Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutesJ AGENDA ITEM NO. 7 Consideration of a preliminary plat of .Cat Hollow. (94305)/ City Planner Kee presented the staff report and recommended approval of the plat with the addition of a note .prohibiting .access to Glenhaven Drive from all lots except lots 1 and 2 of block 1; and the provision of a 10' wide public utility .easement to accommodate existing utilities located along the .rear of lots 1, 7, 8 and 9 of block 1. If the creek is not to receive improvements which' will allow the grading and .development of the lots close to the creek, a note should. be placed on the plat stating that any construction including buildings, grading or filling on the properties adjacent to the creek will be required to obtain a development permit before proceeding with the work. This recommendation is made as away to preserve the natural creek appearance and assure the protection of private property from .damage. due to erosion and flooding. The property owners will individually be responsible for any .maintenance of the creek since there are no proposed improvements to .reduce the operating expenses' related to the creek to the public included with this project. Commissioner Mariott moved to recommend approval of the preliminary plat of the Cat Hollow Subdivision with staff recommendations. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion which passed.' unopposed (5 - 0). AGENDA ITEM NO. 8: Consideration 'of an apppeal to the Driveway Access and Location Ordinance for driveway placement for the City Slickers Restaurant to be located on lot A2 of the D. A. Smith subdivision. (93-425) City Engineer Pullen informed the Commission that the site plan for the subject property denied by the Project Review Committee placed a driveway access immediately adjacent to the existing driveway of Taco Cabana on Live Oak Street. Live Oak Street is classified as a local street. According to .the Driveway Access and Location Ordinance, the spacing required for driveways along local streets is a minimum of 150' and a desired 190'. The applicant is requesting an appeal from this requirement. The applicant does have the option to construct a combined drive with the adjacent property. to comply with the ordinance requirements;' however, he has chosen not to do so. Kevin Musgrave of 9207 Village Drive in San Antonio approached the Commission and stated that he approached the City in October before beginning plans on the project and was never aware of restrictions on driveway placement until the Project Review Committee meeting. If the driveways are installed as required by ordinance, abottle-neck situation will occur since there will only be one way in and out along the access road by La Quinta. Mr. Musgrave ..explained that he owns the access easement between La Quinta and the subject property and is responsible for property taxes and maintenance. Currently he also owns the .adjacent Taco Cabana restaurant; however, he would like to develop the .new .restaurant separately so that it can. be sold in the future. If a shared driveway was built between the subject property and Taco: Cabana, much .needed .parking. spaces would have to be .eliminated. Mr. Musgrave stated he spoke to Sanitation Superintendent Jim Smith and he would be in favor of the property being more accessible for the sanitation trucks to enter and exit the property. The appeal is primarily being requested to eliminate future traffic problems. caused by the creation' of abottle-neck situation without the additional driveway along Live Oak Street. Commissioner .Hall questioned staff if the proposed entrance could be installed and signed as an "exit only" as an alternative to denying the second access to Live Oak Street. City Engineer Pullen stated that that is a possibility; however, staff has found that they do not function as we1L There is also a connection between the .subject property and Taco Cabana that would allow traffic to exit from both sites through the driveway located on the Taco Cabana property along. Live' Oak Street. P & Z Minutes February 3, 1994 Page 4 ~ ~ [ ~~~ .T' . .~ m-:~-rani: we ace ya to c e in b~ fore the PRC to talk about this is we have some concerns based on the Impact Study with regard to detention, and we have some questions and maybe if you can make us feel a little bit more comfortable about the questions that we have ---we can still goahead with the PRC,.what we would like to do because I think the drainage issue is"'going. to be the biggest issue here is let's go ahead and resolve the drainage issue and once it's resolved then we can hold the formal PRC and if that is today that is fine ...You. know I don't think it is going to put you any. further behind because if we .had the PRC today we would still ask gall to address the drainage issues before we proceeded on. So I really don't think it is going to'put you any further behind if for some reason we don't PRC today, I think