Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneousGALINDO .ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS 3833 South Texas Ave., Suite 213 Bryan, Texas 77802. (409) 846-8868 November 21, 1.997 E Mr. Paul Kaspar Engineering Department , City of College Station ~, College Station, TX Ref: Hartland Bank College Station, TX I ~) Dear Paul: Please find attached the calculations to document the impact on the sanitary sewer system by I the proposed Hartland dank facility to be located in Lot 14, Block T, University Park Section IL (, ~! The attachment consists of twa tables. The first table calculates the peak water demand at i li 1.817 gpm (0.004 cfs). III The second table assumes that 100% of the peak water demand will go into an 8" sewer line i r with a minimum grade of 0.5°/a (0.005 ft/ft). However a discharge of 0.01 cfs has been used in ~~ these calculations, instead of.0.004 cfs, because the software package used does not consider discharges smaller than 0.01 cfs. Under these conditions the sewer discharge will have a depth of 0.4" (0.05') in the 8" pipe, ~ Sincerely, i~ GALIIVDO ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS, INC. ,, Christian A. Galindo, P.E., R.P.L.S. ~~~~„ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ President ,~ . ............ ~, .~ •'° s~ ';° cc. Hartland Bank ~°'' ~#r ; ~ ~' f Salim Ismail ~..,....a....~...,.e.o.o~a......a~...a..A ®Ct-ii~l5~"i~a air. ~a~~lly~3~ ~~ Parvis Vessali ~..~...~.....o. k.QS~.9©......~.,......«.. ,, .;9 ~ ~ ~ ~®,~ ~~ i ,; ,i ~.,-: GALINDO ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS 3833 South Texas Ave., Suite 213 Bryan, Texas 77802 (409) 846-8868 Proj: HARTLAND BANK AT UPII 11/ 19/97 29-97 WATER CONSUMPTION FIXTURE. _ SYM._ GPCD FIXTURE PERSON GPD QUANT. PEAK GPM UNITS Toilet. T 28 9.3 12 336 3 2 1.400 Lavatory L 3 1.0 36 4 0.200 Urinal U 9 3.0 108 1 0.150 Coffee S. CS 2 0.7 24 1 0.033 H2O Ftn. WF 2 0.7 24 1 0.033 1.817 SANITARY SEWERS USAGE Estimated at 1000 of water consumption, or 1.817 GPM Equivalent volume in cubic feet per second 0..004 cfs Worksheet Name: HARTLAND BANK Comrent: SANITARY SEWII2 UTILIZATION ESTIMATE Solve For Actual. Depth Given Input Data: Diameter.... .... 0.67 ft Slope.. ...... 0.0050. ft/ft Manning's n....... 0.012 Discharge......... 0.01 cfs Computed Results: Depth........ ... 0.05 ft Velocity.......... 0.87 fps Flow Area......... 0.01 sf Critical Depth.... 0.04 ft Critical Slope.... 0.0072 ft/ft Percent Full...... 7.27 ~ Full Capacity..... 0.94 cfs AMAX @.94D......., 1.O1 cfs Froude Ntnnber..... 0.85 (flow is Subcritical) Open Channel Flow Module, Version 3.21 (c) 1990 Haestad Methods, Inc. * 37 Brookside Rd * Waterbury, Ct 06708 Shirley \/olk Re PRC ~ Page 1_ From: Shirley Volk To: LCARTER@CITY Of= COLLEGE STATION.UTILITY SERVICES C... Subject: Re: PRC Yes, I think it does. We met with them on 11/18 and actually told them that, but their question v~ras whether or not the available capacity would handle a bank. A bank is being proposed to go on the smaller of the two lots. Paul told them that "currently there is no capacity for any development" and explained what the development for the Wheeler property was doing to upgrade the -line. Then they asked about aroy "leftover capacity" and Paul explained that he doesn't know if there is any "leftover capacity", but told them to submit an engineer's estimate for actual demands for the bank (in maximum gallons per day) and the City then can determine if