HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutesCommissioner Lightfoot asked if anyone voiced their reason for opposition. Staff Planner. Kee
explained that some concern was enforcing .the weed restrictions.. One of the owners that was in
opposition has moved from the area, meaning actually three properly owners are in opposition.
Commissioner Gribou moved to initiate the rezoning procedures. Commissioner Garner seconded the
motion which passed unopposed (5-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3: Consideration of a proposed. final plat for ~oodcreek Section Eight
encompassing 3767 acres zoned PUD-2, Planned Unit Development located on the east side of
Stonebrook Drive and Wilshire Courtintersectiono (97-244)
Graduate Engineer Kaspar presented the staff report and stated that the final .plat is proposed as a
Planned Unit Development similar to Woodcreek Phase 7 which is located across Stonebrook Drive.
This development would create 13 PUD lots .around the east extension of Wilshire Court. Mr. Kaspar
explained that the. water service. is being extended within this subdivision. to provide service and fire
protection. The applicant is .proposing to continue Wilshire Court across Stonebrook Drive.
Approximately 0.5 acres of .public right-of-way is being dedicated. with this plat. A storrnwater
detention facility would. be provided by .the applicant which.. would be owned and. maintained . by the
Homeowners Associations. Staff recommended approval of this proposed final plat.
Commissioner Lightfoot moved to approve the proposed final plat. Commissioner Parker seconded the
motion which passed unopposed (5-0):
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: Consideration of a final plat for Dartmouth Crossing, 8.289 acre
subdivision. on the south side of Southwest Parkway at the .proposed extension of Dartmouth
Drivem (97-246)
Staff explained that this item was withdrawn by the applicant prior to the meeting,
AGENDA ITEM N0.5: Establish parking requirements for the Sylvan Learning Center.
Senior Planner McCully presented this item and stated that the applicant is proposing to build a free
standing tutoring center on a vacant tract that has been subdivided recently on Southwest Parkway near
Central Park Lane. The proposal will be the first tutoringcenter to locate on an individual site in this
City. In two instances in the past, the tutoring services were classified as "schools" rather than tutoring
services due, to .the large amount of students that would be taught at peak times within a r~;latively small
lease space. Those businesses were required to go through the Conditional Use Permit process due to
the school classification .This request has been classified. as a "freestanding tutoring. service" by staff.
The proposed building will be approximately 6000 square ft (included in the conceptual plan).
According to the applicant during the highest peak times there would be around 25 people in the center.
Many children are .dropped off...' The applicant is requesting the same parking requirements as an office
building of the same size. The ratio' for an office building of the same size would. be l to 250, and
would require 24 parking spaces. Staff recommended approval with the condition that any future
significant changes in use or employees be reevaluated.
Commissioner Gribou expressed his concern with dead-end public. parking lots.. Ms. McCully said Staff
would relay this concern to the applicant.
P&ZMinutes November 20, 1997 Page 2 oJll
Commissioner Lightfoot asked if anyone voiced their reason for opposition. .Staff Planner Kee
explained that some concern was enforcing the weed restrictions. One of the owners that was in
opposition has moved from the area, meaning actually three property owners are in opposition.
Commissioner Gribou moved to initiate the rezoning procedures.. Commissioner Garner seconded the
motion which passed unopposed (5-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3: Consideration of a proposed final. plat for. Woodcreek Section Eight
encompassing 3767 acres zoned PUD-2, Planned Unit Development located on the east side of
Stonebrook Drive and Wilshire Court intersection. (97-244)
Graduate Engineer Kaspar presented the .staff report and stated that the final plat is proposed. as a
Planned ZJnit Development similar to Woodcreek Phase 7 which is located across Stonebrook Drive.
This development would create 13 PtJD lots around the east. extension of Wilshire Court.. Mr. Kaspar
explained that the water service is being extended within this subdivision to provide service and fire
protection. The applicant is proposing to continue Wilshire .Court across Stonebrook Drive.
Approximately 0.5 acres of public right-of--way is being .dedicated with this plat. A stormwater
detention facility would be provided by .the applicant which would be owned and maintained by the
Homeowners .Associations. Staff recommended approval of this proposed final plat.
Commissioner Lightfoot moved to approve the proposed final plat. Commissioner Parker seconded the
motion which passed unopposed. (5-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: Consideration of a final plat for Dartmouth Crossing, 8,289 acre
subdivision on the south side of Southwest Parkway at the proposed extension of Dartmouth
Driven (97-246)
Staff explained that this item was withdrawn by the applicant prior to the meetinge
AGENDA ITEM NO. S: Establish parking requirements for the Sylvan Learning Center.
Senior Planner McCully presented this item and stated that the applicant is proposing to build a free
standing tutoring center on a vacant tract that has been subdivided recently on Southwest Parkway near
Central Park Lane. The. proposal will be the first tutoring center to locate on an individual site in this
City. In two instances in the past, the tutoring services were classified as "schools" rather than tutoring
services due to the large amount of students that would be taught at peak times within a relatively small
lease space. Those businesses were-required to go through-the Conditional Use Permit .process due to
the school classification. This. request has been classified as a "freestanding tutoring service" by staff.
The proposed building .will be approximately 6000 _ square ft (included in the conceptual plan).
According. to the applicant during.. the highest ..peak times there would be around 25 people in the center.
Many `children are dropped off. The applicant is requesting the same parking requirements as an office.
building of'the same size. The ratio for an office building of the same size would. be l to 250, ,and
would- require 24 parking spaces. Staff recommended approval with the condition that any future
significant changes in use or employees be reevaluated.
Commissioner Gribou expressed ..his concern with dead-end public parking lots. Ms. McCully said Staff
would. relay this concern to the applicant.
P&Zllaftnutes November 20, 1997 Page 2 ojll