HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneousFrom: Jim Callaway
To: jkee,klazasvolk
Date: 3/21/96 2:50pm
I have received a couple of calls from Allen Swaboda and Steve Hansen re: the change in drive location on the proposed office sites. I realize that there
were some errors in the information submitted and that our original "approval" was based on inacurate data, BUT I also understand that moving the
driveway to increase the separation from the intersection and the U-turn lane adds a significant cost for crossing the drainage channel. I also understand that
Kent has no problems with the proposed location. as planned (and last time I looked the. City Engineer has the authority and responsibility to deal with this).
Based on the above, I have advised Hansen and Swaboda that we will do the following in order to keep the drive at the requested location:
1. Work with them in a variance application, or,
2. Work with them in modifying the u-turnlane curbs, barriers, etc, subject to TxDOT approval (I made no commihnents to $$$ for modifications, stating
only that maybe we pay'for it, maybe they pay for it, maybe we share costs), or if 1 or2 above cannot be accomplished;
3. We accept the proposed location (I based this 3rd alternative on my understanding that Kent had no problems with this concept).
I will askthat they make every effort to accomplish 1 and 2 above before we result to the last alternative. Time is of the essence in this project as it is one of
the three sites under consideration by Merrill Lynch. I have given them assurances that they can proceed with their plans to develop with the drive as
proposed.
Jane and Kent- Please see to it that the planning and engineering gang work to accomplish # 1 or 2 before we have. to resort to #3.
Shirley- Please put a copy of this note into the project file.
I will put the above in the form'of a letter to Allen S. and will cc a copy. to the project file.
CC: snoe, eash
From: Jane Kee
To: dcharanza
Date: 12/ 12/95 10:22am
Subject: Allen Swoboda
Wants to look at developing front part of Emerald Forest where lus office building is, out to the By-Pass. Wants to talk access, roads, utilities, zoning. Deb
- please fmd a time where the 4 of us can meet with him. Tomorrow morning may be a good possibility since we have no PRC. thanks. Call Allen at
693-3223 when you haves time.
CC: svolk, vmorgan,ehard
t
0
o ~
o
ti ~
z
-- ~ -._ .
.~ ~ ~ -„~.
~~ ~ ~
~~~
a~ ~~~ p
i a
0.75 oc - ~' ~Q' ~~
'i:--~' '~~~
m
.. '~, o
w
O
Q
_ ~
' I ~/ ~' ~ N
V' ~'') /~
~ ~ ~ .~
N
~ 5.11 ac
s ~ z 6
4.48 total ac a°' I,
`~ ~~~ ~1
~ ~
v ~~.~.
v~ -
.9 z`
M _ ~~
C5 ~ ,,
C9 C6 ,,~ 4.33 ac
N 6-
54.01'
S 89°16`04" W
C12
Q N S 0°35'48" E
h--- ~ 221.14'
V / N
~.
' tl7 `..
N ~ ~ ~ o
1.90 'ao ~ v
0.79 ac
s9~~.~,9~ ~~ 3
~`~S, 162.25' 1.19 ac
F 1o4.1T,
N 81.24'53„ W 131.03': 18.)5'
N 85°13'44" W C1 78°75'
C2
' ~ 0 120' S 7g'33`29" E C3
A , RIVE 230'
~u~
E
R I~ L D p RIVE
gRKINq~,
~ ~ ~ ~e
3g~ ti ~~~~
v 7~ ~ ,~ .~~ ~ ~
- ~-~
~~~
~',~_
~~~~~~~-
+~~ ,
From: Shirley Volk
To: City of College Station.City Ha11(TBRYMER), JCALLA...
Subject: Dev Review- Merrill-Lynch -Reply -Reply -Reply
I spoke with Allen Swoboda today about this. attd told him he could actually turn in everything (master preliminary plat, final plat, site plan with construction
& building documents) at once at the next deadline if he wants to, He indicated he probably could not get everything done by then since that deadline is
2/14, but he would probably be turning in the master preliminary plat then with the final plat following within a week or two, for scheduling 2 weeks after
the preliminary plat. As soon as we get anything which: constitutes something that makes all this "public record", we can let the HOA know about it. As far
as any rezoning, according to our records, nothing will have. to be rezoned) It's all. already in place. ~--
»> Jim Callaway 02/01/96 03:29pm»>
We will make the HOA aware of the project just as soon as something is turned in for review. Until then we are in a "wait and see" (other
builder/developers maybe working with this same group). We will pay attention to landscape and buffers BtTT this thing will be so far from the residential
area that buffering won't be as relevant as landscaputg for appearance. FYI- Staff was visited by one of the Emerald Forest home owners (in a separate and
unrelated visit)- his comment was that he wants to "fight e a-p zoning" -whatever that means.
