HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous~~~~.~1 Page No. ~, of ~ Pages
- ~ '+dF6~~~~x~~V~l
. ~ ~ p... f;. r-
O T _. , t _~r a._ ,^ v
GASS 1 n ~ ~`
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY & BUILD~RS-
~[_„ ~_ r .. _ .~ ~... ~;. ;. ~,, 6 r y. a n , Texas 7 7 8 0 1
). k. .. v
f 5
.
~
PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO PHONE DATf
~~ ~ ~tot~ ~~,1. ~~._ ~ ~, 1l9?f~
STREET
JOB NAME
• ~~• ~~
CITY, STATE AND ZIP. CO
DE JOB LOCAT
ON
.~aygn«~
a~
~tl Yv~X~ T. f L7cs8 I
ter` ap
Jic~v ~sEf• ~J~ f +~'~$. d~ ~ti'43i.
ARCHITECT DATE Of PL
ANS
~ - JOB PHONE
p
y4 +9
~~d3M"y~ ?~ ~} I
~~~~J (I
We hereby submit specifications and estimates
for
:
~
y
P11~,~0~A'ij t+E?t1Y~`t.~t"t;~ J~.g ls~'~ ~,I4.~.Ci €~~.'~~.~r~~
7"~ b ~?~r~.~I 7~~
y
•~'•'4#~Wd\~~-ei~Jr '{4 ~CiY viiilOd iY4r V.O~ ~V® ~~~e`sb ~ W t`E~.~ 6#i! 4FrW V4)~ 64~Mi 4•~~ .~~~kd ~ YJ*
~~~=~
a. ~`~ar~$
~t ,
~
;,~
s
, Fite.
~
~~ ~Z } s~~
~ ~ ~~:.~e~
~~ r~r. ~.
~
}
yy~~y,
~{
~
j
„,~~
,
y
~ty
,
g
~
(
~
b~yi85P~i.~~
~~t,~°~# ~
`,
~d~
~l.
~' EZ sF{~.~. ~ ~~~JL ~
+v~S. Et
l~
~ '~'~,.~. i Vi ~~~~iY vi~A ~~4=ti. 't~.3..
~.,,.
,zt
y,
~{,,,
.~y
,,
y~,
gg
car ~~~S.S.i.~
~:i ai1a7~
~
bGd Z ~r
,. ~
~~~V~S tid
~~ ~~~~
~~
~
~i ~i~
~.q
,,
a
~t,p
y.
g
5
~
g'g
p
t
+
~~~~
*'~_J4..3.=r+~$}V~ 5~
~~~~ ~~~,~ L' '340 ~tti'~.~ ~r~~~6D~ ii~
~~ iX
4
~
~
~
.Y
.~$ i
R
4
J
q,,
,
r
,
~+y
~~~
,
.}, ,
,
.
~
~
,
R
,1
E~
'~r°etc
i
~
L~
l~
~
i~
t
L« ~
~
'~~ ~~a~m ~'$. ~'.'~, ~°.~.a#r ~~ ~~1~~ ~rdrif Ali 'e~iliK~
y
,
,#.„
~
.~~
p
~g
~.
a
y
,
~"~ 4~..~8$~~
.
il
~Cl~ e14`=~3d i~~ir liG
~i.-.~~5
S
~ L
V ~~~a
~
--°;s
,
~„
~
~
.~
~]
$
,g
a
y ~~q ~. ,,,,q .t
~t~i ~~~.~ T2Sdai
~d~tl~t 4€'
3:..~~~
~
,
i
~ a~iAs. ~r ~r7 V~3.~
3.~~t~
~
~
'~~{ ~t
a
~ j
~}
~
y
l~
+,,
~
.
.
,~{~ T:.'~(~~'3y i~
4
~ ~c~t.~~bd
~~ T~1
ii ~
BcS~~ ~~r,~@~S ~si
~t~'P'~f ~
#
7
~+~ ~
.r~
j.
T,°y
,
[
y~
~~„
,
,f,,
~
~.~
1"~~:-'-:ii. tE'°r~+.
~~$
ir
~~'~ Q~'1 ~-z5~~ a~~ if0 ..7..lFi«R~;'~,.4.~ ~~~~~.&t~ r~ 1~, Q3 ~ ~~.~ ~~~~=QS6.l.i4l~CFC~
~~
.,~qq~~
$. ,
,
~~;:.~~!till L~TJ~~.~'~'/G ~~ ~.t`xa ~ii~~`/k ....~
~ara~r~a~~r a~ ~,fa~ e.19. ~~ ark ~e~r far alet~ ~a~i sa~..f"3.
~~ve Vicar t~~ si~.~ af; ~3, ~~ ~ ~~~ ~e ~~ a~ e~~~~r~ Q~ ~~.
~r~.
t'~31iST~.A~r„ TK?fi ~iCY 87
E ~aia~T yi7t' $~'1'~i*4+ rr Ir~OVC~3'~A~ ~$ Lc~ ~JxG~3~(3
,~*
,
y6JlJ ~~~r ~~a ~W ++++~f
[' ~xII}ib:~P hereby to furnish material and labor -complete in accordance with above specifications, for the sum of;
a'i33"'~e $[~E~li~iSi3t~. ~:i'1F h~~t'~3x" .~..,..,...,o...............r..............~..,..........®.,- dollars ($ ~$t~ )
-
Payment to be made as fol
l
o
w
s:
_
/
/
/
•
gg
l{
[\
L
a
tj ~F }~ ~q /yj ±~ .y ~ yy ~+~gy#,, ~/~} c
]
i. Va~b Bi S~i~.' 1) V1.i:t~V~~~~~~ Y~. V6T RY ~V(i$#I ~.+i VViN {hl:*OV~I ~' ~~/ v i. .
All material is guaranteed to be as specified. All work to be completed in a workmanlike %~f ~' '--~_.
manner according to standard practices. Any alteration or deviation from above specifica• Authorized ~j ,.~ :- - ~ , '•
tioris involving extra costs will be executed only upon .written orders, and will become an $ignatUre ~ -c "-`fi' 1' G_ _ -~~ L~;.~li ~"~~
extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, accidents
or delays beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, tornado and. other necessary insurance. Note: This propOSal may be
` Our workers are fully covered by Workmen's Compensation Insurance. ~ withdrawn by us if not ~cepted within days.
.~tPP~t~tttt~F ~~ ~X~~1dTBiMl -The above prices, specifications ~
and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized .signature
to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. ~ Q
Date of Acceptance:
Sabme.McCully.-..Re_ Re zonnng 2 77. Ac on. Hwy .158._to match__shop: next._door (S-ConServ rents its. - .....::...::..rF_.___:::_..Page:1.:
From: Sabine McCully
To: "jbell cL~acsaamu.edu"@City of College Station.SMTP
Date: 10/16/98 11:16AM
Subject: Re Re-zoning 2.77. Ac on Hwy 158 to match shop next door (S-ConServ. rents it)
dear mrs. bell:
i have finally gotten about as far as i think i can in researching all that is available in our records in
deteriming the status of your property. i; have contacted the county courthouse, obtained a copy of
Bryan's land use plan, spoken about the area with Bryan's city planner joey dunn, .and obtained a deed
referenced in the rezoning ordinance listed below. from all of this information, i thought i would complile
it in writing so that you may have this information #o add to what you already have regarding the subject
property.
