Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Miscellaneous
~' 4~-- ~~=~~ /~ G~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~~~ y~ `~~ ~~---~-- i~.~ ~ ~~~ (~`~~ ~~-~-~-~ ,-~, ~"~' `'~j CITY OF COLLEGE STATIOI`I `~ LEGAL DEPARTMENT / POST OFFICE BOX 9960 - 7101 TEXAS AVENUE CQLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842-9960 {409).764-3507 MEMORANDUM TO: I d 1'~-~ ~~t~~YYt~A w FROM: Cathy Locke, City Attorney ~, DATE: r3 i0 Your request has been received by the Legal Department. We have `numerous requests pending at this time. 1n order to accomplish ail the work we`have, it will be necessary for us to prioritize departmental requests. As of this time, the status of your request is as#ollows: Your request figs not been assigned to an attorney, but will be assigned as soon. as possible. ,_,~ Your request has been assigned to ~~~ ~~ c~ If the attorney needs more information, you will be contacted.:. If you feel. that the Legal Department needs more information to prioritize your request, please make sure that information is noted on he request or provide further written support:. We will provide you with the legal support you requested as soon as possible. Please understand that there are numerous competing needs. CL:d cc. ~~(,t~lt ~ O3/O9/tiJ4 di/c/winword/form ~. ~- ~ ~., ~•, CITY OF COLLEGE STATION `~; LEGAL DEPARTMENT POST OFFICE BOX 9960 1101 TEXAS AVENUE COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77842-9960 (4D9) 764-3507 MEMORANDUM TO: Natalie Thomas,.. Planning Technician FROM: Karl Black, Assistant City Attorney. ''~ RE: Rezoning Ordinance - 2800 Welsh DATE: May 23, 1994 As requested, .please find attached the rezoning ordinance .for the 3.94 acres tract, being Tract B, Block 55, Southwood Valley Section 24A. The Applicant is Thomas Properties. If we can be of further assistance, please advise. CL:jls Attachment cc: Tom Brymer js/c/rezone/natalie ,aU-u. ° e: r~~a its U8 { o. r~ioiow CS,`0-~~ ~r'va- 5~' 7,,-^ 3 d So ~-t ~( ~. ~laX~ ~--~~, ~n 4~1r5o e cs°,~-,~ ^r'za a~ 9as~ ~~ C~~LL,=G~ ~~I"~~'~a~, j,- a 71rs+'1 ~.~~.~` ~;'T';,. n,~j .i`iP."~~'1tr: e~i - - ., - - ip :...J.: ~ ~ r t ! ~ ~ i_ I 9 ~ j ~ ii; ~ -'~~ ~ !- j ? Q-?.-i :~ ~ l ~_; .~ ~- ~ ;~, i~ . _ ,~ 1 i ~ .~ 7 .~ v A Y A a~ ~..~ _ _ t 1 s`%~ f ~~ - f' ~ k `> 4 ,, :a .r'i~ ? ~ T ,. w i ~~~! ~F.;r t~~}R74 ai ~ ~i 'f i /~ :(.. ., ~~~d ~~ ~1I T 1.$ .. t'i" •I:.t!.. t ~ . ~ l:i y I I: '? .. , .- 1 i s.,! l+l ~ T r. \ t~ /- ~.~ t` T ; i 0 1 L r ~. ~ T j ~ i S ! . ~ i ~4 ... j 'J ~ ., ~ C t _ ,. *; ~~;~ . F u'if`{ ,, ~ 5 ~ 1 t ;~ v `+~`.- v s ! ~i~K y~, L!6 1 1~'> ~ •:.,j s Y~~ v ,~ ~ h~j ~ ~- I - i ~ ~. •~7 i. 3 ~..., s i, p~(1 ~r~:,t`1!~ f~~~.ihtt ~ ,. ~'.- ,~L._~~ .,~. ~ 47~ ~j71 n `~r. _ . .~... -T ti i ° r( ~ t° ~ w7 ss. s .r ._ ~ . 6 i 'y t h (~ ~ n ' K `~ ~ i ~ ~ - - ~`~b ~:~r .,`~>~~~;G~ :SITU., Zu11 h rilE CT _ _. ~: ~ .., ~ 1 7 1' t r _. i K: 1 1' s 1 ! i e ~ ~ C y} ~> j . . T ` ,„,;: - 7 .1R ~ t( e~! ^~ i~.._ ~~ r. ~ i~l 5 }' :~.~ ~ ~, ~;~~:, ...~.__ n-. (~ :~ s~° x.: ~. ... -- --- ~---------...._ a --------........---.------ - --. -_. p r yr is h _ ! R7 PiD - R8t?p22 l 582800-0450-1420 :SPECK, DANIEL W~£ PA~1~LA`' .! CN7S: G~1sS2~G2 LAND SPTt3: Als I~iP.SFTt3- Al SITUS; 2x12 N PU'tBLU CT ENTS: G1sS2sG2 - :.:_~,~.,.'.._. x~_:: <- St3UTN1~C~ElU VALLEYS tiLUCK 45s LO 14LR u.._:. .. .. ~---1- . - ~.:. _ - -w---~ PiD: 844074 1103.59) SgUTH~lUQU YALL~.Ys dLE3GK 4bs - .... .. v: :. ...::>::: ~~ ~..:~:..>::... , . . . .<..... :.:, Gt3LLEGE STATZOi~s TX `77841 LANO•SPTt3SL'ExP} IMP.SPTB: EXP ~~.. .:.::.:: :..: :. .. r..~.rr+~+?~~.~..a..w.....~.r.4-..e-~~--"~'~w.i~.ax. ~+r-.n .rr.~-~tw.~..,~wyr,,» ~w«.F _ . .:: ::::... ... s ..KINDE~i-CAitf LEARNit~b CE'NTERSs SiTUS• 1024 dALCDNtS ~LVU as p ,0 `BOX 2151 pL 3biU2 MONTGUMERY~ ENTS b1sSZsC2 ...- ~~~. t. ~~ s ~«P. , -' *2 : * ~ . µ•. h t Y~4 .\ ' ^rir`~~`~ ~ ~ p -. .~ - ~ ~ , F : . f :...:.... ~, ,~ 9' . .. ....... :qi ;:.r :::::::..:: f ] ,. '1 A ~~ i~ i @. ~ m2 i :" ~ Y~ r ..a '~ i { ~ .... .. .... .... .... .... ... .... . . :: . .. v.w::::--.. .:::::. :.: . 1. W ~'Rr.; S.~ 5 ....._ .... ...... ......... .............. ..:._............. . ..::: .:..:.......::::...... lYicar Y: ~ tiLU 4~ ' Y , :n. ~ ~ ; ~ ti ~ila~ ~' a~ ~..~" _ ~ - ~ L.L~ ~ V~ ~ g~i ~ ~ , ;~i ~ ,P~ ,h ~ ( z : .R440T6 (91145) PID ,i ~ ~ ~ ~ ss 582800-0470-OU 14 SiTUS' 7UU-702 SAk „~. " : ~:;a L_IGHTSEYs RUNALU £ ;~-1• ,~. ~, ,. _ --~ ., _ ..., .. ~ v ~~~ 4ULLtVt srATiUI~, fix:.-~~-4~ r ., ~::~~ s~'a'tyt'gv~~aw2a«, way. Wx~wa-~.~nraiar...e. ~ :.,~:sks.~`~~raa~.-~, : .~.. r . '.:_~ :tea? 't,,,, 17 zo' ~~SLT.U~.7n_~f~~~:_~: ~. >: 21'' ~ALZ~JCSr,R, JA;fiHS J ~ j~~:x~~ra=~~~ - ~' . ~ 7 i ~ 1 ~. ~ ~~ ~;~.. ~ ~ ~1:.- is ,. :. T ;;: _ .. --- 2`y11 a7TEC CT __ E¢JTS• ~lSL,CZ - ~P 23, CQ! LrCc ST~TIL,^1~ rY 17d4~ ~A~,;C1 SF'7~3: 41~ IMP .st'Tcs: Al 24 II, _ T ~ .~ - - -- 27i ~I ~ X3175!!? (114 i~:~l ' ~~;uT~:~~.~:.:~AL~..~`~ #,.€~~?~. ~~.;,, i~~ ~ - - ....~..v.......:. ~ zs, MU~ISTLR~ CLY~t t °14 K.G;4N~T '3 5ITU5: 2~t1~ AZ.{'~(; CT 30 ''2'y09 AZTEC CT El~TS: ~1,SL.G2 32 :::.:::. ~ :::. ,... ~ 35 PI!? KR7571 1114rJ54) 5JUT.itdssr~1U t'ALLt~Y, r3LUCK ~7, LU7 4 36 ~ 5f'?s~~u-~57~--`~u4u 137 f ~ S'"T~11z M ~ ~ M I C rs ~ ~ L r, L ti ~ ~ ~. ~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~: C T - m ^_ ~ 3s : ~} 7 ~ C T ~ ~. ~~:.7 ;E~ ~ l T S . ; iM ~ : ~ ,~ ~~' ~ ~ 39 . !I I ~ t ! r 1 1. ~l.~Eks ~~ ~E'i I~J ~~~ ~~` 1~.~~! ~,. . # T i c f s :..:.Y L..iV~~)3'.E~E.. 3i.i,'l Tip}~ _~~t TL};.* s~.~- 40 41 43 ~~~ z ~-}~s?~' ~ ~-I ~~3~~3 ) ~~ ,1T~{.e({f~~~j .~~L~'L `t~j @~~ii~~~C ~~J ~~~ ~ .: .. ~ , i ~u5 R~~LFS, ''~1~~IAM 5 t. J~~.IA ~ S~T~~S= ~~;~~ .'~:7 ~~-~, LT s ~ Ia6 - _ 2~ ~ 5 AZTEC. C T _ .,. ~'~} T S: v 1 f S L f (, 2 .W....,,... ~ .~ _ ~_ W .. 47 CU~LFGF STnTIUrds (x L7~s4] LAfvIJ SNfi~: A1~ 1~1i~ .S1~Te: At 48 I49 -_ _ - ,_:. s1 Pin= KR7573 Efii1y`~?#'I .3 i~~T"-t~'..rf~I, 'iF:~EL~L~'s _< 3~..i~~1~ ~:~~; Ltl1 V s2 SN.?H~U-U57~-('U~~~ - T- -- - __ = - - ~,+ 53' L1~IERF4~FlCt ~~. i~~~~h;~ ~)~IV1 f=~. f.' r Tt'f 51 T~)~~ iy ~~:j AZr~~. T ~.1 54. -.zyn3 IiTT~~. (,T ~~:TS: t~l?~.2'1 LZ b5 CiJLt~~t~~ STnTIiJ^d, i ~ - 114, L,;lv{~ :~'r~T~,_..: ~Ei~ I~s~ ~#~~'~i. T T- ~.. ._...Ai L L 56 - 57 .::;:.:.... , ~~~~ PTD: R87578 t 43C6i) SCUTtiW0fJ0 VALL~Y~ BLOCK S7, Lt)T 11 t-~' 5~C~u .E wt.r~?t[o-~s,_ Ln~~riei[car,"~ilsti!fits..~a+r~.r~e~r,.~r~+hk~as~yrw:..k~AM.~~~r..~rrr.,. .. EAd'fS : G1,SZ,C2 LAfVD SPTti: Ai, TMP.SPTts: Ai 'xis - -- - ~~u ~ rr~uuu 5 ~w~, : -, .: •~ . . .: ~..'~. : :~ . <. ., r~: ' 1~. ... s~o ~~ere~~~.~ra®syO~rs ~~~o~~~m ~e~~~s~~a ~a ms ~es~~a ~s wu ~./ ~d0 ~~r~~~~ .,,~ - ~e.oeo drs ss ~~~s~~ 11 SOUTtiWU0,U YALLEY~ 6LIJC'K 54s L07 _ ,~ PID: R443U8 t4430F~) 1 5 'r'~:~.e~~t ,y~fi-`t7-"~,~:~i._sr>'-~*T'J.~.:fu~;R* '~:.~ ..... ..... .. ft ED OAKS 7X ~5~154 ..:::• ........ ::.. ~ . .. ENTS. G1sS2aC;2 ~ s LAh[D SPT~= Air INIP.SPTti: Al ~ ~ ... ::.. i .:.. ... ..+r..... ... ... .... ..... ,:._ . ; ; >: zz ROCHELLEs JETtiaD ~ tTat_ zs 328 pEgBLEBROClK Si7U5: bU4 Sato P1A4t1D za RED t3AKs TX 75154. tNTS GIsSL~(,2 _ ~~ 25 .::.. ... :.:::::.:....: ::.h : :........:.:...:. ~: :....: ... ..: : :... ~ ailfr-+MMr~rrR -wiY~w!!~'....... _::..:::. .:. .: .:.:wf?Mtw fw.IRfM . -h .:::.:.....::. ..:. .:.. .::::::: :.::. z7 :.: :.:... °:.:.......:. ~:.. :.a:. . PID. 'R~+43'iQ tLi8t351 ...: :. .. ..... .. ..... ......... SEll1TH~tU~3tJ VALLCY~ BLOCK 54s Li3 za zs 5 5$2SC~U-0 . ~,!~-O15v 15-A ~ Z5-3 so ~ fIRD,S~ TOMMY E ~. r1AU 1CE 33 ,: ~ :, x _ ~ ~ ~ ... .. .... ® ~ r pID: R44312 illF3s3~) SQUTH~dUt1D VALLtY~ dLUCK 54s LOT __ as 3 ... ::.... ... :. ., ..... .. : ..:.. ... ~. .. :. ~.. : .:.... A..:... .:::..:::....::::.. :.:...:..:,:... ::.:.. I. ....:::......... :. ....;:...;.~.. ._ . ..:....::::.:..::.._ :.:..... ..... . ..... ,,:. . .aa rr p~ rr ............... .......... ii::::::`:..:::?:`:::;:'i.':" _ .... .: .~:. ....: ..................: .......:_....:. ...:...... .:.:......................::.:::::: :.::::...... .:.: ~:....:. .. ....... ... .. ::::. :::::.. :..:....>y:::: -::.:..n::.:.-f:~~ - o COLLEGE STATION, TX g4~ ENTS • V1~SL~C2 4 LAND SPTt3: C1 i 43 - ,~,. v. -. .. F - - ~ '~ ~... ::...:...:,:,, .:.:.... :~ ..............:::.. .........:.,.:.,~ ..... ti ... .:.. .,r.. , ......... _. ....,:.. :...:....: ~~ . h... ~. .:.:.. .. n .:......... ......:... ....~.:... ..:.:::... ..:..... ~::~:. .. h..:-:: _:....:::::.ce.v. hS~. ..:. }~ : ...... .n .v. ...-::.: ...:... . ... ....... .::..:.. ..n : T.s. ... ::: h. ..:.. :..:.:. :...::. ..:. .: .:.. :.: .,...:. ..... .., .... : :. h. ..:.: :.. .. ...: :.....:.:.:..:....: ..:. ~. GY:: 4:I:.Y:C . .,.. .~:c.:..f. :: .... .... .. .....: .... .. .:.. .x:.:....a .:. .. _... .... .,..... ~,:d... pk. ....h.. :.... :..:. ...,.:,. , .>::::.s>::...y: y § '~` `~ x ....., : .. .... ... ....:.. .rte. _. ...,. y ~'~V ..:..... . h... .. ~ ,....._... ..... ::...4. : k i:: >..>.. ....... _..... .... ... ....:: ... ....... ..::._:... h ... t .... ..: ..::.:: :.:...:..:...:.:..:. :...h::...--:.:.... . , r ... _. _ ... ..... ... .. :.. . .... ...:... ..... . .,:.. ..,.... ..:......... .. . ... .:...... ... ..::hS; :.:......... ......:::..:.. .,.. ....: ..hy Er. :... .,. .... : :.~:.. ..... h... .. ,:... .... :.::.:::. . ...._.... ..... ._ ......: -::. :...:... :x :'iii:?%%o_:~^; ..:.., : ... ; .:: as 705 DQVER S'ITUS: b1Z SAN r1aR1D 47 COLLEGE STATIO~t, TX 771345 E~tTS: G1,S29C2 l.Ai~iD SP TES C 1 $ :: _ _ _ ...... ..:; .~Crw.roc.»,wk«.wk.~cw.wrwr~v~.r:..- :. ~s.r~ ;..; . i ,:::::. ; : ~ _. ~ ...... ...:.:. .. .. ..,.:.... .:. ::.:: .. _ ....... .... ......: ,.: ... h . : ..:: .. ... .,.._.. ..!~. :. .:.:. _.,...:.::::::>..,,.._::> :::::...::. ..: .. ..... .. .. ..... .. :..... _:-...............::.:::.:::::.::...... y~ ~e~. .i ~j ...... .. .. .:. . h ... .... ....:..... ....::. .:...~1k.aS.~::~3:FAfid:.~.+Y±Ri!~~xf•.r... _cC nz..,:.:,.:::::y....- ...... :.4: <>::fis>:;>,. :::::.~.:::...::::,._.:.:,.::.~::..~::::::.~:.~:..~:_<:.;>;;:;:;~:<.;:;;x;._h.:=;;:::::::o»xer.:.:::::<o.z::ii:=:tt:o::;;~:::ox«..::::»:ax:..>:>rz<xx:;~,.:;:x;:.;;;<s:»~;:z.~~:::::::.:~:.::.. . ....:. :.:::: .:: :. ::: _ ~::.... ~: ::.:::.,..:-.. .... ::.aisjs~::::~:;::;_.::.:..::~:::).a:s:;:::::?i::i:..::..::•:::.:::.:...5..:::.::::::::o.::::~~:::::.~::::::.;rago:!:.i'<.;;r:>::.c`t.`.`:::.~::.i'p;::::;., .. ...: .:. :.: -.. .....:......::.:.:. .::.:.:...:.~.:.... .,~..:;.:... I __... _ _ _ A C A U S °Y. S T ,, ~, !~ BRAZOS COt1NTY ,APPRAISAL ~JIST~2ICT Iyy,~ PRELIMINARY ~tE~LL"F(]R ALL" E= .~„ °r.NG " Ct~FTW AR E GROUP s INC. _.....____...._.:...__~___~--- -..e~~..~-~---- -------_..______----~---~----------------- .-~„~~r~,~_~„nn vn, ~ FY. CLUCK 54s LOT ~At~U SPTti: Als IC-P.SPTti= Al STTUS: 628 SAN MAR 1D _ _,_ _ ,. , r -~ r ~ , .._ 1. :,:.:. ~;:. .~ +"~ r eta., s ~, ~ ,ir. .. ~ ~~- DY$TRICT ~'~t ~ r~.~~H , ~ ,,` n t3RAZOS CQUNTY ApPRA1SAL` .~`g94~-.~' L' ''~ THE S OFTW'AP. E GRCIUP ~ INC• .. - ~~ ., .......- ..__ _. ~c _n. .^?- ~ I .. "I ' ~ ~ A I» I R jai ~' 56~ 5r ARDSON~ TX ~ ~` EhlTS G1~SL~C2 LANi? S}'Td: A1~ zt~P.St'Ti~: Al :...:... ~..~..:..:~:~•:...::.:.;::::. '~ ~ 4`~t ~.. .. _ ....Y ~~~~~ y~DUNN~ WILLIAM E ,5 MARY L SITUS' 636 SAN "!Alt1D ~ ~~i~4h ENTS G1~SZ~G2 __ x CpL;LEGORSTATZiI^1 TX .~ ~ P` ~ ~~ 5 ~"~" i'~"~.~'".`,`',~".`,°`t`. ...... ~ ..~ ::., ~$ O U T Hk+ U 0 U Y Q L L E Y~ S L U K 9: PID• R443Z6 (8-8318} 23-A 8280Q-Q54~?-023U 5 CLARK -R08E.RT ALAN -_ ~ ~< S~~'#15~:~~.,, ~ ~~~ - ;`:::w 'v. Nom. ~. ~" ~ .y `x 4 y ~ n .. ........:....:v I :.~~.< ~ ~ o.\. :.Y.:.Y S . 2E+:`. ...... .\ ~t ` \ i`M ` l~ W. .h-:.. . , ik~.. ;,. ;' ~ e 'ma'r s ,:. . ~., ;.. .. , x .... ,..: ::. ~~,~ '• .~oa a.... ~........-.-...arr.. ..-~ ~ H 50~THWOOD VALLEYS dLUCK 54~ LDT PID: ft44327 (118985) ,... ~ ~#,~. ,sr ~ ..,.,. ... :.~. ~. .. .._~ ~}~.. __ ..~..... ...... , c. X 8,-h_b U ; ~ ' I;1P.SPTb: Al ~0< LAN17 SP TB : AIs 3O t )AL rcR~ ~•,~ 434 BERNARD DK , SEALYs TX 774~ti 3C~~4 _ 587 sann.~r~~4n-~?41 LOG SITUS= b42 SAy iSARiD EATS= U1sSZ~C2 _.,:.. L4-"~ 1 ,~ ~~ ~f ~M ~~ Opposition to Portion of Welsh Avenue nearest:. Mormon Church rezoned for Duplexes We, the undersigned :property ownersnear the proposed zoning change area, are opposed ;to the rezoning of the plot of land on Welsh Avenue nearest the Mormon church. We ask the Planning and Zoning .Commission and the .City Council of College.. Station to leave the 3.94 acre plot zoned for single family residential as it was intended in the long- '., range planning of College Station. NAME ADDRESS PHONE 1. ~~ ~ C~~z~a~ ., ~~ 4. ~~~~ F (ter- a~~ ~~~ ~f 6. ~'; r~~ r 7 ~~ 11. Lam- 16. '? tt ~~~:~{ s t~ 'mil h w 5 ~--- ,. ,~ NAME ADDRESS SHONE ._ 20. ~~~ y ~ y. 21. ~~hn `~`~ ~~~~ ~f ~3~ ~®y faa 22. S Z!`~~ ~~t~-u~z~ s 23' _ ~~ ~ ~ (~ a (~ ~ S J~ 24. 25. ~.~ °~ ~~~' ; DGG IVY 26. ~r ~ ~7 ~- L ~.~-. ~~~~ 29. JI dry- ~~~ ~ ~G~~ ~, ~~ X33. ~ ~ ~l~ `~ ~~'~~~ ~~~~~~j3 ~ /~ 36. _ ~~"~ ~~' e 40. Opposition to Portion of Welsh Avenue nearest Mormon Church rezoned for Duplexes We, the undersigned property owners near the proposed zoning change area, are opposed to the rezoning of he plot of land on Welsh Avenue nearest the Mormon church. We ask the Planning: and Zoning Commission and the City Council of College Station to leave the 3.94 acre. plot zoned for single family residential as it was intended in the long- range planning of College Station. NAME ~.: L ~, ~ , ADDRESS ~~~ ~ ~G 3 ~~ .~ Z ~Z ~ ~~~ = ~ ~ PHONE ~~ _ - ~ ~ .f Opposition to Portion of Welsh Avenue nearest: Mormon Church rezoned for Duplexes We, the undersigned property owners near the proposed zoning change area, are opposed to the rezoning of the plot of land on Welsh Avenue nearest the Mormon church. We ask the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council of College Station to leave the 3`.94 :acre plot zoned fore single family residential as it was intended in the long- range planning of College Station. NAME ADDRESS PHONE 1. ~ ~ ,r. - ,.3 ~~,~ ~.:.~. ~ ~-~ __~~-may ., s. ~-° 9. IM® l~ ®c~~s~' ~ ~ 3 ~~ 7 ~ 12. 3a G 13. 14. 15. 