The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMinutesDRAFT Commissioner Hall-explained that the proposed apartment use is compatible with the surrounding area. He stated that from an aesthetic. standpoint, the .proposed apartment complex would be .preferred by many people because it is managed by one agency. as opposed to duplexes which are individually owned, maintained and often. used for rental property:. The drainage for. the site will be addressed at the: time of site plan review. The'motion to recommend approval passed unanimously (5 - 0). '.AGENDA ITEM N0.3: Public hearing. to consider a final plat for the .Shenandoah 'Phase One Resubdvision of lot 25, block 14, approximately 6eS acres into 26 single family ,lots. {94-238)x/ ,Project Engineer McCully presented the staff report and recommended approval of the final plat with the conditions stated in the Presubmssion Conference Report. The srte is part of the original ,Shenandoah Subdivision plats, but was never completed. With thedown turn in the mid 1980's, .this. site was replated back to a single lot for financial purposes. The current application uses essentially the same `street and lot layouts, but also includes additional improvements required by ,current ordinances, as well as some drainage' modifications which will- help reduce some of the existing starm runoff problems in the existing portions of the subdivision. Chairman Hawthorne opened the public hearing. Engineer Mike McClure approached the Commission and offered to answer questions pertaining to the proposed resubdivision plat. Chairman Hawthorne closed the public hearing. Commissioner Lightfoot moved to recommend approval of the. final plat for the Shenandoah 'Phase One Resubdivision plat of lot 25 block 14 with staff recommendations. Commissioner Smith seconded the motion which passed unopposed (5 - 0). AGENDA ITEM NO. 4: Public Hearing to consider a conditional use permit request ,for Pathways to th,e Future computer education center located at 1501 F.M. 2818, Suite 111. (94-712) Staff Planner Kuenzel presented the staff report and recommended approval with. the condition that any future expansions come back before the Commission .for approval.. No site changes are ,planned as a part of this proposal, .therefore no Project Review Committee meeting was required. .Shopping centers are designed for a mix of uses that have varying parking requirements and hours ',of operation. The applicant expects up to 16 teenage students at peak times. Traffic will be mostly drop-off. This use should not be detrimental to the existing situation as it is no more intense than .:other intense uses that are allowed by right in any shopping center. Eight ',surrounding property owners were notified with no response. .Chairman Hawthorne opened the_public hearing. Seeing no one present to speak in favor of or in opposition to the proposed rezoning request, he closed the public hearing. Commissioner Garner moved to grant a conditional use permit request to allow a computer .tutoring service at 1501 F.M.. 2818,.. Suite 111 for Pathways to the Future with staff recommendations. Commissioner Hall seconded the motion which passed unopposed (5 - 0). P & Z Mirnrles Oct~be~° 20, 199= .Page 3 0, f 7 AGENDA ITEM. COVER SHEET REGULAR AGENDA STATUTORY AGENDA CONSENT AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTED BY: Brett McCully, Engineering Project Manager FOR COUNCIL:MEETIIVG OF: Nove r l 1, 199 DIRECTOR APPROVAL: ,,: ~..~~-- ~ J EXECUTIVE TEAM MEMBER APPROVAL: / ~~t!~(~ ,/ ~ ,~ _" ITEM: Public ":hearing and. consideration of a Final Plat (Replat) of Bloclc 14, Lot 25, Shenandoah, Phase One located at the western end of the existing Shenandoah Subdivision. (94-238) ITEM SUMMARY:: This -plat will create 26 single family lots as well. as dedicate .the necessary public rights of way and easements. This ,plat is generally in the same configuration as the original approvals for this site m the early 1980's, however the infrastructure is being reconstructed in order to meet current requirements.-The .Planning and Zoning ':Commission approved this, item .with staff recommendations at their October 20; 1994. meeting , STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval with the- Presubmission Conference commenes. FINANCIAL SUMMARY: N/A CITY ATTORNEY RECOMMENDATIONS: N/A COUNCIL ACTION DESIRED: Approve final plat, SUPPORTING MATERIALS: l . Surrounding. Area Map (SAM) 2: Presubmission Conference Report 3. Staff Report 4. Planning and Zoning Commission minutes 5. Copy of Final Plat y AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET REGULAR AGENDA STATUTORY AGENDA CONSENT AGENDA ITEM :SUBMITTED BY: Brett McCully, Engineering Project Manager FOR COUNCIL MEETING. OF: December 8, 1994 DIRECTOR APPROVAL: EXECUTIVE TEAM MEMBER APPROVAL: ITEM: .Public hearing and consideration of a Final Plat (Replat) of Block 14, Lot 25 Shenandoah, Phase One located at the western end of the existing Shenandoah Subdivision. 94 23 8) ITEM. SUMMARY: This plat will create 26 single family lots as well as dedicate public rights of way and easements. This plat is generally in the same configuration as the original approvals for this site in'the early 1980's, however the infrastructure is being. reconstructed i order to meet current requirements. The Planning and Zoning Commission approved this item with staff recommendations at their .October 20, 1994 meeting... Council heard this item o November 11th, and tabled the :consideration until December 8th. and gave staff direction regarding existing. drainage problems. STAFF .RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval with the Conference comments, and with` the reconstruction of the existing detention ba snetobnrovide additional flood protection. p FINANCIAL SUMMARY:. N/A CITY ATTORNEY RECOMMENDATIONS: N/A~ COUNCIL ACTION DESIRED: Approve final plat. SUPPORTING MATERIALS; 1. Staff Memorandum. to Tom Brymer 2. StaffMemorandum to Mark Smith 3. StaffMemorandum to Kent Laza 4. Surrounding Area Map (SAM) 5. Presubmission Conference Report 6. StaffReport 7. Planning and Zoning Commission minutes 8. Copy of Final Plat PRESUBMISSION CONFERENCE REPORT September 12, 1994. TO: Michael R. McClure, McClure Engineering 1722 Broadmoor, Suite 21.0, Bryan, TX 77802 Ed Froehling 3887 High Lonesome, College Station, TX 77845 FROM: Project Review Committee Sabine Kuenzel, Staff Plan e Veronica Morgan, Assistan ity Engineer Mike Lane, P&Z Representative Others Attending Natalie Thomas, Planning Te n' Shirley Volk, Development Coord or Samantha Smith, Engineering Assistant Don Lusk, Electrical Line Coordinator George McLean, CSISD Representative SUBJECT: Final Plat -Shenandoah Phase One; proposed resubdivision of lot 25; block 14 of the Shenandoah Phase One Subdivision totaling 6.5 acres divided into 26 single family lots. (94-238) A Project Review Committee Meeting was held Wednesday, September 7, 1994 to discuss the above mentioned final plat. The following ordinance requirements and comments were made by the various staff members: Ordinance Requirements: _ The temporary turnaround at the end of Stony Creek Lane must be a minimum of 80' in diameter. Show this dimension. ~. PRC Report Shenandoah Phase One Case #94-238 Page 2 of 2 Comments/Concerns: _ Comments and concerns for the overall drainage are included with the drainage impact studies. _ It is .the developer's responsibility for the placement of all conduit and for payment of twenty percent of the cost for electrical service. Submit a letter requesting electrical service and agreeing to pay the associated costs. _ The developer is also responsible for the installation of street lighting. SUBMIT 1 MYLAR ORIGINAL AND 16 COPIES OF THE REVISED FINAL PLAT BY FRIDAY, OCTOBER 14, 1994 TO BE INCLUDED IN THE PACKETS OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PACKETS FOR THE MEETING OF OCTOBER 20, 1994. THE.CITY COUNCIL WILL CONSIDER THE FINAL PLAT ON THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 10, 1994. U ~>~ STAFF FRC REPQRT '¢-' 1 ~ 1 it llenan 11 Phase One Resubd vls o S doa Case #94-238 i Discretionary Items: - None: Ordinance Requirements: The tempora turnaround at the. end of Stony: Creek Lane must be a minimum of 80' in diameter. (~~a~~~er~) I' Comments/Concerns:' ~ p~~< , A. Remove the "R" designation from r~ ~ "" .~ ~~ ~~L Comments nd concerns for the overall drainage: are included with the drainage impacf - ~ , studies. It is the. developer's..responsibility for the placement of all conduit and for payment of twenty percent of the cost for electrical service. Submit a letter requesting electrical ~~, service and agreeing to pay `the associated costs. ~ _ The developer is also responsible: for the installation of street lighting. This final .plat is scheduled for the October 20, 1994 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting and the November 10, 1994 City Council meeting. I~ I I, ~t _ ~ --- f ~~v A {~ ~' ~~ c~ '~ m~~C AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET e~~ REGULAR AGENDA STATUTORY AGENDA V-~~~~~a CONSENT AGENDA ITEM SUBMITTED. BY: Brett McCully, Engineering. Project Manager FOR COUNCIL MEETING DIItECTOR APPROVAL: EXECUTIVE TEAM MEMBER APPROVAL: ~/~ 2~8 ~~j~ ~~ ~u~~ P ~ 0` ~c_. p~ ~~. ~-~--~5 ~t~ ~ ITEM: Consideration of oversize participation in the amount of $9,358.76 for construction of water and roadway improvements within the Shenandoah Replat Subdivision. ITEh'I SUMMARY:. Thy replat of Shenandoah Phase 1 .was approved by Council on December 8th, 1994 however sufficient Information was not available at that time to prepare the estimates needed,for the participation request. The approved improvement lpaans for this subdivision include the additional 8 feet of width in Southern Plantation Drive providing a 47 foot width in accordance with. our thoroughfare plan. The plans also include a waterline which has been increased in size from 8 inches to 12 Inches in diameter to provide the City,the ability to extend service in this area to the west. Both of these items are in complete conformance with the City Oversize Participation Policies. / Attached. for reference is the project engineer's breakdown of the costs of construction, which has ~/ been agreed upon by Staff and the Applicant. STAFF; RECOMMENDATIONS: Approve the Request for the ..participation as indicated below. FINANCIAL SUMMARY: The participation amounts areas follows: Street: $3,986.16 Water: $3,372.60 According to the Finance Department, these funds are available in the oversize.. participation accounts. CITY ATTORNEY RECOMMENDATIONS: N/A COUNCIL ACTION DESIRED: Approve Request. SUPPORTING MATERIALS: 1. Engineer's Breakdown of construction costs