HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous
AGENDA . ITEM COVER SHEET
ITEM SUBMITTED BY: DavidJ .Pullen,P .E., City Engineer
:;~:::::p:::Go~e.~~
EXECUTIVE TEAM MEMB;RAPPROVAL ... c-. ,/lV(~
ITEM: . .ConsiderResOllltion. apPOinting the Planning And Zoning Commission to
serve as the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee.
ITEM SUMMARY:... The Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (CIAC) is an
integral.....partofthe . Impact Fee financing process. .. The ..committeeadvisesand
assists with adopting the land use assumptions; reviews the capital improvement
plan and files written comments; monitors and evaluates implementation of the
capital improvement. plan; flIes semiannual reports about the capital
improvemynts plan and impact fees; and advises the City COllncil of any need to
upaate the plan. land llse assumptions or impact fee schedules. It is necessary to
appoint the . CIACinorder to develop the Land Use Assumptions and Capital
. Improvement Plan necessary. to implement the Impact Fee flnancingoption for
capital prOjects associated with development demand. I
FINANCIAL <SUMMARY:
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff.recOmmendsappointment of the Planning
and Zoning . Commission as the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee.
CITY . ATTORNEY RECOMMENDATION:
COUNCIL ACTION DESIRED:. Appoint thePlannmg and Zoning Commission as
the Capital Ill1provell1entsAdvisory COmmittee. and direct the staff to proceed with
the ..processofadoptingan Impact Fee Ordinance.
SUPPORTING.. MATERIALS:
I. Resolution
...
la2 ~
~.. ~~ /
... Ii)~~
/' ~tl;) / l
i\~JJ\' ,1
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR SANITARY SERVICE AREA "92-01"
2nd D D R AFT
June 22, 1992
was
It
PH~~SE I:
on
land
and
Road and will .extend a
the existing 1 i f"t
PHASE III:
vacant area
TABLE IV
~..~se-l.............N.~.O.......~units-s.~;.vedl~~t~~llallocation~~ad.jUs.t~
\-- Exi tingl . Ne.w . .... ... . factor est. .... cost
II ..~~5 .... . .266 ............ 52110. 51 106,000.. 54,120
III .. I. O. .1 .90 '. I . .. ..1 1.0. . .. 122,'OooL122,000
~ta~_1-"-~80 ~913~19=-L__.1 $543,000 1$450,17~
/
LAND tJSE ASBlJMPTIONS SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AREA "92-01"
June 22, 1992
Sanitary Sewer ServIce Area "92-01", Attachment. "A", consists of about
530Acresofagrlcultural, industrial,. low densIty .residentialand
instltutlonaluses. ..... Theacreage.ofexistlnglanduses.ls.shown In. Table
I. The .landuses andacreageexpectedtodeve<lopwlthlnthe next ten
yea.rs isshoW'n In Table II. Acreagedosenotmake'allowancefor street
right-of--ways.
TABLE. I
EXISTING LAND. .USE
GROSS ACRES
Low Density.... .. . ..... ... .... .... ..... .. .. ..5 0
Comme rclal/Industria l..>..i.... . . ... ... .... .40
Parks .. ... ..... ..... . .. ..... . ..... .. . ... .. . .11
Schools... ... .. . .. ... ......... ....... ...... . ... .... ..... .. . ...36
Agricultural.... ... .............. ..........393
Total 530
rrABLE II
PROJECTED GROWTH 1.992 TO 20002
PROJECTED NEW DEVELOPMENT GROSS ACRES
(1992~2002)
Low Density .Residential................. ..............242
Edelweiss <Esta t es.....124
C--B<toLow Density 8
East Area 110
Med lum DensIty Rest dent lal...r..... ......... 25
Commercial/Industrial.................... 20
Pa rks..... ... ......... ... ... . ..... ...... ... ... . .. .......i.l1
Total 298
PROJECTED...... NEIt1IlEVEL'OPMENT
(....2...0'0. 2............... TO:.............2. O. 1.z... ..)
