The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMiscellaneous~/ ~~~ -~ ~ -~ ~/~/~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~of~ ~ ~, ~ ~~ ~ ~~- ~ FILENOTE LODGECO PARKING LOT September 11,1998 Talked with Karl Oehler with University Towers and told him to go ahead and begin parking in the Lodgeco parking lot. We will be out in mid October to check on the landscaping, seeding/sodding and cleanup work around the site to assure that it is complete. Veronica ~. FRED ~AYLISS, P. C. ATTORNEY AT LAW 410 SOUTH TEXAS AVENUE, SUITE 110 COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840 TELEPHONE (409) 846-4601 TELECOPIER (409) 846-8569 June 15, 1995 VIA HAND DELIVERY Ms. Veronica Morgan City of College Station 1101 Texas Avenue South College Station, Texas Dear Veronica: Enclosed is a copy of the plat showing the proposed irrigation for the islands in the parking lot and the original unrecorded Private Access Easement. After you have reviewed these please issue the development permit, and I will effectuate the recording of the Release of Private Access Easement. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, J. Fred Bayliss JFB/gjc Enclosures (FB581\LTR.B/GJC DEVELOPMENT PERMIT PERMIT NO. #291 A FOR AREAS OUTSIDE THE SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA RE: CHAPTER 13 OF THE COLLEGE STATION CITY CODE SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of Lot 2 of Lodgeco Subdivision Part of Lot 2 of North Park Addition Section II SITE ADDRESS: 1-ileadowland Street -next to Hampton Inn OWNER: Lodgeco Properties Ltd. P.O. Box 10614 College Station, Texas 77842 DRAINAGE BASIN: Carter Creek; draining to Burton Creek, Basin 1 (Bryan). TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: This permit is valid for the site construction associated with the construction of a swimming pool for Lodgeco Properties. Erosion control must be installed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans. Contractor shall prevent silt and debris from leaving the site in accordance with the City of College Station Drainage Policy and Design Criteria. Owner and/or contractor shall be responsible for any damage to existing city streets or infrastructure due to heavy machinery and/or equipment. The parking •lot, associated landscaping, and irrigation system will be permitted separately at a later date. This permit, being temporary, is valid only within sixty (60) days of the date shown below, and is not intended to allow the complete development of the site as proposed. Any work performed after the expiration of this permit is not covered, and is considered unauthorized. In accordance with Chapter 13 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of College Station, measures shall be taken to insure that debris from construction, erosion, and sedimentation shall not be deposited in city streets, or existing drainage facilities. I hereby grant this permit for development of an area outside the special flood hazard area. All development shall be in accordance with the plans and specifications mitted to and approved by the City Engineer in the development permit application for above nam project and all of the codes and ordinances of the City of College Station t t apply. tor~~prese~it`~t~ve Date Date Date 3P~a ~`~ ` 1 7 r- _ ~" ~ ~ P ~ ~ ~n~~ __T._TnN~=~ _-.~ ~ ~ i~~ ~~~ ~ ~g ~~g jjj ~ gig, °~. ~- I ~ ~- ~" ~^ i t ~ ~• ~~j e9 /~ ,fie ~ ,p@ '.'~~ ~~~-~d~da ~~v;~ A ~°1~~' f~ did ( `'r '~ ~-R~L b lj ~~t~,.ppli' 9 c' 1/ ~ „~M", 4~,..~Pa E,s.l ~ d ~g 2Y ®9 l ~f ~ N 6`" _ e. r ~® ~ 6 °® __ g Ys ~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~Gt~ •~ G~{ ~,°'~ d Vie. ~ a2~ ~ i ~- ~, f`~°6 ~I.~~ ~~ ~~~ d`if~ ds~Y_=-~'~i Printed by Shirley Volk 6/28/95 11:19am From: Shirley Volk To: Veronica Morgan Subject: fwd: Lodgeco ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ===NOTE====------=====6/20/95==9:24am=====________=_______=_______=_________ CC: Jane Kee, Natalie Thomas, Sabina Kuenzel V: David Moore has looked over the irrigation plan and said he has no problem with it. The copy of the easement you gave to Nat is actually the original. What do you want to do next? As far as I know, this thing is ready to go and what is lacking is the Drainage Development Permit. As I recall, you wanted that to be done simultaneously with the filing of the easement, but I don't know how to do that, because they don't want to file it until you issue the DDP, and you don't want to issue the DDP until they file the easement! What have you decided will be the process? Fwd=by:=Veronica=Morg=6/20/95=12:27pm_______________________________________ Fwd to: Shirley Volk ............................................................................ i'll issue, they sign and we follow them to the courthouse to get a copy of the filed easement. im easy on this one just so it all happens in some close proximity to each other. - not days or weeks apart so we forget. you know my forgetfulness is on the rise lately so i have to curb it any way i can. Fwd=by:=Shirley=Volk==6/21/95==8:23am====___________________________________ Fwd to: Veronica Morgan CC: Natalie Thomas ............................................................................ Are you ready to issue now if I call Galindo and tell him? Who needs to come in to get the DDP? Has Galindo submitted the application and paid the fee? Just let me know what to do and when, and I'll be happy to follow through on this. Nat will help, also, if we need for her to. Fwd=by:=Natalie=Thoma=6/21/95==8:40am_______________________________________ Fwd to: Shirley Volk ............................................................................ I have to go to the court house today or tomorrow to file some plats anyway. So, just let me know. Fwd=by:=Shirley=Volk==6/23/95=10:33am_______________________________________ Fwd to: Veronica Morgan ............................................................................ V: Where are we on this? Fwd=by:=Veronica=Morg=6/27/95==5:31pm_______________________________________ Fwd to: Natalie Thomas, Sabina Kuenzel, Shirley Volk ............................................................................ i know it has been a while since you girls have heard from me on email. well, Shirley knows some of this already but i'11 brief you all now. i have been in contact with fred bayliss and gary mobley on this. supposedly, gary just wants to build the pool and nothing else and bayliss just wants the pool in now too. sooooo, i have changed the ddp to cover the site construction for the pool ONLY and with a statement that the parking lot will follow with another ddp for it (actually the same ddp #, with an "a" and "b" part - so they only have one fee). gary mobley should be coming in to sign. we need to hold on the filing of the abandonment of the easement until the second half of the ddp is issued. Shirley is going to check with bldg to see if they have pool plans reviewed or to review to issue a bldg permit for the pool. clear as Mud??? Fwd=by:=Sabina=Kuenze=6/28/95==9:15am_______________________________________ Fwd to: Natalie Thomas, Shirley Volk, Veronica Morgan CC: David Moore, Jane Kee, Joey Dunn, Lisa Hankins ............................................................................ before we issue any certificate of completion we will ensure that the illegal gravel parking lot is no longer in use! Paae: 1 SUBMIT APPLICATION AND THIS LIST CHECKED-OFF WITH 16 FOLDED COPIES OF SITE PLAN FOR REVIEW REQUIREMENTS FOR SITE PLAN PROPOSALS [~] .Sheet size - 24" x 36" 2. Title block to include: a.) Name, address,. location, and legal description b.) Name, address, and telephone number of applicant c.) Name, address, and telephone number of developer/owner d.) Name, address, and telephone number of architect engineer e.) Date of submittal ^ 33. Ownership and current zoning of parcel and all abutting parcels. l~! A key map (not necessarily to scale). 5 Scale should be largest standard engineering scale possible on sheet. ~ 6. Provide a north arrow. ^ 7. Topography, final grading plan, and other pertinent drainage information. (If plan has too much ,/ information, show drainage on separate sheet.) ;~ 8. All existing streets, drives, buildings, and water courses on or adjacent to the proposed project site. f~ 9. Locate 100 yr floodplain on or adjacent to the proposed project site, note if there is none on the site. ~'~ ^ 10. Location and size of existing utilities within or adjacent to the proposed project site. ^ 1 l.~Proposed location, type, and size of the following: a.) Buildings and structures b.) Off-Street parking areas with parking spaces drawn, tabulated, and dimensioned c.) Sidewalks d.) Common open space sites e.) Sites for solid waste containers ^ 12. Proposed streets, drives, and curb cuts. For each proposed curb cut (including driveways, streets, alleys, etc.) locate existing curb cuts on the same and opposite side of the street to determine separation distances between existing and proposed curb cuts. Indicate driveway throat length as measured in the Driveway Ordinance. (See Ordinance 1961 for .driveway location and design requirements.) 13. The total number of residential buildings and units to be constructed on the proposed project site. fir] 14. Landscape plan as required in Section 11 of the Zoning.Ordinance (See Ordinance # 1638.) The landscaping plan can be shown on a separate sheet if too much information is on the original site plan. Attempt to reduce or eliminate plantings in easements. Include information on the plan such as: a) existing landscaping to remain b) required point calculations c) proposed new plantings with points earned 15. Indicate unit type (number of bedrooms). X416. The density of dwelling units per acre of the proposed project. ]17. The gross square footage of buildings and the proposed use of each building. A~18. The total site area and percent of building coverage of site. "119. Designate number of parking spaces required by ordinance and provided by proposal. ^ 20. Show dimensions to size and locate all structures, parking spaces, drives, curb cuts, parking islands, and setbacks. The following are typical standards for Plan Development established by Ordinance or Policy: 1. Building separation is a minimum of 15 feet. ~2. Building setbacks are outlined in Ordinance 1638, Zoning Ordinance, Table A (Sec. 7, P. 30) ~ 3. Minimum parking space is 9' X 20', or on a perimeter row, 9' x 18' with a 2' overhang. All multi-family parking lots must be screened from rights-of way. . Minimum drive width is 23' with head-in parking or 20' without parking. 5. Landscaped islands of 6" raised curb are located at both ends of each parking row. 6. Landscaped islands are also located every 15 spaces or interior rows and every 20 spaces on perimeter rows. Streetscape compliance is required which involves special plantings along certain specified in the City's Streetscape Plan. 7. A 6" raised curb is required around all edges of all parts of all paved areas without exception. (To include islands, planting areas, access ways, dumpster locations, utility pads, etc.) Curb detail to be approved b~t~ ig Weer. No exceptions will be made for areas designated as "reserved for future parking" . ~ Wheelstops maybe required on interior rows longer than 10 spaces or in special situations.. ® Sidewalks are required at time of development if property has frontage on a street shown on the sidewalk Master Plan or if the Project Review Committee determines the necessity. (Refer to Section ~Y0.2 of the Zoning Ordinance). ~1 10. Director of Public Services determines number, and size of dumpsters. Locations shall be such that ~dumpsters are not visible from streets. Gates are discouraged and visual screening may be required. 1. Parking islands are 9' X 20 ; or 180 square feet. G~ ~12 . Healthy, native trees over 6" in caliper should be retained whenever possible. f Fire lanes of a minimum of 20 feet in width with a minimum height clearance of 14 feet must be established if any structure of any type is more than 150 feet from a public street or highway. 14. Any structure in any zoning district other than R-1, R-lA, or R-2 must be within 300 feet of a fire n phydrant as measured along a public street or highway. .1" a 15. Fire h drants .must be located on the same side of a major street as a project, and shall be in a location Y approved by the Fire Marshal's office and the Superintendent of Water and Sewer. q~~ JII~II~\16. Fire hydrants must be operable and accepted by the City and drives must have an all weather surface before a building permit can be issued. °17. A raised island not less than 6" in height and not less than 8' in width shall separate parking areas from public rights-of--way. Eight foot setback from R.O.W. to curb of parking lot. ° GALINDO ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS 3833 South Texas Ave., Suite 280 Bryan, Texas 77802 (409) 846-8868 April 20, 1995 Mr. Kent Laza, P.E. City Engineer City of College Station 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77840 Subject: Drainage Report 0.54-acre tract Lodgeco Parking Lot Meadowland Street College Station, TX Dear Mr. Laza: Please find enclosed for your review and approval the referenced report in duplicate with the necessary exhibits to illustrate our findings. This report is required to obtain approval of the Site Plan for the Lodgeco Parking Lot and Swimming Pool which is being submitted separately. Sincerely, GALINDO ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS j ~'' c r~ p_ 3 ~1 a ..~e ~.n,~...R,~°-) ~~ Christian A. Galindo, P.E., R.P.L.S. President cc: Fred Bayliss, Atty. LODGECO PARKING LOT DRAINAGE REPORT 1. TRACT DESCRIPTION 9-95 Lodgeco's parking lot is to be located on the northeast side of Meadowland Street, about 1,000 feet from its intersection with University Drive; College Station, Texas. The tract covers a portion of Lot 2, Lodgeco Subdivision and a portion of Lot 2, North Park Addition, Section II, containing an area of 23,532 s.f. (0.540 acre).. The map shown on Exhibit A, showing the tract, has been extracted from the 24"x36" Site Plan. Topography, obtained from Williams-Stackhouse, Inc. & G. W. Muery Services, Inc., is depicted in the referenced 24"X36" drawing. The Plan shows the existing topography, proposed grading, proposed parking layout, sedimentation and erosion control notes and location of a proposed swimming pool being designed by others. Three runoff Sections have been defined for this tract as shown on Exhibit A. 2. FLOOD PLAIN The current Flood Insurance Study does not identify the existence of a 100-flood plain near the location of this tract. Reference is made to FEMA Map # 48041 C0144C, dated July 2, 1992. 3. DESIGN CRITERIA The existing direction of runoff is to be maintained after improving this site. The combined runoff from this site and the remaining portion of Lot 2, Lodgeco Subdivision, which is currently vacant, drains onto Texas Avenue, or S. H. 6, a State of Texas highway. page 2 The parking lot will have an asphalt surface and will drain to the northeast through curb cuts or weirs built into a 0.6' high curb. The parking lot will act as a runoff detention facility to mitigate the effects of the increased runoff rate. A rainfall intensity equivalent to a 100-year storm and a time of concentration of ten minutes was used in the calculations. Runoff was calculated using the Rational Method. 4. RUN OFF CALCULATIONS Exhibit B, or Table 1, summarizes the runoff calculations using the Rational Method. This Exhibit lists, in tabular form, the constants and factors used. Q for a return period of 100 years was used for subsequent analysis and calculations. The tract was divided into three sections for pre and post development conditions. Sections 1 and 2 that constitute the parking lot show a runoff rate increase from 3.18 cfs to 5.10 cfs. Section 3, swimming pool area, shows an increase from 0.25 cfs to 0.34 cfs. Because of the small magnitude of runoff from Section 3, which will be further reduced as the surface area of the swimming pool is known, no provisions have been made to detain runoff from this area. 5. ON .SITE DETENTION Exhibit C, Table 2, show the Mass Curve calculations and provides a preliminary sizing of the required detention pond. Exhibit C, Table 3, is the Inflow/Outflow Simulation for the detention pond. page 3 The outlet consists of three 5" wide curb cuts, on a 0.6' high (7" high), as shown on the Site Plan. A coefficient of 0.7 was used for the rectangular weir equation. The maximum Q-out attained with this outlet (all three weirs) is calculated at 3.26 cfs, slightly higher than the pre-development rate of 3.18 cfs but still within acceptable engineering limits. Under these conditions the ponding volume attained is calculated at slightly over 2,900 cu.ft., a maximum ponding depth at 0.60, 1.85' and the maximum outflow velocity at of 4.34 fps at each weir. In order to forestall erosion due to the runoff concentration at the three weirs a riprap pad, 6'x6', is to be installed at the downstream side of each weir. It is further recommended that a hay bale barrier be placed further down in the remaining portion of Lot 2, Lodgeco Subdivision, as a temporary sedimentation/erosion measure until it is developed. Exhibit D, Table 4, is a plot of the ponding available in the parking lot. The volume available is 3,280 cu.ft., greater than the 2,900 cu.ft. required. This pond is delineated in the grading plan given in the 24"x36" Site Plan. Exhibit E, flow simulation for the detention pond, is a graphical depiction of Table 3, Exhibit C. _~~ ®~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ e ~ 'K b6®a mi^. rx~ r^ ~ " ^. o ~ ~"~'~ ~d ~~ ~ ~~ a ~ a ~~ " 4 ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ a rs-may o , ~, . ao.oa . . d ! ~ y p ^q p ~! g @ ~ ae®axo ~ ears rape wa +on. ~y ~p t^4 ,rte V^ J CHRISTIAN A. GALINDO, P.E. # 53425, R.P.L.S. # 44~~~m~~~~~~~`~~°~ April 20, 1995 page 4 v EXHIBIT A ---- --- / ~~ 1s ~~ REMAINDER ^F ~~ ~`' L^T 2 VACANT ~ ~,~~ LODGEC^ SUBDIVISION ~ CONCRETE ~, 1996/331 ~ O AG WALL ~ ~,Lg PLATTED 5, ~ O ,2 ~.QOS'` ~~ ~~ ~,~~ ~ ~` ~` SWIM ING m ~~~ Fob ~V5 ~ IRS /2' IRS RE DES GNED S'~~ O,o sf r/~~' rv T -~01 1S BY C~i A ~F4~ / < A `~T~p~ D Eb4 ?~ ~ ,~< `y],Z ~~ ~.JL ~ ~'gy °i l A e~'~' Q~ E3CISTING ~~ ti~ ', `2'~PS~~C~ Tj0 GRavDRARY M r ~~ 5tis~~I ~0 ° G~ PADRKING ~ ~ ''a ~ rv CJO~ ~0,5'R ~ LOT ND2ER OF ~,~ .0 0`~'a~ S S O_ r \~1,p~,o~ sA b~P'~ ~ ti~ ly 30 a R ~,~ S7 LC]DGEC^ SUBDIVISI[ ~ ~ -~ S° 1996/331 ~c ~~T L ~~~~~~ti~ ~ ~ S ~ ~ 2'R oa u~~ PLATTED T ~F~QQ- ~ ~ ~Os31 1/Z' ~ Q~~~ NET 8a TH PARK ~`~ ~S~v~ ~- A ~ ~ S ISLAND F I^N II ''~0 2,~~ ~'O ~° ~~ .S 32 0~~ 1~ 2~ o A 374 SF 43 29,0 TT D ~ .~ ~~ ti2~ 2 8 ~,° r ~ ~ 5.0 a 34 ~ r 27 o io,s' ~° ~ ~° ~ zo,o 0o s° °; 15 4,R X7,6 a ~~~ ~° 35 ti c~° 16 s'R `Z 4'R ,~ 26 'S ET is P R 2 r~ ~~ti 17 1 S \ J SLAND 18 1 \ \~ '~ /L~- A202 S 18 R ~~ 2 R N 45° ~tio ~o ~ 3 9sAy ~~ 2 4 9.0 2 ~ ° 19 ~<v 1: 7 '~ \ ~a X 3 8 2 2 ~ '~S' 9 80 ~ ° 3 9 3 `~° 8 ~C.'O 40o NET °~~~ 7 ~ 2" .ti0' 9° ANDEA 4,R 6 ,yy~O' ~~'` 41 3 SF ~~ U~ '9 4 2 4~ S, 4'R Y`'e~ 5 ~~ S v'°~~ U jQ~ ° ` f 4 R ~~os 3 ~ ~~°1o Pgg~~~ ~,.. / <v 1~' ~ o .S ti0' 4 Q- c oa~z ~~f. Is'R ~.~~ e S ~~' cG ~ 2~2 ~?p 0~~~~ o y \\ ~' o~ VACANT ~ .`O~ 2 Liz• RF ~Q l9 \ ~~ •O \~ \ v C,Y~ EXHIBIT B 11 11 11 ~'jt CA 1 i <r p' IY-f i M r-1 aT '~' 1 V' II 1-I Oti N N 1 st' W N M 1 u y-. n 1 ,~ 11 0 11 N o o I M m o o I Irs n o n 1 I 11 ~ 11 1 i [s7 n u I I I 1 .--7 n ~ 11 n II 1 1 Q+ II Q1 US 11 N M `a' 1 OO .-I N m I ~ M 1 E+ 11 11 >-I 11 Y. 11 W N N ; - N i l 1 O I I 1[J II N O O ~"s <r 0 0 s~ 1 II II 1 1 11 11 i 1 11 II 11 11 1 1 1 r-~ II 11 (72 N 11 Y+ II O~ O r'I 1 `a• N N 1 O~ V• Q5 1 O N N r-i •a >ti 11 Cti i l - 1 - - - - ; ' II 11 N O O i N aY' O O 3 >G 11 In 11 1 I ~-- I I II 11 N i t II 11 1 1 I 1 11 II 11 OI U] 11 00 00 Gii I cl• tom- r-1 1,1J 1 'O' II S.+ 11 r-i .--1 Ll') ICJ N N 1 O O 11 ST. 11 1 1 • .-I 11 11 N O O 1 N M p O ~' 11 O 11 1 i Ii 11 rl 11 II 1 I 1 11 11 1 1 I 1 11 i I 11 11 CJI U] 11 -V' \O ~O 1 Lam- ~ O~ M 1 O 11 YI 11 O's .--i rl 1 N ri .--1 N 1 G> 11 E 11 ?v II Il') 11 ~I O O 1 N M O O 1 M 11 11 11 11 1 1 I 1 11 11 11 11 1 1 11 11 H N ~-. Qi 11 YI 11 M M II b~-. 11 ~D ...G II O 11 11 O I I ~'1 Il. . .-1 1.1 - '--I r-1 ii 11 11 11 11 11 11 f-1 fll 11 Y t 1 Od <T L'~ '~' 11 11 I T 11 .--1 ~ n o n . 11 11 to 11 11 .--i ~1 r-i ~1 n 1 u n n it ,1 I .-~+ U) 1 1+ II .-I ri ~ 11 11 6ti 11 11 UJ - W - 11 ~ II O+ ~ 11 N 11 II 11 II 11 it 11 II H ~ 11 1!5 ~ 11 ~ 11 M _ II to 11 l 0 ~ 11 II 11 O 11 LYf '~ II .-+ it II 11~ 11 11 11 tl 11 II t-+ U) 11 Y+ 11 M G~ M Qti II 11 ar 11 II ~.O - `a 11 Ln 11 [~- r"' II 11 11 II ~ 11 el .'~ 11 p 11 - 11 C 'O II O O O 0 0 0 1--- 11 H q V] 11 - (U 11 ~ V] 11 0 0 0 O O O a x 11 G 11 O E. t6 II -~- 11 V al 1.1 II a g.' pC] 11 11 - 11 d II c~ a-- 11 U 11 c - 11 n o o W N e"y IC S-+ 11 w z -+--+ 11 O U 11 v .-. II M .-i .--~ o a o cw a c: i l ~ 11 Q H ~ 11 E V I I .`G E O it II p pl: V 11 11 p[ ~ ~_.-~ I t 11 11 11 11 .C -+-i 11 O O O O O O 11 +s w 11 N ~D Oti ~'' ~ l0 1 i b+ N .-i 11 ~ 11 11 N i~ n a 11 u 11 n 11 n 11 w u 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 c> w 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 u n o w a n o o Ise ~ o 0 0 11 ~ 11 u n u 11 u n n c~ 11 0 0 0 O o 0 11 i t I.n a.-~ 0 0 0 .ra u u u n o o a o 0 0 n n 11 11 II II 11 11 1 i 11 FC N T 00 M 1 O ~ 00 M 1 O .+~ 11 !U 11 LL'S N Ln 1 'V' i1"') N LL'S I `>' O 11 YI 11 sl' 0 0 1 Ff') d' O O 1 tt7 a it U 11 1 1 11 ~-C 0 0 0 1 O 0 0 0 1 O O+ 11 11 1 i ~ 11 -.-i 11 11 11 1 1 I ,3C 11 11 V1 11 11 }.a I.CS 11 fU 11 +-I 11 Ul 11 R. ---_, 11 O G•-. 11 <U 11 O (lY ~ II tCJ t6 ~ l7'+ II O r-1 it C/] E~ 11 it ~ 11 Qi 11 .~ •~-I U UJ Q1 11 ~ 11 .-1 -.-1 O U U U U '~_ -11 II II 1r1 Y-1 fU 11 Y+ YI ~-~ AY 'V' 11 LT O 11 11 i l O 11 }-1 i l N N ~ ^V •= +-> ~ 11 O 11 (L N V] ~ ~ In O~ ^C3 11 11 W 11 f6 ~ ~ l.+ II ~ ~ [Cf 1 O I1 11 H 11 S-+ O lCi O+ ii O O ~ O'. a 11 11 11 C' V f1a ~ 11 V V C7 11 ~ O 11 11 N 11 `--. 11 II I I N tU 11 •.-i i t .a,-i 11 >-+ 11 O 11 ~1 N M L 11 CV d 11 .-1 N M Y6 ~ ~ .ice 11 O R7 C6 11 U 11 N 11 4-1 i l N 11 -+-1 -+-~ I I O it -+~ O ti ",C+ q 11 V] I I F4 i t Fr-C. 11 E+ YI I T 1 U) I I O O I W O I f0 .-1 1 Y+ 1 Kq 1 - ~ I D-. Y. I ~~ 1 I c o I ~ . C) I 0 V I i a.+ i d. I N N I .O I -ice )v ~-~ Si i it O i 1--. ~-1 I -~ L ~' ~+ ?.+ 1 O ~ ~•-1 .~ ti? N Ul ~-. ".~ 1 a+ O .. . V) C -i-i ~ ~ .a _+ ~ cn o G V O V O O O o M o O C`~ O b O W QY O as7 O O V' O v n Ir> m o co o <r o o .ri o 6 t~ an Oti O O c~0 O ~ O O O O r- O O cA 00 O In O O c0 O O [~ a!) tD O 00 O l0 O O p O O W O I s-. o m -S~ N '-O EXHIBIT C Job: 9-95 MASS CURVE CALCULATIONS TABLE 2 Date: 04J19~95 (1D0-year storm) TIME, t C A A I (100) Q in 60 ~ t V in Q out ---- V aut -------- Delta V --------- --------- 0 ---------- -------- ---------- 0 --------- -------------- D D S 0.438 14.760 6.469 300 1,941 3,18D 954 987 10 11.639 5.101 600 3,061 1,908 1,153 15 9.132 4.266 900 3,839 2,862 917 20 8.430 3.695 1,200 4,434 3,816 618 25 1.477 3.277_ 1,500 4,916 4,770 146 30 6.146 2.957 1,800 5,322 5,724 (402) 35 6.164 2.702 2,100 5,673 6,678 (1,005) 40 5.688 2.493 2,400 5,983 7,632 (1,649) 45 5.291_ 2.319 2,700 6,262 .8,586 (2,324) 50 4.954 2.171 3,000 6,514 9,540 (3,026} Constants for use in formula: I-b~(t+d)"e County: Braaos 2-yr 5-yr 10-yr 2S-yr 50-yr 100-yr b 65 76 80 89 48 96 e 0.$06 0.185 0.763 0,154 0.145 0.730 d 8.0 ------------------- 8.5 --------- 8.5 --------- 8.S --------- 8.5 8.0 ----------------- Job: 9-95 FLOW SIMULATION TABLE 3 Date: 19-Apr-95 (25-year storm) Time, t Q in V in DV in + V ave Contour h Q out V out Cum, V sta. min. cfs c.f. V sta. - c.f. - elv. ft -------- ft ----------- cfs --------- c.f. --------- v out ------- c.f. ---------- ------- 0 ------------ 0 -------- 0 ------- -- ----- -- 329.50 0 0 5 6.469 2,870 2,810 1,435 329.92 0.42 2.13 819 819 2,051 10 5.101 4,526 3,701 2,879 330.09 O.S9 3.24 411 1,.790 2,736 15 4.266 5,669 3,819 3,308 330.10 0.60 3.26 419 2,169 2,900 20 3.695 6,536 3,767 3,333 330.10 0.60 3.26 979 3,748 2,181 25 3.217 1,232 3,484 3,136 330.07 0.57 3.18 954 4,102 2,530 30 2.957 1,814 3,112 2,821 330.02 O.S2 3.04 911 5,614 2,201 35 2.702 8,315 2,101 2,451 329.47 0.47 2.84 867 6,480 1,835 40 2.493 8,315 1,835 1,835 329,91 0.41 2.70 809 1,290 1,025 45 2.319 8,315 1,025 1,025 329.69 0.19 1.89 551 7,840 474 50 ------- 2.171 ------------ 8,315 -------- 474 ---------- 474 -------- 329.51 -------- 0,01 ----------- 0.92 --------- 126 --------- 1,967 ------- 348 ---------- 33D.20 ItJDGECO PARKING LOT PENDING AVAILABILITY 33D.10 330.00 `` 329.9D Z W 329.8D J W 329.7D EXHIBIT D 329.6D 329.5D-IL 0.0 500.0 1000.0 1500.0 2000.0 2500.0 3000.0 3500.0 STORAGE VOLUME, 1000 C.F. TABLE 4. PONDING AVAILABILITY Elev. PARTIAL ft. AREA, s.f ---------------- 329.50 0 329.70 2,900 379.90 4,100 330,10 6,000 CUM. .AREA, s,f 0 2,900 7,000 13,000 Del h ft. .0.00 0.20 0.20 0,20 Del V Cum V cu.ft, cu.ft. --------------- 0 0 290 290 990 1,280 2,000 3,280 U W W W H W U w H 3 a w IIJDGECO PARKING I10T FIIJW SIMULATION 7 W 6 V 0 a o a O 3 ~ w C7 2 ~ H 1 a ~V.O - Q in - Q out --• PONQING EXHI~I'~ E 8 o.a 1a.a ~a.a 30.0 4u.u TIME,-MIN. Interoffice Memo To: Sabine Kuenzel, Planning Division From: Jim Smith, Sanitation Division,~- Date: April 28, 1995 Subject: Review of Project Review Committee Agenda.; May 3, 1995 ~. Parking Lot Plan - Lodgeco Parking Lot (95-409):` I do not see any container location or reference to garbage collection on the plan. It is my understanding that all site plans or modifications to site plans must have garbage collection referenced before they are accepted at Planning. Let me know if I am understanding the process correctly. Parking Lot Plan -Holy Cross Lutheran Church (95-702): Again, I do not see any container location or reference to garbage collection on the plan. Final Plat -Brown Addition (95-215): No problems with this plat. Final Plat - Deuel Addition (95-216): No problems with this plat. Final Plat -Polar-Bek Subdivision (95-218): No problems with this plat. I have routed these plans and plats to Paul Urso, Street Superintendent for his review. Please contact me if you have any questions. sabinell/js RELEASE OF PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT THE STATE OF TEXAS ~ ~ KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF BRAZOS ~ Reference is made to a Private Access Easement ("Easement") recorded in Volume 270, page 173 of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas. LODGECO PROPERTIES,. LTD., a Texas limited partnership, the current owner of the land in which the Private Access Easement recorded in Volume 270, Page 178, of the Official Records of Brazos County, Texas is located in its entirety, hereby declares said recorded Easement to be vacated and released. Dated effective 1995. LODGECO PROPERTIES, LTD., a Texas Limited Partnership BY: ROSSCO HOLDINGS INCORPORATED, a California corporation, GENERAL PAWNER By STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~ COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ~ On MAY 995, before me, °~'-~~ s y ~ ~ f ~ (here insert name and tle~of t~heff®cer) °~p~r~sonally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person whose name(s) is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/ executed the same in his/ t authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/h t signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. (FB52)5487\DOC.1/gjc