Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutesCity Council Regular Meeting Page 6 Thursday, December 8, 1.994 Mayor Ringer opened the. public hearing.. No one spoke. Mayor Ringer closed the public hearing. Councilman Mariott moved approval of the final plat. The motion was seconded: by Councilman Crouch which carried unanimously, 7-0. ~R 2) Consideration of replat for Southwood Vallev 24A, Tract B, Block 55 located on Welsh Avenue-iust north of Deacon/Welsh intersection (94-239) Assistant City Engineer Veronica Morgan described this item. She elaborated on the residents' concerns expressed to the Planning and Zoning Commission at their November 17th meeting. Mayor Ringer opened the .public hearing. Earl Havel of Garrett Engineering addressed the Council. He reiterated the statements made by the Assistant City Engineer. Mr. Havel remarked that the homes are planned for three bedrooms, 2 baths, single family residential constructed in a uniform and aesthetic manner. The builder is Thomas Properties. Glenn Thomas spoke to the. Council. He presented a conceptual plan of the homes. He affirmed the statements made by the engineer. Councilman Mariott made the motion to approve the replat (94-239). The motion was seconded by Councilman Hickson which carried unanimously, 7-tJ. (R-3) -- Public hearing and consideration of an ordinance rezoning 4.314 acres located along the east side of Wellborn Road near the Graham Road intersection from C-2 Commercial-Industrial to R-5 Apartments-Medium Density. Applicant, Cottages of Rock Prairie. Staff Planner Sabine Kuenzel explained the rezoning request. The applicant proposes to build a retirement community. The proposed zoning is in compliance with the land use plan for this area adopted in 1992. She described the adjacent land uses. She noted that the R-5 will continue to act as a buffer. Staff recommended approval Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval Mayor Ringer opened the public hearing. No one spoke. Mayor Ringer closed the public hearing. City Council Regular Meeting Thursday, December 8, 1994 Page 7 Councilman Crouch moved approval of Ordinance No. 2099." The motion was seconded by Councilman Mariott which carried unanimously, 7-0. jR-4) -- Reconsideration of an ordinance rezoning 20.24 acres alona the south side of Southwest Parkway on both sides of the planned Dartmouth extension from R-1 Single Family to R-2 Duplex, R-5 Apartments/Medium Density, and C-N *Neighborhood Commercial .Applicant Mark Carrabba. Staff Planner Sabine Kuenzel explained that this item was tabled at the .last council meeting. The request is forduplex zoning on the east side of planned Dartmouth extension. The construction of the extension shall be the responsibility of property owner when platted. This request conforms with the 2818 land use plan. Ms. Kuenzel stated that the council's concerns at the last meeting related to ownership and appearance of duplex development. She pointed out that the council adopted the streetscape ordinance at their last meeting. For this particular plat, the owner will be required to comply with the new streetscape requirements. Mayor Ringer opened the public hearing. Hank McQuaide, 12939 SH 30, spoke in favor of the rezoning request. Mayor Ringer closed the public hearing. Councilman Mcllhaney received a letter from Mike McEachen. He is opposed to rezoning because of inadequate vehicle parking and duplex development. Councilman Mariott moved .approval of Ordinance No. 2100 instructing staff to require tree plantings along Dartmouth as part of the platting phase. The motion was seconded by Councilman Fox. The motion carried by a vote of 5-2. FOR: Mayor Ringer, Councilmembers Fox, Mariott, Kennady, Hickson AGAINST: Councilmembers Crouch and Mcllhaney (R-5) Public hearing and consideration of an ordinance rezoning 6.3 acres located along the south side of Holleman approximately 600 feet west of Dartmouth from C-1 General Commercial to R-5 Apartment Buildings/Medium Density. Applicant in the name of Elrey Ash for the City of College Station. t94-122) Staff Planner Sabine Kuenzel described the