the PRC will go a lot smoother once we have the answers to the drainage questions resolved. In the Impact Study, there was some discussion about how much room was needed for the detention and can you kinda show us Earl where the detention was planned for and .... l~ two places .that .are ~• -r~_ ar hP,-A ea ~~.. h~x~ Now, what is actually represented here is this line is the center. of the existing creek that's closely as we could ascertain from the City of CS topol maps. We have physically gone out on the .ground and done a certified boundary survey however,. we have not run a profiles or sewer line??....You know.. Locations for the creeks, as well as .over here. Now we have this small area here., obviously if we are going to keep the creek in the same location we will be encroaching with some detention facilities and. when I say detention facilities what were are looking on this side is the section .that is going to make the channel on this side. We anticipate having the flow metered out of this existing structure here we will include that in"our model when we get down to actual simulations through our ponds. V• Okay, so that one won't be done away with. Earl: No This is no longer a temporary?? Earl• This? It is in accordance to the plan.. This one right here. V When we originally discussed this whole thing that was going to be temporary until such time that was going to come in. Is that now a permanent structure???? When we discussed the , entire ... ... My impression early on we talked .about it being temporary, but my was that we made it Vs Okay, well I think you can utilize what is out there. Our impression was that it was going to be a temporary thing. I don't think structural wise that it is necessarily temporary and I think you can leave it out there. If you want to leave it out. there...... Earl e It is pretty permanent. It's ...I'm not an engineer but., I think it is built to be'a permanent thing. What we have looked at we've assumed from reviewing those plans that it was a permanent structure. I remember early on we .were talking about them..... Nothing were on the plans where it said anything that is temporary....... V: Well, part of that was. because we couldn't...to protect these people and to protect the people down stream we had to deal. with that as a quote unquote permanent structure, so that there wasn't any notes on the plats that this. was ', temporary .:....In case this never came in. :because if this never came in that had to stay. Earl: I will say this.:.. We do get into a situation where it's determined for whatever the purpose that this needs to be a temporary tuation. I think we can still squeeze the detention that we had here out and this area over here. This is our main area that we want to detain. It's going to be an on channel detention pond. Earl the way this is constructed I wouldn't want to do away with it. i II Ve We may want to incorporate something else into it. Earl: We would probably like to reduce the amount of potential detention. Because it is`pretty high But the way they've done it I don't. want to go back in and redo .those . But it would be nice to reduce the potential detention if possible. V: We aretalkingabout relocating this creek stall?? or .leaving.. it where it is??? or-any improvements to it. I realize that some of it is note on your property. There.. are some concerns:... 1) we don't wont. to disturb what's out there necessary but we want to make sure that it can handle whatever flow will be entering it. Earl: More or less our major concern here was the situation that we haveastructure here which I think everybody is aware is ..grossly inadequate. This being more or less the top of, the hill We can by creating a storage capacity additional storage capacity and we can you know, allow this structure into'. our. .corporate that into our plan possibly making that an outlet control structure and we'd pick the volume that we need in order to ..you know.. if we`ve got to run the `whole of storms ..the five through the 100 year we picked obviously the 100 years generate the worst case .scenario here as far as volume.. We incorporate that ''into 1, our plan and we work backwards in order to see exactly how ~ much volume that is generated in the predevelopment, how much volume is generated in the post. .development, and then we come up with a target volume for detention. How much volume do you think you need??? Because we need to know how much area going to be taken?? Earl: You are saying four acres.:. I was looking up It is on the backs of Earl: Okay it is possibly in the original study that Riley had done. Yes, Yes' Earl: One thing we've submitted Wiley's information here is essentially a basis knowing that had already gone through. We have actually came up with a difference acreage than Riley had come up based on actual underground survey. Where are your calculations. of it??? Earl: Our acreage for the detention....I don't have that included in my stuff here." Where did he say that he had four acres? It's not on that sheet. I don't have that... They made the statement that there was a certain elevation and that ... Ee .Okay And that anything 278 was non buildable which makes for all intents and purposes this is 278 right here ....... So that lot was not buildable.'