Commercia l/Indllst ria 1
Theseassumptlons<are.bas~dionthe cit;y' sCompr~hensive >LandUse . Plan,
r.. ieven ...J. ....VanReit,etalproperty ..andthehl s<t ory of deve lopmen tin
thisarea..o.f the ....city.overthepast three.. years
As proposed, the Edelweiss Estates subdivision will account for 389 of
these units.
TABLE III
( continued.)
Nonre s.ldent tal
LUE/Meter Size
5/8 inch simple
3/4 inch simple
1 inch sImple
1-1/2 inch simple
2 inch simple
2 inch compound
2 inch turbin:e
3 inch compound
3 inch tur,bine
4 inch' compound
4 inch turbine
6 inc~ compound
8 in~h compouind
6 i nc ht ur J:>: 1 ne
10 inch, c€)]npound
8 inch,turbine
10 inch! turbine
12 indhturhine
1
1.>5
2..5
5
8
8
10
16
24
25
42
50
80
92
115
160
250
330
.f .
provldesanalternatlve.locatlonforotherklnds of industrial users.
The frontage along the south sIde of.GrahamRoad within the service
arealsllkely to develop between 2002. and 2012.
SERVICE UNIT DETERMINATION
TheCityo~CollegeStatlon has selected theLlvingUnlt Equivalent as
the. appropr iate..measureof wastewater.....servlceconsumptton .by .new
development In Sanitary Sewer ..ServiceArea92-01. .. As used in ,the
wastewaterCIP,a"servtce .un.lt" Is .diefined......to..be. a......singlefamily
residencewithoutregardforthe.numberofbedroomswithin residential
use . areas and <equ.ivalent to one .5/8 inch water meter ,which is the
average size water meter servic ing. .onesingle.family res ident ial
dwelling in the cIty, in nonresidential use areas. Living Unit
Equivalents are shown in Table III.
TABLE III
L>IVI NG UN ITiEQU IVALENTS
LUE
1
IY.I;>e...of structure
SlrlgleFamily<Dwelling
(all... sIzes/no. of bedrooms)
Du~)lex
( a 11. .slzes/no. of .. .be dro 0 ms)
duplex
2
Trlplex
(all .sizes/n.o. of bedrooms)
triplex
3
Fourplex
(all.sizes/no.
Otc9--gJOq
MEM()RANDUM
TO: College Station City Council
FROM: Capital Improvements Advisory Committ~e
RE: Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvements Plan and Impact Fee
implementation for sanitary sewer service area 92-01
The . Capital Improvements Advisory Committee met T~ursday, August 20, 1992
to discuss the Land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan for sanitary
sewer service area 92-01.. and file the following. written ..comments:
It is the consensus of the AdvisoryCommitte~ that both the Land Use
Assumptions and 'Capital Improvements Plan . for sanitary sewer service
area 92~Olaredeveloped in harmony with theCity's. Comprehensive
Plan.
Committee members are concerned that the. impact fee process may not
be the most. cost efficient and effective. way to finance future growth.
The impact fee process has many ineffioiencieswhen imposed on a. single
small service area... . Statutory requirements concerning monitoring will tie
up too much staff and Advisory Committee time. By imposing impact
fees on asinglesmallservice.area,..theCityis getting involved.ina.lot of
burea ucracy. for.,a. rela.tively . small recovery. We . question ...this.....alternative's
use to financethisparticuJarservicearea . over the next twenty years.
ntJDJP
01.. if -1/5j
r
EXHIBIT A
SANITARY iSE.WE.RSE.RVICE.ARE.A.. "92-01"
prepared. by De.velOpll1.ent Services
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LANOl.1SEASSUMPTlONSS,ANITARY SEWER SERVICE AREA. "92..01'.
TABLE.IEXISTINO>LAND USE
FIG''f..1RE 1.0ITYOFGOLLB~ES'I'A.TION SERIAL ZONES
COI..LEGBS'I'ATIONLAND USEINVEN'rOR'i,DECEMBER.1991
FIGURE 2 EXISTING LAND USES
TABLElI llROJECl'ED GROWTH 1992 TO 2002
'TABLE IIIRROlBCI'ED GRO'WTH 2002 TO 2012
FIGURE. 3 LAND USE.. ASS UMPllON S
LAND USE ASSUMP'I'IONS SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AREA " 92-01 "
August 1992
LAND USE
Low Density
Commercial I Industrial
Parks
Schools
Agricultural
GROSS ACRES
57
40
11
35
387
Total 530
1
It is anticipated that about half the multi-family acreage will build-out between 1992 and 2002. Over
the last three years apartment rents have increased and vacancy rates have decreased indicating that the
m u1ti~fa mily market could support additional development. . The majority of multi-family units within
the City are occupied by college students and the service area is in a location that would provide
excellent access to the university..
It is not anticipated that the amount of proposed commercial acreage in the service area wiHbuild-out
within the tenyearperiod.from 1992t02002. ..Existingretail and office commercial square footage
City-wide has.stiU not been adequately absorbed since the overbuildingduringtheeady 1980's. The
large amount of commercial square footage added over the last two years has been very large grocery
store facilities which.would notbe.likely.in this. service area.
It is reasonable to expect neighborhood commercial uses to accompany .. the residential development as it
occurs. I tisalsQreasonabI e toexj?ect that com m ercial development will occur at the intersection of
Rock Prairie and Wellborn whentheextension of Rock Prairie is completed. Staffwould anticipate 20
acres of commercial development from 1992 to 2002with the remainder being developed from 2002 to
2012.
The..Graham Road Industrial area has been established .overthe lasttenyearsle.aving.10.acresvacanl It
is reasonable tOieXpect theremainin,gl()tsiQthisj~d~strialareatobuild~outin. the next ten years with
uses similar to existing ones. The c:ityis currently dev7lopingaBusinessPark in another location, but it
is aimed towardR&Dand I ightmaIlufacturi nguses.>U7lie <Eity is being Inoreag~ressive in attracting
economicpro~pectsand the industrialacrea~e in the service area provioes an. alternative lo.cation for
other kinds of industrial users. .4JhefmntagealOngthesouthsideof Graham Road within the service
area is more likely to develop between 2002 and 2012.
The landusesandacreageex.~ctedto developwitJ1inthe next ten years is shoVln in Table II. The land
uses and acreage expected to develop between 2002 and 2012 are shown in Table IiI.
2
. ~t 't
,4,
t
t
_..It......
~~~
oc:l_
to- : c::J
en 'CJ
~......
"Z~
--' l.LJ
<t:~
<-' -
0:: c:l
c..u c:l
x: ......
JC
c::J CIIl
(...) <n
<<=\ ::::c
~c:l
<c t-
~5
::3
U':I CL..
w~
,-,.en
<J: t-
'1- -
.C).X
II- ::::J
0... - t-
=::;J (I') x
o 0::: w
e:::: +- c::::a
a:I 0::
C:I <n
'-d
0::
W '-d' U).
-"" . x: U..I
_ CJ.~
ex. ::c <t:
C) c...
x:: en
w.en
-J "UJ
_ x::
c:c CJ
C) ::c
x:
.>-<<1
_ .;...J.t-
.....- . -
....JX: . %
=::;J <t: 0
x; .......
>-
0:::
:=
%
~
w-
en 0'
=' '.D"-
CQ ......
x'
CI: 0::
-' ;uJ
~
::z: x:
c::a1.&J
..... c:..1
t- u.c
C ..c:::a
1-
<n
w
(,%J
'-d
~
o
(;..)