»> Tom Brymer 01/31/96 1i45am »>
I agree, the. sooner you get the Emerald Forest HOA ut the loop, ttte better off we and the developer will be. Please expedite that occurring ,thanks. I
think we need to pay particular attention to landscape buffers between )his property and the adjacent single family residene s. Keep me in the loop on this
one.,. and since I live there, I'll keep my ears open too. ~~ 1 ~ /
»> Jim Callaway-01/30/96 04: Optn »> f GO C~
I spoke with :Steve Hansen re: a :proposed office. building. at the Em ForestlE. Bypass interchange.
He willbe working with M. Lynclx (owner) and Swoboda (Developer) to construct toh building. M. Lyttclris oti a very short time frame due to lease on
current office. Swoboda will be platting, Keatingwill be the eotisulting engineer: Swoboda will do a prelimplat, etc. for the whole property and a final
plat of the building site. Steve explained the time problem and I offered our standard "fast track" with:
Final plat of first phase to run: concurrently with masterprelim for the whole tract;
Site plan, DDP etc. to run concurrently with plats;
Building permit submission to take place as soon as site plan approval is completed.
Please watch for this project - I told Steve that. you will. be his point of contact. Let me know if you find arty problems. Also- Jane, Shirley- We may need
to do some utfonnation sharing with the Koine owners assoc. in Em. Forest.
CC: City of College Station:City Hall(jkee),
a
From: Shirley Volk
To: City of College Staton.City Hall(TBRYMER), JCALLA...
Subject: Dev Review- Merrill-Lynch -Reply -Reply -Reply
There's been a bit of a change since I sent you mail on this yesterday. Allen Swoboda, Keating & Hansen came in and met with Ed Hard & I today. This
time they had a preliminary plat which was more detailed than. those we .looked at before,. and I was able to ascertain that the will need to rezone the small
left-over A-O zoned tract where Allen's sales office sets if they want to use it for pernianent otaice development. Allen said he .thought they had done that
years ago (pre-1980), but according to the descriptions in the ordinances of that area, that small tract was left out. I gave them copies of the old ordinances.
and Debbie Keating will check ahem via computer and compare that to what we have figured out. If hers are "better", we'll use them!
Anyway, their plan now is to tum in the rezoning request on 2/14 for 3/7 P&Z acid 3/28 Council. The plats, impact studies, constniction docs, etc. will be
turned in on2/28 for 3/21 P&Z and 4/1:1 Council if the Council meeting.. is still applicable.
Ed basically agreed to the concept. presented today, Witte an indication that before he gave the final "blessing" on drive & street locations, he would have to
have a bit more information, but it appeared to him that it would probably be accept<~ble as shown.
As soon as we get anapplication-in here: we will be contacting the HOA there. Allen is already thinking about including a 30 foot tree-d buffer between is
development and the residential yards which back up to it.
»> Jim Callaway 02/01/96 03:29pm »>
We will make the HOA aware of the project just as soon as something is turned in for review. Until then we are in a "wait and see" (other
builder/developers may be working with this same group). We wily pay. attention to landscape and buffers $UT this thing will be so far from the residential
area that buffering won't be as relevant as landscaping for appearance. FYL- Staff was visited by one of the Emerald Forest. home owners (in a separate and
unrelated visit}, his coimnent was that he wants to "fight the a-p zoning" -whatever that means.
»> Tom Brymer 01/31/96 11:45am »>
T agree, the sooner you get the Emerald Forest HOA in the loop, the better off we and the developer will be. Please expedite that occurring ,thanks. I
think we need to pay particular. attention. to landscape but~'ers between this property. and the adjacent. single family residences. Keep me in the loop onthis
one., and since T live there, Pll keep my ears opera too.
»> Jun Callaway O1/30/96 04aOpm »>
I spoke with Steve Hansen re: a proposed office building atthe Em Forest/E. Bypass interchange.
