HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous
SANITARY SEWER IMPACT STUDY
for
Bert Wheelers Inc. 8.471 & 4.242 Acre Tracts
Richard Carter Survey, A-8
College Station, Brazos County, Texas
August 7, 1997
PURPOSE:
The subject property for this report is. the Bert Wheelers Inc. 8.471 and 4.242 acre
tracts located on the southwest and southeast comers of the University.and Lincoln drive
intersection. The purpose of this report is to investigate existing sanitary sewer lines within
and downstream of the area in light of proposed development of the two tracts and to suggest
modification (revitalization) to the system to provide adequate sanitary sewage flow
collection. This is not a comprehensive system analysis and only accounts for impact on the
existing sanitary sewer system due to the development of the subject tracts.
This study is being conducted at the request of Bert Wheelers, Inc., current owner of
the tracts, as a condition for the rezoning of the tracts approved by City of College Station
Planning &. Zoning Commission April 17, 1997. Current development plans for the two tracts
are conceptual in nature and th~refore the most intense landuse for individual zoning districts
will be used in the analysis.
SITE DESCRIPTION:
The study area consists of a total of 12.713 acres lying south arid adjacent to F.M. 60,
University Drive, at its intersection with Lincoln Drive (see Appendix 1, "General Location").
CurrentZoning for the 8.471 acre tract is C-B Business Commercial and for the 4.242 acre
tract iSI\-P Administrative Professional. Currently there is no developed land 'use and the
tracts are vacant.
PROPOSED USAGE:
'*
There is not a specific use proposed for the 8.471 acre tract. The most intense use for
C-B zoning is considered Hotel/motel. The 4.242 acre tract has two scenarios for proposed
usage. ... The first, Scenario A. is to have the entire tract operating under A-P Administrative
Professicmal.. The second, Scenario B is for 1.738 acres of the tract to operate under A-P
zoninga,nd the remaining 2.504 acres operate under C-B zoning. . Currently, steps are being
taken bYitheowner to gain City approval for Scenario B. Under this option, proposed usage
would be. as follows:
Table 1
Area Zoning Usage Size
,
1.738 acres A-P MIXed Office 15,000 sf
2.504 acres C-8 Extended Stay Hotel 95 rooms
(See Appendix 2, "Proposed Usage" for graphical representation.)
.. -:I
~ '-
EXISTING CONDITIONS SANITARY SEWER LfNE ANALYSIS:
r<ccc"\
'\
The City of College Station Engineering Department provided information conceming\"zL-/)
existing conditions for the sanitary sewer collection system serving the subject tracts. Lines
are described from manhole to manhole as shown in Exhibit A, "Existing Conditions" found in
Appendix 3, "Existing Sanitary Sewer System". The system analysis for this project begins at
a manhole located at the northeast comer of the 4.242 acre tract designated as M030A and
terminates at manhole M00110cated near the College Station City Limits line (see Appendix
3). Limited capacity exists in the current system. Line segments and limiting capacities are
summarized in the following table.
END MANHOLES UNESIZE SLOPE QFUU. REMAINING CAPACITY
(in) ( ftIft) (gpm) (gpm)
M030A-M018 8 0.003 312.0 292.03
(a~umed) .
M018-M024 8 0.004 345.6 197.47
M024-M025 8 0.0039 341.1 193.98
M025-M029 8 0.0116 583.5 457.78
M029-M021- 8 0.0032 309.7 89.76
M021-M017 8 0.0071 457.8 251.33
M017-M013. 8 0.004 345.6 125.66
M013-M010. 8 0.0039 341.1 125.66
M010-M00S.. 8 0.0021 251.3 22.44
M008-M007 12 0.0074 471.3 260.30
M007-M005 12 0.0056 1207.4 1059.17
M005-M0308 12 0.0033 929.1 758047
t
M030B-M003 12 0.0018 691.2 502.66 ~
M003-M001 12 0.0016 650.8 457.78
M001-M027 18 0.002 214504 700.13
Table 2
(Information provided by Cij}t~f 9()lIegeStcltion, Engineering Dept.)
r Indicates line capacity eXG~ed~(ifunder Scenario B) .
\* Indicates line capacity. eXGe.ed~d under S. cenarios A & 8)
. .. .... :1,. ...
Line M030A-M018 had inaccurat~ ia~~uilt infomiation and time constraints prevented field
verification of line slope and flo'J{Ul'ler... A minimal slope of 0.3% was assumed for this line
and existing flow calculated per T~~(J;Cdesign standards (see Appendix 3 fOE line capacity
and existing flow calculations). . . .
- '-
PROPOSED CONDITIONS SANITARY SEWER LfNE ANALYSIS:
DESIGN PARAMETERS:
Design flows are based on comparable usage for like zoned properties. In the
absence of a proposed use, the most intense use for a zoning district will be used. The
following table describes these design parameters (see Appendix 4, "Design Parameters").
Table 3
COMPARABLE COMPARABLE PEAKING COMPARABLE
ZONING AVE. FLOW PEAK FLOW
USAGE (gpd)/ac FACTOR (gpd / gpm)/ac
A-P AdminlProf Mixed Office 412. 4.5 1854/1.3
C-B BuslComm Hotel 4382. 4.5 19719/13.7
rFlow from comparable land use provided by City of College Station, Engineering Department)
Under Scenario B for the 2.42 acre tract, design flows have been calculated as follows:
Mixed Office:
2.2 gpm - peak flow
As per A-P zoning shown in Table 3
1.3 gpmlac * 1.738 ac
Extended Stay
Hotel:
59.4 gpm - peak flow
Assumption: Patrons of extended stay hotel have daily
sanitary sewer usage rate equal to a private
. residents. 2 Occupants per room.
Usage: 100 gpdlperson = 0.0694 gpmlperson (ref. TNRCC
.Rules, ch 317, fig. 317.4(a).
Peaking Factor: 4.5
;
0---, JI"
<: .' ,-:-' I~ r
G '-- .... ~ ".; \ :.
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED FLOWRA TES:
'*
Table 4
TRACT ZONING PEAK FLOW
(gpm)
8.741 acres C-8 BuslComm ,',.', ,: A- (~:::"116.0
4242 acrel? Scenario A A-P AdminlProf - 5.5
. . ~ ... ....- ~ . ,
4242 acres Scenario B 1.738 ac A-P + 2.504 ac C-8 22 + 59.4 = 61.6
TOTAL SCENARIO A 121.5
.
TOTAL SCENARIO B .11Z&
-
-.
r
/. ,
.. .. (see Appendix 4, "Design Parameters" for calculation)
~~
SYSTEM ACCEPTABILITY:
The extreme limiting line capacity for the existing sanitary sewer system is 22.4 gpm
occurring in line M010-M008 with the second most limiting capacity being 89.8 gpm in line
M029-M021. Capacity of the system is exceeded under both development scenarios.
Portions of the existing line wt/lneed to be reworked to accommodate the increased sewer
demand. Scenario A exceeds capacity of the existing system along two sections of line
(M029-M021 & M010-M008) and nears full flow capacity along two other sections (M017 _ '.
M013 & M013-M01 0). Scenario B exCeeds capacity of the system along the entire route from
M029 to MOOB (see Exhibit B "Existing System Inadequacy" in Appendix 3 and Table 5 below
for summary). Revitalization of the system is required prior to any development Causing an
increase in peak sanitary sewer flow greater than 22~4 gpm.
UNESIZE QFUU. REMAINING CAPACITY REMAINING CAPACITY
END MANHOLES SCENARIO A SCENARIO 8
(in) (gpm) (gpm I %) (gpm 1%)
M030A-M018 8 312.0 286.5/92% 230.4/74%
.
M018-M024 8 345.6 76.0/22% 19.9/6%
M024-M025 8 341.1 72.5/21% 16.4/5%
M025-M029 8 583.5 336.3/58% 280.2/48%
M029-M021 8 309.7 -10% -/0%
M021-M017 8 457.8 129.8/28% 73.7 /16%
M017-M013 8 345.6 4.2/1% -/0%
M013-M010 8 341.1 4.16/1% -/0%
M010-M008 8 251.3 -/0% -/0%
M008-M007 12 471.3 138.8 /29% 82.7/18%
M007-M005 12 1207.4 937.7/78% 881.6/73%
M005-M030B 12 929.1 637.0/68% 580.9/62%
M0308-M003 12 691.2 381.2/55% 325.1/47%
M003-M001 12 650.8 336.28152% 280.2143%
MOO 1-M027 18 2145.4 578.6/27% 522.53/24%
Table 5
~ ~
PROPOSED SYSTEM REVITALIZATION:
Using the development scenarios set forth in this report, proposed system
revitalization will be discussed and cost estimates of the improvements provided.
SCENARIO A: Total increase in peak sanitary sewer flow due to this scenario is
calculated to be 121.5 gpm. Using the given existing capacities within the system,
line sections M010-M008 & M029-M021 are exceeded. Suggested improvements' to
the system consist of the fOllowing:
A. 1) J'nstall a 10" line on a minimum 0.33% slope from manhole M029 to
M008 accommodating all of the increased flow as well as existing flow.
Capacity of new line -667.5gpm minimum
Contributing flow (exist+new) - 246.85 + 121.5 = 368.4 gpm
Remaining Capacity - 299.1 gpm
2) Abandon the existing 8" line in place.
(see Appendix 4. "Design Parameters" for calculation)
SCENARIO B: Total increase in peak sanitary sewer flow due.to this scenario is
calculated tq be .177.6 gpm. Using the given existing capacities within the system.
line sections from M029 to M008 will need to be reworked. Suggested
improvements to the system consists of the following:
A. 1) Install a 10" line on a minimum 0.33% slope from manhole M029 to
M008 accommodating all of the increased flow as well as existing flow.
Capacity of new line - 667.5 gpm minimum
Contributing flow (exist+new) - 246.85 + 177.6 = 424.4 gpm
Remaining Capacity - 243.1 gpm
2) Abandon the existing 8" line in place.
(see Appendix 4, "Design Parameters" for calculation)
~
.See Appendix 5 for Cost Estimate
~
~ ~
CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS:
It is shown using accepted design principles that the subject tracts would require
additional sanitary sewer capacity should they develop according to the proposed
development scenarios. Although Scenario A exceeds capacity of the existing sanitary sewer
system in only two segments, full flow is approached in two additional segments. In Scenario
B, the majority of the system's capacity from manhole M029 to M008 is exceeded. It is
recommended that revitalization option A, applicable to both scenarios, be constructed to
provide the excess sanitary sewer capacity needed to accommodate the subject tract
development. This option provides for the existing and additional sewer demands while
leaving a significant amount of remaining capacity in the line. Since there is no definite
development plan for the 8.471 acre tract, this remaining capacity can be used as a reserve
to insure that the Owner can use the 8.471 acre tract for purposes that may require more
sanitary sewer capacity than the projected 116.0 gpm. It should be noted that if the 8.471
acre tract develops in such a manner as to require more than 193.98 gpm in sanitary sewer
capacity (fimiting capacity in line M024-M025) additional revitalization of the system would be
necessary to carry flow to the system improvements as recommended by this report.
Due to the fact that other undeveloped areas are in close proximity to this project, it is
recommended that the City of College Station consider providing an oversized line capable of
receiving additional sanitary sewer flows based on projected land use.
-'
~ ~
APPENDICES
1) General location Map
2) Proposed Usage
3) Existing Sanitary Sewer System
4) Design Parameters
5) Cost Estimate
'*
-:I.
~ '-
APPENDIX 1
GeneraLLocation Map
'*
~ 't
GBNERALLOCATION MAP
SCAlE: 1- =300'
#0
.::}
c}~
~
~O
c}~
c,<V
S
0'"
G
..-
I
I
"
I~/
~ ----
,-
----
II
...:; /
/~
/
/
/
/
KUNG ENGINEERINr. ., '" 'RVFYlNr.
APPENDIX 2
Proposed Usage
'*
..~
~ 1t
"
SCHNARIO A
PROPOSBD USAGE
/I
"
If
I
I
"
II\Q
.4'0(,,\
1'-1
'(... j
l'r~'
SCAlE: 1- =300'
;:-0
V
0<-
~
~a
4-"'?-
c,<V
-!f
0"';
G
"
"
~~
---
~
I
I~_-
'-
'-
KUNG ENGINEERING 1, ~,/R\IFYINC':
---
/
/
/
/
SCAlE: 1-=300'
~
( .~
\ I
"'-4>/
SCBNARIO B
PROPOSBD USAGE
II
I
I
I
~--
"-
"-
~---
......
---
......
I
I
il.~
/
/
-1 /
/' /'
/
t! \"'), //
KU/'IG E/'I~~~IN~,-& .SURVEYlNG
APPENDIX 3
Existing Sanitary Sewer System
'*
-:I.
~ '-
SCALE: 1"=300'
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM
EXISTING OONDmONS
~s
V~
CJ~
,p~
~.;.
s
<vc,<V
O"V
c;
f ~022
\
\
-----
,
,
"
M029 "
~----
---
_ - ORNEE
UNNERS\T<
'*
\
KUNG ENGINEERING &: SURVEYING
RRYAN Tn'A..<:
Wheeler properties University @ lincoln
Qexist Qful/ Qexcess Qexcess
manhole line size slope cfs cfs cfs gpm
03381-M018
8 0.004 0.39 o.n 0.44 197.47
03381-M024
8 0.0039 0.39 0.76 0.43 192.98
03381-M025
8 0.0116 0.39 1.30 1.02 457.78
03381-M029
8 0.0032 0.55 0.69 0.20 89.76
03282-M021
8 0.0071 0.55 1.02 0.56 251.33
03282-M017
8 0.004 0.55 o.n 0.28 125.66
03282-M013
8 0.0039 0.55 0.76 0.28 125.66
03282-M010
8 0.0021 0.55 0.56 0.05 22.44
03282-M008
8 0.0074 0.55 1.05 0.58 260.30
03282-M007
12 0.0056 0.55 2.69 2.36 1059.17
03282-M005
12 0.0033 0.55 2.07 1.69 758.47
03282-M030
12 0.0018 0.55 1.54 1.12 502.66
03282-M003
12 0.0016 0.55 1.45 1.02 457.78
03282-M001
18 0.002 3.61 4.78 1.56 700.13
~
p'!1no .., -~ ..,
Full Flow Capacity
Worksheet for Circular Channel
Project DescriptIon
Project File
Worksheet
Flow Bement
Method
Solve For
e:\haestad\pi\bwss.tm2
8" Sanitary Sewer-Clay or Concrete Pipe
Circular Channel
Manning's Formula
Full Flow Capacity
Input Data
Mannings Coefficient
Channel Slope
Diameter
0.013
0.003300 V : H
0.67 ft
Results
Depth
Discharge
Flow Area
Wetted Perimeter
Top Width
Critical Depth
Percent Full
Critical Slope
Velocity
Velocity Head
Specific Energy
Froude Number
Maximum Discharge
Full Flow Capacity
Full Row Slope
Aug 7.1997
16:34:10
0.67
311.97
0.35
2.10
0.00
0.39
100.00
0.007713 V: H
1.99 tus
0.06 ft
FULL ft
FULL
0.75 Wls
0.70 Wls
0.003300 V : H
ft
gaVmin
ft2
ft
ft
ft
Kling Engineering & Surveying
Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666
'*
.....'1
~ It.
FlowMaster v4.1 c
Page 1 of 1
0)
~
~
-,
~'--
':::::J
"")
~
-
0...
SY:)lliM INADEQUACY.. SCBNARIO A
1" =300'
~s
v~
v~
~
~\o
s,\'i'-
<vG<V
o ,-,'V
c;
CAPACfTY LEGEND
>50~ REMAINING
40~
30~
20~
10~
O~
8"
f~~
\
\
LINE CAPACITY EXCEEDED
\
KUNG ENGINEERING /1; SURVEYING
BRYAN. TEXAS
/)~
I
\'~il
SYSltiM: INADEQUACY - SCBNARIO B
1" =300'
~s
v~
0~
\o~
'5-';;-
s
<vu<V
o"'v
c;
CAPACllY LEGEND
>50% REMAINING
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
\
I ,
fr,
, I
, \
M029 \
"'- -- - -
---
_ _ OR\\It. t.
U~N€.RS\Tl
----
KUNG ENGINEERING &: SURVEYING
BRYAN. TEXAS .
APPENDIX 4
Design Parameters
~
-'!
~ '-
/
-
I-
i .
Sanitary Sewer Impact AnalYSis
Bert Wheeler 8.471 & 4.242 acre tracts
. l
Prepared
Revised
5/20/97
6/12197
Tract
Size (ac)
Zoning
Max use:
Use camp:
Comp ave. WN flow (gpdlac)
Ave. flow tract A (gpd)
Ave. flow tract A (gpm)
Peak flow tract A (gpm)
Tract
Size (a c)
Zoning
Max use:
Use camp:
Camp ave. ww flow (gpd/ac)
Ave. flow tract A (gpd)
Ave. flow tract A (gpm)
Peak flow tract A (gpm)
Peak Combined Flow (gpm)
M/M. .Mi1'I.'Capacity avaiL in 8" line
A
~.471
C-8
Hotel
Hilton
4,382
37,120
25.78 ..
116.00
B
4.242
A-P
Mixed Office
French Arbor
412'"
'\
1,748 ,
"
1.21'"
5.46
121.46
22.4
:;.... '\~ t) , ': )........-
;-..,~ .....--. ..
Tl-.\ ~~L -t C/<:i ~L.
U~ nl...~.;. I
L .-:;;.......~,. J I' ~.~.
1..- 't-)." _ ~__. i..:..;..... ::'\ __
- ~;.
.-:.. J tf.':L!-;:. ":c
\;
"'.:.. ~.;'\ ~. '. "0 ."',
....'-"! - ....'""- ;.::
"'''''"",
......,
.....'.
-.,
~
x.. Lt. S
~~ ~ ~::.:.,
. ,1:'----, ' - f)/ ~ - ~:'.
:.- ~;..~. '. ~)l.,.4.-!.J :.,.
~::'.-{ll\
t C- ~. .
C, ~..\
,I'
~ i"J
-~
i--.~I !)~ " .
: :. !fo...." '-.
.'/...-. .
- ; ,-
'-"-.-. -'--
. ._~ :::,=="7~-=--"-- .-__"_
~: ....;;~ ~. .... .L: :
~ ~~ '-.' ~ '.
Proposed flows cannot be accomodated in existing facilities
~.~ (. ~ ~
t. .
~ "I ~ ; .. -'" ~.
-.;
" .
Q -.
-:!.
'-
~
........
., '-
; .
30 TAC 317.4(a)
Page 1 of 1
r;--.~\ I
Daily Wastewater Flow- Wastewater
Gallons Strength
I Source r Remarks I Per Person I mgIL BODs
1 Municipality f Residential I 100 I 200
____0.
I Subdivision r Residential 1 \ 100 I 200
"
I Trailer Park (Transient) I -. ..... I
2 ~ persons per 50 300
trailer
I Mobile Home Park f 3 persons per trailer I 75 I 300
1 School with Cafeteria 1 With Showers 1- 20 I 300
I Without Showers 1 15 I 300
1 Recreational Parks r Overnight user I 30 I 200
I Day user 1 5 I 100
Office Building or I .----- I
f 20 300
Factory ~ ..
..-:::::=:::.-:
I Motel I f 50 I 300
.
I Restaurant I Per Meal I 5 I 1000
1 Hospital I Per Bed I 200 1- 300
1 Nursing Home I Per Bed I 100 I 300
F / n.Ji"u.. ;uJt..4:S
~
~'-
Full Flow Capacity
Worksheet for Circular Channel
Project Description
Project File
Worksheet
Row Element
Method
Solve For
e:\haestad\pi\bwss.fm2
10" P .V.C. Sanitary Sewer
Circular Channel
Manning's Formula
Full Row Capacity
Input Data
Mannings Coefficient
Channel Slope
Diameter
0.011
0.003300 V : H
0.83 ft
Results
Depth
Discharge
Row Area
Wetted Perimeter
Top Width
Critical Depth
Percent Full
Critical Slope
Velocity
Velocity Head
Specific Energy
Froude Number
Maximum Discharge
Full Flow Capacity
Fun Row Slope
Aug 6. 1997
22.:09:58
0.83
667.52
0.55
2.62
0.00
0.55
100.00
0.005627 V : H
2.73 ftls
0.12 ft
FULL ft
FULL
1.60 ffJ/s
1.49 ffJ/s
0.003300 V : H
ft
gaVmin
ftZ
ft
ft
ft
Kling Engineering & Sucveying
Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666
'*
.....'.
~ "C.
FlowMaster v4.1c
Page 1 ot 1
APPENDIX 5
Cost Estimate
-l
'*
~. -c.
BERT WHEELERS INC.
8.471 AC & 4.242 AC TRACTS
SANITARY SewER IMPROVEMENTS
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
AUGUST 7, 1997
ITEM NO. QTY
UNIT
DESCRIPTION
UNIT COST
TOTAL
SANITARY SEWER
1 1040 LF 10" P.V.C. - S.D.R. 26 @ 4'-8' BURY $30.00 $31,200.00
2 2 EA TIE to existing manhole (watertight connection)
Approx. 8-12' depth $700.00 $1,400.00
3 5 EA MANHOLE wi lid @-8'-10'depth $1,800.00 $9,000.00
SUB-TOTAL: $41,600.00
10% CONTINGENCY: $4,160.00
SANITARY SEWER TOTAL: $45,760.00
'*
-:!
~. "C.
EXHIBIT D
I
r
I
i
r
~
I I
i
'B
u
10
IrON
~ ~
EXHIBIT E
BERT WHEELERS INC.
8.471 AC & 4.242 AC TRACTS
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
ESTIMATE SUMMARY
OCTOBER 29, 1997
REVISED OCTOBER 30, 1997
REPLACED SECTION
DEVELOPER
DESCRIPTION COST
CITY
COST
10" LINE from M029-M007
ReplacIng existing 8" line with 10" line obtaining capacity
for developments occurlng on Wheeler Subdivision $61,880.00
-0-
TOTAL PROJECT COST 10" LINE: $61,880.00 $0.00
12" LINE from M029-M007
Cost of oversizing 10" line to 12" line obtaining capacity
for development other than in Wheeler Sub<flVislon
$61,880.00
$10,208.00
12" LINE from M018-M029
Replacing existing B"line with 12" line along altemate
route obtaining capacity for development other than in
VVheclerSubd~on
.()-
$50.206.00
TOTAL COST 12" LINE: $61,880.00
TOTAL PROJECT COST 12" LINE: $122.294.00
$60,414.00
'*
-.
~
~. ~
EXHIBIT E
BERT WHEELERS INC.
8.471 AC & 4.242 AC TRACTS
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE "2"
OCTOBER 29,1997
REVISED OCTOBER 30,1997
OVERSIZED TO 12" LINE
ITEM NO. QTY
UNIT
UNIT COST
TOTAL
DESCRIPTION
REPLACEMENT FROM M018-M029
1
370
LF 12" P.V.C. - S.D.R. 26 @ 4'-8' bury (Crossing F.M. 60)
(from M018-M025) $38.00
LF 12- P.V.C. - S.D.R. 26 @ 4'_8' bury (North of F.M. 60)
. (from M025-M029, requested by City - not required
by Impact Study for Development) $38.00
2
200
3
180
LF ROAD BORE (F.M. 60) W/18- steel casing $100.00
4
1
EA TIEto existing manhole (watertight connection)
& Plug exisitng B"line (Approx. 8-12' depth) $1,000.00
5
1
EA MANHOLE wI lid @ ....8'.10' depth $1,800.00
10% CONTINGENCY:
SUB-TOTAL:
ENGINEERING FEES:
SANITARY SEWER TOTAL:
· Length of sanitary sewer line based on City of College Station
Wastewater Overlay Maps. Distances are not field verified &
may not reflect actual on the ground line lengths.
'*
-:!.
~~
$14,060.00
$7,600.00
$18.000.00
$1,000.00
$1,800.00
$42,460.00
$4,246.00
$::::::0
$50,206.00
. EXHIBIT E
10" UNE
BERT WHEELERS INC.
8.471 AC & 4.242 AC TRACTS
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE "1"
OCTOBER 29,1997
DESCRIPTION
UNIT COST
TOTAL
ITEM NO. aTY
UNIT
REPLACEMENT FROM M029-M007
1 1160 LF 10. P.V.C. - S.D.R. 26 @ .c.'-8' BURY $30.00 $34,800.00
2 2 EA TIE to eJdsting manhole (watertight connection)
& Plug existing 8" line (Approx. 8-12' depth) $1,000.00 $2,000.00
3 5 EA MANHOLE wI id @ -S'-10' depth $1,800.00 $9,000.00
$45,800.00
10% CONTINGENCY: $4,580.00
SUB-TOTAL: $50,380.00
ENGINEERING FEES: $6,000.00
SPECIAL SERVICES:
Geotechnical Testing: Trench compaction $3,000.00
Surveying: Additional Easement Requirement $2,500.00
SANrTARY SEWER TOTAL: $61,880.00
OVERSIZED TO 12" UNE
ITEM NO. aTY
v
UNIT
DESCRIPTION
UNIT COST
TOTAL
REPLACEMENT FROM M029-M007
LF
12" P.V.C. - S.D.R. 26 @ .c.'-8' BURY
TIE to e>>stIng manhole (watertight COM8ction)
& Plug existing 6'" rlOc(ApprOx. 6-12' depth)
MANHOLE w/6d @ -8'-10' depth
$38.00
$<<,080.00
1
1160
2
2
3
5
'*
EA
$1,000.00
$2,000.00
$9,000.00
$55,080.00
$5,508.00
$60,566.00
$6,000.00
$3.000.00
$2.500.00
$72,088.00
$10,208.00
EA
$1,800.00
100.10 CONTINGENCY:
SUB-TOTAL:
. ENGINEERING FEES:
SPECIAL SERVICES:
Geotechnical Testing: Trench compacUon
Surveying: Add"dional Easement Requirement
SANITARY SEWER TOTAl:
......'l.
~~
DIFFERENCE:
· Length of sanitary sewer line based on City of CoBege Station
Wastewater OVerlay Maps. Distances are not field verified &
may not reflect actual on the ground &ne lengths.
SCAlE: 1- =300'
SANrrARY SHwtiKSYS'1EM
B:Al.:flu<<J CONDl'llONS
EXHIBIT E
tr
l~o~
\
\
\
--
'*
kUNG Ol~NC ct: SU~
t"1
X
::r:
-
.
.
..,
~
~
i
i
:
"II
~
!
~i
f.
i
i
:It.
.
EXH
IBIT G
e
e
e
---..
'*
~
iJ~ ".
~
r
r,
I
EXHIBIT H
CONSENT OF THE SOLE DIRECTOR
IN LIEU OF SPECIAL MEETING
OF
w. D. HAMM III CORPORA TION
(the "Corpora tion")
JUNE 25, 1987
The undersigned, being the Sole Director of the Corporation, does hereby, pursu-
ant to Article 9.10B of the Texas Business Corporation Act, adopt the following resolu-
tions by execution of this Consent, and such Consent shall have the same force and ef-
fect as a unanimous vote by the undersigned at a properly called special meeting of the
Board of Directors of the Corporation.
RESOLVED, that in the judgment of the sole Director of the Corpo-
ration, it is deemed advisable to amend the Articles of Incorporation so as
to change the name of the Corporation, and to that end Article I be
changed to read as follows:
"ARTICLE I
NAME
The name of the Corporation is W. Dow Hamm III
Corpora tion."
RESOLVED FURTHER, that inasumch as no organizational meeting
has been held for the election of officers and issuance of shares of the
Corporation, W. Dow Hamm III, the sole Director of the Corporation, is
hereby authorized, to (a) sign, execute, certify to, verify, acknowledge,
deliver, accept, file and record the Articles of Amendment and any arid
all such instruments and documents with the Secretary of State of Texa~, '
and (b) take, or cause to be taken, any and all such action in the name of
and on behalf of the Corporation or otherwise, (as in his judgment shall be
necessary, desirable or appropriate) in order to effect the purposes of the
foregoing resolutions.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Consent as of the day
;tfld year first above writ ten.
DIRECTOR:
'/i/~~
W. Dow Hamm III
~. ~
~~~:2D070287B.60
, 87jsd2
--
t
CONSENT OF DIRECTOR
IN LIEU OF
ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING OF
W. DOW HAMM III CORPORATION
(the "Corporation")
JULY 13, 1987
The,undersigned, being the person named as the initial Di-
rector ln the Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation,
hereby, pursuant to Article 9.10B of the Texas Business Corpora-
tion Act, consents to and adopts in all respects the following
resolutions and such consent shall have the same force and' effect
JS a vote by the und~rsigned at the organizational meeting of the
Board of Directors called by the undersigned.
1. Acceptance of Articles of Incorporation.
~
;1.
RESOLVED, that the Articles of Incorporation of the
Corporation as filed in the Office of the Secretary of State
of the State of Texas on June 25, 1987, and as reviewed by
the Director of the Corporation, are hereby accepted and ap-
proved,and the Secretary of the Corporation is directed to
place the Articles of Incorporation in the corporate record
book of the Corporation.
t
~.
!(
~..
J.
~
:!~
.'
.t
~
~
'l
~.
~
};
i:
"'i:
~
~.
f,
.f
\oi
q;
2. Bylaws.
RESOLVED, that the Bylaws for the regulation of the af-
fairs of the Corporation, as reviewed by the Director of the
Corporation, are hereby accepted and approved, and the Sec-
retary of the Corporation is directed to place the Bylaws in
the corporate record book of the Corporation.
* 3.
Officers.
'*
RESOLVED, that
hereby are, elected
in the capacities set
until stich time as
qual if i ed:
the following persons be, and they
to serve as officers of the Corporation
forth opposite their respective names
their successors shall be elected and
President and
Secretary
t. Corporate Seal.
RESOLVED I that the form of seal of the Corporat ion I ; an
impression of which may appear in the margin 9f this Con-
sent, is hereby approved and adopted as the official sea~'of
the Corporation.
W. Dow Hamm III
1--..
-
j,
i
t
f
r
~
1
,
/"."~
i'1
~I
5. Stock Certificates.
RESOLVED, that the form of certificate attached to this
consent as Exhibit "A" is hereby approved and adopted as the
form of certificate to evidence ownership of shares of Com-
mon Stock, ten cent par value, of the Corporation.
6. Section 1244 Stock Plan.
RESOLVED, that pursuant to the provisions
1244 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as
the Regulations thereunder, the Stock of the
shall, to the extent permitted, be Section 1244
of Section
amended, and
Corporation
Stock.
7. Issuance of Shares.
3=
z
C
-i
m
(J'I
RESOLVED, that the Corporation shall issue under its
Section 1244 Stock Plan to and in the name of the following
shareholder one thousand (1,000) shares of its ten cent par
value Common Stock for and against receipt by the Corpora-
tion of the consideration shown, and that when such shares
of Common Stock of the Corporation are so issued, such
shares shall be duly issued, val idly outstanding, fully,paid
and nonassessable.
--"
Shareholder
Shares
Consideration
W. Dow Hamm III
1,000
$1,000.00 cash
8. Depository Bank.
RESOLVED, that
be, and it hereby is, designated the depository bank of the
Corporation and that the officers of the Corporation are
hereby authorized to execute the Resolution prepared by suCh
bank for the establishment of banking relations, a copy of,
....hich is attached as Exhibit "B" to this Consent. '*
9. Fiscal Year.
RESOLVED, that the fiscal year of the Corporation shall
end on December 31.
::). S Corporat ion Elect ion.
~ RESOLVED, that the Corporation e~ects to be taxed as a
small business corporation" under Section 1361 of the In-
:~rnal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, or any successor
S~atutes thereto. '
~
~. '-
-2-
11. Commencinq Business.
RESOLVED, that the consideration of at least $1,000.00
has been received for the issuance of shares, and that, con-
sequently, the Corporation is able to commence and transact
business and incur indebtedness.
12. Orqanizational Costs.
RESOLVED, that the Treasurer of this Corporation be,
and he is hereby, authorized to pay all charges and expenses
arising out of the organization of this Corporation and to
reimburse any person who has made any disbursements there-
for.
~
Z
C
-i
m
C/l
13. Authority.
i,
~
RESOLVED, that the officers of the Corporation are
hereby severally authorized to (a) sign, execute, certify
to, verify, acknowledge, deliver, acce~t, file and record
any and all such instruments and documents, and (b) take, or
cause to be taken, any and all such act ion in he name of and
on behalf of the Corporation or otherwise, (as in any such
officer's judgment shall be necessary, desirable or appro-
tJriate) in order to effect the purposes of the foregoing
resolutions.
-
i IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned does hereby execute this
Jonsen t as of the 13 th day of July, 1987.
1
j.
(
1
1
f
~
~
,
{
r
,405:0071387C.90
~0715878HWI
DIRECTOR:
(
.d//~
w. Dow'Harnm III
~
,.
'*
".
-!
~. ~
-3-
Regular 8/12/97
Page 5
Councilman Mariott made a motion to approve the Comprehensive Plan. The
motion was seconded by Mayor Protem Kennady.
Discussion by councilmeinbers related to the fact that the final report wa~ not
presented to Council prior to consideration.
Me Kennady made an amended motion to delay the vote until the final document
is brought before the Council at the earliest date possible.
Councilman Esmond seconded the motion which failed by a vote of2-2-1.
FOR: Mayor Protem Kennady, Councilmembers Esmond
AGAINST: Mayor Mctlhaney, Councilmembers Mariott
ABSTAINED: Councilman Anderson
The original motion to adopt the comprehensive plan by resolution carried 3-2.
FOR: Mayor Mctlhaney, Councilmembers Kennady, Mariott
AGAINST: Councilmembers Anderson, Esmond
Item No. 5c: - Public hearinQ and consider rezonina of approximately
4.24 acres located on the southeast corner of University Drive and
Lincoln Avenue from A-P Administrative-Professional to C-B Business
Commercial. (91-106).
City Planner Jane Kee presented toe staff report and stated that the existing
A-P zoning conforms with the University Drive Corridor Land Use ~Ian, which
shows business commercial uses to the west of Lincoln and lower. impact
administrative professional uses to the east of Uncoln. The C-B zoning would
shift the boundary line between the business commercial and the ~drninistrative
professional to the east, adjacent to the existing Post Oak Forest offices. The
applicant has requested that the policy relating to land uses on th~spl#h side of
University be changed to reflect more business commercial as oPr19sed to
administrative professional. The existing policy guarantees thattl1e city has
some va~nt land reserved for office uses. Staff recommended a~ainst the
re~onipgbecausethe policy change in rezoning would no longer ~~serve a
significantiamount of land for office use and it does not conform W,th council
policy ifef1~cted in the Comprehensive Plan. If the rezoning and ppUcy is
chang~d.staffrecommended approval-with the condition that a s~wer impact
study pe ~royided at the time of develo~O)ent analyzing the impa~ of
dev~.lopment on the. sewer infraslfl:lcture and that any il!lproveme~ts are bome
by the deyeloper. Planning and Zoning Commission voted 4-1 tqrecommend
denial of the request. -i '
Mayor Mcllhaneyopened the public hearing.
~. ~
Regular 8/12/97
Page 6
Hank McQuaide of 12939 SH 30, spoke in favor of the rezoning to C-B.
Fain McDougal of4150 Shadowbrook, real estate broker; representing MicroAge
stated that the proposed Marriott Suites will harmonize ""iththe newly buUt
townhomes along Lincoln Avenue.
Jonathon Brinsden with Hamm Corporation informed the Commission that he is
currently working with MicroAge for development of aJreestanding office building
and Marriott for extended stay suites called Town Place Suites.
Dow Hamm, III President of Hamm Corporation in Humble, Tx. addressed the
Council and encouraged. Council to approve the request.
Stewart Kling, local engineer, addressed the Council on the sewer line
infrastructure. Council asked several questions regarding this issue.
The following citizens aTidressed the Council in opposition to the rezoning. The
concerns related to the (jevelopment affect on the quality of life, integrity of
neighborhood, and thefacttha~previous councilis have set _a direction by
establishing a zone inthearea.
Oran Nicks, 901 Munson
Joe LaCour, 608 Summ~rglen
Horace Hodge, 601 Surt'lmerglen
Steven Miller, 906 Munson
Greg Bennett, 612 SumfIlerglen
Mayor Mcllhaney referr~d to letters received from qouncilman Dick Birdwell and
Bill Smith, a resident from College Hills Subdivisio'1' .-
'*
Mayor Mcllhaney close<Jth{3 public hearing.
Councilman Esmond rt1~dE3amotion to approve Or~inanceNo._2254withthe
condition that the dev~l~per!J>rovide the sewer caPflcity and an acceptable
development agreem~n~ ,~, brqught back to council.. . Councilman Esmond
clarified his motion tor~'st~~, ithat the developer is ~esponsible for terms of the
development agreerne.n~ 'al'l~ if he fails, the. rezonirl9 of this. property is not valid.
Mayor Protem Kennadyii~e~n4edthe motion. Motion carried 4-1, Councilman
Anderson voted againsti!th~ mqtion.
~. ~
FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI
-t
TEL=713-651-5246
Oct 31,97
12:09 No.OOS P.Ol
Fu LI31<1t) HT & .J AWOI,S KI
L.I... P.
T"..C....O"E:: 71:vr.51~)151
~V\ ~((~--\i J~
.,':'lJS"Of4
......."SI4tf4C;TO,". U,<:::.
^VC''fH.l
~;^U t'\t'TO..IIO
(')^&.I.A"
...c.:w von....
t..(\S A ..U:;I""I ,ac;
.OrJnnP>J
711R.CH
I~ONG KONG
A Ilce.$;TCAl:n I ,,,,,ncu LtAnn.I'Y l'"nlIo/CIl&llIP
l~()l ''''t;Il,.'NNI!:Y. ~~Ul' c ~tOO
1.-louSTor-r. TEX^S 'I7nIO-:~095
__.___...__..,...,,,.'h...... ..
,..' ....... PHONK No. iN EvENT OF
To: NAlIIEo f^OOD4ILE PilON}; No. T1WiSWSSroN Drrrwuurr
".- ~.,~-_. ~ ~ -,(" 't- ~~et'
(1) ~ ~.(..
(2) , ......--
(3)
(4) -...'-'
(6) ........,."....-
(6)
.. '2-..
~ No. oU'ap aut:
JOHN S. HOLLYFIELD ll4t. ~ (lDclu4l.oi ~Y"f" BlooeL) -
Frnn,:
~~_.~,~.;-~ MatW No.: q 13 ~ 1 } ,
Dol AU;omey 110': 0206
Dl\t.o: J~""'~I-<tl
HE'l'URN TRANSMITTED FAX TO:. JOHN ~. HOLtlfFIELD
1lElo{AlUm:.. . ....___
.....,..,....-..-......-
~..~ ~!~ ~~ ---t.~.
+~.; ~,~ \ ~ r>.-.PA' ~.
)(.. '(.-
. '"
IJ:you apenence.I1nY proOllntB Wit/I tilts .tran.smt"lon or.hmJc any auu~""" plixue call (118J66I.J111.
CONFIDENTIALI'l"Y NO'l'lCb1~ . Unl/!lU otherwiM indlet\tM or ohviolll;l from t.h~ nntllro.of tho transmittal,
the information cOntained In this f'acslmUe Dl06!J8ge Is attorney prtvUogod aDd ~Df1.doDtto.llnformatlo111ntended
for the use of the Indlvidu.al or ontity.nomod above. Ie tho roador of tbls UlQS138.G9 is Dot the intondod recipiont,
or the employee or agent responsiblo to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
diNemhultiotl, distribution or copying of thltt communication is strictly .problbltecl. Ir you have received. ~hls. .
communiC'Jlt.ionin ArmJ', plMM Immodlataly notifY tho sender by telephone nnd .return the original message to
Fulbdghl.& Jliwol'Sklat .the p.oove addl'eS8 $. tho U.S. rostAI sorvice Ilt our OltpoD.50. Thank you. .
FOR UECEPTIONISTS ONLY
UEOEI'TJONIBT ItEOORD: a A.M.
DATrJr!ME l\. nEO: J J . o P.M.. llECEIVED BY:
~
FOR pR!N'r COMMUNICATIONS ONLY
COMPLETION 'l'OO~: o A.M. OPERATOR:
,,:....;. Cl P.M.
,.
City of College Station
1101 South Texas Avenue
P.o. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
I~
Date: \0 I ~\I e\"l
Number of pages including cover sheet: l
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
F ~ ~ d
L f"" - \\\ \ -' .~\ \
Fronc~~~~~
Phone:
Faxphone:\ r:, --leS\-'6~~\.Q
CC:
Phone:
Fax phone:
409-764-3570
409-764-3496
REMARKS: D Urgent D For your review D Reply ASAP D Please comment
.-.
If you did not receive a complete fax, please call our office immediately for a new transmittal.
,.
City of College Station
1101 South Texas Avenue
P.O. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
<<~
Date: \ CJ (6\ / qi
Number of pages including cover sheet: :::I=-
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
~\'A-\-~~ '6,\~~~S\
~
· I'\R ~<?\2
Phone:
Fax phone: \ -dSb\-<S% -~CJ~
CC:
Phone:
Fax phone:
409-764-3570
409-764-3496
REMARKS:
D Urgent
D For your review D Reply ASAP
D Please coIIlment
If you did not receive a complete fax, please call our office immediately for a new transmittal.
.
, :
tl-
City of College Station
1101 South Texas Avenue
P.O. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
fa(
Date: \0 I '3 \ I er,
Number of pages including cover sheet: ~
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
~~~ ~('~()o.\~
Fi
. ~Q *,~Q.
Phone:
Fax.Phone:~ -~
CC:
Phone:
Fax phone:
409-764-3570
409-764-3496
REMARKS:
o Urgent
o For your review 0 Reply ASAP
o Please comment
If you did not receive a complete fax, please call our office immediately for a new transmittal.
KLING ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING
Consulting Engineers -land Surveyors
4103 Texas Avenue, Suite 212
Bryan, Texas 77802
Tel. (409) 846-6212
Fax (409) 846-8252
TO
PROJECT NAME
orJ
DATE
A.1/AiCt
PROJECT NO.
ATTENTION
REFERENCE
WE TRANSMIT:
o Under Separate Cover
~Closed
VIA:
9_~ail
~essenger
o Federal Express
o Express Mail
o Special Courier
o Picked Up By Your Office
THE FOllOWING:
o Prints
o Copies
o Originals
o Plat
o Field Notes
o Plans
~eport
tJ Estimate
o Cut Sheets
o Computer Printout
o File
o Contract
o
NO. DESCRIPTION
P, //.1 ~ frl,
L/ \
P.O. Box 4234
Bryan, Texas 77805
'&
FOR:
o Your Review & Approval
o Your Review & Comment
o Your Review & Distribution
OYour Review, Revision & Return
o Your Signature & Return
OYour File and/or Use
OAs Requested By:
o Please Acknowledge Receipt of
Enclosures
o Please Return Enclosures To Us
o Copies Of This letter Of~Transmittal
Sent To:
If Enclosures Are Not As Noted,
Please Notify Us At Once.
~
,1!l
c.2J
CD
TITLE SLIDE
On 8-12-97 Council approved a rezoning request from A-P to C-B for 2.5
acres at the corner of University Drive and Lincoln Avenue. The applicant
at the time presented an impact study regarding sewer and presented
conceptual site plans and architectural elevations to show the intended
use. The proposed project is a 3 story Marriott Towne Place Suites
extended stay hotel.
Council's motion - condition that a development agreement be entered into
whereby the proposed project would be built within a given time frame or
the zoning would not become effective.
The agreement was also to outline participation for sewer
improvements and
to ensure that the project is eventually built as shown on proposed
plans and drawings. The latter is to assure the adjacent neighborhood that
what was shown to City Council will be what gets built.
PPT - DEV AG. SLIDE 1
In summary the agreement does the following:
1. The developer will upgrade a given sewer line based on impact
study recommendations from an 8" to a 10" line. The City will pay for
oversizing the line to a 12" line. The City will also pay design and
construction costs for upgrading another portion of sewer from an 8" to a
12" line. This portion is not necessary to the development but
accomplishes a needed upgrade for the area. The developer will design
and construct all sewer improvements. Reimbursement from City will
occur after accepted by City.
The Wheeler representatives have also asked the City to reserve. sewer
capacity for the remainder of the Wheeler subdivision (property on the
southwest corner).
ELMO - SAM FR. REZONING
The City does not "reserve" sewer capacity for individual future
developments. The sewer upgrades the developer is doing have to be
done specifically for the Marriott Towne Suites project. But there will be
excess capacity after these upgrades. There is a paragraph in the
agreement that states that when the remainder of the Wheeler property
develops, if there is insufficient capacity due to other development that
has occurred, the City will reimburse the developer at that time all
reasonable costs to additionally upgrade the system.
PPT - DEV AG. SLIDE 2
2. The agreement calls for building the project within two years or the
zoning reverts back to A-P.
3. It calls for a buffer to be maintained as was presented on the
conceptual site plan. The buffer can be used for only passive
recreational uses or storm water management.
4. Access is limited to one cut on University and one on Lincoln for the
southeast property.
5. Building height is limited to 3 stories, facade shall be at least 25%
brick. Colors shall be muted earth tones. These items were all
presented on the elevations at the Council hearing.
6. The number of suites is limited to 95.
ELMO - SITE PLAN SHOWING BUFFER
ELMO - ELEVATION
The remainder of the agreement has the standard indemnification and
insurance clauses. These do expire 5 years after execution of the
agreement. There is also warranty language that states warranty
expires after one year from acceptance of sewer line.
@)-?\.
(- .
PPT - DEV. AG. SLIDE 3
Cost to the City for oversizing the line required for the development is
$10,208.
Cost to the City for upgrading the additional line for the area is estimated to
be $50,206. Total cost is $60,414.
There is $40,000 available in the sewer collection rehab fund and $50,000
available in sewer oversize for this year. There could potentially be minor
cost to City if there is insufficient reserve sewer capacity when remainder
of Wheeler property develops, if this paragraph is included in the
agreement. .
Since coversht - there has been additional interest in the Univ. Dr. corridor.
A hotel project with 5 retail pads & 2 restaurant pads has expressed
serious interest in developing. The sewer upgrades in this DA should take
care of the Wheeler property and the Quality Suites Hotel which is currently
building.
The impact analysis for the Wheeler property showed a need for a 10 inch
line. The oversize for no more than a 12 at this point is because there is
nothing larger than a 12 for these lines to tie into as you move to the plant.
We do not know at this time if the additional capacity created with the
upgrade described in this DA would be sufficient to take care of this new
interest. If it is not we will be back before Council with an oversize request
again to upgrade the line further.
If we find a need for additional capacity, the City can then determine
whether to proceed with the upgrade as descibed in this development ago
or amend the agreemnt to build an even larger line but without impacting
the timeline for this Mariott Towne Suites project.
Staff Recommendation: Approve agreement as presented with direction
for further engineering analysis. .
o
CD
TITLE SLIDE
On 8-12-97 Council approved a rezoning request from A-P to C-B for 2.5
acres at the corner of University Drive and Lincoln Avenue. The applicant
at the time presented an impact study regarding sewer and presented
conceptual site plans and architectural elevations to show the intended
use. The proposed project is a 3 story Marriott Towne Place Suites
extended stay hotel.
Council's motion - condition that a development agreement be entered into
whereby the proposed project would be built within a given time frame or
the zoning would not become effective.
The agreement was also to outline participation for sewer
improvements and
to ensure that the project is eventually built as shown on proposed
plans and drawings. The latter is to assure the adjacent neighborhood that
what was shown to City Council will be what gets built.
PPT - DEV AG. SLIDE 1
In summary the agreement does the following:
1. The developer will upgrade a given sewer line based on impact
study recommendations from an 8" to a 10" line. The City will pay for
oversizing the line to a 12" line. The City will also pay design and
construction costs for upgrading another portion of sewer from an 8" to a
12" line. This portion is not necessary to the development but
accomplishes a needed upgrade for the area. The developer will design
and construct all sewer improvements. Reimbursement from City will
occur after accepted by City.
The Wheeler representatives have also asked the City to reserve sewer
capacity for the remainder of the Wheeler subdivision (property on the
southwest corner).
ELMO - SAM FR. REZONING
The City does not "reserve" sewer capacity for individual future
developments. The sewer upgrades the developer is doing have to be
done specifically for the Marriott Towne Suites project. But there will be
excess capacity after these upgrades. There is a paragraph in the
agreement that states that when the remainder of the Wheeler property
develops, if there is insufficient capacity due to other development that
has occurred, the City will reimburse the developer at that time all
,reasonable costs to addi~ionallY upgrade th~ system. -,-H {~ Af> P llES oV"\ Li
TO UV\E \')()6I2.-A\J\Ct> to,,! 1i;>6U5l-Dl?ElQ.. -:- VLO+ JVLC, o-~4 l(A~,.ptrob(e4V\s
PPT- DEV AG. SLIDE 2 4<-u~ ckw^~;brQ()...<<l .
2. The agreement calls for building the project within two years or the
zoning reverts back to A-P.
3. It calls for a buffer to be maintained as was presented on the
conceptual site plan. The buffer can be used for only passive
recreational uses or storm water management.
4. Access is limited to one cut on University and one on Lincoln for the
southeast property.
s. Building height .is limited to 3 stories, facade shall be at least 25%
brick. Colors shall be muted earth tones. These items were all
presented on the elevations at the Council hearing.
6. The number of suites is limited to 95.
ELMO - SITE PLAN SHOWING BUFFER
ELMO - ELEVATION
The remainder of the agreement has the standard indemnification and
insurance clauses. These do expire 5 years after execution of the
agreement. There is also warranty language that states warranty
expires after one year from acceptance of sewer line.
PPT - DEV. AG. SLIDE 3
Cost to the City for oversizing the line required for the development is
$10,208.
Cost to the City for upgrading the additional line for the area is estimated to
be $50,206. Total costis $60,414.
There is $40,000 available in the sewer collection rehab fund and $50,000
available in sewer oversize for this year. There could potentially be minor
cost to City if there is insufficient reserve sewer capacity when remainder
of Wheeler property develops, if this paragraph is included in the
agreement.,
Since coversht - there has been additional interest in the Univ. Dr. corridor.
A hotel project with 5 retail pads & 2 restaurant pads has expressed
serious interest in developing. The sewer upgrades in this DA should take
care of the Wheeler property and the Quality Suites Hotel which is currently
building.
The impact analysis for the Wheeler property showed a need for a 10 inch
line. The oversize for no .more than a 12 at this point is because there is
nothing larger than a 12 for these lines to tie into as you move to the plant.
We do not know at this time if the additional capacity created with the
upgrade described in this DA would be sufficient to take care of this new
interest. If it is not we will be back before Council with an oversize request
again to upgrade the line further.
If we find a need for additional capacity, the City can then determine
whether to proceed with the upgrade as descibed in this development ago
ar amend the agreemnt to build an even larger line but without impacting
the timeline for this Mariott Towne Suites project.
Staff Rec.ommendation: Approve agreement as presented with direction
for further engineering analysis.
o
City of College Station, TX
Planning Division
~r
<<,\/ \Y:' ~
(J.\tff vP' ~
\? /
/
Development Agreement
G) Sewer Improvements
..t OP Line
..t Additional Line
..t Reserve Capacity
, E (W\O - ~J!\1tI\ DC Pk./. <A ~\.:it . ;Mr~S~
Development Agreement (Cont.)
~ Two Year Time Frame
Q) Buffer
@ Access
CID Bldg. Height/Facade/Colors
@ # Suites
G() C() __ L' "" /L 'I .c:(
CJ.<?lAAC ,-C..)U2>t) 6Ol: l 0/ OJ '-Ie 1 to-r--
Financial Impact to City
. OP Line - $10,208
. Additional Line - $50,206
Sewer Collection Rehab Funds
Sewer Oversize Funds
~
~
~
('~.'.
. I
AJ
I:J
ti
.
f1
II
~
,l~
I~
jJ
1].
\1h
F'~(;-'::;
SANITARY SEWER IMPACT STUDY
FOR
BERT WHEELERS INC.
8.471 & 4.242 Acre Tracts
Richard Carter Survey, A-8
College Station, Brazos County, Texas
August 7, 1997
DEVELOPED BY
Bert Wheelers Inc.
10665 Richmond
Houston, Texas 77042
PREPARED BY:
. Kling Engineering & Surveying
4013 Texas Ave., Suite 212
Bryan, Texas 77802
~409) 846-6212
__'-...-:l """
--::o(~ OF r.~
;: '\Y"';........... -I.
'",....* .... ~'l.
i! */ .' -,:.',
ft.:.__...._.---1A~
-.,..~.:J:.4i!j;-,iJ
". ~ .-.Jt~'
. r,-"
fiJ9]',
L~
~
[J
tJ
[J
t1
LJ
[J
lJ
___.<."';~+"';C","~,,,,,,~c,""'7'OCC0_;,,,,~?#:;.-,:";i+~",===~=~:;~::;:~~~;~:'7i~~~~~~~~=~
SANITARY SEWER IMPACT STUDY
for
Bert Wheelers Inc. 8.471 & 4.242 Acre Tracts
Richard Carter Survey, A-8
College Station, Brazos County, Texas
August 7, 1997
PURPOSE:
The subject property for this report is. the Bert Wheelers Inc. 8.471 and 4.242 acre
tracts located on the southwest and southeast corners of the University and Lincoln drive
intersection. The purpose of this report is to investigate existing sanitary sewer lines within
and downstream of the area in light of proposed development of the two tracts and to suggest
modification (revitalization) to the system to provide adequate. sanitary sewage flow
collection. This is not a comprehensive system analysis and only accounts for impact on the
existing sanitary sewer system due to the development of the subject tracts.
This study is being conducted at the request of Bert Wheelers., Inc., current owner of
the tracts, asa condition for the rezoning of the tracts approved by City of College Station
Planning & Zoning Commission April 17, 1997. Current development plans for the two tracts
are conceptual in nature and therefore the most intense landuse for individual zoning districts
will be used in the analysis.
SITE DESCRIPTION:
The study area consists of a total of 12.713 acres lying south and adjacent to F.M. 60,
Univefsity Drive, at its intersection with Lincoln Drive (see Appendix 1, "General Location").
Current Zoning for the 8.471 acre tract is C-B Business Commercial and for the 4.242 acre
tract is A-P Administrative Professional. Currently there is no developed land use and the
tracts are vacant.
PROPOSED USAGE:
There is not a specific use proposed for the 8.471 acre tract. The most intense use for
C-B zoning.is considered Hotel/motel. The 4.242 acre tract has two scenarios for proposed
usage. Th~ first, Scenario A, is to have the entire tract operating under A-P Administrative
Professional. The second, Scenario B is for 1.738 acres of the tract to operate under A-P
zoning. and 'the remaining 2.504 acres operate under C-B zoning. Currently, steps are being
taken by the owner to gain City approval for Scenario B. Under this option, proposed usage
would be asJollows:
Table 1
Area Zoning Usage Size
1.738 acres A-P Mixed Office 15,000 sf
2.504 acres C-B Extenc!ed Stay Hotel 95 rooms
(See Appendix 2, "Proposed" Usage" for graphical representation.)
[li.'--
"''''::'
o
CI
D
n
tJ
[J
[J
fJ
C
~"c.
t\',;.
~
fJ,.
.~ .1
~""
F'1
AJ
In
.
..-..-.~---~---".-. ._,--~.._-_..-..--. - ..~.._._---._--_._---.----. - - - - ..' .------..------.---.----~-~ . - - ~.;.;...- - - -, :;..,....= -'",_.c,;;:'. ,,_:-,. ~;c;':~,..--;"',,-.::,_-~~~:j
EXISTING CONDITIONS SANITARY SEWER LINE ANALYSIS:
The City of College Station Engineering Department provided information concerning
existing conditions for the sanitary sewer collection system serving the subject tracts. Lines
are described from manhole to manhole as shown in Exhibit At "Existing Conditions" found in
Appendix 3, "Existing Sanitary Sewer System". The system analysis for this project begins at
a manhole located at the northeast corner of the 4.242 acre tract designated as M030A a~d
terminates at manhole M00110cated near the College Station City Limits line (see Appendix
3). Limited capacity exists in the current system. Line segments and limiting capacities are
summarized in the following table.
Table 2
END MANHOLES UNESIZE SLOPE QFULL REMAINING CAPACITY
(in) (Wft) (gpm) (gpm)
M030A-M018 8 0.003 312.0 292.03
(assumed)
M018-M024 8 0.004 345.6 197.47
M024-M025 8 0.0039 341.1 193.98
M025-M029 8 0.0116 583.5 457.78
M029-M021.* 8 0.9032 309.7 89.76
M021-M017 8 0.0071 457.8 251.33
M017 -M013* 8 0.004 345.6 125.66
M013-M010* 8 0.0039 341.1 125.66
M010,.M008** 8 0.0021 251.3 22.44
-
M008-M007 12 . 0.0074 471.3 260.30
M007 -M005 12 0.0056 1207.4 1059.17
M005-M030B 12 0.0033 929.1 758.47
M030B-M003 12 0.0018 691.2 502.66
c-
M003,.M001 12 0.0016 650.8 457.78
M001-M027 18 0.002 2145.4 700.13
.
(Information provided by City of College Station, Engineering Dept.)
.(* Indicates line capacity exceeded under Scenario B). .
(** Indicates line capacity exceeded under Scenarios A & B)
Line M030A-M018 had inaccurate as-built information and time constraints prevented field
verification of line slope and flowlines. A minimal slope of 0.3% was assumed for this line
and existing flow calculated per TNRCC design standards (see Appendix 3 for line capacity
and existing flow calculations).
~J
~J
J
U
!'s'l
!I
-
1"
I U
,. f"'.~-~-~';';
PROPOSED CONDITIONS SANITARY SEWER LINE ANALYSIS:
DESIGN PARAMETERS:
Design flows are based on comparable usage for like zoned properties. In the
absence of a proposed use, the most intense use fOr a zoning district will be used. The
following table describes these design parameters (see Appendix 4, "Design Parameters"):
Table 3
COMPARABLE COMPARABLE PEAKING COMPARABLE
ZONING AVE. FLOW . PEAK FLOW
USAGE {gpd)/ac FACTOR (gpd / gpm)/ac
A-P AdminlProf Mixed Office 412* 4.5 1854/1.3
C-B BuslComm Hotel 4382* 4,.5 19719/13,.7
('''1
! i
Iii (*Flow from comparable land use provided by City of College Station, Engineering Department)
~ Under Scenario 8 for the 2.42 acre tract, design flows have been calculated as follows:
WC'l1
I i
li'1il.!'?
!i1n
11:.:i 1
iJ
111~.' .
1.,.
i!!;;1
!'1:i;+'1
iiliJ
&J~;""'I
,Pi::::i
'Iij'!,
LJ.
LJ
~
1;1
.
.,
.
I;J
Mixed Office:
2.2 gpm - peak flow
As per A-P zoning shown in Table 3
1.3}gpm/ac *1.?38 ac
59.4 gpm - peak flow
Assumption: Patrons of extended stay hotel have daily
sanitary sewer usage rate equal to a private
. residents. 2 Occupants per room.
Usage: 100 gpdlperson = 0.0694 gpm/person (ref. TNRCC
:Rules, ch 317, fig. 317.4(a).
Peaking Factor: 4.5
Extended Stay
Hotel:
r ~ \J\,4,.;~
\.......J j#'. I.~
YIo CCr"?cllf~G:ci",
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED FLOWRATES:
Table 4
TRACT ZONING PEAK FLOW
(gpm)
.8.741 acres C-B BuslComm /1. 7' X A--~ 11 ?O
4.242 acres Scenario A A-P AdminlProf ~,a.)( 4-( <..~~tk:~~5.5
4.242 acres Scenario B 1.738 ac A-P + 2.504ac C-B 2.2 + 59.4 = 61.6
TOTAL SCENARIO A 121.5
TOTAL SCENARIO B 177.6
/
Q
,(;
'0
"
:J
.. ;<
,ie,
;.". ,.
...'( / '1(~:,
, . :~7 , C'('
'~":i
1"-
l ;~.....
i' ....,
{ /
,/
,. 'Cpt,.
d
(see Appendix 4, "Design Parameters" for calculation>
o
l'
tJ
I'
LJ
t:J
[]
(J
ri
II
[]
[J
[J
."
IL
_,- .."",'",,,. ",'.;"'>':;'i"'".~""'oA;""":>'~')c'''-~+.;:~;':i':;'.'-;.:":"";";,,,,.,:;:,.>>o,,,,~,., -,
"".;'::,;~);:;i;';;;:';~~;#'<~AA~;i~Ph~i;~t#!iiew~F"")'"'~' ,,;iir":ill:'iii',a"~.'ij;:j~0;;;,;..~_.jU;'~X;;;,b-'!i;'1".i4"""'-~"<~;A.2,:ili'i;'G"".~""'-'<'~~~~"!i':\:'f1;"\-1Gl"";"""'f':'."';lf~;;':
SYSTEM ACCEPTABILITY:
The extreme limiting line capacity for the existing sanitary sewer system is 22.4 gpm
occurring in line M01 q-M008 with the second most limiting capacity being 89.8 gpm in line
M029-M021. Capacity of the system is exceeded under both development. scenarios.
Portions of the existing line will need to be reworked to accommodate the increased sewer
demand. Scenario A exceeds capacity of the existing system along two sections of line
(M029-M021 & M010-M008) and nears full flow capacity along two other sections (M017- '.
M013 & M013-M01 0). Scenario B exce~ds capacity of the system along the entire route from
M029 to M008 (see Exhibit B "Existing System Inadequacy" in Appendix 3 and Table 5 below
for summary). Revitalization of.the system .is required prior to any development causing an
increase in peak sanitary sewer flow greater than 22~4 gpm. .
Table 5
LINE SIZE QFULL REMAINING CAPACITY REMAINING CAPACITY
END MANHOLES SCENARIO A SCENARIO B
(in) (gpm) (gpm 1 %) (gpm/%)
M030A-M018 8 312;0 286.5/92% 230.4/74%
M018-M024 8 345.6 76.0/22% 19.91.6%
M024...M025 8 341.1 72.5/21% 16.4/5%
M025-M029 8 583.5 336.3/58% 280.2/48%
M029-M021 8 309.7 -/0% -/0%
I
M021-M017 8 457.8 129.8/28% 73.7/16%
M017-M013 8 345.6 4.2/1% -/0%
M013-M010 8 341.1 4.16/1% -/0%
M010-M008 8 251.3 -/0% -/0%
M008-M007 12 471.3 138.8 129% 82.7/18%
M007 -M005 12 1207.4 937.7/78% 881.6/73%
M005-M030B 12 929.1 637.0/68% 580.9/62%
M03QB.oM003 12 691.2 381.2/55% 325.1/47%
MOO3-M001 12 650.8 336.28/52% 280.2/43%
MOQ1-M027 18 I 2145.4 578.6/27% 522.53/24%
j:
,
o
o
f"""
u
o
w
Q
~
"
aJ
o
~
~
&J
iJ
IIi
II
1;1
.
IJ
PROPOSED SYSTEM REVITALIZATION:
Using the development scenarios set forth in this report, proposed system
revitalization will be discussed and cost estimates of the improvements provided.
SCENARIO A: Total increase in peak sanitary sewer flow due to this scenario is
calculated to be 1~1.5 gpm. Using the given existing capacities within the syste~,
line sections M010-M008 & M029-M021 are exceeded. Suggested improvements to
the system consist of the following:
A. 1) Install a 10" line on a minimum 0.33% slope from manhole M029 to
M008 accommodating all of the increased flow as well as existing flow.
Capacity of new line - 667.5 gpm minimum
Contributing flow (exist+new) - 246.85 + 121.5 = 368.4 gpm
Remaining Capacity - 299.1 gpm .
2) Abandon the existing 8" line in place.
(see Appendix 4, "Design Parameters"for calculation)
SCENARIO B: Total increase in peak sanitary sewer flow due to this scenario is
calculated to be 177.6 gpm. Using the given existing capacities within the system,
line sections from M029 to M008 will need to be reworked. Suggested
improvements to the system consists of the following:
A. 1) Install a 10" line on a minimum 0.33% slope from manhole M029 to
M008 accommodating all of the increased flow as well as existing flow.
Capacity of new line -:667.5 gpm minimum
Contributing flow (exist+new) - 246.85 + 177.6 = 424.4 gpm
Remaining Capacity - 243.1 gpm
2) Abandon the existing 8" line in place.
(see Appendix 4, "Design Parameters" for calculation)
*See Appendix 5 for Cost Estimate
iJ".'
~""
,,_,' :,:, ---,.-' ,":" _ "'';'"i:, "'-'M:'",': :'O:'~,\-"~":"":'_1',''':~'::","~:~'7'''S
'-'f:':- ::'4:~';;;';;'~~:_-':"'H:.""'+~"+~;ii,._;:;~;:;i("~;.'+ei,",-""""""",,,,=::
~,' .." ..... ,,' " , ", ....,.... .--->:--:..---,:--__:-,,'_-"c.c.->__,:~::_:;;.:-":-,i'i;;:~_;--~-.-,;, ',i_,:: -"---_,~~;,-,:,T.c,;~i~:,~',i;;;,.~c:'W':""'~'''~cW-'-"'':';:::::~?i.:?':*':~:<:-::{:;-.::"i~~,\l'~'t'"'''4E~~"5~
-~-"~".-.._-,-"'-~_. ., .-,... >~ w,'"'""._'""'m-'.~-'::.<.~ ._~-" ._".,..."'''-..'~'..w. ~._,",_.M',. I
m CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS;
:J
!.. additio~~~ ::~:'ryU:~':e~:e:a~~ ~~~e~l~~~~~:e:~~t=~:~~~~otr~~;;~~e~qUire
development scenarios. Although Scenario A exceeds capacity of the existing sanitary sewer
system in only two segments, full flow is approached in two additional segments. In Scenario
B, the majority of the system's capacity from manhole M029 to M008 is exceeded. It is .
recommended that revitalization optionA, applicable to both scenarios, be constructed to
provide the excess sanitary sewer capacity needed to accommodate the subject tract
development. This option provides for the existing and additional sewer demands while
leaving a significant amount of remaining capacity in the line. Since there is no definite
development plan for the 8.471 acre tract, this remaining capacity can be used as a reserve
to insure that the Owner can use the 8.471 acre tract for purposes that may require more
sanitary sewer capacity than the projected 116.0 gpm. It should be noted that if the 8.471
acre tract develops in such a manner as to require more than 193.98 gpm in sanitary sewer
capacity. (limiting capacity in line M024-M025) additional revitalization of the system would be
necessary to carry flow to the system improvements as recommended by this report.
Due to the fact that other undeveloped areas are in close proximity to this project, it is
recommended that the City of College Station consider providing an oversized line capable of
receiv.ing additional sanitary sewer flows based on projected land use.
fi
JrJ
~
~
tJ
t:l
tJ
[J
IJ
tJ
IU
_'. _, ......." "'_S'_""_"",',".<.~"~'...;~." ,;i',;~"-
~',,"~*...'._"_"-;'::~ -t<.~-
--
...
'1:~-' ---.1___ -
J
J
~J
~J
:j
J
r:T~',-!
I
1.1
'--1
I :
, i
~
c
c
c
Cj
n
LJ
r'J'
L',
W
Ti
&J
i'
8J
~
t,
uJ
APPENDICES
1) General Location Map
2) Proposed Usage
3) Existing Sanitary Sewer System
4) Design Parameters
5) Cost Estimate
,,':';;:':"-Kt:;5-
11"-
. '. .. . . . ..' .. --'~~"''''_':'':'''' .-......"'.--'=' "~" -"':"'f,~",;"';;--'0;'~~m.i,?,~-0.:~t;.-,.:it~;~"'E'"~' ~--:11'0'::'.'<:'-r:;:-":,:',~:'":_:):;',~jJj~,#"1tJ1t::j"::"i':
-, - r__~:~~..~,;;r",=__, ~.=.."C"=\~;"'''=.~"-_"''.''''''''~'_W_,,",.''.'''''''_~' Y-."1iI\;
iJ'
bill!
Q
APPENDIX 1
[J
Q
U
General Location Map
II
II
~"..
';'::
i
~
~
I'
.
I:J
~
I'
IF
1M
IJ
GENERAL LOCATION MAP
SCALE: 1- =300'
#c,
V
0-<:-
~
~a
t;-~
(:)<v
.:y
0"
G
"
"
~ ----
....
----
....
/
"
"
/
/
/
/
L]
~J
J
J
APPENDIX 2
. Proposed Usage
r-'l
. I
I
~
1--1
L
C
W
U
"I
LJ
f1'1
LJ
IJ
.
~
LJ
.,
.
LJ
IP
iJ.-
~{:':
if,
IU~
'1(1
.
SCENARIO A
P.ROPOSBDUSAGB
SCALE: 1. =300'
J;-c,
V
r:}~
~
~o
4'~
(j~
S
oy
G
"
"
~~
-
---
-
-
/
/
/
/
/
SCENARIO B
PROPOSED USAGE
SCALE: 1- =300'
"
"
~ -----
.,..
-----
.,..
.,..
/
"
"
/
/
/
/
P*~-
J
.
I
~
~I
,...........,.,)
~J
~
LJ
'--1
LJ
LJ
r-l
LJ
:l]
L,.,.!
.'"
{~
~
LJ
1m
.
IU
Iw
.![n
~
&:J
M
I~ i
-
""""'-'!fi"
...
._'-=-::':::~~ii~"";'-".' -;;..~~~;
APPENDIX 3
Existing Sanitary Sewer System
I
iii
SCALE: 1" =300'
SANITARY DWEll SYSTEM
BXlSTlNG CONDmONS
J
I
i
.
~C:>
0~
CJ~
\o~
~~
C:>
~\j~
ovv
c;
I j
.
~I
W
~~~~l
.d
i
CHi
U
r1
LI
,II
M010
8b
r ~
U
LJ
fl
LJ
~
n:"i
LJ
IJJ
f~o~
\
\
\
- -
L]
Iii
Ir
LJ
~
KUNG ENGINEERING & SURVEYING
~I"')VAJd Tr'VA~
J
~ I
J
--.'1
'J
:-C']
J.j
I
ji
'I
~I
o
o
r~1
L]
LJ
1
L.,
41iW
nrI
L'"
~"~
f"1
., ,i
If
,1
.
f"'1
II i
~
IJ
.~
~
an
.
.(1
.
Wheeler properties
University @ Iincoln
Qexist Qfull Qexcess Qexcess
line size slope cfs cfs .cfs gpm
8 0.004 0.39 0.77 0.44 197.47
8 0.0039 0.39 0.76 0.43 192.98
8 0.0116 0.39 1.30 1.02 457.78
8 .0.0032 0.55 0.69 0.20 89.76
8 0.0071 0.55 1.02 0.56 251.33
8 0.004 0.55 0.77 0.28 125.66
8 0.0039 0.55 0.76 0.28 125.66
8 0.0021 0.55 0.56 0.05 22.44
8 0.0074 0.55 1.05 0.58 260.30
12 0.0056 0.55 2.69 2.36 1059.17
12 0.0033 0.55 2.07 1.69 758.47
12 0.0018 0.55 1.54 1.12 502.66
12 0.0016 0.55 1.45 1.02 457.78
18 0.002 3.61 4.78 1.56 700.13
manhole
03381-M018
03381-M024
03381-M025
03381-M029
03282-M021
03282-M017
03282-M013
03282-M010
03282-M008
03282-M007
03282-M005
03282-M030
03282-M003
03282-M001
J
j
"',---"!
iJ
.
..
11
.
11
L,
~l
LJ
'"1
LJ
U
LJ
11
If
~
{1
IfJ
1[1i
Ir
IJ
.n
~
iQ:,'.
k!i.
d:
OJ:,
Project Description
Project File
Worksheet
Flow Element
Method
Solve For
Full Flow Capacity
Worksheet for Circular Channel
e:\haestad\pi\bwss.fm2
8" Sanitary Sewer-Clay or Concrete Pipe
Circular Channel
Manning's Formula
Full Flow Capacity
Input Data
Mannings Coefficient
Channel Slope
Diameter
0.013
0.003300 V : H
0.67 ft
Results
Depth
Discharge
Flow Area
Wetted Perimeter
Top Width
Critical Depth
Percent Full
Critical Slope
Velocity
Velocity Head
Specific Energy
Froude Number
Maximum Discharge
Full Flow Capacity
Full Flow Slope
1M Aug 7,1997
IJ 16:34:10
0.67
311.97
0.35
2.10
0.00
0.39
100.00
0.007713 V : H
1.99 ftls
0.06 ft
FULL ft
FULL
0.75 W/s
0.70 W/s
0.003300 V : H
ft
gaVmin
ft2
ft
ft
ft
I<Ilng Engineering & Surveying
Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666
FlowMaster v4.1 c
Page 1 of 1
J
,J
rJ
:J
I
..
~
~
t..
c::;.
-.~
rC=C'l
i
~
~
U
r ]
~I
\;.
~
c!~
~J
U
;-,
~~
:1
L,J
1"1
LJ
rj
~
o
iJ
LJ
22
~
Ii: !
.
I.
~
~
'~
~1
~
i-l
~J
'1
~j
W
,~
Ii
~
~.
SYSTEM INADEQUACY - SCENARIO A
SCALE: 1" =300'
#,0
v
v~
\O~
~~
o
<v~<v
O"V
CJ
CAPACllY LEGEND
>50% REMAINING
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
8"
f~22
\
\
LINE CAPACITY EXCEEDED
\
I I
f{'.,
" ,
M029 ,
~-----
--- - ORNE E
M025 \J~NERS\1'<
KUNG ENGINEERING & SURVEYING
BRYAN, TEXAS
'w~
-"-" ~-~" "- 'C',,",,''"''-,,+;''',>;;''''~'-':'jC~'",,,,~0",'0,,,,~;4,?~#~,-~~~%,~:Y~>'~:-'?-::~_;:"_:~~~"""'-"it"g-,--_'W:t;~;-,-~1-'"-';
~-
--4:'~":~'=---'
'1e'..",~~1IJ!1!i""]nl!!IITt1:111~""r~. "v.....
J
J
IJ
,J
I
lJ
r----'j
J
SYSTBM INADEQUACY - SCBNARlO B
SCALE: 1" =300'
#f?
V
O~
~\o~
. 4'~
~c,~
O'vv
C;
r~-----'l
~.
o
r~ 1
U
'I
LJ
r-i
L.)
.'~
f~22
\
\
LJ
\
LJ
.,
.
Ii
IP
.,
.w
10
KUNG ENGINEERING & SURVEYING
. BRYAN. TEXAS
J; i!Ol!~" "'" ","'lriJ;'''!1'f'
CAPACllY LEGEND
>50% REMAINING
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
, '" -". > ~ ~~~~~,~n;W!~~.~W~'7f9'''~~'P.1I'~~
J
J
~J
'lJ
',~J.~
.,
~J
J
J
11
W
Q'l
'.L';::'
.,..d
APPENDIX 4
Design Parameters
I~
U
~
I I
~
1!f1
[;; i
If
W"'.',
:ii'I."..
l!
i
~
W
W
~
Ii. -
,J
IJ
~j
~J .
Q.
C"''J
J
r'Cl
;...,
:J
r 1
I
'iIl
:-I
I i
III
"
I .
i..I
.r'l
'~
Q
!:fl
~. ,
i .
:I;,d
fT!
Ii:!
iIIi
~""l"
, 'J
'I'!
l~'
"T1
~.~
~
~.
~
-...~m~V!--lII
'C~"",,!,j,," ."",r\"".'!C~",,,,.c."""""""""_~rjj::!l!l....~!Ii '"!J"",''E!i::'.''' :: . g:"""M."I,".~~,
/
,-;~. \~v- r-\
k...;\ ,\)..J., 1
.~'---'~ .
,-., /'''' \ J
\c~ , ~ ~...,..
"'."... '-' 1.. \ ,- ,
Sanitary Sewer Impact Analysis
Bert Wheeler 8.471 & 4.242 acre tracts
Tract
Size (ac)
Zoning
Max use:
Use camp:
Comp ave. ww flow (gpd/ac)
Ave. flow tract A (gpd)
Ave. flow tract A (gpm)
Peak flow tract A (gpm)
Tract
Size (ac)
Zoning
Max use:
Use camp:
Camp ave. ww flow (gpd/ac)
Ave. flow tract A (gpd)
Ave. flow tract A (gpm)
Peak flow tract A (gpm)
Peak Combined Flow (gpm)
M I\-A
.Mitt Capacity avail. in 8" line
A
~.471
C-B
Hotel
Hilton
4,382
37,'120
25.78
116.00
B
4.242
A-P
Mixed Office
French ,rbor
412'
1,748
1.21
5.46
121.46 .
22.4
Prepared
Revised
5/20/97
6112197
_ 3o~ ~}" .\..J~ ,_ 6,j)tR,s;-'
T~w-> +tt\'u.. ~ ~~/dc.q.J
U u- '2. ~ ~~" t rOoyY.. ~ ~~I 3 00 o'.~:
x.t4\ S ~c,
~ t ~\~;'~;~ .
r ".1.1;
Lvnv,,-,. ro u...., .'
,.~.,-~_..-_.,,-,. ~ s ~f N"\
0~ I!J{~~
OJ'X1 q)v,/\
(]' '
71.. Jr)
""-'1..,.
" .
, ........-........c(...;..
h\!... :
c;.J".,
I\u
C1f,IAA.
0""'\
;-,-'-iZ~cr:-J- -P~6:--:;-'-'.,~;~,{5L.~...)
~ ~\ 1..Q~".:ll {~r o",Q.;'~)'~S)
,,--:.. ,~ ~4~. -i\..!'. .,~. to'
\,~\ \""i ...;:J.~.'''- l /"'- ~ ""A \::~) r _
I "
,
,{\~\.CL ~.J.)'lv"'.r!:}rr",.) \ i~!/\'
Proposed flows cannot be accomodated !n existing fa i1ities W Z, Cc, ii', "', C .1.;-. t........ L\ \L_~,--."
t.,,\_"'v,,:' ,:'t. r-r'\ \ ~. 0/') ~:;i..Q. ~.)U ~...(....'<
r . ~l r,' r't:Ar .1
-"'" tj~.r~ ~v'-'v " ,~'-
~. ~-- :"
~r\,.~ ' i~\ (t;~(:;\
. '
\
\
~._.,_...:""-""""....."",~~---~-,,,-_.,,,,....,,~... .
..-....-,-,..-..--
J
J
J
,
iJ
r-':!
IJ
I .~ 1
W
i-:'-l
~
r''''l
I .
.
W
~J
W
W
~
~.
~
~
LJ
~
!'i"!\
LJ
rl
~
30 TAC 317.4(a)
\ \__\ \ \\ \
------P , _'_. ~ .\ .,.., . -' I
I ~I\\. ~ \ "'-~' ~~.--.
l -~ i:' \ ~ r>~, ~. '\,"
:..J'~ '--^
Page I ofl
\ \ '~.~~.
c.' ",'
,J-; .{'''... ,~_~-" ~." <,<<II ,-. J
Daily Wastewater Flow - Wastewater
Gallons Strength
I Source I Remarks I Per Person I . .. mg/L BODs
I Municipality I Residential I 100 I 200
I Subdivision I Residential I (~~.) I 200
Trailer Park (Transient) 2 ~ persons per 50 I 300
trailer
I Mobile Home Park 13 persons per trailer I. 75 I 300
I School with Cafeteria. I With Showers I' 20 I 300
I Without Showers I 15 I 300
I Recreational Parks I Overnight user I 30 I 200
I Day user I 5 I 100
Office Building or I Qg~ I 300
Factory
I Motel I C~O J I 300
I Restaurant I Per Meal I 5 I 1000
I Hospital I Per Bed I 200 1- 300
I Nursing Home I Per Bed I 100 I 300
F / TI'1~c4. ..~u;S
J
J
cJ
.J
,---I
.~
:~
i~-::C-l
~
Project Description
Project File
Worksheet
Flow Element
Method
Solve For
Input Data
Mannings Coefficient
Channel Slope
Diameter
r'-':"l
Results
Depth
Discharge
Flow Area
Wetted Perimeter
Top Width
Critical Depth
Percent Full
Critical Slope
Velocity
Velocity Head
Specific Energy
Froude Number
Maximum Discharge
Full Flow Capacity
Full Flow Slope
..
i --l
I I
~
~
~
:l
~
~
rl
Ir
ij
W
rl
It
:l
I.JI
"~'-
>4;'
~
~
Aug 6,1997
22:09:58
Full Flow Capacity
Worksheet for Circular Channel
e:\haestad\pi\bwss.fm2
10" P.V.C. Sanitary Sewer
Circular Channel
Manning's Formula
Full Flow Capacity
0.011
0.003300 V : H
0.83 ft
0.83
667.52
0.55
2.62
0.00
0.55
100.00
0.005627 V : H
2.73 ftls
0.12 ft
FULL ft
FULL
1.60 ft3/s
1.49 ft3/s
0.003300 V : H
ft
gallmin
fl2
ft
ft
ft
K1ing.Engineering & Surveying
Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666
FlowMaster v4.1 c
Page 1 of 1
J
.J
,J
]
J
J
APPENDIX 5
Cost Estimate
I~ ~ I
'I
~
II
I 1
~
n
I ,
I I
W
c
C
II
r]
II
iii
rl
W
~,.":.
;-';:;'!
llii
I
I
I
I 00;",.11,',
WJ.."..
!':i'!i
1;;11;
{~Ii .
lit!~
UjJ
~."\'
.}ii:;:.!
.~'
~
J:J
~J
iJ
IJ
U
J
~II
I.iii
BERT WHEELERS INC.
8.471 AC & 4~242 AC TRACTS
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
AUGUST 7, 1997
ITEM NO, QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT COST
TOTAL
SANITARY SEWER
{"or'7)
.(. !
I '
iilJ
1 1040 LF 10" P.V.C. - S.D.R. 26@4'-8' BURY $30.00 $31,200.00
2 2 EA TIE to existing manhole (watertight connection)
Approx. 8-12' depth $700.00 $1,400.00
3 5 EA MANHOLE wI lid @ -8'-10' depth $1,800.00 $9,000.00
SUS.:.TOTAL: $41,600.00
10% CONTINGENCY: $4,160.00
SANITARY SEWER TOTAL: $45,760.00
c
O.
...".
l
U
[.(1'"
:1:......
,li)!;"J
C.,
'I
- ~
.~
I:J
t],
I;J
[J'
EXHIBIT E
REPLACED SECTION
10" LINE from M029-M007
12" LINE from M029-M007
12" LINE from M018-M029
BERT WHEELERS INC.
8.471 AC & 4.242 AC TRACTS
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
ESTIMATE SUMMARY
OCTOBER 29, 1997
REVISED OCTOBER 30, 1997
DEVELOPER CITY
DESCRIPTION COST COST
Replacing existing 8" line with 10" line obtaining capacity
for developments occuring on Wheeler Subdivision $61,880.00 -0-
TOTAL PROJECT COST 10" LINE: _$61 ,880.00 $0.00
COit of oversizing 10" line to 12" line obtaining capacity
for development other than in Wheeler Subdivision $61.880.00 $10,208.00
Replacing existing 8" line with 12" line along alternate
route obtaining capacity for development other than in
Wheeler Subdivision -0- $50.206.00
TOTAL COST 12" LINE: $61,880.00 $60,414.00
TOTAL PROJECT COST 12" LINE: $122,294.00
EXHIBIT E
BERT WHEELERS INC.
8.471 AC & 4.242 AC TRACTS
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE "2"
OCTOBER 29, 1997
REVISED OCTOBER 30,1997
OVERSIZED TO 12" LINE
ITEM NO. QTY
UNIT
DESCRIPTION
REPLACEMENT FROM M018-M029
1
370
IF 12" P.V.C. - S.D.R. 26 @ 4'.6' bury (Crossing F.M. 60)
(from M018-M025)
2
200
LF 12" P.V.C. - S.D.R. 26 @ 4'-8' bury (North of F.M. 60)
(from M025-M029, requested by City - not required
by Impact Study for Development)
3
180
LF ROAD BORE (F.M. 60) W/18" steel casing
4
1
EA TIE to existing manhole (watertight connection)
& Plug exisitng 6" line (Approx. 8-12' depth)
5
1
EA MANHOLE wI lid @ -8'-10' depth
10% CONTINGENCY:
SUB-TOTAL:
ENGINEERING FEES:
SANITARY SEWER TOTAL:
· Length of sanitary sewer line based on City of College Station
Wastewater Over1ay Maps. Distances are not field verified &
may not reflect actual on the ground line lengths.
UNIT COST
TOTAL
$38.00
$14,060.00
$38.00 $7,600.0.0.
$100.00 $18,000.00.
$1,000.00 $1,000.00
$1,800.00 $1,800.00
$42,460.00
$4,246.00
$46,70.6.00
$3,500.00
$50.,20.6.0.0.
EXHIBIT E
BERT WHEELERS INC.
8.471 AC & 4.242 AC TRACTS
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE "i"
OCTOBER 29, 1997
10" LINE
ITEM NO. QTY
UNIT
DESCRIPTION
UNIT COST
TOTAL
REPLACEMENT FROM M029-M007
1 1160 LF 10" P.V.C. - S.O.R. 26 @ 4'-8' BURY $30.00 $34,800.00
2 2 EA TIE to elCisting manhole (watertight connection)
& Plug existing 8" line (Approx. 8-12' depth) $1,000.00 $2,000.00
3 5 EA MANHOLE wI lid @ -8'-10' depth $1,800.00 $9,000.00
$45,800.00
10% CONTINGENCY: $4,580.00
SUB-TOTAL: $50,380.00
ENGINEERING FEES: $6,000.00
SPECIAL SERVICES:
Geotechnical Testing: Trench compaction $3,000.00
Surveying: Additional Easement Requirement $2,500.00
SANITARY SEWER TOTAL: $61 ,880.00
OVERSIZED TO 12" LINE
ITEM NO. QTY
UNIT
DESCRIPTION
UNIT COST
TOTAL
REPLACEMENT FROM M029-M007
1160 LF 12" P.V.C. - S.D.R. 26@4'-8' BURY $38.00 $44,080.00
2 2 EA TIE to existing manhole (watertight connection)
& Plug existing S"lIne (Approx. 6-12' depth) $1,000.00 $2,000.00
3 5 EA MANHOLE wI lid @ -8'-10' depth $1,800.00 $9,000.00
$55,080.00
10% CONTINGENCY: $5,508.00
SUB-TOTAL: $60,566.00
ENGINEERING FEES: $6,000.00
SPECIAL SERVICES:
Geotechnical Testing: Trench compaction $3,000.00
Surveying: Additional Easement Requirement $2,500.00
SANITARY SEWER TOTAL: $72,088.00
DIFFERENCE: $10,208,00
· Length of sanitary sewer line based on City of College Station
Wastewater Overlay Maps. Distances are not field verified &
may not reflect actual on the ground line lengths.
EXHIBIT E
-~
v""
v~
~c~
~'\~
~\:J~
cP
M0308
SCALE: 1" =300'
SANITARY SBWBR SYS'I'BM
~1U'tGCONJ)r11ONS
tr
kUNG ENGINEEl'UNG <Ie SURllFrlNc
.l!l
{!.
~
'"
"
." OJ
~ (I)
~:J
a
a",
0.0)
'"
tli
~
00
~C!
" ~
CD
Q)
10
2
1-(1:1
..:~
.2!o
CD<e
CD.-
~~
t::CX)
Q)
m
S1
LL
01
u
" III
ii:.s
OI-
l: :l
;:1/)
o
I-
~
."
~ ra2
ffi -- 0
-U)I
x
UJ
'"
g
'"
N
'"
0)
a
!a
Ill)
.0)
.!!!
II)
a. 01
o :;f
l: E!
::>. u
C/J ~
01
- (I)
I!! u
OlE
1:00
8
'"
r;;
'-:
a
8~ !
~
~l
"
a
CD
o
o
.,...
oF
....
l:
CD
E
a.
..Q
CD
>
CD
o
LL
0-
U) E
8 g
~!l:
o W m
;:J a. a.
"
Ix:
W
..J
<(
U
CI)
li1
f!
u
~
-g 5:
j :J
'(1)
L ~
0-0
Q)U)!l:
N
c;;
Cl
~
"
ll.
enUellV Ulooul1
\,
"'
'''-
\
~
CD
CD
....
en
2
I-
.:
CD
Qj
Q)
~
t::
CIl
m
S;
LL
/
/'
--
It
CD
>
.i::
o
~
.(j)
L-
a>
>
.c
:J
~
V
~.
'r"""'i~~
, 1;
. E
. ;;
\'
\f:/
~
~
CD
Q)
~.
2
u
~
~
~
i~
~
~
~
.~
,
1..-
"
"
~~
i:
c
;;:
-
.
.
e
'EXIIIBrr G
<t)
~
T
~.:
It
EXHIBIT H
CONSENT OF THE SOLE DIRECTOR
IN LIEU OF SPECIAL MEETING
OF
W. D. HAMM III CORPORA nON
(the "Corporation")
JUNE 25, 1987
The undersigned, being the Sole Director of the Corporation, does hereby, pursu-
ant to Article 9.10B of the Texas Business Corporation Act, adopt the followiogresolu-
lions by execution of this Consent, and such Consent shall have the same fOrce and ef-
feet as a unanimous vote by the undersigned at a properly called .special mee~ingi of. the
Board of Directors of the Corporation.
RESOLVED, that in the judgment of the sole Director of theCorpo-
ration, it is deemed advisable to amend the Articles of Incorporation so as!
to change the name of the Corporation, and to that end Article I be
changed to read as follows:
"ARTICLE I
NAME
The name of the Corporation is W. Dow Hamm HI
Corpora tion."
RESOLVED FURTHER, that inasumch as no organizational mee~ing
has been held for the election of officers and issuance of shares oFthe
Corporation, W, Dow Hamm III, the sole Director of theCorporatiol1,i$,
hereby authorized, to (a) sign, execute, certify to, verify, acknowle9g~.
deliver, accept, file and record the Articles of Amendment and anyan9L:
all such instruments and documents with the Secretary of State ofT~~as.:'
and (b) take, or cause to be taken, any and all such actionJn the nam!:!()f'
and on behalf of the Corporation or otherwise, (as in his judgment shapb~
necessary, desirable or appropriate) in order to effect the purposes! of)h~. .
foregoing resolutions. .. .. ...
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this.consentaso(~l)~day
~In(l year first above written.
DIRECTOR:
75"/~
W. Dow Hamm III
~~5: D07028 7B.60
· 0287jsd2