HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous' '
,~~-,
~f v` r.~,
~~
/ ~~ ~ ~ ~'
f
ar `.~/ 1oA~ ~/C i .
~-~~~ ~ z
~~ ~.
~~~IL~ . '"~`' - -. ~~~
-~ - _
..
~,, - _
i ~.
K. L. Karnes Construction Co., Is.~c.
5305 Trail Iake Drive
Fort Worth Texas 76133
817-294-2700
Memorandum
Date: 11/15/95
~-~~ ~ ~~ .Veronica Morgan. P. E.
~Frc rl: Randy Kopplin
~~t7 ` -
RE: Edelwiess Phase 3A
36 Unit Assisted Living Facility
~~~~~~
9
We have calculated the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee for the above referenced project as follows:
(36 Living Units) x (.75 factor). x ($152.18) _ $41 Q8.86
~''~ e ~
Would please confum that our calculations are correct. ~
Thank you for your assistance.
w
went
f a c s i m i l e
To: Veronica Morgan, P.E.
Company.'
Fax Number.' +1 (409) 764-3496
Business Phone:
From: Randy Kopplin
Fax iVumber.' +1 {817) 377-1794
Business Phone:
Home Phone:
Pages: 2
Date/Time: 11/15/95 2:41:38 PM
Subject' Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee
Assisted Living Facility
Pale 2 of 2
Case #96-506
Co/mments/Concerns:
/ Coordinate electrical service details with Electrical Operations Coordinator Tony
® Michalsky at (409) 764-3660. ~~"~
/ The 20' underground electrical easement shown on the final plat should be changed to a
20' public utility easement. Coordinate telephone service details with G.T.E.
Representative Laverne Akin at (409) 821-4723.
V The plans from Mike McClure should include:
Water line plans for interior waterlines including fire hydrants.
e Sprinkler connection {siamese) which the fire department would like to have near the
fire hydrant and away from the building if at all possible.
`~
ADA ramp details for ramps constructed on public sidewalks.
® Grading details with curb openings.
® Drainage details including flumes, headwalls, etc.
:-~
~8. Designate number of parking spaces required by ~~rdinance and provided by proposal.
L~19. Show dimensions to size and locate all structures; parking spaces, drives, curb cuts, parking islands, and
setbacks,
~'~ ^ 20. Are there impact fees associated with his development?
~~~,/
^ 21. Provide a water and sanita-y sewer legend to include water demands (minimum, maximum and average
demands in galhns per minute) and sewer loadings (.maximum demands. in gallons per day).
^ 22 Show all meter locations and note their sizes..
The following are typical standards for Plan Development established by Ordinance or Policy:
~r'f 1. Building separation is a minimull~ of l5 feet.
~1 2. Building setbacks are outlined in Ordinance 1638, Zoning Ordinance, Table A (Sec. 7, P. 30)
~3. Minimum parking space is 9' ~ 20', or on a perimeter ro\v, 9' x 1'8' with a 2' overhang.
4. Minimum drive width is 23' with. head-in parking or 20' without parking.
5. Raised landscaped islands, (6" raised curb) of a minimum of 180 sq. ft. are located at both ends of every
parking row. Additionally, 180 sq. ft. of landscaping for every I5 interior parking spaces must be
provided.
^ 6. Streetscape compliance is required \uhich Involves special plantings along streets specified in the City's
Streetscape Plan.
^ 7. A 6" raised :curb. is required around all edges. of all. parts of all paved areas without exception. (To
include islands, planting areas, access ways, dumpster locations, utility pads, etc.) .Curb detail to be
approved by City En,ineer. No exceptions will be made for areas designated as "reserved for future
f parking"
l~ 8. Wheelstops may be required on interior rows longer than 10 spaces or in special situations.
~9. Sidewalks .are required at time of development if property has frontage. on a street shown on the
sidewalk Master Plan or if the Project Revlew Committee determines the .necessity. (Refer to Section
10.2 of the Zoning Ordinance).
10. Locations of dumpsters shall be such that dumpsters are not visible from streets. Gates are discouraged
and visual screening is required.
"l. Healthy, native trees over 6" in caliper should be retained whenever possible.
^ i2. Fire lanes of a minimum of 20 feet in width with a minimum height clearance of l~ feet must be
established if any structure of any type is more than l50 feet from a public street or highvvay.
^ 13. Any structure inany zoning district other than R-l, R-1A, or R-2 must be within 300 feet of a fire
hydrant as measured along a public street or highway,
^ 14. Fire hydrants must be located on the same side of a major street as a project, and shall be in a location
approved by the City Engineer.
^ 15. Fire hydrants must be operable and accepted by the City and drives must have an all weather surface
before a building permit can be issued.
~16. A twenty four foot setback from R.O.W. to curb of parking lot is required. Parking may be allowed in
this area up to a maximum of 7 contiguous spaces.
^ I7. All plans must include irrigation systems for landscaping. Irrigation meters .are separate from the regular water
systems for buildings and must be sized accordingly and include backflo\v prevention protection.
~' CITY OF COLLEGE STATIOI`I
Post ®ffice i3ox 9360 1101 'Texas Aaenue
College Station, Texas 77842-9360
(403) 764-3500
PLAN EXAMINATION
PERSONAL CARE FACILITY --3901 VICTORIABOAD
1. damp proofing under slab, mina. 6 mils polyethylene
2. need clarification ; a) location of beams under bearing. walls
b) detail for bay window foundation
3. type K copper only under slab
4. all water lines inside building shall be copper only
5. need indirect coimection ender kitchen sinks, ex. rinse sink, dishwashing sink, etc.
6. need truss details and layout from truss plate and signed by engineer
7, need exterior main disconnecting means for electrical system
8, need location of all paneUload centers and layout.
9. sprinkler system shall be include in the fire alarm system
10. need fire damper at 1 hour ceiling penetration
11. need panic type lyardware on exterior exit doors
12. ramp shall not exceed 1:12 slope
13. door SF1 & SF2 shall be 44" wide
14. is this design as per SBCCI CODES, notes on plan indicate building is design to the NATIONAL
BUILDING
15. connecfion behind bathtub shall have access panels.
Any question regarding this plan review please feel free to call me at 409-764-3744
Thank you,
'~.~o~~if----~
'Carl Warren, Plan Examiner
kloane ®f 'Texas Al;l~ CIn6versit3r
JAMES E. NEELY
.:ARCHITECT
1003 NORTH 9TH STREET
VAN BUREN, ARKANSAS 72956
Telephone (501)474-3278
3-20-96
ADDENDUM
THIS ADDENDUM SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER PLANS TITLED,
39 UNIT PERSONAL CARE. FACILITY,
COLLEGE 'STATION TEXAS,
COMM N0. C-262, DATED 12-7-94,
LAST REVISION DATE 3-8-96.
'1) ALL DRIVE & PARKING CONCRETE SHALL BE 6" THICK WITH
#3 BARS 18" ON CENTER (SEE CONC NOTES. SH #5).
~~' i~~
ES E. NEELY, ARCH'T.
February 27, 1996
Mr. Kris. Carter, Regional Project Manager
Gilliland Construction Ca
P. O. Box 347
Scranton, AR 72863
Dear Mr. Carter:
As 1 indicated in .our telephone conversation a few minutes ago, the City staff is
having a great deal of difficulty in reviewing the plans submitted on 2-1496,
because the site plan is incomplete, and it really .isn't at all like the site plan
submitted by K. L. Karnes Construction Co. and reviewed by the staff in
November 1995.
Normally the steps in the .review process are as follows: (1)Applicant submits 16
copies of site plan, grading plan, drainage plan and- landscape .plan for review.
(2)Project Review Committee reviews .plan and votes on the project. In this
particular case, .the PRC voted to approve the plan with certain spec:,ific
conditions. (3)AppJicant revises the plans to comply with conditions of approval
and submits 4 sets of full building/site construction plans with those 'revised
site/grading/drainage/landscape plans attached. (4)City .reviews. plans. and
redlines with conditions for compliance and returns on 5th working'.:.. day to
applicant for revisions. (5)Applicant -makes revisions and resubmits 4 complete
sets of plans for review for compliance (done within 5 working days). (6)Jf plans
approved, applicant pays. fees and ..receives building. permit and drainage
development permit.
To date the staff has reviewed the building -plans .submitted and has the
following comments pertaining to the items missing from the site plan: (1 ).Need
vicinity map, {2)Need temporary blanket easement. prior to issuance of building
permit, (3)Need all water_& sewer & irrigation demands (minimum & maxirnurn in
gallons per minute and gallons .per day (sewer) so City can. size meters, (4)Need
waterline plans for interior, including.. fire hydrant(s), (5)Sprinkler connection
(Siamese) needs to be located near the fire .hydrant area, but away from the
building -show location, (6)Need ADA details for ramps on public sidewalk -
show location, (7)Need drainage .details, including. flumes, headwalls, etc.,
(8)Need to see backflow preventor/sprinkler vault details on some set of .plans,
(9)Need detail on how driveway detail will tie into Victoria, (10)Need technical
data on fiber mesh to indicate that 4" with fiber mesh is as strong as 6" w/#3's at
18" o.c., (11)Need grading. details with curb. openings, (12)Need for fire hydrant
to be shown on site. plan so staff can determine if 1 hydrant provides coverage
for entire site, (18)Fire lanes need to be more clearly defined,. (14)Show radii of
curbing, both inside & outside, (15)Make the location of the new manhole more
clear, (16)Water meters must be located in easements,. with City maintenance up
to and including meter, and owner maintenance for service line .(from meter to
building), (17)Sca1e on ,plan is so sma11 it is barely legible -please provide
better prints.
As you can see with the above comments from the engineering division, there
are a number of problems to be addressed before. a complete .review can be
made. The planning staff has not yet made a determination as to whether or not
an additional P.R.C. review will be required. I will call you. as .soon as that
decision is made.. I am including with this .FAX a copy of the review made by the
building division. Those comments must be addressed .prior. to issuance of a
building permit. I am also including a copy of the P.R.C. report of the review of
the plans submitted by Karnes so you can see some of the items which were
missing on those .plans.. In addition, i am including a checklist that staff uses to
review plans submitted. If you will have your designer use this list in .preparing a
revised site plan, it will include the items. we use to determine compliance.
.look forward to hearing from you as to the direction you indicate. to us you
would like to take afi this point in the process. I will help you all I can.. We are
looking forward to having this facili#y developed in :College Station,
Yours very truly,
Shirley J. Volk
Development Coordinator
cc: Assisted Living Concepts
10570 SE Washington #213
Portland, OR 97216
Jane R. Kee, City Planner
File
`" ... 4
s:.
K. L. Kames Construction Co., Inc.
5305 Trail Lake Drive
Fort Worth Texas 76133
817-294-2700
Memorandum
Date: 11/15/95
'~,h-(: ~:'" Veronica Morgan. P. E.
r : ~ l.andy Kopplin
O F ~°
RE: Edelwiess Phase 3A
36 ~Jnit Assisted Living Facility
^~~~ .
~~~--
.~~. J
. _ ,
We have calculated the Sanitary Sewer Impact Fee for the above referenced project as follows:
(36 Living Units) x (.75 factor) x ($152.18).= $4108.86
Would please corrru~m that our calculations are correct. J `~t,,
U
Thank you for your assistance.
,,
G~' ~-`--'~-'
~~ ~,~~
~ U
I
~~- C~~
'~ ~„
~ ~~
~.
` PORTLAND, OREGON 97216 ~ "~ -~:.. - ~'
1503)252-6233 ~ ~ ~''
.,
JAM E. NEELY, Architect ~ !
1003 9, VAN BUREN, AR 72956 i
OFFIC~: 317 N. 5, FT. SMfTH, AR 72901
(501172-4754 ~r.t:istX'a°=~
-~coat:eption :. '"
FORR ST E. CAUDLE, Engineer ~:
100 AL,NCIT - _ ~ .~ ..
t }*
:.. ,.
BAST P. TE~CAS 78602 ` ~ ~ `
{51:21; 2~-.2085 - ~~~ ,. ~~y,•.
~,~~ n _
MIKE. e+uLURE, Enginesr ~~ ': -
t~
1722 ROAD~VIOOR, SUITE 210 - ; ,~ > . ~S };
BRA' , TEXAS 77802 ~. *`
(40~1'~~6-6700. ~.-
DATE OF SUBMITTAL: 2/14/96 ~a:'r./~~~ ® `~-~ `'~
~.Jf
SEE McCLURE ENGINEERING DRAWINGS FOR THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: {„~, .
