Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous FAX \% Date: J/ 1 0 / q 7 Pages to follow: I Phone:(S(2 ~ 32'`f - 473 Fax. CS~Z) 3Z9 _ 875- ? From: ~ /~ / Phone: (409) 764-3570 Fax: (409)764-3496 Comments: / / -C~-~t'i.~ (~-.11.r 1`A.r ~ K S / ~ ~~ o~ ~Li Qw7 ~S If you do not receive all of these pages, please call (409) 7643570... \ ~9I. ,,.3090 .:..~ '~1 _, ', -. y~, .-- ~t '•~ %~ % ~ ` "~: - .._._. -~ ~ ~-•~ - ,\ 2919 \~\ _ 7P. j X89 `,~ ~~-~ ~ ," . 307.9 ~ .,.r - ,,, _ ~, ~ y , v ~ `\ J 298.9 •., t; \ `~\ x V 307.2 \ ~\ -.~ ~ ~ ~~,I ` ~ \ ~\. ,~_. i 297.6' 295.7 . ~ \ \ TM} -~ rA X30eg ~ .,~., \. t ~l `~~_ ~ '\'t, 294.4 G • ll ~ ~~ }07.1 ~ \ 1 ~ r.' \ ~~ \ ~ r ti (~~ ~ ~ O 297.0 ! \\ ~ i4 I ~ ~~ 3 y ._ 2971 X '~ ~ ~\ 1 ~ .. x, 1 ~., l \. .~l ~±w.,l ' ~ ,~ x 3027 r s \ ` ~\ j e~G~~ ,,~,. r' , f~ t' J• ~~'` ` ~~ 9 t : ~ 1~~ \ 301.7 It ~7 /~ X291. f t r,„t x301.7 it x 3~ \ ~ / / -..` 289 ~: J ' 3050 ~~.t~J12 ~=f f ~3, ~' ® _ x301.7 -'i% r,, y `~ ~ `f ,_ `` +` ,S ~~ \~: .'~~, ... '' ~ .~.t,., f ~ 3025 __` ~ , Ji 7 x /' 29 t.t X96 0 ., ~~ x x299.5 1( _ -~~ - ~ i'" 299.0 e \ ~ -. /-1 x x301.3 '.,` Y '_~~. - j.. 1- t~ 299.6 ~. X ~ _ , f~ ' A G 0\~~\~ x299.4300. ~.,~ '~ 299.0 ~~ !^~ m t~ .-• x l 295.3 , i f' 1( ^~~ ,. ~ x2924 ` ' _ ~s ` is fr`~ ~.~'~1 , 2u, -'w rr x o~ siaage ~. ~~ ~i 290.8 _ f ' X f' • 1 - ~ ~'0 f' t x 294.8 4 tr 289.3 '~ ` r x ,7 ' o. .,.. ~~ ~ x2896 _ ;, 296.4 I~~ ~ f'` 4x ~`~ .~ ~ ~ j ,, X29 ~~ /~ - , x289.4 '~~~ r.".%~ 3x ~ 290.6 ~ ~.- x ~ ~ ~i ~~•"'.~^ f j M f~r~75 i~%~ ~~ \. ~ ~-r°.~' '287.5 - __... ~ ~ti., !r '+ _~ f Y _ _-+^ • i+ i ' _ i _ X_ s i Y _. ' 288.8 (` 5 ~ t t'2a56;' ~ ~ r r /r -.ie.~ x ~ ~ 2862,' C t ,. ~ r.. i i .. 4 x ~ .~_ x 289.1 ~ 290 1 x 1- ' x2as.s Li h/~~ S ,. From: Jane Kee To: City of College Station.City Hall(EHard, JDunn\, KL... Date: 11/21/96 1:51pm Subject: Development to east of hospital -Reply f~ I agree with your assessment on #2. , Don't think this is in impact fee area. #7 Brazos Village is quiant, I like it #8 »> Shirley Volk 11/20/96 04:56pm »> Ed, Steve, Sabine & I met with John Doucet & Ken Carr this afternoon for a second .meeting to discuss Longmire and platting of the property between First Nat'l Bank & the hospital - to Birmingham and perhaps even Graham. They raised several questions which we were unable to answer, so Steve & I wrote them down and told them we would get back to them with some answers. The que ions/tasks are as follows: 1. opy of Traffic Impact Analysis (Steve is checking on this; I wasn't aple to find it while they were here. ) ~ ,,~,~ ~ L~ ~ ~- ,~~~°~~_~- ~~t~j~~.cr~s~~`'~ ~~`",•~ 2. Who builds the street? Steve had the preliminary plat .file in the meeting and he pulled the staff report/cover sheet which went to council (again). That report states that "...the preliminary plat should be conditioned upon the construction of the turn lane prior to any future final platting of the parent tract." It is my opinion and Steve's as well, that the.deve-3:r~~ of agent tract will be res onsible far buildin th T E -tu. - e_ and it will be his responsibility to deal with the. seller of the property and the owner of the bank's lot to get them to participate if he can~;\ As far as timing, I think it can be built with the rest of the infrastructu a for the subdivision,-and be handled just as any other infrastructure requirement - the_y do the plans, guarantee it and build it. '`J 3. Mr. Carr asked again about a dedication of a regional detention area, Tub (, with a little different twist this time. He said they may buy the Tiller tract as well as what we have been looking at, and thought that perhaps the detention area could be in the existing creek area and serve a large region, and perhaps they could dedicate it as a park. We told them that as commercial development, it would not be subject to parkland dedication, and this would be something that Parks would have to take into consideration. We didn't decide who would be referring this to Beachy, but I would imagine Sabine will. ~--tot, let me know and I can. _ , ~'~" D ~~ - ~~/ 2 Can a road be built over a capped oil well?'Steve is checking wi - e ~~~-~~ Railroad Commission about this. ~`~- wit.-~ ~ d!a~-~-+~1~t.- GAL.-~~G-~C ~-~'~- - '~'~°`"'"'~"~ We told them definite y that shared a ce s wou d be equ nd - should address it some way on the plat so any future purchaser of a lot woul be aware that would be necessary. 6. Steve told them if they abandon the existing sewer line from Birmingham to the middle of this parent tract, they would either have to fill it with grout or remove it completely. 7. Is this area or the area along Graham Road east of the service center part ~1 of the sewer impact fee area? Steve & Sabine-did not think so. ,p $. Would "Brazos Village" be an acceptable name for a subdivision (shopping center, too, T guess)? I checked with 911 and they don°t have a problem, as long as it's not a street name. I'll also check with Fire & PD to get their opinion. That's about all I have written down on the meeting. Please read this and respond if you know the answer to any of the questions. Ed thinks we need to have a meeting to talk. about. who builds the right turn lane, .but maybe we can handle it with e-mail.. Thanks for your help.. CCs City of College Staton.City Hall(JCallaway, NThom... ~, From: Steve Beachy To: CITY HALL(Smccully) Date: 12/2/96 2:50pm Subject: Development east of the hospital -Forwarded -Reply -Reply -Reply Based upon the information that you have given me, I don't think that we need any parkland in that area. If it was contigous to Southwood Athletic Park it may be something that would have value for recreation purposes. »> Sabine McCully 12/02/96 11:28am »> i would send you something more detailed but I'm afraid this is all we've gotten so far. the developer came in for a predevelopment meeting, and showed us a conceptual layout of some property. between rock prairie road and birmingham. but then they started talking about acquiring some land adjacent to the use and maybe even more along graham road. there was no drawing to accompany this part of the conversation. they wanted an answer to the concept of the city taking over maintenance of a larger detention area. we know the answer to that - a resounding "no". but then they asked if we would consider taking over a detention area if we got some additional parkland out of the deal. well, i had to think about the edelweis park, where we essentially did just that. the big difference here is that the entire area that these guys are looking to plat is zoned exclusively for commercial use. we will not get any parkland east of the use and north of birmingham when this area develops out (no parkland dedication is required'of nonresidential subdivisions). maybe this is ok with you. guys. but if it'sn't, do we want to look at a deal now while the opportunity is there rather than be in a position where we may be looking at a land purchase later? i guess my main question at this point is: do we need or want parkland in this future commercial area? »> Steve Beachy 11/30/96 11:28am »> send me a copy of the plan to look at. proposing, how large is it and where it Thanks I need to know exactly what they are is located. »> Sabine McCully 11/27/96 04:38pm »> Steve, i need to talk with you regarding the acceptance of a detention pond and commercial area park for the property between birmingham and rock prairie road. these guys have .asked us whether we would accept and maintain a detention area if they add some land to the deal and give us parkland that we would otherwise not be able to get because the subdivision would be for commercial uses. what do you think? x From: Sabine McCully To: svolk Date: 12/2/96 3:23pm Subject: Development east of the hospital -Forwarded -Reply -Reply -Reply -Forwarded Shirley, i think we have our answer...we're only interested if the land by Southwood athletic park is involved. From: Steve Homeyer To: SVOLK Date r 12/2/96 3:20pm Subject: John Doucet I checked with the. RRC about building over a plugged well and they said that the casing should be cut-off a minimum of 3 feet below grade. This would allow for construction over the well bore. If in the event, the casing is exposed during construction they would like to inspect the casing when it is cut again. He said that the State would not pay to have the casing lowered. His name was Gill (Something??) at 713-956-4000. With this info, I should be complete with my tasks 1) RRC 2) Traffic Impact Study 3) Disks for utilities ~ ~lti~ ~~~e~ ~~C~~~;~~~C ~ ~- From: Shirley Volk To: SHOMEYER Subject: Longmire extension -Reply -Reply I think I was in that edited presentation. Anyway, Jane said Ed would call them on Monday. »> Steve Homeyer 12/13/96 02:06pm »> Last Friday Ed gave Scott and I a Reader's Digest version of the discussion I missed during the Lone Star Pavilion crisis. From that, I came away with the understanding that the alignment that was submitted would be ok. Ed said that he felt that it may not be necessary to continue Longmire from Rock Prairie to Cypress Meadows. He said that it would prevent the commercial to residential traffic that could potentially cause a problem "disturb" the residents in the surrounding neighborhoods. There were numerous possibilities for extensions, relocations and new streets to-provide the same N/S movement that we are needing. »> Shirley Volk 12/13/96 01:41pm »> I just got a call from Keith Schauer in John Doucet's office (512)329-8743 wondering if anyone had reviewed the alternate Longmire alignment that John had left with us! I was very surprised to receive that call because I thought that had been taken care of at the very latest right after our meeting a week ago today. I told him I would check on this, and since I haven't seen Ed today it might not be today that someone responds to his question. I told him I couldn't respond to it officially because although I thought Ed had determined the alignment through the property they were working with would work, he thought it was going to require some type of realignment on the southern end to make it work and it was going to take someone a lot more knowledgeable than I to respond so they could continue with their planning from the response. He was very nice and said that yesterday John had asked him to check on this, so as of then no one had called them. Who feels qualified to call or .should we wait until Ed gets back. When is that, Jane? I think Monday will be fine, but I didn't know for sure when Ed will return. From: Edwin. Hard To: JKEE, SVOLK, SHOMEYER, KLAZA Date: 12/16/96 2:42pm Subject: Doucett Dvlpmt I called Keith Schauer back re the Longmire alignment this AM. We got that squared away. I also informed him about the access easement we would be looking for to connect Lot 1 (FNB) with the Longmire extension. I faxed him a copy of the bank site plan which shows the location of "future cross access". The bank site plan shows it to be 27' wide with its CL being 34.5 north of Lot 1's SW property corner. Keith asked if there would be some flexibility in its location due to its impact to their proposed Lot'4. I said possibly. The TAC preliminary plat does not show this access easement, nor is there any indication of it on the LO Ball plat of Lot 1. Keith also asked me about the. design of the right turn lane. I told him to design it such that the banks driveway is not in the taper and to begin the taper west of the banks drive.. From: Edwin Hard To: SVOLK, SHOMEYER, JKEE, VMORGAN Date: 1/9/97 11:Olam_ Subject: Douaet, Movahill Calls - FYI Got a call yesterday from J. Doucet and his partner Keith(?). They called to ask me about the section of the ordinance which could require them to pay for a portion of a signal at R. Prairie/Longmire. I explained it and said it would be something we as a staff would consider as part of .their plat submittal. They said they plan to have one submitted by the end of next week. I said it was v. important that they show the acces easement from Longmire to Lot 1 (the Bank). I had previously faxed Keith a copy of the bank site plan showing where the easement would have to connect to the bank property. J. Movahill w/ Bury&Pittman called to ask me about the striping for Luther and J-B. T gave him some direction and he will be submitting plans for our review early next week. ~~' _ ~ / v~ yl I 07 ~ ~ ~ ' Q7 i ~ ~ m R=2 5 ~ ~' ~rn ,T ;~ •.-. W _, -Tl ,~ ~ ~ v o 0 D ~ j ~ tv, dp `. T Z I I O ~ ~ v ~~ N < Tip m ~ D m c~Z - - ~ ~ ~ r*'I D n I -~ r~ W FUTURE I / -~ ~ ~ ~ CRUSS CESS / 0o D / Z -p. ~ D ~° ~ Z T` O~~j II p OVA ~~ ~ DC _c D D d3 -i < N d Z -~ tnnn ~ _ -a ~ _ (P C ~ ~ -. .CD O ~'~ .~~ 0 r**- - - 0 0 • C. z • ~. • ? I ~ PROP. UNDEF :' D CONNECTION ~ EXIST. OVERF a- - .f.. _ z N 1~ r ~ ~ o ~ ~ `' -_- S 5T47'~ ~ ~ _.~ .--- - ~ I ~ i N mD% Z ~ N ~ ao z CN mo ~m m• o cn ~ D N p Zrj~ O ~~ ~ Z cn ~ D~ -~ rrl ~~m (n ~$~ 1 ~D w0 '~ rD OrmnN - --i Z- ~ i 0 ~.m O Rj N Z r*t D ~Z~ ~m N O ~ Z v J ~ ~ ~~ . ~ ' O v ~I 'N• / w ~voz~~ 0 ~Dm O c~ / ~ /~ o ~ D o h' V ~ - '1 t*t -i •• ~ O 0 O \ ~ Z ITI ~ r*1 n m Z n -Zi O In ° I ~ Z o c ~ ~~omc m1 ~ ' ~ D Znm N ~ Z n- i O z m m 0 O ~ / N N < Z N ri C / ~.o \. J ~~ f. .D~W..._._._..w_____ ..e f _~6~u,r _~ _. _ . __. _:._ ._ _ ..._ uJ ~. ~.` _~~ ~ _. ~.: ___,__ __~_...__. .____. w._._ ___~..__ .. _.____ w.. ______ _ .,_~._. _~~.__.__._ _.._.~ _. ~ _. _... . . ~~ ~ __.w.c ._ _ .~ _ .~.d ,~. ~~ _~._ ~~ _ ~ .. n a..~ _ ~~ s_~. ~ ..~~... __ ._._.._~_ . ~ __. ~~ _.~_._~ ..._. N _...~.wr._. _ . ,~.. ,_...._... ~.~..._., ...~ _~,___.._~_..._~..:___ ___.. _ ._~~.. ~ ,._. __._._.__._~ _ _. _ :r .,.~ ~s ~_ w - ..~...a ~_,,__ _ ~ _ f a _ 4 .a ~..- ~ y "L ~~~ /~/~~/tom (~'//1 ~/C /, ~Y + ~ ._.~e..,_. _..~...... ....«._.._ ~__~~~^!~ .. .m-._ __~.....,_....:.