16. ~~ ~` -~-~~ lit ~ tN Opposition to Portion of Welsh Avenue nearest Mormon Church rezoned for Duplexes We, the undersigned property .owners near the .proposed zoning change area, are opposed 'to the rezoning of the plot of land on Welsh Avenue nearest the. Mormon church. We ask the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council of Col ege Station to leave the 3.94 .acre plot zo~ed for single family residential as it was intended in-the long- range planning of .College Station. NAME ADDRESS FHONE 1. ~ ..f 4• v ~ ~ ~. ~~ ~ f ~~ ,~ ~~a~:~ ~,~ ~~~~ ~r 11. 12. -~ 13 14. 15. 16. ~ -' Opposition to Portion of Welsh Avenue nearest Mormon Church rezoned for Duplexes We, the undersigned property owners near the proposed zoning change .area, are opposed to "thee rezoning of the plot of land on Welsh Avenue nearest the Mormon church. We ask the Planning and Z®ning Commission and the City Council of College Station o leave the 3.94 acre plot. zoned for single family residential as it was intended in the long- range planning of College Station. NAME ADDRESS PHONE ~- t' ~- ~ ~ ~~~ a N ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~-7 ~ ~~ ~ ~_ ~ . 14. ~f~'~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ ,.__,, -~ NAME ADDRESS PHONE y ~~ 1t S , ~ 17. ~ ~ -~~~c. 18. ~~~ ~~~~ 21. 22. 23. 24, 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39'. 40 ~~~ Opposition to Portion of Welsh Avenue nearest Mormon Church rezoned for Duplexes - We; the undersigned property owners near the proposed:-.zoning change area,: are opposed to the rezoning of the. plot of land on Welsh Avenue nearest the Marmon church.: We ask the `Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council of College: Station to leave the 3.94 .acre plot. zoned for single. family residential. as it was intended in the long- range planning of College Station. NAME ADDRESS PHONE 1. .~~.eV t~. ~ ~/~« ~er< ~ `117 ~~ r ~~z 7~`~ _ ?-°76Es 2. ~1 r Imo.. ~ ~q-.~ 6~ ._ 1 ~73z~ G~ ~~~ 4. ~ , ~ ~ ~-~ awe/ ~ 9 © ~ 6. g. ~ ~U~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~. ~~ ~- ~ ~~ ~- ~~ w ~ 12, ~~~~ ~ a I5. ~~`~ ~~ ~ ~1~L~ I6. t . o NAME ADDRESS PHONE 18. G~~°- ®e ~, Cam. C'.S . 7"~ a~~ ~S (a ~ 3 - ~~?~~% 19. 20. ~ ~.. 2L ~5 23. ~-r~ ~ ~.~.~...~. ~ ~o ~e C'.~ T~ '77`7 ~L1 ~- ~'/ ~ c~- I ~ ,"' q A ~~~ e' q3 ~ 733 .~f~.. 3~I3 C'~- C~ u7~' 25. 28. ~~- 29 ~~~°~~ ~ ~~~~~ .. ~ ~.~ 30. f _, ~a ~t GS`~ ~X ~~j~ 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. 40. ,~ 1~r. artd ~lrs. ~avicl~lK. Ellis 3008 ~oCero St. ~'oCCege Station, 7X 77845 (409 696-303.3 19 May, 1994 Planning Division City of College Station 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842-9960 RE: PROPOSED REZONING AT 2800 WELSH AVE To the Members of the. Planning and Zoning Commission: We would like to state our objections to the proposed rezoning of the lot at 2800 Welsh Ave. As a property owner in the neighborhood, I am extremely concerned about the impact such a rezoning would have on me as well as on the neighborhood. My concerns include the following: The development of duplexes in an area that is otherwise entirely composed of single. family .dwellings, would have a serious negative. impact on the property values of those single. family dwellings. While this is of concern to me as a property owner, it should also be ` of .concern to the City since this will ultimately impact future expected property taxes. 2. The presence of up to 66 additional cars (11 duplexes x 2 units per duplex x 3 cars. per unit) in one small side street would represent a substantial increase to a traffic flow that is already quite heavy at .peak times. This is a particular concern since Welsh is a principal route for travel to and from both the Junior High School and Rock Prairie Elementary, and many children, including my own, walk or cycle along Welsh on the way to school. 3. The presence of duplexes will also have an impact on all of us who live around them because of the increase in noise and the increase in traffic. One individual who lives at the north. end of Bolero, and who backs on to the existing duplexes on San Mario, has commented that since they were built they have frequently been kept awake until well after midnight by the noise of the duplex inhabitants. 4. While Thomas Brothers may well have every intention of building "upscale" duplexes that would not be an .eyesore, they will have no control over either the occupants or the appearance of the duplexes once they are built and. sold. They will be able to walk away from the situation, while we will be the ones who have to live with it. ~, ,: In summary,. both my wife and I are strongly opposed to the proposed rezoning. We feel that it is a betrayal of the interests of the existing property owners in the area, and to the best long-term interests ofthe city. We recognize that there is a need for this type of residential development; however, we feel that this is not the place for it. Sincerely, -` David M. Ellis, Ph. D. Kathryn A. Ellis TIE OF ®F - TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY WARD College Station Texas Stake 17 May, 1994 Planning Division. City of College Station 1101 Texas Avenue College. Station, TX 77842-9960 To the Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission: As a Bishop of the Church that is located immediately to the south of the lot in question, I wish to make a formal statement of opposition to the proposed rezoning of the 3.94 acres at 2800 Welsh from R-1 Single Family Residential to R-2 Duplexes. There are, I believe, substantive reasons for believing that retaining the .present zoning is in the best interests of the existing property owners in the area, and of the city as a whole: There is a clear natural boundary, namely the drainage line immediately to the north of the lot in question, that serves to separate it from the existing area of duplexes. All .other areas south of this boundary, between Wellborn Rd. and Rio Grande, are zoned as single family. 2. The presence of up to 66 additional cars (11 duplexes x 2 units per duplex x 3 cars per unit) in one small side street would represent a substantial increase to a traffic flow that is already quite heavy at peak times. This, is a particular concern since we frequently have activities after school and in the evening when there are many children and teenagers around. 3. We are also concerned that our parking lot would be used as overflow parking for either the' inhabitants of the duplexes, or their visitors. This would be a particular problem on weekends, when we are holding Church meetings. 