HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes,$
PRQJECT REVIEW COM~VIITTEE REPQRT
~.
.~
February 8,1993
TQ: Lar Stone, Schrickel Rollins & Associates
~'
11b1 Corporate Drive-VV #200, Arlington, TX 7b006
Eire Ash, Develo ment :Services Director
y P
1101 Texas Avenue, College Station, TX 77840
Herschel. Lindl , Schrckel Rollins & Associates
y ,
11:61 Corporate Drive W #200, Arlington, TX 7b006
- E
FR(7M: Project Review Committee:
Jane Kee, Sensor Plann r
Veronica Mor an, Asssta t to the City Engineer
g
Craig Hall, P & Z Cam is loner
ethers Attending:
Natalie Thomas, Planning :Technician
Samantha Smith, Engineering Assistant
Shirley Volk, Development Coordinator
Tarry Michalsky, Electrical operations. Caordrn~ator ~.
Deborah .Keating, Project Engineer - .Drainage
Laverne Akin, GTE Representative
~'~ George Spain, Fire Inspector
Coy Perry, Building Official
SUBJECT; MASTER PRELIMINARY PLAT & PLAN -Pebble Creek business
• 't 's existn Business ark near the Pebble
~ Center, to be located In the c~ y g p
Creek. development. (93.300
The Pro•ect Review Committee met an ~ednesda ,February 3, 1993 to discuss he
J y
above mentioned master prehm~nary plat and plan. The following comments were. made
~; ~y he various reviewing agents:
ELECTRICAL:
:Coordinate a meetin with Electrical 0 erations Coordinator Tony Michalsky at
g p. ..
(409) 764-3660 to discuss street construction perta~ning to the installation of duct
'~ and conduit s stems for utilities and a street lighting plan to meet current
~ y
~~ ordinances.
..
d
li
PRC Report
PC Business- Ctr
Case #93-30D -
Page Z
wATER(w___ASTE wATER
1
Submit lan and rofile views with construction documents.
p p
Coordinate the imn and installation of the 8" water. line extension .along
_. . g .
Highway 6 with Englne~ring Assistant Samantha. Smith at (409} 764-3660.,
ENGINEERING:
Define the train of installation of the detention ponds for each development.
. g d
Clarify In the construction :documents at exactly what .point each detention pan,
s~auld be installed.
'' The ra ased culvert roadwa crossin in base. two should be designed to the
p P -. _ Y ~ p
twenty-five year storm.
Submit construction documents for all utilities and infrastructure prior to final
plat.
~,
i Submit ail. revisions to the im act studies er the letter sent to Larry Stone from.
p P
Assistant to the City Engineer Veronica Morgan.
PLA11fI~TING:
~~ ccess and bikewa connection. between this
~ Show... any .,proposed pedestrian a y
development and the Pebble Creek development.
Show the ro osed S Barman Drive offset and applicable thoroughfare plan
p p _ p
amendment.
The screenin re urements between block 1 and the adjacent .single family
g q
~~ development should be addressed in the restrlctrons and covenants of the
association.:.
G.T.E..
~~ Coordinate tele .:hone service with G.T1E. Re resentative Laverne Akin at (409}
- p p ...
g21-4723. Ensure that there are adequate easements for ut~litles and that all
blocks and lots can be served.
LONE STAR GAS:.
Coordinate as service and i in la out wi h Lane Star Gas Representative Dan
.~. _ g p p g Y
Fazzino at (409} 77~-0627.
SUBMIT 1 REPRODUCIBLE AND 13 COPIES OF THE REVISED MASTER
PRELIMINARY FLAT ANI) PLAN B~Y FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 12: 1993 TO BE
INCLUDED IN THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PACKETS. FOR
THE MEETING CJF THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 18, 1993.
AGENDA ITEM N0.4 Consideration of a master preluninary plat and plan for. the Pebble.. Creek
Business center. (~'3-302)
' Cit Planner Callawa resented the staff report and .recommended..- approval of the master plan: and
y yp
relmina lot with presubmisson report comments and recornrnendations from the- impact studies. He
P ~ p ~ t' n were resent
explained :that representatives from the ..consulting firm hired by the City of ;College Sta io p
to further explain the proposal.
Hershel Lindly of Schrickel Rollins & Associates approached the Commission and explained the current
trend of develo in industrial parks in a park type atmosphere. Such a facility would provide a place for
p g
industry, offices and other businesses that are no presently available. The Texas A~iM Research Park is
an extremel hi h ualit facili ;however, it is limited to research industries only. Mr. Lindly explained
y g q , y ~'
~~ that ultimatel there will' be an association that will own the open space to be developed and maintained.
y
~~ The amenities shown will robably not be complete until: the last property is developed v~ithin the park.
~~ p ..
He concluded that the engineer for the project, Larry Stone is also present and is willing. to answer any
uestions pertaining to the proposal...
q
Director of Develo merit Services Ash :approached the Commission. and stated that he is the project
p
manager of this proposed Business Center and offered to answer any questions.
i
Commissioner Gribou questioned staff as to the proposed separation between this development and the
~~ abuttin residential development.
~~
f Mr. Ash ex lamed that: the city is currently involved in negotiations with the developer of Pebble Creek to
discuss trading of certain property rn this area that may, include more property ..along the Bypass. The
actual bounda of the subject .:property is rectangular rn shape; however,. the :plan shows a different
~' ,
configuration where the development would abut residential development to allow for more of a natural
ve etatve buffer. The consultants are currently working an development standard for the.. business center
~ g , , ,
~~ pertaining to setbacks, screening devices, maximum amount of impervious area, etc.
~,
f Commissioner ;Lane questioned staff as to the name change from College Station. Business Park to Pebble
Creek Business Center.
Develo merit Services Director Ash stated that the name Pebble Creek: Business. Center was placed on
p ,
F the plan by the consultants and will be considered by the City Council..
F;
EI
'~
Commissioner Marott moved to recommend approval of the master preliminary plat and master
develo merit lan for the Pebble Creek Business Center with all. staff :recommendations.. Commissioner
~~ p p
~~I Grlbou seconded the motion which passed unopposed (6 - 0).
fJ - ..
~.
AGENDA ITEM N0.5 Consideration of a~n ordinance amending chapter 9, Subdivision Regulations, of
E, the Code of CJrdinances specifically to require screening devices between public rights of v~ay and rear or
' side residential yards, easements or :alleys. X93^805
~ mission that subdivision screenin such as fences and walls is .one
City Planner Callaway informed the Com g ,
of several fence related areas hat staff will address during the next few months. Fences ..and walls
~~ constructed for the ur oses of screening residential subdivisions from street view are not required or
p , p~
~ regulated by the subdivision.: regulations. Staff has been reviewing this ub~ect, evaluating .the screening
now in place and visiting other cities to examine similar situations. Based on the review, staff
recommends the adoption of regulations o:
[f
f
~ -- Require subdivision screening fences or devices where residential.. lots are adjacent to
streets along a side or rear lot line, including situations where alleys or access
~~'~ easements are located between the street and lot;
E
k~~
f~
VIII
F
€~I