Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes Draft P&Z Minutes June 17, 1993 Page.4 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5: Considerationofafinalplatfor the.Oakbrook.ValleySubdivision. ..(93-214) Assistant...to.....the....City...EngineerMorgan..presented. .the....staff report and. recommended. approval....of .the..final. plat as presented. <The final plat conforms to the approved preliminary plat. The area is reflected as medium density. residential on .... the ..land.. useplan,wit~ no collectors or arterials through the property as shown on. the Thoroughfare Plan. Due to the size.ofthis development, the . applicant. will be required . to pay fee~. in lieu of paid. Sidewalks will be required .alongbothH~atherwoodLane and Deacon Drive., .. Staff reviewed this.plat at the Presubmission Conference on May 19, 1993. Staff has issued an administrative decisiol1 regarding the size of the drainage easement necessgryforthedetentionpond at the rear of lots 10, 23 and24~ In that decision,. the proposed 60'width.issufficient. Commissioner Hall moved to Tecommendapprovalof the final plat of the Oakbrook Valley Subdivision with staff recommenda tions. .Commissionerl-.lerringseconded. the motion . which. passed unopposed (5 -0). ConsideratiQ:D.ofa final plat for the PebbleCl"eek Phase 2A.SubdivjSion. (93- AssiStantto the City EngineerMorganpresented..the. staff report.. and... recommended approval: of the. final plat withtheProjectR~viewCoIUmittee..... recoIJ1Tend~tions. ...The . urea .is. reflected as low density.. residential.. on the land use plan with no collectorsorart~rials through the property as shown on the thoroughfare plan. Sidewalks ..areb e in.g.p rovidedalong . Ston~b~i~r Circle. Commissioner ... Gribou.... moved . to. .Tec()mtn~~dapproval.. of the final.... plat .of the Pebble Creek Phase 2A Subdivision with staff recommendations.C(i)111Il1issionerHerring seconded the motion which passed unopposed (5 - 0). ~ENDAITEM.NO.7: eonsideralio*()fa. finaLpJat for .the Shenandoah. Phase I Subdivision, Block A. (93-215) Assistantto . the . City Engineer Morgan p~F~:e:nted the staff report and recommended approvaL . Staff reviewed this. plat at a Presubmission Conference?~i.ttlne 9,1993.. Shared access will be researched and discussed at the time of site plan . review. The site.. p~~n!'must come before . the Planning and Zoning Commission for final approyal. ' i Commissioner. .Herring...moved ..to. ..recOIll~fnd.....approval.......of the final plat for the. Shenandoah Phase I Subdivision, Block A with staff. recommep4!~tions. Commissioner . Gribou seconded the motion which passed unopposed {5 - 0).