Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Miscellaneous
{~ CITY ~ :_A:~,I'~:.,E ~T~TIOI`I ~ ~ ,~ ~ _ _ ~ ~~ ~s~~ il .:~ ~, May 8, 1995 Brisben Development Co. 4750 Ashwood, STE 300 Cincinnati, OH 45249 Attna Kim Vowell Re; Windsor Pointe Infrastructure Engineer's Estimate Dear Mr. Vowell: We are in receipt of the May 8, 1995 engineer's estimate on the above referenced project. Tlie City of College Station is in agreement with the amounts shown thereon for the two alternates that you will be bidding. It is our understanding that you wish to use "Alternate - B" which is the ADS/RANCOR storm drain system. We have approved this material with cement stabilized bedding for use in a public system. The estimate for Alternate - B is $264,585.46. This is the amount that should be used in the bond you wish to post as a financial guarantee for the final plat for Windsor Pointe. It is my understanding that you have been working with our legal department and they are satisfied with the bond language and are just waiting for this amount to be verified. I hope this information helps and please do not hesitate to call if I can be of further assistance. Sincerely, Veronica J. B. Morgan, P.E. Asst. City Engineer cc: Kent Laza, City Engineer Shirley Volk, Development Coordinator Roxanne Nemik, Sr. Asst. City Attorney Tom Lowe Greg Taggert .:,.. w 5650 SOUTH BRAINARD AVENUE, LA GRANGE, ILLINOIS 60525 708/352-6282 Fax 708!352-6295 May. 9, 1995 Ms. Roxanne Nemcik, Atty. at Law city of College Station 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX ?7842-9960 Re: W.O. Brisben Companies, Inc. Bond. No. 78826. Dear Ms. Nemcik: Mr. Vowel! of W. O. Brisben Companies, Inc. called and indicated. you had a concern over how to contact the Surety in the event of a claim. You can. reach Frontier Insurance Company of New York at 195 Lake Louise Marie Road, Rock Hill, NY 22775-8000. Their phone .number is (S00) 836-2100_ If you should have any further questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, SCHEER'S, INCORPORATED Bonnie Kruse Bond. Department. PE~'(~ NCE I~NI) KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT WE, as Principal (hereinafter. called the Obligor), and (hereinafter called the Surety), are held firmly bound to the City of College Station, Texas, in the sum of to the payment of which sum, well and truly to be made, we do bind ourselves, heirs, executors and administrators, jointly and severally, by these presents. Signed by us and dated at .1995. Texas this day of WHEREAS, the Obligor has requested that the City of College Station approve and accept for recordation the currently proposed plat of Windsor Pointe Subdivision without having completed the construction of Central Park Lane and all other public improvements required by law for the approval and final recordation of said subdivision. Obligor has therefore elected to post a bond for the completion of said improvements in order to secure the approval and recording of said plat by the said city. KNOW THEREFORE, the conditions of authorization by the city are as follows: PERFORMANCE BOND for construction, completion, and acceptance by the City of College Station of all improvements for public street, water, and storm drainage as depicted on the approved plans for Windsor Pointe Subdivision, as described on the plan schedule included herein as Exhibit '°A". Said construction to be according to the standards and specifications of the City of College Station, Texas. Said improvements to be bonded at the amount of according to the Engineer's Estimate included herein as Exhibit "B". The Obligor shall faithfully and fully perform the above conditions wen~this obligation shall be void; otherwise to remain in full force in law. Executed in presence of: Brisben Development Inc. Accepted: 19 Surety Address: ,000351-C.08-11(2580) ~df3- ~ NAN 9'V,~~g r i,~'gl~.+~~~19 S aJ~~ WATER PLANTS WATER LIlVE "A" (I2")PLAN PROFILE WATER LIl~iE "B" (6")PLAN PR()FiLE WATER LINE r~~.n (gn .)PLAN PR®~$LE UTILITY DETAILS CE 7 UTII,ITY DETAILS CE ~ UTILITY DETAILS CE 9 STREET PLANS STREET PLAN PRQFILE (CENTRAL PA.RI~ LANE) ®FFSTTE STORM SEWER PLAN PROFII.E (3FFSITE FUTURE STREET CENTERLINE GRADE PLAN (REFERENCE ~}NLY) STREET STRIPING PLAN WITH SIGNAGE STREET DETAILS -SHEET I STREET DETAILS - SgiEET 2 ~ ., PUBV li WATBR L{NE$ Item No. Description Estimated Quantit Unit it Price $ Amount Waterline "A"' Sta. 0+00 to Sta. 8+21 1 12'k12" M.J. Ta i Sleeve and Valve for AC Pie 1 Ea 3000 3000 2 Burin w/ 3/8" thic 18" Steel Encasement w/ Cascade Co. S cers 70 LF 90 6300 3 4" x 2" Reducer w/ 2' . J. Gate Valve & Box 1 Ea 350 350 4 12'k4" M.J. Tee & 4" x ' Reducer w/ 2" M.J. Gate Valve & Box Ea 400 400 5 12" 11 1 /4° M.J. Bend w/ nc. Thrust Blockin 2 Ea 250 500 6 T 1 F.H. w/ all A urtenan s 1 Ea 1600 1600 7 12'k6" M.J. Tee w/Conc. Thrust ckin 3 Ea 250 750 8 5' M.J. Gate Valve w/Box and 5' lu 1 Ea 320 320 9 12" Waterline "A" DR14 C900 Class 200 C Pi in Class D Embed ent 754 LF 23 17342 1D 12" M.J. Gate Valve w/Box 2 Ea 900 1,800 11 2" Blow-off Assembl 1 Ea 350 350 Waterline °'i3°° Sta. 0+00 to Sta. 7+43 12 3/8'k16" Steel Encasement w/Cascade MFG. Co. S ce 56 LF 36 2 016 13 6" M.J. Gate Valve w/Box 1 Ea 300 300 14 5' 11 1 /4° M.J. Bend wl Conc. Thrust Blockin 1 Ea 200 200 15 5k6" M.J. Tee and 5' M.J. Gate Valve w/Box and /Conc. Thrust ckin 2 Ea 480 960 16 5' 45° M.J. Bend w/Thrust Blockin 1 Ea 200 200 17 5' 221/2° M.J. Bendw/Thrust Blockin 1 Ea 200 200 18 5' 90° M.J. Bend w/Thrust Blockin 1 Ea 200 200 19 6" DR14 C900 Class 200 PVC Waterlin w/ Class D Beddin LF 9.50 7058.50 20 Remove Exist. 