HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutesPROJECT REVIEW COMMITTEE REPORT
October 23, 1995
TO: Larry Wells, Municipal Development Group
203. Holleman Drive East, College Station, TX 77840
Jerry Etheridge
1504 Saddle Lane, College Station,. TX 77840
FROM: Project Review Committee
Jane Kee, City Plann r
Steve Homeyer, Gradu e ivil Engineer
Charles Smith, P&Z Re , r sentative
Others. Attending
Natalie Thomas, Planning Technician.
Veronica Morgan, Assistant City Engineer
Tony Mchalsky Electrical Operations Coordinator
Laverne Akin, G.T.E. Representative
SUBJECT:. Parking Lot Plan =Budget Mini Storage Expansion; proposed .addition to an
existing mini storage facility located. on the southeast corner of Wellborn Road and
Holleman Drive.. (95-416)
A Project Review Committee meeting was .held Wednesday, October 18, 1995 to discuss the
above mentioned parking lot plan. City Planner Kee moved to recommend approval of the
proposed site plan with the following conditions:
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
The following. is a list of ordinance requirements. identified by .the Project Review
Committee.. This. list does not relieve .the. applicant of total compliance with all current
ordinance requirements.
Ordinance Requirements:
Remove. the three proposed parking spaces near the Holleman Drive entrance to meet the
minimum throat length requirements.
Provide material types on the existing water-and sanitary sewer mains
_ The connection of the proposed and existing sidewalk at the intersection of Holleman
Drive and Wellborn Road must be constructed` so that the ramp may be used. Note that if
the existing wheelchair ramp does not meet minimum ADA (Americans with Disabilities
Act) standards, it will be reconstructed to meet these standards.
_ Note that the proposed buildings will be used for storage only and no office space is
proposed at this time_
PRC Report
Budget~l~lini Storage
Case #95-416
Page 2 of 2
Ordinance Requirements (cont.
_ Show the setback from the..property line to. the back of curb. in the parking lot along the
Wellborn Road frontage.
Show the fire: lane design.
_ Show the common property line between lots 18 and 19.
_ Provide a blanket drainage easement. on lot 17 forlots 18 and 19.
Provide retaining. wall and head wall details.
Comments/Concerns:
See drainage report for slope information near lot 17. (Staff expressed concern with the
steep slops between inlets. 3 and 4 in the drainage basin.)
_ Coordinate the transformer location near building one, conduit placement .and electrical
service details with Electrical Operations Coordinator Tony Michalsky at (409) 764-3660.
_ G.T.B. has existing underground facilities in the rear of the site. Provide one 2" PVC pipe
with. pull string from the outside. building termination to the rear utility .easement.. (There
is a' pedestal that .the conduit could be placed to.) Thee conduit should ell up 4' at the
building location and should be within 20' of power. Coordinate telephone service details
with G.T.E. Representative Laverne Akin at (409) 821-4723.
P&Z Representative. Smith seconded the motion to recommend approval of the use. and site plan
with the above mentioned conditions which passed unopposed (3 - 0).
SUBMIT 4 COPIES OF THE REVISED SITE PLAN ATTACHED TO FOUR COMPLETE
SETS OF BUILDING PLANS TO CONTINUE WITH PHASE II OF THE BUILDING
PERMIT PROCESS'
APPEAL PROCESS: An applicant may appeal the decision of the Project Review Committee
to the Planning and Zoning Commission within five days after the. PRC Committee meeting.
Failure to appeal the PRC action shall constitute a contractual acceptance of all conditions
.imposed, and a waiver and surrender of all complaints, defects, or potential invalidity, whether
under state or federal law. An applicant .:appealing the decision of the PRC shall file ten copies of
the final site plan as approved by the PRC, showing .all changes and requirements imposed by the
PRC,. and accompanied by a written explanation of those items being appealed. Untl_ said copies
are on file, no further: development approval shall occur, and no further action by the Commission
shall take place. An applicant may appeal only .certain .aspects of situ plan review, and in the
absence of discretionary review by the Commission, 'or review pursuant to a petition, all other
aspects of the. site plan shall be final. Any notice of appeal shall state with particularity the aspects
which are to be appealed; .:Coordinate appeal process through: Development Coordinator Shirley
. Volk at (409) 764-3741.