request. She noted that the potential buyer of the property intends to invest in apartment development. ~' MINUTES Planning & Zoning Commission CITY OF COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS September 15, 1994 7:00 P.M. COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Commissioners Hall, Garner, .Lane, Lightfoot, Smith and Gribou. COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Chairman Hawthorne. STAFF PRESENT: City Planner Kee, Assistant City Engineer Morgan, Project Engineer McCully, Planning Technician Thomas, and Staff Planner Kuenzel. (Council Liaison Hickson was in the audience. ) AGENDA ITEM NO. 1: The Consent Agenda consists of non-controversial or "housekeeping" items required by law. Items may be removed from the. Consent Agenda by any citizen, City staff member, or Commissioner by making such a request prior to a motion and vote on the Consent Agenda. (1.1) Approval of minutes from the meeting of September 1, 1994. Commissioner. Gribou moved to approve consent agenda item 1.1. Commissioner Garner seconded the motion which passed unopposed (6 - 0). AGENDA ITEM NO. 2: Public hearing to consider a rezoning request for 4.314 acres located along the east side of Wellborn Road approximately 500' north of the Graham Road intersection from G2 Commercial Industrial to R-5 Medium Density Apartments. (94-120j1/ Staff Planner Kuenzel presented the staff report and recommended approval of the proposed rezoning request. The site is located in the southwestern corner of the Edelweiss/Rock Prairie Estates Subdivision, the Master Plan for which was approved by the City Council in 199L. The Plan included a revision to the Future Land Use Plan to include this area, which had been annexed into the City a few months prior to the Master Plan submittal. That Plan showed single family located in the center of the .subdivision with astep-down approach coupled with a landscape easement to assure buffering. Commercial zoning is limited to intersections including the subject tract. The C-2 was considered compatible :with the M-1 to the south and the limited commercial to the north. The requested rezoning would likewise meet development policies and be compatible with .existing and planned uses in the surrounding areas. The City of College Station recently completed a capital improvement project which extended a main sewer trunk line to this general area. It is sized to adequately serve this type of development. This development would have to extend approximately 1800 feet of .sewer to serve the development and tie into this line. The development would also have to construct the collector street along the northern property line and waterlines per the Edelweiss/Rock Prairie Estates Master Plan, Access to this tract will not be permitted from Wellborn Road. A Fiscal Impact Analysis was run and the requested rezoning shows slightly less net revenue for the City under abuild-out scenario than the existing zoning for the subdivision. ~~ Commissioner Hall opened the public hearing. Representative of the applicant Russ Hutchins of 2207 Woodsong Trail in Arlington, approached the Commission and offered to answer questions about the proposed development. A total of 136 units are planned consisting of 13 buildings with 12 living units per building. He stated that the proposed retirement community wi1T consist of 70% affordable housing retirees and the remaining 30% of the units will be at market rate. The rents will range from $350 - $550 per month. Mr. Hutchins stated that the actual density of the project is less than 10 units per acre. Access to the site will be from a proposed street that will connect to Wellborn Road. There will be no direct access from the proposed site to Wellborn Road. Commissioner Hall closed the public hearing. Commissioner Gribou moved to recommend approval of a rezoning request for 4.314 acres located along the east side of Wellborn Road approximately 500' north of the Graham Road intersection from C-2 Commercial Industrial to R-5 Medium Density Apartments. Commissioner Lightfoot seconded the motion which passed unopposed (6 - 0). AGENDA ITEM NO. 3: Consideration of a variance request to the minimum parking lot standards for the First Federal Savings and Loan building located at 2202 Longmire Drive. (94-403) Project Engineer McCully informed the Commission that the parking lot plan for the First Federal Banking facility on Longmire Drive was approved by staff in the course of the normal review process. The Project Review Committee (PRC) approved the .site plan on March 4, 1994. However, approval of the site plan does not exempt an applicant from meeting all ordinance requirements even if certain requirements were not mentioned. in the PRC review. At the completion of site construction, an inspection was made and it was found that the southern limit of the original parking area, which extends a length of approximately 180 feet, had not been curbed in accordance with the Zoning .Ordinance. It was determined that the marking on the plans was consistent with that of a proposed curb; but no note or direction was included on the plans which would ensure that the. curb would be installed. The. applicant and contractor were notified of the deficiency, and directed to install the curbing as required. Instead, the contractor installed concrete wheel stops along ,the, edge of paving, believing that the wheel stops would meet our Ordinance. Because the discrepancy was not specifically. noted during the original plan review, and due to the concerns of staff to not hinder the occupancy of the building, a temporary certificate of occupancy was prepared, with the curbing required to be bonded by the applicant. This agreement has not been signed by the applicant ..because a variance to the standards is pending. There is therefore no certificate of occupancy at this time and technically the building should not be occupied. Since the occupancy of the building, the. applicant has resisted efforts to install the curbing based on the following reasoning: the original parking lot was not curbed, the intention of the applicant is to further'expand to the south and would have to remove this curbing at some point and because the comment was not made .during the original plan review process. Several telephone. meetings were held to inform the applicant of the City's intention to pursue code enforcement options to have the, curb installed. During the course of these meetings, it was decided that because the curbing reduirement could have. been appealed to the Planning and Zoning Commission after PRC, and since the applicant was not aware of this opportunity, that the applicant should be allowed to request a 'variance to the Zoning Ordinance. Normally, a variance request must be submitted no later than ten days after PRC review. The variance request is based upon the opinion of the applicant that the, wheel stops are the same as curbing, that the openings between the stops will allow drainage', to exit the site better, and that the replacement of the stops with curbing is an unnecessary expense. P & Z Minzrtes September I5, 1994 Page 2 of 5 ~'r~m: ~ridgett~ George Company: ~eliege Station Parks & Recreation Depar#ment phone. 7~4-34'!4 _ Fax. 784-3737 ..Data: 1 Q/6/94 pag+~s incfudlrl~ this cover page: 11 ~ott~ents: Jane, just I~c~ under "~aricland C~edi~ati~n.a headings and hs~pef~i6y you'i( fnd ~ha~ ~c~~°~~ I~s~l~in~ fQr. Let Ci1~ ~nc~W if ycu need ar~yt~ing else. Brid~ette ~~ ~~ k~ t)02 11]!OGi~1~ 18;32 '$~~~ 76~ ~?~i C5 PARKS & $EC ~ '~ - - ~~ H, r RK5 ANa RECREATION BOAR REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, APRIL.-T4, -1992 CENTRAL .PARK CC3N~ERENCE RHO MEMBERS PRESENT. Sharon Colsa~n Chairperson;. 1~eborah Webb; Marti Badgers; ~~orge C?resser; Bill Lancaster; Cagle Schrt~idt; arts,! Jim. Gardner, Courticil Luison MEMBERS A,BSENTt Andrea errr~ STAFF PRESIohlT: Steve Heathy, birectar; .Ric Plaeger, A$st. Qirector; Curtis Bingham, Qperations Supt.; Sheila Walker, Programs Supv.; [?avid Gerling, Special Facilities Supt,; Vera Solis, Aquatics Supv„ Sheryl Laskie, Staff Asst. PRIESEN7ERSs Steve Arden, DPVeloper; Scott Mendell L_ ~AL!_~O t7RDER: The meeting was galled tt~ order at 7:fl5pm. II. APPRC~VA! t~F MINUTES: Mirtt~tes were approved. 111. -HEAR 'VISITORS: Norte IV. PRESENTATIpN OF AWARDS: Steve states! that the. Kids flub Program was reccagrt:'zed as arte of the best in "Iexas by the Corpe~rate Child aevelopr~ent Fund which produces The 3est of Texas Program publicatican. Ttt~re were apprcaxirrtately 4c~ submissions from across the Mate far this award, with seven progrart~s being selected to be features! irr the bdt~l~, The t~tp three were selected to .put can a presentatian at a ~Qnferenee irr l\ustin. `Ellis ecanferQnce was for legislators invalv~d in Cltilc~ Care i_egisl~tlan ar Fatt7ily l55ues LQgislation, arlci for people ~~vha were trying to start tlt~r r~wn programs. Sheila stated that smaller rural cpmrYaranities don't have child care prugrarns like the largger urban arias do ancf she felt like one of the ways she cauls~ .help them was to help tlier~t visualize' a ~aY that they could start a prograrrt willtc~ut federal funding or grants, Sheila said .that tl~e bids Klrrki initiated the L'Vellrtess F'ro~;ram this year, vvhir`_lt involves physical, social and emc~tiQrtal help, and is activity based rather tl°aart just an instructional curriculurvt. Also, this year Taekwondo, PianoF Sports Enrichment and Arts Crafts Enrirhmertt were intr~ctcluced. Sheila stated tlyat she is currer~kly de:ring a telephrane surrey to evaluate the curree~t p~rctgram. Sheila stated that they currently have 57 l~~ -inc~sme "free°' students right t~~w and that one of the lft/GB;'9~ 1G;3~ $'4ilA 7t34 ~i37 c:~S PaRKS & REC: _ [7jt1n4 ~` - Parks and Recreation Board Meeting ~'i `~ . P Tuesday, April 14, 1 X92 Pagc 3 Station if they were s~o much in favor ~f it, Scott mQnriorr~d that it was because he livc$ close to Central t'ark, that central Park is an exceilPrit Ic~catian from a k~usir-ess point of view, and that he is also targeting tf-e ~i0~ saftL~a11 t~articipants that are already patr+~nizing Central .Park. He stated that BRAG is too far out fcer most laeeaple and that they do not have as many participants as ~nlleg~ Station does. Sharon asked the Board to make a recommendat'ran either for sir against this proposal so that it could move forward to City Council: George raised the question "Do we want to open our parks to commercial enterprise?" He also wanted tea know what other cities are doing with regards to batting cages. Sharon stated that we would be setting a precedent with this permahent structure. Sharon believes that the 25 spaces needed for parking will make a difference with the current parking spaces. Sire lelieves that the batting cage patrons will try to park closest to the cages, on the struts and even possibly Qn the bypass. Gayle agreed with Shar~-n, she daesn'tbeleve that everyone will park in designated parking spaces. Her cancems lie with the fact that people will park on the side of the street if no designated parking spaces are available; causing a potential hazard. Scott addressed these concerns by statin that cars would be towed if they were parked illeggally, Steve stated that this proposal, ~ke all proposals, wound have to go through a ftarrrrai hid prQCess. Sharon asked the Board tai c~irtsider whether or not the site picked fQr the cages was suitable` tc~ them. Gayly felt like the Parks ~epartmrent staff should be the ones to decide where tl~e ,cages should ga irr the park itr ordQr for maintenance not tQ be affected by the +rages. ;Mart~i voiced her approval fear the batting erage prespvsal and believes that it would add tc~ the ant-ancement of the park. Sharon stated that a!! the Board needs to do at this point is tc~ recomment the k~atting cages within City parks to be rur3 by a corz~i7rercial enterprise. The Board Merrebers approved the recommendation. Steve stated the earliest that City Council caulc9 review this proposal would be the 2nd week in May. V!. il~lSCI:,IS~~+I~N ~~ P~~I~iLAhl6~ QFE[}iCATiC3l~) l~QR I~:E~lS11~1GT®N SUgIC~IVISI+OIV: Steve Arden, representing Van Reed, lnc, out of Hcrustan, stated rl~:~t they wil! initially be developing 1 a9 acres on the south side of Rack Prairie Road. The nr-rth side of Rock Prairie will not be developed until Eater because of the lack of access to that area, The location they are prapo~ing far this 17~rk would `in,~lude a etentron pond. fc~r drainage pdrposes that would not l7e City maintained but maintained by the neighborhood association, tlftr, Arden displayed a neap detaeling where the park would Ise., The Board expressed sorrre concerns aEaouc the number of parks irr the.. same. vicinity. Steve ;Mated that orre disadvantage is the location of tlye park being close eQ Vl/estchester Park instead of adjacent to it. It would. be easierta maintain if it were cs~nnected. Anczther disadvantage w~auid lae the close proximiey to ttyc~ industriaE area located on i;.;raham ~aad. CC:trre advantage would be to acquire a 10 acre site for the price cif S. He stated that ~ ~ acres is a .nice size to I~ave far a park. Another advantage is that it offers a gr+~at deal of street frontage and visibility, similar tE~ Galabard Park, which increases the safety factor and facil(tates the usage of a park.. Another advantage is that it is south of Rock 1'rairie'Road which i~ a major road. ~t this poitrt 4/are Reed, lnd. hoc( not considered a S arse site adjaccr~t to Westchester Park. Gayle moved that the Poard not accept the prc~posaL She yeas concerned about it being so close to 1Nestchester Park, E~ut not adjacent tc- it, ar-d was alsr~ concerned -about it being clcese to the commercial area. George seconded the molian. 'Sharntr does not like the fact that it would b~ close to a 10/t)G/~~ 16; 14 $4U~ 764 1737 CS P9RIiS & REC.' - _~1UD5 Parks and Recr~eatfQn Beard Meeting ~ ~,,, ~;~ ~' Tuesday, April .14, 1992 Page 4 c~rrnmcrcial area either. Marti liked tl7e prol~osaf. She didn't like the idea of children cras~inp, Rock t~rairfe Road if It were located adjacent to 1Nestchester, Sharon rryotioned for. Mr. Arden to make_arrokher proposal at a different location. Gayle, Bill and George approved the motion; Marti opposed the matiun. VII.... ISCUSSIC?I~{ AhrlD COIWSIfI~!„RATIC,~N CAF AtxT A[~AMSC>!N a'C~t^1l. ,~~'.• PROV~MENTS ANia RO~t HtJURa: Steve stet that the gr~al of this project was to provide increased water. tinted recreatiana ~appc~rtunities to the kcal residents and far summer visitor- In additior7, Adamsc~tr ~~ l is an existing facility shat is not being used to its rnax' um capacity. By (ncreasirrg its sage it will help to negate the need to build additio fac:ililies in the near future. The ca eqt is to redevelop. the existing SO meter ct~mpe can pool irtta a multi- use theme aririrt d site through the adtfition of`recreation equip tint, shelters, deck furniture, graphic landscaping ant! .related support 4acilities. ~ ~e "Adamsa» Lagoon" would be a semi tr ical inland lagoon, surrounded by jung( -plants and creatures; and an exciting water play and that offend safe and adventurous tivities far participants of all ages,. The small wets slide is still being researched. Ste displayed ~ scale drawing ref the rtrural that will be , ' inted on the pump rnom wall b ussell Reed, Steve askee,! the f~c~ard tc~ consider wheth to put ire additiQna) recreati equipment or additiarial .shade Structures. Steve fe~IS this utting in more recreation uipment would be the k7est thing to d4 at this point. Stave st ed that Vera Salis rese' ed more on the Lily park Walk, and the safety consultants felt the there wasn't any pro m putting it in. Steve wc,uld like se,me small walk up play strut res (ie: tic tat toe rivingg equipt7~ent) irz tl~e wading pool area, they are not "clirrrk- on" tQ stir no strrfacin dull !~e required undzr tl-rer7r. Also, he woiilci like tQ put in ~a sand box t e structure f' the kids to play. in, The waterslitle that was originally selected has beent roughly r arched and has Dean deterr~,itred to be unacceptable ley the risk manager, e f near e company a-rd Ellis & Associates. ~Qther waterslides are being researched at t 's tint The high dive focaard has' been removed at this tin°~e. (dew signage would else' be 'm merited with this fiE~st phase. Phase ti would be done with funds that uld have to be aequ(red through some t pe of dehx obligation, something like a Certi a af'Ohsligation or n7aniey barro~veci withiin tl~e ~ity'$ fund structure. The Firian.ce D' ctor It that that was a feasible way to approach it. 1'he idea would be to repay it-throw increas riser fees, over a five year period. The figure. that they felt'could be ethic d was $15 O~Q. ThPsta monies would b'uy a crne chute water slide with a two chu platfarrrr, al{a ing a secoestl chute to he added at a later time. Installation fees fpr, itianal decking, .amps, utilities, etc.; a second entrylexit paint and.. an additit~ shade structure w (d fee acicied at that tirrbe'. Steve stated that Phase ill w 1d be ittrplemented at a t e when tl~e financial situation could handle it, which wo be d~terrrrined by the sac s of the first tvv© phases and the revenue that they generat (Eerrrs that would be added at is phase would lee the second waterslide, an additfana ode structure, restrcrc~r~s, and an dditi€~naf play area. Steve dc~cs not feel that main Wants casts v~ill !~e able tQ fee tecov. eci initially, but he does believe that"capital c will kre recovered. Gayle asked if the straoms ~nrould,be Weer! to kre enlarged dire t he increased numbers of pecr~le, Steve tea that acfditiortal restrcroms are in the plans. anon asked about. shade structures. eve pc~intecf out three new permanent shade stru res that have already Been consfructed, ~a~le voiced her concern about tf°ie plays attunes getting hot. Steve said that the tots° items were made Brut of ffk~erg{ass. St~:ve aslce e f3aard's 1~11OB~14 lEi: Ali ,;r;,° ~'*" '$4G~ 764 ~ i 3? CS Pr1RIfS & RE" PARKS AND RECREATIQN BOARD REGULAR MEETtIVG TuESCIAY,,. MAY 12, '1992 CENYRAL PARK CONFERENCE ROAM MEMRE!!tS RRESENT: MEh113ERS A65EIdTs STAEE RRESENT: GUESTS: pro s Sharan Golsen, Chairperson; Dek~Qrah Webb; Mani Rodgers; Andrea Derrig; George Dresser, dill Larycaster; Gayle Schmidt; and )im Gardner, Council Liaison Steve Heathy, C7irector; laic Plaegcr, Asst. Director; Shcryl Laskie, Staff Asst.; E3ridgette George, Senior Secretary Steve Arden, Developer L CALL TO +ORnER: The meeting was called to order at 7:06pm. U. APP'ROVAl, OF M1MlJTES; Minutes were apprcaved, with minor` corr~CtionS. l11. I°lEAR VISITORS: None tV. DISCUSSIOI'~ Al+,lt] CONSlt3ERATI+ORI OE f'ARKt.~l~tD! I~EI~fCAT'iQN REQI=J IREMEN'~S: Steve.. informed the Board that the Parkland Gedcatian C~rdinartce was establisP7ed t4 form neighborhord parks, which is separate from eommunity parks.. Neigl>borh.aod parks serve people within relativ~l~ close access of their homes. He stated that the provisions state. that the pity rxtay choose, try accept sash in lieu of that land, if sufficient park area is already in the public clc~mai~e iro the area of the proposed development or .! tftie recreation pe~tential in, that zone wouldbe better s®n~ed by escpar~dirag or improving existing parks. 1~bd; The QedicatiQn Ordinance shall be rroet ~iy payment in lieu ref lartc~ at trie per errs price set from time to time by resoiuti"ari ~f City Council; the latest oi~e was set at X225 per dwelling dnit. Thee Board"s decision is `to either accept the parkland dedication as pr~pdsed v~ithin the subdivision as shown; reject it-and ask tf~at additicxnaP land be placed by the existing park; or aslc for cash in lieu cif land be provided. Steve vvas asked to gather additional i~~fori~~:atic~n, regarding park land as it relates to the existing po}~ulataen and the projected pcp~latic~n. ~te"4re reminded the I3nard that Westchester is a 14 acre park. The I'~ati~a'nal Recreation and FarPc~ ,~ssaciatic~n's standards for neighborhoc~el parks is a` minimum of 2 1l~ acres per 1CIOp population.- The prnpc,sed sul~divtsiQn p~rpuPation is estirt~atcd at approximately 21OC} people. The :existing C'~r<lnd~n l~lei,ghts subdivision area showed ~~~ people from the last print c~L~t, _~ . __ . ,- 1(r,'ca(ii94 1Q:3Ei '$`4alf~ 7Ei4 X73"r C'S P~RI{S & REC f~r:r[f9 ~ ~~,,~ ~ Parks and Recreatior- Beard Nleeting Tuesday, May ~ 2, 1992 Page 2 Stev¢. stated that the Planning & honing Clepartmerit is favorable to the proposed park area. He stated that some advantages of tl,e proposal are that `the .City would gain son7e additional land aI{owing fc~r much needed practice fields, etc. Also, t{7e residents south of Rack Pra(rie Road .would not have to worry abQUt their kids CrUSSir€g that major thoroughfare to get to .the park. Cane of the disadvantages is that the City wi{1 gain additional lanc# that the City vVi{! be responsible for the development and lang. term mainte-tanre of. ".Andrea asl~ed where the fund(ng would come from to build l{tt~ park after the land is dedicated. Steve sued that hstor(cal{y the money has come frurlt bond (sues, with a- few exceptions. Steve gave e;camples of several sites that .have teen accepted as dedicated parkland but Dave never been developed. Steve Arden presented a map showing the proposed park site. Mr. Art~en has net with the Planningg }~epartmcnt to get an idea of street design and layout, He showed w13Ere llte bicycle lanes and .sidewalks would go. _ _ ~ _ . . _ Mr, Arctet~ s[atec~that van t~e€t, tt~c- is neat asking e err s ecru on epa rnent nor the City lt:r take over the n7ai€,te~,ance of the detention pond, Thy I~~igh€bcsrhood Asso~iation,i5 responsible for ehr~se cletentian .ponds and keeping them open and mewed. ~haro€3 asked tv1r. r~cd~n hour c(ye Fiameawner°s Association is goirt~ tcs finance r~sairltainit~~; that pond. He said that the Homeowner's Association wi!! ha+~e a monthly assessn~enl lu each praper°ty dw€~~r ~1ithin the suodivisinn to maintain thcsse +~letention ponds.. He slatec# that they ai•e not rally panda, but ~uari(c1 be a play aroma most of the tir€,e except w}Detj there is heavy rai€'af~{{, l'~r. r~rden eiispiay2e} sorrte slides showi;~g the deten[i~€~ ppr€d and pr~,pas~t{ f~arlc site, ~earge stated that }te liked the prc~pc~sal, } le suggested rlevelczping an agt°eemetit where the City wnr.t(d agree to this prap4sal fc~r up frar,t s~oia-iper,sation to dc~ 6err~~ w~~rk, Culvert v4f~rk, etc. ~e doesn't believe that the. ~leigl-€l~Qr{~{aad ~~ast~ci~tian will kee{~ ~~~ their part Qf taking c_-are of t{ie dat~ntion. pond that would be {acaled adjacent to a r.ity ,ark and'recon°~menc#s that it be sntegrated into a tote! site p{at-r. (fie suggested the ~~ty r~eg~tiate acceptable terms vrsith the developer, relieving the ~#evelo;~er and/or tl~~ F#C-me~,vdners ;~ssnciation of the r~sp~ns{bility ar:d n~airrtenar~~e of that pond. H~ also voiced his eonc;ern about rert~aving the sail. franc that area liar t}te detentic~ra pant} ar,d leaping mostly clay ~fliere grass vii! not grow. Sharon wanted ~^r< Arden to address w},at world happe€, :nrhen the ai{ cc~rt,pany decides toed€-ill an tail we{1 just dov~sn the street tram where the }~rop4sed park is located. Mr. Arden dcie§n'l be{(eye that they will drill there: tvtr. Arden stated that the pp~rQjected tune frame for l}~e south lids develcapn,t~nt is ~-6 years. Sharon thir?ks that. tt~e Poard should' v~Fait are ap}aroving thee.. pre~posal usttil after the t'lannistg ~ ~c~r:ng C3epartment is finished wit}€ the configuration of the streets and drainage foe that Su~7diviSiC7n. George n-aade a r~ic~tic~n to accept tl~e prc~}.~rsed site and t(~at it he ir€tegratec# inter a total site plan and.. t#~al c:;arnpensation be ir~a.lrsci!a~d far the relief cif any' duties. Marti seeanded the :,~,Qtian. The rr€c~tie~n sassed. The €3~:,ar~! wanted to make ~r_€re that the City Cc~unci( was well inf~arriiec! about the ~oarc~'s ct~€trerns regarding this ~letentic€-r pond and park site. Steve slated that. he +rv4uld p€~epar~'~, written recc~n,n.s~ndation to ga fcsre~vard to the City Gauncil'. He als~a stat~c# that tl~e pl~t~ are presented by the ~lanrti€~~ staff at the vVarkshop Agenda, artd it`s at that poit,€ that the ~trrtcil ~A~il! clisctrss ~rtythirtg that's l~ertiner,c to that plat and tf~~tt hoard met~}~ers part ~aV, present at t(~at tirfite. V. fJlg~l1SSIC]~1 OF 1'AI~K ~~M1i~S: Ste~re displayed a rrsala gertRrated by the ~'ity'S Planning staff ar,d pointed :gut the park zcsnes. St~Ave stated that all of the devel~stsc~rs iii ~r~ne ?donated cash, wF~h;~h currently totals ~~SO,Q€~~_ ~ec~rge st~te•°° that he does not approve cat ~or~e g. ;. (~ believes that that