizes. This maybe appropriate for discussion
or Development agreement.
4) Although no cross access should be necessary we have shown it as you requested.
5) We have removed the ink blot. The zone is C-B.
6) The flood plain has been located by using x-sections.
7) We show the existing apparent easements. To date we have found nothing of record.
8) The Bert Wheeler tract was split off from this tract in the early 70's and the ownership is remote.
9) Would prefer detention be handled on a lot by lot basis. Due to the size and Tc of the Burton Creek
Basin, there is a very real possibility of creating flooding due to "peak stacking".
10) Scott & White is discharging to a natural drainage way. Our client cannot prevent the drainage from
c.01-38(3127)
.b . q8~ 3a
7
.~
using the channel, but we do not wish to grant an easement prior to site development on Lot 1, Block
Two, as it is best to wait until actual site design.
11) This is unclear.
12) TheBert Wheeler tract is not included in our preliminary Plat. Water is available across Highway 60,
and the tract is legally served.
13) Based on our preliminary investigations, 8" water lines should be sufficient for service.
14) All Lots have access to streets, why are separate access easements required.
IS) For Development of Lot 1, Block One, and Lot 1, Block Two, there is no plan to acquire a
CLOMAR, but to use the tracts "as is".
16) We have extended proposed Glenhaven in Phase One to the north line of Lot 1, Block One.
17) Land and Development cost on the 5.20 acre tract will run around $2.25/SF - to $2.75/SF. When
ever reasonable benefits are likely given these expected costs, the tract will likely develop, barring
governmental interference.
18) No Floodway is on this tract according to the FEMA-FIRM..
19) Glenhaven Phasing will be address by development agreement as appropriate.
20) (A) Glenhaven is intended to be a part of subdivision lot development.
(B) Client does not want to grant remote landowner access easements at this time. This is
negotiable.
21) Same as 20B.
22) Parkland dedication will be dealt with at time of final platting for R-5 tracts.
23) We have moved proposed Glenhaven to match the center line of existing Glenhaven.
Please call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Gregory K. aggart
Vice President/Project Manager
c.01-3 8 (3127)
`''~, CITY OF COhLECE STATIOI'~
`~ PARKS & RECRE14T1®N
`/ P6ST OFFICE BOX 9960
COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842-9960
(409) 764-3773
.MEMORANDUM
December 1, 1998
fi0: Edwin Hard, Transportation Planner
FIB®M: Steve Beachy, Director of Parks & Recreation
SUBJECT: Gateway Preliminary: Master Plan
The preliminary master plan for the Gatetivay subdivisionincludes one tract identified as
RS (reserve "B"). The plan does not indicate any site for potential .park land dedication.
The RS tract encompasses a total of 20.59 acres. This would provide up to 494 dwelling
units at the maximum density allowed. by the zoning regulations. Under the current park
land dedication requirements, this would equate to approximately 3.7 acres of park land or
$111, 150 cash dedication.
Should the developer propose the land dedication, this will require review and approval of
the parks and recreation board. The closest existing parks site' to this development is
located in the adjacent University Park subdivision and includes .approximately 10.2. acres.
There appears, to be no pedestrian linkage available between the two subdivisions without
traveling along University Drive. However, I believe that the future residentswill most
likely becollege students and they will have different. needs than those of a typical single
family residential development.
I recommend. that the parkland dedication be met with cash rather than additional land in
this area. The location and small amount of land required will not lend. itself to a quality
park development.
copies: Parks & Recreation Board
We provide good things in life9
_ - _ _ _-
_I __
.~w
-- ~ ,~
___
__ _ - - __ ,
/~~ f
~, _. ' _ ~ _. - ---~! boo Z---- ___ _ ~-~/ _~_~r~,67'~''~°"~Idoo-~i 4c~-)_
Z .
8.70 ~r, I 1~_ 7~'~9 w~
__
__ _ ___
__
__
I _ __
__ . _-- ..
_-_ _ _ ___
__
:GATEWAY
At the last P&Z mtg.;the Commission tabled this preliminary plat because of concerns,
residents across University Dr. have regarding the extension of Glenhaven Dr. north into
Bryan. Concerns were that traffic generated by this connection would have a negative
impact on Glenhaven Drive south of University. Dr.