1. OWNERSHIP AND CURRENT ZONING AF PARCEL AND ALL ABUTTING. PARCELS. ° ~
2. A KEY MAP. ~ ~~ . ~1
~ 3. TOPOGRAPHY, FINAL GRADING PLAN, AND OTHER PERTINENT DRAINAGE !/~ ~•~`
'~ INFORMATION. -'f ~~,,~.~ ;.
4'. ALl EXi$TiNti STREETS, DRIVES, BUILDINGS, ANQ WATEtit COURSES ON OR `' ~~ "
;\ ~ .
ADJACENT. TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT SITE... ~ ~ ~ - ~ !~ ~`.
5. LOCATE 1.00 YEAR FLOODPLAIN ON OR ADJACENT TO. THE PROPOSED PROJE
SITE, OR NOTE IF THEREI3 NONE ON THE SITE. ~ ~(
6. LOCATION AND SIZE OF EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN OR ADJACENT TO. T ~ `~'
i
PROPOSED PROJECT SITE. ~ G,~
~,
I N D E X ~ ~~' ~ ~, ~_ ,
~ ~ ~';
- ~ ;
SHEET ~ DESCRIPTION ~
T .
1 SITE PLAN. PAYING PLAN a GENERAL NOTES. _
r'''A.
~.
2 FLOOR PLA a
N NOTES
3 ELEVATIONS, DOOR, NtNDUN. AND..S70R<+FRONT SCIIEDI~L~ 8 NOTES F..
~:
4 CABINET~DETAIIS,.ROOM FINtSN SCNEDULE~a NO1ES _°~
5 FOUNDATION PLAN a DETAtIS
.6 FRAMING PLAN a NOTES a DETAILS ~ -
I _7 SECTIONS - _ - _ .
8 PLUMBING PLANS aNOTES -
9 IIYAC AND NOTES. _
.._ , ~
10.` ` EIECTR I CAL PLAN a NOTES
•1l LIFE SAFETY PLAN a NOTES - -
j
39 UNIT PERSONAL_CARE FACILCTY'~
COLLEGE~:STATION, TEXAS
~ ~• Y ~ , .
,c^.- ,~ ~.: ": ~ ~ ~ A ltt:l l t 11x:1'
From: Kent Laza
To: City of College Station.City Hall(SVOLK), VMORGAN
Date: 8/30/96 4:45pm
Subject: Bluebonnet House -Reply -Reply
The note on the site plan was revised to include the fibermesh after the PRC meeting. I suspect that when it was caught, we simply made them change back.
I think a letter that states "the fibermesh is not acceptable under our current standards -and therefore was not allowed" would be sufficient.
»> Veronica Morgan 08/30/96 04:26pm »>
kent and all, although i would have to go to the files to check but my recollection was...... in discussions with me about the subject i told them they could
submit technical data on the fibermesh to show it was as strong: as our steel reinforcement schedule and we could review the data. i dont ever remember the
tech data coming in for the mesh and instead the plans were changed. now i may be wrong but my first memory of the subject is -this is what happened. so i
dont know if the letter is in order. do you guys remember anythign else?
»> Shirley Volk 08/30/96 02:24pm »>
The Assisted Living Center on Victoria became the Bluebonnet House. They were issued their C.O. today. The project manager, Dave McCormick came in
to thank everyone for being so cooperative & helpful throughout the entire process. He said everyone from the City involved in either the review or
inspection process couldn't have been more helpful and fair and that if he had his choice between working here full time (with the City reviewing &
inspecting) and doing just'one job in Dallas - he would most certainly choose here! (I guess that's a compliment :)!)
He left with a request for help. On the plans which were submitted for review they proposed to us a 4" fibermesh concrete in the Fire Lane, but under
someone's specifications,during the review process they were required to change what they used, and the result was they changed to 6" 3500 psi w/#3 or #4
bar 18" o.c. both ways. This increased their cost by approximately $30,000. What they have asked is that the City write a letter statimg the City required the
change; that way, the owner will reimburse the contractor forthe additional costs.
He asked that we fax the letter to Gilliland Construction Co., Attention: Lee B. Gilliland (501)938-7075. The hard copy. can be sent to: Gilliland
Construction, P.O. Box 347, Scranton, Arkansas 72863 ATTN: Mr. Lee B. Gilliland.
Thanks for taking care of this. Please give me a copy to put in the planning files.
CC: City of College Station.City Hall(SHomeyer, SSSmit...