Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous ~::~:5.E!~i:2:2rK:~::::B.~:~:::~:r.!n~4~:B.]r~:~:::::::::::::.:...::::::::::........:.::::.:::::::..::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~,~..:':::::::.:::,:::::::...,.::'::.-.::::::..:..:':::::'::::::...,.:.:.::::::::::'~:~::::':::.:...::'::-:::........~':"':::::::::'-"::::..~::::':.~.:..,.:":':':-..::::::=.'.:,.::~:.--.'.,:.:__.....e.~9.:~.J] From: To: Subject: Shirley Volk JKEE@CITY OF COLLEGE STATION.CITY HALL Re: Brinsden D.A. Lot 1 Block 1 Wheeler Subdivision Phase One W. Dow Hamm, III Corporation 20202 Highway 59 North Suite 100 Humble, Texas 77338 >>> Jane Kee 09/11/97 11 :15AM >>> Can you tell me easily the lot and Block and Subdivision name of the lot where the Mariott Suites is going and the Name and address of the Hamm group so I can fill in blanks on the D.A. So you're upto date. . I've given aC6py of a draft to Paul to work with V on the sewer part. I told Brinsden I'd try to have a rough draft to him by next week end so his attorney could review. We won't go to Council 'tiI after their closing which Won't be until in Oct. or early Nov. We're just trying to get a draft for their review because they will close before the DA goes to. CC. There is a risk but if they can ,at least review the draft they may feel some level of confort to go ahead and close. Thanks City of College Station_ -........j;. --..........,.,........-.-... . F>>.oa()"~960t>COllege Station, Texas .77842 '.' c__.. "):~;~">'>'_;" ,-, 'i ,;---,,-,';<'-"'-,>'..';.'i"'--' ern' OFCOUEdB5TATION F~ 'i~.'r ~.. Date: /.. '/97 Number ofpageslncludiogc6kr sheet: .. . - :_:.';,:<::; ,',_'J , ~~-~~ Fro;d4$/h Fax phone: CC: Fax phone: (409)764-3570 (409) 764-3496 Phone: Phone: o o Please comment ~ ..-dt~ ./ 7A....~_ ~ ~ ~~,f!!iz.~ - ..... .' - ~)tr ~. Lhl1dt/.li'.~~~ -:?~ ~ ~ ~'/~~~ P~9l-~~- J . ' ~~ - - ~~~)~~ ~~/ . ~~/Md~ _' ."_ A J' /.# A<i'~) 4tAb ~.~ ~~ ~ ~/ ... V ~y.~ ..... ~ ~~~. ~r!; ~ L~~~\ .-,/~./?/ ~/~~~ ~_ City of College Station -.j PO Box 9960, . College StiltiOn, Texas 77842 CIn' OF COllEGE STATION FAX Date: 1/ ~ /97 ~. .- Number of pages including cover sheet: . ~ ~~13~~ - F::4'~ ~/ Phone: Fax phone: CC: Phone: Fax phone: (409)764-3570 (409) 764-3496 .&/1 ~ co coco co ..... m 00 0 1.0 CO 1.01.0 1.0 ,... 1.0 -.:t-.:t -.:t ..... OI.OM.....MCON.....I.OO.....ONN.....ONCONOI.OI.ONI.OOOONOOOOI.OOO -.:t-.:t.....-.:t..........O-.:t-.:t-.:t-.:t-.:t-.:t-.:tO-.:t-.:tCO-.:t-.:tOO-.:tO-.:t-.:t-.:tO-.:t-.:t-.:t-.:tO-.:t~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ N,...,...m,...m,...,...,...,..."""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" W t- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ZZ Z ZZZZZ ZZ Z Z ZZZ ZZZZ ZZ 00 0 00000 QQ 0 0 QQQ QOQQ QQ ~~W~W ~t-~~~ t-t- ~<( ~ t-t-<(t- t-<(t-t-t-<( t-<(~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~ t- ~ ~t-~ t-~~t- t-~ WW~W~ 0000000000 0000<( 00 00 000000 00000000 WOO Ww~W~~ WWwWW~~ WW~~w w WWW WWWW ww GG~G~t-ZG~GGGt-t-WGGWt-GZZGZGGGZGGGGZGG ~~W~W~<(~~~~~~~~~~<(~~<(<(~<(~~~<(~~~~<(~~ ~55~5~0~5555500~55~05~~5~555~5555~55 ooomom~mooooo~~oooz~ommomooomoooomoo M 0 ..... W t- OO W 0 t-O:: 0:: 000 a.. 0:: O~t- 0:: ~ 0 0-0 0 t- O~o:: CO CO MCO t--.:t ~ 00 ~WW 00,...0 wm W W I.Ol.Oml.O Wm !Xl Z 0:: O::>~ -.:t-.:tm-.:t o::M W 0 <(Z~ XXXX OX ..... -.:t ~~ ~::::> 0000 0 u. u.0 Q) ..... ~ 001.00 mmmm <(m Cl I 00 .....00 0000 CIS ,... 00 '0 a.. m <(,... N ~~o.. 0..0..0..0.. ~o.. t- Z W ~ ~ 0 co o <( 0 ~ 0 Z 000.. W 0* 0:: Z I - oow ~ 00:: O- 00 3 t- ~~o ~ ~o ~ WWW t- ~ gg.~ ~. ffi oo~w. o~ ~ G>> ffi 0 t-~mbmgOG<(O::G ~~t-~~ ~wllillimlli . g<(<( 0:: ~ <(*~0::~000::~20:: ~~~~w ~0::~~z~z330::33z2~0::0 ~~~~~~ffi~o~~t-~~~offi~~~~~~~goo~oog~~et- ~~x~x~~~~~~~~~gm~~~z~~~~z~~d~~z~~ffi~ ~~wgo::goo..o::wt-O::WI.OI.O<(<(5!Xl1.O::::>~~z"~~~~<(~~~t-zo::o.. o oomcoocowO~COCO>~MCO""'~~ ~ .....mNI.OM~wZO..... OooooooOoOooI.OCOCOooo~COO<(<(t-<(MN""'M""'''''''''''O<(U.o _,... -.:t 0 .....00. --~oo t- 0001.0000 W -.:t <(ONO"O"O"O"-.:tO".....O"O"N..........<(~Oo::..........ww<(wm..........N..........ma..~N..... W l= ~ ~ ~ ~u. 0 W o 00 G t-w ::::> W~ ~ ~ 0:: m~ U. l= ~~ ~ 0:: ~ ::::> ~ >0 0 <( GO ~ o 0 ~ ~ ~ 00 ~3 ~~~~ ~>fm ~o:: ~'..~ ~ ~z ~t-t-~~o~t-z>>o> ~wwc zo::~~ 00 000<( 3:00 o::o::oo~oo::ooo ~oa.<(Zw~t- w""~<( oGWGzOWci~W~ww~ww~w~5>~><(0::~w~0 ~!Xlo~ ..~.z...~~~...~. ><(. ~..~.w~O::f:. :~~~~:~o..~~~<(~~~::::>o. ~ia.~3:w~~g . ~ ~ W ~. 0 . W <( 0:: W > > 0 ~ I <( > ~ ~ . ~ ~ 0 ~ 0:: ~ ,;> u.. ~~OZ050Z0WZou.U.o~~ u.~oot-o<(zo~o::~~w~o::~ ~8~~~m~~~~~~~~5~m~~~~~~~:~~~i~0~~~~ w;ffigigo~~~~~ffiMMffil=~~~ffi~~~~~~~z~~~@~ffio3: ~NO::W~WOO~O~~~ WOZ% ~<(<(~<(Zo::t-aWu.~~~~ ~3~~~~~~~5~~~~~~~~~~~gg8g~2~~~5~~~~~ o. ...1.. ..... 1"* ~ ~,...~M,........ococomomcoo.....mNm-.:tONCOI.O-.:t~I.OCOI.O-.:tMN-.:tocomo a..CO-.:tMCOMMNCONCOCO,...COMI.OI.OMI.OCOMCOCOCONN,...,...,...,...,...Ncommo ol.O,...,...co,...,...,...co,...mCOmI.OMcoo,...OI.O,...MMM,...,............................,...mmmo 0:: ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.. ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ N l;). ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " IV IV IV. tY tY tY tY tV tV tV rY tV rY rY' rY' tY 0" 0" 0" IY' IY' IY' IY' IY' 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: > c W ." '" 97-106 ANCO SERVICE INC PO BOX 218060 HOUSTON, TX 77218 97-106 BEHRENS, MILDRED D 4926 VIENNA CR DALLAS, TX 75228 97-106 BIRDWELL, J RICHARD 3 FOREST DR COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 97-106 CAMP, EARNEST S PO DRAWERCT COLLEGE STATION, TX 77841 97-106 CANNON, MARTHA P 903 MUNSON COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 97-106 DWS DEVELOPMENT INC POBOX 4508 BRYAN, TX 77805 97-106 . FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK 2900 S TEXAS AVE BRYAN, TX 77802 97-106 HALL, MICHAEL B & CAROLYN 32 FOREST DR COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840-2313 97-106 HOMEOWNERS ASSN POST OAK FOREST INC 23.A FOREST DR COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 97-106 KARBROOKE, INC 2700 SH 6 S #1000 COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845 97-106 LUZA, JACOB JR C/O MARY MA TOUS 700 KRENEK TAP RD COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 97-106 MAE DEAN WHEELER 1000 SHADY DRIVE COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 97-106 MAYER, RICHARD J & PAULA S DEW 215 LEE ST COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 97-106 NICKS, ORAN W 901 MUNSON COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 97-106 MILLER, MARVIN C & MIRYAM 2 FOREST DR COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 97-106 PLUM, CHARLES 5 FOREST DR COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 97-106 PARKER, JANE PATRICIA GRIZZLE 1002 CRESTWOOD DR BRYAN, TX 77801-4303 97-106 WHEELER, F W BERT 10665 RICHMOND #100 HOUSTON, TX 77042 97-106 ROMAN, WILLIAM B JR & JEANNETTE H PO BOX 3994 BRYAN, TX 77805 " 97-106 WILLIAMS, ANDREW A & JEANNIE S 3301 MILDONHALL CT COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845 97-106 WOOD, SAMUEL E & JANICE 6 FOREST DR COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840-2313 97-106 97-106 97-106 97-106 97-106 97-106 97-106 97-106 97-106 97-106 97-106 97-106 97-106 97-106 97-106 97-106 ZONING DISTRICT INFORMATION SUMMARY Case #97-106 From A-P to C-B EXISTING A-P ADMIN. PROFESSIONAL PROPOSED C-B BUSINESS COMMERCIAL: PURPOSE: This district would accommodate selected commercial businesses which provide a service rather than sell products, either retail or wholesale. The uses allowed have relatively low traffic generation and require limited location identification. PURPOSE: This district is intended as an alternative to general commercial districts in areas where certain commercial uses may be appropriate, but where more intensive uses of the land may not be compatible with the surrounding character. Administrative offices. Art studio or gallery. Business, music or commercial schools. Financial institutions. Doctor or dentist offices. Government offices. Offices, professional or service. Photographer's studio. Radio, TV station (no towers). Publicparking lot for operating vehicles. Real estate office. Small recycling collection facilities. Travel agency or tourist bureau. Other personal service shops. Only limited outside business activity is allowed. Outside business activity is defined as outside display of merchandise for sale but does not include outside storage of merchandise. Outside business activity locations are permitted only . in areas no farther than 50' from the building where the primary business is located and are not allowed in . areas out in the parking lot. Outside business activity is not permitted within 50' from any adjacent roadway. PERMITTED USES: PERMITTED USES: Administrative/professional offices. Alcoholic beverage sales (retail). Art studio or gallery. Cleaner (no on-site cleaning). Dance or music school. Domestic household & office equip. rental. Dormitory. Financial institution. Hotel/motel. Personal