2" Blowoff Assembl aka Connection to Exist. 5' AC WL 1 Ea 225 225 Waterline "C" Sta. 0+00 to ta. 7+25 21 6" M.J. Gate Valve and Plu w/ nc. Thrust Blockin 1 300 300 22 5k5' M.J. Tee and 5' M.J. Ga Valve and Plu w/Conc. Thrust Blockin 2 Ea 480 960 23 G' 45° M.J. Bend w/Conc. rust Blockin 2 Ea 200 400 24 5' DR14,C900,CIass 200 VC Waterline w/ Class D Embedment 725 LF 9.50 6887.50 SUBTOTAL 52619 ~~. ,'> CENTRAL PAR!( LANE • STREET AND DRAINAGE ftem ' No. Description Estimated Quantit Una Unit Price $ Amount 1 Concrete Drive Entrance w/Median and Curb 2 Ea 3,000 6000 2 Remove & Dis se of Conc.Walkwa in Accord. w! COCS S c. No. 702 8 LF 24 192 3 Construct Sidewalk Ram in Accordance w/the Drawin s 2 Ea 600 1200 4 Const.4"x6' Sdwlk IncLReinf. Steel & Sand Cush.in Accord. w/ COCS #1402 1,270 LF 16 20,320 5 1 1/2" De h of T D HMAC in Accord. w/ COOS S c. #306, Com lets & 315 Tons 45 14,175 In-Place Includin all Materials and Tack or Prime Coat 6 6" of Crushed Limestone Base Mater.ln Accord. w/ COCS #202 Com late & 1 520 ns .17.25 26 220 In-Place 7 Lime Stabilized Su rade to 6"~ Accord.w/ COCS t/204 4 310 S.Yd 1.65 7112 8 Pre ration of R.O.W. In Accord nce w/ COCS S cification No. 101 4 S.Yd 0.30 1230 9 Construct Concrete Curb & Gutte the Locations Shown on the Drawin s 356 LF 8 10 848 Com ate & In-Place in Accordance w/ COCS S cification No. 401 10 Pedestian Guard-Rail Location Sh wn on Dw s & in Accord.w/ Encloserd 20 LF 100 2000 Detail Sheet Com late & In-Place \ 11 12 Seedin of R.O.W. for Park Lane in Ac ordance w/ COCS S c.,N`o. 709 Su rade Lime Stabilized to De h of 5'i,Usin 6% Lime Incl t Lime 1 510 4310 S.Yd S.Yd 0.56 3.50 831 15085 & Mani .Com I. & Cam ct.ln-Place in cord. w/ COCS.#s 106 ~ 204 13 Excavation & Pro . Utiliz. Earthwork in Ac rd. w/ COGS S c. No. 103 2680 C.Yd 5.25 14 070 14 T Ill Barricade Fixe !' 60 Ea 12.5 750 15 Street Li ht C.O.C.S. Standard Galvanize 3 Ea 3292 9 876. SUBTOTAL 129 908 DFF-SITE DRAINAGE RCP - Alter~afe ' iA" Item No. Description f ,'" Estimated Quantit Unit Unit Price $ Amount 1 2' H x 4' W Box Culvert w/ Ceryrent Sand Stabilization 68 LF 110 7,480 2 Concrete Headwall w/Win s~ & A ron 5 W x 4' - 5' L x 5' H 1 LS 3500 3,500 3 Std. Recessed Curb Inlet w`I Rin & Cover 1 LS 1,200 1,200 4 Std. Recessed Curb Inlet'Modified w/Rin & Cover 1 LS 2800 2800 5 Concrete Junction Bo s 4 Ea 1800 7200 6 35' RCP C-76 Class~fll w/ Beddin 512 LF 45 23 Ov0 - 7 42" RCP C-76 Clash III w! Beddin 6 LF 70 41 020 8 Remove & Re lac `Concrete Curb & Gutter 2 LF 22 5500 9 Remove & Re lade Concrete Drive 10' x 15' Re lace w/ 5' Thickness 150 SF 2.75 412.5 10 Remove & Re I ce 6' Concret® Walk 250 LF 10.75 2687.5 11 Remove & Re lace Barbed Wire Fence 20 LF 6.25 125 SUBTOTAL 94965 ~'~~~ e®°°a® ~ , ~~ 4 4~, ®®oNSe®looooe® ® ~ N4R~f . BA ! . se ®ee wo~vm a~a~a»®®CE ~~ 60873 ~k~~' ti ~, ~~, ' ~ .~ ®® ~ ~ ;~: , "c'We-4'i.~s 5 OPF-SITE ®RA/NAGE ADS/F/ANCOR - A/tert-ate ~° Item No. 1 2 3 Description 2' H x 4' W Box Culvert w/Cement Sand Stabilization Concrete Headwall w/Win s& A ron 5 W x 4' - 5' L x 5 H Std. Recessed Curb Inletw/ Rin & Cover Estimated Quantit 68 1 1 UnR LF LS LS Unit Price $ 110 3 ~( 200 Amount /~ 7,480 3500 1,200 4 Std. Recessed Curb Inlet Modified w/ Rin & Cover 1 L 2800 2800 5 6 Concrete Junction Boxes Remove & Re lace Concrete Cu & Gutter 4 250 ,tea LF 1800 22 7200 5500 . 7 Remove & Re lace Concrete Driv 10' x 15 Re lace w/ 5' Thickness 1 SF 2.75 412.5 8 Remove & Re lace 5 Concrete Wal LF 10.75 2687.5 9 Remove & Re dace Barbed Wire Fence 20 LF 6.25 125 10 30" Pi w/Beddin 512 LF 33.8 17305.6 11 36" Pi w/Beddin 358 LF 45.66 16346.28 12 42'° Pi w/Beddin 228 LF 64.11 14617.08 SUBTOTAL 79 174 PAINT STRIPING Item No. Description. Estimated Quantit Unit Unit Price $ Amount 1 White Paint Stri in 590 SF 0.4 236 2 Yellow Paint Stri in 60 SF 0.4 24 SUBTOTAL 260 SIGNAGE AND PAINT STRIPING SIGN Item No. Description / MUTCD Designation Estimate Quantit Unit it Price Amount 1 Street Name Si n / SNS ~ 2 Ea 50 1 DD 2 S ed Limit35 Si n / R2-1 24" x °' 1 Ea 50 50 3 Sto Si n / R1-1 30" x ~' 3 Ea 57.5 172.5 4 Desi Hated Lane Si n / R3-11 24'°x30' 2 Ea 50 100 SUBTOTAL 422.5 Alternate "A" (RCP) TOTAL Alternate "B" (ADS/~iANCOR) TOTAL ®®®~~ ~~ NOR H B. L~LL,1R. oo®ES~•W w& suw~m®a.~ ~ ~©~ ~ 60873 -;~~~ K `~ ~' ~~~~~~ $ 273,174.50 $ 262,383.46 Printed by Shirley Volk 4/24/95 5:09pm From: Roxanne Nemcik To: Shirley Volk, Veronica Morgan Subject: Winsdor Pointe --------------------------------------- ===NOTE====------=====4/24/95==3:28pm== I spoke with Bill Thornton concerning the easement and he agreed to modify the easement document and supply a copy of a title policy to me. He said he will get the revised easement to me tomorrow. Page: 1 3 a 'a~ ITS' CAF CL.L,~GE STATIOI~i - , , .:::it€~ May 8, 1995 Brisben Development Co. 4750 Ashwood, STE 300 Cincinnati, OH 45249 Attn: Kim Vowell Re: Windsor Pointe Infrastructure Engineer's Estimate Dear Mr. Vowell: We are in receipt of the May 8, 1995 engineer's estimate on the above referenced project. The City of College Station is in agreement with the amounts shown thereon for the two alternates that you will be bidding. It is our understanding that you wish to use "Alternate - B'° which is the ANCOR storm drain system. We have approved this material with cement stabilized bedding for use in a public system. The estimate for Alternate - B is $264,585.46. This is the amount that should be used in the bond you wish to post as a financial guarantee for the final plat for Windsor Pointe. It is my understanding that you have been working with our legal department and they are satisfied with the bond language and are just waiting for this amount to be verified. I hope this information helps and please do not hesitate to call if I can be of further assistance. Sincerely, l1(.,~s-Gn c~C.