Also had concerns about traffic that will be generated from the development itself. I'll
address that in a moment.
I would like to clarify something said by the applicant's engineer and stated in a letter
from. Sharon Colson. Both indicated that the city staff said that the Glenhaven connection
had to be done. As you know the Glenhaven connection has been on the thoroughfare
plan for about S years now and the subdivision regulations require plats to comply with
the comprehensive plan, which means showing all thoroughfares as per the plan, or
making an argument that the thoroughfare plan should be .changed and presenting a plat
that. differs from the plan or requesting a variance to the preliminary platting requirements
which would defer theissue as in the previous Texas World. Speedway case.. The
Commission then has the responsibility to decide the issue.
In this particular case Glenhaven has been on the plan extending into Bryan for two
reasons - to provide. some. additional north/south movement through the community and to
provide an alternative flow to the one-way frontage road: Although this is a good idea
from a traffic standpoint, it is not critical to either College Station or Bryan. The
developer did not ask to very from thee.. thoroughfare plan and presented a plat showing
compliance. At the last mtg. the developer indicated they do not need this connection for
their development. Staff agrees that this development does not need the extension. Staff
also does not have any great concern .over deleting the connection from the thoroughfare
plan.
As for traffic that will be generated from the development itself,. the Commission realizes
that. these issues are dealt with at the time of zoning requests. This. property was rezoned
in the early 90s to commercial and multi-family residential. This is very appropriate for a
large tract at the intersection of two major arterial roadways. With zoning in hand, .keep
in mind that the property owner has rights to the uses that are permitted in these districts
and to reasonable ingress and egress. These cannot be denied. That does not mean that
we cannot affect the design through the platting process and how this ingress and egress
occurs.
Ed-has put together some information for the Commission and concerned,residents
regarding traffic generation and distribution. I'll let himpresent this at this time.
I would remind the Commission that action must be taken on this plat tonite either as a
recommendation for approval, approval with conditions or denial for reasons stated,
,r
P1tOPERTY OWNER'S INFORMATION
LOTS 1 & 5, BLOCK 1, TIRE GATEWAY, PHASE I
Delmar Baronhead I Ltd
15900 Dooley Road
Addison, Texas 75001
LOT 2R, BLOCK 1, THE GATEWAY, PHASE I
CSI Associates
18377 Beach Boulevard, Suite 208
Huntington Beach, CA 92048
LOT 4R, BLOCK 1, THE GATEWAY', PHASE I
Maroon. City Partners Ltd.
3214. Westchester Avenue
College Station, Texas 77845
............................ .
~. rsSWR M.•~.w ....... ..........
.~ :.
ti.
~x
:.`
:.: ..
~~;?~ ~~~
::~;
vM .:
.~~~~ .. ::>r..
J+'?:
Y Y1 ~.:
h
,~,.,L'.' r, {
..:
~:'~~~ =~
s:,
43?:~
:..};~.
`=~.
-:.~
,.~~.
THE GATEWAY
Recommendation
^ Include Corner Tract /Share Access
^ Var. to Waterline for Corner Tract
^ Easement to Lamar Tract
^ Note Existing Sewer as 20'PUE
^ Off-Ramp Location
^ Clarify Access Es. For Reserve B
^ Drainage Easements
^ Floodplain Notation
,~;i r~ ~~~~ P
~' `"I /'~.'f4~`W"~"i°`- ~~'Va/1~.1. F.ls/~~'I"[i f~~`~G~wt,?'.~21'bC
/~ f l /~,,,_~~
'h> ~-'~ yVl~k sfi~~a~i .
1
THE GATEWAY
Recommendation (oont.)
^ Commercial Drive in Lieu of Glenhaven
e FinalPlat for Ph. I Include
- Two Driveways on University at
Median Openings
- Access to Frontage Road
^ Address Internal Circulation with Site
Plan
~-y ~~ ~i
..THE GATEWAY
SCENERIO #1 orst Case
Tx>Ps
^ Home Improvement 3,100
^ Apartments 4,200
~S ^ Specialty Retail 1,200
^ Restaurant 2,000
~~ ^ Super Market 7,300
^ Discount Store 7,100
TOTAL 24,900
~~ 3~i:
"'~ l7' r !
