HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report
~
ST{:IFF 1:;:I::::PDF~'r
.........................-..-..........................
C ..::\ ":; v::! l'"'-lei ~
0.<:']......111
{.'~lp P 1 i c .::iI. t: ::
D. B. L.e~\ti r:;;
Request~ Rezone from R-4 Apartments Low Density to R-5 Aparments
Ivlfi:?d i urn Dfi::!n s :i. t y
L..cJc.::\t:i. on::
West of the extension of Cornell Drivel North of the
Brentwood Subdivision (see enclosed area map)
Physical Features~
f'~\ Il" (-:.? ~'::\. :: t) It ~:5 6) .i:l c:: It
D i il'l(",~n g:; i (in m::
l='I"'Dn t 0:\9 v:? ::
Df.~pth ~
SEE ENCLOSED DRAWING
('~I/'f.~i::t
2:onin9=
NDr.th ::
Eas.~t ::
South ::
IfJej:5t ~
L.......l.1I
R.....~;;::
1::<.....1.1.
l:~...,,~,~.: tl
(~ '1
..t.......
(.., '1
../.......
Existing Land Use~
Subject tract is vacant. Duplexes adjacent to the south.
Mini-storage warehoumes adjacent tD the north. Balance of
o:if"e,'::\ :1. !:;; V.::\Cii:iI"l't."
L.i::\nd Ur:;;e 1='1 a\n::
Area is reflected as Medlum Density Remidential.
E::: n 9 :1. n l~ v:i! r' :1. n~;J ~
!\Ieit if i Ci:,.t :1. Cln:
(one inquiry as Df 6-13)
ReCDmmendatiDn and Comments~
This area is reflected as medium density Dn the City's land
use plan. R-5 zDning would typically be located in an area
l'''fi::!flli:!ctv::!d fOlr' high€01'" dfi::!nj:;;.it:y" 1::;:e!zcininl.:;J tl''jijE; ar'E?a t:.I:;:J F:;:.....::::;
would not cause a significant increase in the Dverall area
density. R-5 zDning would allow for an additional 52
dwelling units above the 104 units allowed by the current
R-4 zoning. The area would maintain an overall medium
density as long as increases in density are nDt granted Dn
the east side of the extension Df CDrnell St.
The subject tract is abutted by commercial zoning on two
f.5i dE?j:;;" BDt.h t.hfi:! C:U!'''lr'~::!nt i::\nd 1'''e:!qu€.?j,5tf.?d ~~ on i ng pf"ovi dv~ ~.;;,nd
appropriate buffer to the lower density residential usem to
the south and east of the subject tract.
The applicant has cited potential fraternity/sorority use of
the property as the reason for this request. The qu~stion
:i.
..
j
to be considered by the Commission is the apropriate zoning
fDr the tract. Development of fraternity/sorority houses on
thf.0 t,r'oH::t I,'\foul d bE,! con"s:i. d€01'''~;!d .::ilS ,::i cDndi t i on,~':\l Uf.se :1. f R-:S
zoning is granted by the Council"
In reviewinq this request the staff has found the fcllowing~
A" Both the current and requested zoning dimtricts
would be compatible with the adjacent C-1 and R-2
~.~\ r" 1~7~ <::t $:. :1
B. Both the current and requested zoning districts
would be cDnsistant with the City"m plan and
development poliCies"
:;:::