Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Miscellaneous
~~ ~~ _. a 6.. , `~~ ~IT ~ COLLEGE ~'ATIOI`I ~~ Ec is ~ Development S vices ~~~ t ~~t ~:~~~ ~~~ d G~-6 ~ ~yh„ `~ ~~L ~!; ~~~`` ;.- ~ i ~~,,~ , ~~~ ~1 ~~ r S J~+' t ~~~//j /~f .s,,, .a ~~, r ~ ~' r I - ~' ,~~~: ~ -~ ~ ~ __I'__- ~~+ tit Vl~ j ~. ----- U -'~~` ~~ ~.~~ ~~ ~~~ CITY OF COLLEGE Plannin Division 9 7/,30 ~GLsc~ ~~L~z2~- ~" ~%~~~ h.~ STATIOI`I ~ ~ J~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~,~~"y~, ao d - z~~ `~x~- J ~~ `~T'~ "7 r°- Aur ~ rs~.. ~~tCE `~fk'..~w ~ ~~~~ ~.-~ ~, ~-~ ~~;~~ ._ - Gib -~~ G~~, ~~~~ ~ ,, ~;~,~ %'r~~ ~.-.-~-- ~--~= _ _ . ~~ ~~ ~~~ (,, ~ ~~ ; / f /j !~ ~~~ ~ r ,:~~ ' ~~l~'`,,: ,~~~~% ~j~~ ~~~ ~~/ ~~~ ~~ ~ . ~~~r~`` ~~ ~ °~` ~~~~~~ ~ may, ~,u,~-u~/ ~~~ .~-- - ~,. r~~~~~ ~~~ - l ~~~~ ~ ~/~ `~ CITY OF COLLEGE STATIOI~I ,` S Planning Division ~~~ ~~ ~ ; f~,_~ 2N'~Aw /~',+ j~21 -si<L , r ~~ ,~ e e ~~~.~- ~~.. -~' ~~~ F ~ ~~~ . ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~ C[TY OF COLLEGE STATION Planning Division G Fix ~~/,~J ~lsv ~6/l> i o,~ ~~~- ~~~ ~-,,~ N .o a~~ ~~ . ~ --~ ~~~~ ~ ~~ A.i/_ `~~ CITY OF COLLEGE ~TATIOI~I Planning Division g~~° ,r, ~ ~3 ~~~ ~ ~ • ~~~ t 3 S"a ~~/o ~ ~ ~ CITY OF CC L.L~GC~EE STATIOI`I ~ `~ Planning Division ~,cr,~ 7~ ' .~ ten/ ~~c-~-Y/ ~G~ ~~G fie. ~~ ~~ ~ °~c ~ ~ ~f .-' ~.,C ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ r~, ~- __ __ _ OLLEGE STATIOI~I Planning Division ~. ~~ ~ .~ ,~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~` ~~ { ~~ ', ~ ~~ ,~, ~ `~ ~~ s ~~ ~:~ ~~ . ~,~~ ~~,~; _. Communications _ ~!~ ~'° €' Fax- ? J '_ - __.__ _____ _-..__.___ _.. E -__ .. _-J .__.__ ___-- . __- _ ._._. .. __-_ ___.. ___ = I __.___ _____ = I ~_ 1 I E. -._______I-_.__..__________ __________--__-_______._.______-______ __..__._-___.__.._.___ _- I ! ,- _ __.__._-_-- _ _. - _ __ ._-_________________--_._.__.__-__- ____.. __ .__c 1___-...____-_ _ _ -___ -_ _ -__ _-__i. ____..__.__ _--...__-_. ___ ___.._..__ ____ _ ____.___ c o i - . ~ ~. = 1' - - _ __ __ E° -----' -------- --- _ ! - --- -- -__ - -- - -- --- F f _---- _ _. _ _ - -- _ _ _ __ _ - __ ~ - --r ._--- _ _ ITCG9 NO tli Gapy igt!t 1U~3 SoNhworll Co Wt >p eltl,MHU1U8E- N ~°~ CITY OF COLLEGE STATIOI`I Post Office Boz 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 77842-9960 {409); 7643500 July 15, 1996 Shears Companies Attn: Mr. Charles W, Shears 1325 La Concha Houston, Texas 77054 REs Proposed Lone-Star Pavilion at Tens Avenue and Lincoln Dear Mr. Shears: We look forward to working with you in order to provide a quality development for everyone. There' were several issues .addressed during a recent predevelopment meeting .that need further clarification. During the meeting, the following proposal; was presented by the developer's representative: • °The developer will pay for the cost of constructing Eisenhower from Lincolii to his driveway which has an approximate length of 200 feet. • `The developer will relocate the proposed temporary drive when Eisenhoc~~er is constructed: 'This driveway would be temporary in nature and would be constructed to asphalt paving standards, but would not be constructed as a curb and gutter section. • The developer would give: the City a bond to guarantee the relocation of the driveway and the construction of Eisenhower. This bond would be cashed and held in escrow until the. street construction occurred, at which time, the monies would be removed, • The developer requested the City to provide the necessary right~f vvay ~engineeiing documents to construct Eisenhower Str~ et. • The developer would contribute $50,000.00 to the construction of a traffic signal at the main entrance to the proposed development. The developer proposes to pay for the entire signal at the time of construction, with the City reimbursing him within two (2) years of obtaining a building permit for the first retail box. This reimbursement is for the remaining balance exceeding the participation level indicated above. e The developer will conduct a warrant study regarding the potential installation of a traffic signal at the main entrance to the development. • .The developer requested participation for the conversion of the existing open channel to an underground storm sewer The City proposes the following items to be incorporated into a potential Development Agreement: • The developer must submit a $200.00 application fee for the base charge of a development agreement. The developer must agree to pay for the cost of preparing die development agreem~;nt. • The developer must submit a site plan`at a scale of 1 inch = l00 feet. Home of Texas AEM Unjversity ~. i Mr. Charles W. Shears July 15, 1996 Lone-Star Pavilion Page 2 • Any Development Agreement would be contingent upon several items which include a performance criteria based on opening of businesses. rather than proposed activities, and the size of the development remaining at the proposed at 110,967 .square feet. • The developer will be responsible for providing a warrant study o indicate the need for the requested signal at the proposed main entrance. • To facilitate the through traffic movement on site, no head in parking will be allowed off of the main entrance drive aisle. • The proposed location of the main entrance does not benefit anyone: but this development. Therefore, City-Staff proposes to align this entrance in such a manner that the remaining portion of the 707 Center and surrounding propert es .can have access to Texas Avenue via this potentially signalized entrance. • The developer will be responsible for. the construction of the storm sewer. The City will not participate in this construction as requested by the developer. Staff researched this possibility and found that if does not meet the criteria for cost participation within our ordinance. We;will be amenable to participating in a different item. • The developer will be responsible for one-half ('/2) of the estimated costs. to obtain the right-of--way and construct Eisenhower from its current terminus to Lincoln Avenue. This responsibility must be taken care of prior to the issuance of a building permit in the form of cash. • The developer shall provide a twenty (20) foot sanitary sewer easement located in the main drive aisle: that runs north-south in front of the proposed big boxes and retail center from Lincoln to the northern property line of this development. Please contact Mr. Brett McCully, Assistant to the City Engineer, as to the possibility of granting this easement at (409)764-3660. • The developer shall close the proposed thirty-five (35) foot driveway south of the 3,600 square foot. pad site shown on the site plan as the Original Pasta Company. • The existing parking spaces along Texas Avenue are non-conforming. If these existing spaces are reconstructed, the .ordinance requirements must be met for this: non-conforming use. Streetscape requirements on Texas Avenue require live oak trees planted every sixty (60) feet on center as well as a'form of parking screening. ® It will be the developers responsibility to solicit written approval from the surrounding businesses and property owners in order to relocate the median opening currently approved as part of the Texas Avenue widening. This opening location was determined as a result of input received during several public meetings. The City could help you obtain the names-.and addresses of the individuals who participated in the public meetings and those who have had direct negotiations with. the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). Once you have obtained this approval, you can forward that along with a request for relocation to the City. The City will help. facilitate the processing through TxD'OT, however it will ultimately be the responsibility of the developer to obtain their written approval. At the present time, there are too many unknowns and too. few exchanges of requirements to warrant the need for a development agreement. ~; ~1 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 Texas Avenue South, PO Sox 9960 • College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (409)764-3.570 /Fax (409)764-3496 Date: ~june 18, 19.99 # of pages included cover: 3 Ifyou did notreceive acomplete-fax, please call our office immedlatelyforanewuansmittal. TO: Bill Wri~~ht FAX: (713) 278-942 COMPANY:. WLB Associates Inca ~, Best Buy FROM: Brid~ette George PHONE: (409)764-3570 COMPANY: Cites of College Station REMARKS: ^ Urgent ~ For your review ^ Replay ASAP ^ FYI We will be ready to issue a development .permit .when. we receive the following 1) Development Permit application; and, 2) Seven (7) copies of the ans for us to a rove. Thank you, Brid~ette _ ~.- ,.,._ ~~ .a,enn man enoa DF.VF.LOPMENT SVCS ~ 0O1 UU/10/:7.7 va.vi. ~.~-•- x::~s~ ACTIVITY REPORT ~~~ TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX N0. CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START TIME USAGE TIME PAGES RESULT 8023 917132789422PP161 06/18 09:51 O1'14 3 OK From: Kent Laza Tos JCALLAWAY, SVOLK, JKEE, VMORGAN Date: 12/19/96 4:48pm Subject: Lone Star Pavillon Well, believe it or not I thinkwe have .this. one resolved - at least until construction begins and a whole new set of problems arise. Davis Wilson and his clients have agreed to participate in construction of a parallel outfall line from the inlet at Lincoln and Foster down to Texas Ave. They will pay 50~ of the cost up to a maximum of $10,000. We are signing some letter agreements to that affect now. Give yourselves a pat on the back (and another one for Steve). CC: NTHOMAS, SHOMEYER IQr •~ '_ I (.- - I t •( ~ I {: O>> ( ( - I f E: G ~ ~ i I ~ -- •--- -1 i It ----' I 1 ------------- i ::- . t - -° ~~ ~ - - ----{ ,. . ~ ^, _. C7 ---~- - ....... aB;~vD~;v' •, --~- avD PLUG rl _ S 47 135' 29' E ~ -'~ n m ~ I ~ `~- 5/5 GO v+~ c?aSEUNE ' faT!it .. ~I A7 --___ ___=_--__-__- ~ ._-._.._.._.._.-_.. _.._.. _.. _.. _.._ o -_- - ___- - _..-.-_.. _.. - .. _. -- -.. _.. I ------ -------'---------- -- I ~ iu%r5 GF CONSTRUCTION c"aSc uE,v r I ~ a(1. CONNECriONS TO BE uaDE r0 EX1STIVG P!PES I SHaLt BE FIELD vERlF,EO ~' THE COtIrR,^LrOR r0 ~ ASSURE GRavrL/ FLG~v I CONTR;LTOR SHGOLO TAKE EXTl4EuE CARE NOT TO DauaGE EX!571xG UNDERGROUND i I UTIUrlES. REFS? TO 'S!GNaL. ;LL'JUl/Iar;Gv & UNDERGROUND UT!L,TY (~•YGUTS' ~ SHED rS FCR TYPE 4vD APPROXI,IIA± E L~,C.aT:ON. ;r IS i HE CGvrr%CTOh S RESPONSr81LI7Y 70 NO rIFY UrIL1 TY CO.uPa`//ES 'NHEN VIORKING'1N rHE:R vIGNITY. ALL /NCET STa710N5 avD OFFSETS TO °E vERtFIED IN THE FIELD BY TN.E CCNTRaC,OR ~ REFER TO ' STORu SEk'ER av0 INLET SU.uua4r• SHEET FOR TRENCH EX''AV:.r,Ox Pr',OrECrlON LOCarrONS aNq CUavrlTlES --~ n, .1 `i o,i ~ b! 'bI r~: ~ ~~ ~p ~ ~ Ni c*~' ~ tii Ni a. ~j *q til ti Vic. ¢;' ~~ ~~ DRa'N -~ - FL•318.22 J / p~ FL•3/7.39J l t FL•3R.59 ~° / ~ f FL•ST.?D / Ir !? SLOrrED ORaIN GETaL. rNLc"r a5C rG• 3X.36 T ~ !8• X 6' RCP --- ` NILET rr0: .3 h~!-~--30'RCP 5' Ezr. ,,,'_~_~ r ~, ~ i i ~ Sr'a on-95 I - - ~ ---...-_..- a3 ° 16 FL E3 ? '. LEFT OF d.L~EU.°!E ~ .'.. GR^U lD P 3 . ~F+ n '+3' ----- '. ; r~1TTcr ... ._--. - --t ..-. EXISTING ., t P,OF!LE .-_ INLET ~ NO ;;a ~ - II ---__. IORUaL ~ ~ - GR.:DF_ - 331.53 ~: ar PROPOSED GUTTE,4 Lxarl0,v D'c"XT. ~ ~ SEa 5.5.70 - I ~ FT OF BaSEUNE I -arERa~ a5a ------. _ 1 n TE,'~ cF~r ,~urrER P.4CFIf - ------ ~ - N..RtIaL GUT ---- ~. - . - ----------------- ,GRADE -325 55 .330 z x _~~ Rr= n .ores ~riFr ~-'-~--- - - - - -- ---------- - Ii ---- .-.-..._._. 2c. X 3Tp' RCP 9 0!53 FTiFT -1` r-'- ---- _ i F! • 327.95 - ------ ... ---- _ - -- - -- J! RCP ~ ... _: . ... ~ 0 *-- _ ' " _______________._-_-_..- ~ F / ~20 - --- ------~ - ------- ------------ - - -------~ -------°----~----._-._ L• 322-I! ! aP GTE. ~ _ VOJ!a9 _ -T .L•;! uED/aN DRalN S C1b 6 f:a ~ LEFT SIDE- GUTTER GR; DE ~ ? ------°- --- - - - -- - - - -- _ rA- ' .. _.. -- .. E!r- { 310 : - e: ^v : --- - --- -- --- ------- - - ~ ~,: ~. ~ '•?~ !NIFT '10. a7 -1: vi: ~' T: a;: m' .N: N: N: „~~: „Ni n: n: ~i sra 5u•oo I~ r,ILEr,..,. ~s+ ~ ~. RlGHr OF BaSEUflE ; I S' EXT. ~: ~~ NOR.uaL GUTTER S. a o/5.5D i~GRaDE •333.38 Rr T OF BaSc"UNE RIGHT GUTTER - -- -- ---- ------------------ N 330 ~ _ - - ------------ -- -°--------° r,RaDE ~25-79 ____.,~___e_____ • --------~-- i _-_.__••__-._s___--------------•------------1= ~a° x 45S' RCP v O!5 FT7F T -- - - - = - - - _ . FL• 324.00 ! i ; i °--------•----•-•---•- -°-° ... ...........•-•--....-._... _. .:.. ~- - 320 ~2`: X6° RCP -----•---------=- •---°-_- FL• 322.22 !OB) 11_.._..____.._____.w.__-___-__- s 322.02 N 0333 FTlFT FL !~ ' ~~ JNCT BOX I c O2 : ! FL•322.22 FL°322. ' -- _. ........... .. .-- 310 E PoGHT SIDE GUTTER GRADE _____._i---_------ LATERAL •~8 ro •aBa - ., 9 O . N '. ^. ~: ~. .. '~: P. ~J: nl: N: N~ ~' m: N: N: O' CJ N: "l: n: 510>00(G1 l1 ~ r2 615-00 (CI - _ -- _ a0~S~at ~o ti ~: I ~ • - ~-- r ` E . •. - ; ~°` :..• I - ~ --~ _ _ ..; `; 0 a. • ;. --- I ... , i ----• ..., _ ' COrlSTRUCTlON ~ { ve :'~ ; -..-.-. - _- _ - ------ $ - ~I• - ~EaSE,uENT {{~ :I:..°--- #~3-- _. -----rtg lr ' ____---°~y' ----°----~----'4,~-.~_ -- ----...-.._ ,fir--~ - _ DRAiN ~_ r2----___~ . . - .. -., _ . _ ~ ..i..::~: .1 ,.. .., ' . -- y -.. iO ------ .. ' -•--'--..:,_ ................. . '•. - ;qC ~- 9R..~~E ~', ~~ ~D CON ................ ~~ ~ I ' ............................................°.._. 0' cl LAG I a _-~_ AB?NCON -,---- SIEUI?PJ CRAJN - ~ ~,r rLYO PLb'G. ~ s i i w i ~ 620-CXJ I z ,_ AJI ...- .... i~ .....................o..o...e.,,...,. .........,........,,............,,...... - JOGGING PATH --_-- ---- ------------_---------------------_°°------------- ~1 SC.~: ~ 50 ICO FT ,~1 ,` ~i b bI ^' ~ ~ ppppyyyy l ~' `°' I ~ ~i tiI tiI tii ~ vy yr = ~.~ ~I ~ -r - FL"316.97 FL-3/8.31 ~ FL•318.22 FL•3A.89 FL-3T1.59 '., FL°317.20 ' 18' SLOTTED DRAlN GETAlL. INLET ASC 'r8' Cu? FL•314.85 rN70 INLET 'A+5 INLET N0. BI ro-~xr. ~ STA 622.23 r, EFT OF BASELINE NORaIAt GUTTE.4 GRADE • 3/6.85 42' X 9 RCP .~37 FT/FT1 J' ~-JNCT 80X INLET N0. 81 F{.310.80 FL• 3rLr3- y c.~ z~---~. - - - _ -. - - - - I / •-.. j - ' r'f t z- 3c RCP -mac' 'l '~ ~ i i a5 ANGLE `` STA 022.53 --~~ ~%"~~" 225'RT OF BL I ~, 13J~~ 2- 3G' RCP ~ '~:,y_. ~ l TEIi.-GRnSY CONST RJCT;Oti ~~, •` EASEuE,vT • ~-~ ~\ PPOPOSEO CHANNEL --'f ~ laIPPME.'JENr ~- _..s.`. \_ . TG° 3X.36 ; JNCT 6OX N0. B2 ~ 18" X 6' RCP STA 522.23 I 30' RCP , I FT OF EzS !NE I ; DP.OP /NLc'T N0. ASA ,~ EL 1 I ;,vLET ,YO ° ' ~:--L) TEE ASB STa 619°18 rcX 9SRCo tJAC.C OR 2GRE%i ~lfL • 3t0.8C - - •,3 1` ' _ (FFT OF B.LSEUNE --T._..- T g .0105 FT /FT ~~ E>'° ~ ~ T? ^22.73 i I ' ------~- '- " ° " ~ FL• 3/6.0'3 FL GRATE • 320.30" ~ - s;9 --• FL ..3!7.43' I ~~ I £• r OF 8A`EUNE .S ',, r;OR.ud GU~ER '~ ' INLET h'O. r_ ~~' I~~ iATERAt 'A5A r ~ rd E.YT- Ia IGPADEL • J16.8O I I rr BASELINE ' - I \ ~ 330 .-:.- - -_ _. - i ST olB•90 _k `L• 3/3.62 rTTER LEFT. GUTTER P.RCFILE LEFT OF BASELINE °-'~O ~ '25.b5 --- -•---°-_ ..... ~.m FL- 3x2.62 .INSET N0. aG RCP ' NOR,U,cL GUTTER ay'Y y' Sra 62P9O ~ ~ .OICS FT/FTl 8J'RC° i IDa '- _ _ _ _ -- _ _ _ ,,RaDE 320.97 ~~ LATE"Rat •06 TO •.A9 LE,= T OF BAS_c UNE I r _ & . v9 , _____ _________ kGRUaL GUTTER ' _______ ~r •3,7.E0 t .. .. - _ .. T32Jf Rn __ , ~___. _.._..._ IGh JE n~ ' N n• '-TpP G7E•°' : L• 3/8.56 FL°3ir.•12 i ~ .UEDlAN ORAlN i ~ 3rb 92 ~ f} STA 618.40 6/qrG' ~ , P ~ Q~i C ~ ~. n: .'1. N N: ^Ni rl: ~: "Ni :. ~. is"UNE ° RIGHT GUTTER .PROFILE 79 --° XISTlN i ~ Ni oj; W: O: - N: rn: ~; ~II vl: v: ry: n N: N: n: n: n: n: n: n: ,~ n I8 .~. - ~ t 10 . --'-- --'-- r3 6 -- - ~ I ----- -~ ---°-----------~---°--------- ----FL 3 2 ------- _ -- -- -~ FL- 309.81 ------.....°..---- - -- -- (-- --°-- B IN%f r .i I ,,, r~. 310.31. ---, 30' X 95' RCP !JACK 0° °0^i_r I o .O/05 fi/fir N'^EP ~Y ~X.~S aVE ~. 3301 gX15T1NG-°GROLIND PROFILE----- - 5' EXT. AT PROPOSED GUTTER LOCATroN STA s21 °^ a N 'rD 24' X 35' RCP ~ R. ~• OF .,ASEU EI ~ ' SLOPE TO .UATCa EXIST. NOR.uw:. GLJT%ER ° - ° ° : - ° - - - - - - - GRADE • 318. v7 ° -----------------------• 320 - --_-___---°--------__~e_c__--------_ .~ -- - --° --- - -- RCP -° .__d. _..._..:_.......--°---------°---_.._.....__ . - ._...~.__.---- - - - --°°°--°..-._._...--- - aOT RCP - ----=---_-..---- :°-° ............:_-.-FL• 312. E N: n: N; r`: ~: O'. ,:~: C~: m, m: N: `.~i ~ n: n: ~ ~: ~°l ; r9 o2O.OOtG) 2-3c x i TO OUTFACE CVTFALL FL° 310.9! , 310 St ~t ~' I C: ~' ~: I n: 22 523.00 tG) ~ .c~+r. _ i JU5O ® T FAX Date: ~ Z , ~ 3 _ ~ / Pages to follow: To: ~~ l~ (~ C,J / L Sv~I Phone: ..._--- Fax: (~ 1 3~ I rJ Z " ~ ~o ~ ~ From: S'/~C~ r.~v~Yc~:. Phone: (409) 764-3570 Fax: (409)764-3496 Comments:. If you do not receive all of these pages, please call (409) 764570.. ~'~~;'"~' a . n ,~: ~~ ,:... ~~~ f CITY OF COLLEGE ST~T[OI`{ ~' ~~ 4 S~ !// /n November l2, 199C Mr. Pat Williams, P. E. Area Engineer Texas Department of Transportation 1300 N. Texas Avenue Bryari,`TX 7780-2760 Re: Shift in Median Opening on Texas Ave. Dear Pat: Attached find letters from Mr. Paul Clarke of Clarke & Wyndham Real Estate and Mr. Davis Wilson of Wilson/Zetty Associates requesting the relocation of the median opening for the Texas 707 area as currently shown in the Texas Avenue widening plans. The center line of the median opening in question is located at about 615+13. This centerline needs to shift approximately 10~ feet south to 616+18 in order to coincide with the planned esplanade driveway of the proposed redevelopment. Please contact me or Steve Homeyer regarding further ,details on this design change. The City is in support of this change and requests that TXDOT begin redesign work for this probable change order. The City will submit a final notification for the change order upon our issuance of a development permit for this planned redevelopment. As you know, a traffic signal is planned for this driveway and median opening. A traffic study has been conducted for the. proposed redevelopment which indicates that the signal will be warranted. The City will be in contact with the TXDOT regarding the details of the signal in the near future. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Edwin Hard, AICP Transportation Planner cc: Steve Homeyer Shirley Volk Charles Shears, Shears Investments C. Davis Wilson, Wilson/Zetty Associates Paul Clarke, Clarke & Wyndham Rcal Estate T ~~'ILSON/ZETT1'/ASSOCIATES, INC. ARCii[TECTS • ENGiNFERS • PLANNERS November 7, 1996. Mr. Steve Homeyer City of College Station P.O Eiox"9960 College Station, Texas 7784? ~ Request For Relocating Esplanade Cut on Texas Ave Dear Ste~~e. This letter into submit a formal request to mo•~e the refould be Stat on 616U17 PP reasingthei00 feet south of the current planned esp'tanade cut This length of the left turn lane. If there are any further questions please do not hesitate in calling. Respectfully s~aY~mitted, C. Davis Wil on A.I.A., C.S.I. Eor Charles Shears 3100 W[LCRF:S"r, SUITE; 325 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77042 (7l 3) 952-8600 LARKE ® YND ~i~~M REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT SERVICES Nove-liber 1 l , l 996 Mr. Ed Hard City of College Station P.O Box 9960 1 lOl S Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 77542-9960 RE: Texas Avenue h~iedian Cut Via: Fax & Mail Dear Mr. Hard: Please accept this letter on behalf of The 707 Center and United Development that we are aware and in agreement of the relocation of the planned median cut to access The 707 Center. The new location approximately I00 feet to the south has been planned comprehensively with the pending redevelopment of this area. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions. Best regards, Paul 1 larke, CCIM President P1C/tb rcrGIX=~ 3608 Ease 29th Street, Suite l00 Bryan/Cc~lle;,~e Station, Texas 77802 409/846-4384 Fax 409/846.1461 . ~ ti 192 713/681-5876 Fax 7l 3/681.5877 9800 N. W. Freeway, Suite 203 ltuusteu~, T~xa. 77l =~' ~f c~ ~~~ i ~.~ ~7 S C~T`T~ µT~ C.~lj ~}xt uC ~~) Ft c~ ~~~~ C~u ~l C t-~ ~S~ ~ ~ /rl A-TCI-I 7-~ June 25, 1996 ~-Y~~`S ~~Jl S Gc.~ S 1 a~ pi S~~ P ~ ~''''~ - Shears Companies Attn: Mr. Charles W. Shears S' -~~~ 1325 La Concha 2~ ~~ Houston, Texas 77054 ~ s ~~ RE: Proposed Lone-Star Pavilion at Texas Avenue and Lincoln Dear Mr. Shears: We look forward to working with you in order to provide a quality development for everyone. There were several issues addressed during a recent predevelopment meeting that need further clarification. During the meeting, the following proposal was presented by the developer's representative: 1. The developer will pay. for the cost of constructing Eisenhower from Lincoln to his driveway: which has an approximate length of 200. feet. 2. The developer will relocate the proposed temporary drive when Eisenhower is constructed. This driveway would be temporary in nature and would be constructed. to asphalt paving standards, but would not be constructed as a curb and gutter section. 3. The developer would give the City a bond to guarantee the relocation of the driveway and theconstruction of Eisenhower. This bond would be cashed and held in escrow until the street construction occurred, at which time, the monies would be removed. 4. The developer requested the City to provide the necessary right-of way engineering documents to construct Eisenhower Street. 5. The developer would contribute $50,000.00 to the construction of a traffic signal at the main entrance. to the proposed development. The developer proposes. to pay for the entire signal, at the time of construction, with the City reimbursing him within two (2) Years of obtaining a building permit. for the first retail box. This reimbursement is for the remaining balance exceeding the participation level indicated above. 6. The developer. will conduct a warrant studyregarding the potential installation of a traffic signal at the main entrance to the development. 7. 'The developer requested participation for the conversion of the existing open channel to an underground storm sewer . The City proposes the following items to be incorporated into a potential D,e~velo,pm+ent Agreement: ~t ~ `' 1. The develo m t submit 2 0, ~~ fee for the ~~ of a development ~„ agreemen a si p an~~~~cal u-ch ~ 100 feet.. 3 ~2.'. The development agreementwill contingent. upon performance cri or City r.~, ~~~~`" participation or reimbursement. of the developer. This. crite ' based upon the opening of businesses and not proposed activities. reimbursement is based upon the size of development currently proposed at 1 • , 67 square feet. 3. The developer will be responsible for providing a warrant study to indica~eed for the requested signal at the proposed main entrance. , June 25, 1996 •~ Mr. Charles W. Shears page 2 Lone-Star Pavilion Y '~~~ , ~ 3 veto r will be responsible for the construction of the storm sewer. The City w~}} ~ ~~~~~~~`"'r~ 4. The de Pe ~ da2S 1'-o~I' t~,'~' `t'om ''"~ not participate in this construction as requested by the dev ~o r 5. The developer will be responsible for one-half ('/z) of theco~s s~O obtain the right-of-way and construct E' enho er from its c ~t t~rminus to Lincoln Avenue. no head in pazking To facilitate th 6. will be allowed a main entrance drive aisle. The proposed traffic signal location vide a benefit to any other area except for this development. For this reason, does not pro the main entrance must be ali ed in sucph. ,a_ ~a,,n,,,ne~r ~a~s~t~o ~°nnect to the before mentioned property and provide cross access, ~ ~ ~~""` "''~"" ~"~" them in 7. The developer shall provide a twenty (20) foot sanitary sewer easement lo~ tGd m 5 ~~ . n e~~` ~ "~,,,~' -south front of the IA~icQ fA~K _V drive aisle that runs north ~- ~pQ~. 8. The developer shall close th~~~~~e (35) foot driveway south of the 3,60 square foot pad site shown on the site plan as the Original Pasta Company +hat th .~~ ~~e~- 9. The existing parking spaces along Texas Avenue are non-conforming,~.._,~~, . If these existing spaces are reconstructed, the ordinance re uirements must be met for this non-conforming use. Streetscape requirements on Texas q form of r as well as a eve s' 60 feet on cente ees lanted ixty ( ) ive ak tr r3' uire P Avenue req parking screening: 10. It will be the developers responsibility to solicit written approval from the surrounding businesses and properly owners in order to relocate the median opening currently approved ~' as part of the Texas Avenue widening. This openng location was determined as a result of input'received during several public meetings: The City could help you. obtain the names and addresses of the individuals who participated in the public meetings and those w~ho~av ad nation. ~.Gi- rans direct ne otiations wi the Texas a ent of po a~~~ ~!, g h ,~+ ° ~ L, n ~ ~ yC~o~' vS A. ~ . ~. v ~~. ~ v~4- there are too many unknowns and ew e^~~"'""~est~t requirements to warrant the ~ 'f At the present tune, I; need for a,development agreement. '~~~~9~ f. !~ ~ If you have any questions or comments, feel free to contact me at {409) 764-3570. Sincerely, Steve Homeyer Graduate Engineer ec: Jim Callaway, Asst. Dir. of Development Services Kent Lana, City Engineer Veronica Morgan, Asst. City Engineer Jane ICee, City Planner Sabine Kuenzel, Senior Planner Shirley: Volk, Development Coordinator Ed Hard, Transportation Planner Dan Wilson, Wilson/Zetty Associates, Inc. U5-'a~-y6 U3.19k1`dl ~'kUt!! WILSON ZETTY ASSOC, . kUl 4 FAX TRANSMISSION WILSON/ZETTY/ASSOCIATES 3100 Wifcrest, Suite 325 Houston, Texas 77042 713!052-8600 FAX 713!952-8610 No, of Pages lr~cl. This .age: ~` ,_ Project. Name: ~ ~'~'~" Project No.. 95~ `~ i - ~ L - ~ ~ T fa~fl3°l.. Company: ._.l:d'~(...t' ~- Attn: ' ~'Q~/~-~ ~'ax Number; ,,~C~~~ 7~ ~` 3 7 9~ - Frorn: ~%r~1R~~f` Date: ~' ~ g' y ~~ __ US-~~-yb U3:l~k~l FkUN1 WILSON ZETTY ASSOC.. WILSON/ZET'TY/ASSOCIATES, INC. ARCHITECTS • HNGIN$TRS • BLANNSftS May 2Q 1996 Ms. Veronica Morgan Assistant City Engineer City of College Station P. 0, Box 9960 Ph; 409/764-.3570 College Station, TX 77542 Fax: X04/764-3496 Re: Lone Star Pavilion, a 103,000 s.f Shopping Center Located on the N.E. Corner of Texas and Lincoln Street, College Station, Texas [fear Vernnica~ The following letter on the above referenced project iy an oltriine anci summary ofthe Uene.ral Agreements, in principle, .discussed with you. Charlie Shears, the r3eveloper, myself, Architect, Sabine Kaenzell, Staff Planner and Ed Hard, Transportation Planner. At our meeting in your offices, Niay 14. 1996, the subjects discussed were: I. Open Ditch in 25ft, Drainage Easement A, Gc+ieially A~iee~I Upun. 1. De<eloper will i~tstall pipe as p~~i ul'~.lcvcl~~pir~cnt cunstrucsiun. 2. City of College Station will reimburse Developer for the difference in the cost of installing larger pipe required to handle upstream stoi rn run-off and the cost of the size pipe required to handle normal storm run-off from dcvetoper site, _ B, Need; 1, Difference in pipe size, 36"x21". ?. Cost for ditTerence, $24.04/L,F, x 642 .LF,- $12,840.00. 1' U'~ 3100 WILCRSST, SUITE 32~ HUU~'I'UIV, 'r>r'X~,S 771341 (713) 951.8600 UU-'~li-yb U3:1~kM ~'kU~l WILSON ZETTY ASSOC. , II. Ei3enhower Street: A. Generally Agreed Upon: .City will at some future date acduire the Albert Pierce Tract (known as Tract #5,.1,216 Acres) or a portion thereof, large enough to extend lrisenhawer Street South to Lincoln Street at the City of College Station's expense, Developer agrees to reimburse the City of College Station for approximately 190' L.F. of 39' back to back surface sheet, excluding sidewalks, bike trails and utilities, (above or below the ground). 'The Developer agrees to put up a ~3and nr l .etter of Credit, at the I)evel~per'c diccretinn, to covet the mutually agreed upon cost of the apprnxima.te tytl''T. F of ctrest, to he paid to the City upon completion of the entire extension t~ i,incofn Street. Developer agrees to build a temporary l 1lZ" asphalt on ~ 1/2" limestone base service drive and remove the drive when the street extension is c~tnplete and replace the drive with landscape. B. Need: 1. A dimension tie from property corner tct street right-of-way, i talked to Greg Ta~gert with M,D,G, and he said he would brine you three (3) copies of the survey wi[h the tic-in as swan as pwsibtc. 2, Estimate of crJSt. Fen rjuw, use $24,000,00. C. Generally Agrccd Upon, Traffic Si3na1 and Esplanade Cut, located on "texas .Avenue adjacent to and Just South of Developer's North Property Line. 1. The City of College Station agrees to install a traffc light with lcfr hand turn signals at the above mentioned location, by the time that. Aarncs find ;~toble is open far business. ?. The Developer will pay the entire cost of the signalizatson. ;. The. City of College Stat'son will reimburse the Developer al! but 550,000,00 of the cost Lvithin two years of the date of the first shopping center's proper building permit, D. Need, Estimated cost of signal frc+m the C ity o#' College Sta[ian. City of Cohee Station will work with 1)PVFi~~cr rn cshtain 'I'~ !)t~t'c approval cif relacatian of asptanade c[it, left turn Pane and permit: fnr a t~tir lane entry. r)evehper will provide at his cost a projected traffic study and prPlimina.ry warrants. Aisn., provide to Traffic Engineers and the City of College Station. the major renantsprojected traffic counts, ~U3 US-Z~-U6 U3:1~~N1 ~'1zUM WILSON ZETTY ASSOC,, YU~ r. 4, Dcveioper will provide the City of College Station with letters of request from the tenants and when available, provide the City with Proof of Tenancy, IIh In previous meetings, because th® "Red Lobster" is a part of this project by Reciprocal Easement Agreement (R.E.A,), it was determined shpt: A, Generally Agreed Upon: 1, The new 24' green area requirement would be waived and negotiated to an approximate 8'ft green area buffer at Texas Avenue, since the "Lord & Ladies" and "Project 707" existing pavament encroar..h on 'Texas Avenue to align with the existing "ked I..ohster" Pavernent. 2. That. this develnllment would have one monument sign and one ~5'ft ry{nn sign {if located 70' from Texas Avenue Curb), exclusive of legal signage for "On the Border" or "Red Lobster". 3. That this development would not require. a plat, only a "Site Plan Approval" and that the entire development is Zoned properly. Veronica, to simplify the agreement, I would suggest that Charlie dive yQU a Band or Letter of Credit for the difference between Items I anti II. I appreciate t}IC fact that you aie expediting tlic agreements with the other city administrative off ccs. We are starti,is~ Cu„su uctio,t Ducu,ncnts within about two (2) weeks, anticipating dcliyery of Offica Depot on December 1st and ~VilsUn/ZcttylAssociates, Inc. is proceeding with planning based on our discussion. if there are auy changes, or if you aced further clarification, please do not hesitate to contact me. t. cc: Charlie Shears, Shears Investments Greg Taggert, M.D.G. John Lively, Tribble & Stephens :~~[I PRC)tDOC 9'9304~C5 -~~ ;~-h 5 'tit G _ Jc'~ ~~ A~ y mEi ~~~ ~r~~D~ Lu ~ C t-~ ~i~t~ .1._ June 25,1996 ~-~-~~5 ~~1 S C~ SS 1 awl ~ /Yl A-T~/-~ T~Ti`t l Shears Companies 'c,5 Attn: Mr. Charles W. Shears ' S~~~ Op ~~ , 1325 La Concha ~'('~-~ ~ _Z(9 ~~ Houston, Texas 77054 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~` Z' ~~ RE: Proposed Lone-Star Pavilion at Texas Avenue and Lincoln Dear Mr. Shears: We look forward to working with you in order to provide a quality development for everyone. There were several issues addressed during a recent predevelopment meeting that need further clarification. During the meeting, the following proposal was presented by the developer's representative: 1. The :developer will pay for the cost of constructing Eisenhower from Lincoln to his driveway which has an approximate length of 200 feet. 2. The developer will relocate the proposed temporary drive when Eisenhower is constructed. This driveway would be temporary in nature and would be constructed to asphalt paving standards, but would not be constructed as a curb and. gutter section. 3. The' developer would give he City a bond to guarantee the relocation of the driveway and the construction of Eisenhower. This bond would be cashed and held in escrow until the street construction occurred, at which time, the monies would be removed. 4. The developerrequested the City to provide the necessary right-of--way engineering documents to construct Eisenhower Street. 5. The developer would contribute-$50,000.00 to the construction of a traffic signal at the main entrance to the proposed development. The developerproposes to pay for the entire signal at the time of construction, with the City reimbursing him within two (2) Years of obtaining a building permit for the first retail box. This reimbursement is for the remaining balance exceeding the participation level indicated above. 6. The developer. will conduct a warrant. study regarding the potential installation of a traffic signal at the main entrance to the development. 7. The developer requested participation for the conversion of the existing open channel to an underground storm sewer . The City proposes the following... items: to be incorporated into a potential Development Agreement: 1. 'The developer must submit a $200.00 application fee for the processing o£a development agreement and a site plan scaled to 1 inch equals 100 feet.. 2. The development agreement will be contingent upon.performance criteri®n for City participation or reimbursement of the developer. This criteria will bebased-.upon the opening of businesses and not proposed activities. Tlus reimbursement is based upon the size of development currently proposed at 110,967 square feet. 3. The developer will be responsible for providing a warrant study to indicate a need for the requested signal at the proposed main entrance. Mr. Charles W. Shears Lone-Star Pavilion June 25, 1996 Page 2 4. The developer will be responsible for the construction of the storm sewer. The City will not participate in this construction as requested by the developer. 5. The developer will be responsible for one-half ('/2) of the costs to obtain the right-of--way and construct Eisenhower from its current terminus to Lincoln Avenue. 6. To facilitate the traffiagenerated by the adjacent property to the north, no head in parking will be allowed from the main entrance drive aisle. The proposed traffic signal location does not provide a benefit to any other area except for this development. For this reason, the main entrance must be aligned in such a manner as to connect to the before mentioned property and provide cross access. 7. The developer shall provide a twenty (20) foot sanitary sewer easement located in the main .drive aisle that runs north-south across the front of the buildings.. 8. The developer shall close the thirty-five (35) foot driveway south of the 3,600 square foot .pad site shown on the. site plan as the Original Pasta Company. 9. The existing parking spaces along Texas Avenue are non-conforming in that they do not meet existing requirements. ff these existing spaces are reconstructed, the ordinance requirements must. be met for this non-conforming use, Streetscape requirements on Texas Avenue require Live Oak trees planted every sixty (60) fcet on center as well as a foam of parking screening. 10. It will be the. developers responsibility to solicit written approval from the surrounding businesses. and properly owners in order to relocate the median opening currently approved as part of the Texas Avenue widening. This opening location was determined: as a result of input received during. several public meetings: The City could help you obtain the names and addresses of,the individuals who participated in the public meetings and those who have had direct negotiations with the Texas Department of Transportation, At the present time, there are too many unknowns and too few exchanges of requirements to warrant the need for a-development agreement. If you have any questions or comments, feel free to contact me at (409) 764-3570. Sincerely, Steve Homeyer Graduate Engineer cc: Jim Callaway, Asst. Dir. of Development Services Kent Laza, City.Engineer Veronica Morgan, Asst. City Engineer. Jane Kee, City Planner Sabine Kuenzel, Senior Planner. Shirley Volk, Development Coordinator Ed Hard, Transportation Planner Dan Wilson, Wilson/Zetty Associates, Inc, :. ; CITY OF COLLEGE STATIOI`I December 5, 1996 Mr. Charles W. Shears Shears Companies 1325 LaConcha Suite 200 Houston, TX 77054 It is understood and mutually agreed thatBuilding,Permit#9603118 for the construction of a commercial development is issued under the following terms and conditions: 1. The City of College Station Development Services Departmentwill retain the-services of a Registered Professional Engineer to evaluate and resolve the differences and disagreements between the Gity' Engineering Department and the Lone Star-Pavilion project engineer with respect to appropriate design for drainagefacilities necessary for the proposed development. 2. Shears Companies will seek approval of a plat for the proposed Lone Star Pavilion shopping center. A proposal for oversize participation on the part of the City in relation to the upstream run-off will be presented to the City Council for their consideration. Additionally, it is understood that Lone Star Pavilion Shopping Centercan fulfill any and all drainage requirements by submission of and City approval of drainage plans and specifications deemed adequate by the City'Engineer. In such case, the above two terms and conditions are nolonger necessary. J es M. Callaway Ac 'ng Director Development Services Date of Signature: 12 - G, -' q ~ Charles s Shears Companies Date of Signature: /~ ~ S'~ ~ a ~f T as A~ n3v~ralty From: Veronica Morgan To: internet:wlb~wlbeng.com Date: 6/14/99 4:03PM Subject: besf buy :college station ~~~~~o Mr. Wright I recieved your fax and original letter re: the above referenced site. I have reviewed the following: 1. your fax dated June 9,1999 re: ramps and water/sewer demands 2. drainage report 3. 24"x36" civil site drawings labeled sheets G1 through c-5 4. 8-1/2" lettersize fax from: WLB to Judy Smith re: revision of handicap ramps The City comments are. as follows; 1. In response#o your June 9th letter. a. I am assuming that your 80 gpm water demand is a maximum demand. If so, our water meter sizing (whichis done by the city based on your submitted demands) would size a 1-1/2" meter for this building. So you will need to change your site civil drawing to show the 1-1/2" size and not the 2" water meter. b. Yes, we will require that the handicap spaces;are 9' regardless of the state criteria so please modify your site civils accordingly. c.please fax on your letterhead a simple water and` sewer demand legend or table (as opposed to a full letter) which states type of the demand. and max demand which we will staple to the approved site plan. 2the-drainage report is approved as submitted. you sent us two copies so both will... be stamped approved and one returned to you for your records. 3.the .original site .plan that we reviewed was done by the architect on this project. it appears that you submitted the civil site plan in order to answer several of bur technical site related questions. this is fine however we can only have one official approved site plan. we have had problems on past projects with the .architect and engineers each having a site plan which are approved. and they do not match. for this reason we will ask that the architect site plan sheet be removed from the documents as we will not approve that plan and will disregard the sheet. your sheet c-3 will constitute the official approved site plan with c-4 as a supplement. please inform the architect of this. 4. state that the exist parking lot pavement near lincoln that will be removed will be replaced with grass cover. 5.we request that if you will use. bollards on the lincoln side of the building at the exit door that they match the bollards-used in the front. we do have streetscape requirements which looks. at accessory items and assure that they blend with the building or are: aesthetically .pleasing if they can be viewed from the street. 6. once all above comments have been addressed please submit 7 copies. of your sheets c-1 through c-5 for us to approve. hope. this: helps and that we can soon finish this approval process. i am more. than happy to try and help any way that i can. we are extremely busy in the office right now so the best way to reach me is via email. thanks veronica // ~/ D~ iyATER DEMGpMS (DOMESTIC) MIN. AVG. MAX. p 7..41 28.64 SEWER DEMANDS GPD .MIN. AVG. 8536 . 34145 p PARKING ~ RESTAURAI PARKING ~ R COVE CSIl~ZILE FA T SHEE CITY OF COLLEGE. STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. .1101 South Texas Avenue, P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Phone (409) 764=3570 Fax (409) 764-3496 DATE: ~ ~ ~ # PAGES INCLUDING COVER J ew transmittal. If you. did not receive a complete fax, please call our office immediately fora n TO: J COMPANY: DEPARTMENT: PHONE: FAX: ~ ° ~~ ~~ .FROM: ~ ~ ~ PHONE:. FAX: LETTER OF TRANSMITTA 46-vrU L )dL-~rI~? ~.r. ~~y-~~.ra~TPL+~.vr: crcu: . 2.Gr~ 1 i ~~1.~~~ ai~ l l1 rL~i..~+.Ci~Q la L~ CV i~~ ~. ~. Ali CQj.:.~`~.t.^... .: l~~~i~. 1L'~~ TAI l (-..ajo6 -2=.. ra: f~~;f~ (/~ P=cM: ~.4~G JGa ~tJN^cc=: ~10~ - dUV~~1 ~._ Q cp K ApP4QVAL Q P'CF't YCU~C l;Sc Q Ac tZ~QUc:T_~ ~~ ~~ G~-_.,. ~ . J . ~y=~ ~~. _. ~ . CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY CHECKLIST ~~ Project` Date: - `~'`'~ ELECTRIC: (Ray 3680, ony 343 ~~ D~ ENGINEERING: Covers Water, Sewer, Drainage, ~ lities, Impact Fees (Kent 3581, Veronica 3763, ve 3592 (David D. 777-3942, Vern W. 777-0192, Jerry J, 777-3~55~ , J ~~ 7 70) ~~"" .~-- ~~ FI E: (Jon 3781) _- ~ LEGAL: (Jan 3546) (Easement?) i ZO LAND/LANDSCAPING/DUMPSTER LOCATION & SCREENING: Sabine 378 Joey 3748) ~~ DUMPSTER SERVICE: (Jim S. Wally, Freddie -all at 3690) /~ L ~ /~ /' ,i 1 f . From: Shirley Volk To: RWESTBROOK Subject: Office Depot and .Spec Retail Space.-Reply -Reply I don't either! So, that basically answers my question. Will you be going back out before Monday? »> Rick Westbrook 06/18/97 03:19pm »> I went by yesterday at the request of the Building Department to do Office Depot's. fire final, They. have about 9 sprinkler heads that have been painted and need replacing, their extinguishers were'not installed, the fire lanes in back have not been painted, and the Fire Dept. turn around has not been paved yet, (behind Barnes and Noble). I can't turn Office Depot loose until they get a little closer. The superintendent, Mike, said he should be ready Monday, not including all of the rear fire lane. I'm not sure if this answers your "shell".question, but I don't usually look at buildings that way. Thanks, Rick '~ '~ it 09/18/97 15:31 ~ ~ A . B . $lY C1PPI1V C1 ~~ CEAITLs ii priOPEATIES, 1KL. 'v'ia Facsimile d09-7b4-3496 $205 969 1051 Septem>aer 17, 1997 Ms. Shirley Volk Development Coordinator City of College Station p, O, Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77542 Re: Y,onc Star Pavilion Landscaping along Texas Avenue Dear Ms_ Volk: AB SHOPPING CTR ;-~~ DEVELOPMENT SVCS 0 001 Please accept this letter as our commitment to complete the landscaping along Texas Avenue, in front of our property, according to the approved landscaping plan. This work will be done as soon as practical after the road work on Texas Avenue is completed, Sincerely, A.B. Shopping Center Properties, Jnc. ~~ ~n~ Bill Ayers BA/es cc: Jason Snell -Tribble Stephens Rich Wingo - A.B: Shopping Center Properties, Inc. Tom Brown - A.B. Shopping Center Properties, Inc. r ,. COLLEGE STAT[ON P. O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 Tel: 409 764 3500 September 18, 1997. Mr. Rich Wingo Mr. Bill Ayers A. B. Shopping Real Estate Planning, Construction, Development Department 1900 International Park Drive .Suite 303 Birmingham, Alabama 35243 SUBJECT: Lone Star Pavillion Shopping Center College Station, Texas Gentlemen: In an effort to expedite the occupancy. of the new Barnes & Noble store located in your shopping center, we have put together this "punchlist° for your consideration and agreement. Several items in the shopping center have not been completed, .but after assessing the nature of the requirements,. it has been decided that because these are not "health and safety" issues, the completion of these items can be temporarily postponed until a later time; that time being priorto issuance of any Building Permits for the small. lease spaces in the one remaining building which has been constructed. The primary items to be addressed are your share of the temporary traffic signal which was installed atthe entrance to your shopping center at Texas: Avenue. This signal was installed in addition and prior to the permanent signals which the City. agreed to install for the project. The initial cost to the developer was quoted to the architect as approximately $60,000. However,. the City instal ldd the support posts and cables at our expense and will remove them when necessary. We were also able to include some equipment. is the temporary signal which will become part of the ..permanent installation, and the cost. requested of the developer has been reduced to $13,000.00. This item is still: outstanding. Payment of the developer's 20% of the cost of installation of electric service for the Barnes & Noble store is still outstanding. We spoke about~this on Home of Texas A&M University 6 . M ~ ~ ~+ 1 September 4th and you were going to check into it, but to date, the City has not received these monies. The other. items which need to be addressed concern completion of the landscaping on the site. There are several. island areas in which "solid sod° was approved for groundcover. Sod has not been installed in some of those islands. I have spoken to `Mike White, the superintendent on the job for Tribble and Stevens, and he will be faxing a letter to the City today to indicate the date the landscaping items will be complete. ~ have stated over the telephone that you will fax a "letter of intent" regarding mpletion of the curbing, landscaping and clean up of the portion of the site along Texas Avenue once the improvements are completed by the highway department. You may include that statement with the letter covering the other items. With the above exceptions, the City is ready to issue a Certificate of Occupancy to the superintendent for the Barnes & Noble store today. We will accept a "letter of intent° from you which includes. the dates you propose to have the above listed items complete, and will hold any. additional Building Permits for the shopping center until these items are completed. Once again, .let me compliment you on the appearance your shopping center will have once the landscaping and clean up is complete. The FAX number in Development Services is (409)764-3946. I look forward to hearing from you this afternoon. Yours very truly, Shirley J. Vol Development Coordinator cc: File Building Division 09017/97 10:23 p ^ ^ ~,,s. ,s10PPttV C: c E t~'C F.1z T•RCJPL1t7IE'.S. l Nr. $205 969 1051 AB SHOPPING CTR ~-~~ DEVELOPMENT SVCS 1~j001 Via Facsimile 409-764-3496 September 17, 1997 Nls. Shirley Volk Development Coordinator City of College Station p, Q. Box 4960 College Station, ?exas 77842 Rc: T,one Star Pavilion Landscaping along Texas Avenue Dear Ms. Volk: Please accept this letter as our commitment to complete the landscaping along Texas Avenue, in front of our property, according to the approved landscaping plan. This work will be done as soon as practical-after the road work on Texas Avenue is completed. Sincerely, A.B. Shopping Center Properties, Inc. ._ ~~~~ Bill Ayers B,Alcs cc: 7ason Snell -Tribble Stephens Rich Wingo - A.I3• Shopping Center Properties, Inc... Tom Brown.- A.B. Shopping Center Properties, Inc. r, ~~ ~~ 1-~-~ " ~. ~`~(3) 785- ~(a%/ ~~ ~ ~ ,~DC1 ~,.• ~~..~. MAR. _1.1999 1~33PM MAXWELL JOHANSON MAH N0.659 P.2 G~' ~~' 5~"' ~~~ ~~g~~ Memo. ~~,0 ti. tests To: Randall Naccari-A.LC,, Baker Shopping C@tster l1 Johanson Maher Arehi axwe M $13 Third Avenue South; Propettaes ~tashrrills, TN 372'10 c~ Curt Johanson-Maxwell Johan$on MaherRrchttects Phone: 1 (6y5}'244-817a Tom BrownwA.l.C. i3aker shopping Center Fax 1 (61~ 244-8141. Properties- From: Mathew B.Rcot Date: 07J1Z199 Project sest.t3uy -College Station TX (98108} Sub'ec~t: Ct of Colt a Station ~ Planning t]epartment h- e9 Comments, Randall- i spoke this morning with Natalie Ruiz ofthe City of College Station. She had trade some comments in /regards to the Building Permit Application for the new $est Buy at Lonestar Pavilion. These comments ~~~;n; pertain to i~he site plan and will need to be addr~saed-by the civH engineer, 1. Show ail existing and proposed site utilities. include utilityiocatlons, easements, and meters. 2 lndtcate the location of the nearest existing lire hydrant. ~~ 3. Show ail fire lanes around buTldit+g. 4. Provide a letter stating that the current water and sevw~sr toads are less than or equal to the '~. ~,~, revivusiy approved use (t'etsmart}. if they are not, the meter site: writ need to be increased,. ~ ~~ 5. The proposed Best buy store covers more impervious area than the previously approved -use. ~b,~r.4~`~ 1~ b~ Provide signed calculations indicating #hat the existing retention ~p~-,... areas are capable of handling the additional rtltt-off. ~~ ti Show ail existing trees'alang Lincoln 5trest. (f any trees are removed as part of the protect, they V` crust be relocated along Lincain Street: within 50' of the roadway. 7. Comment: There is a safety concerq in regards to the existing parking spaces closest to the ~~~ Lincoln Street entrance. The steepness ofithe entrance ramp could,pose a hazard to cars backing cut of these spaces. Recommend that the last two spaces be omitted, (This is a re+contmendation only, compliance is not required}. A building permit will not be issued until the i#ems above have been addressed (except Nd. 7}. The £ity will require 5,copies'of the signed and sealed siteplan which (nctudes this information. 1 have not seen the civil drawings yet, perhaps most of this has: already been taken care of. Could you please send rite a wpy of the site plan that is ubmitted for our records? lfthere is anything I can do to help expeditethe process please let the know. lfyou orthe civil engineer. needs to contact Natalie Ruiz, her telephone number is {4p9j' 764-.'~57U. Thank you for your. help. e>~I ~ ~~~ i 1~"" `' ~e~ FACSIMILE COVER SHEET CITY OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1101 South Texas Avenue, P:O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas .77$42 Phone (409) 764-3570 Fax (409) 764-3496 r DATE: ®/ fG, # PAGES INCLUDING COVER Ifyou did of receive a complete fax, please call our office immediately for a new transmittal. To: ~ r- Cw ~,~~ COMPANY: ~ ~ ~-~ ~C-f' ~ DEPARTMENT: PHONE: ~'II~ ~ ~ o'Z ` 7~ ~ FAX: ~ r'o o~ ' 02 J d FROM: PHONE: ' ~~ FAX: ~ - G REMARKS: ' ^ Urgent For your review ^ Reply ASAP ^ Please Comment ~OGJ ~ ~-I c~C ~I~f~E nJ ~m ~ ~ ~rE~ - ~ ~ ~~ S `~` ~ ~~ o ~ ~'" -E ~I~~ vE~ ~ T ~ ~~ ~ ~ L~ ~[~ ~~I~ M ~ `° 1 ~ ~ rD ~ Leo ~ ~~ C nlnl ~ ~ 7"E ~ti G ~ ,--- -f- -~ ~ ~ _ ~ ' rs ~ ~ ~ GL s of 1101 South Texas Avenue P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 CITY OF COLLEGE STATION of DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Date: / ~/ ~~ Number of pages including cover sheet: 3 ~-~ From: Phone: 409-764-3570 Fax phone 409-764-3496 rTw~ A Drre• I~ TTraant r"1 For your review ^ Reply ASAP ^ Please comment If you did not receive a complete fax, please call our office immediately for a new transmittal: Phone: Fax phone (o~~' ~~ 9 " ~®~ ~~- CC: Cit of Coale eStation PO Boz 9960, .Coale c Station; Te1:as 77842 CITY OF COL1_EC~E STATIOI`~ Date:. / J` '~~~,'~ Number of pages including cover sheet: ~~ v To: ' ~ ~ v- _ From: ~ , Phone: ~~ ° !~'7-~ Fax hone: °~ - ~~ CC: Phone (409)764-3570 Fax phone- (409) 764-3496 :.~ ~' i ^ ^ ~~ ~ "~' ~~ A.B. SHOPPING CENTER p:ROPERTIE S, INC. i. Via Facsimile: 409-764-3496. i ~ September 17, 1997 I j I 1VIs. Shirley Volk Development Coordinator City of College Station P. O. Box 99b0 College Station, Texas 77842 ~, Re: Lone Star Pavilion Landscaping along Texas Avenue Dear Ms. Volk ~ Please accept his letter as our commitment to complete the landscaping along Texas Avenue, in front of our property, according to the 'approved landscaping plan. This work will be done as soon as practical after the road work on Texas Avenue is completed.. ~I Sincerely, A.B. Sho in Center Pro erties, Inc. p pP g ~, `''`~ ~.~~ Bill Ayers BA/es ~' cc: Jason Snell -Tribble Stephens ~ Rich Wingo = A.B. Shopping Center Properties, Inca ~ Tom Brown = A.B. Shopping Center Properties, Inc. - - I .. - - - 1900 International Park Drive Suite 303 Birmingham, Alabama 35243 2OS/969.1000 Fax 205/969.1051 SAP-2~2-97 09:32 AM TRISBLE ~ STEPHENS CO. September 22, 1997 Ms. Shirley J. Volk Development Coordinator City of College Station i 101 Texas Avcnuc College Station. Texas 77842 Re: Lone Star Pavilion Dear Shirley: VIA FAX: (409} 764-3496 713 695 1167 ~r~ A~'~~~ P. 01 Tribble & Stephens As we discussed on during our telephone conversation, there arc some outstanding items that need to be addressed on the above referenced project. Below is the list of the outstanding items as I understand them and their current status: 1. BROKEN CURB AT TEXAS AVENUE -This curb was broken before we began work on our project, but we would iikc to do whatever is necessary to get it repaired. I have a telephone call into Tom Brown with A.B. Shopping Center Properties, Inc. to try and get. authorization to gel repair this curb. 2. SOD AT LANDSCAPE ISLAND ON LINCOLN AVENUE • This is the area where our construction usilcr was located. I spoke with Kent Potts of 8raros Valley Nursery this morning and directedhim to sod this area and he assured me that it would be taken care of. I will follow up with him and make sure that this work is completed, 3. BUILDiNGPAD SITE SEEDING • During my conversation this morning with Kent Potts, he said that he had completed the clean-up in this area and would hydromulch the pad today. 4. LANDSCAPING BETWEEN BARNES & NOBLE AND 707 CENTER -This area was torn up after we had graded, I will findthe responsible party and get this item resolved, I will stay on top of these items and mRke sure that they are resolved to your satisfaction, Thank you for all of your help in making this a successful project. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, ason . Snell Project Manager CC: Tom Brown - A.B. Shopping Center Properties, Inc. Mike White • Tribble & Stephens Co. 2427 -Correspond©ncc i ''',~I June 25.,1996 Shears Companies , Attn: Mr. Charles W. Shears 1325 La Concha Houston, Texas 77054 RE: Proposed Lone-Star Pavilion at Texas Avenue and Lincoln Dear Mr. Shears:. We look forward to working with you in order: to provide a quality development for .everyone. There were several issues addressed during a recent predevelopment meeting that need fiuther clarification. The construction of Eisenhower .Street must be addressed as to who will be responsible .for the acquisition of right-of-way and the construction of the street section. During the meeting, the following proposal was presented by the de,~ o~er's~r- presentative:. A p~r~=~ p ~ +L~ 1.j/~IGDL/U /CID ~' -~ . 1. The developer ~ ' 'the ~ ° E~~enoh~ptyveu ~ ~E ~i 'es ~ Z. Thedeveloper would relocate Pa w~hen~~~;se~ower is cons cted. This internal ~~~ Jc'~~ ~ , j driveway would be temporary in nature and would be constructed to asphalt paving standards, but :would not be constructed as a curb and. gutter section. 3. The developer would give the City. a bond to guarantee the relocation of the driveway and hed and held in escrow until the ' nd would be cas on of Eisenhower.. This bo ct- e constru th '~ street construction occurred, at which time, the monies wool ~e :removed. ', 4. The developer requested the City to provide the necess ^ gmeering documents to construct Eisenhower Street. S. The developer would contribute $SO,000AO to the construction of a traffic signal at the r ro sed to a for the entire ro sed develo ent. Thedevelo p po p y main entrance to the p po pm 1~ signal at the'time of construction, with the City reimbursing him for the remaining balance (~,a(,oL ~'~"" exceeding the participation level indicated above. ' ~~, 6. The developer will conduct a warrant study ~ the installation of the q signal system. ~( c~ac•~+,~,2.. ~F ~,,y~J 7. The developer requested particip Lion for th storm sewer hich ex~~e, GIs tlu~ size ~~t~~/-~,~,,,(a "~' re aired b their development. ~~ U q y 7Ww The ~ e a" letter agree n~~ e c ~`btix,retailers indi a ' their de ire to ~ 1_oc~~s_development. ad ' 'on to n ob is ~~ same si _; ~dk,U .' preliminary amage calculations to size. the box culvert for both'the ultimate design and ~' to mast also be ~~~~~ ' ed b the develo meat of the Lone Star Pavilion. An engineer s estima the desi r u~r P gn eq Y submitted with both designs to be considered for the requested-participation. The development will be responsible for the construcfion of a portion of Eisenhower. This responsibility will include the dedication of right-of-way as well as the construction of Eisenhower necessary to provide access to the development :from Lincoln Avenue. A cost estimate. must also be submitted for the portion of Eisenhower constructed by the developer. /~~~ 'D ~ ~y ~ ~ " ~A LDD, ~~~ ~ ~~~ c/ ~~I _ .~... Mr. Charles W. Shears June 25,1996 Lone-Star Pavilion Page 2 The City wouldlike to receive in return for entering into a development .agreement the acquisition of right-of--way including the design and construction of Eisenhower Street from Ash Street to Lincoln .Avenue. The planting of street trees along arterial streets will be necessary to comply- with the landscape ordinance. As part flf the development. agreement process, the City will analyze the trade-offs made by both. parties to determine whether or not it is advantageous to enter into such an agreement. A~~ the. present tune, there are too es of re cuts to warrant n fora eve opment agreement. To address the existing parking spaces along Texas Avenue, they are non-conforming in that they do not meet existing requirements. The latest Zoning Ordinance requires atwenty-four. (24) foot landscape , reserve along :all rights-of--way. Parking may encroach by up to six (6) feet from the properly line, but only at a maximum of seven {7j spaces and. only if all other streetscape requirements can be met. Those ,. requirements include street trees (for Texas Avenue, these would be Live Oaks plantedevery sixty (b0) , feet on center) as well as parking :screening. Tf~e.~~sr g ~na~~ a~ta be reconstructed, the ordinance requirement must be met. The ordinance does provide for a variance, and as was discussed, staff will assistyou in the preparation of the ;application... Staff does not make recommendations to the Zoning Board, however, they are aware of the alternative to place a parking island every seven spaces. In cases where the ordinance could still be met and there are no physical hardships involved, the Board has denied -such variances. We are including an application and the bylaws of the Zoning Board with this letter. Should you choose to apply for the variance, please let us lrnow. It will be the: responsibility of the developer to solicit approval from the surrounding business and .property owners in order to relocate the median opemng cuirentiy approved as part of the Texas Avenue widening. This opening location was determined as a result of input received during several public ~ meetings. In order to relocate this median;opening the developer must obtain written approval from the properties affected by this relocation. The City could help you obtain the names and .addresses of the individuals who participated in the public meetings and those who have had direct :negotiations with the Texas Department of Transportation. If you have :any questions or comments, feel free to contact me at {409) 764-3570. Sincerely, Steve Homeyer Graduate Engineer cc: Jun Callaway, Asst. Dir. of Development Services Kent Laza City Engineer Veronica Morgan, Asst. City'Engineer Jane Kee, City Planner Sabine Kuenzel, Senior Planner Shirley Volk, Development.Coordinator Ed Hard, Transportation Planner Dan Wilson, Wiison/Zetty Associates, Inal Q~ June 25; 1996 I Shears Companies Attn::Mr. Charles W. Shears 1325 La Concha Houston, Texas 77054 RE: Proposed Lone-Star Pavilion at Tezas Avenue and Lincoln Dear Mr. Shears: We Gook forward to working with you in order to provide a quality .development for everyone. There were several issues addressed during a recent predevelopment meeting that need further. clarification. :The construction of Eisenhower Street must be addressed as to who will be responsible for the acquisition ofright-of--way and the :construction of the street section. Durin eeting, the following ~ lG~~l proposal was presented by the developer's representa ' ~. _ _ Q ,_ ~,(~1-'~ 1, 1. The developer ~ cost of constructm~g Eisenhower ts->~e~a~- 2. The developer wouldrelocate ~ ell-drive when Eisenhower is constructed. T1us driveway would be temporary in nature and would be constructed to asphalt paving standards, but would not be constructed as a curb and gaffer section. 3. The developer would give the Ciiy,a bond: to guarantee the relocation of the. driveway and the construction of Eisenhower. This bond would be cashed and held in escrow until the street construction occurred, at which time, the monies would be removed, 4. The developer requested the City to' provide~he necessary engineering documents to construct Eisenhower Street. ` rp UJ 5. The developer would contribute $50,000.00 to the construction of a traffic signal at the main entrance to the proposed development. The developer proposed to pay for the entire signal at the time of construction, with the-City reimbursing him f` or the remaining balance exceeding the participation level indicated above. ~ a 6. The developer will conduct a warran# study v~~ti~f~rse~~g-the installation of the signal system. 7. The developer requested oparticipation for the storm sewer -°~` The City will require a letter from each of-the large box retailers iodic ' g their desire to .locate within. this development. In addition to these agreements, the City .will ~ ~ ~~ ^ . projections from these same retailers in order to analyze the need for a traffic signal. The City will also ~f' L need to obtain preliminary drainage. calculations to size the box culvert for both the ultimate design and the design required by the development of the Lone Star Pavilion, An engineer's estimate must also be '' submitted with both designs to be considered for the requested oversize participation. The development will be responsible for the construction of a portion of Eisenhower. This responsibility will include the dedication of right-of way as well as the construction of Eisenhower necessary to provide. access to the development from Lincohi Avenue. A cost estimate must' also be' submitted for 'the portion of Eisenhower constructed by he developer. ICI a,; Mr. Charles W. Shears Lone-StarePavilion June 25,1996 Page 2 The City would like.. to receive in return for entering into a development agreement the acquisition of right-of-way including the design and construction of Eisenhower Street from Ash Street to Lincoln Avenue. The planting of street 'trees along arterial streets will be necessary to comply with the landscape ordinance... e a e ~2de 1~3z-bt~uz a*~;P~ r~ ~PrPrmine wheth r tit ie ~ ~ ~•• ''_ ...~ ~ iw au~u ou ar~wauv ~. , eve ~ , U~ To address the existing parking spaces along Texas Ave ;they are non-conforming in that they do not meet existing requirements. The latest Zoning Or ' ce requires atwenty-four (24) foot landscape reserve along all rights-of--way. Parking may encr ach by uy to six (6) feet from the_property line,. but only at a maximum of seven{7) spaces and only if all other streetscape requirements -can be met. Those ~f :{ requirements include street trees (for Texas Avenue, these would be Live Oaks planted every sixty (60) ~- feet on :center) as well as parking screening. If the existing spaces are to be reconstructed, the ordinance requirement' must be met. The ordinance does provide for a variance, and as was discussed, staff will assist you in the preparation of the application. s ~' antes. a are ui¢ u ' 'ca on an l r. o u se app y or e v ~ . It will be the responsibility of the developer to solicitAapp~from the surrounding business. and .properly owners in order to relocate the median opening currently approved as part of the Texas Avenue widening. This opening location was determined as a result of input received during several .public meetings. In order to relocate this median opening,. the developer must obtain written approval from the properties affected by this relocation. The City cfluld help you obtain the names and addresses of the individuals who participated in the public meetings and those who havs'had direct negotiations -with the .Texas Department of Transportation. If you have. any questions or comments, feel free to contact me at (409) 764-3570. Sincerely, Steve Homeyer Graduate Engineer cc: Tim Callaway, Asst. Dir. of Development Services Kent Laza, City Engineer Veronica Morgan; Asst. City Engineer .Jane Kee, .City Planner Sabine Kuenzel, :Senior Planner Shirley Volk, Development Coordinator Ed Hard, Transportation Planner ~ Dan Wilson, Wilson/Zetty Associates,. Inc.' June 25, 1996. Shears Companies .Attn: Mr. Charles W: Shears 1325 La Concha Houston, Texas 77054 RE: Proposed Lone-Star Pavilion at Texas Avenue and Lincoln Dear Mr. Shears: We look forward to working with you in order to provide a .quality development fore everyone... There were several issues addressed during a recent predeveiopment meeting that need further clarification. The construction of Eisenhower Street must be addressed as to who will be responsible for the acquisition of right-of-way and the construcrion of the street section.. During the meeting, the following proposal was presented by the developer's representative: ((mac ,-~~- -~vrr+..: [, ~ ( Zob~ 1. The developer ~ ~ e cost. f cc~° ' g Eisenhower to his drivewa . H 2. The. developer would relocate ve w en isenhower is constructed.:. This i~er~ra~i driveway would be "temporary in nature and wouldbe constructed to asphalt paving standards, but would not be constructed as a curb and gutter section: 3. The developer would give the City a bond to guarantee the relocation of the driveway: and the construction of Eisenhower. This bond would be cashed and held in escrow until the street construction occurred, at which time,. the monies would be removed 4. The: developer requested the City to provide the necessary :engineering documents to construct Eisenhower Street. 5. The developer would contribute $50,000.00 to the construction of a traffic signal at the main entrance to the proposed development. The developer propo ~ tp pa~ f ~s e ~n b~ ~ ~d ~~~ ,~, ... signalat the time of construction, with the City reimbursing him`'~`oe'~'femaYmng~ialance ~. ,,~~ ~ S i ISM exceeding the participation level indicated above. ~ .~; ~~-~,~ ~ 6. The developer will conduct a warrant study u~th~e~~Eit~;~~~ed~~efinstallafion of~ltc A ~12/~FFI~, Signal 6j~9~EHi. AT 'T'1'f~' M A /A( C'~C7`~C Aar G F 7a ~ ';a~":j(;,"2, 0'~~'"~~7-/T '? 7. The developer requestedaparticipation for the storm sewer which exceeds the size ° re aired by their development. u7Y rah c L ~iroo~~ ~ ~cx~ i~G r (~'tL The City will require a letter of agreement from each of the large box retailers indicating their desire to locate within this development. In addition to these agreements, the City will need tca obtain traff_ is -t _ _ rojections from these same retailers in order. to analyze the need for a traffic signal. The C-~~~-e~-~ w i~( ' ' preliminary drainage calculations to size the box culvert for both the ultimate design and the design required ~y the development of the Lone' Star Pavilion.. An engineer's estimate must also be submitted with both designs: to be considered for the requested ate-participation.. The development will be responsible for the construction eof Eisenhower. This responsibility will include the dedication of right-of-way as well as the construction of Eisenhower necessary to .provide access to the development from Lincoln Avenue. A cost estimate must also be submitted for the portion of Eisenhower constructed by the developer. Mr. Charles W. Shears Lone-Star Pavilion June 25, 1996 Page 2 The City would like to receive in return for entering into a development'. agreement the acquisition of right-of-way including the design and construction of Eisenhower .Street from Ash Street to Lincoln Avenue. The planting of street :trees along: arterial streets will be necessary to comply with the landscape ordinance.: As part of the. development agreement process, the City will. analyze the trade-offs made by both parties. to determine whether or not it is advantageous to enter into such an agreement. At the. present time, there are too many .unknowns and too -few .exchanges of requirements to warrant the ~5~ for a development agreement. v ~.~In~ ` ~r3 ~foT To address the existing parking spaces along Texas Avenue, they are non-conforming in that they do not ..meet existing requirements. The latest Zoning Ordinance requires atwenty-four (24) foot landscape reserve along all rights-of--way. Parking may encroach by up to six (6) fcet from the property line, but only at a maximum of seven ('n spaces and only if all other strcetscape requirements .can be met. Those requirements include street trees (forTexas Avenue, these would be Live Oaks planted every sixty (60) feet. on center) as well as parking screening.. If the existing spaces are to be :reconstructed, the ordinance requirement must be met. The ordinance does provide for a variance, and as was .discussed, staff will assist you in the preparation of the application. Staff does not make recommendations to the Zoning Board, however, they are aware of the alternative to place a parking island every seven spaces.. In cases .where the ordinance could still be met and there are no physical hardships involved, the Board has .denied. such variances. We are including an application and the bylaws of the: Zoning Board with this letter. Should you choose to iapply for the variance, please let us know. It will be the responsibility of the-developer to solicit approval from the surrounding business and property owners in order to relocate the median opening currently approved as part of the Texas Avenue widening. Taus opening location was determined as a result of input received during several public meetings. In order to relocate this median opening, the developer must obtain written approval from the properties affected by this relocation The City could help. you obtain the names and addresses of the individuals who participated in the public meetings and those who have had direct negotiations with the Texas Department of Transportation. If you have any questions orcomments feel free to contact me at (409) 764-3570. Sincerely, Steve Homeyer Graduate Engineer cc: Tim Callaway, Asst. Dir. of Development Services Kent Laza, City Engineer Veronica Morgan, .Asst. City Engineer Jane Kee, City Planner Sabine Kuenzel, Senior Planner Shirley Volk, Development Coordinator Ed Hard, Transportation Planner Dan Wilson,:: Wilson/Zetty Associates, Inc. ~~c~~ ~ ~~~ ~~ _~ S ~~7 Tz~ ~~ /'~,~ ~ISC~ S s~~ -~-h S Un~^1'~CG _ iJc`~~cr-4 June 25, 1996 ~-~p~~`'S `~1 S C~c.. SS 1 ~h~ 7~ ~ ~~~ T~~ ~ Shears Companies Arin: Mr. Charles W. Sheazs ~ ` ~~~ 1325 La Concha Houston, Texas 77054 (~ _2~ ~~ Z = ~~ RE: Proposed Lone-Star Pavilion at Texas Avenue and Lincoln Dear Mr. Sheazs: We look forward to working with you in order to provide a quality development for everyone. There were several issues addressed .during a recent predevelopment meeting that need further clarification. During the meeting, the following proposal was presented by the developer's representative: 1. The developer will pay for the cost of constructing Eisenhower from Lincoln to his driveway. which has an approximate length of 200.feet. ~/ 2. The developer will relocate the proposed temporazy drive when Eisenhower is constructed. ~~~~ This driveway would be temporary in nature and would be constructed to asphalt paving f standards, but would not be constructed as a~ curb and gutter section. / 3. The developer would give the Cty,a bond to guazantee the relocation of the driveway and ~ ~, ,f~ the construction of Eisenhower. This boriti would be cashed and held in escrow until the street construction occurred, at which time, the monies would be removed. 4. The developer requested the,City to provide the necessary right-of--way engineering documents to construct Eisenhower Street. 5. The developer would contribute $50,000.00 to the construction of a traffic signal at the main entrance to the proposed development. The developer proposes to pay for the entire signal at the time of construction, with the City reimbursing him within two (2) yeazs of obtaining a building permit for the first retail box. This reimbursement is for the remaining balance exceeding the participation level indicated above. 6. The developer will conduct a warrant studyregarding the potential installation of a traffic signal at :the main entrance to the development. 7. The developer requested participation for the conversion of the existing open channel to an underground storm sewer . The City proposes the following items to be incorporated into a potential Development Agreement: 1. 2. ~,~,,..~ ~J~,d ~t y F ~~' R~ P ~ ,~~~ w i ~ ,~.~-'" 3. .~ ~~ ~s~ a'a b~~r ~.,. l i '' ~~~ ~ ~ U°~ n i ~) @~-' ~; n '~tl.. The developer must submit a $200.00 application fee for the processing of a development agreement and. a site plan scaled to 1 inch equals 100 feet. The. development agreement will be contingent upon performance criterion for City participation or reimbursement of the developer. This criteria will be based upon the opening of businesses and not proposed activities. This reimbursement is based upon the size of development currently proposed at 110,967 squaze feet. The developer will be responsible for pr®viding a warrant study to indicate a need for the requested signal at the proposed main entrance. Mr, Charles W. Sheazs June 25, 1996 Lone-Star Pavilion Page 2 4. The developer will. be responsible for the construction of the storm sewer. The City will not participate in this construction as requested by the developer. 5. The developer will be responsible for one-half ('/z) of the costs to obtain the right-of-way and construct Eisenhower from its current terminus to Lincoln Avenue. _~',~` ~. To facilitate the traffic generated by the adjacent property to the north, no head in pazking ~. ,~ ' ~~ ~ will be allowed from the main entrance drive aisle. The proposed' traffic signal location ~' ~ ~" ~, ,~ ~ ~ does not provide a benefit to any other area except for this development. For this reason, '~~' '`,,x ~.~ the main entrance must be aligned in such a manner as to connect to the before mentioned '~ 4 ~ property and provide cross access. , 7. The developer shall provide a twenty (20) foot sanitary sewer easement located in the main drive aisle that runs north-south across the front of the buildings. 8. The developer shall close he thirty-five (35) foot driveway south of the 3,600 square foot pad site shown on the site plan as the Original Pasta Company. 9. The existing parking spaces .along Texas Avenue aze non-conforming in that they do not meet existing requirements.. ff these existing spaces are reconstructed, the ordinance requirements must be met for this non-conforming use. Streetscape requirements on Texas Avenue require Live Oak trees planted every sixty (60) feet on center as well as a form of parking screening. 10. It will be the developers responsibility to solicit written approval. from the surrounding businesses and property owners in order to relocate the median opening currently approved as part of the Texas Avenue widening. This opening location was determined as' a result of input received during several public meetings. The City couldhelp-you obtain the names and addresses of the individuals who participated in the public meetings and those who have had direct negotiations with the Texas Department of Transportation. At the present time, there .are :too many unknowns and too few exchanges of requirements to warrant the need for a development agreement. ff you have any. questions or comments, feel free to contact me at (409) 764-3570. Sincerely, Steve Homeyer Graduate Engineer ce: Jim Callaway, Asst. Dir. of Development Services Kent Laza, City Engineer Veronica Morgan, Asst; City Engineer Jane Kee, City Planner Sabine Kuenzel, Senior Planner Shirley Volk, Development Coordinator Ed Hard, Transportation Planner Dan Wilson, Wilson/Zetty Associates, Inc. ~• CITY OF COLLEGE STATION nd Bud et Office of Mana ement a 9 9 ~~ P.O. SOX 9960 1101 TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842 (409) 764-3461 Fax (409) 7643571 I'~ MEMORANDUM TO: Veronica Morgan -- Assistant City Engineer FROM: Mike Lindsey--Sc. Budget Analyst SUBJECT: fiscal Impact Analysis DATE: July 2, 1996 Please find the attached FIND Model fiscal impact analysis of the proposed commercial development (77,763 net commercial square feet :added) at 707 Texas Ave. The overall net impact#o the City is $88,177 annually., Two of he major assumptions are as follows: $94,39 taxable sales per` sq. foot and $100 ..per square .foot. assessed valuation. The economic impact results seem a little high at 106 direct jobs created. I would ,put it at about 55 jobs and $800,000 of direct income to the College Station economy...... , ~~ ~ y ~ ° ~ y x r ~'~' I '~ rx N ID W 7. rx NN c ia H "~' rxa NN e -1 1--/ 11$ IC fD tG rya 'x fDN W rx "~ NfC a u A ~a ~ olC I CC M C 70 tG m C G7 W m C . D bC1 da C r Ca va C Ica to m C H o tcl y vaN H vaN ~ ' y Cn tD H daN 3 H mN ~ H mfD 'a19 N R7"17 I ~s9 Ly tFJC '>il C • J R7 L -JC . >r H `~7 L1 ta'~7C ~.' cn .'7 ~+c1 L+~G O I-3 Y3 `IC1 t7C1C tl ~ ~1 tr,IC H c'] ~ ~o 7~G+ G~ H 1-r X N 11.` 1-1 }p N t5f F-1 X N y f--1 } , N CSa H }Z N "~ h-1 Y. N v~ K'J~ O V] ~ G V] 'L7 7O C1] ~! [!~ T3 r to •cl C to R,7 ~! pl;~a H .'a' t7 ~ N Cs n .'b N ~ t J n .b fP C3 IT.J C f'1 N .'>y i~ tea. !'] CD . ~ L3 ".~ d C~ N 3'y t7 b "E WIt7 r+ r va r m cx r m a r cn cs r m r~ v cyw ' H H V] l--f V] d 1---1 Va d H V] d H m H fn ~] 3. 3 3 3 - ~ 3 3 OLD i H - H H H H H H - ~3. '11 •... 1 1 . 1 ~ 1 1 H~.b ll 1 1 1 ~ J 1 ~F-1 11 1 1 1 __ L i 1 ; t ; , ; ~., ; CJC~ 11 t 1 ~~ ..-.~~ 1.-µ.m py~G- j 11 00 I 1 ~--.1~ 1 1--Y~ 1 ..-.. +7 1 Oo(Jl 1 OocO C. 11 OO / +] 1 F~QI 1 lOO t.• 1 1-+(Tl 1 1-.~ lTl toQ1 ~~ I O~C.7 1 [~,] 1 11 ~ t-a 11 1-+ 1 rP 1 41W ~] I OOVI F--I I Oo0 Ol 1 P~61 Ol 11001 ~~ 1 Vl[~~ 1 F-~ 11 z7.t Ja 1 O>n~ +7 ! /-+00 - 0~1 lpz] la t l0[St 10 t CJ1LJl N 1 ~]lp 1 lp 11 J N 1 1--~N 0~ 1 4-+-tia N 1 ~PtJ1 O 1 00 Ip 1 OY~I O 1 {-~F-I 1 SCE I i. I . j _ _ ' ~ ~ ' ' ~ O ~ ~ ~ ' >y UG7 O C H W Gl ~ ~' ' O ~ ' ~~ ~ t'1 i W C"' W t-1 CU f ] H t-I T+I t-1 b Cd y CG "r. 2 H -I t "ma W y b b[7 70 O t-1 . ^A .b . r . 7e b '~ to x t-1 Du t-+ r . O "~' I d C~ C'] C1 7D Gl 70 CU H GSf bG7 bd t-1 W ~--/ 7C .'~ 7C GU 1 ~--~ W W .b CC b ~ I N b ~ H H H ra 4] Ctr :a7 C/~ 7d cn 70 ¢-1 ('] C/]. t~ G1 cn 7d ' W ".~' 7d c'] t-1 G] cn Gsl ' t-1 I ~,. 7v ~ '.~' :7c1 70 f'] tc9 O H C+tl ~ S+ f1 d t .1 tc] . ry C l7sl H t J " " rd 1' I m O i H C7 H !S H ~ •a "~ U57 1'~ H "~ '.3 I-I R+ 4] H b W L~ V] CU 1v d R+ I-+a c," 7r bd R+ t'1 V] U] va H '.a~ I--I ~.' '~7 ~' 1 .. tC H '.~ H K 1c1 C ' I rn I b O ' C '~ ~1.. C1] C/] ~ :7. 4] :W .~' {Z "~ 7-. "~ :s7 In. tti X CJ ~1"~ •id Y. 2 i I V] 4TJ O t'7 "z ~ ~-I. f'1 O '~ O 'JO 7d KY W d y1 '. bd O h-I t'1 Od t7 ~ 1]U H d I W bO ~-] CC t7. L: X... H I-C t-1 C C H 9' C7 t-1 C7 C ("S r'-a ' V] v~ t'I cn .b I d ~--I. izi .'>y bc1 - 7d 3a1 H H --1 3 '1' U 7d ~ 7d H tG f ] ~+ >G I ' ~' C! 7d ' ] d ~ :717 t" r-+ f'] t+7 H [:] '~ C+7 "L' t J " t-I ^~] ri7 I f ] br7 7d 4'1 C "~ Ca7 H 1FJ '{i C>•J 'Z 3' a' C ~ O crs ' ~ t4. Q " cn I O tX1 O tFJ ~ '"~ d .b cn :C!] 'a C tC I-I bC :C W W :cn H :. W 'X H {~-I '~-. d 'H ~-.~ }t1' ~ CU ~ Cn UU C/] -~ ~ d 1 I 3 3 k +C • •. Cf~ CO '"~ v] cn tic? '~J H O .. o ' z ~ rn C .. I tc] ' bCl «`a7 H i!] G7 b57 W ~'+O 'C/] W b W I f ] 77' .b C/] C/] C!] bc7 1-r,1 hC9 7d bG7 I--I CI] H 1--1 ~ m ~ 3 ~ am" CU t-1 "~. [ f7 C +'J H I L ~. x' cn. [n H I-l 3 X 1 d C. ~ cn I- v] C[t I. G I ~ 1 Cb I ; t-I I Y I 1--~ I {-+ I Oo W I N t 1~ 1 O ~-• N Q\ Ol l _ I He lp 1--+ N W N F~ Q\ I . .l+ F-~ I H1 Oo VI O~ Q~ I 1-• Ol N F• (JI (ll (TI Ql Y OoI W O W 1--~ I .P .l I ~O d ] OD O I N O~ I--+ W W Oo W !~ O. . W Oo Q~ I (ll .P lJ'I W CII N Oo I W rP 1 l0 i I I I ~.~ .i OO W VI 1 ~P W N ~.. N 00 .P 1-1 [TI N O Ol ! Ql W .. lG 4-1. rP W ~P I v V 1 Ql H H x H O H '-F.' H. ~E H 170 ~,.:. . O O O O O. -O 77T' O b O tl y H H ('~ H H cra ct~ ~ sn r H ~7 ~7 ~'. ~.' cn H aE aE aE H H to W 1 U O b ~+~. O b0 b ~ E ~ ~" 1--1 yl yl b ~a1 b H b -b ~+ T+1 !a b t-1 n 1 ~ +a t-I t-1 I,p,,, t'" L: C t-I. V] y. . cn cn G1 t-1 H H H :~ t-1 G! H 1 0 ~I 3 O .b O A H H H H ~E b0 CG b0 C~ '~ 1 N .iy fig CC L ]c O c~ - H :tr1 H ~C ~" 7E. GO L~7 [~3 Cam] Stagy ~'., 7v '.V 7O ~ Cs].. H h-t 1 ~,. 7c1 tr0 O J~C H O : SxS 1--1 "~y" iu1 cn . b OE ~E ~ >=" H y, C t-1 '~ !~ 1 ~o O C H tti! W t-1 W.. 3 LU. 7O H cn b b b b bd H. O }z1' !'S '".~ GC 1-1 1 rn b G] W `~" t-1 - 1-1 }ty O7 70 G] H H H H H `.V CSI H GO GC - b C] C] '>a 1 O '"~ t-1 f'] d GO "i7 t0 W W W GO ".t.1' isi 1--1 y+ H C I c~ C CC -- 3 O H tC. ~] I>c.7 C "~' ~ - rn "..~ O "G' CC rK b O b CO rn C '~' d ~E - .'a1 H :d O .'ti' I-i .b O .b C'7 ~i7 C '"~' 131 C G1 i0 3. bD .tea. G7 W - 1+0 I-I n O H d". "~ d 1 I 1 lFJ d ~7 Cam] d H +. CJ xl C+7 H "~' H: .t4 t.7 'S '".C t+7 cn .tom 1 !"Z t'~ '"~ O '"~ b ."~ CSC H "..IC - b d O X .,0 "~' I O H ~ h7 Cn H trJ W W 70 - '"~' •p C ; 3 C "ICJ '"~' v] Z C W b0 O Z d O b0 ' G .. .. d O. Z H ':b 'GO 170+ C/] 1 O 1 f ] F-1 1 ~ b t Z' O b I ~ .b y !--1 1 1 d .y W 11 1 Y 1 1 I C 11 1 1 I 1. 1 1 Ch it 1 1 1 1 1 t""1 11 t 11 Ih 1 t 1 1 1 1 F~ 1 i~ 11 O 1 11 N 1 1 1 N 1 t!'11 i-+ ~A 1-+1 Ot l~ N 1 ~~ 1 N 00 lp 1 O 1 1 11'~ 1 1 r r r r I 1 {-~ '~ 11 O 1 Qll 61 O 1 (l1 ~1'+ (TI 1 1--~ rA 111 VI .00.1 1 0~1 N t N 1 l0 11 OO 1 (J'1 ! (Jl y 1 W ~P OO OD 1 W N H~ N N 1 N O l~ 1 N 1 lO 11 F~ I '~ %~~ ~~! f~~I ~j it .. O 1 O (JI 1 Ql N Oo l0 J 1 N O ~P N N 1 Ol 01. O 1--~ 1 W 1 O\ to H ~., y ~" y py y ~ O O O d O O ~' O .b O t-I p " ~ -JL .7 y y ~ y y vJ C"1 y ~7 V3 y ~. H H OG7 1767 7 t+ K7 ~v t7 "><7 ~7. ~ an ~ 1 ~ OY. X1 SI S+ O bd S+ O.. 1--a ~ ~+ y S~ b bC1 ~ t-I !~ ~ 1---1 ~1 ' C CC H ' O '+ fN bCl " bCl ' 1 4 17 C-1 t-I H t-1 C C d t" ~ W t" y ~ C" ITJ y t'1 W SL ' ' CO C Sti t V7 x Sal + I N bd + ~r bd 3. I--1 y ~ CJ n ^.O ~ ~. t-I CG CC 1--1 A W ~ "' 1 ~ c ~ ~ t'7 . y y ~ .~ C ~ ~ ' ~ [/1 O ~-I ' er' t ~ ~ ~ " .~ C. O y p . ~. ~ L -+ C 1 " Sd A tFJ t . p "I ' o i O 17 .1 ~ b y 3w bc1.. L-~ ~ y G1 .b ' trd y G"... ".~ CU 1-1 ' ~ IC R+ ~O t >'.7 "' 1 b bd b7 6 t-I.. .1--~1 ~ H. H Sav t>E7 H t7 cS rS. ~1 tJ c~ 3 tx+ ' s.._, ' I Ocn r '".~ t-1 y d v>,:. ~ bd. W Sb t-1 y C '~ ' 'A CG GG7 . . 1 4 ~-. 1 x^. V] Y W 3 O W t-1 ~ `: 7E y CU G' '7. ~7 7 + 'JO I'+d G` rs7 L"1 1-1 SV' r-1 GI. H "11. t7 .p1 t-I W ~'] "~ C y y 5C C O C d I 1 tC3 C73 ' .. .-3 '2. Cn d H. C 'ZC C H. C1 1--1 . ~ 1--1 '.3' CU I . p1 bc7 's7 t7 y ~ Ei7 H C7 ".G 1-C t-' '~C G1 A in S ti 1 [750 r ~ o :h .-~ v ~ 1--1 C ~ t~ ts7 z z I O«C z ~ r r ~ y z y c .'v 3 ~ t ~ C d v7 d '"~ r W ~ C .-. y b «e ty +-I O n ~ 1--1 S~7 CG CU "1" I I ~ bL7 i p d y d 1b O I t7 O ~ 1 .~ k z `~' r C 11 ' 1 I I 11 1 'i~ a I 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 ta7 r 11 lid 1IW1 1 1 ; 1 1 N1 ~. ~ 11 i-I 1 1 t-~ I F-+ N 1 N Oo I OD OO 1 N ~{> 11 W 1 11.E 1 H.1 . 1 F~ . I--X1 .. 1 1--+ r ap 1 . 1 aG ~ 1-+ 1 . - 1 1-. ~.. .00.1 . 1 00 . O I . 1 W . W ~. N . ~] . N . 1 {-~ 11. ap 1 N I N QO t 0~ OD 1 00 41 t W Vl I V1 ap 1 ~.] W .P ~] N ~.] N 1 a0 i1 O.I a0 I lG ao t aA r-~ 1 Fr :oo I oo ~ I ~.l crl I oo N 1--. O Q\ N W 1 to II.~P 1 i ~I d I. d .P 1 ~A F-~ 1 {-+ 1--I a 1--1 1-1 f /--I 011: d 'Ql t0 N OD t11 Ol O I of e. H H "s7 l7 d ~7Lt1 O d ~-+- 1"''- r- Oc7 aT w <-r w LS w r-s cc '-f m ~~0~ ~a r r 1--' C"a f1 K-!ON ~ ~ O ~ O O O o~ ~ o lJ' O C a ~ O f t"r R m R r O N a-r Ic'y e-r tY m e-r n crab-i r p r e-~r• r r ~ :o C~c7 w ~xa Orr 3~ ~~ .-lo`~ 1-1a~ I-lor~ .-lore .-lore 1 r xw ~I~ ~ 1-i1[y 7~ 14t0 ~ 1--*O ~ t-f.p ~ 1-ytp 1 w I-al< ry' y~ Iraf71'D rT(D ~-S Va C"a CD cTfD f-t vaf~(D rrfD ht - Cn ca CD crcD 1-f (A ("a 1:D CT(p 1'4 1 f H va d 1-{ C~ 1"S C] f"i C'a K Ca f"i C] ff`G EG F+- N- F+- F+~ F+- N- Y• Y- 1~- F+- If'O C ~i _ w w r r w w r r w w r 1--+ w w r r w w rr 1 (p ~ f I 1 I W t-f i . 1 1 f I 1 ~ '., 1 N I N O 1 O 1 f... f 1--f 1 1 fPl fp {-I 1 F~ 1 W.1 W 1 I Off W O'1 O 1 OI O 1 ' ~ b f b ltf 1 f.T fJ1 1 l11 I Yf ' 1 1 1 1 1 b 1~ f 1-f N 1 N b 1 t0 1--f 1 I--` ~A 1 rP 1 b . P f . P b 1 b ~ i 1 1 O f O O 1 O f Ol b 1 OC7t0 fP 1 OO.P N 1 OON Ql 1 0001 V'I 1 OOVI Ib w LQ .~ ','. i ~~ .... "[ ~~ ~ July 29, .1997 .. Certified Mail No: P-078-68.1-979 ' • Return Receipt Requested EPA -Office of Wastewater Management 401 M Street Southwest Washington, D.C: 20460 Attention: Betty West RE: NOTICE OF TERNIlNATION EPA Storm Water General Permit TXici05~8~6 Lone Star Pavilion College Station, Texas Dear Ms. West: I am enclosing. a Notice. of Termination for the above referenced EPA Storm Water General Permit TXR10Y806. This Notice of Termination is for the Lone Star Pavilion, College Station, Texas. We are attempting to comply with the EPA storm water discharge regulations. If you. require any additional information, please contact this`office. Sincerely, TRIBBLE & STEPHENS CO. v Allen Corte v Director-Project Support CC: Water Management Division, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region VI, 1445 Ross Avenue, 14th Floor, Dallas, .Texas 75202-2733 T.N.R.C.C., Water Utilities Division, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-.3087 Harris County Flood Control District, -9900 Northwest Freeway, Suite #220, Houston, Texas .77092 T&S Misc. Corporate Headquarters: 8580 Katy: Freeway, Suite 320 • Houston, Texas 77024 • .{713) 465-8550 • FAX .(713) 973 7107 ' ~ - - - --- - _ I 'THIS F!ORAA REPUICES PR$YI~?US FQR11~ ~514~7 (8-9?.~ F«m rsppro~roa. or~tts. ~,o. w~ ~ . PI+~• ~s fn~ruiabns B~Tots Com stio Th1. Form . '~°"''~ w,•n NPD€6 1 ~ UMSed Sdt W~i-t ~ P~ ~t~9 ~ , ~R~ '~" Ngtla~ of Tim{Wagon ~NCT~ of Covatag• under ~ NPRE9 Glfanot~l P*rmit for ~~ $tfsrm Wat+Mr ti ~rgtaf>t Asw+riatf~d with IlultutrMi Aetiv)ty .sutxtreaion ci this Notice of Termination conatlhRea notl~a plat the pt,~~yy Idantifled In 6vction I) of q~11a forth la no~o~er aulhorizad to aci'tat'Qa at4mt water aatxfat•d wi#t induetrltif a tlult the Ni'DES L NEG~S$ R td• ~-I iNFOtiMATIt7N MUST BE PROI/IQEp QN TFlIS FOIgM '' c X ur g . r am. . proQ Y, • L,Perntft~IMorm•tian NPpss storm wete- , T X. R , 1. 0 Y 8 061 ~~ Hera IfYoy an No Longer ~ Ch+ok hst• ii trt• 6tanti Wst•r ~ " l G ~ en4ral Parmi Nymner. ., _. --.~•--.~-- ~•-..-•~-,.~. ~-~ th• Opertsior of the. Fttaltty: ~l Diacharq• le Bainq Txminat•d: . I!• FacflftY Aper~k~r !n(ortYtanon ~ ~ , Nom. 1 T !~ I B B L E , &~,S T ~ P ,H ,E ,N ~S , C, 0,. ~ , . , ~ Phone: IZ ;1 3 .4 6' 5 ~ 8 5_5_.0. Addrees:._1 q_.~6 ~~ OM...~H...A..,. ~~. ~~:_Ia..,N,>__0......Ti,:..4 N ..,.~ R ~..~~.,:.~.,~,,,~.,_ ..1..,.:....~,„.~...~....,,...~I~....1~-.I ~. ,_~ city;- ..M~.,~~.w~..S, ~,.'~..,;.~.,~,....i_,..~..,~_.,~_.,~r..,.~_...e... _,~.,...~..:.~.....~,~ `:Ytr•. T~ zl~': ~,.~~ p_~4...t3._.....~.~ M~.:t. I II(. FadNty/&Ite lt~tfort lnfomtadan " •Namo, ! 4 O N E , S , T, A, R, ,P•~ A .V' I , L , I O , N L ~ . , ~ , I. ~ , ~ , A~ar~as• 17, 1 `~ ,~ ~_ T ~ ' X~A S' ~ ,A ~ V , E , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , . ~ ~ ~ I ~ , S,T;A~,T,I,O. N,` , T X 7,7_,8,.4;0 okyc ! C, 0,: L L, E, G . E , L •~ ~ ~ I stets: (_~.~J ZIP Godr I ~ ~ ~ ,~ Latlttaae ~ ,,..•.,.M. ' ~__~ tertq{tuda;l ~ ~ I_~~ I I quettar, ~....~M~- soon; ~.__t._~ Tanttah~; ~....~..,~.,~.t.,..J Rt4noe~ lV, Certli~tiam I certify under penalttyy at iaw That ell stoml~t~tpr dlttt;ll~rpea aesocie:tad with Ui$uat~ial •activiiy ham the Icl~titned ia~llity .that are nutnotizad pya NPDES gg~~a~~r~!R~tmlt hnvft btwn ouminatetl or t~t•t' t rani ntt ttxlgpr ift4't~pertrtor of the facility or aonattucgon eltp, 1 ta,atirstand that~by • sut>r111ttlnq this Ncpaa of Terminaq~n, i am r1o longer nuthorltad to dlscharpa •totrn vnisr attaoda~d with Induatga! >~INt1(undvr this pen•rai permit, and that dlschgrgfnSl poilutanttt fn stormwater tt~pcaat®d with.lnttstahf~d aodviCy to vr•tnrli aJ ttta Unlt.d states ie unNtwfyl tattler the q•m water Act wharo the tii9t~lArge la not authorized. by a NPQE9 ppe•mtit, ! also utt4ereta~d thAt mo ftubrrtlthl of trio Notkle Qf T•rmfnatltxt does nct, release en bp•rahor from o t f l Cl A W t Nlt d t ap ne, o c . 5 • tit ttarl a y f9r anY vi or ptQ t aap e peRni ,Punt Narnq. _,A ~-:._,~__~,...,~~..t _.k Qa..f~~.T.~,..:~...~:., i_,.a_..~.._:,r.,..a,....~.._.t~..,._..a....ar.,,~.._u....a~.~.,.,_,:..t,~-i Date: 17.~.:2..i.~.;.9 i.Z.; _,i i ?Slgnatutec . ~ , indruodom for ComPigNn®Notk# of T•rminaltorl {tdOn Fgrm ' ~. , , Who Mati Ftt~ r Tinttoa or TatnMattsn (NOT) ~ Ytfltar• to Flia NOT Form ~ , PartT{fttaea typo era proridPtttr ~'~ under .n ,t:Ptt-laawd N~tl4rtat Pollutant Send this roan to the the fopowkl9 adtirsu; Dit-sMrpa t?Iknlnatiart SY>ttam WAOtrt;1 ,fleixtal PMrNt (4letydnQ tM i~ , ' ' MUNf•9aotorPermMYf~- min Wetsr't~ldtupeaMtoelat>•d rrlgt hlduatrlN kffvlly ~ Stortrt Vygter Ntitica ai TerrnirttiNott (~09) ttMY worrlft a NWe• or Tertitktagen (NoT] forth xft.n tMlr facMitlw ne IorgrF 4ot i~ Stmt, 9.W. , hfre any atorrtt watet• d(tte~>tlfe3l~ tttuodei~d >teGt InrtuaMai u ditktsq in WaMinOtat, DC 2p4f,Q , ttla alarm watet r~tlttWm a<4o CfR t22.~5tb)q~), or tnttert a>!ti ttf~ no Ign~r ' the apaAtor of tM hdA~ea. ' , ~ CninpistA+O ttt• Famr Fqr oglatntctbn arrdririaa, atlminatkxt of ail atamt wont dkcttarpet'aaaoaiatad wnh Irtbuatdil attiiVly ocwra when glahrrt>+d sole at ttte pcn><typtpn rNa (Mti 15+Pe or prMt, velnd ~r't+M IattRra, in ltti aRpr4pripta stalls Dory. Pleat. t,aan fintJly taaEllst+d ens fentporary•ergafOn ~ sagtmant eantiol gNPwns plats lath Nlrraebr batwa+n the ma*s, AbdnMaa if naoaaai-ry to stay w~mM ha><a btirt Jamowb or rcpt ~ taRiPwd n bn ~pPref7d+ta thta, or•thrtt ~N afonn tM nunibar at ah+N>tcMr# atloMad for aKt1 tlam. Wa,a~N orN'tpace for tx^aKt ~,ata/daehsrpaa spotjsled wAl+~InAo+trial agf~igr ham tM conamralop sks thtte hatwa.n tarps, but not [or punet+ratlen rtttrW uttiaaa th.y artn+adaQ to elartiy ero gvllterfsad by a NPDE5 prnetsl a~ fi+"-a ahatrrW Osact allmirMled, FhtN your r•apaN•. N 1oN have any gyaagona about tttla roan, tahphata or wrty the itcst~ipzrtlan mane that rlt ~fdl;distut641si attlvigp N iha alts Mvs naafi Nottca~ollrttgtt Proat+Wrtq Gen4ral (7D0) ist•3250. cor/H4ataq, tlftd that # ixtNorm perarglfat ytpaAtdr+ oowr +wdt a datltlN of 7076 of ' the aowR-Rot unpaved ara+ta rpd ar'aaa not aowrsd'by p+RTM~ ttutwtyraa ttu 4Mn wtabilehtd, or agcrivelenr penpaffa(1e tbe>~Itlan rtlMwn• {ateh ea 1t>• , uw M rlprap, gebierts, or geoteYdla) tt~w tpart InllDtoyd. . .. , t:RA FOOtt J510.7 (&~) u ~a ~~~~. ~f ~- ~Y ~f,'. ^ ~' ~,k '! ~ ~ r~ l~y~ r~~. °v 9 K d, s 0 0 a y roro ~~ ~o ~ Ij r. . .. N > rF ' O ~7.. 01 3 H 0 ~ Z ~' H I-' k N r N ~ ' =1 O cr C Q1 a r cr L=1 W N ~ ° z L 3] ~ o _z M V' ~ \ O N C` 0... H ~ ,m H~ v za o ro ~ o P'S \ 'O m ';` ~ V ' K O' O' ro o ° '''~. \ d T '" ,T m >;A: W ~ m '' z ~~ ~ m l0 ~ ~ 3 (1 v a '~ Z l0~ U7 s ~ ~ sD Z 0 o 0 'c O p O . z ~ :. O O `~ .v} N,' b c Y~ ° z q ~ ~ o o O ~' : 0.~. ~ ~~: m O~ o ~ O C-t'; o 0 0 CS ~j ~~'/ a dnl I" - _ _ -_ ~~ t~~~ ,) CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY CHECKLIST / Datc: Project: - ~"on 34 ELECTRIC: (Ray 3680, ~ y ) / ~~ ~ y-~~~~- a~ ~ ~~ ENGINEERING: Covers Water, Sewer, Drainage, Site Utilities, Impact Fees (Kent 3581, Veronica 3763, Steve 3592) (David D. 777-3942, Vern W. 777-0192, Jerry J. 777-3557, John L. 759-3970) FIRE: (Jon 3781) LEGAL: (Jan 3546). '(Easement?) ZONING/PARKLAND/LANDSCAPING/DUMPSTER LOCATION & SCREENING: (Sabine 3782, Joey 3748) DUMPS ER SERVICE: ,.~( im S., wily, Freddie -all at 3690) ~" ~ ~' ~' ~~ ~ %~ ,_~ ~ =~ }° ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~I~~ ~~~~' Aa~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~. ~~- ~~~ ~0 3 ~~.~ (~~s)~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ao~~96~,-~or~ '1/3 ~rll~.~ Tian. /~s~..~. ~' ~ ~~~~~'~ .~ p~,~ ~ ~je.~ ~e ~~~~ ~~v ~e ,~'`~e ~~ R~~ B~ ~~ ,~ ~ .lie ~~~ a~~c~~~~~G~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~ ~' .~~~ Page 1 .Shirley Volk.- Re: Barnes & Noble From: Shirley Volk To: JCALLAWAY@CITY OF COLLEGE STATION.CITY HALL Date: 9/5/97 5:16PM Subject: Re: Barnes & Noble I talked to Davis oday and gave him your message. He replied that he had never been quoted any type of dollarfigure, and he certainly wasn't the person to receive the bill! He said fhe City should write a letter to Bill Ayers at ABShopping Center aboutthis and to include an explanation which indicates that all parties involved were working to meet a deadline for installation of the light, and that cost figures and responsibilities were arrived at later. He-said he would like to receive a copy of that letter. Also said that you should call Davis if you have a problem with this! He's also got a call into Steve to talk about the drainage, and he's going to try tome the problem to On The Border rather than to anything on Lone Star's design. I told him the only thing F am aware of is thaf when OTB opened, the inlet in the rear wasn't finished, but l didn't remember how that coincided with the big rain! I'm going to copy Steve with. this so I don't have to write this part again. Steve, you don't have to pay attention. to the rest of this, but please DO pay attention to this paragraph! »> Jim Callaway 09/04/97 02:33PM »> Shirley- The figure that l had discussed with Mark Smith for participation in the Temp signal was $10,000 to $13,000. Staff at Public Works had originally quoted a higher figure based on the total cost of the signal.. Some of the equipment stays for the permenant .installation and our goal was to get some participation. So while the actual cost was. higher, the .above price is the range we discussed for the developers participation. The signal deal was worked through Davis, not A&B. Davis was originally quoted about $60,000. We got help from Bob Phol on setting the post, etc. and worked the price down. You should contact Davis;first, tell. him it's $13,000 and asK if he wants to have us bill him or A&B. »> Shirley Volk 09/04/97 11:04AM »> Just had a call from Bldg yesterday that final inspections are being scheduled for Barnes & Noble -that means they will be wanting a C.O. soon and we'need to identify ANY outstanding items which must be addressed before the C.O. is requested) That includes items on the SITE, like incomplete landscaping (which 'l'm aware of and .have informed the ABShopping Center people .about) and the $ they owe for their part of the traffic signal (which l've also mentioned). Give me your complete list of needs so I can forward that on to the ABS people to take care of so we don't hold up B&N. Thanks. CC: SHomeyer ~~ . ~ ~~~ ~1" ~ ~~. ,u~.~ hn~ qy~N \ ~~~~~ ~ ~~~~ (7~~.~~ ~ ~ ~ fig..,,-9aa7 _ ~~ CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY C ECKLIST ~~' Date: Project: ELECTRIC: (Ray 3680, ony 3438 /~~ 4~ ENGINEERING: Covers Water, Sewer; Draina tilities, Impact Fees - (Kent 3581, Veronica 3763, teve 35 (® vid D: 777-3942.,. Vern W. 777-0192, Jerry J: 777-3 57, John L. 7~9-3970) ~~ ~~~ ir/~i ~~` ~° ~ ~~ `~ -fem. - ~ lO~ FIRE: (Jon 3781 ~~ ~~ ~~- LEGAL: (Jan 3546) (Easement?) • `~~r~% ~~,.~..~-~ ~~~"..c'G' ~/.~ D~ ~~ ~~~`' ZONIN ARKLAND/LANDSCAPING/DUMPSTER LOCATION & SCREENING: ine ,Joey 3748) ~ir/ ~/~ Ly2Qirr~C. ~ ~~fo i ;h,,G~t/`- JG2'~i(~~ - .Z~~ ~. DUMPSTER SERVICE: (Jim S., ally, Freddie - a-I at 3690) -;Y. .. • ~ „/ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ o~~ ~~ ~~. ~--~ '~~~~~~ ~~-~ From: Steve Homeyer To: SVOLK Date: 12/4/96 11:54am Subject: Lone Star Pavilliion -Reply There is still one outstanding concern left. From the very beginning, we stated that we had a concern with the. backwater effects associated with this development in regard to the 707 Center.: This issue has never been addressed and I have discussed it with their engineer on several occasions since our initial meeting. What we have proposed to the developer is the following condition. He must submit to the City, a letter stating that he is fully aware and understands that. there is the potential for the proposed 24" RCP to be redesigned and that this redesign may increase. his construction costs. He must also state that he understands that he cannot do any construction within the existing channel until this issue has been resolved. This limitation will not prevent development from continuing on the remaining areas of the site, but it may. create an inconvenience for the contractor. From what we have been told, the developer needs a building permit in order to receive his financing. We feel that this proposal would allow for this site to be under construction while we are working on this drainage issue. »> Shirley Volk 12/04/96 09:28am »> Steve: Just had a call from Charlie Shears saying Davis had mentioned something to him yesterday about the permit .being ready for them today. Are you ready to sign .off? Will you come stamp the plans? Lance: Have they submitted an application for a building permit yet? The contractor will be Tribble (or Treble) and Stevens. Are they registered with the .City? What do they need to do to get the permit? CC: JCALLAWAY, KLAZA, VMORGAN, Lsimms ~~ ~~ ~~~: January 24, 1997 CITE OF CC~~ .LEGE STATIOI`~ ~isst `;€fte~ ~;~x ~~°~F"a ~ I:~? "r~.~~u :~ve¢zu:: 'its?€e;~ . ~s:~wu ~ .:~:~~ 7 r :?~f-ys~~fit Mr. Phillip McAfee A. B. Real Estate, Inc. 1900 International Park Drive Suite 303 Birmingham, Alabama 35243 RE: Approved Construction Documents (Civil) for Lone Star Pavillion Dear Mr. McAfee: Construction documents for the civil site work have been approved for the Lone Star Pavillion and contain the following sheets: Cover sheet dated 11/23/96 approved for construction 12/5/96 Sheet C-1 dated 1/20/97 approved for construction 1/23/97 Sheet A-1 dated 11/23/96 approved for construction 12/5/96 Sheet G2 dated 11/23/96 approved for construction 12/5/96 Sheet C-3 dated 1/20/97 approved for construction 1/23/97 Sheet C-4 dated 1/20/97 approved for construction 1/23/97 Sheet C-5 dated 1/20/97 approved for construction 1/23/97 Sheet C-6 dated 11/23/96 approved for construction 12/5/96 Sheet C-7 dated 11/23/96 approved for construction 12/5/96 Sheet C-8 dated 11/23/96 approved for construction 12/5/96 Sheet C-9 dated 1/20/97 approved for constructional/23/97 Sheet C-10 dated 1/20/97 approved for construction 1/23/97 Sheet C-1 l dated 1/20/97 approved for construction 1/23/97 I hope this information will fulfill your request. ff it does not, please let me know and I will do something different. Because of the different dates of submittal and approval, I decided the best way to relay the information was to include these details. We still need a minimum of 2 sets of these documents to stamp "approved" for our files and for the contractor's. set. You may submit as many additional sets for us to approve for your files as you need. It was nice to visit with you on the phone and we Look forward to working with you throughout the construction and completion of your project. Yours very truly, ,%-1 i (\ Shirley J. Vol Development Coordinator cc: Davis Wilson HAFA e~E~: c`~r d'~:..~`. a'~u'n .`~.CriK3 3~.$i5ya',_,,.h-+_.~. •. s ~~ ~~ Dcvclopmcnt Scn ices C 1 0 l C O lle e S t a tlO i1 P.O. Box 9960, College Station, Tai 77b42-9960 rax To: A~ Phone: Fax phone:. CC: Date: ~ ~ t Number of pages including cover sheet: ~,. Phone: (409) 764-3570 Fay phone (409) 764-3496 REMA ^ Urgent Q~~or your revie~~ ^ Reply ASAP ^ Please comment P ~~~ ... ~ _.. 4 r- ~ ° - D ~ _~j~~ ,:+/ ~l - 6 V From: To: Date: Subject: Jim Callaway SVOLK 1/8/97 8:29am Lone Star Pavillion -Reply Remeber we are "participating" with them to the tune of about $100,000 for a traffic signal. »> Shirley Volk 01/07/97 04:04pm »> I just had a call from Bill Ayers, who is with AB Shopping Centers - the company that either bought all or part of the Lone Star Pavillion shopping center. He will be in town tomorrow. and wants to meet with me to discuss several things: changing the site plan (I told him we had already reviewed the plans they had sent. and had told them their plan to load parking along the boulevard entrance. will not be acceptable), changing the location of islands and landscaping. (told him he can make a presentation and we will consider it, but suggested that he read that part o,f his zoning ordinance before he makes a presentation), and the items the City is participating in. I asked Steve what the City is participating in and he said virtually zip -that we are building our own sewer line acoss the front of the stores, so we will not be participating with them; and, they are going to participate with us for one-half up to a maximum of $10,000'for the storm sewer that goes down Lincoln to Texas Ave. Now if all of this is correct and if you aren't available tomorrow afternoon at "about 3 or 3:30", I can meet with him and tell him exactly this. If it isn't correct., please correct it. If you can meet with us I would welcome you because I've dealt with him before and it's not the most pleasant experience I've ever had! Let me know what you want me to do! (Also, if my throat takes a turn for the worse, I'll have Natalie meet with him!) `.' ~ CITE I~ C® G~ STATI~I°`I ~=k r ... , ~- ..^'~d!'g~ ..1 ~.ii ~iUa':. ~ryYf x'e a 6~$~_~; Vii; i? December 19, 1996 College Station/A.B./Limited Partnership A Delaware Limited Partnership Attn: Mr. Charles W. Shears 1325 La Concha Houston, Texas 77054 RE: Proposed Lone-Star Pavilion at Texas Avenue and Lincoln Dear Mr. Shears: This letter is to state that the City of College Station finds the drainage calculations to be satisfactory for the above referenced development. As stated in the letter of agreement dated December 5, 1996, the approval of the drainage design releases the Limited Partnership from the requirements outlined in that document. If you have any questions or comments, feel free to contact me at (409)764-3 570. Sincerely, ent Laza City Engineer xc: Jim Callaway, Acting Dir. of Development Services Steve Homeyer, Graduate Engineer Shirley Volk, Development Coordinator Davis Wilson, Wilson/Zetty Associates, Inc. ~~~y~-;~~•: ~~ +~.~s~ gam' _ }E.... ~ ..~~ 12/;9/96 17:57 L 409 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS lQ]001 ~~~ ACTIVITY REPORT ~~~ TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX N0. 8462 CONNECTION TEL p17139528610pp396 CONNECTION ID START TIME 12/19 17:55 USAGE TIME 01'44 PAGES 3 RESULT OK ~~ FAX l~ Date: (Z _ ~~ _ q ~ Pages to follow: Phone: -~ ~ 3 `~ ~'~ Z -~G oa Fax:. -~ / 3 9 S Z - $ G ! t7 From: ~~~=~ rn L'~~~.. Phone: (409) 764-3570 Fax: (409)764-3496 Comments: n't r4 r L . ~~-C~S~ SIG~.t -7~-,~ ~!-1 ?~ fk /~~ ~~ If you do not receive all. of these pages, please call (409) 7643570.. ~~ °y"~~ CITE Off` CC~I..~..~G~ S^TTP~TIOI`~ F ~ ~r sst M~ f'ps' p: ~. ~~a~. x ti' 1_ ~~~: ,''..ur~taiee December 19, 1996 College Station/A.B./Limited Partnership A Delaware Limited Partnership Atlas: Mr. Charles W. Shears 1325 La Concha Houston, Texas 77054 RE: Proposed Lone-Star Pavilion at Texas Avenue and Lincoln Dear Mr. Shears: This letter is to state that the City of College Station finds the drainage calculations to be satisfactory for the above. referenced development. As stated in the letter of agreement dated December 5, 1996, the approval of the drainage design releases the Limited Partnership from the requirements outlined in that document. If you have any questions or comments, feel free to contact me at (409)764-3570. Sincerely, east Laza City Engineer xc: Jim Callaway, Acting Dir. of Development Services Steve Homeyer, Graduate Engineer Shirley Volk, Development Coordinator Davis Wilson, Wilson/Zetty Associates, Inc. M ';~~~ CITE C)F" ~ ~Ci~= STATI®I~I rr~~~_ ~t~€~ December 19, 1996 College Station/A.B./Limited Partnership A Delawaze Limited Partnership Attn: Mr. Charles W. Shears 1325 La Concha Houston, Texas 77054 It is understood and mutually agreed that College Station/A.B./Limited Partnership, a Delaware Limited Partnership, will participate in the construction of a storm drain from the curb inlet located at the intersection of Lincoln Avenue and Foster Avenue to the storm drain system located within the Texas Avenue right-of--way. The Limited Partnership agrees to financially participate in an amount that equals fifty percent (50%) of the total construction cost up to a maximum often thousand dollazs ($10,000). Kent M. Laza City Engineer Date of Signature: / Z / Charles W. Shears, Limited Partner College Station/A.B.fLimited Partnership, A Delaware Limited Partnership Date of Signature: ,ry ~~ CITY OF COLLEGE STATIOI`I Po~L ~D6fice fox 3300 ~ t01 Texas ~±+z~eae ~o!lege ~tatioss, Texas T~E3~2-33&0 0403} ~6~-35dt3 December 5, 1996 Mr. Charles W. Shears Shears Companies 1325 LaConcha Suite 200 Houston, TX 77054 Mr. Davis Wilson Wilson/Zetty/Associates, Inc. 3100 Wilcrest Suite 325 Houston, TX 77042 SUBJECT: Building Permit -Lone Star Pavilion Shopping Center Gentlemen: The building permit for the Lone Star Pavilion Shopping Center is ready to be picked up in the Building Department in City Hall at 1101 Texas during the hours between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. Monday through Friday. We look forward to working with you throughout construction of this project. Yours very truly, /~ r / ~_ Shirley J. Voly~, Development' oordinator Post-it® Fax Note 7671 Date/~ ~ pa°ges~ To ff~ I ~EL ~ From ~~ LK. Co./Dept. Co. aC D C Phone # Phone # ~/ ~ %~~ ~ O Fax # Fax # ~ / ~ 2 ll~~~~ of Texas ~t~ ~4:siv~r.itg 12/05/96 17:23 ^0'409 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS l~ 0 O 1 ,~,.. su~x;:~~;:x:~s~~;x~~::~~:~xx:x~*:~~~e:~sxsxx~:~~: :~:~:~ ACTIVITY REPORT ~:~:~ TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX N0, 8309 CONNECTION TEL 1713952861Opp161 CONNECTION ID START TIME 12/05 17:23 USAGE TIME 00'37 PAGES 1 RESULT OK 12/05/96 17:26 L 409 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS X1001 %~~k~k:ksk~k~ksk:k%k~:%~s~%~Nc~kX:~:X:~k~k~k~k~%k~kX: :~:~:~ ACTIVITY REPORT ~~~; TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX N0. CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START TIME USAGE TIME PAGES RESULT 8311 17137960623pp161 12/05 17:25 00'49 1 OK 12/06/96 12:09 'C3'409 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS l~1j001 :~~::~ ACTIVITY REPORT ~~~ ~k:k~::k~~k%k:is~k~:~~:k:k%k~k:ksk*:k~k%k:ksk:k~K* TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX N0. 8321 CONNECTION TEL 17139737107pp161 CONNECTION ID START TIME 12/06 12:07 USAGE TIME 01'15 PAGES 1 RESULT OK ~~V. ~~ ~ C"f City of College Station Development Services P.O. Box 9960, College Station, TX 77842-9960 FAX To: ~ ~~ ~i.~ Phone: Fax phone: CC: Date: F`ro` /~~ Number of pages including cover sheet: From: ,~._ Phone: (409) 764-3570 Fax phone: (409) 764-3496 ~, ~ ,, REMARKS: ®' Urgent For your review ^ Reply ASAP ^ Please comment f t O 1~ Bury+Pittman December 3, 1996 Ms. Shirley 7. Volk City of College Station Development Coordinator 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 77842 RE: .Drainage Report for On The Border at College Station College Station, Texas Dear Ms. Volk: 3002-21 As you are awaze, it is the intent of Brinker-International to build a proposed On The Border restaurant on part of what is now known as the Texas 707 Shopping Center at 707 Texas Avenue, College Station, Texas. In order to do so, a portion of the shopping center is to be demolished to make room for the proposed On The Border restaurant. A drainage analysis has been prepared, to examine the whether or not. the amount of runoff has been increased on the revised portion of the 707 shopping center and whether existing drainage patterns have been altered and what impact this has on existing storm drainage systems. Before. demolition of the specified portion of the 707 shopping center, approximately 6,921 squaze feet of .landscape azea currently exists. However, after demolition and construction of the proposed On The Border restaurant approximately 14,718 square feet. of landscaping will be provided. Therefore,. a net increase of 7,797 square feet of landscape area will be achieved by building the proposed On The Border restaurant, thus, reducing the weighted "C" factor and decreasing the amount of runoff from the site.. Table 1 shows both existing and proposed calculated storm water flows fora 10 year storm event, as required in the storm drainage policy and design standards handbook for the City of College Station. In comparing both existing and proposed conditions, even with a light shift in drainage areas, proposed flows are lower then existing flows. Along with an increase in landscape. area and a reduction in stormwater flows, the proposed On The Border restaurant has been positioned such that there is no .significant alterations in drainage patterns on the proposed site. The attached Figure's 1 & 2 show the existing drainage patterns compared to the proposed drainage patterns of the site. As you can see, the proposed and existing drainage divides separating the drainage flowing Bury &Pittman-DFW, Inc. Consulting Engineers/Surveyors 5310 Harvest Hill Road/Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75230 Te] 214/991-0011 Fax 214/991-0275 y-~ Ott Ms. Shirley J. Volk City of College Station December 3, 1996 Page 2 to the front and rear of the property are virtually identical. This should insure that neither drainage .system is asked to increase the capacity for which it was originally designed. If you have any questions or comments, do not hesitate to give me a call. Very truly yours, W Oce L. Vest, P.E. Branch Manager ~'~~ Kevin Spraggins Project Manager OLV\KS\nh Attachments F:\3002-21 \ADMIN\002SLT02. WP6 TABLE 1 Calculated flows (Q) for existing. and proposed condition for On The Border site: DESIGN STORM USED - 10 YEAR • Time of Concentration (T~)-l0 min (minimum allowable) • Rainfall Intensity (ilo)-8.25in/hr (Figure III - I) • Weighted "C" Factor: Existing Proposed Total Area - 105328.94 ft2 Total Area - 105328.94 ftz Landscape - 6,920:56 ft2 Landscape - 14,717.3 ft2 Impervious - 98,408.38 ft2 Impervious - 90,611.64 ft2 Weighted C Factor: C = (0 9~8_~408.38+(~.45~6,920.5 6 C _ ,(0.9190 ,611.64+(0.45114,717.3 105,328.94 105,328.94 C = 0.87. C = 0.84 Design Flows (Qcfs): • Existing: • Drainage Area A: Area = 31814.99 ft2 = 0.73 ac C = 0.87 I = 8.25 Q = CIA _(0.87)(8.:25)(0.73). = 5.24 cfs • Drainage Area B: Area = 73,513.95 ft2 = 1.69 ac C = 0.87 I ._.8.25 Q =CIA = 12.13 cfs QII~V P_ ®ITTPAAf.I IAI /'~ • Proposed • Drainage Area A: Area = 32245.25 ft2 = 0.74 ac C = 0.84 I = '8..25 Q =CIA =..(0.84)(8.25)(0.74) = 5.13. cfs • Drainage Area B: Area = 73083.69 fttz = 1.68 ac C = 0.84 I = 8.25 Q =CIA =.(0.84).(8.25)(1.68) = 11.64 cfs F:\3002-21 \ADMIN\002SLT02. WP6 RI IRV R PITTMAN IN(": U CALCULATED FLOWS(O) FOR EXISTING CONDITIONS: DRAINAGE AREA A: C = 0.87 i = 8.25 in/hr A = 0.73 ac 0 = CiA = (0.87)(8.25)(0.73) = 5.24 cfs DRAINAGE AREA B: C = 0.87 i = 8.25 in~hr A = 1 .69 ac Q = CiA = (0.87)(8.25)(1.69) = 17_.13 cfs LEC~ IXiSTNG DRAINAGE AREA ~~ FFGL1 RE ~ EXISTING DRAINAGE AREAS MTV DECEMBER S. 1996 a Bur +Pitt~ ~~ .~ ..~ _,~.~ w ~~~ ,+ .w....~~ .., „~,,.,.~ e w,,.,m~ ~.., ..n . r.~ ~~~~ ~ ILTS (Y1 tAC,~nori -wr x1s CP,LCULATED FLOWS(Q) FOR PROPOSED CONDITIONS: DRAINAGE AREA A: C = 0.84 i = 8.25 in/hr A = 0.74 ac 0 = CiA = (0.84)(8.25)(0.74} = 5.1 DRAINAGE AREA B: C = 0.84 i = 8.25 in/hr A = 1.68 oc 0 = CiA = (0.84)(8.25)(1.68) _ 11 LEC~ND PROPOSES DReVN/~E N2EA FKtU R~ 2 ED DRAINAGE AREAS OATS DECEbEBER 3, 1996 ~ B ~y+Pittr E~nars and au a...a >• a..a a.a. ae sa wVan~n~ re ~-+s+a o c.~wa ~wc .~ a ew 12/06/96 16:32 ^C 409 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS I~ 0 O 1 x::~~:x::x:~~xsx~e~::~xe~~:~~~:~~::~~~*x::x~~ ~~c~ ACTIVITY REPORT ~:~:~ ~::u:~~:~c:~x:~~~;:~~::~:xx:x:~x:~::~:~xe:~~x:x~x~ TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX N0. 8330 CONNECTION TEL 17139528610pp161 CONNECTION ID START TIME 12/06 16:27 USAGE TIME 04'56 PAGES 9 RESULT OK ~: \~ Development Services City of College Station P.o. Box 9960, College Station, TX 77842-9960 FAX To: /5 /Lit/ Phone: Fax hone: ~/~ l~so~ ~~ ~ CC: Date: Number of pages including cover sheet:. From: 2~ o~ Phone: (409) 764-3570 Fax phone: (409)764-3496 REMARKS: Urgent ~ ~~ ~ D,~ ~or your review ^ r ~~ ~'~~ Reply ASAP A~tz~~r ^ Please comment ~~/i f~ou _ ~. ~/II/a L .lSoC(//n~i~/T ~~ ~i~ll/~9Yl~I ~~S ~ ly~f~-~E S"~,~?~_ ~T f~b~ ie~~ ~a ~,r~~r ~o~ ~~ v~'~Gi / ~l ~~ ~~i'd~~1S `y7~ I" ~STG,c~r~~'~ ~L- ~1~~ ~l G~~C,~ v~. ' / /`F//// ~/C ~~l ~ ~ V/ ~i ~~~V'`,'.J K / Jf c~`"r~ /)/) n~~ / J .~~wt ,~.~ ..-rte /T I ~ •• ~i9-7Z- ~i~/1'I Y~y Q !J/G/~L~ ~ ~~ G /~N ~~P- f~i l~7~ `7 ~ `~ From: Tony Michalsky To: City'of College Station.City Hall(SVOLK), CITY HAL... Date: 1/28/97 11:43am Subject: Lone Star Pavillion -Reply. I just talked to Greg Hardemann with Lone .Star Shopping Center about the temp easement, he is going to fill out the easement .info sheet and get us the necessary paper work. So I guess let's see what happens? »> Jan Schwartz 01/27/97 04:22pm »> I talked with Cameron about this. He agrees that we need to have a meeting with Kent, Brent, you, Tony, Cameron and whoever else might be interested to discuss and coordinate our efforts on these easements--the temporary blanket utility easement they want and the easements the highway department wants along Texas Avenue. We will need proof as to who owns the property before any easements can be obtained. Then we will need to be sure and get ALL the easements we want/need at the same time. Can you coordinate this or do you want us to set it up? CC: City of College Station.City Hall(CREYNOLDS, KLAZA... . ~~~. .~, CITY OF CC~I~CiE STATIOI`I -= -~ ~ ~'e~~~ ~a~ic~ fax ~~~~ Y I~~ "r~s:~~ vcaiz~~ Caiie~~ ~it~ta~:. _i"~:-~:~ 3~i"x~G-?3~.~°~F (4Lf3? _'"~•~-:54312 January 24, 1997 Mr. Phillip McAfee A. B. Real Estate, Inc. 1900 International Park Drive Suite 303 Birmingham, Alabama 35243 RE: Approved Construction Documents (Civil) for Lone Star Pavillion Dear Mr. McAfee: Construction documents for the civil site work have been approved for the Lone Star Pavillion and contain the following sheets: Cover sheet dated 11/23/96 approved foe construction 12!5/96 Sheet C-1 dated 1/20/97 approved for construction 1/23/97 Sheet A-1 dated 11/23/96 approved for construction 12/5/96 Sheet C-2 dated 11/23/96 approved for construction 12/5/96 Sheet C-3 dated 1/20/97 approved for construction T/23/97 Sheet C-4 dated 1/20/97 approved for construction 1/23/97 Sheet C-5 dated 1120/97 approved for construction 1/23/97 Sheet C-6 dated 11/23/96 approved for construction 12/5/96 Sheet C-7 dated 11/23/96 approved for construction 12/5/96 Sheet C-8 dated 11/23/96 approved for construction 12/5/96 Sheet C-9 dated 1/20/97 approved for construction 1/23/97 Sheet C-l0 dated 1/20/97 approved for construction 1/23/97 Sheet C-11 dated 1/20/97 approved for construction 1/23/97 I hope this information will fulfill your request. If it does not, please let me know and I will do something different. Because of the different dates of submittal and approval, I decided the best way to relay the information was to include these details. We still need a minimum of 2 sets of these documents to stamp "approved" for our files and for the contractor's set. You may submit as many additional sets for us to approve for your files as you need. It was nice to visit with you on the phone and we look forward to working with you throughout the construction and completion of your project. Yours very truly, lr--~ Shirley J. Volk J Development Coordinator cc: Davis Wilson 1-lcsarE~: oaf `$:~~as Af, ~as~t~:~w; - ~ Dc~~clopmcnt Scrvrccs ' of ~olle~e ~tatloll Po E3o9960, CollcgcStation,X 7747_-9y6~ C ~~~ 11AX T~o Phone. ~_~ __~--! Faxphonc~~~-( /~ cc REMARKS Fr m. ~~~~ - _ -- __ ~-. ,,. ~. --- r Phone:. (409) 764-3570 Fax phone (409) 764-3496 ^ Urgent ^ For }'our rc~~~c~~ ^ Repl}' ASAP ^ Ptcasc conuncnt ~..ft---~ , ~ .. r r _ a __ _ _ . pate ~~~~~~~~v ~ ~ - ~~~ City of College Station Public Utilities Department Electrical Division P.O. Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 409!764-3452 FAX Con#acts: Tony Michatsky, Operations Coordinator, 409-764438 .Ray Havens, Superintendent, 409 764-3680 RE: ELECTRICAL SERVICE REQUEST We the undersigned of hereby request electric service for: Business name Location Owner's name Billing address Phone number Fax number - Estimated Date Construction begins. Estimated Constnaction completion.date Antiapated date permanent service required We further understand that we are #o pay the City of College Sfation ~20% (plus sales tax) of the total estimated cost of electric service installation and famish either "blanket" . or "as-built" easement before any work will be done by the City.. . THiS ~fS NOT A REQUEST FOR METER INSTALLATION. Thank you,. Owner ~ (Lettermust be signed) MAIL OR FAX TO ABOVE ADDRESS 11/08/96 10:18 ^C 409 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS 1~j001 ~~~ ACTIVITY REPORT ~~~ TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX N0. 7974 CONNECTION TEL 17137960623pp161 CONNECTION ID START TIME 11/08 10:10 USAGE TIME 08'14 PAGES 6 RESULT OK ~_ Dc.~clopnicnt Scr~~iccs City of College Station P.O Box 9960, cou~g~station,TX 77842-9960 FAJ~ Ta: ( y/~~~y~~ J/~'~ r~ ~~N~j /~ Phone. Fax~honc _ CC. Data. ~ ~ ~ ~~ Number of pages including cover sheet _ ~! From: ~, ~. Phone (409) 764-3570 Fax hone: (409) 764-3496 Please comment RE:MAfZKS: ^ Urgent ^ For your revie~~ ^ Reply ASAP shears Companies November 1, 1996 Shirley Volk City of College Station 1101 South Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77840 RE: Lone Star Pavilion Signage Dear Ms. Volk:. Enclosed please find. a copy ofthe signage to be used for the pylon sign, and. the building sign for Office Depot and Barnes & Nobie. Before I can close this transaction, I must obtain approval from the City of College Station on the signage. I would appreciate your assistance in expediting this matter. If you have any questions, please da not hesitate to call. CWS/kmm Enclosure 1325 La Concha, Suite 200 Houston, Texas 77054 (713) 796-1005 Fax: (713) 796-0623 WILSON/ZETTY/ASSOCIATES, INC. ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • PLANNERS November 23, 1996 li MEMORANDUN6 TO: ...Shirley Volk Development Coordinator City of College Station FROM: Bill Holmes RE: Lone Star Pavilion S. C. Co;leye Station, Texas Enclosed are the following prints of Drawings for the abtwE referenced project: Sets Complete Construction Documents -Civil,-Landscaping & Shell Building ~ Sets Givil only with Drawing A-1 included 2 Prints A--1 & C-1 1 Print L-1 Since we have made revisions on almost all Drawings for` this Project, we printed the above listed Sets complete and are returning the previously issued sets as they. were returned to us, including all `red-mar`k' prints. Please review and contact me with any further comments as soon as possible. cc: File Charlie Shears _Rich Wingo ..Jeff Roberts 3100 WILCREST, SUITE 325 • HOUSTON, TEXAS. 77042 (713) 952-8600 WILSON/ZET"TY/ASSOCIATES, INC. • ARCgITECTS • ENGINEERS • PLANNERS OCtO17eF 7, 1996. Mr. Tony 1Vlichalsky Operations Coordinator 160.1 Graham Rd. College Station, Texas 77840 ~: Electrical Service, Lone Star Pavillion, College Station, Texas: l~ezr Tony It was a Leasure meeting with you: the other day. Enclosed is a site plan of the above referenced P s sopping center. We are ro osing, as discussed with you, 3 points of attachment to the building and preliminary P P Loads for 277/480 3 PH service are as follows. _ ; , ~ Pets Mart (future) = 550 Arnpheres. , Phase I Total = 1,450 Arnpheres. ~. ~~ }A. two gutters ~, Office Depot (gutter # t } = 800 ~,mpheres ~. Computer Store = 210 Ampheres.& specified space includes expansion = 410 ampheres _ 650 Ampheres. ~. Barr_es ~c Nobel (future } = 600 Arnpheres. Tony, I need a letter addressed to me on your letterhead stating that you will provide tnz.,P~`v'e' to the center. The following Is understood: l . Underground service is provided from the pole line and you will provide that service. _ Ycu will start the design when you receive our final load analyzes & request the service on J your service request form. (Please forward the request forms to my cffice along with the letter requested above.} 1 The Developer will pay for and install all conduit and construct the transformer?~:rlctien box pads. according to your design. You will provide all wire, transformers and sanction boxes to our outside disconnect. 5. There is a blanket easement in affect on the property at closing, at some date in the future The developer will provide you with a surveyed & meets & bounds easement. 3f00 WILCREST, SUITE 325 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77042 (7I3} 952.8600 vVILSON/ZETTY/ASSOCIATES, INC. ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • PLANNERS Tony. Thank You for your cooperation and for the above requested letter, If you have any filrther questions please do not hesitate in contacting me. Respectfully Requested, C. Davi C.C. Charles Shears Rich ~Vingo ~eff Roberts Shirley Volk 3100 WILCREST, SUITE 325 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77042 {713) 952-8500 WILSON/ZETTY/ASSOCIATES, INC. • ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • PLANNERS October 7, 1995. Mr. Don Fazzino Customer Representative Lolie Star Gas '. 4200 HWY 6 South. Bryan, Texas 77802 ~; Natural Gas Service, Lone Star Pavillion, City of College Station, Texas: Dear Don, I enjoyed meeting with you the other day. Our Lenders have requested a letter addressed to me on your Letterhead stating that natural gas service to the building is available. We do not anticipate the use of natural gas for the first phase, which includes the following: I, Approximately 22,500 S.F. of specified space which may include the Old Navy. 2. A 31,000 S:F. Office Depot. Subsequent Please Include the Following. 1. A 22,000 S.F. Petsmart which may. use Natural Gas. 2_ A 25,000 S.F. Barnes & Nabel which may use Natural Gas. Please state the availability of natural gas and your pracedure_ Don, Thank You for expediting the letter of availability to my office as soon as possible. If you have any further questions please do nat hesitate in calling. Respectfully Requested, C. Davis ikon A.LA, C.S.I. C.C. .Charles Shears Rich VVingo Jeff Roberts Shirley ~rolk 3100 WILCREST, SU1TE 325 HOUSTON, TF..}CAS 77042 (~I3} 952-8600 WILSONlZETTy~ASSOCIATES, INC. ~ ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • PLANNERS October 7, 1996. Mr. Laverne Akin Customer Representative G.T.E. 301 Industrial Blvd. Bryan, Texas 77803 RE: Telephone Service Availability to Lone Star Pavillion: Dear Laverne: I enjoyed meeting with you the other day; Our lender has requested that you write a letter statjng that phone service ~s available to the center. Enclosed is a layout of the center; showing the proposed electrical underground service. The dos ed lines are 3" diameter P: V.C. pipes we will provide for you as eithe abovearequested letter our; cable, from Tony's pole lme to just inside the store. You cano ate the conduits in .our Y of availability to advise us if the layout is O.K.. and we w~l incorp constriction documents. i Laverne, Thank You for expediting the letter of availability to my office as soon as possible. Please do not hesitate in contacting me if there are any questions. Respectfully Requested, C%U~~-~ C. Davis C.C. son A.I.A. C.S.I. Ch~rles Shears Rich Wingo Jeff Roberts Shirley Volk h 31Q0 WILCREST, SUITE 325 HOUSTON, TEYAS 77042 (713) 952-8b00 WILSON/ZE.TTZ'lASSOCIATES, INC ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • PLANNERS October 7, 1996. Mr. Steve Homeyer Graduate Engineer City of College Station RE: Lone Star Pavillion, Sanitary Sewer and Water Availability Dear Steve, Sewer the above referenced pro}ect our lenders are aski eadfor a Water and Sanitary On Availability letter, on .City of College Station Letter ' not much for ;Sanitary Sewer it is 8,100 gallons per day'. Water usage is more Total usage is the landscape irrigation,. about 14 gallons per minute. Also the three mayor tenan s because of will have 6" fire lines to their. fire protection sprinklers- u,~Z/A used The he breakdown of the usage is noted on the enclosed bdlueprint of the site plan. T City of Houston standard's, as discussed, and routs ; p st difference between NOTE: In the same letter you might also coammit P teimbursement o t e co d a proximately 360 L.F. of 12" public sewer & 5 195 L.F. of 8" pnvate sewer and one M.H P M.H.'s both constrction and engineering costs. r our consideration and for expediting the letter. Should you have dry Steve, Thank You fo y questions please do not hesitate in contacting me. Respectfully Requested, ' (~ C Davis GC. ilson A.I-A C.S.I Charles Shears Rich Wingo 3ei~Roberts Shirley Volk 3100 WILCREST, SUITE 3?5 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77042 (713) 452-8600 From: Jim Smith To: City Ha11.Smccully Date: 8/30/96 5:05pm Subject: PRC - Wednesday, September 4, 1996 Parking Lot Plan - Lone Star Pavilion (96-418): I do not see any container locations for this project. Problems!!! Let me know. Thanks Staff Project Review Committee Meeting September 4, 1.996 PARKING LOT PLAN (96-418) Lone-Star Pavilion Requirements Underground service required. Electric Service Request Form. (see attached) fill out and return. Developer is responsible for 20% of the cost of electrical service. Developer installs all conduit per. city design. Easement. required to cover all electrical lines as installed. (Temporary blanket easement for construction. purposes, followed by meets and bounds descriptive easements after installations. See attached form.) Outside disconnect. required. Information The City will design the electrical layout and provide the plans for the installation of conduit and transformer /junction box pads. For removal of existing electrical lines to buildings being removed call 764-3438. From: Shirley Volk To: JKEE Subjects TXDOT and Lone Star -Reply -Reply Some time ago Charlie Shear & Jim agreed that Paul Clarke would be the local representative of the developer. I would guess that still holds true, but Pll be happy to call Charlie & ask if thafs the way it still is. )?ll let you know. »> Jane Kee 10/22/96 02:29pm »> I would think we can coordinate for them but I would give them the opportunity to be present if they want to. »> Edwin Hard 10/22/96 02:03pm »> Pat Williams called and he had questions concerning two items. on this. He hasn't been contacted by anyone from Lone Star about moving the median opening. for the signal yet.. He hasn't seen any site plans, etc. Pat says TXDOT has an encroachment problem on Texas possibly in part of what is being redeveloped. If it is, he wants to make sure the encroachment is remedied in the site plan. I told Pat Td set up a meeting with staff and possibly a developer rep to talk about these things. Jane/Shirley, do yall think we need to ask someone from Lone star'to come or could we just handle this with staff. Basically, Pat needs to see the site plan and talk with the owners of the prop. with the encroachment. He's not sure who that is. FAX TRANSMISSION WILSON/ZETTY/ASSOCIATES _ 3100 Wilcrest, Suite 325 Houston, Texas 77042 713/952-8600 FAX 713/952-8610 No. of Pages. Incl. This Page: Project No.: ~~~~ Project Name: ~~~~ 57 ~~Z ~~~~ I ((~~ 1 ~~~ls ~fil~S~~ mon~~ VDU ~~C~@(~~~ ~~~ , 1'Ylb ~'11~f~C~ ~~~' r ~ f,. Company: ~~ ~t ~I_ ~~ ~d l~-~(~-P ~~~(~~ Attn: ~ ~ ~, SDI ~ From: ~~~,~~,.~ ~tJ ~ f~J`(~ Date: ~ ~ ~~~ From: Shirley Volk To: Smccully Subject: Lone Star Pavillion -Reply -Reply -Reply -Reply »> Sabine McCully 10/10/96 04:39pm »> has anyone from engineering taken a look at this? i was not in on the last meetings regarding that issue. i have reviewed the new plan and can go no further until i get a new landscape plan. i am concerned that they will not have enough room for the landscpape/streescape rpoints xequired now that all the green space has been removed. Ci \s~ of College Station FAX To: -~ =~- Phone: Fax phone: CC: Date: Number of pages including cover sheet: From~~ ~'s '~ l~~ A /" ~ ~~ Phone: (409) 764-370 Fax phone: (409) 764-3496 REMARKS: ^ Urgent [~~or your review ^ Reply ASAP ~ ^ Ptease comment i 1 ~ - ~' i IA ~Z~~ . -"~ c r B~ of ~p = Fem. ~ ~ ~ / - ~ g'` `~~ / er w ~„ " / tr i ~ ~~~~ ..17. D +~ i .~ , ~,r~ ~ J i_~ _. _.. ~~ ~~ ~a i r ~ t Development Services P.O. Box 9960, Coll TX 77842-9960 PRC Report Lone Star Pavilion Case #96-418 Page 4 of 4 Planning and Zoning Commission Representative Garner seconded the motion to approve the site plan with the above mentioned conditions which passed unopposed (3 - 0). SUBMIT 4 COMPLETE SETS OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS WITH THE REVISED SITE PLAN ATTACHED TO CONTINUE WITH PHASE II OF THE BUILDING PERMIT PROCESS. COORDINATE FUTURE SUBMITTALS WITH DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR SHIRLEY VOLK AT (409) 764-3570. APPEAL PROCESS: An applicant may appeal the decision of the Project. Review Committee to the Planning and Zoning Commission within five days after the PRC Committee meeting. Failure to appeal the PRC action shall constitute a contractual acceptance of all conditions imposed, and a waiver and surrender of all complaints, defects, or potential invalidity, .whether under state or federal law. An applicant appealing the decision of the PRC shall file ten copies of the final site plan as approved by the PRC, showing all changes and requirements imposedby the PRC, and accompanied by a written explanation of those items being appealed. Until said copies are on file, no further development approval shall occur, and no further action by the Commission shall take place. An applicant may appeal .only certain aspects of site plan review, and in the absence of discretionary review by the. Commission, or review pursuant to a petition, all other: aspects of the site plan shall be final. Any notice of appeal shall state with particularity the aspects which are to be appealed. Coordinate appeal process through Development Coordinator Shirley Volk at (409) 764-3741. 1.1/12/96 12:40 rd'409 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS (~1j001 :~~:* ACTIVITY :REPORT ~:~~ TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. 8023 CONNECTION TEL 97643489 CONNECTION ID PSC START TIME 11/12 12:36 USAGE TIME 04'00 PAGES 1 I RESULT OK d ~~ I ppp ~. i ti_. `, ~~ yi i ~o~~~R. I~'~ F' CCiE STATIOI`I October 31, 1996 Paul Clark Clark and Wyndham, Inc.. 3608 E. 29th Street Bryan, Texas 77802 Re: Lone Star Pavilion Dear Paul: Following our telephone conversation yesterday regarding the issuance of a temporary Certificate of Occupation for the Office Depot being proposed on Texas Avenue, I visited with several staff members and came to the following conclusion. The City of College Station is willing to issue a temporary C.O. for OfI•ice Depot without the completion of the main entrance drive shown on the site plans as long as adequate parking and fire lanes are provided without it. Obviously, all other building codes, utilities, access points, and other requirements must be met before the temporary C.O. is issued. We will require that phase lines on the site plan be submitted showing which areas of the development will be in place at the time the temporary C.O. is anticipated. In this way we can see how circulation and parking will be addressed without the entrance road. If you have any questions, please contact me at your convenience. Sincerer, Kent Laza City Engineer ~~ ~- xc: Jim Callaway Jane Kee Shirley Volk Steve Homeyer fi WII,SON/ZETTY/ASSOCIATES, INC. ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • PLANNERS November 12, 1996 City of College Station 1101 Texas Ave. College Station, Texas ATTENTION: Steve Homyer RE: Lone Star Pavilion Shopping Center Development Dear Mr. Homyer; we have sent by over-night delivery 2 copies of the final drainage engineering. report {with your red lined copy} and 4 sets of construction .plans {sheet no. C1, C2, C3, C6, C7 & C8} for the Lone Star Pavilion shopping center development located on the north corner of Texas Avenue and Lincoln Avenue, College Station, Texas. Your should receive them today. If you have any questions or require additional information, please give us a call. Thank you for your help in this matter. Yours truly, Thomas H. Eik 1, P.E. R"a%'v~ ~ x, ~.~ yY i .,rat ~s', ~~` ~`, eve' <. '''' ,°~ ~ A ~r~Ua .:..v sA .~ 'i ~..,::~: e. 44~e. .-~: L ~a., _ 6:Y. 'C,1~ .a N ('t Sti;~ ~ir~~~ `' 4 ~ M1q ~s !' ' .,,~t,~. ~J,A,'C,'..,. 5 $ ~s Development Scn~iccs Lion TX 77842-9960 Sta '~ a tlO it P.O. E3o~ 9960, Collcgc (.,ity of Colle e St FAX To: ~,~,//5 _ 1ti 50~ •9~~ _ - /LG ~O,G=/1'I ~.S Date: // ~/ cl.~ Number of pages including cover sheet From: ..~~/,e~E/ D ~ ~`~ ~~~ ~- ~ Phone: (409) 764-3570 Phone. ----~- - /"/ ~ 1 ~~~~~Q Fay phone: (409) 764-349G Fax hone. '/ CC. For our rcvic~~ ^ Reply ASAP ^ Please comrncnt REMARKS: ^ Urgent ^ y ~pc~G- A/ni~/~ ~jc~/r 70 .1.~.1C in/l'L11~/~ ~ f S ~T(LYI ~~' ,~ ~~ r~r2>/ ~R L L ~~~~~s_ ~js ~ ~,~c5 T~rl G~i~~~ ~/, ~ /yip ~ Ti~fl CG. - ,~ ~~ /~©oa „ice, , ~a- ~ ~ ~~ Fi,~E Gam} SE~~a~zH`To~~~ ~a/~ ~~~~ orb ,~3LVc, ~ fz l,~(Jt3l~ G/~gG~E cE5 ' i', e . ~~ ~~z /1Jo~ ~o~ APPENDIX 1 STANDARD BUILDING CODE ADOPTED A booklet entitled 'Standard Building. Code 1994 Edition' as amended and as hereafter may be amended, at least one (1) copy of which is on file in the office of the Building Official of the City of College Station, Texas, is hereby adopted and designated as the Building Code of the City of College Station, Texas. AMENDMENTS TO STANDARD BUILDING CODE A. The above referenced Standard Building Code is hereby amended as follows: 1. Section 102.2.1 is amended to provide that the Building Official is an employee-at- will and may be terminated as per the .personnel manual 2. Section 103.5 is amended by deleting therefrom the following sentence: 'All such unsafe buildings, structures or service systems are hereby declared illegal and shall be abated by repair and rehabilitation'.. or by demolition in accordance with the provi- sions of the Structural Standard Code for the elimination or repair of unsafe build- ings.' 3. Section 104.1.1 is amended in addition to read as follows: 'Home Owner Permit - A property owner shall obtain a building permit for work to be done by him on a build- ing owned and occupied by him as his homestead. After six (6) months of inactivity, the permit is void and must be re-permitted by the homeowner or a contractor at the discretion of the Building Official. Electrical, plumbing and mechanical systems must be installed by licensed contractors.' 4. Section 104.4.5 shall be added to read: There shall be no combustible or flam- mable materials. placed on site, lot or subdivision where waterlines and fire hydrants as required. by the applicable subdivision regulations are not completed and in service and where all-weather access for emergency vehicles does not exist to within one hundred fifty feet (150') of the most remote part of the structure.' 5 Section 104.5 shall be added to read: Buildino Contractors. It shall be the duty of every contractor who shall make con- tracts .for the installation or repair of buildings for which a permit is required, and every contractor or builder making. such contracts and subletting the same or any part thereof, to register his name and license with the Building Official, giving full name, residence and place of business, and in case of removal from one place to another to have made corresponding change to the Building Official. Plumbing Contractors. Plumbing contractors that have a State of Texas Master Plumbing Contractor's License must register their license with the City of College Station before a permit will be issued by the City. Air Conditioning Refrigeration and Heating Contractors. Air conditioning and heat- ing .contractors that have a State of Texas Air Conditioning, Refrigeration and Heat- ing Contractors License must. register their licenses with the City of College Station before a permit will be issued by the City. Lawn Sprinkler or Irrigation Contractors. Lawn Sprinkler or Irrigation Contractors who have a State of Texas License must register their license. with the City of College Station before a permit will be issued by the City. 3-57 Rev. 3196 Electrical Contractors. Electrical Contractors who have a Master's License must pay a registration fee to the :City of College Station before a permit will be issued by the City. Before a license is registered by the City, applicant shall provide adequate proof of insurance coverage for bodily injury, property damage and worker's compensation in the following amounts: (a) $300,000 combined single limit; (b) Workers Compensation in accorciance with the State of Texas. All Contractors. Each vehicle used shall have affixed to the back window driver's side identification numbers and letters two inches (2'~ high as follows: For Building Contractors - C.C.B.R. (Registration No.) For Electrical Contractors - C.C.E.R. (Registration No.) For Plumbing Contractors - C.C.P.R. (Registration No.) For Air Conditioning Contractors - C.C.A.C.R. (Registration No.) For Imgation Contractors. - C.C.LR. (Registration No.) Use State of Texaslicense number, if applicable.' 6. Section 411.1.3 shall be .added to read: 'Accessory Portable Storage Building. Portable storage buildings are defined as those portable storage buildings that are not permanently affixed to the',ground. One accessory portable storage budding, not over one hundred (100) square feet in area, per. residential lot will be allowed in the rear yard without a building. permit if if can be moved and sanitary facilities, water supply, and. electric system are not contained in the. structure and structure is not placed in surface drainage'. easement.' 7. Section 412.1.1 is amended ',by deleting therefrom the phrase 'or areas of refuge (compartmentation) in accordance with Section 412.9.' 8. Section 412.1.1 #5 shall be added to read as follows: 'All enclosed stairways are to be pressurized.' 9, Table 500 shall be amended by the addition of the superscript 'K' to the allowable areas tabulated in the Type I11, V, VI, columns for Group R Occupancy, story height three (3) and above, and the addition to the table of a new note 'K' to read: 'Two (2) remote independent means of egress from each floor area occupied by separate tenants shall be provided.' 10. Section 704.3 shall be added to read as follows: '704.3 Public Rental Storage Ware- house - (A) A public rental storage warehouse is a structure used solely for storage occupancy, which is divided into separate spaces accessible to each tenant and in which the management does not bear responsibilities as a warehouseman. (B) Tenant separation shall not be required in a public rental storage warehouse.. (C) A wall having fire resistance of 'not less than two (2} hours, parallel to the longitudinal axis of the building .and dividing the building into two (2) parts of equal area insofar as the configuration of rental spaces permits, shall be provided in each public rental storage warehouse building.' '' 11. Section 803.3 -Table 803.3 shall be amended to read as follows: 'Minimum flame spread classifications for all group A-Assemblies shall be Class A interior finish material in exit corridors and exits when sprinklered.' 12. Section 803.4 shall be amended with the first paragraph to read as follows: 'Delete Exceptions' 13. Section 903.8.4 shall be added as follows: 'An approved automatic sprinkler system shall be provided in group 'A-Assembly occupancies (except churches), when a group A-Assembly total floor area exceeds seventy-five hundred (7500) square feet.' 3-58 Rev. 3/96 14. Section 903.8.5 shall be added to .read as follows: '(7) An approved sprinkler sys- tem shall be provided in all structures where the total building area exceeds fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet and in all structures exceeding two stories in height.' 15. Section 903.8.6. shall be added to read as follows: 'An approved sprinkler system shall be provided in all hotels and motels.' 16. Section 904.5.3 shall be added as follows: The one and one-half inch (1 1 /2") wet standpipe hose and nozzles is not required; however, the Fire Department risers and hose connections are to be provided in the corridor and not in the stairway.' 17. Section .1803.1.2 TRENCH SAFETY. On all construction projects, public or private, within the boundaries of the City. of College Station, or within the extratemtorial jurisdiction, the bid document and the' contract shall contain: (a) Detailed plans and specifications for adequate safety systems that meet OSHA standards, and (b) A pay item for those safety systems. (c) This requirement shall not apply to persons subject to safety standards adopted under Article 6053-1, V.T.C.S., and subject to the administrative penalty provisions of Article 6053-2, V.T.C.S. (d) Violations will. be reported to OSHA and the job superintendent. 18. Section 2304.1.2 shall be amended by adding: 'All concrete slabs at grade shall have special termite protection by soil treatment or other approved methods of ter- mite protection.' 19. All Appendices except D and H are hereby adopted. 20. The CABO 1992 One and Two Family Dwelling Code, adopted in Appendix C to the Standard Building Code,1994 Eddron, rs hereby amended as follows: 'R - 202.1 Exterior walls: is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: "Exterior walls locatedless than three feet (3~ from property lines shall have not less than a one (1) hour fire resistance rating. The fire resistance rating of exterior walls located Less than three feet (3') from property line shall be constructed for exposure from the inside wall only." Those one and two family structures located less than three feet (3') from 'a vacant lot or identified. common. area (greenbelt area, etc.) need not comply with the fire resistance rating requirement." R 210.2 Emergency egress openings: In the second paragraph, the second and third sentences are amended to'read: "All egress or rescue windows from sleeping rooms must have a minimum opening height dimension of 24 inches and a minimum opening width dimension of 20 inches. The minimum net clear opening shall be 3.33 square feet." M - 1101.1.4 Attic installations: Is amended to add the following sentence: "When no attic. equipment is installed, an opening of twenty inches (20") by twenty-four inches (24"), minimum;',is allowed.' B. REGISTRATION FEES. Registration fees for contractors shall be set by Council resolution. C. TEMPORARY OCCUPANCY OF STREETS WITH BUILDING MATERIAL. ETC. 1. Permit and Bond Hereafter any person or persons, .firm, or corporation desiring to temporarily occupy any portion of any public street, alley, or sidewalk within the City of College Station for the purpose of placing thereon material or rubbish for or from building operations, or for any purpose whatsoever connected with the erection, removal, alteration, or 3-59 Rev. 396 ~~ . ,. _ . r. .. ' ~:.~ College Station Fire Department Fire Prevention Division Construction Development Guide Water Supplies Public fire hydrants shall be installed in single-family. and duplex zoning districts at such locations that no part of any structure shall be more than five hundred (500) feet from a fire hydrant as measured along the right-of--way of a public street as the fire hose is laid off the fire truck. Chapter 6 .Section 1 (B) (5) (a) subsection 603.1.3A City of College Station Code of Ordinances. Public fire hydrants shall be installed in districts other than single-family and duplex zoning districts at such locations that no part of any structure, aboveground tanks or fueling stations shall be more than three hundred (300) feet from a fire hydrant as measured along the right-of-way of a public street or along an approved fire lane as the fire hose is laid off the fire truck. The installation of public fire hydrants in such districts may be deferred and required as a condition of the building permit for structures. Chapter 6 Section 1 (B) (5) (a) subsection 603.1.3B City of College Station Code of Ordinances. Fire hydrants shall be tested prior to any construction. Hydrant locations shall be ~E approved by the College Station Engineering Division. Fire hydrant access shall not be obstructed or impeded at any time. All other regulations regarding water distribution should be directed to the College Station Engineering Division. Automatic Fire Sprinkler System Requirements Fire sprinkler systems shall meet the criteria of the 1994 Standard Fire Code, 1994 Standard Building Code and all applicable provisions of N.F.P.A. 13, 13-R, and 13- D. Plan submittal with required approval .and permits must be secured through the College Station Building Department. All system inspections and tests should be scheduled through the College Station Fire Department Fire Prevention Division. Planning Two sets of drawings are required to be submitted to the College Station Building Department which include, but are not limited to the following items: 1. Engineer's seal on plans. 2. Piping locations. 3. Pipe sizes. 4. Hanger locations and hanger details. 5. Head locations and details (walls and other obstructions). 9 6. Riser specifications including valves, gauges, and fire department connection(s). 7. Hydraulic calculations 8. Building classification (construction type). 9. Hazardous storage and precautions taken for accidental spills. 10. Double check valves shall be installed is accordance with College Station Engineering Division specifications and documentation of testing shall be provided to the Fire Marshal prior to acceptance of the sprinkler system. Sprinkler system plans shall be submitted to the College Station Building Department at the same time as the building plans. Any concerns regarding the drawings will be addressed and sent back with that set. of drawings. If you have any questions regarding the fire sprinkler system please contact the Building Department or the Fire Prevention Division. Testin Newly installed sprinkler systems require a two (2) hour two hundred (200) psi hydrostatic test. The testing procedure for existing sprinkler systems is a two (2) hour one hundred fifty (150) psi hydrostatic test. If an existing system is extensively altered, the system shall be re-tested. The decision to re-test a system shall be determined by the College Station Fire Marshal on a 1 case by case basis, Existing hydraulically calculated systems shall be recalculated when the addition of one or more sprinkler heads is required. (Calculations shall be provided to the Building Department for review) All sprinkler system valves shall be properly marked in accordance with N.F.P.A. 13, Section 2-7.3. The hydrostatic acceptance test shall be witnessed and approved by a member of the College Station Fire Department Fire Prevention Division. The sprinkler system test fee is indicated on the "Inspection/ Test request" located in Appendix A-8. The permit fee shall be paid at the College Station Building Department. If the system does not pass it is left to the discretion of the Fire Inspector as to whether an additional test fee is required. Sprinkler piping and hangers shall not be covered and/or concealed by any means prior to being inspected and approved by the College Station Fire Prevention Division. **This includes drop grid style ceilings** The underground supply line(s) to the sprinkler riser shall be hydrostatically tested and the results provided to the College Station Fire Prevention Division before the system is approved. (This test is not witnessed by a member of the Fire Prevention Division) 10 Additional Information In all structures, except single-family or duplex dwellings protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system as a requirement, an electronic water flow alarm shall be provided as a means of supervising the system. All required systems designed in accordance with N.F.P.A. 13 or 13-R, except in single-family or duplex dwellings, shall be constantly monitored by a licensed alarm company. Any changes that must be made to update the system shall be at the owner's expense. All alarm systems shall be approved by the Building .Official and tested by the Fire Marshal or his designee to ensure completion and.proper operation. Verification of alarm connection to an alarm company shall be submitted in writing by a representative of the alarm company to the Fire Marshal. Alarm companies under this section will meet current N.F.P.A. 72 Standards. City of College Station Code of Ordinances Chapter 6 Section 1 (B) (5) (b) subsection 603.15.5. .Suitable signs must be provided on the door of the enclosure that contains any sprinkler system valves and/or controls. The signs shall state "Fire Sprinkler Control ~~ Valves m two (2) inch high block letters with a minimum stroke of one half ('/~) inch, and of a color contrasting with its background. Valves or switches that are located within building elements must also be identified in an approved, suitable, and easily identifiable manner at the point of access to said valve or component. All fire department connections. shall be installed at a location approved by the College Station Fire Prevention Division. Fire department connections shall be immediately discernible. A minimum of five (5) feet of clear space shall be maintained around any fire. department connection or fire department control valve.. City of College Station Code of Ordinances Chapter 6 Section 1 (B) (5) (d) subsection 603.16.3. A fire hydrant capable of supplying the sprinkler system shall be located a maximum of one hundred fifty (150) feet from the fire department connection. Shelving units and shelves shall. be constructed so as not to provide storage closer than two (2) feet below any ceiling nor closer than eighteen (18) inches below the horizontal plane of any sprinkler head deflector. A U.L. approved outside electric. or hydraulic warning device (bell or horn) shall be installed on the outside of the structure proximate to the fire department connection of a building protected by a sprinkler system. Sprinkler valves shall be secured in accordance with N.F.P.A. 13. In sprinklered structures that are protected with a fire alarm detection system, valves shall be tied directly into a supervisory alarm circuit' and shall be monitored through the fire alarm system. In structures that are not protected by a fire alarm system, the sprinkler control 11 valves shall be secured by one of the following methods: Locked in the open position with a chain and/or padlock; locked in a room designated for that purpose and identified on the door accordingly; or locked in a cage or other approved area that can be adequately supervised and secured. Kitchen. Fire Extinguishing Systems Cooking hood extinguishing systems providing protection for cooking and ventilation equipment will be reviewed by the Building Department. For a complete _ review to take place the following information shall be provided: 1. A full set of drawings shall be submitted to the College Station Building Department. 2. Description of extinguishing system type (automatic sprinkler, carbon dioxide, dry chemical, or liquid agent). 3. Type of system design (Engineered system versus apre-engineered system). 4. Engineered and pre-engineered systems shall contain full details of system design. 5. Design shall specifically note interconnection for fuel supply shutoff, ventilation 1 control, damper control, associated ducting system, etc. Power to appliances (gas, electrical, etc.) located under the protection of the extinguishing system shall completely shut off upon system activation. ~. 6. Cooking hood extinguishing systems shall be designed in accordance with the latest locally adopted editions of N.F.P.A. 12, 12A, 12B, 13, 17,17A, and 96; the Standard Fire Code, Standard Building Code, Standard Mechanical Code, and any applicable local amendments and rules. 7. Monitoring of cooking hood suppression systems shall be in accordance with N.F.P.A. 72 when applicable. 8. An inert gas blow-off test shall be conducted on all new or remodeled systems prior to acceptance. The system test fee is indicated on the "Inspection/ Test request located in Appendix A-8. The permit fee shall be paid at the College Station Building Department. If the system does not pass it is left to the discretion of the inspector as to whether an additional test fee is required. 9. Please allow twenty-four (24) hours advance notice for a system test. Call the College Station Fire Prevention Division to schedule an acceptance test. 12 CONSULTING ENCsINEERS PROJECT MEMORA~fiD1iFM Msy S, 1999 To: Judy SixJt& Firora: William M Langford, PE Protect: Best Buy Lone Star Pavilion, College Station, Texas IWLB Job No. 9900301 Srd~Ject: Rwisiaa of Handicap Rampa Front Building Sidewailtd .lady, Per information obtained ly J.D. Burkhardt the adjacent tease space in the shopping center was .required by ADA review/inspection to ~epgrade the existing handicap ramps located along the building front. The upgrade required .the removal of the existing ramps from the vehicle access aisle area adjacent to .the parking spaces and recessing them into the sidewalk area. We have revised the Site Paving Plan, Sheet C4 to call for removal of the existing two ramps in front mf the Best Buy (in the new sidewalk area} and proposed two recessed ramps in the sidewalk. to replace them. I)ue to the location of the proposed bollards and building walls, it was necessary to shift the existing handicap space locations so .that the ramps had a minimum Sheet x 5 feet unobstructed landing area at the top of the ramp in the sidewalk. The relocated parking spaces and proposed re-striping Limits are shown on the attached 8.5 x 11 sketches.. The relocation. does not affect the previous parking count, but only shifts the location of the handicap spaces within the parking bays to avoid conflicts with the bollards or building wall. The proposed changes should be approved by the City inspector, or Fermin Departanent prior to building the ramps. Copies of the fiall construction plans should be submitted for ADA review by Mat Root. Cc (via fax and overnight. delivery} J. D. Buurkhardt {vw/ to copies revised Sheet C4} Mat hoot (uv 3 Copies full plans including revised Sheet C4) WLB AsSOC~aas. IIVC. •7830 weatgka Drive • Houstioa. TeYaa 7?063 • Tei ? 13 278-9800 • Fax 713 278-8422 • e-Instl wlb~wlben~.cam ~•d ~NI~{3~lI9N3 ~~Fi4 Wd®E:bO 66. 60 hklt ~. .- 'I REFER t0 PLAM . ~ ~C (MAX. SLOE Y.Y2) PAVING SEE REINF. TO 4' TFMC. CONC. tiAIAP ~ /;" SITE PLAN 6fAT'CH SIDEWALK SOORf • 2' ON CENTER JOINT FOR T'1~PE AND GOLDRED NON~SKI6 FINISH REINF. sEYOWC CuRe EXt. JOINT 1IE: DETAIL ANT ~/A1.3 b .: s. ~.. ... •: _ . _ _ ., -.~ ~~~ 1/2' ASpFIIILT ~ r, ( ~ /4 REIIiF. TES • 40' Q.G. IMPREpIV ATEO „~-~*. exPANS~cN BOAND . AT CONC. PAV4NC ONLY , . otr~EERwsED REFER. TO PLAN FOR LOCA1gN . ~-- wAUcwar -- 6d 01~1#RSN ~)'~Ft) E~A~IS+oN 7JONdT RE: a/At.3 ~'~TT°-°-~,a 1/a`DEE'P x ~1~'rNIDE °~~:::~:~jy4ypjP:•'~~,r .•~..~. G.,'RAAIPfAMD•~°•~.~•:::: f 'V'. QROOVES A4 FLARES W O.C,' T1A'IGAL CONTIlASTINC COLOR COLORED NON-SKI FTNISFI ~~SS NOTED TME1lW1SE)) LM. SCOFIELD . CO. COLOREQ DR1°-SHAKE NARDNEI! 'LiT}4OCFlROhE' 1~ TYPBCAL- RAMP RECESSED INT® SIDEWALK ~ , d- __- - ... . _.•. __._.___.__~Ii•133FJI9N3 A3NHtiQ wd~E a b0 66 r ea wrlr n•ti~~ ~` ~_~~ CITY OF COLD ~TP~TOI~: ~ ~ E~o~t ~r~~ce fox ?3~i~ ~ t~t~ ~ ~-~~; x ~g~G~s_ (~o~; ~s~-~sce November 27, 1996. Shears .Companies Attn: Mr. Charles W. Shears 1325 La Concha Houston, Texas 77054 RE: Proposed Lone-Star Pavilion at Texas Avenue and Lincoln Dear Mr. Shears: In response to your inquiry about receiving Development and Building Permits for the above referenced project, I would like to state that the City has reviewed this project and did not find anything that would prevent a permit from being issued when some minor concerns are addressed. These concerns are related to the site grading and detention requirements that are outlined in the. City's Drainage Policy and Design Standards. At the present time, the Engineering Staff has a concern with the proposed amount of storm water that is being discharged by this development. The amount of storm water discharge: can be corrected by modifying the outlet structure and creating sufficient volume to detain the necessary storm water. Upon the last plan submittal on November 25, 1996 the architect .for this project stated that the majority of the plan sheets have been modified. The development review staff has not had the opportunity. to review these new sheets as of this .letter. If these new modifications do note. change the overall site layout, then the requested permits could be issued when the above. mentioned concerns have been addressed. If you have any questions or comments, feel free to contact me at (409)764-3570. S' c rely, Steve o ever Shir ey Vol Graduate Engineer Development Coordinator xc: Jim Callaway, Acting Dir. of Development Services Kent Laza, City Engineer Davis Wilson, Wilson/Zetty Associates, Inc. C1 ~~- ~~ of College Station r ax To: ~- ~, xi ~ Phone: Fax hone: ~ (~~ ~ ~ Z _~ ~ ~ CC: _. _ __ _ _ _ Coh~~. ~,.~;~, -~,q~/~c_ tam 1~.~' ~.~ ~ ~ Development Scn~iccs P.O. Box 9960, College Station, TX 77842-9960 ~~x~ ~~ i~ ~ ~a'~ /~ ~~~~ /a -~ - 7~i Date: Number of pages including cover sheet From: 5~~~= - Phone: (409)764-3570 Fax hone: (409)764-3496 For our revic++ ^ Reply ASAP ^ Please comment REMARKS: ^ Urgent ^ Y PRIMARY DRAINAGE BASIN DESCRIPTION: 1. Basin 2 is gently sloping to Wolfpin Creek, which flows easterly, with a variety of land uses. 2. No related previous drainage studies exist, except for the drainage .maps for Texas Ave. prepared by the Texas Highway Department. 3. The proposed development is located on Flood Insurance Map No. 4804100144 C, effective date July 2, 1992, and is shown to be in Zone X, which is outside the 500-year flood plain. SECONDARY DRAINAGE BASIN DESCRIPTION: The general offsite drainage crosses the subject property from the 707 Center on the northwest and the undeveloped land on the northeast. This runoff is presently being carried by an existing ~ swa'le running from the northwest property line to an existing storm .~ ~,,~ drainage inlet on Lincoln Avenue which appears to be satisfactorily handling the existing runoff. The runoff from the 707 Center will ~~w be piped across the subject property. The runoff from the ~ undeveloped land on the northeast will be intercepted by a back- ~~%S slope trench and delivered to the existing inlet by pipe. The S~ ` back-slope trench inlet is designed to allow a portion of the ~ ~ runoff to enter Lincoln Ave. and be carried down the pavement, as ~' it normally does at the present. M ~ DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA REFERENCE AND CONSTRAINTS 1. Regulations - The drainage system for the proposed development a~ 'C~~ was simplified and standard criteria was met by diverting. the ~~ runoff from offsite property from consideration in the development runoff calculations_ Thus,. the pre-development and the post '~7 `~ development runoff discharges remain unchanged. ~,v~(~-~ 2. Development Criteria Reference and Constraints ~E C3F '!~ a. There were no previous drainage studies for the property piP~= under consideration. '~ 't~ b. By achieving parity between the pre-development and post ~cc development runoffs, the impact of this project on existing street and drainage systems is held to a minimum. C~ 2 F 3. Hydrological Criteria a. The Intensity-Duration-Frequency (IDF) Curves were prepared using the constants obtained from the Texas Highway Department, based on Technical Paper No. 40, for Brazos County, Texas. Design rainfall 100-year, 24 hour. b. Runoff calculation method used was the Soil Conservation Service, TR-55, which coincides with the data contained in the City of College Station Designs. Standards. c. The Triangular and Computed Flood Hydrographs were used in conjunction with reservoir routing stage-storage-discharge relationship as found in the SCS routing coefficient method. The computer software is manufactured by Eagle Point. d. The design storm recurrence intervals are 2, 5, 10, 25, 50 and 100 years with 24 hour duration. e. Standard calculations were used in this design; 4. Hydraulic Criteria: a. The capacities of the piping in the front parking lot were determined using graphs prepared- based on Manning's formulas (n=0..01), for orrugated Plastic Pip . Dla Slope Q (full) OT A~ PrPP O M~Te~i~~ 18" 0.5% 6.5 Cfs 24" 0.86$ 28.0 Cfs 24" 0.35% 18.0 Cfs 30" 0.35°s 33.0 Cfs 30" 1.93% 40.0 cfs Capacities for piping at the rear of the buildings. Dia. Slope Q (full) ,~ ~ ~~ 12" 4.0% 9.0 cfs ~ ~~~ 0.9% 15.0 cfs ~~~~ b. The detention pond uses concrete retaining walls, gras ~` ~~ bottom sloped at 0.5%, and concrete pilot trenches. Th outfall structure facilitates an 8" diameter orifice a~ ~ (,,~ base with a 90° v notch weir at the top. At the maximum ~ ~~,~\~k in the pond, the capacity of the pond is 65,892.5 cubic feet. The maximum discharge is 4.8835 cfs. The orifice discharges ~~ ~~ 3.2613 cfs and the weir dlscharges 1.6222 cfs, at the maximum depth in the pond. 3 ~ . 1~ ~~ ~ ~~~c ~c~~~~~~~ ~__ TI`P-C S~T~ C 1 , 2~ ~G> ~~ ~~ A2E~s A Q t~ ~C ~ ~ ~FFc:~ i~ '~ t-t.-O~~ *~ 2ovh ~~4- Pt c~ ~,~ ~ c-x~s~ mac, fox a ~ ~~~co~~ , tS 7~~E ~1 ~~GT G4 ~ S~''D II`t ?~~ ~ ~ C 2C'A s ~ 'C-~.l~a'T'L~'~ r`l'D 071 `~0`7 ~L o~ 7 ~rS ~ 7 LASS E W~TL•'1Z 'TD ~Y D S~4 2 ~ ~~o ~ ~ ~ T ~ '~e>< rr/ G ~~/a of ~.aJE -r ~-Q E v~" A `r'`'3E c~'D ~ tiE ~~~~St"'i , w ~ n+~ T ~N G p-wA~ of . ~~ E ~.,ks ~ oT ,c}-~~' . 3(.E ~ 2EV ~~ ~S t~l~-o,Zyv<<417on1~ ~ Pr ~~ ~'Z~~`~~?~!G r'iT~ r~l7a Try cxx~-/~t..C__ TV yC"7~~/r` r N ~ 'rid -~ ~ ~i ~ ~4TE'D ~ t~l G'n^, 2~ . 'l?'~s ~ F~-Ot~ S ~~D % t~ ~ 7?'~ ~ Cl~~'L''S 14JV (~ ~l~r~ co~FFrC-r~NTS. ~S ~NFoizN~+~TO~/ rS 1`lEC.Essl~~~' 't2.c~ pv~-c'~t./. ~ . ~JZ r t,~ Tu 2~ tZ fE~fZ~ 't'om ~ATCt-I ~`~`~- ' '~CIZ~CS{rS~ 8Y iLO~'r~^!C' ?7'~N'l ~lq ~. ~ ~. ~oc~~S 1~~ ~L.St~ r F 77~~ G ~ 77fz -~ ~-r/ n ot1 r~c~N [~ 7v ,q-~cp ~-' ~ ~2 vYt a2~ L w ~ t..C. G ~ Gk 'to ~~ZEC F ~ ow j Yct,~ ~E ~-s fat s~ ~tl- ~ T 'Jj-h S '~.oEs ~/aT Oc.Crc.~ t2 . S~~ ~?-/,a c~cSt D ~ ~~ t, r ><! G 7}.~-~4?' t.~/~ 7~~~ t"~.,.T r 7' G.4~1 ~lcr BC .t-u,2 ou1z S r i~ , ~~ T~{1S ~IEt/iC~ ~~3 nloT c~.~ ~ /kS 7?f~' ~i~ZST i2~'Vic=w ~p ~ C,o w~. t~C., r r4~1 C..C~ .• v 1 APPENDICES: 1. Hydrologic Computations a. Land use for the 707 Center was Business/Commercial and the land use for the undeveloped property to the northeast of the project was Natural Grasslands. b. Storm water runoff (peak 100-year discharge) for; 1) the 707 Center was determined to be 25.66 cfs 2) the pre-development raw land portion of the project was determined to be 36.01 cfs 3) the undeveloped offsite property to the northeast was determined to 14.71 cfs 4) post development front parking .lot was determined to '~ ~ be 29.67 cfs 5) detention pond maximum discharge 4.88 cfs c. The pre-developed runoff for Area B is 36.01 cfs and the post development runoff for Area C and Area D is 34.55 cfs. Therefore, the project does not increase the total amount of runoff . 2, Hydraulic Computations: i a. There are no culverts in this project. / ~~Jv~ b. Storm Sewer Capacities (~~S~Q~~~~ 1) Pipes in front parking lot ~`NMa a) 18" capacity= 6.5 cfs ; actual flow = 5.76 cfs b) 24 " capacity = 18 . 0 cfs ; actual flow = 17 .21 cf s c) 30" capacity = 33.0 cfs; actual flow = 27.07 cfs d} 30" outfall = 40. 0 cfs : actual flow- = 29.67 cfs e) 24' from 707 Center; cap. = 28.0 cfs actual flow = 25.66 cfs 7 ~~' L CONSULTING ENGINEERS (~ ~ s, ~~ t ~, G May 24, 1999 ~ ~ ,, . ~ :.~ ~.; , .. Natalie Ruiz City of College Station ~ ~' ~ `' P.O. Box 9960 1.101 Texas Avenue College Station, -Texas 77542 Re Proposed Construction of a Best Buy store in College Station WLB File No. 9900301 Dear Ms Ruiz, This letter is in response to a building permit requirement you discussed with the Best Buy project architect Mat Root on March 1. Mr. Root notified us by copy of the attached fax that you requested conformation that water and sewer loads for the proposed Best Buy will not exceed the planned requirements of the PETsMART store that was originally planned but never built on this site, and that an increase in proposed water meter size is not required Based on our previous .experience as civil engineers for PETsMART stores and as explained below, we are certain that the water usage for the propose Best Buy will be significantly less than a PETsMART store of approximately the same size. We were not involved in the original proposed PETsMART and since the store was never constructed, we cannot determine the proposed water and sewer requirements for that store. However, as shown on the attached plans, a PETsMARTS store typically has high water and sewer use areas that are not included in the proposed Best Buy store. These high water use areas .are principally the veterinary facilities, pet grooming and bathing areas, and the aquariums sales areas shown on the attached plans. We do not intend to use larger potable water and fire sprinkler water services lines than were originally designed by another engineer. for the PETsMART. The site plumbing plan for the PETsMART store indicate a 2-inch potable water service and a 6-inch fire sprinkler. service were proposed. We have verified though field surveys that the meter box for the 2- inch connection was installed and we intend to use it fora 2-inch meter. If you have any questions or need additional information please call me. Best Regards, ~~~ ~ ~~ William V. Wright, rincipal WLB Associates, Inc. WLB ASSOCIATES, Irrc. •7830 Westglen Drive • Houston, Texas 77063 • Te1713 278-9300 • Fax 713 278-9422 • e-mail wlb@wlbeng.com Sent br: SUN BUILDERS v0. 713. 8698023; P1HK. 1.1999 1 ~ 33PM fMAXWCwL~ JOHANSdN MEAN ~..x GO ~~~L~~ ~~ 'p~ IJ[sYWet! Johansen Maher Arciittecfs S18 Third AYeenie Sovih ldashvllfe. Thl 37 7Q 05(21/99 11 :51AM;j~~#887;Page 2/2 N0.659 P.2 _ Memo Ta: Randall (VaoCari-A.t.G. Baker Shopprigg Ceder Properties Phones 1(615) 244-8170 ~ GurtJahaaaan.BAa~cwetkJohs~ltson MaherArthRects Faec 7 67 2a4-3149 Tom Brawa~A.t.s3. Balser ShaPPfng center ~ ~ Properties Fromc Mathew t3. float Date: OitHZ/etr Projeu~,8est Buy-t;cliega Statian'FX {98108) Subject: city of College. titatidp .planning department Gvmments Randall- tspokethismorningwith Ngtafia Rtt?c of the City of Cotieg8 Station. She had made some ccmmenls to t+egards to the puiiding Permit Applicat€an for the new Beat., Buy ab L+anestar Fiavllton. Thetre comments pvrtatn to the sdte`plan at:d wltt need to be reddbssad lay the sluff engiteear. 1. Shaw al! existing and proposed site utltiEles. Include utih''ty lacatlceua. easements. and meters. ^. tndtcaGe the location o! the nearest existing fire hydrant. 3. Shaw al! ftr+e Panes around bullding. d. Provide a letteratating thatthe current water and seyrar loads are less than yr equal to flee previously approved use (petsmart). if they ate not, the meter sine wpl need 'to ba lnareased. 6. The proposed t3est Buy store covers mrra impervious area than the previously approved use Arovidv signed calculations inciiaoting that the ex:s~Gng retention areas sre capable of handling the addltlonal iurt-off. 6. Show alt. exialing trees along Lincoln 9h+aat, p any treEtt are removed as part ~ the Pro1,~~ they must fie relocated atortg Liaacln Street wi#hin SO' df the roadway. 7. Cornmeett: There is a safety ~neerh in regards tQ the existing perking spades olasest tp the tinccln Street entrance. The sbee{~neeas o! the emrance ramp could pose a hazard to pars backing oat of these spaa~. Recommend that the lasfitwo spaces be omitted... (T'his is a recamfiendation only, cpmpliance Is not regairadJ. A bertid[ng permit wlq not he issued ttntit the items above have been addressed (except 11to. 7J. The City wPli require & aapies of the signed and sealed site plan which lndudes_thit lnbrntation. t fiave net seen the civil drawings yet, parhape moat of this has already been taken care of could yoap please sond ens a copy of the stba plan that 6s subrteitted for our racnras7 lf~tere is anything f can do to help eacpedt#e the process please let me know if you or the dull enginerer needs to contact Natalie Ruiz, her telephone number is (409) 7B4~3li7D Thank you for your help. /!~ rre Sent bar: SUN BUILDERS CO. 713 8698023; 26x0 deb Plaza 3?xive S~ 64t} 33oustaa, Texas TTIX38-1389 05/21/99 11 :51AM;J~~#887; Page 1/2 FORM X1411 (713)/868-9123 • Fax: X113)1869-$1323 / /~ .2. (/ 7 D+~tt:: ~~ TR~rsrQ~rEn To : ~JG- /~ FAX TEL'~c}NE i~1U'.fi~BER OF PAGES: `~ (INCLUDING T32S PAGE} MESSAGE: F'YI: CONFIRwIATION: P~:.R YOUR RE4UEST; l''r MESSAGE F'I~OM- ~ U -~`- .._. ~ :P7~EASE i~70'.~„2FY SENDER IF YQII-8~','Y£' D~'FFICIILTY WIT'S TR28 TR~iI7SM=S$2t]N ORIGIriAL COPY WSLL BE - Ft~RWARDED VIA: ~, ~ FEDERAL EXP~tES S ' , /'~ OR=GSNAL WILL NOT BE FORWARDED' I/ PLEASE RESPOND IIPON RECRIPT VIA: . 'FAX: PHQNEr _ / RESPONSE NCT REQU2REi7' ~,/ COCFR.I~.: ~. MESSAGE e;. ;y W L CONSULTING ENGINEERS June 9 1999 v' ~~ ~~ Veronica Morgan City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 77542 Re Proposed Construction of a Best Buy Store in College Station WLB File No. 9900301 Dear Ms. Morgan, This letter is in response to your request to .provide water and sanitary sewer requirements for the proposed Best Buy Store in College Station and your comments regarding the width of handicapped parking spaces.. POTABLE WATER DEMAND. The water requirement for the proposed Best buy Store in Collage Station is 60 gallons per -- minute (gpm) computed using the Standard Plumbing Code 1994. As shown on the plumbing plan sheet M-3, the store contains. 17 fixtures, .which equates to 61 equivalent "fixture units". We propose to install a 2-inch water meter,. which according to the Standard Plumbing code would result in an acceptable pressure loss of less than 7 psi per 100 feet of line at 60 gpm. WASTE WATER DISCHARGE. The estimated wastewater discharge is 2,.111_ gallons per day. This estimate is based on criteria established by the City of Houston for retail stores such as Best Buy. The City of Houston capacity requirements for sanitary sewer flows are determined by multiplying a factor by the square footage of the building. This computation yields an answer in units of equivalent single-family connections. The number of single-family connections can be converted to flow by again using another City of Houston criteria as shown below: Discharge (gallons per dax) =Square oota~of store X 0.'.000223 (service unit equitant (s. u. e), per sq. ft.) X 315 al~lons der day per s. u. e. ) Wastewater Discharge = 2,111 gallons per day = 30,050 sq.ft. X .000223 s.u.e/sq.ft. X 315 gpd/s.u.e. Our experience is that this criterion is used by all the governmental entities in the Houston area. We have found that other governmental jurisdictions outside Houston use other criteria but it is also our experience .that most of these other criteria estimate smaller wastewater discharges than the City of Houston criteria, so the City of Houston criteria are conservative when compared to others. If College Station has different criteria please fax them to me and I will recomputed the flows. ~G~~ e„ ate- a~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~'~. °` WLB ASSOCIATES, Irrc. •7830 Westglen Drive • Houston, Texas 77063 • TeY 713 278-9300 • Fax 713 278-9422 • e-mail wlb@wlbeng.com - ~~ L ~~~g~Ir~~~~~ Ir~~~ CONSULTING ENGINEERS HANDICAPPED PARKING In Houston we typically use 9-foot .wide spaces as you do in .College Station, but for handicapped spaces we follow the State of Texas requirements, which specifies an 8-foot wide parking space.. According to the State of Texas, the extra: one-foot of width is not needed. because. the width of the handicapped access isle provides sufficient width for opening of doors and handling of wheel chairs.. A copy of the .states criteria we use is attached. If you want the extra foot just let we know. If you have any questions or need additional information. please call me. Best Regards, ~- . ~_ '~'~' M,` ' William V. right, Principal WLB Associates, Inc. ASSOCIATES, IrrC. •7830 Westglen Drive • Houston, Texas 77063 • Te1713 278-9300 • Fax 713 278-9422 • e-mail wlb@wlbeng.com i I~ A4.5 Ground and Floor Surfaces. A4.5.1 General.. People who have difficulty walking or maintaining balance or who. use crutches, canes, or walkers, and those with restricted gaits are particularly sensitive to slipping.. and trigging hazards. For such II people, a stable and regulaz surface is necessary for safe walking, particularly on stairs. Wheelchairs can be propelled mast easily on surfaces that aze hard, stable, and regular. Soft loose surfaces such as shag carpet, loose 'p sand or gravel, wet .clay, and irregular surfaces such as cobblestones can significantly impede wheelchair '~~~ movement.::.... Slip resistance is based on`the frictional force necessary to keep a, shoe heel or crutch tip from slipping on a like) <to be found. on the surface. While the dynamic coefficient of friction n itions walking surface under cod y during walking varies in a complex and non-uniform way,. the static coefficient of friction, which; can be measured in several ways,. provides a close approximation of .the slip resistance of a surface. Contrary to.popular belief, some slippage is necessary to walking,. especially for persons with restricted gaits; a truly "non-slip" surface. could II not be negotiated. ' ~ - The Occupational Safety and Health Administration recommends that walking_surfaces have a static coefficient of friction of 0.5. A research -project. sponsored by the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance -with disabilities and concluded-that a hi her coefficient of Board conducted tests with ersons g Boazd Access ) P ( friction was 'needed by such persons. A tatic coefficient of friction of 0:6 is recommended. for accessible routes I, and 0.8 for ramps. ._:_ ... It is recognized .that the coefficient of friction varies considerably due to the presence of contaminants, :water, floor' finishes;. and other factors not under the control of the' designer or builder and.not subject to designand. construction: guidelines and that compliance; would be .difficult to measurer on the building site. Nevertheless, I'' many common building materials suitable for flooring aze now labeled with information on the static coefficient of friction. While it may .not be:possible to compara one product directly with another,: or to guazantee a constant. ' er are encouraged to s eci materials with appropriate values. As more products measure, builders and.design „s b P _ fY went and s ecification is like) The include information. on slip resistance, improved uniformity in measure p y Access Board°s advisory guidelines on Slip Resistant. Surfaces provides. additional information on this subject. 1 es on walks and round or floor surfaces can cause considerable difficulty in propelling a wheelchair Cross s op g m a straight fine. ' Q ive criteria for c etin both uantitative and ualitat arp g n in develo m d e 4 e o b r et. Much more needs to P b q A4.5.3 Ca P •' i tics ' d weave need to be studied .However, certain functional character s (i.e., problems. associated with texture an ) are well established. When both carpet and-padding are used,. it is desirable to have: minimum movement which would allow the etxo hum ne etween the floor and the ad and the pad and the: carpet carp . p (preferably, no ) b P thick soft lush ad' or cushion, articular) in combination with long or warp..In;heavily trafficked areas, a (p ) P P Y carpet pile,. makes it difficult for individuals in wheelchairs' and those with other ambulatory' disabilities to get about. Firm carpeting can. be achieved-through proper selection and combination of. pad and. carpet, sometimes with the elimination of the pad or cushion, and with proper installation. Carpeting designed-with a weave. that causes-a.zi -zap effect when «~heeled across is strongly discourged. a~ - ,, A4.6 Parking and Passenger Loading,Zones. `~ ° ~;.~,,,~,, ~ A4.6.3 Parking Spaces. The increasing use of vans: with side-mounted Iifts or ramps by persons with disabilities. has necessitated some revisions in specifications for parking spaces and adjacent access aisles. The typical. accessible parking space is 96 in (2440 mm) wide with an adjacent. 60 in {1525 mm) access aisle. However, this aisle does not permit lifts,or ramps to be deployed and still leave room for a person using-a wheelchair or other mobility aid to exit the lift platform or ramp. In tests conducted with actual: lift/van/wheelchair combinations,. (under aBoard-sponsored Accessible Parking and Loading Zones Project) reseazchers found thata space and aisle totaling almost 204 in (5180 inm) wide was needed to deploy a lftandexit conveniently. The "van accessible" ~~ a~ .....~ ., '4 %° parking space: required by these guidelines .provides a 96 in (2440 mm) wide space with a 96 in (2440 mm) ~, adjacent access aisle which is just wide enough to maneuver and exit from a side mounted lift. If a 96 in (2440 } j mm) access aisle is placed between two spaces, two "van .accessible" spaces are created. Alternatively, if the . wide access aisle. is provided at the end of a row (an area often unused), it may be possible to ,provide the wide ` access aisle without additional space (see Fig. AS(a)). , ~~~ n is ed~''tc~-a1~Y'~ va' s to~~`~iies~n"the wider aisle, but the space is not intended to be restricted. ,~ only to vans. "Universal".Parking Space Design. An alternative to the provision of a percentage ofapaces with a wide aisle; and he associated need to include additional signage, is the use of what has been called the "universal" pazking space design. Under this design,. all accessible spaces aze 132 in (3350 mm) wide.with a 60 in (1525 mm) access aisle (see Fig. AS(b)). One advantage- to this design is that no additional signage is needed because all spaces '~ can: accommodate a van with aside-mounted lift or ramp,. Also, there's no competition between cars and vans .fore spaces since. all spaces can accommodate either. Furthermore, a .wider space permits vehicles to park to one side or the other within the 132 in (3350 mm) space to allow persons to' exit-and enter the vehicle on either the driver or passenger: side, although,: in'some cases, this would require exiting or entering without amarked - access aisle. . It is sometimes di,~'zcult for a person with disabilities to back into parking spaces, making common access aisles shared by two spaces impractical. Abetter design is to provide an access aisle for each space rather than having two spaces. share the same aisle. An essential consideration for an deli n is Navin the access aisl y $ g e level with the pazkmg space. Since a person with a disability, using a lift or ramp, must maneuver within the access aisle, the aisle cannot include a ramp or sloped azea. The access aisle must be connected to an accessible route to the appropriate accessible entrance of a building. or facility. The parking access aisle must either blend' with the accessible route or have a curb ramp complying .with 4 7. Such a curb ramp. opening must be located within the access. aisle boundaries, not within " the parking space boundaries. Unfortunately, many facilities are designed with a ramp that is blocked when any , vehicle parks in the: accessible space. :Also, the required dimensions of the access aisle cannot be restricted by planters,' curbs or wheel, tops. Y - A4.6.4 Signage. Signs designating parking places for disabled people can be 'seen from a driver's seat. if the signs aze mounted high enough. (generally between 48 in (1220 mm)'and 80 in (2030 mm)) above the ground or floor surface and located at the front of a parking space. ,. _ A4,6.5 Vertical Clearance.. High-top vans, which disabled people or transportation services often use, require higher cl , c~~-~s~k~ngr~g utomobiles. accessible route ~ '- • ...... ..0.........0 . . ~. ~ ~ .o.......0 .... .....<.. a.......:.. a o c 0 ~~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~~ I i_ I t I~` I .. Isd ~ sq 96 min 60 min96 min96 min - 132 mm mm 132 min 132 min ~ _ 2440: .1525 :2440.-2440 3350 52 3350 3350 1525 324 min 252 min ~~f s225 s4oo I~ la1 (bl ~ Van Accessible. Space at End Universal Parking Space Design of Row ig. A5 ~ _ ~~~ *'~,,, `. =k~ing~Space Alternatives ,~~ haw h~ ~~~ti~~~ti ~,~ ~~ l ~~~~, _~_ ___~_.__._~n~ ._ _~ .w~ __ ___. ~_..---- ------C ~__ ~. ~ M_.__ ~__. ~_ ~~,~ __ _ __ .- r _- ._~ _____ ~, _._ _~ ~______:____~ ~_e __ .. __~~_ __ _. ~o, Nl-1, .. ~~ ik .; _~~ __:_ ,-, _..a.f~.,.._,..._. .._. _._. _______ _ _.__... '~....__ ~? ~ -_ ~~. iRf ~~ ~~ ~`~ ^-- t ~ __._ .___ _ _ _ ~ ~ _ ~_ _ ,.-- r 1 1 ......_,..... I l Cl Ci of College .Station FAX To: I ~~ ~~~ ~~I ~~o~ Date: I ~f ~/CJ Number of pages including cover sheet: From: Phone: Fax phone: CC: Phone: (409) 764-3570 Fax phone: (409) 764-3496 REMARKS.: ^ Urgent ~" ^ For your review ^ Reply ASAP ^ Please comment ~~1L-17/nl~ l ~~i-~ iT !~~'~ f3~9~D O~ ~•Srri~-~-~o ~ =~~~o ~O"o (p ao l U! A L ~ P ~C~S oZ, ~ 00 III~G~l~~S o~ - ~o SS THI~~ lo~ ~ ~~i,%~-G~- '"~~"~ Development Services P.O. Box 9960, College Station, TX 77842-9960 shears Companies September 10, 1996 Kent NI. Laza, P.E. City of College Station 1101 Texas Avenue P.O. Box 9960 College .Station, TX 7?842 RE: Traffic Light - Lca~e_ Star P'avilion' Dear 1VIr. Laza: ~' RECEIVED SEP 1 2 1996 I enjoyed meeting. with you last week. I am looking forward to working with you again to complete this pro}ect. The tra#~ic light is a very important factor to this development. Please let me know when I can expect to have the letter from the City, .regarding our conversation last week. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. W. Shears CWS/kmm -1325 La Concha, Suite 200 Houston, Texas 77054 (713) 796-1005 Fax: (713) 796-0623 __ ~ J / L ~ •~ G D^~v SiY-~-rZ Cit of Colle a Station PO Box 9960, Colle a Station„Texas 77842 ~ ~ ~L~ CITY OF COLLEGE S°TATIOI`I Date: ~ /Z`1'/97 FAX ~~~ Number of pages including cover sheet: ~~ To: ~~ ~s ~, ~~ From: ~2--Uc~ G`~~- Phone: ~~ ~ 3) ~7 SZ'' ~L b p Fax phone: ~ ~ ~ 3~ S 5Z - $ Ca ~ b CC: Phone: (409)764-3570. Fax phone: (409) 764-3496 ~~~: ~'~~ ^ Urgent ^ For your review ^ Reply ASAP ^ Please comment ~C~ 4~uh ~ ~T~'~4"r ADC 3(_/~SC(~ Kim= ,v~ /~l~ G,> 17'a-E ~G/4,(Z !7 '7~ ~' /~Ct~) CRC7~s4n/ Gc_: f~- l C.o~c ~~~ , ~ r- : ot.,.~ ~~~ A-,~ U cZ, . ~c-sno-~S ~L:C~-s~ c.~~~. ~ ~ ®~ ~` 'on En neerin Z'rans~ortatz g g IOSEPH D. Bt.nSCHKE, D. ENG., P.E., PRESIDENT 1722 BROAUMOOR, SUITE 212 BRYAN, TEXAS 77802 Mazch 20, 1997 Mr. Steve Homeyer City of College Station P. O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 RE: Lone Staz Retail Center Dear Steve: Analysts (409) 776-1822 FAx (409) 776-6119 Thank you for providing me with a copy of the most recent parking lot layout for the referenced Center. My original concern had been the lack of storage for vehicles exiting the Center at the proposed signalized entrance/exit. The attached revised parking lot layout has remedied that concern. I do not know if the city of College Station can make demands relative to the interior parking lot design. However, I have several ,additional concerns with the proposed layout, as .indicated below. L The curb return leaving the Center is very short. I would recommend at least a 25-foot radius on the return. 2. The curb returns within the lot (10-foot-radii) are too short. I would recommend at least 20- foot radii instead. 3. There are some very short transition areas. Vehicles cannot travel along these transition paths. Hence, debris will collect along the curb and look trashy. Also, drivers will not feel comfortable as they travel along these paths. I have -illustrated more realistic transitions on the attached layout.. 4. The Center. has several driveways, including one very close to what .will be the signalized entrance/exit. I would strongly suggest closing one of the entrances, as shown on the attached sketch. 5. It would be most desirable to redesign the existing parking lot adjacent to the Red Lobster. I realize that this may not be feasible and I would not consider this suggestion absolutely necessary. Specializing in.• Traffic Engineering Roadway Design .Accident Analysis Mr. Steve Homeyer March 20,1997 Page 2 Please contact me if you have any questions. S' rely, J eph D. Blaschke, D.Eng., P.E. President JDB/sb Attachment ~-~ ~~ '~~ ~~ ~ c O ~~~ ';~ ~ 1 ° 2 3' 19'~ ~ 198_~~' ,~ 15 A KI Cs SP G 5 215 5.~. SNOP'~ GTF2 _____ 7 ~" , ~-- /~~ 9 (V ' ~ ~ I r C~ ~~ ~ .~ i n \ , N I ~lo~~ ~ ~ ,~~ ' Q fY~~~~ ~Y~'n~i"~`i~~~ sr~, , ~! . ~ y ~ `- ffi ' a ~ c~1 ~ .- - - o - --- ---~----~- -1~---_~.~ --r----~----~-- ~ Cf~ -- ~----~_----~---- l -1---~-~-- _A _~s~_s_.~_- i .., ~ ~ s ~____~---- - _ - N ~I ° 23' - - 19" E 191.59' ` ~ Iv ~~ ~gA t P Tt ~ ~ e ~" ~ t~~r'IOVE E>C (ST.` f~U~D INCz ~ GAh ALL UTILITIES BELOUI ~UIREME '~ ~~fi~'KINC~ F'~RKI~iCx 1 ~G I ~ co I ~--- L___ ~~R- _ _ _ ~.:: __ ti ~~, ~~/ 1 ~•~ CITE Off' C®L.LEGE ~TATIOI`I P O. BOX 9960 1101 TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842-0960 - (409) 764- 3500 May 6, 1997 Texas Department of Transportation ATTN: M_ r. Patrick Williams, P,~. 1300 N. Texas Avenue Bryan, Texas 77803 12E: Driveway Permit for lone Star Pavilion Dear Mr. Williams: Attached is the original signed Driveway Permit Application for the above referenced development at 715 Texas Avenue South. Three copies were submitted last week that did not have the .correct owner ,representative's signature; Mr. Mike White, the construction supervisor on -site, has informed me that he would like to begin construction on the driveway connection to Texas Avenue on May 12, 1997. If it is at all passible to issue`this permit to meet his construction time line it would benefit all parties involved. Please review at your earliest convenienceand if you have any questi©ns feel free to contact me at 764-3570. Sincerely, 1 W. Paul Karp Graduate Civil ngineer - xc: Shirley Volk, Development Coordinator Davis Wilson, Wilson/Zetty/Tipps TxD©T Driveway Permit Pile Home. of Texas A & M University r ~~ ®~ ~` res ortation En ineerin,g ~naly$ts Tra ~ 9 JOSEPH D. BIASCHKE, D. ENG., P.E. PRESIDENT (409) 776-1822 1722 BROAOMOOR, Suite 212 FN( (409) 776-6119 BRYAN, TEaus 77802 March 19, 1997 Mr. Lee Robinson Traffic Systems. Manager City of College Station P. O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842-0960 RE: Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Intersection of Texas Avenue and Lone Star Pavilion. Retail Center Exit College Station, Texas Dear Mr. Robinson: I have attached a s~~mmary of approach volume counts on Texas Avenue in the vicinity of the proposed Lone Star Pavilion Retail Center Exit.. Also attached are projected traffic volume counts expected to use the Exit after: the Retail Center opens laterthis year.. These counfs were collected and estimated during a 1996 traffic impact study conducted for the proposed development by WHM Transportation Consultants, Inc. The counts appear to be realistic considering the current traffic volumes using Texas Avenue and the size of the proposed retail center. It is readily apparent that the traffic volumes. at the proposed intersection will be sufficient to . warrant a traffic signal installation based on Warrant No. 2 that is contained in the Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. The signal will be positioned' at a location almost centered between the. existing traffic signal. installations at the intersections of Texas Avenue with University Drive and Walton Drive. If the proposed signal installation is fully actuated and timed appropriately, I believe the signals can be operated with minimal impact on Texas Avenue traffic, I would not suggest installing traffic signals at any other locations between the existing signalized intersections. I will be happy to assist you if the -State Department of Transportation requires a more detailed signal warrant analysis. Please advise: me if additional assistance is desired. Specializing in: Traf, flc "Enghaeering Roadway :Design Acci~d ent Anall/sl Mr. Lee Robinson March 19,1997 Page. 2 Thank you for allowing me to assist you iri this matter.' Sincerely, G~~ Joseph D. Blaschke, D.Eng., P.E. President JDB/sb Attachments xc: Mr. Edwin Hard INTERSECTION OF TEXAS AVENUE AND LONE STAR PAVILION RETAIL-CENTER EXIT SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS (WA,RRANT N0 2) Hour Tegas Ave.. Warrant Warrant Retail. Center Warrant Warrant (Both Appr.)~ Vol. Satisfied Ezit Vol. Satisfied 10 - 11 a.m. 1706 900 Yes 66 100 No 11 - 12 p.m. 2288 900 Yes 105 100 Yes 12 - 1 p.m. 2371 900 Yes 141 100 Yes 1 - 2 p.m. 2486 900 Yes 146 100 Yes 2 - 3 p.m. 2166 900 Yes 157 100 Yes 3 - 4 p.m. 2126 900 .Yes 159 100 Yes 4 - 5 p.m. 2096 900 Yes 163 100 Yes 5 - 6 p.m. 2326 900 Yes 170 100 Yes 6 - 7 p.m. 1862 900 Yes 138 100 Yes 7 - 8 p.m. 1627 900 Yes 125 100 Yes 8 - 9 p.m. .1464 900 Yes 138 100 Yes 9 - 10 p.m. 1285 900 Yes 163 100 Yes s~'a~ o ~~~~~ o .~ ~u~€Pt! D. BL,ASC~,. . ... ~t`~E~2 ~ `q~~1 ~s'rAt ~ ~: 3~ ~~~~.~ s Ci C"%l of College Station FAX To: ~` C~U(0~-/~-~ S SG~~~ Phone: Fax phone ~7~ 3 ~ 7 ~/~ '- (~(2 3 CC: Date: /~~S /~ ~ Number of pages including cover sheet: From: /'''" /~ f~ mot' ~ rt~ Phone: (409) 764-3570 Fax phone: (409) 764-3496 REMARKS; ^ Urgent ^ For your review ^ Reply ASAP ^ Please comment Development Services P.O. Box 9960, College Station, TX 77842-9960 " a Texas Department of Transportation 1300 N. TEXAS AVE. • BRYAN, TEXAS 77803-2760 (409) 778-2165 December 2, 1996. Project: DBUSTP 89(61) Control: 0050-01-056 Highway: BS6-R (Texas Avenue) Brazos County Mr. Ed Hard City of College Station P. O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842-9960 Dear Mr. Hard: We are in receipt of your November 12, 19961etter requesting the relocation of the median opening from centerline Station 615+13 to centerline Station 616+18 on the referenced project. This median relocation is necessary to match the planned driveway of an adjacent development. The change order for the relocation is currently being designed, and we will forward it for your review when it is complete. Please contact me if you have any further question. Sincerely, Patrick T. Williams, P. E. Area Engineer CWH/bja cc: District Construction Project Engineer An Equal Opportunity Employer -~ ~ ~es~- 9 2~°~ SUBMTr APPLICATION AND TEffS! LIST cl~clcED-or-~ wI1-II,Ib 10 FOLDED COPIES OF SITE PLAN FOR REVIEW MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN PROPOSALS (('ALL CITY ORDINANCES MUST BE MET) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLL WING: u 1. Sheet size - 24" x 36" ^ 2. Titleblock to include: Name, ddres ,location, and lesal descri to ion o~ P~'~'''~~ fir:) Name, address, and telephone number of applicant. Name, address,. and telephone number of developer/owner . Name, .address, and telephone number of archtecdengineer Date of submittal f. Total site area ^ 3. Ownership and current zoning of parcel and all abutting parcels. C~ 4. A key`map (not necessarily to scale). t~3" 5. Scale should be largest standard engineering scale possible on sheet. Gd' 6. Provide a north arrow. ^ 7. Topography, final grading plan, and other pertinent drainage information. (If plan has too much information, .show drainage on separate sheet.) E~ 8. All existing streets, drives, buildings, and water courses. on or adjacent to the proposed project site. ^ 9. Locate-100 yr. floodplain on or adjacent to the proposed project site, note if there is none on the site. ^ 10 .Location and size of existing utilities within or adjacent to the proposed project: site. ^ 11. Proposed location, type, and.size ofthe following: ~ Buildings and structures 4-b.) Off-Street parking areas with parking spaces drawn, tabulated, and dimensioned ~.e:) .Sidewalks ~.--d.) Comman open space sites c~'Sites for solid waste containers ^ 12. P~'oposed streets, drives, and curb cuts. For each proposed, curb cut (including driveways, streets, leys, etc.) locate existing curb cuts on the same and opposite side of the street to determine separation distances between existing and proposed curb cuts. Indicate driveway throat length as measured in the Driveway Ordinance. (See Ordinance .1961 fordriveway location and design requuements.) ~' ^ 13. The total number of residential buildings and. units to be constructed on the proposed project site. ^ 14. dscape plan as required in Section 11 of the Zoning Ordinance (See Ordinance # 1638.) The andscaping plan can be shown on a separate sheet if too much information is on the original site plan. Attempt to reduce or eliminate plantings in easements. Include information on the plan such as: a) existing landscaping to remain.. b) required. point calculations y c) proposed new plantings with points earned h~j ~' ^ 15. Indicate unit type (number of bedrooms). IJ' ~ ^ 16. The density of dwelling units per acre of the proposed project. 17. The gross square footage of buildings and the proposed use of each building. 5s~~~3sF °`~ -. C~1' l8. Designate number of parking spaces required by ordinance and provided by proposal. C~]' 19. Show dimensions to size and ovate all structures, parking spaces, drives,. curb cuts, parking islands, and setbacks. (~/ ~ ^ 20. Are there impact fees associated with this development? D 2 .. Provide a water and sanitary sewer legend to include water demands (muumum, maximum and ave~a~ ge ands in allons er minute) and sewer loadings (maximum demands in gallons per day).1- (,t,-t~~`' ~D ~ '"dem g P ~ ~ ~ ~,~-~ st be located in easements or R.O.W. (City will size meters~~w- ^ 22 hove all meter locat~~ ~`er~s~m`u The following are typical standards for. Plan Development established by Ordinance or Policya ~i [~ 1. Building separation is a minimum of 15 feet. t~' 2. Building setbacks are outlined in Ordinance 1638, Zoning Ordinance, Table A (Sec. 7, P. 30). 3. Minimum parking space is 9' X 20', or on a perimeter row, 9' x 18' with a 2' overhang: t3 4. Minimum drive width. is 23' with head-in parking or 20' without parking. 1~5. Raised landscaped islands, (6" raised curb) of a minimum of 180 sq. ft. are located at both ends of every parking row. Additionally, 180 sq. ft. of landscaping for every i 5 interior parking paces must be provided. ^ 6. Streetscape compliance is required which involves special plantings along streets specified in the City's Streetscape Plan. C~7. A 6'° raised curb is required around all edges of all parts of all paved areas without exception. (To include islands, planting areas, access ways, dumpster locations, utility. pads, etc.) Curb detail to be approved by City Engineer. No- exceptions will be made for areas designated as "reserved for future parking„. i ^ 8. Wheelstops maybe: required on interior rows longer than 10 spaces or in pedal situations. I~ C~ ® 9. Sidewalks are required at tune of development if prop~e deternun s the necessity r (Refer to Section sidewalk Master Plan or if the Project Review Committ 10.2 of the Zoning Ordinance). ~10. Locations of dumpsters shall be such that dumpsters are not visible. from streets. Gates are discouraged and visual screening from R.O.W. is required.: ^ 11. Healthy, native trees over 6" in caliper should be retainedwhenever possible. ^ 12 Fire lanes of a minimum of 20 feet in width with a minimum height clearance of 14 feet must be .established if any structure of any type is more than 150 feet from a public street or highway. R-1A, or R-2 must be within 300 feet of a fire ® 13. y structure in any zoning district other than R-1, (~\ndrant as measured. along a public street or along: an approved fire. lane as the hose is laid off the truck. ----®--~--1--4--. ire hydrants must be located on the. same side of a major street as a project, and shall be in a location ~----''approved by the City Engineer. ~® 15. ire hydrants must be operable and accepted by the City and drives must have an all weather surface ~----''before combustibles can be brought on any site. ~6. A twenty four foot setback from R.O.W. to curb of parking lot is required.... Parking may be allowed in this area up to a maximum of 7 contiguous spaces. ^ 17. All plans must include irrigation systems for landscaping- Irrigation meters are separate from the regular water systems for buildings and must be sized accordingly and includebackflow prevention protection. ...................... Page:1-: `Natalie Ruiz best buy questions .:Nx:.:..,.n~ .::::........, w:,::: :..,-::......... ::..., From: Sabine McCully To: Bridgette George, Carl Warren, Jeff Tondre, l_is... Date: Fri,. Mar 12, 1999 3:.00 PM Subject: best buyquestions this is an fyi with .questions at the end: fyi -.today jess and i,met with a bill iangford, engineer with wlb associates out of houston, regarding the proposed best buy expansion at the pavillion. jeff joined us for a while to discuss drainage and sewer capacity. we went over the redlines on the site plan. that had already been submitted and reviewed. he agreed to talk to :the pertinent people to get the throat depth lengthened for the driveway off of lincoln near the front of the future store. we agreed to let him show just the development area, rather than redraw the full site plan, with the condition that some type of overall plan that shows the whole center is included with the total approved package. bill will do a drainage study to account for the increase in impervious cover, and-might put in a detention pond near lincoln. we still need to send him a package of information, ovemighted if possible, regarding the following unanswered. questions: 1. what type of water/sewer demands were :proposed with petsmart? we could not find the water/sewer table on the approved site plan for the center. perhaps they are on another sheet with the approved building permit set? if so, we need to send- a copy... if not, then he would still like a copy of a typically acceptable form for this table. 2. he's shown us an-"as-built" survey, which does not show that. we have an easement along lincoln. i assume this is good enough to show us there is no easement? 3. does a water meter need to be set with additional tap fees due? or did the pavillion already provide the meter for the future store? 4. is the sprinkler water line stub;out live? 5. is there an rpbp required for the water? was it a requirement when the center was built? if not, and the site was grandfathered, will they also be grandfathered from meeting the requirment? 6. do we have waterline plan :and profile sheets for the public waterline? if so, bill would like a copy sent to him. CC: Edwin Hard, Jessica Jimmerson ~• r k ~I°IRY CAF` I~~GE ~T~~'IC~T~ ~. October 8, 1996 Wilson/Zetty/Associates,,Inc. Attn: Mr. C. Davis Wilson, A.LA., C.S.I. 3100 Wilcrest, Suite 325 Houston, Texas 77042 RE: Proposed Lone-Star Pavilion at Texas Avenue and Lincoln Dear Mr. Wilson: I have reviewed the water and sewer demands you submitted in your October 7, 1996 correspondence. The proposed demands are as follows: Future Barnes and Noble Sanitary Sewer: 1,760 GPD Water: 2.70 GPM Proposed Office Depot Sanitary Sewer: 2,180 GPD Water: 3.30 GPM Proposed Spec. Space Sanitary Sewer: 1,125 GPD Water: 1.70 GPM Proposed Computer Space Sanitary Sewer: 450 GPD Water: 0.70 GPM Future Petsmart Sanitary Sewer: 1,580 GPD Water: 2.50 GPM Irrigation Sanitary Sewer: 0 GPD Water: 2.80 GPM Total Site Demands Sanitary Sewer: 7,095 GPD ~ 7,100 GPD Water: 13.70 GPM ~ 14 GPM Upon reviewing this information, the City has the ability to provide water and sewer service as well as fire protection based upon these proposed demands. If for some reason these demands change, the City would need to reevaluate the new numbers. To respond your comment regarding the reimbursement between the cost of an 8 inch and 12. inch sewer line, we need to address the responsibilities of both parties. It is the responsibility of the developer to provide service to his development. In a plan you submitted to the Project Review Committee on September 4, 1996, there were. 4 manholes and approximately 755 feet of 8 inch sanitary sewer required to service your development. In a plan submitted with your October 7, 1996 correspondence, there were October 8, 1996 Mr. C. Davis Wilson Page 2 Lone-Star Pavilion 4 manholes and approximately 875 feet of 12 inch sanitary sewer necessary to provide service to the adjacent properties to the north. The City will participate in the cost difference of materials between the 8 inch and 12 inch pipe as well as any engineering costs associated with extending the line beyond what is required by your development. According. to these two submittals, the City would .have the potential upon approval by the City Council to participate in the cost of installing 120 feet of 12 inch line and the difference in cost of materials between the 8 inch and 12 inch line for a distance of 755 feet. In order to more accurately address this item, an engineer's estimate will need to be submitted for this construction. I hope I have been able to .adequately address. your questions regarding this cost participation. If you have any questions or comments, feel frce to contact me at (409) 764-3570. S~ncerely, Steve Homeyer Graduate Engineer ce: Kent Laza, City Engineer Shirley Volk,. Development Coordinator Charles Shears, Shears Investments r..,.., ~~ ~ ~ a oa T1F.VF.T,(IPMENT SVCS t~ooi lG/ua/ao ic.li .._~~ .~. --_ ~~~e ACTIVITY REPORT xe~x: ~~~~~~~~~:~~~~~~~c~~~~~~~~~~x: TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX N0. CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID START TIME USAGE TIME PAGES RESULT 8294 17139528610pp161 12/05 12:10 01'11 2 OK ". e~ Development Services City of Colle a Station P.o. Box 9960, College Station, TX 77842-9960 FAX To~~~ Phone: Fax hone: CC: ', ~~ Date: /off-- .ra ~(O Number of pages including cover sheet: From: - L y/~. Phone:. (409)764-3570 Fax phone (409) 764-3496 r, ,-, ---_ ___..,.... n RPni~ a~np f-1 Please comment Fa °~~ CITY OF COLLEGE STATIOI`I ~ ~~ , trot ~-~s ~~~~~r h,^"~ .~, -,~ mast Ot€ice Sax ~~~e7 ''"'`> ~ ~ailege ~t~tiae~, ~'~x~s 77&42-964 (~tOg) 7~~-35i)® December 5, 1996 Subject: Lone Star Pavilion Shopping Center TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: The City of College Station has recently reviewed plans for the proposed subject shopping center to be located in the East Gate Square and D. A. Smith subdivisions at the northeast corner of the intersection of Texas Avenue and Lincoln Street in College Station. The zoning on this properly is classified as C-1 General Commercial and the proposed use is listed as a permitted use in that zoning district in the City's Zoning Ordinance. -~~,°r`_ J e RKee City Planner t-l~arra~ ~t Tomas Ar,~`~ ~sciv~rslt,r WILSON/ZETTY/ASSOCIATES, INC. ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • PLANNERS ®ctober 7, 1996. Mr. Steve Homeyer (-raduate Engineer City of College Station RE. Lone Star Pavillion, Sanitary Sewer and Water Availability Dear Steve, Dn the above referenced project our lenders are asking for a Water and Sanitary Sewer Availability letter, on City of College Station Letterhead. Tos ai usage is not much for ;Sanitary Sewer it is 8,100 gallons per day. Water usage is more because of the landscape irrigation,-about 14 gallons per minute. Also the three major tenants will have 6" fire lines to their fire protection sprinklers. The breakdown of the usage is noted on the enclosed blueprint of the site plan. W/Z/A used The City of Houston standard's, as discussed, and rounded up. i~0 d F ~ to the same letter ~.=ou might also commit to reimbursement of the cost difference betwe°n SUS T ~+. ~~~ Sii° nr?a'~ttE'--~E~WP.T' ~.pd oriA 1~.t9 r4Tlii 3C?X?r~tXlfnitiLCl~f 3c~v L. iof i~"F ~iUV.?i% Si-`vvc; d ,ft,`s ~,~o~,. ~o;;s`~°ction end engineering cosh. Steve 'hank Yola for your consideration and for expediting the letter. Should you have any questions please do not hesitate in contacting me. tZespectfully ~ertuested, i C Davis ikon A.LA C.S.I. C.C, Charles Shears Rich Wingo Jeff Roberts Shirley Volk 3100 WILCREST, SUITE 325 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77042 (713) 952-8600 ~~:~?~3 CITY OF COLLEGE STATIOI`I November 12, 1996 Mr. Pat Williams, P. E. Area Engineer Texas Department of Transportation 1300 N. Texas Avenue Bryan, TX 77803-2760 Re: Shift in Median Opening on Texas Ave. Dear Pat: Attached find letters from Mr. Paul Clarke of Clarke & Wyndham. Real Estate and Mr. Davis Wilson of Wilson/Zetty Associates requesting the relocation of the median. opening for the Texas 707 area as currently shown in the Texas Avenue widening plans. The center line of the median opening in question is located at about 615+13. This centerline needs to shift approximately 105 feet south to 616+18 in order to coincide with the planned esplanade driveway of the proposed redevelopment. Please contact me or Steve Homeyer regarding further details on this design change. The City is in support of this change and requests that TXDOT begin redesign work for this probable change order. The City will submit a final notification for the change order upon our issuance of a development permit for this planned redevelopment. As you know, a traffic signal is planned for this driveway and median opening. A traffic study has been conducted for the proposed redevelopment which indicates that the signal will be warranted. The City will be in contact with the TXDOT regarding the details of the signal in the near future. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Edwin Hard, AICP Transportation Planner cc: Steve Homeyer Shirley Volk Charles Shears, Shears Investments C. Davis Wilson, Wilson/Zetty Associates Ij Paul Clarke, Clarke & Wyndham Real Estate 9 ~.- WILSON/ZETTY/ASSOCIATES, INC. ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • PLANNERS November 7, 1996. Mr. Steve Homeyer City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 ~: Request For Relocating Esplanade Cut on Texas Ave. Dear Steve. This letter is to submit a formal request to move the reiould be Stat on 616 17 pncreasingthe100 feet south of'the current planned esplanade cut. Th~~ length of the left turn lane. If there are any further questions please do not hesitate in calling. Respectfully C. Davis Wil on A.LA., C.S_I. For: Charles Shears 3100 WILCREST, SUITE 325 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77042 (7I3) 952-8600 LARKS ~- YND~i~°~.M REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT SERVICES November 11, 1996 Mr. Ed Hard City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 1 201 S. Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 77842-9960 RE: Texas Avenue Median Cut Via: Sax & Mail Dear Mr. Hard: Please accept this letter on behalf of The 707 Center and United Development that we are aware and in agreement of the relocation of the planned median cut to access The 707 Center. The new location approximately 100 feet to the south has been planned comprehensively with the pending redevelopment of this area. Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions. Best regards, Paul J. larke, CCIM President PJC/tb r~e:~ixa 3608 East 29th Street, Suite 200 Bryan/College Station, Texas 77802 409/846-4384 Fax 409/846-1461 9800 N. W. Freeway, Suite 203 Houston, Texas 77092 713/681-5876 Fax 713/681-5877 f- r ~ E ~ ~ o~J~ spa ~ 1~~~~~ `•~ CITY OF COLLEGE STATIOI`I P. O. BOX 9960 1101 TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE STATIOPI, TEXAS 77842-0960 (409)764-3500 May 14, 1997 A.B. Shopping Centers Attn: Mr. Tom Brown 1900 International Park Drive, Suite 303 - Birmingham, Alabama 35243 RE: Closure of an Existing Driveway into the Lone Star.Pavilion Dear Mr. Brown: Per>our conversation, I have requested a letter.. from the Texas Department of Transportation regarding :the closure of the existing: driveway south of the proposed main :entrance into he ' Lone Star Pavilion Shopping Center.. A copy of this letter is attached for your files. If you have any questions or comments, feel free to contact meat (409)7643570. S' a ly,; Steve H Meyer Assts to the City Engineer ~. xc: Shirley Volk, Development Coordinator Sabine McCully, Senior Planner ~ning Case File Home of Texas A & M University L € c- only 5-r~iZ-- `t C. - ~~, Tees lie apt ref 7"rar~sa~tati®~ ~ 1300 N. TEXAS AVE. • BRYAN, TEXAS 77803-2760 • (409) 778-2165 l May 9, 1997 Project: DBUSTP 89(61)UM Control: 0050-01-056 ~ Highway: BS6-R (Texas Avenue) ~~ Brazos County I'~ Mr. Rich Wingo A. B. Shoppin enter Properties, Inca 1900 In ational Park Drive, Suite 303 ~, B' gham, Alabama 3524 Dear. Mr. Wingo: As we discussed over-the phone, I am unable to stop construction of the Lone Star Pavilion parking that is planned within the property area claimed by the State of Texas and A. B. Shopping Center. However, should this claim settle in favor of the State, A. B. Shopping Center Properties, Ina will be required to remove all improvements from State right-of-way. Sincerely,. ', Patrick T. Williams, P. E. Area Engineer PTW/bja cc: Jim Calloway, City of College Station '~ teve Homeyer, City of College Station I An Equal Opportunity Employer _. .. c ~O iCM~ ~•- CITY OF' COLLEGE STATIOI`I P. O. BOX 9960 1101 TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 7 78 4 2-0960 ..!409).764-3500 Apri122, 1997 Texas Department of Transportation ATTN: Mr. Patrick Williams, P.E. 1300 N. Texas Avenue Bryan, Texas 77803 RE: .Temporary Traffic Signal for Lone Star Pavilion (715 Texas Avenue) -~/~ Dear Mr. Williams: This letter is in response to your meeting with Kent Laza and Scott Hester regarding the temporary traffic signal at the. above referenced location. It was discussed at this` meeting, that the City will be responsible for the costs associated with the installation and maintenance of the signal as well as contracting with G. Carter Construction to relocate the temporary signal heads as required by project phasing.. In addition, the City plans to utilize the: permanent control box. with this temporary installation. In order to accommodate. the development of this site, the tentative date. for this construction is the week of May 19, 1997. If this date poses a problem for the construction of Texas Avenue, please let me know as soon as possible so that the date can be rescheduled. If you have any comments, please feel free to contact Kent Lazy or myself at 764-3570. S' ely, Steve Homeyer Asst. to the City Engineer xa ~nt Laza, City Engineer /Shirle Vo Develo meat Coordinator y ~ P Scott Hester, Transportation Technician. Lee Robinson, Traffic Systems Manager Home of Texas A & M University ~, 1 COL L EC E STAT ~•~ C1T ^ ~" I10}TEX AVENUE P. O. BOX 9960 77842--09 `® COLLEGE STATIOPt, TEXAS. ` (409)764-3500 v Apri125, 1997 -'texas Department of Transportation Ate: lvir. Patrick Williams, P.E: 1300 N. Texas Avenue Bryan, .Texas 77803 gE ; Driveway Permit for Lone Star Pavilion Dear Mr. Williams:. ies of a Driveway Permit APPh~~On for the above referenced development. at Attached are.. 3 cop Site is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Texas 715 Texas Avenue South. Thy roximately 642 feet.'.:of frontage on Texas Avenue. The Avenue and Lincoln Street and has app with a 6 foot .raised ro osing to construct a 45 foot wide commercial ~~ earliest convenience and if applicant P P Please review at y median at the no ~ ns ffeel free to contact me at 764-3570. you `have any que Sincerely, UV'~~ W: Paul Kaspar Graduate Civil Engineer . Shirley Volk, Development Coordinator xc: Wilson/ZettY~TiPPs Davis Wilson, Permit File TxDOT Driveway Home. of Texas A & M University a `d `~~(-l~~' C ~ 1 L (% ~ S I Z:'" i' ~- ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ -,~( Texan De artment of Transportation p 1300 N. TEXAS AVE. • N1aYrAC 25, 9977803-2760 • (409) 778-2165 Project: DBUSTP (89) 61 Control: Q450-41-056 Highway: BS6-R County: Brazos Mr. Steve Homeyer City of College Station P. O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77843 Dear Mr. Homeyer: Attached is a copy of the right-of--way map for the section of BS6-R(Texa Ave.) in front of the developing Lone Star Pavilion Shopping Center (LSPSC). According to the right-of--way map and the approved siteplan ofLSPSC dated December 5, 1997, it appears that the proposed parking area encroaches onto the BS6-R right-of way. This is unacceptable, nor permitted. Therefore, in accordance with the. Municipal Maintenance Agreement, I'm requesting. your assistance to ensure the construction of LSPSC does not encroach onto the State's right-of--way. On the same site plan is shown the existing parking. for Red Lobster Restaurant. This parking also encroaches onto the right-of--way. Again, I'm requesting your assistance in having LSPSC remove that portion of Red. Lobster parking that currently encroaches onto the State's right-of--way. Your assistance is appreciated. Should you have any questions, please call. Sincerely "~`(~ S (-~ t LS a~ b.~ `-~/ Attachment ~~ ~~ ~.~e~......' Patrick T. Williams, P. E. Area Engineer An Equal Opportunity Employer ill g ~C~ A.B_ SHOPPING CENTER _ PROPERTIES, ~I INC. .January 30, 1997 i ~ Ms. Shirley Volk City of College Station Development. Coordinator II 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842 (409) 764-3500 RE: Lone Star Pavilion -College Station, TX Dear Shirley, As requested please find enclosed (3) sets of approved civil plans. We have sent you an additional set to be stamped "approved" for our files. Thank you for your help.... Sincerely, ' ~' (~ Phillip McAfee pc: Greg Hardeman/A.B. Bill Ayers/A.B. Rich Wingo/A.B. i C:/mcafee/college/volk.wpd i o 1.900 International Park Drive Suite 303 Birmingham,Alabama 35243. 205/969,1000 Fax 205/9.69.1051 3t ~ ~~ '~ `~ ~~~~. , ~ ~ ® EGA ~TATIOI`I ~' ~~~ ~ ~ CITY ~F' COLL ;~" ~ ~ pEo/ELOPMENT SERVICES [3EPARTMENT ~` ~~ Post Office Box 9960. 1101 Texas Avenue ~r, ~~ College Station, Texas 77842-0960 (409) 764-3570 September 27, 1996 Paul Clarke Clarke ~ Wyndham Inc. 3608 E. 29th Street I3ryan, Texas 7721UZ Dear Mr. Clarke: The College Station City Council has authorized staff to proceed with a traffic signal project on Texas Avenue north of Lincoln Avenue. This authorization was unanimously approved at the September 26, 1996 regular meeting of the City Council. This signal project will. be funded by the Citv through- our Capital .Improvements Program bond funds. We will coordinate the signal design and installation with the consolidated driveway into the existing and proposed commercial development along the east side of Texas Avenue. Please do not hesitate to contact me it~ I can be of any further assistance. Sincerely, Jim Callaway Acting Director of Development Services :~c cc: Skip .Noe, City Manager ~i `"Buiiding a fetter City in Partnership wish You" 1 FAX TRANSMISSION WILSON/ZETTYIASSOCIATES 3100 V1liicrest, Suite 325 Houston, Texas 77042 713/952-8600 FAX 7131952-8610 No. of Pages 4ncl. This Page: Project No.: C~ ~~ ~~ Project Name: ~~rl `t_ S~-~~ lz PC~.i~ ~ l ~ f ~~ Company: 1. ~ ~ ~ ~-~~~1~ -~ Attn: ~~ U~ ~YY\.~ l~L~ 1~ Fax Number: ~ ~"~~J(~~~ ~'~~ From: ~ - ~~ 1 J 1~~~`~1~ - Date: ~~~ ~~~ ~' WiLSUNlZETTY/ASSOCIATES, INC. ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • PLANNERS November 7, 1996. Mr. Steve Homeyer City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 RE: Request. For Relocating Esplanade Cut on Texas Ave. Dear Steve: This letter is to submit a formal request to move the referenced esplanade cut approximately 100 feet south of the current planned esplanade cut. This would be Station b16t17 increasing the length of the left turn lane. If there are any further questions please do not hesitate in calling. Respectfully C. Davis Wil~on A.LA., C.S.I. For: Charles Shears From: Edwin Hard To: City of College Station.City Hall(SVOLK), KLAZA Date: 8/29/96 4:35pm Subject: Traffic signaULone Star Pavillion -Reply -Forwarded -Reply -Reply The only signal that is a defuute for FY 97 is Ma1USquare. Tlus one could be more expensive than most due to median work and other improvements being discussed as a resolution to this issue. We have not yet heard back from the Mall. We should also keep in mind the R. Prairie extension to Wellborn...one will be needed there. If we get folks .together to talk about this we need to include Lee Robinson. We met as a group and narrowed the field down to 4 or 5 intersections. The one for Lone Star was not considered b/c that development was not being considered at that time. »> Kent Laza 08/29/96 02:08pm »> I checked with Ed who confirmed what I thought. That is that we have not determined which intersections to put signals onto yet. A staff committee has looked at and voted on ones to consider, but no decision has been reached. »> Shirley Volk 08/29/96 O1:SOpm »> Can you help me on this? Paul needs the info before Council considers the budget tonight. CC: City of College Station.City Hall(7KERSTEN), 5.~. «.. .:'rR v u ~ Trans ortation En ineerin Consultants, Inc. WH p g ~ C. Michael Walton, PhD., I'.E. Mike McInturff, M.Eng., P.E. Randy B. Machemehl, PhD., P.E. August 15,1996 Mr. Edwin Hard City of :College Station ' 1101 Texas Avenue College: Station,. TX 77842-3500 Dear Ed: The purpose of this letter is to discuss the results of a traffic signal warrant analysis completed for the intersection of Texas Avenue and the proposed main driveway to the Lone-Star Pavilion Retail Center, whichwill be located. in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Texas Avenue and Lincoln Drive in College Station. Figure 1 shows the proposed development plan for the Lone-Star Pavilion. Presently, Texas Avenue has a five lane pavement section with two lanes in .each direction and a continuous center left turn lane. Construction is currently underway to upgrade this roadway to a six lane divided section with a raised median. Given the future divided section on Texas Avenue, the main si#e driveway under study will be the only site driveway on Texas Avenue from which left turns will be permissible. The driveway is proposed to have a two lane approach section with one left turn only lane and one right turn only lane. __ :Existing traffic. distributions on Texas Avenue are summarized':in Table 1. The existing` traffic distribution was obtained from 24 hour tube count information gathered `on August 5-7,1996. ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ /~ r~ "Q"'`- 5~ Sr eati. Based on information provided to WH1VI by Shears Interests, the Lone-Star Pavilion Retail Center will consist of a 94,000 square foot shopping center, a 7,800 square foot Red Lobster restaurant, and a 7,867 square foot On the Border restaurant. As shown in Figure 1, the proposed Lone-Star Pavilion will access the roadway network via four driveways onto Texas .Avenue and two driveways onto Lincoln Drive. A summa of estimated tri s to be enerated b the sho in center and the restaurant land uses is given ~' p g Y Pp g below in Table 2. Trip generation estimates were derived using the most current version of the ITE Trip Generation Report. Table 2. Summary of Y~aily and Peak Hour Trip Generation } ~ . , Lone Star Pavilion . 24 Dour AM PM Size Two-Way ,: - Peak Hour Peak Hour xi ~E r . Exit Enter E t lum to SF Vo e L nd Use a - ,, a~ ~ 9. ..Shopping Center 94,000 6,799 ' ~ 99 58 315 315 Red Lobster restaurant 7,800 ..1,387 ~ ~e J~~ 59 `: 57 56 44 7 57 5 7 7 1399 59 5 O'nthe Border restaurant ,86 , Total 109,667 9,585. :217. 172 428 404 ... 2717 Rio Grande Street Austen, Texas 78705 Phone + 512/473-8343 FAX 512/473-8237 Mr. Edwin Hard August 15,1996 Page 2 Using empirical data, the ITE has developed percentage estimates of daily entering and exiting shopping center traffic for each hour between 10:00 AM and 10:00 PM. The hourly variation in shopping center traffic is shown in Table 3 .for the proposed Lone-Star Pavilion main driveway. Entering and exiting traffic volume estimates for each hour have been adjusted to correlate with ITE PM peak hour trip generation estimates. Projected Lone-Star Pavilion site traffic was distributed through the Texas Avenue and Lone-Star Pavilion Driveway intersection to forecast future traffic volumes at site opening. Table 4 summarizes forecasted .traffic distribution.-estimates for the intersection of Texas. Avenue and the proposed driveway. This distribution. results from appropriate assumptions on utilization of this and the other proposed driveways: The Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (TMUTCD) requires that certain conditions be met prior to installation of a traffic signal. These conditions,.known as warrants, are summarized as follows: 1. Minimum Traffic Volumes Interruption of Continuous Traffic 3. Minimum Pedestrian Z7olume 4. School Crossing 5. Progressive Movement 6. Accident Experience 7. Systems 8. Combination Four Hour Volumes 10. Peak Hour Delay 1~ Peak Hour Volume ~2 Traffic Actuated Signal Comparison of th e warrants with projected traffic volumes shown in Table 4 indicates that Warrants 2, 9,11, and 12 will be met based on volume criteria. Based on the results of the analysis described herein and field review of the site, consideration of a traffic signal is hereby requested. Please contact me or Heidi Westerfield if you have any questions. Sincerely, ~~~~ Mike McInturff, P.E. President Enclosures cc: Charles Shears, Shears Interests H1ZW r W d _- F ~~ <N Y A~~ ~'. ~~ .~K~r Z+~ Q Q Q X Q J~~U ~. v L ~$ 3nr3nv svx31 ~ ~~ R ~COw .00~ _ \ / 011]' _~--lei.°- / .~ ~. -- i V ) I ~ k'i -.-.-.-- ~r.~. ...,~ t L .~.. ). 1. I ~ ~, ~ v L 9 t ~ ~ IL_ - ~ n~' ~Dr R © ~ - _ I I _- ~ _ lk _ ~_- ,; ~ -~Di i k - ; ~ i = I I ~; 1 - ~ ~ - i i 3 i ~ ~ i- ~ ~~ 1 ~ w •- - 1 i ~T}_.~~ .-.-.-.J ~ ~ I I I ., o •It) I~ r~.od h.' ~.Y.'1 ~ ~ h 1~' "a w^I r- *• ,., E S" ~ ~ ~ t Xb -x Y ~~ S.,,Ak ~ ~ bf 4 ~ x , y uh ~ pp 7 Y~ y ~- i ~ r 1 ~!• `~~ ~~~~ Y s ~ ! J `~ k ~ h 9 4 e~x s,v99 s ~Y,I~. _ ~e H,tly,~'~' i69 [, ~ ` I w h ~ r.~l:ri,a r..~ ~€ r~i5 k4 ~ v~ v o ~ ~ 61 LRS ~ o ~ h 6 6 ~~iE DLL .O~ W ALA Y ~ iti 1.~ I r ~ $ 1= ~ ^~ \ o J a ~ ~ § r ~ I~ „~, W ~ ~, O ~w ~ h^ . I) I. Y ` „„ t ~ pp 2 ~ V ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ w.~.e~..a y ~ ~ ~ R €€ W ----- ---- ~ ~, m ^ i I ~ 1 ~~ F~ F ~](j L ~ .OO C.~ yn lOaw+.L~ M ei i azv.sa -+oa .oG ,a~atlc y~o.wat~a awwu Ig '~__~~__._...__.__.-~-n-PaO'IY1~-- _____-_._--__-._._- ---___. la'-~-. I LL.-•-•---•-•---•---•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•----J R r a WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. -Austin, Texas Table L Existing Traffic Distribution Texas Avenue Time Northbound Southbound Total 12:00 186 203 389 1:00 124 172 296 2:00 57 67 124 3:00 41 43 84 4:00 41 37 78 5:00 78 66 144 6:00 195 178 373 7:00 867 406 1,273 .8:00 843 553 1,396 9:00 1,025 759 1,784 10:00 954 752 .1,706 11:00 1,257 1,031 2,288 12:00 1,345 1,026 2,371 1:00 1,462 1,024 2,486 2:00 1,208 958 2,166 3:00 1,174 952 2,126 4:00 1,194 902 2,096 5:00 1,290 1,036 2,326 6:00 988 874 1,862 7:00 894 733 1,627 8:00 804 660 1,464 9:00 719 566 1,285 .10:00 507 394 901 11:00: 330 285 615 Total 17,583. 13,677 31,260 Lone-Star Pavilion: 8/13/96 e 4 c Table 3. Hourly Variation in Shopping Center Traffic at the Lone-Star Pavilion Main Driveway Adjusted Time % of24 Hr. % of 24 Hr. Entering Exiting Entering Begins Enterin Exiting Traffic Traffic Traffic 10:00 7.5 3.7 187 74 201 11:00 8.6 5.9 214 119 231 12:00 9.5 7.9 237 159 255 13:00 8.7 8.2 217 165 233 14:00 7.9 8.8 197 177 212 15:00 7.7 8.9 192 179 206 16:00 8.2 9.1 204 183 220 17:00 8.3 9.5 207 191 223 18:00 7.8 7.7 194 155 209 19:00 8.4 7.0 209 141 225 20:00 4.7 7.7 117 155 126 21:00 1.8 9.1 45 183 48 Adjusted Exiting Traffic 66 105 141 146 157 159 163 170 138 125 138 163 ITE Daily Trip Generation 9,585 Entering/Exiting Split: 50%/50% % Entering Mainbriveway 52% Exiting Main Driveway 42% Adjustment factor 1.08 Entering Adjustment factor 0.89 .Exiting Adjustment factor is computed as ITE center volume. ,~p ~~Z w1~.~ ~~ ~-s-~- ~~-u.z._ tom-,®®.~. ~ Trip Generation volume divided by ITE shopping Source: Trip Generation, 5th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers Washington, D.C.,1991, page 1232, Table 2. Lone-Star Pavilion: 8/13/96 G~ d` T' 'r'tL ~r~~ acs` ~~ 1 ~C Table 4. Projecte Site Plus Forecasted Traffic Volumes ~~" ~ ~~~?~"`--- ~` Lone-Star /~, Texas Avenue Driveway r~ .~i~~t~""' 4 Time. Northbound Southbound. ~ Total Westbound 10:00 1,046 984 2,030 66 11:00 1,390 1,297 2,687 105 12:00 1,515 1,320 2,835 141 1:00 1,634 1,293 2,927 146 2:00 1,387 1,202 2,589 157 3:00 1,353 1,190 2,544 159 4:00 1,379 1,156 2,534 163 5:00 1,482 1,293 2,775 170 6:00 1,148 1,115 2,263 138 7:00 1,045 993 2,038 125 8:00 951 805 1,757 138 9:00 877 622 1,499 16~ `? ~~ ;; ''~ l '- Mrl?r3'Y s~ Idta/[AM~r G[o N~'t dhe°e~ R11r~lo eNsir-ra~-ri ~ a ~f' ~~ ~Y' ot.+.y c~~ ® (a./~® ~~'~ a-c<s.~ Ji ~ ° ~/V ~-sl ~s°l~_~1+~'~ -TDT ~/dr YL.~. LJ ~J~~~i ~ W'~}~~ r J-G d ~ ~ ~ ~~L1 ~~ Os~ w!y ~ PLe/ P/'a.Il ~~ gam. ~ ..r /".I/I p~~~°^'iY~R. ~ SLY' FZ°P~!-( / / ,~ S..~i aa'f C.fD srrl7r ~ it o ~'t ~ ~ ~- ~ +©2~~ve rr~ we /,~[.~~,~a.¢ ato'a~ ~ ~ ~' s~-u~--.e. pti~rte~tc~... ,"~ s,~.~t-~X C~ 7`~~`s ~o c~^~i~vt ~r ~.r~°' ~t. s'~a~l'~j S'~•°(.?~' r l r "Vb t a S,.bf/.~' .~ lfn.r~G~' ~r ~~®-~~a~~,z[,.. Gi. c~~y y f L/~~' ,+-~+J Q~~/J ~. ~ .,.. ~61L.(O~{4+'l.I /O •"• e ~~`p !W' II Y~.'~saiti ~'}' f,~,Q ~G ~' ~G`% w( 7i. ~ ~~ ~` ~ ° 9 Lone-Star Pavilion: 8/13/96 ,.,, ~~~ I~ ~/ X~ ~s Development Services City of .College Station p°p° Box 9960,_ .College Station, TX 77$42-9960 FAX To: ~ ~ ~~ Phone: 1 FaY phone: C7~ 3 ! ~] 9~ _' !~6L 3 CC: Date: ~Z ~,~ ~~ G Number of pages including cover sheet: From: ~ ~~ Phone: (409) 764 3570. FaY phone° (409) 764-3496 REMARKS: ^ Urgent ^ For your review ^ Reply ASAP ^' Please comment r~ Texas .Department of Transportation 1300 N. TEXAS AVE: • BRYAN, TEXAS 77803-2760 • (409) 778-2165 December 2, 1996 Project: IDBUSTP 89(61) Control: 0050-01-056 Highway: BS6-R (Texas Avenue) Brazos County Mr. Ed Hard City of College Station P. O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842-9960 Dear Mr. Hard: We are in receipt of your November 12, 1996 letter requesting the relocation of the median opening from centerline Station 615+13 to centerline Station 616+18 on the referenced. project, This median relocation is necessary to match the planned driveway of an adjacent development. The change order for the relocation is currently being designed, and we will forward it for your review when it is complete. Please contact me if you have any further question. Sincerely, Patrick T. Williams,. P. E. Area Engineer CWH/bja cc: District Construction Project Engineer An Equal Opportunity Employer ~-/Lt Gv~lc s ~Z 'o . ~ ineerin A.nul s Tra~sportat~c ~ g g ~OSEPH D. BLASCHKE, D. ENG.,. P.E., PRESIDENT 1722 BROADMOpR, SuErE 212 (409) 776-1822 BevaN, TExns 77802 Fax (409) 776-6119 March 20, 1997 Mr. Steve Homeyer City of College Station P; ®.13ox -9960 C®llege Station,-Texas 'T7842 RE: Lone Star Retail Center liear ateve: Thank you for providing me with a copy of the most recent parking lot layout for the referenced Center. My original concern had been the lack of storage for vehicles exiting the Center at the proposed signalized entrance/exit. The attached revised parking lot layout has remedied that ~®ncern. I do not know if the city of College Station can make demands relative to the interior parking lot design. However, I have several ,additional concerns with the proposed layout,: as indicated below... 1. The curb-return leaving the Center is very short. I would recommend atleast a 25-foot radius on the. return.. 2. The curb returns within the lot (10-foot-radii) are too. short. I would recommend at least 20- foot radii instead. 3. There are some very short transition. areas. Vehicles cannot .travel along these transition `paths: Hence, debris-will collect along. the curb and look trashy. Also, drivers will not feel comfortable as they travel along these paths. I have illustrated more realistic transitions on the attached layout:. 4. The Center. has several driveways, including- one- very close to what .will be the signalized entrance/exit. I would strongly suggest. closing one of the entrances; as shown on the attached sketch. 5. It,would be most-desirable to redesign the existing parking lot adjacent to the Red Lobster. I realize that this may not be feasible and I would not .consider this suggestion absolutely necessary... Specaallzing in: Traffic Engineering ~ Roadway Design. Accident Analysis Mr. Steve Homeyer March 20,1997 Page 2 Please contact me if you have any questions. Si erely, J eph D. Blaschke, D.Eng.,. P.E. President JDBIsb Attachment ~•~ CITY OF COLLEGE STATIOI`I P. O. BOX 9960 1101 TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842 0960 (409) 764 - 3500 May, 9, 1997 Texas Department of Transportation ATTN: Mr. Patrick Williams, PE. 1300 N. Texas Avenue Bryan, Texas 77803 RE: Temporary Traffic Signal for Lone StarPaviliod (715 Texas Avenue) Dear Mr. Williams: This letter is in response to your meeting with Kent Laza; and Scott Hester regarding the temporary. traffic `signal at the above referenced location. It was :discussed at this meeting, that the:City will be responsible for the costs. associated with the installation and maintenance of the ,,signal as well as contracting with G. Carter Construction to relocate the temporary signal heads as required by project phasing. In addition, the City plansto utilize the permanent control box with this temporary installation. As .per our conversation this.: morning, I have attached 'copies of two independent warrant studies that were conducted for this development in August 1996 by WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. and March 1997 by Transportation Engineering Analysts that indicates a need for a traffic signal at this location. Due to the existing Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) construction on Texas Avenue, the permanent' signal cannot. be installed at thin time and therefore a temporary ..signal is warranted. Tn order to accommodate the development of this site, the tentative date for this construction is the week of May 19, 1997.. If this .date .poses a problem for the construction of Texas Avenue, .please let me know. as soon as possible so that the date can be rescheduled. If you have. any comments, please feel free to contact Kent Laza or myself at 764-3570. zinc rely, .Steve. omeyer Asst. to the City Engineer xc: Kent Laza, City Engineer Shirley Volk, Development Coordinator Scott Hester, Transportation Technician Lee Robinson, Traffic Systems Manager Home. of Texas A & M University ~° v :5,~ ~~` \~i ~~ C[TY OF COLLEGE STAT[O[`[ ... ~' ..•~ /~ ~~ ~~~ ~y November l2a 1996 Mr. Pat Williams, P. E. Area Engineer Texas Department of Transportation 1300 N. Texas A~~c°nuc Qr}'an, T\ 7750?-27G0 Re: Shift in Median Opening on Teas Ave Dear Pat: Attached find letters from Mr. Paul Clarke of Clarke & Wyndham Rcal Estate and Mr. Davis Wilson of Wilson/Zctty Associates requesting the relocation of the median opening for the Texas 707 area as currently sho~~•n in the Texas Avenue undening plans. The center line of the median opening in question is located at about 615+13. This centerline needs to shift approximately l0~ feet south to GlG+l8 in order to coincide with the planned esplanade driveway of the proposed redevelopment. E'lease contact me or Steve Homeyer regarding further details on this design change. The City is in support of this change and requests that TXDOT begin redesign work for this probable change order: The City will submit a final notification for the change order upon our issuance of a development permit for this planned redevelopment. As you kno~~, a traffic signal is planned for this driveway and median .opening. A traffic study has been conducted for the proposed redwctopmcni which indicates that the signal will be warranted. The Cite «-ill be in contact with the TXDOT regarding the details of the signal in the near future. Please do not h~sitatc to call if }'ou have any questions or ncc;d additional information. Sincerely, Edwin Hard, AICP Transportation Planner cc: S[cvc [-{omcycr Shirley Volk Charles Shears, Shears [nvestments C. Davis Wilson, Wilso~~/Zctty Associates Paul Clarke, Clarke & Wyndham Rcal Estate wH,M Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. C. Michael Walton, PhD., P.E. August 15,1996 Mr. Edwin Hard City of College Station 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX .77842-3500 Dear Ed: Mike McInturff, M.Eng., P.E. Randy B. Machemehl, PhD., P.E. The purpose of this letter is to discuss the results of a trafficsignal warrantanalysis completed for the intersection of Texas Avenue and the proposed main driveway to the Lone-Star Pavilion Retail Center, . which will be located in .the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Texas Avenue and Lincoln Drive in College Station. Figure 1 shows the proposed development plan for the Lone-Star Pavilion. Presently, Texas Avenue has a five lane pavement section with two lanes in each direction and a " continuous center left turn lane. Construction is currently underway to upgrade this roadway to a six lane divided section with a raised median. Given the future divided section on Texas Avenue, the main site driveway under study will be the only site driveway on Texas Avenue from which left turns will be permissible. The driveway is proposed to .have a two lane approach section with one left turn only lane and one right turn only lane. Existing traffic distributions on Texas Avenue are summarized in Table 1. The existing traffic distribution was obtained from 24 hour tube count information gathered ~on August 5-7,1996. - ~t ~ ~° ~ ~^ ~~`/ "~` ycSS,cr Based on information provided to WHM by Shears Interests, the Lone~Star Pavilion Retail Center will rnnsist of a 94,000 square foot shopping center, a 7,800 square foot Red Lobster restaurant, and a 7,867 .square foot On the Border restaurant. As shown in Figure 1, the proposed Lone-Star Pavilion will access 'the roadway network. via four driveways onto Texas Avenue and two driveways onto Lincoln Drive. A summary of estimated trips to be generated by the shopping center and the restaurant land uses is given below in Table 2. Trip generation estimates'were derived using the most current version of the ITE Trip Generation Report. Table 2. Summary of Daily and Peak Hour Trip Generation < Lone Star Pavilion -' 24 Hour AM PM Size Two-Way. ~ Peak Hour Peak Hour [;and Use SF Volume •'EnT Exit Enter Exit fJ?-~~d~''~~ Shopping Center 94,000 6,799 ~ ~~ ~~ 99 .58 57 ~ ~ 59 315 56 315 '~ Red Lobster restaurant 7,800 : 1,387 t~~i~ 59 57 57 45 On the Border restaurant 7,867 .1,399 Total 109,667 9,585 ; 217 172 428 404 't717 Rio Grande Streei Austin, Texas 78705 Phone 512/473-8343 FAX 512/473-8237 Mr. Edwin Hard August 15,1996 Page 2 Using empirical data, the [TE has developed percentage .estimates of daily entering and exiting shopping center traffic for each hour between 10:00 AM and 10:00 PM. The hourly variation in shopping center traffic is shown in Table 3 for the proposed Lone-Star Pavilion main driveway. Entering and exiting traffic volume estimates for each hour have been adjusted to correlate with ITE PM peak hour trip generation estimates. .Projected Lone-Star Pavilion site traffic was distributed through the Texas Avenue and Lone-Star Pavilion Driveway intersection to forecast future traffic volumes at site opening. Table 4 summarizes forecasted traffic distribution estimates #or the intersection of Texas. Avenue and the proposed driveway. This distribution results from appropriate assumptions on utilization of this and the other proposed driveways. The Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (TMLJTCD) requires that certain conditions be met prior to installation of a traffic signal. These conditions, known as warrants, are summarized as follows: 1. Minimum Traffic Volumes Q Interruption of Continuous Traffic 3. Minimum Pedestrian Volume 4. School Crossing 5. Progressive Movement 6. Accident Experience 7. Systems 8. Combination (g~ Four Hour Volumes 10. Peak Hour Delay 1(1, Peak Hour Volume ~2 Traffic Actuated Signal Comparison of the warrants with projected traffic volumes shown in Table 4 indicates that Warrants 2, 9,11, and 12 will be met based on volume criteria. Based on the results of the analysis described herein and field review of the site, consideration of a traffic signal is hereby requested. Please contact me or Heidi Westerfield if you have any questions. Sincerely, Mike Mclnturff, P.E. President Enclosures cr. Charles Shears, Shears Interests HRW f i ~ C ~91.~r.~~~yi,~~i'i4 ~.~ ~ ~= l $ e F ~~ l L I 1 ` ~~ v Y S 1... b ¢t 1 bsR1 ~ S' ~~ L ~°y ^i i 2255 ! i f s v - rr 1 Y ~ Y .1 •: w Y ;,;, ~ s~~~ ~ I 7: i w Y y "~ r' 4 +.f9r~ v Y ~ ~ ~ r Y ~ ~i7. e" 3 '~ v~ oY ~~ ~ s W " y~. p r Y ~ y ~ y 9 ~ $r11 re. ~ i. `1R~t 'ii A i ~ ~v' s u~ t y i~tZC~.~t~ ~ y : ~ 6 t . ~ ~\ u ~ ~; mi F ~' I <~ .~~~~ ~'~ N u XW Jf-~U A yu3nv 6vx3t -- -- -- --_t.. --- _i ~,~ ~ oy ~ ~-- =-=~-' _.~ .,. wC..L -- -•-•-• F- -r •-•-- a;~-- -~: ;`_ t' _i lT y~ ~• 1' _j 7 T L~ 1 ~~ _ _ _ - {~I(~, 1" - ~~ - - -- d - -'#- - - •- - -- - - ~."~ 7C~C - - - -- - C Y ' ' F, J i'.-. ~. O~ Y ~. .M f - -_ 4 4. ., -4 4 _.~?.~ _ _L }~~ t ~I~ .I .' . IF Y ~~ ~~ I` i ]~ ~~ Y _._...~. n uvic~ 9~ ~ a7rvsr uoa~v '~ ~ ----~------- - -•J A Y ~ ~ ' ~ I ! ~`~ C ~ `~ 1, ~~ E g r9 YU L L ({. R ~ r,--~.~ ~. -1 2 '~ ± -' _ i ~~,i - ~ _ • ~I~~ hs~~_ ~ ~ ~ = r~~~ i ~1 ~~ U v i- ~ ~ 4 ; i ~~ ~ I __ 1 ~= f _ ~ ~-~~- ---~J WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, [nc. -Austin, Texas Table L Existing Traffic DisEribution Texas Avenue Time Nortnnouna ~uu-vvu--u 12:00 186 203 389 1:00 124 172 296 2:00 57 67 124 3:00 41 43 84 4:00 41 37 78 5:00 78 66 144 6:00 195 178 373 7;00 867 406 1,273 .8.00 g43 553 1,396 9:00 1,025 759 1,784 10:00 954 752 1,706 11:00 1,257 1,031 2,288 12:00 1,345. 1,026 2,371 1;00 1,462 1,024 2,486 2:00 1,208 958 2,166 3;00 1,174 952 2,126 4;00 1,194 902 2,096 5;00 1,290 1,036 2,326 6;00 988 874 1,862 7:00 894 733 1,627 8:00 804 660 1,464 9:00 719 566 1,285 10:00 507 394 901 11:00 330 285 615 Total 17,583 .13,677 31,260 Lone~Star Pavilion: 8/13/96 Table 3. Hourly Variation in Shopping Center Traffic at the Lone-Star Pavilion Main Driveway Adjusted Adjusted Time °b of 24 Kr. % of 24 Hr. Entering Exiting Entering Exiting Begins Enterin Exitin Traffic Traffic Traffic Traffic 10:00 7.5 3.7 187 74 201 66 11:00 8.6 5.9 214 119 231 105 12:00 9.5 7.9 237 159 255 141 13:00 8.7 8.2 217 165 233 146 14:00 7.9 8.8 197 177 212 157 15:00 7.7 8.9 192 179 206 159 16:00 8.2 9.1 204 183 220 163 17:00 8.3 9.5 207 191 223 170 18:00 7.8 7.7 194 155 209 138 19:00 8.4 7.0 209 141 225 125 20:00 4.7 7.7 117 155 126 138 21:00 1.8 9.1 45 183 48 163 ITE Daily Trip Generation 9,585 Entering/Exiting Split: 50%/50% ~~; Z % Entering Main Driveway 52% Dc~f ~ 54~// ' D ~ '~~/""`~ ~p ~ `~ ~ ~~~oC,~ ;sue'=; ~' w~- Y'~t {~.<il. 5 Gi/: ~ ru~ i .-e-.t fp,~ I ti6 0 % Exiting Main Driveway 42% 1 ~ ~'~-S~ t taro .C- -~sw.- Adjustment factor 1.08 Entering In~l+hc ~ ~,~~ 7 Adjustment factor 0.89 Exiting {~e~ '"'~'` ~`Q'`f `r - Adjustment factor is computed as ITE Trip Generation volume divided by ITE shopping center volume. Source: Trip Generation, 5th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers Washington, D.C.,1991, page 1232, Table 2. Lone-Star Pavilion: 8/13/96 .: ~ . G~ f f'` t^ C T L ~t~ ~ ~s Table 4. Projecte .Site Plus Forecasted Traffic ~lolumes Lone-Star ~j "~ ` -~ 'L Texas Avenue Driveway ~~ .e.~-%~~ Time Northbound Southbound :Total Westbound 10:00 1,046 984 2,030 ~ 11:00 1,390 1,297 2,687 105 12:00 1,515 1,320 2,835 141 1:00 1~63e} 1,293 2,927 146 2:00 1,387 1,202 2,589 157 3:00 1,353 1,190. 2,544 159 4:00 1,379 1,156 2,534 163 5:00 1,482 1,293 2,775 170 6:00 1,148 1,115 2,263 138 7:00 1,045 993 2,038 1 ~ 8:00 951 805 1,757 138 9:00 877 622 1,499 1 ~ / :-::, M~ nar s-lr~ t 11b ~GtwT Cl' do ~tvt •'NQ<~ /i1 rY1 _ +~/0.lYct-.~ Y- o "' ljasNC !°crA /3 ~~ ~l /A~ GGIa/ ` /t/ f -eri ~~ Z. .m Wa-rYaa°~_h-~~ /x~~tcY s~~- vo 3. ~' / / r ¢ s ~2o,Ra lir we may( 3,~.~.-~ ~ No ~ ` ,~ '~`. ~''~. E - ~' s," ,~.,R.Q C•' ~*`s /° G._~i~ . i ~"r t- fur..` a. s~ ~` ~ s~s-``~/°~': ~; .~-~ c a~~~ wtiiXH.'cr -~q.~w~,.. CLrc~ly~ ;~ ~'~V• / Z ~J~ 3. ~ 9 Lone-Star Pavilion: 8/13/96 s ®~ ~` ns ortation Engineering Tra p JosEPH D. BuscHlcE, D. ENC., P.E., PRESIDENT 1722 BROADMOOR~ SUITE 212 BRYAN, TEx~s 77802 March 19, 1997 Mr. Lee Robinson Traffic Systems Manager City of College Station P. O. Box 9960 College Station,. Texas 77842-0960 RE: Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Intersection of Texas Avenue and Lone Star Pavilion Retail Center Exit College Station, Texas - Dear Mr. Robinson: ~lnaly$ts. (409)776-1822 fix (409) 776-6119 I have attached a s~unmary of approach volume counts on Texas Avenue in the vicinity of the proposed Lone Star Pavilion Retail Center Exit. Also attached are projected traffic volume counts expected. to use the Exit after the Retail Center opens later this year.-. These counts were collected and estimated during a 1996 traffic impact study conducted for the proposed development by WHM Transportation Consultants, Inc. The counts appear to be realistic considering the current traffic volumes using. Texas Avenue and the size of the proposed retail center. It is readily apparent that the traffic volumes at the proposed intersection will be sufficient to , warrant a traffic signal installation based on Warrant No. 2 that is contained in the TQxac Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. 'The signal will be positioned a# a location almost centered between the~existing traffic signal installations at the intersections of Texas Avenue with University Drive and Walton Drive. If the proposed signal. installation is fully actuated and timed appropriately, I believe the signals can be operated with minimal impact on Texas Avenue traffic; I-would not suggest installing traffic signals at any other locations between the. existing signalized intersections. i will be happy to assist you if the State Department of Transportation requires a more detailed signal warrant analysis. Please advise me if additional assistance is desired. Specializing in.• Z'-'af, f~c En9~neet-in9 Ttoadwa~/ Des~grt. Accident Analysis Mr. Lee Robinson March 19,1997 Page 2 Thank you for allowing me to assist you in this matter. Sincerely, G~ Joseph D. Blaschke, D.Eng., P.E. President JDB/sb Attachments xc: Mr. Edwin Hard ~, Hour 10 -11 a.m. 11- 12 p.m. 12 - 1 p.m. 1- 2 p.m. 2 - 3 p.m. 3 - 4 p.m. 4 - 5 p.m. 5-6p.m. 6-7p.m. 7 - 8 p.m. 8-9p.m. 9 - 10 p.m. ~y INTERSECTION OF TEXAS AVENUE AND LONE STAR PAVILION RETAIL CENTER EXIT SIGNAL WA,RgANT ANALYSIS (W~4,RRANT N0.2) Tezas Ave. Warrant Warrant. Retail Center Warrant Warrant (Both Appr.)' Vol. Satisfied Ezit Vol. Satisfied 1706 900 Yes 66 100 No 2288 900 Yes 105 - 100 Yes 2371 900 Yes 141 100 Yes 2486 900 Yes 146 100 Yes 2166 900 Yes 157 100 Yes 2126 900 Yes 159 100 Yes 2096 900 Yes 163 100 Yes 2326 900 Yes 170 100 Yes 1862 900 Yes 138 100 Yes 1627 900 Yes 125 100 Yes 1464 900 Yes 138 100 Yes 1285 900 Yes 163 100 Yes tc,~- T~~6~~ *ei ... e~ JOSEPl~ D Bt11SC~ ~t`~EC2 u `q~~1 S F`~..... ~ _ 3 `:` +~ Cit of Colle a Station PO Box 9960, Cone a Station. Texas 77842 CITY OF COLLEGE STATIOt`I Date: ~j / /97 F 1~~~.X Number of pages including cover sheet: ~, .' - To• Phone '77~ "_ ~~'$2 Fax Phone• "77 ~' ° ~ ~ D $ CC_ From: J f - cj~u c ~~~iETz t Phone• (409)764-3570. Fax phone- (409) 764-3496 ^ Reply ASAP ^ 'P[ease comment ~~~; ^ Urgent ^ For your review „~, ~~;~n~< 'visa :~ ~~:~: ~~ .~ Novcntbcr t 2, - ~)9G CITY OF COLLEGE STATION s~ Mr. Pat \~Villiams, P. E. Area Engineer Texas Department of "Crarisportation 1300 N. Tcvas Avcnuc 13r}~an, T\ 77RU ~-2760 Re: Shift in Median Opening on Texas Avc. Dear Pat: Attached find letters from Mr: Paul Clarke of Clarke & W}mdham Real Estate and Mr: Davis Wilson of Wilson/Zetty Associates requesting the relocation of the median opening for the Texas 707 area as currently shov<~n in the Texas Avenue «~dening plans. The center line of the median opening in question is located. at about 615+13. This: centerline needs to shift approximately l0~ fact south to 616+ 18 in order to coincide .vith he planned' esplanade driveway of the proposed redevelopment. Please contact me or Steve. Homeyer regarding further .details on this design change. The City is in support of this change and requests that TXDOT begin redesign work for this probable change order. The City will submit a final notification for the change order upon our issuance of a development permit for this planned redevelopment.. As you kno~~, a traffic signal isplanned for this driveway and median opening. A traffic study has been conducted for the proposed rcde;vclopmcnt which indicates that the signal will be warranted The City ~~'ill be in contact with the "CXDOT regarding the details of the signal in the near future. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions or need additional information. S inccrcly, Edwin Hard, AIC:I' Transportation Planner cc' Stcvc E-{omeycr Shirley Volk Charles Shears, Shears Investments C. Davis Wilson, Wilsoi~/Zetty Associates Paul Clarke, Clarke & Wyndham Rcal Estate ;r wH~, Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. Mike Mdnturff, M.Eng., P.E. Randy B. Machemehl, PhD., P.E. C. Michael Walton, PhD., P.E. August 15,1996 Mr. Edwin .Hard City of College Station. 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842-3500 Dear Ed: The purpose of this letter is to discuss the results of a trafficsignal warrant analysis completed for the intersection of Texas Avenue and the proposed main driveway to the Lone-Star Pavilion Retail Center, which will be located in.the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Texas Avenue and Lincoln Drive in College Station. Figure 1 shows the proposed development plan for the Lone-Star Pavilion. Presently, Texas Avenue has a five lane pavement sed underwa tolungrade this oadway to as ix continuous center leff turn lane. Construction is current y y P lane divided section with a raised median. Given the future divided section on Texas Avenue, the main site driveway under study will be the only site drivewaane aTe oath section with one leftfturn only lane permissible. The dnveway is proposed to have a two 1 pp and one right turn only lane. Existing traffic distributions on Texas Avenue. are summarized in Tablegul . The existi ~~ ~af~fi ~ '~ /~ ~ distribution was obtained from 24 hour tube count information gathered on Au st 5-7,1996. - S e s ~ ~„ Based on information provided to WHM by Shears Interesare foot Red Ltoli ser rest urant and a 7,867 consist of a 94,000 square foot shopping center, a 7,800 squ quare foot On the Border restaurant. As shown in Figure 1, the proposed Lone-Star Pavilion will access ~~"the roadway network via four driveways onto Texas Avenue and two driveways onto Lincoln Drive. A summary of estimated trips to be generated by the shopping center and the restaurant land uses is given below in Table 2. Trip generation estimates were derived using the most current version of the ITE Trip Generation Report. Table 2. -. Land Use Summary of Daily and Peak Dour °I'rip Generation Lone Star Pavilion Shopping Center Red Lobster restaurant O`n the Border restaurant Total 24 Hour AM PM Size Two-Way ~ Peak Hour Peak Hour SF Volume :E„~e?' Exit Enter Exit 94,000 6,799 ~ ~~',~ 99 58 315 344 7,800 1,387 ~~' ~ 59 ~ 57 57 45 7,867 1,399 109,667 9,585 :217 172. 428 404 2717 Rio Grande Stree'r Austin, Texas 78705 Phone • 1512/473-8343 FAX 512/473-8237 Mr. Edwin Hard August 15,1996 Page 2 Using. empirical data, the ITE has developed percentage estimates of daily entering and. exiting shopping center traffic for each hourbetween 10:00 AM and 10:00 PM. The hourly variation in shopping center traffic is shown in Table 3 for the proposed Lone-Star Pavilion main driveway. Entering and exiting traffic volume estimates for each hour have been adjusted to correlate with ITE PM peak hour trip. generation estimates. Projected Lone-Star Pavilion site traffic was distributed through the Texas Avenue and Lone-Star Pavilion Driveway intersection to forecast future traffic volumes at site opening. Table 4 summarizes forecasted traffic distribution estimates for the intersection of Texas Avenue and the proposed driveway. This distribution results from appropriate assumptions on utilization of this and the other proposed driveways.. The Texas Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (TMUTCD) requires that certain conditions be met prior. to installation of a traffic signal. These conditions, known as warrants, are summarized as follows: 1. Minimum Traffic Volumes Q Interruption of Continuous Traffie 3. Minimum Pedestrian Volume 4. School Crossing 5. Progressive Movement 6. Accident Experience 7. Systems 8. Combination (q~ Four Hour Volumes 10. Peak Hour Delay 1Q Peak Hour Volume Traffic Actuated Signal Comparison of the warrants with projected traffic volumes shown in Table 4 indicates that Warrants 2, 9,11, and 12 will be met based on volume criteria. Based on the results of the analysis described herein and field review of the site, consideration of a traffic signal is hereby requested. Please contact me or Heidi Westerfield if you have any questions. Sincerely, Mike McInturff, P.E. President Enclosures cc: Charles Shears,. Shears Interests HRW I ~ •g, ;~/~y~{ i ~ w ~~.1i yl • Y t ~ Y. rI S .y:~Yi~ I s,I '':~ r 5' . 'rp ~ ~dxI ~ .~~;a Q ~, ' 7r~t 1. F Y• 7 ~! 1 yy{~ r~y~Y ~ s~ 9 ryPr~o9 QQ m r r ~~• v9~~r x ~~ ~~~ l` ~ l (L' ~ C {j I~ E ~ r-~ p ~ ~ ~q,~ ;~ ~ a5 EE A~~"~, t x~ ~y Y~ ~ I v (. , e.t9°rl,,,,. ~ ~ t 9 y V.. ~ ~ S s oR~t •- ti 6. a ~1'iL ~ OW Q tD F- U J (, ~+ 3M3nv 6v>;3t ~-~ ~ ~ ~ __ _.. ~ _. ..-~L~ ~ ~ 0041E \ // Mt]' ~-~}S-.~• -........_. ~. t ~~•---- -1 w. I ~• .. D ~ a--- I WOO ~Y.~~-~~-~ ~`_ _ ( (.I I ~- I r. ~- 8 T------ - - - - ~ ~ i, ~ j I~ I ~ ~ ~ .T ~ T ~ -] 7 T T' ~-.T .1. ~ "i ~T J1~ •~ U ~'... ~ ~ f - j- ~ j ~- ~- _~ t r ~. ~ -r i ~........_.... 1 I(D r-- ~< ~ ~ ~~ _ - - --- =- _ - -- - _ _ D -- ~a -------- <~ W (a - - - -- - -- ~ - - ~f-- r b'o z I FI ~• _ .~ ~# ~ ~~ X~, ~~ii ~ a ~~Y ~, 1 ~ 1yycc ~ 3 F ~ ~ 1 ~:~ - - _ ---- 1 .« ' ' ~ L~~' - - - -u°'~- - o .. - --' -~-.~...y.T.~ -'. .._ _..- ._.. ......._.. .- . 91 I uvisa .,o„ .os aaa~us wa+a«x~a aanuu Ig' _ aTn.a. uoaw I,. ~. . + _ k n r a WHM Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. -Austin, Texas Table 1. ExisEing Traffic DistribuEion Texas Avenue Time Northbouna ~ou~nvuul.u _~~• 12:00 186 203 389 1:00 124 172 296 2:00 57 67 124 3:00 41 43 84 4:00 41 37 78 5:00 78 ~' 144 6;00 195 178 373 7;00 867 406 1,273 8:00 g43 553 1,396 9:00 1,025 759 1,784 10:00 954. 752 1,706 11:00 1,257 1,031 2,288 12:00 1,345 1,026 2,371 1;00 1,462 1,024 2,486 2:00 1,208 958 2,166 3;00 1,174 952 2,126 4:00 1,194 902 2.096 5;00. 1,290 1,036 2,326 6;00 988 874 1,862 7;00 894 733 1,627 8:00 804 660 1,464 9;00 719. 566 1,285 10:00 507 394 901 11:00 330 285 615 Total 17,583 13,677 31,260 Lone-Star Pavilion: 8/13/96 Table 3. Hourly Variation in Shopping Center Traffic at the Lone-Star Pavilion Main Driveway Adjusted Adjusted Time % of 24 Hr. % of 24 Hr. Entering Exiting Entering Exiting Begins Enterin Exitin Traffic Traffic Traffie Traffic 10:00 7.5 3.7 187 74 201 66 11:00 8.6 5.9 214 119'. 231 105 12:00 9.5 7.9 237 159 255 141 13:00 8.7 8.2 217 165. 233 146 14:00 7.9 8.8 197 177 212 157 15:00 7.7 8.9 192 179 206 159 16:00 8.2 9.1 204 183 220 163 17:00 8.3 9.5 207 191 223 170 18:00 7.8 7.7 194 155. 209 138 19:00 8.4 7.0 209 141 225 125 20:00 4.7 7.7 117 155 126 138 21:00 1.8 9.1 45 183 48 163 ITE Daily Trip Generation 9,585 Entering/Exiting Split: 50%/50% /'°` ~'Z % Entering Main Driveway 52% ~c~f ~Yttu s ~ f~~"""""'" ~p ~ `~ ~ ~~`~~' % Exiting Main Driveway 42% ~1 Adjustment factor 1.08 Entering W lac ~' ~ ~F.~sr` ~ "`" ~`~ ` " p~p ? Adjustment factor 0.89 Exiting {~~c ~ "`'~~'`" ~tD'`f `~ Adjustment factor is computed as ITE Trip Generation volume divided by ITE shopping center volume. Source: Trip Generation, 5th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers Washington, D.C.,1991, page 1232, Table 2. Lone-Star Pavilion: 8/13/96 G~"" ~, t ~ d'' L ~`'~ ~ cS ~,~ i , Table 4. Projecte , Site Plus Forecasted Traffie Volumes - __ _ - _. gone-Star Texas Avenue Driveway Time Northbound Southbou~ - Total Westbound 10:00 1,046 984 2,030 ~ 11:00 1,390 1,297 2,687 105 12:00 . 1,515 1,320 2,835 141 1:00 1,634 1,293 2,927 .146 .2;00 1,387 1,202 2,589 157 3;00 1,353 1,190 2,544 159 4;00 1,379 1,156 2,534 163 5;00 1,482 1,293 2,775 170 ..6;00 1,148 1,115 2,263 138 7:00 1,045 993 2,038 125 g:00 951 805 1,757 138 9:00 877 622 1,499 16 ~ ~ / ~~~~ ~,~ ~` Q ! r / ,~ 1~Z7 :~`/~~ , phi- cL,.y v~ Cl GtrS ,l~ "sr ~,/ IJa~lt.,ger Glo ~trr~ rtaet~ M,LI_ ,.~Q.rra-.i~- ~ '! ' -- l"- r ~1r~r s~fz~ .l 2- _ ~/1/d'-sYan~_eht~ v IN.rYt~`Y /S7Y~t~- ~!D 3< tl ~ -- ~20~~ Jrr e.t .ivy( Ass.-f - No ,}z~r ~s.ti~ - ~c ! ~~r 1 ~J ~ S•~~~,y-~~ Shy-.~~='e ~?~ .~t c a~asxt ~Gtir.~w' ~z~w.eF,.. ~LIC~CIt~ s~ G~.t.:y. P ,- Ca.,d~rn..e?7irx . A.". ,et ~ 9 Lone-Star Pavilion: 8/13/96 ® ~- ®~ ~ Trans ortation Engineering Analysts. p ~OSEPH D. BLASCHKE~ D. ENC., P.E., `PRESIDENT (409) 776-1822 1722 BROAOMOOR, Suite 212 FAX (409) 776-6119 BRYAN, TEXAS 77$02 ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ _ . March 19, 1997 Mr. Lee Robinson Traffic .Systems Manager City of College Station P. O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842-0960 RE: Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Intersection of Texas Avenue and Lone Star Pavilion Retail Center Exit College Station, Texas Dear Mr. Robinson: I have attached a s<unmary of approach volume counts on Texas Avenue in the vicinity of the proposed Lone Star Pavilion Retail Center Exit.. Also attached are projected traffic volume counts expected to use the Exit after the Retail Center opens later--this year. These counfs were collected and estimated during a 1996 traffic impact study conducted for the proposed development by VVffiVI Transportation Consultants, Inc. Thecounts appear to be realistic considering the current traffic volumes using Texas Avenue and the size of the proposed retail center. It is readily apparent that the traffic. volumes at the proposed intersection will be sufficient to . warrant a traffic signal installation based on Warrant No. 2 that is contained in the TPxa~ Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. The. signal will. be positioned at a location almost centered between the. existing traffic signal installations at the intersections of Texas- Avenue with University Drive and Walton Drive. If the proposed signal installation is fully actuated and timed appropriately, I believe the signals can be operated with minimal impact on-Texas Avenue traffic, I`would not suggest installing traffic signals at any other locations between the existing signalized intersections.- I will be happy to assist you if the State. Department of Transp®rtation requires a more detailed signal warrant analysis.. Please advise me if additional assistance is desired. Sneclal>Zzing ln: Traffic Englneering Headway Design Accident Analys$s Mr: Lee Robinson March 19,1997 Page 2 Thank you for allowing me to assist you in this matter.' Sincerely, L Joseph D. Blaschke, D.Eng., P.E. President 7DB/sb Attachments xc: Mr. Edwin Hard INTERSECTION OF TEXAS AVENUE AND LONE STAR PAVILION RETAIL CENTER EXIT SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS_ (WA,RRANT N0.2) Hour 10 - 11 a.m. 11 - 12 p.m. 12 - 1 p.m. 1 - 2 p.m. 2 - 3 p.m. 3 - 4 p.m. 4 - S p.m. 5-6p.m. 6-7p.m. 7 - 8 p.m. 8-9p.m. 9 - 10 p.m. Tezas Ave. Warrant Warrant Retail Centea° Warrant Warrant (Both Appr.) Vol. Satisfied Ezit Vol. Satisfied 1706 900 Yes 66 100 No 2288 900 Yes 105 100 Yes 2371 900 Yes 141 100 Yes 2486 900 Yes 146 100 Yes 2166 900 Yes 157 100 Yes 2126 900 Yes 159 100 Yes 2096 900 Yes 163 100 Yes 2326 900 Yes 170 100 Yes 1862 900 Yes 138. 100 Yes 1627 900 Yes -125 1.00 Yes 1464 900. Yes 138 100 Yes 1285 900 Yes 163 100 Yes ~~ Of ~,e~b 5~~'°`~"pJ' t ~~` ios~ o 'eusc~ ... ~~'EC~s . = ~q~~1 ~At ~ r 3, ~~~~.• CITY OF COLLEGE STATIOI`I April 22, 1997 Texas Department of Transportation ATTN: Mr. Patrick Williams, P.E. 1300 N. Texas Avenue Bryan, Texas 77803 RE: Temporary Traffic Signal for Lone Star Pavilion (715 Texas Avenue) Dear Mr. Williams: This letter is in response to your meeting with Kent Laza and Scott Hester regarding the temporary traffic signal at the above referenced location. It was discussed at this meeting, that the City will be responsible for the costs associated with the installation and maintenance of the signal as well as contracting with G. Carter. Construction to relocate the temporary signal heads. as required by project phasing. In addition, the City plans to .utilize the permanent control box with this temporary installation. In order to accommodate the development of this site, the tentative date for this construction is the week of May 19, 1997.. If this date poses a problem for the construction of Texas Avenue, please let me know as soon as possible so that the date can be rescheduled. If you have any comments, please feel free to contact Kent Laza or myself at 764-3570. Sincerely, Steve Homeyer Asst. to the City Engineer xc: Kent Laza, City Engineer Shirley Volk, Development Coordinator Scott Hester, Transportation Technician Lee Robinson, Traffic :Systems Manager P G. BOX 9960 1101 TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE STATIO(V, TEXAS 77842-0960 (409) 764-3500 Home of Texas A & M Clniversity ~,,,~ 9G -~/~' ,•- CITY OF COLLEGE STATIOI`I ~'~ P. O. BOX 9960 1101 TEXAS AVEPIUE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842 0960' (409)764-3500 May 9, 1997 Texas Department of Transportation ATTN: Mr. Patrick Williams, P.E. 1300 N. Texas Avenue Bryan, Texas 77803 RE: Temporary Traffic: Signal for Lone Star Pavilion (715 Texas Avenue) Dear Mr. Williams: This letter is in response to your meeting with Dent Laza and Scott Hester regazding he temporary traffic signal at the above referenced location. It was discussed at this meeting, that the City will be responsible for the costs associated with the installation and maintenance of the signal as well as contracting .with G. Carter Construction. to relocate the temporary signal heads as required by project phasing. In addition, the City plans to utilize the permanent control box with this temporary installation. As per our' conversation this morning, I have attached copies of. two independent warrant. studies that were conducted for this development in August 1996 by W1~IlVI Transportation Engineering Consultants, Inc. and Mazch 1997. by Transportation Engineering Analysts that indicates a need for a traffic signal at this location. Due to the existing Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) construction. on Texas Avenue, the permanent -signal cannot. be installed at this time and therefore a temporary signal is warranted In order to accommodate ~; the development of this site, the .tentative date for: this construction is the week of May' 19, 1997. ff this date poses a problem for. the construction of Texas Avenue, please let me know as soon as possible so that the date can be rescheduled. If you have any comments, please feel free to contact Kent Laza or myself at 764-3 570. inc rely, Steve omeyer Asst. to the City Engineer xc: Kent Lana, City. Engineer v~"fiirley Volk, Development Coordinator. Scott Hester, Transportation Technician Lee Robinson, Traffic Systems Manager Home of Texas A & M (lnive~sity Te~c Depart t t Tra~portation 1300-N. TEXAS AVE. BRYAN, TEXAS 77803-2760 • (409) 778-2165 May 9, 1997 Project: DBUSTP 89(61}UM Control: 005 0-01-056 ..Highway: BSS-R (Texas Avenue} ~."Zz.CS r3i~s tTjr Mr. Rich WngO A. B, Shoppin enter Properties, Inc. - 1900 In atonal Park Drive, Suite 303 B' gham, Alabama 35243- Dear Mr. Wingo: As we discussed over the phone, I am unable to stop construction of the Lone Star Pavilion parking .that is planned within the property area claimed by the State of Texas and A. B. Shopping Centex. However, should this claim settle in favor of the State, A. B. Shopping Center Properties, Inc. will be required to remove all improvements from State right-of-way. Sincerely, Patrick T. Williams, P. E. Area Engineer PTW/bja cc: im. Calloway,. City of College Station Steve. Homeyer, City of College Station An Equal Opportunity Employer (409).764-3500 May 12, 1997 A.B. Shopping Centers Attn: Mr. Tom Brown:..: 1900 International Park Drive,'Suite-303 Birmingham, Alabama 35243 RE: Closure of an Ezisting Driveway into the -Lone Star Pavilion Dear Mr, Brown:' Per. your equest I have requested a letter from the Texas Department of Transportation regarding` he closure of the existing driveway south of the proposed main entrance into: the Lone Star Pavilion Shopping Center, A copy of this letter is attached for your files. If you have any questions or comments,: feel free to contact meat (409)764-3 570. S' ce ly, Steve Homeyer Asst. to the City. Engineer xc: ~ 'rley Volk, Development Coordinator Sabine McCully, Senior Planner ...Planning Case File y .. Home Of Texas A & NI Clniversity ~•I CITY O~ COLLEGE STATIOI`I P O. BOX 9960 1101 TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE STATIOf`I, TEXAS 77842-0960 ~ ,, '- ~( `E' Cit of Colle a Station PO Box 9960, Colle a Station, Texas 77842 - - IOI`I 1.1 l Y VC ~.vL.l_~.v~. ~ in- ivy ~ FAX `~ _ Date: ~/,j /97 Number of pages including cover sheet: To: ~~ \\ ~V~S wJ~sc'~J~ Phone: ~ ~ 3 ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~---~ Fax phone: SL r D CC: From: ~~Z~~ /n~~~12 Phone: (409)764-3570 Fax phone: (409) 764-3496 REMARKS: ^ Urgent ^ For your review ^ Reply ASAP ^ Please comment ~Av~S ~q.~ ~ + SC,u.S S 'T ~t S S t r~-t r4~ onl 5~~~ Texas Department of Transportation 1300 N. TEXAS AVE. • BRYAN, TEXAS 77803-2760 (409) 778-2165 March 25, 1997 Project: DBUSTP (89) 61 Control: 0050-01-056 Highway: BS6-R County: Brazos Mr. Steve Homeyer City of College Station P. O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77843 Dear Mr. Homeyer: Attached is a copy of the right-of--way map for the section of BS6-R(Texas Ave.) in front of the developing Lone Star Pavilion Shopping Center (LSPSC). According to the right-of--way map and the approved site plan of LSPSC dated December 5, 1997, it appears that the proposed parking area encroaches onto the BS6-R right-of way. This is unacceptable, nor permitted. Therefore, in accordance with the Municipal Maintenance Agreement, I'm requesting your assistance to ensure the construction of LSPSC does not encroach onto the State's right-of--way. On the same site plan is shown the existing parking for Red Lobster Restaurant. This parking also encroaches onto the right-of--way. Again, I'm requesting your assistance in having LSPSC remove that portion of Red Lobster parking that currently encroaches onto the State's right-of--way. Your assistance is appreciated. Should you .have any questions, please call. Sincerely ~~~~~, Patrick T. Williams, P. E. Area Engineer Attachment An Equal Opportunity Employer 9 r ~ .PROPERTY LNE ~. PER RESUB. OF LOT A V. 1057. P. 123 I -DEED UEE PER / V. 1877. P. 14 ~ FND %Z" AR J LOT Al I IBENTY 44' DEED LNE PER PROPOSED RO.W. 1.75' V. 1007, P. 488 1 85' s.7a . 0.47 ~ . . .L 2.60 E XISTIN G RO.W. ~, O 3" D FND ~. ~ 1-~ i I N CONC. oera~ ,rA., j N.T.S. ~RTER LEAGUE I 'RACY 8 j o.A. s-.TH st~eo. V. 49, P. 105 I I ~ RESEIUE' LOT 1 :. " EAST GATE SQUIRE - 1 r 32 B.C.D.R. CQ~ 33 d" ~ , H SUS: i V- 542. P. 125 . ~ -. ;j I ~~ TRACT "B" I ~ " '~ ~ ~ 707 CENTER L P ,-.. ~ ~ ~ ROY BUCEK jE I NOTES . V. 77 14 18 P. ~~ R O B C V. 274, P: 87 m 4 f OCT: 31, 1968 ~ r a ~Z~ A ~ ° GENERIC AlILlS RESTAURANT 1. ALL BEARINGS IRE BASED ON THE TEXAS STATE . . . . ' JULY! 29 1993 _ _ , ~._„_ ,_ o • • , o tXtO(1P, INC. PLANE COORDMATE SYSTEM. CENTRII ZONE . ~ ' 3.85 AC ._ ..~ - _- ~ ~~ a i ~° V. 695, P. 516 R O B G cNA0 27). ALL DISTANCES -ND COORDAVATES SHOWN - -- - . __ -, ~--cc-~ - _ i v ~ ~ ~ . `~ K ~ . . . . JAN. 18. 7983 ARE SURFACE AND AMY BE CONVERTED TO GRID BY AIULTPLYNG A GRD FACTOR OF 0 99588 -~-y Z ~ z _ tJ . . . 4.9a ~ 1 s~E ~ 2.'~DENOTES A SET ~°.LR..YMITH ALUAAMIIM -CAP, UN ESS OTHERWISE NOTED 9~i1 I~ • L : , ~ •30.46• E~_ 183.58' S 48 S 48.4Y52" E '170:02• ~ _ EO 3. SURVEY LENE LOCATpNS MtE APPROXWUITE MO BASED UPON THE BEST AVALABLE EVIOEtACE _. _ , a' "~ ~.., ° . ~ ~ EXISTING q.O.W , o .o . - s . ~~.....~..-._...~.: ,~m.~.~.+.r.':.. _. .- _ .p -.- ~ -:-._._ ~ ~.~.:.~..-ate _ __.-_ -~ ~_ ~~ - _- a. L 7 u ~ St1RVEY LM1E n ~o e ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ Q ~ S 47.35'29" E 6t5 - -~. N I, PROPOSED BASEIAVE BUS.HWY.6 , ~ W . _ -__...... _... u _~__. :~ ' ..~a. o... .,~.-_ ~ ~.. v.,n ~ _ ,..:.,_ Z - EXSTNG R.O W. ~' - J ,9,. w -1975.22• ~EGE OF TEXAS ^ ! \' j .) I UE i ~,i 0 72' 3 IlE OTAt ' S W ACCOIIriT M0: 8077-1-t0 SCAtE~ r • s0' IAEVsS-1t-!i CAwtE~ -AIICELS 7TCE.I0TCE, IRCE, 12TCE,13TCi ~ NtCC LANDTECH CONSULTANTS`INC. 2627 NORTH LOOP WEST,SUTE 224 HousTON,TEXAS naoe TEL. ND. t7E3> 861-7068 w ~ -. STATE ~i ~ wQ ~ '~~'n 6 a.[ Ewa. a wn ter. ~. tXXNTY ~. ~ a a 17 BRAZOS 05 01 061 3 04/03/97 16:33 '$`409 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS (QJ 0 O 1 :~*~~x:~esxsx~xe~:x:~:~cs~~k~x~~~c~kx::k%k~::~:k :~~~ ACTIVITY REPORT ~:~~ TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX N0. 9625 CONNECTION TEL p17139528610pp396 CONNECTION ID START TIME 04/03 16:31 USAGE TIME 01'47 PAGES 3 RESULT OK .M^ '., ~i ~~~~~ ~~I CITY OI-~ C®LLEGE STATIOI~I P O. BOX 9960 1101 TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE STATIOhI, TEXAS 77842-0960 '(409) 764- 3500 I May 12, 1997 A.B. Shopping Centers Attn: Mr. Tom Brown 1900 International Park Drive, Suite 303 - Birmingham, Alabama 35243 RE: Closure of an Existing Driveway into the Lone Star Pavilion Dear Mr. Brown: -Per your., request, I have requested. a letter from the Texas Department of Transportation regarding the closure of the existing driveway south of the proposed main entrance into .the Lone Stare-Pavilion Shopping Center. A copy of this letter is attached for your files...: ff you have any questions or comments, feel free to contact me at (409)764-3570. S' ce ly, , Steve Homeyer Asst. to the City Engineer ~; .r - xc: Shirley Volk, Development Coordinator Sabine McCully, Senior Planner ~Pi~anning Case File i i Home of Texas A & M Clniversity Texas Department of Transportation 13U0 N. TEXAS' AVE. • BRYAN,` TEXAS 77803-2760 • (409) 778-2165 May 9, 199?. Project: DBUSTP 89(61) Control: 0054-41-456 Highway: BS6-R County: Brazos Mr. Steven Homeyer City of College Station P.O. Box 9964 College Station, TX '777842 Dear Mr. Homeyer: At a previous meeting :with A.B. Shopping Center, we recommended the closure of the existing drive south ofthe main entrance to the new Lone Star Pavilion. Operationally, we believe the closure would improve ingress and egress to this property and improve the efficiency of the proposed signals. at the. main entrance. We still support this. recommendation and request your assistance in the closure. I have spoken with Rich Wingo of A.B. Shopping Center and he is agreement to this proposal. Sincerely,. _ _ Patrick T. Williams,. P.E. Area Engineer An Equal Opportunity Employer L~Tr~~. e__ _~ ~_m~_ _ ___ .._4~_______.~___. _~ __ ~______._ ___ __W __a_~~~~ _ ~~ _-----__~~V_.m~_ ___ _._ _. I~-roc, ~~ ot,1~ ~~k;C,y~t 7- ~ ~~f'~~~~c ?" ~ 1~~ __~ ~._____ _..;;~.______~.____~_e_ _._._~_____.__V______._ _~~ ~~__w__M_._.~____.~_.~.~ __~__.____._V~~e_. ~/~'A,~S Nc'~~S '~ CCl ~~~s ~~/G s i~--2ar~ I St,~.22vu~~tnl~ ~(zot~-~.7~rcc- S ,; _ S ,l~tjt,J ~ o ~~G-~-°7'~~G ~ _._~;--^_._ c...,,1,47-- --_f.._~ _._Go ~c~~l .________~~___ _ ~..~________.~_T_.____________..~._____m_- ---.___.________ ._v ._ _ _______~.~a __..__._...~__~ ~ ___..._._---___.__ ____.._______~._~~~ __~.~__~_v~~.___.___.._._____.___-_. ~~~ ~ "~~ f it ~r~`~ . ~- _._ _ __ ___._ ____ `t. --_ :_ -- ~~ r ~~ .~_.,_.~21 _'. ___ 4-- - - - --,- - _. __ __ __ . ____ - ----°~ - ham--, ~~~Q(J -- __ __ ___ ~~- - ~ _- __ __ --- --- - ~V(~.. -._ _ _- _U _ --- __ - --- ,f June 25, 1996 Shears Companies Attn: Mr. Charles W. Shears 1325 La Concha Houston, Texas 77054 RE: Proposed Lone-Star Pavilion at Texas Avenue and Lincoln Dear Mr. Shears: We look forward to working with you in order o ah development for everyone. There were several issues addressed during a recent. ent meeting that need further clarification The construction of Eisenhower Street must b ddressed as to who .will be responsible for the acquisition of right-of--way. and. the construction of the street section. During the meeting,. the following proposal was presented by the developer's representative: 1. The developer would participate in the cost of constructing Eisenhower to his driveway. 2. The developer would relocate his internal drive when Eisenhower is constructed: This internal driveway would be temporary in nature and would. be constructed to asphalt paving standards, -but would not be constructed as a curb and gutter section. 3. The developer would give the City a bond to guarantee the relocation of the driveway and the construction of Eisenhower. This bond would be cashed and held in escrow until the street construction occurred, at which time, the monies would be removed. 4. The. developer requested the City to provide the necessary engineering documents to construct Eisenhower Street. 5. The developer would contribute $50,000.00 to the construction of a traffic signal at the main entrance to the proposed development. The developer proposed to pay for the entire signal at the time of construction, with the City reimbursing him for the remaining balance exceeding the participation level indicated above. 6. The developer will conduct a warrant study with the City scheduling the installation of the signal system. 7. The. developer requested oversize participation for the storm sewer which exceeds the size required by their development. The City will require a letter of agreement from each of the large. box retailers indicating their desire to locate within this. development. In addition to these agreements, the City will need to obtain traffic projections from these same retailers in order to analyze the need for a traffic signal. The City will also need to obtain :preliminary drainage :calculations to .size the box culvert for both the ultimate design and the design required by the development of the Lone Star Pavilion. An engineer's estimate must also be submitted with both designs to be considered for the requested. oversize participation. The development will be responsible for the .construction of a portion of Eisenhower. This responsibility will include the dedication of right-of--way as well'as the :construction of Eisenhower necessary'to provide access to .the development from Lincoln Avenue. A cost estimate must also be submitted for the portion of Eisenhower constructed by the developer. Mr. Charles W. Shears Lone-Star Pavilion June 25, 1996 Page 2 The City would like to receive in return for entering into a development agreement the acquisition of right-of--way including the .design and .construction of Eisenhower Street from Ash .Street to Lincoln Avenue. The planting of street trees along arterial streets will be necessary to comply with the landscape ordinance. As part of the development agreement process, the City will analyze the trade-offs made by both parties to determine whether or not it is advantageous. to enter into such an agreement. At the present time, there are too many unknowns and too few exchanges of requirements to warrant the need for a development agreement. To address the existing parking spaces along Texas Avenue, the enon-conforming in that they do not meet existing requirements.. The latest Zoning. Ordinance s. a twenty-four (24) foot landscape reserve along all rights-of--way. Parking may encroach six {6) feet from the property line, but only at a maximum of seven. (7) spaces and only ' e streetscape requirements can be met. Those requirements include street trees (for Texas Ave se would be Live Oaks planted every sixty (60) feet on center) as well as parking screening... If thesting spaces are to be reconstructed, the ordinance requirement must be met. The: ordinance does provide for a variance, and as was discussed, staff will assist you in the preparation of the application. Staff does not make recommendations to the Zoning Board, however, they are aware. of the alternative to place a parking island every seven spaces. In cases where the ordinance could still be met and there are no physical hardships involved, the Board has denied such variances. We are including an application and the bylaws. of the Zoning Board withthis letter. Should you choose to apply for the variance, please let us know. If you have any questions or comments, feel free to contact me at (409) 764-3570. Sincerely, Steve Homeyer Graduate Engineer cc: Jim Callaway, Asst. Dir. of Development Services Kent Laza, City Engineer Veronica Morgan, Asst. City Engineer Jane.Kee, City.Planner Sabine Kuenzel, Senior Planner Shirley Volk, Development Coordinator Ed Hard,. Transportation Planner Dan Wilson, Wilson/Zetty Associates, Inc. From: Paul Kaspar To: Shirley Volk Date: 2/19/98 1:02PM Subject: Re: Drainage Problem at Lone Star Pavillion don't know if you were copied on the email to mark from jim? I wasn't,. but I found out the jest, and I thought 1'd keep you informed if you were not copied. Jim told .Mark that they complied with all of our ordinances in the design of thafi complex, however, they evidently did not meet the owner's needs. That is absolutely the situation. wrapped up in anut-shell. The problem truly resides between the owner and their design engineer. Any water entering their site currently would have been entering their site previously and should have-been addressed by the engineer's design. f believe from conversations that I had with Steve H. a while ago, that there were concerns raised by staff, but that their design met our minimum guidelines. I tried to explain this to Tom Brown and offered any help we could.. provide in providing copies of our ordinance and any information we had in the design files on this project. They were going to have their in house engineer do some rough talcs and probably call on us later in the process. That's what I know about the. situation. »> Mark Smith 02/19/98 10:32AM »> How did their plans show that that drainage would be handled? »> Shirley Volk 02/19/98 10:19AM »> I had a call from. Tom Brown who manages the: Lone Star Pavillion shopping center (Barnes & Noble, Office Depot, etcJ on Monday morning. He said he has. a terrible :drainage problem there (DUH!), and a lot of the .problem comes from runoff from where Eisenhower deadends, but some comes from the 707 Shopping Center. He said that he had met with Paul K. on the site., but since then he'd had another rain! His tenants are withholding rent because of the flooding problem, and he is wondering if the City can help him in any way. Paul, 1 don't know what you have determined since you met with him, but he called and asked me to try to .get some help from the City, so I'm simply sending out the message to see if anyone knows if there is anything the City can or should be doing to help,. or if the problem is entirely his to deal with, with his engineers and architects who designed the project. Tom's phone number is (205)969-1D00 if anyone wants to talk with him. I would like to be kept in the loop on his one since he called me. Thanks, CC: Veronica Morgan „ ., ,,,~ , n . , ~ •R-e no 7aa ~a9e DEVELOPMENT SVCS ~ ool e B :k~k%k~%k%k~k%k.'k:k.k~k~.'~kX:N~"%k~~k%k~'+k%k%k%k~h'%k ~kx~:k ACTIVITY REPORT ~:k:k %k~k:k%ksk:k~k:k%k%k~:ksk%k~k~~k:k;k:k%k:k:k%k:k~~ TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX N0. 1915 CONNECTION TEL 17139.528`61Dpp396 CONNECTION ID START TIME 09/12 14:09 USAGE TIME 02'59 PAGES 5 RESULT OK ~~C. ~ C.,U~~ ~~ -~- /~ c ~~~~`~ ~~'' . Cit of Colle a Station.: PO Boz 9960. Collc c Station. Texas 77842 CITY OF' COLLEGE. STATIOI`( Date:. 1' / ~ ~ /97 ~~ ~~~~,'°" "' Number of pages including eover sheet: ~~ Y ~~ .: Two: .1..~/~, ~/t S ~..J 1 c.. S o.~. Phone: ~ ! 3 `')~J Z ~.E'ca Fax phone• ~" ~ CC: From: <~~~ ~;, ~IG-~L~~ Phone (409)764-3570 Fax phone• (409) 764-3496 ~~~: ^ Urgent ^ For your review ^ Reply ASAP ^ Please oocnmeat -TL, S `~ -~l~ %l~ ~OL.t. 2C~Z1 C.tC,. il.~ C,..~< . ~__. .... ~-- --~ --,--~---- - f - V 4 ' ... 329.35 G . - . ~ t c~ `` 9 ~ ~ I TRUCTED --; I ` ~D ~ ''~~ r 7C 331.5: 331 0~ ENING OF - .329.90 TC 1- 32;x.40 G I 4 TC ~ ~ . ~ 330.67 TC (g~ ~.. '~ •~`~ 330.52 G ~-~ ~~ ---_._ ""~"~` [t 4 G 330.17 G _.., •--- 331.02 TC , I - _ . ~- . 330.52 G' ~ %..._... .__ ~ F" - ~'I~ , ' ~' ~ . 331. O.FS _~ ~ „ ~ _.--..1 f 330.28 ` `" 33b.81 TC , I s~ I I 329.78 G -0.45 G 330.31 G ® 328.63 TC ~---. I ~ 3 T ~~- ;~ / 328.13 - ~` ~ I I ' 329:5 1.3 ~., 330.45 G TC f ~``, ~ I ',. ~ ~-. I 330.04 TC 330.32 N I ~(, i ~ 33 TC 329. G 329.54 G ~ f' • I i I 1 1 I ~~. ~,. / ' ~ _ t,+1 I v _' ~ 0 .: I, ~, i ~ 1 ) j ' 333.56 TC t ~ 4= !~ ~ l- ' I m 1 - ~ 9.41 TG~ 3 .91 G ~ , ~- 331.06 G i ~ Z~" ^,~' ~/ 2.00 ~ ~8 ~" w . ~~ I ~ 4 ~, ~~AA vd J ~ i i ' ~ ti I . .,. ~ ~ ~ , i ~ , ~ f I ~ 1 I ~ ' ~ 329:47 TC 329. i TC ,~ ~.i.., ' ~ ~. ;, ~ ~ ' I it 32 . G 32ss G , ~y°N 3;~~ ~ ___-.__ i _ `L _ PATIO 1 '~ I ~ - _ _ . 328.97 C ~ if _ - ___-. '~ ~_ X34 TC 328.47 ~~ ~~ ~ ~ 331.88 FS ~ _ ~Q I 328. G 2y 33. ~' ` • 330.51 ': ~;~- `, , 330.01 G ~ 1.1y. ' '~ ~ ;~ ~ I ,~, ~ '` { 3 8 ~ I~ I ~s ~ ® 3 58 , I ~ .~ ,> ~ J:~~,~ I • ~ ,~ I ~ ~ ,, 429.70 TC 1 ~'' y 4 ~ ~ , 9.20 G 3 TC 330.7: ,~ ~°~ I 3 2 8 .- ~- 330.2 ~~' _- _~ 3 ~p EMOVED _ A _. _ ~. I 'tN 1 ~ 6 I 28.34 TC 329.91 FS ~ ~... ~ 3 .84 G 1.5516 9% • ,. ' 3 0.15 7 ~- ..-~ .1 TC -F~_ , I 3 9.65 G ~ TG ~ ~..~ 1 ~. _ .328.75 TC 328. 330.59 TC . ._.._ ~r. ~ - - -Gw - '~ ^ I 1.358 Pa /~wws 328.70 TC I ~~ I . ~.. ' .326.62 TC -" ~ 328.20 G _ '~ `- ; 326.12 G ' I '-- _ _ . . ; I ~~ ~' _ _. _ _ _~ .. -- - ~.- ~.•, ~ ~~ ~ i ~j' `~G SS 9 ` ` TC 331.53 TC 330.52 G 331.03 G _ r_._• 7C _ _ _~^~ ~ 32:fl0_~S G 331. O.FS"' - ~- ~ 1 331.50 FS 1 TC - aSGTC ;' I I 15 G ~,` • _ ~ S' _ 337:72 G ,~~ - ~~.... _ ~~ \ , ~. ._- \ g rc 3 ~ 54 G 330 , ---' "" . ~ X30.93 TC 330 59 TC --___ ___- . 330.43 G 330.09 ~~ l'J"'"" ~ 331.01 TG - 330.56 TC J 330.51 G ~'-- 50 FS ~ _..J .~~ . , ,~ 4.~=~ ~~ • ~~330~ •• , ..:ate., •..'. r ._ ~ ~ rc ,,-.- _ ,--.. BORDER/~ U 32s.3o G PROTOTYPE 4.6 330.55 TC 2.00 n 331 aA 330.05 G TSL= 332.4 0 330 .~ ~s 3 ~ \ - M~ ~- ~._. ~ .- r ,~0 _ PATIO 331.50 FS _. _, -_- _ _.__. 331.50 FS i "- - --_'- _~ _._ __ -_._,.-- 331.88 FS 331.30 FS 331.29 TC:., " ~~~ ' ~ m . _ _ 330.33 TC _ 330.79 ~'-' 329.83 G G - - ~ O 329.41 FS / ~: __ ~, __--_ ", ~__ 3 8 , _ _ 329.03 TC 318.71 TC 3 58 `.., ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ . __.._ _ ` . __. _ ____--, -rv_.~ '_. _... _ 328.53 G '' ~ 28.21 G -- 329.01 G 4; :.~- 4 1. 83b 33 1.29 0 ~ ~ , ~ -++ 328.91 TC 330.2 TC 330.79 FS 330.05 FS 3 9 328.41 G ' ~ / ~ ~~O ~ ~2 f' ~ ~ 328.41 TC 328.3 .~i99; 329.91 FS 2% 329.36 TC 0.963; ~ 327.91 ~ 329.56 TC 327.8 3 0.15 T 329.06 ~2 328.86 G 3 9.65 G .29.37 TC ~ ,328:87 G 329.54 TC---_~--. ~~"' 328.59 TC 328.a 528. - 52.3 ~ -33@.(~-T~ - - -.. ,_ .. - 32T G - - - -~=~~-.. L - - -~2~9-~ -~~9- _ _.330.33- TC -- - '~{ ~"" - " -b'+~- -- ~"' __ ~ ~~~~a - ----~= -aF----- --- ". ~~s _-- - - - ~ 328.50 S 39.23 ~C GAL - as 328.70TC ----- -------1-g9'7~------- ' 328.20 G 8.73 G ~~ . ...-. - _.__.._ 1 { ~' ~ ~' I y Q ~,. ,~~~ e ,~ 4 ~ ~ G ~~~y. ~ ~ ~ i TK,~c r E TR~~c-r ~ _. ~ ~ ~,AS7 T~ ~G2UAR~ I 0. .B.c~.,7x. ~, --''~ y 331.24_ TC y 3 J ~ -'._ _. \ \ °j'~~ 329 E 330.54 G ~~ ,II 11.53 '. C 330.7. X30.93 TC 330.'59 TC \ 11.03 G ~ ~ ~ 330.43 G 330.09 \ ~' D` ____- ~., ~ ~ ,_ ----- ~ 9 '~ `~ , 330.56 TC 0.03 TC ..___` ' 32.-OO.ES ~•-33-0- -5-1 G ~ 9.53 G ~ ~' I, ' 331.50 FS 331.50 FS / / 3 - - _ _ - _ -~ ~~• ; : •- \ X330 ~``'~w ~~iG ~ ~ ~' ._ ~~ =tom `. ~ ~ ~~ r •3r~ ~/' TC ~ t *• 9:78 2 3 9 ~' • ~~~ •: ' • , ~ ~.• •: tr' ,y 329.28 G 329.33 TC • ~ M M 328.83 G 329.80 TC ON THE. ~ 32s.3o G \ :.- '~ R E RD BO / , 330.55 7C ~..0 1 ,. __~~i`~ ', /PROTOTYPE 4.6 331.10 330.05 G r'' \~` / TSL=332.0 ~\\ _' 4 0 330 A6' ` ` ~? . ~~. ~ _. -' ~ 328.60 TC ~ /`! 328.10 G i 331.50 FS ,_ - / 331.50 FS i - 1 • ~„_.. 1 331.30 FS 331.29 TC,~_ ~~ 330.33 TC ~- 330.79 ~ ~~' ~ 329.83 G/~329~.41~FS 31. _, . _ / -- , 329.03 Tt _.. _.._,_. ___. 328.53 G -. _ _.~ _ . __._-Y° ~ ~ 329.01 G 1. 89~ --- 1.29% 33 ~ 0 328.91 TC/ 30.79 FS 330.05 FS 3 328.41 G ~; ~ ~" •"" " '' ~Z9 r ~~' . • '1, 328.32 TC ;y`j 328.41 ?C ~~ 0.96 % .~"327.91 327.82 G /' Y 2~ 329.56 TC 329.36 TC r 326.71 F5, 5 T 329.06 ~J2 328.86 G ~ '~~ ~5 G 29:37 TC _ i 328.59 TC -..328 41 TC 329.54 rp ;328`87 G 329.04 G - .- - - ~ . - ~2$:49~C -~-, .~~9LG - - - - - - - _ _ _ 1 328.50 S' 3'9.23 SfC _ - _ ._G~ - - - - - - - - Lgg~ - - - - - - - - -325:$1T_-~ 1.039. 70 TC 8.73 G 20 G I /~ -,'i- y, -~, `~ ~ ~ ~~G~~ ~~ ~ ^ I ~ ~ O ~ -~, ~- I~ ~~~~ti ~ ~~ I TRAC r E 7RAC"1" D ~ I I ~AS7 T~ S~tUAR~ I VOL. ~~~, ~G. ~ ~~ I 0. .~.CG.,7x. --~ >~ -~~ ~ , e ~ ~ ~ ~ 330 / r \ - -~ ~ ~ ,~~0 TC 330.26 TC ~ 7C 330-~59 TC ~ ~1' 329 ~ G 2g_76 G G 330.09 ~ ~ ~ 329.58 G ~~ 330.56 TC 30.03 TC i ,.___-._...~..._ &-G-~`""~ Q 9.53 G ~ i `~ ' X30.00 T ~ U • ~ ~ 329.50 G v 330 ~ \ ~~'l CJ~~ c ~ ~ ~ ,t~ _ .~ I (~) ' ~ ~ ~ 329.78 TC ~ ~ v_ ~~ ,~ ____ 'i 329 ~ --_._ 329.x8 c -__-r---_...__ i _ k 329.33 TC - 329.80 TC 328.83 G f~, 329.30 G -~ it ~ y~ • ~ ~~ ,.. \` / .:.r ~~\ ~ 329.17 TC ~~ CHIS 'x SET CHiS 'x SET _" ~ ~\ _..~..~- Q.' 328.50 TC .328.60 TC ~ 328.00 FS - 0 ! 328.10 G 328.96 TC\ ~ - __. _., 'y`1' .~~ _-_~~ -- ~ . _`. „ -32$:46-G~ ~_ ~ ----- -- ,,r ~ _y '~ 8.72 TC ~~~ ' 328.22 G --- --- -- --- ~ ~-- ~_ .~- Ix I ~ ~ I ~ sn>CCO e~oG. Cq 1 i, ~ ~ I ~'i 328.19 TC j i ~1 ~'~lt~~~~ ', 9 .. - - - - ': 327.69 ~ I ~y~~C/~ i ~j~ G° , , ~: ~- ~ i 38.06 TC ~~~ - ~'_ ~ ~, 38 .76 TC 1 - `~, - - ---- O~~ O '~ J y /~ ' '1 ~ 327. 7 TC 1 ,~ `j '~ `1, / / / ~ `; 328.32 TC ~;,~ ~ a 326. 7 G I 327.82 G 327.65 tC •~' - 326.71 FS 32 ,.15 G'1 , '~ - -- -- STUCC~p Yet,pc- ..328 41 TC ' 27.04 TC ~~~ i ' _ s _ - ~- '' ~- -e'~,f~w- -~ - - _ - 3 --------'~29~1 TG ~ 1:037L. 8FS ~, I ~~ !, ~ 2 i ,~ , ~ ,~ ~~ ~~ w ~ , ~ I ~~¢G~ ~ ~ '~~' WILSON/ZET'rY/ASSOCIATES, INC. ARCHITECTS • ENGINEERS • PLANNERS May 20,..1996 Ms. Veronica Morgan Assistant City: Engineer i,SC~ o~ ~63~~A+~~...IJt~Ld Vld P. O. Box 9960 Ph: 409/764-3570 Colhge Station, TX 77542 Fax:. 409/764-3496 Re: Lone Star Pavilion, a 103;000 s:f. Shopping Center Located on the N.E. Corner of Texas and Lincoln Street, College Station, Texas Dear Veronica:... The f®llowing letter ©n the above referenced project is an outline and summary of the General Agreements, in principle; discussed with you,Charlie Shears, the leveloper; myself, Architect, Sabine Kuenzell, Staff Planner and Ed Hard; Transportation Planner: At our meeting in your offices, May 14, 1996, the subjects discussed were: r. Open Ditch in 25ft. Drainage Easement A. eneraiiy Agreed (J~en: 1.. Developer will install pipe as part of development construction. 2. City of College Station will reimburse Developer for the difference in the cost of installing larger pipe required to handle,upstream storm run-off ancl. the cost of the size pipe required to handle normal storm run-off frv,:, a developer site. B. Need: 1. Difference in pipe size, 36"x21„ 2 Cost for difference; $20:00/LF. x 642 LF.= $12,840.00. 3100 WILCREST, SUITE 325 HQUSTON, TEXAS 77042 (713) 952-8600 II. Eisenhower Street: A. Generally Agreed Upon: -City will at some future date acquire the Albert Pierce Tract (known as Tract #5,1.216 Acres) or a portion thereof, large enough to extend Eisenhower Street South to Lincoln Street at the City. of College Station's expense.. Developer agrees to reimburse the City ~f College Station for approximately 190' L.F. of 39' back to back surface sheet, excluding sidewalks, bike trails and utilities,. (above or below the ground): The Developer agrees to taut lap a Bond or Letter of Credit, at ~hP Developer°s' discretion, to cover the mutually agreed upon cost of the approximate 190' L.F. of street, to be paid to the City upon completion of the entire extension to Lincoln Street. beveloper agrees to bu~'d a, temporary 1 1/2" asphalt on 5 1/2" limestone base service drive-and remove the drive when the street extension is complete and replace the drive with landscape. B. Need: 1. A dimension tie from property corner to street, right-of--way. I talked to Greg Taggert with M.D.G. and he said he would bring you three (3) copies of the survey with the tie-in as soon as possible.. 2. Estimate of cost. Far now, use $24;000.00. C. Generally Agreed Upon: Traffic Signal and Esplanade Cut, located on Texas Avenue adjacent to and just South of Developer's North Property Line. 1. The City ofCollege Station agrees to install a traffic lightwith left hand turn signals at the above mentionedlocation, by the time that Barnes and Noble is open for business. 2. The Developer will pay the entire cost of the signalization. ~. T'he City of college Station will reimburse the Developerall but $50,000.00 of the cost within two years of the date of the first shopping center °s proper building permit. D. Need: 1. Estimated cost of signal from the City' of College Station, 2. City of College. Station will work with Developer to''olstain TX Dot's approval of relocation-of esplanade cut, left turn lane and permits for a four lane entry. 3. Developer will .provide at his cost a projected traffic .study and. preliminary warrants. Also,. provide to Traffic Engineers and the City of College Stati®n the major tenants projected. traffic counts. 4. Developer willprovide the City of College Station with letters of request from the tenants and when available, provide the City with Proof of Tenancy. IIL In previous meetings, because the "Red Lobster", is a part of this project by Reciprocal Casement Agreement (IZ.E.A.), it was determined that: A. Cpenerally Agreed Upon: 1. The new 24' green. area requirement would be waived and negotiated to an approximate 8'ft green area. buffer at Texas Avenue, since the "I~;ord & Ladies".and "Project 707" existing pavement encroach on Texas Avenue to align-with the existing "Red Lobster°' ,pavement.. 2. That this development would have one. monument sign. and one 3 5'ft pylon sign (if located 70° from 'T'exas Avenue .Curb), exclusive of legal signage for "On the border" or "Red Lobster". 3. That this development would not require a plat, only a "Site Plan Approval" and that the entire development is zoned properly. ~leronica, to simplify :the agreement, I would suggest that Charlie give you a Bond or Letter of Credit for the difference between Items I and II. I appreciate the fact that :you are expediting the agreements with the other city administrative offices. We are starting Construction Documents within about. two {2) weeks, anticipating delivery of ®ffice .Depot on December 1st and Wilson/ZettylAssociates, Inc. is proceeding with planning based. on our discussion. If there are any changes, er if you need further clarification, please do not hesitate to contact me. Respectfu 1 mitted, ._._-~--.~--.~. l~ C. Davis ikon, A.LA., C.S.L President cc: Charlie Shears, Shears.Investments. Greg Taggert, M.D.G. Sohn Lively, Tribble & Stephens AMIPRO\DOCS\95044CS -------- ~Q Panaddy .IB8~2S ~ uewsa~eg - -_ _-. - 2610~9W Q iaoeueW;unaoay ---96=6 6-8 a~~o _.....__ ~d `ap~ns}unH ~oq~a-, WWII ~~ ~BS~oW~ ae^^Q saa~~a~~oo~ algoN'8 saua~s .~awo;sn~ ~uu~~ ~~ ueol~awe y~~ou ;~ _ ~; ., {. .:, ~. '~:`~ .,. .~ oL .> ~ .~ a ... ~. ..:: ... .~• .. ... .~ a ypp~ SN9IS'N81Nd'ON Z4Z5 b£Z 6TZ,$ i~T~ZI 96/TU/Ti