July 1970 -city of college station: adopts subdivision .regulations that applied in .the city limits and within a
one-mile radius of the city (the city's extra-territorial jurisdiction at that time)_ any partitions that occurred
after this date should have been legally platted in accordance with the subdivision regulations.
aug. 27,.1971- a 15.379 acre tract was conveyed to your sole ownership out of a larger46.19 acre tract
that had been owned jointly-by mildred jane peters murphy, tract' peters, and'you. this partition should
have been accomplished in compliance with the city's subdivision regulations. we have no record of
such. subdivision approval any further partitions of the 15.379 acre tract were. also subject to the
subdivision regulations.
sept. 25,.1980 -ord. no. 1240 annexed .all of the area between highway 158, highway 30, the city limits at
the time, and-highway 60 into the. city of college station. this annexation included your 15.379 acre tract.
at that time,. a welding business existed on a portion. of your tract. it also appears#hat a single ffamily
home existed on the property as well
jan. 22, 1981 -ord. no. 1262 rezoned the 1.19 acre tract to c-2 and the same ordinance rezoned a 2.25
acre tract to r-1. The purpose of the rezoning was to allow continuation and expansion of the existing
welding business and,to allow the addition of a garage to the home.
nov. 10,.1988 -the city council denied a rezoning request for m-2 heavy industrial .zoning. the denial
was pursuant to a negative recommendation from staff and the planning and zoning commission. the
', basis of the recommendation was the nand use: plan showing low density rural residential..
' the city's land use plan shows the area. as rural density.. the land .use plan for the city of Bryan does not
reflect a future land use forthe area across 158;.. however, thaf area is being proposed for. annexation
', into Bryan's city limits in-the .near future. preliminary discussions with-the city planner in Bryan would
i indicate that for the time being, Bryan's land use plan will most likely mirror college station's and reflect
- the eastside of 158 from highway 30 o highway60 as rural. residential.. if there is to be any change in
the land use plan within this area, the .planning departments of both cities will likely work together to
coordinafe efforts. at this time, however, there are too. many .high growth areas in both cities that
j demand more immediate attention.
i
from all of this information, i conclude that all of the property .included in the original 46.19 acres is
~ subject to compliance with the city's subdivision regulations, and that final plats will need to be approved
~ before building permits can be issued on those future tots. i also do not believe that staff will be able to
support a rezoning for. additional .commercial zoning.
~ having said all this, i do feel i should inform you of the .city .council's decision last meeting to approve a
' limited commercial rezoning for a tract in the southern-most area of the city, which. request was also. not
in compliance with he comprehensive plan. the council's reasoning, as i saw it, was that the area
~ already has existing commercial uses in the vicinity.
;Sabine McCully . Re_ Re zoning:2.77. Ac_on Hwy 158ao match shop,next._door (S_ ConServ .rents it) ~~ ~~~Page.2.
if you have further questions or would like application .information, please let me know.
»> joyce bell <jbell~acsaamu.edu> 09/29/98 09:47AM »>
Hi Sabine - I got a recording. when, I called so decided to try email
believe our 3.95 Ac (with our shop and house on it) were incorporated into
G.S. in 1980. We paid taxes#hrough 1985 on that 3.95 acreage. In 1986 the
shop, egpt., and 1.18 ac weresold o Barry Pruitt (dba/Pruitt's Welding
Serv). However, he paid on the note to us for several months then fiound
another place. That deed can be found in Vol. 905, P. 0790 and 0793. The
Bryan lJtil. Easement on land that included that 3.95 ac was granted way back
I on Nov. 3, 1938 (Vol. 98, P. 90). A C. S. util. easemenf was granted in
1984 - I don't know if this was the first. (Vole. 297, P. 252). (My notes
were unclear - I'm not sure about that date and ref.)
I
Sabine, i would appreciate any assistance you and your colleagues can give.
me in .order #o re-zone the 2.77 ae to C-2. Even if S-Con Serv. is
prohibited from buying my fand (due to cost of attaining the rigorous
standards set out in the comprehensive plan for C. S.), perhaps l could sell
I~ into someone else in anothertype of business.. if there is anything I can
do or any other information you.. need., .please. let me know. 1 hope. to hear
I~ from. you soon.
~ Thanks.
Joyce Bell
internetjdunn@ci.bryan.tx.us, Jane Kee, Lee Bat...
:.: ,.........::...::
<Shirley,Volk Re: Re zornng 2 77 Ac on Hwy. 1.58 tormatch sho~..next.door.(S ConServ...rents.it)..,,...,,_..,.,..,,,...,.,,,..,. .:.......:::..:...,:age....:::
From: Sabine McCully
To: " jbell~acsaamu.edu"@City of College Station.SMTP
Date: 10/16/98 11s 16AM
Subject: Re: Re-zoning 2.77 Ac on Hwy 158 to match shop next door (S-ConServ. rents it)
dear mrs. bell:
i have finally gotten about. as far as i think i can in researching all. that is available in our records in
deteriming the status of-your property. i have contacted the county courthouse, obtained a copy of
Bryan's land use plan, spoken about the area with Bryan's city planner joey dunn, and obtained a deed
referenced in the rezoning ordinance listed below. from all of this information, i thought i would complile
it in writing so that you may have this information#o add to what you already have regarding the subject
property.
July 1:970 -city of college station adopts subdivision regulations that applied' in the citylimits and within a
one:-mile radius. of the -city (the city's extra-territorial jurisdiction at that time). any partitions that occurred
after;this date should have been legally platted in accordance with the subdivision regulations.
aug. 27, 1971 - a 15.379. acre tract was conveyed to your sole ownership out of a larger 46.19 acre tract
that had been owned jointly by Mildred jape peters. Murphy, tracy peters, and you. this. partition. should
have been accomplished in compliance with the city's subdivision regulations. we have no record of
such subdivision approval any further partitions of the 1.5.379 acre tract were also subject to the
subdivision regulations.
sept. 25, 1980 -ord. no. 1240 annexed all of the area between highway 1.58, highway 30, thee... city limits at
the time, and highway 60 into the city of college station., this annexation included your 15.379 acre tract.
at that time, a welding Business existed on a portion of your tract. it also appears that a single family
home existed on the property as well
jan. 22, 1981 -ord. no. 1262 rezoned the 1.t9 acre tract to c-2 and the same ordinance rezoned a 2.25
acre tract to r-1. The purpose of the rezoning was to allow continuation and expansion of the existing
welding business and to allow the addition of a garage to the home.
nov. 10, 1988 - he city .council denied a rezoning request for m-2 -heavy industrial zoning. the denial
was pursuant to a negative recommendationfrom staff and the planning and zoning commission. the
basis of the recommendation was the land use plan. showing. low density rural residential.
the city's. land use plan shows -the area as rural density. the land use plan for the city of Bryan does not
reflect afuture-land use for the area across-158; however, hat-area is being proposed for annexation
into Bryan's city limits in the near future. preliminary discussions with the city planner in Bryan. would
indicate that for the time being, Bryan's land use plan will most>likely mirror. college station's and reflect
the east side of 1.58 from highway 30 to highway 60 as rural residential. if there is to be any change in
the land use plan within this area, the planning departments of both cities will .likely work together to
coordinate efforts. at this time, :however, there are: too many high: growth areas in both. cities that
demand more immediate attention:.
from all of this information, i conclude that-all of the property included in the original 46.19 acres. is
subject to compliance with the city's subdivision regulations, and'that final plats will need to be approved
before building permits can be issued on those future lots. i alsa do not believe that staff will be able to
support a rezoning for additional commercial zoning.
having said all this, i do feel should inform you of the city council's decision last meeting to .approve a
limited commercial rezoning for a tract in the southern-most area of the city, which request was also not
incompliance with the comprehensive plan. the council's reasoning, as i saw it, was that the area
already has existing commercial uses in the vicinity.