4. We feel that rezoning would lead to additional concerns for the safety and maintenance of our property, due to the more transient nature of duplex housing. Finally, we would like to point out that at the tiine, of the initial purchase of the lot on which we built our chapel, we were told by the original developer, Mr. Bill Fitch, that the adjacent vacant lot was zoned for single-family. dwellings, and this would not be changed. Our Church has a policy, that has been developed. after many years of .experience all over the country and all over the world, of only building in single-family zoned. areas. Sincerely avid. M. Ellis Bishop ,r Charles W. Graham 632 San Mario Court College Station, Tx '77845 May 19, 1994 Planning and Zoning Commission e% Planning Department City of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Tx. 77842-9960 Re: Proposed rezoning at 2800 Welsh Avenue Dear Commissioners: I am requesting that the proposed rezoning of Tract B, Block 55 of Southwood Valley 24-A, 2800 Welsh, from R-1 Single Family Residence to R-2 Duplexes, be denied. My family and I have lived on San. Mario Court, adjacent to and north. of the subject real estate since Apri1,1983, and with some historical insight we would like to offer the fallowing reasons why rezoning this particular tract of land would not be proper. First, I would like to relate to you a number of undesirable experiences we have endured while living on San Maria Court, which is zoned R-2, to explain why we would be against rezoning the subject land from R-I to R-2. When my family and I first moved to San Mario, approximately one fourth of the lots had been built on. To the unit, all of the duplexes and hameplexes were of different designs. AlI had either carports (the duplexes} or garages (the homeplexes), and all of the designs and materials used anthem were different. This made for an interesting neighborhood for a while, and a large number of families were attracted to these units. As development continued on San Mario .Court and adjacent streets to the north, however, what I would call a general degradation of the overall area occurred. The pattern of development gradually changed so that numerous units had the same design, using the same floor plans and materials finishes. Carports and garages were omitted and replaced with parking slabs. Occupancy changed to a remarkably larger proportion of single adult renters. The neighborhood lost much of its original character because of the change in visual character, use, and maintenance of these duplex properties. At present, I would characterize my neighborhood as a giant parking lot with dwelling units jammed in between the parking spaces. In the last couple of years the typical pattern of occupancy far the area has been far three people on average to .live in each side of a duplex unit, and for them to have theee automobiles per side (the residents of one nearby unit had five automobiles and two boats there for aver. two years). It is not uncommon for duplex residents to have five -seven automobiles per unit. Curb cuts far the parking slabs are sa close together there. is little space far on-street College Station Planning and Zoning Commission May 19, 1994 Page 2 parking, hence people park on lawns, bumper-to-bumper an the short parking slabs, and anywhere a short section of curb can be found. Guests have a difficult time finding places to park. Sadly, we have seen numerous confrontations between residents overpacking. I~Toise and stray pets are two side problems we have also seen too much of. Police and animal control officers have to make frequent calls to ..:the area. I have often wondered too what would happen if a major emergency (e.g. fire 'or tornado) occurred in the area when everyone was home -getting emergency ,vehicles into the. area would be almost impossible. We have also, over the years, seen the volume of runoff increase dramatically in the drainage ditch to the west and north of the subject property. Houses downstream in the Brothers Boulevard area ,have been flooded,. and we have observed the flow level in the ditch during many recent storms to be up into our and our neighbors' yards. Increased density of duplex development on the subject property will only unnecessarily exacerbate the problem .:downstream. If development is going to occur on this land, let it be at the reduced ':densities of single-familydetached housing. Unfortunately, given the long term trend, the general degradation of the area is getting worse, :not better. Personal frustrations in peoples' dailylives aside, I would argue that the performance of our financial investments in these properties has suffered. It is common knowledge that many homeowners who bought single-family homes on the south, east and west edges ofthe subject real estate did so with the knowledge that the subject real estate was zoned R-1, and that compatible housing types at typical single-family densities and uses would probably be built on this land someday. These homeowners and the church congregation at the corner of Welsh and Deacon streets, I feel sure, were counting on the zoning to ensure compatibility with their properties. To rezone the subject property would be a breach of public trust and confidence in the principle of zoning, which is meant to foster compatible land development. Certainly other, more desirable land is available for multi-family development in the south College Station area. Unless the Planning and Zoning Commission and the College Station city council were willing tc> greatly change its off-street parking requirements far R-2 districts, to implement other measures to ensure a better mixture of designs, and to require better care of these properties once built, I cannot imagine why another permit far a duplex unit would be approved in any area of town. It is certainly improper to rezone this tract of land from R-1 to R-2. Sin/ce~relQy_, d1 Charles W. Graham Homeowner, 832 San Mario Court 19 May, 1994 2901 Aztec Court... College Station, TX 77845 409-272-1402. Planning and Zoning Board City of College Station, Texas I i, Dear Members: We wish to express our'objection to the proposed rezoning of the four-acre block of land near the intersection of Deacon and Welsh Streets which joins our property. on the NE side. We understand that currently the land is zoned for single family dwellings, and that Mr. Thomas is requesting that it be rezoned for duplexes. We object to any. rezoning of this property for the following reasons; 1. When we purchased the lot for our home, the zoning regulations were a priority concern. 2. If rezoned, it would be similar to the. duplex area just West of us which is an untie t and. trash area. p Y llin are aiwa s better tie t nei hborhoods. 3. Sin le famil dwe I' g g Y g Y p 4. Avery strong concern is ,the proposed plan for the use of the and directly behind our home. Will it be used for garbage storage, garbage'pickup, drainage .ditches, etc. . 5. On our side of town, currently there are no duplexes established that come as close to Deacon'as these would. 6. Presently, we have a very strong security-minded neighborhood. This security would be jeopardized if the duplexes.were built. 7. Our property evaluation for tax purposes just went up $11;000. These high taxes reflect the quality of our neighborhood which would be compromised with the :rezoning...: Thank you for considering our.positon. `Sincerely, aine M. Thompson Dr.To~ r~ Thompson Thomas T. & Gail R. Colby 2908 Aztec Court College Station, TX 77845-6558 College Station Planning and Zoning Commission ~ 1101 Texas Avenue South PO Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842-9960 May 19, 1994 Dear Commissioners: We strongly oppose the request by Thomas Properties to rezone the :property at 2$00 Welsh from single family homes to duplexes.. This change is not in the best interest of nearby residents or the City of College Station. We built our home in this area of College Station for two main reasons, the. strong property values and the quiet, family atmosphere. The construction of duplexes on the .property in question will decrease our property values and marketability and turn our. quiet, family neighborhood into a loud, overcrowded continuation of the already existing student housing to the The on ' al lon' ran a laps of Colle e Station should be followed and single. family north gin a ~ g P g i homes meeting all the current deed restrictions should be built. The economic gain and interests of of a few individuals. the city and its residents should be supersede the economic gain I Thank you for.. yQUr cooperation:: and: open mindedness in this matter. Hopefully, .together, we can build a better Cityof College Station for allour families. ill Sincerely, Tho' as T. Colby Gail R Colby i May 18, 1994 i Planning and Zoning. Commission P:O. Box 9960 ~; College Station, Texas 77842 i Dear Commissioners: We strongly oppose the proposed zoning change to the 3.94 acre plot next to the Mormon Church on Welsh: Avenue. The plot is currently zoned :for single family housing and should remain that way. We want to preserve the family neighborhood tradition that now exists in the housing that surrounds the Mormon Church. We live 'at 2909 Aztec Court and our backyard faces the plot in question. Therefore any zoning ..change would directly affect' us. When we purchased our property we wanted to .live in single family neighborhood. The fact Ghat the 3.94 plot was zoned for single: family housing contributed to our decision to purchase the. property. Zoning is a tool used by municipalities .for long range planning. Commercial businesses, industry and individuals use the zoning maps developed by` the City of College Station to make decisions on long erm investments. In effect, the City of College Station has made a commitment to the ,public hat this land`be developed for single family housing. Therefore it is critical. that the City. of College Station: stand by their original commitment, as stated by the zoning maps, to provide investors. a measure of security required :for long term investment. Again, we strongly oppose any zoning change to the 3.94 acre plot next to the Mormon Church on Welsh Avenue. Sincerely, ~~~ /V ~~ Mar aret and Clyde 1Vlunster 2949 Aztec Court College. Station, Texas 77843 6. _ _ j ~; DanieGaruf~ieresa 7. Linederger 2903 .~ztec Court Co(.~ege Station, Texas 77845 I 19 May 1994 i Planning and Zoning:Commisson City of College Station P. O. Box 9960, 1101 Texas Avenue College Station, 'TX 77842-9960 Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission, 'I This letter is written to speak against the proposed rezoning of the of at 2800 Welsh Avenue .from single family residential to duplexes. This property is located directly .behind our .home, and the :development of the property .will ubstantial effect not onl on the value. of our property, but also on the have a s Y quality of life we enjoy. We were told that the lot in question was zoned single family residential. when we were debating buying our house, and Ghat fact was an important consideration in our decision to .purchase _2903 Aztec Court. We oppose the efforts by Thomas Properties to change the. zoning at this time. We, .like all our: neighbors, believe that the building of .duplexes in our neighborhood would have several negative .repercussions. 'Firstly, it would increase the traffic in an area where: many .children. walk to .Rock .Prairie Elementary and A&M Consolidated High schools. Secondly, duplexes would be occupied by a larger number of people than single family dwellings, and especially if rented or sold to college students, would result in increased noise pollution. 'Thirdly, the duplexes would add to the "visual clutter" of .the ~ neighborhood resulting in a loss of environmental quality..: All these factors would diminish property values and lower the quality of life for the .residents of our neighborhood. Please represent the best interests of the community and keep the zoning as R-1 residential, single family. Respectfully yours,. ,- 0 'v~~~Jl.Q,9Li., ~ - Cam/ - Theresa T. Lineber er 1 Lineber er ` g R. Dance g a. ~.. William S. Rholes 2905 Aztec Ct. College Station, TX 77845 May 19, 1994 Planning and Zoning Commission of College Station College Station, TX 77842 c/o Natalie Thomas Dear Commission Members: I am writing to register my opposition to the proposed zoning change for 2800 Welsh, a 3.94 acre plot of land near the Mormon Church at the corner of-Welsh and Deacon. I am writing because I,will not be able to be at the meeting on May 19th to express my opposition in person. I am a 16 year resident of College Station, employed by the university. I bought a home near the land in question about two years ago. My backyard backs up to the middle of the. plot of land that ',may be rezoned. I am concerned about the impact of the °rezoning on the nature of our neighborhood and on property values. Impact on the Neighborhood I am worried about the increase in noise level that will. come when this land is rezoned. If land in question were to be used to build single family housing as it is currently zoned, I would not. expect a major change or a problem, but the traffic and noise associated with the number of people and vehicles. that duplexes would bring in will change things very much for the worse. We now -have a very quiet, peaceful, pleasant neighborhood; I hope that will not change. A second problem is asethetc in nature. Duplexes bring many cars into a neighborhood and in my opinion destroy the appearance of the neighborhood. While I recognize that College Station needs duplexes in order to accommodate the needs of our citizens, we need zoning that locates duplexes in places that permit single family home owners to have the kind of enviornment that they desire while at the same time meeting the housing needs of potential duplex residents. Property Values I am concerned about the impact of the. zoning commission's decision on the property values in the area.. As any local real estate agent will verify, homes that back up to duplexes do not have the same market value as homes that are in single family dwelling areas. Had the land behind my home been zoned for duplexes, I would never have bought my .current home, and I doubt that many of my neighbors would have either. The homes. on Aztec, ~. the street that is nearest the plot. of land in question, are very new; they average about 3 years old. It seems unfair to me, now that all the lots on Aztec have been sold and homes built, that a rezoning is contemplated so quickly.. As with most people, my home is my single largest financial investment. I need to have my investment protected by the city, not undercut. Do Changing Conditions Justify a Chance in Zoning One could argue that zoning regulations have to be flexible enought to accommodate change, but Aztec Ct. and its surrounding area has only recently been developed. I do not see major changes in the city of College Station that would necessitate a change in zoning. The application by Thomas Properties says merely that there is an increasing demand for duplexes which makes the zoning change necessary and justified. Demand, however, increases grid decreased continually. If zoning regulations changes everytime there is a change. in the 'the housing market, zoning regualtions will mean nothing. Zoning regulations and changes in zoning have to be based on something more olid and predictable. To put it bluntly, I cannot invest my money in a home unless I have some sort of assurance that I know 'what kind of neighborhood I am buying into. Property values in College Station are`high compared to surrounding areas n'part because our city traditionally has zoned in such a way as to protect homeowners and home values.. Let's keep it that way. Are We Being Unfair to the New Owners of the Land in Ouestion? The new owners of the land, Thomas Properties, will certainly argue that they have a right to make a profit on their investment, and no one would argue with them, but they acquired this land on March 7th. of this year knowing its zoning. I am sure that they would not have bought it if a change in zoning were absolutely necessary for them to develop the land profitably. Moreover, Thomas Properties is a respected builder of single family homes and certainly could use the land to construct single family properties. Conclusion I am asking you to uphold the idea that zoning regulations must be consistent enough for homeowners to make sound, long-term decisions about the kind of neighborhood that they wish to buy into and reside in. Please keep the zoning of this plot of land as it now is. S,~i`n~cer~e~ly, William 5. Rholes May 18, 1994 Planning and Zoning Commission P.O. Box 9960 College Station, Texas 77842 Dear Commissioners: We strongly oppose the proposed zoning change to the 3.94 acre plot next to the Mormon Church on Welsh Avenue: The plot is currently zoned for single family housing and should. remain that way. We want to preserve the family neighborhood tradition that now exists in the housing that surrounds the Mormon Church. We live at 2909 Aztec Court and our backyard faces .the plot in question. Therefore .any zoning change would directly affect us. When we purchased.. our property we wanted to live in single family neighborhood. The fact that the 3.94 plot was zoned for single family housing contributed to our' decision to purchase the property. Zoning is a tool used by municipalities for long range planning. Commercial businesses, industry and individuals use the zoning maps .developed by the City of College Station to make decisions on long term investments. In effect, the City of College. Station has made a commitment to the public .that this land be developed for single family housing. Therefore it is critical that the .City of College Station stand by their original commitment, as stated by the zoning maps, to provide investors a measure of security required for long. term investment. Again, we strongly oppose any zoning change to the 3.94 acre plot next to the Mormon Church on Welsh Avenue. .Sincerely, j ~ Mar ret and Clyde Munster 2909 Aztec Court College Station, Texas 77843 II'~i lt~a~y7 I ~, l ~~~i Alanning and Zaning E.aIIIffi1SSian City of College Station A. C7. BCI~' 996() C+allege Station T~?~54:~ ~-uk~~ect: Zdning Change petition far ~St~[~ welsh ~e are rarely disappainted .that Thames Brr~thers requested the subject zaning change. They built many of the homes in dur neighborhaad. Thee Bald these Names with a value based un the feet that. the subject raper ty i zoned far single family dwellings. ail of t-he ether builders said praperties in the neighbarhaad based of the same assumption. Naw that all these properties h~~fe been sdld, Thomas Brothers have requested that a zoning change be made .that will reduce the value of the properties they snld vt~er the past few years. e do nit think this is right and we petition you to deny the request far the zoning change. May 16, 1994 Planning and Zoning Commission of College Station P.O. Box 9960 \ College Station, Texas 77842 To Whom It May Concern: I wish to vehemently express my opposition to the requested change in zoning for the 3.94 acre property on Welch Street located.adjacent to the Mormon church. This property is situated directly behind my back yard fence. I live at 2907 Aztec Court, College Station. When I purchased this house the decision was due., in part, to the privacyafforded by the vacant land behind the house. I knew at sometime in the future that construction would take place. on the subject property and I accepted the fact that eventually there would be "single family" homes built. The construction of "duplexes" on this property is entirely unacceptable! I do not wish to have duplexes and... their occupants located directly behind. my back fence! It will disrupt the ambiance of the "family" neighborhood, it will result in higher traffic congestion, higher noise level, greater degree of unsightly off-street auto parking, and will in general degrade the value of the neighborhood, and particularly my home! It is my understanding that their are over 1000 units either under construction, recently completed, or soon to be started in College Station. While I understand that there has been a shortage of rental property in College Station in past years I fear that this recent construction boom may bode problems for the future. Given the increased availability of rental units, ' he higher construction. costs, and higher interest rates the rental rates for these units (estimated at $650- $750/month) will be beyond the reach of most students. This likely will result in several situations. (1) Several students will .have to pool their resources and share the duplex resulting in an even greater degree of population density and. over crowding, (2) The units will have to rent at a loss to be competitive meaning the owners will likely have to sell the units at a loss or certainly below market value. This will erode the property value of other homes in the area. I believe the motivation behind the re-zoning request by Thomas Properties is strictly short term profit oriented. They stand to make more money by building duplexes rather than single family homes, they can build them: faster, and they will likely sell more easily. If they do not. sell. they can always rent them out to students at a loss .until the market comes back. I do not believe that Thomas Properties is worried about the potential degradation of the neighborhood or property values once they have secured their profit. There are no duplexes in this area of the neighborhood and their is no need to change that situation now at the expense of the property owners how bought/built homes here expecting the area to remain a single family neighborhood. I strongly .request the College Station Planning and Zoning Cammission and the College Station City Council deny the requested zoning change. Sincerely, ,. Michael A. for s ~~ Property Owner, 2907 Aztec Court, College Station cc: College Station City Council s.. ~p~.rP~~ ~ ~~ ~~ti ~ ~; 4r„;''1 ',,.i w r ~° :~: ru I P jJ ~ v ~ a _- ~ ~ ° ~`"~ ~.' l ,.ter ~•'l~~z''}`h- ~ ~. ~?1 ~ 4 ~ ~„ m ~, ~ w_ z. i _... _M. ry _. ~.~~~ .....` ~ i C~..°~ er r~,.r~.®° s....°c~`" y"'+°~~ r~ ~,~~ ~~L..~sC.~a..' ~-~..c~•°'`l V. '` '~ _..... .: a ~ _w° -1 ...~, r~. ~v~~. v ~' -`~'~ s, E ~ .~..,,_ I ~~ ._ ~. o ,, i , J ~-- ~1 ~ ~ ~ C,~ g _< ~~ / J ~~~n. `85'Cuab Fa'Fn ~sa~ ``A~,~v ~~ 4'~ May 17,1994 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission of College Station ~. FROM: Chuck and Theresa Phinney ~ ~' ~ ~r~~,2~, We are residents of 2906 Aztec Court in College Station, Texas. We have been informed of Thomas Properties' interest in rezoning the 3:94. acre plot nearest the Mormon Church on Welsh Avenue. The. intent is to change the land from single- family to duplex. zoning. We are vehemently opposed to this. We purchased in a single-family neighborhood and would like it to stay as such. Thank you for your consideration. ~~~ ~3;`~a~ ~ 9 ~9~= COLLEGE STATION TEXAS STAKE May 19, 1994 Planning and Zaning Commission City of College Station 1101`Texas Avenue College Station, TX 77842-9960 bear Commission Members: Representing the .Church of Jesus Christ of .Latter bay Saints at 2814 Welsh Avenue, 2 would like to register our opposition to the proposed rezoning of the 3.94 acres at 2800 Welsh from R-1 Single Family Residential to R-~ buplexes. Our. reasons areas follows: Our property was the. first developed west of Welsh Avenue. Church policy nationwide is always o build in single family residential areas if permitted by Local ordinance. We tried unsuccessfully to abtan suitable property in an already develaped area o£ the city. We purchased .the site at 2814 Welsh specifically because it was entirely surrounded by property zoned R-1,. We were. assured by the seller, Mr. Bill Fitch, that he would only develop or sell nearby property for single family residences. He expressed the view that the drainages line north of the adjoining property grovided a natural division all the way to Rio Grande between .duplex and single family residential areas and that the city would not likely approve a change. We would not have purchased our site had there been any reasonable chance nearby property would be rezoned 'far more dense construction. We regard the proposed rezoning to be undesira}ale because of the more transient nature of duplex housing areas, increased church security and maintenance requirements, and likely unauthorized use of our parking lot for overflow parking during activities in the duplex area. Thank you for considering our concerns. I urgeyou to vote against the rezoning request. Sincerely., C. Richard Shumway Stake President James L. True 2902 Aztec Court College Station TX 77845-6558 May 17, 1994 Planning and Zoning .Commission of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station TX 77842 Subject: Re-zoning on Welsh Avenue Thank you for your notification of hearings on a request to rezone from single family dwellings to duplexes on Welsh Ave. This looks like a bad idea to us. Last year we purchased our home in this area, one which we hoped would stay zoned for single family houses. Our home represents the biggest single investment we've ever made, and we-are worried that nearby rezoning for additional duplexes will affect us adversely. Prior commitments preclude our attending your meeting on May 19 although we hope to attend the City Council meeting on June 9. Please accept this letter as a statement of our strong reservations against re-zoning in the area to create an opportunity for additional duplexes. Respectfully, L AME L. TRUE. BOBBIE M. TRUE ~Q' ~ ~ f~~~ ~ ~~~~ ~~-j ~~> 1 ~ ~~~ y, ~' ~ ~~ f°°~_ ~ ~ ~s ~ jam ~. ~~r° ~.~~-~~- FAQ ; ~, ~p ~ , F ~:, ~-~~ ~~ ~ ~ `bo ~~3'e (¢ Michael and Elena. Nikolaou 2903 Bolero Ct. College Station, TX 77845 Planning and Zoning Commission of College Station P.O. Box 9960 College Station, TX 77842 Dear Sir/Madam: I am writing to ask that the City of College Station reject the zoning change requested by Thomas Properties on a 3.94 acre lot near Mormon Church on Welsh Avenue. As a property owner nearest the proposed change area,. I am deeply concerned about the proposed change, and strongly believe that the land should remain zoned .for single family housing, as originally planned. Sincerely, ~~~~~ L ~ / Michael and Elena Nikolaou ~. ®~.~~ ~~:,~ ~ ~3.b e',€. r:; ~"'1}ty 4~?~ .:~}"'pE~E :I ~. .#.~t}.:.1. ~ [€li€.#. ::3 t~i :#. !..~?i ~, €:"x s- .. ..: _., £."e ., } »•~-€. ._ rs i' ""S£"..:.:i» ..# ~:..3::. ! i € .{»E .. a f.:s~:: ~ 3 }..±ift _'?:-" ~ :-+ a } €}~{.' t. ~ :'=!•it :f. S ~.i 3:.:! ~:~..,..,_. -';Y: ~~ F 3! €,» ~ ._. t... `t € #°P ~ t'S3 # € 1„,5 i"=~'. ~'"!it E„Ei'~!i"~ C=~„`l, n. E'= i3. ".'. L".+ .s»;;i€"~{~= v# 7 i~ ." ..,: £ , .€. M::~ ~:'r:.' . !~E ; , .. 1 ,~ W _ ...: } _- .#. » "... ... .» . E.a .. i +~ _ .. .~ 1. i ,... g' f 1 .. ~'' f € 3 . ;. #-1 r:: ..sl ;;:: t £f cC"lt !... 'e}~f. ;: „t ~ ~ s„~ ~` :.! ~~}~ s...s ~~` ::ff}... ...E A .. » i+:} 3°i.. ~.r?Wl i'S `,~~ ; ._ l.. i. ._ .._.. :.7 .. -- ... : ~. .~. ~i"3 T:3' ». ... ~.•. " a~ ~..~,. 3 ..a i..i"i !~.~B,i;::. ~ i..'s...... ~ f. »3 .i..~t ".t`~`"'a ~ ji:°}w ~"1 .t:.?w£~ il.:.~ L+.."" i "^i :i. j,.}!~ ~. ~~.' } •:.:f[ :..i. ,~ :". €.._2 , z:'a:' ~.. ,::. i » ~ . ":!.." ""'._, xT=!.... £ €xdEEf.E.•^: .'s. i : ~~» +_ _:"tr=' f : w!:3Yf :}. €'li."~.€ »'E .^ w 1' i^i t"i^^ €I..f. x }v .€?....? +'!1 f E ty '#£" h~ i f ~if~'£?=x ',€ f ~ ['"f .». I ~.' ~. "......... : `: 3»+ !" } .. } .." ... .. x t - _.. ~~.. rx,,,s .L i = ~ . Z € S..: i °~: € .. dot ..•"3 £: x.a f E.~.; € } ,.-• z " fw... ;~ t t..._..". ".. ".: wt «. 1:.:. •T € ~4}µe€e~'_:. ~E_.l.r.: u.. f~`.'t; Yr..-.t .f..:~'~ :~.:~'' 1„:£E.=.' "i.}.;-}R 3-e ::~i £"'sw E-j :'.~ s.. is ~~!},:3 i. F,~s'T. •'. ~.3# }.";€ ~.•~.. i:3E'.H!.:3s f~-}?d!i°3".€?~!wi.:~~.3 ~. `" .~` ;»}#. .. s,~sF^3~ !,s„~" .c ;^: E:~ i. '`:'~. ~ f.:~ 3 f y5...::W •~. " ~?,.. L :»~.€?;"11 i ,«. € :^:'~€.. ? :3.. ~.... ti!~ .#- `_ .~. =.:4 C.€ ~. ~: `~: ri ;i*°' i 2 . r i !~`rtG.~ {;"' :#. ~•~~ .... ._ ~ t=:.::.:i.C~ a:..#. ~ f E~ "'~.., ~:_ :3.._ . ":! , ~ _ :4%k-! f: ! .... ~:. ' ~..#: # • ; . r"~ }:: i t" 1"~,'. .€ .:.. ~': ~ __ !.~ ~ p:. e-:? :~ :»` ; ~ ..}-»_~ _... l i• ~ '~. (._~ :~ .._ . ~~? ~y !.? #._? E":: f ",• ~ .,.?. 1 ~.?~. _.:: } _. E. , •~} i r . ~ ............ ... ~ ~4•}R:° _ i...1. .. S. 3»€ ... " 1 3 ~. i P 1...C iy .... €• ..€'• ~ .~- v ~..€:' .a:!... €°' s i .~Y . i i .., ,"t? '-- ~ ~ '.E'+;= ~- _i !?;! 3°+ •~' 3»i ^. t.. ¢ 3~ }. , ;~: t }»s 's + "f; =e +°,.l .#. }.#... ...# f . 3!~ #E.f;:.. ti's"€3.,,1 ~~ I !}". .: r' }"?~ ;+E' {. e..i'-~. ~. E" ..... ~ !"S'~ .~£.."."#."~ .3. 3•# a';.a ,f!`.» ~ 1. _},"1 . ~~~r ;:5~'?~.' j'~tv} .. .. E w. =.:i?»} m°...s~ } ! N •~;. E,~ ~ !.!(;' ~ ,. ~5.~ ... t .}.E. .3,i 2.~; 3 3. is t «. i~3 '{,. i:_'. _ tTS »..€"i!~~.:. '7.9`€3"' ._. .3 .":: a_ .L i.s E~ L E~3 y[..~.#. i~#3::) •..: , . ~ , ..F.."+ i...! E •:..£ ~':... 1 L , ,.: €..,#;- : £ ~} ~. E..: ~r ..:. . !.., ".# _ f... ~. 3'- t=r k'r' :#: ~. ~, E:.~ i' ,^'!..19, :~? ~;. ...a ~. ~ j ~.: ~'"€,..t Z!"~• 'r '#'.i"€.~:. ?..; ~ E~~. i. •-tn } ~ ":. `_`t-.E» :"y ,'+;»: }-'liw:E~ i ~..t ~ t~!~. E_ _ __ E __ ~^i:~}~ ,[; i_x tea. _ s e~1,e«., s.a , ~L.. e, i"'€}. , #."} t ,:~il."# .#. ?~i . i e~? .v-?..~~~ a.. € I!~j i...»i?~.}~'c..l.... ..:w '€ -}~~ •~ .^ ~'+EC::,# R:'`,'.. ~'..• ~• i E ~. ,R.e !"s. r«.{»! f f .~. t 14y ~. .~ 2913 Aztec Court' College Station, Texas. 77845 May 19, 1.994 Planning and Zoning Commission Planning Division. City of College Station 1101 Texas Avenue College Station,. Texas 77842 Ladies. and Gentlemen of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the Planning Division: We are writing to .let you know that we along with -many of our neighbors, are unilaterally opposed to .the request for rezoning of the property in Tract B, .Block 55 of Southwood Valley 24-A, 2800 Welsh. Thin property is currently zoned R-l, and we 'strongly believe ~ the ..zoning should remain unchanged. A few of the reasons which support. our position will be recapitulated in the .paragraphs below. Early in 1990, we began construction on the first residence in the entire area. north of .Deacon Street and west of Welsh Avenue. Before purchasing. our lot and commencing- construction of our custom home, we took the trouble to check the zoning districts in the area. We were pleased to see that the entire area was zoned. R-1, Single Family Residential, and we relied upon. that when we selected our lot and built our custom home. Moreover, we believe that city planners undoubtedly had a certain logic in mind when this area was zoned and before it was developed. We can see no reason now to obviate this logic, especially after many of us have built our home in reliance upon the established zoning. ~'~ -~ P We would also wish to note that soon after we began construction of our home, Thomas Properties commenced construction of a 2700 square foot home .next door to ours. Larry Mariott, our builder, and the Thomas brothers, builders of .the house next door,. told us and our neighbors they planned to build large two storey homes. on all of the sites on Aztec Court. We believed them, but did not exact a written promise. The promises were not fulfilled. The entirety of Aztec Court is now built.' Four of the fifteen homes on the street are two storey. We can lament the builders not keeping their. word. We cannot accept the City of College .Station now changing the established written zoning upon which we relied. Sincerely, Robert Segner, Jr. Su anne Segner U 4 ` t. ~` ~. '' ,~ ., ,; t- `c` ~ ~~ z ~, Opposition to Portion of Welsh Avenue nearest Mormon Church rezoned for Duplexes We,'..the undersigned property owners near the proposed zoning change :area, are opposed to the rezoning of he plot of land on Welsh Avenue. nearest he Mormon church. We ask the .Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council of College Station to leave the 3.94 acre plot zoned for single family residential as it was intended in the long- range planning of College Station. NAME: ADDRESS PHONE 1. ~ ~ '~~.~~,~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~;~:~~ ~~ ~-~"w ~ ~~ X133 ~, ~ ~ ~~~c ,~3~7~ -~ ~ v 4. ~ i~2~ ~r 9. ~'~1~ ~~ ;mac ~! ~ ~~" ~- ~ 9/ `~ L~~' ~'" 1 .~.uac~,~--.-~- Ltd d~~~-- .~a aI GZ~, ~ o ~, ~ ~.3- ~7/!( 12. ~~~~ ~~~`~ ~z7"~ ~~ '~ ~~~ ~ ~~-fir ~ ~a~~~ 13. ~ ~a~~-- f~ Z ~ C> ~ ~ '~ N~t`~< NAME _ ADDRESS ~. PHONE 18. ~1 ~ t ~ ~ ~- ~' ~.~~-~-~ Goa ~ -- f> 19. r V~l~l~ f~ ~ ~~~~C~-J ~~ 20. ~~,- 21. ~pdj d~Z~~GS°t~ ~~3 ~-~~ ~G ~~ ~~~-~~~ 22. d ~'~~ ~ baz ~~~ ~ ~ - ~~ L z 23: ~~~~ ~~ ~~ 30 0 ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~©~6~ 24. ~ !~''4' ~.p` r J- ~ 30O f~~--~ ~yc,~ 77 ~f- ~ ~~ ~- 2s. ~ ~ ~ ~o o~~' ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ -~ 26. ~/( ~: n 3~8~~3 29. '~ 30 3L 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. . 37. 38. 39. 40. Opposition to Portion of Welsh Avenue nearest Mormon Church rezoned for Duplexes i We, the undersigned property owners near he proposed zoning ~ change area, are opposed to the rezoning of the plot of land on Welsh Avenue. nearest the Mormon church. We ask the'..Planning and' Zoning Commission and the City Council of College Station to Leave the 3.94 acre plot zo~ed for single family residential as it was. intended in the long- range planrri~g of College Station. NAME ADDRESS PHONE 3~ ~ ~ ~~ r 2. ~ '~ 3• ~ B-~fOy ~~~~~ Gam,.-. 7~ Z ~.~ G ~ ~1~~ ~ ~ ~ ~4~~' ~~~.~. ~. s ,~ 7a~ ~~~~~ 7~-~~ ~~ 3 C~ 3 lI.- j 12. ~ 13. I 14. 15. 16. ...:,, Opposition to Portion of Welsh:Avenue nearest Mormon Church rezoned for Duplexes We, the .undersigned property owners:: near the proposed` zoning change area, are opposed to the rezoning of the plot of land on Welsh Avenue nearest the Mormon.: church. We ask the Planning. and Zoning Commission and the City Council of College Station to leave the 3.94 a acre plot zoned for single family residential as it was intended in the long- range planning of.College Station. NA1~~IE ADDRESS PHONE .9w 1. C~` ~ ~ ~ CL.~~j ,t "7 ~ ~ - ~ ~ T 2. ~ - ~ ~~ 3. ~D ~ z~ y~ - ~~-~~. 5. .~~,~ ~t 6. G~~~ r ~~~~ ~U~~~ ~ . ~~~ ^ 1 ~9~ ~. 0 ~ _ ~- 9 --~~ y ~ ~~~~ r ~ ~~~ ~~~.C GL ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 12. L~ Gti~s ~: ~ l ~" Ike ~~ ~`~ . ~ 9`~ - ~ ~-~/ 15. ~i ~~ ~ObjE' °~ ~ S~ ,~- ~ 7 ~ t r. ~ ". NAME ADDRESS PHONE '~~ ~~-~ ~~ ~ ~*~ c~ ~~~ ~ G~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~-~9~~ ~ 18. 3 19. ~~~ J 0 20.~ _ o~ ~ .~ ~~~ D ~ ~~~ ~ s y ~ 22. ' C~ ~~ ~ ~CQ ~ 1 n ~~ 1~ ~~~'~:r~c~ S~ ~~j ~ ~ ~~ v v. ~~~ 25. G~~~,~~1 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. 39: 40. Opposition to Portion of Welsh Avenue nearest Mormon- Church rezoned for Duplexes We, the undersigned property owners near the proposed. zoning change area, are opposed ,to the rezoning of the plot of land on Welsh d Avenue nearest he Mormon church. We ask the Planning.. and Zoning Commission and the City Council of College Station to leave .the 3.94 acre plot zoned for single family residential as it was intended in the long- ~~ . ~~ range planning of College Station.. ICI ' NAME.. ADDRESS PHONE 1. l ~~~~ :.. ~ ~~~r~~"~ ~. ~, 5, i 2~ ~~~ ~3~3~ 6. ~, .. '~ _w.. 9 ~~Ut GJ ~ ~ GBb~ ~~~ ~~~ .~ ~~~~~i~ ~~ ~~ ~ /~ "i 1 ~ a~' F ~. - _ "'NC ~-. ~~ ~ 16. 1~ tt ee~iQ hWS~~-- '' NAME ADDRESS PHONE ~ 18. `~'/ ~~ ~ ~ ~Q ~ K'c~ CQ~~ `l8~ `7 19. - ~~~~~~ ~. y ~ g ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ y~' 21. ~~hn Y~r~ ~~~y ~~ , ~ b q~~ ~~3~ - 22. S~' ~~~~r Z3 i~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ r 23. ~5J - ~ a zs. ~~' "~ , ~~ 27.~~ ~~ a~ j ~~~C~ ~7~'~ ~~~c ~-'iY G _..-.. , 30. ' . 112 ~ ~ 1a~' l~o~ e--~ Gf" 1~ S 7~~ - ~66-~ ~~ ~~ `~' 35. ~/1 ~ LtJ ~,~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - J l .. ~ t'J ~ - ~~~` ~~~t'~ 39. ~ fit, 40. ,,~~ ;y: '~- ..L~ ~. ~~ M ~; ' i ~= ;-_~ :;s~ ;~~ `; ' - `' ~f, y~! ~ ~~' '~ _., ~ fY .'i _'ZyyF _y~S, ,y~+ :' s ~1' ~'~. ~y .:e x' \ ( ~ ~ '~' ~ ' ~ -_ ~'; 3(• .; ~~~~ t _' - ~~4y~ Y i r _ . ?;a;;: =?t \ `' ?nc =f \ ; ~~, ~`j --_ _-.. __,'` ,,i 1. ['v.'. `3~ w- ;;;, ;.;4, =~v K~'