HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneousCOLLEGE STATION
P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue
Tel: 409 764 3500
November 12, 1997
Mr. William S. Thornton, Jr.
Bruchez, Goss, Thornton, Meronoff,
Michel & Hawthorne, P.C.
4342 Carter Creek
Bryan, Texas 77802
College Station, TX '77842
RE: University Commons -College Station Phase II, Ltd. (Lots. 13R, 14R and
15R-1, Block B, Eastmark Subdivision, Phase II, College Station, Brazos
County, Texas)
Dear Bill:
In connection with the above referenced matter, please find enclosed copies of the following
documents:
(1) 0.101 acre Pedestrian Access Easement from University Commons -College
Station, Ltd. to the City of College Station; Volume 2961, Page 329, Official
Records of Brazos County, Texas;
(2) 0.103. acre Pedestrian Access Easement from University Commons -College
Station Phase II, Ltd. to the City of College Station; Volume 2961, Page. 331,
Official Records of Brazos County, Texas;
(3) 0.015 acre Access Easement from University Commons -College Station,
Ltd. to the City of College Station; Volume 2961, Page 333, Official Records
of Brazos County, Texas;
(4) 0.248 acre Access Easement from University Commons -College Station
Phase II, Ltd. to the .City of College Station; Volume 2961, Page 335, Official
Records of Brazos County, Texas;
(5) Utility Easement covering a 0.420 acre tract (Tract One) and a 0.429 acre
tract (Tract Two) from University Commons -College Station Phase II, Ltd.
to the City of College Station; Volume 2961, Page 338, Official Records of
Brazos County, Texas; and
(6) Special Warranty Deed from University Commons -College Station Phase
II, Ltd. to the City,of College Station (1.86 acre tract out of Lot 15R-1, Block
B, Eastmark Phase II Resubdivision; recorded in Volume 2961, Page 346,
Official Records of Brazos County, Texas.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the enclosed documents, please
call me at 764-3507.
S' rely,
Cameron Re o ds
Assistant Ci Attorney
CDRaah
Enclosures
xc: Shirley Volk, Development Coordinator
/ab~c:~urhftlt~firojedr~rrmsic»ma~tbnrnton.doc Home of Texas A&M University
»/ ~z/9~
`•~ .CITY OF COL~,E~E ~TATIOI`I
`~ LEGAL bEPARTMENT
®/ POST OFFICE BOX 9960 1101 TEXAS AVENUE {
COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842-9960 ~ ~%~~
(409)764-3507
^ /~ /
MEMORANDUM
TO: Steve Beachy, Director/Parks & Recreation
' Carol Arnold, Supervisory Staff Accountant
FROM: Jan Schwartz, Legal Assistan
SUBJECT: Parkland Dedication
i
DATE: December 10, 1997
The City of College Station. recently acquired through parkland. dedication a 1.86 acre tract of
land in the Eastmark Subdivision. I am attaching a copy of he deed for your records.
:~s
Attachment
;,. ,_; CI~C ~F ~O ~~ STATI®1`I
'` ~~ 8~`sa~~ d:Dffl~~ ~o~ ~`3F'sg ~ k ~ ~ ~'~a, ~ !? ~~~.rx€a~
~'~'' ~aEleg~ sv.~#s3r~, "E~e~~n:w 7'~~~c-°~~~€~
(~f3~; T~~•35~f3
November 21, 1996
Capstone Development
Attn: Mr. Rob Howland
600 Luckie Drive, Suite 424
Birmingham, Alabama 35223
RE: Proposed University Commons Phase II
Dear Mr. Howland:
I have reviewed the water .and sewer demands submitted by M.D.G. as part of the construction
documents. The proposed demands are as follows:
Buildings 1 and 2
Sanitary Sewer: 4,800 GPD Water: 160 GPM
Buildings 3 and 4
Sanitary Sewer: 7,200 GPD Water: 200 GPM
Total Site Demands:
Sanitary Sewer: 12,000 GPD Water: 360 GPM
Fire Protection:
Typical Fire Flow: 250 GPM with a top floor residual pressure of 25-30 PSI
Upon. reviewing this information, the City has the ability to provide water and sewer service as well
as fire protection based upon these proposed demands. If for some reason these demands change,
the City would need to reevaluate the new numbers.
If you have any questions or comments, feel free to contact me at (409) 764-3570.
S~ rely,
Steve omeyer
Graduate Engineer
xc: nt Laza, City Engineer
.Shirley Volk, Development Coordinator
From: Sabine McCully
To: nthomas
Date: 10/21/96 4:11pm
Subject: prc comments for university commons II
nan and i just got done checking the landscape plan and have the
following comments:
- unless the barricade distance for the existing trees is equal.
to one foot for every caliper inch, only 50 points will be given
for each existing tree. this means that only the 6" elm (la:beled
"c" on the list of existing trees) will receive 200 points. the
others all are worth 50 points.
- there will be no points given for the existing hackberry
-'based on the above :comments, the total points given for the
existing trees. equal 900 points.
-.add a note to note #5 that there will. be no grade changes
within the barricaded areas of existing trees that are to remain.
-'add some additional screening for the parking spaces in the
southwest corner of the site..
one of the notes states that only certain areas of the site
will be irrigated and that others will be served with hydrants
located near the buildings. the city. required that all areas are
irrigated.
jape, i think. they may have worked off of an older ordinance.
also, jim smith just emailed me to let me know that the site will
require 3 more dumpsters. we need to make sure they can locate
all 4 in an acceptable manner.
CC: jkee
10/31/96 14:34 C`i`409 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS 1001
~k:k:k:k.k~k:k:k~%k~:k~~~.k~ksk~:k%k:k%ksk%k*~:
~:k:k ACTIVITY. REPORT ~u~:k
sk~k~~:~k%k~k:k~k:k%k%k~k~kx:~::k~:~s~k:ksk:k~~k~k%k
TRANSMISSION OK
TX/RX N0. 7918.
CONNECTION TEL 12058711465pp161
CONNECTION ID
START TIME 10/31 14:32
USAGE TIME 01'08
PAGES 2
RESULT OK
~~
City of College Station
Development Scr~~iccs
P.O. E3ox 9960, College Station, TX 77842-99'60
rax
- -
Phone . __
Fa.~ hone. _
CC.
Date: ]
Numt~er oC-pages including cover sheet
From: C~/"
C
Phone: (409)764-3570
Fax hone: (409)764-3496
__ _ . ~.,~ r~ r r~~~~~ f~ Fnr vour rcv~c~~ ^ Reply ASfvP ^ Plcasc comment
Re: University Commons - Phase II
College Station, Texas
Dear Shirley,
Enclosed are four (4)-sets of architectural and landscape drawings.
for the referenced project. Greg Taggart should delivez- .the
required civil drawings on Wednesday of this week. Please`
distribute these as needed for permit review, and call me should;.
you need anything further on this.
Greg is also preparing a legal description for the floodwa~y and
minimum reservation areas to be dedicated to the City prier to
issuance of the building permit.
Our general contractor for this project. will be Universal`
Constructors of McMinnville, Tennessee. We .anticipate closing on:
the property late in November, and Universal should be prepared to
pull the permit immediately thereafter. Permit fees will be paid,,
by Universal.
Thank you for your assistance throughout the approval process;- and'
please call me if I can provide any additional information.
Sincerely,
Capston Development Co p.
~ ~.' r
'~~~'
~'
Kent T. Campbe 1 ~
Vice President
cc: Greg Taggart/MDG
"CS VOLK.O29"
600 Lucki~ Drive • Suite 424 • Birmingham, AL 35223 • (205) 871-0020 • FAX (205) 871-]465
From: Shirley Volk
To: VMorgan, JCallaway
Subject: BackflowPreventerq&a
I talked to Bill Riley this a.m. and explained my question; I added an e-mail to him later today with the info that V received from a contractor that this was a
TNRCC requirement. I spoke with the Capstone people after that twice and he said during the second conversation that he had talked with some people who
said that while it is a TNRCC requirement, it had been misinterpreted.
Bill Riley just called me back to explain that in College Station, domestic meters do not have to have backflow preventers because we have a backflow
preventer program.. So that is the answer - we don't need them here except on irrigation & sprinkler lines.
M ~
I~RB Report
University Commons II
Case #96-SOZ
Page 2 of 4
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
~~ ~ l ~i. t c. ~ 7'ES /~.lFa2~ ,4.7 0~,1
~~,~ ~S (rQrGlGt~1l G o2 ~l-f~ ~
Discretionary Items (cont.):
~, _ Provide pedestrian and vehicular access to the creek in the existing 20' public sanitary
sewer easement located at the end of Eastmark Drive between the original development
and the proposed phase.
