HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes~.:: ;..~ w __. _ r _ ~:. _ ~_ _ _ _ _ _
- ~ .'
F
~~ :.: ..
ted that in all likelihood there will be a re uest to rezone the R-4 tract to C-B. If
Mr. Esmond sta .
this was ranted then the ro osed rezoning would not create.. a sandwiching effect. There ~s
g ~ P.P
ro osed C=B zoning surrounding this property. It is in the City's interest to see that this property
p p
is developed fully.
~` fanner Kee' stated that if there was a rezonin request on the R-4 tract o C-B, she would
aen~or P g
have to make a ne ative recommendation because of its conflict with he future land use plan. Thee
g .
remainin ro osed rezonings from C-1 to C-B along this corridor, ,are not In conflict with the land
gp P
f
use plan.
~ Vin. Ha11 stated that if his rezonin re uest was denied, it would not prohibit the applicant from
1. g q .
requesting C-B zoning in the future when there are definite plans for a use that ~s not allowed m an
A-P zoning district.
Mr Esmond stated that the C-B zonin will ive the developer more flexibility .and would still allow
g g
the a licant to develop. a use listed under the A P district. He moved to recommend approval of
Pp Park II subdivision from A-P .
the rezoning request of Lot 14, Block T of the University ,
Administrative Professional to C B Business Commercial. Mr. Hawthorne econded the ..motion
which passed ~$ - l ) Mr. Ha11 voting. in opposition to the motion.
,AGENDA TICI~M N0.4: Public hearin to consider a city .initiated rezoning of 22 tracts located
~, ~ g
~, along the Un~vers~ty Dave Corndor from Tarro!w to the East By-Pass, from C-1 General
'~ Commercial to C-B Business Commercial and from C~N Neighborhood Commercial to A-P
Administrative Professional (92-100)
senior :Planner I~ee ~ resented the staff :report recommending rezoning of tracts l - 21 to C-B and
p
tract ~2 to A-P. These rezonngs are being initiated at the direction of the City Council upon
adoption of the University Drive Report. This :report stated that there are many locations within
the Ci where some commercial uses such as retail activities, restaurants, theaters and -night clubs
y
are appropriate but not the wide range of uses available in the C-1 zone.:: Therefore, the -C-B
district was created; It is .intended as an alternative to C-1 for locations where the. more intense
commercial uses allowed in C-1 would not be compatible with existing zoning, existing:..land: uses or,
as in the case of University Drive, with the future intent of developing an attractive entryway ~ into
thee: City. The repent concluded: that the: full range of C-1 uses would not be appropriate along the
University Drive corridor considering its function as an entryway and the properties currently ..zoned
C-1 would be more appropriately zoned C-B The report also addressed :what. is referred to as ~ tract
22. It concluded that because the C-i~ zone is designed .::for convenience stores (and this one of the
• ate .
two uses not recommended for the corridor} thin.. pr-operty should be rezoned to a more approprr
district such as R-4 Council modified this recommendation to A P. The proposed. zoning changes
will not alter the comments concerning utility availability found in the University Drive .:Report.. It
stated that -ample water service infrastructure and capacity is `in place to accommodate existing and
future 'development in the area. There is also sufficient sewer capacity to accommodate.. future..
development if similar land use:.: types and density levels: continue to develop.. Gas and electrical
`service .,should pose no~ constraints. One hundred and red property owners within 200' of the subject
properties were notifiedwith, two inquiries.
Chairperson Sawtelle opened the public hearing.
Paul Clarke, representative of the owners on the north side of University from Tarnow to the Anco
tract, stated that he was in favor of the C-B 'zoning in conjunction with the Overlay district to
establish a uniformed effect along ;the corridor. This uniformity should be extended contiguously
along the :corridor and include the A-P, R-4 and R 1 tracts.
(P & Z Minutes February 6, 1992 Pa,~e 3
..