Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneousKLING ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING Consulting Engineers • Land Surveyors. 4103 Texas Avenue, Suite 212 Tel. (409) 846-6212 Bryan, Texas 77802 Fax (409) 846-8252 P.O. Box 4234 Bryan, Texas 77805 TO f G ~~r DATE 7 PROJECT NO. PROJECT NAME ' C ATTENTION REFERENCE WE TRANSMIT: ^ Under Separate Cover l~ Enclosed VIA: ^ Mail f~Messenger ^ Federal Express ^ Express Mail ^ Special Courier ^ Picked Up By Your Office THE FOLLOWING: ^ Prints ^ Copies ^ Originals ^ Plat ^ Field Notes ^ Plans ^ Report ^ Estimate ^ Cut Sheets ^ Computer Printout ^ File ^ Contract NO. DESCRIPTION ~~~ .~~X a Gam. b l 1 y ~.Q. ~~~ FOR: ^Your Review & Approval ^Your Review & Comment ^Your Review & Distribution ^Your Review, Revision & Return ^Your Signature & Return ^Your File and/or Use ^ As Requested By: ^ Please Acknowledge Receipt of Enclosures ^ Please Return Enclosures To Us ^ Copies Of This Letter Of Transmittal Sent To: If Enclosures Are Not As Noted, Please Notify Us At Once. Signed: ~ ~ ~ City of College Station 1101 South Texas Avenue P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION ~f DEVELOPMENT SERVICES To: L-~//Z a y~_. Phone: Fax phone• CC: Date: ~ / ~ / ~4 Number of pages including cover sheet: ~- From: • Phone: 409-764-3570 Fax phone: 409-764-3496 ^ Urgent ^ For your review ^ Reply ASAP , /~ ^~, P,/lease comment /~~~ %~ ~~i~fi2'%n/ i~ %~~- 77/ %/~'T~s ~~~~%F--~ ol-- If you did not receive a complete fax, please call our office immediately for a new transmittal. LLEGE STATION co P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tel: 409 764 3500 March 3, 1998 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: RE: Graham Victoria Subdivision College. Station City staff had. a meeting wi#h local engineer, Stewart Kling, on May 20, 1997 to discuss .David White's property on the corner of Graham Road and Victoria (589 Graham). At that meeting the staff told Mr. Kling that any existing conditions on the property do not have to meet detention requirements. That is, as long as no improvements or changes are made to the site, detention does not need to be addressed.. Staff told Mr. Kling that when any improvements or changes are made to the parking lot or the driveway, the runoff resulting from those changes must be addressed either in the form of detention or by using Victoria if he can show that Victoria has the: capacity.. It was additionally explained that all lots in this subdivision can share detention #acilities by using private drainage easements, and that maintenance of the facilities will be the responsibility of the owners. Mr. Kling was also told that a drainage report and accompanying plans can be submitted either with the plat or with site development. If additio I infor 'on is needed, please contact me. Shirley J. V Development Coordinator Home of Texas A&M University C' Ordinance Requirements: STAFF NOTES Graham Victoria Subdivision Case #97-220 _ The finalplat is a minor .plat and can be approved at staff level. Remove the City Council, Planning & Zoning. Comrrnssron and Commissioner's Court signature blocks.. Modify the City Engineer's block as follows: APPROVAL OF CITY'ENGINEER AND CITY PLANNER We, Kent Laza, City Engineer and Jane. Kee, City Planner of the. City of College Station, Texas, hereby. certify that this subdivision .plat conforms to the requirements of the Subdivision Regulations of the City of College Station, Texas. Kent Laza, City Engineer Jane Kee, City Planner _ Replace general note #3 to state that all .three lots shall take access .only from the 30' private access easement. _ .Update. the vicinity map. (The vicinity. map does not show Victoria Avenue to Graham Road, reflects dated city' limits line and calls: Schaffer Road "East Graham Road". Remove the reference of"South" to Graham Road.) Comments/Concerns: _ Impact fees for the subject property will be required at the time of building permit. Provide a 10' public utility easement along the Graham Road frontage of lots 2 and 3. Coordinate telephone service: details. with G.T.E. Representative Laverne Akin at .(409) 821-4723. Natural gas is available from Graham Road. Contact Lone Star-..Gas Representative.David .borough at (409) 776-0627 office or (409) 777-03.05 .mobile/pager for gas availability and meter location. SUBMIT THE MYLAR ORIGINAL AND 2 COPIES OF THE REVISEll FINAL PLAT TO BE REVIEWED & APPROVED BY STAFF AND FILED FOR RECORD AT THE COUNTY CLERK' S OFFICE. r. GTE LAtfERNE AKIN DESIGNER- ACCESS DESIGN (409} 821-4723 REVIEWED BY: GTE DATE: JUNE 18, 1997 CASE NAME. FINAL PLAT -GRAHAM VICTORIA SUBDIVISION; PROPOSED SUBDIVISION TOTALING 2.94 ACRES DIVIDED INTO THREE C-1 COMMERCIAL LOTS GEtVERALLY LOCATED UN THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE GRAHAM ROAD AND VICTORIA AVENUE fNTERSECTiON. CASE NO: 97-22t~ PrFTER REVIEW OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED DEVELOPMENT, THE FOLLOWING CONCERNS WERE NOTED: Request a 10 fiaot ufility easement along Graham Road across Lots 2 and 3. ~1DDITIt)NAL COMMENTS: I will be happy to answer any questions-I can be reached at 409f821-4723 ,~ MrTN~CI,p,AL DE Y~~ O.~'1 t~ENT G~ t~ ~T~' ~S~I Terms Avg. South, Ste. A • CoIIege Srcria+, 1r~as ~~840.409-693-5359 • FA,Y 409-693•x343 • E,IIAIL:mdgcs~teRet Engineering, Surveying, Planning and Environmental ConsuIrants FAK# ~ 4 .~ ~q ~ NO. PAGES TO FOLLOW Z DATE ~ ~ ~ t ~8 TO ~ ~ ~ G ~ ~c 11 c./ ~ /~ FROM Y ~f there is a problem n~ith this trasmisszon, please call us at 409 b93-5359 CONFIDE~TYNOTI'CE: Thisfacsvnile message and accompanying communications and/or documents are intended for tle ezcussve and con~zdential use of the individual or eniity to which the mPSSge is addressed COlti'~IMENTS ~ ~n~ !/~fvn~a^e.~L~ ~' L! ed' ~i oyt,S " ~~ K~~Pi~~-~ tI~it~ GAL%o~ (~ , ,.--- T-' ~C {~' i~~ ~ ~~ ' t ' / I'' ~ ~; ~ c ~~ ~ J __.. ,~ i ~~ ~~UNICIP,~lL DET~LOP.~~NT CROUP 255 Terns Ave. South, Ste. A • College Station, Terns 77840.409-693-5359 • FAK 409-693-4243 • E-mail: mdgcs~te. com Consulting Englaeers, SurYeyors, Planners and Environmeetal Consultants October 5, 1998 Sabine McCulIy Planning Division Ciry of College Station 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 77842 Re; Bavarian & Japanese Auto works site Block 1, Lot. I, Grtaham Victoria Subdivision 4000 Victoria. Variance Case File: 3/4197 Dear Sabine: Thank you for your assistance in this matter. I understand from my conversation with lane today, that the ZBA ruling means that the auto repair shop will require only 9 spaces. The other o$ice/warehouse uses in the building will require 20 spaces, based on the parking requirements ofthe Zoning Ordinance, according to the following calculations: 6 spaces - 1500 SF office (per Appraisal Dist.) - D. White 1 spaces -,1000 SF storagelwarehouse - D, White 3 s aces (25 rounded up} - 2500 SF storage/warehouse -International Supply 10 Total Spaces Based on the ZBA Wiling allowing 9 for the auto repair use, and Z O for the other on-site uses, it appears that the site requires a total of 19 pazking spaces in full with the Zoning Qrdinance. Several questions remain "up in the air". 1} Based on my understanding of the wording of the ZBA ruling and the data in the Buchanan/Sofl Mechanics report of 20 February 1997, the .parking lot is substandard and will need to be rebuilt to meet City specifications. Is thin correct? Does the rebuild, if required, just cover the actual parking spaces, or do we have to rebuild the driveway areas as well? 2) The current driveway throat-depth is approximateiy 31 feet. Victoria is classed as a minor arterial on the current thoroughfare plan, and therefore requires a 40' throat depth, The ZBA ruling requites that c.01-38(2815) all development regulations be met- does this mean we will have to modify the driveway throat depth to comply with the driveway. ordinance, or does it fall under a "gandfather" exemption? 3) The current driveway throat location is approximately centered on the driveway across Victoria &am our site. In order to provide for better geometry with the existing pavement, we might consider moving the driveway centerline 30' closer to tine building, which would make the opposite right driveway distance approximately 30'. Is there any way we can do this and comply with the Driveway Ordinance? It would certainly be of benefit in the design geometry of the pazking lot. 4) We are currently attempting to do some additional conceptual desigu,'but we need substantive answers to these questions before we can proceed_ I appreciate the info you have akeady provided, and look forward to hearing from you or your colleagues. Sincerely, r~~ 1~. ~ Grego T Bart Project Man er c.01-38(2815) ~I ® p ~ ~ n ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,. n n ~ ~ ~ ~,... F.+. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~• rr. l") ~ ~a ~~ o ~ -°~ ~ • C ~ ~ „~ '~ ch .~ t1` ~ ~ C'" H a GARRETI~' ENGLN'EERfNG 444 Carter Cree BRYAN, 1 (409). /~/ ~5°24 °C.b y~ - X52. ~~ ' ~~j ~,~,r9y ~~ TSB 0¢9 2~ ,/ ~~ ~. 2a'~9C~~ ~~ACT ~D~~i~,T ~T~1/~itlSC'i{~ ~~~~U~ ~~~ ~~~ ca~~~~ ~~, I, Donald•D. Gsrrett, Registered Professional Land Surveyor, No. 2972 do hereby certify that the"above plat is true and correct and agrees with a survey mad'el ~csrk; tie ground under my supervision on September 9, 1992. I ,~~tzx i~er c,ei-tify that no improvements on this property encroach onadj~dent:property nor do any improvements on adjacent property en~X,o'ach'`bn thi 'property, except as shown. This property is`not in 1,~0 ,y,e,a~' ,fl.oo azard area as established by the ,. , , U.S. Army Corps of ~ sneers. ~-.~.<~ ;,~ °~ by ^. ,' ~ P 4 ~ ~ ~ r ~f% "i~• ,~,, .,.