The following. is a .list of ordinance requirements identified by the Project Review
Committee. This list does not relieve the applicant of total compliance with all c;urrent
ordinance requirements.
Ordinance Requirements:
Plan
Do~ri•c h E The Wolf Pen Creek dedication area must be dedicated to the City by separate insi:rument
rior to issuance of a building permit. ~ GNA~~i E i o " Pit o~~,. i o C •O . " P~,~,,. t~7i~-
0~ l~T~,/r G~tJEA tz~i7 ~~ ~ ~~~o'`~/
,/ Show fire lanes throughout the site. ~~ rV9tALi~ ~~~ ~' ~~'~~ dog./,~ `2~i ~l ~6
Note the internal dimensions including turning radii, driveway wits, throat lengths, etc.
Show a typical parking space.
.Note the bedroom sizes to verify the parking information shown on the site plan.
Show the required sidewalk along Eastmark Drive.
Show the phase line between this development and the future "cottage phase". Th.e phase
line must be 20' beyond the developed area.
~,// Show opposite and adjacent driveways. (The driveway at the end of the Eastmark Drive
cul-de-sac is not shown.)
E ~• Note the sizes of the existing sanitary sewer lines on the property.
The following items must be addressed at the entrance of the site .along Eastmark Drive:
atch the grade difference at this location for fire truck access.
~~F;, ~__„ ,The two landscaped islands between the entrance drive and building three, .must be
C.~ modified to provide for fire protection. (However, they must meet throat lengths and
any other criteria.)
'~ 1 Change the sanitary sewer line connection near building three to eliminate the acute angle.
,,,,,.~ ~ According to the Sanitation division, three more dumpsters will be required to service the
Afi~~~~~I~~~~ site far a total of four dumpsters. Show the location for all four dumpsters and the
dU~`~'' ~ necessary screening.
_ Provide all site details with the construction documents including curb, pavement,
sidewalk, etc.
DRB Report
University Commons II
Case #96-502
Page 3 of 4
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
Ordinance.Requirements (cont.l:
/ Landscape Plan Related:
V Unless the barricade distance for the existing trees is equal to one foot for every caliper
inch, only 50 points will be given for each existing tree. This means that only the 6" elm
(labeled "c" on the list of existing trees) will receive 200. points.
There will be no points given for the existing hackberry.
_~ Based on the above comments, the total points given for the existing trees equals 900
points.
~/ Add a note to note #5 that there will be no grade changes within the barricaded areas of
/~ existing trees that are to remain.
J Add some additional screening for the parking spaces in the southwest corner of the site.
One of the notes states that only certain areas of the site will be irrigated and that others
will be served with hydrants located near the buildings. The City requires that all areas are
imgated.
_~ The Board prefers the plant list included as part of the landscape plan and not the
"proposed plant list" attached to the plan on 8 1/2" x 11" paper. (The two plant lists
differ with respect to the tree plantings.)
Grading & Drainage Plan Related.•
? _ Show how the drainage will be handled from the proposed outlet structures to the Wolf
Pen Creek channel and how erosion control will be handled.
Show the centerline of the Wolf Pen Creek channel.
~ _ Submit the final drainage report to be reviewed and approved by staff. Board Member
Henryson expressed concern of allowing increased drainage into Wolf Pen Creek that
could flood downstream developments.
Comments/Concerns:
~ The down spouts on the buildings appear to drain into the landscaped beds. Make sure
that these spouts are routed around the beds or located underground as was done with
phase one to not erode the landscaped beds.
Coordinate electrical service requirements with Electrical Operations Coordinator Tony
Michalsky at (409) 764-3660.
_ The developer/owner is responsible for providing and placing conduit to each building and
pull boxes may also be required. G.T.E. can share the same trench with electrical with
proper separation. G.T.E. will provide a layout as soon as the electrical layout is
complete. Coordinate telephone service details with G.T.E. Representative Laverne Akin
at (409) 82 T-4723.
g
e ~ ... >
DRB Report
University Commons II
Case #9b-502
Page 4 of 4
City Engineer Laza seconded the motion to recommend approval of the site plan with the above
mentioned. conditions which passed unopposed (7 - 0).
SUBMIT 10 COPIES OF THE REVISED SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLA[~i BY
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 30, .1996 TO BE INCLUDED IN THE PL~STNING AND
ZONING COMMISSION PACKETS FOR THE MEETING OF THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 7,
1996. THE MEETING WII:,L BE AT 7:00 PM IN THE CITY HALL COUNCII, ROOM
LOCATED AT 1101 TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH. COORDINATE SUBMITTAL OF ALL
REVISIONS WITH DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR SHIRLEY YOLK AT (409) 764-
3570.
`•, CITY OF COLLEGE.STATIOI`I
PLANNING DIVISION
/ POST OFFICE BOX 9960 1101 TEXAS AVENUE
COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842-9960
409 764-3570
iVOLF PEN CREEK DESIGN REVIEW ~OARD .REPORT
October 25, 1996
T®: Kent Campbell, Capstone Development
600 Luckie Drive, Suite 424, Birmingham, AL 35223
Greg Taggart, Municipal Development Group
203. Holleman Drive East, College Station, TX 77840
Jon. Hobson, Universal Constructors
P. O. Box 28, McMinnville, TN 37110
w
w .{/ ~
0~ \i
r ~t
~~
~~
1.°
FROM: Design Review Board
David Brochu, Chairman
Kay Henryson, Member
George McLean, Member
Robert Mooney, Member
Kent Laza, City Engine r
Jane Kee, City Planner `- i
Charles Smith, P&Z Repr sen,~ative
Others Attending '~~
Natalie Thomas, Planning Technician
~iirley Volk, Development Coordinator
Tony 1Vlichalsky, Electrical Line Designer
Jon Mies, Fire Marshal
Laverne Akin, G.T.E. Representative
SUBJECT: Site Plan -University Commons Phase II; proposed multi-family development on
lots 13R, 14R and 15R, .block B of the Eastmark Phase II Subdivision totaling
8.66 acres and .120 dwelling units near the intersection of Eastmark Drive and
Colgate Drive. (96-502)
A Design Review Board meeting was held Wednesday, October 23, 1996 to discuss the above
mentioned site plan. Chairman Brochu moved to recommend approval of the proposed site plan
with the following discretionary items, ordinance requirements and comments:
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
Discretionary .Items:
/ There are several areas in phase one with damaged, removed or dead plant materials that
need to be replaced. The Board requested that the same materials not be used since they
are not'compatible with this area. Instead of requiring the deficiencies of phase one to be
completed as part of the proposed .phase, the Board decided to have the City Planner write
an enforcement letter to the property. owner. The property owner must submit a revised
landscape,plan or a letter addressing the deficiencies including the new plant material that
will be installed. (The .red maples, red oaks and .magnolia trees that .were installed
originally are almost all dead and do not grow well in this area:}
_. _ _ O
~.~ °~-~
~~ ~
~~ T
CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY CHECKLIS
1 V 1 Date: Project:..
4
EL CTRIC: (Ray 3,80, Tony 3438)
~~ ,~ ~~%
~ ~~ ~i
ENGINEERING: Covers Water, Sewer, Drainage, Site Utilities, Impact Fees
(Kent 3581, Veronica 3763 2)
(David D. 777-3942, Vern W. 777-0192, erry J. 777-355 ;John L. 759-3970)
r 4 ~ a~
FIRE: (Jon 3781)
LEGAL: (Jan 3546)
(Easement?)
~G
~~ ~~ ~/~
KLAND/LANDSCAPING/DUMPSTER LOCATION & SCREENING:
(- ine 3782 Joey 3748)
r~~
DUMPSTER SERVICE: (~ im S., Wally, Freddie -all at 3690)
r~ ~ ~,~~,
a
w
a
~•~ CITY OF COLLEGE STATIOI`I
\~
Universal Constructors
Attn: Mr. Marvin Mangrum
2301 Eastmark Drive
College Station, Texas 77840
RE: University Commons Phase. 2
Dear Mr. Mangrum:
There are several areas of concern hat have been brought to my attention. I made an
inspection of these areas with. Terry Jones, the City's Engineering Inspector, on April 1,
1997 and the areas of concern are as follows:
1. The most southerly driveway to this site does not adhere to the required 0.25
inch per foot cross slope for ADA ramps. This driveway will need to be removed
and replaced-using the proper cross slope.
2. The most northerly. manhole that was set on the .existing storm. drain between
phases 1 and 2 must receive attention. Mr. Jones stated that he has been in contact
with the contractor about the condition of the new manhole.. Thepipe that was
broken out to,allow access does not meet City specifications and will therefore
need to be corrected. The opening is not large enough nor is it properly broken
back. There is steel extending out of the pipe that must be removed such that
there are no protrusions.
3 . The precast headwall that was. installed in the creek channel does not meet 1;he
design criterion established by Municipal Development Group, (NIDG) nor is it in
the proper location. Mr. Jones and I measured the distance. from the curb inlet in
the parking area to the headwall and found that the pipe extends too far into the
creek. This does not allow for the proposed concrete rubble apron to be installed
correctly. In order to achieve the correct design location, the headwall will need
to be relocated with approximately one (1) joint of pipe being removed. The City
has received a detail from MDG that indicates the precast headwall to be adequate.
In ..order for the City to accept. this change using the precast headwall, Mr. North
Bardell, P.E.' of MDG, must submit the .detail to the City's Engineering
Department under his signature and seal, This detail must include he design for
the toe-wall as well as how the rubble apron will tie-in to the headwall.
Post Office Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas 77842-9960.
(4®9) 764-3500
April 3, 1997
Et~ame of Texas A&M University
c;Hp;
~;_,
,.~
~ a
~ Mr. Marvin Mangrum Apri13, 1997
~ University Commons Phase 2 Page 2
I will depend upon Mr. Jones to ensure that these field corrections are made. If you have
,. any questions or comments, feel free to contact me at (409)764-3570,
S' ce ely,
Steve Homeyer
Assn. to the City Engineer
xc: Kent Laza, City Engineer
Jerry Jones, Engineering Inspector
Shirley Volk, Development Coordinator
North Eardell, NIDG
I
,>
From: Melissa Rodgers
To: SVOLK
Date: 6/26/97 12:50pm
Subject:. FYI -Reply -Reply -Reply
No, I did not get the attachment that was supposed to be there!!! That would
explain why I was so confused!
OK, here's a rundown on the apartments per bldg.
bldg 1:
~~ mechanical-completed
"~, plumbing-completed
electrical-~___~_ ~~ed ~~Z-y~~(~;~ ~l~~t
building-not completed
bldg 2:
mechanical-completed
lumbing-completed
electrical- of compl- -~ _d_
building of comp-re~e
bldg 3:
mechanica - e ~~ <~" ~~
plumbing- - -
electrica -no. let_
building of complete
bldg 4:
mechanical-completed
plumbing-completed
electrical-c m 1
building not completed
~, ~%~ ~~
,~
~C/
G~~
t~
I hope that helps you!! When I hear anything else, I will let you know., bye!
i:..l - --
i =
C,~PSTON~;
..
December 17, 1996
Natalie Thomas
City of College Station
Planning Division
Post Office Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842-9960
Re: University Commons - Phase II
College Station, Texas
.Dear Natalie,
This letter will serve to document Capstone's intent to 'dedicate
areas of the referenced project to the City of College;Station.
Specifically, this will include all areas within the-100 year
floodway as well as the Proposed 20' Wolf `Pen=:Creek Dedication
shown on the site plans submitted to the City:
Additionally, it is Capstone's intent to grant the City pedestrian
and vehicular access easements from the cul-de-sac of 'Eastmark
Drive to the Wolf Pen Creek minimum reservation line. T`t is`our
understanding that these easements may be separate. It is al~o'our
understanding that the pedestrian access will be open`to' the
public, but limited to pedestrians, and that the vehicular-access
will be limited to emergency vehicles and City maintenance
vehicles.
We are aware that this letter of intent will be accepted by the
City in lieu of the actual dedication only to expedite issuance of
building permits, and that Certificates of Occupancy for the
project will not be issued prior to the dedication.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance on this issue, and
please call if you require anything further at this time.
Sincerely,
Capsto e Development Corp.
~ ~ / ~'
Kent T. Cam bell
Vice President
"THOMAS.D17"
600 Luckie Drive • Suite 424 • Birmingham. AL 35223 •'(205),871-00,20 • FAX (205)871 1.465_
From: Steve Homeyer
To: JCALLAWAY, KLAZA, VMORGAN, JKEE, Smccully, JDUNN, ...
Date: 12/4/96 12:19pm
Subject: University Commons 2
So that everyone will know, Jane, Sabine, Jim and I discussed a request made
by MDG to relocate the pedestrian access (sidewalk) from the common line
between the two phases and place it within the parking area. MDG made this
request because they did not want to duplicate the concrete surface by
constructing the sidewalk. We decided that to serve the public interests, the
sidewalk would need to be constructed from the end of Eastmark to the cree .
~We decided that the pedestrian access within the parking area would not
provide a safe point of access and "public" access to the creek would not
appear available to the average citizen. 50, to meet the .goals and objectives
outlined in the Wolf Pen Creek Corridor Study. we decided that it should not go
through the parking area. In addition, we decided to allow "feeder" sidewalks
(those sidewalks that are,'not part-of the path system) to be 6 feet in width
rather than l0 feet. This however does not preclude the construction of a 10
foot sidewalk within the reserve area. If I left 'anything out, please make
those additions.
From: Natalie Thomas
To: svolk
Date:. 12/17/96 9:29am
Subject: University Commons II
I just spoke with Kent Campbell concerning the WPC dedication area for their
next phase of development. They are dedication this area by separate
instrument. MDG has told him they have the written description ready;
however, he can't seem to get it from them. (Kent seems to think he will have
the description & dedication-forms in within the next two weeks.)
I agreed to allow Kent to submit a "letter of intent" concerning the
dedication area stating that he knows the dedication MUST take place prior to
issuance of a C.O. This would allow him to start construction as soon as the
civil plans are approved - which MDG says theg will "walk through" today.
Kent .assures me that he will get the dedication information to us as soon as
possible.
Thanks.
CC: jkee, jcallaway
205-E71-1465 CAPSTONE DEVELOPMENT
.557 PO2 DEC 17 '96 11:52
~t ~°~`
~, i~tr~lt:~
CA~sTO~E
December 17, 1996
Natalie Thomas
City of .College Station
Planning Division
Post Office Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842-996.0
Re: University Commons - Phase II
College Station, Texas
Dear Natalie,
This letter will serve. to document Capstone's intent to dedicate
areas of the referenced project to the City of College Station.
Specifically, this will include all areas within the 100 year
floodway as well as the Proposed 20° Wolf Pen Creek Dedication
shown on the site plans submitted to the City.
Additionally, it is Capstone's intent to grant the. City pedestrian
and vehicular access .easements from the cul-de-sac of Ear~tmark
Drive to the Wolf .Pen Creek minimum reservation line. It is our
understanding that these easements may be separate. It is also our
understanding that the pedestrian access, will be open to the
public, but limited to pedestrians., and that the vehicular access
will be limited to emergency vehicles and City maintenance
vehicles.
We are aware that this .letter of intent will be accepted by the
City in lieu of the actual dedication only to expedite issuance of
building permits, and that Certificates of f3ccupancy for .the
project will not be issued prior to the dedication.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance on this issue, and
please call if you require anything further at this time.
Sincerely,
Cape~to~e Developme Corp.
~~~~/'
Kent T. Cam ell
Vice President
r~THOMAS.Dl7"
fi00 LuCkie Drive • Suite a2a • Birmingh¢m, AL 35223 • {205} $7t •0020 • FAX {205} 871-1 a66
205-E71-1465 CAPSTONE DEVELOPMENT
CAPS
CAPSTONE DEVELOPMENT CORP.
800 Luckio Drive
Sulte a24
Birmingham. Alabama 35223
Volce: (205) 871.0020
.fax. (205) 871•ta85
357 P01 DEC 17 '96 11:52
Tfie information conmined in this ttnnsritlssion is oonfident]al, and is intended as a privaia communication between the sender and receiver Hamad below.
If thore are any problems with roceipt of this transmiasion,,pl®asQ ca11 the vofc® number listed above. _____
TO: IV 4~'1~ ~ ~ ~ ~i~ ~b ~
~L 4 r! tJ } t14 ~ J f 510 ~
FAX#: ~zl o`~~ 7~~ - ~ ~ 9 G
FROM: ~~ ~ CkM,~~~cc.
DATE: t ~~! ~ 7
R~; il~„r~+~s+-r-y ~o~.iMonfs ~~'~~ts~ 7~
MESSAGE: bare, ut= ,
.~ rr~ G ~ ~ P t5 qT~ ~. ;~„rg"~r~ op ~ a-t;. nl? UV ~. t~ ~s c~~s 7ED ~ ®>e r 4 r~t~
~GJ ¢OLLUu1 T5 `{ ,EirlL ~ A~,)N5 'IrO~L. `(OII~ 1~ELr~,
Number of peg®s contain®d in this transmission L~ }
~~~~~
~~~ ~~~ ~-
:`• ~ ~a CITY OF C~L~LE~E STATIOI`I
October 24, 1996
Mr. James L. Goodson
Capstone Development Corporation
600 Luckie Drive Suite 424
Birmingham, Alabama 35223
RE: Landscape Concerns on Phase 1 of University Commons
Dear Mr. Goodson:
The Design Review Board met today to review the newest phase of University Commons. The
Board met on-site to make its review. During discussion the Board expressed concerned about
the condition of the landscaping on the site of the original phase. The Design Review Board
was initially going to tie this issue to the certificates of occupancy for this newest phase. Instead
they voted to handle this matter through the normal code enforcement process which allows 45
days for the replacement of dead material
There are several areas on the existing site of Phase 1 where it appears that dead shrubs were
removed. New shrubs should be put in their place in accordance with the originally approved
landscape plan. There are also several trees that have died. Many of these were species that
do not do well in this area.. You should consider changing species to ones that will survive and
cause you less of a maintenance headache. There is also an area where grass is not being
mowed and maintained. This is around the large tree that was preserved near the creek.
The City will need a revised landscape plan. or a letter documenting any changes in plant
material. If you need any help in determining appropriate plant materials please do not hesitate
to call. We will be glad to help. There are several staff members in Parks and Planning who are
very knowledgeable about local trees and shrubs. Please see that these replacements are made
within 45 days of this letter.
We appreciate your cooperation in keeping College Station and your project site as attractive
and well maintained as possible. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Jane R. Kee, AICP
~~ity Planner
cc: File
Kent Campbell, Capstone Development Corporation
600 Luckie Drive Suite 424
Birmingham, Alabama 3:5223
~~
1.0/15/; TUF 11:38 FAX 692.5189 BASHr1,R~HA$ @JQQ2
Ft20M ; ~~ROP~ PHONE N0. Oct. 15 1996 11:24Art P2
r ~~ ~~~~~~ ~~
BOO W'~tt ~lrchi~~CCtura~ F~oodl~8ht
.~~'~~,
~dll ~~~= r,yr~, 0
.:~,
~' ~ ),. ~ 3
r~ ;~
`~.~ ' '' ' `, '' r
~~,•~
~'~ zr. ~ , ~., ,~
r
x ~^ „+~,
~} ;~ 1klr rr l~ d ~ rpl tn: {v(,'-:;L ;,~'~1''~1y, 1
~..}~.~•~_\'Jy~A 4,,~M.~~~ i~h ~ ~~ s.re , lo~TJ{.~~1°",;1:)~f' -f~_ •I
`} N / V~.~
r (i t
'~ PI '
i e 7 .~.
L..
yI r /~~~' a ,J'1
..r ; ~~ w~`YV py,
~y~ oytT ,?~ ~ u
', nx.• ~.. .~~' ~.t~ ~'_"''.YS>r3.J:'r4d~n..r.. 1°•, yr~R1 ~~y{~~-' y`:~, •~}I~.
~~
O( 15-1996 1152 FROM DEMAREST ARCH. 2147485060 TO
FROM Mi*'~I'ROPL_EX PHONE N0.
CAPSTONE DEV P.82
ps;t. I5 ~9'~6 II:23AM P1
-
H1GN .,T
a0p ~
WID7<
tat H rs 133v
7 z'7 - _
77-aaan.l2
77-a224•!a
2.8
2,9
77•a2aa•ZZ
77•x224-22
Z a
2.4
'~
PRESSURE 2b0 w1DE 12BH:7~OV a s 7
6 x 7 77.424-t2 z.5 77.429Q•22 2.4 ~~ .
StlDtVlvl 200 WIDE l27N z l30V 7 x 7 77•dt a4-12 Z.f3 77.ataA-22 z.a. ~''3
-ot47AL
QOQ
WtOE
WInE
-132K +t 132v
t 3t k r: ! 3Zv
7 z 7
'- 71-at 2~s•t 2
7.9
77-ai 2x.22
z 4
..
nALtt)E 2S0 !4t H'x 140V 7 x 7 77-b642.12 2.5 7Y-4042-22 . • 24 r .
AnERCU a0~ W1t78 ~ 7 97-aoza•!2 2.5 77-8022-2Z 24 "~
VAPOR 2t5O VVIDf: l38H x 138v x ,
NOTES: !v ^,aclon. feat o+ rt o+ CittalD Numot~r InGlca:a~: ~aliage. nor ether Val+riglf rnOAlly I~lt Cigti 0>< tofiows:
~ Getalofl Numb:rr ef,nwn arQ far 120 op 4 C
Z.~ l2Ov o ~ Z08v a - 2aov 7 ss zT?Y A = n20v 3 -• Mph;-typ ! 7l3/.70812a0l2>?Y
= fsotpr used ror oo~a wtn4ipadlny. Sys, ro~une ids of "Condhion; eF 3aia" pz4ye fdr explAnat;e!+.
Y Uvl+phttnq -- teatorv must bs nvtiiiQtt It lls:uru arc to bt aimed above ho~aor,rl since spcudl rtsracl+in,n4 is roquit~d.
• Photeastli •nd fusing srn avallsbis, Canwtrsoles r4arsanntatwe or factory.
SPECIFICATIONS:
1Nloucing - Thi: Se•.riett 77 iS conmtructed Of h88vY ila9e high
strength aftJmintrrri hOtirrC weldCt~ for maxirr'1um rigidity.,Joints
arts saatetl with eF~oxy cement tbe' weather tight perfprmanct-
F•louEingeBfiniahkd in b8ked Anarngl, Standard c0iors 2r0 b~a~k-
bronte. and white, OShCr Colors erg availablQ upon rBfjUCZt.
dpticsf Assembly-A dlts fOrmod CoitzBk rpiiacror with Com-
pou~+d curves Drot>luces the I.E.S_ beam pattern ahpwn ;r1 the
catalog fnbla~. Easv ~eccea8 tFit1 optical rompsrtment gaihed
,;hraugh a h~ngvd extrudbd aluminum door assembly. Clear
tt:mpa*::d heat re3iatCnt ler+s ix seeicd to frdtTlo snd silicone
gaYktz'ted to t+ousinQ_
6aliosi Cvmpartmen[- Neavv Sasae dit formed 9tftet hrgckrzt
in8iCl0 ballast compartment acts a4 Beth bgliast mounting
~+• 1 r" ,
1
~.. ~ , .
~>ti~ .. , r
+I.UMIgUW
trOtrylNd
wu[
Act[SS
t`OV[R O
'
.otr rirse~ houwrwG
bracket ~ndtixture support, The ballastcampsRment is acces-
sibltt foc maintenance by t>llening tltq h=nQod door ~tnCi I'emOv
inR Lht alulttir~um (livid@r fJan81.
MOU~LinS •~ Two stylsa are available:
111. an adjt,atable ca9: Hluminvm polefitttr provides concealed
wiring from tenon to }uminaire, Flnist+@d to match fiztur@. this
fittrZr is tlesiHrtcd for cKr~on mounting to 2" pipe {2 2t/f3'• O.D.j or
2 l!2" pipe (2 7!$" D,D.}.
(Zy ya Qglvanized steQ1 trunnion i4 also av9ilttF)lg with acceaat3rie8
for cross arm or welt mounting.
4oaQaaorf•s - Visara, shicihs. wall brackets anv'1 crass a-m
bracFtsis arc $vail~bls and must be orrigre[! separately with
the fixturCE_
_ e'r<.r`av`~Dt33.t.tN1E~DiMEN~IU~ _,
.. r.. v ': ~ t + .'•4 *" ~ 1 ~ y" ~ '~ } POISiCAR>fONATF :. / '. Nflll;t; Mt{tSi ' ~
:•i ~~` $~-~`'•' HINOEd ~• c ,•r, ,, t)+IIffLO $UARD _
r . ~ •'r g"• '• '
~.'. i P ~ .,.nxrva&'MouHT+Nd vtwi [ `reo.~' `;~. ' •• :Ciz lie. • •
~.;~ _ +•
~`~(i Na.. V•4A
r .. ~.~
~~~ g,•.~
r
~T
:•~ Ii ~...::~
' ~RGiRACYOR
.. - Y1tUr1b10N PG+tb ri7T9N •
ISLIT92" OR 2N"•~iPG}
••'-~ WALL
•s1wACKFT ~ •
.:. ZyIUNN+Qnr pApuNTiN6 OrfYa006 04a•BOOD
AO~VisAtrU[ ~" ,•
r
DesCrlpLatDn
SQ 1413 ca9LE
~' It. IonQ Caf,,,1J~
..~
pOpT~AHDL?i8 PHaTOME~RfCB
v
1
i
s
rborOANti~es
-,
trCCONvER81~NCNART '
MYG. „T, FACTOR
~ 1'ti
~~ f.ee ~!
f so I o.s6 1 ; ~~
Ti1~fn hoMyt OhiRt Ya b• Ilnltb meu~tOd
on 30r E'otc. All un1D [lmcd 30' t>e~^!
