HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous
McCORD ENGINEERING, INC.
7607 Eastmark Drive, Suite 102, P.O. Box 10047
College Station, Texas 77842.. (409) 764-8356
Fax. (409).764-9644
July. 7,' 1993
Mr. Ray Havens
Electric . Transmission. &
Distribution, Superintendent
City of College Station
P.O. . Box 9960
College Station, Te
.~
RE:
Dear R :
In accor ancewith. your request, we have reviewed the load and service requirements
for the new buildings proposed for construction at 524 University Drive East. We have
planned the electric distribution layout to serve this project to be underground, in accordance
with the request of the developer. Enclosed herewith for your review and use are five (5) -
copies of our proposed electric distribution layout for this facility.
A 50 kV A,' single-phase, 7,200 volt primary to 120/240 volt secondary pad-mounted
transformer. has been planned for installation to provide.' the requested service utilization voltage
level for the building A..' Metering for building A is proposed to be accomplished at the East
side of the building using 20015 ampere current transformers and a meter with demand
indication of at least 2.5. ..... Also, a 50 kVA,single-phase,7,200voltprimary to 120/240 volt
secondary pad-mounted' transformer has been planned for installation to..provide the requested
service utilization level for Building B and the' existing service at Shellenberger's. Metering
for Building B is proposed to be accomplished at the South side of the building using an 200
Amp, 240 volt,. single-phase, self-contained demand meter. The existing overhead service at
Shellenberger's is to be converted to an underground service and the metering is to remain at
its present location using an. 200 Amp, 240 volt, single-phase, self-contained demand meter.
In accordance . with your City policy, the developer should plan to furnish and install,
in compliance with. City specifications, allrequired electrical conduit. and pour the required
concrete pads forsaid50kVA transformers. The electric layout drawing enclosed provides
details. regarding the required number and sizes of conduit, installation depth, proposed conduit
locations, riser pole conduitrequirements,etc; the transformer pad details should be furnished
when '. the dimensions of the transformer proposed to be used are known.
In accordance with the new policy of your City, the developer is responsible for
reimbursing your City for 20% of the total estimated cost of electric service installation,
City of College Station
July 7, 1993
Page Two
including labor, materials, and standard fee percentages for engineering and overhead cost. We
compute that the 20 % cost contribution required for 524 University Drive East, computes to
be $1,768.00. This cost was .calculatedbased on a total underground cost estimate of
$8,840.00. The total underground cost estimate developed for this project includes a standard
allowance of 30% to cover your City's labor related overhead costs, 7% for material handling
costs,. and. 8.5 % to cover your City's administrative. and engineering costs.
I trust we have provided herein the information you need on this project. If not, or if
questions. arise, please let us. know.
Y ours very truly,
McCORD ENGINEERING, INC.
David j -&;).
Engineering' Assistant
~cJ2
DW/mw
Enclosures
cc: Mr. David Pullen (wlenclosure)
McCord Engineering, Inc.
P. O. Box 10047
College Station, Texas 77842
I.
Underground 'Electrical Layout Cost(l)
II.
Overhead Electrical Layout Cost(1)
Cost Differential
July 7,1993
$ 8.200.00
$ 4,800.00
$ 3.400.00
Above cost'estimates include a standard 'allowance of 30% 'to cover, your City's labor
related ',overhead "costs"7% 'for material handling costs, and 8.5% to cover your City's
administrative and engineering costs .
(1)
~6.~pf....CITYOFCOLLEGESTATION
~ ~ . .. .. PLANNING DIVISION
. Post Office Box 9960 · 11 01 Texas Avenue
College Station, Texas 77842-0960
(409)764-3570
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
December 10, 1993
TO:
RE:
Jane R. kee, City PIa! n6'
Request for Variance t~Iete Sidewalk Requirement
FROM:
The applicantis the'architect for,the,AudioNideo project. The,PRC requested that a sidewalk
be placed along University Drive. Because of existing conditions it is not possible for the
sidewalk to meet ADA standards without, tearing out the existing driveway. The City is
obligated to COIl1ply with ADA standards in all public facilities whether built by the City or by
someone else.
