Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous`printed by Sabina Kuenzel 7/03/95 3:57pm From: Sabina Kuenzel To: Jim Smith. Subject: fwd: prc --------------------------------------- ===NOTE====------=====7/03/95==3:40pm== good morning! hope you had a nice trip. i want to point out something that may not be apparent to you on the mixed-use site. .the exxon immediately to the south got approved several months ago. it shows a dumpster location where the new 5 spaces that are shown on the plan half on this site and half on exxon's. i spoke with roy who says that these sites (lot f-4 is exxon; lots f-3 and f-2 are the mixed use site) plan to use ane dumpster in the shown location. exxon has verbally agreed to haul their trash across the other lots. now, from a zoning standpoint, lot f-4 is its own "building plot" in that it was approved seperately and could stand on its own and meet all ordinance requirements as it is approved. all ordinance requirements, that is, except for dumpsters (exxon was approved with a dumpster that would have to be accessed from lot f-3). however, lots f-2 and f-3 are submitted together as a single project and structures are stradling lot lines. to ws, lots f-2 and f-3 are considered tied together via approval of the site plan and although they can still be sold-off seperately, owner of both lots are bound together in terms of ordinance compliance. is it enough for you to have just a verbal agreement? if i recall, we discussed the possibility of la barronena using taco cabana's dumpster and just getting a larger container. we said ok but only if barronena shows a contingency location should taco cabana's seperately platted and approved lot owner say "no more mr. nice guy". what say you? Fwd=by:=Jim=Smith=====7/03/95==3:51pm== Fwd to: Sabina Kuenzel ....................................... I will still need a container location Page: 1 Printed by Sabina Kuenzel 7/03/95 3:57pm notated on the Exxon Property in case of a split between owners. That way each site could stand alone on garbage collection. This is the same rational we used with Taco Cabana and La Barronena. Thanks! Page: 2 SUBMIT APPLICATION AND THIS LIST CHECKED-0FF WITH 16 FOLDED COPIES OF SITE PLAN FOR REVIEW REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN PROPOSALS ^ 1. Sheet size - 24" x 36" ^ 2. Title block to include: a.) Name, address, location, and legal description b.) Name, address, and telephone number of applicant c.) Name, address, and telephone number of developer/owner d.) Name, address, and telephone number of architect/engineer e.) Date of submittal ^ 3. Ownership and current zoning of parcel and all abutting parcels. ^ 4. A key map (not necessarily to scale). ^ 5. Scale should be largest standard engineering scale possible on sheet. ^ 6. Provide a north arrow. ^ 7. Topography, final grading plan, and other pertinent drainage information. (If plan has too much information, show drainage on separate sheet.) ^ 8. All existing streets, drives, buildings, and water courses on or adjacent to the proposed project site. ^ 9. Locate 100 yr floodplain on or adjacent to the proposed project site, note if there is none on the site. ^ 10. Location and size of existing utilities within or adjacent to the proposed project site. ^ 11.~Proposed location, type, and size of the following: a.) Buildings and structures b.) Off-Street parking areas with parking spaces drawn, tabulated, and dimensioned c.) Sidewalks d.) Common open space sites e.) Sites for solid waste containers ^ 12. Proposed streets, drives, and curb cuts. For each proposed. curb cut (including driveways, streets, alleys, etc.) locate existing curb cuts on the same and opposite side of the street to determine separation distances between existing and proposed curb cuts. Indicate driveway throat length as measured in the Driveway Ordinance. (See Ordinance 1961 for driveway location and design requuements.) ^ 13. The total number of residential buildings and units to be constructed on the proposed project site. ^ 14. Landscape plan as required in Section 11 of the Zoning.Ordinance (See Ordinance # 1638.) The landscaping plan can be shown on a separate sheet if too much information is on the original site plan. Attempt to reduce or eliminate plantings in easements. Include information on the plan such as: a) existing landscaping to remain b) required point calculations c) proposed new plantings with points earned ^ 15. Indicate unit type (number of bedrooms). ^ 16. The