HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneousFrom: Jim Smith
To: City Ha11.Smccully
Date: 10/3/97 3:37pm
Subject: PRC - Wednesday, October 8, 1997 -Reply -Reply
They are 32 feet from the nose to the rear bumper. This is with the forks up
in the travel. position..
»> Sabine McCully 10/03/97 03:03pm »>
ok -- we'll make note of that. .also, how long are those trucks? we figured
that the turn-around area is probably big enough if the trucks are 30' long or
I less.
>.Jm Smith 10/03/97. 02:51pm »>
Parking Lot Plan - Holleman & Welsh Office Building (97-430 The container
location looks fine.. My only concern is the 15 ft. pulling into the
container. I need a 17 radius for my FEL trucks.
Final Plat - Holleman & Welsh Addition (97-233): No problem.
Final Plat - Churchill Estates (97-236): No problem.
Thanks!
01/06/98 17:04
McCord Engineering, Inc,
CS-l3-W.21
11 /20/97
CITY OF COLLEGE STATION
WELCH STREET OFFICE COMPLEX
Project Cost Estimate -New Construction
ASSEMBLY UNIT ASSEMBLY DESCRIPTION
UD#1/0 AL #1/0 AL URD ISKV CABLE
UD#350 MCM S #350 MCM SECONDARY CABLE
UG7-50 1PH 50 KVA LOOP FEED 240/120
UJ2-6-I INS. SECONDARY CONNECTOR BLOCK
UMl-SC CONCRETE TRANSFORMER PAD
UM6-1 IJO LOAD BREAK ELBOW #I/0
UM6-34 ELBOW SURGE ARRESTER
UM6-4 FAULT INDICATOR 200 AMP
UM6-6 GROUND ROD ASSEMBLY
COST ($) PER 1 ASSEMBLY
QTY LABOR MATERIAL TOTAL TOTAL COST ~
0.460 630.00 1,510.00 2,140.00 984,40
0.330 212.50 660.00 872.50 287.93
1.000 162.75 1,009.22 1,171.97 1,171.97
3.000 15.00 17.16 32.16 96.48
I.000 75.60 69.82 145.42 145,42
2.000 48.00 26.45 74.45 148,90
1.000 27.30 69.38 96.68 96.68
1,000 21.00 118.00 139.00 139.00
1.000 15.75 6.06 21,81 21.81
$3,092.54
TOTAL LABOR $803.33
TOTAL MATERIAL $2,289.26
TOTAL $3,092.59
LABOR OVERHEAD 30.00 % $241.01
MATERIAL HANDLING 7.00 % $164.25
TOTAL $3,493.83
ENGINEERING & OVERHEAD 8.50 % $296.98
GRAND TOTAL $3,790.81
ROUNDED TO 53,791.00
DEVELOPER'S CONTRIBUTION 20.00 % $758.00
d 409 764 3452 COLL STA PUB UTL _ l~ 001
DENOTES HOT WORK
i
Owner.•
Ben Walker
vol. 1147, Pg. 849
0.678 Acre i
(Save & Except Tract)
S4a° 5l'd~3"E 45,75'
1
Owner: 1 ..,
A.L. h'olikJr, b ,~
Tract 2 of o• ¢Z~} AG. ~,
& P/O 0.314 Acre traet ~ 4~
• Vol. 339, Pg. 119 1 ~ °; t
I ^ '~
Remainder Tract 1 0
0.314 Acre
I
O.S63AC ~
v
0
a
s iz
~I 1
~i
ti
I OIVnCr: ~ .St
AkGer Knrint I~o.~•ani
fool, 2S3G, 1'g. 78
W ~ 0.3533 Aa'e ~ y ~
~~
~ (Deed
Dist)
-~" 157,1 /(Deed Dist.). _20.0
-~---- - -
N44° 51'55"W 12.34'
L STREET (gift R.O. W Width )_
B,~SIS OF BEARING: N45°04' 12"E BEING THE NC
BEARING OF THE 1.323 ACRES TRACT (CALLED
DEPICTED IN THE DEED RECORDED IN VOL ,
( BRAZOS COUNTY OFFICIAL R~'~
VOTE: EASEMENTS, OR CLAIMS OF F
1:323 ACRES TRACT (CALLED 1.3~~~~
BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS, AS ~ O ~~
(G.F NO. $(Y~~~ ~ ~-~.~
J ~ y
~~
VOTE: THIS TRACE •~ L"` ~o O
,~~q Jr,
FLOOD PLAIN;~:v•O ~ ~' ~• ~`
~ -~
E~~ >
J Op
~' V U
~` ~ O
Owner:
Lynell Ann Divin l~ozencraJl
vol. 1147, 1'g. 549
- FOUND 3/3" CR 3,4S6Acres (net)
FOUND S/8" I,R •
841° 09'19"E 6 . FOUND S/8" i,R
_ 7 QZS
~-. 837
~ ~° Z~'S~"Ir ],4 c 1 FOG'ND Sib" 1.1
urvc Data: - _' "~= ..
R+ 475.00 ~. ~-
p= 7°24'30"
T=30.77 Curve Data: -----J
L=61.46 ~ R- 330.00 L-r N
v- a°47'49" 1 ,~
T=22.20 ( o
L=44,37
1.323 AC. VACANT TRACT ~j
- FOUND 1/2" (.R
N Owner.• ~
,~ First American Bank 1
,~, Yol. 2101, Pg. ? ~ 0
W 1, 32.3 Acres
N
(Called 1.319 Acres Tract)
O
0
~ ~~,
Curve Data. ~ ~
R= 541.03
Curve Data:
R- 460.00 J= 9° 12'08"
~= 12°29'25" T=43.54.
T=50.34 L=86.89
L=100.28 FOUND 3~`~" LR __
FOWi D 5~8" LR CA NSZ° 45'U'1+"~'~g6 80'
r SF,T li2^ L;
_ _ ,^~......" FOWi D Sib" i.R
CH N 28'+W °Y~Q'08' N57° 21'11."W 50.74'
is 1 E: C;V1V1'Vlr;lel i
C:$1 Y OF (.:OLLF:Cir. S l A 1101'1, 1 F:1~A
YROJ t'.C 1 1CL V lE W C Ol'V11ViI 1 1 E r.
OCTOBER 08,1997
PARKING LOT PLAT - HOLLEMAN ~& WELSH OFFICE BUILDING; PROPOSED
5200 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING ON L®T S, BLOCK 1 OF THE
HOLLEMAN AND WELSH ADDITION ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF WELSH
AVENUE ,T[JST SOUTH OF THE HOLLEMAN INTERSECTION. (97-430)
GTE COMMENTS: THE DEVELOPER/OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING
AND PLACING 2 - 41NCH CONDUITS. WITH PULL STRING FROM THE OUTSIDE
BUILDING LOCATION TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF WELSH STREET. THE CONDUIT
SHALL ELL UP 4 FEET ON THE OUTSIDE BUILDING LOCATION ~NI? BE CAPPED AND
ELL UP 6 INCHES IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND BE CAPPED. THE OUTSIDE BUILDING
TEIZMIl~IATION SHALL BE WITHIN 2Q FEET OF POWER - IF NOT THE
DEVELOPER/OWNER iS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND PLACING A 8'X5/8"
COPPER GROUND ROD AT THE BASE OF THE TERMINATION .
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS,. PLEASE CALL ME AT 409/821-4723.
THANKS, LAVERNE AKIN
COLLEGE STATION
P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842
Tel: 409 764 3500
January 15, 1998
George Stuart
P. O. Box 3295
Bryan, TX 77805
Re: Texas Commission for the Blind off ce
building at IIIS Welsh Avenue.
Dear Mr. Stuart,
Several items are necessary for the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.) for the building
at 1115 Welsh .Avenue. These items are basic ordinance requirements and have been noted
throughout the development review process.
Because we understand the needs of your tenants to occupy the building in order to provide basic
ser~rices to their clients, we will .issue. a temporary and conditional C.O. This C.O. is temporary
and will expire on Tuesday, March 31, .1998.. This temporary C.O. will allow your tenants as well
as their clients to occupy the building.
Prior to the expiration of the temporary C.O. the remaining ordinance requirements must be
completed. These items may not be guaranteed. All items must be constructed or installed
orr or before March 31, 1998 with no exceptions: ~
(1) .Install all elements ofthe landscape plan including the irrigation system.
( 2} The .parking lot must be striped and the proper handicap markings completed in
accordance with the approved plans.
(3) The following drainage related items must be completed.
-- Submit an addendum to the approved construction documents (sealed by a
registered professional engineer) that shows the "as built" conditions of the_
.parking lot and the necessary modifications of the detention pond in order to
accommodate the site drainage. The parking lot was not constructed. in
accordance with approved plans .which may cause some redesign of the
detention pond or parking lot. This construction addendum must be
submitted and reviewed' by .City staff prior to construction. of the detention
facility.
-- Construction of the detention pond and associated infrastructure as shown on
the revised and approved construction documents.
-- -Fine grading of the site to include general clean-up and forming earthen berms
along Welsh Avenue in accordance with the approved plans.. The subject
property and. any adjacent properties that were disturbed during construction
must be graded and either seeded or sodded.
Home of Texas A&M University
C.O. Issuance
George Stuart
Page 2 of 2
( 4) Mr. Stuart must sign.and/or obtain the necessary easement documentation for the
off-site 20' public utility easement for the sanitary sewer and storm sewer. The
City's Legal Department is currently reviewing the .easement dedicated to Mr.
Stuart. by the Wozencraft Family. The City must be given the necessary rights to
access and maintain the public utilities within this off.-site easement.
( 5) Installation of lintels for masonry support at all exterior window and door
openings.. (A letter signed and .sealed by a registered professional engineer may be
submitted in lieu of installing the lintels if the engineer can verify that the masonry
is self-supporting.)
( 6) The conduit installed .for electrical service to the building leaves your project site
.and crosses. onto private property. You must relocate the conduit and sernce onto
your property or secure an easement from the impacted property owner.
Please note the importance of addressing all of the above items.. We can not issue the permanent
C.O: until all of the above mentioned items have been completed. While we will do everything we
can to assist you in meeting these requirements, we are relying on you to take the action necessary.
to do so.
I hope that we can continue to work closely together over the next two months to get the project
completed. Please contact me at (409) 764-3570 with any questions.
Sincerely,
atali Tomas Ru'
Assistant Development Coordinator
cc: Lance Simms, Building Official
Case File #97-430
Keith Stanford, 717 Franklin, Waco, TX 76701.
Doug Harrison, 6400 US Highway 290 East, Ste 201, Austin, TX 78723
George Stuart- Page 2
~ v
TATION
EGE S
coL~.
P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842_
Tel: 409 764 3500
March 12, 1998.
