Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutesCommissioner Smith stated that' the current zoning of the property includes many of the uses that the .School. District is concerned about; however,: the C-1 district allows even more intense uses for the property.' There is no guarantee that: the property will be developed as proposed with an office complex and a .convenience store once the property is rezoned. The motion to deny the; rezoning .request passed {2 - 1 - 1); Commissioner Mariott voted in opposition to the motion, Commissioner Hall .:abstained from voting and .Chairman Hawthorne removed himself from. the consideration of the request due. to a conflict of interest. AGENDA ITEM NO. 3: Consideration of a final plat of Tracts A, B and C of Southwood Valley Section 30. ` (94204) Chairman Hawthorne excused himself from considering agenda items two and three; due to a conflict of interest. City Engineer Pullen presented the staff report and recommended approval of the final replat with the recomrnendationsgutlined in the Presubmission Conference Report. Commissioner Mariott moved to recommend approval of .the final .plat of Tracts A., B and C of Southwood Valley Section. 30 with .staff .recommendations.. Commissioner Lane seconded the motion which passed unopposed (4 - 0). AGENDA.ITEM NO. 4: Consideration of a final plat. of .the Industrial Park Phase II. (94- 205). City Engineer Pullen presented the staff report .and recommended approval of the final replat as presented. Commissioner Mariott moved to recommend approval of the final plat of the Industrial Park Phase II as presented. Commissioner'HaIIsecgnded the motion which: passed unopposed (5 _ 0), AGENDA ITEM NO. 5: Consideration of a final plat of the Gateway Park Subdivision (94203). City Engineer Pullen .presented the staff report and. stated that the .purpose of this replat is to replace a temporary blanket easement with permanent dedicated easements. Staff recommended.-.:approval of the `final plat with the conditions outlined in the Presubmission Conference Report. Commissioner-:Lane moved to recommend.. approval of the; final plat.. of the Gateway Park. Subdivision with staff :recommendations. Commissioner Mariott seconded the .motion which .passed .unopposed (5' - 0). AGENDA ]'TEM NO. 6: Consideration of a .preliminary :plat of `Pebble Creek Phase Four. (94-30(~ City Planner Kee .presented the staff report and stated ..that the.. proposed configuration differs slightly from the original approved master. plan but this design is better from an access standpoint. Lots will not be .accessing directly o Spearman Drive but rather will be accessing from a rear .alley. The property will need to be rezoned prior to filing o:f any final plats. Commissioner Hall moved to recommend approval. of the :preliminary plat with staff recommendations. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion which passed .unopposed (5 - 0). P & Z Minutes February 3, 1994 Page 3 ~. PRESUBMISSION CONFERENCE REPORT January 24, 1994 TO: A. P. Boyd, Pebble Creek Development Company 4500 Pebble Creek Pkwy, College Station, TX 77845 Davis Young, Pebble Creek Development Company 4500 Pebble Creelz Pkwy, College Station; TX 77845 David R. Mayo, Joe Orr; Inc. 2167 Post Oak Circle, College Station, TX 77840 FROM: Project Review Committe Jane Kee; City Pla ~ ne ., ` David Pullen, City`En~gi eer Julius Gribou, P & Z epresentativ Others .Attending: Natalie Thomas,. Planning Tec'~i ~: Samantha Smith, Engineering As ' nt Tony Michalsky, Electrical Operations Coordinator Shirley Volk, Development Coordinator George Spain; Fire Marshal Pete Vanecel~, Senior Parks Planner Laverne Akin, GTE Representative Pat Clark, TCA Cable Representative SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat -Pebble Creek Phase Four; approximately 41.7 acres divided into 28 R-1A single family lots .and 68 R-1 single family lots to be located south of Spearman Drive adjoining Pebble Creek Parkway. (94-300) A Presubmission Conference was held Wednesday,. January 29, 1994 to discuss the above mentioned preliminary plat. The .following comments were made by the various reviewing agents: PLANNING: _ Submit a revised master plan of the entire Pebble Creek development to update out. files. _ Bikeways will be required in the designated park area along Pebble Creek Parkway. City's Engineering specifications were given to the developer. _ Submit a rezoning application for the subject property with the final plat. _ Explore the possibility of providing pedestrian access through the proposed cul-de-sacs into the private drainage reserve area. A t PRC Report Pebble Creek 4 Case #94-300 Page Z ELECTRICAL: _ Provide a 10' public .utility easement along the adjacent "Future Pebble Creek Subdivision".along. the western boundary. of the subject property. G.T.E.: _ Submit approved electrical layout and revised master plan to G.T.E. Representative Laverne Akin at (409) 821-4723, SUBMIT 10 COPIES AND 1 MYLAR REPRODUCIBLE OF THE REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT AND BY FRIDAY,. JANUARY 28, 1994 TO BE INCLUDF;D IN THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PACKETS FOR THE MEETING OF THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 3, 1994. THE CITY COUNCIL WILL CONSIDER THE PLAT ON THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 24, 1994. AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET REGULAR AGENDA STATUTORY AGENDA CONSENT AGENDA -ITEM SUBMITTED. BY: Jane R. Kee, City Planner FOR COUNCIL MEETING OF: 2-24-94 DIRECTOR APPROVAL: EXECUTIVE TEAM MEMBER APPROVAL: ITEM: Consideration of a .41.7 acre Preliminary Plat of Pebble Creek Phase 4 located south of Spearman Drive and including a portion of Pebble Creek Parkway. Applicant is Pebble Creek Development Co. ITEM SUMMARY: Thin preliminary plat proposes 28 single family lots to be zoned R-1A and 68 single family lots to be zoned R-1. A rezoning request should be submitted with the final plat. This' phase generally follows the approved master development plan. Additional impact studies were not required. A bikeway will be included within the park area along .Pebble Creek Parkway. There is a small portion of the right-of--way of the street forming the southern boundary that is in the ETJ. The-County has declined to require review of this plat since the vast majority is in the City and since staff has discussed with Council the intent to annex the remainder of Pebble Creek. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:. Staff recommends approval and P&Z voted to recommend approval.. FINANCIAL SUMMARY: NA CITY ATTORNEY RECOMMENDATIONS: NA COUNCIL ACTION DESIRED: Approve preliminary plat SUPPORTING MATERIALS: 1. Location Map 2. Staff Report 3. Application 4. P&Z Minutes 5, Copy of plat