RorfionYM1. TO aomcn tI+A boru^ chaff to
Mtp. tti;Ql+t dth^. 1>MA'if0•+M4iND1Y ~~-.
Vafue~ by f[atpr for ~hR MLp. Ho141,t..
77-at 4a.12 400 wA'tT' ME7pt }{Allbti
77-5?1ia-~ 2 ~40D WA-rT HIGy vRESSUR;; Soolulvl
.,
y'
From: Natalie Thomas
To: svolk
Date: 10/10/96 3:13pm
Subject: University Commons
The original dedication of Brentwood Park was 7.69 acres which covered 1023 dwelling units. To date, only 838 dwelling units have been constructed
leaving 185 units to be developed without having to pay the parkland dedication fee. rm not sure how many units are proposed for phase 3; however, they
can buildup to 185 units without paying parkland. Each unit over 185 will have to pay the $225 .per unit.
CC: jkee
1
~ r
From: Natalie Thomas
To: GSCHROEDER
Date: 10/10/96 2:39pm
Subject: Parkland dedication
In 1994, when'the University Commons apartments developed within the Eastmark II Subdivision, it was determined that the required parkland dedication
was taken care of at the original platting of phases I and II of the Eastmark Sub. Therefore, University Commons did not have to pay the parkland fee.
University Contimons is in the process of adding a third phase to their development at the end of Colgate. They would like to know as soon as possible if the
parkland dedia-ation fee will be required with this third phase. I looked in our files and we do not have any figures on which the original parkland dedication
was based. Do you know how many more units can be developed in this subdivision without paying parkland? (I think there were many units left that could
be built within that subdivision without parkland, but that was two years ago and I can't remember.)
Please let me know what you fmd out. Thanks
From: Natalie Thomas
To: SVOLK
Date: 7/15/96 2:29pm
Subject: University Commons -Reply
Yes we met with him and Greg Taggart to review the conceptual plan they submitted. Nothing really came out of it except that David Brochu wanted them
to take a closer look at their plant material. and-irrigation system for this next phase. The plan was so conceptual and everyone agreed that they could
continue to what they did in the first phase:
»> Shirley Volk 07/15/96 01:26pm »>
Did you have a predevelopmentmeeting with Kent Campbell about their next phase while I was out? Tremember talking to him several times, and helping
to set up a meeting, but i DON'T remember when the meeting was, and since it's not on my calendar, Pm assuming it was last week while I was out! -
May 21, 1996
Mr. Kent Campbell
Capstone Development Corporation
600 Luckie Drive
Birmingham, AL 35223
RE: Extension of Colgate Drive to S.H.6 Frontage Road
Dear Mr. Campbell:
The College Station .City Council made a determination. in the month of April, 1996, that alternatives
exist which will allow Colgate Drive to be extended in the future without impacting Lots 13R, 14R, or
15R-1, Block B Eastmark Phase II subdivision.
If we can be of additional help, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Yours very truly,
Edwin N. Hard, AICP
Transportation Planner
cc: File
,.~. -...~ ~r ~ ..r ., ,:
,, ~{ k . :
x~ `r i~ S R 1 ~ -~.
5 i '~fi ..~
Y .. k
^ Hike & Bike Trail
The Hike and Bike Trail is one of the maximum longitudinal slope of 5%
broom finish
most important elements in the park; reinforced concrete
it links together sections of the park, ..• I~ . ~ ~ :, ~~
provides access for park maintenan- '
ce vehicles, and is the primary mea-
to'-o'
ns of moving people along Wolf Pen 1-~
Creek. The trail must also be durable
and able to withstand flooding conditions. Concrete .provides a surface which will withstand the
traffic and flooding conditions whereas other materials, such as cinders, pavers, or stone create
maintenance problems for the City.
Bollards
Park bollards will guide and direct vehicular and pedestrian traffic in the Wolf Pen Area and link
various sections of the park together. The bollards should be clean and simple in design and
easy to reproduce because of the proposed development schedule for Wolf Pen Creek.
smooth precast
concrete bollard
51
__ _ -
/ typical / d
bollard
C7
Z
•
U
9 ~ a v
e
~ ~ O
O O
'et O
2 ' ~
~ ~ Z N
Z O p
~ • ~ W fA
~ ~ z ' i? a F-
$ a o ,,, 3 Z
N J
~ ~ _ U9 Cn 2
m N Q ~ h- '7
a O
~ ~ m Z
~n Z w N ~ ~ O
J - O 3 ~ ~ ~
V ~ ~ ~ -.
~I
.:, ~.,.., o ~ ~ a
Cn w a a
CD X
• ~ ~Q ~ m W
W ~ ~ ~
w F-
O
O
a _
m • Q ~ x N
°> o ~
'" Z Z W
c c ~
O L ~ Q ~ z
N o ~ ~ ~ Z O
~ W ac
~ W = V
~ Z ~ . N lit
m W ~ - ~
.. U o ~ z J
o Q ~ Q
m ~ ° !! ~ U
~ ~ }a-
H
.. •
=co
1
4!
F-
W
V
Z
O
V
N
0
0
0
W
z
V _
a ~"
N °~
W
o°
z_
f- ~
O N
--~-
J
O
O
F-
~. . ,
~_
O
O
O
t-
VT7T '~
EASEMENT INFORMATION SHEET
(To be Riled in and submitted'with construction plans and specfications Por preliminary review)
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION
EXT.
REQUESTED BY:
(City Department and Name of Person to Contact)
ACCOUNT NO. PROJECT NO.
(For ordering title work, appraisals, etc.)
TYPE OF EASEMENT:
_ Public utilities _ Electric line _, Water line
_ Sprinkler VaulUFire Hydrant _ Sanitary Sewer Line _, Drainage
_ Temporary Blanket Electric Lines _ Temporary Blanket Utilities ,_, Access
(pdor to buAding pem>R)
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS`.
REVIEW AND APPROVAL REQUIRED/GIVEN BY THE FOLLOWING DEPARTMENTS:
Approval Required By: Electric Approval Given By: _ Electric
Water/WW (pleaseiniRal) ____,WaterMlW
Cityfngineer _ City Engineer
APPLICANT INFORMATION
PROPERTY OWNER{S):
(Names must be exacHy as they appear on the deed}
ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER:
ALL
(Names and Addresses)
IF OWNER IS A CORPORATION, PARTNERSHIP, OR JOINT VENTURE:
State of Incorporation/Registration
LEGAL DEPARTMENT MUST BE PROVIDED WITH THE FOLLOWING:
1. For unplatted property, a signed, sealed and dated metes and bounds description and a diagram of the property
showing the location of the easement.
2. For platted property, a copy of tof a recent deedtor title comm tment show ng the names of the grantors/owners
3. For blanket easements, a copy
and a description of the property. The Legal Department is required to obtain either a title report or title commitment on all of er
easements.
4. Corporate or partnership owners must furnish a copy of a corporate resolution or other proof of authority to sign on
behalf of the corporation, partnership, or joint venture.
5. Name, address and phone number of person who is to receive the easement and be responsible for getting it
executed.
2. Partners' Names (if applicable)
3. Person Authorized to Sign
(Name and True)
Any land acquisition resulting from Capita! Improvement Projects
requires a meeting between the City Aftorney and the Project Manager.
I &'.
S ~
0 9 2 4 FEET
~ t ~ _
~ ~ t _ :.~ ~~ ~ 7'
~ I ~~" ,F`
~` x'10" 4 10' R'ID~, LO'~i •--~6 ~`
it I ~ ~ ~~ F~LOti' CiL~~'~F.L I
Ii ,i•:(_ '~ ~ ~ 2°rc 5LOF1,; ~ ~ 10°k SLOE'E
A"". , ~ i ~ ~ ~ _.~., T- -- -- -- --4~ E t
~~ ~ ~..
J (~ '
'' ! s ~- - ~ ~~ ~ ~~
...~' ~~ F~~ Area TRAIL/ TRICKI;E CII~NNI:L CROSS-SECTION
'r ''
i )J u
~' (\ _ ~°
~~ ~
a ,
~ ~, ~ x _J
l J 6 t
'fir ~ ~~~ ` ~I~ i -~ ~ l ~ ~~~g
~' ~ V
v ~ ~ ~.._ns-sa-.-~,~ti._ ..~= -----, c q
j
_ , ~ ~ '~ t u
tf ~
_~ ..4 ~ N -
yy ~~ ~
a
e~~ `' a ~~
L
'~
!' ~'
d®~o PRO,JECT LOCATION
,.~ C~~ST~~~
__ ___-_
_ October 15, 1996
City of College Station
Development Services
Attn:. Shirley Volk
P.O. 'BoY 9960
College Station, Texas 77842-9960
RE: Site Plan Review Application
University Commons Apartments, Phase II
Dear Ms. Volk:
~~ Referring to the City of College Station's Zoning Ordinance under the District Wolf Pen
Creek Development Corridor, the items below have been outlined in the "Developrrient of
Properties in the Corridor" section, page 7-32 as items that need to be addressed. :Our
' intent is to match, for the most part, our existing.P~h~ase I project.
Lighting: Please refer to enclosed product information on both the site
parking lot lighting and courtyard lighting.
Garbage: There are on site garbage collection points ixidicated on the site
~~ plan that are screened. Garbage is collected from the site two times a week.
Utility Service: Please refer to enclosed civil engineering plan by MDG.
i ~~ _ Relationshi Please refer to enclosed lan.
I. p= p
p
~. Attractive landscape: Please refer to enclosed landscape plan and enclosed plant
i ~ material list.
Park Access: Please refer to site plan.
Building Design: Building design and materials will be consistent with existing
~Tniversity Commons buildings that were constructed in Phase I. Please refer to enclosed
photographs to show typical building design and building details.
Materials: See "Building Design" above.
600 L.uckie Drive ~ S~~ite 424 a Birmingham, f~L 35223 ~ (205) 877 -0020 e FAX (2fj5) 871-1465
http://www.capstone-dev.corn
City~ofCollege Station
Site, ~~~ew Plan Application
October 15, 1996
Page Two
~ Colors: The colors used in Phase II will be a match Qf existing colors used ~,
in Phase I of the Uiuversity Commons College Station complex. Phease refer to ezclosed'.
photographs.
~,andscaping: Please refer to the enclosed landscape plan and list~of plant
material.
Signs: There will be no additional complex identification added. The
only signage that will be added will be iuiit identification and traff csignage_that v~ill be
consistent with Phase I in scale, proportion, graphics and color.
We have also addressed items on the "Minimum Requirements for Site Plan Proposals"`
checklist and believe all details have been included or addressed.
For Item 15:- Please refer to the program table included..
i
I'or Item 16: The density of dwelling units per acre, 120 units divided by the total
~ acreage of 8.666 = 13.85 dwelling units per acre.
Please contact me or Kent Campbell with any questions or for any additional information.
We will be glad to provide the City of College Station anything that is needed. Thank
'i you for your help.
Sincerely,
m nt Cor .
~ , . Capstone Deg elop e p
' CGS ~~i~f(~ ~,.~~
~.
Elizabeth Wetzel
Enclosures
i ,
I
CAPSTONE
E T
~'ROGR~M
MK DESCRIPTION NO SQ F TOTALS
B-I 2 BEDROOti1-2 BATH 80 790 63200
Ng-1 2 BDR!~1.-NC ADAPT 40 790 31600
TOTALS l?O 94800
ANCILLARY" BUILDINGS
COMMUNiTI" BLDG.
STORAGE BUILDING
TOTAL CONST~?UCTION AREA 94800
PARKING REQUIRED®2 PER BDRM. 240
PARKING PROVIDED 302
HANDICAPPED PARKING- REQUIRED ('_'~~ b
HANDICAPPED PARKING PROVIDED
`JL mYT.i1~'Y VV11LJ~31~S1~-1 vir~i~i'I V1Ai ~ TY'\TVSr.JF ~JTL>M i~'a1~.,Ia uLUI Vt_V LkL TTd~SLtT W6`1~4L
TaTaT~RT~~T-~aV nr~mnT~T,T3 ~~ ~u~~ ~n.rre~ nati
YTL'LLY JJL.YSlt11q VVI VJILL4 LYV' a/JY 1Vn VV 211•la
!'!YPT: !•nvTiRRdI; ATTC~
lS 11'J v 1•sl•l1:Ylq 11~
x~ii iT~u- DLniYV - ~LAri iT L~'11~4r~ii lY vv~ilu`aviti r~i ~iinr~i.~'u~ i i j LDL~~uv Sii r~'.li1~i i*iiv ii iii-'
I,.'~lY(fT r V >lT;'~,7ET nDA+TTi AT'IY nRT Ln''I'e.Y i `ZA 'f A77~ ~~ijll I UA P RT nru
1111J1 L/.LL LV11'1111Y VLY V k! 1V14' 1'Il ~ L 4 1JLVVLL
R nT;• ~~~ T+hc"mABAr)~ DTInC°~+.' T1' C'TTTTTITiTTC'TnTeT Tr'T'Ifli TAT
1J Vyyl ~1 1/L"1A1 AA1TT1•11114 11 L1V l1 fJV AL77L1 Y AIJ 1~~++V lyyv~~ V R1J ~1~1Y
vYCiv L",CPEN ni`iU 1uV LYLlT1~.1 .IrJLIlA~\~.A viiV iri L~.1 lftv L`nZi~ TiiE i1~rTiTiuio-
viv\i~ICyi iYV vi Dunu i-l~i~Iu~ ni°v Pi vvLunT.r'u lri~iei vl. e av-3vu j
111E I~lJ VT J~'J.~JV 1Dli14%VP~L,Y L~la4 i1.3 i4.~~~11D~-/lAY 1~JI LLL~' £x./14 LTL4V ~TILIIRY ~.7 Rl~tl if
Dr nrjx~r_ rnpJnTTTm mn T,,~r~u T~TTI~TSTTeTf° nr ~n pTrr r un~~c Tiny
1 Ll'LV lY V V V V 1 1 1 V L V31 UV 5111\ V Y 1'1 L' V V AJ 1J 1JVLL V 1`S11
T3 T' nEnriTpT,n ~`TE rnAT au,~Tp~ muT, QnTJTT~' mpunTru T?TT~.T ~r~~mprrnr
Ll,l~LL Y{`.V 1141lL s YS LJ1'11Y Vdl i4 11d.L1 kl AS`1L 1 4111Y VSl 7 /1 1 1 I.JL 1 41 Vl"1L
GTl j, yy yjTL~4ul~,~U'y4 1~./LiDlnf.t4tn1r1I V1RYY 1~.7r11~'~ P9TI LL l~la4V YT1 YL A 3.JL3P VV~1' I]I~J Y~JV V11AY1
~~ mTjT, T.I,~~Talrnr I,nvnTTm Tc ~nTUrDr~m~
,~ 11 L ,J L4 .1 St 1J 1'21 Y1 V 1 11J 1`111,,,1 L .
I>; v~T~ unv>a n~TV nrr>+n~mrnnT~ _ Dr T, ncu~ !'nT L wTi, fY'T' nniar sT ~~-~"~~`~
L' 1 1S11Yli Y1 V{,V 1L 11 VtYV 1LLR li Vt111 t`11J lZ ZVV V!d ILV
mH1zR.KS, L"~TER~E nuIN - uTu
~.!
~' CITY OF COLLAGE STATIOI`I
Pang C3fftce Box 9960 1 fl01 Texas tlrrenue
College StatEon, T~xa§ 77842-9960
(409}.764-3500
October 14, 1996
Mr. Pauf Clarke
Clarke & Wyndham
3608 E. 29th Street
Bryan, TX 77802
Dear Mr. Clarke:
t am responding to your request to Jane. Kee for a letter addressing parkland
dedication requirements for the next phase of the University Commons
apartment complex. A search of our records indicates that the original
dedication of Brentwood Park of 7.69 acres covered 1023 dwelling units. Only
838 dwelling units have been constructed to date, leaving 185 units to be
developed without additional parkland dedication fees. A parkland dedication
fee of $225.00 for all'.. dwelling units over 185 will be required.
If you have any other questions, please contact Jane or me.