....: . .
Shirley Volk: Re: Re-zoning 2 77 Ac on Hwy 1.58 to match shop next:door{S ConServ rents it) : Page_:2
if you have further questions or would like application information, please let me know.
»> joyce bell <jbell~acs.tamu.edu> 09/29/98 09:47AM »>
Hi Sabine - 1 got a recording when I called so decided to try email
I believe our 3:95 Ac (with our shop and house on it) were incorporated .into.
C.S. in 1.:980. We paid' #axes through,1985 on that 3,95 acreage. In 1986 the
shop, egpt,, and:1.18 ac were sold to Bany Pruitt (dba/Pruitt's Welding
Serv.). However, he paid on the note to us for several months. then found
another place: That deed can be found in Vol. 905,: P. 0790 and 0793. The
Bryan `Util. Easement on land that included that 3:95 ac was granted way back
on Nov. 3, 1938 (Vol. ,98, P.' 90). A C. S. util. easement was granted in
1984 - I don't know if this was the first. (Vol 297, P. 252): (My notes
were unclear - I'm not sure about that date. and ref.)
Sabine,.I would appreciate any assistance you and your colleagues can give
me in order to re-zone the 2.77 ac to C-2. Even if S-Con Serv. is
prohibited from buying-my land (due to cost of attaining the rigorous:
standards set out in the comprehensive plan. for C. S.), .perhaps i couldsell
it to someone else in another type of business. ,If'there. is anything I can
do or any other information you need, please let me know: I hope to hear
from you. soon.
Thanks.
Joyce Bell
CC: internet:jdunn~ci.bryan.tx.us, Jane Kee, Lee Bat...
~wvoicE
__
®^ ^®
,^ ^®
DON BOCKMAN SURVEYS
3832 TEXAS AVE.
BRYAN,TEXAS 77801
713-846-1314
• Mr. Miltofi Bei1
Route 3, Box 53
College Station, TX 77840
Invoice No, 80-163
...Date; December 19, 1980
Authorized by~ Your Project Na Project title
Milton Bell Prepare Rezoning P)at
For survey services .rendered to resurvey the perimeter boundary
of the Joyce Peters Bell 3.335 Acre Tract, J. W. Scott League,
ire '4J , l.U 1 1 CyC J 1. cif ~ o iJ ily v i cs<a:i c.v iaii%~y , cXatJ , riilu 5 Uu.: i V i e.+c: t il%G
2 tracts of 1.1868 and 2.2467 acres, prepare a rezoning .plat
and field note descriptions on each tract, .December 18-19, 1980.
TOTAL DUE:
Thank you.
$ 175.00
$ 175.00
PLEASE PAY ON .INVOICE
V V O ~~
I; f ~
~~~~ `'~ ~
~ ~ ~`~ ~~
GERA /
WINN
LD L
OUNTY
BRAZOS C
199` ~~~~
STATEM-ENT
COUNTY .
TAX ASSESSOR-COLLECTOR
X
EXEMPTIONS :TAXABLE VALUE
RATIO 100 % TA
TAX M.C.
RATE
TAXING JURISDICTIONS 0/65
HOMESTEAD D. PERS D.VET.
62,59
0.4174 261.25
BRAZOS CDUNTY 62,59 1.6440 1.028.98
BRYAN ISD 62,59 0,4293 268.7
COLLEGE STATION CITY
TOTAL DUE UPON RECEIPT 1 , 558.93
NAME/ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION MAKE CHECKS/:MONEY ORDERS
PAYABLE TO:
BELL, JOYCE P A00490i J W SCOTT (ICL), TRAC GERALD L. WINN
PO BOX 6153 28.1 , ACRES 1.18, SITUS : 1806 gSSESSOR-COLLECTOR OF TAXES
BRYAN, TX 77805-6153 FM 158 BRA20S COUNTY
300 E: WILLIAM JOEL BRYAN PKWY
BRYAN, TEXAS 77803
?409) 361-4480 __
MAHICt I vHw~ --
LAND F 1 IMPR. F 1 . R81039
62590 004901-0028-001 6272
11800 50790
SEND PAYMENT STUBS BELOW WITH PAYMENT
KEEP THIS UPPER PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS GENERAL INFORMATION
TAXES ON MINERAL INTEREST ARE NOT PAID BY YOUR MORTGAGE COMPANY.
$ 347 .75 IS THE AMOUNT THAT YOU WOULD HAVE PAID FOR COUNTY TAXES WITHOUT THE SALES TAX ADJUSTMENT.
$ 379.36 IS THE AMOUNT THAT YOU WOULD HAVE PAID FOR CITY TAXES WITHOUT THE SALES TAX ADJUSTMENT.
THIS IS DUE TO THE FACT THAT ANTICIPATED SALES TAX REVENUES WERE DEDUCTED FROM THE PRIOR
YEARS OPERATING REVENUES DERIVED fROM PROPERTY TAXES..
DUE DATES: YOU HAVE FROM OCTOBER 1, 1997 TO JANUARY 31; 1998 TO PAY THE FULL AMOUNT OF YOUR TAXES WITHOUT PENALTY OR
INTEREST. YOU WILL BE CHARGED PENALTY AND INTEREST STARTING FEBRUARY 1, 1998.
SPLIT PAYMENT OPTION: IF HALF OF THE TAXES ARE PAID BY NOVEMBER 30, 1997, THE REMAINING HALF MAY BE PAID WITHOUT PENALTY
OR INTEREST ANY TIME ON OR BEFORE JUNE 30, 1998. THE STUBS AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS STATEMENT SHOW THE HALF PAYMENT AMOUNT.
USE THE STUBS AS FOLLOWS:
STUB NO. 1: FOR FULL PAYMENT; YOU MAY ALSO USE FOR FIRST HALF PAYMENT IF PAID BY NOVEMBER 30, 1997.
STUB N0.2: FOR 2ND HALF PAYMENT ONLY -- IF PAID ON OR BEFORE JUNE 30, 1998.