2
~~~
,:::
>rv~!4.:
.x.a:"
..,, .
` ~ ,,max, S ~ ~ t$1Tf
f ..St .,,b~,'`,..... •.•::~~}~ :: get ~ ~~.::.?~~rse~~a~
''L.\;i4\ivi-:,`v:,6', '~};.?ti:~%'iii:;:l.-'v:~~(...j•.;y:.\:i.;:r:'?~Yj.~::y}J:~:;::;: "'.::Z :j':..,
~:~',ti,~'~:•'.i>; ~:r:''SS'~..:' '?:;h`y6iu•~1' . . f''w?~Ey~::\~:~: ~.yt::..:;~~~:'~..:::.
:.:' ::..
~y::.
::.~r':+.:-•'.~.. `,r:': `?"::."iii:;:-,;::• ~,~4.:
::.:..:<
Jr i pt + w4 :`r::.`.
:':>:'~:::5'i'~lEf4~EOffi::;o.~='.fi~~::: `~L'2 :: ~: . '' :"+.,: :.,.:}:: :'<`~".;•-' .: ':1vt
•.; : {~~Y
~. '. aR='
~~
6
IIyy ~ ~ ..
V
-"'~ Y-
Wti+~'1 J
r
~~~~
~~,~~~ ~
`-^~ ~
t-T,~-
THE GATEWAY
SCENERIO #2
~s
^ Home Improvement 3,100
^ Apartments 4,200
^ Specialty Retail 1,200
^ Restaurant 2,000
TOTAL 10,500
.Ji. 4 ..... ~~ :..
<.,;.':''>rJ~3yn-.i+,: .r.;:::: 'O~•~659A7:%;~+;::::a:''::.:°:.'::i:'i:;j: :~:'s\.'b~y;[:"'a:::%~.
x ,~ ~ ~ ..
:;::;:..'::: ::;;.~j~.';::.:
,'' ' ;` {
.,,
...:.
:>
,_.. >.
3
THE GATEWAY
Recommendation
^ Include Corner Tract /Share Access
^ Var. to Waterline for Corner Tract
^ Easement to Lamar Tract
^ Note Existing Sewer as 20'PUE
^ Off-Ramp Location
s Clarify Access Es. For Reserve B
e Drainage Easements.
^ Floodplain Notation
THE GATEWAY
ReCOrilf9ZendatlOn (cont.)
^ Commercial Drive in Lieu of Glenhaven
^ Fna1 Plat for Ph I Include
- Two Driveways. on University at
Median Openings
-Access to Frontage Road
e Address Internal Circulation with Site
Plan
4
III ~ ~~
i ~ P~'~ 6 '
zae» E+o rnaeaaa yc
,I __~__~-'~~
o~
~, s...
O N
1 ~ ~
s.. ~ ~
~ ' ~
~ r t-
i Q
it • A ~ ~~~`'
~/
~~~
~P
~i
~I
~ O
,~ ~~
i
A !"'
_~~~•
tl
I
;~ \
I ~ ~
\~ ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ ~ %~
r.,, ~ d'
,~ ~ ~;
..
I ~ ~
,,,
r~,~,, o ~ , ._
4% ~ ~
~' O bs ~ .
~ o ~o~
J Q
~ ~ Qa ~ _ ~J
s
~ ~ ~~~
I
m
1 ~~
~ m~ ~
} c
a ~
N
~
~ O
.`
Q ~
~;~ ~
`~
1 ~ ~`
'~ ~ Q,
~~ c~
ct~ ~
~. ~~
Y r
zoe+ Fo wv.aaeo
----~-:
w
T~
6a
r
t~~
~ ~
..
o - ,~ o
c~~,
c~
..
t' ~ ~.
o
.~
V
/~~~
~%
Q.
-~'- ~046,4r
0
h >c ~~~
p. O ~J
2~ ~~
ate .
Y /
~,
C
O
m ~ _
~ O
C9 -~ ~.
z
h
N
O
w
L"J
\~
~~
~,~