there will be capacity for that type of development. Nothing was turned in with the application and the plat to indicate that demand. »> Lawrence Carter 11/25/97 03:04PM »> University Park It replat. No problem on the water, there is a 12' water main. along University Drive, However, the wastewater may be a problem. Doesn't the 6" line tie into the same 8" line that we were once considering oversize participation because one of the hotels being built in the area needed to upsize their portion `of the 8" to a 12"? How much #low will the properties built orr these new plats add to the existing flow and wil-more of the 8" line need to be upsized? CC: JCallaway, JKee, NRuiz, PKaspar, Sabine McCull... 97-101 97-1.01 Anco Service Inc= Heinz P. Bloch P.O. Box 218060 128 Dawns Edge Drive Houston, Texas 77218 Montgomery, Texas 773569024 97-101 97-101 William & Denise Boyett Jr. Earnest S. Camp 3916 Chesire P.O. Drawer CT Bryan, Texas 77802 College Station, Texas 77841 97-101 97-101 David & Mary Degroot Haydeh Dejbakhsh 4408 Pembrook Land P.O. Box 5073 Bryan, Texas 77802 Bryan, Texas 77805 97-101 97-101 ,David Dudycha Ray 8~ Beverly Edwards 1006 Sonoma 3823 Village Oaks Orive College Station, Texas 77845 Kingwood, Texas 77339 97-101 97-101 Joseph Elliott Enserch Corp-Lone Star Gas Division 7832 Yorktown PI. 301 S. Harwood St. Los Angeles, CA 90045 Dallas, Texas 75201-5696 97-101 97-101 Ramiro A. Galindo Helen Hoelscher 1900 W. Villa Maria P.O. Box 564 Bryan, Texas 77807 Rosebud, Texas 76570 97-101 97-101 Julian & Elizabeth Johnson Rafeik Sobhi Kheir 9915 N. Dowling Rd. 1215 Spring Loop #B College Station, Texas 77845 College Station, Texas 77840 97-101 97-101 Ron 8~ Whitt Lightsey Ronald 8~ Thomas Lightsey P.O. Box 9180 P.O. Box 9051 College Station, Texas 77842 College Station, Texas 77842 97-101 97-101 Oscar & Swany Parulian Rossco Holdings Inc. 2_606 Pedernales Dc P.O. Box 10539 College Station, Texas 77845 Beverly Hills, CA 90213 97-101 97-101 Berr Wheeler David Whitt 10665.Richmond #100 4214 Texas 131vd Houston, Texas 77042 Texarkana, Texas 75503 __ a 97-101 John & Paula Yonkers Rt. 7 Box 202 Conroe, Texas 77384 97-101 = NIC Investments Go Salim Ismail P.O. Box 2864 Bryan, Texas 77805 ~~-- ZONING DISTRICT INFORMATION SUMMARY Case #96-101 From A-P to C-B ExistinQA-P Administrative Professional: PURPOSE: T'lus district would accommodate selected commercial businesses which provide a service rather than sell products, either retail or wholesale. The uses allowed have relatively low traffic generation and require limited location identification. PERMITTED USES: Administrative offices. Art studio or gallery.' Business, dance, or commercial schools. Financial institutions. Doctor or dentist offices. Govemment offices. Offices, professional or service. Photographer's studio. Radio,: TV station (no towers). Public parking lot for operating vehicles. Real estate office. Small recycling collection facilities. Travel agency or touristbureau. Other personal service shops. Proposed C-B Business Commercial: PURPOSE: This district is intended as an alternative to general commercial districts in areas where certain commercial uses may be appropriate, but where more intensive uses of the land may not be compatible with the surrounding character. Only limited outside. business activity is allowed. Outside business activity is defined as outside display of merchandise for sale but does not include outside storage of merchandise. Outside business activity locations are permitted only in areas no farther than 50' from the building where the primary business is located and are not allowed in areas out in the perking .lot.' Outside business activity is not permitted within 50' from any adjacent roadway: PERMITTED USES: Administrative/professional offices. Alcoholic beverage sales (retail). Art studio or gallery. Cleaner (no on-site cleaning). Dance or music school. Domestic household and office equipment rental. Dormitory. Financial institution. HoteUmotel. Personal service shop. Radio or TV station or studio (no towers). Restaurant. Retail sales. Theater or motion picture, house. Other uses may be considered by the Commission. PROHIBITED USES Convenience Store. Gasoline and service stations. ENGINEERING Water: This property has adequate water service from an existing \vater line in the University Drive right-of--way. Sewer: There is marginal capacity remaining in the sewer line that serves the northern portion of the City. This rezoning is compatible to other parcels in the immediate area. Therefore, he City wil( assume responsibility for, any upgrades that are required to maintain capacity in these lines due to the compatibility of the surrounding zonings. Streets: This property has access to University Drive which is classified as a major arterial and has sufficient capacity. Sidewalks: At the time of site plan review, the development will be responsible for the construction of sidewalks along University Drive if they do not exist. Drainage: The detention requirements for this property will be reviewed. at the time of site plan submittal Flood Plain: According to FEMA FIRM maps, this property is not located within the 100-year flood plain. NOTIFICATION: Legal Notice Publication(s): Advertised Commission Hearing Dates(s): Advertised Council',Hearing Dates: Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners Within 200': Response Received: o:\group\devc _ser~stfipt\9T-101.doc :::: ^:::::::nw:::::;:: •:: nv,w.. nv v4..: :w:::n~:::::::.•.~: v:, v........vv. x.• :::v.. .......... .......... . ................................. :••:: •wnvv~vah:.:::::.:v~:.::x .. ...... \::: r:.. :. ., ?} .. ....v....:Jv......•;•yvv........ •. :•vw........ ~;.w:r+:n..... :. ::: }: :w..........v....... n 4 .. w ::::::: ::.::: w::; ...; .v..vuh:v%.:~ :::v~}::.~.::: .v •~v. n n ................ .. :. :i::: :: ::'::• ;' M•Y~::::•:}.:•'::i~~'i::::::•'::::•:::::•:i:}:is::i:::?.:::•::::~:::L!.:::X:•'. Vii.::}::?.i._.'-::i_}.n~.yn ................ .....:..:.......::.......................:.>:::..,~ ~d:~..:......................................:.........,.::...........::....:...,....:.....:...........::.:...::::.::.::...::..::..:::.: 0 Regular Item Consent Item Statutory Item Item Submitted By: Sabine McCully, Senior Planner For Council Meeting Of: March 13 1997 Director Approval: City Manager Approval: Item: Public hearing and consideration of a rezoning of Lot 14, Block T, University Park Phase II - 2.98 acres located .along the north side of University Drive approximately 100' west of the Spring Loop `intersection .from District ,A-P Administrative Professional to District C-B Commercial Business. (97-101) Item Summary: The site is located in the middle of the University Drive Corridor (aka.Overlay District) and in the middle of an area that was originally intended to become an office strip between the retail commercial areas located at the ends of the corridor. However, much of the office strip has been rezoned to GB ,including the two tracts located immediately adjacenf to the subject tract. The comdor is intended to become an .attractive, commercial entrance into the City, and the requested rezoning would further this goal. The intended use is for a hotel .development. Policy Issue Statement: The City's policy as it relates to this area is to maintain an attractive commercial corridor that will develop as a mix of office, hotel, restaurant, and retail uses. Item Background: The University Drive Corridor Study, which was. adopted) by Council in 1991, recommended a mix of commercial and office uses for the majority of the University Drive frontage extending from Tan-ow to the East Bypass. The intent of the recommendations was. to encourage an attractive entrance into the City through land use and aesthetic controls. Council approved a new commercial district, which lists a range of uses such as .hotels, restaurants, and retail, but prohibits. convenience stores.. and service. stations. The lots that had been zoned C-1 _. during the 1980's were rezoned to he new C-B District in 1992 to ensure uses would be in compliance with the corridor plan. o:~group~deve_serkwshtl97-101.doc The Overlay District was created and applied to the corridor as well. This district contains specific aesthetic requirements and restrictions. At the time that the new comdor restrictions were in the process of being implemented, a rezoning from A-P to C-B was requested on the subject tract. That request was denied due to the goal of maintaining a substantial amount of office zoned property sandwiched between two C-B strips on the north side of University Drive. Two months later, the two tracts. located in the strip intended for office use were rezoned to C-B with the condition that they be platted into a single lot. These tracts are located to the east of the subject tract along University.. The zoning map still reflects the original R-4 and A-P zoning on these tracts because the condition of rezoning to C-B has not yet been satisfied. However, it is anticipated that the tracts will eventually develop as C-B uses. Staff Recommendations: Staff. recommends approval with the condition that a 20' landscape buffer area be installed. across the northern property line adjacent to the R-4 zoning line. Related Advisory Board Recommendations: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval with the buffer easement by a unanimous vote. City Attorney Recommendation/Comments: Legal has prepared the ordinance in proper legal form. Council Action. Options: Approval, approval with conditions, or denial of request. Supporting Materials: 1. Location Map 2. Application 3. Engineering Information 4. Notification Information 5. List of district uses 6. P&Z minutes 7. Ordinance o:lgroupkieve serbvsht~97-101.doc FILE NOTE Lot 14, Block T of University Park II Case #97-249 I left a message on Chris Galindo's recorder that the following items still need to be addressed prior to filing the plat for record: The final plat is a minor plat according to the Subdivision Regulations. Remove the signature block for the Planning and Zoning Commission and modify the "Certificate of the City Engineer" signature block as follows: CERTIFICATE OF CITY ENGINEER & CITY PLANNER We, the City Engineer and. City Planner of the City of College Station, Texas, hereby certify that this subdivision plat conforms to the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the City of College Station. Veronica Morgan, Assistant City Engineer Jane Kee, City Phnner _ Sidewalks .are required along the University Drive frontage. The applicant has the option to submit construction documents and build the sidewalks with the commercial development. If the sidewalks are not constructed with the final plat, they will be constructed at the time of site plan approval. _ Make the above mentioned changes and submit the mylar original and one copy to be filed for record at the Brazos County Courthouse. _1 N tali homas Ruiz Assistant Development Coordinator December 17, 1.997 ~i~n~~ fie- ~~-..~- ~i ~~ ~ ~~. Y~ ,ti. o .mo w .9~~c C/s, :., ~~ ~_ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~I ', ~ _ ~ ~~~ ~ , / `~~~ iN .~ • FOURPL X ~~~ ~ '' U I 5 5, -- 5~~ ~c~rking ccE M~: 178.5 IRF ~ rt31~ W R FO L WSW` MF 3~8°~ 655 OCH 6 /134 L10TT ! , y ~ ` IRF \ g URPLE C ~. ~ Q ' •~ ' R' ~. ~. F E 3• ~ y y y W \ \ y •Y W W W W W W W W\ W .~ W .r-W y y "y y y W y ~,. NOW OR FOR RL W w ~W 8°49 9 E W W~ W W W W ~ T. / ,l' W y k0~ ~ c=74.x'3 E DA9t~ 9 Y DE R = 3 ~.~ r~573.5 n`• (~ FO.U PL ` .~ ~ W\ IR unarc~ ~ °~- LSB-6 ~ o ~~ ~ 30' PIPELI W W W W W ~\ ~ EASEMEN W W W W y W 61/655 y y + y e ~ '~~~. OW DRMERL !i ~ RELEASE RE ORDS W W y -~/- DAVID DYCHA '~ ~ ~~ 1947 157 ' W i ~ \ E o '~ S 35' 17'3 E VAC6 c-~ o ~p ~ ~ C=182. 2~ ~ ~ ~? OR~R~ ~.-425.0 W J3 ~N ~ ,~ ~' ~ p Apo 5 J4o ~ 75 a \ ~. ~ ~ ~~ _4 QQ~2,012~S_ 0 25, 2k° \ 64 PN l /~ ~ 11 ACR. - /~ ~ W ~~ 721 650 W ~ .p ?£o. ~R s ~. ~ N °' z~ , ~ 6° W a,,?nn (( Q -o a• 2 .~ ELEC. ~ /'''~~~p _ ryA 3 ~" y V~iLy y •~ .~ ~ W W y i /2~~ ~ •p ~ ~~ ~ ~- ~ s W 00 ~ R F / a~ a y y y w ~ `CAPPED •o sl W W W W W W W ~`t y .~. J• .6 3• y ~ O y y •Y y J - G ~'~ ~ 1 A NT ~ P~ `N W S 6a 65 --- ~'S~~~~ 15 ~ y~ ~- y Q 5' ~3 p T ~/AJ• g~ 3 W W Cyr y W W W (J S ~FLV • I ~~..// `` a W~•,C//• Wye W W C W y y:7 h, ~ y y d• S~ {J~ W ,~W yy "" W W A. (' //gyp, _. S 1,C `~ W W2 "~~ yt O~ e ~ o LET ~ ~ EIS` S~~ ~ v ~J ~$ ~~~, Rod' _ ,-- '~`-~ / / r = COCA ~ I 1° O, / 1 Pa king 2`~-`~7 -~~~~ /7 / %~`%T - Pueuc u Fa9Nr. 3. I I Po ~ T VH4C D ENENi TI M.,CESS ENENT .} B ~c~ ErER Fasur. 5. R ~ T °t 6 P a r ~H . ` ~0 0 7. G ~ R d! EER ~~ ` N- TI ~ E PEOE9fAL S. B TM \ 9.B 1 1 ~ `~ \ ~~A uH 8 , 1 FOURP X 5 ~~~IRF 5/C ~Qrkin CCE ~ r,R.-1 .5 ~ RAE NW R F ' ` +'~ 1 ~ \ \ S55 OCH 8 URP ~j 1 ~ ~ g ,Fj ' .~ ~ \ 1Q `~ - S'49 +9" : E ~ OR FOR 1 4 7 ° ~°D `~~ S 5K22' E DAYIO !: N DE R 3 ~s73g5, 2i91/Se \ • . ~a.~ F l a 'C 5 . ~` ~y9\y ~,` , ~0. 81 855 ~ ~ \ NOW OR ORMERLY ~ Y A" RD6 \ ~i OAYID CHA H /8i8 CS 98:. O~ /' I °4J 57 ~ \ S 35' 17'3 " E VPG4M ~ ~ ~ e=425. 0 7.500 SF. ~. Y. A o u ~1 ° ~ ~ 2 X 311.2 ~J~°/7i~ ~, ' ,/' ~ _ „ Z Pa ~: • arE . \~ \~ ED ~e'~ ~ p3 ~_' G~2.012 S.. 75q , ~ \ 64 231 ~ 11 ACR. ~. ~~ ~ /' -~' 721 ` a ~. ~ S ~' ~' ? ~ ~6~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ a : .ELEC. V~L 1 ,~ J ~O ~ ~i ' ` ~ ` /Y i~ ~ ~~p. ~8~~ ~ a coPPEo o y. . Q.. .. ,h:~~ ~e~. - gk ~ 15 Y''~` ~' ~'. ` 5,~3 5 5k8'3A OR FORMERLY NOW R ~- 4 ERESTS L7D. 2°77/7) Y PMV N 1 26/190 + + ~ ~ ' 2378/ 8 PLEX t OR y. pq. 7 < 4- ~ 1 8 190 • ~ ~ } ~ ~ '~ SEAS t 6 FOU ~ lz ~ RAH' 4j \ 1 1N t 1L° ~29g ~~ s 1 N ~ Er ~oQ ..d ~~' .~QCJ`~ OT.~ ~_ l`` __ i .2~' ,~ ~~~ CHECKLIST FOR FINAL PLATS. w (~~v.~~ I,.a~ lei ~~~~ Re/quirements based on field survey and marked by monuments and markers: I~' 1. Drawn on 24" x 36" sheet to scale of 100' per inch. 2. Name & address of subdivider, recorded.owner, planner, engineer and surveyor. ^ 3. Name & address of all lenders on the property. Lb U~i ~~a~ ~' • ~/ #~~aM~ o~ Au, ct~S 4. Name & address. of all easement holders. ~' ~G• Qom„ j~ p~J. ~~P~fi~s 5. Proposed name of subdivision .(not pelted or pronounced similarly. to any other subdivision in Brazos County, Texas). ® 6. Date of preparation, scale in feet and north arrow. . . 7. Application fee._ ^ 8. Approved construction documents on 24" x.36" sheets. C~' 9. Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and the C.S.LS.D. ®" 10. Total area intended to be developed. . C~' 11. Subdivision boundary lines indicated by heavy lines. l~ 12. ~ rtificate of Ownership & Dedication; . certificate of Surveyorship and/or Engineer; V~~ertificate of City Engineer; /Approval of Commission; /a Certificate of the County:Clerk. (Owner(s)' signature(s) :must be in place before caking plat to P&Z for consideration). ltd I3. ~~'Jp~c 14. ~IAc 15. a'~A 16. L?~ 17. ~`~ 18. ~Q` 19. L'7 20. Number of lots. a. number of lots by Zoning District. ~~ b. average acreage of each residential. lot. by Zoning. District. Approximate area of street right-of--way. `n _ ~~,Lx Proposed parkland dedication.. i`~~'° ~ Requested oversize participation item if any... Location bf the. One Hundred: Yr. Floo plain according to the most recent available date. If more than 1 sheet, amindex sheet sh wing entire subdivision at a scale,of 500 iPeet per inch. Parkland Dedication information. Exact location, dimensions, Warne and legal description of all existing or recorded streets, alleys, reservations, easements or other R.O.W. within the subdivision, intersecting or' contiguous with boundary or forming. boundary with accurate dimensions, bearings or deflection. angles and radii, area, center angle, degree of curvature, tangent distance and length of all'curves. _ _ __ a vn,t ~~ 'p~~- U~ I~ 1 R.~ '~°` - ~- L~J 21. Same information for proposed streets, alleys, etc. as preliminary plats. 22. Lot corner markers and survey monuments (by symbol) and tied to-basic survey date. 23. Street`, a11~y, and s~ ewalk plans, profiles and. sections, with specifications and detail cost estimates. 24. Sanitary sewer plat with. 2 foot contours, plan and profile lines, showing depth and grades, j with cost estimates. I~ 0~ 25. Water line plat showing fire hydrants, valves, etc. with specifications and a detailed cost Ii estimate. 1 „~ 6. Storm drainage system plat with 2 foot contours, street lines, inlets, storm sewer and !i ~~~,~~ drainage channels, with profiles :and sections,. and showing drainage and runoff areas, and runoff based on 5, 10, .:and 25 year rain intensity. Detail drainage structure design and a~t~ channel lining design if used, with specification and detalcost estimate.. 27. Street lighting plan showing location of lights, design, and with specifications detail cost estimate. ~~ 28. Submit a statement addressing any differences between the final plat and approved Master Preliminary Plat & Plana Indicate any variances requested and reasons for same. t fomss IanVnlplat~5-94 '. 'l e~o~`iw"VV 0 ~-=-~ GALINDO ENGINRERS AND PLANNERS 3833 South Texas Ave., Sutte 280 Bryan, Texas 77802 (409) 846-8868 TEXAS HOTEL MANAGEMENT CORP. EAST UNIVERSITY DRIVE LOT 14, BLOCK "T' UNIVERSITY PARK SECTION II COLLEGE STATION TEXAS X~~~ ~~ ~~ -?,~~~ ~~ ~~~~ 11-97 •. NOW OR FORMERLY NW ~ ~ w CQ GALINDO INTERESTS LTD. FlRMERLY .NOW CR FDRNERI.'Y R8 2077/75 OSCPR RAMlRO GALINDO i d ~. ~. d a ~`~ PARLIIAN 1626/190 d 117 ~~ 2338/198 4-PLEX ~ , CrJ NOW OR FORMERLY ~ S/~ SCALE (Z/' RAMIRO GALINDO ~ /'v ,v i 4-4PLEX ~~ ~I ., ~ 1626/t90 C~S• ~ C )~ ~ T~~v 1 = 8 -\/1 ~-v of ~ 1 2 ' PUBLYC d q ~ FOURPLEX ~ ~ ~k; g)~ O A CESS EASMT ~ ~ / ~ ~ O/J I V - ' z 20' PUE FOURPLEX ` o . \ 9 ~ ', . w . _ 1 lr O 8 e ~ ~ ` 5/ ~ ~ _ oFUURPLEX [RF ` ` -•~ 5~ ` \ ACCESS ASMT, NOW OR FORMERLY HEINTP. BLOCH ~ • \ N 3/e'~ 655/837 `1 ` \ IRF ~ 9 NOW OR FORMERLY ~+S ~ \ JOE A. ELLIOTT ~~~~ \ \ F 1`flURPL~ 626/134 t 1. ~ ~ ~ FDURPLEX \ S 68°49'49" E ~ 10 1 ~ ~ ~ NOW OR FORMERLY ~ / c=41475 1 \ \ 2l 1/59 NARY. DEGROTT \ /•q/•` r=573,5.9 ~~A \ ~ FOURPLEX OAS '• ..i~ ~ 6C1 °~/ 10 ~ ~ ~F \ ~ \ MARxfat~=% ~ •/ c=41471' \ 11 ~7 \ O L8H-6 ~=S~~S7 ]/2' \ NOW OR FORMERLY\ 30' PIPELINE t~UW DR FORMERLY CS ~ IRF DAVID DUDYCHA ~/~ G OLDINGS .INC. ~$ EASEMENT 1947/157 61/633 / ~~ RELEASE RECORDS ~ VACANT z3oo sF. 1 S 35°17'31p E \~ \\ 12 I waN~sTAR G<s ./~,~°~ ~ c=182.09 \ \ . ~a~~~~ .~ r=4.25.90 \ \ 648/231 S 35°x'9'37° E v, \ \ ~ 2' ~ c=1803' N \ \ /' • ~~ER ~ ° r= 425.9D' c v \ \ S ~ / / LEGEND ~ ~ '~j ~ 3/~ Q\ ~. 6~'.r ~ - Roi+ PIPE `~ ~ ~ R CN -CONCRETE MARKER ~ ~ ]/2' $0 C~ Noe - HARK off CONCRETE >±t VACANT ]/Z~ ELEC,~ 1RF S/F = SE7 OR FOLND ~~' FP -FENCE POST X11/\ VAULT CAPPED FC -FENCE CORNER 14 c0 Ic. F" ` t pQ • ~ BH = H~ TO B~ [F; CURB ^ ' '~° Q• BL • HUD.D]NG IINE IO q~ ,y~ RAJ PUE - PUBLIC UTILITY EASMT. ~ G,~~ lO EE -ELECTRICAL EASEMENT //_~ .~ " ~ DE =DRAINAGE EASENENT o ~ ~ ~, ~CJ 1 ~ AE -ACCESS EASEMENT r1 ~ INLET (~ G, 55~, ~ .. .. \ EM - ELECT FETER EASMT. ! J~0 S __JJ /~»n, !J ~ ET =.ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER 1 °G~5 ~V \ NH '~ - NMtiOLECAL/POLE/LIGHT V ` ~ JR8 ~ CD -- CLEAN OUT 5 'CJ S 5S v/v : uArE~Riva.vE ~ Za' N(]TESI SS -.SANITARY SEVER FN -FIRE HYDRANT 1!~' 99' 1, ALL LINEAR DIMENSIC]NS ARE IN FEET. GM =GAS METER. IRF 2 Z,WHERE MEASURED CALLS DIFFER FROM T/H -TELEPHONE PEDESTAL TB ecru - cAeLE Tv RECORDED CALLS THEY ARE SHC]WN VACANT nH ~ o ~ ITIONER ~ ~ INLET L N 1 =MEASURED ~~~~ 3, TC]TALEAREA { R > = 2.9811 ACR, 15 E R > -RECORDED j ,33 \ ~ '~`~ TOTAL AREA C M ) _ .2,9799 ACR. 6~og5 ~ •, '• A\ ~~RS~' (7 ~ 4. BEARING'. BASE IS PLAT IN 538/721. S \`~'~ ~~ ~~ 5, RESTRICTI[]NS IN 502/]89 & 773/699, ' V s' R~ , 6 6. PRCIPERTY ZCINING IS A P. '~~52~ ` •\ \ ~ tA~' 7. &A287 688INDEEDSRECC]RDS14& INSTR MENT 3 PIPELINE\•• ••\ '\ /~ IN 61/655, RELEASE RECC]RDS, .AFFECT THIS PROPERTY, ~- vs s"T ` '. ~' , • • ~ , . ~ • ~ 8. BLs ESTABLISHED BY CITY ORDINANCE # 1638 ~ ~ • • -~ 9. BASE LINE DENOTED BY ~` ~ , ~. ~ '•\ This is to certify that. on April 17, 1997, a survey was completed on the ground of the property legally described as Lot 14, 131ock "T", University Park Section Il, an addition to the City of College Station, Brazos County, Texas, according to the plat recorded in Volume 538, Page 721, Deed Records, Brazos County, Texas, and that this plat is true with that survey. This also cert'rfies that, to the best of my knowledge based on the information currently available to me, there are no building structures, building .structures intrusions or protrusions, apparent conflicts or visible evidence of easements other than what is shown hereon. Furthermore, as depicted in FEMA's FIRM Map # 4804100142 C for Brazos County, Texas, dated July 2, 1992, this property does not lie within an idenfrfied 100-year flood plain. CHRISTIAN A. GALINDO, P.E. # 53425, R.P.L.S. #4473 April 17, 1997