~~
c:..1 ,~
~~
1
~ j
; ~ ten
~.~
1
_. C'4
00-
:r:::;;
.cuM
0'--
4C --
a.. <:>
....~ ~I= = ~I<> ~ ~\- <> = :~:~: = <> <> ::~~~1<> = .J~::;:~: = ~ ~ 2/~ ~ g ~ ~ ::~'~ ~ ~ ~F~1;~l~ ~ ~~J;~
~ ~ ~ I ~~ ~ "~ ". ~ .r::.; ;~.".. I" .i;,'i~;;"l l~j~~1
. . . It' ;. - I I, I t I
~ ~ ~ ~= = ~ ~.~~ ~~ '~Il~ I ! 1~~ ~;~ = =:~ = ~ ~ = ~;~ =~l~~ g;= ~ =j~ ~ ~;= <><> i~ ~ ~ l~,;
~ .... :.. " . . . t . , . ,. ~ ~ I ,i,!:",
5 * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ =;::; ;; ~ .~ 1i5 ~;~ ; E* B =.= ::: <'< ~ ~ ~:= & = :<> =~;~ ~ ..~.~ i ~:~ <'< ~:;; ~ ~l;:!; ~ ~ \M
_ _ _ _ .<"4 _' ~ . <"4 r""> <"4 ; 1- N N l~
~ !
. .. .. .,.. I 4.. .
~ ~ ~ 0.<>:<> <> =;= <> = = = =l= = = ;~~ ~ :== ~ "'" ==;<> .~.~;~ = ~.~~. ~ ~.<> ~ =,~ <> ~.:= <> = ,= = = l:il.
, '~; 1; ;.~" : ~ !C'C I." .- ': 1 :~.-'
; ; . _ ~ j 1 ;
I
i
. . ~
~
90< . In
OJ. t-
....J -
0... X
::::J :;:)
C:II .
~ en
:c w
<t: ;0::
t-~<..2
~<t:
....'<.n
en I.&J
o ,e:::
c::::.. Co.)
=o<Q:
.... ~:::. :~C,.'~,~,:;,
...... .~. '.
. ". .'. ...6........ ....
~_.--=--_.:;' : ~ --=--=--~~..-?-~-~
-r~1 !
:- s ;. ::& :;:
~ ~:: ~~~~:: : .:~~::
....,
~
;
V')
e;
~
r
.
1
1
f"'")
<:>
~
r
L
f"')
D-
C>
......
.
!
N
'0
f"')
!
..\
"1
t
.1
I
,
, .
:r \:..
E
r
i
i.o
~
r
!
i
I
;
.- ! i
.
! t
I
.. !
'. ': 1
'"1
.
. 1
"i
I
1
I
1.
. i
j
i
i
i
: ,
1-- .-1
1<
i
i
\
t
i
\
1
4 '
! '
i
1
\
1
..._ ,_ _: .l
'.'-..
,. .f
)'_ . /.1
. ....~~//
. / . v#'tt-
/
.f
/,f
.//
;?-4-
/
~--<.~\lON
!q.. .
{~
""0 ..(l.t~ ·
.n
ci
~.................. .......~vi
.........~
>-
~
<
o -
z.
::>
~ 0
(f) CD
::> <.:)
0 Z
% Z
:s 0
N
I
t
t
(
I
t
!
t
f;3
I
m
c;. ~ C\J
Zoo
~.I:) ~
OO~::>
1-4Z- (!1 .
~~-
fit ~'.~. ~
~
~
5
...,
Q
~
-- ~~~- ..-~_..
, ..
TABLE!!
PR()JECTED..GROWTH1992.TO.2002
. PROJECTED DEVELOPMENT
Low Density Residential
Edelweiss Estates
C-B to Low Density
East Area
Medium Density Residential
CommerciallIndustrial
, Parks
Total
GROSS. ACRES
218
124
8
86
25
20
11
274
PR.OJEcrED.....DEVELOPMENT
. Commercial/Industrial
Medium Density Residential
: Tota.l .
GROSS.ACRES
89
24
113
3
//
I ~ y/ //
~. 7:>~;'~;;":)
l~ ~I
<~~~
ffi\
~{l
..~f
r
.~
....~~
~~
"",~
'- ~:l!I7\..""" 1
':~v~
I~x
~'" .~ JM~ ~ <..t
~ ~...::i ~
....~ ~ ,,~~ ~y
'A'?< ~...
~7).."~. ~~...~.
"4/ ,~~~ N
x
~ -~
~ ~
0~,: ~
~.~. ... . /. /fl'f " " "
~...~ .. ~
~/ ~ .~~
. x - ~.~.~
.~ e '" ..,. ~
~ ~l:~ . ./JQ
e~ ~.i!.~--~~
"'4.1 1.)::' . .~~~~
..~ ... _~ ~ ~...+. .~ 4'
. ~~ U ,-.:r
l~
~~
~
.~ ~
.~ ~.~
....~ ~~~
.......~ ~~~~
.~ ~
\
.(,' LY' \.
'" .....
... O~/')
'7
~
7
/
~~
~
~
~
<ti...
~
~
C
<3
~
<:)
C- ../''j
__ . ti
I . .::::J.
{~~ .~
"X
,.
"'
//
/
/
~
/
I
I-
I
I
fo.'
/ ~
/
C:
~
~
~
~
~
./
~
h. :.:1'
-~
>7
-~
/
/
$'
.~
# '.....
..}" ~.~
v"~ ..,. .....
~....$
~<:)~ ...~~.,~
~ ~. 4-'~
~'t- I'
"" ..~
j
I~
,
~~
:t
~~ ....
~(,.~
<.;, '!- _ ~ 4'"
~.
,..c
~O
~~
~m
~~
mril
>c~
~~
<riI
E-tO
.........
ZI>
<~
ooril
00
~
~tf~t' ~.
~~~ p ..~$". t-~. ...fl
~ ~<..,,~~...
...~-.:r-". .a~ ~ c--
S :,'"
....}o... .....
~~
%)f!
:s~
~.
~d;.... . rO~
<.,~ ~ .._;l:J~
~~.fo. ~'"'
<:i .. . ",.~
o~~1'
~
~
~.
<U~:
~
wo:~
uW...
~~: '/
:r~ /
/
-~
.. .. ~.,. /.(
~//;.~
/~~,
.~
,a:
(J
.' .
/ "
~m~
X ~. c-.c
i4l1-
e..~i
~~tI
f~i
c;!
2-
x
"
w~s
~Jf!
~~i
o~~
~
~
~8~
.~.~~
~-
"-.
.,
.,
~
~:t
~~<S
~Q::() ~
e,25 k' ~
i.~a~.~f' ~~.. ....,.~~,.<..' >-~........
.... ~ ,'>j/'.)<~ ~
~~~..4S;, ~:?6
-t5 ~~~~ ~ ~ JAv;X
><: ,""XX/' '<) '( ~"s ,: ~ ~
Y:i!: r!1) ~ ~v""' V ~ ,.)7
~i'i ~.. ~~ 0f)~"./;
~Vr '~~ .~~~g
""(J -, >< ...'" "'=:atl \.,
.", / c;t ""
~)~ ~
)/
I
" .,
'.-
~'
~~.
, EXf-llBfT B
/'
!
8
~
~
<t~
..
/
L/
~.
~_v
b~/
/
~
~
'~
EXHIBIT .0
GAR,,-t\L ....IMRFl()\fI5IV1.I5N,-S.R.l.AN
SANITARYSEWISRSERMICEA.REA"92-01 "
Prepared ..bY ..Devef0ptl1~tltSentioes
August 1992
CAPITALIMPROVEMENTS...PLAN..FOR....SANITARY..SEWER..AREA."92-01"
FIGURE 4 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS. PLAN
SERVICE....UNIT>DETERMINATION
TABLE IV LIVING UNITEQlflVALENTS
PROmCl'ED ...OR<J\V'TH....OFLIVING....UNITEQUlVALENTS
COST.ALLOCATION
IM.PAcr....FEE.....CALCULATI.ON
CAPITALIMPROVEMENTPLANFOR SANITARY SERVICE AREA .. 92-01"
August 1992
DESCRIPTION
PHAS:EI:
4
~
/
z
e
f',-
l:)<r
Z
/ 4-
/ L
/'
-t/
X_
W-J
/'
y
~
~
~'../'
.;",.. ~
,~<"
/
~
~
e::
: W
-(I)
>-'
c:
_("C(
Z
X<
wen
/
/
-j
.1-
.i(/
/
/
)0-
cr
<%
t-o
%.v;
<%
enw
f-
ox
~. w' fC')
oC::W
a...W(/)
o~<:
c:w:C
a... (/) Cl.