service shop. Radio or TV station or studio (no towers). Restaurant. Retail sales. Theater or motion picture house. Other uses may be considered by the Commission. PROHIBITED USES: Convenience Store. Gasoline and service stations. '>to if 97-106 AN CO SERVICE INC PO BOX 218060 HOUSTON, TX 77218 97-106 BEHRENS, MILDRED D 4926 VIENNA CR DALLAS, TX 75228 97-106 BIRDWELL, J RICHARD 3 FOREST DR COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 97-106 CAMP, EARNEST S PO DRAWER CT COLLEGE STATION, TX 77841 97-106 CANNON, MARTHA P 903 MUNSON COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 97.106 DWS DEVELOPMENT INC POBOX 4508 BRYAN, TX 77805 97-106 FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK 2900 S TEXAS AVE BRYAN, TX 77802 97-106 HALL, MICHAEL B & CAROLYN 32 FOREST DR COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840-2313 97-106 HOMEOWNERS ASSN POST OAK FOREST INC 23-A FOREST DR COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 97-106 KARBROOKE, INC 2700 SH 6 S #1000 COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845 97-106 LUZA, JACOB JR C/O MARY MA TOUS 700 KRENEK TAP RD COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 97-106 MAE DEAN WHEELER 1000 SHADY DRIVE COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 97-106 MAYER, RICHARD J & PAULA S DEW 215 LEE ST COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 97-106 NICKS, ORAN W 901 MUNSON COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 97-106 MILLER, MARVIN C & MIRYAM 2 FOREST DR COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 97-106 PLUM, CHARLES 5 FOREST DR COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840 97-106 PARKER, JANE PATRICIA GRIZZLE 1002 CRESTWOOD DR BRYAN, TX 77801-4303 97-106 WHEELER, F W BERT 10665 RICHMOND #100 HOUSTON, TX 77042 97-106 ROMAN, WILLIAM B JR & JEANNETTE H PO BOX 3994 BRYAN, TX 77805 . # .. 97-106 WILLIAMS, ANDREW A & JEANNIE S 3301 MILDONHALL CT COLLEGE STATION, TX 77845 97-106 WOOD, SAMUEL E & JANICE 6 FOREST DR COLLEGE STATION, TX 77840-2313 Subject: Shirley Volk SMTP("jonathan@hammcorp.com") Rezoning, 4.242 Acres -Reply From: To: I don't know. I'll have to check with Jane Kee on that one! I'll print this, give it to her, and hopefully get back to you sometime tomorrow. I must, warn you that it may take longer than that to get an answer, however. We'll work on it! >>> "Jonathan H. Brinsden" <jonathan@hammcorp.com> 07/21/97 04:40pm >>> Shirley, As always, thank you for your help and quick response. I have one additional question concerning the possibility of rezoning only the portion of the property required for the hotel. If that subject is raised by me or the council, can they approve the rezoning on that basis at the August 12th meeting or would that require another application? Thanks, Jonathan From: To: Subject: Shirley Volk KLaza, SHomeyer, PKaspar Bert Wheeler's property Lincoln @Univ This is a "heads-up, FYI" e-mail! I had a call from Hank McQuade & Stewart Kling this a.m. about the platting of the property and the impact studies and the construction docs for the sewer line. This is the gist of the conversation. I suggested to Stewart that he Master Prel.Plat both tracts since it used to be one tract until Lincoln went thru. Then to come back with a final on whatever portion he wanted to complete. He asked if he could come in with impact studies for the sewer line several days after the deadline for turning in the plat and I said it wouldn't hurt to ask Kent, but it would be his call since it would mean shuffling projects to get the review done in a timely manner. He then asked about the construction docs for the sewer line, and wondered if they would have to be completed and turned in with the final plat. I asked if the existing sewer line could support the office building, and he replied that it can, so I said perhaps he could coordinate the timing of the construction documents for the sewer line with the plans for whatever project needed the upgrade of the sewer line. I clarified by explaining that I was not giving him the o.k. to do that - or even the first request, and that he would have to get with Kent for the final o.k., but thought that it would be a reasonable request. Since then, I for the sewer the upgrade. mentioned this to Steve and he agreed that the construction docs line upgrades should be handled with the project which requires He didn't comment on the delay of the impact studies. Anyway, Kent, you will probably be hearing from either Hank or Stewart, so be aware that I didn't say they have an o.k. to do either of the above mentioned request, but that they should get with you to see if you would agree to either or both of them. cc: JKee, Jcallaway, NRuiz . '_,." -'0,_-',,,.,, '''';'-'~'''''_''''<_~:'' "':<"'->;"~"''::''S':;-'':.;_-~'"':';'-''_"'"o~~i'ic';;~,L-'''-').;;'~J:''-1.\;:;1-!-;fili1~.i.~';;;in~'-'--;_"c,,""'--.- ;,;;,,;',p' ~,~:i'H'" 'o"..:"-',_;r_>,.),,:;;.,'-_:.c,~~,,,,-, "1' li REZONING 0;~. 7~ c:;r' .CX-.0'.. . 7 c , .~ ....-~.;;::;...~,.~............ ... ............ ..... - ~o<~.... ...c " , ,---. ., , . , ,.~ c:.p.. . ' W~ lu SANITARY SEWER IMPACT STUDY FOR BERT WHEELERS INC. 8.471 & 4.242 Acre Tracts ['I Richard Carter Survey, A-8 =1 College Station, Brazos County, Texas ~"I:I"1 ::)::! l~, I r"~-l' L' li/_',' , !,~ "LfI '_ '__:_'1 l.J 'LJ"I""I i;;'.,1 ",I lr"1' I ' W L:J t:J lJ lJ [J I' ~ August 7, 1997 -:~"::-C,,,";;-*.""'~;;'<j'-"'"-'~:"".;;:~?~~~"~i~:~~~'~~":?-:%~'~'-'-:#~"".:.:2"~j~~C~Jf.L~:S~~~ EXHIBIT C DEVELOPED BY Bert Wheelers Inc. 10665 Richmond Houston,.Texas 77042 PREPARED BY: . Kling Engineering & Surveying 4013 Texas Ave., Suite 212 Bryan, Texas 77802 :L:409) 846-6212 --"" "". -~-(e. OF ~~' ..#': ,,\~........... '.. '?"" ~. ... · ~'l. it */ 11{. ..-\\i*" f?:.-"._.--l.!.~ ...:...~:J:~.~~l!JEJ.-I. . . "it 4705 ~ ..111 .. ~ w'" . . ....., ~] ILJ o rJ"'"'~ i Ii LJ 0' D I' I:J n IiJ IJ r: IiJ [J-.-- +;-_,1 i [] IJ Ie "~__"~~_-'r"::::-":~:=""!,"'_i!'i.,,,.i"'i'i>!,"!!i;C::J'"i~~::.'$.~:' SANITARY SEWER IMPACT STUDY for Bert Wheelers Inc. 8.471 & 4.242 Acre Tracts Richard Carter Survey, A-8 College Station, Brazos County, Texas August 7, 1997 PURPOSE: The subject property for this report is, the Bert Wheelers Inc. 8.471 and 4.242 acre tracts located on the southwest and southeast corners of the University and Lincoln drive intersection. The purpose of this report is to investigate existing sanitary sewer lines within and downstream of the area in light of proposed development of the two tracts and to suggest modification (revitalization) to the system to provide adequate sanitary sewage flow collection. This is not a comprehensive system analysis and only accounts for impact on the existing sanitary sewer system due to the development of the subject tracts. This study is being conducted at the request of Bert Wheelers, Inc., current owner of the tracts, as a condition for the rezoning of the tracts approved by City of College Station Planning & Zoning Commission April 17, 1997. Current development plans for the two tracts are conceptual in nature and therefore the most intense landuse for individual zoning districts will be used in the analysis. SITE DESCRIPTION: The study area consists of a total of 12.713 acres lying south and adjacent to F.M. 60, University Drive, at its intersection with Lincoln Drive (see Appendix 1, "General Location"). Current Zoning for the 8.471 acre tract is C-B Business Commercial and for the 4.242 acre tract is A-P Administrative Professional. Currently there is no developed land use and the tracts are vacant. PROPOSED USAGE: There is not a specific use proposed for the 8.471 acre tract. The most intense use for" C-B zoning is considered Hotel/motel. The 4.242 acre tract has two scenarios for proposed usage. The first, Scenario A, is to have the entire tract operating under A-P Administrative Professional. The second, Scenario B is for 1.738 actes of the tract to operate under A-P zoning and the remaining 2.504 acres operate under C-B zoning. Currently, steps c~re being taken by the owner to gain City approval for Scenario B. Under this option, proposed usage would be as follows: Table 1 Area Zoning Usage Size 1.738 acres A-P Mixed Office 15,000 sf 2.504 acres C-B Extended Stay Hotel 95 rooms (See Appendix 2, "Proposed' Usage" for graphical representation.) ~l r--I L. ;LJ [] J r] Lre o [J [J I~ IIJ I~ ~ ID ID [J IJ ~~.11~"'" .. --_.._~--~:=.