HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff ReportR
.. .. -
STAFF REPORT
Case No.: 96-112
Request: Rezoning of 21.49 acres located approximately 500' south of Morgan's
Lane and adjacent and to the north of Tributary A of Bee Creek, from R-1
Single .Family to C-l General Commercial
Applicants Joe Fazzino for Pleasant Forest Partnership
ITEM SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION
The. subject property is part of the 2818 Extension area, which was studied several years
ago in anticipation of the new roadway. Due to this major change in the area, .anew Land
Use Plan that would. accommodate additional. commercial development and slightly higher
residential developments was adopted. The plan shows mostly commercial development
along Texas Avenue, with. a node of low density .residential development around the Mile
Drive Subdivision between two "buffer" areas. These buffers .consist of a man-made
buffer on the south that was a condition of the service station development and the natural
buffer that exists along the creek. The residents of Mile Drive participated in the public
hearings that took place when the new plan was-adopted and had expressed opposition to
the encroachment of commercial development on his well-established neighborhood. At
that time, they agreed to some commercial north of the creek but only with an adequate
buffer .along the creek.
Staff has-discussed the recent trend of;the City to discourage reclamation of floodplain
areas with .representatives of the applicant. The property owners have asked that. they be
permitted to reclaim at least a portion of the floodplain, due to the fact that a major
portion of the property is contained withinthe 100..year floodplain. The requirement for
the dedication of Dartmouth right-of--way through the subject tract. further reduces the
developable land on the-tract. In this;particular case, Staffwould recommend hat some of
the floodplain be allowed to be reclaimed as long as the floodway remains undisturbed in
order to serve as' a natural buffer area to the residential node to the south as shown om the
Plan. The total width of the floodway in this particular case is approximately 350' and,
roughly two thirds of the floodway is on the subject property. In addition,_this floodway
happens to be heavily wooded, and can serve as a substantial buffer without additional
floodplain dedication: In addition, Staff recommends that the floodway be taken out of
the zoning request to further ensure. that it is not disturbed and that there be no confusion
to future owners of the property.
' The Land Use Plan that was adopted with the 2818 Extension Study shows retail
commercial on the front portion of the tract with medium. density residential on the back
portion. The applicant is requesting.'C- on the entire property in an effort to make the
entire tract more developable, The 2818 study shows additional medium density to the
north, which is currently occupied by two single family homes. The Dartmouth extension
could serve as a ,zoning boundary betweem the proposed C-1 and the existing and future
residential. Along the'side of the property. where the proposed C-1 would immediately
abut residential, the same buffer yard as prescribed in the R&D district should be required
to protect the residential uses.
Staff recommends approval with the following conditions:
1
a+-` `
ZONING AND LAND USE
1. No disturbance. of the floodway
2. Floodway remain R-1
3. Buffer between abutting R-1 (future medium density residential) and requested C-1
Subject Tract:
North:
East:
South:
West:
Proposed Use:
R-1; vacant
A-P Administrative Professional and R-1; developed as
Rosewood Medical center and rural residential
C-1; developed as Crystal Park Plaza
R-1 across the creek; used as a mobile home park
C-1 across Texas Avenue; developedas mix of retail uses
None as yet
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Land Use Plam: Retail Commercial along Texas Avenue for
approximately half of the depth of the property and Medium Density Residential
on the remainder.
Thoroughfare Plan: .The future extension of Dartmouth is shown along the
northern. boundary of the parcel -any .development of the tract will need to
include this extension.
Development Policies: Development policies .for .this particular area would
support commercial and higher density developments due to the topographical
constraints. of the land as well as the locations of major roadways.
Parkland Dedication: None required for commercial land.
ENGINEERING
Water: There is a 12 inch water line located in the east right-of--way of Texas
Avenue. This line. is more than; adequate to serve this proposed rezoning.
Sewer: There is an 18 inch sewer line located within the subject property. This
line is capable of servicing this rezoning.
Streets: The property has frontage on Texas Avenue, a major arterial. This
street has the capacity to support the increased traffic generated by commercial
zoning. The Thoroughfare Plan indicates that Dartmouth will be extended from
its current terminus at Southwest Parkway to Texas Avenue. at Brothers
a
A .-
Boulevard. The developer' will be responsible. for dedicating the appropriate
right-of--way at the .time of platting and construct the street at the time of site
construction..
Drainage: The drainage issue will be reviewed at the time of site plan submittal.
Flood Plain:• This property has. a large area of floodway, as well as floodplain,
located. within its boundaries. The applicant .has addressed the possibility of
reclaiming. a .portion of the floodplain in the future. This potential reclamation
will. be reviewed when the site plan and hydraulic study is submitted.
NOTIFICATION:
Legal Notice Publication(s)s 8-7-96 and 8-17-96
Advertised Commission Hearing Dates(s): 8-1-96
Advertised Council Hearing Dates: 8-22-96
Number of Notices Mailed to Property Owners. Within 200': 12
Response Received: One inquiry as of date of staff report
HISTORICAL. OVERVIEW
Very few G1 property has been created recently. Most of the cases that have been
approved for C=1 since 1990 have been "clean-up" rezonings, which consolidated property
for development or redevelopment purposes. There have been several recent cases where
C-1 property was rezoned to accommodate larger multi-family developments.