George Stuart
P. O. Box 3295
Bryan, TX 77805
Re: Office building located at 111 S Welsh Avenue.
Dear Mr. Stuart,
Attached is a copy of the permanent Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.) for the above mentioned
office building.. There are still a few. items that need to be addressed.. However, since they.are not:'
health and safety related, we have decided to issue a permanent C.O. with the understanding that
you will complete these items as soon as possible. There are threeitems listed on the C.O. that-
must be completed on or before Friday, April 17, 1998.
Please understand that. we will not force the tenants of the building to vacate if the items listed on
the C.O. are not addressed before the deadline. However, we will turn the. case over.. to our Legal
Department to proceed with action. against the contractor/property owner if the work is not..
completed.
I'm sure that the additional two and a half weeks will give you plenty of time to address thefew
remaining. items. Please call me once. the work is completed and I will come out to inspect. H
you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (409) 764-3570.
L.L~X.~~
atali Thomas. Ruiz
Assistant Development Coordinator
cc: ce Simms, Building Official
ase File #97-430
Keith Stanford, 717 Franklin, Waco, TX 76701
David Bosh, 6400: US Highway 290 East,. Ste 201, Austin, TX 78723
Home of Texas A&M University
v ~
CITY OF' COLLEGE STATION
1101 TEXAS AVENUE S.
COLLEGE STATION,. TX 7784LD
C::`E ~ T I F I C A T E O F O C C: U P A N. C Y
OWNEP,''S.NAME: STATE OF .TEXAS _
ADDE'ESS:'WELSH.AVENUE, 1115 FEPMIT #:9702775
Ph?O TEC:T: ` DEFT' OF HUMAN SEF'V:I i_ ES
LOT: 5 EsLOCF~::: 1 SUL~D I V I S I ON: HOLLOMAIV AND .WELSH ADDN
I HAVE•EXAMINED THE OFFICIAL ZONING; MAP OF THE ~:ITY OF COLLEGE STATION
AND DO `HEh?E~SY'GERTIFY THAT THE AF~OVE I~ESCF,'IPED LAND MAY RE OCCUPIED IN
AGC:O~.DAIVCE WITH THE f~EGULAT I ONS FOE: ZOfV I NC; D I STF' I CT _ C_l AS F~ER
OR.DINANC:E NO. i638 SUFt3ECT TQ THE FOLLOWING.VAE:IANCES, EXCEPTIONS OR
SPED I AL E'EGtU I REMENTS AS FOLLOWS e See re firemen below '
3__/ 12 / 98
DATE C Z. I NG OFF I 7 ~tatalie
Assistant opment"Coordinator
I HEREE~Y CERTIFY THAT THIS 'RU I LD I NG HAS ; E3EEIV I N5~'E~:TED AND THAT I T
CAN BCE USED AS GROUP E~ -. bIJS I NESS . , Gf~01.lF D OECUPANCY
CLASSIFICATION AS DEFIRtED HY THE STANDARD BUILDING CODE SUSJ.ECT TQ
THE FOLLOWING SPEC I f I G t~EOU I CEMENTS . (See requirements below.)
3 . f 12 ! - 98 -~-..a'
DATE. (BUILDING FIGIAL:} ce Simms
i Building Official
~i The follor+~ring ite~s must be ccxnpleted by the contractor before Apri.1 17, 1998.:
~) Submit the off-site: easement dedication. docuneFnts signed by r9rs. Wozeneraf~.
(2)~ sPant the 3' " ta11:'screening fences. along the tdelsh Aver~.ue frcmtage to match
the trim of the building.
(3) Fine grading of the site to include general.:: clean-up. Thesubject property
and any adjacent ;properties disturbed during-constructicm mast be graded
and either seeded or sodded:
_...
,~
,;
i
i~~'i~; ~:t'i~IMi~;Iti'i'ti
t'i.`TY ()F tt3LLEC% ~ iA i iON, i'ir:~AS
YI20JE~:T REtiIEW CO~vIMi't'"I'E~
OC'TOBF.I2 48, t~197
FARKIN'G LOT PLA'i' - iiOLLLMAN & WI:I.SI1 UFFICE BUILllING; PROPUSF.D
52UU S(~CTARE FOOT OF'FICL BY)II.UING ON L,U'i' S, I;LOCI~ i (3F TiI)~:
IIOLLI'.MAt1` AND WFLSH .4DDITIOV ALONG TiiG LAST SIUF, OF WELSH
AVENUE JUST SOUT[i OF'TI~iL HOI.LC~tAN INTF.RSF..CTIOV. {97-430}
(.rT1F Cn~1MFN'1'S: 'I'I if L)1VE:!_t.)f'LI2/C)Wh'I:R [S I2I~.SI~t)NSIBI.E FOR I~I20VIDINCi
nNIZ PI..A(_'ING 2 - 4 INCII c_'c.7Nl~t.)1"I'S W!'I'I~I f'I,II.i. S"I'RIN{~ FROM'1'LIE UU'i'SIl~I•r
f~I.III.,C)INC~ I_cJO.A"1'!'c.~N "1'()'I'I~fl- fZIC;t•f•t` t~I~'-~t~nY c:)T~ Wf'f..,Sl.i S'rREtr'I'. '1~Il1; C{)Nl~I)t~I~
SMALL Lt_.L I)1' C III."I' QN "I'~~IF~ £?U"TS1I:)E I3l1tI_.L)!NG LUC:A't'ION nNl~ fib; CAPf'F;[) ANI.)
I=.I.[. l IN £s IN£-'Hf~ti IN 'I~f-If RIC~F~iT'-Of~-WfiY fiNI3 131: (:'Al~I'I"~:l~. THE OUTSlDir I3UlLUlNC;
'I'F~.I2MIN1\TI£)N S~IALL Iit= WI"1'l l!N 2U t~I~:la'i~ t~t~ l't)WIiIt - IF NE)T TfiE
I)I :v!?.t.()PFI2/c~WNER lS 12~SI'C}NS1Lii.~: t~(,)It ['I2t)vtl71NU AND PLACINCf A S`XSlS"
L'£~PI'ER tsf20UN1) 12C)n A'1' "fHE BASE (3F "!'1lf `t"Irl2MI'N~'1'LC}N .
[F Yc~t~ ~~It\vr nNY QUIrS'ClONS, I~L~ASE C;AI.I.. MIS /1"I' ~tU4/82I-4723.
TF~iANKS, LAVl::12NI: E1K[N
•
e
1~1ZINICLI'AL DEVELOPMENT GROUP
2SS1 Texas Ave. South Ste. A • College Station, Texas 77840.409-693-5359 • FAX.• 409-693-4243 • EMAIL: mdgcs@gte. net
Engineering, Surveying, Planning and Environmental Consultants
January 7, 1998
Natalie Ruiz
City of College Station Planning Division
1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, TN 77842
Re: Estimate Request -Your Letter to George Stuart Dated December 31, 1997
Item 8 and Item 11 -
Natalie:
At the direction of our client,. George Stuart, we have prepared the estimates requested, and they
are included in this letter.
In response to your inquiry about sewer service to future Lot 3, Holleman & Welsh Addition, the
lot is alreadyserved by a sewer line along Holleman Drive, as depicted on the City Sewer Map.
.Another is not needed.
Please call me or Greg Taggart if you have. any .questions about these items.
Sincerely,
.~ .~~ ~~o r~ ~~
North Barden, P.E. ~~ ~ ~'t~,~r•' 'A°ti* ~~~
C.E.O. ~ ~.~~ ~t~' '~~ ~ ~d-
0
~I
000797-a 10-22(2864)
I
~`~"' Q°v ~~: .
•~o ~~
,. ~~~ ~.
a~
~~
i'
ENGINEERS ESTIMATE
OF
CONSTRUCTION AND DESIGN COST
'~ FOR
REVISED DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
LOT 5, DLOCK ONE, HOLLEMAN & WELSH ADDITION
PARAGRAPH 8A Construction of Detention Pond & Associated.Infrastructure
Item No. Item Name Unit Cost uanti Cost
1, Detention Pond 3.500.00/ea. 1 ea. 3500.00
2. 1' x 1 ° Grate Inlet 450.00/ea. 1 ea. 450.00
3. 18°' RCP 35.00/LF 162 LF 5670.00
15' x 5' Special J-Box 2400.00/ea. 1 ea. 2400.00
800.00
.Remove Exist J-Box 800.00/ea. 1 ea.
6. Block Sod - St. Augustine 0.25/SF 1800 SF 450.00
`
TOTAL 13 270.00
S ,
PARAGRAPH 8B. Drainage Redesign As Needed
Based on review of as-built data, the parking lot .appears tq function in a reasonable manner.
Only nvnor modifications of a trivial nature appear needed. An example is the addition
discharge point to the detention basin. This represents only a minor change in routing (no
additional drainage report is required). Design costs are expected to be less. than $550.00
PARAGRAPH 8C Construction of Phvsical Modifications of Parking Lot to Drain to Pnnd
Item No. Item Name Unit Cost. uantity Cost
1. 25' x 3' Concrete Flume 3.00/SF 75 SF 225.00
K
000707-e.02-22(2864) ~~
~~
PARAGRAPH 8D Fire Grading; Berm Construction. General Cieanut~
Item No. Item Name Unit Cost uanti Cost
1. Screen Berm Construction
(11 CY/ea) $200.00 3/ea. $600.00
2. Block Sod 0.25/SF 750 SF $187.50
3. General Fine Grade
Cleanup $500.00/LS 1 ea. $500.00
TOTAL $1,287.50
TOTAL FOR ALL ITEMS $15.332.50
~:~ ,~~~
000707-e.02-22(2864)
George Stuart
P. O. Box 3295
Bryan, TX 77805
Re: Texas. Commission, for the Blind offrce building at IIIS T3'elsh Avenue.
Dear Mr. Stuart,.
In response to your letter dated December 30, 1997 and a request for a Certificate of Occupancy
(C.O.) for the building at 1115 Welsh Avenue, I have compiled. a list' of outstanding. items that
must be addressed prior to issuance of a C.O.
(1) The subcontractors must request and pass the final inspection for each of their jobs
including the plumbing, mechanical and electrical.
~' (2) The Building Ofl7cial and Fire Marshal must inspect :and pass the final. building
inspection.'
( 3) A letter of credit or guarantee in the amount of $11,350' must be submitted for the
plant material thaf is shown as part of the .landscaping :plan but not yet installed.
(2270 Landscaping Points x $5 = $11,350 total :guarantee) You will have four
months from the date 'of the Certificate. of Occupancy to install the required
landsca in .Before the letter ofcredit or grantee is released all elements of the
p g
landscape plan must be installed including the irrigation system:
(4) The parking lot must' be .striped, wheel stops :installed and the proper handicap
markings completed in accordance with the approved plans.
'~, { 5) The total of $758 must be submitted for the contractor's portion of the electrical
.service work.. performed by the City.
(6) The. erosion control .silt fencing shown on the construction plans. must be in place
until such time that the detention pond is constructed and accepted by the City and
the vegetative. ground cover has been sufficiently established to prevent erosion.
(7) The 6" sanitary, sewer line .from the .building to the 20' public utility easement in
the rear of the property must be installed,'inspected and approved by the City: The
junction box .must be constructed as part of the sanitary ewer .line as designed by
the Municipal Development Group. Any. modificatiofzs to the junction box must be
submitted by a registered .engineer, reviewed and approved by City sta. fj' prior to
construction. (As part of the inspection, the utility department vv~ll run a camera
through to the line to ensure that all requirements:are met. The utility department
~I i 'n cti n. rdinate the ins ecti n
w111 require sufficient notice to schedu e the i spe o Coo p o
' as soon as possible with Engineering Inspector Jerry Jones at 764-3690.)
Holleman & Welsh Office
C.O. Punchlist
Case #97--430
Page 2 of 3
Items to be addressed before issuance of a C.O. (cont.):
( 8) Cost estimates sealed by a registered Engineer to be reviewed and approved by
staff that includes the following costs as if the City of College Station were
responsible. for the following:
-- Construction of the detention pond and associated infrastructure as shown on
the-approved construction documents.
-- Redesign of the drainage for the site that takes into account the existing
parking lot. The parking lot was not constructed in accordance with approved
plans which may -cause some redesign of the detention pond or parking lot.
-- Modifications to the parking lot that may have to be made in order to properly
drain runoff from the parking lot to the detention pond.
-- Fine grading 'of the site to include general clean-up :and forming earthen berms
along Welsh Avenue in `accordance with the approved plans.. The .subject
property and any adjacent properties that were disturbed during construction
must be graded and either seeded or sodded.
9) A letter of creditor guarantee in the total amount of the sealed estimates approved
by staff plus a 1;5% contingency. (If this total is less than: $10,000, a minimum
guarantee of $10,000 must be subnutted.)
(l0) The design and construction work included in the letter of credit or guarantee must
be completed within 120 calendar days .from the issuance of a C.O. (This 120. day
time limit is the absolute maximum time that will be allowed. for completion of the
work. The detention:: pond. and associated drainage work must. be completed
within 120 days and no extensions will be allowed.)
(1 i) Submit the following information: for review and approval so that the final ptlat for
the subject property can be filed. for record:. -
-- A copy of the off-site 20' public utility easement for the sanitary sewer and
storm sewer.
-- A letter signed and sealed by a professional engineer which explains how lot 3
of the Holleman and Welsh Subdivision will obtain sewer service. This letter
will ensure that sanitary sewer infrastructure need not be extended through the
subject property. to service lot, 3.
In your letter you mention that the engineering firm designing the project advised y~u~o wait for
the outcome of an ordinance amendment that would not require detention for a site of this size.
To .date, no such ordinance amendment has been 'approved and detention is required for the
subject.. property.. It is my understanding Ghat .staff is still exploring the possibility of such an
ordinance change; however, there are no immediate .plans. for City .Council consideration. The
current Drainage Ordinance applies in this instance and all requirements mustbe met.
__
Holleman & Welsh Off ce
GO. Punchlist
Case #97-430
Page 3 of 3
-All of the .above mentioned requirements must be addressed prior to issuance of a C.O. for the
subject property. If you have any questions or need. additional information, please contact me at
(409) 764-3570..
Sincerely,
Natalie Thomas Ruiz
Assistant Development Coordinator
cc: North Bardell, Municipal Development Group
Lance Simms, Building Official
Jerry Jones, Engineering Inspector
Case File #97-430
~!
.~
DEC ~0 '97 04~45PM AM PM #1
P.2
r ~ ~ ,~-~Xa S ~7~0~
~~, ~cz. ~,~'~
~' ? ~. ~ ~ f
`f~1 ~ ~,~z 5 ~t ~i 2.-.
C'®~ ~~ fie, Sr'® ~
3e.c ~ 115., o~ t~rer ~~Y ~. 5~~ -~ ~e ~, ~ ~~ m ~~s ~ ~^
rc~ ~ i ~~~-n~.~nts of ~~S cZ,,~ ~D ~¢ a~,~ E~1~~ v~r ~ ~~ro~'
~ ~ ~,e. ~ra~~a~ ~®r coh ~'~ rvc ¢~ mn- ..Z~ h~v~e_ of ~~~ess; ~'~
~L~®~ COrC.~1'h't'~~ ~~e_ ~~Y4..i'Y~c~.~J~ ~~eY~ a.Y~ ~~'~or5
~mLLow;-r, w~..;c ~, ~~.ve. ~L~o C®hL r; ~~t~c ~'~ z~~~
Ye~~~ h ~Gt4.2L' ~t~,S 1-,~-~ bee.h cz ccornP ~i s~C~ecf -'
r ~ i ~~... ~r~~le~f C~®a r~ ~ ~~.~-o ~ ~ ~ ~,e. c. h~, r ~,~.r~,' ~~ ~ r vn d ~ ~-
~ m , ,~
~ ~. JAY o ~ ec~ Ct~ U i ~ ~~ '~j ~ ~e.~~y~ ~ j.. ~, o h -~S~ ~ ~~c e Y~
wa-S 4.. P~,a-~, ~ i ~~ l(~ vQLo ~~c~ ~o ~ ; ve._. ~ l~ci~ 1_
~JJ ~ ~1., L,- i h S .' a ~. , ,1~ w r ~ Q r~v i ~ c# ~D ~~t. i ~" rv 1^
'~h ~ .911 '~' G O V}'1 ~ ®~ L~ln ~.-'~' ~ L. Q ~ ,
,Z . ~~ sib ~~ ~- ~Iz~. ~~,~ ~-d r ->~~ , ~.'~.s ~ovY~~ ®~, ~~~1~r z 1
CJ~."'~,,,C~ ,~ trJ~1.s , a '~?Cj ~ ~2~, U ~Y r~ t LQ.CSE? , CQ~ 1~~ eh ~eYn e.~Z
~rilG ~. , ~ C~1~ 4'. ®YCaJ~.- ''k~~YS'~ 1~j 9 ~~C7Y4-. ~r'~ h cL ~ d ®~ L ,~ 2 M
~6 Lit-1., ~, ~ '~~^<~Y~ o~ i.~ ~'~ ~ `~
e,r,a$ - ~, ~e rs ~ Ye w ~c c~~ds~ D, x~~ v r cz.h ~~ ~ ~-, ®~ t~ ~ ~
E p fQ~ L. ~ u i L,,~ i ~5 e o g~~ ~ ~" Q.b®s.! ~' ~~ ~ ~+~ r ~~v c~Y ~. ~o Ci'.
DEC ~0 '97 04~45PM AM PM #1 P''
y
/~~se r ~i ~v Y ~Gin,~ ~~ ~ ~v/'.~ ~ 1 ~ e C
a- I~c~ Y i ®c~ ~f ~y »~ e. o~ J 2. ® ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ L o we.~~ ~® r~
~'1 ~.'. ~'p Cep ~ PL ~ ~-~ ,t~ ~ c~e-'ZCc~ { ~ 5 ~r, ~o ~- G1 t Y@- ~ ~- ~.
A.~'SmG i~''~e~ w i ~ t~~ ~Oy i L~i '~~ /.~ x~L
Q.~Y 2G i Q.~-~,.~ .
COLLEGE STATION
P. O. Box 9960 1101. Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842
Tel: 409 764 3500
November 13, 1997
George Stuart
209 A University Drive
College Station, TX 77840
Re: Texas Commission for the Blind office building.
Dear Mr. Stuart,
Attached is a copy of the junction box and landscaping screening berm details. to be attached to
your set of the approved construction documents. The original set of construction documents
was approved with the condition that these two details be submitted and approved at a later date.
Please attach these details to your construction plans that are kept on the fob site. I will forward
copies of the details to the necessary city department.
I will be on vacation from. Monday, November 17th through Monday, December 1st. Please
work closely with Development Coordinator Shirley Volk on the issuance of a certificate of
occupancy.
If you have any questions, please contact myself or Shirley at (409) 764-3570.
Sincerely,
Natalie`Thomas Ruiz
Assistant Development
Attachments __
cc: Lance Simms, Building Official
Cathy Raney, Water/Waste Water.
' ley Volk, Development Coordinator -
File #97-430
Home of Texas A&M University
.t,
JOINT OF PVC CARRIER
PIPE TO BE CENTERED
SO THAT BELL DOES
NOT LIE WITHIN THE
STEEL ENCASEMENT
PROPOSED REINFORCED
CONCRETE JUNCTION BOX
7,-0„
I .
a ~ .
6„ (TYP)
•4
.= UPSTREAM
SOFFIT ELEV =
313.76
O PROPOSED 7" STEEL
6'-0" ENCASEMENT (SCH-40)
(O.D.=7.63")
a
PROPOSED 6" PVC
3,,ss SANITARY. SEWER
311.63
0.5090
---~-i-
FL=311.09 FL=311.06 , „„
311 A2 .a:~ 1~~C®
FL 310.51 31 C_99
~ ': a
e
z
`/
PRQPQSED JUNCTION BMX
CROSS-SECTION ~ SEWER
4
~s~e ,g
' ~' tS! fi tL~ `~t(~
:~ : g~' ~~ s 60873.. ~'~~
~~~eO~A ~~®®
~~ ~`
MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP
203 HOLLEMAN DRIVE EAST.
COLLEGE .STATION, TEXAS 77840
(409)693-5359
Engineering • Planning • .Surveying
,~ .
OPTIONAL SCREENING SHRUB
(TYPE, LOCATION & NUMBER
NOTE * AS SHOWN ON CONSTRUCTION
PLANS.)
SCREENING BERM SHALL HAVE
I HT WITH SHURBS
N HEG
MI
2( )
3' MIN HEIGHT w o SHURBS
& /
( )
2.-0>'
BERM TO BE BLOCK
SODDED w/St. AUGUSTINE
3 / ~j ~~ /~
1 ~j ~j/~j/~j/~j/
~/~
EXISTING
~j\~j\~j\~j\~j\~j\~j\ G ROU N D
~~j/ ~j/ // // //\//\
LANDSCAPING SCREENING BERM
CROSS-SECTION
~~~®~®~
~~ ~ ~ ~
~~
T~
® • ~h.