(, f C~~r (~,0,<T- ~.. ~ Veronica J. B. Morgan, P.E. Asst. City Engineer cc: Kent Laza, City Engineer Shirley Volk, Development Coordinator Roxanne Nemik, Sr. Asst. City Attorney Tom Lowe Greg Taggert ~° ' sa ` ~, GIT1' OF COLLEGE STATION DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ItOt TEXAS a~~E GOLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77840 • <:'~' •=.; :; ., ...:.... Facsimile Cover Sheet -----~ To: /~~ ~~ Company: Phone: ~O '° ~-~' Fax: ~ ~~~ From: ~ ~~o i~ Company: Phone: s~ -'~°`7v Fax: 7 f~ ~ ~° ~ ~~'~ Date: %~ /°~ Pages including this cover page: Comments: /~~ °- ~'%%%%%~a=%%=%`;'eo=;_;:;:%` - C409) 764-3570 ..-:.,..-............:-•-.-•.~:;: ,:,- C409) 764-3496 FAX ,-,..-,.,.o.,,...,.,-.•~•;~.. ,.,.,.,.,. ,: ,.,o..,., „ April 25, 1995 SUBJECT: Windsor Pointe Subdivision Final Plat Windsor Point Apartment Project TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: The City of College Station has been working closely with Kim Vowell, Development Associate for W. O. Brisben Companies, Inc. of Cincinnati, Ohio and the engineering firm, Municipal Development Group of College Station, Texas since approximately December, 1994. It was necessary for any potential developer to plat the property along the south side of Southwest Parkway, along both sides of the extension of Central Park Lane, which included preparation of impact studies, infrastructure documents, as well as building plans, etc. in order to develop the property as an apartment complex. A local realtor had already handled the rezoning of the property in early 1994 to a zoning district which would accommodate an apartment project. To date, the City has approved the Preliminary Plat for the Windsor Pointe Subdivision, has conditionally approved the building plans for the apartments, and is currently finalizing the review and approval of all construction documents for the infrastructure associated with utilities necessary for the .platting of the property. Approval of the plat by both the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council is required prior to filing the plat for record with the County. Filing the plat for record with the County is required before the City can issue building permits for the project. The City's Subdivision Regulations additionally require that infrastructure to support the subdivision must be either .built, approved and accepted by the City prior to filing the plat for record and issuing building permits, or the applicant may submit some type of financial guarantee in lieu of completing construction prior to recording the plat for record. The financial guarantee is based on the applicant's engineer's estimate. To date, the City has not .received that estimate. Parkland Dedication in the amount of $225.00 per dwelling unit is required prior to issuance of a building permit. The Final Plat which is scheduled for consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission on May 4, 1995, and by the City Council on May 11, 1995, conforms to the preliminary plat as approved by the Commission and Council in January of this year. The building plans have been reviewed several times by all reviewing divisions in the City, and. are currently being review for the final time before issuance of a building permit (following filing of the plat for record). The City's Legal Department is currently working with attorneys for Brisben, as well as attorneys for owners of .property on which off-site easements are necessary for providing storm drainage for this project. Several easement documents and been submitted and reviewed, and the final document is currently being prepared, and must also be filed for record prior to filing the final plat for record. All long as all requirements of the City's Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Regulations are met, staff has no reason to believe the final plat will not be approved and filed as requested. If you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. I have attached a copy of the City's Subdivision Regulations for your use. Yours very truly, Jane R. Kee Shirley J. Volk City Planner Development Coordinator Printed by Shirley Volk 4/25/95 1:58pm From: Roxanne Nemcik To: Shirley Volk Subject: Winsdor Point Performance Bond ===NOTE====------=====4/25/95==1:25pm== I have reviewed the form that you sent to me. It is generally acceptable as to form. However, we will need to review the bond in its final form with all the provisions and performance obligations in it prior to acceptance of the bond. Additionally, please inform the developer that we need the original bond of insurance from the surety. Page: 1 ~'PR-25-95 $AT 1 0 : 1 0 Ahl W I NDSDOR PO I NTE LTD . 409 6,93 _1 995 P. 01 N~T'IONAL CONSTRUGTI®N, LLG 2e70#5 ~LJrENI.~. AvENUE N,~.sHVtt,t.E. TENlvE5.5EE 3'I21 t FAQ COPY (CIS) 259°2808 F~c (BIS) 259.3032 Date: rime: b D T0: ~~~3~~~~ FACSIMILE NO: FROM: i` OUR FACSIMI~.E N0. (4fl9) 693-2742 P ~: ~~~~~-b ~ ~~~ NUMBER OF PAGES; ~ INCLUDING COVER PAGE. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS TRANSMISSION,OR IT IT IS IMPAIRED IN ANY WAY, PLEASE CALL AT (409) b93-1995. COMMENTS: ~~ r ~ ~ ~ti ~~ ~ (~~ ~ bd N~~ ~~~ ~ ` c~,~, i i4 ~ryts~ ~- ~~ - `Tov ~~~~ -~~ ~ ~- ~ .~~~~~ ~ . ~~~w ~~~ ~~~ y~ ' ~-~PF'c-~5-95 SAT 1®: i l AM WINDSDOR POINTE LTD. ,_4©9 E•93 1995 P. 02 SOW ,~L.L l~N BY THESE PP.LcS~'i'~ 'F7i~lT ~~ - ~ ~~ (hrtiaa.frrs' eaIIed the Obtigar)~ ~ ~ - ,. G' ' o>~_~C~t~ ~[-~}.~„~ »uzp~,aad hold hrss~,tr bousad to tlsn ~irafxr ~ ) n the :v: of 5~ .~._.~... ~ ~ the ~~c~t at which sum, srGli :a avly sa b0 made. we da bird eursel+~~. bCi,rs, ~pNtas's std seLminis~rars, ~aiatlY ~ ~'~L~', ~y tip grest~ts. Signed by us anct dateQ at - ~,~,_-~...+..- ., Chao this ~y of ~• _ ~, 1 g 4 cc.~s7~;.tc-t' CF~~,o t ~t ~' Ls4 ~w - . - ~ ~7`'c WFi~RF~45, tic .Obliavt ~ requesr~ atldieri~tia~ from th4~ to t syat*m ro rise foLtowtrtg tots ~d Iaadr: 5ubdjrisioa Tovraahip ~ Secciaa ~ Toss Raage ~~ Gt NOW, THF..R£~ORE, ~e caadidGtL of aurhatiZadas ~' tlz~~ are ss follows; C• Ca ~, ~ F~oRJ~te-xc~ Boma vetch tbt faiQtav'C~Steai plcua, as aPpcoVad by tAG , saQ tb~ it~ndstd t uanoam, r~tits sad rrgvl~oas aF , szid 0l111~O1 ~tb [J3G Couary two {Z~ !eD Of ~~ 8ailr~ i1a'QtbwC.~-0G ptani (; ~81YY ~~ ~ldt WQy~ ~ ~ 2ti~icatt~ $asemmz clc~~.aaas ~d rbe rrr~, ~ . , ~---'`-- -c ." ":"*•. ystvrs, ~csrtuy, etc -Q1id~SC~:e~ b}~ me Ob~vt'S m~ecs cecnfiriag the acct;racy of the fafr ll~- A~J~DR0~7/L~,~ snllml -S'ic~y {b0) days Of the dzte sa=Yice is ia.~iated m ~y gari of'-~e ia~rvvcmmt< zb and Couniy fat a!~ ouf}ays ~ ~.~5 baevrret6 by the Caurty is h~~ t{s ces~ (a~/z.~1~t~~' z. vhioh abli~aaaa sizsu aoc esece3 the sum of S 6,697 ;90,,;;w~_{IQ9~ of tIu lastalt; ~g(~(?~yo~ vec i.~gro~u}. 7hc gracaedmg PCform~zare Bend is m as ws~+ ra be wasrruad to biacl thr d ~ of said svrtrt andlor ors iat~+t~r~a~. 1~,~.. Mr1~NA3~CE SAND ~-- r~Ot s P ~ ~~` the d$G= th,e ~'P1"oV:mt~t jS G?~j~i~d ~ Q'Stc~ ~y tIZC ObLiger and sscep:ed• by the r` ~, so ~ovat of 55,697.90 - ------- (FDA of ua Itrtptvyemr~t~ cost},t~ the Cott3ty sr~aiasc ~,{ 1ass, GZ~.i,RC or upeZ;SG 3ILrID,g dirzcsJy 5Y lrssoa GE defective taaaeri~IS ar WatL-maas.~tp - tozzstrtc~iea of acid ~rpvcsaeets or 'as, s r~t~lt of artier ~aps~vemrats, adjt<eszm~ars, e~.,~ ~tcxd at~ att~e cernpfadea by iLa obligor. •I~i+ obi}~az f~ur~tet ads tQ m..im ~ reFair9r taglteam,eaa, esc., x~t'emgtSy Oa ncxtce by If ibc dbti~or shalt fstrhful~y and ~ui.1y gerParm the ifsove eaadldoaa. svfts~ r~ obiigst{pa shin! be yeid~ athCnvize m zt~ ~ full four aad s~iPNa is lssv. ~.~r presca ,.BRISBEN 0EUE1.0PMENT,~,INC. 700 ~. Ct'mper Rd., Cincfnna~i 3otuE A~rp~d; l ~~......,.. DRfSf: ~~191~(.18l~ I/Z °~! 5[3RL7Y ADDRESS - E,40HTIER INSURANCE COMPANY 195 Lake Lorlise Ma rte, dock Hill, NY I2775, i 1 A VVU~/ JafbeS a ~OOTE, Att01^n2,}~-i11-~aG$ 1tJ-3t~d0-1~~13Q N3SSIa3 w~i6s?i:~~ S6~ 5~ add 04/25/95 14:11 4409 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS LQ]001 :k:k*~%K~::k~::k~*:k:k:k~~skK:~%k~:K~xe:kN:~ :~:~:~ ACTIVITY REPORT ~::~~ TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO. 1820 CONNECTION TEL 9pp6932742 CONNECTION ID START TIME 04/25 14:10 USAGE TIME 00'58 PAGES 1 RESULT OK CITY OF COL L ECi E TAT I®i~I April 25, 1995 - Kim Vowell Development Associate W. O. Brisben Companies, Inc. Suite 404 4700 Ashwood Drive Cincinnati, Ohio 45241 RE: Performance Bond -Windsor Pointe Infrastructure Dear Mr. Vowell: Our Legal Department has reviewed the form you submitted, and has found it generally acceptable as to form. However, they will need to review the bond in its final form with all the provisions and performance obligations in it prior to acceptance of the bond. Atso, the City will need to receive the original bond of insurance from the surety company. We hope this fulfills your request. Yours very truly, -- Shirley J. Volk Development Coordinator DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Post Office Box 9960 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, Texas 77842-0960 (409) 764-3570 `"Building a Better City in Partnership with You" 04/25/95 13:42 n409 764 3496 DEVELOPMENT SVCS 1QJ001 ~~~ ACTIVITY REPORT ~~~ TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX N0. 1818 CONNECTION TEL 9pp6932742 CONNECTION ID START TIME 04/25 13:39 USAGE TIME 03'22 PAGES 3 RESULT OK Printed by Shirley Valk 4/21/95 8:15am From: Shirley Volk To: MaryMarget Sexton Subject: fwd: Windsor Pointe again! ===URGENT=NOTE========4/20/95==4:21pm_______________________________________ CC: Natalie Thomas ............................................................................ MM: I just got a call from Greg Taggart requesting our '°City Attorney to write a letter" stating that "there is no legal impediment to the Windsor Pointe plat as long as all engineering requirements are met". If you write a letter, and please do if it will get them off our back, I would suggest you say something like "as long as all ordinance requirements are met, pending approval by the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council." If you want to throw something in about "engineering requirements" like he asked, I would pput that in addition to ordinance requirements. There, I've given advice to an attorney! How's that for shear gall! Anyway, I don't know if he wants this "TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN" or if he wants it to that contact at the bank. Here's that name & address: Lisa Ferrelli Nations Bank - Nashville, Tennessee 1 Nations Bank Plaza Nashville, TN 37239 (615) 749-3564 MM: We don't have an emergency situation anymore, and we DO have scheduling figured out. It will go to the next P&Z on 5/4 and to Council on 5/11. Please let me know whether or not you will be doing this letter so I can let him know if and when you expect to get it finished. Thanks again. Fwd=by:=MaryMarget=Se=4/20/95==4:55pm_______________________________________ Fwd to: Shirley Volk ............................................................................ I will always welcome advice from you! I see a logic problem here: he wants me to say that there is no legal impediment to the approval of the W.P. plat approval. And, you're right. I would have to add the caveat of "subject to ordinance compliance." Well, if they refuse to or fail to comply with some aspect of the ordinance, that's a legal impediment to plat approval. And this doesn't even take into account all of the things that could happen through the p&z, council approval process. It seems to me that there is just too much up in the air for me to make the kind of representation that he wants to Nations Bank. What happens if he doesn°t get a letter? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- - ~ Paae: 1 p.r~.ted by Shirley Volk 4/24/95 8:59am From: Roxanne Nemcik To: Development Services Group Subject: fwd: Winsdor Point easements --------------------------------------- ===NOTE====______=====4/21/95=11:16am== What is going on with Winsdor Point? I got a call from Bill Thornton today concerning drainage easements for this Subdivision? What is the status? Fwd=by:=5hirley=Volk==4/21/95==2:05pm== Fwd to: Roxanne Nemcik CC: Veronica Morgan ....................................... Roxy: I believe he's referring to the off-site easements necessary to carry the storm water from this subdivision to existing city infrastructure. I also believe you forwarded a copy of those easements (not executed) to Veronica earlier this week. She gave them to me to put in the file. The plat will be scheduled for the next P&Z meeting and the Council meeting on 5/11 since they have at least submitted everything necessary for staff to do it°s review. Until this Wed. afternoon, we had not received all the plans required for the infrastructure which will be necessary to make this a subdivision which complies with our ordinances! I've. been working a little over the past 24 hours with Mary Margaret about scheduling questions they've had - and the special favors they want but which we were unable to grant. Hope this helps. It's all I know! Any additional info will have to come from Veronica. Fwd=by:=Roxanne=Nemci=4/24/95==8:43am== Fwd to: Shirley Volk ....................................... Thanks for the infor. Bill Thornton, their attorney has been calling me. In the future, since this project is assigned to me could you refer all info. and problems to me? Thanks. I appreciate it. Fwd=by:=Shirley=Volk==4/24/95==8:54am== Fwd to: Roxanne Nemcik ....................................... You bet! I would have done that last week when I had the question, but didn't know Legal had been contacted on this project, so since MM is our contact for P&Z, I went to her for advice. As it turns out, we handled it on our level, so the only questions they have now are the easements, which were brought in by the applicant at 4 PM Friday (by the time we got out of that meeting, it was after 5, so I didn't deliver them), and the question they raised in the meeting regarding whether we can take a letter of credit Page: 1 ;prig>`ced by Shirley Volk. 4/24/95 8:59am from an out-of-state bank (Nations Bank - Nashville, TN). Thanks. Fwd=by:=Roxanne=Nemci=4/24/95==8:58am== Fwd to: Shirley Volk, Veronica Morgan ....................................... Shirley, I am reviewing the easements now and will let you know about their sufficiency from a legal standpoint. Yes, we can take a letter of credit from a Tennessee bank. Page: 2 Printed by Shirley Volk 4/20/95 11:54am From:Shirley Volk To: MaryMarget Sexton Subject:Windsor Pointe --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ===NOTE____________________________________________________________________ CC: Jane Kee, Jim Callaway, Kent Laza, Natalie Thomas, Veronica Morgan ........................................................................... MM: I met with Greg Taggart (agent, MDG) and Tom Lowe (project manager, apartment complex) this morning after we had spoken, and told them that you had offered to research Texas law more carefully to help determine if their request to get an item on tonight's P&Z agenda constitutes an emergency. However, after you and I had spoken, Jane, Veronica, Nat & I met and determined that (1)we have been charged with the responsibility of taking •~ items to reviewing bodies with complete, accurate .information. We would not be able to do that in this case for several reasons, those being (1)written documentation was not included in the packets for the Commission's review, and (2)there is no staff member free today to get ready to make a presentation at tonight's meeting that would be good enough to cover all areas to be considered (since there is no written documentation). Therefore, we will not be able to include this item on an emergency agenda item for tonight's meeting. As you know, some of the information required for plat submittal was not even turned in until yesterday at approximately 12:30 or 1 p.m. (At which time V & I worked through the entire lunch hour to help review & approve some items). They (.Greg & Tom) told us then that approval of those items would be enough to satisfy the bank. Then at 5 p.m. last night when Jane brought him to me, he said that if they couldn't get on P&Z agenda tonight, the deal would fall through. Today I got Greg & Tom together in my office with Nat & I and I explained all of the above, told them that while we would not be able to get them on tonight's P&Z agenda, we WOULD work with them to get on the same Council meeting (i.e., 5/11) they would have been on had they made tonight's P&Z agenda. I asked if that would help them and Tom replied very gruffly that it would not! I looked surprised, and asked if he was aware that by getting on tonight's P&Z agenda, he would still not have an approved plat because our City requires approval by both the Commission and the Council, and he said he didnot know that either, that he had hired Greg to be the local expert, and had expected him to keep abreast of all of that! I then explained that even if they have approved building plans, the City will not issue a building permit until the plat i~ filed for record. I explained that the plat cannot be filed for record until it is approved by the P&Z, approved by the CC, has all infrastructure construction documents approved, the infrastructure is either built and accepted or it is guaranteed, the parkland dedication is paid AND in this case, the off-site easements for drainage are filed for record. I then told them that you had also offered to call the bank for them to explain our processes, if they thought it would help. They gave me the name of the contact person, but I asked them to call her to see when you should call (to be sure she would be available and know why you were calling). They assured me they would do that and get that info back to me. They both said they would like to be in the room when the phone conversation takes place. They also said they would have to check with their company to see if the call should be made. That's were we are to date - except that I've had one more call from Greg to ask if we could issue a Slab Only permit without having the plat filed for record, and I replied that we cannot. Also explained that as far as they along in the review process, we would be able to issue a full building permit before they can get the platting process completed. Haven't heard back anything on the phone call to the bank. I'll keep you apprised. Thanks for your help so far! Page: 1 Printed by Shirley Volk 4/20/95 11:54am From:Shirley Volk To: MaryMarget Sexton Subject:Windsor Pointe --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ===NOTE____________________________________________________________________ CC: Jane Kee, Jim Callaway, Kent Laza, Natalie Thomas, Veronica Morgan MM: I met with Greq Taggart (agent, MDG) and Tom Lowe (project manager, apartment complex) this morning after we had spoken, and told them that you had offered to research Texas law more carefully to help determine if their request to get an item on tonight's P&Z agenda constitutes an emergency. However, after you and I had spoken, Jane, Veronica, Nat & I met and determined that (1)we have been charged with the responsibility of taking items to reviewing bodies with complete, accurate information. We would not be able to do that in this case for several reasons, those being (1)written documentation was not included in the packets for the Commission's review, and (2)there is no staff member free today to get ready to make a presentation at tonight's meeting that would be good enough to cover all areas to be considered (since there is no written documentation). Therefore, we will not be able to include this item on an emergency agenda item for tonight's meeting. As you know, some of the information required for plat submittal was not even turned in until yesterday at approximately 12:30 or 1 p.m. (At which time V & I worked through the entire lunch hour to help review & approve some items). They (Greg & Tom) told us then that approval of those items would be enough to satisfy the bank. Then at 5 p.m. last night when Jane brought him to me, he said that if they couldn't get on P&Z agenda tonight, the deal would fall through. Today I got Greg & Tom together in my office with Nat & I and I explained all of the above, told them that while we would not be able to get them on tonight's P&Z agenda, we WOULD work with them to get on the same Council meeting (i.e., 5/11) they would have been on had they made tonight's P&Z agenda. I asked if that would help them and Tom replied very gruffly that it would not! I looked surprised, and asked if he was aware that by getting on tonight's P&Z agenda, he would still not have an approved plat because our City requires approval by both the Commission and the Council, and he said he didnot know that either, that he had hired Greg to be the local expert, and had expected him to keep abreast of all of that! I then explained that even if they have approved building plans, the City will not issue a building permit until the plat i~ filed for record. I explained that the plat cannot be filed for record until it is approved by the P&Z, approved by the CC, has all infrastructure construction documents approved, the infrastructure is either built and accepted or it is guaranteed, the parkland dedication is paid AND in this case, the off-site easements for drainage are filed for record. I then told them that you had also offered to call the bank for them to explain our processes, if they thought it would help. They gave me the name of the contact person, but I asked them to call .her to see when you should call (to be sure she would be available and know why you were calling). They assured me they would do that and get that info back to me. They both said they would like to be in the room when the phone conversation takes place. They also said they would have to check with their company to see if the call should be made. That's were we are to date - except that I've had one more call from Greg to ask if we could issue a Slab Only permit without having the plat filed for record, and I replied that we cannot.. Also explained that as far as they along in the review process, we would be able to issue a full building permit before they can get the platting process completed. Haven't heard back anything on the phone call to the bank. I'll keep you apprised. Thanks for your help so far! Page: 1 Printed by Shirley Volk 3/30/95 1:11pm From: Shirley Volk To: Kent Laza, Veronica Morgan Subject: fwd: Performance Criteria --------------------------------------- ===NOTE====------=====3/30/9.5==9:13am== According to my records, in March, 17 items (either projects or parts of projects) came in which required reviewing by Engineering. Of that 17, 3 took over the targeted max. of 5 days, 3 are still in-house (according to MY records, which I think may be wrong in these cases}. Anyway, those three are the Wings 'N More drainage report (reed 3/13), Shenandoah Ph 2 constr.. docs (reed 3/15) and Windsor Pointe 2nd revision Water improvement plans (reed 3/23). All-in-all you're looking pretty good! Fwd=by:=Veronica=Morg=3/30/95=10:03am== Fwd to: Kent Laza, Shirley Volk ....................................... wingsnmore drainage is in the hands of texdot. remember the concentrated flow onto the frontage road. Shenandoah, we blew it, but i'l1 be taking those to mike today. he knows they're coming. windsor pointe water is on hold review stopped - awaiting the street stuff to come in with drainage revisions because those storm drain lines may have conflicts with the water. i have given greg taggert the option that we can approve a "portion" of the water line plans - those lines that are not affected by the storm drains. he understood and did not take me up on this option. as far as i am concerned he still has that option. Page: 1 r ... -: 4 b ~Y r. t : LeY 9' ~ ty ~ I Y t~- .J L,. f„e. ..,. it J 1 P{ ..,_ rte. .LJ. .f lA `i 1:' `ii•f Y .Y.2._3L 1 _~~~ E. ~_/M1..iUES, S V k. S~IAL .. t~ S .L.L :13,'31-_L ~A1i ~ _a .i P..f Ili y7Tz'1~~"'Tt 3 h?•[ t"x :~;?xi<~'x wG: ~.'aiST ~4'~ i ®a RTvE~T 5i' 3 f'l"€~4 f f1e"?i:rx~L'Pl .}./ 1 1 1P L:e .r..+ - b t aJ 1 C 14 / 1 P V i! A .L t B! 1 it 1 t1 V S f..f 9J vl tJ R .f 31 t.f b ~EJ ~.J ti'F_ '. E'P/i IL f~l € ~ 8 9 i^„ t.. Fy'y - .,. . •,. ~ °. ,' .C di, l/ 'S .Y_1"i L" ... _Ll _.J A . . .. _ y_7_t 3. .~v V .. i V§~ d' A ~'1 i-., S.f .t V °._3 J ~J V?P~•b3. YtiJJ3M1 9_'b ~1~R1Yx9 ~`tT i'"4•~J 15"1 ~1&1L ~L~5. !J1 _~L`1 L~Lh'}. YeJ f.~l d'll t ~ a.a'r rd Y ~k'ni 3e it~i f'. ti _;,~. .,,_tn ,.. __. r 1L ~ .._S~_ CJSV 't}V'S':3 J.._ ~. 1FA _~t AJV 1 .1 t~JA Li'± 4 t-1'& T~ u Fnl ~€.i• C ~.E' ``"~ t:3 f't tm~ a;; -C ft~i f "_° ~PJ ~ ~. r:.' ~G' flhf'u' .h ~P-:i ~f\ '`i ilF 't' ~d &.' kJUV Pd YS LM1_st JI. V'SJ ?J fJ _.4..!'tl =_.F .i_ o;1P.. FJ FJ V!Vd~ 1'd1V.@.f L.AlY 1Sl.k.t _.viv Edd av, ~t`~41 ~i vi ~ e~~~,ti_~ti°•A ., ,, z, ... v~J yid r_a E«~.~ 3.i %. o ice. is f • V tJ i~.-J r- ~~ i°~5 t i~ -a ~.~., t J.-, -' ~.r -.; it + s tix ~ r _. A s~ f-° ...-.i f 's_, , r"~.-. s`' ~;. 4.~~ _ ~.u _- _ :. i1 _ _. i°=L., _ _ v _._~ a ,' ~ r! vJr. ~;.f a ~s xJ s a..1 ._a, _:. T-:iv F«li~~tii ~.iiw :a iy r~~v a'ii i• iii a ~vTi ~~~~~rv is .+.`'°r nv ~ui}i`v r~x~.« d~~si _e~tr"i _i~ _L rv f_~e'%;' 3i.d.F 3 r+ vi'3•e~ ~_°iu tv'f' ~~ f4a ~ Ef,~ ~ rT,, ~, .9 !31~Y uE ~.4 i L 4 _tl_. ~I L ~9 3J ._ . t _ .x. ~ J 1: s_d is _4 L J (?. _L __ .. 1 Y !~. J i. !r ,.L i V .. v (i. _I.V F,~~iT'~+-:~"/")?t? flr'' 'T~'fl ~k T h.TTieTT'T4 ~f~yfl ~d~!'3€"1~FTi'~.~[.,~ Cu•r`fiTTF'Te' ~g•ia-ks -V F..1_L-°l.tl L"d AJ t4l CA SJ 1~A1VV1 1vJ A.e.VaJY #. fi AJ A:ddVV LVdJ.• Sll:t ieeJTr ~~ui,.~~n~a'.F ,_, ue ii sa Y`> -d.. ='.._ ~-a`s.. v-~I~i '~ i,r~ ~ ni s r i ri./L,..t~+,~ R'f" °~ ~T t.- -Y`-' • u t i, i I,a a i v as e L E a 1_a ~ ,./ a_ ._ u r_ i9.•u ~ A .J _. ~. ' '!.J C3 fR eJ..i. ':1':"Tti(7"_' Tt TST ~S'Y OF !ir`a i<7 ('` 6 1~ € +~f1 ~: xi ri 4~e~• F-4 ?-a~ A'aa7 ri ?.:8'?a. f'e -y.;. -e~s,.~~, 5 r. r: ~'e"x t- l t _L 1VaJ V 1LS S.!V V !'1!q.tJ S ?_!?. 1J .9.!V l.E f t L3._V r~r L/ 1 J,.~!'1 AJ ~+ A.P is _3 R9 L'14V~, tJA .A N L-'__?.'F dJ 11 r s' P fr" +~. r' '' ~'o.~. :?-c~•+.t .°s" ~. 3.! Ci:... ;i .6 . t e.e ,p .g .... -; i"'. f-~ s E? t s fli..., .., „ r_!~lJ!F LV r_, J^J 117?.L ti,2 SL3]Vds.Yr!"i_ A6~3~ VC... S. SJ SJ A.1 if L/iEdJ L11tiy aL _ 3s-1.•8V x..T'2m '~' 5J •J § P T .7' Viii? L= ti iiE. ra`w i y~-t s. +~ ri .9 ti_i ~ s. u'~~1 ~.J L". vui: .9 =av s€~ i.e.Es u v%i.'~a ~ r ?ri _r. i~tl :5: 1 ._ A 'V aJ dJ.13 1 x R T~~~ j Jtd i Y 9 Fd t~J a 02/28/95 12:16 ^v 409 764 3452 COLL STA PUB UTL I~002 PROJECT REVIEW COMMfTTEE WARY PLAT WOODCREEK PHASE 7 JELOPE,lLL NEED TC}KE PLANS T Ul . THESE GHTS WiL E ETERED ELL 3-1-95 3HTING FOR 1'HE PRIVATE NTAINED BY THE ~-, ON UIT~VILL EED T BE PR V D PER CITY ESIGN THRO O ELECT I AL SE ICE. i E D VEL ER ILL BEA KFDfTO CONTRI 0% ~F THE C T ELE R!C S VICE. f; fNA PLAT EL EISS EST ES PHASE 5 THE EVE OPER ILL N D TO P VIDE 2-6 1 H CON ITS FROM' TO EL ORN OAD A ONG MOR IER. STR LIGHTS NEED TO BE P ED BY THE DEVELOPMENT DRIVE FINAL PLAT WINDSOR POINTE REMINDER OF A POSSIBLE BORE OF SOUTHWEST PARKWAY TO PROVIDE POWER TO DEVELOPMENT. STREET LIGHTING WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED ALONG CENTRAL PARK LANE. CONDUIT WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT PER CITY DESIGN. THE DEVELOPMENT WILL BE ASKED TO CONTRIBUTE 28% OF THE COST TO PROVIDE ELECTRICAL SERVICE. PENAL PLAT SNUG HARBOR PHASE 2 NO PROBLEM PRELIMINARY P1,AT-GERMAN ACRES NO PROBLEM 02/28/95 12:15 L 409 764 3452 LOLL 5TA PUB UTL ~~ ~ ~ CITY ~F CC~~.