~ .._.~~_. a___-.....V.......,._.,.r......,...e,:.~.Y..,.-ti~.a.~....„~~~. °yYl~-~/a~4~/-':/~~ •.. r .y X`/ ., .~. .._..... ...-._ i ~ • d e ~ _ .~ + 7 ~~~l \~~~1.._...... _............_ _ / V ~ _ ~ .:....... ,.. -_.~.....d.>._....§:' :. ~ .gym.. y _ _,~ ~': •_ _ ..._._ _ .....<.... _.._,.. .. - ~~ yr t Jf . ~ i _ ~ ! 2 _.._.w._ _.a. «,u.~ ~ e ._ _._ ~_~._~ ~ .....~ ... _~ ~. _ ~/'fV/ f ~~~ ~ ~'... h _ , ..,.: ~~~~~J`^~/~ ~ ~. _ _._ n ,n .v _ _ u ~ ter.. _ _ ~, _~ _-,. ..._. .,~.,.. n /{~~ _ _ . . ~ _ ,. _ _ _ _ . _. ___..G~ _. _ ~ _ a ____ ~..~. _ ~ - _ v.. , _ ~ - _ ._ _ .. _ _ . _ __ __ _._~~-~~~~~ _-_.~ ____~_ 0.~'~. u._~_ _ _ ~.-~..~~_~_ _.`~~_._ . ~ __ __. _ ~~~' __ _ _ __. _ _ _ ~~~ ~~-.aw_. _ - _ __ _. ~__ _ _~__.~_ _.. ~ _.... ~- _. __ . w_ . _ _ . . ~~;,~ t - ~ ~,. ~,~ ~, ~~° ~~ l _ ,~ ,~ (3~,(,( ~u~~r. ~~ { X \~ ~~. _/ f. ~. From: Nanette Manhart To: POLICB DEPARTMENT(MPATTERSON),svolk Date: il/2l/96 9:35am Subject: Naming a shopping center -Reply -Reply That probably will be fine, but could you or Ronnie provide us a list of the other instances and addresses that you are concerned about, so we can address accordingly? bye »> Mike Patterson 11/21/96 08:33am »> I checked with our address list and did not see any conflicts. However, there are several businesses beginning with "Brazos" and several with "Brazos Valley". I would like to know what the address numbers would be so that we can try and get them to be different than the other businesses that begin with "Brazos". »> Shirley Volk 11/20:/96 05:01pm »> Dev. Services staff met with some people today who want to plat some property along the future extension of Longmire, and they wanted to know if they could name it "Brazos Village". That would be the name of the subdivision, but also the name of the development or shopping center as it develops. I checked with 911 and they didn't have a problem with it as long as it's not the name of a street. What say ye7 ,~, :~ From: Jane Kee To: svolk Date: 11/6/96 2:12pm Subject: L.O.Ball Memorial Subdivision -Reply -Reply -Reply since we all have differing recollections .why don't you pull the file and Kent and Jim wil lhave to decide. They had the most recent dealings with the bank. I do know we did not require the bank to build it with their development. Originanly it was to be put off until the .rest of the platted property developed. At the time the curb cuts for the bank were discussed is where I get fuzzy. Jim should know.. »> Kent Laza 11/06/96 10:56am »> I disagree with Veronica that we should start accepting detention ponds where multiple commercial entities are involved. I just don't think we want to get into that practice. Brandon Heights was an .unusual situation involving a pond/park in a residential subdivision, and in my opinion we should not use it as a precedent for a new policy.' This development sounds similar to the HEB/Target/Enclave/et al. in which they share ownership and maintenance responsibilities. That's the example I'd like to follow. I remember talking about the right hand turn lane on Rock Prairie and Jane indicated Monday that the turn lane had been eliminated. I don't think we required ROW from the bank for that purpose. »> Veronica Morgan 11/05/96 05s53pm »> in our time of "regional detention" thinking, i would .like to see if we could explore ownership of a pond and let them "mow" it, through some sort of contractual agreement with the city. i think Brandon heights opened a new door for us in this realm. as for the'turn lane. i thought it was still a requirement, when the "need arose", which wasnt with the platting of just the corner lot. does that make sense? »> Shirley Volk 11/05/96 05:02pm »> Tony, Ed, Steve & I met with these people today to discuss primarily the location of Longmire thru this tract and the tracts to the south to Graham Road. During the discussion the'subject of detention came up and Steve explained that in some instances', several separate entities have gone together to form an "ownership" of a detention facility for the purpose of maintenance, with all seeparate entities contributing to the financing. The potential developer, Kenneth Carr, asked whether the City would accept the facility and maintain it. Steve explained that the City usually does not. Mr. Carr indicated that the hospital has asked about sharing a facility with this potential development, and he wondered about the. City's USC facility and how detention was handled there. The .bottom line is, I said at the meeting that I would ask the question as to whether the City would be agreeable,to accepting a detention facility for maintenance, much like it did in the Brandon Heights subdivision, if several large tracts developed one large .detention facility instead of a bunch of small ones. Also, the required right hand turn lane on Rock Prairie Road came up and Ed & Steve think that is still a requirement. I thought that had been dropped. We need. some help on this one. There are about 44 acres involved in this project, and tenative plans are for :~ an "upper scale" grocery. store, a fast food,. some retail, some showroom type retail, possible medical office building and the hospital has expressed interest in buying some of the land. I have business-cards for the 3 men who were at the meeting with Fain MacDougal, and they indicated John Doucet, a consulting engineer out of Austin would be the main contact for any answers, questions, comments.. I still need to check to see if indeed."Belmont Place" was ever filed for record! If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask. CC: jcallaway Doucet & Associates,lnc. i January 29,1997 Ms. Shirley Volk City of College Station 1101 Texas Avenue College Statian,'TX 77842 Re: Final Plat for Brazos Village Subdivision Dear Ms. Volk: Attached are sixteen bluelines, one mylar'and three sets of improvement. plans pertaining to the referenced final plat. This. plat has been modified from the approved preliminary. The alignment of Longmire Drive has changed, and the lot configuration has also changed. I believe you will find .our submittal complete. It is our desire to be placed on the February 20, 1997 Planning and Zoning meeting agenda. If any additional information is required; or if there are any questions, please do not hesitate to calk _i 'I ~~n~ i-....:...i ,.E-r,,.,~~ uo.,., r ~ R_'~~c ~ Aiictin Taxac 7R74h a 512/329-8743 • FAX 329-8754 ~, ~3 From: Veronica Morgan To: svolk,shomeyer,jkee,smccully,nthomas,klaza,ehard Date: 10/11/96 11:09am Subject: fain mcdougal predevelopment meeting fain called me yesterday and wants. to talk .about the property between graham and birmingham where longmire will go through. his client wants to purchase/develop the property. but the bank has some time frames they want him to meet on the contract. he is concerned he cant meet those if he wants to assure a rezoning and platting. can be approved before he signs on the dotted line. i told fain about what we did for john godfrey on enclave and offered that we could do the same here for his client. then his client can take that calendar that we work up and show the bank it takes "x" long to do this and see if he can work out the deal. fain said that sounded "great and we were wonderful for offering to do this type of thing". so he will be ca ling Shirley to set up a predevelopment meeting so that we can all talk about process, scheduling, submittal dates, etc. i told him we needed prior to the meeting, a map showing the property in question and what he wants to do with it (ie zoning, platting, etc. - not necessarily "what business") thanks. h~ From: Kent Laza To: JKEE, SVOLK Date: 11/7/96 3:39pm Subject: L.O. Ball right turn lane In looking at the site plan of the First National Bank and the prelimary plat of the site, it appears that .the right turn lane has indeed been required and right-of-way dedicated during the development of the bank.. We were mistaken in saying the ROW for the right turn lane had been deleted. As the remainder - of the property on Rock Prairie develops we need to get any additional ROW from it as well. CC: SHOMEYER, EHARD Doucet ~ Associates, Inc. February 12, 1997 Ms. Shirley Volk. City of College Station 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Re: Final Plat for Brazos Village Subdivision Dear Ms. Volk: Due to some unresolved issues, we respectfully request that the referenced plat be removed from the February 20, 1997 Planning Commission meeting and rescheduled on the March 6, 1997 meeting.. In the mean time, we would like to meet with you and your staff to discuss a few changes to the plat and the access easements. Thank you for your help in this matter. If there are any questions, or if any additional information is required, please do not hesitate to call. j o~ _~~ J ~ ~~ b t'' H if -` Y.f ~' AGENDA-ITEM COVER SHEET CONSENT AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTED. BY: Jane Kee, City Planner FOR COUNCIL MEETING OF: No e DIRECTOR APPROVAL: EXECUTIVE TEAM MEMBER APPROV ITEM: Consideration of a Preliminary Plat for the L.O. Ball Subdivision, a commercial subdivision located at the southwest corner of Rock Prairie Road .and the SH 6 East Bypass. Thee applicant is TAC Realty and Don Ball for Kovak & Co. ITEM- SUMMARY: The preliminary ply consists of a 1.43 acre lot at the corner of Rock. Prairie Road and the ; S.H. 6 Frontage Rd..and: a 27..58 acre reserve tract. This plat is being submitted in .order that the 1.43 acre tract can be developed at this. time. This preliminary plat and a final plat associated with the 1.43 acres are being run concurrently due to a pending sale. This plat. involves the future extension of Longmire Drive. The dedication of the Longmire right of way and its associated construction will occur with the final platting and development of the 27.58 acre reserve tract.. Lot 1's physical size is approximately 5 % of the overall subdivision and Lot 1 is .not guaranteeing with the City any portion of the Longmire construction. Staff has no problem with this because of the small size of Lot 1, however there should be no future subdivisions of the- reserve tract without the extension of Longmire. Staff would .not be in favor. of platting any of the reserve tract, regardless of its location relative to Longmire, without the construction of Longmire. Staff is trying to avoid piecemeal .platting of the. reserve. tract so that we do not end up with another Welsh street situation, wherein .the area remaining o be developed cannot support the cost of the street. There is also aright-of--way dedication shown fora :right turn lane on Rock Priarie. According to impact studies the reservation of the. right-of-way for a right turn is appropriate at this time. The 1.43 acre corner tract is willing to dedicate. the right-of--way for this right turn lane. Based. on the. possible permitted uses in the G2 district full development of the parent tract may necessitate construction of the right turn lane. For this reason the preliminary_ lp at should be conditioned upon the_c9usttsi ti~_on _ of the turn lane prior to any future'final platting of the parent trac_t~, There is a shared. access point between Lot 1 and .the reserve tract. This will be the only.. access point for Lot 1 from Rock Prairie-due to the proximity of the Rock Prairie/SH6 intersection. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff and P&Z„recommend unanimous (5-0) approval of the preliminary plat with the following conditions`. 1. Complete water and sewer impact studies, 2. Extension of the 20' PUE along SH 6 Frontage, 3. Verification that the driveway access easement on Rock Prairie Rd. alignswith the Victoria`Bank driveway access, 4. Provision of PLTEs to cover power poles along Rock Prairie Rd., 5. No future subdivision will be allowed without Longmire construction ~« 6. No future subdivision will be allowed without the construction of the right turn lane shown on Lot 1. 7. No additional future access points will be allowed to Rock Prairie east of the Longmire intersection. FINANCIAL SUMMARY: NA CITY ATTORNEY RECOMMENDATIONS: NA COUNCIL ACTION DESIRED: Approve plat with conditions stated SUPPORTING MATERIALS: 1. Location map 2. Staff Report 3. Application 4. P&Z Minutes 5. Copy of plat PRESUBMISSION CONFERENCE REPORT February 6, 1997 TO: Kenneth D. Carr, .Trustee 3600 Bee Caves Road, Austin, TX 78746 Scott Shortlidge, Doucet & Associates 1301 Capital of Texas Highway South #B325, Austin, TX 78746 FROM: Presubmission Conference Jane Kee, City Pl er Kent Laza, City Engin r Steve Parker, P&Z Representative Others Attending Natalie Thomas, Planning Tec an Shirley. Volk, Development Coor ' or Tony Mchalsky, Electrical Operations. Coordinator Laverne Akin, GTE Representative George McLean, CSISD Representative SUBJECT: F'irral Plat -Brazos Village Subdivision; proposed subdivision totaling 27.5 acres divided into 11' C-2 Commercial Industrial lots generally located on the southwest corner of the Rock Prairie and State Highway 6 intersection to include the extension of Longmire Drive from Rock Prairie Road to Birmingham Drive. (97-207) A Presubmission Conference meeting was held Wednesday, February 5, 1997 to discuss the above mentioned final plat. The following is a list of ordinance .requirements identified by the Presubmission Conference. This list does not relieve the applicant of total compliance with all current ordinance requirements. Discretionary Items: _ The Conference recommended that Streetscape be required along the Longmire Drive extension. However, the plantings will not be required with the final plat buf with the site plan of each individual lot. Ordinance Requirements: _ Correct the vicinity map to show the location of the subject property. Show the existing Lo ammire Drive right-of--.way across Rock Prairie "Road". _ Change the designation of Birmingham to "Birmingham Road". _ Show the right-of-way dedication along Rock Prairie Road along lot 5 for the right turn lane. (Clearly designate this dedication onlot 1.) ig PRC Report Brazos Village Subdivision Case #97-207 Page 2 of 3 Ordinance Requirements (cont.Z _ In the title block,.. label .the document as a "Final Plat" and include the date. (Staff recommends that the title block be relocated to the bottom right-hand corner.). Label the extension of Longmire Drive and note the right-of--way width. _ Note the point of curvature and point of tangent for. the curves in Longmire Drive. Show the location of the entrance ramp for State Highway 6 along the frontage road. Show the location of the opposite and- adjacent driveways along Rock Prairie Road. Show the existing infrastructure and easements. Complete the application submitted. _ Does floodplain exist on the subject property? (If it does, show the location. If it does not, provide a note to that effect.) Show the access locations on the final: plat and note the distance to other access points and intersections. Staff suggested. the following changes: _ Show the shared access location between lots 2 and 3, block 1. Because of the limited space in which a :curb cut will be allowed along the Frontage Road, include the access point' on lot 3 block 1. Show the extension of the access easement along lot 4, block 1 that will connect lot 1, block 1 to Longmire Drive. This easement must connect with the existing access easement on lot 1, block 1 for First National. Bank as shown on the. approved site plan. Show the shared access easement between lots 1 and 5, block 1. Show the shared access easement between. lots 1 and 7, block 2. _ Show the. access point for lot 6, block 2. _ A total of three access points .will be allowed for lots 1 - 5, block 2 from Longmire Drive (The_required spacing is 230'.) Staff suggests the following locations: -- A shared access easement. between.. lots 1 and 2, block 2 that will align with the access easement .along lot. 4, block L across Longmire Drive. -- An accesspoint in the center of lot 3, block 2. -- A shared access easement between lots 4 and 5, block 2. _ While lot 3, block 1 has. adequate frontage. along Birmingham Road and Longmire Drive, the access locations may be limited due to the location of opposite and adjacent driveways. Staff. suggests that the developer, locate these access. points with this final plat to be reviewed and approved with the .other locations. r"' 'Y PRC Report Brazos Village Subdivision Case #97-207 Page 3 of 3 Ordinance Requirements (conta: _ The construction documents are being returned to the applicant on Wednesday, February 5,-1997. Due to the incompleteness of the plans,-staff was not able to do a comprehensive review. Submit the revised plans along with the "original redlined set to be reviewed by staff. All construction documents must be approved prior to filing the final plat for record. _ Any necessary easements identified .during the review of the construction documents must be added to the final plat prior to filing.. (Public utility easements may be required parallel to Longmire Drive for the proposed utilities.) Remove the signature block for the City Council. _ The "ownership. & dedication" and "surveyor and/or engineer" certifcates must be completed :prior to consideration by the Planning. and Zoning Commission. _ The City may require developer participation in the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Longmire Drive and _Rock Prairie Road. An agreement between the City and the developer must be in place to establish joint participation levels for the costs of design, materials .and construction of the signal prior to issuance of a letter of acceptance for the infrastructure of Longmire .Drive. More information is needed in determining the City and developer levels of participation. Discussions to address the signal need to begin as soon as possible. Comments/Concerns: _ Coordinate electrical service details and necessary easements with Electrical Operations Coordinator TonyMichalsky at (409) 764-3660, _ G.T.E. has existing facilities along Highway 6 South and Rock Prairie Road. As each commercial lot develops, easements and/or conduit will be required. Coordinate telephone service details and necessary easements with G.T.E. Representative Laverne Akin at (409) 821-4723. SUBMIT THE. MYLAR ORIGINAL AND 10 COPIES. OF THE REVISED FINAL PLAT BY WEDNESDAY,. FEBRUARY 13, 1997 TO BE INCLUDED IN THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION PACKETS FOR THE MEETING OF THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 1997 AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE CITY .HALL COUNCIL ROOM AT l I01 TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH, COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS. v~ ~. , ~) ./ n ~ \ °, ~ I STAFF PRC REPORT Brazos Village Subdivision ,~~~.~ ~ Case #97-207 ~ `~ ~ y ~ ~ ~,;/ Ordinance Requirements: .~ v `~ v~~~2~~ ~~T ~ ~,/ Correct the vicinity map to show the c ct location of the subject .property. ~ Show the existing Longmire Drive right-of--way across Rock Prairie "Road". j~ Change the designation of Birmingham to "Birmingham Road". +~Show the right-of--way. dedication along Rock Prairie Road along lot 5 for he right turn lane. (Clearly designate this' on lot 1.) ctc,-~Z..~r--' In the title block, label the document as a "Final Plat" and include the date. (Staff recommends that the title block be relocated to the bottom right-hand. corner.) ~/~ Label the extension of Longmire Drive and note the right-of--way width. Note the point of curvature and point of tangent for the curves in Longmire Drive. Show the location of the entrance ramp: for State Highway 6 along the frontage road. Remove the signature block for the City Council. j_/ The "ownership & dedication" and "surveyor and/or engineer" certificates must be completed prior to consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Show the existing infrastructure and easements. Submit paid tax certificates. Submit. the $200 application fee. Complete the application submitted. Does floodplain exist on the subject property? (If it does, show the location.; If it does not, .provide a note to that effect.) Show the location of the opposite and adjacent driveways along Rock Prairie Road. The construction documents are being returned to the applicant on Wednesday, February 5, 1997. Due to the incompleteness of the plans, staff was not able to do a comprehensive review. Submit the revised plans along with the original redlined set to be reviewed by staff. All construction documents must be approved prior to filing the final plat for record. Any necessary easements identified during the review of the construction documents must be added to the final plat prior to filing. (Public utility easements may be required parallel to Longmire Drive for the proposed utilities.) ~~ Brazos Village Subdivision Page 2 of 2 Ordinance Requirements cont.): ~,~~"~`-~,L,~,'~ ~ ,~.~~~~-1 Show the access locations on the final plat and note the distance to other access points and --,q~ intersections. Staff suggested the following changes: `~`"v v Show the shared access location between lots 2 and 3 block 1. Because of the limited space in which a curb cut will be allowed along the ontagead, include the access point on lot. 3, block 1. Show the extension of the access easement along lot 4, block 1 that will connect lot 1, block 1 to Longmire Drive. This easement must connect with the existing .access easement on lot 1, block 1 for First National Bank as shown on the approved site plan. Show the shared access easement between lots l .and 5, block 1. Show the shared access easement between lots 1 and 7, block 2. ~/ Show the access point for lot 6, block 2. i.~A total of three access points will be allowed for lots 1 - 5, block 2 from Longmire Drive (The required spacing is 230' .) Staff suggests the following locations:. ~A shared access easement .between lots 1 and 2, block 2 that will align with the access easement along lot 4, block 1 across Longmire Drive. An access point in the center of lot 3, block 2. A shared access easement between lots 4 and 5, block 2. While lot 3, block 1 has adequate frontage along Birmingham Road and Longmire Drive, the access locations may be limited due to the location of opposite and adjacent driveways. Staff suggests that the developer locate these access points with this final plat to be reviewed and approved with the other locations. ~ r CommentslConcerns: " C <cC~~~,{'L-ti--~~~~'' ,~>~ j _ Coordinate electn~'ca~~servic~~~e~ai'ts with E cal O' eration~C~i~brdina~tor °Tony Michalsky at (409) 764-3660. _ Coordinate telephone service details and necessary easements with G.T.E. Representative Laverne Akin at (409} 821-4723. r ~'! c1- (-'''ter i~ SUBMIT 10 COPIES OF THE REVISED FINAL PLAT.. BY WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 13, 1997 TO BE INCLUDED IN THE PLA1vNING & ZONING CONIlVIISSION PACKETS FOR THE MEETING OF THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 1997.