HomeMy WebLinkAboutStaff Report
~
_----1
STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE:
CASE NO.:
APPLICANT:
December 12, 1992
92-714
Jeffrey T . Milburn
PROPERTY OWNER: First Baptist Church
REQUEST:
Conditional Use Permit for expansion of church
facilities
LOCATION:
Approximately 500' south of the intersection of
Welsh and F.M. 2818
PHYSICAL FEATURES:
Area:
Dimensions:
Frontage:
13.23 acres
Approximately 570' X 765'
570' along Welsh
AREA ZONING AND LAND USE:
Subject Tract: R-5 Apartment/Medium Density; developed
as First Baptist Church
North: R-5 Apartment/Medium Density; currently
vacant
East: R-5 Apartment/Medium Density; currently
vacant
South: R-5 Apartment/Medium Density; developed
as duplexes
West: Not in City, agricultural property
LAND USE PLAN: High density residential
ENGINEERING:
Water: Water is provided to the site through a 12"
waterline along Welsh Avenue.
Sewer: Sewer is provided through an 8"sewerline located
within the utility easement crossing the property
near Welsh Avenue.
Streets: The property is located on the west side of Welsh
Avenue
Flood Plain: Portions of the property along the northern side. are
located within the 1 00 year floodplain.
NOTIFICATION:
Legal NoticePublication(s): 12-2-92
Advertised Commission . Hearing Datefs): 12-17 -92
Number of Notices Mailed to Property
Owners Within 200': 15
Response Received: None as of 12-8-92
STAFF COMMENTS:
Conditional use permits are granted by the. Commission , subJect to
appropriate conditions and safeguards, when the Commission
finds:
A. That. the proposed usel11eets . all the minimum.. standards
established in the Zoning Ordinance for.this type of use;
B. That the proposed use is in harmony with the purpose and
intent of the zoning ordinance and the plan for physical
development of the district as embodied in the comprehensive
plan for the development of the City;
C. That the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health,
welfare, and safety of the sllrroundingneighborhoodor its
occllpants, nor be substantially or permanently injurious to
neighboring property.
(See Sec. 14, Ordinance 1638)
The P.R.C. revieWed this project on December 2, 1992. There was some
confusion regarding existing versus proposed structures, and of the
phasing of the expansion.. These clarifications will be determined before
the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing.