Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous " MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Planning and Zoning Commission Sabine Kuenzel, Staff Planner b~ January 28, 1993 Parking requirements for veterinary clinics As you recall, Dr. Maxine Stiles has requested and received a Conditional Use Permit to allow operation of a veterinary clinic at 123 Millers Lane. She has asked us to review the City's parking requirement because it is her belief that she will not need the number of spaces that will be required. To aid in your decision, staff conducted the. following research. The following cities had parking requirements for clinics and medical offices, but no separate requirement for vets: Irving: 5 per doctor Amarillo: 1 per 300 sf Bryan: 1 per 300 sf Odessa: 1 per 300 sf Port Arthur: 1 per 300 sf Longview: 1 per 300 sf The following cities had separate requirements for vet clinics that were different from medical clinics: Euless: 1 per 300 sf Orange: 1 per 400 sf Denton: 1 per 300 sf The planner in the city of Denton stated that the ratio of 1 per 300 has worked out quite well for them. Euless, Orange, and Denton require less parking for vet than for medical clinics. In contrast, we require 25% more for a vet clinic. The minutes of the meetings where the requirement was set do not give any support for this ratio. The ITE Handbook had no studies of vet clinics, but it did have adequate surveys of small medical clinics. Recalculated to our parking ratios, the results were as follows: Average parking rate: 1 per 325 sf Minimum parking rate: 1 per 665 sf Maximum parking rate: 1 per 195 sf I also called some of the local vet clinics to discuss parking need during peak times. The results here were as follows: Van Stavern 1 vet + 4 empl. 11 to 13 spaces Southwood Valley Animal Hospital 2 vets + 13 empl. 20 spaces Boonville Animal Hospital 1 vet + 2 empl. 9 spaces Dr. Scarmardo 1 vet + 3 empl. 9 spaces Based on this research, staff has no problem with the requirement of 1 space per 300 square feet of building. "" , AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET ITEM SUBMITTED BY: Sabine Kuenzel, Staff Planner DIRECTOR APPROVAL: EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR APPRO ___________________________________________________________________________________________n________________ ITEM: Public hearing to consideranamendment to the zoning ordinance to change the parking requirement for veterinary clinics from the present 1 space for every 150 feet of interior space to 1 space for every 300 feet. ITEM SUMMARY: This change will lessen the current requirement by 50%. Research conducted by.staff included phone calls to other cities and local vet clinics to determine actual need. HNANCIALSUMMARY: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staffand P&Z recommend approval. CITY ATTORNEY RECOMMENDATION: None expressed COUNCIL ACTION DESIRED: Approval or denial of amendment SUPPORTING MATERIALS: 1. Staff memo 2. P&Z minutes ~ If'4 "'" AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET ITEM SUBMITTED BY: Sabine Kuenzel, Staff Planner =~~;::~~:=GOfi;;'(2a EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR APPROVAL: ., ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ITEM: Consideration of an amendment to the zoning ordinance to change the parking requirement for veterinary clinics from the present 1 space for every 150 feet of interior space to 1 space for every 300 feet. ITEM SUMMARY: This change will lessen the current requirement by 50%. Research conducted by staff included phone calls to other cities and local vet clinics to determine actual need. FlNANCIALSUMMARY: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff and P&Z recommend approval. CITY ATTORNEY RECOMMENDATION: None expressed COUNCIL ACTION DESIRED: Approval or denial of amendment SUPPORTING MATERIALS: 1. Ordinance draft