The applicant is requesting ,that this sidewalk be deleted. The ,sidewalk is shown on the City's
master plan for sidewalks. If it is not, built with this project it would be built at, some future
date with,public funds. Staff recommends construction of the sidewalk with the project.
~~
C/J- -LIas
".~<'-~ITY()PC04LEOE · STATION
.. .. .. .~U.I.,.DINQ DI"ISl~
... ..... ........ .... ......PO$tOfficeBo~.99PQ .. ..1101TexaSAvenue
College 5tation,TexCis '7784~-09QO
(409)764-3741
~,
December 13, 1993
SUBJ'ECT:
Jane Kee
ShIrley vo~'ff .
Si de.wa 1 k a l.ong, ' Un,iver sit y Dr,! ve at "524
University Drive East project
TO:
FROM:
Jane:
On 11-24-93 lbeca.meawaretherewasa problemw1 th the
sidewalk in front of the new Audio Video buildfng. I sent the
attache,d excerpt oia memo to the Assistant. City Manager wi th
that information.
11he Certificate of Occupancy for that buIlding was lssuedon
12~8-93wtththe agreement that the sidewalkproblem,as well
as several other mlnorsite adJust.ments, would be solved prior
to issuance ota Certificate of Occupancy for the second
building on thlsbuilding plot.
On this date I called .theContractor,Weldon Jordanot
Construction Resources Group to inform him the variance or
appeal of the sidewalkrequlrement was being taken to the P&Z
on 12/16/93. At that t lme, Mr.. J.ordan was not in" but his
sup,erintendent, Jose took the message and informed me he wou.ld
"be requesting a C.O. within about 1 1/2 weeks (before
Chr istmas) .
Natalie Thomasand>Veronlca Morgan are making contact with the
appl icant 'of the variance request ,Bill Scarmardo,regard i ng
the date t he val" i ance will be cons i dered bYd the })&Z.
,
..
On this date engineering inspector for thepro.Ject at
524 Universlt iveEast (whIch .lncludes 2 new buildings)
reported hat he contrac.tor iShav1ng difficulty installing
a. s i dewa 1 k a 1 ongUni ver sit y Dr i vewh i ch the {:1. ty added after
thepro,.iecthad been approved. 'rhe difficulty apparently is
because of a,largegrade change between theelevatlon along
University Drive and the a,ctuals1te, and furthe<r, as the
sidewalk relat to he driveway entering the site.
I have pulled the Planning files. for thisp:ro~iect and have
noted the ProJect. Review Committee reviewed this project on
March 25, 1993. During that review, one of the comments
incltlded in, the report is nA sidewalk is requested along
'University Driven. In reality, the statement should !have
been that a, sidewalk is required along University Driive
because of approved master sidewalk plan for the City.
In any case, a sidewalk has always been required, and the
architect, Bill Scarmardo, has always been aware of the
requirement. Apparently the Contractor is of the opinion
that this requirement was imposed after the review had. been
made and the plan approved, and<ha stated the Hfact" so
convincingly that 'the City Inspector thought J.t actually was
a fact"
""'r,~
~~ ~b ~~
.~ O~~.~ o;\'<J.-~
f/~6< 9Jr<. ·
1 ~ 1 993
F' ':;,
. .::..
n:
ii 'F"-f:i:i:::s:g,!:~
~ 1 ;..g! gr\
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
Jane Kee
SVOLK
7/15/97 1:26pm
524 University Drive -Reply
that's right - I forgot about it, but it only applies to the parking area and
not to the bldg. itself. An remember they can have up to 7 spaces in that I
reserve area, then an island and 7 more.
>>> Shirley Volk 07/15/97 12:02pm>>>
Jane, another question came up about Bill Scarmardo's project after you left.
Does the 24 foot landscape reserve apply to only parking lots, or does it
apply to the building setback also? Bill designed the site with the 15ft.
side street setback requirement in mind, but then while we were reviewing the
parking lot, Steve & Paul remembered about the 24ft. setback requirement from
Chappel, but none of us knew if it applies to buildings also. (I don ',t think
so, but really don't know!). I told Bill I would get back to him today with
the answer.
Also, this has been platted asa "Replat of ,part of Block G, College Heights
Addition and part of Lot 22, D. A. smith Subdivision", but there's no new name
assigned. In fact the Schellenberger lot is referret to as "Tract No.1" and
the rest of it is "Tract No.2" and was :replattedby the Woodards in 1985.
Also, the zoning appears to be C-l.
r--
C)
r-
0"\, t() .
0' ~ ct~,~
\~' / ,')'~
--- ( ,
t"
'-
\
Q")" "1J~)0, ~ d)/.",/ '
.~/.. ~ -:;;
.
~
lia.
\.
I ~
-
j l
\ J
I /
~-i!c
-
+ ~ jPD'~ ~
-- + -t- +
--0
~-'
-
-
~
-
-
~
\
....
(:)
?"'-
m
(Y)
(Y)
w
~
o
?I
o
If)
o
'.D
~
(/)1
I
....
<:)
ro
Q"t
\.0
,.--J
w
~
o
~l
o
'.D
~
(/)
H
~
/"
,00 '861
3 uOO,OloEt N
C.:::>
+ -~
~ ~~
-t-
~::=II
F'-~
,...~
--
,--
-
(:,:~~~5-~2
,
<:::~
I~ j~ ~
"../.d...."'..,."",
\..,",) (.'\
\"..) - .....
--
-I--
+
[~
~i:di
~
.---
~
I
~..
.W5
"~ ,..,j Y',
k.. /J '~
~
~
~
"'l:l
1
..AJfJP
~
~
""'"
€. .~ ..............
':".
v
~
, ~
~
~7
~' ~
'~
.., !o.:,
J~
0/1 ~
~~~.9~~
~"'" L-- 96,65
~
110199
3 uOO ,00 <>€ i7N
..J
~
I
<...L
2::
....
\D
/'''$ \
\., :~}
......... ./
:s:
~
\0
If)
....
(Y)
If)
<>
~
~
-
~
+
~
....
~
f'
(:)
(\J
C\J
:3
~
"
I.()
.....
f'..
I~
\0
~
z
(:')
c:<)
~"~O'8~ "
3 nOO,OloEtlN
"
~
.....
o
0'
In
~
~
J;&
~.f)
~
Q>~
~>
Q
:;y~
:3
~
(/)
f-~I--t
I(\J>
8r-S
CI!.D~
:3--l::J
lL-V?
~DI
::J ~
If--r-t
t-ey:2:
Ck::<[V?
<[ 0... _
<C
r=1
z
o
t--t
f-
...-.
(::l
~(Y)
<:r:(\J
V)C\J
I-L:J
ICL
L:J
1--/ ""
w~
I~
~
w-'
~D
w>
-1
~ ""
oJ--
UU
<[
LL~
ot-
f-w
cx~
<[u
(L<J:
LL~
o If)
C\J
r-
<r
...J
0....
W
~
~
o
o
....
o
r~
\0 V)
~ ~w
DCk:
~.,Z,U
, <[
I-
0"
~ <C(J".
~\1J
~(\j
(:)
J
~
~O:;1 llQ.:j Q3nSSl
)JSJAIU :JI8VJI:
0
I
0 T"'''''''
~
.., II
2
10
II
~iif
i
~
'~
~
~
8
IJJ~"'"
~~~
P.i~,S:
i~;1:
ii~
tog
~
a ' ·
ecO("oj I
i~I
Ii) . .n
~~'~, .
llI.Ja
; gffi I
~
L
u
(/)
::: ~
-18 lsttol8Pl 9012 G09l.L SlIX3J. *uvba
SLS9-SLL(OOt) ases xOS-O.d
3Nn~31VM
133HS
3AIHO ,UISH3AINnvZS
1~3rO~d
~
~il~
~~!~
~ ;iii
!l 1!11i
~2iUS~w
.. , " 0 11~2~~
.1-: 1Jlk., ~ , ~8~~;
311~ 'STN
,,0-,1>-
I
I
I
I
I
I IS I'
1m
: i I
f~1
i~ I
.-
; f
.~
l.&.Z::)
oiW~
5il&
tJ: .15.
~aJ!i~
I:Sg
i~m8
~~,~~
iLiJo::)1
re:3~z
o8~~
It:=W I .... .I~-
- -"i~~m~i~~~!
~wlfQ~fim~fiJii
~~~m d;~~!!l
,i~~"g~,',1 '~i,~~~
I-: ......;;.t I Ja!i~
l~sa~J U~dl"jX
ij~u~~ SuJ
ml313 ~l
t
6 u/.&..
.t!' cf5 ~a:: 0
6~z G~~
~. ....~ .~li!l; I
LI.I 5-:::)(12 ~41
FZ ~~9 ..j!:! ~
Z .-, ~ :tya; ~ ti
e .~.li !im 'ioa~ ~
~ ~~~~J~mS ~
~il~~~~it ~
}g \r U 1tili!agW::J~ n
tJl ~ ...~ 'fl,fi~itti<~ ~
.~. ,'.~ '~m ~:.~ '.' ~i~ ~
.~ ~."'~~,I,g~M, t,~,~ .~
, u ,me ,~I~~ En
4! ~ .~~ l.&.! ~1n,15 iti .~
~i il~~~ II!I ~
'~ ~ 'cl";r ':l d
l;)al~qa.IU
OUNVWNV;)S. ~J &
m
I -
-I f5
I · CD OSL +
il ....
". /
Z
Q,;...J I <( 5
tn~
~Q I ...J
:::'jZ 0 :5
::;) z CD
:J: a
(II , ....J 0
5 0
CD DOl ~
I i w
I I tn L .-1
I u_
. , 1- ~ 0
I Of,;; + et:
0
JJ (1..
-- ....:!!!!- 'S"S W
3 M.()[)boN Z
"
0 -1
0
~ 1.0 "Td +
N 0 cr:::
~ ~ ~~
; ~f5
II ~ I!
t8>'l\ m i
lil'a Q.
ro ~
'-, :2l
r<)
J
lJ
<:(
IrT----
tn. I
II :
I' I
t
- I I
i I, :
I III ~
~ WI' I tg
i I I ~
~,' I ~
· J ~r
::Jf2
-I' ,I, "ii,' ',I~
L ~ ~,
. -- ~
IT'r=~3'-.a _
~. I
~ II I
~8 I I
~~ I- I
w II I
I'k I
JJ! l
~ ~ I
I I
I I'
; ~&
~ !5~5
o = 0 zELia
~ ii, . ..,~, .'~ i"'i
fB .~ .5, ',U hJ ,~ ~m~,.,m
, -.J m ~i .~ ,ti "~ .~~ <:
6i~gl~iii~
<r"""
~
~~
i~
:,:i
~g
:1
II
~i
~~ g
~IN
i:;
i~ ~
0"
r-
o
t
I
t ,
I
t
. I
,
f~i I
~~~
's~!E" li I
fD~SJg ~
~~~~ ~ I
~~I~ wO I
;<==--a: :e ,~.~
i~m~ m~ t
o~i~ Is
ff..~ ~~ ~' I
i~Bi ill! !i I
wm~~ :1 I
,., .
~
- _~_ ,,/ I
~~,.~ ---r-I-
:::J r -..... _I~VM list fJN[J.SDC3---- " --=---- -
--~- . t-
---
-. ('
~
U
(/)
t-;
Z
~
~
~
~
W
o
I-
Z
<:(
n::
o
>-
I
W
0:::
LL
ttl
~
II
o
It)
+
LO
'>
......
QSS
"
(0
II
;:
~
'Ii'It
W"o
OOg
o
~
It')
~
ft
n::
o
I
o
to
+
"'It
fi
o
i'0
II
OSv
::
00;'
o
o
+
"'it
,--
osr
S
+
I"')
g
+
I'f)
o
&0
+
N
o
o
+
~