He will be working. with M. Lynch f owner} and Swoboda (Developer} to construct toh building. M. Lynch is on a very short time frame due to lease on
current office. Swoboda will be platting; Keating will be the consulting engineer. Swoboda will do a prelim plat, etc: for the whole property and a final
plat of the building site. Steve explained the time problem and I offered our standard "fast track" with:
Final plat of fast phase to run concurrently with master prelim for the whole tract;
Site plan, DDP etc. to nui concurrently with plats;
Building permit submission to take peace as soon as site plan approval is completed.
Please watch for this project - I told Steve that you will be :his point of contact. Let me know if you find any problems. Also- Jaue, Shirley- We may need
to do some information sharing with the home owners assoc. in Em. Forest.
CC: City of College. Station.City Hall(jkee},
o :'
o T
0
~- w
Z
~~
ii ~~.
i, ~
I ~~
I o~
' ` ~~
PO
I'~ ~~/
i
~ 0.75 ac ~~` ~~ Q
m
~' /~ o° W
ti ~ ~ ^~ ~ ~
ii _ ~ ~ ~
I N Q ~~ J ~' ~ N
J ~ ~° ~ Z
_ti N ^ ~ `~'
V, a 5.11 ac I
r_ `~ _ ~ ~
1
_ 1
4.48 total ac a°~
1
s
- i ao
r
i ~.. ~ z
°° -C10 ~~ Cg _~.
M - ~ \\ ~~
__
Z._ N C9 c6 ~_. ~ 4.33 ac
i
54.Oi `
1_..~ S 89°16'04" W
___-- c12
~ ~-T ~, S 0.35' 48" E ___..
_..___. N 221.14'
,J;~ 2
1 ~
i1 cV U
o
~.J 1..90 ac C~ ~
9 0.79 ac
s ,~, 0 3
9~~®' 9~,
~s 162.25 1.19 oc
F 104.17'
N 81°24'53" W 131.03' 18.75
N 85.13'44" W Ct 18.75
C2
° S 79.33 ~ -----_._. _.
120` 29 f C3
A ~~ ~ RIVE 230'
IV R q ~ ~---
L q~ R K YV q~ RIVE
~.~ ~ -~ ~
~•~ CITY ®~ C~LL.~~E STATI~I`I
`~ Post Office Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas 77842-9960
(409) 764-3500
March 20, 1996
Ms. Deborah L. Keating, P.E.
Urban Design Group
P.O. Box 1O1S3
College Station, TX :77842 ~ '
Re :Location of Gemstone. Preliminary Plat, Emerald Plaza Park.
Dear Debbie:
The City's Driveway Ordinance requires that Gemstone drive be located a minimum of 230' from
Emerald Parkway. The ordinance also requires that it be no, closer than 1.00' from the striped gore
for the entrance ramp to S.H. 6. Using aerial photography and applying these requirements, there
appears to be a section of approximately 230 feet in which this roadway could take access to the
SH 6 East Frontage Road.
In light of the above, the; proposed location of Gemstone will need to be moved north a minimum of
80 fcet to be the proper. distance from Emerald Parkway. It can be moved no further than`250 feet
north in order to remain .the proper distance away from the 'entrance rair-p. All things considered,
.:staff feels the optimum location for the rt~ailway would be approxunately 80-100 feet north of its
proposed location.
If these requirements make access to the Frontage Road no longer viable, staff will be available at
your convenience to review alternative layouts in order to expedite this development,
If you have any questions or if I can be of further assistance, please don°t hesitate to call me at
764-3570.
Sincerely,
~'~- -~'
Edwin Hard, AICP
Transportatign Planner
cc: Kent Laza, City Engineer
Veronica. Morgan,Asst' City Engineer
Shirley Volk, Development Coordinator
Home of 'Texas A&M (Iniversity
Staff :Project Review Committee Meeting
March 20, 1996
PRELIMINARY PLAT
Emerald Plaza Park (96-301)
Reauirements
Underground service required on all new and upgrades in electrical services.
Electric Service Request Form (see attached) fill out and .return.
Developer is responsible for 20% of the cost of electrical service.
Developer installs all conduit per city design and requirements on property.
.Developer installs transformers pad and Junction box pads per city spec.
Temporary .Blanket Easement needed. (see attached) fill out and return with
property description,
Information Needed
Service Voltage (Single phase 120/240 volt is readily available.)
(Three phase voltage, closet available fine is south of the
ARC property. )
Electric Load Data (total kW)
Outside disconnect required.
~es~Aa~.t~~l~ 'Y`~r S~re~~~~y~fo~~ ~s~vs~'ca:ate
lJrban JJesign Group
March 13, 1996
Shirley Volk, Development Review Coordinator
Development Services Department
City of College Station
P.O. Box 9960
College Station, Texas 77842-9960-
Re: Preliminary Plat, Emerald Plaza Park
Dear Shirley,
Attached please find the preliminary plat submittal information for the Emerald Plaza Park Subdivision.
With this submittal, the developer. is requesting a variance from the Subdivision Ordinance for the
requirement of extension of utilities and provision for access to some of the lots within the proposed
subdivision. His intent is to obtain legal documents that will tie the. adjacent lots together, such that they
can not be soldndividually resulting in a platted lot without utility service or access. The request is for
lots 6, 7, 8, and 9 only.. These lots are adjacent to Emerald Forest Phase One. The current adjacent
homeowners in Phase One desire to purchase the proposed lots to provide additional buffer to their
existing lots.
If you need additional information to process this variance request, please let me know.
Sincerely,
~~~
Deborah L. Keating, P.E.
Partner, .Urban Design Group
cc: Allen Swoboda, Haldec, Inc.
Post Office Box 10153 College Station, Texas. 77342 409 • 69 6 • 9653
~~~ CITY OF COLLEGE STATIOI~I
Post Office Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas 77842-9960
(409) 764-3500
.pages
pate
7671 ~ ~ _
.Note
March 20 1996 post-it®Fax ~~ From ~~ ~
Co
Ms. Deborah L. Keating, P.E.
:.Urban Design Group
P.O. Box 10153
College Station, T~ 77$42 _ ___ - -
Re :Location of Gemstone. Preliminary Plat, Emerald Plaza Park.
Dear Debbie:
The City's Driveway Ordinance requires that Gemstone drive be located a minimum of 230' from
Emerald Parkway. The ordinance also requires that it be no closer than 100' from the striped gore
for the entrance ramp Uca S.H. 6. Using aerial photography and applying these requirements, there
appears to be a section of approximately 230 feet in which this roadway could take access to the
SH 6 East Frontage Road.
In light of the above, the proposed location of Gemstone will need to be moved north a inimum of
80 feet to be the proper distance from Emerald Parkway. Tt can be moved no further than 250 feet
north in order to remain the proper distance away from the entrance ramp. All things considered,
staff feels the optimum location- for the roadway would be approximately 80-10!D feet north of its
proposed location.
If these requirements make access to the Frontage Road no longer viable, staff will be available at
your convenience to review alternative layouts in order to expedite this development.
If you have any questions or if I can be of further assistance, please don't hesitate to call me at
764=3570.
Sincerely,
Edwin Hard, AICP
Transportation Planner
ce: Kent Laza, City Engineer
Veronica Morgan, Asst. City Engineer
Shirley Volk, Development Coordinator
To _ ,e '~ .
Co.IDePt• I/ PhonE
phone # Fax ~
a ~~
Fax# ~~ ~ ---
Home of Texas A&M university
~ i
I
I~
;~ _
c
..
..
_ ~ _.
I -
_ V
~~
1'
i
i~+~
~ - - -
{. _
b~• ..
..
7 ~ ..
'-~ 1LL~
,~ _
-1..y~~~
~_ ~ ~ Q ~. n
~ ~ ~` `L~ ~ tD fia ' ,~~ ~ ~'
''F
s ~ to ~
,~~F Tl
v,
~~ ~
^'
W
I _
M+ \.~:
1 1V
..
I ~ -r.~~..r, v FjQ'
n
~ ~.
~~.
t~ ~
n ~
w
i ~ 1~
~. i ~ ~~ ~~. k ~ 3 ~ ~y ~ ~
-~' .. -a
~ ~ Fes, ~~, _ --~ ~~ ~::~ ~- ~,,'
I
s
~k.-.;
- I C I~l
~•- CITY OF C®LLEGE STATIOI`I
Post Office Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas 77842-9960
(409) 764-3500 ~
h, •'~ _/
~~
~f
March 20, 1996 ~, ' ti`s
~~~
. ~ ~~,
Ms. Deborah L. Keating, P.E.
Urban Design Group
P.O. Box 10153
College Station, TX 77842
Re :Location of Gemstone. Preliminary Plat, Emerald Plaza Park.
Dear Debbie:
The City's Driveway Ordinance requires that Gemstone drive be located a atrinimum of 230' from
Emerald Parkway. The ordinance also. requires that it be no closer than 100' from the striped gore
for the entrance ramp to S.Ho 6. Using aerial photography and applying these regturements, there
appears to be a section of approximately 230 feet in which this roadway could take access to the
SH 6 East Frontage Road.
In light of the above, the proposed location of Gemstone will need to be moved north a minimum of
80 feet to be the proper,distance from Emerald Parkway. It can be moved no further than 250 feet
north in order to remain the proper distance away:from the'entrance ramp.; All things considered,
staff feels the optimum location for the roadway would be approximately 80-100 feet north `of its
proposed,location.
If -these requirements make access to the Frontage Road no longer viable, staff will be available at
your convenience to review alternative layouts in ordea'to expedite this development.
If you have any questions or if I can br of further assistance; please don't hesitate to call me at
764-3570.
.Sincerely,
Edwin Hard, AICP
Transportation Plaauter
cc: Kean Laza City Engineer
Veronica Morgan,. Asst. City Engineer
Shirley Volk, Development Coordinator
Home of 't`exas A&M Qniversity
;•h4.::.~}4t\'v{>.:.:::::::.::?i:}:::::fiiii::: ~..:::;4..::44:\ 4•.•. \v::v }~,~ $~: ..:....:....... v4: n':{~n
~X Regular Item
Consent Item
Statutory Item
Item Submitted By:
Sabine Kuenzel, Senior Planner
April 25, 1996
residential and commercial areas.
planned,
Item: Consideration of 'a preliminary plat of Emerald Plaza Park, a subdivision of
approximately 20.13 acres. into nine A-P Administrative/Professional lots located on the
northeast comer of State Highway 6 and Emerald Parkway. Application is in the name
of Allen Swoboda. (96-301)
Item Summary: The. plat layout. shows five office lots. with four lots to be sold to the
individual''residential lots to the east. The .four. lots do not. meet the standards for
subdivided lots, however, due to the fact that they are to be used to assure that some
type of buffering occur to protect the abutting residential areas, ..Staff recommends
approval with approval of the variances.
Financial Summary: n/a
Staff Recommendation: Approval of the. preliminary plat and variance with
Presubrnission Conference conditions. The P&Z voted unanimously to recommend
approval with Staff conditions.
City Attorney.Recommendation; No concerns expressed.
Council Action Desired: Approval or denial of request.
Supporting ..Materials:
1. Area map
2. Staff report
3. Presubmission Conference report
4. Application
5. Copy of'Preliminary Plat
6. P & Z Minutes
o:lgroupkleve serlcvshtU6-301.doc
For Council Meeting Of:
Director Approval
City Manager. Approval:
~-~
:,
:y
w..: .:n.
1~;..
~~'a
t.~.
~~,~ ~
i
ti" ~
.... 1 ~ ' -
~;
? aj
` },
, n
VI
i
J -~~
- a®
Aw
/" ~
ati
me
a~'
,~_
.~ .,
~ ~' I ~- ~ _
\ ~ -.~
~..-r-,,~,~m.Q,~.,Q,~,--.. _....._
._ _ k.
-- - _ - - - r -~.
--. _ _ _ mss,, _ - r--,-.,r,_.__
lI r \
+ --_•_-
..
-~ - - -_ -
i ._--a.~- 1,.,~
I _.
~ v I ~ ~.
3 5~~.
