Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous fD ~ ~ ~• ~ ~° ~ ~c ~ ® ~°' ~ ~ o ~ ~ ;'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `~ ~' ~ ® ~ ~ _ ~E- 0 ~E ~ ~ A~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~• ~ ~ ~ ~ ---3 r~ H x ~ ~. O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ar4 ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ N O ' ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 r 0 ~ • y ~ y ~ ~ • ~ cu c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~• H y y PRC Q3-22-95 517E PLAN-SUMMIT FOURPLEXE$ EXTENSIVE OFFSITE CfJNDUIT WILL NEED TO BE INSTALLED ALONG SOUTHWOtaD DR FROM A PgWER POLE TO THE SOUTH OF'THE PROPE~tTY TD THE CORNER OF SUMMIT AND SOUTHWOOD.SOUTHINOOD WILL NEED TO BE BORED AND CONDUIT EXTENDED ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE TO AN APPROPRIATE PAD LOCATION FROM THE PAD LC)CATION,CONDUIT WILL BE NEED TO BE INSTALLED TO-EACH OF THE BUILDINGS.: THB'CUSTOMER WILL BE ASKED TO:CONTRIBUTE 20°/a C}F THE TOTAL COST OF THE JOB, FINAL PLAT-SHENANDOAH :PHASE 2 SUBDIVISION THE'CUSTOMER WILL NEED TO SUPPLY STREET LIGHTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT ALONG WITH THE 5 FT EASEMENTS AS A DESIGN IS DONE FOR THE LIGHTS. THENCUSTOMER WILL SUPPLY THE CONDUIT SYSTEM THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT... THE CUSTOMER WILL BE ASKED TO CONTRIBUTE 20%OF THE TOTAL COST OF THE JOB. 09i19i95 09.55 $409.776 0411 _ TONY JONES f~1001 SEP-16-1995 0?%22 5K1LE'E FARM~ELEIJATDR 806. 578 4214. P. 01 ' Si1MMIT STI~ET AFARTMEl'~TS, INC. 1 Sp6 West Dark Avr. Hcrcford. TX 79045 (8053 S7$-4211 City of College Statism C/o Tony Janes Legacy Construction 4475 Hicks. Lane College Station,.. TX 77$45 September Z4, 19g5 Tony, Thanks for the concern about the fpurplexes. We agree with your conclusion that the new trash dutnpsters will be beneficial`for the complex. We agree to let the city proceed with the plans sub}ect to the fallowing. Buildings 1407 grid 1405, on the comers effected,. roust drain as well. as, ar better than they currently do. These slabs can not act as a dike to retain water backup to the buildin8, This is likely to happen if the grade is raised and leveled to poor the pads- Ensure that there. is drain file that drains the canter of the yard in front of unit 1 in both 1405 and 1407 under the. pads, or ensure that the construction of the pads lowers the. grade rather #han raises the grade.: Plcasa contact Dori Concerning this issue. Thank soul Cliff Skiles TDT Interoffice Memo To: Sabine Kuenzel, Planning Division From: Jim Smith, Sanitation Divsiof Dater March 16, 1995 Subject: Review of Project Review Committee Agenda; March 22, 1995 I want to make Some comments on the site plans sdleduled for review an March 22. 1. Site. Plan -Summit Fourple~es: The site plan as submitted cait be serviced and is operationally correct. However, the containers can still be seen from 2818. I am attaching a copy of this site with an optional location for the containers that will still be serviceable and better screened from 2818. Also, I have an option for this location to use residential containers. Either of these options will be'acceptable. 2. Final Plat -Shenandoah Phase II Subdivision: No .comments. Please contact me if you Dave any questions. sabine7/js z ~ ~. ~'> 0 1•~I O.~O N. av 4 Q ( ~ ~ ° __ s} tJNll's 3gDkt~ i '~ g. g31_SU. ~ ,'.. 4P_~a le'-b' , 1 ~~ N ~ j ~ ~ { Fol. FM fit:. ELEV t2E: 4~'N PV.N~ ~ . p ~ 1 ~ i ` I~. $ E*+TRY .wALk ~ o `V tl T N ~ S. ~S l0'6° ~., ~ i. 117-. ° 13 o B N A j \ ,+~ ~ 1 \ ~ \ \~ ~ z fANC DfLiVC { PAQiciNG ,- ~ \ - j v ~ _ ~~~ e~.,,~ . ~. n ~ ~ \\,-~~ ~ \.:\\ N- 47°O4'Ado'I E- 150.00' ~ ~ ~\~,. \ ~ +~~- ? j•~! ~` d ~ ID ~\. \~\ = 23' PkIVgTEM ~ ~ \ \ ~• ~.: l` ~+ ? ~ , ~. \~~\ \ '.. AccE75 ~s r T T I c \ \'\~ "' \~ ; ~ p }t I ~ i i 1'~TPACI=S'~ qre°. ~ j I s ~A ~' ~f ' N I ~ I ~ - ~ ~_ 0 ~= . ~~so~ u -t I1 pVL 1 O 1 ~. ~ y Z ~ $ '~~>~ `i ~: N _ -. (PAR P'iN ~L, El.E -RE: 4RAb1 F'L.lN~ R ~ ~n 4 u*LIrS ~ '~ ~otz ~ ~ _ p _ ~ s lA ~ EsMT H A7° o.}' l'•l0'1 ~- ISO.OOI ~a ... 00 m 3 ~ >_;_ ~ ov r o° 0 '" N '' '~ ~ ~ y 8 ~ + ._ j ~ ~, 4 t1NiTa 3~pRM N i ~ 1 . Lyy~ {p$ (K0R IN FL. ~1-EV - fzE.cjkA01 !y PLAN !! VV ~ ba 3 ~ ~ -y ~ S. ._ O ENTftY oNC. iU LK 1 °• TYP. 1`. IN c -_ 11 V ~0=6 ~ 117-0" ~1 0` S ~ _6 1\ ~ j 13 PA ~: 91- '~ ~. ~ 4~ art _ ~~ ~ a7 ~ 1~ \ \~\\ \\ - ' coNC. ORtVG 1(PARKINC~ \ \~- \ ~ I ~~~ ,~ V ~; R ~ ~ ~ {~ \~\ ~~ ~ N 4r°o4'4~">=_ 150.00': I o `~\~ r, I ~~~- CO" N = u I W ~.~\ ~..~ ~ s, Acc~SS ESMT s ~\~'\ r, ~\ . ~ $ 9 ~ 6' ~ 1 I Ia .T ~ ~ j I3~PactS ~a p' ~ ~, .~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~1^ A 8 ~; _ ~ ~ _ ~~ _~ r O ~ A = s s b ii ~ J 1 n 7 g { i (PoR ~Ify~. FL ELE.V -~kE GRAS C'L.tN~ y II- : { U H i 7S ~= 3 5DlzM~ I ~ 0 E7' r N ~~ _ r A ? 1 y F ~ ~ l ~ mu'~ N mArnp ''. ,~ j ,. I L_ _..-- ----- - - n r-s+-~i ~- ~S'SL'-Yi L ENE __ _- -12 - ~,~' AA -a ' Printed by Sabina Kuenzel 8/14/95 9:49am From: Shirley Volk. To: Sabina Kuenzel,. Terry Thigpin, Veronica Morgan Subject__fwd__SummitTApts______________ ===NOTE== =______=====8/14/95.==8:04am== The building finals are scheduled for today, so Tony Jones will want his C.O.'s on this complex today. Let me know if it's o.k. on your end. Thanks. Fwd=by:=Sabina=Kuenze=8/14/95==8:3Oam== .Fwd to: Jim Smith jm, i understand•from•shirley~that• there may be a dumpster problem here, i haven't checked the file yet but i intend to do that as well as talk ;to jape (the prc report says to coordinate sanitation with her). before i do so could i get your input, please? thank you! Fwd=by:=Jim=Smith=====8/14/95==8:55am== Fwd to: Sabina Kuenzel When.I.frst•looked•at•ths•ste~plan,• they had several 400 gallon container's located on the 2818 side, in the same spots as the screening fences'.are now. I recommended placing FEL's on the' summit street side because the would be less visible from rights-of-way. :Jane did not. accept this .recommendation'. Jane and I spoke about this and Jane rejected FEL's and requested individual residential containers. It was our' agreement and my .understanding that' these containers would be placed in the parking lot and removed after service. I drove by Summit Apts. last week and. saw the screening fences on 28-18 and' got confused. Thatswhen I called` Shirley.. If the residential containers are to be placed in the enclosures, 'it will be impossible to collect unless the driver gets out of the truck, pulls the cans to the street and replaces them back inside the enclosure after.. collection. This :.defeats. the purpose of automated collection. Let me know what you want to do. [~ ~v~~~ ~ 'til e ~( Page: 1 Cn I AGENDA Project Review Coatunittee CITY OF COLLEGE. STATION, TEXAS City I~aII 'Training Room Wed~~esday, Mai-cli 22, I995 10:00 ~.M. Sl'1'E PLAN - Sunvnit Iwurpleses; proposed fourplexes at 1401 - 1407 Summit totaling 1..64 acres, divided into four multi-farniIy Iots with four buildings .and sixteen living units. (95-500} .FINAL PLAT - ~Shc~nundvah Phase 11 Subdtuisiorr; approximately 12.17b acres divided into 39 single Family Lots bounded b Barron Road an the northwest, Shenandoah Phase I to tl~e southeast, .Southwood Valley 13~ptist Church properly to the northeast and tl~e Froehling 4b acre tract to the southwest. {95-2I 1) / / .i ~, •~-~~, f'~~,L~ ~C ~:~ /~ ~.~..-mss PROJECT REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT March 31, 1995 TO: FROM: P~ SUBJECT: Tony Jones 4475 Hicks Lane, College Station, TX 77845 Constantine Barbu 2909 Texas Avenue, Bryan, TX 77803 Earl Havel, Garrett Engineering 4444 Carter Creek Parkway, Suite 108, Bryan, TX 77802 Project Review Committee-... Jane Kee, City Planner ~,r ,.r Veronica Morgan, ~ istar~t City Engineer Mike Lane, P & Z R~pres,~ntative Others Attending '~--~°' Natalie Thomas, Planning Technician Shirley Volk, Development Coordinator Don Lusk, Electrical Line Coordinator David Moore, Building Official Laverne Akin, G.T.E.. Representative Site Plan -Summit Fou~plexes; proposed fourplexes at 1401 - 1407 Summit Street` totaling 1.64 acres, divided into four multi-family lots with four buildings and sixteen living units. (95-500) A Project Review Committee Meeting was held Wednesday, March 29, 1995 to discuss the above mentioned parking lot plan. City Planner Kee moved to recommend approval of the parking lot plan with the following conditions: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Discretionary Items: The site plan. that is :approved is with the assumption that the proposed drainage plan is correct. If here is a substantial change to the site plan due to changes in the drainage of the site, staff has the. discretion to require the revised site plan to be reviewed by the Project Review Committee. (The. final plat for the subject property must also be revised to reflect the. actual location of the. drainage easement..) q-2 ~ ~ Sidewalks are. required along. the F.M. 2818 frontage road and Southwood Drive. A. PRC Report Summit Fourplexes Case #95-500 Page 2 of 3 The following is a list of ordinance requirements identified. by the Project Review Committee. This .list does not relieve the applicant of total compliance with all current ordinance requirements. Ordinance Requirements: Site Plan Related.• ,~- z ~ / :Tabulate the total density of the project and the number of dwelling units per acre. ~{ - 2 ? / Tabulate the gross square footage of the .proposed buildings. Show the minimum, maximum and era a water, sewer and irrigation demands for the .proposed deve~lopment~ so at the meter sizes can be established. _ 1Vote that there is no floodplain on the subject property. ~.. ~. ~ / Show the interior radius on both driveways along Summit Street. _ Provide curbing around the entire perimeter of the parking .lot including at the ends of the parking stalls. Landscape Plan Related.• _ The landscape plan exceeds the minimum point requirements by 170 points per lot. Comments/Concerns: N/i~ If the Summit Street right-of--way is abandoned, fire lanes will be required for the proposed fourplexes to provide adequate coverage to the site. Additional fire hydrants will not be required. _ Coordinate the proposed location and screening of the individual garbage cans for each living unit with City Planner Jane Kee at (409) 764-3520. _ In.detail #3 on the site: plan, do not allow the apron at the street to toe under. _ Extensive off site conduit must be installed along a utility easement in the apartment complex to the south .that will make it necessary to bore .Summit 'Street to an appropriate pad. location. From the pad location, conduit must be installed to each of the buildings. The developer is responsible for 20% of the total job. cost:. Coordinate details with Electrical Line Coordinator Don Lusk at {409) 764-3660. _ Conduit is required from the proposed buildings to the existing telephone cable along F.M. 2818. Coordinate details with G.T.E. Representative Laverne Akin at (409) 821-4723. -~ PRC Report Summit Fourplexes Case #95-500 Page 3 of 3 P & Z .Representative Lane seconded :the motion to approve the site plan with the above mentioned conditions which passed unopposed (3 - 0). SUBMIT 4 COMPLETE SETS OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS WITH THE REVISED SITE PLAN ATTACHED TO CONTINUE WITH PHASE II OF THE BUILDINCr PERMIT PROCESS. COORDINATE FUTURE SUBMITTALS WITH DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR SHIltLEY YOLK AT (409) 764-3570. APPEAL PROCESS: An applicant may appeal the decision of the Project Review Committee to the Planning and Zoning Commission within five days .after the PRC Committee meeting. Failure to appeal the PRC action shall constitute a contractual acceptance of all conditions imposed, and. a waiver and surrender of all complaints, defects, or potential invalidity, whether under state or federal law.. An applicant appealing the decision of the PRC shall file ten copies of the final site plan as approved by the PRC, showing all changes and requirements imposed. by the PRC, and accompanied by a written explanation of those items being appealed. Until said copies are on file,.. no further development approval. shall occur, and no further action by the Commission shall take place.. An applicant may appeal only certain aspects of .site .plan review,. and in the absence of discretionary review by the Commission, or -review pursuant to a petition, all other aspects of the site plan shall be final. Any notice of appeal shall state with particularity the aspects which are to be appealed. Coordinate appeal process. through Development Coordinator Shirley Volk at (409) 764-3741.