,/
~
-b,
i- ~
=:l
,,~ 5
,~
/i~~/
~~ ~.~
"".. at<~
~t~
~g
,/
~
!
5
I
~
~
~
~
(I' '\ .~
~ '\ ~
./~ .'!;,..~.\'\ .~ .~
.... .~
.~~ '\ .
~.tn 0\ ~
~ffi .. ..~.\L~
Clt< SO" ~!' .~~
w~ - .j:;Q '......~. ~
~O:W0 "< <r:.C"ot .......
'c..&.IJ c.n5~' .. ..~
03; <t-.., ~.t{ ~
~:;lit B~~f",.. ~.~~~~~
~AY ~%
.~. . ~..'.~
<zz:
ent.J
....
ox
;~ ~::
/')ll~ c..w (/)
...~ ~ o~<
,tf..~ i( ," .... ~:;lit
'v x )o..~
l~
i~
\
~\
~ ~
\. 'f\
'\
V
"/
~t
~
.~,~
. .
. .
- .
. .
...
/
~
:11
".. e. !~.
~ .~....
~~ "
~kJ~ 1)1 5(d "& P'"
1J ~~. ^ (~"\.x ,~....
Y""'" ..}.:..A ;(.~ ~ ~\l
.~ ,... "I) ~ jo. y-.; :.~.....' x/x .~. ...
. c):~ v. ...... I ~V~X. ~ "
.t:( ~~........ .. It ~ "K~V" ~)1 j "
).(" ~ "L ,..-.J..Y;'W '~~...
~ ~ ~ ~ ~K)"" ..~(l 'Q~
..~c ~& ~ ~ ~ ~l!~ ,,~~
~
'" .~ ~y
'..l-~ )-
,. ~~7"~
.~.'/j
~O/
Wlc ln~ >-.
~i ~ ^ ~ ~~ I
~\(Kv;{' I(. YA X
~;:R~~ t" "~
>m:."' )(~ ~ ,~
.~~ ~~fi~~ ~~~~~ Y
~
" o/~.
~~li
..'~ ~ '"T X,.
/
~
.I:~
1/
p'
"-~'
/
/
/
/,
/
f
q
4,/'
.~~
/
!
~
il
I
......""'-
,.
"
,...
<<0::0
<WI
O);.~
ZWO\
::> ,(/).
o .c(
co>-'w
a::: a:::
0<<
Wt:
(/)ZW
0<0
0.. .cn >
o 0::
c:..........
c..0c.n
~
.1
/.f
/<-/
V-
)-
<<
-<%
....0
.~u;.
cn~
o~
W .t..J .-
en
:po:: W
c..W<n
o~-<
c:~:c
c..cna..
.~
~~
,~
.~
~~.
.~ '
~
~~,
~.~
~
..<'
/~
.~
~
~
~~ ~~
~
/#
.l
~
.~
~~
~fl-.,'ON
~~ ~ . ~
~ ~ (j
~o ..(1.tO ·
i
t
~
.~
a
~
t
t)
~
5
o
Z
tiJ
C>
~
>-
<<
-<
o
Z 0::
g~
mW
(I)
w
<n>-
::)~
ot=
% %.
:5~
..:t
~
8
t-4
1lc
~
o
8
Z
~
::-SZ
~.~
p.~
0114-
~
III
::-s
~
.~
W
_.~
~~
(!J
=.... ~
- :~.u..