:d- ~ ~, ,P ...
o
/~_ ~\_ T....
ti -- -
~ - Lori ~ I
-~ <M u
.~
~- ~ c~
~ ~~ ~ ~
C I i ~ II
J +.inmll
1
W, ~ ~_I _
O
.-- ,Z
I ~ - ~
fi 1 I e
( ~ '
I ~~
I I
I
V i
I
00 ~ ~~
o~ N ~ ~ I ~ '
/~® ~ r ~~+
~, tiw~
~ ~ _
'~ ~N i
~ ~ ~
~ 3 '
~ ~ ~ - ~ ~
1 ~~ ~ ~
~ - ~ i
Z A
I \~ I ~ ~ ~
PII~i4'~OaS I
~~~ ` " ~ ~ '
~ ~ I \
1 • ' ~ ~~ ~ ' ..ice J ' I 11
fib` ~ q -+- ~
~ ~ ~,L
IP IDM
(r~ i
~~ ~
-~r(J ~. -- --1 - ~' ~
~ ~ I
-.-,.~-:~, I
I
~} ~ ~ III ~
p I ~ ~~
' ~ f C`J .. ~ , ~ ~ ' ,!1
LLJ ni+opµ vv UC`0 ~ I
.~ ' i
I
- I
,~- ~ I
in w ~ i
i- ~ ~ I
~'» 4' ,~ I
Q I
.o v~~v~ ~ ~ , I -
J ~ Q ~ ~
W v ~J ++~ ~ ~ ~ p '
U~~, QQ.o~ I I _ I
~~ _
bM ~~N~ ~;-,~,, .~
PRESUBMISSION CONFERENCE REPORT '
March 20, 1996
TO: Allen Swoboda
1607 Emerald Parkway, College Station, TX 77845
Deborah Keating,. Urban Design Group
909' Southwest Parkway, Suite E, College Station, TX 77840
FROM:. Project Review .Committee
Sabine Kuenzel, Senior Planner
.Kent Laza, City Engineer
Larry Lightfoot,. P&Z Representative
Others .Attending
Natalie>Thomas, Planning Technician
Shirley'Volk, Development Coordinator
Tony Michalsky, Electrical .Operations Coordinator
Laverne Akin, G.T.E. Representative
Don Fazzino, Lone Star Gas Representative
SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat -Emerald Plaza Park; proposed subdivision of approximately
20,13 acres into nine Administrative Professional lots generally located on the
northeast corner of State Highway 6 and Emerald Parkway. (96-301)
A Presubmission Conference meeting: was held Wednesday, March 20, 1996 to discuss the above
mentioned. preliminary plat. The., following. is a list of ordinance requirements identified. by
the Presubmission Conference. -This list does not relieve the applicant of total compliance
with all current ordinance requirements.
Ordinance Reduirements:
® According'to the City's: Driveway Ordinance, the proposed location of Gemstone will need
to be moved north a minimum of 80' to be the proper distance from Emerald Parkway. It
can be moved no further than 250' north in order to remain the. proper distance away from
the entrance ramp. All things considered, staff feels the optimum location for the roadway
would be approximately 80 - 100' n®rth of its .proposed. location. If these requirements
make access to the Frontage. Road no longer viable, staff will be available to review
alternative layouts in order to expedite this development.
_ Show the existing entrance ramp along the State Highway 6 frontage road to include the
distance from the proposed Gemstone from the gore.
Show the floodway on the preliminary plat .drawing.
PRC Report
Emerald Plaza Park
Case #96-301
Page 2 of 2
Ordinance Requirements cont.):
Add a general note pertaining to lots 6 - 9 concerning the lack of utilities and access and
that they are not buildable lots.
_ Submit the: necessary documentation for a Letter of Map Amendment to FEMA in order
to re-establish the floodplain since the fill has been placed on the site.
Comments/Concerns:
Three phase electrical.. service is available south of the Agency Records Control .property
across Emerald Parkway. Coordinate service details and cost estimates with .Electrical
Operations Coordinator Tony Michalsky at (409) 764-3660. Since Gemstone is a public
street, the developer will be responsible for street lighting according to-City Specifications.
_ Coordinate telephone .service details with G.T.E. Representative Laverne Akin at (409)
820-4723.
_ Coordinate gas service details with Lone Star Gas Representative Don Fazzino at (409)
776-0627.
SUBMIT 13 COPIES OF THE REVISED FINAL. PLAT BY WEDNESDAY, MARCH 27,
1996 TO BE INCLUDED IN THE PLANNING -AND ZONING COMMISSION PACKETS
FOR THE MEETING OF °THURSDAY, APRIL 4, 1996. THE CITY COUNCIL WII.,L
CONSIDER THE' FINAL PLAT ON THURSDAY,. APRIL 25, 1996. BOTH MEETINGS
WII.,L BE HELD AT ?:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL ROOM OF THE COLLEGE STATION
CITY HALL LOCATED AT 1 lOT TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH.