HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report~~ ~
I _._ _.._ ___ __... _-_ ___. _. _._... ___ _.. _... _'____..
i
STAFF REPORT
I
i
Item: Public Hearing and Consideration of a Rezoning from R-1 Single Family to PUD-2
Planned Unit Development and Consideration of the Associated Master Plan and
Preliminary. Plat for theproperty located along the,east right-of-.way line of Stonebrook
Drive and to the south of Woodcreek 3, same being approximately 3.8 acres. ITEM No.
97-100 and 97-300
Item Summary: The original master plan for this areas shows: single family development.
The PUD is a single family zone and therefore, this- change is considered very minor. The
`previous master plan shows 91ots while the'proposed~PUD now shows 13. Both
scenarios show lots off of one cul-de-sac.
The rezoning to PUD-2 is the same as the PLTD-2 for Woodcreek Phase 7 that is in place
.across Stonebrook Drive. This section will essentially mirror that section.
The preliminary plat submitted with the rezoning has been reviewed. The street is
proposed to be private, as is-the one across Stonebrook. It will be built to public street
standards with the exception that parking spaces will back directly onto the roadway. This
is very typical of the PUD development and in fact allows the development to'meet the
parking ratios established in the PUD.
I'' This section has an existing brick wall in place along its only street frontage and the PRC
did not take the discretion to require any addrtonal streetscapmg along this roadway.
Budgetary & Financial Summary:..
Policy Issue Statement: This development impacts the. Civic Pride Vision -and impacts
the City's policy regarding private streets.
Item Background: Woodcreek Phase 7 PUD was approved in 1995 with some
controversy from surrounding Woodcreek. homeowners regarding screening along
Stonebridge. That rezoning was approved conditioned upon a wall and plantings being
installed along Stonbridge. The PRC saw no need for additional screening for this section
as an existing wall is in place along Stonbrook.
Staff Recommendations: Recommends approval as submitted with Pre-submission
comments.
"stfrpt"97100300.doc"
r _.
A
Related Advisory Board Recommendations: The presubmission conference report is
attached and approval is recommended as submitted with minor comments.
City Attorney Recommendation/Comments:
Council Action Options: Approve rezoning and preliminary plat, Deny rezoning-.and
preliminary Plat. Table or delay action''giving staff direction as to further information
required.
~;
:Supporting Materials: '
I
1. Location Map
!~
2. Application
2. Engineering Information
3: Notification Information
~'
~:
i
~ .
~~ _._
-_
___
_.
I
__
ENGINEERING
Waters This property has adequate water service from an existing 12 inch water
line in the Stonebrook Drive right-of--way.
Sewer: This property has adequate sewer service from an existing 8 inch sewer
line located along the perimeter of the proposed development.
Streets:. This development proposes to construct a "private" street to, provide
internal 'mobility. This proposed street will intersect Stonebrook Drive, a
collector on the Thoroughfare Plan. The existing "public" street system has
adequate capacity to handle this proposed development.
Drainage: 'The Preliminary Plat indicates a '..storm water detention area in the
southeast corner. The detention requirements for this ..development will 'be
reviewed at the tirne° of Final Plat submittal.
Flood Plain: According to FEMA FIRM maps, this property is nat located
- within the 100-year flood plain.
.:NOTIFICATION:
Legal Notice Publication(s)z
Advertised Commission Hearing Dates(s): Feb 20, 1997
Advertised Council Hearing Dates: March 13, 1997
'Number of Notices Mailed to Property: Owners Within .200';
Response Received:
"stfrpt"97100300:doc"