-:....::-=~~-~~;;..;;~~-~'i\lIMr-~~;;~ EXISTING CONDITIONS SANITARY SEWER LINE ANALYSIS: The City of College Station Engineering Department provided information concerning existing conditions for the sanitary sewer collection system serving the subject tracts.. Lines are described from manhole to manhole as shown in Exhibit A, "Existing Conditions" found in Appendix 3, "Existing Sanitary Sewer System". The system analysis for this project begins at a manhole located at the northeast corner of the 4.242 acre tract designated as M030A a~d terminates at manhole M00110cated near the College Station City Limits line (see Appendix 3). Limited capacity exists in the current system. Line segments and limiting capt:lcities are summarized in the following table. Table 2 END MANHOLES LINE SIZE SLOPE QFULL REMAINING CAPACITY (in) (ftIft) (gpm) (gpm) M030A-M018 8 0.003 312.0 292.03 (assumed) M018-M024 8 0.004 345.6 197.47 M024-M025 8 0.0039 341.1 193.98 M025-M029 8 0.0116 583.5 457.78 M029-M021** 8 0.9032 309.7 89.76 M021-M017 8 0.0071 457.8 251.33 M017-M013* 8 0.004 345.6 125.66 M013-M010* 8 0.0039 341.1 125.66 M010-M008- 8 0.0021 251.3 22.44 M008-M007 12 . 0.0074 471.3 260.30 M007 -M005 12 0.0056 1207.4 1059.17 M005-M030B 12 0.0033 929.1 758.47 M030B-M003 12 0.0018 691.2 502.66 M003-M001 12 0.0016 650.8 457.78 M001-M027 18 0.002 2145.4 700.13 (Information provided by City of College Station, Engineering Dept.) (* Indicates line capacity exceeded under Scenario B) . (** Indicates line capacity exceeded under Scenarios A & B) Line M030A-M018 had inaccurate as-built information and time constraints prevented field verification of line slope and flowlines. A minimal slope of 0.3% was assumed for this line and existing flow calculated per TNRCC design standards (see Appendix 3 for line capacity and existing flow calculations). J J J J J rUll ~ r-: W 'l U WI "-.-'1 J !, L.jJ Uf11 ,I de 11,.'"1 I!il ! ~ LJf' ,Ii ii!. n,e. L" I:~ . I"i ~ " LJ LJ" " I ':"^~:a' 10 . lJ PROPOSED CONDITIONS SANITARY SEWER LINE ANALYSIS: DESIGN PARAMETERS: Design flows are based on comparable usage for like zoned properties. In the absence of a proposed use, the most intense use for a zoning district will be used. The following table describes these design parameters (see Appendix 4, "Design Parameters"): Table 3 COMPARABLE COMPARABLE PEAKING COMPARABLE ZONING USAGE AVE. FLOW FACTOR PEAK FLOW (gpd}/ac (gpd / gpm}/ac A-P AdminlProf Mixed Office 412* 4.5 1854/1.3 C-B BuslComm Hotel 4382* 4,.5 19719/13,.'7 (*Flow from comparable land use provided by City of College Station, Engineering Department) Under Scenario B for the 2.42 acre tract, design flows have been calculated as follows: Mixed Office: Extended Stay Hotel: r c::" '--'~.. <- >\,"- ..~ ."'\ I "6 x...;;:..-\ V'__\ 0(.) 0=!,- (J" \ '\ ~_. ...-'.{- . ~i~~ 2.2 gpm - peak flow As per A-P zoning shown in Table 3 1.3, gpm/ac * 1. ?3a ac 59.4 gpm - peak flow Assumption: Patrons of extended stay hotel have daily sanitary sewer usage rate equal to a private . residents. 2 Occupants per room. Usage: 100 gpd/person = 0.0694 gpm/person (ref. TNRCC :Rules, ch 317, fig. 317.4(a). Peaking Factor: 4.5 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED FLOWRA TES: TRACT ZONING PEAK FLOW (gpm) .8.741 acres C-B BuslComm ;:) ~ - 116 0 '.-4 ,~(,,- '". 4.242 acres Scenario A A-P AdminlProf ('3.x q. o'llAt -~ 5.5 . t <.:"_ 4.242 acres Scenario B 1.738 ac A-P + 2.504 ac C-B 2.2 + 59.4 = 61.6 TOTAL SCENARIO A 121.5 TOTAL SCENARIO B 177.6 Table 4 /' r,~ 'J ,.', C'O ) ;; ( "~ ......... I , :I.., (see Appendix 4, "Design Parameters" for calculation) -:0 J ,J :J :] J ('C;c'1 I I iI.i u c o 1"''1 l,j ~ LFC11 i ~ I ',,-ij i"!;fll "".1 'r';'"I i~ I~ {i,!"',j I.i'!'i',:! "~ "''lJ .' I . Ii . LJ"i i"'\A ~~. -- "" ~ ~ .'! ~ SYSTEM ACCEPTABILITY: The extreme limiting line capacity for the existing sanitary sewer system is 22.4 gpm occurring in line M01 q-M008 with the second most limiting capacity being 89.8 gpm in line M029-M021. Capacity of the system is exceeded under both development scenarios. Portions of the existing line will need to be reworked to accommodate the increased sewer demand. Scenario A exceeds capacity of the existing system along two sections c)f line (M029-M021& M010-M008) and nears full flow capacity along two other sections (M017- '. M013 & M013-M01 0). Scenario 8 exce~ds capacity of the system along the entirel route from M029 to M008 (see Exhibit 8 "Existing System Inadequacy" in Appendix 3 and Table 5 below for summary). Revitalization of _the system ,is required prior to any development alusing an increase in peak sanitary sewer flow greater than 22~4 gpm. . Table 5 . UNESIZE QFULL REMAINING CAPACITY REMAINING CAPACITY END MANHOLES SCENARIO A SCENARIO B (in) (gpm) (gpm/%) (gpm / %) M030A-M018 8 312~0 286.5/92% 230.4/74% M018-M024 8 345.6 76.0/22% 19.9/6% M024-M025 8 341.1 72.5/21% 16.4/5% M025-M029 8 583.5 336.3158% 280.2/48% M029-M021 8 309.7 -,I 0% -/0% - M021-M017 8 457.8 129.8/28% 73.7/16% M017-M013 ,8 345.6 4.2/1% -/0% M013-M010 8 341.1 4.16/1% -/0% M010-M008 8 ' 251.3 -/0% -/0% M008-M007 12 471.3 138.8/29% 82.7/18% M007 -M005 12 1207.4 937.7/78% 881.6/73% M005-M030B 12 929.1 637.0/68% 580.9/62% M030B-M003 12 691.2 381.2/55% 325.1/47% M003-M001 12 650.8 336.28/52% 280.2/43% M001-M027 18 2145.4 578.6/27% 522.53/24% c-J 'LJ ~] ~) o l' lJ o J ~ 1!'l1 I I if U 1 U 11 .. LJ [J PROPOSED SYSTEM REVITALIZATION: Using the development scenarios set forth in this report, proposed system revitalization will be discussed and cost estimates of the improvements provided. SCENARIO A: Total increase in peak sanitary sewer flow due to this scenario is calculated to be 121.5 gpm. Using the given existing capacities within the system" line sections M010-M008 & M029-M021 are exceeded. Suggested improvements to the system consi$t of the following: A. 1) Install a 10" line on a minimum 0.33% slope from manhole M029 to M008 accommodating all of the increased flow as well as existing flow. Capacity of new line - 667.5 gpm minimum Contributing flow (exist+new) - 246.85 + 121.5 = 368.4 gpm Remaining Capacity - 299.1 gpm 2) Abandon the existing 8" line in place. (see Appendix 4, "Design Parameters" for calculation) SCENARIO B: Total increase in peak sanitary sewer flow due to this scenario is calculated to be 177.6 gpm. Using the given existing capacities within the system, line sections from M029 to M008 will need to be reworked. Suggested improvements to the system consists of the following: A. 1) Install a 10" line on a minimum 0.33% slope from manhole M029 to M008 accommodating all of the increased flow as well as existing flow. Capacity of new line -:667.5 gpm minimum Contributing flow (exist+new) - 246.85 + 177.6 = 424.4 gpm Remaining Capacity - 243.1 gpm 2) Abandon the existing 8" line in place. (see Appendix 4, "Design Parameters" for calculation) *See Appendix 5 for Cost Estimate J ~] :] ~] :] o o 1\ 1 Ii [ , ~ f:~~ w m:", i I 1Ji1i:4 W t:1 I:J [J ~ . 11 . [J CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: It is shown using accepted design principles that the subject tracts would require additional sanitary sewer capacity should they develop according to the proposed development scenarios. Although Scenario A exceeds capacity of the existing sanitary sewer system in only two segments, full flow is approached in two additional segments. In Scenario B, the majority of the system's capacity from manhole M029 to M008 is exceeded. It is . recommended that revitalization option A, applicable to both scenarios, be constructed to provide the excess sanitary sewer capacity needed to accommodate the subject tract development. This option provides for the existing and additional sewer demands while leaving a significant amount of remaining capacity in the line. Since there is no definite development plan for the 8.471 acre tract, this remaining capacity can be used as a reserve to insure that the Owner can use the 8.471 acre tract for purposes that may require more sanitary sewer capacity than the projected 116.0 gpm. It sho,uld be noted that iftfle 8.471 acre tract develops in such a manner as to require more than 193.98 gpm in sanitary sewer capacity.(limiting capacity in line M024-M025) additional revitalization of the syst~rn would be necessary to carry flow to the system improvements as recommended by this report. Due to the fact that ott:ler undeveloped areas are in close proximity to this project,! i1tiis recommended that the City of College Station consider providing an oversized line capable of receiving additional sanitary sewer flows based on projected land use. J I ,j APPENDICES J f-'C-~l iJ ,-1 I IIIi 1-1 I ~ C L1 '-I LJ r-1 W U LJ r'l L"':j' ii,'; "iii', ~rll", I ~J W IW\~:' i':!; ~~ 11 IIIJ I:J IfJ 1) General Location Map 2) Proposed Usage 3) Existing Sanitary Sewer System 4) Design Parameters 5) Cost Estimate . "...._~,.~~---~~~~;t=:;::-:.,:;~ :J IJ ,] :] J ~--1 ~ APPENDIX 1 General Location Map 'e r~1 U '"I U r'l ~I n LJ ~ [.~ III Ii i .~ .n .. I:J ., iii Ll ., IP 1M ~ GENBRAL LOCATION MAP SCALE: 1- =300' #~ ..:s c}~ ~ ~a r}'?- c,<V S 0" G / '- '- / / / / 1 J 'j .J :j :] APPENDIX 2 . Proposed Usage (,"-'1 . I : i ... r:::""l I ~ D Il W 1--1 LJ LJ 1-" ..'] Ir fi III~ n l~ In ~ .~ IF In ~ Ij . M IJ SCENARIO A PROPOSBD USAGE ':",,:.,'1 .1 ~ ; - l I SCALE: 1. =300' #c, V G-~ ~ ~o ~~ c,<<" ~ 0" G / / " " / / / / ~'~-',~~c"+','hh,"'""",.,,,. j'c""'':0-';:.o:j,J;;,;,,,,~;,~~a;\7''''~;,,~~,~,,,,,,4~~4~~t:,",':':c" = ~ ~~~.