NOTICE TO PERSONS RECEIVING AN-0VER-65 HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION: IF YOU ARE 65 OR OLDER AND HAVE APPLIED FOR A HOMESTEAC
EXEMPTION, THE SCHOOL' TAXES YOU OWE THIS YEAR MAY BE LESS THAN WOULD BE INDICATED IF YOU WERE SIMPLY TO APPLY THE CURREN-
YEARS TAX RATE TO THE TAXABLE VALUE OF YOUR PROPERTY. THIS IS TRUE DUE TO A PROVISION OF STATE LAW WHICH PROVIDES THAT THr
SCHOOL DISTRICT TAXES ON THE HOMESTEAD PROPERTY OF A PERSON WHO QUALIFIES FORA 66 OR OVER HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION MAY NOT BE
INCREASED ABOVE THE AMOUNT OF TAXES PAID IN THE FIRST YEAR THE EXEMPTION WAS RECEIVED. THE ONLY EXCEPTION TO THIS "TAX FREEZE
OCCURS IN INSTANCES WHERE AN IMPROVEMENT (SUCH AS A NEW ROOM) HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE HOMESTEAD PROPERTY. IN THOSE
INSTANCES THE VALUE OF THE NEW IMPROVEMENTS IS TAXED AT THE CURRENT TAX RATE, AND THE AMOUNT OF TAXES PAID ON THE HOMESTEA[
IS RAISED ACCORDINGLY.
FAILURE TO RECEIVE A TAX NOTICE DOES NOT DISMISS PENALTY AND INTEREST
TAXFC nFITNl~11FNT nN 2/1/9A. ATTnRNEY FEES nF-15% WILL 8E ADDED ON JULY 1. 1998 IF NOT PAID.
BRAZ4S COUNTY 1997 TAX ~TATEMEIVT GERA~~ ~. wiNN
0 TY TAX ASSESSOR COLLECTOR
TAXING JURISDICTIONS EXEMPTIONS TAXABLE VALUE . TAX
BRAZOS COUNTY RoMES7a4D Ot65 D. PERS D.VET.. RATIO 100 % - --RATE TAX M.C.
BRYAN ISD
COLLEGE STATION CITY 15,000 67,87 0.4174
0 283.29
67,87 0.4293 299.3$
NAME/ADDRESS
BELL, JOYCE P
PO BOX 6153
BRYAN, TX 77805-6153
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
TOTAL DUE UPON RECEIPT ~ 1 , 443.8
MAKE 'CHECKS/MONEY ORDERS
PAYABLE TO:
GERALD L. WINN
ASSESSOR-COLLECTOR OF TAXES
BRAZOS COUNTY
300 E. WILLIAM JOEL BRYAN PKWY
BRYAN, TEXAS 77803
1409) 361 -4480
LAND IMPR.
E1 E1 `
A004901 J W SCOTT (ICL), TRAC
28, ACRES 2.77, SITUS: 1900 F
158
L- 23550 44320. ~ R13513
'-- 67870 (:004901-0028-0000( 8271
' KEEP THIS UPPER PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS -'
GENERAL INFORMATION SEND PAYMENT STUBS BELOW WITH PAYMENT
TAXES.. ON MINERAL .INTEREST ARE NOT PAID BY YOUR MORTGAGE COMPANY.
$ 377.09 IS THE AMOUNT THAT YQU WOULD HAVE PAID FOR COUNTY TAXES WITHOUT THE SALES TAX ADJUSTMENT. ''
$ 41 1.36 IS THE AMOUNT THAT YOU WOULD HAVE PAID FOR CITY TAXES. WITHOUT THE SALES TAX ADJUSTMENT.
!I THIS IS DUE TO THE FACT THATgNTICiPATED SALES TAX REVENUES WERE DEDUCTED FROM THE PRIOR
YEARS. OPERATING REVENUES DERIVED FROM PROPERTY TAXES.
DUE DATES: YOU HAVE FROM OCTOBER 1, 1997 TO JANUARY 31, 1998 TO PAY THE FULL AMOUNT OF YOUR TAXES WITHOUT PENALTY OR
INTEREST. YOU WILL BE CHARGED PENALTY AND INTEREST STARTING FEBRUARY 1, 1998.
SPLIT PAYMENT. OPTION: IF HALF OF THE TAXES ARE PAID BY NOVEMBER 30.1997, THE REMAINING HALF MAYBE PAID WITHOUT PENALTY
' OR INTEREST ANY TIME ON OR BEFORE JUNE 30, 1998. THE STUBS AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS STATEMENT SHOW THE HALF PAYMENT AMOUNT.
USE THE STUBS AS FOLLOWS:
STUB NO. 1: FOR FULL PAYMENT; YOU MAY ALSO USE FOR FIRST HALF PAYMENT IF PAID BY NOVEMBER 30, 1997.
STUB N0.2: FOR 2ND HALF PAYMENT ONLY -- IF PAID ON OR BEFOREJUNE 30, 1998.
NOTICE TO PERSONS RECEIVING AN OVER-65 HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION: IF YOU ARE 65 OR .OLDER AND HAVE APPLIED FOR A HOMESTEAD
EXEMPTION, THE SCHOOL. TAXES YOU OWE THIS YEAR MAY BE LESS THAN WOULD BE INDICATED IF YOU WERE .SIMPLY TO APPLY THE CURRENT
.YEARS TAX RATE TO THE TAXABLE VALUE OF YOUR. PROPERTY. THIS IS TRUE DUE TO A PROVISION OF STATE.. LAW WHICH PROVIDES THAT THE
SCHOOL DISTRICT TAXES ON THE HOMESTEAD PROPERTY OF A PERSON WHO QUALIFIES FORA 65 OR OVER HOMESTEAD EXEMPTION MAY NOT BE
~ INCREASED ABOVE THE AMOUNT OF TAXES PAID 1N THE FIRST YEAR THE. EXEMPTION WAS'RECEIVED. THE ONLY EXCEPTION TO' THIS "TAX FREEZE"
(OCCURS IN INSTANCES WHERE AN IMPROVEMENT (SUCH AS A NEW ROOM} HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE .HOMESTEAD PROPERTY, IN THOSE
INSTANCES THE VALUE OF THE NEW IMPROVEMENTS IS TAXED AT THE CURRENT TAX RATE, AND THE AMOUNT OE TAXES PAID ON THE HOMESTEAD
~IS RAISED ACCORDINGLY.
FAILURE TO RECEIVE A TAX NOTICE DOES NOT DISMISS PENALTY AND INTEREST
rnvcc nee T-JAIICPiT nN O/~/qQ pTTf1RNFV FFFc, nF 1S°L WTI_L RF nn~En nN JllLY 1. 1998 IF NOT .PAID.
ZONING DISTRICT INFORMATION SUMMARY
Case #98-119
From R-1 to C-2
Existing R-1 Single Family:
PURPOSE: : This district includes lands
subdivided for single family residential
purposes and .associated uses. This district is
designed to provide sufficient, suitable
residential neighborhoods, protected from
incompatible uses, provided with necessary
facilities and services.
Proposed C-2 Commercial -Industrial:
PURPOSE: This. district is designed to
provide locations for outlets offering goods
and services to a limited segment of the
general public. The uses included primarily
serve other commercial and industrial
enterprises.
PERMITTED USES:
Boarding kennels (public).
PERMITTED USES:
Single family dwellings.
Home occupations.
Carting, crating, express storage.
Farm implement sales (new or used), storage,
repair.
Garden (including greenhouse), for
commercial purposes.
General merchandise warehouse.
Hardware (industrial sales).
Lumber and building material sales and
storage.
Monument sales.
Machine shop.
Sheet metal fabrication shop.
Sign shop (painting, manufacturing).
Trailer and/or accessory equipment sales,
rental, storage or repair.
Welding shop.
Wholesales and service.
Sabine. McCully,-11:16 AM 10f16./.98, Re: Re-zoning 2-,-77--Ac on Hwy 1
Return-Path: <Smccully@ci.college-station.tx.us>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 1998 11::16:51 -0500
From: Sabine McCully <Smccully@ci.college-station.tx.us>
To: jbell@acs.tamu.edu
Cc: jdunn@ci.bxyan.tx.us,JKEE@ci.college-station.tx.us,
LBATTLE@d.college-station.tx.us,
NRUIZ@ci.col.lege-station.tx.us, SVOLK@ci.college-station.tx.us
Subject: Re: Re-zoning 2.77 Ac on Hwy 158 to match shop next door
(S-ConServ. rents it)
Content-Disposition: inline
dear mrs. bell:
i have finally gotten about as far as i think i can in researching all
that is available in our records in deteriming the status of your
property. i have contacted the county courthouse, obtained a copy of
Bryan's land use plan, spoken about the area wit
h Bryan°s city planner Joey dunn, and obtained a deed referenced in
the rezoning ordinance listed below. from all of this information, i
thought i would complile it in writing so that you may have this
information to add to what you .already have regardi
ng the subject property.
July 1970 - city of college station adopts subdivision regulations
that applied in the city limits and within a one-mile radius of the
city (the city's extra-territorial jurisdiction at that time). any
partitions that occurred after this date should have
been legally platted in accordance with the. subdivision regulations.
aug. 27, 1971 - a 15.379 acre tract was conveyed to your sole
ownership out of a larger 46.19 acre tract that had been owned jointly
by mildred Jane peters murphy, tracy peters, and you. this partition
should have been accomplished in compliance with th
e city's subdivision regulations. we have no .record of such
subdivision approval. any further partitions of the 15.379 acre tract
were also subject to the subdivision regulations.
sept. 25, 1980 - ord.. no. 1240 annexed all of the area between highway
158, highway 30, the city limits at the time., and highway 60 into the
city of college station.. this annexation included your 15.379. acre
tract. at that time, a welding business exist
ed on a portion of your tract. it also appears that a single family
home existed on the property as well.
Jan. 22, 1981 - ord. no, 1262 rezoned the 1.19 acre tract to c-2 and
the same ordinance rezoned a 2.25 acre tract to r-l. The purpose of
the rezoning was to allow continuation and expansion of the existing
.welding business and to allow-the addition of a
garage to the home.
Printed for Joyce bell <jbell@acs.tamu.edu> 1
Sabine McCully, 11:16 AM 10/16/98, Re: Re-zoning 2.77_Ac on Hwy 1
nov. 10, 1988 - the city council denied a rezoning request for m-2
heavy industrial zoning,.... the denial was pursuant to a negative
recommendation from staff and the planning and zoning commission. the
basis of the recommendation was the land use plan sho
wing low density rural residential.
the city's. land use plan. shows the area as rural density. the land
use plan for the city of bryan does not reflect a future land use for
the area. across 158; however, that area is being proposed for
annexation into Bryan's city limits in the near future.
preliminary discussions with the city planner in Bryan would
indicate that for the time being, Bryan's land use plan will most
likely mirror college station's and reflect the east side of 158 from
highway 30 to highway 60 as rural residential. if there
is to be any change in the land use plan within this area, the
planning departments of both cities will likely work together to
coordinate efforts. at this time, however, there are too many high
growth areas in both cities that demand more immediate att
ention.
from all of this information, i conclude that .all of the property
included in the original 46.19 acres is subject to compliance with the
city's subdivision regulations, and that final plats will need to be
approved before building permits can be issued on
those future lots. i also do not believe that staff will be able to
support a rezoning for additional commercial zoning.
having said all this, i
council's decision last
rezoning for a tract in
request was also not in
n. the council's reaso
has existing commercial
do feel i should inform you of the city
meeting to approve a limited commercial
the southern-most area of the city, which
compliance with the comprehensive pla
Wing, as i saw it, was that the area already
uses in the vicinity.
if you have further questions or would like application information,
please let me know.
»> Joyce bell <jbell@acs.tamu.edu> 09/29/98 09:47AM »>
Hi Sabine - I got a recording when I called so decided to try email.
I believe our 3.95 Ac (with our shop. and house on it) were
incorporated into
C.S. in 1980. We paid taxes through 1985 on that 3.95 acreage. In
1986 the
shop, egpt., and 1.18 ac were sold to Barry Pruitt (dba/Pruitt's
Welding
Serv.) However, he paid on the-note to us for several months then
Printed for Joyce bell <jbell@acs.tamu.edu> 2
a
Sabine McCully, 11:16 AM 10/16/98, Re: Re-zoning 2.77.Ac on Hwy 1
found
another place. That. deed .can be found in Vol. 905, P. 0790 and 0793.
The
Bryan Util. Easement on land that included that 3.95 ac was granted
way back
on Nov. 3, 1938 (Vol.. 98, P,. 90). A C. S. util. easement was granted
in
1984 - I don't know if this was the first. (Vol. 297, P. 252). (My
notes
were unclear - I'm not sure about that date and ref.)
Sabine, I would:. appreciate any assistance you and your colleagues can
give
me in order to re-zone the 2.77 ac to C-2. Even if S-Con Serv. is
prohibited from buying my land (due to cost of attaining the rigorous
standards set out in the comprehensive plan for C. S.), perhaps I
could sell
it to someone else in another type of business. If there is anything
I can
do or any other information you need, please let me know. I hope to
hear
from you soon.
Thanks.
Joyce Bell
Printed for joyce bell <jbell@acs . tamu. edu> ___ _~
smccully@ci college, 11:23 AM 10/28/98, Rezoning ac. on Hwy 158 to
I
To: smccully@ei.college-station.tx.us
From: Joyce bell <jbell@acs.tamu.edu>
Subject: Rezoning ac. on Hwy 158 to, match shop
Cc.
Bcc:
X-Attachments:
Thanks for your email on Oct. 20 and your further research. (When I
talked to Joyce Devaney Sunday, she said she met with the C.S. planner
before she bought our property in 1972 and was told that land would
never be in the city limits!) We-sold 11.424 ac. to Joyce Devaney in
May of 1972, so the property should be legally exempt from platting. I
have a copy of the deed and tax roll showing the transaction.
I talked to Richard Creel (S-Con Services) and he said that Wickson
Water has indicated that a fire hydrant can be installed at that
location. He will meet today with-Green Smith (his partner) and
discuss the situation further. I think they are preparing plans for
the proposed shop to submit with the application, or will do so.
Now - all we need is for your committee and the council to allow it!
Thanks again, Sabine, for all your help.
Joyce Bell
Printed for Joyce bell <jbell@acs.tamu.edu> 1
__
98-119 98-119
Robert H. Conaway Joyce P. Bell
P,O. Box 3363 P.O. Box 6153
Bryan, Texas 77805 Bryan, Texas 77805-6153
98-119
Joyce Devaney Living Trust
1278 CR-Ak
Melrose, NM 88124-9429
ZOlvING DISTRICT INFORMATION SUMMARY
Case #98-119
From R-1 to C-2
Existing R-1 Single. Family:
Proposed C-2 Commercial -Industrial:
PURPOSE: This district includes lands
subdivided for single family .residential
purposes and associated uses. This district is
designed to provide sufficient, suitable
residential neighborhoods, protected from
incompatible uses, provided with necessary
facilities and services.