~,~~ir]E ~~~TIC~F`~._. PUBLIC UTILiT~ES DEP~RTME[YI' I60I Graham Road P.O. Box 3960 College Station, Texas 77842 -0960 I~ 0 O 1 o ferattoras Crv~ IIectr[caI-f~jasa-3ss1 A~ntntsaation (404} 764-3686 Tech~,teaf (409} 754-36gZ USC FP.X(409j'764-3452 WaterlWastcwater(409}763557 ~E`A~ TRANSMITTAL . PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT OFFICE PHONE : (409) 764-3660 DATE: p!-~• g ~~ COMPANY: ~ ' r ~ ATTENTION: t FAX PHONE: (409) 764-3452 ~ ~~~ FAX NUMBER: ` ~, ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ FROM: NUIV~ER OF PAGES: (INCLUDING COVER SHEET COMMENTS: IF YOU DO NOT RECEIVE THE CORRECT NUMBER OF PAGES, PLEASE CONTACT THE PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT AT THE ABOVE NUMBER_ Quatii~ SCr;;rc~ and Performance - C~~r 1'romi~e to Xoitf CHECKLIST FOR FINAL PLATS ~~ yP~~~- Requirements based on field survey and marked by monuments and markers: 1. Drawn on 24" x 36" sheet to scale of 100' per inch. 2. -Name & address of subdivider, recorded owner, planner, engineer and surveyor. 3. Name & address of all lenders on the property. ~ 4. Name & address of all easement holders. 5. Proposed name of subdivision (not spelled or pronounced similarly to any other subdivision in Brazos County, Texas). ~` 6. Date of preparation, scale in feet and north arrow. l~ 7. Application fee. ., ~= 8. construction documents on 24".x.36" sheets. 9. Paid tax certificates from City of College Station, Brazos County and the C.S.LS.D. (~ 10. Total area intended to be developed. 11. Subdivision boundary lines indicated by heavy lines. 12. Certificate of Ownership & Dedication; '+~ertificate of Surveyorship and/or Engineer; certificate of City Engineer; ~`t~pproval of Commission; a Approval of City Council; certificate of the County Clerk. (Owner(s)' signature(s) must be in place before taking plat to P&Z for consideration). ~° ® 13. Number of lots. ^ a. number of lots by Zoning District. ^ b. average acreage of each residential lot by Zoning District. 14. Approximate area of street right-of--way.. ~. G~A~ ~ Ca-r.. ~'~ 15. Proposed parkland dedication. '® ~P~~,'2~u `` ~'"~`~ 16. Requested oversize participation items, if ariy. t'~ y 17. Location of the One Hundred Yr. Floodplain according to the most recent available date. ~ 18. If more than 1 sheet, an index sheet showing entire subdivision at a scale of 500 feet per inch. ~~ ~~"~' 19. Parkland Dedication information. 20. Exact location, dimensions, name and legal description of all existing or recorded streets, alleys, reservations, easements or other R.O.W. within the subdivision, intersecting or contiguous with boundary or forming boundary with accurate dimensions, bearings or deflection angles and radii, area, center angle, degree of curvature, tangent distance and length of all curves. 21. Same information for proposed streets, alleys, etc. as preliminary plats. 22. Lot corner markers and survey monuments (by symbol) and tied to basic survey date. ^ 23.Street, alley, and sidewalk plans, profiles and sections, with specifications and detail cost estimates. ^ 24. ~Sarutary sewer plat with 2 foot contours, plan and profile lines, showing depth and grades, with cost estimates. ^ ~,~~ Water line plat showing fire hydrants, valves, etc. with specifications and a detailed cost estimate. ^ 26. Storm drainage system plat with 2 foot contours, street lines, inlets, storm sewer and drainage channels, with profiles and sections, and showing drainage and runoff areas, and runoff based on 5, 10, and 25 year rain intensity. Detail drainage structure design and channel lining design if used, with specification and detail cost estimate. ^ 27. Street lighting plan showing location of lights, design, and with specifications detail cost estimate. • 28. Submit a statement addressing any differences between the final plat and approved Master Preliminary Plat & Plan. 29. Indicate any variances requested and reasons for same. 30. Are there impact fees associated with this development? fom~s\plac\frelplaN •95 "~ ~~Q.Ij~ '~/fV '~ V9Nd'~/~.5.~'.JY~-"~~/'li ~.IVSLL'~J4M1u•3d~"'i°'G'~ ~ ~, ~~~ .~ ' :~.~- ,~- -~-~~~- ~ ~a~ ~ '~[~~- ~ ~~ `~~ ~_ ..1~__ _ ~A~~. s ~-- - - F ~.) } AAUNICIPAL DEVELaPlNENT GRDUP ~ (~(~~~(~(~ QQ ~' ~[~~~]~~]~ U'~(~LL, P.0. Box 9249 203 Holleman Drive East College Station, Texas 77840-9249 (409) 693.5359 ATTLNT~CM C,/`~/. 4 RL: 4 ~ t TO ,. - ~ WE ARE -SENDING YOU ^ Attached ^ Under separate cover via the following items: ^ Shop drawings ^ Prints ^ Plans ^ Samples ^ Specifications ^ Copy of letter ^ Change order ^ THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: For approval ^ Approved as submitted ^ Resubmit copies for approval .For your use ^ Approved as noted. ^ Submit copies for distribution As requested ^ Returned for corrections ^ Return corrected prints ^ For review and comment ^ ^ FOR BIDS DUE i9 ^ PRINTS RETURNED: AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS COPY TO l~ P~ .' `~ D SIGNED: