HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes~ ~~~ 3u
Mr. Parker made a motion to approve the plat as submitted;. Mr. Smith seconded the motion
which carried unanimously (6-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO.7: Consideration of a preliminary plat of the Pebble Creek
Phase Six Subdivision totaling 45.33 acres divided into 105 single family lots located
between the east line of the College Station Business Center Phase I and the west line of
Pebble Creek Phase 4C. (96-311)
City Planner Eke made the staff presentation for this item, referring to the staff reporf included in
the. packets and pointed out this. preliminary plat has been accompanied by a revised Master
Plan which reflects the changes made since the Master Plan was approved in 1992. She stated
that as with all developments, an impact on the surrounding infrastructure will occur, adding that
this development will not create a substantial negative impact.
She referred to the location of sidewalks in the platted area and indicated they meet our
subdivision: requirements. She informed the Commissiorrthat staff recommends approval of this
plat with the condition that the R-1 rezoning become effective prior to final -plat approval. She
pointed out that the area is currently zoned A-O and R-3 so the zone change is necessary. She
stated that the paperwork forthat rezoning request has been received and will come before the
Commission at the next meeting.
Mr. Grub invited comments from the .audience. None were forthcoming. Mr. Massy made a
motion to approve the preliminary plat with. staffs conditions. Mr. Lightfoot seconded the motion
which carried unanimously (6-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO. 8: Consideration of a-final plat of the O.C.Cooper Place F_.._
9 P g -;ri ~~.-~.-.-
subdivision totaling 2.37 acres divided into ei ht du lex lots located alon the west side ~(
of Holleman Drive just west ofthe-Enclave Apartments. (96-221). ~\ _ _ ~--,
City Engineer Laza made the staff. presentation which followed the staff report included in the
packets. Ne informed the Commission that since the packets were prepared, the engineer for
the project has asked for permission to change the alignment for drainage. and sewer, and
explained that due o unanticipated problems occumng which. negatively. affected the original
plans, the proposal"is to change the direction of the infrastructure.. The new proposal would
.require off-site easements to;be granted by the owners of the LULAC project. Staff has asked
forthe developer to provide a letter from the LULAC owners indicating agreement will be
forthcoming. Staff has received that letter, but the construction documents have not been
completed or reviewed yet. The developer and engineer have been meeting with those. people,
and are close to finalizing hat agreement, so staff would. recommend approval of the plat with
the conditions tha# a written agreement with required easements are submitted to the City, and
that all construction documents are approved by the City Engineer's office prior to filing the plat
for record.
Comments from the. audience were invited and Roy Hammons, project engineer came forvvard
and talked about_the problems he had with the previous drainage and sewer plans, and
explained the new proposal will be more in both the City's arad the developer's best interests. He
stated the legal documents and'the engineering construction documents will be forthcoming very
quickly.
Mr. Parker made a motion to approve the plat with the. conditions listed by the City Engineer.
Mr. Smith seconded the motion which carried unanimously (6-0).
AGENDA ITEM NO.9: Public hearing to consider an amendment to Section 7.15 of
the Zoning Ordin,e pertaining to the C-3 Planned. Commercial zoning district to allow
.small restaurants, yljj~tt sit down dining and without drive thrus. (96-809)