Yours very truly,
Shirley J. V
Development Coordinator
"3c~~~ ~a~ "~ ~.xas ~~~~ ~.lrxiv~:r~.§1~
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kent,Campbell, CapstoneDevelopment
FROM: Natalie Thomas, Planning Technicia
DATE:. October 28, 1996
RE: Questions concerning the IDesign Review Report dated October 25, 1996.
In response to your questions that we discussed earlier today by telephone, I have put together this memo
to help clarify the following items:
(1) The vehicular/pedestrian access at the .end of .the Eastmark Drive cul-de-sac.
The accessway should be contained in a "public access" easement. The existing 20' utility
easement could. be dedicated as a "public access and utility" easement. Upon acceptance of
the accessway, the .City will. be responsible for maintenance of the. paved section..
This accessway should be .constructed from the. existing Eastmark Drive to the minimum
reservation line of Wolf Pen Creek.
Removable bollards should be installed at the end of the paved section until the minimum
reservation area is developed and the accessway is extended. (See the attached bollard
information that is copied from page 51 of the. Wolf Pen Creek Master Plan.)
_ There is not a formally adopted pavement "standard" for vehicular/pedestrian accessways
on private property. However, there are. many sources that we use for. guidelines including
the Subdivision Regulations, Wolf Pen Creek Master Plan and Standard Street
Specifications..' We encourage you to .submit any innovative design criteria or alternate
standards that you would like for us to consider. The following criteria is compiled from
the various sources:
_ In order to provide a combination vehicular and pedestrian. accessway,. the pavement
section hould be at least 10' to 12' in v~~idth.
The accessway must be durable and able to withstand .maintenance vehicles.."Concrete
provides a -surface which will.: withstand the. traiTic and flooding conditions whereas
other materials, such as cinders, pavers, or stone. create maintenance problems." (Wolf
Pen Creek Master Plan, page 51)
_ The City does have.. a "center drain alley section" (see attached) that is designed to
handle maintenance traffic. This design. standard is a minimum. 6" pavement section
with #4 bars on 18" centers both ways. This section. has a "V" in the middle to also
drain the alley which will probably not be used at this location. This standard can be
used as a guide. for pavement thickness and reinforcement.
_ Staff is also willing to work with you on developing a standard if there is a drainage
design problem that needs to be addressed. At a .recent site visit, staff noticed that
some erosion has occurred in he area where the accessway is to be constructed. It is
difficult to tell if there is a problem at this location without the completed drainage
report; however, ..staff will work with you on any innovative design solution you want
to submit. (For example, I have included a "traiUtrickle channel. cross-section from a
project in Tulsa, Oklahoma that you may find helpful.)
(2) Delaying the construction of the vehicular/pedestrian access. Staff discussed the .possibility
of delaying the .construction of this accessway through the posting of a bond or letter of credit
until the City develops the creek area. It was determined hat the vehicular access to the
creek should be installed with this phase. Since there will be such a large portion of the creek
in this area that will be maintained by the City and because there: will. be more drainage
structures built to the. creek, the City. will need access to that property for. maintenance
immediately. If flooding occurs. or there are problems with the existing or proposed outfall
structures, the Cityhas no way to get equipment into the creek area without this access.
(3) The dedication of the creek and minimum .reservation area.. to the City. .Please refer to the
attached "Easement Information Sheet" for the requirements.. The. completed form and
requested information will be required for the dedication area and the public access easement.
The City's legal department will prepare .the. necessary documentation once the information
for both,dedications is received. The dedication of the minimum reservation area must occur
prior to issuance of a building permit. The dedication of the access easement must occur prior
to issuance of a .certificate of occupancy.
(4) Additional, parking lot screening required in the .Design Review .Board Report.. Please refer
to the attached copy of the site plan that shows the additional screening of the parking lot near
the most southerly driveway along Eastmark Drive.
(5) Landscaping flan Revisions. You requested .that changes to the landscape plan be submitted
in written form instead of changing the. submitted plan. Submitting this information in writing
without revising the plan is acceptable as long as all of the items outlined in the report are
addressed.
I hope this memo helps clarify the. report you received by fax earlier this. morning. If you still have
questions or need additional information, always feel free to call me at (409) 764-3570 or by a-mail
(nthomas@ci.college-station.tx.us). Thank you.
cc: file
Crreg Taggart,lVIDG
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
('
FROM: Sabine NI°Cully, Semor Planner
i
DATE:. Halloween, 1996
~~
RE: University Commons Phase II
This project is for the expansion of the University Commons apartment complex located in
the WPC corridor at the .intersection of Eastmark and Colgate. The plan submitted is for
an additional 120 apartment units. to cover 8.6 acres.
I
The Planning and Zoning Commission has ultimate approval authority of all plans in the
I' corridor. In order to approve a WPC project, the Commission must find that the
following goals have been achieved:
Minimum ordinance standards
Logic of design
Harmonious and compatible materials and architecture
Adequate provisions for circulation -vehicular and pedestrian and for space
utilization
East of maintenance
The Design Review Board. reviewed the proposal on October 25 with the previous
standards in mind. The new phase will match the existing. phase in terms of architecture
and colors. 'The Board found that in general, the proposal met the intent of the district.
The Board recommended specifically that approval of the site plan be conditioned upon
the several changes to the. site plan. These are listed in the.attached DRB report.. Some of
the requirements have been further clarified in the memorandum from Natalie Thomas
dated October 28, 1996.
Staff recommends approval with all DRB conditions.
University Commons
Building Exterior
~~~,
-:~~;~~
~--s
college STation, Texas overhead
i
S
~^
w I~
M
00
0
~ ~~
~.
'~ ~
r„'
cn
O ~ ~ w '~ ,~ o
~ -~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ bo
~
~
~
~
~ ~,
~
~,
~ ~c ,
~ W ~
~ o ~ U
~ ~
~
M
~, ,
b
O
0
~
~
° ~
~ ~ o -~
~
~
~ o o ~ x
~
cn
W ~ ~ a
~ ~~.~~' ~'~ ~"0 3
~ ~.~~~ ~-
~ ~
~~ ~~
z ~
o-~o_ ~~
~
H °~so~~a°~oo~ a
z
~ T
z
q
z
M
Z
~i
I r
~ i Z
N
Z i
o ~O
~ O
O
~ O
r
r
Z !~ Z
.n
co
' a~ O C p.. v~ rn ~ ~, rr ~ ~ ~ o~ ~,
rt (P rt
° ~ ~ n o ~, ~ o ~, ~ ~ ~ gip' ~c C7 °~ ~ w ~ ~ C/~
~ ~ ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~s o ~ ~ ~¢~o ~
~ °c~'~ ~ own°~°o~~ ~ off.°~~~rt ~
'~ ~, ~, ~~ O ~ Cr1 _~ ~ rt _~ ~ ~, ~ ~ O C ~ O
~ ~ A~
Vi ,..t Q.+ ~, ¢ ~ ¢,,
lJl
m m
N ~
~, 1.
~;,
m
m
m
0 0
m m
~ ~
m
J
m
N
M
0
Zo
'~ O ~
Drip '~ U ~ ~ ~ '~ ~---~
~ ~ ~ ~ sue..-O ,~ O ~ ~ ~ bA "~«y;~t
0 A U ~ 'tj '~
' ~ O ~ cd
CSC ~D
S ~
~
,
~
~ ~ ~
~ U
~
~
y ~
~ ~ ~
~ N
O ~
N ~-+' O ,~ s
''
~
~i ,
~ `~ U "d OU N ~ ,~ ~ 'J w O
~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ "O ~ U •~ ~ ~
,-[ p~ ~ ~ ,-~ ~
~ ~ ~ O
'
O
a
~ j
~
r±
~
C
d
•O ~" ~ U O ~ ~d
~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~+ vii "~ ~ N ~
a
O "
~
"'
' ~ Q U
~ c
d O
O
F'' c
C O
d P-a
~°
a
r 3
3
ch
°' 3
M
3
T
N ~
?! o
~JL _ I ~ T
3
3 ~
20
O
N
N
A
r
m
0
N
N
A
w
y ~ ~N~ N
n L Q
}~- N ~ W
IFF --„II a -
z
~ ~w
N N_
W
z N Itw ~
~ ~ o.
c:, ~ r"
- n ~W
N
~, -
Z N CT
n
~~~ ~
~ ~
N
r
N ~ N
N
a A
O
N
N F~+.
~_ ~ ~ ~
_ ~~-+~
Z- ~~w rP
m
~ ~ ~ w p~
O A
A
w ~ r ~~
~ G7 w
_ c v <'.'-
~m A
~``' ~
~ ~ w
w o , '~
O ,~ W 1 N ~
o n 111
T rr i
T ~5 N
O 1
~1
N „y W yI
O Q~
N
r
.Ni ~ o~ j~ o ~"
a N ~~~~
N
V
V --{
o
~~
-y.
~1 ~
e
~ N
~V
W
A ~/
rt
. C
~
~
~ ~
` ~ ~
~
~"'~ ~
'~ ~ $v ~
~
rt n
~ UCl Vl ~
O ~, .~
~
~ O ~ F'f
rt ~.'
' ~, O O
rt O ~ ~' ~
"
C7 ~' ~ .~ 'rT i
~ v "
~ ,~ OQ U'
n "~
O ~
~ ~ ~
~ 0
rt ~
~ >S O rn ~
n ~
O
~.-e
r.-~
~+ ~
~ ~ r
:n ~
~ "~'1'~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~"S ~
n ~ n n
~ CD ~• ¢:
'
r-t (
~
~ ~; ~ o
-
~ Q n
~c ~ o o ~'
~ '~ ~
~' ~ .
~, ~ • n
~ aca ~
~ ~ rt
~( ~ ~. ~ ~ rt ~
~
rt
~
C/ ~
~ ~
O ~ IT+
1~
"'t O O
~+ ~ C ~ ~ rt ~
~ ~~
~ ~ O
0
~
rt ~ h
O ~ ~
Q 1'Y
O.+ ~
CD ~ ~ rD y.~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~+
~ ~ ~ ~
~+ ~ (n
.~ C~ CD O rt ~
CD W W .~ ~ .~' n L3' CD
O O~ ~
W
O C+ ry
~` CD O
rt ~ ~- O '~
cn
O
- O P~ ~-' n
~-s ~- 0 U4
'~' C~ ~ O
r
~ ~
O`! ,
~'h C ~ ~ rt rt
W
~ r, Cp
O ~ ~ ~
N
~ O C~ .C
~ n rt, "t
v
, o ~ ~ rn o
. ~
~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~o
= ~
o m ~ ~~''~
'~
~ ~~~
~` ~
~~°
~
° ~
o ~ °'o ay
O
p
w ~ ~ ~.'ts ~.
~ .
~-.
~ ~
~
Y
~
~c
~'
'
~ O rt
~ ~. ~' w
~
~
~ p, ,~ ~
r~ O rn
O ,-~
~~ rt ~O
O .
~ n
.~
~ O ~- Aa
-'!
~ O ~ ~
(~ n rt
~
O QQ ~ ~ ~
~ rt
~ ~ G ~
~ ~ rt O
~ N
~ O~ ~~ W
~ O
~ ~ ~ ~
O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q
~
~ ~ ~ ~ .
~
O . ~
~
~ ~ o ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~o ~ ~ ~ 0 0
~ ~ ~ „~,trt-~ ~ ~ ~ Q C7 C7 rt ~, ,.~.~ ~-, rrt-r ¢ ~ ~, ~ cn, ~ ~ rt 0'Q CD
'Y ~ ~ O ~ A~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ CD 0'Q ~ cn ~ ~ P\
0 0 O C~ t"3 ,--r O „'t O ~' \ 1
•+, ,-h ~ ~ ,_, ,..t cn "'~ N ~ CD n Cp W 0 ~ "~ CD (D G `C
~ ~ :~ ~ ~ p ~ O n P] C1. ~ ~ O cn "'~ c~-r O `n • 0~Q v' ~ ~ ~ (~ ~ I~
~ .n~-~ ~ ~ ~ (D ~ ~Q.,, ~ ~ ~ ~" ~ O(De rt ,rte, ~ ~- 1"P
~ ~' ~"' rti ~ V~ CD
Q7 Rjh't~ N ~-h W ~ CD "~ W r P~ ~ ^' i--~ f'1 O '~ ~+ C1. ~ rt cn ~ .-.
~ ~ O ~ (p rt ~ Q ~ 't3 N ~ O ~ CD n ~ ~ ,.~.t ~ c~i~ ~ N G ~Q n N ~ l~l
Sy CD ~ "'t cn rt (~ rt (~ ~ PD ~ cn O O '~ ~ ~ CD ~ A~ l7
~ A~ ~ ~ O rt ~ ~ ~_ N CD ~ ~ n n CD 0 O O ~ cn C1 ~' c~i> ,~ l~
1" r
O P1 'C CD CD f7 C7 W P) ~ ~ cn rt '_' Q., ~ H ~ ~ ~'
~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ C n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rt ~ ~ V ~ ~ ~
rt^^
~ i-~-+
1
io
u
a
A
. O
.~
A
(+') r
II N
Q II
a
"~ ~ 1
II N
II T
a
N
N d.
~
~ " C
(0 N
~ ~
a y N
~
c_ 0
-O
~ ~ a a ~ m
U E
VJ ~
~
N
C ~ ~`
-O a N .
N E m
T fl- C
N N >
a $ m O
a ~ 3
o
m a ~
3 .
II ro
y ~ ~
ro ~~
m ~ o oro
r ~ o .N .n ~
Y `_ `~
~
~' m
cd % ~ t6 •-
r aNi rn ~
c ~
~ a a°i
>. C ~ ~'C ~~ ~ ~ "O
no ~ c
3 ~ 3 c m
v
~'ti _
U O y ¢
II c6 E ~
Oro
mmac°i
Q
¢ ~
Q.~
ar
~ ~ 1
II N
Q II
a
0
r
II
a o
N
cv v
~ ~
II ~
II
a a,
N
C7~
., , ~ I
l!7
a
Z
o
ch
a - ~ -
u' `.~ T
~ N ~ ~
G~
w °C
~a
~ J
O
J m
N
0
f M
E
O T
U
O ~
'a O
.. G
~ O
N LO
s". G
~ X
O O
V a
,~ O ,~ O N .~ ~ ' ~ N ~ ~ O U .~ '~ Q ~ O ^d O O
y O ~, cci cd ,~ U U O O N c~ G - ~ ~ s~ >~ O U ~ ~ '~
~ a~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ,' ~' .~ a~ O ~ ~ O v, U v O c~a ~ '~ ~ ~ U U ~ a
0 ~ O w O .~ ~ O O '~ ,~ ~ '~ rOr '~ ~ ~ ~ N c~ ~ r~r ~ O O O ,~ N
~;
*~ " , ~3,
~ ~ ~ O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~ ~'~
'~ U ~+ ~ _ ~
~ ~ ¢' N ~ sue. ~ ~ ~ -c6 UN sU~ ,~,' ..ti~ cC ~ `° w k~~~
~o ~~~ ~~~~'w ~~~~v~~~~ v~ ~ ~'
Cd ~ ~ >-. ro .~, d i fi gf
U ~ ~ c0 ~ p U c~ O s-i bIJ ~ U . ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i, x o , ~'''~~
'.~ ~ ~ GL ~ ~ ~ '-p O '-' ~
~ ~ ~ O rr~,
7
~~ ~
O
a
~i
rn
a
z
a3i
t >
a
v~ H
'n :.. ~ c :p ' o -.
'OaU~° °
w cC a~ s~ ~ O u O ~
_
~ '_' U
'~ ~ ~ O ~
' O ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ .~ c~
3 ,~ U
,~
o .~ ~
~--o
~ O' ~ ao ~~,
~~~U
U ~
.~ s~. o
.-~,.~ ~
0
U ~
0 ~ 0
o~3 ~
~~a~
~' ~
~o
U'~
~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ v, Q. ,..~ ~ ,.., ~ , ~
~ ~
~ ~" ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O N ~ ~ ,~ ~
p ~
Q ~ ~
'~ ~ v ~ ~ ~
v ~ ~ O ~
-'
,~ U .-tom ~'~ ~ „
~
~ O
~ p, ~ y
, ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'k '~ '~ •~ ~ ~
~ .~ ~~
am ~ ~
C ~
v
v ~
~ a
oQ
~~
U~
v~
~ ~
ow
.,b/E-bZ~
~ ~ a
I~ i r aN
~~
,FEZ
L
I r~
I ~ ~ Q
DTI
~W L I
J J
W Z ~ r
~ M Q
~ n
~ ~~
..b/l-OZ
v
~ w -L
c~JJ.
~ Q
_ I O
~WZ '°° a
~~ ~
~ ~
mT
M ~ r~
"'Na I ( z
cJi ~ ~ r
Q
r
(V
r
r
U
z
a
N
v
U
C
N
N
a°
E
J
U
U
O
N
~ O N
II II N
a ~~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ T
II II -
Q d N
iv ~~? ro m