.: that lot was not buildable.. this one may b'e buildable with some finish floor elevations and E: Based on elevations out of the floodplain stating the this is the As closely as can be These are City of College. Station .contours now. We discovered early on when we started doing some of areas between contours that Mr. Riley's contours as per the master plan Nothing I can' make out a thing he is saying!!!!! The City of College Station contours. There is some discrepancy at this point I don't know exactly how much it is, but that some of this area here. Everyone talking at one time can't make out anything they are saying....... E :_ Well I mean that... to me that I know we put this as a to here and we essentially expanded on very little..:.. that is kinda like. four acres... I am having trouble with that... I am seeing that you know four acres V: We, are too.. E: Four acres 6 .foot deep,:. four. acres.... you know...how deep? It has no volume it's .just a_two dimensional area. What I would propose at this point and time... seeing as though we had trouble getting you know... his simulations.. in fact we don't have his simulations out of this pond, we had to run our own..n a model of it... since we've already got this thing at somewhat of a...not an extremely accurate model.. if was just for estimate purposes.... but we can expand upon that. Let us run since the"area is so small...let us run essentially a flood study through this area and taking into account the types that we have 2-48's and lets use those as controlling factor so that we can pick an elevation we want it to reach to the top of the curve.? do we want a free board in there that you know certainly those 48's are going to have in order to function economically and efficiently. And we will just work this thing backwards..-. taking into account if we want to keep the total volume in here or if we want to take volume out.. those are numbers that we get in this area...we are not talking about leaving this in its natural state..we are talking about coming in here and excavating, generating quite a bit of additional volume in order to... it's not just a here that backs water up in a natural basin.. it would be anmprovedsection. Vz and you won't utilize any of those property to pond water on. E: No, No we would use....... V: So ya'11 could alter the elevation somewhat? E: We would kick that natural ground elevation that most corresponds to that property. I wouldassume contours .don't run exactly on the . We are going to come back to the nearest contour or elevation away from that property line that does not allow for us getting across .that property line. And whatever.... There is some backup there now. V: Some. what??? Some ponding of water, is that what you are saying?? Yeah.. Of course., what's really happening is these things are only half functional. There would be.... V: Are you saying they are half functional, cause they are half functional because they are.full of something? Yeah..trees grown-in v: Okay. There is some back up on .this. On this area now and even down here. Va Right, but as part `of ya'lls design for the dentention pond you can't ... you have to utilize your land. Right..rght I understand. V: You .can't utilize their land. E: I think and I guess maybe we just all need. to agree or disagree on this fact, but you know it would be the wrong thing. to do here to get this water from here to here you know in a speeded up fashion and then not have any improvement downstream assuming that you kmow if we don't have the adequate structure the water goes over the road and does all kind of stuff that it probably does right now. We would like to keep this in as much a natural state ...while I mean we can't get out of our property over here .and do this. V: Unless you come up property owners to land back there as guys if you wanted to use so of that with some do that. .. ya'l1 too if the pack there sort of agreement with those I mean to utilize that piece of can go in concert with these are is any reason that you want the natural channel. E• Unless we could....'. I see some problems with that you know V: I am saying that is an option open to t'a'll whether you. choose to use it or not is up to t'a'll. E: Again, what we would like to do here is attempt and expand upon all this in order to define exactly what volume we do need. Work it backwards based on those two structures and using those as the determining factor. And coming up with that... if you want to call it magic volume that association with this. gives us...I don't think this four acres is reasonable.r. I can say that if we came in here. we could get the same volume as for an acre by going an acre four foot deep. That is kind of a nebulous and has no dimension to me. V: What we would like to see come back is some area set aside for detention and labeled as such and us be able to follow the impact study to figure out that yeah that is indeed enough room and you can plat all the lots around it that you have platted and we feel comfortable that those lots won't be enindated with detention at some future date and the same is true over in this area as well. Since there won't be any creek improvements on these people properties we have to kind of separate this development into two zones. You can't discharge stuff that is increased and this just detain it all here. You have got to detain here discharge nothing more than what's being ,discharged now here then it comes back on your property then you have to do the same thing here and detain so that your flows don't exceed..... E: For this area that we have here we are talking about this already detained so we are very minimal as far as .here. Where surface drain at this point and time the water around to a point. to some inlets here. which we are .picking this up instead of dumping it right there. We are dumping it over here, but we have got that,.... V: Where would these kids go to school? Do you think? Elementary school would be back here on College Hills. Would there be any benefit, `you know, if you recall when we went to council the last time, there was some discussion about Carol Street not going through and that it would be the developer's responsibility here to make a logical end to Carol :and -the existing portion of Carol right of way. I think Councilman Crouch-made that- in for a motion in front of the council. He made that comment .and then. somebody else said that the city was getting ready to do something to Mary Oaks Drive and I can"t understand what he is saying!!! They talked. about the advantages and disadvantages of dedicating this bank to property owners with various things. So T don't recall that requirements on our parts. U: We will go back and research the minutes. One of the things I was wondering about if these kids are going to go to school back over here,'if it might somewhat of an advantage to incorporate whatever drainage you do in here, whatever detention and have some kind of pathway system for those kids in here, to maybe give back this land. I don't have a problem with that the only ....the question it raises is there are so few children in the subdivision that I don't know. V: How may people would be in there??? We really have an inkling that's for both extremes. Very, very young and.-.. if that were toehold true... in this area it may not serve any purpose, but on the other hand we children. I don't have a problem withthat. E: The only problem that I can see with that is we would have to build a structure that would be safe for the kids. I am talking about hands rails, any kind of handicap ramps. that we need in order to get across......Typically, by doing this we are directing those kids down to an area where we really don't want those kids to be. They are going to be down there anyway..I mean there is nothing we can do about that..that would be my only .concern. V: It wouldn't necessary have to go through the.... E: .But, we have bridges all through town and the kids go to them now. I had thought one time more about getting from here to the park..I'm really not sure that the children are going to .walk from here to school. V: What are your thoughts about getting from .here to the park? Whether the children come from this neighborhood to the park V: What were your thoughts along that line?? more than they ought to be... A pedestrian way to get. from here to the park...We will look at again. The school may be a little far to think about walking...I don't know.. E: We could probably incorporate that into this series of that they have `and the top of that would be the logical place to put it. Yeah that is a pretty deep draw right through there.... E: But I do believe that it would need to have the type handrails and the whole works. These kids confined along that pathway rather than ... Critical time..you know is during the storm, on this small a basin we are probably looking at water being backed up in there maximum depth maybe for an hour or two. You don't really thing that the kids would be out there during the -peak storm, you know.. however, if we do have water backed up for any period of time after the storm... they are going to be out there. I think what you want to do Earl is look at this area right. here and try to figure out does thi ....that thing gets deep quickly. E: We got we could ..... Might be can cut that one off somewhere .back here..... V: This is off Carol Street, right? Yes V: You might get Mark Smith, Earl because he is working on this quarter of the road (can't understand part) What size pipes and stuff '~~ II E: '~, That brings up'another question? Carters Grove are they anticipating any storm sewer coming ~ back to this point?? ~, I I don't really see that storm sewer would speed up the flow anymore than the street flow type. That wouldn't be an impact on .this at all here. I It could be back down though, cause there...this comes around this way someway or another and there is a creek that actually comes this :way. V": That is right. ~ If that creek would storm. E: If the creek were lined or something like that rather than. Makes you raise the question I think there is a house or two back up there somewhat that might have a problem.... V: One more thing that I at least want to bring up.....is some of our original drainage ordinances about this area.... becaus8 this area that Carters Grove area is such a problem area as far as drainage is concerned right now. There is requirements in the drainage ordinance .....one of the '~~ sections that talks about detaining and willing to see how that's going to effect ya'11... we need to see those calculatons....It may add a little bit to the detention. requirement... E: When you say ultimate.:does that be indicating our ultimate or the ultimate... V: The ultimate.. The only one we really wanted could figure out was that one. That is the only tract that will make a difference because to park is a park and it is going to stay a park, I mean it is not going to change,much...All of this back here is already developed and closed this way .and will flow into that ..that is the only tract. So that is-why we say we don't think it is going to make much difference. E: Would they not be required on their tract to detain some V: It doesn't matter. We still have to do it.. Every tract in the Carters Grove is responsible to do that, because the drainage problems are so bad. So you will be required to do a 100 year ultimate, they would be required to do a 100 year ultimate, if this .tract every left a in which it is not ever going to happen. It is not likely.. It could happen V: Not very likely. Not with .what is out there. E: What they could possible do ..at this point and time it's more less their own developed type park, that they come in and .put some swings, volley ball court, whatever they may be some parking coming in. They at that point, would also be required V: I don't think it is .going to make a big difference for you but we just thought we would mention that because we will need to see those calculations. Ez Looking at the l00 year stormis our requirement here any way...certainly it will have some effect to us, but we will just have to determine at this point and time how much, and I think really .what we `need to do is go back and start from here and run this thing completely through in order....at this point and time we've decided that: we ..,nothing is going to happen down here with these to 48's within the future 'of the city doesn't have any intentions of doing any thing there V: We don't E: Then we just use those as are If and indeed they are ...if they have more capacity than we can discharge then we will have to look at 2nd year. restructure here that would bring water to those flood gates. Okay what e se, what other issues can you think of while we are here. Can't understand what they are saying here. V: What we hate to have happen is this preliminary plat go through planning and zoning commission and the. council without knowing and being comfortable with how much of this plan is actually going to take the detention. E: You know really, what we are. going to need to do here though. .'. we are in the process right now of acquiring actual foot depth. Next .step is for our field crews to tie in the creeks...get us some at that point and time we will be establishing profiles for sewer line, and any other profiles for this area that we need t'o determine the exact ground elevations and then I think solve this question once 'and for all. Which one of these is right you know as far as the ...., Keep in mind that these may or may not work. E: Well, I am going to say that if these guys essentially --- you know their property line comes to here...its not a .platted property line... this is just by and they own this property...they are not .going to allow us to do this. They may not give us any easement. • What we may end up doing is having to go down here and do some kind of something like this.....but one of these people of here, I would have to go back and check...so time ago wanted.. was willing to give us easement across for us doing some improvements on their yard when we are out there with dozers,...so, we will have to double check on that. V: You may be able to negotiate one of them. E: One thing that hasn't come up in this conversation is you know we are in the process of getting in here and modifying this creek, we are talking here and things of that nature. V: How much modification will you be doing? E: You know I think that's I don't know how you feel about that We have got a floodplain line across here which if you go by this could get wors8. I don't feel that this is correct. This is .based on the latest stuff that we By coming. in here and taking .the additional volume out, theoretically we could decrease this line down. What I vision happening is...this lot is going to be part of the detention and coming across here...someplace is 'going to be say a 125 feet or so...ths backlot line. This is considered the fringes of the floodplain and do an analysis to determine that.... I can't understand what they are saying here. This would become our own lot.?? We have it drawn..this way.... Same thing over here. The lot lines will change. Can't understand what they are 'saying here...... through a drainage pipe, no actually an inlet here and on Glen haven drive or so and it came down in a pipe just a little ways and then... That. is one of the reason we changed our design --will minimize that kind of Too low--cant' understand what they are saying. E: - Based on the information we got we have a good grade from here to here. We probably have the"flexibility where we can bring .this water back if we wanted too. We could make In lieu of a pipe here, utilize these pips here would bring this water ...maybe we just move these back in this direction and pick the water...I hate to run water across an intersecton...I like to pick the water up before we get to the intersecton..if we catch this here there is not a whole lot of water generated on this side of the road from here to here. So we move these back we might could stretch it to get these guys back over here..... Maybe we size these to carry 25 year storm sub surface and then we allow for minor I am not talking ditch...I'm just talking about low area graded swell type situation maybe a foot deep that covers this....20 foot easement.. it could be a 1/20 slope that could be just for the emergency overflow. You can work all that out... but .one of the things that has to happen is ...this from here to here has got to be very because when this water comes down this street it doesn't take very much to jump that .....it would probably help this .situation of the water because you don't want it coming across here. Even just throw them out there now, then it doesn't take much of'a rain for it to shoot across okay, well you are going to engineer that. Is that a feasible situation or do we need to look at complete 100 year: storm in the system...underground? DK The purpose of trying to the ditches wasn't just to put it under ground but was the fencing problem just the ..reserving that space for any kind of draining weather is the hundred year or whatever. vs People just get up in arms about ...where can I put my fence and DK If you leave it up to the builder then keep those grades the way you have ...then when people come in and do landscaping They fill it in We get the neighbor calling us going about filling ditch in - and its not going that. way anymore, its standing on my property. We couldn't interest the city in a right of way could we. No way Jose..:... Anything else besides drainage.... I was hoping made the statement about the last time we went through we submitted to the plat to P&Z with a recommendation that is was okay as long as all the drainage was worked out and I don't think we are going to be able to do that with this one until all that information is gathered up. P&Z council would shoot us and we would all be hunting for jobs if we took this one and said the same thing. We approve this without ....as long as the drainage issue is resolved. E: We would look at P&Z...say if we didn't get tabled today or whatever...:. You don't understand all the background ...because Haytell Vice and because of the background on this...this has got to be letter perfect before we go forward. Because it also has to do with what I hope will be my own going effort with Haytell Vice and I don't want . E: We are still talking about approval of P&Z though. you know you guys standing up before P&Z and saying this looks right to us...although we don't have the data to substantiate . They don't have. enough. information now to do that. E: We:.what I am saying is let's continue with what we are doing and let's get the information .for them prior. to going. to P&Z :..aren't we talking about November 5 for P&Z. I didn't bring a calendar with me. We have to have our .staff reports down and complete a week and half prior to P&Z meeting.. We have already missed the second P&Z meeting in October. The first one in November would be the very very soonest you could go...and that's if on your next submittal you answer all our questions with regard to . ....... ..November 5th would be the first one that means we have to .have everything back in from ya'11...there is a possibility that you might be able .....it means really cranking on your part because we have got to have your submittal back into us by the 19th of October..that gives us a week to review it and make sure that everything is okay. E• Would that give ya'11 enough time possibly if we turned it in then???? and what I am talking about turning into you guys is the That shows. the detention areas. We really have to do is have almost final plat.. Because the detention is so critical. At this point we are talking about, Steve...the final design on the .detention." E: The thing I am squeezed here for is actually not so much the office. time in doing the computations and the engineering...but getting our crew out there to get us the data...raw data and get. that processed in enough time to make that deadline... DK: But we are not asking you to have that field work done to -turn this information in...that's something you are putting onyourself... E: I think I understand that but at this point and time the effort for engineering would be almost identical to turn in a preliminary thing that was based on preliminary without acutal field shots. V: It's not going to make any difference if you go to P&Z on November 5, than if you go on November 19th...and here is why...when you go on Nov 5 you can't hit the next Council meeting...because there is'not going to be a council meeting, So it doesn't matter if you go on Nov 5 or Nov 19th. you would hit the same council meeting which is Dec 10. December 10 is the soonest;..cause see if you wanted to go to the only. meeting in Nov for council you would have had to get this weeks P&Z meeting, well actually next weeks P&Z meeting...the staff reports are due this week. So December 10 is the soonest.: It gives you more time on the front end before P&Z to answer a lot more of these questions because it gives you two more weeks.. E: I would personally would like to answer that question finally once. Whether preliminarily and then go to final... Is there .any way to excelerate the final if we need too? No not really then you start the construction drawings. The schedule around thanksgiving to Christmas is horrible they drop council meetings.... For the last 3 months of this year we have had one council meeting per month. Only one in October and one in November and one in December. .Non drainage items that you are aware of that we can... V: Some of the nondrainage items will come from the PRC and I really.-would like to wait with the PRC until you have come .`.back with a revised plan that shows where this stuff is going. to be because it your easement locations which I hate for these guys that are going to be over there to reivew this and say well if this happens. do .this and if this happens do this......I would prefer them to see a plan that will be what the plan is going to be and let them reivew. I think the PRC is the least of your worries as far as timing is concerned...we meet once a week every week... Have you kicked this around to get a feel of how this is being accepted other than drainage...the utility dept ',are going to want some realignments here and there, but do you have a gut feel how if we had gone to PRC today or do whatever how this would be accepted? vs I don't know I haven't heard anything from them, so I'don't know if there is any major problems on their paxt .. E: The only thing I am getting at is if we don't go to PRC today L would like to be able_to kinds know ahead of time so we can address some of these other problems that get to PRC and they go bad. V: How about if you do this...I don't know how it ends!!! G ` AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET CONSENT AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTED BY: Jane R. Kee, City Planner FOR COUNCIL MEETING OF: 2-24-94 DIRECTOR APPROVAL: EXECUTIVE TEAM MEMBER APPROVAL: ITEMi Consideration of a Preliminary Plat of Cat Hollow, a Residential Subdivision. Applicant is Myrad Real Estate. ITEM SUMMARY: This subdivision consists of 46 R-1 single family lots .totaling 17.35 acres. It is adjacent to the Glenhaven .Subdivision at Dominik .Drive and was formerly Glenhaven Phase 10. The plat includes right-of-way for the. extension of Glenhaven Drive to Dominik. There will be sidewalks. along both sides of Glenhaven.. The.. proposed development is in a drainage basin .with no capacity to accommodate any increase in run of£ The developer is proposing to control the discharge of storm water at the pre development rate as xequired by the Drainage Policy and Design Standards, Chapter 13 of the City Code of Ordinances There is a defined creek adjacent to the. property which is designated Zone A on the current FEMA maps. Zone A is a designated flood prone area .without determined flood plain elevations. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff & P&Z recommend approval with a note to be, added to the. final plat prohibiting access to Glenhaven with the exception of Lots 1 & 2, Block, 1 and with the provision of a 10' utility easement. for existing utilities along the rear of Lots .1,7,8,9, Block L If the creek is not to receive improvements which will allow the grading. and development o£ the lots close to the creek, a note should be placed' on the .plat stating that any .construction including buildings, grading or filling on the properties adjacent to the creek will be required to obtain a development permit before proceeding with the work. This recommendation is made as way to preserve the :natural. creek. appearance and assure. the protection of private property from damage due to erosion :and flooding_ The property owners will individually be responsible for any maintenance of the creek since there are no proposed improvements to reduce the operating expenses .related to the creek to the public included with this project. FINANCIAL SUMMARY:. NA CITY ATTORNEY RECOMMENDATIONS: NA COUNCIL ACTION DESIRED: Approve preliminary plat with conditions. SUPPORTING MATERIALS: 1. Location Map' 2. Staff Report 3. Application 4. Minutes 5. Copy of plat. PRF,SUBMISSION CONFEREPdLE REPC3RT January Z4, 1994 TO: Deborah Keating, Urban Design Graup P. O. Box 101.5 ~, College Station, TX 77842 Dan Bensimcjn .and Beth Whatley, Myrad Real Estate 7~7 Canterbury, College Station,. TX 77840. FROM: Project Review Commute Jane ICe~, City Plan, David Pullen,. City ~~,~ eer Julius Gribou, P & Z presentati Others Attending;. Natalie Thomas, Planning Tec n' Samantha Smith, Erigineernag As. ' ~ ant Tony Nlichalslcy, Electrical Operations Coordinator.. Shirley Volk, Developzi~ent Coc>rdinator George Spain,. Fire. Marshal Pete Vanecel<, Sent~r Parks PlanlZer Laverne Alcin, GTE Representative Pat Clarl<, TCA Cal71e Representative SUBJECT: Prelirrli»<nry ~Iat - Cat HoJJoE~ Si~l~divison, (previously Glenhaven Phase Ten} approximately fc7rty-six R-2 single family lots totalling 17.35 acres adjacent to the Glenhaven Subdivision, between Glenhaven Drive and Dominil~ Drive. (94-301} _~ A Presubmisson Conference was held Wednesday, January ~, 1994 to discuss the above mentioned preliminary plat. The following comments were. made by the various reviewing agents:. ENGINEERING: _ A drainage conference is required prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission .meeting to discuss the details of the impact. studies. The City of College Station nay wish to Icecap the proposed water line at the Dominik cul- _ de-sac at the time of constructicm to avoid the exzstmg .dead end. PRC Report Cat Hollas~ Case #94-3~1 Page Z PLANNING: _ According to the Bikeway Master i'lan, Glenhaven must be signed as a bike route. Add a note to the plat prohibiting access to Glenhaven .Drive with the exception of lots 1 - and 2 of block 1: PARKS: Staff will verify if parl~land dedication requirements have been met for this development. WATER/~hIASTE WATER ~ FIRE:. Provide two additional copies of the mp~~ct studies for this development. ELECTRICAL: Provide a 1.~' public utility easement to cover the existing utilities located along the rear _ of lots 1, 7, S and q cif block 7. G.T.E.: Provide. electrical layout and coordinate electrical service with G.T.E. Representative - Laverne A1cin at (4~~~ S?1-~172~. T.C.A. Cable: Coordinate conduit. lalacement and service details. with T.C.A. Cable Representative Pat SUBMIT 1O COPIES AND 7 MYLAR REPROD1 CI$ O B~ NCLUDED N THE PRELIMINARY PLAT Al`~D BY FRIDAY, JANt1ARY 2S, PLANNING AND ZO SING ~ )COMTMIIE ~ ~,~, COUNCIL WIOLL CONSIDERETHE PPLAT THURSDAY, FEBRUAR > ON THURSDAY, FEBRUARY ?~> 1)94. Facsimile Cover Sheet To: Shirley Volk Company: Development Services Phone: Fax: From: Mark Smith Company: City of College Station Phone: (409)764-3692 Fax: (409)764-3489 Date: 01 /18/94 Pages including this cover page: Comments: PRC COMMENTS 01-19-94 Final Plat Indistrial Park -- No Comment Final Plat SWV Sec 30 -- • What improved drainage facilitiesontaine within t e roposed drainage easements? ;~~'~ `s ~ ` • Is the 80' wide 'utility easement' intended to also cove a drainage facility? ' A • If so, I'd recommend that a lesser easement be dedicated that strictly addresses the utility needs and separate consideration be given to the drainage needs. • Will this plat meet the Drainage Policy and Design Standards? Preliminary Plat Pebble Creek IV -- • Why a 'Private Drainage Reserve'? If the facility m ets all require ents f~or`d 1edication it yy ~ ~.~5'~Nw~~a.C+ r/~'6 L should be dedicated as a drainage easement. - no~ heC¢eser~~ • 6-C.5.10. The location,. approximate dimensions, description and name of all porpos~i is~ ~~e~y streets, alleys, drainage structures, parks, or other public areas,... ~° ~~ • 6-C.5.13. Vacinity map.....which shall show.....the general drainage plan and ultimate destination of water for a distance of one quarter (1/4) mile and possible storm sewer... Preliminary Plat Cat Hollow -- • 6-C.5.10. The location, approximate dimensions, description and name of all porposed streets, alleys, drainage structures, parks, or other public areas,... • 6-C.5.13.' Vacinity map.....which shall show.....the general drainage plan and ultimate destination of water for a distance of one quarter (1/4) mile and'possible storm sewer...