~~,,~~ ;, ~'j'(::',:"~(t{j3t;:'~,~,~:;::':,'2 ." "',,"""0 ," . , ';:"~''!t;,::;;:~~ ~, 1 j :. SCENARIO B PROPOSED USAGE SCAlE: 1. =300' ;:-c, .:s G-~ ~ ~(j c}~ ~~ s 0" G / / J J APPENDIX 3 ~ Existing Sanitary Sewer System , ~ D ~I '--1 LJ W LJ n LJ Lllj ,-~~ 'fl1 LU L~ r1f1 L'I .~U fl"i IIJ, I ,~ ,',.'-: ,j i""i [1iI'l II!! II"iJ IJ[~ 11!lt I .n ~ .~ I, : ~ .-'..c;:,.~,:.,.....z'<~"~";;~'>-"';;'"""";"_~'?~':~_'7.-'_~__-':'-_~_~'"~",_:;';.,_~i,~,:;.-,,,,..":~;-::..:-,_~.~~~~~., SCALE: 1" =300' SANITARY SBWER SYSTEM EXISTING CONDmONS .. {::.s 0~ (;~ ':\o~ '5-.~ S ~,,~ 0\;" CJ " ~j (J U M010 8" f~~ \ \ \ 111 L' <,:,,"::! . ,,~J1 r-') L~ tJ ~ LJ ~ LJ LJ I:J IJ \ \ KUNG ENGINEERING & SURVEYING BRYAN. TEXAS J ,j ~:'I , I .. (--::-~l I ~ L L 1;;'7-::1 LJ 1-1 LJ 1-] LJ Ll LJ "li LJ LJ IT: . f1 I,J IIl"'1 Ii . iii ~ ., . n IJ Wheeler properties University @ Iincoln Qexist Qfull Qexcess IQexcess line size slope cfs cfs cfs gpm 8 0.004 0.39 0.77 0.44 197.47 8 0.0039 0.39 0.76 0.43 192.98 8 0.0116 0.39 1.30 1.02 ,457.78 8 ,0.0032 0.55 0.69 0.20 89.76 8 0.0071 0.55 1.02 0.56 251.33 8 0.004 0.55 0.77 0.28 125.66 8 0.0039 0.55 0.76 0.28 125.66 8 0.0021 0.55 0.56 0.05 :!2.44 8 0.0074 0.55 1.05 0.58 260.30 12 0.0056 0.55 2.69 2.36 1059.17 12 0.0033 0.55 2.07 1.69 758.47 12 0.0018 0.55 1.54 1.12 502.66 12 0.0016 0.55 1.45 1.02 457.78 18, 0.002 3.61 4.78 1.56 700.13 manhole 03381-M018 03381-M024 03381-M025 03381-M029 03282-M021 03282-M017 03282-M013 03282-M010 03282-M008 03282-M007 03282-M005 03282-M030 03282-M003 03282-M001 0""__..... ...:.~... J J ---I I - ,1''---''-1 I ~ [1 r" I LI 'l LJ c: "'--1 LJ f-r'~ LJ (I Ir riA LJ'I ;'0;';' ~" . 1"1 Ir LJ"" I .':)"-'1 ,~ ., . ., . 1Ji" 1:-:,- +" IJ W~,__ , - - _" -..~~~~~::::':':1..~"'~-'''_-',l.'-j .''''-l~7'.::'"';, ":l"i. Fun Flow Capacity Worksheet for Circular Channel Project Description Project File Worksheet Flow Element Method. Solve For e:\haestad\pi\bwss.fm2 8" Sanitary Sewer-Clay or Concrete Pipe Circular Channel Manning's Formula Full Flow Capacity Input Data Mannings Coefficient Channel Slope Diameter 0.013 0.003300 V : H 0.67 ft Results Depth Discharge Flow Area Wetted Perimeter Top Width Critical Depth Percent Full Critical Slope Velocity Velocity Head Specific Energy Froude Number Maximum Discharge Full Flow Capacity Full Flow Slope It..;.:..'..'......,.......... Aug 7, 1997 ~;,. 16:34:10 0.67 311.97 0.35 2.10 0.00 0.39 100.00 0.007713 V : H 1.99 ftls 0.06 ft FULL ft FULL 0.75 fl3/s 0.70 fl3/s 0.003300 V : H ft gaVmin ft2 ft ft ft Kling Engineering & Surveying Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 FlowMaster v4.1 c Page 1 of 1 J J J - -, ,J ,.:c....:'l i i . ,.- i ~I U 'I U r0:l ~j '--1 Lj '1 ~j r-T~ LJ ~ 'J fl~ L1i millS ~fiiJ'j I~!i ! . iJr"",-, ,d" 'I ':1 .n . ~ ~ (.., c:::. -.~ "- c.....; ~ ~ nUl ~ I I ~ '---1 ~ , I ~ '--I ~j C--j ~ !'Ul I.J ~1 ~ '1 ~j f"11 1..,1 .~ ~~, lit. ~ ~ ~ ~ I ! ~ I I ~ SYSTEM INADEQUACY - SCBNAlUO A SCALE: 1" =300' #C? V- (;1' ,o~ ~~ C? <v~<v o"v C; CAPACllY LEGEND c- .1 - >50% REMAINING 40% 30% 20% - 10% 0% 8" f~22 \ \ LINE CAPACITY EXCEEDED - - \ KUNG ENGINEERING & SURVEYING BRYAN, TEXAS , , fI', , , , \ M029 \ ______-- '\.. --- - - . --- - ORNe:. e:. M025 U~Ne:.R~ii J J J ~J ~ :1 L" re:"1 LJ r. I IJ SYS'I'BM INADEQUACY - SCBNARlO B SCALE: 1" =300' ~C:> v.~ v<0 \o~ '5.~ C:> ~G~ o"-v CJ "-1 , [ I t,..A .... pcC'"'l ~ C l~ .; f ~022 \ \ il LJ L~ ~i' i . I'! il'< ;! ';'" \ ~.". I . I,,-J~ U"~' :i,_I: I'" ~'~'I" Ii I f: t;U~il"- i!:"': ~(,-i:!i'J lii',1 t"~ LiJ KUNG ENGINEERING & SURVEYING BRYAN, TEXAS CAPACITY LEGEND - >50% REMAINING 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% J cJ r-....., ,J ~j r 1 LJ ~] rc'~l lJ APPENDIX 4 Design Parameters r~l IJ W ,1 , I Iii 1"1 i I .. ~!~i I . H..; {r~1 ~ W~"1' I::::! 'il' f~!' II ~ ~ W ~ ~ J 1 J 'J I]. ~J' J J iJ f' -.1 J r-.l ; I ~ n , i ~ iCl I , I J ai ~ ~~1' ~J I~ I~ ~ ~ ~. CJ / r--:------ -r~,--V\~ -'''''''- ~ , -~'l '-....,.e". ''-'/ ' Sanitary Sewer Impact Analysis Bert Wheeler 8.471 & 4.242 acre tracts ;--r-'~~t; '\:~~=.7~'-~it~~~=:==:':-t\,~:' I' I \.>....~ '~1 \ 'c\'';'.I. .1\ !;,~J ;'~ ,. I' h', ,"-," "~~)C ~ 'Wo..\ L.L ~,JJi'r' , . , Proposed flows cannot be accomodated in existing fa9i/ities \J.) -(L , ,(; k t \ I ~ 7 ,""l L~ I 1 R j ~ \ ,'t " \" \ \ \ ' V""" U;/'....' k \ - ~"" "'-~J-.., \'\. C> ~/\.-~,~v~' r",' ~ ~ \ :~~J i IY", \ Tract Size (ac) Zoning Max use: Use comp: Comp ave. ww flow (gpd/ac) Ave. flow tract A (gpd) Ave. flow tract A (gpm) Peak flow tract A (gpm) Tract Size (ae) Zoning Max use: Use camp: Comp ave. ww flow (gpd/ac) Ave. flow tract A (gpd) Ave. flow tract A (gpm) Peak flow tract A (gpm) Peak Combined Flow (gpm) MA-A .Mif(' Capacity avail. in 8" line Prepared Revised 5/20/97 6/12/97 A ~.471 C-B Motel ':? ~ .