PERMITTED USES:
Single family dwellings..
Home occupations.
PURPOSE: This district is designed to
provide locations for outlets offering goods
and services to a limited segment of the
general. public. The uses included primarily
serve other commercial and industrial
enterprises.
PERMTTED USES:
Boarding kennels (public).
Carting, crating, express storage.
Farm implement sales {new or used), storage,
repair.
Garden (including greenhouse), for
commercial purposes.
General merchandise warehouse.
Hardware. (industrial sales).
Lumber and building material sales and
storage.
Monument sales.
Machine shop.
Sheet metal fabrication shop.
Sign shop. (painting, manufacturing).
Trailer and/or accessory equipment sales,
rental, storage or repair.
Welding shop.
Wholesales and service.
i
On-site Sewage Facility
t
~ 'From Julie Anderson with Brazos County Health Department, septic system would not be
~ allowed due to high ground water, however an aerobic/ surface application treatment system
would be allowed.
• Based upon preliminary parking requirements and proposed buildings, it appears that sufficient area
is available for surface application.
Water
• From Kent Watson with Wickson Creek Special Utility Districf, the available fire flow is about
750gpm.
'~ • Required fire flow is approximately 1250 gpm.
!, • Jon Mies would be supportive of a variance provided all buildings are sprinkled and fire hydrant is
provided for the.. site.
01/13/99 08:39 $409 361 3759 PLANNING SERVICE 1~j002/006
~,-
~YA~
PB~Z ~ TExAs
STAFF REp~RT Rezoning Request, RZ98-16
CASE SUM~VIARY
CASE: Reaoning from `AO' Agricultural Open to `PD-M'
Planned Development -Mixed Use
DATE OF REPORT: November 5, 1998
P&Z MEETING DATE; November 19, 1998
STAFF CONTACT: Joey Dunn
SITE DATA:
OWNER{S}; Bryan Development, Ltd. /
Bryan Parks Investments, Ltd.
APPLICANT: William J. Lero
SITE LOCATION: "Park Hudson" - a 3 51.933-acre tract at the SW
corner of FM 158 and FM b0 (University Dr. East)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Richard Carter Survey, A-8
J,W. Scott Survey, A 49
SIZE OF PROPERTY: 351.433 acres
ZONING & EXISTING LAND USE;
Subject Site: `AO' Agricultural Open; vacant
Northwest: `SF-5' Single Fanily~ Tiffany Park Subdivision- Bowen
Elementary School
Northeast: (across FM 158} `AO' Agricultural Open! `R' Retail;
lamely vacant, with 2 existing homes (one of which is
being redeveloped as a restaurant)
Southeast: (across FM 60} College Station City Limits; TAMU
.property, City of College Station's future site for
regional athletic center
Southwest: College Station City Limits; vacant
ANALYSES OF ISSUES
BACKGROUND
Earlier this year, the Bryan-College Station Economic Development Foundation
secured a letter of intent from DecisionOne, Inc. to locate a 70,000 square foot
building on a ten acre tract within the subject property. This project will be a
computer service call center with approximately 500 employees and a gross annual
payroll of approximately twelve million dollars.
The City Council has taken action on two items relative to this project:
9!08!98 Page 1 SR-RZ98-I6
01/13/99 08:39 $~09 361 3759
PLANNING SERVICE 1~j003/006
1. On September 8, 1998, the City Council approved an incentive package for
DecisionOne to locate within the 351-acre subject property, now referred by
the developer as `mark Hudson".
2. On October 27, 1998, the City Council approved a request from Bryan
Development Ltd.. far payment of costs associated with the extension of
Copperfield Drive from Bowen Elementary School to University Drive East
(FM 6U}. 'The Council approved the request in the aznaunt of approximately
$2,300,000.00 in order to induce industrial development in this area.
CURRENT REQUEST
Since the Decision4ne project was introduced, the applicant has investigated and is in
negotiateon for several other possible uses. for this property.. The Brazos Valley
Physicians' Organization (BVPO} has indicated an interest in locating an out-patient
or "day surgery" hospital at the southwest corner of University and the future
extension of Copperfield Drive. Other uses have also been considered, including
se~gle family residential, multifamily, commercial, retail, industrial,
wazehouse/dstribution, and a church.
Therefore, in order to .prepare the subject property for a mix of uses, the applicant
requests a, rezoning from `A O' Agncultural Open to `PD-M' Planned Development -
Mixed Ilse. (refer to development plan}. The proposed plan reflects a general
arrangement of commercial uses along; University Drive, with oi~ce and residential
uses along the Copperfield Drive extension.
In order to provide flexibility for the particulaz needs of each individual property
within thee. development, the applicant offers the following table of land use ratios for
this request:
Land Use Category Maximum Acreage Maximam Percent of
Total Acrea e
Residential 70 acres 20%
MnItifainil 25 acres ~%
Medical ' 40 acres i 1%
Office Buldn SO acres. 23%
Commercial '75 acres 21%
Retail 75 acres 21%
Industrial'' 30 acres 8°I°
Warehouse /Distribution 80 acres 23%
Church 40 acres 11
Normal development standards for the respective zoning districts (including buffering
requirements} would apply as each individual property develops.
9/08!98 Page 2 SR RZ98-16
No special circumstances have been identified which would cause other similarly
classified property unavailable for development.
D. The recent rate at which land is being developed in the same zoning classifrcation
as the request; particularly in the vicinity of the proposed change.
This project is viewed as a catalyst far business park development in this area
Bryan. It is also intended to tie ijn to other recent and anticipated developments in
the azea, .including the Copperfiield, Wheeler Ridge, and Tiffany Park subdivisions,
and the future College Station Regional Athletic Center to the south.
E. How other areas designated for similar development will be, or are unlikely to be
affected if the proposed amendment is approved; and whether Batch designation for
other areas should be modified also.
As stated above, this request is intended to tie in with existing and proposed
developments in the immediate area.
F. Any other fuctors a,,~fecting health, safety, morals, or general welfare.
There aze no other factors identified at this time, which would substantially affect
the health, safety, morals, or general welfare.
9108/98 Page 3 SR-RZ98-I6
01/13/99 08:40 $409 361 3759 PLANNING SERVICE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The proposed. development plan is largely in accordance with the current land use
plan, which reflects commercial and medium to .high density residential along
University. Drive south of Hudson Creep and low density residential to the interior,
north of Hudson Creek. As the current plan reflects, Hudson Creek will remain to
serve as a natural butFer between commercial uses along University Drive and
residential uses along Copperfieid. Hudson Creek will also be utilized for possible
pedestrian'walkways and passive recreation.