density of dwelling units per acre of the proposed project. ^ 17. The gross square footage of buildings and the proposed use of each building. ^ 18. The total site area and percent of building coverage of site. ^ 19. Designate number of parking spaces required by ordinance and provided by proposal. ^ 20. Show dimensions to size and locate all structures, parking spaces, drives, curb cuts, parking islands, and setbacks. The following are typical standards for Plan Development established by Ordinance or Policy: __ ^ 1. Building separation is a minimum of 15 feet. ^ 2. Building setbacks are outlined in Ordinance 1638, Zoning Ordinance, Table A (Sec. 7, P. 30) ^ 3. Minimum parking space is 9' X 20', or on a perimeter row, 9' x 18' with a 2' overhang. All multi-family parking lots must be screened from rights-of way. ^ 4. Minimum drive width is 23' with head-in parking or 20' without parking. ^ 5. Landscaped islands of 6" raised curb are located at both ends of each parking row. ^ 6. Landscaped islands are also located every 15 spaces or interior rows and every 20 spaces on perimeter rows. Streetscape compliance is required which involves special plantings along certain specified in the City's Streetscape Plan. ^ 7. A 6" raised curb is required around all edges of all parts of all paved areas without exception. (To include islands, planting areas, access ways, dumpster locations, utility pads, etc.) Curb detail to be improved bby Cit~Eng,Yneer. No exceptions will be made for areas designated as "reserved for future parking" . ^ 8. Wheelstops may be required on interior rows longer than 10 spaces or in special situations. ^ 9. Sidewalks are required at time of development if property has frontage on a street shown on the sidewalk Master Plan or if the Project Review Committee determines the necessity. (Refer to Section 10.2 of the Zoning Ordinance). ^ 10. Director of Public Services determines number, and size of dumpsters. Locations shall be such that dumpsters are not visible from streets. Gates are discouraged and visual screening may be required. ^ 11. Parking islands are 9' X 20 ; or 180 square feet. ^ 12. Healthy, native trees over 6" in caliper should be retained whenever possible. ^ 13. Fire lanes of a minimum of 20 feet in width with a minimum height clearance of 14 feet must be established if any structure of any type is more than 150 feet from a public street or highway. ^ 14. Any structure in any zoning district other than R-1, R-lA, or R-2 must be within 300 feet of a fire hydrant as measured along a public street or highway. ^ 15. Fire hydrants must be located on the same side of a major street as a project, and shall be in a location approved by the Fire Marshal's office and. the Superintendent of Water and Sewer. ^ 16. Fire hydrants must be operable and accepted by the City and drives must have an all weather surface before a building permit can be issued. ^ 17. A raised island not less than 6" in height and not less than 8' in width shall separate parking areas from public rights-of--way. Eight foot setback from R.O.W. to curb of parking lot. \. SLTEMIT APPLICATION AND THIS LIST CHECKED-OFF WITH I6 FOLDED COPIES OF SITE PLAN FOR REVIEW REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN PROPOSALS Cd" 1. Sheet size - 24" x 36" ~. Title block to include: a.) Name, address, location, and legal description b.) Name, address, and telephone number of applicant c.) Name, address, and telephone number of developer/owner d.) Name, address, and telephone number of architect/engineer e.) Date of submittal ^ 3. Ownership and current zoning of parcel and all abutting parcels. ~4. .key map (not necessarily to scale). -/5. Scale should be largest standard engineering scale possible on sheet. cad' 6. Provide a north arrow. ^ 7. Topography, final grading plan, and other pertinent drainage information. (If plan .has too much information, show drainage on separate sheet.) _____. ^ 8. All existing streets, drives, buildings, and water courses on or adjacent to the proposed project site. ~____ ^ 9. Locate 100 yr floodplain on or adjacent to the proposed project site, note if there is none on the site. ~.- ^ 10. Location and size of existing utilities within or adjacent to the proposed project site. -- ~ ^ 11. Proposed location, type, and size of the following: v~ Buildings and structures ---~ b.) Off-Street parking areas with parking spaces drawn, tabulated, and dimensioned ~- Sidewalks d.) Common open space sites e.....