~, ~ (\ ,.M_ H'lt ; 0 Q.o()"" '; \..J ~~_ t_. ;;:; \..' ~\., 4,13:~ -. ~I ~ \ 1I r I . +0\0 \ '. .5',,) e?J.r-,~lf._. . 37,120 I't~ ~'\'- Vt"', ! . ,V' a'"' , 25.78 , U.t-L '2. ~ Q.irY. ~ ~ ~'() I 3 00 ~.rl 116.00 ~. x...t..:l, sac, ~ /' ! ~\D>';Of ' B ~. LvnulJ1~ tv ,E, ~~~2 _, -- "IS 'e-f /1', , 721,: Mixed Office G k\ "TfJ (2..((., ( ( Fren4ch.12~or --------". Q.c:;:. , Ce,\:: ~8 '\ \ \ t....e i -'-:) [- ,\ ' ~~8 \ ttl~ V' 121.46 22.4 .....<,."'-~.."'.....,'...~...."....~'I.""""'"""- ,""",-~.._.",_._"~""._,,...,,.- . - J J ,J ,J '-', lJ C I ;J r-~-:1 IJ rl : I ~ r--1 , .. 1--1 I . .. F"-l ~ '-1 ~j " ~j '-l Ir n t. r--l ~J IJ" ~ I'J'-' ~ f1 LJ 30 TAC 317.4(a) ---.--P \ '-.,\ ~ \ t \ I n\,l... --t-Cl.~ .,;) \ I" I ,~ \. \ fc/', ~G.. \,,,", -.J,..,;v'....,...Q......~,.l...... ,~';,J ..j Remarks I Residential I Residential I 2 ~ persons per Trailer Park (Transient) trailer / Mobile Home Park /3 persons per trailer I, I School with Cafeteria I With Showers ,. I Without Showers I Recreational Parks I Overnight user I I Day user I I I I I I Source Municipality Subdivision Office Building or Factory Motel Restaurant Hospital Nursing Home Per Meal Per Bed Per Bed Daily Wastewater Flow - Gallons Per Person 100 C~~~) 50 75 20 15 30 5 9P) 5 200 100 Page 1 of 1 I Wastewater Strlength I ',mg!I.. BODs I 2:00 I 2:00 ~oo I 300 I 300 I 300 I 200 I 100 ~oo I 300 I 1000 I - 300 I 300 F / T 1'1~"'- iZ.&Ju;S .~ ,~ ,~ ~~ I l~ r i~ r . I~ ~ III . ~ Project Description Project File Worksheet Flow Element Method Solve For Input Data Mannings Coefficient Channel Slope Diameter Results Depth Discharge Flow Area Wetted Perimeter Top Width Critical Depth Percent Full Critical Slope Velocity Velocity Head Specific Energy Froude Number Maximum Discharge Full Flow Capacity Full Flow Slope ,..1 , , II ~ (-1 I , I ! ~ r-1 .~ ~ '-1 W r-1 ~ ,-1 ~j ,-~ ~j rr1 ~~ li1 ~:~9~5~997 Full Flow Capacity Worksheet for Circular Channel e:\haestad\pi\bwss.fm2 10" P.V.C. Sanitary Sewer Circular Channel Manning's Formula Full Flow Capacity 0.011 0.003300 V : H 0.83 ft 0.83 667.52 0.55 2.62 0.00 0.55 100.00 0.005627 V : H 2.73 ftls 0.12 ft FULLft FULL 1.60 ft3/s 1.49 ft3/s 0.003300 V : H ft gallmin fl2 ft ft ft Kling Engineering & Surveying Haestad Methods, Inc. 37 Brookside Road Waterbury, CT 06708 (203) 755-1666 FlowMaster v4.1 c Page 1 of 1 ;"""'-:","..-::.:"",~""",~:<..:,,; l~ _1.,,,,,_.,_ ,J r--m- ,J LJ ~J ~J J ,.1 W 11 : I w./ ,---. I ~ W rfl ~j (J W ~J ~~I!'~ -T.:.i j':U ~i'J ~ LJ ~ LJ .~ .. ~~~~~: J~;,-~,~_~__>-',:j"-"~il'\!1f'#"--:;,::::-'--::,C"'-'_-" ... . . . .::.:;;;~'-~;:;;~~~~~ . . .'7 ~..., - B' '. ,. ,.. ~~:;r~~_ APPENDIX 5 Cost Estimate ,J ',J lJ iJ :] U J F'1 W LJ (J (J [J: [] 1J ,;;~',""""",..~,;,~:~,>"~":,;;,,,,,,'"":;S';J,~,,,,,;'''''''''*''' ,',c:'~"*~~'\l4i-~-,:_-,_,,,~,;,:,,_;j'~~'i!~,'~'";"~;t';;'f-'-i(~'i~~"-'" '~"""""C;;"";""'''''''-*1,i;'':('~~'~'''f''7&''''h''~i;2 SERT WHEELERS INC. 8.471 AC & 4.242 AC'TRACTS SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE AUGUST 7, 1997 ITEM NO. QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL SANITARY SEWER 1 1040 LF 10" P.V.C. - S.D.R. 26 @4'-8' BURY $30.00 $31,200.00 2 2 EA TIE to existing manhole (watertight connection) Approx. 8-12' depth $700.00 $1,400.00 3 5 EA MANHOLE w/lid @ -8'-10' depth $1,800.00 $9,000.00 SUB':'TOTAL: $41,600.00 10% CONTINGENCY: $4,160.00 SANITARY SEWER TOTAL: $45,760.00 ... ..... - ~Z :to ~- <.... 'T'''' .J..n:: ~o 0;]. ell: n ~u ~ ---- \ r-- \Y o tC) '- J ~ ~ =~ o Ol{) 00> l{) ~ ~ ~::J N '<t N "'" JS (:. 00 00 ..f~ l{) ;Q :;EO ::~ -('Ii :l:;J: ~~ Qfl:: o ~() ~ '" " .. III iLs '" ,- c '" ;:1Il {:. "0 ~ >-m C co (5 2Ci5I >< W l{) '<t a l{) N a I~ I~ l{) 0> CD CD ~ 1-(1:1 ..:CD CD ... 'iic'i CD ~~ 1:: CD m ~ LL. .!!! II) Q. '" o ~ c: e >- ,!:! en :!O (!) "ffi 25 OlE 2-0 o o l{) t'-- ('l t'-- a 81 o.ri' 81 "",' (1) 0) <~ ~ a CD g,) o o .... ~ - c: CD E Q. ..Q CD > CD C u:' 0- W E 88 ~o:: o W (j) :;:J 0... 0. f}. W ..J ~ UJ Iii ~ " 5- " c .. ....I .", LL E .0 0-0 "'we:: N Iii tll C ~ .. D. 31 ::l .~ ~, " \ "- , , \ , , "- \ , "- \ " " \ """ ., \ . \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \" \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ enuel\tf Ulooul1 CI) > .i:: C >0 - .e ~ "2 ::J U t,)) CD CD - (1:1 2 I- ..: CD 'ii CD ~ 3: i m / ~ LL. \ \ \ ./ v'