This pipe line will provide capacity for existing land uses and new residential, commercia.l and industrial
development which will occnrfrom 1991 to 2002 as well as commercial development whIch will occur
from 2002 to 2012.
PHASE II:
Phase III provides sanitary sewerservieetothis currentlyvaeant area for projected industrial
development from 1992to 2002.
5
SERVICE UNIT. DETERMINATION
Theei tyofCOllegeStation . hasseleded the Li vingUl1itEqui valent as. the appropriate. m easure of
wastewaterservicpcons\lmptipn by new development in Sanitary Sewer Service,Area 92-01. As. used in
the wastewaterCIP,a'lserviceunit" is defined to be a single famB y residence without regard for the
nurnberofRedroorns. A 5/8 inch Vlater meter is the typical size water meter serving a single family
home in the city..Since water use is di recdy related to sa nit{lrysewer flow, the siuof the water meter is
used to deterrnine Living Unit rt-quivalents fornonresidentiaLJanduses. The 5/8 inch meter is counted
as one unit 0thersizemeters are proportioned Living Unit Equivalents according to there flow
relationship to theS/Sinch meter. Living Unit :Bquivalentsareshown in Table IV.
TABLE IV
LIVING UNIT EQUIVALENTS
Residential Structu res
Type, of Structure
Single Family Dwelling
(a'll.,..sizes/no.,...(Jf .bedrooms)
Duplex
(allsizeslno.ofbedroerns)
Triplex
(aIls izeslno.ofbedro()111 8)
Fourplex
(all sizeslno...of.bedrooms)
Multifamily
(one and tW'o>bedroqrn..units)
(three. and more...bedroom....1Hlits)
MebileHome
space
Unit
LUE
structure
1
duplex
2
ttip~ex
3
fourplex
4
mobile home
0.75
1
0.75
unit
unit
6
TABLE IV
(continued)
Meter Size
--
LUE/Meter Size
3~5
15
10
o
2
o
7
EXISTING LUE1S:
Land Use
Acres
LUE/Acre
LUEts
PROJEICTIONS:
51
o
40
11
35
387
530
3.5
o
10
o
2
o
Low Density Residential
Medi umD ens ityResiclential
Com merciallIndl),strial
Parks
Schools
Agricultural
Totals
PROJECTED .GROW.TH..1992...-2002
DUE/Acre
LUE's
Low. Density Resiqe ntia 1
Medi\lmD~nsity Residential
COm mtereia1/1 ndustrial
Parks
Schools
Agricultural
Totals
218
25
20
11
o
o
274
3..5
15
"10
o
o
o
763
375
200
o
o
o
1338
PROJECTED . GROWTH 20.02-2012
L.ancl.1Jse
Acres
LOB/Acre
LUE1s
Low.I)ensityResidential
Medium D~nsity,~esidentiQ.l
ComnlerciallInd us tria 1
Parks
Schools
A.gricultural
Totals
8
COST ALLOCATION
Total N~w LUE's .. .. . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . .. . . . .' · · .... · · · ... .2588
Total LUE's served.. . ~ . .. . .. . . . . . . . .... . . · · · · · · ., ... · .. .3258
Cost AIlocatitinFactor. . . ., . . . . . . . .. .. .. . · .. · · · ..258813258 = 0.79
PHASE. ESTIMATED ELIGIBLE
COST COST
SERVICE
D.ISTRIB'UTIO.N
t92-102'02-'12 '
65% 35%
lO{)% .
RECOVERY
1992-2002 2002-2012
I
II
III
Totals
$315,OC>O
lOc,O()()
1~2,000
$543,(JOO
$,:Q.1S,OO<J
50)000
122~OOO
$4~O,OOO
100%
$204,750
53,000
$251,750
$110,250
122,000
$232,250
IMPACfFEECALCLTLATION
Maximum Impacffee:;;::Cost X (;(i)sta flocation fa~tor
numbetof.newLUE's
$2S7,750X.79/1338 =..$152.18:
9