-°~.) Sites for solid waste containers 12. Proposed streets, drives, and curb cuts. For each proposed curb cut (including driveways, streets, alleys, etc.) locate existing curb cuts on the same and opposite side of the street to determine separation distances between existing and proposed curb cuts. Indicate driveway throat length as measured in the Driveway Ordinance. (See Ordinance 1961 for driveway location and design requirements.) 1.3. The total number of residential buildings and units to be constructed on the proposed project site. ^ 14. Landscape plan as required in Section 11 of the Zoning Ordinance (See Ordinance # 1638.) The landscaping plan can be shown on a .separate sheet if too much information is on the original site plan. Attempt to reduce or eliminate plantings in easements. Include information on the plan such as: a) existing landscaping to remain b) required point calculations ~f c) proposed new plantings with points earned X11 5. Indicate unit type (number of bedrooms). . The density of dwelling units per acre of the proposed project. 17. The gross square footage of buildings and the proposed use of each building. ~~ UY 18 The total site area and percent of building coverage of site. 19. Designate number of parking spaces required by ordinance and provided by proposal. ^ 20. Show dimensions to size and locate all structures, parking spaces, drives, curb cuts, parking islands, and setbacks. 1. Are there impact fees associated with this development? The following are typical standards for Plan Development established by Ordinance or Policy: C~ -. Building separation is a minimum of 15 feet. 2. Building setbacks are outlined in Ordinance 1638, Zoning Ordinance, Table A (Sec. 7, P. 30) ^ 3. Minimum parking space is 9' X 20', or on a perimeter row, 9' x 18' with a 2' overhang. All multi-family parking lots must be screened from rights-of way. ^ 4, Minimum drive width is 23' with head-in parking or 20' without parking. _ ^ 5. Landscaped islands of 6" raised curb are located at both ends of each parking row. ~'. ® 6. Landscaped islands are also located every 15 spaces or interior rows and every 20 spaces on perimeter rows. Streetscape compliance is required which involves special plantings along certain specified in the City's Streetscape Plan. ^ 7. A 6" raised curb is required around all edges of all parts of all paved areas without exception. (To include islands, planting areas, access ways, dumpster locations, utility pads, etc.) Curb detail to be approved by City En ineer. No exceptions will be made for areas designated as "reserved for future ~arking". ld' 8. Wheelsto s ma be re uired on interior rows lop er than 10 s aces or ins ecial situations. P Y q g p p .Sidewalks are required at time of development if property has frontage on a street shown on the sidewalk Master Plan or if the Project Review Committee determines the necessity. (Refer to Section 10.2 of the Zoning Ordinance). ® ^ 10, Director of Public Services determines number, and size of dumpsters. Locations shall be such that dumpsters are not visible from streets. Gates are discouraged and visual screening may be required. ~._- ^ 11. Parking islands are 9' X 20 ; or 180 square feet. ~12. Healthy, native trees over 6" in caliper should be retained whenever possible. ,~. ^ 13. Fire lanes of a minimum of 20 feet in width with a minimum height clearance of 14 feet must be established if any structure of any type is more than 150 feet from a public street or highway. _ ^ 14. Any structure in any zoning district other than R-1, R-1A, or R-2 must be within 300 feet of a fire hydrant as measured along a public street or highway. ~- ^ 15. Fire hydrants must be located on the same side of a major street as a project, and shall be in a location approved by the Fire Marshal's office and the Superintendent of Water and Sewer. _r...-, ^ 16, Fi f hydrants must be operable and accepted by the City and drives must have an all weather surface ~~~be o e a butldmg perrrut can be issued. ~ 17. A raised island not less than 6" in height and not less than 8' in width shall separate parking areas from public rights-of--way. Eight foot setback from R.O.W. to curb of parking lot. ~ 3~ wli - s 5.. G... t` F . S'~~'F Y 5 •`'n E tt 3~ ~ y x __t _._E .SL _~ ~_ ~. .. 3. 4~ V i. ~ `_4~5 _ ~ ~_. <t62erS 0-F 1F-^ g'.: a °a""- ~ , ~, a _._. __.n b t _ . , _, _ .. .. r_ 1_.i ._ - _' .. f k it ! r' ~ ~.. 14t'!' i k t `- 1 k of _ t _..,~. _, tp .. S_'_-.3 .~'T< s ~_~5 _e-.d+ ,!"c "i .. f~':' R :.-a' s~rva'P c s, J~ IJ n._'~ Lo ,' fJ :.__ ~ Lil. ._YL ..._R~V ~ .1 ._J s.4 -_t~~.} ~~ 4 AJ ut £ ~.: 1JtY i. 0 e From: Samantha Smith To: VMORGAN, SHOMEYER, SVOLK Date: 4/1/96 11:25am Subject: Auto Lube and Wash plans Steve or V, have y'all seen DDP file folder #344? Have either of you seen a drainage report for this project? (either new or revised - I can't tell what the status is.) Shirley, we can send these plans back, with comments from Steve. The only things Pm unsure about are: 1. Whether we received $100 DDP fee, 2. Whether we have an approved drainage report. The DDP is ready for their signature once the plans are complete (including drug rpt) and the fee has been received. Thanks to al13 of you. RUG 04 ' 9 % 03 ~ Oi.PM WS ALLEN 409 ~ ~ 9 3823 ~ ~~ -~'~~ "`~~° P. 1 M. L. HAMMONS, P.E. 1700 KYLE SOUTH, SUITE 240 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840 (409) 696-1444 July 29, 1997 Mr Steve Hohmeyer City of~ College Station Engineering Department College Station, Texas Ref: Wash/Cube Development Rock Prairie Rd, {~ Hwy 6 South Mr. Hohmeyer: As w® have discuss®d, additional work is needed at subJect location for 100% completion of the detention pond. The top block course has not been constructed on a portion of the pond wall and some adJusfinent may be needed on the grate inlet at the discharge box.. it is estimated that .the additional work can be completed for $1,800.00 ~ Sincerely, ~~ ,. ,mil Printed by Shirley Volk 8/09/95 8:36am ~~~ From: Shirley Volk Confirm receipt To: Elrey Ash, Jane Kee, Jim Callaway, Tom Brymer Subject: Exxon Express ===NOTE_____________________________________________________________________ CC: Jeff Kersten, Sabina Kuenzel, Veronica Morgan, Ji~•n Smith. I wanted to give you an update on what has happened at the Exxon Express and why it is open and operating with a little dumpster setting right out in front! As you know, we have reviewed and approved with conditions a site plan for the 2 lots to the north of the Exxon site. That plan overlaps with the Exxon site, and is somewhat different from that approved for Exxon originaly. The owner of the Exxon station thought that because we had reviewed and approved that plan with conditions, he could go ahead and build his part of that plan with the Exxon station. The site plan for the Exxon station was not the same in certain areas! Anyway, that's what he did, and because of that, he did not have enough pavement poured to put the dumpster where it was approved. The trucks could not get to it. We struck a deal and issued a C.O. Tuesday with the condition that he has a permanent dumpster pad poured and a screened fence installed around it by Aug 22 (2 weeks). Additionally, he must add pavement to accommodate a shared access easement between t!ie Exxon site and the site to the north. He must. furnish filed copies of easements, both access and dumpster, and install haybales and silt fencing along the c;rive pavement to control runoff from the Exxon site. (by Sept 8 - 1 month).. Also, he put up a financial guarantee of $3750 to cover these conditions, as well as a big bond to cover landscaping requirements because it is really too=>hot to successfully install landscaping right now. I wanted you to know that Jim, Sabine & i~2ronica helped "cut this deal", and the customer went away happy to be open for business today, albeit not completely satisfied because he couldn't understand why he had to do all of this! I wanted to update everyone on what has happened in case yo~z get calls about the dumpster setting right out in front - completely unscreened. There really wasn't any other way to do it and let him open for business today. We thought also if it is right by his door, he will be in a big hurry to get the permanent location finished! I also want to thank Jeff K. for his help. R Page: 1 From: Tony Michalsky To: CITY HALL(SVOLK) Date: 4/23/96 8:20am Subject: Car Wash, Cleaners, Lube center Rk Pr Rd & Tex Av -Reply It's okay, we are getting a temp blanket easement on the property. »> Shirley Volk 04/22/96 05:07pm »> Today when I was going thru the redlined plans for this project to see if I could retrieve an approved site plan for our files, I noticed that Roy had designated a 15 ft. utility easement, but it doesn't cover the underground to the building. Tony, is that a problem? I thought we needed an easement to the meter - or are the meters for this entire project on the transformer? Or, Nat, did you check on this before you stamped it? HELP!!!