•
•
~ ~ 4.~ ~ ~
.. e6eNN~Ya1~olNeMee+~~le•
.. li
l
-4,s~ •
~~~ TH A D
O
vd
1
~`~~
.~ t ~~
~ ~i3
MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP
203. HOLLEMAN '.DRIVE EAST
® COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840
(409)693-5359
E7cgineBrng • Plannting Surveying
j
~;
''
~~
1~1UNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT GRO SIP
203 Holleman Drive East • College Station, Texas 77840. 409-693-5359 - FAX.• 409-693-4243
Engineering, Surveying, Planning and Environmental Consultants
_~ ~
~° ~~-CS,
i~~~uV
-~
~~
October 24, 1997
Natalie Ruiz
City of College Station
POBox 9960
College Station, Texas 77840
Re: George Stuart, Holleman and Welsh Addition, NIDG Noe2864-707
Dear Natalie:
Per our phone conversation on October 23, 1997, the following changes have been made and will
be amended to the construction plans:
1, Landscaping screening berm will have 2' (minimum) height with shrubs and 3'
(minimum) height without shrubs,
2. Water demand with all fixtures on is 43 g.p.m.; therefore, a 1" meter is required.
Please feel free to call me if you have any questions.
Sinc rely,
Ration A. Metcalf, E.LT.
RM/tm
CC: George Stuart, Developer
000707-c.07-22(2864)
1~7UNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP
203 Holleman Drive East • College Station, Texas 77840. 409-693-5359 • FAX.• 409-693-4243
Engineering, Surveying, Planning and Environmental Consultants
~~ ~
1i ~~
'~~
October 21, 1997
City of College Station
Development Services
PO Box 9960
College Station, Texas- 77840
Re: George Stuart, Holleman and Welsh Addition, MDG No. 2864-707
Dear Sir or Madam:
Per Veronica Morgan and Natalie Ruiz the additional details shall be amended to the Holleman
and Welsh Addition construction plans for the Texas Rehabilitation Commission and Texas
Commission for the Blind. The following revisions have been made:
1) The proposed junction box shall change in size from a 5' X 15' box to a T X 15' box. The
addition width will allow for a capacity of 92.39 c.f.s. at full-flow capacity of the
upstream 36" R.C.P..
2) The proposed 6" sanitary sewer crossing through the proposed junction box shall consist
of a 7" steel encasement pipe as protection and maintenance access for the carrier pipe.
Penetrations through the junction box shall. be made water tight.
3) The cross-section at the proposed sewer line has been shown to reflect the junction box
flowlines. The junction box flowline data is as follows:
• FL (36" In) = 310.76
• FL (36" Out) = 310.38
• FL (@ Sewer) = 310.51
The proposed junction box will be laid at the existing storm sewer grade of 2.54%. The
clearance between the. junction box and bottom of the steel encasement will be 5.75"
which will allow for 27.10 c.f.s. capacity before entering orifice flow.
0000707-c.06-23 (2864)
City of College Station
Page 2
October 21, 1997
4) Enclosed are the hydraulic calculations showing the capacity of the proposed junction box
at the three (3) different phases of flow:
• Free-flow (under the sewer line)
• Orifice flow (under the sewer line)
• Orifice flow and weir. flow (over and under the sewer line)
5) Across-section detail of the landscaping screening berms is enclosed. The berms shall be
constructed with 3:1 side slopes with a 2' crest to allow for adequate mowing capabilities.
Landscaping screening berm in front of the electrical transformer shall have screening
shrubs as shown on the landscaping and irrigation construction plans.
Attached are two (2) additional sets of construction plans as requested for Mr. Paul Kasper.
Should you have any questions, please feel free to call me.
Sincerely,
Ration A. Metcalf, E.LT.
RM/tm
CC: Veronica Morgan, COOS Development Services
Natalie Ruiz, COCS Development Services
Paul Kasper, COCSDevelopmenfServices
George Stuart, Developer
0000707-c.06-23 (2864)
~_
a
z
0
'.zl
p
z
0
U
z
W OtOnrt~.m OlnOf Orr10 Mt`Ji N0ONO 1~f M ONO aO~tr0OO00100 O t00 O0 OMl Mti~i0 ~1~MOOND. fNO tM ~N
O
O n M /0 M W r r y, r b 1~ r M yy~
T
V V
M
0
M
NNM
~ V
1
+1
+7 M
I
C O CI 'QhO~OD NNCI~fG I+OOTG C]~rNNM ~'ed-~~~~~
NNNNN
rr rr
~
~ r r
5a ~
~ V
~ N ~
U
~ 10006) CA Q1 OM7 7M nnN 101000)
NO W 10 t01t)OOOMI~r10rrC'7O x010 C1?/hN
^
W W
~~ p p r r N M 7 Il) ID 00 T~ N <f 111 h O N N N N N~
rrrr
z
a ~ ~
=~
~ ~
`~ Nr
~ S
3~
U ~ M Q M N V'O0 O M 7QLDNNaOO NQNOOOID ID
- IOOf~710 a00 N710 a001r Nmu~mnoornOr Nlh '
7
'
1 A F}„ ?? 7
7 f~I
O r r r r N N N N N N f~7 M fh 1~7 M CSI 1~
3 0 o y
J f
a W
O
~y
~i _
09690 r 'NM CC~11. IOnnO) 6100 NM M C10
r?O0 r.Qn OI'7 CO Q)NOCOr~aDr QnOMtO Q)
"~ ~~ O OO rrr NNNNM M MQ<l7N10 to /C 01010
GY _
~
~ ¢ 00000
.
~
A
. 9/nvvr9lnoooaooooo
cOC01
m/616oOmrnrnoo rrrrrrrrr rr
vvcavvvv
y,-,a E„ uLL.
3 MIh17/"7 riair)vvcvcvvc
W ~ ~ V
U O V 11'9 ~ O N O`~ LA ~ O 1fY N N 10 ID ~ ID N 11'1 ID ~ N N
r r r
= r
10 OpOO1010 t0O101D 10100 OO10 t01010Ot01D t0
F..,
~
W
V9 ~" J
~+
i-. M 00 ~ O M W M a0 M a0 M oe M W M a0 M a] M 00 M 0) M
OO rNNMM77iff i(1 ID t0nnuo x001 O1OOr
G
Q ~°r O O O O O G O O O O O O O G O O O O O O r r r
W ~.
2
W t0 M Q V° 10 N N O N M O
N~ f~7 MNOOON 00 ~O
(' N.?O ~OOOOOrr~r~
~
s
OD ~ W = N
za oV
~~x
~ 3 ~, ~~~M~~~~~~~~~
LL
• 0000000000000
,3 Q ~ u
.
W
U
O
~" A
O U
^
~
Q nnnnnnnnnnnnn
nnnnnnnnnnn;r•n
~
W N
l
uW NNNNNNNNNNNNN
~ ~ o
w Z
a
1.4
C ~
~~^'^
~
N n~~ N n N n N n N n N
00 NNM M 7?1111n t0
o ~~ o00000oo®ooao
_~
G.^.'
z
~ ~'
a ~
Z V1
~ ~
~ ~
a~
3
C ~
.] A
G:, z
L-.i ~
~., O
L,
.Ni
olnn noorn~rno
W onl~lo/nln c
(' O O N 7 n O r~ N N
a~
s~
ar =-
0
W In NI!)U7NNIONID t/'1
O N N N N N N N N N N
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
J~ O O C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0)
00~ r~ NNM fN+1,M
~ ~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
W ~ O N N M~ N~ t O n
OMIOONNCO ~n
~ v O O O O r r N N N
Q
M M M M 1 `7 1' ~i M M M M
~' O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LL
W ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -
o "
U
O OO~ ~NNIO+I CN+1.7 C' o
W~ O O O O O O O O C O ~
0
_ ~
v
016010 O IOOYf.O129010010010010010010010010010010 OIOOIOOi6Oi0010010010010 0
Q ~ OOrrNNMM V ~10b/O OD nnO0 O0 W 0100 r r NNMP M~ V; ~ CIO /OhhO~ CO 090100 rrN N p,
F" W w C G O O C-O O C CO OO C O O G O G OO r r r r r r r N tV N N N CV c
~ _ ~" $
O O O O 10 O r O (O O O O O (0 O O O r O O O O (O O O
N N ID 10 n. n O o0 O d) O O r r N N Ih lh v, 7 1() W ID 10 n n. a0 00 Of ~ O O r r N N M P7 v c ui 10 IC 10 n n
W O O O O O O O O O O r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r N N N N N N N CV N CV N N N N N N
J~ M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M ch M M M M M M M M M M M
W
~ ~' N O N0D W NON W 0D W ODNO 10M~01
.• W M 'Q 1n 0) 00 r ~ f• O ~ Of 0+1 W V O ~ N Of M
~! W tD DDO CH !`01r 0D 00rMfC 01 r~}tL/01N
F ~ N ~ ~ 1p b ~ W W 0D t0 0D 0D h h h h OO 00 OD OD 01
Q 0J
Un
~ ~
U O
N O N 00 t0 N O N W h 00 00 N O N M v d)
~ W fh R 1A W W rRf~O~~MOD~OCON6i 10 f~I
Z ~ ~ N?t0 C00 M1A h.0 N7'~0~ N VI f~GN1n ~
f~7 M frI M7?~T 71n IA to lnNfO.W tLlhhhh
.~ _
~ w N ~
.a 3 0
3
U ~ 1n lnveoNOOIhiAMr01h1ANOhQraO
} CIA V1ha00)Q10r N07 f~77N(Ohh00 a)O1
A H V V7~Q~7Q~(>ul vi of lA lA tNNNiAN1A l(7
G.7 U d
3 0 w~
O a
~4~i +D.W h00 O1O0 NNM 7NN(Oh 000000.
N in 00rsthreTh 007 f00) NNaOr ~h
~ O K ~ hr`~aoooccoirnoioooo~ r:~N~oi
3 '~" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
rq ~ d r r r r r
a ~ va:vv:cvvvvvvvvvvvvvvc
U O l..l 1n N 1(9 1A N 1n 1(f 1A N N to N N ~ N N i11 1I1 In N.
5 3 F- tt) t0 tD tL) ttl <D fC ILI ftl t0 ~ f0 f0 t0 f0 0Cl f0 (O W 0D
~ W ~
VS G:. J
~~,,,' W fh W M W M 00 M 00 M 00 M 00 M W M W M 00 M
w Q r N N f~ R7 ? 7 ~ N t0 f0 ~ I~ 00 00 Of O1 O O r
LLQl ~ r r r r r r r r r r r N N N
_ v
C/1 W
~ ~ V
C
~ ^ Q tlJ
~ ~ ~a o
3 v ~w
o ao3 ,~
LT+ '~ G:7 w U
DC O w A U .r
~ w ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ate. ~ ~
H w ~C a-
U a :;, a O
~ C w ~
ti x
.~. W
Z ~ ~
w
N
h r:.
O
r C~ W
CL ,a a~
~ ;~ p_
~ y
saw ~~
W~
oc
a z a~
~.
w -+ d
w
° ~ O W C
U
U
_ ....
O~Ob 0101 O10OiQ OIn.Otn 0!00000
o-a Q M M ref W W 10 i0hh 000001 Of OOrrNN
O Q ~^, N N CI LV 0V N OV P! M 0V lV N N (V M M M M M M
F ttll=~J ...
W W O W O O r~ N N M M 7 V N N (O fOD h h
W N N N N M fh M M C7 M M M M M M f~'f M M M M
J~ f'~f M M Cf M ('7 M M M M P7 M f~7 M l'7 f`7 M (`') (`') M
W
x
at°
9
O
d
0
c`.
a~ \ ~~~~~~ aQ
~qo~o~ ~,%~ gc~wa~0 vZ
u'~
~-- F-,
E
li Si ~ a a
J. , H' ~ ~ l> ~ Q Qom. ZO
~. ~~\
~~~~ '" w
/~ ~b ~ ~ V /
•:: ~ '~. a
''~. 4
I
O
a a,
r-~
Ll U
W ~
~ R ~C W ~
LL,vp NaU ~ ~
a W ~ :c
~OV z ,. a
>a `Y
p
~
~ ~ ~
a"a Z
Z W r;
(Y
G Z
~C j N
~_~- -1
W ~
z
0, ~" c , ~' ~ O -' ~
L%' 4 fir, j M ~~_ sl- \'
~ / ~ ~ ~!\ _
I~ ~~L\
p ~., ~-
/ ~ ~
z g
c-' 2.
Z
O L Z~
~_
'mss. U. J W
mI.
sS, w ~
~
_.-..
__
J ~ ____.
ant ~ --- -'-- -+= G
t~
g_ , ~ J ~
is O
~, z
~y w ~ v~\•=e U ~
v' u w ~ .y _ W O O \ ~ vt
wZ.- ~~ _
O~ II OO p W ~ o- O n ~
~ ',_
\ - a-
/
_~86tc ~- ~ o
~ o
.-~
~ / ~ ~' b
__ ~ ~ /
~; ./. o F ~~~
3 ~'. ~
_ ~ ~, ~ ~ i Z
17~y1 ~ / ~ / 'V
W ~ J~v
/j~~/J~
,//
~~- \~`
`min /
//
O r'7 CCI
~OO~~YO
?(O ~NQ
~~, ~
~~'~
CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANC CHECKLIST
Date: Project:
ELECTRIC: Ra .3680, Tony 3438) ~~~
( Y
ENGINEERING: Covers Water, Sewer, Drainage, -Site Utilities, Impact Fees
(Kenn 3581, Veronica 3763, Steve 3592) r~,~i ' a~~L(~
(Vern W. 777-0192Jerry J. 777 John L. 229-5873) ~~ 0 ~ ~~`
~15~9~(
FIRE: {.Jen-3~1-}~~~~~
i
LEGAL: (Jan 3546)
(Easement?)
ZONING/PARKLAND/LANDSCAPING/DUMPSTER LOCATION & SCREENING:
(Sabine 3782, Joey 3748)
DUMPSTER SERVICE: (Jim S., Wally, Freddie -all at 3690)
q
'"' CITY OF COLLECiE~ $TATIOI`I
PLANNING DIVISION
POST OFFICE 60X 9960 1101 TEXAS AVENUE
- COLLEGE STATION. TEXAS 77842-9960
(409) 754-3570
December 30, 1997
George Stuart
~-
P. O. Box 3295:
Bryan, TX 77805
Re: Texas: Commission for the Blind :office building at 111 S Welsh Avenue.
Dear Mr. Stuart,
in response to your letter dated December 30, 1997 and a request for a Certificate of Occupancy
(C.O.) for the building at 1115 Welsh Avenue, I have compiled a list of outstanding items that
must be addressed prior to issuance of a C.O.
(1) The subcontractors must request and pass the final inspection for each of their jobs
~' including the plumbing, mechanical and electrical:
( 2) The Building Official. and Fire Marshal must inspect ;and pass the final building
'' inspection...
( 3) A letter of credit or guarantee in the amount of $11,350 must be submitted-for-the
plant material that is shown as part of the landscaping plan but not yet.. installed...
Points x 5 = $11 35O total grantee You will have four
2270 Landsca m $ )
P g ~ .
months from the date of the Certificate of Occupancy to install the required
landscaping..- Before the letter of credit or guarantee is released, all elements of the
'~ landscape plan must be installed including: the imgation.system. - ~'
(4) The parking lot. must be striped, wheel stops .installed and the proper handicap
markings comple#ed in accordance with the approved plans.
' ~~ y.( 5) The total of $758 must be submitted for the contractor's portion of the electrical.
~ service work performed by the City. ,z
1-~O-qB
(6) The erosion control silt fencing shown on the construction plans must be in place
until such time that the detention pond is constructed. and accepted by-the City and
he vegetative ground cover fias.been. sufficiently established to prevent erosion.
7) The 6" sanitary sewer line .from the .building to the 20' public utility easement in
f he roe must be installed ins ected and_a roved b the Ci .The
the rear o t Pp Y tY
p
P P rtY
junction box must be constructed as part. of the sanitary sewer ine as designed by
the Municipal Development Group... Any modifications to the junction box must be
submitted by a registered engineer, reviewed and approved by City staff prior #o
I~' art: of the ms ection the utili de artment will run a camera
construction. (Asp p ty p _
through to the line to ensure that all requirements are met. The utility department
will require .sufficient notice to .schedule the inspection. Coordinate the inspection
as soon as-possible with Engineering Inspector Jerry Jones at 764-3690.)
i~•
Holleman & Welsh Off ce
C.O. Punchlist
Case #97-430
Page 2 of 3
Items to be addressed before issuance of a C.O. (cont.):
( 8) Cost estimates sealed by a registered Engineer to be reviewed and approved by
staff that. includes the following costs as if the City of College Station were
responsible for the following: ~_
-- Construction of the detention pond and associated infrastructure as shown on
the approved construction documents.
-- Redesign of the drainage for the site that takes into account the existing
parking lot. The parking lot was not constructed in accordance with approved
plans which maycause some redesign of the detention pond or parking lot.
-- Modifications to the parking lot: that may have to be made in order to properly
drain runoff from the parking lot to the detention pond.
-- Fine grading of the site to include. general. clean-up and. forming earthen berms...
along Welsh Avenue in accordance with he approved plans. The subject
property and any adjacent properties. that. were disturbed during construction
must be graded and either seeded or odded:
( 9) A letter of credit or guarantee in the total amount of the sealed estimates .approved:
by-staff plus a 15% contingency. (If this total is less than'$10,000, a nunimum
guarantee of $10,000 must be submitted.)
(10) The design and .construction work included in the letter of credit or guarantee must
be completed within 120 calendar days from the issuance of a C.O. (Thin 120 day
time limit is the absolute maximum time that will be .allowed :for completion of the
work. The detention pond and associated drainage work must; be completed
within 120 days and no extensions will be allowed.)
(11) Submit the following information for review.. and approval so that the final plat for
the subject property can be filed for record: '
-- A copy of the off-site 20' public utility easement for the sanitary sewer and
storm sewer.
-- A letter igned and sealed by a professional engineer which explains how lot 3
of the I-lolleman and Welsh ..Subdivision will.. obtain sewer sernce. This .letter
will-ensure that sanitary ewer infrastructure need not be extended through the
subject property to service lot 3.
In your letter you mention that the engineering firm designing the project advised y~u~o wait for
the outcome of an ordinance amendment that would .not require detention for a site of this size.
To date, no such .ordinance `amendment has been approved and detention is :required for the
subject property. It is my understanding Ghat staff is still exploring .the possibility of such an
ordinance change; however, there are no :.immediate .plans for City Council consideration. The
current Drainage Ordinance applies in this instance and all requirements must be met.
r~
Holleman & Welsh Office
C.O. Punchlist
Case. # 97-430
Page 3 of 3
All of the above mentioned requirements must beaddressed prior to issuance of a C.O. for the
I~ subject property. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at
(409) 764-3570.
i
1 ~-
Sincerely,
I -
i
Natalie Thomas Ruiz
Assistant Development Coordinator
II
I cc: North Bardell, Municipal Development`Group
~ Lance Simms, Building Official
.:Jerry Jones, Engineering Inspector
Case File #97-430
~,
:III
_~
~;
~~
u
~:
a
A 1~1ZINICIPAL DEVELOP~I~IENT GROUP
251 Texas Ave. South Ste. A • College Station, Texas 77840. 409-693-5359 • FAX.• 409-693-4243 • EMAIL: mdgcs@gte.net
Engineering, Surveying, Planning and Environmental Consultants
January 7, 1998
Natalie Ruiz
City of College Station Planning Division
.1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, TX 77842
Re: Estimate Request -Your Letter to George Stuart Dated December 31, 1997
Item 8 and Item 11
Natalie:
At the direction of our client, George Stuart, we have prepared the estimates requested, and they
are included in this letter.
In response to your inquiry about sewer service. to future Lot 3, Holleman.& Welsh Addition, the
lot is already served by a sewer line along Holleman Drive, as depicted on the City Sewer Map.
Another is not needed.
Please call me or Greg Taggart if you have any. questions about these items.
Sincerely,
't ~/ ~®,~~ ®F r~ gee
,•e..®•,® ,~
North Bardell, P.E. ®® ga'`~•• ®'••4 ~~~
C.E.O. _ ®~ ~ ~
A,~ .a ~
s~ ~~oN~9aO~sse®O/ee~+'s~n~~~~
000797-c.10-22(2864)
Q7'pw QQ~~
pmQ,~~~~'+.~
~~#. ,~~:
a
ENGINEERS- ESTIMATE
OF
CONSTRUCTION AND DESIGN COST
FOR
REVISED. DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
LOT 5, BLOCK ONE, HOLLEMAN & WELSH ADDITION
PARAGRAPH 8A Construction of Detention Pond & Associated Infrastructure
Item No. Item Name Unit Cost uanti Cost
1. Detention Pond 3500.00/ea. 1 ea. 3500.00
2. 1' x 1' Grate Inlet 450..00/ea. 1 ea. 450.00
3, 18".RCP 35.00/L,F 162 LF 5670.00
4. 15' x 5` Special J-Box 2400.00/ea. 1 ea. ~ 2400.00
5. Remove Exist J-Box 800.00/ea. 1 ea. 800.00
(, Block Sod - St. Augustine.. 0.25/SF 1800 SF 450.00
TOTAL $13,270.00
PARAGRAPH 8B Drainage Redesign As Needed
Based on review of as-built data, the parking lot appears to function in a reasonable manner.
Only minor modifications of a trivial nature. appear needed. An example is the addition
discharge .point to the detention basin. This represents only a minor change in routing (no
aidditional drainage report is required). Design costs are expected to be less. than $550.00
PARAGRAPH 8C Construction of Physical Modifications of Parking Lot to Drain to Pend
Item No. Item Name Unit Cost uanti Cost
1. 25' x 3' Concrete Flume 3.00/SF 75 SF 225.00
000707-e.02-22(2864)
~~
PARAGRAPH 8D Fire Grading Berm Construction General Cleanup
Item No. Item Name Unit Cost uanti Cost
1. Screen Berm Construction.
(11 CY/ea.) $200.00 3/ea. $600.00
2. Block Sod 0.25/SF 750. SF $187.50.
3. .General Fine Grade
Cleanup $500.00/LS 1 ea. $500.00
..TOTAL $1,287.50
TOTAL FOR ALL ITEMS $15.332.50
„_
r~
~.~ ~~~~
~~
000707-e.02-22(2864)
PAGE.1 OF 4
~~ I TY OF' iw OLLE%E STAT I Ohl
11i3i TEXAS AUE1'.1UE ~.
:r:OLLESE STAT ~ OrrE s T X ~78~t ~
TEMPORARY ANp GOND 1 T 10 t~(AL
~; E 1*~' T I F I t~ (=: T E O F' ~O ~~ ~=: U F A !~ 1=: Y
!,5 DAY PERIOD
OWhIEiT:s S idAl"fEs STATE GF TEXAS
F'EF:!"! I T # c '37F ~:~ ~ i 5
ADDF'ESS : WELSH A'JEt~1UE, i i i ~
F'1*:OJ'Ei.:T a DEFT OF HUt'iAhi SEF:U I GES
LOT : 5 T~LO~~ F=: ~ i SURD I'~ I S I C}hE : I-iOLLQ("EAI~I r=~t~{J7 Ef1ELSH AT:~I}t~!
I HA`.1E' EXAi~1I1~fED THE O~= F- T ~ : I AL. Z O1~i T f~ki:~ 1'~IAF' OF l"NE C T TY CIF ~~:OLL.Ek:~E STAT l: C1f~
ACID DO HEF:EI~Y i=:EF:I` I FI° THAT THF_ AE~OWE i7ES~~ F"I T~ET~ LAC•iT~t i"fAV TAE O~~:F~ UP I ED I i~
A-= ~::OF:I?Ahli_ E irJ I T'H THE F:E-~ULAT I O#~]S F[]~: 2C71~I I I~~~ D I STi<' T GT ,~ C -. 1 ._ AS F'EF:
CtF:D Z iVAt~C:E I'dO. i E~3S ~UT=~.3Ei_ T TO .THE FOLLOW l: l~i~ ~'AF? I A - ~~: S s EXt= EFT I Ot;IS Off:
'
SF'EG I AL F:EF;?U I F;Et'IEt~TS AS FOLLOWS : Th i~ cond i t i ona T G~Y' ire on
mt_
Monday Februar 23 1893. =°On or before is date. the =gin nce a uirements _
`
~
~'1` : $:
-f
referenced i'n'th.e attached T,etter d e~ J" nu '" be c ed. _„_.,_.-
•~ t
~
~~ ,
_
-
_--T-__ q
DATE ~'ZO •I'Ifi~;~ -aF I~~- Natal a Rui'.z, Asst be 1 Coord-inator
I HE4=:ETi'~ i= EF:T I F t` THAT THIS E-~U I LD I C~I~~ HAS E~EEt~I I hiSF'E; :TEU At~D THAT. I ~"
C:Af~i ' DE USED RS a~F:OUF` lj -- 1~sUS I tv#ESS , ~:~!*:OL1F' 13 Cl{::~= tJF'AC~1~=::t~
~=:LASS I F I ar AT I O4V AS DEFINED TAY THE STAi~ILI~F:I~ 1~U I LD I i~l~:~ ~~ OL~E SUSS 1'E}=.T TO
THE FOLLORn~ I hlf.~ SE1EE_ IF I ~= F:EL•?tJ I F`Ei~EitiTS n Qc.,.~u~ancv off, the 6u i i d i ng, i s L°t ti-~~~d--
to emp.1 ogees of the tenant anent i es- on T v no 'pu61 `c ~ T T.Qyred ,~.py
building until a, permanent C,Oo is: issued.
1 9 _i _2~ _ _,_. _ .,_.... ._._..
DATE tEtUILDIi~t-~ GFFI~= :+ Lance... imms~
-~ `-°-~ ~ EXP I RAT (ON DATE - F 'E (3 R tl A R Y 2 3, 1 9 9 8, M 0 D A Y
~ __
E .STATION
C~LLEG
P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 771;42
Tel: 409 764 3500
January 7, 1998
George Stuart
P. O: Box 3295
Bryan, TX 77805
Doug Harrison
via facsimile. @ .693-9810
Dear Mr. Stuart,
Re. Texas Commission for the Blind office
building at 1115 Welsh Aveiftue.
Several items are necessary for the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (C.O.) for the building
at 11 i 5 Welsh Avenue. These items are basic :ordinance requirements and have been noted
throughout the development review process. These .were outlined in our letter to you dated
December 30, 1997. However, we understand the needs of your tenants to occupy the building in
order to-provide basic services to their clients. In order to facilitate your tenant's service delivery
we will issue a temporary and conditional C.O.
This. C.O. is temporary and will expire after 45 .days .from. the. date. of issuance. The C.O. will
include a condition limiting occupancy to employees of the tenant agencies. This temporary C.O.
can not be issueduntil the following items have been completed:.
( 1) The electrical and mechanical subcontractors must request and pass the final
inspection for each of their jobs.
( 2) The Building Official and. Fire Marshal mush inspect and pass the final building
inspection. Major .pending items include 'fire dampers and door closers. The final
building.. inspection can .not be performed until the electrical and mechanical
inspectians have been passed.
( 3) The erosion control silt fencing shown on the construction plans must be in place
until such time that the detention pond is constructed and accepted by the City and
the vegetative ground cover has been sufficiently established to prevent erosion.
Prior to .the expiration of the 45 day temporary C.O. the remaining .ordinance requirements
must be completed. These include:
( 1) A letter of credit or guarantee in the amount of $11,350 must be submitted for the
plant material that is shown. as part of the landscaping plan but not yet installed.
(2270 Landscaping Points x $5 = $11,350 total guarantee) You will have four
months from the date of the Certificate of :Occupancy to install the required
landscaping. Before the- letter of credit or guarantee is released, all elements of the
landscape plan must be installed including the irrigation system.
Home of Texas A&M University
__y ~,,
( 2) The parking lot must be striped,. wheel stops installed and the proper handicap
markings completed in accordance with theapproved plans.
(3) Cost estimates sealed. by a registered Engineer to be reviewed and approved by
staff'that includes the following costs as ff the City of College Station were
responsible for the following:
-- :Construction of the detention pond and associated infrastructure as shown on
the approved construction documents.
-- Redesign of the drainage for the site that takes into account the existing
parking lot. The parking lot was not constructed in accordance with. approved
plans which may cause some redesign.: of the detention pond or parking lot.
-- Modifications to the parking lot that may have to be made in order to properly
drain runoff from the parking lotto .the. detention pond.
-- Fine. grading of the site to include general clean-up and forming earthen berms
along Welsh Avenue in accordance with .the approved plans. The subject
property and any adjacent properties that were disturbed during construction
must be graded and either seeded or sodded:
( 4) A letter of credit or guarantee from a financial institution the total amount of
the sealed estimates approved by staff plus a 15% contingency.. (If this .total is
less than $10,000, a minimum guarantee of $10,000. must be submitted.)
( 5) The design and construction work included in the letter of credit or guarantee must
be completed within 120 calendar days ;from the issuance of a temporary C.O.
(This
120 daytime limit is the absolute maximum time that will be allowed. for
completion of the work. The detention pond. and associated drainage work must
be completed within 120 days and no extensions will be allowed.)
{ 6) .Submit thefollowng information for. review and approval so that the final plat for
the subject property can be filed for record:
-- A copy of he ofr=site 20' public utility easement for the sanitary sewer and
storm sewer.
-- A letter signed and sealed by a professional engineer which explains how lot 3
of the Holleman and Welsh Subdivision will obtain sewer service. This letter
will ensure that sanitary. sewer infrastructure need not be extended through the
subject property to service lot 3.
(7) Building code items that may be deferred and completed during the 45 day period
include:
Handicapped parking striping and signage.
Installation of sewer cleanout.
Installation of lintels for .masonry support at all exterior window and door
openings.
( 9) The conduit installed for electrical service to thebuildingleaves your project site
and crosses onto private property. You must. relocate the conduit and sernce onto
your property or secure an easement from the impacted property owner.
George Stuart, Doug Harrison January. 7, 1997 page 2
~~.._"
We regret the disruption in service delivery your .clients .have experienced due to lack of
completion of the above. items. However, I feel that we have been sensitive to the needs of your
clients throughout the .development review and construction inspection of your .project. A slab
permit was issued .prior to .completion of the plan review so that you could begin construction
while the reviews were completed. Building permits were issued prior to platting requirements
being fulfilled. Plan reviews were accelerated where possible with one day turn-around on some
.plan items. Additionally, Assistant Development Coordinator Natalie Ruiz personally monitored
and expedited this project in every way possible...
Please note the importance of addressing all of the above items. We can not issue the temporary
and conditional C.O. until all final building inspections have passed. The temporary. C.O. will
expire after 45 days and we will not be able to 'issue a full C.O. and allow public occupancy until
all ordinance requirements have. been met. While we will do everything we can to assist you in
meeting these requirements, we are,relying on you to take the action necessary to do so.
Sincerely,
J"im Callaway
Development Services Director.
:jc
cc: Lance Simms, Building Official
Case File #97-430
George Stuart, Doug Harrison January 7, 1997 page 3
P « fl. Pox 3~~5
l~r~any `:texas 77~~'S
January 6, 1~9~3
~~atal ie Ruiz
City of College Station9 Texas
~.~ : 111 ~ ~~1 sh Avenue
The following is in reference to your correspondence
of 1~-31-9~, a C.O. punchl~.st~ and the guarantee
that the landscape and drainage items wi11 be accom-
rlished within the requested l2t} days:
.Accompanying is a.Commitment Letter for a trans-
action which will close at. University Title Co.
in College station. The guarantee will consist of
a letter informing University Title Co, to place
in escrow the amount of money which has been desig-
nated for landscape and the yet to be determined
amount of money for the drainage item. This. can be
done when the exact amount of the drainage 'item has
been determined,
Sincerelyy
George R , Stuart
(~a~ u~`/
~~~
-~
Fhone(409)268-1008. 1-800-990-9252 Fax (409)268-5879
JanuaryS~`, 1998
George R. Stuart
2406 Burton Dr.
Bryan, TX
77802
RE• 1115 Welsh Avenue, College Station . TX '
.Dear Mr Stuart:
Based on-the. information submitted to us, we area pleased to offer the following etter of
commitment,. subject to the following terms and conditions. '
l) Loan Type: Permanent Loan.
2) Purpose:.. To provide permanent financing for the above mentioned office building,
College Station, Texas.
3) Borrower: George. Stuart or to be formed business entity.
4) Requested Loan Amount: $334,000:00 not to exceed the lesser of a-loan to value of
70% of Lender's approved appraised market. value, or 75% of :cost.. Such. appraisal
shall be made a condition of loan. approval. .
5) Interest Rate: 2~5 basis points. over the corresponding treasury instrument, .fixed for
the term of the loan. Interest shall be calculated on the basis of a 360-day year and
twelve30-day months.
6) .Amortization Plan: 25 years.
7) Term/Maturity: I0 years.
8) Forward Commitment Fee: 1%.
9) Loan Fee: 3% (1.5% Lender; 1.5% Broker).
Stuart's :State Oi~ice Bldg:.
l of t
~ a .fig ,..:
1D) Underwriting Fee and Good Faith Deposit: Anon-refundable underwriting fee in the
amount of $2,500 shall be paid to Lender upon execution of this letter of commitment.
11) Debt Service Coverage: Shall be at least 140: 1.
12) Prepayment: Subject to yield maintenance.
13) Additional Dods: Require satisfactory appraisal report survey and certificate of
occupency.
Please let me know if you have: any questions regarding the conditions set forth in this
letter.
Sincerely,
Marshall Hussain
MH: GS
,,
__
I •_
2 of t
Stuart's State Office Bldg. __
Alway~~ getting `it right
~fuart Construction"company is
'~fmishing a project at Welsh
~~~ Avenue and'Holleman Drive.
I'm the heating-air °conditioning '
contractor who worked alongside
the plumbers, electricians; etc. The
owner could not have put together
a better team. The. biggest chal-
lenge these guys faced.. did not come
from the work or<the scheduling,
but from the .College Station ~ -
inspection department.
Everything is a definite maybe -
you never know what to expect
next. The electricians ran dome
really heavy conduit 6 feet' under- '
ground and were told by an inspec-
for to cover ita The next day, anoth-
er inspectorhad -them dig it up. ''
What is okay at rough-in is wrong
at final inspection:' Sometimes tech=
nology causes a regulation to
become,obsolete - everyone,agrees_
=but they still enforce it to the
hilt because "that's what the. book
says." The construction company,,,;
owner could write, anon-fiction
book on the nightmare he faced
Commonsense is not that common,
but in the case,of the inspection;,
department it is non-e~stent: -
These are intelligent,` well-edu-
cated men. They're nice guys,:Uut
they're "flexihTe" ~~as concrete.
Two years,a~o, I t~iulf ~ house in
Bryan and toiuid -the inspectors to
be both helpf{~l.and profession~~l. .
Other tra~lesnien agree:'Bryan
inspectors get it, right `the first
time. Iwant the ~pubhc;,to know: .
Building costs are~ugler because ,
of College Station's scllizophrenic~
inspection department. One sub- "'
contractor.told me~he'hds College...
Station jobs 20 percent;higher than
ones in Bryan:: The huger ultimate-
ly picks "ip the tab.
t F.:
C. RUSSELL PATES
College Station
Holleman & Welsh Office Building
Time Line
March 4. 1997 - A predevelopment meeting was held with Mr. Stuart to discuss his proposal for
an office building that will house the Texas Rehabilitation Commission and the Texas Commission
for the Blind. Staff discussed platting issues, utility availability and possible extensions, potential
ZBA variances and the City's development review process.
September 24. 1997 -Municipal Development :Group (NIDG) submitted the final plat.
September 30. 1997 - MDG submitted the site, landscaping and grading plans for review by the
Project Review Comnuttee (PRC). This same day, Mr. Stuart requested a slab only permit to
start construction. Staff informed him that the City would not be in a .position to issue such a
permit until the PRC approved the site plan and reviewed. the final plat. Staff agreed to discuss
the possibility of issuing a slab only permit at the PRC meeting.
.October 6. 1997 -Staff faxed NIDG a copy of the concerns identified by staff after their review of
the final plat and site plan. These concerns would be discussed in more detail at the PRC meeting.
October 8. 1997 -The PRC reviewed and recommended approval of the final plat with several
conditions. The final plat was scheduled for the November 6, 1997 Planning and .Zoning
Commission meeting. Mr. Stuart informed staff that the building had to be completed by
December L, 1997.: He needed a,buildng permit as soon as possible and could not wait until after
the Commission :meeting for a permit. Mr. Stuart stated that he had to start the project
immediately or he could lose the entire. deal. He again requested a slab only permit to at least get
started on the project.
The PRC reviewed and approved the site .plan with many conditions and concerns. Staff agreed
to the following at the PRC meeting:
To issue a slab only permit .given the following parameters:.
_ The applicant submit the revised .site plan :addressing the concerns outlined in
the meeting that could potentially impact the site layout. (Staff .offered to
review the revised site plan between 2:00 and 3:00 the same day. If the
revised site plan was not received by 2:00, the five day turnaround time would
be necessary given. staffs schedule over the. next few days. The revisions
were received at 4:00 and staffreviewed them that afternoon.)
_ Monetary guarantees for the infrastructure associated with the final plat would
be required before a full building permit is issued.
A Certificate of Occupancy would not be issued until the final plat is filed for
record'.
October 9, 1997 -The slab only permit was issued.
October 10 1997 thru October 19, 1997 -Staff worked closely with MDG reviewing and
revising site and construction plans.
October 20, 1997 -Staff approved ,the full construction. documents with the exception of two
details; the landscape screening berm and the junction box. detail. The full building permit was
issued.
November 4, 1997 -Staff approved the details. for the landscape screening berm and the junction
box detail. A .copy of the approved :details were faxed to NIDG.
November 6. 1997 - P&Z approved the final.. plat with staff recommendations.
November 13. 1997 - Staffrnailed a copy of the approved screening berm and junction box details
to Mr. Stuart and asked that he attach the details to the approved plans that are kept on the site.
Months of November & December -Natalie and Shirley drove by the site several times to check
on the progress of the development.
Over the Christmas Holidays - Mr. Stuart called and requested a final building inspection. At this
time, the subcontractors had not requested a final inspection for the electrical, mechanical or
plumbing work. Natalie Ruiz started working on the C.O. punch list. for the entire project.
December 29, 1997 -Natalie discussed many of the outstanding. items with Mr. Stuart including
the sanitary sewer. line, junction box, landscaping,. final inspections,- etc. Natalie met with
Engineering Inspector, Jerry Jones on the site to determine what engineering: details needed to be
completed. The contractor responsible for installing. the sanitary sewer ne from the main to the
building was just beginning work. He informed staff that the junction box was not a part of his
bid. Natalie and- Jerry informed the contractor and Mr. Stuart that the junction box must be
installed with the sanitary sewer line. as,designed by MDG.
December 30 1997 - Mr; Stuart faxed Natalie a letter requesting "120 days in which to complete
the details not directly associated with the building itself'.
December 31. 1997 -Natalie met with Mr. Stuart and discussed a draft "punch list" of
outstanding items that must be :addressed prior to issuance. of a C;O. The final punch list was
faxed and mailed to Nir. Stuart. (See letter dated December 30, 1997.)
The .electrical. department attempted to install the primary service from Holleman Drive to the
transformer. Jerry Garrett and Rob Bullock noticed that the conduit installed by the contractor,
Ron Lowe, had too many sharp bends. The stub out for the transformer was also tilted and
placed closer to the property line than. shown on the approved .plans.. Jerry .and Rob agreed to try
and pull the. conductors through;:. however, they were unsuccessful The contractor was told to
straighten out the conduit so that the service: lines could be installed.
January 2. 1998 -Shirley Volk met with Mr. Stuart, Doug Harrison and Keith Stanford
(Representatives of the Commission for the Blind & Rehabilitation Commission). They discussed
the letter and discussed the possibility of a temporary C.O: once all health and safety related items
were completed including the sanitary sewer line, building code requirements, etc.
January S. 1998 -The electrical department connected the secondary system from the
transformer to the building. Jerry Garrett and Rob Bullock noticed that the conduit placed by the
contractor from the transformer to the .building was incorrectly placed approximately 2' on the
adjacent property. They spoke with the utility contractor,. Ron Lowe, and agreed to connect the
electrical service temporarily given the time constraints placed upon the owner. At that time, they
informed Mr. Lowe that he had the following two options:
Relocate the conduit onto the subject property
Obtain a public utility easement from the adjacent property owner.
Jerry and Rob explained that since the City is responsible for the service to the building, they need
access to the line for future repairs. This access can be given through an easement on the adjacent
property or by relocating the service to the subject property..
In an effort to facilitate the completion of the building; Lance Simms approved an electrical "early
on" to .allow electricity to the building. The Building. Official has the discretion to allow an "early
on" in certain situations and he allowed one in this case..
January 6. 1998 -1VIr. Stuart paid his portion of the electrical service costs to the building. (This
was item #5 in the punch list dated December 30; 1997.) He submitted a personal letter
guaranteeing that the landscaping and drainage items will be accomplished within 120 days. Mr.
Stuart also submitted a mortgage commitment letter and. agreed to escrow the exact amount of
the drainage improvements:once determined. Natalie informed Mr. Stuart that the City requires a
letter of guarantee from a lending institution :prior to issuance of a C.O. The other 9 items on the
punch list must be taken care of before issuance of a C.O.
.Ianuary' 7...1998 - Jirn Callaway met with Mr. Harrison and Mr. Stuart to discuss the punch list.
Jim agreed to issue a temporary and conditional C.O. for 45 days to allow employees only in the
building once several health and afety related items were completed. Within the 45 day time
frame;... the remaining items. on the punch list must be completed: and/or guaranteed; (The details
of this agreement are outlined in a letter from Jim on January 7, 1998.)
Staff :received the: sealed engineer's estimates for the completion of the detention pond and final
site grading. -(Item #8 in the punch List ;dated December 30, 199'1.)
,IanuarX 9. 1998 -The 45 day temporary and conditional CA. was. issued with the conditions
outlined in the January 7, i 998 letter - C.O. expiration date,. February 23, 1998.
January 14. 1998 - Mr. Stuart and NU. Harrison met with Tim, Lance and Natalie. to discuss the
remaining items on the punch list. Mr. Stuart stated that he could not guarantee both the
landscaping and the drainage improvements._Mr. Harrison expressed concern that ahe State may
have to cancel he lease agreement and find facilities elsewhere.
January I5, .1998 -Natalie and Vern Wright, the engineering inspector, inspected the. site and
went through the engineer's estimates to "check off' the items that had been completed since the
letter was written in order to lower the total amount to be guaranteed. Two items on the list had
been completed and the total amount to be guaranteed. was reduced by $3200 for a total of
$13.,953 in drainage improvements.
A temporary C.O. was issued to allow- employees and the public to occupy the building. All items
remaining on the punch list must be constructed or installed on or before March 31, 1998 with no
exceptions. The developer no longer has the option to bond the remaining improvements.
Natalie delivered. this temporary C.O. and met with Mr. Stuart, Mr. Harrison and Mr. Stanford on
the job site and reviewed the remaining items to be completed before March 31, 1998.
January 21. 1998 - Mr. Stuart met with Natalie and wanted clarification on the irrigation system
requirements.. He does not. agree with. the approved irrigation. plan prepared by MDG and would
prefer to water the landscaping. through. hose bibs. Natalie informed him that he must install a
permanent in-ground irrigation as shown on the approved plans. If he would like to make
changes to the system, he can submit a new plan to be reviewed by staff.
Natali Thomas Ruiz
Assistant Development Coordinator
January 22, 1998
c
Lance imms
Building Official
January 22, 1998
~~~~
`~~ CITY OF COLLEGE STATLOI`I
`~
February 20, 1998
George Stuart
P. O. Box 3295
Bryan, TX 77805
Re: Texas Commission for the Blind office building at 1115 Welsh Avenue.
Dear Mr. Stuart,
This letter. is o touch base with you regarding the items necessary for the issuance of a permanent
Certificate of'Occupancy (C.O.) forthe building at 1115 Welsh Avenue. On January 15, 1998y
the City issued a temporary and conditional C.O. to allow the two State: of Texas organizations to
provide services to their clients. There were six items outlined with the temporary C.O. that had
to be constructed or installed on or-before March 31, 1998 with no exceptions. (These items are
outlined in a etter to you on January 15, 1998. that is attached to the temporary C.O.)
after a site visit on Friday, February 13, 1998, I noticed that the. majority of the items on the
original list have been addressed. The following is a st of items that are still outstanding:
(1) Install all elements of the landscape plan including the irrigation system.
Once the irrigation system and all plant materials are installed, staff will inspect the
landscaping and verify that the irrigation system is operational:
( 2) Fine. grading of the site to include general clean-up and forming earthen berms
along. Welsh Avenue in accordance with the approved plans The subject property
a»d ;any adjacent properties that were disturbed during construction must be
graded and either seeded or sodded
There are a few areas on and off-site that need to be addressed. (The areas off-site
include the existing transformer location near the convenience store and the
adjacent Wozencraft .property to .the .rear. These areas were disturbed during the
installation of electrical conduit, sanitarysewer and storm sewer. infrastructure.
The trees that were. cut down need to be removed and the site needs. to be graded
and either seeded or sodded.)
The approved plans show three berms that .are parallel to Welsh Avenue near the
front of the property. The purpose. of these berms was to screen the transformer
and the parking lot from Welsh Avenue.
PLANNING DIVISION
POST OFFICE BOX 9960 1101 TEXAS AVENUE
COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842-9960
(409) 7643570
~a
w
Ilolleman & Welsh
George Stuarrt
Page 2 of 2
February 19, 1998
The following two options are available to you:
Install the three berms as shown on the approved plans; or,
_ Submit an alternative to the plan to be reviewed by staff. The
screening must be 3' in height and may .consist of plant materials, an
earthen beam, a low wall or -some combination. I noticed that you
have installed two shrubs .along the Welsh side of the .transformer.
Additional plantings will be required in order to screenthe transformer
.adequately. (Since the transformer isplacedimmediately adjacent to
the property line, screening will not be required off youf property.
Instead, it must be adequately screened .from the other two sides.)
( 3) Sign and/or.. obtain the necessary easement .documentation for the off-site. 20'
public utility easement for the sanitary sewer and storm sewer.-
We have recently received the necessary title work for the off-site. easement and
have prepared -the documentation for your signature. Please contact Jan Schwartz
with the City's Legal Department at 764-3507 to sign the necessary paperwork.
The remaining items;listed in the January 1,5, 1998 temporary C.O. letter have been addressed. ~, I
just wanted to make contact with you concerning the remaining items well in advance. of the
1Vlarch 31, 1998 deadline. I
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at (409) 764.'-3570. I~'
Sincerely,
~Tatalie(Thomas Ruiz.
Assistant Development Coordinator
cc: Lance Simms, Building Official
Case File #97-430
Keith Stanford, 7.17 Franklin, .Waco, TX 76701
Doug Harrison, 6400 US Highway 290 East, Ste 201, Austin, TX 78723
FILE NOTE
Holleman & Welsh .Office Building
Case.#97-430
On Wednesday, January 28, 1998, George Stuart came by and dropped off the following information:
A "revised" landscape.plan showing where some shrubs were relocated. (The original plan showed
a row of shrubs along the back of the building that would not be visible from Welsh Avenue. Mr.
Stuart asked o move those shrubs into the islands so they would be more visible.)
A'"revised" irrigation system plan.
A "revised" site plan showing the changes to the detention area.
~' Mr. Stuart asked about the screening. of the transformer location. On the revised .plan he shows two
shrubs in front of the transformer to screen it from Holleman. I expressed concern that the two shrubs
may not be'adequate and that additional screening may be required. I agreed to visit'the site and take a
look at what'he's done and get with him later.
Lance and I spoke with Mr. Stuart over the telephone and informed him that a check valve will be
'~ required at the meter for the irrigation system. Before installation of the system, a licensed irrigator or a
certified plumber must pull the .permit. Upon the inspection of the landscaping, staff will check to make
sure the irrigation .system is operating properly. I hand delivered a copy of .the list of acceptable back
flow presenter's to Mr. Stuart on Friday, January 30, 1998.
I reviewed the revised .site plan with Veronica: on Friday, January 30, 1998 and we noticed that the
changes to the site plan were made by Greg Taggart. with 1VIDG and dated 1/97. The seal on the plan
was by North Barden on October 17, 1997. The revised plan did not show the information referenced
in the January 15, 1.998 letter to Mr. Stuart. The plan did not include as built conditions and was not
sealed properly by a registered .professional engineer. Veronica requested that I set up a meeting with
North, Greg and myself at their office to discuss the information submitted.
Than same ,.Friday afternoon, I spoke with Mr. Stuart and informed him that the revised site plan
submitted is not acceptable. I told -him that we would set up a meeting with NIDG as soon as possible
to discuss the situation. Mr. Stuart expressed concern that his contractor is trying to beat the rains
forecasted for -the weekend and could not wait until next week for an answer. I stated that I could not
give him the authorization to proceed with the detention area without an approved set of plans that
were properly sealed. Later that Friday afternoon, at the job site, Mr. Stuart said that he had spoke with
North an a were going to take care of .getting thee. information together.
Y
N alie T mas uiz
Assistant Development Coordinator
January 30 1998
a
ti
RONALD J.~KRUHL, P.E.
Structural Engineering Consulting Services
1023 Harrington Avenue
College Station,. Texas 77840
9 January i9~98
George R. Stuart
P.O. Box 3295
Bryan, TX ..77805.
Re: Health and Human Services Facility, Welsh Avenue, College Station, Texas
Dear Mr. Stuart:
As you requested an inspection and analysis of the masonry work. over the windows and doors of
the above referenced project was made on January 8, 1998.
My analysis shows that the three courses of 4"x8"xl6" concrete masonry units will span the six ',
foot wide'windows and three foot wide doors.
I trust this report will satisfy your requirements.. If I may be of further assistance, please let me
know.
Sincerely,. _ ,~E of TFX~~~`
....
P ''' ~,9 ~~~t
.vGC~ ~ , . ~ j -
~ ~~
Ron la d J Kruhl , P.E. ~ : RONALD ~1 KRUHL ~~ .~
y ~o ~: ' :38192 ~ . ~~
~,~lFSS ^~STE ~~V`'i`r
m
__ _ __
v
,.
~ i
a ~ I
J ~
Ql
I
~.Q~f,.f, t:. ~~ t
.~
., -
~~
9.
_.
=
~T -_
~~~
y-K ~ • A
-
5
~, {~
~y~
_,,'; l
ti
' r~ ~~ ~ ~ I
?_.42%
't ---
-
u~ -
t
~
I s
------- ~ ~
'
\
Y h' (~i
is
. V !lU I
~? ~-,-r~-~-- a ~
I I
~7 'J
}= ~ __ Q
` O
6: ~
~ r
~
a ~ ~`'
Q
~
~~ eo
`~~ ~
i . 4 ~ Q rp p5 45
- ~ ---- Q F, ~ ~~.
., h
'! ~~
- _ _ ~ ,~ ~.
----- _.... _ _. ~ J-~ ~ ! c~
• Z
,~o O ~
~ ~ c~
--------- ~~ 5~~ o P~
- -- \ f ~ O ( 6Q~~.
I N
~ p
N .o ,2 d '.
dodo l~ !~*
1 ~ .~~
__
it .
C~ ~ ,
_~, ~ _
~ ..
_--
?
_ ~~ /. r
~~~ - ~~~~
_.
. ~~'
-s ~ M n y~. ~^'
._
~- ..
,_ y ,~o,~
_. -- ~ _
_ __..
_.. -
_ - - `~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I, w~~ ~N AVENUE
~a
~;^;~*.
;,~,
~~~:
,,y. ; ,
>r
:.,,,:
~, F
May 7, 2002
Mr. George Stuart
1200 Briarcrest Dr.
Bryan, TX 77802
Certified Mail: 7099 3220 0000 7848 2926
Return Receipt Requested
Dear Mr. George Stuart:
This letter is to inform you that the subject property located at 4145 Welsh is not in
compliance with the Site and Landscaping plan that was approved October 20, 1997
or the revised Landscaping. plan that was submitted on January 30, 1998. Along
with this approved landscaping plan, you were required to install: an irrigation system.
It is our understanding. that this irrigation system is not in operation. Please install
your landscaping arid. irrigation per your approved plans as required by section 11.6-
Aand 11.2-E, respectively, of the. College Station Zoning Ordinance. Upon receipt of
this letter, you have 30 days to comply. Failure to comply will result in a $2000.00 per
day fine per the City of College Station Zoning Ordinance. If you have any questions,
please feel free to call me at (979) 764-3570..
Sincerely,
Jennifer Flanery
Staff Planning Intern
CC: Code Enforcement