CITY OF BRYAN ENDS STATEMENTS:
2. The economic life of the community is stable and growing appropriately.
2.1 There is an adequate employment base.
2.1.1 Citizens aze employable.
2.1.2 Worl~orce is :employed.
2.1.3 There are adequate business opportunities to meet the employment needs.
2.2 There is a diverse recession. proof economy.
2.2.1 There is an appropriate mix of small, medium and large businesses.
2.2.2 There is diversity in the types of businesses/industries.
2.2.3 Products aze high quality and innovative.
2.2.4 Businesses can compete globally.
2.3 There is a dynamic, positive.. business climate.
2.3.1 The economic climate is favorable to businesses.
2.3.2 Businesses flourish.
2.3.3 The economic climate is responsive to the changing needs of businesses.
2.3.4 The economic climate is responsive to the changing needs of citizens_
2.3.5 There is growth in'the economy.
2.3.6 Businesses contribute to the community.
2.3.7 Businesses collaborate.
2.3.8 Businesses are innovative, lrnowledge-based and idea-based.
RESPONSES TO NOTIFICATION: None received at time of this report. Responses
from property notifications will be presented at the l~Iovember 19, 1998 public
hearing.
STAFF RECOMIVIENDATION: Staff recommends approval of this request, with the
condition that each property within the .development meet the appropriate bufFering
and other development standazds within each normal zoning designation.
f~j 004/006
9/08!98 Page 4 SR-RZ98-lb
01/13/99 08:0 $~09 361 3759 PLANNING SER~lICE
-
-
-
j~` _ /
i'
LaoA Ux Hatfoa ~ rnaal[~cw.
/ ~~ -
rLand Uee I14a~IntPm Maximum I -
/
~ Caw~ory Acreage ~ SL oF7ola1 / i
-~ .. AeretRo ~ /- / r ~
' Resideminl _ 7{~ LL'[47 ,! ,,,, ?0:'r6 _ .~ / / ! ~
MuiliCamii ~ S aSf4Y 7°/a _ /
Muhcnl _ a{~ i~tKp ~ 1 I% - r~ 1 ~ r
~OrGGG ~ ~ 6b LCiCB ..~ -..3q6....~ ~~ r ~
=-• --
~Cwnrocn;ial 75 nem 21°ro ~ I ~ ~ I _ ~
~ ~. _. .. ,.-t...,-...- ., i l ~ ~,__.
IIRgail _......7514_ny _. 21%..._. . J ~ -_.~----'~~,'t~~
1~rlduyVinl ttlacte8.--{-•' fee ! // ~~~
1-._.
Wacrhaux/ >ltlaatee ^_3% - i~~~>~~
~U1SttiDWiun `` ~ "' -~~-1~~~ C
.,.,
. _ , ,....
Church ~ 1.so n.res . . t 1% . ~' ~. - ~ ~
~~ ~ -~
' ~
- _ ~.>~ `~~~ MwR[~IUL1eU016t1t16UTlOlI I 1
_ u +.sanop. ~~±5)
~., i '~~ ~ 1\~Jll
~ ~~ ~ 1 ._w
1 "~1 \ i \\\\~ `
J ~~~i~ ^T 'l' i ice, f ~ `,~
\ <C,~ ,~ , •,~Y \
~ z { <
\ ~\J~ ~ ~ r
~\
., ~
~,~ ~\ S
~~ /
/ \~~\\ slncL[ P,ralLtr \\\
• ~~
,(
~~' ---
~\` LI !1
t
~~ ~ ~"
l~
i ~
` 1~ i
! ~
coMrlRllcul• 1 4
~ :~ ~ {l
7 ~
1 1 / i
i
~' i
/~- ~ ..a
ll '
k
i
i
f
t
4~
~~
I
I
t
I
1
E ~ na,y.~>ar~~.
n~a ~
r/ ~ ~~
~!-0w y/ !
r ~ ~
/~ ~ ~ ~~ COMMEIICIaL
~,~~ ~
;~ " ~
t
coet~[acl.L j
~ ~
I
~,.._ ... ...... _.. i
t ~'
~ ~'~_'/ i ~...
Z
r
..,
yt~ n ~ t
~ :~ I
,; l t
,' 1
~~ l
t
'/-- OYPICF7- ~
MI1LTIp,Vyyy Q
i ~\
1
I
' ~~ \
OFilC-yyULTIPAMILY
,1 ~~ ~.
~~ ;
51NGLL P.~si1LY
til
It
``, ~ 11
i ~ ~ -t
ii
' r~
t- I r
v
~['~•~_
.~~
Oath 3S•xl
~Rl<11or1 hRf°f Arm /me~~'ro3
i 1
r
1 1
I ,_,_
f r--__._..__ _,_._.._
r l'
! I
l
1
~r17b F1~1 t~ ScIP~IC. f 1~' MH+{F~es•~h., ;,
•rr~ Jrrnlcrr- ~r r~r ~r>Y r~.tun'r->
/rSr RT74 CCD 9tGSrRE4rL 43~
GyJ11rc7gEi}{q,. F11SlR` ~.
~ 005/006
01/13/99 08:40 $409 361 3759 PLANNING SERVICE 1~j006/006
REZON1NCr CRITERIA
When considering rezoning requests, Section 30.6 of the Zoning Ordinance requires
the Cornmissior- to consider the following factors:
A. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed, change will be appropriate in the
immediate area concerned; relationship to general area and the City as a whole.
Staff. contends that the uses permitted by the proposed change will be appropriate
inthe immediate area concerned and to the City as a whole.
B. Whether the proposed change is in accord with arty existing or proposed plans fvr
providing public schools, streets, water supply, sanitary sewers, acrd other utilities
to the area and shall note the findings.
As stated above, the City Council. has approved city participation in the extension
of Copperfield Drive in order.. to induce development in this area. The Texas
Department of Transportation also.. anticipates a Phase II widening of FM158 along
the northeast portion of this property, which would also include utility extensions.
C. The amount of vacant land currently classified for similar development in the
vicinity and elsewhere in the City,. and. arty special circumstances which may make
a substantial prnt of such vacant land unavailable for development.
No special circumstances have been identified which would cause other similarly
classified property unavailable for development.
D. ,The recent rate at which land is being developed in the same zoning class cation
as the request; particularly in the vicinity of the proposed change.
This project is viewed as a catalyst for business park development in this area
Bryan. It is also intended to tie in to other recent and anticipated developments in
the area, including the Copperfield, Wheeler Ridge, and Tiffany Park subdivisions,
and the future College Station Regional Athletic Center to the south.
E. Haw other areas designated fvr similarr development will be, or are unlikely to be
affected if the ,proposed amendment is approved, and whether such designation for
other areas should be madif~ed also
As stated above, this request is intended to tie in with existing and proposed
developments in the immediate area.
F. Any other factors a,~ecting health, safety, r-iorals, or general tive fare.
There are no other factors identified at this time, which would substantially affect
the health, safety, morals, or general welfaze.
4/Q8/98 Page 3 SR-RZ98-16
On-site Sewage Facility
From Julie Anderson with Brazos County Health Department, septic system would not be
allowed due to high ground water, however an aerobic/ surface application treatment system
would be allowed.
• Based upon preliminary parking requirements and proposedbuildings, it appears that sufficient area
is available for surface. application.
Water
• From Kent Watson with Wickson Creek. Special Utility District, the available fire flow is about
750gpm.
Required fire flow. is approximately 1250 gpm.
® Jon Mies would be supportive of a variance provided all buildings are sprinkled and fire hydrant. is
provided forthe -site.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
~~~ ,
FROM: SabineM`Cully, Senior Planner"
DATE: January 12,.1999
RE: Reconsideration. of 158 rezoning from R-1 to C-2
At the December 3 meeting, the Conunission tabled this item in order to give the applicant .and
Staff time to answer unresolved issues regarding water and septic/sewer availability to the subject
site. Although it is not possible to give: definitive answers to these. questions without a complete
plan submittal, Staff has-gathered the following information:.
Gravity-sewer vs. on-site: sewage. facility
Due to the fact that the property is grandfathered from subdivision regulations unless further
lot divisions take place, both the subject property and the C-2 zoned welding shop facility to
the north will not be required to have public sewer extended to and through the properties.
Therefore, the.-uses may be served by one or more septic. systems if all Brazos .County .Health
.Department requirements are. met. Based upon preliminary parking requirements and proposed
buildings, it appears.. that sufficient area is available: for an "aerobic/surface application
treatment" system. According the Health .Department, :the high ground water present on the
site willprevent the more traditional`"septic system".
Water for fire protection,purposes
Again, no public water line is required to extend to and through the: property due to its legal
nonconforming: exemption from Subdivision. Regulations. However, fire .protection
requirements still need to be met for all new structures in the City limits. Information from
Wickson Creek Special Utility District that owns the existing water line. shows that the
available fire flow is below City of College Station:. standards. Therefore the applicant. will
need to be granted a variance before proceeding with :expansion plans. The Fire Marshal has
indicated that. he would recommend approval of such a variance if all buildings are sprinkled
.and if a fire hydrant is installed.
The above information covers. only the specificuse and magnitude as presented by the applicant.
For purposes of a rezoning, 'the entire range of potential uses and their impacts to existing
infrastructure and existing/future land uses in the area should be considered. The Staff report for
this item is therefore also included in your packet for reconsideration of this item.
attachments: 1. Staff report w/ its attachments 2. PnZ minutes 12-3-98
98-119b 98-119b 98-119b
Robert H. Conaway Joyce P. Bell Joyce Devaney Living Trust
P.O. Box 3363 P.O. Box 6153 1278 CR Ak
Bryan, Texas 77805 Bryan, Texas 77805-6153 Melrose, NM 88124-9429
QCT-16-9$ FRI 10:?6 AID C~-O~U~I~~T~Y-C~I.~E~R~k~B~ Fnx ISO, 361125 P, 1
1 ~ ~ r
300 East 26th Stzeet
B ty~.a, .Texas 7780 3
FAX NUME3ER { 409) 361.-41?.5
FA:X TRAI~iSM1T.CAL
TO:
COMPANY: ,.
~1ZOM: ~
DEPARTMENT:
Pk~ONE; ~~P ~ ~" ~TT
Total no. pages;
~~ ';
>;
ti~ .
.a
~i
4• •.
$}'
~'
~`~
~~;
r`
-; ~ ~~~;
~~~ C`-,
- ~ ~ ~-.J
\~
(~~
~ ", `\ ' ,.
~. f
JI~~~ ~ _~
.~- ~~ 11 ~
^ Applicadon `~ ~ ~
-~. ~f.
D Property Survey/Plat - ~ 1 .
~. ~ ---
^ Location Map - _ ~ `~'
~~ ~5
o Piz ad ~ ..
~:{
:,
p Council Ad ?~ ~ ~} ~~
' ;~ t;
^ No#ification Letter ~ Llst ~~`, "'~
~ ~~~
y ~ ~~.
D Certificates of ~~g t .
1
^ 8#aff Rcport
~ ~ ~,
Q PdcZ il~iinu#em ~.__~ 4„
~~
e;;:
^ Council Cover Sheet ~, ~ ~~ y ,3
^ Council Minutes ~ t
Signed OrdinaACe ~ ~~. ~ ~~ ~ ,;
a ~ ~ ~~
~ ~~
~.
~~
~~
.~~
~:
>~~,~
~~
,4h ` ~
1 l`A
£Yn ~-
Q ~ I ~~ • ~ O
J
a ~ ~~ ~ .~ ~
w ~~ G ° ~
CJ ~I 'u f(\ \~
~i
~ ~I ff~ •\
h ~
H ~ ~ \ 1
W
N
a ~ ~. o Dd
4
!^
~ ~ ~ ° ~'°
~ ,, ")
a
N
NF
W
VO
<o j ~ ~M
~ i
W ~ ~„ ~ Q,
Ii
!~
~~ {~ O ~ v
W O
VJ v
a~
0.1
N ~ ~I ~ ~
a
~S o ~I
O ~) •,,\
•,
c ,~`~
T ~.. o -
~ ~I ,v '~ ~ ~ ~~ ~
c
O ~ ~ ~ ~.~
W~ ~
0
'~ V \ V
^a
~.
W ~ ~ ~, 1
ai G ~
I p Z > I ~y
Q ~ ~
N \
O
xo
_. 0
h 1
W. ~ .- t
0 i ~ ' ^.• -
v
~ I ~ ~ ~ I ~
o
ay,;... ..E.v.._'S;~'^~L 1:~~~ ,~' a.'. ;t; rT... ~u r,n C4-.v'F~a~. c:~i ~;3~L ar.`~~ __ ~ ~_~ ;~r'a =~c?~, s?~7 t',.
~.
O
V
DO
\.
~>
v'
~..
lY
v
\(\`~~v
`.1
.'~'
?J~,~ `~4
C }~' ~ 'e f!' t rt} 5~ ~ NK~ Yb n'+'~`!~~'~ .~ ~ rte` ~~~:: L'~Ft "~~': w'. ~j Y
~f rp
,
~{~ ~' ` Y t W }, J vFiA'.M1 ~ ~14r
_
,~ `
I
?
wo ~
i
~..~ i I
as ~ ~ i
0
W'
7 '
-
~ ...~,
~'o. D .
,MV ,
Q t\\
~ JJJ
^ _'
I~
O
~. ~
v Cn
~6.
1
o
- N;
c`
v. 4,
o m
J ")
\l
~~,
..ew«~5A1,i1~4Sl~N~d`~i'G1~f~JS$11.31:~.~1~i6 "~:•=.r•~u fop''yut;a~S'~cn'~bk~aitti:,ik'..:bl:~~: •-.. -•
VNPII ~' `` ~ `~ `~ 1
` ___.
o ~ ~ ~ '`, I
__ _ _ _ _
_O. O ~ ~ ~
~. ~~
_ : . _ ~. ~
__._ ~ ~ C~
1~
~ N
•
N
.r-~ ~-
j ~ V,.~ ~l ~. -,
i
O - ~ ,~;
.~
Z \~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~~
it = o. ~~ ~ c ~ ~~!~ C
v ~° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ <
\ ~.
0 V
._.
... .
.-.
_._..
. .
J _ V . _..
.. ._ __ _
d :..
_ . ~~ ~ __.
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~~
~ ~~
v~ Q a o °o . .
N C ~ ~ C
v0= ~' ..
~ N
.~ ~'
,~
,_ ~~ ~~
~~ o ~ _ - ~ ~
~ ,
o Q .4
1.
V' V
~ 3 ~ ~ ~ 1
Q Z ~ m ~ ~ ~\~~ s
.~~~ ~
.. ~~~
~ ,
. .
~~~ ~ ~~~
i ~